Skip to main content

Full text of "The Scottish nation : or, The surnames, families, literature, honours, and biographical history of the people of Scotland"

See other formats


Google 


This  is  a  digital  copy  of  a  book  that  was  preserved  for  generations  on  library  shelves  before  it  was  carefully  scanned  by  Google  as  part  of  a  project 

to  make  the  world's  books  discoverable  online. 

It  has  survived  long  enough  for  the  copyright  to  expire  and  the  book  to  enter  the  public  domain.  A  public  domain  book  is  one  that  was  never  subject 

to  copyright  or  whose  legal  copyright  term  has  expired.  Whether  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  may  vary  country  to  country.  Public  domain  books 

are  our  gateways  to  the  past,  representing  a  wealth  of  history,  culture  and  knowledge  that's  often  difficult  to  discover. 

Marks,  notations  and  other  maiginalia  present  in  the  original  volume  will  appear  in  this  file  -  a  reminder  of  this  book's  long  journey  from  the 

publisher  to  a  library  and  finally  to  you. 

Usage  guidelines 

Google  is  proud  to  partner  with  libraries  to  digitize  public  domain  materials  and  make  them  widely  accessible.  Public  domain  books  belong  to  the 
public  and  we  are  merely  their  custodians.  Nevertheless,  this  work  is  expensive,  so  in  order  to  keep  providing  tliis  resource,  we  liave  taken  steps  to 
prevent  abuse  by  commercial  parties,  including  placing  technical  restrictions  on  automated  querying. 
We  also  ask  that  you: 

+  Make  non-commercial  use  of  the  files  We  designed  Google  Book  Search  for  use  by  individuals,  and  we  request  that  you  use  these  files  for 
personal,  non-commercial  purposes. 

+  Refrain  fivm  automated  querying  Do  not  send  automated  queries  of  any  sort  to  Google's  system:  If  you  are  conducting  research  on  machine 
translation,  optical  character  recognition  or  other  areas  where  access  to  a  large  amount  of  text  is  helpful,  please  contact  us.  We  encourage  the 
use  of  public  domain  materials  for  these  purposes  and  may  be  able  to  help. 

+  Maintain  attributionTht  GoogXt  "watermark"  you  see  on  each  file  is  essential  for  in  forming  people  about  this  project  and  helping  them  find 
additional  materials  through  Google  Book  Search.  Please  do  not  remove  it. 

+  Keep  it  legal  Whatever  your  use,  remember  that  you  are  responsible  for  ensuring  that  what  you  are  doing  is  legal.  Do  not  assume  that  just 
because  we  believe  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  the  United  States,  that  the  work  is  also  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  other 
countries.  Whether  a  book  is  still  in  copyright  varies  from  country  to  country,  and  we  can't  offer  guidance  on  whether  any  specific  use  of 
any  specific  book  is  allowed.  Please  do  not  assume  that  a  book's  appearance  in  Google  Book  Search  means  it  can  be  used  in  any  manner 
anywhere  in  the  world.  Copyright  infringement  liabili^  can  be  quite  severe. 

About  Google  Book  Search 

Google's  mission  is  to  organize  the  world's  information  and  to  make  it  universally  accessible  and  useful.   Google  Book  Search  helps  readers 
discover  the  world's  books  while  helping  authors  and  publishers  reach  new  audiences.  You  can  search  through  the  full  text  of  this  book  on  the  web 

at|http: //books  .google  .com/I 


rC 


V. 


\  1 


T  . 


n  M 


i 


I. 


THE 


SCOTTISH    NATION; 


■     ,1  OR  THK 

I 


SURNAMES,   FAMILIES,   LITERATURE,   HONOURS, 


^ 
I  I 


I 


I 


I 


I 


I 


J 


I 


I 


I  • 


li 


AND 


BIOGRAPHICAL  HISTORY 


<»K  THK 


PEOPLE   OF    SCOTLAND. 


BV 


WILLIAM   ANDERSON, 

V 

AtrmOR  OF  LIFK,  AND  EDITOR  OF  WORKS,  OF  LORD  BTROK,  A<'.,  ftO. 


VOL.  IIL 

MAC-ZET 

i\D    SUPPLElEXr. 


A.  FULLARTON  &  CO., 

44    SOUTH     BRIDGE,     EDINBURGH;     AND 
116  NEWGATE  STRKET,  LONDON. 

1863. 


A 


3 


i 


V.3 


KDIKBUKOIf: 
rULLAHTOV  AMD  MAO-NAB,  ritlNTICiU;.  LSITR  WAI^ 


^    -■         • 


•      ■.       »• 


I. 


'.       >•         • 


*■- 


■r*'. 


'^1 


...<. 


I 

t 


\ 


i    r 


••   :^¥..  "^-^ 

, 

^^     "l.     ..-• 

s 

/;■■■ 

•       rf 

•«1 

^^.** ' 


si 


1^ 


♦" 


»:s  I 


t  '    ■;-•     f    !.;?»'?('■  ^ 


^ii*  ♦i""->'»   !     I'll:!    ' -.1  ■'<•.     .'  aij:/ .i    /■■  /.'.k'.'.i  I :      a   .1    .-■  .:  \i\ii      T.  fiir  !'■  aj-^      \ 


.S   Til***    !«•    ■■'■>"       f 


.  *         ■    » 

■  ■■    -J* 


I 


I 


I 


I 


I 


I       I 

-    'I 
I    h 


I 


I 


I 


I 


PREFACE. 

The  work  wliich  is  now  presented  to  the  world  assumes,  by  its  compre- 
hensively national  title,  that  the  various  and  diversified  information  it 
contains  is  so  illustrative  of  the  Scottish  nation,  and  of  the  origin  and 
constitution  of  modem  Scottish  society,  as  to  justify  the  adoption  for  it 
of  a  designation  so  conspicuous.  Of  any  other  country,  it  is  true,  an  ac- 
count of  its  surnames,  families,  and  honours,  would  cast  little  or  no  light 
over  the  constitution  of  the  society  existing  therein.  Such  an  account 
would  probably  tell  next  to  nothing  of  the  earlier  races  out  of  which 
society  was  formed,  because,  in  the  case  of  any  other  nation,  whatever 
might  elsewhere  be  found  to  illustrate  that  part  of  its  history,  few  indica- 
tions in  the  names  now  borne  by  individuals  or  families,  or  in  its  titles  of 
honour,  will  be  found  to  mark  the  tribes  or  institutions  whence  they 
sprung,  or  to  be  otherwise  identified  with  the  commencement  of  its 
national  unity.  This  is  a  result  to  be  found  in  Scotland  alone;  not 
uniformly,  indeed,  nor  always  without  admixture  of  doubt,  but  certainly 
in  a  greater  degi-ee  than  in  any  other  kingdom  or  state. 

Modem  Scottish  society,  and  Scottish  nationality  in  its  proper  sense, 
may  be  said  to  have  come  into  existence  together.  Hereditary  monarchy, 
hereditary  surnames,  families,  and  honours,  hitherto  unknown  among  its 
peoples,  were  their  common  instruments  for  consolidation,  for  conserva- 
tion, and  for  progress.  To  the  Cumbrian,  the  Pict,  the  Scot,  Norwegian, 
Dane,  or  Saxon,  who,  at  various  times  and  in  various  degrees,  were  spread 
over  its  soil,  these  distinctions  were  exceptional  and  comparatively  un- 
known. 

In  the  early  part  of  the  twelfth  century,  the  greater  part  of  the  country 
now  constituting  Scotland  was  in  a  state  little  better  than  that  of  chaos, 
and  worse  than  that  of  anarchy.     A  contemporary  document  of  a  solemn 


ly  PBEFACE. 


character  describes  the  southern  portion  (and  it  may  be  held  as  equally 
true  of  the  northern)  as  having  till  then  been  occupied  rather  than  in- 
habited "  by  diverse  tribes  of  diverse  nations  coming  from  diverse  parts ; 
of  dissimilar  language,  features,  and  modes  of  living,  not  easily  able  to 
hold  converse  among  themselves,  practically  Pagans  rather  than  Christ- 
ians, living  more  like  irrational  animals  than  as  worthy  of  the  name  of  a 
people,"^  and  even  deducting  from  this  picture  for  the  exaggerations  of 
a  Churchman,  enough  remains  to  confirm  the  foregoing  remark.  The 
arrival  of  a  new  people  of  polished  manners,  military  discipline,  and 
Christian  zeal,  by  giving  new  institutions  and,  for  a  time,  a  new  language 
to  this  inconginious  mass,  created  a  nation  and  a  nationality,  yet  without 
a  so-called  revolution  or  even  a  change  of  dynasty.  The  new  race, 
whose  presence  was  so  beneficially  felt  in  Scotland,  came  through  Eng- 
land, yet  were  not  of  it.  They  were  the  Normans, — a  people  of  the 
same  original  stock  as  many  of  the  tribes  above  referred  to,  but  refined 
and  instructed  by  familiarity  with  the  institutions  of  the  South. 

This  new  order  of  things,  however,  might  have  attained  to  no  per- 
manence, or  even  if  permanent,  to  no  historic  significance — at  least  in 
the  sense  which  our  title  assumes — ^liad  not  the  silent  but  ceaseless  immi- 
gration of  the  new  race  continued  without  interruption  for  nearly  two 
centuries,  in  the  courae  of  which  they  identified  their  fortunes  with  those 
of  a  dynasty  which,  although  sprung  from  an  elder  settlement  of  the 
population,  was  led  by  sympathy,  education,  and  the  necessities  of 
their  position,  to  cherish,  enrich,  and  lean  upon  this  new  people  for 
the  preservation  of  their  crown  and  prerogativ.es,  and  to  cement  their 
union  by  numerous  family  alliances.  A  revolution,  which  placed  first 
one  and  then  another  family  of  the  new  race  upon  tlie  throne  of  Scot- 
land, completed  the  solidarity  of  the  social  union  of  races  in  Scotland, 
while  it  prevented  fresh  admixtures  of  foreign  blood ;  and  lastly  and 
chiefly  the  practice  of  bestowing  hereditary  surnames  and  honours,  and 
of  holding  all  lands  from  the  Crown,  which  obtained  generally  throughout 


^  DiverssB  tribus,  divenarnm  nacionum,  ex  diversis  partibus  affluentes,  regionem  prefittum  habita- 
verunt.  Sed  dispari  genie  et  dissimuli  lingu&,  et  varia  more  viYentes,  haul  facile  (inter)  sese  consen- 
cientes,  gentilitatem  potius  quam  fidei  cultum  tennerunt.  Quos  infelices  et  damnate  habitaciouis, 
habitatores,  more  pecudum  irrationabiliter  degentes,  dignatus  est  Dominus,  .  .  .  TiFitare. — 
Inquisition  by  David  Prince  of  Cumbria  {circa  1116). 


1 1 


I 


I  .: 


f  I' 


t     r 


» 


I 


:! 


I 


I 


I 


PREFACE. 


this  period,  and  found  a  permanent  and  faithful  record  in  charters  and 
other  public  deeds,  many  of  which  are  still  in  existence,  insm-ed  to  Scot- 
land the  integiity  and  continuity  of  its  social  annals. 

The  surnames  traceable  to  immigrant  Norman  chiefs,  or  to  the  lands 
bestowed  upon  their  retainers,  constitute  by  far  the  greater  portion  of  those 
peculiar  and  pertaining  to  vast  numbers  of  individuals  forming  modem 
Scottish  society.  Under  those  derived  from  lands,  not  a  few  Danish  and 
Norwegian  names  are  to  be  found,  which,  in  like  manner  as  those  of  Celtic 
and  Norman  origin  referring  to  personal  or  local  distinctives,  are  to  be  re- 
cognised by  their  composition ;  yet,  while  of  this  latter  class,  even  in  the 
remote  North  we  find  in  the  names  Fraser,  Grant,  Cameron,  and  others, 
undeniable  proofs,  notwithstanding  their  present  use  of  the  Celtic  tongue, 
of  a  Norman  or  French  immigration,  the  composition  of  the  southern 
population  is  singularly  manifested  when  the  distinctive  of  an  individual 
of  the  more  ancient  lineageis^^6,as  in  the  case  of  a  Fleming  or  an  Inglis^ 
expressed  by  the  simple  name  of  Scott.  An  account  of  the  origin  or  of  the 
original  holdera  of  these  surnames  of  the  forefathere  of  the  present  Scot- 
tish people,  cannot  fail  to  be  highly  interesting  to  all  classes  at  the 
present  day. 

But,  a  mere  explanation  of  the  origin  o^  surnames  alone  would  lack  com- 
pleteness unless  accompanied  with  some  account  of  the  families  by  which 
they  were  borne,— of  the  distribution  of  those  families  over  the  country, — 
of  their  subdivision  into  new  families, — and  of  the  distinguished  individ- 
uals who  sustained  their  reputation  and  promoted  their  influence:  and  such 
an  account  it  is  one  of  the  objects  of  this  Work  to  supply.  ^  The  Scottish 
Nation'  professes  to  present  the  succession,  the  affiliations  and  alliances, 
and  the  leading  incidents  in  the  history  of  the  families  whose  sur- 
names have  obtained  distinction  and  influence  throughout  Scotland  since 
the  reign  of  Malcolm  Canmore. 

Tlie  ancient  baronies  of  Scotland,  associated  as  they  were  with  heredi- 
tary jurisdictions  only  short  of  regal,  had  all  a  significancy  in  that  country 
unequalled  in  any  others  where  the  feudal  regime  obtained.  The  holders 
of  these  honours  were  regarded  as  heads  of  its  name  as  well  as  of  their 
vassals ;  and  to  promote  the  honour  of  the  one  as  well  as  the  welfare  of 

I ,' -- 1 


!  I 
I 


VI  PREFACE. 


the  other  was  their  business  and  their  strength.  An  account  of  these 
hoTumra  is  an  account  of  the  temtorial  supremacy  of  a  name  and  of  a 
family,  among  tlie  members  of  which  the  lands  under  the  jurisdiction 
of  their  heads  were  in  course  of  time  pai-celled  out. 

A  history  of  Scottish  titles  is  a  necessary  supplement  to  that  of  families, 
and  a  key  to  many  of  the  social  and  political  incidents  in  that  kingdom 
as  well  as  in  the  history  and  fortunes  of  its  families.  Such  a  history  forms, 
therefore,  another  and  it  is  hoped  a  valuable  topic  of  the  present  Work 

Immeasurably  beyond  all  these  social  facts  in  importance,  although 
greatly  illustrated  by  the  lights  they  furnish,  the  biographies  of  its  dis- 
tinguished natives  become,  when  properly  treated,  the  topic  which  illus- 
trates and  shows  forth  in  its  strength  and  peculiarities  ^  The  Scottish 
Nation.'  The  poorest  country  in  Europe,  occupied  by  a  hardy  race  trained 
to  militaiy  exercises,  struggling  for  centuries  to  maintain  their  national  in- 
dependence, and  ever  contendhig  for  masteiy  amongst  themselves,  Scotland 
has  beheld  her  sons  loving  and  honouring  the  countiy  that  gave  them  birth 
with  a  high  and  pure  patriotism ;  and  clinging  to  each  other  with  a  pro- 
verbial partiality,  yet  not  alone  on  account  of  their  common  relationship, 
but  also  for  those  qualities  of  endui-ance,  energy,  and  intelligence- which 
their  common  struggles  and  even  social  feuds  drew  forth  and  incorporated 
as  it  were  with  the  national  character.  At  a  comparatively  early  period 
she  sent  forth  many  of  her  sons  to  obtain  distinction  and  honours  in  other 
lands;  and  when  more  peaceful  times  had  airived  and  milder  institu- 
tions obtained,  she  saw  them  launch  into  the  arts  of  civil  life,  for  which 
their  hereditary  qualities,  animated  by  the  lessons  of  a  simple  but  sin- 
cere piety,  had  well  prepared  them,  and  assert  for  themselves  a  front 
rank  among  the  leaders  of  mind  and  intellect  in  Europe,  iu  numbers  alto- 
gether unexampled  in  the  social  development  of  other  nations.  Of  such 
men  is  Scotland's  pride  and  glory,  and  their  lives  and  deeds  constitute 
the  truest  account  of  the  Scottish  nation. 

.  In  its  general  biography  the  present  work  embraces  a  wider  range 
than  is  contemplated  in  any  of  those  specially  devoted  to  that  subject, 
comprising  many  names  not  to  be  met  with  in  history,  yet  of  men  whose 
skill,  genius,  or  labours  have  added  to  the  comfort,  the  knowledge,  or 


PREFACE. 


Vll 


I 


the  happiness  of  mankind.  Not  a  few  names,  moreover,  that  have  long 
been  borne  down  by  undeserved  obloquy  have  been  restored  to  their 
proper  position ;  while  others,  upheld  by  misstatement  or  exaggeration 
at  an  undue  elevation,  have  been  placed  on  a  lower  pedestal.  In  all  cases 
the  truth  has  been  stated,  without  reference  to  party  feelings  or  sectarian 
misrepresentations. 

In  the  department  of  literature  gi-eat  attention  has  been  bestowed  upon 
the  articles  relating  to  men  distinguished  by  their  writings.  By  append- 
ing the  titles  and  dates  of  their  works,  and  sometimes  when  these  were 
numerous,  classifying  the  subjects  treated  of,  easy  reference  is  combined 
with  great  economy  of  space.  In  a  word,  as  respects  the  productions  of  its 
literary  characters,  *  The  Scottish  Nation'  becomes  as  it  were  a  Bibli- 
olAeca  Scottica  corrected  and  brought  down  to  the  present  day. 

For  a  work  of  this  character  it  is  evident  that  an  Alphabetical  arrange- 
menif  or  what  is  generally  although  incorrectly  known  as  the  Dictionary 
form,  is  the  only  one  compatible  with  clearness,  order,  and  facility  of  ref- 
erence, and  accordingly  such  a  form  has  been  adopted,  with  some  peculi- 
arities which  it  is  hoped  will  be  found  to  improve  it  in  these  respects. 
In  all  other  works  of  this  kind,  when  several  articles  or  parties  of 
the  same  name  came  to  be  described,  the  sub-alphabetical  order,  or  that 
of  the  initial  letters  has  obtained.  In  the  case  of  biographies,  however, 
on  this  principle,  the  ancestor  is  placed  often  at  a  distance  from  and  not 
unfrequently  long  after  his  descendants.  Throughout  long  lists  of  similar 
surnames  the  strictly  alphabetical  an-angement  mixes  up  epochs,  and 
mars  all  attempts  to  present  the  connection  which  distinguished  indi- 
viduals bearing  them  had  to  one  another.  This  inconvenience,  except 
in  a  few  unimportant  cases,  has  been  obviated  by  a  double  arrange- 
ment. In  narrating  isolated  biogi'aphies  of  individuals  of  the  same  sur- 
name the  order  in  time  is  followed;  they  succeed  each  other  accord- 
ing to  the  epochs  in  which  the  parties  lived.  Where,  however,  a  lineal 
descent  is  traceable,  the  biographies  are  introduced  and  continued  in  a 
direct  succession.  The  order  of  the  series  is  here  chronological,  but  in 
the  order  of  families,  and  not  by  individuals. 

To  the  student  of  Scottish  history  the  value  of  the  assistance  fiimished 


VI 11  PREFACE. 


by  a  work  of  the  character  of  ^  The  Scottish  Nation'  need  not  be  dwelt 
upon.  In  the  accounts  given  of  every  family  or  title  of  antiquity  and  note, 
numerous  indirect  and  incidental  lights  are  thrown  upon  its  pages.  The 
direct  additional  matter  it  supplies,  is,  however,  perhaps  of  still  more 
importance.  In  this,  as  well  as  in  many  other  points,  it  will  be  found  a  more 
accurate  and  complete  exhibition  of  the  Earlier  History  of  Scotland  than 
any  that  has  yet  been  presented  to  the  public. 

In  the  course  of  his  labours  the  author  was  necessarily  obliged  to  enter 
into  an  extensive  correspondence  with  noblemen  and  gentlemen  in  all 
parts  of  the  kingdom,  and  with  some  families  out  of  it,  and  he  now  returns 
his  acknowledgments  to  all  for  the  kindness  and  promptitude  with  which 
they  answered  his  applications,  furnished  valuable  information,  and,  in 
many  cases,  placed  their  family  records,  for  the  time,  at  his  perusal. 
It  may  give  some  idea  of  the  care  and  research  bestowed  upon  this 
work  when  it  is  stated  that  the  author  was  altogether  nearly  twelve  years 
occupied  in  its  composition  and  coiTcction. 

The  Autographs,  Seals,  Genealogical  and  Titular  tables,  and  other 
illustrative  objects,  as  well  as  the  Portraits  on  wood  and  steel  with  which 
the  work  is  so  profusely  embellished,  have  all  been  taken  from  original 
or  other  authentic  sources. 

A  National  Gallery  of  Scottish  Portraits  has  long  been  pointed  out  as 
a  desideratum,  and  learned  societies  have  recently  brought  the  matter 
strongly  before  the  public.  In  the  care  taken  to  make  the  Portrait  illus- 
trations authentic  and  numerous  in  a  degree  far  beyond  those  in  any  col- 
lection heretofore  presented  to  the  world,  the  Publishers  anticipate  that 
the  first  exhibition  of  a  National  Portrait  Gallery  worthy  of  the 
name  will  be  found  in  the  pages  of  ^  The  Scottish  Nation/ 

The  Biographies  that  were  required  to  be  added  during  the  publica- 
tion of  the  work  by  demise  of  distinguished  individuals,  are  given  in  the 

form  of  a  Supplement. 

W.  A. 


ii 

I 

i 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS. 


^^^^^^^^^^S^^^^^»^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0^ 


1      ' 
"l 

;  -I 

i       ( 


i  I 


I  I 


VOLUME    III. 


ENGRAVED  PORTRAITS. 


I.Graham,  Sir    Tliomas,    Lordly, .  ^.      ,     ^ 

Lynedoch,  f  ^*'°"  *  pwnting  by  Lawrence, 

9.  MooRB,  Sir  John,  „                        „ 

3.  MuiiRO,  Sir  Thomas,  „                Shce, 

4.  McRRAY,     William,  Earl    of)                                    i>         u 

M»n.field,  ;                 ••               Reynolds, 

5.  Ramsat,  Allan,  „                his  Son,  Allan, 

6.  Scott,  Sir  Walter,  .,                G.  S.  Newton,  R.A., 

7.  Watt,  James,  „       bust  by  Cliantjy, 


To  face 
Engraved  by  W.  Iloll,  Frontispiece 


»» 


»» 


»* 


11 


11 


»» 


»» 
»» 

page  196 
216 

ft 

227 

R.  Bell, 
J.  B.  Bird, 
W.  Holl, 

324 
415 
613 

ENGRAVED  TABLES  OF  TITULAR  GENEiVLOGIES. 

Ancient  Earldoms. 


&  Earldom  of  Afenteth,  as  arranged  by  author  and  others, 
9  „  Strathearn, 

10.  „  ly^nnox, 

11.  „  Moray, 


« 


i» 


«i 

It 


2. 
3. 


♦5. 


Mackat,  Robert,  View  of  Cape) 
Wrath,  > 

Mackexzir,  Sir  George, 
Mackenzie,  Henry, 

Macintosh,  Sir  Janu'S, 

MAf'LAiiRKN,  Colin, 
M ACXAB  of  Ma^'itab,  Archibald,  )^ 
(hist  of  rate.)  ) 

Macneill,  Hector, 

Maci'HErmon.  James, 

Maptland,     Sir    John,    Lord) 

Thirlest*ne.  ) 

Maix'olm  II.,  View  of  Huins  { 

of  lOMA,  ) 


WOODCUTS  (IN  LETTERPRESS). 
From  a  Sketch  by  J.  C.  Brown, 

{■• 


{■■ 


8. 

y. 

10. 

11. 

12 
13. 


14.  Maxwkli.,  Sir  Murray, 
l.">. 

17. 


i> 


i» 


•1 


»i 


Malcolm,  Sir  Pultency, 

Maixx)LM,  Sir  John, 

Marr,  John  KrKkiiie,  9th  Earl  f     1 

of.  ;  J 

f 
( 

Mkxteitii,  \\  illiani,  1 8th  E.arl  )^ 
of.  ) 

MiLLRR,  Iluj^h, 

MoNTOOME  .Y.  JAincs.  (hy  per-  )     \ 
mission  of  Mt'S8r«.lA)iigiiianH.)  |     ( 


11 


M 


'» 


an  Engraving  published  in  )^ 
1810  by  Richardson,  l^mdon,  f 

l'(>rtrait  by  Colvin  Smith,  en-  (_ 
graved  1)V  Ilorsburgh,  C 

Portrait  by  Lawrence,  engraved  1 
l)y  Freeman,  } 

Sinitli's  IcoMographia  Scotica, 

Photograph  from  life, 

Portrait  by  Williams,  engraved  )_ 
by  liodgers,  ) 

Portrjiit  atlixed  to  Memoir,  in  }_ 
edition  of  OsHinn,  ) 

Pinkerton's  Scottish  Gallery, 

Painting  from  nature  by  .1.  C.  ) 
Hrown,  jT 

Portrait  by  Ijane,  engraved  by  )^ 
Wood,  s 

Portrait  by  G.  Ilayter,  engrsiv("d  }_ 
on  stone  by  Lane,  ^ 

Pinkerton's  Icono£fraphia.(from 
an  original  painting  in  pos- 
8<'?4Kion  of  present  earl,) 

Portrait  dniwn  and  engraved  by 
T.  Wageman,  1817  (appended 
to  vol.  of  Percy  AnecaotCH), 

Pinkerton's  Scottish  Gallery, 

Photograph  by  Tunney,  en-  )^ 
graved  by  Bell,  S 

portrait  prefixed  to  MoiDoir  of  i_ 
Life  and  writings,  18.04.  ) 


148 

148 

Frontispiece 

200 


En&:raved  by 

Landells, 

17 

AV 

.J 

.  Linton, 

,22 

25 

33 

* 

37 

53 

58 

65 

82 

Orrell  Smith, 

86 

W. 

J. 

Linton, 

97 

It 

99 

11 


M 


H 


n 


11 


11 


It 


111 
ue 

149 
168 
189 


'  I 


LIST  OP  ILLUSTRATIONS. 


19.  Hoots,  John,  M.D., 


r,  Aleuiia«r,  D.D., 


I.  Napheh,  Sir  Charlei, 


23.  ORKiTEt,    Qoorga     Uamiltoit, ) 
l^rl  of,  i 

34. 1'jUtK,  Miingo, 
35.  PutEERTON,  John, 


From  Foitrait  hy  Bir  Jolu  Medina, 
„  Cochmia  or  Bome, 

in  pOMouion  of  J.  Uaointosli, 
Ee,, 
Portrait    from   originitl   draw- 
ing by  Qeddca,  from  Litlio- 
nb  of  the  lime,  engriTed 
.  W.  Uaat  for  Virtue  & 
C^.,  IB41, 
PorlrtUt  in  poaKMion  of  the  late 
A.  ConsUble, 
by 
Paiiiti  epon- 

seai  ^rl  of  BuvhKii, 


EngrsTed  bj  W.  J.  liubw,  192 


ST.  Plakfair,  John,  -^ 

28.  Pol,LOt,  Robert,  -( 

29.  Pmsoi-K.  SlrJ"bii,  ■■ 

30.  James  Douslu.  )  J 
2.1  Duke  nf,                            /  I 

31.  Raebuhm,  ^r  Ilenrj, 

32.  Rbih,  Thomas,  -j 

33.  R'RKKT  tl .  King  orScctlaod, 
3*.  RonBKT  III.,  „ 

30.  ltjBKKTau.\,  WiUiaui,  D.U.,  ' 


T.  A. 

Ii 

tVS 

ortiait  by 

after  K 

<!\h 

„      ill  European  MuguiiM,  ) 
1814.  > 

Pinkeriou's  Scottiab  OnUerj, 


I.  UuscuuM,  Aiuxniiilur, 

i.  Scott,  Divid,  - 
iJ.  tiErun.  Osorge,  5ih  l^ord, 

II.  Shabf,  JainuH,   ArcUliiahop  ot  |  _, 

Su  AuJrowa,  (ill  Ilia  yuucb,)  /  , 

1.  bHAKi'.Juiuea,  ditto,  (ill  bia  old  I  ' 

«B"0                                   i"  ■ 

1,  Huiru,  Adam,  LL.I>.,  -■ 


niEMK,  Sir  Jhids*  Carnegie,  |_  ' 
xl  ut;  ixMil  uf  littrl  Jaiuja,  1  . 
iTiBWUoii.  Ji>bii,  Arcbbiil 


"I  7-1.) 
S.  Staik,    Jobu    DalrvMipb 

E«rl  ui; 
7.  Stewaut,  DugalJ, 
S.  SmAiLAx,  W>tli,>.», 


rcbbiili-  I     , 
(at  ari>:  ^  - 


gr«vedj_ 
W.  B.  I 


PortraiC  by  LaggHii,  engraTed  (_ 
(1819)  by  Ke«diiig,  1 

KiigrHViiig  by  lienco  frnm  ins-) 
Jallioii    by   'I'ahu,  iu  Scuta  ^ 

bv    Hello.) 
797  by  Ca-  } 


Iinpreiuiou  aupplied  by  preaeut  I 
KngniTing  by  W.  Holler  (1939),  ) 

Portrait  by  Sir  Jobu  Medina,  (^ 
engraved  Ly  Homuian,  > 

Portrait  by  Itaeburn,  engraved  I 
by  Turner,  ) 

Portrait  by  Beynolds,  engrared  ( 
by  Jouea,  S 


■'/ 


.  I 


49l  SreixQB,  Sir  Robert, 

60.  Stuart,  Lndy  Arabella  (daugh- ' 
ter  of  5th  Eirl  of  Lennox, 
innocent  victim  of  State  jenl- 
ouay  of  Elizabeth  and  James,) 

51.  Taxmahili.,  Robert, 

52.  Telford,  Thomaji, 

53.  Thom,  William, 

54.  Thomson,  James, 


55.  TuoMSox,  Thomas, 

56.  TuoMSoy,  Rev.  John, 

57.  Traquaiu,  John  Stewart,  lst\ 

Earl  of,  j 

53.  TxTLKR,  William, 

53.  TvTLER,     Alexander     Fraser,  1 
Lord  Woodhouselee,  } 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS, 


From  Medallion  Portrait  (painted  and  ^ 

engraved  by  himself),  copy  >•  Engraved  by  W. 
by  Grouse,  '  ) 


8 

Page 
J.  Linton,  529 


If 


»» 


»» 


»» 


t» 


»» 


«» 


If 


»i 


n 


I        60.  WiLKiE,  Sir  David, 


i» 


61.  WiLso!!,     Jolin,     Christopher} 

North  (of  Blackwood's  Mag.),  ) 

62.  WiTiiERHPoojf,    John,     D.l).,  ) 

LL.D.,  j 

63.  Akxot,  Sir  Michael,  Shield  in  > 

Aruot  'I'owcr.  j" 

6t.  Dirto,  ditto.   Lintel   in   Arnot  } 
'J'owcr,  f 


tt 


II 


»i 


n 


a  rare  En^i^raving  of  the  time,  > 
by  Richardson,  j 

Portrait  by  Morton,  engraved 

by  J.  T.  Smitli,  in  collected 

Works, 
Portrait,  printed  and  enorraved 

by    H.    Meyer    for  .  Messrs. 

Fisher,  8on*&  Co.,  1848, 
Lithograph  drawn  on  Stone  by 

G.  Yates, 
Portrait  by  Robinson  prefixed 

to    his    Works,    Pic&eriug's 

edition  (1830), 
Portrait  by   Lauder,  engraved') 

(for    liannatyne    Club)    by  v 

Shaw,  ) 

Portrait  by  F.  Crodall  in  Hogg's  \ 

Instructor,  j" 

Smith's  Iconographia  Scotica, 

Portrait  by  Raebum,  engraved) 
by  R.  Scott,  r 

Painting  by  Jackson,  from  on- 
ginal  Portrait  by  Raebum. 
engraved  by  Picart,  publish- 
ed 1813, 

Portrait  by  Sir  W.  Beechy,  on- ' 
graved     by     Robinson,     for 
Messrs.  Fisher,  Son  &  Co., 
1846, 

Portrait  drawn  on  wood  by  W.  *" 
H.  Scott,  Esq.,  R.S.A.,  'after  V 
others  by  various  artists,         \ 

Engraving   in    United    States,! 
(from  Portrait  in  possession  V 
of  his  grandsons,)  j 

Litiio^raph  furnislied  by  present  \ 
representative  of  the  family,  j 

Ditto,  ditto, 


II 


II 


II 


II 


II 


n 


II 


II 


II 


»l 


«1 


>l 


If 


II 


II 


II 


»l 


♦I 


II 


II 


II 


II 


»l 


w 


II 


II 


538 

549 

553 
557 
558 

562 

505 
580 

587 

588 

642 

655 

666 

681 
C81 


I     I 


THE 


SCOTTISH    NATION. 


■r^^^^w>«^»  ^r^>'ww»^w^^»^rws»^»"i^^^v^^\rwv^^^^w^^^^WV^^^^\^^ 


MACINTYRE. 


M 


ICAcnrmuB,  the  name  of  a  minor  aept,  called,  in  Gaelic 
tiwdn  Mfhie  An  TSaoir.  They  are  a  branch  of  the  clan 
DomU,  and  their  badge  is  the  same  as  theirs,  the  common 
heath.  The  Gaelic  word  Saor  means  a  carpenter.  Accord- 
Jbk  to  tradition  one  of  the  Macdonalds  being  in  a  boat  at  sea, 
it  apmng  a  leak,  and,  finding  it  sinking,  he  forced  his  thumb 
into  the  hole,  and  cat  it  off,  so  that  he  might  be  able  to  reach 
the  land  in  safety.  He  was  ever  afterwards  called  A  n  T^Saoir, 
and  Mae  An  T*3aoir,  in  the  Gaelic,  is  very  nearly  prononnc- 
ed  like  Mactntyn.  Another  story  says  that  one  of  the  clan 
Donald,  named  Panl,  in  Sutherland,  in  the  end  of  the  13th 
csntary,  bnilt  Dun  Creich,  a  vitrified  fort  in  that  county, 
when  he  aequirsd  the  name  of  Saoir,  and  as  professions  were 
Iwreditary  among  the  Celts,  it  descended  to  his  posterity. 

The  MacintTres  of  Rannoeh  were  famous  musicians,  and 
after  1680,  they  became  the  pipers  to  Bdenzies  of  Weenis, 
chief  of  the  clan  Menzies,  for  whom  they  composed  the  ap- 
|>ropriate  salute.  One  of  them  was  the  author  of  a  fine  piece 
of  bagpipo  music  commemorative  of  the  battle  of  Sheriffmuir 
in  1715.  During  the  rebellion  of  1745-6,  the  Macintyres 
were  in  the  clan  regiment  of  Stewart  of  Appin,  on  the  side  of 
the  Pretender. 

MACINTYRE,  Duncan,  one  of  the  best  of  the 
modem  Gaelic  poets,  was  born  of  poor  parents,  in 
Dniimliaghart,  Glenorchy,  Argyleshire,  March  20, 
1724.  Being  in  bis  yoath  very  handsome,  he  was 
commonly  called  by  his  countrymen,  Donnacha 
Bhn  nan  hran^  that  is  *  fair  Dnncan  of  the  Songs.* 
On  the  breaking  out  of  the  rebellion  of  1745,  lie 
engaged  on  the  government  side,  as  the  substitute 
of  a  Mr.  Fletcher  of  Glenorchy,  for  the  sum  of 
800  merks  Scots,  to  be  paid  on  his  return.  He 
fought  at  the  battle  of  Falkirk,  January  17,  1746, 
under  the  command  of  Colonel  Campbell  of  Car- 
whin,  and  in  the  retreat  he  either  lost  or  threw 

away  his  sword.    As  it  belonged  to  Mr.  Fletcher, 
III. 


MACINTYRE. 


that  gentleman  refused  to  pay  him  the  300  merks, 
and  he.  in  consequence,  composed  a  song  on  **  the 
battle  of  Falkirk,*'  in  which  he  has  given  a  minute 
and  admirable  account  of  that  engagement,  and 
especially  of  everything  relating  to  the  sword, 
much  to  the  annoyance  of  Mr.  Fletcher.  Macin- 
tyre  likewise  complained  of  his  conduct  to  the  earl 
of  Breadalbane,  who  obliged  him  to  pay  the  poet, 
who  had  risked  his  life  for  him,  the  stipulated  re- 
ward. Being  an  excellent  marksman,  he  was  ap- 
pointed forester  to  the  earl  of  Breadalbane,  and 
afterwards  to  the  duke  of  Argyle. 

On  the  passing  of  the  act  which  proscribed  the 
Highland  dress,  he  composed  an  indignant  poem, 
called  *  The  Anathema  of  the  Breeks,'  wherein  he 
boldly  attacked  the  government  for  having  passed 
a  law  which  was  equally  obnoxious  to  the  clans 
friendly  to  the  house  of  Hanover  as  to  those  who 
had  engaged  in  the  rebellion,  and  said  it  was 
enough  to  make  the  whole  country  turn  Jacobite 
should  Prince  Charles  Edward  return  to  Scotland. 
He  was,  in  consequence,  committed  to  prison,  bnt 
by  the  influence  of  his  friends  he  was  soon  re- 
leased. When  the  act  was  repealed  in  1782,  he 
commemorated  the  event  in  a  congratulatory 
poem,  which  was  as  popular  with  the  Gael  as  the 
former  one  had  been. 

In  1793  he  became  a  private  in  the  Breadal- 
bane fencibles,  and  continued  to  serve  in  it  till 
1799,  when  the  regiment  was  disbanded.  His 
volume  of  poems  and  songs  was  first  published  at 


MACIVOR. 


M^KAIL 


Edinburj^h  in  1768.  He  went  throngh  the  High- 
lands for  subscribers  to  defray  the  expense. 
Thongh  he  never  received  any  education  of  any 
kindf  he  excelled  in  every  kind  of  verse  that  he 
tried.  A  clergyman  wrote  down  his  poems  from 
oral  recitation.  They  were  reprinted  in  1790, 
and  again  in  1804,  with  some  additional  pieces. 
A  fourth  edition  was  printed  at  Glasgow  in  1 833. 
The  writer  of  his  life  in  Reid*s  *  Bibliotheca-Scoto- 
Celtica/  says  that  "all  good  judges  of  Celtic 
poetry  agree  that  nothing  like  the  purity  of  his 
Gaelic  and  the  style  of  his  poetry,  has  appeared 
in  the  Highlands  since  the  days  of  Ossian.'*  His 
biographer  in  Mackenzie's  *  Beauties  of  Gaelic 
Poetry'  (Glasgow,  1841),  says  that  when  deliver- 
ing the  third  edition  of  his  poems  to  his  snbscrib- 
ei-s,  the  Rev.  Mr.  M*Callum  of  Arisaig,  "saw 
him  travelling  slowly  with  his  wife.  He  was 
dressed  in  the  Highland  garb,  with  a  checked  bon- 
net, over  which  a  large  bushy  tail  of  a  wild  ani- 
mal hung,  a  badger's  skin  fastened  by  a  belt  in 
front,  a  hanger  by  his  side,  and  a  soldier's  wallet 
was  strapped  to  his  shoulders.  He  had  not  been 
seen  by  any  present  before  then,  but  was  imme- 
diately recognised.  A  forward  young  man  asked 
him  if  it  was  he  that  made  Ben-dourain?  *No,' 
replied  the  venerable  old  man,  *  Ben-dourain  was 
made  before  yon  or  I  was  born,  but  I  made  a  po- 
em in  praise  of  Ben-dourain.'  He  then  inquired 
if  any  would  buy  a  copy  of  his  book.  I  told  him 
to  call  upon  me,  paid  him  three  shillings,  and  had 
some  conversation  with  him.  He  spoke  slowly ; 
he  seemed  to  have  no  high  opinion  of  his  own 
works ;  and  said  little  of  Gaelic  poetiy ;  but  said, 
that  officers  in  the  army  used  to  tell  him  about 
the  Greek  poets ;  and  Pindar  was  chiefly  admired 
by  him."  Having  been  appointed  bard  to  the 
Highland  Society,  he  furnished  it  with  many  stir- 
ring addresses  in  Gaelic  at  its  annual  meetings. 

On  the  recommendation  of  the  earl  of  Breadal- 
bane,  who  befriended  him  through  life,  he  was 
appointed  in  his  old  age  one  of  the  city  guard  of 
Edinburgh.  He  subsequently  lived  retired,  and 
died  in  that  city  in  October  1812. 

Macivou,  the  name  of  a  minor  sept,  a  branch  of  the  great 
Siol  Diaermidy  or  race  of  Campbell,  having  the  same  badge, 
the  myrtle.  The  founder  of  this  branch  was  Ivor,  son  of 
Duncan,  lord  of  Lochow,  in  the  tima  of  Malcolm  IV.  (1153 


— 1165),  and  his  descendants,  to  distingnish  themselves  from 
the  other  branches  of  the  family  of  Argyle,  assumed  the  name 
of  their  ancestor  for  their  surname,  and  are  called  Maclvon, 
and  sometimes  Clan-Ivor.  They  are  also  called  Clan  Glas- 
saiy,  and  Clan  Ivor  GlnsHary,  from  a  district  in  Ai^leshire 
of  that  naine«  which  was  principally  posseased  by  them.  But 
the  chieftain  or  bead  of  the  tribe  is  in  Celtic  called  Maclvor, 
without  regard  to  the  Christian  name.  Their  original  lands 
were  Lergachonzie,  Asknish,  and  others  in  CowhI,  but  there 
were  also  many  families  of  the  name  in  Caithness,  Invemeas- 
shire,  and  the  Lewis.  Those  who  settled  in  Lodiaber  took 
the  name  of  MacGlasrich,  from  the  district  of  Glassary,  and 
became  followers  of  Macdonald  of  Keppoch. 

In  1564,  Archibald,  fifth  earl  of  Argyle,  by  and  with  the 
concurrence  of  the  tribe  of  Maclvor  and  '*  Clan  Glassary,** 
made  a  formal  resignation,  in  presence  of  a  notary  public  and 
several  gentlemen,  of  the  chieftainship  there,  in  favour  of  his 
cousin  Ivor  Maclvor,  of  lergachonzie  and  Askniah,  and  his 
heirs  whomsoever,  who,  by  the  dtle-deeds  of  their  estjtte, 
became  bound  to  use  the  surname  and  anna  of  Maclvor, — the 
muttoen  of  the  house  of  Argyle  and  that  of  Maclvor  of  Ask- 
nish being  typic^il  of  their  relative  positions;  the  former, 
*'ne  obliviscaria ;  **  and  the  latter,  *'nunquam  obliviscar.** 
When  Archibald,  ninth  earl  of  Argyle,  was  employed  in 
quelling  same  civil  commotions,  in  1679,  Maclvor.  true  to 
his  motto,  attended  him  with  one  hundred  men  of  his  own 
tribe :  and  when  the  earl  returned  from  Holland  in  1685,  he 
again  joined  him,  and  was  forfeited  with  him. 

After  the  Revolution,  when  the  eari*s  forfeiture  was  re- 
scinded, Archibald,  tenth  earl  and  afterwards  first  duke  of 
Argyle,  gave  back  Maclvor*s  estate  to  his  son  Duncan,  sod 
his  heirs,  on  condition  that  they  should  bear  the  surname 
and  arms  of  Campbell  and  of  the  family  of  Maclvor,  (anna 
et  cognomen  de  Campbell  et  Familiie  de  Maclver,  gerenti- 
bus,  &c.). 

From  the  earls  of  Argyle.  the  Maclvors  held  several  potts 
of  trust  and  honour,  such  as  the  keeping  of  the  castle  of  In- 
verary,  &c.  They  were  also  hereditary  coroners  within  a  cer- 
tain district. 

•  In  the  rebellion  of  1745-6,  the  Maclvors  went  out  with 
the  Macdonalds  of  Keppoch,  and  at  the  battle  of  Culloden, 
they  were  drawn  up  as  a  separate  body,  with  officers  of  their 
own,  as  they  were  anxious  to  be  placed  in  a  portion  where 
there  was  no  chance  of  their  being  opposed  to  the  Argyle  mi- 
litia, having  the  same  badge  and  wearing  their  tartan. 

In  1858,  the  lord  lyon  king  of  arms,  by  interlocutor  of  his 
lordship's  depute,  on  the  application  of  Duncan  Maclvor 
Campbell,  Esq.  of  Asknish, — (formerly  Duncan  Campbell 
Paterson,  eldest  son  of  the  deceased  James  Paterson,  of 
Clobber  Hall,  county  Clare,  Ireland,  grandson  of  Agnes, 
eldest  daughter  of  Angus  Campbell  of  Asknish,  and  ne- 
phew of  Lieutenant  -  colonel  Paterson,  assistant  -  quarter- 
master-general of  her  majesty's  forces,)-— recognised  him  as 
heir  of  line  of  the  family  of  Maclvor  of  Asknisli,  and  under  a 
deed  of  entail,  as  heir  of  tailzie,  now  in  possession  of  said 
estate,  and,  as  such,  '*  to  use,  be^,  and  constantly  retain  the 
arms  and  surname  of  Campbell  and  of  the  family  of  Maclvor 
and  designation  of  Asknish.** 

M*KAIL,  Hugh,  a  martyr  of  the  covenant,  was 
bom  about  1640.  He  studied,  with  a  view  to  the 
church,  at  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  under  the 
care  of  his  uncle,  one  of  the  ministers  of  that  city, 
and  was  afterwards,  for  some  time,  chaplain  to 


I  -  — 
!l 


i\ 


M^KAIL 


HUGH. 


1 1 


day  about  80  serious  a  business  would  give  no  of- 
fence ;  to  whicii  the  bisiiop  answered  that  it  would 
give  no  offence.  Then  Mr.  Mattliew  went  to  en- 
quire for  his  horse,  but  the  stabler^s  family  were 
all  gone  to  church,  so  that  be  could  not  travel  till 
Monday  morning  early,  and  when  he  came  to 
Bnckhaven,  the  wind  being  easterly,  the  fish-boats 
were  coming  into  the  harbour,  and  he  hired  one 
of  them  immediately,  and  arrived  at  I^ith  in  the 
evening,  having  sent  his  horse  to  Bmntisland. 
He  went  immediately  to  Archbishop  Burnet  of 
Glasgow,  and  delivered  a  letter  to  him,  who  did 
read  it,  and  then  said  that  the  business  was  in  the 
justiciaries*  hands.*' 

Next  day,  being  the  18th  December,  the  pris- 
oner was  bronght  before  the  court  of  justiciary, 
with  other  three.  When  placed  at  the  bar, 
M'Kail  addressed  the  couit,  and  *^  si)oke  of  the 
tics  and  engagements  that  were  upon  the  land  to 
God ;  and  having  commended  the  institution,  dig- 
nity, and  blessing  of  presbyterian  goveniment,  he 
said  that  the  last  words  of  the  national  covenant 
had  always  great  weight  on  his  spirit.  Where- 
upon the  king's  advocate  interrupted  him,  and  de- 
sired, he  would  forbear  that  discourse,  since  he 
was  not  called  in  question  for  his  persuasion,  but 
for  the  crime  of  rebellion.**  As  a  matter  of 
course  he  was  found  guilty  of  high  treason,  and 
condemned  to  be  hanged  at  the  market  cross  of 
Edinburgh  on  December  22,  four  days  after. 
The  three  others  who  were  tried  along  with  him 
were  likewise  sentenced  to  death.  On  his  way 
back  to  the  tolbooth  he  received  the  greatest  sym- 
pathy from  the  people,  and  to  some  women  who 
were  lamenting  his  fate,  he  said :  **  Weep  not : 
though  I  am  but  young,  and  in  the  budding  of  my 
hopes  and  labours  in  the  ministry,  I  am  not  to  be 
mourned ;  for  one  drop  of  my  blood,  through  the 
grace  of  God,  may  make  more  hearts  contrite, 
than  many  years*  sermons  might  have  done.**  At 
his  request,  his  father  was  allowed  to  visit  him  in 
prison,  and  the  interview  between  them  was  pecu- 
liarly affecting.  He  spent  the  short  time  allotted 
to  him  in  acts  of  devotion,  and  in  encouraging  and 
supporting  those  who  were  to  suffer  with  him. 
He  even  at  times  showed  considei*able  cheerful- 
ness. On  a  friend,  who  went  to  see  him,  express- 
ing his  8onx)w  for  his  mangled  limb,  he  answered 


that  the  fear  of  his  neck  made  him  forget  his  leg. 
On  the  evening  before  his  execution,  while  at 
supper  with  his  fellow-prisoners,  he  said  to  them 
gaily,  ^*  Eat  to  the  full,  and  cherish  your  bodies, 
that  we  may  be  a  fat  Christmas  pie  to  the  pre- 
lates.** After  supper  he  read  to  them  the  16tli 
Psalm,  and  then  said,  *^  If  there  were  anything  in 
the  world  sadly  and  unwillingly  to  be  left,  it  were 
the  reading  of  the  Scriptures,**  but,  he  added,  it 
was  a  source  of  comfort  that  he  would  soon  be  in 
that  place  where  even  Scripture  is  no  longer 
necessary.  He  then  wrote  his  will,  bequeathing 
his  few  books  to  his  friends.  He  slept  sonnd- 
ly,  and  on  awakening,  at  five  o'clock  in  the 
moniing,  one  who  was  to  suffer  with  him,  he 
said  pleasantly,  **  Up,  John,  for  you  are  too 
long  in  bed ;  you  and  I  look  not  like  men  go- 
ing to  be  hanged  this  day,  seeing  we  lie  so  long.** 
Before  proceeding  to  the  scaffold  he  bade  farewell 
to  his  father,  and  assured  him  that  his  sufferings 
would  do  more  hui*t  to  the  prelates,  and  be  more 
edifying  to  God*s  )>eople  than  if  he  were  to  conti- 
nue in  the  ministry  for  twenty  years.  On  his 
appearance  on  the  scaffold  the  grief  of  the  specta- 
tors bui*st  forth  in  loud  expressions  of  wailing,  so 
that  it  is  recorded  ^^  there  was  scarce  ever  seen  so 
much  sorrow  in  onlookers ;  scarce  was  there  a  dry 
cheek  in  the  whole  street  or  windows  at  the  cross 
of  Edinburgh.**  On  ascending  the  ladder  he  said 
to  his  ftiends,  *^  I  care  no  more  to  go  up  this  lad- 
der than  if  I  were  going  home  to  my  father's 
house.  Friends  and  fellow  sufferers,  be  not 
afraid  ;  every  step  of  this  ladder  is  a  degree  nearer 
heaven.** 

Previous  to  being  turned  off,  he  addressed  the 
spectators  at  some  length,  imputing  the  perse- 
cution of  the  churcli  to  the  prelates,  and  declar- 
ing his  readiness  to  die  for  the  cause  of  God, 
the  covenants,  and  the  work  of  reformation, 
which  had  been  the  glory  of  Scotland.  He  con- 
cluded with  the  following  sublime  exclamation: 
^*And  now,  I  leave  off  to  speak  any  more  to 
creatures,  and  begin  my  intercourse  with  Grod, 
which  shall  never  be  broken  off.  Farewell,  fa- 
ther and  mother,  friends  and  relations,  farewell 
the  world  and  all  delights,  farewell  meat  and 
drink,  farewell  sun,  moon,  and  stars !  Welcome 
God  and  Father;  welcome  sweet  Jesus  Christ, 


I     1 


I    I 


I    t 


I     t 


ji 


! ; 


MACKAY. 


MACKAY. 


wick.  To  avoid  his  vengeance,  Mowat  toiik  refuge,  with  his 
followers,  in  the  chapel  of  St.  Duffus  near  Tain,  bat  they 
were  followed  thither  by  Thomas,  who  slew  him  and  his  peo- 
ple, and  burnt  the  chapel  to  the  ground.  In  consequence  of 
this  outrage  the  king  issued  a  proclamation  against  Thomas 
Maeneill,  promising  his  lands  as  a  reward  to  any  one  who 
would  kill  or  apprehend  him.  Angns  Murray,  son  of  Alex- 
ander Murray  of  Cubin,  with  a  view  to  his  apprehension, 
o^ered  his  brothers,  Morgan  and  Keill  Macneill,  for  their  as- 
sistance, his  two  daughters  in  marriage,  besides  promising  to 
aid  them  in  getting  possession  of  the  lands  of  Angns  Dubh 
ill  Strathnaver.  They  accordingly  apprehended  their  bro- 
ther, Thomas,  who  was  delivered  up  to  the  king,  and 
executed  at  Inverness.  Murray  gave  his  daughters  in 
marriage  to  Kcill  and  Morgan  Macneill,  as  he  had  promised, 
and  thereafter  made  an  incursion  into  Strathnaver,  to  seize 
the  lands  of  Angus  Dubh  Mackay.  The  latter,  being  too  old 
to  lead  his  dun  in  person,  gave  the  command  of  it  to  John 
Aberigh,  hi.s  natural  son,  but  to  save  the  effusion  of  blood,  he 
sent  a  message  to  his  consins,  Neill  and  Morg:m,  offering  to 
surrender  to  them  all  his  lands  in  Strathnaver,  if  they  would 
allow  him  to  retain  Kintail.  This  offer  was  rejected,  and 
a  desperate  battle  took  place  at  Drumnacoub,  near  Tongue. 
Among  the  slain  were  the  beginners  of  the  strife,  Angus 
Murray  and  his  two  sons-in-law,  Neill  and  Morgan  Macneill. 
John  Aberigh,  the  victor,  lost  an  arm  in  the  conflict.  After 
the  battle,  Angus  Dubh,  the  chief,  caused  himself  to  be  car- 
ried to  the  field,  to  search  for  the  bodies  of  his  slain  cousins, 
when  he  was  killed  by  an  arrow  from  a  Sutherland  man,  who 
lay  concealed  near  the  spot. 

In  1437  Neill  VVasse  Mackay  was  released  from  confine- 
ment in  the  Bass,  and  on  assuming  the  chiefship,  he  bestow- 
ed on  John  Aberigh,  for  his  attention  to  his  father,  the  lands 
of  l/ochnaver  in  fee  simple,  which  were  long  possessed  by  his 
posterity,  that  particular  branch  of  the  Mackays,  called  the 
Sliochd-ean-Aberigh,  or  an-Abrach.  Neill  Wasse,  soon  after 
his  accession,  ravaged  Caithness,  but  died  the  same  year, 
leaving  two  sons,  Angns,  and  John  Roy  Mackay,  the  latter 
founder  of  another  branch,  called  the  Sliochd-ean-Roy. 

Angus  Mackay.  the  elder  son,  assisted  the  Keiths  in  in- 
vading Caithness  in  1464,  when  they  defeated  the  inhabitants 
of  that  district  in  an  engagement  at  Blaretannie.  He  was 
burnt  to  death  in  the  church  of  I'arbet  in  1475,  by  the  men 
of  Ross,  whom  he  had  often  molested.  With  a  daughter, 
married  to  Sutherland  of  Dilred,  he  bad  three  sons,  viz.,  John 
Reawigh,  meaning  yellowish  red,  the  colour  of  his  hair; 
Y-Roy  Mackay ;  and  Neill  Naverigh  Mackay. 

To  revenge  his  father's  death,  John  Reawigh  Mackay,  the 
eldest  son,  raised  a  large  force,  and  assisted  by  Robert 
Sutherland,  uncle  to  the  earl  of  Sutherland,  invaded  Strath* 
oikell,  and  laid  waste  the  lands  of  the  Rosses  in  that  district. 
A  battle  took  place,  llth  July  1487,  at  Aldy-Charrisb,  when 
the  Rosses  were  defeated,  and  their  chief,  Alexander  Ross  of 
BHlnagowan,  and  17  other  prindpal  men  of  that  clan  were 
slain.    The  victims  returned  home  with  a  lai^  booty. 

It  was  by  forays  such  as  these  that  the  great  Highland 
chiefs,  and  even  some  of  the  lowland  nobles,  contrived,  in 
former  times,  to  increase  their  stores  and  add  to  their  posses- 
sions, and  the  Mackays  soon  obtained  a  large  accession  to 
their  lands  by  the  following  drcumstance,  which  strongly 
marks  the  manners  of  the  age.  The  nephew  of  the  Mackay 
chief,  Alexander  Sntherland  of  Dilred,  having  failed  to  repay 
a  sum  of  money  he  had  borrowed  from  Sir  James  Dunbar  of 
Cumnock,  the  latter  took  legal  measures  to  secure  his  debt 
by  appraising  part  of  his  lands.  The  affront  was  the  more 
palling  as  the  Dunbars  had  but  recently  settled  in  Suther- 


land, and  the  laird  of  Dilred  **  grudged,  as  it  were,"  (nys 
Sir  Robert  Gordon)  "  that  a  stranger  shouki  brawe  (brave) 
him  at  his  owne  dimrs."  Whilst  in  this  humour  be  happened 
to  nieet  Sir  James  Dunbar  s  brother,  Alexander,  the  husband 
of  the  countess  dowager  of  Sntherland,  and  after  some  alter- 
cation, a  combat  ensued,  when  Alexander  Dunbar  was  killed. 
Sir  James  immediately  went  to  Edinburgh,  and  laid  the  mat- 
ter before  the  king,  who  caused  Alexander  Sutherland  to  be 
prodaimed  a  rebel,  and  promised  his  lands  to  any  one  who 
should  apprehend  him.  After  some  search,  he  was  taken, 
with  ten  of  his  followers,  by  his  uncle,  Y-Roy  Mackay,  who 
had  succeeded  his  brother,  John  Reawigh  Mackay,  as  chief  of 
the  Mackays.  Sutherland  was  executed,  and  his  lands  be- 
stowed on  Y-Roy  Mackay.  These  were  Annidall,  Strathy, 
Golspietour,  Kinnald,  Kilcolmkill,  and  Dilred,  the  charter  of 
which  was  dated  at  Inverness,  4th  November  1449.  **  Ava- 
rice,^ says  Sir  R.  Gordon,  **  is  a  strange  vyce,  which  respects 
neither  blood  nor  freindship.  This  is  the  first  infeftment  that 
any  of  the  fainilie  of  Macky  had  from  the  king,  so  far  as  I 
can  perceave  by  the  records  of  this  kingdoih ;  and  they  wer 
untill  this  tym  possessors  onlie  of  their  lands  in  Strathnaver, 
not  careing  much  for  any  charters  or  infeftments,  as  most 
pairts  of  the  Highlanders  have  alwise  done.**  {llitt,  p.  80.) 
In  February  1512,  Sir  James  Dunbar  obtained  a  decree  be- 
fore the  court  of  session,  setting  aside  the  right  of  Y-Roy 
Mackay  to  that  part  of  the  lands  of  Alexander  Sutheriand, 
over  which  his  security  extended,  and  ordaining  the  eari  of 
Sutherland,  as  superior  of  the  lands,  to  receive  Sir  James  as 
his  vassal.  In  1516,  Y-Roy  Mackay  gave  his  bond  of  servica 
to  Adam  Gordon  of  Aboyne,  brother  of  the  earl  of  Huntly» 
who  had  become  earl  of  Sutherland,  by  marriage  with  Eliza- 
beth, sister  and  heiress  of  the  ninth  earl,  but  died  soon  after. 
Donald,  his  youngest  son,  slain  at  Morinsh,  was  ancestor  of  a 
branch  of  the  Mackays  <»lled  the  Sliochd-Donald-Mackay. 

John,  the  eldest  son,  had  no  sooner  taken  possession  of  his 
father's  lands,  than  his  uncle,  Neill  Naverigh  Mackay  and  his 
two  sons,  assisted  by  a  force  furnished  them  by  the  earl  of 
Caithness,  entered  Strathnaver,  and  dispossessed  him  of  his 
inheritance.  John  hastened  to  the  clan  Chattan  and  the  clan 
Kenzie,  to  crave  their  aid,  and,  in  his  absence,  his  brother, 
Donald,  with  a  small  force,  surprised  at  night  Neill  Naverigh's 
party  at  Dalnaivigh  in  Strathnaver,  and  slew  both  his  cousins 
and  the  greater  part  of  their  men.  Their  father,  Neill  Nave- 
righ, threw  himself  upon  the  generosity  of  his  nephews,  but 
they  ruthlessly  ordered  him  to  be  beheaded  by  the  bands  of 
his  own  foster-brother. 

In  1517,  in  the  absence  of  the  earl  of  Sntherland,  who  had 
wrested  from  John  Mackay  a  portion  of  his  lands,  he  and  his 
brother  Donald  invaded  Sutherland  with  a  large  force,  lliey 
were  met  at  a  place  called  Torran-Dubh,  near  Rogart  in 
Strathfieet,  by  the  Sutherland  men,  under  Alexander  Suther- 
land, natural  brother  of  the  countess,  and,  after  a  furious 
battle,  defeated,  with  great  slaughter.  Sir  Robert  Gordon 
says  that  this  "  was  the  greatest  conflict  that  hitherto  hes 
been  foughtin  between  the  inhabitants  of  these  countreyes,  or 
within  the  diocy  of  Catteynes,  to  our  knowledge."  (Page  92). 

After  several  reverses,  John  Mackay  submitted  to  the  earl  in 
1518,  and  granted  him  his  bond  of  service.  But  such  was  his 
restless  and  turbulent  disposition  that  he  afterwards  prevailed 
upon  Alexander  Sutherland,  the  bastard,  who  had  married 
his  sister  and  pretended  a  claim  to  the  earldom,  to  raise  the 
standard  of  insurrection  against  the  earl.  Alexander  Snther- 
land was  taken  prisoner  and  beheaded  on  the  spot,  but  John 
Mackay  continued  his  hostile  inroads  into  the  earl's  country. 
On  his  way  home  from  one  of  these  excursions,  wi^h  a  large 
quantity  of  cattle,  he  was  attacked  and  defeated  by  the  mas- 


MACKAY, 


8 


OF  SCOURIE. 


I  i 


|! 


i  I 


and  had  placed  himself  under  tlie  protection  of  tlie  earl  of 
Caithness.  A  farious  conflict  ensii»),  which  lasted  for  a  con- 
siderable time,  but  on  the  approach  of  night  the  Caithness 
men  were  forced  to  retire  from  the  field.  Donald  Mackar 
of  Soonrie  being  afterwards  apprehended  and  imprisoned  in 
Dunrobin  castle,  was,  at  tlie  request  of  his  brother,  Hugh 
Macknj,  reIe.H8ed  by  the  earl  of  Satherland,  to  whom  he  ever 
afterwards  remained  faithful.  While  the  Caithness  men 
were  engaged  in  their  late  excursion  into  Sutherland,  Hugh 
Mackav  entered  into  Caithness,  and  laid  waste  everything  in 
his  course,  even  to  the  gates  of  Thurso.  He  carried  off  a 
large  quantity  of  booty  without  opposition,  which  he  divided 
among  his  countrymen,  according  to  custom. 

Of  the  army  raised  by  tlie  earl  of  Sutherland  in  1601,  to 
oppose  the  threatened  invasion  of  his  territories  by  the  earl 
of  Caithness,  the  advanced  guard  was  commanded  by  Patrick 
Gordon  of  Gartayand  Donald  Mackayof  Scourie,  and  the  right 
wing  by  Hugh  Mackay.  On  its  approach,  however,  the 
Caithness  men  Xmk  to  flight.  In  August  1602,  Hugh  Mac- 
kay accompanied  the  earl  of  Sutherland,  and  his  brother,  Sir 
Robert  Gordon,  on  a  vitiit  to  Patrick  Stuart,  eari  of  Orkney. 
In  1610  he  and  his  son,  Donald  Mackay,  afterwards  Ix)rd 
Reay,  were  summoned  before  the  privy  council  at  Edinburgh, 
by  the  earl  of  Caithness,  for  giving  succour  and  protection  to 
John  Sutherland,  an  outlaw,  the  son  of  Hugh  Mackay's  sis- 
ter. He  had  lived  in  Berriedale,  under  the  earl  of  Caithnens, 
whose  oppressions  had  driven  him  to  acts  of  vengeance  and 
spoliation,  and  having  disregarded  a  citntinn  to  appear  at 
Edinburgh,  to  answer  certain  cliarges  against  him,  he  had 
been  proclaimed  a  rel)el.  In  obedience  to  the  summons  Mac- 
kay hastened  to  the  capital,  where  he  met  Sir  Robert  Gor- 
don, who  had  arrived  from  England  for  the  purpose  of  assist- 
ing him  on  the  occasion.  Ixird  Caithness,  howex'er,  was 
easily  indnced  to  settle  the  matter,  atid,  on  his  invitation 
subsequently,  the  Mackay  cliief  and  his  brother  William  spent 
th6  following  Christmas  with  him  at  Gimigo  castle.  His  de- 
sign in  asking  thorn  was  to  separate  the  Mackays  from  the 
Sutherland  interests,  but  in  this  he  was  unsuccessful.  Hugh 
Mackay  died  at  Tongue,  11th  September  1614,  in  his  55th 
vear.  Ho  was  connected  with  both  the  rival  houses  bv  mar- 
ri»ge ;  his  first  wife  being  Lady  Elizabeth  Sinclair,  second 
daughter  of  George,  fourth  earl  of  Caithness,  and  relict  of 
Alexander  Sutherland  of  Duffus ;  and  his  second,  I^dy  Jenn 
Gordon,  eldest  daughter  of  Alexander,  eleventh  earl  of  Suth- 
erland. The  former  lady  was  drowned,  and  left  a  daughter. 
By  the  latt«»r  he  had  two  sons.  Sir  Donald  Mackay  of  Far, 
first  Lord  Heay,  and  John,  who  married  in  1619,  a  daughter 
of  James  Sinclair  of  Murkle,  by  whom  he  had  Hugh  Mackay 
and  other  children. 

Sir  Donald  Mnckjiy  of  Far,  the  elder  son,  was,  by  Charles 
I.,  created  a  peer  of  Scotland,  by  the  title  of  I^rd  Reay,  by 
patent,  dated  20th  June.  1 G28,  to  him  and  his  heirs  male 
whatever.  See  Rkay,  I^rd.  From  him  the  land  of  the 
Mackays  in  Sutherhind  acquired  the  name  of  *'  f^rd  Reay's 
Country,"  which  it  has  ever  since  rehiined.  It  now  belongs 
to  the  duke  of  Sutherland. 

The  Mackays  became  very  numerous  in  the  northern  conn- 
tios,  and  tlie  descent  of  their  chiefs,  in  the  male  line,  has 
continued  unbroken  from  their  first  appearance  in  the  north 
down  to  the  present  time.  In  the  county  of  Sutherland,  thoy 
mnltiplicd  greatly  also,  under  other  names,  such  as  M'Phail, 
Poison,  Bain,  Nielson,  &c  The  names  of  Mackio  and  M'Ghie 
are  also  said  to  be  derived  from  Mackay.  The  old  family  of 
M'Ghie  of  Baimaghie,  which  for  about  600  years  possessed 
estates  in  Galloway,  used  the  same  anns  as  the  chief  of  the 
Mackays.     They  continued  in  possession  of  their  lands  till 


1786.  Baimaghie  means  Mackay  town.  The  name  M*Cri« 
b  supposed  to  be  a  corruption  of  M*Ghie. 

At  the  time  of  the  rebellion  of  1745,  the  Mackays  were 
one  of  the  clans  that  continued  faithful  to  the  government,  at 
which  time  its  effective  force  was  estimated  at  800  men  by 
President  Forbes.  It  is  siud  that  in  the  last  Satherland  fen- 
cibles,  raised  in  1798  and  disbanded  in  1797,  there  were  88 
John  Mackays  in  one  company  alone.  In  1794  the  Beaj 
fencibles,  800  strong,  were  raised  in  a  few  weeks,  in  **  Lord 
Reay's  country, **  the  residence  of  the  clan  Mackay.  The 
names  of  no  fewer  than  700  of  them  had  the  prefix  of  Mae. 
From  1795  to  1802,  when  it  was  disbanded,  the  r^ment 
was  employed  in  Ireland,  where  it  soon  acquired  the  confi- 
dence of  Generals  Lake  and  Nugent.  The  former  was  par- 
ticularlv  attached  to  the  Reav  fencibles,  and  after  the  defeat 
of  Castlebar,  he  frequently  exclaimed,  *''  If  I  had  had  my 
brave  and  honest  Reays  there,  this  would  not  have  happen- 
ed.*" At  Tara  Hidl,  26th  May,  1798,  three  companies  of  the 
Reays  distinguished  themselves  in  an  attack  upon  a  large 
body  of  rebels,  whom  they  drove  from  a  strong  position,  with 
the  loss  of  about  400  killed  and  wounded,  they  themselves 
having  only  26  men  killed  and  wounded. 

With  regard  to  the  term  Siol  Mhorgan  applied  to  the  dan 
Mackay,  Mr.  Robert  Mackay  of  Thurso,  the  family  historian, 
denies  that  as  a  clan  they  were  ever  known  by  that  dengna- 
tion,  which  rests,  he  says,  only  on  the  affirmation  of  Sir  Ro- 
bert Gordon,  without  any  authority.  He  adds :  "  There  are, 
indeed,  to  this  day,  persons  of  the  surname  Morgan  and 
Morganach,  who  are  understood  to  be  of  the  Mackays,  but 
that  the  whole  clan,  at  any  period,  went  under  that  dengna- 
tion,  is  incorrect ;  and  those  of  them  who  did  so,  were  al- 
wavs  few  and  of  but  small  account.  The  name  seems  to  be 
of  Welsh  origin ;  but  how  it  obtained  among  the  Mackays  it 
is  impossible  now  to  say.** 


Of  the  branches  of  the  clan  Mackav,  the  familv  of  Scourie 
is  the  most  celebrated.     Tliev  were  descended  from  Donald 

• 

Mackay  of  Scourie  and  Eriboll,  elder  son  of  lye  Mackay  III., 
chief  of  the  clan  from  1550  to  1571,  by  his  first  wife,  a 
daughter  of  Hugh  Macleod  of  Assynt.  With  regard  to  the 
manner  in  which  they  became  possessed  of  Scourie,  and  in- 
deed of  the  whole  parish  of  Edderachillis,  an  account  is  given 
by  the  Rev.  Mr.  Falconer  in  the  Old  Statistical  Account  of 
Scotland,  which  can  only  be  reconciled  with  the  family  his- 
tory by  considering  lye  Mackay  and  the  "  Sir  Hugh  Mackay** 
of  his  narrative  as  identical,  and  by  rejecting  the  story  about 
his  son  Donald's  mother.  Donald  and  his  full  brother,  John 
Beg  Mackay,  were  considered  illegitimate,  because  their  pa- 
rents were  cousins.  The  chief  of  the  clan,  styled  **  Sir  Hugh 
Mackay,"  having  occasion,  in  1550,  to  remit  some  money  to 
Edinburgh,  was  surprised  to  find  his  messenger  return  the 
following  day  without  it,  as  he  had  been  robbed  on  the  way 
by  a  party  of  armed  men,  with  blackened  faces.  The  gene- 
ral suspicion  of  the  country  fell  upon  James  Macleod  of 
Edderachillis,  who  was  of  a  turbulent  and  factious  disposition^ 
as  the  person  who  had  employed  them  to  commit  the  rob- 
bery. With  the  Morisons  of  Durness  he  had  frequent  quar- 
rels, and  Morison  of  Ashir,  the  principal  man  amongst  them, 
having,  at  that  time,  in  his  house,  Donald  Mackay,  a  natural 
son  of  the  Mackay  chief,  he  proposed,  both  to  the  Mackays 
and  his  own  friends,  that  he  should  be  laird  of  Edderachillis, 
if  Macleod  could  be  made  away  with.  A  cousin  of  James 
Macleod,  named  Donald  Macleod,  undertook  to  put  him  to 
death,  on  being  promised  the  half  of  Edderachillis  and  Donald 
Mackay 'a  mother  for  his  wife.  A  party  of  the  Morisons,  with 
Donald  Mackay  at  their  head,  marched,  in  a  dark  morning, 


MACKAY, 


10 


HUGH. 


Ford  and  a  detachment  of  the  86th  r^ment,  an  account  of 
which  is  given  in  an  appendix  to  a  aabsequent  edition  of  his 
NarratiTe  of  the  Loss  of  the  Jono.  He  died  at  Calcutta  in 
1804,  from  an  afiection  of  the  liver,  contracted  during  the 
twentj-three  dreadfiil  dajs  he  passed  on  the  wreck  of  the 
Juno.  In  the  churchyard  of  Calcutta  there  is  a  monument 
to  his  memorji  and  in  that  of  their  native  parish  of  Lairg  in 
Sutherland  a  square  monumentf  with  a  separate  tablet  for 
each,  commemorates  the  characters  of  the  Rev.  John  Mac- 
kaj,  and  his  son,  and  two  grandsons. 

General  Mackaj's  cousin-german,  Captun  William  Mao- 
kaj  of  Borlej,  eldest  son  of  Donald  Mackaj  of  Borlej,  secmid 
son  of  Donald,  first  of  Scourie,  led  a  companj  of  the  Mac- 
kays  at  the  battle  of  Worcester  in  1651,  on  the  side  of  Charles 
IL  He  had  three  sons :  Captain  Hugh  Mackay  of  Scourie ; 
Donald ;  and  the  Rev.  John  Madcay,  minister  first  of  Dur- 
ness, and  afterwards  of  L^rg,  above  mentioned.  Donald, 
the  second  son,  was  a  member  of  the  council  of  the  Darien 
company  in  1698,  and  was  sent  to  Britain  from  the  colony 
with  an  address  to  the  king,  and  a  pressing  request  to  the 
directors  to  send  out,  with  all  expedition,  supplies  of  provi- 
sions, ammunition,  and  men.  On  his  return  to  the  colony, 
he  found  it  abandoned.  His  fate  was  a  melancholy  one. 
Being  at  sea  in  1702,  he  harpooned  a  shark,  and  having  got 
entangled  with  the  rope,  was  dragged  overboard  and  drowned. 


The  eldest  branch  of  the  Mackays  was  that  of  the  Clan- 
Abrach,  descended  from  John  Aberigh  Mackay,  second  son 
of  Angus  Dubh,  who  received  the  lands  of  Achness,  Brea- 
chat,  and  others,  from  his  brother,  Neiil  Wasse  (see  page  5). 
Of  this  ftunily  was  Robert  Mackay,  writer,  Thurso,  the  his- 
torian of  the  clan  Mackay.  According  to  this  gentleman, 
John  Aberigh,  the  first  of  this  branch,  gave  his  name  to  the 
district  of  Strathnaver.  In  the  Gaelic  language,  he  says, 
the  inhabitants  of  Strathnaver  are  called  Naverigh,  and  that 
tribe  the  SHochd-nan -Aberigh.  John,  their  founder,  some 
say,  took  his  appellation  of  Aberigh  from  Lochaber,  where 
he  resided  in  his  youth  with  some  relatives,  and  from  Strath- 
na-Aberich  the  transition  is  natural  to  Strath-n*-Averich. 
Neill  Kaverich,  above  mentioned,  was  so  called  firom  his  hav- 
ing belonged  to  the  Reay  Country,  that  is,  Strathnaver. 
The  Clan-Abrach  were  the  most  numerous  and  powerful 
branch  of  the  Mackays.  They  acted  as  wardens  of  their 
country,  and  never  betrayed  their  trust 

The  Bighouse  branch  were  descendants  of  William  Mac- 
kay of  Far,  younger  half  brother  of  Donald  Mackay  of  Scourie, 
by  his  second  wife,  Christian  Sinclair,  daughter  of  the  laird 
of  Dun. 

The  Strathy  branch  sprung  from  John  Mackay  of  Dilred 
and  Strathy,  brother  of  the  first  Lord  Reay,  and  son  of  Hugh 
Mackay  of  Far,  by  his  wife.  Lady  Jane  Gordon,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  Alexander,  earl  of  Sutherland. 

The  Melness  branch  came  from  the  Hon.  Colonel  ^neas 
Mackay,  second  son  of  the  first  Lord  Reay,  by  his  first  wife, 
the  Hon.  Barbara  Mackenzie,  daughter  of  Lord  Kintail. 

The  Kinloch  branch  descended  from  the  Hon.  Captiun 
William  Mackay,  and  the  Sandwood  branch  from  the  Hon. 
Charles  Mackay,  sons  of  the  first  Lord  Rei^  by  his  last  wife, 
Magory  Sindau*,  daughter  of  Francis  Sinclair  of  Stirooke. 

The  founder  of  the  Holland  branch  of  the  Mackays,  Gene- 
ral Hugh  Mackay,  prior  to  1680,  when  a  colonel  in  the  Dutch 
service,  and  having  no  prospect  of  leaving  Holland,  wrote  for 
some  of  his  near  relatives  to  go  over  and  settle  in  that  conn- 
tiy.  Amongst  those  were  his  brother,  James,  and  his 
nephews,  £neas  and  Robert,  sons  of  the  first  Lord  Reay. 
The  former  he  took  into  his  own  regiment,  in  which,  in  a  few 


years,  he  became  lieutenant-colonel.  The  latter  he  sent  to 
school  at  Utrecht  for  a  short  time,  and  aflerwards  obtained 
commissions  for  them  in  his  own  regiment.  In  the  beginning 
of  1687,  several  British  officers  in  the  Dutch  service  were  re- 
called to  England  by  King  James,  and  amongst  others  was 
MneaB  Mackay,  then  a  captain.  On  his  arrival  in  London, 
the  King  made  him  some  favourable  proportions  to  enter  his 
service,  which  he  declined,  and,  in  consequence,  when  he 
reached  Scotland,  he  was  ordered  to  be  apprehended  as  a  spy. 
He  had  been  imprisoned  nearly  seven  months  in  Edinburgh 
castle,  when  the  prince  of  Orange  landed  at  Torbay,  and  he 
was  liberated  upon  granting  his  personal  bond  to  appear  be- 
fore the  privy  council  when  called  upon,  under  a  penal^  of 
£500  sterling.  The  Dutch  Alackays  married  among  the  no- 
bility of  Holland,  and  one  of  the  families  of  that  branch  held 
the  title  <^  baron. 

MACKAY,  Hugh,  a  distinguished  military 
commauder,  the  third  son  of  Colonel  Hagh  Mac- 
kay of  Scourie,  was  born  about  1640.  His  two 
elder  brothers  having  been  murdered  in  the  man- 
ner above  shown,  he  early  succeeded  to  the  family 
estate.  Soon  after  the  Kestoration  in  1660,  he 
obtained  an  ensign^s  commission  in  the  Royal 
Scots,  then,  from  its  commanding  ofiScer,  termed 
Douglas'  or  Dumbarton's  i*egiment,  and  accompa- 
nied it  to  France,  on  that  coi*ps  being  lent  by 
Charles  II.  to  the  French  king.  It  is  now  the 
fii'st  foot  of  the  British  line.  Among  his  bro- 
ther subalterns  was  young  Churchill,  afterwards 
the, great  duke  of  Mai'Iborough,  with  whom  he 
kept  up  a  friendly  correspondence  till  his  death. 
In  1669,  with  several  other  officers,  he  volun- 
teered into  the  service  of  Venice,  and  so  greatly 
distinguished  himself  in  several  engagements  with 
the  Turks  in  the  island  of  Caudia,  that  he  receiv- 
ed from  the  Republic  a  medal  of  great  value,  in 
acknowledgment  of  his  services. 

In  1672  he  had  the  rank  conferred  on  him  of 
captain  in  Dumbarton's  regiment,  and  was  em- 
ployed with  it  in  the  unprincipled  expedition  of 
Louis  against  the  United  Provinces.  His  regi- 
ment formed  part  of  the  division  of  the  army 
which,  under  Marshal  Turenne,  overran  the  pro- 
vince of  Gueldres,  and  captured  most  of  the 
Dutch  foitresses  on  the  Meuse  and  Waal.  At 
the  small  town  of  Bommel,  in  Guelderland,  he 
was  quartered  in  the  house  of  a  Dutch  lady,  the 
widow  of  the  Chevalier  Arnold  de  Bie,  whose  eld- 
est daughter,  Clara,  he  married  in  1673. 

Previous  to  this  event,  not  approving  of  the 
cause  in  which  he  was  engaged,  he  had  resigned 
his  commission  in  the  Royal  Scots,  and  entered 


! 


MACKAY, 


12 


HUGH. 


were  disposed  of.  Having  thus  reason  to  distrust 
the  fidelity  of  a  portion  of  liis  force,  Mackay  con- 
tinued his  I'etreat  till  he  was  joined  by  some  rein- 
forcements npon  whom  he  coald  rely,  when  he 
tamed  npon  Dundee,  and  puraned  him  into  Bade- 
noch.  He  subsequently  marched  to  Inverness, 
whence  he  wrote  to  the  duke  of  Hamilton,  presi- 
dent of  the  convention,  urging  the  necessity  of 
establishing  ^^a  formidable  gairison**  at  Liver- 
lochy,  and  small  ones  in  other  places  in  the  north, 
without  which  he  considered  that  it  would  be  ut- 
terly impossible  to  subdue  the  Highlanders.  He 
himself  soon  after  repaired  to  Edinburgh,  to  has- 
ten the  preparations  for  carrying  such  a  project 
into  effect ;  but  the  plan  he  proposed,  as  he  him- 
self confesses,  **  considering  the  inability,  ignor- 
ance, and  little  forwardness  of  the  government  to 
furnish  the  necessary  ingredients  for  the  advance 
of  their  service,  was  built  upon  a  sandy  founda- 
tion, and  much  like  the  building  of  castles  in  the 
air."     (^Machai/*8  Memoirs^  p.  46.) 

After  completing  his  arrangements  at  Edin- 
burgh, Mackay  went  to  Stirling,  to  inspect  the 
castle.  From  that  place  he  proceeded  to»Pei*th, 
and  on  the  26th  July  1689,  he  began  his  march 
into  Atliol,  at  the  head  of  an  army,  as  generally 
stated,  of  4,500  men,  but  he  tells  us  himself,  in 
his  ^Memoira,'  that  he  had  witii  him  only  **8ix 
battalions  of  foot,  making  at  the  most  8,000  men, 
with  four  troops  of  hoi^se  and  as  many  dragoons." 
Among  the  foot  were  two  Scottish  regiments, 
which,  as  stated  in  Mr.  Mackay  of  Rockfield^s 
Life  of  General  Mackay,  **  as  well  as  the  horse, 
were  not  only  new  levies,  but  were  also  command- 
ed by  noblemen  and  gentlemen  wholly  destitute 
of  military  experience,  and  selected  for  their  re- 
spective commands  solely  on  account  of  their 
power  of  raising  men  ;  little  more,  therefore,  than 
one  half  of  the  whole  number  could  be  said  to  be 
disciplined."  At  night  the  general  encamped  op- 
posite to  Dunkeld.  Here,  at  midnight,  he  re- 
ceived an  express  from  the  marquis  of  Tullibar- 
dine,  (often  styled  Lord  Murray,)  announcing 
that  Viscount  Dundee  had  entered  Athol,  and  in 
consequence  he  had  retreated  from  before  the  cas- 
tle of  Blair,  which  he  had  for  some  time  block- 
aded, and  informing  him  that  at  the  upper  end  of 
the  pass  of  Killiecrankie,  which  lay  between  him 


and  Lord  Dundee,  he  had  posted  a  guard  to  se- 
cure a  free  passage  through  it  to  his  troops. 

On  receipt  of  this  alarming  intelligence,  Mac- 
kay despatched  orders  to  Perth,  to  hasten  the 
arrival  of  six  troops  of  cavalry  which  he  had  left 
there,  and  at  daybreak  next  day,  proceeded  in  di- 
i*ection  of  the  pass.  At  ten  o^clock  in  the 
moniing  he  reached  its  lower  extremity,  when  be 
halted  his  ti-oops,  and  allowed  them  two  hours  to 
rest  and  refi*esh  themselves.  Receiving  notice 
that  the  pass  was  clear,  he  again  put  his  men  in 
motion,  and  they  effected  their  passage  through 
this  terrific  defile,  with  the  loss  only  of  a  single 
horseman.  In  that  singularly  wild  and  stupen- 
dous locality,  a  handful  of  men,  with  no  other 
ammunition  than  stones,  stationed  at  intervals  on 
the  summit  of  the  precipices,  could  easily  impede 
the  progress  of  any  troops.  If  even  at  the  pres- 
ent time,  with  the  advantages  of  the  excellent 
road,  foi-med  nearly  sixty  yeara  afterwards,  its 
passage  is  difficult  to  the  traveller,  it  must  have 
been  much  more  so  in  General  Mackay^s  time, 
when  it  was  in  a  state  of  the  most  savage  desola- 
tion. "  When  the  pass  of  Kiiliecrankie,"  says 
one  authority,  "  is  traversed,  the  country  beyond 
is  found  to  open  suddenly  up  into  a  plain,  which 
is  expressively  called  the  Blair  or  field  of  Athol. 
Immediately  beyond  the  pass  this  plain  is  not 
very  spacious,  but  is  confined  to  that  description 
of  territor}'  which  in  Scotland  is  called  a  haugh, 
or  a  stripe  of  level  alluvial  soil  by  the  brink  of  a 
river.  The  road  debouches  upon  this  narrow 
plain ;  the  river  runs  along  under  the  hills  on  the 
left ;  on  the  right  rise  other  hills,  but  not  of  so 
bold  a  character.  Mackav  no  sooner  arrived  at  a 
space  sufficiently  wide  for  drawing  up  his  army 
than  he  halted  and  began  to  intrench  himself. 
He  left  his  baggage  at  a  blacksmith's  house  near 
the  termination  of  the  pass,  so  as  to  have  the  pro- 
tection of  the  aimy  in  front." 

As  it  was  Viscount  Dundee's  object  to  prevent 
Mackay  fi*om  establishing  himself  in  Athol,  he  did 
not  hesitate  to  meet  him  with  an  inferior  force, 
amounting  to  little  more  than  the  half  of  that 
under  Mackay.  In  making  his  dispositions,  the 
latter  divided  ever}*  battalion  into  two  parts,  and, 
as  he  meant  to  fight  three  deep,  he  left  a  small 
distance   between  each  of  these  sub-battalions. 


I 


MACKAY, 


14 


HUGH. 


airy  to  follow  him,  that  be  might  get  them  again 
formed,  bat  only  one  person  made  the  attempt,  a 
servant,  whose  horse  was  shot  under  him.  Fat- 
ting spurs  to  his  horse,  he  galloped  through  the 
Highlanders,  and  when  he  had  got  sufficiently 
out  of  immediate  danger,  he  turned  round  to  ob- 
serve the  appearance  of  the  field.  To  his  aston- 
ishment he  saw  none  of  his  troops,  but  the  dead, 
the  wounded,  and  the  dying.  His  army  had  dis- 
appeared. "In  the  twinkling  of  an  eye,  in  a 
manner,^'  he  says,  "  our  men  were  out  of  sight, 
being  got  pell  mell  down  to  the  river-side,  where 
our  baggage  stood.**  The  flight  of  his  men  must 
have  been  truly  rapid,  for  although  his  left  wing, 
which  had  never  been  attacked,  had  taken  to  flight 
before  he  rode  off,  his  right  wing  and  centre  had 
still  kept  their  ground.  But  now  the  whole  of 
his  line  had  fled  from  the  field,  pursued  by  the 
Highlanders,  till  the  latter  wera  stopped  by  the 
baggage,  and  it  was  to  their  desire  for  plunder  that 
those  who  escaped  owed  their  safety,  for  had  the 
Highlanders  continued  their  pursuit,  it  is  very 
probable  that  not  an  individual  of  Mackay^s  army 
would  have  been  left  to  relate  the  sad  disaster  of 
their  discomfiture  and  death. 

When  the  general  had  recovered  from  his  sur- 
prise, and  the  smoke  had  cleared  away,  he  dis- 
covered on  the  right  a  small  number  of  his  troops. 
He  subsequently  came  upon  another  portion  of 
them.  With  these,  he  retired  across  the  Garry, 
without  molestation,  and  contrary  to  the  opinion 
of  several  of  his  officers,  who  advised  him  to 
march  through  the  pass  of  Killiecrankie  to  Perth, 
he  proceeded  several  miles  up  Atliol,  with  the  in- 
tention of  crossing  over  the  hills  to  Stirling. 
About  two  miles  from  the  field  of  battle,  he  came 
up  with  a  party  of  about  150  fugitives,  almost 
without  arms,  under  the  command  of  Colonel 
Ramsay,  who  was  quite  at  a  loss  what  direction 
to  take.  Continuing  his  march  along  the  edge  of 
a  rivulet  which  falls  into  the  GaiTy,  he  came  to  a 
little  village,  where  he  procured  fi-om  the  inhabit- 
ants such  information  as  enabled  him,  with  the 
assistance  of  his  map,  to  decide  upon  his  route. 
Early  in  the  morning  he  reached  Weem  castle, 
the  seat  of  his  friend,  the  chief  of  the  clan  Men- 
zies,  whose  son  had  been  in  the  action  at  the 
head  of  a  company  of  Highlanders,  and  here  he 


obtained  some  sleep  and  refreshment  after  his  fa- 
tigues and  harassing  march.  On  Sunday,  the 
28th  July,  the  general  continued  his  march  with 
very  little  halting,  and  on  Monday  he  arrived  at 
Stirling  with  about  400  men.  The  viscount  of 
Dundee  fell  in  the  battle,  and  thus  rendered  his 
victory  a  fruitless  one  to  King  James.  On  the 
side  of  Mackay  no  fewer  than  2,000  men  fell,  and 
500  were  made  prisoners.  The  loss  on  the  side 
of  Dundee  could  never  be  accurately  ascertained. 
It  is  stated  to  have  been  considerable,  and  General 
Mackay  says  that  "  the  enemy  lost  on  the  field 
six  for  our  one." 

Among  the  persons  of  rank  and  distinction 
slain  were  his  brother  Colonel  Mackay  and  Brig- 
adier Balfour.  His  nephew,  the  Hon.  Captain 
Mackay,  had  been  left  for  dead  on  the  field  of 
battle,  and  was  found  by  Glengary  and  his  men, 
who,  perceiving  him  still  alive,  carried  him  on  a 
bam  door  to  the  nearest  hut,  where  he  remained 
some  days  till  he  could  be  removed  in  safety  to 
Dunkeld.  He  never  completely  recovered  the 
effect  of  his  wounds  at  Kiiliecrankie,  and  after 
serving,  and  being  repeatedly  wounded,  in  several 
of  King  William*s  battles  in  Flauders,  he  died  at 
Tongue,  the  seat  of  his  family,  in  December  1696, 
in  the  SOth  year  of  his  age.  « 

After  concentrating  the  troops  at  Stirling,  Gen* 
eral  Mackay,  within  a  few  days  after  his  arrival 
at  that  place,  found  himself  again  at  the  head  of 
a  considerable  force.  He  then  resolved  to  march 
direct  to  Perth,  and  place  a  garrison  there.  On 
coming  within  half-a-mile  of  the  town,  he  observ- 
ed a  party  of  the  enemy,  consisting  of  about  300 
Athol  men,  approaching  from  it.  The  latter,  see- 
ing from  the  dispositions  made  by  General  Mac- 
kay, that  their  retreat  wonld  be  intercepted, 
threw  themselves  into  the  Tay,  whither  they  were 
followed  by  Mackay^s  cavalry,  who  cut  them 
down  in  the  water  without  mercy.  He  subse- 
quently followed  Colonel  Cannan,  who,  on  the 
death  of  Dundee,  had  assumed  the  command  of 
James*  army,  to  the  north,  and  stayed  a  night  at 
Aberdeen.  His  arrival  there  gave  great  joy,  he 
says,  (Memoirs,  p.  66,)  to'most  of  the  inhabit- 
ants, as  they  wer^  in  dread  of  a  visit  from  the 
Highlanders  that  very  night. 

From  Aberdeen  Mackay  proceeded  up  Deeside, 


MACKAY, 


16 


ROBERT. 


1690,  he  i^esigned  the  chief  command  of  the  army 
and  retired  to  his  family  in  Holland,  hia  adopted 
conn  try.  Of  his  services  in  Scotland,  he  left  an 
interesting  account  in  his  ^^  Memoirs/*  printed  for 
the  first  time  for  the  Bannatyne  Club  in  1833. 

In  1691,  he  was  appointed  second  in  command 
of  King  William^s  foi*ces,  serving  against  the  ad- 
herents of  King  James  in  Ireland.  He  arrived  in 
that  country  in  the  beginning  of  May  of  that  year, 
and  signalised  himself  by  his  skill  and  gallantry  at 
the  capture  of  Athlone,  having  led  his  men  on  foot 
throngh  a  deep  and  rapid  ford  on  the  river  Shan- 
non, amid  a  continued  shower  of  balls,  bullets, 
and  grenades.  Smollett  says,  '^  Never  was  a  more 
desperate  service,  nor  was  ever  exploit  performed 
with  more  valour  and  intrepidity."  At  the  battle 
of  Aughrinr,  which  followed,  he  commanded  the 
right  wing  of  King  William^s  army,  and  the  vic- 
tory, it  was  acknowledged,  was  gained  chiefly  by 
his  foresight,  good  conduct,  and  courage. 

After  the  capitulation  of  Limerick,  on  the  Sd  of 
the  ensuing  October,  he  returned  to  Holland,  and 
in  the  succeeding  year,  when  King  William  took 
the  field  against  Louis  XIY.  of  France,  Mackay, 
with  the  rank  of  lieutenant-general,  was  nominat- 
ed to  the  command  of  the  British  division  of  the 
confederate  army  in  Flanders.  He  was  killed  at 
the  disastrous  battle  of  Steinkirk,  July  24th,  1692. 
He  had  been  ordered  to  a  post  which,  he  saw, 
could  not  be  maintained,  and  sent  back  his  opinion 
about  it,  but  the  former  orders  were  confirmed,  so 
he  advanced  to  his  death,  saying  only,  *^  The  will 
of  the  Lord  be  done.**  It  is  stated  that  in  the 
course  of  that  evening,  King  William  frequently 
mentioned  with  i-egret  the  death  of  one  of  his 
generals,  but  said  nothing  of  General  Mackay. 
One  of  the  officers  present  took  the  liberty  of  ex- 
pressing his  surprise  that  his  majesty  had  made 
no  allusion  to  his  old  and  faithful  servant,  Mackay. 
**  No,"  replied  the  king,  "  Mackay  serred  a  higher 
Master,  but  the  other  served  me  with  his  soul.** 
The  king  attended  Mackay*8  funeral,  and  when 
the  body  was  laid  in  the  grave,  he  said,  ^*  There 
he  lies,  and  an  honester  man  the  world  cannot 
produce.**  He  is  still  termed  in  his  native  coun- 
try, "  Shenlar  mor,**  the  great  general.  He  was 
to  have  been  rewarded  by  King  William,  for  his 
services,  with  the  title  of  earl  of  Scourie,  but  the 


intrigues  of  his  rival,  Mackenzie  of  Coigach  or 
Cromarty,  prevented  it. 

The  eldest  of  his  three  daughters,  Margaret, 
became  the  wife  of  George,  third  Lord  Reay. 
The  two  others  married  Dutchmen,  the  one  a 
minister  of  Nimeguen,  the  other,  the  burgomaster 
of  that  town. 

Bishop*  Burnet  describes  General  Mackay  as 
one  of  the  most  pious  soldiera  wiiom  he  had  ever 
known,  and  highly  commends  him  for  the  care 
which  he  took  to  enforce  the  observance  of  strict 
discipline,  and  attention  to  religious  exercises, 
among  both  the  officers  and  men  under  his  com- 
mand. It  was  commonly  said  of  him  by  the 
Dutch  soldiers,  that  he  knew  no  fear  but  the  fear 
of  God.  One  of  his  ruling  principles  was  never 
to  aid  what  he  considered  a  bad  cause.  His  Life, 
by  John  Mackay,  Esq.  of  Rockfield,  the  represen- 
tative in  the  male  line  of  the  family  of  Scom'ie, 
was  published  in  1836,  in  one  vol.  4to. 

MACKAY,  Robert,  an  eminent  Gaelic  bard, 
commonly  called  Rob  Donn,  that  is.  Brown  Ro- 
bert, the  son  of  a  herdsman,  was  born  in  1714,  at 
Durness,  in  Sutherlandshire.    He  says  himself: 

"  I  was  bom  in  the  winter, 
*Mongst  the  wild  frowning  monntains ; 
Mj  first  sight  of  the  world 
Was  the  snow-drift  aroand  me.** 

His  mother,  a  woman  of  vigorous  understanding, 
was  well  versed  in  Highland  poetry  and  music, 
with  which  she  stored  his  mind  in  his  childhood. 
He  never  leaiiit  to  read.  Till  he  was  seven  years 
old  he  tended  calves,  but  at  that  age  he  was  ta- 
ken into  the  service  of  Mi*.  John  Mackay,  of  the 
family  of  Skerray,  a  gentleman  who  carried  on  an 
extensive  business  as  a  cattle-dealer.  As  he 
grew  to  years  he  was  employed  as  a  drover,  and 
sometimes  went  with  herds  as  far  as  to  the  Eng- 
lish markets.  He  was  afterwards  engaged  by 
Donald  Lord  Reay,  the  chief  of  his  clan,  as  his 
cattle-steward  or  cow-keeper,  called  in  some  parts 
of  the  country  a  boman.  He  now  married,  and 
in  course  of  time  became  the  father  of  thirteen 
children. 

Unfortunately  his  fondness  for  deer-hunting, 
for  which  he  was,  on  one  occasion,  summoned  be- 
fore the  sheriff-substitute  of  the  county,  when  he 


J 


MACK  AY. 


18 


MACKENZIE. 


11 


I 


given  of  some  of  them.  The  memoir  which  ac- 
companies them  was  written  by  Sir  Walter  Scott. 
MACKAY,  John,  an  eminent  botanist,  was 
bom  at  Kirkaldy,  December  25,  1772.  Fie  early 
discovered  a  strong  predilection  for  botanical 
pnrsolts,  and  even  at  the  age  of  14,  he  liad  formed 
a  very  considerable  collection  pf  the  rarer  kinds  of 
garden  and  hothouse  plants.  In  the  beginning  of 
1791  he  was  placed  in  Dickson  and  Company*8 
nnrseries  at  Edinburgh ;  of  which,  in  1793,  he  re- 
ceived the  principal  charge.  Every  summer  he 
made  a  botanical  excursion  to  the  Highlands ;  he 
likewise  travei-sed  tlie  Western  Isles,  and  in  most 
of  these  journeys  he  was  successful  in  adding  some 
new  species  to  the  British  Flora.  To  the  elegant 
work  entitled  ^  English  Botany,'  then  in  course  of 
publication,  under  the  care  of  Dr.  Smith  and  Mr. 
Sowerbv  of  Ix)ndon,  he  contributed  various  valu- 
able  articles  and  figures  of  indigenous  plants,  and 
in  February  1796,  he  was  elected  an  associate  of 
the  Linnasan  Society  of  London.  In  1800,  on  the 
death  of  Mr.  Menzies,  he  succeeded  him  as  super- 
intendent of  the  Roval  Botanic  Garden  of  Edin- 
burgh,  where  he  died  April  14,  1802. 

Mackenzie,  t1)e  surname  of  a  clan,  (badge,  deer  grasfi,) 
which  has  long  cherished  a  traditiunanr  belief  in  its  descent 
firom  the  Norman  family  of  Fitzgerald  settled  in  Ireland.  Its 
pretensions  to  such  an  origin  are  founded  upon  a  fragment  of 
the  records  of  Icolmkill,  and  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Kintail 
in  Wester  Ross,  said  to  have  been  granted  by  Alexander  III., 
to  Colin  Fitzgerald,  their  supposed  progenitor.  According  to 
the  Icolmkill  fragment,  a  personage  described  as  **  Peregri- 
nna  et  Hibemns  nobilis  ex  familia  Geraldinorum,**  that  is,  **a 
noble  stranger  and  Hibernian,  of  the  family  of  the  Geral- 
dines,'*  being  driven  from  Ireland,  with  a  considerable  num- 
ber of  followers,  about  1261,  was  received  graciously  by  the 
king,  and  remained  thenceforward  at  the  court.  Having 
given  powerful  aid  to  the  Scots  at  the  battle  of  I^rgs  two 
years  afterwards,  he  was  rewarded  by  a  grant  of  Kintail, 
erected  into  a  free  barony  by  charter  dated  9th  January, 
1266.  No  such  document,  however,  as  this  pretended  frag- 
ment of  Icolmkill  is  known  to  be  in  existence,  at  least,  as 
Mr.  Skene  says,  nobody  has  ever  seen  it,  and  as  for  King  Al- 
exander's charter,  he  declares  (^Highlanders^  vcl.  ii.  p.  235) 
that  **it  bears  the  most  palpable  marks  of  having  been  a  for- 
gery of  later  date,  and  one  by  no  means  happy  in  the  execu- 
tion.** Besides,  the  words  "Colino  Hibemo,"  contained  in 
it,  do  not  prove  the  said  Colin  to  have  been  an  Irishman,  as 
Hibemi  was  at  that  period  a  common  appellation  of  the  Gael 
of  Scotland. 

The  ancestor  of  the  clan  Kenzie  was  Gilleon-og,  or  Colin 
the  younger,  a  son  of  Gilleon  na  hair*de,  that  is,  Colin  of  the 
Aird,  progenitor  of  the  earls  of  Ross,  and  from  the  MS.  of 
14o0  their  Gaelic  descent  may  be  conndered  established. 
Colin  of  Kintail  is  said  to  have  married  a  daughter  of  Walter, 
lord  high  steward  of  Scotland.     He  died  in  1278,  and  his 


son,  Kenneth,  being,  in  1304,  succeeded  by  bis  son,  also  call- 
ed Kenneth,  with  the  addition  of  Mackenneth,  the  latter, 
softened  into  Mackenny  or  Mackenzie,  became  the  name  of 
the  whole  dan.  Murdoch,  or  Murcha,  the  son  of  Kenneth, 
received  from  David  II.  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Kintail  at 
early  as  1362.  At  the  beginning  of  the  15th  century,  the 
clan  Kenzie  appears  to  have  been  both  numerous  and  power- 
ful, for  its  chief,  Kenneth  More,  when  arrested,  in  1427.  with 
his  son-in-law,  Angus  of  Moray,  and  Macmatban,  by  Jameg 
I.  in  his  parliament  at  Inverness,  was  said  to  be  able  to  mus- 
ter 2,000  men. 

In  1463,  Alexander  Mackenzie  of  Kintail  received  Stntth- 
gan'e  and  many  other  lands  from  John,  earl  of  Ross,  the 
same  who  was  forfeited  in  1476.  The  Mackenzie  chiefs 
were  originally  vassals  of  the  earls  of  Ross,  but  after  their  for- 
feiture, they  became  independent  of  any  superior  but  the 
crown.  They  strenuously  opposed  the  Macdonalds  in  every 
attempt  which  they  made  to  regam  possession  of  the  earl- 
dom. Alexander  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Kenneth,  who 
had  taken  for  bis  first  wife  I^dy  Margaret  Macdonald,  daugh- 
ter of  the  forfeited  earl,  John  lord  of  the  Isles,  and  having, 
about  1480,  divorced  bis  wife,  he  brought  upon  himself  the 
resentment  of  her  family.  Her  brother,  Angus,  invaded 
Roes,  with  a  body  of  his  island  vassals,  and  encountering  the 
Mackenzies  at  a  place  called  Lagebread,  defeated  them  with 
considerable  loss.  In  1491,  Alexander  of  Lochalsh,  caUed 
Alaster  Macgillespoc,  nephew  of  the  lord  of  the  Isles,  made 
his  appearance,  at  the  bead  of  a  large  body  of  the  Islanders, 
in  Wester  Ross,  and  proceeded  to  Stratbconnan,  for  the  pur- 
pose of  ravaging  the  lands  of  the  Mackenzies.  The  latter, 
however,  under  the  above-named  Kenneth,  assembled  in 
great  force,  and  after  a  fierce  and  obstinate  battle,  the  Mac- 
donalds were  defeated  with  much  slaughter,  and  expelled 
from  R4>SM.  lliis  engagement  was  called  the  battle  of  Blair- 
na-Park.  The  Mackenzies  then  proceeded  to  ravage  the 
lands  of  Ardmanach  and  Foulis,  and  committed  so  many  ex- 
cesses that  the  earl  of  Huntly,  lieutenant  of  the  north,  was 
compelled  to  act  against  them  as  rebels  and  oppressors  of  the 
lieges.     Kenneth  died  soon  after. 

Kenneth  Oig,  his  son  by  the  divorced  wife,  was  chief  in 
1493.  Two  years  afterwards,  he  and  Farquhar  Madntoeh 
were  imprisoned  by  James  V.  in  the  castle  of  Edinburgh. 
Ill  1497,  the  Macdonalds  again  invaded  Ross,  but  were  en- 
countered by  the  Mackenzies  and  Munroes,  at  a  place  called 
Dnimchatt,  and  after  a  sharp  skirmish,  were  routed  and 
driven  out  of  Ross.  The  same  year  he  and  Macintosh  made 
their  escape  from  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  but  on  their  way 
to  the  Highlands,  they  were  treacherously  seized  at  the 
Torwood,  by  the  laird  of  Buchanan.  Kenneth  Oig  resisted 
and  was  slain,  and  his  head  presented  to  the  king  by  Buchan- 
an. His  death  was  avenged  by  his  foster-brother  at  Flodden. 
This  was  a  man  of  the  district  of  Kenlochar,  named  Donald 
Dubh  Mac  Gillechrist  Vic  Giilereoch.  In  the  retreat  of  the 
Scots  army  he  beard  some  one  near  him  say,  **  Alas !  laird, 
thou  hast  fallen."  On  inquiry  he  was  told  that  it  was  the 
laird  of  Buchanan,  who  had  sunk  from  wounds  or  exhaust- 
ion. Rushing  forward,  he  shouted  out,  '*If  he  hath  not 
fallen,  he  shall  fall,**  and  slew  Buchanan  on  the  spot 

Kenneth  Oig,  having  no  issue,  was  succeeded  by  his 
brother,  John,  whose  mother,  Agnes  Fraser,  was  a  daughter 
of  Lord  Lovat.  She  had  other  sons,  from  whom  sprung 
numerous  branches  of  this  wide-sprsiid  family.  As  he  was 
very  young,  his  kinsman.  Hector  Roy  Mackenzie,  progenitor 
of  the  houMO  of  Gerloch,  assumed  the  command  of  the  dan, 
as  guardian  of  the  young  chief.  **  Under  hift  rule,"  says  Mr. 
Gregory,  {HighUindt  cmd  Jsla ofScoUand^  p.  111.)  "  the  clan 


MACKENZIE 


20 


OF  TARBET. 


first  earl  of  Seaforth,  and  the  Hon.  John  Mackenzie  of  iMch- 
slin.  His  second  wife  was  Isabel,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander 
Ogilvie  of  Powrie,  bj  whom,  with  a  daughter,  Sybilla,  Mrs. 
Macleod  of  Macleod,  he  had  four  sons,  vis.,  Alexander, 
George,  second  earl  of  Seaforth ;  Thomas,  of  Pluscardine,  and 
Simon  of  Lochslin,  whose  eldest  son  was  the  celebrated  Sir 
George  Mackenzie  of  Rosehangh,  lord  advocate  in  the  reigns 
of  Charles  II.  and  James  VII.,  of  whom  a  memoir  is  subse- 
quentlj  given  in  larger  tjpe. 

Colin,  second  Lord  Kintail,  was  created  earl  of  Seaforth,  bv 
patent  dated  at  Theobald's,  8d  December  1623,  to  him  and 
bib  heirs  male.  (See  Sraportii,  earl  of). 

The  great-grandson  of  the  third  earl  of  Seaforth,  and  male 
heir  of  the  familv,  was  Colonel  Thomas  Frederick  Humber- 
ston  MHckeiizie.  who  fell  at  Gheriah  in  India  in  1783,  and  of 
whom  a  memoir  is  given  under  the  head  of  Skaforth,  earl  of. 
His  brtither,  Francis  Huiiiberston  Mackenrie,  obtained  the 
Seaforth  estates,  and  whs  created  Baron  Seaforth  in  the 
peerage  of  the  United  Kingdom  in  1796.  Djing  without 
surviving  male  issue  his  title  became  extinct,  and  his  eldest 
daughter,  the  Hon.  Mary  Frederica  Elizabeth,  having  taken 
for  her  second  husband  J.  A.  Stewart  of  Glasserton,  a  cadet 
of  the  house  of  Galloway,  that  gentleman  assumed  the  name 
of  Stewart  Mackenzie  of  Seaforth. 

The  clan  Kenzie  from  small  beginnings  had  increased  in 
territory  and  influence  till  they  became,  next  to  the  Camp- 
bells, the  greatest  clan  in  the  West  Highlands.  They  re- 
mained loyal  to  the  Stuarts,  but  the  forfeiture  of  the  earl  of 
Seaforth  in  1715,  and  of  the  earl  of  Cromarty  in  1745, 
weakened  their  power  greatly.  They  are  still,  however,  one 
of  the  most  numerous  tribes  in  the  Highlands.  In  1745 
their  efiective  strength  was  calculated  at  2,500.  No  fewer 
than  seven  families  of  the  name  possess  baronetcies. 

The  armorial  bearings  of  the  Mackenzies  are  a  stag's  head 
and  horns.  It  is  said  that  they  were  assumed  in  consequence 
of  Kenneth,  the  ancestor  of  the  family,  having  rescued  the 
king  of  Scotland  from  an  infuriated  stag,  which  he  had 
wounded.  *'  In  gratitude  for  his  assistance,"  says  Stewart 
of  Garth,  *'  the  king  gave  him  a  grant  of  the  castle  and  lands 
of  Castle  Donnan,  and  thus  laid  the  foundation  of  the  family 
and  clan  Mackenncth  or  Mackenzie."  From  the  stag's  head 
in  their  arms  the  term  Caberfae  was  applied  to  the  chiefs. 


The  progenitor  of  the  Gerloch  or  Gairloch  branch  of  the 
Mackenzies  was,  as  above  shown,  He(*tor,  tlie  elder  of  the  two 
sons  of  Alexander,  7th  chief,  by  his  2d  wife,  Margaret  Mac- 
dowall,  daughter  of  John,  lord  of  Lorn.  He  lived  in  the 
reigns  of  Kings  .Tames  III.  and  IV.,  and  was  by  the  High- 
landers called  •'  Eachin  Roy,"  or  Red  Hector,  from  the  colour 
of  his  hair.  To  the  assistance  of  the  former  of  these  mon- 
archs,  when  the  confederated  nobles  collected  in  arms  against 
him,  he  raised  a  considerable  body  of  the  clan  Kenzie,  and 
fought  at  their  head  at  the  battle  of  Sauchiebum.  After  the 
defeat  of  his  party,  he  retreated  to  the  north,  and,  taking 
possession  of  Redcnstle,  put  a  garrison  in  it  Thereafter  he 
joined  the  earl  of  Huntly.  and  from  James  \V.  he  obtained  in 
1494  a  grant  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Gerloch,  or  Gairloch, 
in  Ross-shire.  These  lands  originally  belonged  to  the  Siol- 
Vic-Gilliechallum,  or  Macleods  of  Rasay,  a  branch  of  the 
family  of  I^wis,  but  Hector,  by  means  of  a  mor^^e  or  wad- 
set, had  acquired  a  small  portion  of  them,  and  in  1508  he 
got  Brachan,  the  lands  of  Moy,  the  royal  forest  of  Glas.Hiter, 
and  other  lands,  united  to  them.  In  process  of  time,  his  suc- 
cessors came  to  possess  the  whole  district,  but  not  till  after  a 
long  and  bloody  feud  with  the  Siol-Vic-Gilliechallum,  which 
lasted  till  1611,  when  it  was  brought  to  a  sudden  close  by  a 


skirmish,  in  which  Gillechallum  Oig,  laird  of  Rasay,  and 
Murdoch  Mackenzie,  a  younger  son  of  the  laird  of  Gerloch, 
were  slain.  From  that  time  the  Mackenzies  possessed  Ger- 
loch without  interruption  from  the  Macleods. 

Hector,  the  first  of  the  boose  of  Gerloch,  was  with  the  clan 
at  Flodden,  where  most  of  them  were  killed ;  and  he  and  his 
nephew,  John,  the  chief,  to  whom  he  was  tutor,  narrowly 
escaped.  By  a  daughter  of  the  laird  of  Grant,  to  whom  he 
was  betrothed,  but  who  died  before  the  marriage  was  cele- 
brated, he  had  a  son.  Hector,  who  got  the  name  of  Came,  or 
one-eyed.  He  afterwards  married  a  daughter  of  Ranald 
Macdonald  of  Moydart,  and,  with  two  daughters,  he  had 
four  sons. 

John,  the  eldest  of  these,  called  by  the  Highlanders,  John 
Glesich,  married  Agnes,  only  daughter  of  James  Eraser  of 
Foinich,  brother  of  Hugh,  Ijord  Lovat,  and  died  in  1550. 
He  had  three  sons;  Hector,  his  heir;  John,  who  succeeded 
Hector,  and  carried  on  the  line  of  the  family ;  and  Alexan- 
der, from  whom  descended  Murdoch  Mackenzie,  bbhop  of 
Moray  and  afterwards  of  Caithness,  in  the  reigns  of  Cbaries 
I.  and  II.  Of  this  branch,  also,  was  Dr  James  Mackenzie, 
an  eminent  phyucian,  author  of  the  '  History  of  Health.* 

Kenneth  Mackenzie,  eighth  baron  of  Gerloch,  was  created 
a  baronet  of  Kova  Scotia  in  1700.  He  married  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Sir  Roderick  Mackenzie  of  Findon,  and  was  suc- 
ceeded, in  1704,  by  his  son,  Sir  Alexander,  second  baronet,, 
who  married  Janet,  daughter  of  Sir  Roy  Mackenzie  of  Scat- 
well,  and  with  three  daughters  had  six  sons,  most  of  whom 
died  young.  He  himself  died  in  1766.  His  eldest  son.  Sir 
Alexander,  3d  bnronet,  married,  1st,  Margaret,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  Roderick  Mackenzie  of  Redcastle,  issue  one  son.  Hector; 
2dly,  Jean,  only  daughter  of  John  Gorrie,  Esq.,  commissary 
of  Ross,  issue  2  sons,  John,  a  general  officer,  and  Kennetli,  an 
officer  in  India,  and  3  daughters.     He  died  13th  April  1770. 

Sir  Hector  Mackenzie,  his  eldest  son,  4th  baronet  of  the  Ger- 
loch branch,  died  in  April  1826.  His  son.  Sir  Francis 
Alexander,  5th  baronet,  bom  in  1798,  died  June  2,  1843. 
The  eldest  son  of  Sir  Francis,  Sir  Kenneth  Smith  Madcenzie, 
6th  baronet,  bom  1832,  married  in  I860  the  2d  daughter  of 
Walter  Frederick  Campbell  of  Islay. 


The  Mackenzies  of  Portmore,  county  Peebles,  are  a  branch 
of  the  Gerloch  family.  Colin  Mackenzie  of  Portmore,  great- 
grandson  of  Sir  Alexander  Mackenzie,  baronet  of  Gerloch, 
married  in  1803,  Elizul>eth,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Forbes 
of  Pitsligo,  and  died  in  September  1830.  He  had  three 
brothers,  William  Mackenzie  of  Muirtown,  Roes-sliire;  Suther- 
land Mackenzie  of  Edinburgh,  and  John,  banker  in  luvemess. 
His  son,  William  Forbes  Mackenzie,  M.P.  for  Peebles-shire, 
bom  in  April  1807,  and  appointed  in  1831  deputy  lieutenant 
for  that  county,  was  the  introducer  of  the  act  of  parliament 
passed  in  1854,  for  the  regulation  of  public  houstt  in  Scotland, 
conunonly  called  "  Forbes  Mackenzie's  Act.** 

The  first  of  the  Mackenzies  of  Tarbet  and  Royston,  in  the 
county  of  Cromarty,  was  Sir  Roderick  Mackenzie,  second  son 
of  Colin  Mackenzie  of  Kintail,  brother  of  the  first  Lord  Mac- 
kenzie of  Kintail  Having  married  Margaret,  daughter  and 
heiress  of  Torqnil  Macleod  of  the  l^w&s,  he  added  the  armo- 
riol  bearings  of  the  Macleods  to  his  own.  His  son,  John 
Mackenzie  of  Tarbet,  was  created  a  baronet  of  Nova  Scotia, 
21st  Mav  1628.  He  had  four  sons.  The  third  son,  Roderick 
Mackenzie,  was  o.i  Ist  December  1702,  appointed  justice 
clerk,  and  an  ordinary  lord  of  session  12th  January  1703, 
when  he  took  his  seat  as  Lord  Prestonhall.  He  was  super- 
seded as  justice  clerk  in  October  1704,  and  resigned  his  teat 


1 1 

I  ! 


MACKENZIE, 


24 


HENRY. 


to  claim  the  anthorship.  He  was  at  pains  to 
transcribe  tlie  whole  in  his  own  hand,  with  a 
plentiful  introdnction  of  blottings,  interlineations, 
and  corrections,  and  he  maintained  his  preten- 
sions with  so  mnch  plansibilitj  and  pertinacity, 
that  Messrs.  Cadell  and  Strahan,  the  publishers, 
at  last  found  it  necessary  to  undeceive  the  public 
by  a  formal  contradiction.  In  1778  Mr.  Macken- 
zie published  his  *  Man  of  the  World/  which  dis- 
played tlie  same  tone  of  exquisite  moral  delicacy 
and  elegance  of  style  as  his  former  work.  In  1777 
he  produced  *  Julia  de  Roubigii^/  a  beautiful  and 
tragic  tale,  in  a  series  of  letters,  exhibiting  the  re- 
fined sensibility  and  the  delicate  perception  of 
human  character  and  manners  wltich  distinguished 
all  his  writings. 

Mr.  Mackenzie  was  one  of  the  principal  mem- 
bers of  the  **  Mirror  Club,"  and  edited  the  well- 
known  periodical  of  that  name.  Most  of  the 
other  gentlemen  connected  with  it  were  after- 
wards judges  in  the  Court  of  Session — namely, 
I/Ord  Cullen,  Lord  Abercromby.  I^ord  Craig,  and 
Lord  Bannatyne.  *  The  Mirror '  was  commenced 
January  23,  1779,  and  ended  May  27,  1780,  hav- 
ing latterly  been  issued  twice  a- week.  Of  the 
110  papere  to  which  it  extended,  forty-two  were 
contributed  by  Mr.  Mackenzie,  including  I^ 
Roche.  The  sale  never  at  any  time  exceeded  four 
hundred  copies,  but  when  afterwards  republished 
in  duodecimo  volumes,  with  the  names  of  the 
authors,  a  considerable  sum  was  obtained  for  the 
copyright,  out  of  which  the  proprietore  presented 
£100  to  the  Orphan  Hospital,  and  purchased  a 
hogshead  of  claret  for  the  use  of  the  club.  *  The 
Lounger,*  a  publication  of  a  similar  character,  also 
conducted  by  Mr.  Mackenzie,  was  commenced  by 
the  same  parties,  Februar}'  6,  1785,  and  was  con- 
tinued weekly  till  January  6,  1787.  Of  the  101 
papei*8  which  It  includes,  fifty -seven  were  written 

i     bv  Mr.  Mackenzie,  who,  in  one  of  the  latter  num- 

I      " 

I     bers,  reviewed  for  the  first  time  the  Poems  of 

I 

'     Bums,  which  were  just  then  published. 

On  the  institution  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Edin- 
burgh, Mr.  Mackenzie  became  one  of  its  mem- 
bers ;  an  I  among  the  papers  with  which  he  en- 
riched its  Transactions  are  an  elegant  tribute  to 
the  memory  of  his  friend  Lord  Abercromby,  and 
a  Memoir  on  Grerman  Tragedy,  in  the   latter 


of  which  he  bestows  high  praise  on  the  *  Emi- 
lia GalottI*  of  Lessing.  and  *The  Robbers*  of 
Schiller.  He  took  lessons  in  German  from  a  Dr. 
Okely,  at  that  time  studying  medicine  In  Edin- 
burgh ;  and  in  1791  he  published  a  small  volume, 
containing  translations  of  *The  Set  of  Horses,* 
by  Lessing,  and  of  two  or  three  other  German 
dramatic  pieces.  He  was  also  an  original  mem- 
ber of  the  Highland  Society,  and  by  him  were 
published  the  volumes  of  their  Transactions,  to 
which  he  prefixed  an  account  of  the  institution, 
and  the  principal  proceedings  of  the  Society.  In 
these  Transactions  is  also  to  be  found  his  view  of 
the  controversy  respecting  Ossian*s  Poems,  con- 
taining an  interesting  account  of  Gaelic  poetry. 

At  the  time  of  the  French  revolution  he  pub- 
lished various  political  pamphlets,  with  the  view 
of  counteracting  the  progress  of  democratic  princi- 
ples in  this  country.  One  of  these,  entitled  *  An 
Account  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Parliament  of 
1784,*  introduced  him  to  the  notice  of  Mr.  Pitt; 
and  in  1804,  on  the  recommendation  of  Iy)rd  Mel- 
ville and  Mr.  George  Rose,  he  was  appointed  to 
the  lucrative  office  of  comptroller  of  taxes  for 
Scotland,  which  he  held  till  his  death. 

In  1793  he  wrote  the  Life  of  Dr.  Blacklock, 
prefixed  to  a  quarto  edition  of  the  blind  poet*s 
works,  published  for  the  benefit  of  his  widow.  In 
1808  he  brought  out  a  complete  edition  of  his  own 
works,  in  eight  volumes  8vo.  In  1812  he  read  to 
the  Royal  Society  his  *Life  of  John  Home;*  and 
as  a  sort  of  supplement  to  it,  he  then  added  some 
Critical  Essays,  chiefly  on  dramatic  poetry,  which 
have  not  been  published,  but  the  Life  itself  ap- 
peared in  1822.  Mr.  Mackenzie  himself  attempt- 
ed dramatic  writing,  but  without  success.  A 
tragedy,  composed  in  his  early  youth,  entitled 

*  The  Spanish  Father,*  was  rejected  by  Garrick, 
and  never  represented.  In  1773  another  tragedy 
of  his,  styled  *The  Prince  of  Tunis,*  was  per- 
formed with  applause  for  six  nights  at  the  Edin- 
burgh theatre.  A  third  tragedy,  founded  on 
Lilly's  *  Fatal  Curiosity,*  called  '  Tlie  Shipwreck,* 
and  two  comedies,  *  Tlie  Force  of  Fashion,*  and 

*  The  White  Hypocrite,'  were  produced  at  Covent 
Garden  successively,  but  they  proved  complete 
failures.  His  portrait,  from  a  painting  by  Sir 
Henry  Raeburn,  will  be  found  on  next  page. 


r 


MaCERLIE. 


26 


M'KERLIE. 


left  tome  writings,  states,  "the  next  great  familj  are  the 
Kerlies  of  Crug>;IetOD,  who  being  brave  warriors  st4)od  boldly 
up  for  the  independence  of  tiieir  country  under  WaUlace,  and 
it  was  one  of  theu:  forefathers  who,  at  a  place  called  Dunmoir 
in  Carrick,  was  particularly  instrumental  in  giving  the  Danes 
a  notable  overthrow.  He  took  Kric  the  son  of  Swain  pri- 
soner, for  which  service  the  king  gave  him  lands  in  CarricK.** 
They  took  part  in  the  Cnuuides,  to  which  their  armorial 
bearings,  borne  for  centuries,  specially  refer,  and  several  tra- 
ditiiins  of  adventurous  exploits  have  been  handed  down. 
The  loss  of  their  early  liiKtory  can  never  be  replaced.  As 
corroborated  by  Felix  O'CaiToH,  in  hU  Translation  of  the 
Chronicles  of  Tara,  and  History  of  the  Sennachies,  it  is  that 
the  first  Carroll  (afterwards  changed  to  Kerlie)  who  cume 
from  Ireland  was  a  petty  king  or  chief  in  that  country.  Flee- 
ing to  Scotland,  he  was  hospitably  received  by  the  king,  and 
had  lands  assigned  to  him  in  Galloway,  where  he  lived  in  great 
splendour.  Henry  the  minstrel,  the  biographer  of  WulUce 
about  1470,  also  states  with  reference  to  William  Carroll  or 
Kerlie,  the  compatriot  of  Wallace  (with  whom  the  change  iu 
the  name  is  believed  to  have  first  occurred),  that  his  ancestor 
accompanied  David  I.  from  Ireland,  and  having  at  Dunmoir 
in  Carrick,  with  700  ScHts,  defeated  9.000  Danes,  had  lands 
in  Carrick,  then  a  part  of  Galloway,  now  of  Ayrshire,  given 
to  him  for  that  service.  Henry,  however,  is  wrong  as  to  the 
period,  which  is  believed  to  have  been  either  in  the  9th  of 
10th  century,  when  the  Cruithne  passed  over  to  Galloway 
from  Ireland. 

Carroll  was  the  original  name,  in  Ireland  0*Carroll,  of 
which  once  powerful  family  more  than  one  branch  were  petty 
kings  or  chiefs  over  different  districts  in  the  north  of  that 
country,  even  extending  so  far  south  as  Meath,  where  were 
the  hall  and  Court  of  Tara,  as  also  Eile  or  Ely,  now  called 
King's  County,  the  chief  of  all  being  the  arch  king  of  Argiiill. 
Since  then  (a  peculiarity  common  with  Galloway  surnames) 
the  name  has  been  variously  spelled  at  different  periods,  as 
Kerl6,  Kerlie,  M 'Carole,  M'Carlie.and  M'Kerlie. 

The  castle  and  lands  of  Carleton  in  Carrick,  (now  owned 
by  the  Cathcarts  under  a  charter  dated  1324)  was  the  first 
property  possessed  by  the  family  in  Galloway,  originally 
called  Carolton,  the  residence  of  Carroll.  It  is  mentioned 
as  a  tradition  in  Ayrshire  that  Carleton  Castle,  in  remote 
times,  previous  to  the  arrival  of  the  Cathcarts  in  Carrick,  be- 
longed to  a  family  of  the  name  of  De  Kiersly,  evidently  a  cor- 
ruption of  Kerlie.  They  afterwards  obtained  the  castle  and 
lands  of  Cruggleton,  &c.  This  castle  (the  Black  Ruck  of 
Cree)  was  built  by  the  Danes  about  1098,  on  the  highest  sum- 
mit of  a  range  of  precipices  about  200  feet  high,  overhanging 
the  sea,  nt  the  mouth  of  Wigtown  Bay.  It  was  considered 
impregnable,  being  on  a  small  promontory  wliicli  juts  into 
the  sea;  and  landward  defended  with  strung  batllemented 
walls,  with  a  fosse  between  them,  42  feet  wide  and  16  feet 
deep,  over  which  was  a  drawbridge  with  gates,  portcullis,  &c 
The  area  within  the  walls  contuned  an  acre  and  a  quarter. 
The  castle  was  ruinous  before  the  year  1684.  It  is  un  in- 
teresting, though  very  greatly  dilapidated  ruin.  Part  of  an 
unomameuted  arch,  and  the  lower  parts  of  some  walls,  alone 
remain  to  attest  its  ancient  spaciousness  and  strength. 

Chalmers,  in  his  Caledoiwi^  hss  some  extraordinary  errors 
in  regard  to  Cruggleton.  At  the  time  he  wrote,  any  peasant 
in  the  neighbourhood  could  have  told  him  who  the  ancient 
owners  were,  but  apparently  without  troubling  himself  with 
much  inquiry,  lie  seems  at  once  to  have  concluded  that  this 
castle  must  have  belonged  to  the  lords  of  Galloway,  and  that 
John  Comvn  the  elder  inherited  it  thnmgh  his  mother,  from 
finding,  in  Dugdale*s  Baronage,  ni«ution  of  his  name  in  cou- 


nection  with  it;  in  the  extract  of  which  short  passage  he 
omits  Galway  castle  (the  royal  castle  of  Wigtown)  to  adapt  it 
to  his  ideas.  As  an  antiquarian  Chalmers  ought  to  have 
known  that  the  castles  of  the  lords  of  Gallowav  were  in  Cen- 
tral  Galloway,  the  Stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright,  and  not  in 
Western  Gallowav. 

From  1282  the  vicissitudes  attending  the  possession  of  this 
castle  were  many,  furnishing  a  striking  example  of  the  inse- 
curity of  property  in  this  distracted  district  of  Scotland, 
where  charters  were  unknown  until  the  14th  century,  the  an- 
cient Celtic  proprietors  having  held  their  lands  under  their 
own  Celtic  laws.  In  1282,  Wm.  Kerlie  had  as  his  guest  Lord 
Soulis,  (a  secret  adherent  of  Edward  1.,)  who  took  the  castle 
by  treachery.  Kerlie  escaped,  and  in  several  ineffectual  at- 
tempts to  retake  it,  lost  his  remaining  followers.  In  1292, 
John  Comyn,  earl  of  Buchan,  had  temporary  possession,  as 
also  of  the  royal  castle  of  Wigtown.  In  1296,  Edward  I.  ap- 
pointed Henry  Percy,  governor  of  it  and  other  castles,  and  in 
1297,  Percy  was  succeeded  by  John  of  Hoddleston.  In  1296, 
Wm.  Kerlie,  the  real  owner,  was  one  of  tlie  first  to  join  Sir 
Wm.  W^allaoe  at  the  csstle  of  the  earl  of  Lennox,  and  from 
that  date  was  his  constant  friend  and  companion  in  arms,  iu 
the  noble  and  desperate  struggle  for  liberty. 

In  1297,  Wallace  went  to  Galloway,  and  under  Kerlie*s 
guidance,  Cruggleton  castle,  by  a  daring  scheme,  was  retaken 
by  surprise,  and  the  gunison  of  60  men  slain,  a  priest  and  two 
women  only  having  been  spared.  Kerlie  was  then  restored 
to  his  patrimonial  property.  He  however  did  not  leave  Wal- 
lace, and  at  the  fatal  battle  of  Falkirk  in  1298,  he  is  tradi- 
tionally saiii  to  iiave  appeared  ut  the  head  of  500  men,  most 
of  whom  were  slain  in  an  ineffectual  attempt  to  rescue  Sir 
John  the  Graeme.  This  patriot^s  career  was  closed  at  Kobras- 
toun  near  Glasgow  in  July  1305,  when  he  accompanied  Wal- 
lace there,  to  await  a  meeting  with  Robert  the  Bruce,  and 
were  basely  betrayed  into  the  hands  of  their  enemies.  While 
both  were  asleep  their  arms  were  secretly  removed,  Kerlie 
slain,  and  the  noble  Wallace  reserved  for  a  worse  fate. 

Wm.  Kerlie  was  one  of  the  few  who  never  swore  fealty  to 
Edward ^he  Usurper.  He  left  an  infant  son,  also  called  Wil- 
liam, bom  in  1298,  and  therefore  7  years  of  age  at  his  father's 
death.  This  boy  was  treacherously  dealt  with  by  the  prior 
and  monks  of  the  monastery  of  '*  Candida  Casa,**  Whithorn, 
near  Cruggleton,  who  in  1309  concealed  from  Robert  the 
Bruce  that  he  existed,  and  was  owner  of  the  castle  and  lands, 
but  represented  that  they  had  belonged  to  Lord  Soulis,  all  of 
whose  property  had  been  directed  to  be  sequestrated,  and  by 
this  means  obtained  a  charter  of  them  for  the  monasterv. 

« 

.Again  in  the  disturbed  reign  of  David  II.,  when  properties  were 
so  freely  disposed  of  to  his  own  supporters,  Gilbert  Kennedy 
(an  ancestor  of  the  Ailsa  family),  who  had  been  one  of  his 
hostages  iu  England,  obtained  in  1366,  a  charter  of  the  castle 
and  lands,  but  it  was  never  put  in  force,  and  in  1423  the 
prior  and  monks  of  **  Candida  Casa  *'  got  it  cancelled.  By 
the  charter  of  1309,  the  superiority  was  wrested  by  **  Candida 
Casa"  from  young  Kerlie  and  his  descendants,  but  this  was 
unknown  to  them  for  generations,  as  the  family  were  never 
disturbed  in  their  proprietory  rights  by  the  monastery.  They 
retained  possession  until  about  the  end  of  the  16th  century, 
when  the  Refonnation  bruke  up  the  ancient  tenures,  and  as 
the  family  held  under  the  Celtic  laws  without  a  Crown 
charter,  with  the  ruin  of  the  church,  they  loat  the  castle  and 
lands. 

The  last  of  the  family,  from  father  to  aon,  who  possessed 
the  castle  and  lands,  was  John,  who  in  the  **  InquiiiUonsi  de 
Tutela,''  under  date  20th  June  1583,  is  called  therein  M -Ca- 
role. 


MACKINNON. 


28 


MACKFNNON. 


it  for  the  district  of  Mtshn'ish,  bein^;  that  pMrt  of  Mull  imnie- 
diatelj  to  the  Dorth  and  west  of  Tobermory.  They,  likewise, 
possessed  the  lands  of  Strathordell  in  Skye,  from  which  the 
chiefs  usnallj  took  their  style.  Lauchlan  Macfingon,  or 
Mackinnon.  chief  of  his  clan,  witnessed  a  charter  by  Doniild, 
lord  of  the  Isles,  in  1409.  The  name  of  the  chief  in  1493  is 
uncertain ;  but  Neil  Mackiniion  of  Mishninh  was  at  the  head 
of  the  tribe  in  1515.**  {ffighlands  and  Itlei  of  Scotland,  p. 
80.)  Two  years  afterwards  this  Neil  and  se^'eral  others,  de- 
scribed as  ''  kin,  men,  serrants.  and  part-takers'*  of  Lauch- 
lan Maclean  of  Dowart,  were  included  in  a  remission  which 
that  chief  obtained  for  their  share  in  the  rebellion  of  Sir  Do- 
nald Macdonald  of  Ix>chalsh.  In  1545  the  chiefs  name  was 
£win.  He  was  one  of  the  barons  and  council  of  the  Isles 
who,  in  that  year,  swore  allegiance  to  the  king  of  England  at 
Knockfergus  in  Ireland. 

'*  In  consequence,**  says  Mr.  Skene,  "of  their  connexion 
with  the  Macdonalds,  the  Mackinnons  have  no  history  inde- 
pendent of  that  clan  ;  and  the  internal  state  of  these  tribes 
during  the  government  of  the  lords  of  the  Isles  is  so  obscure 
that  little  can  be  learned  regarding  them,  until  the  forfeitmv 
of  the  last  of  these  lords.  During  their  dependence  upon  the 
Macdonalds  tliere  is  but  one  event  of  any  importance  in 
which  we  find  the  Mackinnons  taking  a  share,  for  it  would 
appear  that  on  the  death  of  John  of  the  Islea,  in  the  four- 
teenth oontury,  Mackinnon,  with  what  object  it  is  impoesible 
now  to  asoertun,  stirred  up  his  second  son,  John  Mor,  to  re- 
bel against  his  eldest  brother,  apparently  with  a  view  to  the 
chiefship,  and  his  faction  was  joined  by  the  Macleans  and  the 
Madeods.  But  Donald,  the  eider  brother,  was  supported  by 
so  great  a  proportion  of  the  tribe,  that  he  drove  John  Mor 
and  his  party  out  of  the  Isles,  and  pursued  him  to  Galloway, 
and  from  thence  to  Ireland.  The  rebellion  being  thus  put 
down,  John  Mor  threw  himself  upon  his  brother's  mercy,  and 
received  his  pardon,  but  Mackinnon  was  taken  and  hanged, 
as  having  been  the  inntigator  of  the  disturbance.**  (^Skene's 
Hu/hlanders,  vol.  ii.  p.  259.)  This  appears  to  have  taken 
place  after  1380,  as  John,  Ix)rd  of  the  Isles,  died  tliat  year. 
In  the  disturbances  in  the  Isles,  during  the  16th  century.  Sir 
I^nchlan  Mackinnon  bore  an  active  part. 

As  a  proof  of  the  common  descent  of  the  Mackinnons,  the 
Macgregors,  and  the  Macnabs,  although  their  territories  were 
far  distant  from  each  other,  two  bonds  of  friendship  exist, 
which  are  curious  specimens  of  the  manners  of  the  times. 
Tlie  one  dated  12th  July,  1606,  was  entered  into  between 
Lauchlan  Mackinnon  of  Strathordell  and  Finlay  Macnab  of 
Bowaine,  who,  as  its  tenor  runs,  happened  "  to  forgether  to- 
gcdder,  with  certain  of  the  said  Fiiilay*s  friends,  in  their 
rooms,  in  the  laird  of  Glenurchy's  country,  and  the  said 
lauchlan  and  Finlay,  being  come  of  ane  hou.se,  and  being  of 
one  surname  and  lineage,  notwithstanding  the  said  Lauchlan 
and  Finlay  this  long  time  bygane  oversaw  their  awn  dueties 
till  ndderis,  in  respect  of  the  long  distance  betwixt  their 
dwelling  places,**  agreed,  with  t^e  consent  of  their  kin  and 
friends,  to  give  all  assistance  and  service  to  each  other.  And 
are  "  content  to  subscribe  to  the  ftame,  with  their  hands  led 
to  the  penJ"  Mackinnon's  signature  is  characteristic  It  is 
"  l^audiland,  mise  (i.  e.  myself)  Mac  Fingon.*'  The  other 
bond  of  manrent,  dated  at  Kilmorie  in  1671,  was  between 
lauchlan  Mackinnon  of  Strathordell  and  James  Macgregor 
of  Macgregor,  and  it  is  therein  stated  tliat  *'  for  the  special 
love  and  amitie  between  these  persons,  and  condescendinc; 
that  they  are  descended  lawfully  Ji'a  tunt  breethren  of  auld 
detcent,  wherefore  and  for  certain  onerous  causes  moving,  we 
witt  ye  we  to  be  bound  and  obleisit,  Hkeas  by  the  tenor  here- 
of we  faithfully  bind  and  obleise  us  and  our  successors,  our 


kin,  friends  and  followers,  futhfuUy  to  serve  aue  anither  in 
all  causes  with  our  men  and  servants,  against  all  who  live 
or  die.** 

During  the  civil  wars  the  Mackinnons  joined  the  standard 
of  the  marquis  of  Montrose,  and  formed  part  of  his  force  at  the 
battle  of  Inverlochy.  Feb.  2,  1645.  In  1650,  Uochlan  Mac- 
kinnon, the  cliief,  raised  a  regiment  of  his  clan  for  the  service 
of  Charles  IL,  and  at  the  battle  of  Worcester,  in  1646,  he  was 
made  a  knight  banneret.  His  son,  Daniel  Mohr,  had  2  sons, 
John,  whose  great-grandson  died  in  India,  unmarried,  in  1808, 
and  Daniel,  who  emigrated  to  Antigua,  and  die<i  in  1720.  His 
eldest  son  nnd  heir,  William  Mackinnon  of  Antigua,  an  eminent 
member  of  the  legislature  of  that  island  died  at  Bath  in  1767. 
The  Kon  of  the  latter,  Willinm  Mackinnon  of  Antigua  and 
Binfield.  Berkshire,  died  in  1809.  The  youngest  of  hiafoor 
sons,  Henry,  MHJor-general  Mackinnon,  a  distinguished  officer, 
was  killed  by  the  explosion  of  a  magnzine,  while  leading  on 
the  main  storming  party,  at  Ciudad  Rodrigo,  Feb.  29,  1812. 
A  tablet  was  erected  to  his  memory  in  St.  Paul's  cathedral. 

The  eldest  son.  W^illiam  Mackinnon,  died  young,  leaving, 
with  2  daughters.  2  sons,  William  Alexander  Mackinnon,  who 
succeeded  his  grandfather,  and  Daniel,  colonel  of  the  Cold- 
stream guards,  of  whom  a  memwr  follows  in  larger  type. 

William  Alexander  Mackinnon  of  Mackinnon,  M.P.,  tlie 
chief  magistnite  and  deputy  lieutenant  for  the  counties  of 
Middlesex,  Hampshire,  and  Kssex,  and  author  of 'The  His- 
toiy  of  Civilization,*  and  other  publications  ('  Public  Opinion,* 
*  Thoughts  on  the  Currency  Question,' Ac.)  bom  in  1789. 
succeeded  in  1809.  He  married  Emma,  daughter  of  Joseph 
Palmer,  Esq.  of  Rush  House,  County  Dublin,  with  issue,  3 
sons  and  3  daughters.  The  eldest  son,  William  Alexander, 
also  M.P.,  bom  in  1813,  married  daughter  of  F.  Willes,  Esq. 

lauchlan  Mackinnon  of  Letterfeam  also  claims  to  be  tlie 
heir-male  of  the  family.  Although  there  are  many  gentlemen 
of  the  name  still  resident  in  Skye,  there  is  no  Mackinnon  pm- 
prietor  of  lands  now  either  in  that  island  or  in  Mull. 

The  Mackinnons  engaged  in  both  rebellions  in  favour  of 
the  Stuarts.  In  1715,  150  of  them  fought  with  the  Macdo- 
nalds of  Sleat  at  the  battle  of  Sheriffmuir,  for  which  the  diief 
was  forfeited,  but  received  a  pardon,  4th  January,  1727.  In 
1745,  Mackinnon,  though  then  old  and  infirm,  joined  Prince 
Charles  with  a  battalion  of  his  dan.  President  Forbes  esti- 
mates their  effective  force  at  that  period  at  200  men.  After 
the  battle  of  Culluden,  the  prince,  in  his  wanderings,  took 
refuge  in  the  country  of  the  Mackinnons,  when  travelling 
in  disguise  through  Skye,  and  was  concealed  by  the  chief  in 
a  cave,  where  I^y  Mackinnon  brought  him  a  refreshment  of 
cold  meat  and  wine.  Afterwards  the  chief  and  one  of  his 
clansmen,  John  Mackinnon,  residing  at  Ellagol,  conducted 
the  royal  fugitive  in  his  own  boat  to  the  mainland,  to  the 
country  of  Macdonald  of  Morar.  Not  meeting  with  that  as- 
sistance from  the  latter  which  he  expected,  the  prince,  in 
great  distress,  tumed  round  to  Mackinnon,  and  said,  **I 
hope,  Mr.  Mackinnon,  you  will  not  desert  me  too,  and  leave 
me  in  the  lurch ;  but  that  you  will  do  all  ior  my  preserva- 
tion you  can.**  The  old  chief,  thinking  that  these  words 
were  meant  for  him,  said,  with  tears  in  his  eyes,  "  I  ne%'er 
will  leave  your  royal  highness  in  the  day  of  danger ;  but  will, 
under  God,  do  all  I  can  for  you,  and  go  with  yon  wherever 
you  order  me.**  *'  Oh,  no,**  rejoined  Charles,  "  that  is  too 
much  for  one  of  your  advanced  years.  Sir;  I  heartily  thank 
you  for  your  readiness  to  take  care  of  me,  as  I  am  well  sat- 
isfied of  your  zeal  for  me  and  my  cause ;  but  one  of  your  age 
cannot  well  hold  out  with  the  fatigues  and  dangers  I  must 
undergo.  It  was  to  your  friend  John  here,  a  stout  young 
man,  I  was  addressing  myself."    "  Well,  then,**  said  John 


MACKINTOSH, 


80 


Sm  JAMES. 


Tytler,  wife  of  Lord  Woodhonselee,  one  of  the 
lords  of  session.  Major  Mercer,  the  friend  of 
Beattie  and  the  author  of  a  small  volnme  of 
*  Lyric  Poems/  who  held  a  lientenant*s  commis- 
sion in  the  same  regiment,  (and  a  memoir  of 
whom  is  given  snbsequently  in  Its  place)  in  a  let- 
ter to  Lord  Glenbervie,  thus  speaks  of  Sir  James^ 
father  and  uncle:  *^John  Macintosh  was  one  of 
the  most  lively,  good  humoured,  gallant  lads  I 
ever  knew ;  and  he  had  an  elder  brother  of  the 
name  of  Angus,  who  served  in  the  regiment  (Col. 
afterwards  Sir  R.  M.  Kcith^s)  that  constantly  en- 
camped next  to  ours,  wlio  was  a  most  intelligent 
man,  and  a  most  accomplished  gentleman.  Mr. 
M.^s  grandfather  saw  his  two  sons  return  home,  at 
the  end  of  the  seven  years'  war,  one  with  a  shat- 
tered leg,  and  the  other  with  the  loss  of  an  eye.*' 
His  father  was  afterwards  captain  in  the  68th  re- 
giment, in  which  he  served  at  Gibraltar,  during 
the  famous  siege  of  that  place. 

He  received  the  first  part  of  his  education  at 
the  school  of  Fortrose,  in  Ross-shire,  to  which  he 
was  sent  in  the  summer  of  1775,  and  he  remained 
there  till  he  went  to  King's  College,  Old  Aber- 
deen, in  Oatober  1780.  His  passion  for  reading, 
in  his  boyhood,  was  so  great  that  his  father  often 
complained  that  he  would  become  **  a  mere  ped- 
ant." He  read  at  all  times  and  in  all  places,  and 
would  frequently  sit  up  the  gi'eater  part  of  the 
night  over  his  books.  Whilst  at  school  so  great 
was  his  proficiency  that  he  was  employed  by  the 
usher,  whose  name  was  Stalker,  to  teach  the 
younger  boys,  and  ^*  that  boy,  that  Jamie  Mack- 
intosh," was  known  all  over  the  country  as  a  pro- 
digy of  learning.  He  also  made  some  attempts  at 
writing  vei'ses,  which,  for  the  four  winters  he  con- 
tinued at  Aberdeen,  gained  him  the  name  of  ^  the 
poet.'  His  companion  at  King's  College  was  the 
afterwards  celebrated  Robert  Hall  of  Leicester. 
They  lived  in  the  same  house,  and  read  and 
studied  together.  They  were  both  fond  of  argu- 
ment, and  had  almost  daily  discussions  on  most 
topics  of  enquiry,  particularly  in  morals  and  me- 
taphysics. In  their  joint  studies,  we  are  told  in 
Gregory's  Memoir  of  Robert  Hall,  (page  22)  they 
read  much  of  Xenophon  and  Herodotus,  and  more 
of  Plato ;  and  so  well  was  all  this  known,  exciting 
admuration  in  some,  in  others  envy,  that  it  was 


not  unusual,  as  they  went  along,  for  their  class- 
fellows  to  point  at  them,  and  say,  Hhere  go 
Plato  and  Herodotus  P  Under  the  auspices  of 
these  two  highly  gifted  young  men,  a  debating 
society  was  formed  in  King's  College,  which  was 
jocularly  termed  *  the  Hall  and  Mackintosh  Club.' 

In  March  1784,  Mr.  Mackintosh  took  his  degree 
of  master  of  arts,  and  the  next  thing  to  be  consid- 
ered was  the  choice  of  a  profession.  He  himself 
wished  to  become  an  advocate  at  the  Scottish  bar, 
but  his  friends  prefeired  that  he  should  be  a  doc- 
tor of  medicine,  and  in  October  of  the  same  year 
he  went  to  Edinburgh,  where  for  three  years  he 
attended  the  medical  classes.  While  at  the  uni- 
versity of  that  city,  he  became  a  member  of  the 
Speculative  Society,  which  met  for  the  discussion 
of  subjects  in  general  literature  and  science,  and 
at  its  meetings  he  soon  distinguished  himself  as  a 
keen  and  eloquent  debater.  At  this  time  its  lend- 
ers were  Charles  Hope,  afterwards  lord  president 
of  the  court  of  session ;  Baron  Constant  de  Re- 
becque,  the  subsequently  celebrated  Benjamin 
Constant ;  Mailcolm  Lutng,  the  historian ;  and 
Thomas  Addis  Emmett.  He  attended  the  lec- 
tures of  Dr.  Brown,  the  founder  of  the  Brunonian 
system,  and  for  k  time  was  one  of  his  most  enthu- 
siastic disciples.  He  was  also  a  member  of  the 
royal  medical  and  royal  pliysical  societies.  In 
1787  he  took  his  degree  of  M.D.,  his  thesis  on  the 
occasion  being  *'  De  motu  musculari." 

In  the  beginning  of  the  following  spring  he 
went  to  London,  accompanied  by  one  of  his  col- 
lege friends,  Lewis  Grant,  the  eldest  son  of  Sir 
James  Grant  of  Grant,  then  M.P.  for  Morayshire, 
nnd  afterwards  earl  of  Seafield  and  Findlater. 
His  mind  had  an  early  bias  towards  politics,  and 
as  his  principles  were  of  the  most  liberal  kind,  he 
soon  became  a  member  of  the  Society  for  Consti- 
tutional information,  one  of  the  numerous  political 
societies  of  that  exciting  period.  He  seems  at 
this  time  to  have  contemplated  settling  in  St. 
Petersburg  as  a  physician,  but  the  plan  was  not 
carried  into  effect.  On  the  death  of  his  father, 
the  same  year,  he  succeeded  to  the  family  estate 
of  Kellachie,  in  Inverness-shire,  worth  about  £900 
a-year,  but  burdened  by  an  annuity  to  the  widow 
of  a  former  proprietor,  who  still  survived.  In  the 
course  of  a  year  or  two  he  was  compelled  to  dis- 


1 1 


'\ 


!J 


MACKINTOSH, 


32 


SIR  JAMES. 


tation  distingn^e."  Family  ties  forbade,  what 
otherwise  he  confessed  that  he  should  DOt  have 
been  averse  from — the  means  *^of  giving  more 
effectual  aid,  by  a  personal  residence  for  some  time 
in  Russia."  It  was  an  odd  coincidence  tliat  an 
opportunity  should  now  offer  of  going,  as  a  jurist, 
to  the  same  conntry  for  wliich  he  was  once  de- 
signed as  a  physician.  He  was  also,  about  tlie 
same  time,  invited  by  a  body  of  London  publish- 
ers, to  supeVintend  a  new  edition  of  Johnson*s 
Poets,  but  the  project  never  came  to  anytliing. 

Among  the  crowds  of  Britisli  subjects  who  lias- 
tened  to  Paris,  on  the  peace  of  Amiens  in  autumn 
1802,  were  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Mackintosh,  wlio  re- 
mained in  that  capital  a  month,  wlien  he  was 
presented  to  the  Fii*st  Consul.  The  terrible 
events  of  the  reign  of  terror  in  France  had  long 
ere  this  modified  very  considerably  many  of  the 
opinions  he  had  expressed  in  the  *•  VindiclaB  Gal- 
lic®." On  the  trial,  February  21,  1803,  of  M. 
Peltier,  a  French  refugee,  editor  of  a  Fi*ench  jour- 
nal published  in  London,  entitled  ^  L^Ambigu,*  for 
a  libel  on  Napoleon  Bonaparte,  first  consul  of 
France,  Mr.  Mackintosh  appeareiTas  sole  counsel 
for  the  defendant,  while  the  case  for  the  prosecu- 
tion was  conducted  by  Mr.  Perceval,  afterwards 
prime  minister,  then  attorney  general,  and  Mr. 
Abbott,  afterwards  T^rd  Tenterden.  His  address 
to  the  jury  on  the  occasion  was  declared  by  Lord 
EUenborough,  the  presiding  judge,  to  be  "the 
most  eloquent  oration  he  ever  had  heard  in  West- 
minster Hall."  A  translation  of  this  speech 
was  made  by  Madame  de  Stael,  and  circulated 
throughout  £urt)pe.  No  less  a  personage  than 
I/)uis  Philippe,  due  d'Orlcans,  afterwards  king  of 
the  French,  had  partly  translated  his  '  Y indicia 
Gallicae,'  and  a  speech  subsequently  delivered  by 
him  in  the  cause  of  Poland  received  the  same 
honour  from  the  patriotic  princess  Jablonowska. 

A  short  time  thereafter  he  was  appointed  re- 
corder, or  criminal  judge  of  Bombay,  when  he 
was  knighted,  December  21,  1803.  He  arrived 
at  Bombay  26th  May,  1804,  and  on  the  institu- 
tion, in  that  year,  of  a  court  of  vice- admiralty 
there,  for  the  trial  and  adjudication  of  all  prize 
and  maritime  cases,  he  was  appointed  judge  of 
that  couit.  He  remained  in  India  for  seven 
years,  distinguishing  himself  by  his  fearlessness  in 


the  discharge  of  his  official  duties,  and  his  exer- 
tions in  the  amelioration  of  the  criminal  law.  He 
founded  the  Literary  Society  of  Bombay,  and  con- 
tributed various  valuable  communications  to  the 
Asiatic  Register,  lie  left  Bombay  in  November 
1811,  retiring  from  the  recordership  with  a  pen- 
sion of  i^  1,200  from  the  East  India  Compan}-. 
Previous  to  his  departure  the  grand  jury  present- 
ed a  complimentary  address,  requesting  that  he 
would  sit  for  his  portrait,  to  be  hung  in  the  hall 
of  the  court.  The  Literary  Society  of  Bombay 
elected  biro,  on  his  diiwirture,  their  honorary 
president,  and  requested  him  to  sit  for  a  bust  to 
be  placed  in  their  library ;  and  with  both  requests 
he  complied. 

On  his  arrival  in  England,  he  received  a  com- 
munication from  Mr.  Perceval,  then  first  lord  of 
the  Treasuiy,  offering  him  a  scat  in  parliament, 
but  he  declined  it,  as  he  could  not  agree  with 
government  on  the  subject  of  the  Roman  Catholic 
disabilities,  being  in  favour  of  their  removal.  His 
answer,  dated  May  11, 1812,  was  ready  to  be  sent 
the  very  day  that  Perceval  was  shot  by  Belling- 
ham  in  the  lobby  of  the  House  of  Commons. 
Lord  Livei-pool,  wlio  succeeded  Perceval,  offered 
him  the  office  of  a  commissioner  for  India,  but 
that  also  he  declined.  lie  was  elected  M.P.  for 
the  county  of  Nairn  in  July  1813.  The  following 
year,  on  the  restoration  of  the  Bourbons,  he  again 
visited  Paris,  and  on  his  return,  while  the  impres- 
sions  which  the  aspect  of  affairs  in  the  French 
capital  had  created  were  still  fresh  in  his  memory, 
he  communicated  to  the  Edinburgh  Review  (vol. 
xxiv.  p.  505)  some  Reflections  on  the  subject. 

In  1818,  he  became,  by  appointment  of  the 
court  of  Directors,  professor  of  law  and  general 
politics  in  the  East  India  Company^s  college  at 
Haileybury.  The  same  year,  on  the  death  of 
Dr.  Thomas  Brown,  he  was  offered  the  professor- 
ship of  moral  philosophy  in  the  university  of  Ed- 
inburgh, but  declined  it,  a  determination  which 
he  afterwards  greatly  regretted,  as  lie  had  always 
been  desirous  of  an  academic  career. 

Through  the  influence  of  the  duke  of  Devon- 
shire, he  was  elected  for  Knaresborongh,  in  the 
parliament  which  met  in  January  1819,  and  was 
rechoscn  for  that  place  at  four  subsequent  elec- 
tions.    He  took  a  prominent  part  on  all  questions 


MACKNIGHT. 


34 


MACLACHLAN. 


li 


MACKNIGHT,  Jamks,  D.D.,  a  learned  bibli- 
cal critic,  the  son  of  the  Rev.  William  Macknight, 
minister  of  Irvine  in  Ayrshire,  was  bom  Septem- 
ber 17,  1721.  He  received  his  academical  educa- 
tion at  the  nniversity  of  Glasgow,  and  afterwards 
stndied  theology  at  Leyden.  On  his  retnrn  to 
Scotland  he  was  licensed  to  preach  by  the  pres- 
bytery of  Irvine,  and  after  officiating  for  some 
time  at  the  Gorbals,  in  Glasgow,  he  acted  as 
assistant  at  Kilwinning.  In  May  1753  he  was 
ordained  minister  of  Maybole  in  his  native  coun- 
ty. In  1756  he  published  a  *  Harmony  of  the 
Grospels,'  which  met  with  such  a  favourable  recep- 
tion, that  he  was  induced  in  1763  to  bring  out  a 
second  edition,  with  considerable  improvements 
and  additions.  The  same  year  he  produced  his 
*  Truth  of  the  Gospel  History,'  which  still  farther 
advanced  his  reputation  as  a  theologian.  From 
the  university  of  Edinburgh  he  received  the  de- 
gree of  D.D.,  and  he  was  in  1769  chosen  modera- 
tor of  the  General  Assembly  of  the  Church  of 
Scotland.  During  the  same  year  he  was  trans- 
lated to  the  parocliial  charge  of  Jedburgh,  and  in 
1772  he  became  minister,  first  of  Lady  Tester's, 
Edinburgh,  and  in  1778  of  the  Old  Church  in  that 
city,  where  he  had  for  his  colleague  Dr.  Henry 
the  historisn.  For  upwards  of  thirty  years  he 
was  engaged  in  the  preparation  of  his  last  and 
most  important  work,  *  The  New  Literal  Transla- 
tion from  the  Greek  of  all  the  Apostolical  Epis- 
tles, with  Commentaries  and  Notes,'  which  was 
published  in  1795,  in  4  vols,  quarto.  He  died 
Januarv  18.  1800. — His  works  are: 

Hnrmonj  of  the  Foar  Gospela.  in  which  the  natural  order 
of  each  is  prewrred ;  with  a  Paraphrase  and  Kotea.  Lrnid. 
1756.  3  ToI<(.  in  one,  4to.  3d  etiit.;  with  six  DiMoaraes  on 
.Tewish  Antiquities.  Lond.  1763.  4to.  3d.  edit.  Edin. 
1804, 3  vols.  (tro.  This  has  long  been  regarded  as  a  standard 
k«ok  among  Dix-ines.  It  was  translated  into  Latin,  bj  Pro- 
fessw  Rockersfelder.  and  poUisbed  at  Bremen  and  Derenter. 
1773,  3  vols.  8to. 

The  Tknth  of  the  Gospel  Historr  shewn,  in  three  books^ 
I^ondon,  1763,  4to. 

The  Traralation  of  the  First  and  Second  Epistles  to  the 
Thes^alonians:  with  a  Commentair  and  Notes.     London. 

1787.  4lo 

A  new  literal  Translation,  frrm  the  original  Greek,  of  all 
the  .\postoUc  Epistles ;  with  a  Comroentan-  and  Koles,  Phi- 
K>k^<^K  Critacad,  Explanatorr,  and  Practical.  To  which  is 
adde^l.  A  Htstorr  of  the  Life  of  the  Apnstle  Paul.  Edin., 
ir.Vi,  4  TobL  4to.  3d  edit.:  with  the  Greek  Text,  and  an 
actvunt  rf  the  life  of  the  Author.  1807,  6  vols.  8ra  Abo 
without  the  Greek  Text.    3  vobu  Ato.  and  4  rob.  dro.    Thb 


is  a  work  of  theological  diligencSf  learning  and  pietj  not 
often  paralleled. 


BTacij^CHLAK,  the  surname  of  a  clan  of  ireat  antiquity  in 
Ar)(]rle!(hire;  badge,  the  mountain  ash.  Thej  possessed  the 
barony  of  Strethlachlan  in  Gowal.  and  other  extensiTe  pos- 
sessions in  the  parishes  of  Glassrie  and  Kilmartin,  and  on 
Loch  Awe  side,  which  were  separated  from  the  main  teat  of 
the  family  bj  the  arm  of  the  sea  called  Loch  Fjme. 

Hie  clan  lisehlan  (in  Gnelio  l^chninn)  was  one  of  those 
great  Argyleshira  clans,  which,  during  the  existence  of  the 
Celtic  kingdom  of  Argyle  and  the  Isles,  formed  bj  S<nnerled 
in  the  Tith  centurr.  compo^  a  bodj  of  powerful  tribes  under 
his  swsT,  and  af>er  the  forfeitura  of  the  last  Liml  of  Uie  Isles, 
occupied  an  independent  pontion.  They  were  one  of  those 
Gaelic  tribes  who  adopted  the  oared  galley  for  their  special 
device,  as  indicative  of  their  connexion,  either  by  rendenoe  or 
descent,  with  the  Isles.  An  ancestor  of  the  family,  Lachlan 
Mor.  who  lived  in  the  13th  century,  is  described  in  the  Gaelic 
MS.  of  1467.  (the  date  1450  usually  ascribed  to  it  having  been 
found  to  be  wrong,)  as  **  son  of  Pstrick,  son  of  Gilchrist,  son  of 
Aids  Alain,  called  the  clnmt^,  son  of  Henrv  or  Anradan,  firom 
whom  are  descended  also  the  clan  Niell.**  From  the  genealogy 
of  the  clan  Lachlan  being  given  with  much  greater  minute- 
ness than  that  of  any  other  of  the  clans,  the  author  of  the  MS. 
is  supposed  to  have  been  a  Msclschlan,  and  it  seems  probable 
that  it  once  fitrmed  a  part  of  the  well  known  collection  of 
ancient  MS8.,  so  long  preserved  bv  the  familv  of  Madadilan 
of  Kilbride  (see  CoUecUmea  de  Rebus  AlbtaudM,  page  60). 
and  eventuallv  purchased  bvthe  Highland  Sodetj  of  Scotland. 

Bv  tradition  the  Maclaclilans  are  said  to  have  come  from 
Ireland,  tlieir  original  stock  being  the  O'lxNigiilins  of  Meatb. 

According  to  the  Irish  genealogies,  the  clan  Ladilan,  the 
Lamonds.  and  the  M*Ewens  of  Otter,  were  kindred  tribes, 
being  descended  from  brothers  who  were  sons  of  Aids  AUun 
above  referred  to,  and  tradition  relates  that  they  tock  poasM 
Mon  of  the  greater  part  of  the  district  of  Gowal,  from  Toward 
Point  to  Strachur  at  the  same  time;  the  Laimrnds  being  se- 
psrated  from  the  M*Ewens  by  the  river  of  Kilfinan,  and  the 
M'Ewens  from  tlie  Madachlans  by  the  stream  which  sqMrates 
the  parislies  of  Kilfinan  and  Strath  Lachlan.  Aida  Alain,  the 
common  ancestor  of  these  fiimilies.  b  stated  in  andent  Irish 
genealogies  to  have  been  the  grandson  of  Hugh  Atlaman,  the 
head  of  the  great  family  of  0*Neils,  kings  of  Ireland. 

About  1330,  Gilchrist  Madachlnn,  who  b  mentioned  in  the 
manuscript  of  1467  as  chief  of  the  family  of  M  selachian  at  the 
time,  b  a  witness  to  a  charter  <^  Kilfinan  granted  by  I  jmnianiiB, 
ancestor  of  the  Lamonds.  (see  CharUJanf  ofPaidejf.') 

In  1293,  Gilleskel  Madachlan  got  a  charter  of  bb  knds in 
ErKsdb  from  BaBoL  (See  Tktmmms  SeoO.  Act$^  voL  i  p.  91.) 

In  a  document  preserved  in  the  treMicniy  of  ber  Majesty's 
Exchequer,  entitled  **  Les  petitions  de  tcrre  dimiandees  en 
Kscoce,"  there  b  the  following  entry.  **  Item  GiUescop  Msc- 
loghlan  ad  demands  la  Baronie  de  Molbryde  juvene.  apelle 
Strath,  que  fn  prb  contre  le  foi  de  BoL**  From  thb  it  appears 
that  Gillespie  M selachian  was  in  possession  of  the  lands  still 
letained  by  the  familv.  during  the  occupation  of  Scotland  by 
Edward  L  in  1396.  (See  Sir  Fnmeu  PalgrmeM  SeoUitk 
Hoopments,  voL  l  p.  319.) 

In  1308,  Gillespie  Madachlan  sst  in  the  first  parliament  of 
Robert  the  Brace  at  St  Andrews,  and  hb  signature  and  seal 
tag  are  attached  to  the  roll  oi  that  pariiament.  (See  Tkom' 
foms  Sex4L  Act*.  vt.|.  I  p.  99.) 

In  1314.  Archibald  Madachlan  in  Ergadia.  granted  toth* 
Preaching  Friara  of  Glaagow  fottj  »biUbigs  to  be  pttdjsarl^ 


MACLAURIN. 


36 


MACLAURIN. 


I 


1 1 


29th  March  1822,  aged  47.  A  Memoir  of  his 
life  and  some  of  his  Graelic  pieces  are  inserted  in 
Mackenzie's  Beauties  of  Gaelic  Poetry  (Glasgow, 
1841). 

MACLAURnr,  the  surname  of  «  ckn,  oommonlj  spelled 
MacUren  (badgef  the  Uorel,)  said  to  have  been  derived  from 
the  district  of  Lorn  in  Ai^grleshire,  the  Gaelic  orthographj  of 
which  is  Labbrin,  pronounced  Lanrin,  hence  the  Madaurins 
are  called  the  dann  Labhrm.  That  district  took  its  name 
from  Lorn,  one  of  the  three  sons  of  £rc,  who,  in  603,  arrived  in 
Ar|i;yle8hire  from  Ireland,  and  founded  there  the  Scoto-Irish 
kingdom  of  Dalriada,  a  word  borne  by  the  Madaurins  as  a 
motto  above  their  coat  of  arms. 

From  Argyleshire  the  tribe  of  Laurin  moved  into  Perth- 
shire, having,  it  is  said,  acqmred  from  Kenneth  Macalpin, 
after  his  conquest  of  the  Picts  in  the  9th  century,  the  dis- 
tricts oi  Balquhidder  and  Stratheam,  and  three  brothers  are 
mentioned  as  having  got  assigned  to  them  in  that  temtoiy 
the  lands  of  Bruach,  Auchleskin,  and  Stank.  In  the  church- 
yard of  Balquhidder,  cdebrated  as  containing  the  grave  of 
Kob  Boj,  the  burial  places  of  their  different  families  are 
marked  off  separatdj,  so  as  to  correspond  with  the  ntuation 
which  these  estates  bear  to  each  other,  a  drcumstance  which 
so  fur  favours  the  tradition  regarding  them. 

Among  the  followers  of  Malise,  earl  of  Stratheam,  at  the 
battle  of  the  Standard  in  1138,  were  a  tribe  called  '*  Laver- 
nani,"  supposed  bj  Lord  Hailes  to  have  been  the  dan  Lau- 
rin. Of  Uioee  Scottish  barons  who  swore  fealtj  to  Ed- 
ward I.  in  1296,  were  Maurice  of  Tiree,  an  island  in  the 
county  of  Argyle  which  formerly  belonged  to  the  Madaurins, 
Conan  of  Balquhidder,  and  Laurin  of  Ardveche  in  Strath- 
eam, all  of  the  dan  Laurin.  When  the  earldom  of  Strath- 
eam became  vested  in  the  crown  in  1370,  the  Madaurins 
were  reduced  from  the  condition  of  proprietors  to  that  of 
**kyndly"  or  perpetual  tenants,  which  they  continued  to  be 
till  1508,  when  it  was  deemed  expedient  that  this  Celtic 
holding  should  be  changed,  and  the  lands  set  in  feu,  **  for  in- 
crease of  polide  and  augmentation  of  the  king's  rental"  The 
Madaurins  were  among  the  loyal  dans  that  fought  for  James 
III.  at  Sauchiebum  in  1488.  They  were  also  at  Flodden 
and  at  Pinkie.  In  the  well-known  rolls  of  the  dans  pos- 
sessing chiefr,  dated  in  1687  and  1594,  "the  dan  Lauren" 
are  mentioned. 

A  sanguinary  encounter  once  took  place  between  the  Mac- 
laurins  of  Auchleskin  and  the  Buchanans  of  Leny,  arising 
out  of  the  following  drcumstance :  At  the  fair  of  St  Kessaig 
held  at  Kilmahog,  in  the  parish  of  Callander,  one  of  the  Bu- 
chanans strode  a  Madanrin  of  weak  intdlect,  on  the  cheek, 
with  a  salmon  which  he  was  carrying,  and  knocked  off  his 
bonnet  The  latter  said  he  would  not  dare  to  repeat  the 
blow  at  next  St  George's  fair  at  Balquhidder.  To  that  fair 
the  Buchanans  went  in  a  strong  body,  and  on  their  appear- 
ance the  half  witted  Madanrin,  who  had  received  the  insult, 
for  the  first  time  told  what  had  occurred  at  the  fair  at  Kil- 
mahog. The  waming  cross  was  immediately  sent  through 
the  dan,  and  every  man  able  to  bear  arms  hastened  to  the 
muster.  In  their  impatience  the  Madaurins  began  the  bat- 
tle, before  all  their  force  had  collected,  and  were  driven  from 
the  field,  but  one  of  them,  seeing  his  son  cut  down,  turned 
furiously  upon  the  Buchanans,  shouting  the  war-cry  of  his 
tribe,  (**  Craig  Tnire,"  the  rock  of  the  boar,)  and  his  dans- 
men  rallying,  became  fired  with  the  miri-cath^  or  madness  of 
battle,  and  mshed  after  him,  fighting  desperately.  The  Bu- 
chanans were  skin  in  gi«at  numbers,   and  driven  over  a 


small  cascade  of  the  Bahraig  stream,  which  retains  the 
name  of  LMoiMm-iSMcacAan,  "  the  cascade  of  the  dead  bo- 
dies." Two  only  escaped  from  the  fidd,  one  of  whom  was 
slain  at  Gartnafoaran,  and  the  other  fdl  at  the  point  which, 
from  him,  was  ever  afterwards  known  as  Sron  Lamk.  Tra- 
dition variously  fixes  this  clan  battle  in  the  reign  of  one  of 
the  Alexanders,  that  is,  between  1106  and  1286,  and  in  the 
16th  centurv. 

About  1497,  some  of  the  dan  Laurin  having  carried  off  the 
cattie  torn  the  Braes  of  Lochaber,  the  Maodonalds  followed 
the  spoilers,  and,  overtaking  them  in  Glenuchy,  after  a  sharp 
fight,  recovered  the  "  lifting."  The  Madaurins  straightway 
sought  the  assistance  of  their  kinsman,  Dugal  Stewart  of 
Appin,  who  at  once  joined  them  with  his  followers,  and  a 
conflict  took  place,  when  both  Dugal  and  Maodonald  of  Kep- 
poch,  the  chiefs  of  their  respective  dans,  were  among  the 
slain.  This  Dugal  was  the  first  of  the  Stewarts  of  Appin. 
He  was  an  illegitimate  son  of  John  Stewart,  third  lord  ot 
Ix>m,  by  a  lady  of  the  dan  Laurin,  and  in  1469  when  he  at- 
tempted, by  force  of  arms,  to  obtain  possession  of  his  father's 
lands,  be  was  assisted  by  the  Madaurins,  ISO  of  whom  fell 
in  a  battle  that  took  place  at  the  foot  of  Bendoran,  a  moun- 
tain in  Glenurchy. 

The  dan  Laurin  were  the  strongest  sept  in  Balquhidder, 
which  was  called  "  the  country  of  the  Madaurins."  Although 
there  are  few  families  of  the  name  there  now,  so  numerous 
were  they  at  one  period  that  none  dared  enter  the  church, 
until  the  Madaurins  had  taken  their  seats.  This  invidious 
right  claimed  by  them  often  led  to  unseemly  brawls  and 
fights  at  the  church  door,  and  lives  were  sometimes  lost  in 
consequence.  In  1532,  Sir  John  Madanrin,  vicar  of  Bal- 
quhidder, was  killed  in  one  of  these  quarrels,  and  several  of 
his  kinsmen,  implicated  in  the  deed,  were  outlawed. 

A  deadly  feud  existed  between  the  Madaurins  and  their 
neighbours,  the  Macgregors  of  Rob  Roy's  tribe.  In  the  16th 
century,  the  latter  slaughtered  no  fewer  than  eighteen  honse- 
holdeni  of  the  Madanrin  name,  with  the  whole  of  their  fami- 
lies, and  took  possession  of  the  farms  which  had  bdonged  to 
them.  The  deed  was  not  investigated  till  1604,  forty-six 
years  afterwards,  when  it  was  thus  described  in  their  trial 
for  the  slaughter  of  the  Colquhouns:  "And  sidyk,  John 
M^Coull  cheire,  ffor  airt  and  pairt  of  the  crewall  murthour 
and  buming  of  auchtene  houshalders  of  the  clan  Lawren. 
thair  wy ves  and  baims,  committit  fourtie  sax  seir  syne,  or 
thairby."  The  verdict  was  that  he  was  "  dene,  innocent, 
and  acquit  of  the  said  crymes."  The  hill  farm  of  Inveraen^, 
on  "  The  Braes  of  Balquhidder,**  was  one  of  the  farms  thus 
forcibly  occupied  by  the  Macgregors,  although  the  property  of 
a  Madanrin  family,  and  in  the  days  of  Bob  Roy,  two  centu- 
ries afterwards,  the  aid  of  Stewart  of  Appin  was  called  in  to 
replace  the  Madaurins  in  their  own,  wbidi  he  did  at  the  head 
of  200  of  his  men.  All  these  farms,  however,  are  now  the 
property  of  the  chief  of  dan  Gregor,  having  been  purchased 
about  1798,  from  the  oommisnoners  of  the  forfdted  estates. 

The  Madaurins  were  out  in  the  rebdlion  of  1745.  Ac- 
cording to  President  Forbes,  they  were  fbllowen  of  the  Hur- 
rays of  Athol,  but  although  some  of  them  might  have  been 
so,  the  majority  of  the  dan  fought  for  the  Pretender  with  the 
Stewarts  of  Appin  under  Stewart  of  ArdsheiL  Among  them 
was  Madanrin  of  Invementy,  who  was  taken  priscmer  after 
the  battle  of  Culloden,  but  made  bis  escape  in  a  very  singu- 
Ur  marmer  from  the  soldiers  who  were  conducting  him  to 
Carlisle.  The  incident  has  been  introduced  hy  Sir  Walter 
Soott  into '  Bedgauntiet,*  where ''  Pate-in-Peril"  ia  the  h«ro  of 
it  On  the  way  to  England  the  party  had  reached  the  well- 
known  **  Devil's  Beef  Stand,"  otherwise  called  "*  Johnstone^s 


1 1 

■  I 


MACLAURIN. 


88 


MACLEAN. 


A  complete  System  of  Fluxions :  with  thmr  application  to 
tlie  most  considerable  Prohlems  in  Geometry  and  Matoral 
Philosophy.    Edin.  1742,  2  voU».  4to. 

Account  of  Sir  Isaac  Newton*s  Philoeophical  DiscoverieSf 
published  from  his  MS.  papers ;  with  an  Account  of  the  Life 
and  Writings  of  the  Author,  by  Pat.  Blurdoch.  London, 
1748,  4to. 

Treatise  of  Algebra,  in  three  Parts.  To  which  is  added, 
An  Appendix  concerning  the  General  Properties  of  Geometri- 
cal Lines.     Lond.,  1748,  8vo.     1766,  8vo. 

On  the  Construction  and  Measure  of  Curves;  by  which 
many  infinite  series  of  Curves  are  either  Measured  or  reduced 
to  Simple  Curves.     PhiL  Trans.  Abr.  vi.  356.    1718. 

A  New  Universal  Method  of  describing  all  kinds  of  Curves, 
Dy  means  of  Right  lines  and  Angles  only.     lb.  392.     1719. 

Concerning  Equations  with  impossible  Roots.  lb.  Abr.  vii. 
145.     1726. 

On  the  Description  of  Curve  IJnes.    lb.  viii.  41.     1785. 

Rule  for  finding  the  Meridional  Parts  to  any  Spheroid,  with 
the  same  exactness  as  in  a  Sphere,    lb.  516.     1741. 

Of  the  Bans  of  the  Cells  where  the  Bees  deposit  their 
Honey.    lb.  709.     1743. 

Cause  of  the  Variation  of  the  Obliqtuty  of  the  Ecliptic. 
Ess.  Phvs.  and  Lit.  i.  174.    1754. 

Concerning  the  sudden  and  surprising  Changes  observed  on 
the  Surface  of  Jupiter's  Body.     lb.  184. 

MACLAURIN,  John,  Lord  Dreghorn,  an 
able  lawyer,  son  of  the  preceding,  was  bom  at 
Edinburgh,  December  15,  1734,  old  style.  He 
received  the  mdiments  of  his  education  at  the 
High  school,  and  subsequently  went  through  the 
usual  academical  course  at  the  university  of  that 
city.  On  8d  August  1756  be  was  admitted  a 
member  of  the  faculty  of  advocates  at  Edinburgh, 
and  after  practising  at  the  bar  for  many  years 
with  much  reputation,  he  was,  on  17th  January 
1788,  raised  to  the  bench,  when  he  took  the*titlo 
of  Lord  Dreghorn.  He  died  December  24,  1796. 
^  A  Dissertation  to  prove  that  Troy  was  not  taken 
by  the  Greeks,'  read  by  him  before  the  Royal  So- 
ciety of  Edinburgh,  of  which  he  was  one  of  the 
original  members,  was  inserted  in  the  Transac- 
tions of  that  Society  in  1788.  He  kept  a  journal 
of  the  various  important  events  that  happened  in 
Europe  from  1792  to  1785,  from  which,  sboitly 
before  his  death,  he  made  a  selection,  with  the 
view  of  publication.  His  works,  in  a  collected 
form,  were  published  at  Edinburgh  in  2  vols,  in 
1798.  At  a  very  early  period,  as  we  learn  from 
the  Life  prefixed,  he  displayed  a  natural  turn  for 
poetical  composition,  and  among  his  school- fellows 
was  distinguished  by  the  name  of  ^  the  poet.*  His 
poems,  however,  do  not  rank  very  high.  Most  of 
them  were  thrown  off  from  a  private  printing 


press  of  his  own  for  circulation  among  his  friends     ' 
He  was  the  author  of  the  following  works : 

Observations  on  some  Pomts  of  Law ;  with  a  System  of 
the  Jndidal  Iaw  of  Moses.     Edin.  1759, 12nio. 

Connderations  on  the  Nature  and  Origin  of  litenuy  Plro- 
perty.    Edin.  1767,  8vo. 

Information  for  Mango  Campbell,  late  Officer  of  Ezom  at 
Saltcoats,  in  a  Criminal  Prosecution  before  the  Hi^  Coiort  of 
Jastidary  in  Scotland,  for  the  alleged  Murder  of  the  late 
Alexander  Earl  of  Eglinton.    London,  1770,  8vo. 

Arguments  and  Decisions  in  Remarkable  Cases  before  tlw 
High  Court  of  Justidary,  and  other  Supreme  Courts  in  Scot- 
land.   Edin.  1774,  4to. 

A  Dissertation  to  prove  that  Troy  was  not  taken  by  the 
Greeks.    Trans.  Edin.  Soc.  i.  43.     1788. 

Works.    Edin.  1798,  2  vols.  8vo. 

He  also  wrote  three  dramas  of  no  great  merit,  entitled 
'Hampden,'  'The  Pulilic,*  and  'The  PhilosopherV  Opera.** 
Several  of  his  pieces  will  be  found  in  Donaldson's  CoUectioii, 
printed  at  Edinburgh  in  1760. 


Macleah,  the  name  of  a  dan  (badge,  blackberry  heath) 
of  supposed  Irish  descent,  founded  by  one  of  the  Fltisgerald 
family,  as  the  clan  Kenzio  is  said  to  have  been  by  another. 
The  Macleans  are  not  mentioned  among  the  native  tribes  in 
the  Gaelic  MS.  of  1450,  and  the  Norman  or  Italian  origin  of 
their  chiefs  is  therefore  the  more  probable,  the  Fitxgeralds 
having  sprung  from  the  Florentine  Geraldi,  one  of  whom 
came  over  with  William  the  Conqueror.  Their  progenitor, 
according  to  Celtic  tradition,  was  one  Gillean  or  Gille-oin,  a 
name  signifying  the  young  man,  or  the  servant  or  foUower  of 
John,  who  lived  so  early  as  the  beginning  of  the  6th  century. 
He  was  called  Gillean-^ni-Tuiodh^  that  is,  Gillean  with  the 
axe,  from  the  dexterous  manner  in  which  he  wielded  that 
weapon  in  battle,  and  his  descendants  bear  a  battle-axe  in 
their  crest,  between  a  Inurel  and  a  cypress  branch.  Macal- 
lans, the  GhcHc  pronunciation  of  the  UHme,  may  mean  the 
great  stranger,  from  moffmu,  great,  and  o^ieiMW,  a  fordgner. 
(See  vol.  ii.,  p.  707,  art  Mac.) 

The  Macleans  have  been  lix^ated  in  Mull  dnoe  the  14tb 
century.  They  appear  originally  to  have  belonged  to  Moray. 
Mr.  Skene  says:  "  The  two  oldest  genealogies  of  the  Madeana, 
of  which  one  is  the  production  of  the  Beatons,  who  were  here- 
ditary sennachies  of  the  family,  concur  in  deriving  the  dan 
Gille-eon  from  the  same  race  from  whom  the  clans  bdongihg 
to  the  great  Moray  tribe  are  brought  by  the  MS.  of  1450.  OiP 
this  dan  the  oldest  seat  seems  to  have  been  the  district  of  Lorn, 
as  thpy  first  appear  in  subjection  to  the  lords  of  Lorn ;  and  thdr 
situation  being  thus  between  the  Cnmerons  and  Mnonachtans, 
who  were  undisputed  branches  of  the  Moray  tribe,  there  can 
be  little  doubt  that  the  Macleans  belonged  to  that  tribe  ahm. 
As  their  oldest  seat  was  thus  in  Arg^Ie,  while  they  are  un- 
questionably a  part  of  the  tribe  of  Moray,  we  may  infer  that 
they  were  one  of  those  dans  transplanted  from  North  Moray 
by  Malcolm  IV.,  and  it  is  not  unlikely  that  Glen  Urquhart  waa 
their  original  reddenoe,  aa  that  district  is  said  to  have  been  in 
the  possession  of  the  Macleans  when  the  Biasets  came  in.** 

The  first  of  the  name  on  record,  Gillean,  lived  in  the  reign 
of  Alexander  III.  (1249—1286),  and  fought  against  the 
Norsemen  at  the  battle  of  Largs.  In  the  Ragman  Roll  we 
find  Gilliemore  Madlean  described  as  del  Counte  de  Perth, 
among  those  who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  I.  in  1296.  Aa 
the  county  of  Perth  at  that  period  induded  Lorn,  it  is  proba- 
ble that  he  was  the  son  of  Gillean  and  ancestor  of  the  Mao- 
leani.    In  the  rugn  of  Robert  the  Bmce  mention  ia  made  of 


.     r^J  /- 


MACLEAN, 


40 


LACHLAN  MOR. 


.1 


:i 


in  thtt  year  a  feud  of  a  most  implacable  character  broke  ottt 
between  the  Macleans  and  the  Campbells,  arising  out  of  an 
oocnrrenoe,  irhich  forms  the  sabject  of  Miss  Baillie's  cele- 
brated tragedy  of  *  The  Family  Legend,'  and  is  thus  related 
by  Mr.  Gregory :  **  I^inchlan  Cattanach  Maclean  of  Dowart 
married  Lady  Elizabeth  Campbell,  daughter  of  Archibald, 
second  earl  of  Argyle ;  and,  either  from  the  drcamstanoe  of 
their  union  being  unfruitful,  or  more  probably  owing  to  some 
domestic  quarrels,  he  determined  to  get  rid  of  his  wife. 
Some  accounts  say  that  she  had  twice  attempted  her  hus- 
band's life ;  but,  whatever  the  cause  may  have  been,  Mac- 
lean, following  the  advice  of  two  of  his  vassals,  who  exercised 
a  considerable  influence  over  him  from  the  tie  of  fosterage, 
caused  his  lady  to  be  exposed  on  a  rock,  which  was  only  vis- 
ible at  low  water,  intending  that  she  should  be  swept  away 
by  the  return  of  the  tide.  This  rock  Hm  between  the  island 
of  IJsmore  and  the  coast  of  Mull,  and  is  still  known  by  the 
name  of  the  *  Lady's  Rock.'  From  this  perilous  situation 
she  was  rescued  by  a  boat  accidentally  passing,  and  conveyed 
to  her  brother's  house.  Her  relations,  although  much  exas- 
perated against  Maclean,  smothered  their  resentment  for  a 
time,  but  only  to  break  out  afterwards  with  greater  violence ; 
for  the  laird  of  Dowart,  being  in  Edinburgh,  was  surprised, 
when  in  bed,  and  assas^nated  by  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Cal- 
der,  the  lady's  brother.  The  Macleans  instantly  took  arms, 
to  revenge  Uie  death  of  their  chief,  and  the  Campbells  were 
not  slow  in  preparing  to  follow  up  the  fend ;  but  the  gov- 
ernment interfered,  and,  for  the  present,  an  appeal  to  arms 
was  avoided."  {Gregorys  Hiffhlands  and  liU»^  pp.  127, 
128.)  In  1529,  however,  the  Madeans  joined  the  Clandonald 
of  iHia  against  the  earl  of  Ai^Ie,  and  ravaged  with  fire  and 
sword  the  lands  of  Roseneath,  Craignish,  and  others  belong- 
ing to  the  Campbells,  killing  many  of  the  inhabitants.  The 
Campbells,  on  their  part,  retaliated  by  laying  waste  great 
portion  of  the  isles  of  Mnll  and  Tiree  and  the  lands  of  Mor- 
vem,  belonging  to  the  Madeans.  In  May  1580,  Madean  of 
Dowart  and  Alexander  of  Isia  made  their  personal  submis- 
sion to  the  sovereign  at  Stiriing,  and,  with  the  other  rebel 
island  chiefs  who  followed  their  example,  were  pardoned, 
upon  giving  security  for  their  after  obedience. 

In  1545,  Maclean  of  Dowart  acted  a  very  prominent  part 
in  the  intrigues  with  England,  in  furtherance  of  the  project 
of  Hemry  VIII.,  to  force  the  Scottish  nation  to  consent  to  a 
marriage  between  Prince  Edward  and  the  young  Queen  Ma* 
ry.  He  and  Maclean  of  Lochbuy  were  among  the  barons  of 
the  IsIm  who  accompanied  Donald  Dubh  to  Ireland,  and  at 
the  command  of  the  earl  of  Lennox,  daiming  to  be  regent  of 
Scotland,  swore  allegiance  to  the  king  of  England.  One  of 
the  two  plenipotentiaries  sent  by  Donald  Dubh  to  the  Eng- 
lish court  at  this  time,  was  Patrick  Madean,  brother  of 
Dowart,  described  as  justidar  of  the  Isles  and  bulie  of  Icolm- 
kill.  Of  the  money  sent  by  the  English  king  to  pay  the 
islesmen  engaged  in  the  expedition  against  the  regent  Ar- 
ran,  Maclean  of  Dowart  seems  to  have  had  the  chaige,  but 
not  making  a  proper  diWsion  of  it,  the  insular  chiefs  sepa- 
rated in  discontent,  and  the  expedition  came,  in  consequence, 
to  an  end.  Macvurich,  in  a  note  quoted  by  Mr.  Gregory, 
says :  "  A  ship  came  from  England  with  a  supply  of  money 
to  carry  on  the  war,  which  landed  at  Mull ;  and  the  money 
was  given  to  Madean  of  Dowart  to  be  distributed  among  the 
commanders  of  the  army ;  which  they  not  receiving  in  pro- 
portion as  it  should  have  been  distributed  amongst  them, 
caused  the  army  to  disperse." 

The  dan  history  subsequently  consisted  chiefly  of  fends  in 
which  the  Dowart  family  were  engaged  with  the  CoU  branch 
of  the  Macleans,  and  the  Macdonalds  of  Kintyre.    The  dis- 


pute with  the  former  arose  from  Dowart,  who  was  generally 
recognised  as  the  head  of  the  Clan-lean,  insisting  <m  being 
followed  as  chief  by  Maclean  of  Coll,  and  the  latter,  who  held 
his  lands  direct  from  the  crown,  dedining  to  acknowledge 
him  as  such,  on  the  ground  that  being  a  free  baron,  be  owed 
no  service  but  to  his  sovereign  as  his  feudal  superior.  In  con- 
sequence of  this  refusal,  Dowart,  in  the  year  1561,  cawed 
Coil's  lands  to  be  ravaged,  and  his  tenants  to  be  imprisoned. 
With  some  difficulty,  and  after  the  lapse  of  several  yean, 
Coll  succeeded  in  bringing  his  case  before  the  privy  ooandl, 
who  ordered  Dowart  to  make  reparation  to  him  for  the  ii^iBry 
done  to  his  property  and  tenants,  and  likewise  to  refrain 
from  molesting  him  in  future.  But  on  a  renewal  of  the  fend 
some  years  after,  the  Madeans  of  Coll  were  expelled  from 
that  island  by  the  young  laird  of  Dowart. 

Tlie  quarrel  between  the  Macleans  and  the  Macdonalds  of 
Isla  and  Kintyre  was,  at  the  outset,  merely  a  dispute  as  to  the 
right  of  occupancy  of  the  crown  lands  called  the  Rhinnt  of 
Isla,  but  it  soon  involved  these  tribes  in  a  long  and  bloody 
feud,  and  eventually  led  to  the  destruction  neariy  of  them 
both.  The  Madeans,  who  were  in  possession,  claimed  to  hold 
the  lands  in  dispute  as  tenants  of  the  crown,  but  the  privj 
council  dedded  that  Macdonald  of  Ida  was  really  the  crown 
tenant  In  1562,  the  Macdonalds  of  Isla,  assisted  by  thoee 
of  Sleat,  invaded  the  isles  of  Mull,  Tiree,  and  Coll,  and  in 
1565  the  rival  chiefs  were  compelled  to  find  snratiee,  to  the 
amount  of  £10,000,  that  they  would  abstain  from  mntoal 
hostilities.  But  even  this  did  not  restrain  a  high  spirited 
tribe  like  the  Madeans.  On  the  death  of  James  Maedouald 
of  Dunyveg,  Hector  Maclean  of  Dowsrt  ravaged  with  fire  and 
sword  the  isle  of  Gigha,  being  part  of  the  jointure  lands  of 
Lady  Agnes  Campbell,  Macdonald's  widow,  and  in  conse- 
quence Queen  Mary,  then  at  the  castle  of  Dunbar,  granted, 
on  28th  April,  1567,  a  commission  of  lieutenandry  to  theearl  of 
Argvle  against  him  and  his  dan.   {AndUda  Seoiiea,  p.  898.) 

Lachlan  Maclean  of  Dowart,  called  Lachlan  Mor,  waa  chief 
of  the  Macleans  in  1578.  He  is  sud  to  have  got  the  name  of 
Jfor,  from  his  great  stature,  but,  as  we  have  already  shown 
in  the  artide  on  Campbell  (vol.  i.  p.  544),  this  term  was 
frequently  applied  to  denote  superior  rank.  Under  him  the 
feud  with  the  Macdonalds  assumed  a  most  sangninaiy  and 
relentless  character.  He  is  described  as  a  young  man  of  an 
active  and  energetic  spirit,  and  of  superior  talents  improved 
by  a  good  education,  but  of  a  cruel  and  fierce  dispontimi. 
He  had  succeeded  young  to  the  chiefship,  and  during  his 
minority  the  estates  were  managed  by  his  kinsman,  Hector 
Maclean,  whose  father,  Allan  Maclean  of  Gigha  and  Torinak, 
brother  of  the  former  Maclean  of  Dowart,  is  celebrated  in 
tradition  as  a  warrior,  by  the  name  of  AUin  tta^n  Sop,  To 
obtain  possession  of  the  estates  for  himself,  Hector  designed 
to  deprive  the  young  chief  of  his  life,  but  Lachlan  Mor  dis- 
covered his  purpose,  and  on  attaining  his  majority,  had  him 
apprehended,  and  after  imprisoning  him  for  a  considerable 
time  in  the  castle  of  Dowart,  he  was  removed  to  the  isle  of 
Coll,  and  beheaded  by  Lachlan's  order.  The  following  year, 
on  a  renewal  of  the  fend  between  the  Madeans  and  the  Mac- 
donalds of  Ida,  the  king  and  conndl  commanded  the  diiefii 
of  both  tribes  to  subscribe  assurances  of  indemnity  to  each 
other,  under  the  penalty  of  treason.  But  although  Macdon- 
ald of  Dnnyveg,  at  this  time,  married  Madean's  nster,  hosti- 
lities were  only  suspended  between  the  dans,  to  break  out  no 
long  time  after,  with  increased  violence.  It  was  in  the  year 
1585  that  this  most  destructive  feud  reached  its  hdght,  and 
that  under  the  following  drcumstances: 

Macdonald  of  Sleat,  on  his  way  to  visit  his  kinsman, 
Angus  Macdonald,  was  driven  by  stress  of  weather  to  the 


MACLEAN 


42 


OF  DOWART. 


was  spared.  With  two  of  his  followeni  who  had  escaped  the 
fate  of  their  companions,  he  was  thrown  into  a  dongeon,  and 
not  released  for  a  year  afterwards,  when  he  and  other 
prisoners  were  exchanged  for  Maclean*s  son,  and  the  other 
hostages  in  the  hands  of  Angus  Maodonald. 

Previous  to  his  liberation,  however,  with  the  assistance  of 
a  hundred  Spanish  soldiers  belonging  to  the  Florida,  a  ship 
of  the  Spanish  Armada  driven  bj  a  storm  into  the  harboor  of 
Tobermory  in  Mull,  I^u^lan  Mor  had  ravaged  and  plunder- 
ed the  isles  of  Rum  and  Big,  occupied  by  the  Clanranald,  and 
those  of  Cauna  and  Mndc,  belonging  to  the  clan  Ian.  In 
this  expedition  he  is  said  to  have  burned  the  whole  inhabi- 
tants of  these  Isles,  sparing  neither  age  nor  sex.  On  the 
mainland  he  besieged  for  three  days  &Iac  Ian*s  castle  of  Min- 
g^rry  in  Ardnamurchan.  The  Macdonalds,  on  their  side,  as- 
sisted by  a  band  of  English  mercenaries,  wasted  the  lands  of 
the  Macleans  with  fire  and  sword. 

The  mutual  ravages  committed  by  the  hostile  clans,  in 
which  the  kindred  and  vassal  tribes  on  both  sides  were  in- 
volved, and  the  effects  of  which  were  felt  throughout  the 
whole  of  the  Hebrides,  attracted,  in  1589,  the  serious  atten- 
tion of  the  king  and  coundl,  and  fur  the  purpose  of  putting 
an  end  to  them,  the  rival  chiefs,  with  Macdonald  of  Sleat,  on 
receiving  remissions,  under  the  privy  seal,  for  all  the  crimes 
committed  by  them,  were  induced  to  proceed  to  Edinburgh. 
On  their  arrival,  they  were  committed  prisoners  to  the  castle, 
and,  after  some  time,  Maclean  and  Angus  Macdonald  were 
brought  to  trial,  in  spite  of  the  remissions  granted  to  tliem ; 
one  of  the  principal  charges  against  them  being  their  trea- 
sonable hiring  of  Spanish  and  English  soldiers  to  fight  in 
their  private  quarrels.  Both  chiefs  submitted  themselves  to 
the  king*s  mercy,  and  placed  their  lives  and  lands  at  his  dis- 
posal. On  payment  each  of  a  small  fine  they  were  allowed 
to  return  to  the  Isles,  Macdonald  of  Sleat  being  released  at 
the  same  time.  Besides  certain  conditions  being  imposed 
upon  them,  they  were  taken  bound  to  return  to  their  con- 
finement id  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  whenever  they  should 
be  summoned,  on  twenty  days*  warning.  Not  fulfilling  the 
conditions,  they  were,  on  14  th  July  1593,  cited  to  appear  be- 
fore the  privy  council,  and  as  they  disobeyed  the  summons, 
both  I^chhin  Mor  and  Angus  Maodonald  were,  in  1594,  for- 
feited by  parliament 

At  the  battle  of  Glenlivat,  in  that  year,  fought  between 
the  Catholic  earls  of  Huntly,  Angus,  and  Enrol,  on  the  one 
side,  and  the  king^s  forces,  under  the  earl  of  Argyle,  on  the 
other,  Lachlan  Mor,  ut  the  head  of  the  Macleans,  particularly 
distinguished  himself.  Argyle  lost  the  battle,  but,  says  Mr. 
Gregory,  (Highlands  and  hle»  of  Scotland^  p.  259,)  **  the 
conduct  of  Lachlan  Maclean  of  Dow  art,  who  was  one  of  Ar- 
gyle*s  officers,  in  this  action,  would,  it  imitated  by  the  other 
leaders,  have  converted  the  defeat  into  a  victory.  That  chief 
acted  the  part  of  a  brave  and  skilful  soldier,  keeping  his  men 
in  their  ranks,  and  employing,  with  good  effect,  all  the  ad- 
vantages of  his  position.  It  was  his  division  which  inflicted 
the  principal  loss  on  the  rebels,  and,  at  the  close  of  the  ac- 
tion, he  retired  in  good  order  with  those  under  his  command. 
It  is  said  that,  after  the  battle,  he  offered,  if  Argyle  would 
give  him  five  hundred  men  in  addition  to  his  own  clan,  to 
bring  the  eari  of  Huntly  prisoner  into  Argyle*s  camp.  This 
proposal  was  rejected,  but  having  come  to  the  ears  of  Huntly, 
incensed  him  greatly  against  Maclean,  whose  son  afterwards, 
according  to  tradition,  lost  a  large  estate  in  Lochaber,  through 
the  animosity  of  that  powerful  nobleman.** 

In  1596  Lachlan  Mor  repaired  to  court,  and  on  making  his 
lahmisnon  to  the  king,  the  act  of  forfeiture  was  removed. 
He  also  received  from  the  crown  a  lease  of  the  Rhinns  of 


Isla,  so  long  in  dispute  between  him  and  Maodonald  of  Duny- 
veg.  While  thus  at  the  head  of  favour,  however,  his  unjust 
and  oppresuve  conduct  to  the  family  of  the  Macleans  of  Coll, 
whose  castle  and  bland  he  had  seized  some  years  before,  on 
the  death  of  Hector  Maclean,  proprietor  thereof,  was  brought 
before  the  privy  council  by  Lachlan  Maclean,  then  of  Coll, 
Hector*s  son,  and  the  same  year  he  was  ordered  to  deliver  up 
not  only  the  castle  of  Coll,  but  all  his  own  castles  and  strong- 
holds, to  the  lieutenant  of  the  Isles,  on  twenty-four  houxB* 
warning,  aUw,  to  restore  to  Coll,  within  thirty  days,  all  the 
lands  of  which  he  had  deprived  him,  under  a  penalty  of 
10,000  merks.  In  1598,  Lachlan  Mor,  with  the  view  of  ex- 
pelling the  Macdonalds  from  Isla,  levied  his  vassals  and  pro- 
ceeded to  that  island,  and  after  an  ineffectual  attempt  at  an 
adjustment  of  their  differences,  was  encountered,  on  5th  Au- 
gust, at  tlie  head  of  Lochgruinard,  by  Sir  James  Macdonald, 
son  of  Angus,  at  the  h^d  of  his  clan,  when  the  Macleans 
were  defeated,  and  their  chief  killed,  with  80  of  his  principal 
men  and  200  common  soldiers.  Lachlan  Barroch  Maclean,  a 
son  of  Sir  Lachlan,  was  dangerously  wounded,  but  escaped. 
Sir  I^u^lan,  according  to  Sir  Robert  Gordon,  had  consulted 
a  witch  before  he  undertook  this  journey  into  Isla ;  she  ad- 
nsed  him,  in  the  first  place,  not  to  land  upon  the  island  on 
a  Thursday ;  secondly,  that  he  should  not  drink  of  the  water 
of  a  well  near  Gruinard ;  and  lastly,  she  told  him  that  one 
Maclean  should  be  slain  at  Gruinard.  **  The  first  he  trans- 
gressed unwillingly,*'  says  Sir  Robert,  "  being  driven  into  the 
island  of  Isla  by  a  tempest  upon  a  Thursday ;  the  second  he 
tranHgrcssed  negligentlie,  haveing  drank  of  that  water  before 
he  wes  awair ;  and  so  he  was  killed  ther  at  Groinard,  as  wes 
foretold  him,  hot  doubtfnllie.  Tims  endeth  all  these  that 
doe  trust  in  such  kynd  of  responces,  or  doe  hunt  after  them.** 
{Hist  p.  238.) 

Hector  Maclean,  the  son  and  successor  of  Sir  Lachlan,  at 
the  head  of  a  numerous  force,  iifterwards  invaded  Isla,  and 
attacked  and  defeated  the  Maolonalds  at  a  place  called  Bern 
Bige,  and  then  ravaged  the  whole  island.  He  was  one  of 
the  principal  chiefe  of  the  Isles  seized  by  I^rd  Ochiltree,  the 
king's  lieutenant,  on  his  expedition  to  the  Isles  in  1608,  and 
carried  to  Edinburgh.  The  following  year  he  and  Maodo- 
nald of  Dunyveg  were  selected  to  accompany  the  king's  com- 
missioner on  his  survev  of  the  Isles.  With  two  of  his  bro- 
there,  and  Hector  Maclean  of  I^ochbuy,  and  almost  all  the 
principal  islesmen,  he  was  present  at  lona  when  the  cele- 
brated ^'Statutes  of  Icolmkill"  were  enacted.  He  was  also 
one  of  the  six  principal  islandere  who  met  at  Edinburgh  on 
28th  June  1610,  to  hear  his  majesty's  pleasure  declared  to 
them,  when  they  were  compelled  to  give  sureties  to  a  large 
amount  for  their  reappearance  before  the  council  in  May 
IGll.  In  the  conditions  imposed  upon  the  chiefs  for  the  pa- 
cification of  the  Isles  in  1616,  we  find  that  Bfadean  of  Dow- 
art  was  not  to  use  in  his  house  more  than  four  tun  of  wine, 
and  Coll  and  Lochbuy  one  tun  each.  At  this  time  Maclean 
of  Dowart  and  his  brother  Lachlan,  having  delayed  to  find 
the  sureties  required  of  them,  were  committed  to  ward  in  ^ 
Edinburgh  castle,  whence  the  former  was  soon  liberated,  and 
allowed  to  live  vrith  Achc^n  of  Gosfurd,  his  father-in-law, 
under  his  own  recognisance  of  £40,000,  and  his  father-in- 
law's  for  5,000  merks,  that  he  should  remain  there  until  per- 
mitted by  the  coundl  to  return  to  the  Isles.  Dowart's  bro- 
ther was  not  liberated  till  the  folk)wing  year. 

Sir  lachlan  Maclean  of  Morvem,  a  younger  brother  of 
Hector  Maclean  of  Dowart,  was  in  1631  created  a  baronet  of 
Nova  Scotia  by  Charles  I.,  and  on  the  death  of  his  elder  bro- 
ther he  succeeded  to  the  estate  of  Dowart  In  the  dvil  wan 
the  Macleans  took  amis  under  Montrose,  and  fought  valiantly 


MACLEAN, 


44 


OF  COLL. 


CapL  Hoodf  RN.,  and  another,  Lonisa,  became  the  wife  of 
Hod.  Ralph  Pelham  Meville,  son  of  the  earl  oC  AbeipiTenDj. 


The  first  of  the  Lochbar  branch  of  the  Macleans  was  Heo- 
tor  Reganach,  brother  of  Lachlan  Lubanicb  abore  mentioned. 
He  had  a  aon  named  John,  or  Mnrohard,  whose  great-grand- 
son, John  Oig  Maclean  of  IxMshbaj,  received  from  King 
James  IV.,  sereral  charters  of  oonfinnation  nnder  the  great 
seal,  of  the  lands  and  baronies  which  had  been  held  bj  his 
progenitors.  He  was  killed,  with  his  two  elder  sons,  hi  a 
familj  fend  with  the  Macleans  of  Oowart  His  only  surriv- 
ing  son,  Murdoch,  was  obliged,  in  oonseqnence  of  the  same 
fend,  to  retire  to  Ireland,  where  he  remained  for  several 
years,  and  married  a  daughter  of  the  earl  of  Antrim.  By  the 
mediation  of  his  father-in-law,  his  differences  with  Dowart 
were  satisfactorily  adjusted,  and  he  retomed  to  the  isles, 
where  he  spent  his  latter  years  in  peace.  His  son,  John 
Moir  Maclean  of  Lochbuy,  was  so  expert  a  fencer  that,  ac- 
cording to  a  history  of  the  family,  he  fought  on  a  stage  in 
EcUnburgh  before  the  king  and  court,  and  killed  a  famous 
Italian  swordsman,  who  had  challenged  all  Scotland.  By  his 
wife,  a  daughter  of  Macdonald  of  the  Isles,  he  had  two  sons. 
Hector,  who  succeeded  him,  and  Charles,  progenitor  of  the 
Macleans  of  Tapull.  From  the  latter  family  descended  Sir 
Alexander  Maclean  of  Ottar,  mentioned  in  the  preceding 
page,  who  sttMched  himself  to  the  interests  of  James  VII. 
He  accompanied  the  fallen  monarch  to  France,  and  rose  to 
the  rank  of  colonel  in  the  French  service. 

The  house  of  Lochbuy  has  always  maintained  that  of  the 
two  brothers,  Lachlan  Lubanich  and  Hector  Reganaoh,  the 
latter  was  the  senior,  and  that,  consequently,  the  chiefship  of 
the  Macleans  is  vested  in  its  head ;  **  but  this,**  says  Mr. 
Gr^ry,  "  is  a  point  on  which  there  is  no  certain  evidence." 
The  whole  clan,  at  different  periods,  have  followed  the  head 
of  both  families  to  the  field,  and  fought  xmder  their  command. 
Of  this  house  was  Hector  Maclean,  elected  bishop  of  Argyle 
in  1680.  He  had  in  his  younger  years  taken  arms  for  the 
king  in  the  civil  wars,  but  being  of  a  religious  dispoation  he 
ultimately  entered  the  church.  The  Lochbuy  fsmily  now 
spells  its  name  Maclaine. 


The  Coll  branch  of  the  Macleans,  like  that  of  Dowart,  de- 
scended from  Lachlan  Lubanicb,  said  to  have  been  grand- 
father of  the  fourth  laird  of  Dowart  and  the  first  laird  of 
Coll,  who  were  brothers.  John  Madean,  sumamed  Garbh, 
son  of  Iju:hlan  of  Dowart,  obtained  the  isle  of  Coll  and  the 
lands  of  Quinish  in  Mull  from  Alexander,  eari  of  Ross  and 
lord  of  the  Isles,  and  afterwards,  on  the  forfeitnre  of  Cameron, 
the  lands  of  Lochiel.  The  latter  grant  engendered,  as  we 
have  seen,  a  deadly  feud  between  the  Camerons  and  the 
Macleans,  which  led  to  much  contention  and  bloodshed  be- 
tween them.  At  one  time  the  son  and  successor  of  John 
Garbh  occupied  Lochiel  by  force,  but  was  killed  in  a  conflict 
with  the  Camerons  at  Corpach,  in  the  reign  of  James  III. 
His  infant  son  would  also  have  been  put  to  death,  had  the 
boy  not  been  saved  by  the  Macgillonies  or  Maclonichs,  a  tribe 
of  Loohaber  that  generally  followed  the  clan  Cameron.  This 
youth,  subsequently  known  as  John  Abrach  Maclean  of  Coll, 
was  the  representative  of  the  family  in  1498,  and  from  hhn 
was  adopted  by  his  successors  the  patronymic  appellation  of 
Maclean  Abradi,  by  which  the  lairds  of  Coll  were  ever  after 
distingmshed. 

The  tradition  concerning  this  heir  of  Coll  is  thus  related 
by  Dr.  Johnson,  in  his  Tour  to  the  Hebrides :  **  Very  near 
the  house  of  Madean  stands  the  castie  of  Coll,  which  was  the 
manrion  of  the  laird  till  tha  house  was  bnUt    On  the  wall 


was,  not  long  ago,  a  stone  with  an  inscription,  importing, 
*  That  if  any  man  of  the  dan  of  Madooksh  shall  appear 
before  this  castie,  though  he  come  at  midnight  with  a  bud's 
head  in  his  hand,  he  shall  there  find  saliBty  and  protaetioii 
against  all  but  the  king.*  This  is  an  old  Highland  treaty 
made  upon  a  memorable  occasioo.  Madean,  the  son  of 
John  Garbh,  who  recovered  CoU,  and  oonqoered  Barra,  had 
obtained,  it  is  said,  from  James  XL,  a  grant  of  the  lands  of 
Lochiel,  forfeited,  I  suppose,  by  some  offence  against  the 
state.  Forfeited  estates  were  not  in  those  days  qoietiy  re- 
signed: Madean,  therefore,  went  with  an  armed  force  to 
seise  his  new  possessions,  and,  I  know  not  for  whatreaaon, 
tock  his  wife  with  him.  The  Camerons  rose  in  defence  of 
then*  chief,  and  a  battie  was  fVmght  at  the  bead  <^  Lochnesa, 
near  the  place  where  Fort  Augustus  now  stands,  in  whieb 
Lochiel  obtained  the  victory,  and  Madean,  with  his  follow- 
ers, was  defeated  and  destroyed.  The  lady  fell  into  the  banda 
of  the  conquerors,  and  being  found  pregnant,  was  placed  hi 
the  custody  of  Maclonich,  one  of  a  tribe  or  family  branched  I  i 
from  Cameron,  with  orders,  if  she  brought  a  boy,  to  destroj 
him,  if  a  girl,  to  spare  her.  Madonioh's  wife,  who  was  witk 
child  likewise,  had  a  girl  about  the  same  time  at  which  Lady 
Madean  brought  a  ooy ;  and  Madonich,  with  more  genero- 
sity to  his  captive  than  fidelity  to  his  trust,  contrived  that 
the  children  should  be  changed.  Madean  being  thus  pre- 
served from  death,  in  time  recovered  his  original  patrimony; 
and  in  gratitude  to  his  friend,  made  his  castle  a  place  of  re- 
fuge to  any  of  the  dan  that  should  think  himself  in  danger; 
and,  as  a  proof  of  redprocal  confidence,  Madean  took  upon 
himself  and  his  posterity  the  care  of  educating  the  heir  ot 
Maclonich.  This  story,  like  all  other  traditions  of  the  High- 
lands, is  variously  related ;  but,  though  some  dicnmatanoea 
are  uncertain,  the  principal  fact  is  true.  Madean  undoubt- 
edly owed  his  preservation  to  Madonich ;  fw  the  treaty  be- 
tween the  two  families  has  been  strictly  observed ;  it  did  not 
mnk  into  disuse  and  oblivion,  but  continued  in  its  full  force 
while  the  chieftains  retained  their  power.  The  power  of  pn>- 
tec^on  subsists  no  longer;  but  what  the  law  permits  is  yet 
continued,  and  Madean  of  Coll  now  edueates  the  heir  of 
Madonich.** 

The  account  of  the  conversion  of  the  simple  islanders  of 
Coll  from  popery  to  protestantism  is  curious.  The  laird  had 
imbibed  the  prindples  of  the  Reformation,  but  fbund  his  peo- 
ple rdnctant  to  abandon  the  religion  of  their  fathera.  To 
compd  them  to  do  so,  he  did  not  trouble  himsdf  witli  argu- 
ment (Mr  reasoning  of  any  sort,  but  took  his  station  one  Son- 
day  in  the  path  which  led  to  the  Roman  Catholic  dinroh, 
and  as  his  dansmen  approached,  he  drove  them  back  with 
his  cane.  They  at  once  made  their  way  to  the  protestant 
place  of  worship,  and  from  this  persuanve  mode  of  0Qnv«>- 
sion,  his  vassals  ever  after  called  it  the  religion  of  the  gold- 
beaded  stick.  Lachlan,  the  seventh  proprietor  of  CoU,  went 
over  to  Holland  with  some  of  bis  own  nnen,  in  the  reign  of 
Charles  II.,  and  obtained  the  command  of  a  company  in 
General  Mackay*s  regiment,  in  the  service  of  the  prinee  of 
Orange.  He  afterwards  returned  to  Scotland,  and  was 
drowned  hi  the  water  of  Lochy  in  Lochaber  in  1887. 

Dr.  Johnson  seems  to  have  been  especially  gratified  with 
his  reception  at  Coll.  "  We  were  at  Coll,**  he  says,  "  nnder 
the  protection  of  the  young  laird,  and  wherever  we  roved, 
we  were  pleased  to  see  the  reverence  with  whidi  his  anbjeots 
regarded  him.  He  did  not  endeavour  to  dazzle  them  by  any 
magnificence  of  dress ;  his  only  distinction  waa  a  feather  in 
his  bonnet ;  but,  as  soon  as  he  appeared,  they  forsook  thehr 
work  had  dustered  about  him ;  he  took  them  by  the  hand, 
and  they  seemed  mntaally  delighted.    He  haa  the  proper 


MACLKOD 


46 


OF  HARRIS. 


ther*8  death,  by  leading  bis  clan  to  battle,  the  Highlanders 
having  a  strong  aversion  to  follow  a  deformed  leader.  He 
was  therefore  designed  for  the  ebnrch,  and  with  that  view 
was  placed  with  the  monks  of  Beaoliea,  to  receive  the  reqni- 
ute  ecclesiastical  upbringing.  On  coming  of  age,  and  duly 
set  apart  for  his  holj  woric,  he  set  out  upon  a  tour  to  the 
west  coast,  the  isle  of  Skye,  and  other  places  adjacent,  where 
he  built  the  churches  of  Rilmuir  in  Sleat,  in  the  cburchjard 
of  which  parish  the  celebrated  Flora  Macdonald  lies  buried, 
and  Kilchrennan  in  Glenelg.  Disregarding  the  recent  decree 
of  Pope  Innoo^t  III.,  strictlj  enjoining  the  celibacy  of  the 
clergy,  he  mamed,  and  had  sevnral  children.  One  of  his 
sons  he  called  GUUe-Fkinnan^  in  honour  of  the  renowned  St 
Finnan,  and  as  the  Fh  is  here  not  pronounced  in  the  Gaelic, 
Ghilli-inan  became  of  course  Madennan. 

The  Maclennans  inhabited  with  the  Macraes  the  district  of 
Kintail  in  Ross-shire,  the  boundary  between  them  being  a 
river  which  runs  into  Loch  Duich.  At  the  battle  of  Auld- 
earn in  1645,  they  were  intrusted  with  the  standard  of  Lord 
Seaforth,  and  they  defended  it  so  gallantly,  that  great  num- 
bers of  them  were  cut  down  around  it.  Eighteen  of  the  wi- 
dows of  the  Maclennans  slain  on  this  occasion  married  their 
neighbours  the  Macraes.  Like  the  latter,  the  Maclennans 
were  subordinate  to  the  Seaforth  branch  of  the  Mackenzies, 
and  in  the  difierent  rebellions,  fought  under  the  renowned 
**  Caber  feidh,**  or  Caberfae,  as  the  Mackrazie*s  banner  was 
called,  from  the  deerV  head  in  the  centre. 
,  The  old  Jacobite  ballad  of  Sherifimuir,  to  the  tune  of 

**  We  ran  and  they  ran," 

was  written  by  a  clergyman  of  this  name,  the  Rev.  Murdoch 
Blaclennan  of  Crathie  in  Braemar.  He  became  minister  of 
that  parish  in  1749,  and  died  there  22d  July  1783,  in  the 
82d  year  of  his  age.  An  abridged  version  of  it  is  inwerted  in 
Motherwell  and  Hogg*s  edition  of  the  Works  of  Bums,  vol.  ii. 
page  164. 


Maclkod,  the  name  of  one  of  the  most  considerable  clans 
of  the  western  isles  (badge,  the  red  whortleberry),  divided 
into  two  tribes  independent  of  each  other,  the  Macleods  of 
Harris  and  the  Macleods  of  Lewis.  To  the  progenitors  of 
this  clan  a  Norwegian  origin  has  commonly  been  assigned. 
They  are  also  supposed  to  be  of  the  same  stock  as  the  Camp- 
bells, according  to  a  family  history  referred  to  by  Mr.  Skene, 
which  dates  no  farther  back  than  the  early  part  of  the  16th 
century. 

The  genealogy  claimed  for  them  asserts  (see  Dovglas*  Bar- 
onage^  page  375)  that  the  ancestor  of  the  chiefs  of  the  clan, 
and  he  who  gave  it  its  clan  name,  was  I/)yd  or  Leod,  eldest 
son  of  King  Olave  the  Black,  brother  of  Magnus,  the  last 
king  of  Man  and  the  Isles.  This  Leod  is  said  to  have  had 
two  sons :  Tormod,  progenitor  of  the  Macleods  of  Harris, 
hence  called  the  Siol  Tormod,  or  race  of  Tormod ;  and  Tor- 
quil,  of  those  of  Lewis,  called  the  Siol  Torquil,  or  race  of 
Torquil.  Although,  however,  Mr.  Skene  and  others  are  of 
opinion  that  there  is  no  authority  whatever  for  such  a  de- 
scent, and  **  The  Chronicle  of  Man"  gives  no  countenance  to 
it,  we  think  the  probabilities  are  in  its  favour,  from  the  man- 
ifestly Norw^an  names  borne  by  the  founders  of  the  clan, 
namely,  Tormod  and  Torquil,  and  from  their  position  in  the 
isles,  from  the  very  commencement  of  their  known  history. 
The  dan  itself,  there  can  be  no  doubt,  are  the  descendants  of 
the  andent  Gaelic  inhabitants  of  the  western  ides. 

Tormod,  the  son  of  the  first  Tormod.  nded  with  Bruce,  in 
the  struggle  for  Scottish  independence,  and  always  remamed 


faithful  and  loyal  to  him.  His  son,  Malcolm,  g^  a 
charter  from  David  II.,  of  two-thirds  of  Glenelg,  on  the 
mainland,  a  portion  of  the  fbrfdted  lands  of  the  Biasets,  in 
consideration  for  which  the  reddendum  was  to  provide  a  gal- 
ley of  36  oars,  fbr  the  king*s  use  whenever  xequired.  This  is 
the  eariiest  charter  in  possesdon  of  the  Madeoda.  The  same 
Mdcolm  obtained  the  lands  in  Skye  which  were  kmg  in  pos- 
sesdon of  his  descendants,  by  marriage  with  a  danf^ter  of 
MacArailt,  said  co  have  been  one  of  the  Norwegian  nobles  of 
the  Isles.  From  the  name,  however,  we  would  be  indined  to 
take  this  MacArailt  for  a  Cdt  The  sennachica  sometimes 
made  sad  dips. 

Madeod  of  Harris,  originally  dedgnated  **de  Glendg," 
that  bdng  the  first  and  prindpal  possesdon  of  the  fiunily, 
seems  to  have  been  the  proper  chief  of  the  dan  Leod.  The 
island  or  rather  peninsula  of  Harris,  which  is  adjacent  to 
Lewis,  belonged,  at  an  early  period,  to  the  Macmariea  of 
Garmoran  and  the  North  Ides,  under  whom  the  chief  of  the 
Siol  Tormod  appears  to  have  possessed  it.  From  this  famflj, 
the  superiority  of  the  North  Ides  passed  to  the  Maodonalds 
of  Ida  by  marriage,  and  thus  Harris  came  to  form  a  part  of 
the  lordship  of  the  Isles.  In  the  ide  of  Skye  the  Siol  Tor- 
mod  possessed  the  districts  of  Dunvegan,  Duirinidi,  Brac^ 
dale,  Lyndde,  Troutemess,  and  Minganish,  being  about  two-  | 
thirds  of  the  whole  island.  Their  prindpal  seat  was  Dunvegan, 
hence  the  chief  was  often  styled  of  that  place. 

The  first  charter  of  the  Madeods  of  Lewis,  or  Siol  Torquil, 
is  dso  one  by  King  David  II.  It  is  historically  known  that 
in  1369,  the  year  before  his  death,  that  monarch  proceeded  in 
person,  at  the  head  of  a  formidable  expedition,  against  the 
rebellious  lord  of  the  Isles,  and  compelled  him  and  his  vassal 
chiefs,  at  Inverness,  to  submit  to  his  authority.  One  of  the 
means  employed  by  him  on  this  occasion  to  effect  that  pur- 
pose, and  to  keep  the  rude  northern  chiefs  to  the  obedience  of 
the  laws,  was  the  promise  of  rewards  and  the  bestowal  of 
lands,  on  some  of  the  prindpal  of  them.  It  is  even  said, 
{Fordun  a  Goodal^  vol.  ii.  p.  380,)  that  he  used  artifice  to 
divide  them  and  induce  them  to  day  or  capture  one  another. 
Certdn  it  is,  that  it  was  in  this  rdgn  that  the  practice  of 
bonds  of  manrent  or  friendsliip  among  the  chiefs  and  nobles 
began.  The  charter  referred  to  contained  a  royal  grant  to 
Torquil  Madeod  of  the  barony  of  Assynt,  on  the  north-western 
coast  of  Sutheriandshire.  This  barony,  however,  he  is  sdd 
to  have  obtained  by  marriage  with  the  hdress,  whose  name 
was  Macnicol.  It  was  held  from  the  crown.  In  that  char- 
ter he  has  no  dedgnation,  hence  it  is  thought  that  he  had 
then  no  other  proper^.  The  I^wis  Madeods  hdd  that  island 
as  vassals  of  the  Maodondds  of  Isla  from  1844,  and  soon 
came  to  rival  the  Harris  branch  of  the  Madeods  in  power  and 
extent  of  territory,  and  even  to  dispute  the  chiefship  with 
them.  Their  armorial  bearings,  however,  were  different,  the 
family  of  Harris  having  a  casde,  while  that  of  Lewis  had  % 
burning  mount  The  possesdons  of  the  Siol  Torquil  were 
very  extendve,  comprehending  the  isles  of  Lewis  and  Rasay, 
the  district  of  Watemess  in  Skye,  and  those  of  Assynt^  Co- 
geach,  and  Gerloch,  on  the  mainland. 

To  return  to  the  Harris  branch.  The  grandson  of  the 
above-mentioned  Mdcolm,  William  Madeod,  sumamed  Aek^ 
krack,  or  the  derk,  from  bdng  in  his  youth  designed  for  the 
church,  was  one  of  the  most  daring  chiefs  of  his  time.  To 
avenge  an  insult  which  he  had  received,  when  young,  from 
the  Fraaers,  he  had  no  sooner  succeeded  to  his  patrimony, 
than  he  ravaged  the  estate  of  Lovat  in  the  Aurd.  Having 
afterwards  incurred  the  resentment  of  his  superior,  the  lord 
of  the  Ides,  that  powerful  chief  invaded  his  territoiy  with  % 
large  force,  but  was  defeated  at  a  place  called  Loduligachan, 


MACLEOD 


48 


OF  LEWIS. 


I . 


Jm  univerBtj  of  Gla^ow ;  bat  in  thu  he  was  foiled  bj  the 
interpoeitimi  of  the  eari  of  Argjle.  He  oontiniied,  notwitb- 
standing,  to  retain  possesuon  of  the  estates  of  the  heiress, 
and  of  the  command  of  the  clan,  till  his  death  in  1559.** 
The  heiress  of  Harris  iras  one  of  Queen  Mary's  maids  of  hon- 
onr,  and  the  earl  of  Argjrle,  having  ultimately  become  her 
guardian,  she  was  given  bj  him  in  marriage  to  his  kinsman, 
Duncan  Campbell,  younger  of  Auchinbreck.  Throug)i  the 
previous  efforts  of  the  e«rl,  Tormod  Macleod,  on  receiving  a 
legal  title  to  Harris  and  the  other  estates,  renounced  in  fa- 
vour of  Argyle  all  his  claims  to  the  lands  of  the  Ciandonald, 
and  paid  1,000  merks  towards  the  dowry  of  his  niece.  He 
also  gave  his  bond  of  service  to  Argyle  for  himself  and  his 
dan.  Mary  Macleod,  in  consequence,  made  a  complete  sur- 
render to  her  uncle  of  her  title  to  the  lands  of  Harris,  Dun- 
vegan,  and  Glenelg,  and  Argyle  obtained  for  him  a  crown 
charter  of  these  estates,  dated  4th  August,  1579.  Tormod 
adhered  firmlj  to  the  interests  of  Queen  Mary,  and  died  in 
1584.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son,  William,  under 
whom  the  Harris  Madeods  assisted  the  Madeans  in  their 
feuds  with  the  Macdonalds  of  Isla  and  Skye,  while  the  Lewis 
Madeods  supported  the  latter.  On  his  death  in  1590,  his 
brother,  Roderick,  the  Rory  Mor  of  tradition,  became  diief  of 
the  Harris  Madeods.  In  1595,  he  went  with  500  of  his  clan 
to  Ulster,  to  assist  Bed  Hugh  0*Donnell,  at  that  time  in  re- 
bdlion  against  the  queen  of  England.  In  1601  he  had  a 
quarrel  with  Macdonald  of  Sleat,  an  account  of  which,  with 
its  results,  has  been  already  given,  (see  vol.  iL  p.  714). 

In  December  1597,  an  act  of  the  Estates  had  been  passed, 
by  which  it  was  made  imperaUve  upon  all  the  chieftains  and 
landlords  in  the  Highlands  and  Isles,  to  produce  their  title- 
deeds  before  the  lords  of  Exchequer  on  the  15th  of  the  fol- 
lowing May,  under  the  pain  of  foifeiture.  The  heads  of  the 
two  branches  of  the  Madeods  disregarded  the  act,  and  a  gift 
of  their  estates  was  granted  to  a  number  of  Fife  gentlemen, 
for  the  purposes  of  colonization.  They  first  began  with  the 
Lewis,  in  which  the  experiment  failed,  as  afterwards  narrat- 
ed. Roderick  Macleod,  on  his  part,  exerted  himself  to  get 
the  forfeiture  of  his  lands  of  Harris,  Dunvegan,  and  Glenelg, 
removed,  and  ultimately  succeeded,  having  obtained  a  remis- 
sion from  the  king,  dated  4th  May,  1610.  He  was  knighted 
by  King  James  VI.,  by  whom  he  was  mudi  esteemed,  and 
had  several  friendly  letters  from  his  majesty ;  also,  a  particu- 
lar license,  dated  16th  June,  1616,  to  go  to  London,  to  the 
court,  at  any  time  he  pleased.  In  the  Denmylne  MS.,  in  the 
Advocates*  Library,  there  are  various  letters  of  Sir  Roderick, 
prindpally  concerning  the  escape  of  Sir  James  Macdonald  of 
iHia  in  1615.  To  ensure  their  obedience  to  the  laws,  the 
privy  council  had  ordered  the  chiefs  to  appear  before  thern 
once  a-year,  on  the  10th  July,  or  oftener  if  required,  on  be- 
ing duly  dted ;  and  on  the  suppression  of  the  rebdiion  of  Sir 
James  Macdonald,  the  same  year,  still  more  stringent  regula- 
tions were  adopted.  They  were  compelled  to  exhibit 
each  a  certain  number  of  their  prindpal  kinsmen,  and  were 
only  to  maintain  in  household  certain  proportiona  of  gentle- 
men, according  to  their  rank,  Madeod  being  allowed  six; 
they  were  also  to  reside  at  certain  spedfied  places  on  their 
estates.  Various  other  conditions  were  imposed  on  them, 
the  most  important  of  which  was  one  relating  to  the  educa- 
tion of  their  children.  The  chiefs  were  required  to  send  all 
thdr  children  above  nine  years  of  age  to  school  in  the  Low- 
lands, to  be  instructed  in  reading,  writing,  and  speaking  the 
English  language ;  and  none  could  be  served  heirs  to  thdr 
fathers,  or  recdved  as  tenants  to  the  king,  until  they  had  re- 
ceived that  education.  The  very  quantity  of  wine  they  were 
to  use  in  their  bouses  was  regulated,  Madeod*s  allotment 


bdng  four  tuns,  and  eadi  chief  was  bound  to  take  strict  or- 
der throughout  his  whole  estates  that  none  of  his  tenants  or 
vassals  should  buy  or  drink  any  wine.  This  last  obligation 
proceeded  on  the  narrative  that  **  the  great  and  extraordinazy 
excesse  in  drinking  of  wyne,  commonlie  usit  among  the  eom- 
m<mis  and  tenantis  of  the  Yllis,  is  not  only  ane  occanoon  of 
the  beastlie  and  barbarous  arndties  and  inhumanities  that 
fallis  oute  amangis  tharoe,  to  the  offens  and  displeasoor  of 
God,  and  contempt  of  law  and  justice;  but  with  that  it 
drawis  nomberis  of  thame  to  miserable  necesdtie  and  povar- 
tie,  sua  that  they  are  oonstr^ynit,  quhen  they  want  from  thdr 
awne,  to  tak  from  thair  nichtbours.**  Fmding  that  this  regr 
ulation,  strict  as  it  was,  was  evaded,  the  privy  coniidl  in 
1622  passed  an  act  prohibiting  masters  of  vessels,  under  the 
penalty  of  confiscaUon  of  the  artide,  from  carrying  more 
wine  to  the  Ides  than  the  quantity  allowed  to  the  chi^  and 
gentlemen.  In  the  preamble  of  this  act  the  rcMon  of  this 
new  r^ulation  is  thus  stated : — **  With  the  insatiable  desyre 
quhaurof  the  saidis  Islanderis  ar  so  far  possesst,  that,  when 
tliair  anyvis  ony  schip  or  uther  veschell  there  with  wines, 
thay  spend  both  dayes  and  nights  in  their  excesse  <^  drink- 
ing sa  lang  as  thair  is  anie  of  the  wyne  left ;  sua  that,  bdng 
overcome  with  drink,  thair  ftdlis  oute  many  inconvenientis 
amangis  thame,  to  the  breck  of  his  miyesteis  peace,**  &a 
Sir  Roderick  died  in  the  beginning  of  1626.  By  his  wife,  a 
daughter  of  Macdonald  of  Glengarry,  he  had,  with  six  dangfa- 
ters,  five  sons,  viz.  John,  his  heir;  Sir  Roderick,  progenitor 
of  the  Madeods  of  Talisker ;  Sir  Norman,  of  the  Madeods  of 
Bemera  and  Muiravonside ;  W'illiam,  of  the  Madeods  of  Ha- 
mer ;  and  Donald,  of  those  of  Grisemish. 

The  history  of  the  Siol  Torquil,  or  Lewis  Madeods,  as  it 
approached  its  dose,  was  most  disastrous.  Roderick,  the 
chief  of  this  branch  in  1569,  got  involved  in  a  deadly  feud 
with  the  Mackenzies,  which  ended  only  with  the  destruction 
of  his  whole  family.  He  had  married  a  daughter  of  John 
Mackenzie  of  Kintail,  and  a  son  whom  she  bore,  and  who 
was  named  Torquil  Comumach^  from  his  residence  among  his 
mother*s  relations  in  Stratbconnan,  was  disowned  by  him,  on 
account  of  the  alleged  adultery  of  his  mother  with  the  breve 
or  Celtic  judge  of  the  Lewis.  She  eloped  with  John  Mao- 
Gillechallnm  of  Rasay,  a  cousin  of  Roderick,  and  was,  in 
consequence,  divorced.  He  took  for  his  second  wife,  in  1541, 
Barbara  Stewart,  daughter  of  Andrew  Lord  Avandale,  and 
by  this  lady  had  a  son,  likewise  named  Torquil,  and  snmamed 
Oigkre^  or  the  Heir,  to  distinguish  him  from  the  other  Tor- 
quil. About  1566,  the  former,  with  200  attendants,  was 
drowned  in  a  tempest,  when  sailing  from  Lewis  to  Skj%  and 
Torquil  Connanach  immediately  took  up  arms  to  vindicate 
what  he  conceived  to  be  his  rights.  In  his  pretenuons  he 
was  supported  by  the  Mackenzies.  Roderick  was  appre- 
hended and  detained  four  years  a  prisoner  in  tlie  castle  of  Stor- 
noway.  In  his  extremity  that  chief  had  sought  the  assistanoe 
of  Donald  Gorme  or  Macdonald  of  Sleat,  who,  with  his  sanction, 
took  steps  to  procure  his  own  recognition  as  heir  of  the  line 
of  Lewis,  founding  his  claim  on  an  alleged  confession  of 
Hugh  Madeod,  the  breve  of  the  island,  that  Torquil  CofUKm- 
ach  was  in  reality  his  son.  But  the  feud  between  the  Mac- 
donalds and  Mackenzies  was  put  an  end  to  by  the  mediation 
of  the  Regent  Moray.  Before  bdng  released  from  his  capti- 
vity, the  old  chief  was  brought  before  the  R^nt  Mar  and 
his  privy  council,  and  compelled  to  resign  his  estate  into  the 
hands  of  the  crown,  taking  a  new  destination  of  it  to  himself 
in  liferent,  and  alter  his  death  to  Torquil  ConmanacK  ee  his 
son  and  heir  apparenL  On  regaining  his  Uberty,  however, 
he  revoked  all  that  he  had  done  when  a  prisoner,  on  the 
ground  of  coerdon.    This  led  to  new  com  motions,  and  in 


I  L  ^■i  —  ■ 


MACLEOD 


50 


OF  RASAY. 


I 


,  I 


w(sre  at  length  driyen  from  it  by  the  MackensieB.  Neill  sur- 
rendered to  Roderick  Macleod  of  HnrrUf  who,  on  bdng 
charged,  under  pain  of  trtfason,  to  deliyer  him  to  the  privj 
council  at  Edinburgh,  gave  him  up,  with  hia  aon,  Donald. 
Neill  was  brought  to  trial,  convicted,  and  executed,  and  ia 
said  to  have  died  "  verr  Chriatianlie,'*  in  April  1613.  Do- 
nald, his  son,  was  banished  from  Scotland,  and  died  in  HoW 
.and.  Roderick  and  William,  two  of  the  ions  of  Rorj  Oig, 
were  seized  bv  the  tutor  of  Kntail,  and  executed.  Mal- 
colm, the  other  son,  apprehended  at  the  same  time,  made  his 
escape,  and  continued  to  harass  the  Mackenues  for  years. 
He  was  prominently  engaged  in  Sir  James  Macdonald's  re- 
bellion in  1615,  and  afterwards  went  to  Flanders,  but  in 
1616  was  once  more  in  the  J^wia,  where  he  killed  two  gen- 
tlemen of  the  Mackenzies.  He  subsequently  went  to  Spain, 
whence  he  returned  with  Sir  James  Macdonald  in  1620.  In 
1622  and  1626,  commissions  of  fire  and  sword  were  granted 
to  I^rd  Kintail  and  bis  clan  agunst  *'  Malcolm  MacRoari 
Macleod.**    Nothing  more  is  known  of  him. 

On  the  extinction  of  the  main  line  of  the  Lewis,  the  re- 
presentation of  the  family  devolved  on  the  Macleods  of  Ra- 
say,  afterwards  referred  to.  The  title  of  Lord  Macleod  was 
the  second  title  of  the  Mackenzies,  earls  of  Cromarty. 

In  the  civil  wars,  Sir  Roderick  Macleod  of  Harris,  son  of 
John,  commonly  called  John  Mor,  supported  the  royal  cause, 
and  Charles  L  was  so  sensible  of  his  services  that  he  wrote 
him  a  kind  and  friendly  letter,  dated  at  Durham,  2d  May 
1639,  promising  him  his  constant  favour  and  protection.  His 
eldest  son,  also  named  Roderick,  acquired,  from  his  humour, 
the  surname  of  Roderick  the  Witty.  Being  a  minor  during 
the  usurpation,  the  whole  clan  followed  his  uncles.  Sir  Rod- 
erick Macleod  of  Talisker  and  Sir  Nonnan  Macleod  of  Beme- 
ra.  At  that  time  the  Macleods  could  bring  into  the  field 
700  men.  At  the  battle  of  Worcester  in  1651,  the  Macleods 
fought  on  the  side  of  Charles  II.,  and  so  great  was  the  slaugh- 
ter amongst  them  that  it  was  agreed  by  the  other  dans  that 
they  should  not  engage  in  any  other  conflict  until  they  had 
recovered  their  losses.  The  Harris  estates  were  sequestrated 
by  Cromwell,  but  the  chief  of  the  Macleods  was  at  last,  in 
May  1655,  admitted  into  the  protection  of  the  Common- 
wealth by  General  Monk,  on  his  finding  security  for  his 
peaceable  behaviour  under  the  penalty  of  £6,000  sterling, 
and  paying  a  fine  of  £2,500.  Both  his  uncles,  however, 
were  expressly  excepted. 

At  the  Revolution,  Macleod  of  Macleod,  which  became  the 
draignation  of  tlie  laird  of  Harris,  as  chief  of  the  clan,  was 
favourable  to  the  cause  of  James  VII.,  and  a  letter  written 
to  him  by  Viscount  Dundee,  dated  Muy,  June  23,  1689,  giv- 
ing an  account  of  the  preparations  of  the  other  chiefs,  and  of 
his  own  proceedings,  and  enclosing  a  lett«r  from  the  exiled 
monarch  to  him,  is  printed  in  Browne's  History  of  the  High- 
lands. In  1715,  the  effective  force  of  the  Macleods  was  1,000 
men,  and  in  1745,  900.  The  chief,  by  the  advice  of  Presi- 
dent Forbes,  did  not  join  in  the  rebellion  of  that  year,  and  so 
saved  his  estates,  but  many  of  his  clansmen,  burning  with 
zeal  for  the  cause  of  Prince  Charles,  fought  in  the  ranks  of 
tlie  rebel  army. 

At  page  47  it  is  mentioned  that  the  bad  treatment  which 
a  daughter  of  the  chief  of  the  Macleods  experienced  from  her 
husband,  the  captain  of  the  Clanranald,  bad  caused  them  to 
take  the  first  opportunity  of  inflicting  a  signal  vengeance  on 
the  Macdonalds.  The  merciless  act  of  Macleod,  by  which 
the  entire  population  of  an  island  was  cut  off  at  once,  is  de- 
scribed by  Mr.  Skene  {Hist  of  the  IHghUrndt^  vol.  ii.  page 
277),  and  is  shortly  thus.  Towards  the  close  of  the  16th 
centwy,  a  small  number  of  Macleods  accidentally  landed  on 


the  island  of  Eigg,  and  were  hospitably  received  bj  the  in- 
habitants. Offering.  bowe\'er,  some  indvilitiei  to  the  young 
women  of  the  island,  they  were  by  the  nude  relatives  of  the 
latter  bound  hand  and  foot,  thrown  into  a  boat,  and  arat 
adrift.  Being  met  and  rescued  by  a  party  of  their  own  elans- 
men,  they  were  brought  to  Dunvegan,  the  residence  of  their 
chief,  to  whom  they  told  their  story.  Instantly  manning  his 
galleys,  Macleod  hastened  to  Eigg.  On  descrpng  hb  a|H 
proach  the  islanders,  with  their  wives  and  children,  to  the 
number  of  200  persons,  took  refuge  in  a  large  cave,  situated 
in  a  retired  and  secret  place.  Here  for  two  days  they  re- 
mained undiscovered,  but  having  nnfortnnately  sent  <nit  a 
scout  to  see  if  the  Macleods  were  gone,  their  retreat  was  de- 
tected, but  they  refhsed  to  surrender.  A  stream  of  water 
fell  over  the  entrance  to  the  cave,  and  pertly  coneealed  it. 
This  Macleod  caused  to  be  ttimed  from  its  course,  and  then 
ordered  all  the  wood  and  other  combustibles  which  could  be 
found  to  be  piled  up  around  its  mouth,  and  set  fire  to,  when 
all  within  the  cave  were  suffocated. 

The  Siol  Tormod  continued  to  possess  Harris,  Dunvegan, 
and  Glenelg  till  near  the  close  of  the  I8th  century.  The 
former  and  the  latter  estates  have  now  passed  into  other 
hands.  A  considerable  portion  of  Harris  is  the  property  of 
the  earl  of  Dunmore,  and  many  of  its  inhabitants  have  emi- 
grated to  Cape  Breton  and  Canada.  The  climate  of  the 
island  is  sud  to  be  favourable  to  longevity.  Martin,  in  his 
account  of  the  Western  Isles,  says  he  knew  sevo^l  in  Harris 
of  90  years  of  age.  One  Lady  Macleod,  who  passed  the  most 
of  her  time  here,  lived  to  103,  had  then  a  comely  head  of 
hair  and  good  teeth,  and  enjoyed  a  perfect  understanding  till 
the  week  she  died.  Her  son.  Sir  Norman  Macleod,  died  at 
96 ;  and  his  grandson,  Donald  Macleod  of  Bemera,  at  91. 
Glenelg  became  the  property  first  of  Charles  Grant,  Lord 
Glenelg,  and  afterwards  of  Mr.  Baillie.  From  the  family  of 
Bemera,  one  of  the  principal  branches  of  the  Harris  Mae- 
leods,  sprung  the  Macleods  of  Luskinder,  of  which  Sir  Wil- 
liam Macleod  Bannatyne,  a  lord  of  session,  was  a  cadet.  For 
a  brief  memoir  of  him,  see  vol.  i.  p.  286. 


The  first  of  the  house  of  Rasay,  the  proprietor  of  which  is 
the  representative  and  heir  male  of  the  I^ewis  branch  of  the 
Macleods,  was  Malcolm  Garbh  Macleod,  the  second  son  of 
Malcolm,  8th  chief  of  the  Lewis.  In  the  reign  of  James  V. 
he  obtained  from  his  father  in  patrimony  the  island  of  Rasay, 
which  lies  between  Skye  and  the  Ross-shire  district  of  Ap- 
plecroas.  In  1569  the  whole  of  the  Rasay  family,  except  one 
infant,  were  barbarously  massacr^  by  one  of  their  own  kins- 
men, under  the  following  circumstances.  John  MacGille- 
challum  Macleod  of  Rasay,  called  Ian  na  Tvaidk,  or  John 
with  the  axe,  who  had,  as  stated  on  p.  48,  carried  off  Janet 
Mackenzie,  the  first  wife  of  his  chief,  Roderick  Macleod  of 
the  Lewis,  married  her,  after  her  divorce,  and  had  by  her 
several  sons  and  one  daughter.  The  latter  became  the  wife 
of  Alexander  Roy  Mackenzie,  a  grandson  of  Hector  or  Ea- 
chan  Roy,  the  first  of  the  Mackenzies  of  Gerloch,  a  marriage 
which  gave  great  offence  to  his  clan,  the  Siol  vie  Gillecbal- 
lum,  as  the  latter  had  long  been  at  feud  with  that  particular 
branch  of  the  Mackenzies.  On  Janet  Mackenzie's  death,  he 
of  the  axe  married  a  sister  of  a  kinsman  of  his  own,  Ruari 
Macallan  Macleod,  who  from  his  venomous  disposition  was 
sumamed  Nimhneach,  The  latter,  to  obtain  Rasay  for  bis 
nephew,  his  sister's  son,  resolved  to  cut  off  both  his  brother- 
in-law  and  his  sons  by  the  first  marriage.  He  accordingly  in- 
vited him  to  a  feast  in  the  island  of  Isay  in  Skye,  and  after 
it  was  over,  he  left  the  apartment.  Then,  causing  them  to 
be  sent  for  one  by  one,  he  had  each  of  them 


MACNAB 


52 


OF  MACNAB. 


Beul,  in  the  reign  of  Jaiiie8  III.,  uf  the  Uodtf  of  Ardchyle,  and 
Wester  Duiuioh,  in  the  bHn>iiy  of  Gieiidochiurt  and  county  of 
Perth,  diited  January  1,  I486.  He  had  also  a  chnrter  frum 
•lames  IV.,  of  the  huida  of  Ewir  nud  LeiragMn,  tn  the  same 
barony,  dated  January  9,  1502.  He  died  soon  thM«M(ter, 
leaving  a  son,  Finl.-ty  Macnab,  fifth  Uird  of  Mitcnab,  who  hi 
witness  in  a  cliarter,  under  the  great  seal,  to  Dancau  Camp- 
bell of  Glenorchy,  wherein  he  is  debigued  *'  Fkikuu  Macnaby 
dominuM  de  eodem^^  &c,  SepL  18,  1511.  He  died  about  tbe 
close  of  the  reign  of  James  V. 

His  sun,  Fuihiy  Macnab  of  Bovain  and  of  that  ilk,  6tli  chief 
frt)m  Gilbert,  alienated  or  mortgaged  a  great  portion  of  his 
lands  to  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  ancestor  of  the  marquis  of 
Hreadalbane,  as  appears  by  a  charter  to  **  CoUn  Campbell  uf 
Glenurchy,  his  heirs  and  assignees  whatever,  according  to  the 
deed  granted  to  him  by  Fmlay  Macnab  of  Bovain,  24tli  No- 
vember, 1552,  of  all  and  sundry  the  huids  of  Bovain  and  Ard- 
chyle,  &&,  confirmed  by  a  diarter  under  the  great  seal  from 
Mary,  dated  27th  June,  1553."  Gleuor chy*s  right  of  sqperiur- 
ity  tlie  Macnal»8  always  refused  to  acknowledge. 

His  son,  Fmlay  .Macnab,  tlio  seventh  laird«  who  lived  in 
tlie  reign  of  James  VI.,  was  the  chief  who  entered  into  the 
bond  of  friendship  and  manrent  with  his  cousin,  Lauchian 
Mackinnon  of  StrathordelU  12th  July,  1606,  quoted  at  page 
28  of  tliis  volume.    This  cbief  earned  on  a  deadly  feud  with 
the  Neishes  or  M^Ilduys,  a  tribe  which  po6«es»ed  the  upper 
parts  of  Stratheam,  and  inhabited  an  iitland  in  the  lower  part  of 
Ludi  Earn,  called  from  them  Neibh  island.    Many  battles  were 
fought  between  them,  with  various  success.    The  Inst  wus  at 
Glehbuultachan,  abont  two  miles  north  of  Loch  Kuin  fout,  in 
which  the  Macnabs  were  victorious,  and  tlie  Neishes  cut  off 
almost  to  a  man.    A  small  renmaut  of  them,  however,  ttill 
lived  m  the  island  referred  to,  the  head  of  which  was  an  old 
man,  who  subsisted  by  plundering  the  people  in  the  neigh- 
bourhood.     One  Christmas,  the  cliief  uf  tbe  Macnabs  had 
sent  his  servant  to  Crieff  for  provisions,  but,  on  his  return,  he 
was  waylaid,  and  robbed  of  all  his  purchases.      He  went 
home,  therefore,  empty-handed,  and  told  his  tale  to  the  laird. 
Macnab  bad  twelve  sons,  all  men  of  great  strength,  but  one 
in  particular  exceedingly  athletic,  who  was  called  for  a  byname, 
Icun  VMon  Mac  an  Appa^  or  "Smooth  John  Macnab."     In 
the  evening,  these  men  were  gloomily  meditating  some  signal 
revenge  on  their  old  enemies,  when  their  tather  entered,  and 
said  in  Gaelic,  "  The  night  is  the  night,  if  the  lads  were  but 
Uds ! "     Eiich  man  instantly  started  to  his  feet,  and  belted  on 
his  dirk,  lib  claymore,  and  his  pistols.     Led  by  their  brother 
John,  they  set  uut,  taking  a  fishing-boat  on  their  shoulders 
tn>m  Ix}ch  Tay,  carrying  it  over  the  mountains  and  gleus 
till  they  reached   Loch  Earn,  where  they  launched  it,  and 
passed  over  to  the  island.     All  was  silent  in  the  habiUition  of 
^eittii.     Having  all  the  boats  at  the  inland  secured,  they  had 
gune  to  sleep  without  fear  of  surprise.     Smooth  Juhn,  with 
his   foot  dashed  open  tbe  door  of  Neish's  house;  and  the 
party,  rushing  in,  attacked  the  unfortunate  family,  every  one 
of  whom  was  put  to  the  sword,  with  the  exception  of  one 
man  and  a  boy,  who  concealed  thenuielves  under  a   bed. 
Carrying  uff  the  heads  of  the  Neishes,  and  any  plunder  they 
could  secure,  the  youths  presented  themselves  to  their  father, 
while  the  piper  struck  up  the  pibroch  of  victory. 

The  next  laird,  **  Smooth  John,"  the  son  of  this  Finlay, 
made  a  dintinguislied  figure  in  the  reign  of  Charles  L,  and 
suffei-ed  many  hardships  on  account  of  his  attachment  to  tlie 
royal  cause.  After  the  battle  of  Alford  in  1645,  he  joined  the 
army  of  Montrose,  witli  his  clan,  and  was  of  great  service  to 
him  at  the  battle  of  KiUyth.  He  was  subsequently  directed 
by  Montrose  to  giurison  Ins  caatle  of  Kinuudiiie,  and  he  con- 


tinued there  until  besieged  by  General  Leslie,  when,  their  pio- 
visions  failing,  he  endeavoured,  with  800  nicn,  to  maka  bit 
escape,  during  the  darkness  of  the  night.  Marehiog  oal« 
sword  in  hand,  they  all  got  off,  except  Macnab  himself  and 
one  of  his  men,  who  were  sent  prisouem  to  Edinbui]^  llaO" 
nab  was  condemned  to  death,  but  escaped  the  night  prsvkNW 
to  the  day  on  which  he  was  ordered  fur  execution.  He  was 
killed  at  the  battle  of  Worcester  in  1651.  During  the  coin- 
monwealth,  his  castle  of  Eilau  Rowan  was  burned,  his  estates 
ravaged  and  sequestrated,  and  the  family  papers  >g>*in  hM^> 
Taking  advantage  of  the  troubles  of  the  tunes,  his  powerful 
neighbour,  Campbell  of  Glenurchy,  in  the  heart  of  wliose  pos- 
sessions Macnab's  lands  were  situated,  on  the  pretence  that  he 
had  sustuned  coniuderable  losses  frum  the  clan  Macnab,  got 
possession  of  the  estates  in  recompense  thereo£ 

This  chief  of  the  Macnabs  married  a  daughter  of  Campbell 
of  Glenlyun,  and  with  one  daughter,  li;id  a  son,  Alexander 
Macnab,  ninth  laird,  who  was  only  fuur  years  old  when  bia 
father  was  killed  on  Worcester  battle-field.  His  mother  and 
friends  applied  to  General  Monk  for  some  relief  from  the 
family  estates  for  herself  and  children.  That  general  nuule  a 
favourable  report  on  the  application,  but  it  had  no  effect.  It 
was  directed  to  Captain  Gascoigne,  governor  of  Fiularig,  and 
was  in  the  following  tenns :  '*  I  do  hereby  dechire,  that  it 
was  not  intended  by  my  order  for  repairing  tlie  laird  of  Glen- 
urchy's  losses  by  the  Macnabs  out  of  their  estates,  that  the 
s:une  should  extend  to  the  molesting  or  intenneddling  with 
the  ebtates  of  any  of  the  Macnabs  who  live  peaceably.  And 
forasmuch  as  I  understand  that  the  widow  of  the  laird  of 
Macnab  hatli  lived  peaceably,  yon  are  hereby  authorised,  and 
I  desire,  in  case  any  vexation  be  offered  to  the  outing  or  di»- 
possetising  of  the  said  widow  and  her  children  of  tbe  aaid 
lands,  or  anything  that  belongs  tu  them,  under  colour  ai  the 
said  order,  to  preserve  the  rights  that  to  tliem  bebng,  aa  if 
the  said  order  had  never  been  made,  and  to  enter  and  receive 
them  into  their  lauds ;  and  this  favour  also  is  to  be  extended 
for  Arcliibalu  Macnab  uf  Acharne.  Given  under  my  band 
and  seal  at  Dalkeith,  18th  January,  1654.  (Signed)  S.  S. 
George  Monk."  After  the  Restoration,  appUcation  was  made 
to  the  Scottish  Estates,  by  the  Lady  Macnab  and  her  son, 
for  redress,  and  in  1661  they  received  a  oonsidenible  portion 
of  their  huids,  which  the  family  enjoyed  till  tbe  beginning  of 
tbe  present  century,  when  they  were  sold. 

By  his  wife,  Elizabeth,  a  sister  of  Sir  Alexander  Menuea, 
of  Weem,  baronet,  Alexander  Macnab  of  that  ilk  bad  a  son 
and  heir,  Robert  Macnab,  tenth  laird,  who  married  Anne 
Campbell,  sister  of  the  earl  of  Breadalbane.    Of  several  cbil- 
dreii  only  two  survived,  John,  who  succeeded  his  father,  and 
Archibald.     The  elder  sou,  John,  held  a  commission  in  the 
Black  Watch,  and  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  battls  of  Preston- 
pans,  and,  with  several  others,  confined  in  Doune  Castle,  un- 
der the  charge  of  Macgregur  uf  Glengyle,  where  he  remained 
till  after  the  battle  of  CuUoden.     The  majurity  of  tlie  dan 
took  the  side  of  the  house  uf  Stuart,  and  were  led  by  AUister 
Macnab  of  Inshewan  and   Archibald  Macnab  of  Acbame. 
They  were  mostly  incorporated  in  the  Duke  of  Perth's  regi- 
ment,  of  which  Alexander  Macnab  of  Dundum    was  the 
standard  bearer.    The  others  juined  a  body  of  Breadalbane 
men  under  tbe  command  of  Campbell  of  Glenlyon.     The 
younger  son,  Archibald,  obtained  in  1740  a  oommisMon  aa 
eiiMgn  in  the  Black  Watch  (now  the42d  Highlanders),  oo  ita 
onbodiment,  and  served  hi  Germany  with  that  regiment.     In 
June  1745  he  was  appointed  captam  of  Loudoun*s  High- 
landers, and  in  1757  he  distinguislied  himself  at  the  battle  et 
Fellinghaiifien.     Under  General  Wolfe,  be  was  present  at  tbe 
battle  of  Quebec     He  served  also  throughout  the  American 


r 


MACNAGHTON 


54 


OF  MACNAGHTON. 


I . 


then  Picts.  The  parish  of  Dnnnicben,  in  FoifHn»hire,  derived 
Its  name  from  the  Gaelic  dun^  a  hill,  and  the  word  JVecAlon, 
the  name  of  a  Pictiah  chief  who  is  traditionally  reported  to 
have  resided  in  the  parish.  According  to  Buchanan  of  Auch- 
mar,  {Hiitory  of  tite  Origin  of  the  Clam^  p.  84,)  the  heads 
of  this  clan  were  for  ages  thanes  of  Loch  Tay,  and  possessed 
ail  the  country  between  the  south  nde  of  Loch-Fyne  and 
LochawCf  parts  of  which  were  Glenira,  Glenshira,  Gl^ifine, 
Mild  other  places,  while  their  principal  seat  was  Dunderraw 
on  Loch-Fyne. 

In  the  reign  of  Robert  IIL,  Maurice  or  Morioe  Macnaugh- 
ton  had  a  charter  from  Colin  Campbell  of  Lochow  of  sundry 
lands  in  Over  I^ochow,  but  their  first  settlement  in  Aigyle- 
shire,  in  the  central  parts  of  which  their  lands  latteriy  wholly 
lay,  took  place  long  before  this.  The  Macnaughtons  are  said 
to  have  been  originally  a  branch  of  the  tribes  of  the  province 
of  Moray,  when  united  under  its  maormors.  (Skene's  His- 
tory of  the  Highlands^  vol  iL  p.  201.)  These  maormors 
were  the  roost  powerful  cliiefs  in  Scotland  during  the  middle 
ages.  When  Malcolm  the  Maiden  attempted  to  civilize  the 
ancient  pnmnoe  of  Moray,  by  introducing  Norman  and  Saxon 
families,  such  as  the  Bissets,  the  Comyns,  &c.,  in  the  place 
of  the  rude  Celtic  natives  whom  he  had  expatriated  to  the 
south,  he  gave  lands  in  or  near  Strathtay  or  Strathspey,  to 
Nachtan  of  Moray,  for  those  he  had  held  in  that  province. 
He  had  there  a  residence  called  Dunnachtan  castle.  Kisbet 
{Heraldry^  vol.  L  p.  419)  describes  this  Nachtan  as  *'  an  em- 
inent man  in  the  time  of  Malcolm  IV.,**  and  says  that  he 
''  was  in  great  esteem  with  the  family  of  Lochawe,  to  whom 
he  was  very  assistant  in  tlieir  wars  with  the  ^lacdougals,  for 
which  he  was  rewarded  with  sundry  lands.**  The  family  of 
Lochawe  here  mentioned  were  the  Campbells. 

The  Macnaughtons  appear  to  have  been  fairly  and  finally 
settled  in  Argyleshire  previous  to  the  reign  of  Alexander  III., 
as  Gilchrist  Macnaughton,  styled  of  that  ilk,  was  by  that 
munarch  appointed  in  1287,  heritable  keeper  of  his  castle  and 
island  of  Frechelan  (Fraoch  Elian)  on  Lochawe,  on  condition 
that  he  should  be  properly  entertained  when  he  should  pass 
that  way,  whence,  a  castle  embattled  was  assumed  as  the 
crest  of  the  family. 

This  Gilchrist  was  father  or  grandfather  of  Donald  Mac- 
naughton of  that  ilk,  who  being  nearly  connected  with  the 
Macdougals  of  Lorn,  joined  that  powerful  chief  with  his  dan 
agaiuHt  Robert  the  Bruce,  and  fought  agiunst  the  latter  at 
the  battle  of  Dalree  in  1806,  in  consequence  of  which  he  lost 
a  great  part  of  his  estates.  In  Abercromby*s  *  Martial 
Achievements,*  (vol.  i.  p.  577,)  it  is  related  that  the  extraor- 
dinary courage  shown  by  the  king  in  having,  in  a  narrow 
pass,  slain  with  his  own  hand  several  of  his  pursuers,  and 
amongst  the  rest  three  brothers,  so  greatly  excited  the  admi* 
ration  of  the  chief  of  the  Macnaughtons  that  he  became 
thenceforth  one  of  his  firmest  adherents. 

His  son  and  successor,  Duncan  Macnaughton  of  that  ilk, 
was  a  steady  and  loyal  subject  to  King  David  II.,  who,  as  a 
reward  for  his  fidelity,  conferred  on  his  son,  Alexander,  lands 
in  the  island  of  Lewis,  a  portion  of  the  forfeited  possessions 
of  John  of  the  Isles,  which  the  chiefo  of  the  clan  Naughton 
hi^ld  for  a  time.  The  ruins  of  their  castle  of  Macnaughton 
are  still  pointed  out  on  that  island. 

Donald  Macnaughton,  a  younger  son  of  the  family,  was, 
in  1436,  elected  bishop  of  Dnnkeld,  in  the  reign  of  James  I. 

Alexander  Macnaughton  of  that  ilk,  who  lived  in  the  be- 
ginning of  the  16th  century,  was  knighted  by  James  IV.. 
whom  he  accompanied  to  the  disastrous  field  of  Flodden. 
where  he  was  slain  with  nearly  the  whole  chivalry  of  Scot- 
land.    His  sun,  John,  was  succeeded  by  his   second  son. 


Malcolm  Macnaughton  of  GlemAma,  his  ddest  son  having 
predeceased  him.  Malcolm  died  in  the  end  of  tht  reign  M 
James  VL,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son,  Alexander. 
John,  the  second  son  of  Malcolm,  being  of  a  handsome  ap- 
pearance, attracted  the  notice  of  King  James  VI.,  who  ap- 
pointed him  one  of  his  pages  of  honour,  on  his  accession  to 
the  Enghsh  crown.  He  became  rich,  and  purchased  lands  in 
Kintyre.  He  was  also  sheriff-depute  of  Aigyleshire.  His 
elder  brother,  Alexander  Macnaughton  of  that  ilk,  adhered 
firmly  to  the  cause  of  Charles  I.,  and  in  his  service,  like  all 
who  remained  loyal  to  him,  sustuned  many  severe  loMea. 
At  the  Restoration,  as  some  sort  of  compensation,  h«  was 
knighted  by  Charles  II.,  and.  unlike  many  others,  he  recdved 
from  that  monarch  a  liberal  pension  for  life.  Sir  Alexander 
Macnaughton  spent  his  later  years  in  London,  where  he  died. 
His  son  and  successor,  John  Macnaughton  of  that  ilk,  ano- 
ceeded  to  an  estate  greatly  burdened  with  debt,  but  did  not 
hesitate  in  his  adherence  to  the  fallen  fortunes  of  the  Stuarts. 
At  the  head  of  a  considerable  body  of  his  own  clan,  he  joined 
the  viscount  Dundee,  and  was  with  him  at  RiUiecrankia. 
James  VII.  signed  a  deed  In  his  favour,  restoring  to  hu  fam- 
ily all  its  old  lands  and  hereditary  rights,  but,  as  it  never 
passed  the  seals  in  Scotland,  it  was  of  less  value  than  the  p*- 
per  on  which  it  was  written.  His  lands  were  taken  from 
him,  not  by  forfeiture,  but  **  the  estate,**  says  Buchanan  of 
Auchmar,  *"  was  evicted  by  creditors  for  sums  noway  equiva- 
lent to  its  value,  and,  there  being  no  diligence  used  for  relief 
thereof,  it  went  out  of  the  hands  of  the  family."  His  aon, 
Alexander,  a  captain  in  Queen  Anne's  guards,  was  killed  io 
the  expedition  to  Vigo  in  1702.  His  brother,  John,  at  the 
beginning  of  the  last  century  was  for  many  years  collector  ol 
customs  at  Anstruther  in  Fife,  and  subsequently  was  ap- 
pointed in.spector  -  general  in  the  same  department.  The 
direct  male  line  of  the  Macnaughton  chiefs  liecame  extinct  at 
his  death. 


The  chiefithip  is  now  in  an  Iriith  family,  descended  from 
Shane  Dhu,  grandson  of  Sir  Alexander  Macnaghton,  slain  at 
Flodden,  who  went  to  Ireland  in  1580,  as  secretary  to  his  kins- 
man, the  1  Rt  earl  of  Antrim,  and  settled  there.  His  son  Daniel 
Macnaghton,  Esq.,  married  Catherine,  niece  of  the  celebrat- 
ed primate,  George  Dowdall,  and  their  great-grandson,  Ed- 
nmnd  Alexander  Macnaghten,  Esq.  of  Beardiville,  bom  Au- 
gust 3,  1762,  was  M.P.  for  County  Antrim,  and  a  lord  of  the 
treasury.  The  clan  Macnaghton  elected  this  gentleman  and 
his  heirs  to  the  chieftiunship.  At  his  decease  in  1882.  it  de- 
scended with  his  family  estates  to  his  brother.  Sir  Francis 
Workman  Macnaghten,  bom  August  2,  1763,  educated  for  the 
Imw,  and  knighted  on  being  appointed  a  judge  of  the  supreme 
oourt  of  judicature  at  Madras,  in  1809.  In  1815  he  was 
transferred  to  that  of  Bengal,  and  in  1823  he  assumed  the 
addiUunal  surname  and  arms  of  Workman.  He  retired 
from  the  bencli  in  1825,  and  was  created  a  baronet,  July  16, 
1836.  He  died  Nov.  22, 1843.  By  his  wife,  the  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  William  Dunkin  of  Clogher,  a  judge  of  the  supreme 
court  of  judicature,  Calcutta,  he  had  6  sons  and  10  daugh- 
ters. Of  the  eldest  son,  in  the  following  paragraph,  llie 
2d  son,  William  Hay,  of  the  Bengal  Civil  Service,  was  created 
a  baronet  in  1839,  and  was  assattinated  at  Cabul,  Dec.  25, 
1841.  StQart  Macnaghten,  the  youngest  son,  bora  Jane  20, 
1815,  educated  at  Edinburgh  and  Trinity  College,  Dublin,  (B.  A. 
1835),  called  to  the  bar  at  the  Middle  Temple.  1839;  married 
in  1848,  Agnes,  daughter  of  James  Eastmont,  Esq.  of  St, 
Bemers,  omt  Ediiibui^,  and  widow  of  Capt  I^ewis  Shedden. 

The  eldest  son.  Sir  Edmund  Charles  Workman  Macnagh- 
ten, of  Dunderave,  Bushmills,  county  Antrim,  2d  baronet. 


MACNEILL 


r>C} 


OF  COIX)NSAY. 


the  old  chief,  and  placed  him  in  irons.  Neiil  Macneill,  called 
Wevittlache,  waa  found  innocent  and  liberated  throngli  tlie 
iiiflaenoe  of  his  uncle.  Barra's  elder  tons,  on  being  cbai^ged 
tri  exhibit  their  father  before  the  privy  council,  refused,  on 
which  thej  were  proclaimed  rebels,  and  commianon  was  given 
to  the  captain  of  the  Clanranald  against  them.  In  conse- 
quence of  these  proceedingR,  which  occurred  about  1613, 
Clanranald  was  enabled  to  secure  the  peaceable  sacoession  of 
his  nephew  to  the  estate  of  Barra,  on  the  death  of  his  father^ 
which  happened  soon  after.  {Oregofy'i  HighkmdM  <md  Idei^ 
p.  846.) 

The  island  of  Barra  and  the  adjacent  isles  are  still  pos- 
sessed by  the  descendant  and  representatiTe  of  the  faroilj  of 
MacneilL  Their  feudal  castle  of  Cbisamul  has  been  already 
mentioned.  It  id  a  building  of  an  hexagonal  form,  strongly 
built,  with  a  wall  above  thirty  feet  high,  and  andiorage  for 
small  vessels  on  every  side  of  it.  In  one  of  its  angles  is  a 
high  square  tower,  on  the  top  of  which,  at  the  comer  imme- 
diately above  the  gate,  is  a  hole,  through  which  the  gock- 
man,  or  watchman,  who  sat  there  all  night,  tlirew  down 
stones  upon  any  who  might  attempt  to  surprise  the  gate  in 
the  darkness.  Martin,  who  visited  Barra  in  1708,  in  his 
*  Description  of  the  Western  Island^,*  says  that  the  Highland 
Chroniclers  or  sennachies  alleged  that  the  then  chief  of  Bar- 
ra was  the  84th  lineal  descendant  from  the  first  Macneill 
who  had  held  it.  He  relates  that  the  inhabitants  of  this  and 
the  other  islands  belonging  to  Macneill  were  in  the  custom  of 
applying  to  him  for  wives  and  husbands,  when  he  named  the 
persons  most  suitable  for  them,  and  gave  them  a  bottle  of 
strong  waters  fur  the  marriage  feast 


The  chief  of  tlie  Macneills  of  Gigha,  in  the  first  half  of 
the  16th  century,  was  Neill  Macneill,  who  was  killed,  with 
many  gentlemen  of  his  tribe,  in  1530,  in  a  feud  with 
Allan  Maclean  of  Torlusk,  called  Altin  nan  8op^  bn>- 
tlier  of  Maclean  of  Dowart.  His  only  daughter,  Anabolla, 
made  over  the  lands  of  Gigha  to  her  natural  brother,  Neiil. 
The  latter  was  present,  on  the  English  side,  at  the  batt,le  of 
Ancrum-Moor,  in  1544,  but  it  is  uncertain  whether  he  was 
there  as  an  ambassador  from  the  lord  of  the  Isles,  or  fought 
in  the  English  ranks  at  the  head  of  his  clansmen.  He  sold 
Gigha  to  James  Macdonald  of  Isla  in  1554,  and  died  without 
legitimate  issue  in  the  latter  part  of  the  reign  of  Queen  Mary. 

On  the  extinction  of  the  direct  male  line,  Neill  Macneill 
vie  Eachan,  who  had  obtained  the  lands  of  Taynish,  became 
heir  male  of  the  family.  His  descendant.  Hector  Macneill  of 
Taynish,  purchased  in  1590,  the  island  of  Gigha  from  John 
Campbell  of  Calder,  who  had  acquired  it  from  Macdonald  of 
Isla,  so  that  it  again  became  the  property  of  a  Macneill. 
The  estates  of  Gigha  and  Taynish  were  pomessed  by  his  de- 
scendants till  1780,  when  the  former  was  sold  to  Macneill  of 
Colonsay,  a  cadet  of  the  family. 

The  representative  of  the  male  line  of  the  Macneills  of 
Taynish  and  Gigha,  Roger  Hamilton  Macneill  of  Taynish, 
married  Elisabeth,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Hamilton  Price, 
Esq.  of  Raploch,  Lanaiicshire,  with  whom  he  got  that  estate, 
and  assumed,  in  consequence,  the  name  of  Hamilton.  His 
descendants  are  now  designated  of  Raploch. 

The  principal  cadets  of  the  Gigha  Macneills,  beades  the 
Taynish  family,  were  those  of  Gallochallie,  Carskesy,  and 
Tirfcrgns.  Torquil,  a  younger  son  of  Lachlan  Macneill  Buy 
of  Tirfergus,  acquired  the  estate  of  Ugadale  in  Argyleshire, 
by  marriage  with  the  heiress  of  the  Mackays  in  the  end  of 
the  17th  century.  The  present  proprietor  spelUi  his  name 
Macneal.  From  Malcolm  Beg  Macneill,  celebrated  in  High- 
land tradition  for  his  extraordinary  prowess  and  great  strength. 


son  of  John  Oig  Macneill  of  Gallochallie,  in  the  reign  of  Jantes 
VI.,  sprung  the  Macneills  of  Afkbonan.  Malcolm^  only 
son,  Neill  i^g,  had  two  sons,  John,  who  suooeeded  him,  and 
I>onald  Macneill  of  Crerar,  ancestor  of  the  MacneiUi  of  Co- 
lonsay, now  the  possessors  of  Gigha.  Many  cadets  of  tht 
Macneills  of  Gigba  settled  in  the  north  of  Ireland. 

Both  branches  of  the  clan  Neill  laid  claim  to  the  chiefidiip. 
According  to  tradition,  it  has  belonged,  since  the  middle  of 
the  16th  oentury,  to  the  house  of  Barra.  Under  the  date  of 
1650,  a  letter  appears  in  the  register  of  the  privy  oonndlf  ad- 
dressed to  "'•  TorkiU  Macneill,  chief  and  principal  of  the  dan 
and  surname  of  Macnelia."  Mr.  Skene  conjectures  this  Tor- 
kill  to  have  been  the  hereditary  keeper  of  Castle  Sweyn,  and 
connected  with  neither  branch  of  the  Macneills.  He  is  said, 
however,  to  have  been  the  brother  of  Neill  Macneill  of  Gtgtia, 
killed  in  1580,  as  above  mentioned,  and  to  have,  on  his  bro- 
ther's death,  obtained  a  grant  of  the  non-entries  of  Gigha  as 
representative  of  the  family.  If  this  be  correct,  according  to 
the  above  designation,  the  chiefship  was  in  the  Gigha  line. 
Torquil  appears  to  have  died  without  leaving  any  direct  suc- 


cession. 


The  first  of  the  family  of  Colonsay,  Donald  Macneill  of 
Crerar  in  South  Knapdale,  exchanged  tliat  estate  in  1700, 
with  the  duke  of  Arfryle,  for  the  islands  of  Colonsay  and  Or- 
on.say.  The  old  possessors  of  these  two  islands,  whidi  are 
only  separated  by  a  narrow  sound,  dry  at  low  water,  were  the 
Macduffies  or  Macphies  (see  Macphis).  Donald's  great- 
grandson,  Archibald  Macneill  of  Colonaay,  sold  that  island  to 
his  cousin,  John  Macneill,  who  married  Hester,  daughter  of 
Duncan  Macneill  of  Dunmore,  and  had  six  sons.  His  eldest 
son,  Alexander,  younger  of  Colonsay,  became  the  purchaser 
of  Gigha.  Two  of  his  other  sons,  Duncan  and  Sir  John 
Macneill,  have  distinguished  themselves,  the  one  as  a  lawyer 
and  judge,  and  the  other  as  a  diplomatist. 

Duncan,  the  second  son,  bom  in  Colonsay  in  1794,  after 
being  educated  at  the  universities  of  St  Andrews  and  Edin- 
burgh, was  admitted  advocate  at  the  Scottish  bar  in  1816. 
In  1824  he  was  appointed  sheriff  of  Perthshire,  and  in  No- 
vember 1884,  solicitor-general  for  Scotland,  which  office  he 
held  till  the  following  April,  and  again  from  September  1841 
to  October  1842.  At  the  latter  date  he  was  appointed  lord- 
advocate,  and  continued  so  till  July  1846.  He  was  elected 
dean  of  the  faculty  of  advocates,  and  in  May  1851  was  raised 
to  the  bench  as  a  lord  of  aession  and  justiciary,  when  he  a»> 
sumed  the  title  of  Lord  Colonsay.  In  May  1852  he  was  ap- 
pointed lord-justice-general  and  president  of  the  court  (tf 
session,  snd  in  the  following  year  was  sworn  in  a  privy  coun- 
cillor.    He  was  M.P.  for  Argyleshire  from  1843  to  1851. 

Sir  John  Macneill,  G.C.B.,  and  F.R.S.E.,  the  thiid  son, 
waa  bom  at  Colonsay  in  1795,  and  in  his  19th  year  graduated 
M.D.  at  the  university  of  Edinburgh.  He  practised  for  some 
time  in  the  East,  as  a  physician,  and  in  1831  was  appointed 
assistant  envoy  at  the  court  of  Persia.  In  1834  he  became 
secretary  of  the  embassy,  and  received  the  Persian  order  of  tlie 
Lion  and  Sun,  and  in  June  1836  was  appointed  envoy  ex- 
traordinary and  minister  plenipotentinry  to  that  court.  In 
1839  he  was  created  a  civil  knight  grand  cross  of  the  order  of 
the  Bath.  During  htK  residence  in  Persia  be  became  thor- 
oughly acquainted  with  the  habits,  policy,  and  rraources  of 
the  Asiatic  nations ;  and  was  enabled,  even  at  that  period,  to 
point  out  the  aggressive  designs  of  Russia  with  nugular  pen- 
etration and  ability.  In  1844  he  returned  home,  and  soon 
after  he  was  placed  at  the  head  of  the  board  appointed  to 
superintend  the  working  of  the  new  Scottish  Poor  law  act  of 
1845.     In  1851  he  conducted  a  special  inquiry  into  the 


MACPHERSON. 


60 


MACPHERSON. 


From  the  Campbells  of  Jnrerawe  sprang  the  Caiiiipbells  uf 
Shirwan,  Kilmartin,  and  Cruachan. 

In  1660,  Dongall  Campbell,  or,  as  he  was  called,  the  Ma- 
oonochie  of  Inveraogh,  engaged  in  the  rebellion  of  the  mar- 
quis of  Argyle,  in  whone  armament  of  the  clan  Campbell  be 
held  the  rank  of  major.  He  was  tried  with  the  marquis  in 
1661  and  attainted.  He  was  soon  afterwards  executed  at 
CarliHle. 

After  the  Revolution  of  1688,  Dougall  s  son,  James  Ma- 
oonochie,  who,  at  his  father*8  death,  was  little  more  than  nine 
years  old,  applied  to  government  for  the  restoration  uf  the 
Argjleshire  property,  which  had  got  into  the  possession  of 
an  uncle,  but  was  unsuooessfnl.  From  King  William  III., 
however,  he  obtained  a  grant  in  compensation,  which  he 
invested  in  the  purchase  of  the  lands  of  Kirknewton,  in 
the  muir  now  called  Meadowbank,  Mid  Ix>thian,  which 
his  descendant  still  possesses,  and,  adopting  Lowland  cus- 
toms, all  the  family  took  the  name  of  Maconochie.  His  only 
son,  Alexander  Maconochie,  was  a  writer  in  Edinburgh.  The 
son  of  the  latter,  Allan  Maconochie,  a  celebrated  lawyer,  bom 
January  26,  1748,  died  June  14,  1816,  was  a  lord  of  session 
and  justidary,  under  the  title  of  Lord  Meadowbaitk,  being 
appointed  to  the  former  in  1796,  and  to  the  latter  in  1804. 
While  attending  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  he  whs  one  of 
the  five  students  who  originated  the  Speculative  Sodety,  and 
was  afterwards  for  some  time  Professor  of  the  Laws  of  Na- 
ture and  Nations  in  that  university.  He  was  the  author  of 
a  pamphlet  entitled  *  Considerations  on  the  Introduction  of 
Trial  by  Jury  in  Scotland,*  and  in  1815,  when  the  Scottish 
jury  court  was  instituted,  he  was  appointed  one  of  the  lords 
commissioners.  He  is  said  to  have  been  the  inventor  of  moss 
manure,  now  extensively  employed  in  various  counties  of 
Scotland,  and  printed  for  private  distribution  a  tract  on  the 
subject.  He  married  Elizabeth,  third  daughter  of  Robert 
Wellwood,  Esq.,  of  Garvock,  by  whom  he  had  issua 

His  eldest  son,  Alexander  Maconochie,  passed  advocate  in 
1799,  and  after  being  sheriff-depute  of  the  county  of  Had- 
dington 1810,  solicitor-general  1818,  and  lord-advocate  1816, 
was  appointed  a  lord  of  session  and  justiciary  in  1819,  when 
he  also  took  the  title  of  Lord  Meadowbank.  He  resigned  in 
1841,  and  died  Nov.  80,  1861.  On  the  dnath  of  his  cousin, 
Robert  Scott  Welwood,  be  succeeded  to  the  entailed  estates 
of  Garvock  and  Pittiver,  in  the  county  of  Fife,  and  assumed 
the  name  of  Welwood  of  Garvock  (see  Welwood).  He  mar- 
ried Anne,  eldest  daughter  of  I/>rd-pre8ident  Blair;  issue, 
with  6  daughters,  4  sons,  viz. — 1.  Allan  Alexander  Macono- 
chie, LL.D.,  bom  in  1806.  passed  advocate  in  1829,  and  in 
1842  appointed  professor  of  civil  law  and  the  law  of  Scotlund 
in  the  university  of  Glasgow.  2.  Robert  Blair,  writer  to  the 
signet    8.  William  Maximilian  George.     4.  Henry  Dundas. 


Macphbrsoh,  the  name  of  one  of  the  two  principal 
branches  of  the  clan  Chattaii,  the  badge  of  which  was  the 
box  evergreen.  In  the  Celtic  the  Macpbersons  are  called  the 
clnn  Vuirich  or  Muirich,  from  an  ancestor  of  that  name,  who, 
in  the  Gaelic  MS.  of  1450,  is  said  to  have  been  the  **  son  of 
Swen,  son  of  Heth,  son  of  Nachtan,  son  of  Gillichattan,  from 
whom  came  the  clan  Cbattan."  The  word  Gillichattan 
means  a  votary  or  servant  of  St.  Kattan,  a  Scottish  saint, 
M»  Gilliclirist  means  a  servant  of  Christ;  hence  Gilchrist. 

Tlie  descent  of  the  heads  of  the  Macpbersons  from  the  an- 
aent  chiefs  of  the  clan  Chattan  has  been  unbroken,  and  tra- 
dition is  uniformly  in  favour  of  their  right  to  the  chiefship  of 
the  whole  clan.  The  claim  of  the  Macintoshes,  the  other 
principal  branch  of  the  clan  Chattan,  to  the  chiefship  has 
been  already  disposed  of  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  744  d  teq.y    Their  own 


traditional  story  of  their  descent  from  MaodnC  thane  of  Fife, 
is  extremely  improbable,  and  if  it  were  true,  it  would  prove 
that  tliey  were  not  a  branch  of  the  clan  Chattan  at  alL  On 
their  own  showing,  they  obtained  the  chiefship  by  marriage, 
and  that  from  tlie  head  of  tlie  Macpbersona,  whom  thiey  no- 
knowledge  to  have  been  at  one  period  chief  of  the  dan  Chat- 
tan. The  rule  of  clanship  excludes  femalee  from  the  roocM 
aion,  and  the  heir  male,  not  the  heir  of  line,  became  chief  of 
the  clan  Chattan. 

It  was  from  Muirich  or  Murdoch,  who  succeeded  to  the 
chiefship  in  1153,  that  the  Macpbersons  derive  the  name  of 
the  dan  Muirich  or  Vuirich.  This  Muirich  waspanon  of 
Kingussie,  a  religious  establishment  in  the  lower  part  of  Bad- 
enoch,  and  the  surname,  properly  Macpheraain,  was  given  to 
his  descendants  from  his  office.  He  was  the  great-grandaoo 
of  Gillichattan  Mor,  the  founder  of  the  dan,  who  Uved  in  the 
reign  of  Malcolm  Canmore,  and  having  married,  on  a  papal 
dispensation,  a  daughter  of  the  thane  of  Calder,  he  had  five 
sons.  Tlie  eldest,  Gillichattan,  the  third  of  the  name,  and 
chief  of  the  clan  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  II.,  was  father  of 
Dougal  Dall,  the  chief  whose  daughter  Eva  married  Angos 
Macintosh  of  Madntosh.  On  Dougal  Dairs  death,  as  he  had 
no  sons,  the  representation  of  the  family  devolved  on  his  cou- 
sin and  heir  male,  Kenneth,  eldest  son  of  Eoghen  or  Ewen 
Baan,  second  son  of  Muirich.  Ndll  Ckrom^  so  called  from 
his  stooping  shoulders,  Muirich*s  third  son,  was  a  great  arti- 
ficer in  iron,  and  took  the  name  of  Smith  from  his  trade. 
Ferquhard  Gilliriach,  or  the  swift,  the  fourth  son,  is  said  to 
have  been  the  progenitor  of  the  MacGillivrays,  who  followed 
the  Madntosh  branch  of  the  dan  Chattan,  and  from  David 
Dubh,  or  the  Swarthy,  the  youngest  of  Muirich*s  sons,  were 
descended  the  clan  Dhai,  or  Davidsons  of  Invemahavon. 

The  portion  of  the  clan  Chattan  who  adhered  to  Kenneth 
settled  in  Badenoch.  Kenneth's  son,  Duncan  Macpherson  of 
Cluny,  lived  in  the  reign  of  Robert  the  Bruce,  and  fought  on 
his  side,  at  the  head  of  his  clan,  at  Bannockbnm.  He  re- 
cdved  a  commission  to  expel  the  Comyns  from  Badenodi, 
and  on  their  forfeiture  he  obtained,  for  his  services,  a  grant 
of  their  lands.  He  was  also  allowed  to  add  a  hand  holding 
a  dagger  to  his  armorial  bearings.  His  grandson,  Donald  Mor 
Macpherson,  was  chief  in  1886,  when  a  battle  took  place  at 
Invemahavon  between  the  dan  Chattan  and  the  Camerons, 
in  which  a  great  number  of  the  former  were  killed,  and  the 
latter  were  nearly  cut  off  to  a  man.  The  laird  of  Madntoeh 
having  carried  away  the  cattle  of  the  Camerons,  at  different 
times,  on  account  of  the  nonpayment  of  their  rents,  for  the 
lands  held  of  him  in  Lochaber,  they  marched  into  Badenoch 
to  the  number  of  400,  resolved  upon  reprisals.  To  oppooe 
them  Madntosh  collected  his  followerB,  and  called  the  Mac- 
pbersons and  Davidsons  to  his  aid.  A  dispute  about  prece- 
dency greatly  weakened  his  force,  and  gave  the  Camerons 
the  advantage.  Tlie  command  of  the  right  wing  was  claim- 
ed both  by  Cluny  and  Davidson  of  Invemahavon,  the  leader 
of  the  Davidsons,  the  former  as  chief  of  the  dan  Chattan, 
and  the  latter  as  the  head  of  the  eldest  branch.  Macintosh 
dedded  against  Cluny,  on  which  the  Macpbersons  withdrew 
from  the  field.  In  the  conflict  that  ensued,  many  of  the 
Madntoshes  and  nearly  all  the  Davidsons  were  slain.  The 
Macpbersons,  sedng  this,  forgot  their  wounded  pride,  and 
next  day  attacking  the  Camerons,  defeated  them  with 
great  loss,  thdr  leader  bdng  among  the  killed.  It  is  the 
opinion  of  some  writers,  and  among  the  rest  of  Shaw,  the 
historian  of  Moray,  that  this  quarrel  about  preoeden<7  was 
the  origin  of  the  celebrated  judicial  combat  on  the  North 
Inch  of  Perth  in  1896,  which  has  already  been  described  on- 
der  the  h<*ad  Macdvtobh.  and  that  the  parties  were  the 


MACPHERSON 


62 


OF  CLUNY. 


th«  oommencement  of  tb«  action,  the  Glengnnr  men,  who 
were  on  the  right,  kept  firing  as  thej  advanced,  but  the 
Macphenona,  on  the  left,  came  sooner  in  contact  with  the 
dragoons,  and  reoeiTed  the  whole  of  their  fire.  When  the 
balls  were  wbiszing  about  thero,  Clunj  exclaimed,  **  What 
the  devil  is  this?**  Lord  George  told  him  that  they  had  no 
remedj  but  to  attack  the  dragoons,  sword  in  hand,  before 
thejr  hiid  time  to  charge  again.  Then,  drawing  hL»  sword,  he 
cried  out,  **  Claymore,"  and  Glnny  doing  the  same,  the  Mao- 
phemons  rushed  down  to  the  bottom  ditch  of  the  enclosure, 
and  cleairing  the  hedges  as  they  went,  fell  sword  in  hand  upon 
the  king*8  troops,  killing  many  and  putting  the  rest  to  flight 

At  the  battle  of  Falkirk,  the  Macphersons  formed  a  portion 
of  the  first  line.  They  were  too  late  for  the  battle  of  Cnllo- 
den,  where  their  asustance  migbt  have  turned  the  fortune  of 
the  day,  and  they  did  not  come  up  till  after  the  retreat  of 
Charles  from  that  decisiTe  field.  In  the  subsequent  devasta- 
tions committed  by  the  English  army,  Cluny^s  house  was 
plundered  and  burnt  to  the  ground.  Every  exertion  was  made 
by  the  government  troops  for  his  apprehension,  but  they 
never  could  lay  their  hands  upon  him.  At  first  he  lived  with 
Lochiel  in  a  retreat  at  Benalder,  a  hill  on  his  own  property 
on  the  borders  of  Rannoch.  Towards  the  end  of  Prince 
Charles*  wanderings,  for  the  purpose  of  meeUng  the  prince, 
he  set  out  for  Auchnacaiy,  where  he  supposed  him  to  be,  but 
missing  him  there,  he  retraced  his  steps,  and  found  him  in  a 
miserable  hovel  with  Lochiel,  at  a  pliice  called  Mellenauir  or 
Millanuir,  on  the  side  of  Benalder.  On  entering  the  hut, 
Cluny  would  have  kneeled  befure  the  prince,  but  the  latter 
prevented  him,  and,  giving  him  a  kiss,  said,  *'  I  am  sorry, 
Cluny,  yon  and  your  regiment  were  not  at  Culloden :  I  did 
not  hear  till  very  lately  that  you  were  so  near  us  that  day.** 
Tlie  day  following  Cluny  conducted  the  prince  and  his  at- 
tendants to  a  little  shieling  about  two  miles  farther  into  Ben- 
alder, and  after  passing  two  nights  there  he  took  him  to  a 
more  secure  retreat  called  the  Cage,  which  he  had  fitted  up 
for  him,  and  where  he  lay  concealed  for  several  weeks  till  the 
arrival  of  the  French  frigate  which  conveyed  him  back  to 
France. 

For  himself  Cluny  had  several  places  of  concealment  on  his 
estate.  He  lived  for  nine  years  in  a  cave  at  a  short  distance 
from  where  his  house  had  st^x>d.  "  This  cave,**  says  General 
Stewart,  (Sketches  of  the  Highlanders,  vol.  i.  pp.  60,  61.) 
"  was  in  the  front  of  a  woody  precipice,  the  trees  and  shelv- 
ing rocks  completely  concealing  the  entrance.  It  was  dug 
ont  by  his  own  people,  who  worked  by  night,  and  conveyed 
the  stones  and  rubbish  into  a  lake  in  the  neighbourhood,  that 
no  vestige  of  their  labour  might  betray  the  retreat  of  their 
master.  In  this  sanctuary  he  lived  secure,  occasionally  visit- 
ing his  fnends  by  night,  or  when  time  slackened  the  rigour  of 
the  search.  Upwards  of  a  hundred  persons  knew  where  he 
was  concealed,  and  a  reward  of  £1,000  was  offered  to  any 
one  who  should  give  information  against  him ;  and  as  it  was 
known  that  he  was  concealed  on  his  own  estate,  eighty  men 
were  constantly  stationed  there,  besides  the  parties  continu- 
ally marching  into  the  country,  to  intimidate  his  tenantry, 
and  induce  them  to  disclose  the  place  of  his  concealment.** 
But  neither  the  fear  of  danger  nor  the  hope  of  reward  could 
prevail  on  any  of  his  people  to  betray  him,  or  even  to  discon- 
tiime  their  faithful  services. 

For  the  purpose  of  discovering  his  retreat.  Sir  Hector 
Monro,  at  that  time  a  lieutenant  in  the  d4th  regiment,  at  the 
head  of  a  large  party,  continued  two  years  in  Badenoch,  yet 
so  true  were  the  clan  to  their  chief  that  not  a  trace  of  him 
could  be  found.  On  one  occasion,  while  spending  a  few  hours 
at  night  convivially  with  his  friends,  he  escaped  by  a  back 


window  of  the  house  they  were  in,  just  as  the  soldiery  were 
breaking  open  the  door.  He  became  so  cautions  that,  on 
parting  with  his  wife,  or  any  of  his  friends,  he  never  told 
tliem  to  which  of  his  places  of  concealment  be  was  going,  or 
suffered  any  one  to  accompany  him,  that  they  might  have  it 
in  their  power  to  answer,  when  questioned,  that  thej  knew 
not  where  he  was.  He  escaped  to  France  in  1755,  mod  died 
at  Dunkirk  the  following  year. 

Frequent  mention  is  made  in  the  Stuart  papers  of  a  sum  of 
money,  amounting  to  £27,000,  which  the  prince  had  intrust- 
ed to  another  person,  by  whom  it  was  lodged  in  the  hands  of 
Cluny.  Before  quitting  Scotland  the  prince  gave  Cluny  in- 
structions that  "  not  one  farthing**  was  to  be  assigned  awaj 
without  an  <x-der  from  himself.  Another  note  to  him,  dated 
from  on  board  the  French  vessel  in  which  he  embarked  for 
France,  directs  £750  to  be  divided  among  the  Macgregon, 
the  Stewarts,  the  Macdonalds  of  Glengary  and  Reppoch,  and 
the  *'  Lokel  clan,**  as  the  Gamerons  of  Lochiel  are  called.  He 
likewise  directs  especial  care  to  be  taken  of  *' rings,  seU, 
(seah^)  and  other  trifels**  belonging  to  him,  and  all  lying  in 
certain  **  bozks,**  that  is,  boxn.  The  last  letter  that  seems 
to  have  been  written  to  him  by  the  prince  on  the  subject, 
dated  '*  Ye  4th  Septeml)er,  1754,**  and  addressed  "•  For  G. 
M.  (that  is,  Cluny  Macpherson)  in  Scotld,**  is  as  follows : 
*^  Sir,  This  is  to  desire  you  to  come  as  soon  as  you  can  con- 
veniently to  Paris,  bringing  over  with  you  all  the  effccta 
whatsoever  that  I  left  in  your  hand  when  I  was  in  Scotland, 
as  also  whatever  money  you  can  come  at,  for  I  happen  to  be 
at  present  in  great  straits,  which  makes  me  wish  that  you 
should  delay  as  little  as  possible  to  meet  ine  for  that  effecL 
You  are  to  address  yourself  when  arrived  at  Paris,  to  Mr. 
John  Waters,  Banker,  &c.  He  will  direct  you  where  to 
find  your  sincere  friend.  C.  P.**  This  letter  is  copied  from 
the  original  draught  in  Charles*  own  hand,  among  the  Stuart 
papers,  in  possession  of  her  majesty.  In  the  perilous  cir- 
cumstances in  which  Cluny  was  then  placed,  it  is  not  known 
whether  he  was  able  to  comply  with  all  the  directions  he  re- 
ceived regarding  the  application  of  the  money,  but  it  is  be- 
lieved that  when  he  escaped  to  France  he  was  enabled  to  give 
the  prince  a  good  account  of  the  same. 

E wen's  son,  Duncan,  was  bom  in  1750,  in  a  kiln  for  drying 
com,  in  which  his  mother  had  taken  refuge  after  the  destruc- 
tion of  their  house.  During  his  minority  his  uncle,  Major 
John  Macpherson  of  the  78th  foot,  acted  as  his  guardian. 
He  received  back  the  estate  which  had  been  forfeited,  and, 
entering  the  army,  became  lieutenant-colonel  of  the  8d  foot- 
guards.  He  married,  12th  June,  1798,  Catherine,  youngest 
daughter  of  Sir  Evan  Cameron  of  Fassfera,  baronet,  and  on 
his  death,  Ist  August  1817,  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son, 
Ewen  Macpherson  of  Cluny,  the  28d  chief  from  Gillichattan 
Mor;  a  captain  on  halfpay,  42d  Highlanders,  a  magistrate 
and  a  deputy-lieutenant  of  Invemess-shire ;  married  20th 
December  1832,  the  youngest  daughter  of  Henry  Davidson  of 
Tulloch  Castle,  Ross-shire,  with  issue. 

In  Cluny  castle  are  preserved  various  relics  of  the  rebdlion 
of  1745 ;  amongst  the  rest  the  prinoe*s  target  and  lace  wrist 
raffles,  and  an  autograph  letter  from  Charles,  promising  an 
ample  reward  to  his  devoted  friend  Cluny.  There  is  abK>  the 
black  pipe  chanter  on  which  the  prosperity  of  the  house  ot 
Cluny  is  said  to  be  dependent,  and  which  all  trae  members  of 
the  dan  Vuirich  firmly  believe  fell  from  heaven,  in  place  of 
the  one  lost  at  the  conflict  on  the  North  Inch  of  Perth ! 

The  war-cry  of  the  Macphersons  was  *'  Craig  Dho,**  the 
name  of  a  rock  in  the  neighbourhood  of  Cluny  Castle.  The 
chief  is  called  in  the  Highlands  '*Mac  Mhurich  Chlanaidh,** 
but  everywhere  else  b  better  known  as  Cluny  Macpherson. 


MACPHERSON, 


64 


JAM£S* 


pherson  was  invited,  and  Dr.  Blair,  from  whom 
this  account  is  taken,  says  that  he  had  a  chief 
hand  in  convoking  the*  meeting.  Among  those 
present  were  Patrick,  Lord  Elibank,  Principal 
Robertson,  the  historian,  Mr.  John  Home,  Dr. 
Adam  Ferguson,  Dr.  Blair  himself,  and  many 
others.  After  much  conversation  with  Macpher- 
son,  it  was  agreed  that  he  should,  without  delay, 
go  through  the  Highlands  for  the  purpose  of  col- 
lecting all  the  Gaelic  poetry  he  could  find,  the  ex- 
pense to  be  defrayed  by  a  subscription  raised 
from  the  meeting,  with  the  aid  of  such  other 
friends  as  they  might  apply  to  with  that  object. 

The  same  year  (1760)  Macpherson  set  off  to 
the  Highlands ;  and,  du'ing  his  tour,  he  from  time 
to  time  transmitted  to  Dr.  Blair  and  his  other 
literary  friends,  accounts  of  his  progress  in  col- 
lecting, from  many  different  and  remote  parts,  all 
the  remains  he  could  find  of  ancient  Gaelic  poetry, 
either  in  writing  or  preserved  by  oral  tradition. 
Ill  the  course  of  his  journey  he  wrote  two  letters 
to  the  Rev.  James  M^Lagan,  at  one  period  mini- 
ster of  Amalrie,  and  aftei'wards  of  Blair  in  Athol, 
in  the  first  of  which,  dated  from  Ruthven  (in 
Badenocb),  27th  October,  1760,  he  says,  *'  I  have 
met  with  a  number  of  old  manuscripts  in  my  tra- 
vels ;  the  poetical  part  of  them  I  have  endeavour- 
ed to  secure."  The  second,  dated  from  Edin- 
burgh, 16th  January,  1761,  contains  this  passage: 
^'  I  have  been  lucky  enough  to  lay  my  hands  on  a 
pretty  complete  poem,  and  truly  epic,  concerning 
Fingal.''  This  is  the  first  intimation  of  that  re- 
markable work  which  was  soon  to  create  a  most 
extraordinary  sensation  in  the  literary  world. 

The  districts  through  which  Macpherson  travel- 
led, in  the  prosecution  of  bis  undertaking,  were 
chiefly  the  north-western  parts  of  Inverness-shire, 
the  Isle  of  Sky  e,  and  some  of  the  adjoining  islands; 
"  places,"  says  the  Report  of  the  Committee  of 
the  Highland  Society,  afterwards  published,  *^from 
their  remoteness  and  state  of  mannere  at  that  pe- 
riod, most  likely  to  afford,  in  a  pure  and  genuine 
state,  the  ancient  traditionary  tales  and  poems,  of 
which  the  recital  then  formed  the  favourite  amuse- 
ment of  the  long  and  idle  winter  evenings  of  the 
Highlanders." 

On  his  return  to  Edinburgh,  Macpherson  im- 
mediately set  about  translating  the  Gaelic  poems 


which  he  had  collected  into  English.  Soon  after, 
he  published  the  fruits  of  his  mission,  in  2  vols. 
4to,  the  first  in  1762,  under  the  patronage  of  Lord 
Bute,  containing  *  Fingal,  an  ancient  Epic  Poem 
in  six  books,  with  other  lesser  Poems ;'  and  the 
second  in  1763,  with  the  title  of  ^  Temora,  an  Epic 
Poem,  in  eight  books,  with  other  poems.*  Both 
professed  to  have  been  composed  by  Ossian,  the 
son  of  Fingal,  a  Gaelic  prince  of  the  fourth  cen- 
tury, and  translated  from  the  Graelic  language. 

From  the  first  the  genuineness  of  these  poems 
became  a  matter  of  dispute,  and  for  some  years 
a  violent  controversy  raged  upon  the  subject. 
Among  those  who  believed  in  their  authenticity 
were  Dr.  Blair,  Dr.  Gregory,  Lord  Karnes,  the 
Rev.  Dr.  Graham  of  Aberfoyle,  and  Su*  John  Sin- 
clair, baronet ;  and  amongst  the  most  distinguish- 
ed of  those  who  denied  their  genuineness  were 
Mr.  Hume  the  historian,  Dr.  Samuel  Johnson, 
Dr.  Smith  of  Campbelltown,  and  Mr.  Laiug,  au- 
thor of  *■  Notes  and  Illustrations*  introduced  into 
an  edition  of  Ossian's  Poems,  published  in  Edin- 
burgh in  1805.  The  latter  were  replied  to  by 
Mr.  Alexander  Macdonald  in  a  work  entitled 
^Some  of  Osdian*s  lesser  Poems  rendered  into 
verse,  with  a  preliminary  discourse  in  answer  to 
Mr.  Laiug's  Critical  and  Historical  Dissertations 
on  the  antiquity  of  Ossian's  Poems,*  Liverpool, 
1805,  8vo.  They  were  also  condemned  as  spuri- 
ous in  a  work  entitled  ^  An  Inquiry  into  the  Au- 
thenticity of  the  Poems  of  Ossian.*  By  W.  Shaw, 
A.M.  London,  1781.  So  strong  was  Dr.  John- 
son^s  prejudice  against  them,  that  in  his  ^  Journey 
to  the  Western  Islands,*  he  declared  that  **  the 
poems  of  Ossian  never  existed  in  any  other  form 
than  that  which  we  have  seen,**  meaning  in  Mac- 
phcrson*s  translation,  and  ^^  that  the  editor  or  au- 
thor never  could  show  the  original,  nor  can  it  be 
shown  by  any  other.**  Sir  James  Macintosh,  too, 
in  his  ^  History  of  England,'  expresses  himself 
very  strongly  against  their  authenticity.  At  the 
close  of  a  long  and  eloquent  passage  concerning 
them  he  says:  ** Since  the  keen  and  searching 
publication  of  Mr.  Laing,  these  poems  have  fallen 
in  reputation,  as  they  lost  the  character  of  genu- 
ineness. They  had  been  admired  by  all  the  na- 
tions, and  by  all  the  men  of  genius  in  Europe. 
The  last  incident  in  their  story  is  perhaps  the 


MACPHERSON. 


66 


MACPHIE. 


In  1773,  lie  issued  a  prose  translation  in  two 
Tolumea,  cl  the  *  Iliad  of  Homer,*  which  was  re- 
ceived with  ridicule  and  abiuM},  and  universally 
considered  a  failure.  The  same  year  he  wrote  a 
threatening  letter  to  Dr.  Johnson,  in  consequence 
of  his  remarks  on  Ossian  in  his  celebrated  ^  Tour 
to  the  Hebrides.*  Tlie  latter  returned  a  most 
sarcastic  reply,  wherciu  he  told  him,  with  the 
most  cutting  contempt,  that  his  "abilities  since 
his  Homer,  were  not  so  formidable."  In  1775, 
Macpherson  published  *  A  History  of  Great  Brit- 
ain, fi*om  the  Restoration  to  the  Accession  of  the 
House  of  Hanover,^  in  2  vols.  4to;  and,  along 
with  it,  the  data  on  which  his  statements  were 
founded,  in  two  additional  volumes  of  *  Original 
Papers,*  for  which  last  work  he  is  snid  to  have 
received  the  sum  of  £3,000. 

Aliout  this  time  ho  was  employed  by  the  go- 
vcmmcnt  to  write  two  pamphlets  in  vindication 
and  suppoi-t  of  the  measures  which  led  to  the 
American  war,  and  to  the  ultimate  independence 
of  the  colonies  of  North  America,  now  the  United 
States.  He  was  also  appointed  agent  to  the  nabob 
of  Arcot,  in  behalf  of  whom  he  also  published 
two  works.  As  il  was  thought  requisite  that  he 
should  have  a  seat  in  parliament,  in  order  the  more 
effectually  to  attend  to  the  nabob's  interests,  in 
1780  he  was  elected  member  for  Camelfoixl,  for 
which  place  he  was  rcchoscn  in  1784,  and  again  in 
1790.  Declining  health  induced  him  to  retire  to 
an  elegant  mansion,  named  Belleville,  which  he 
had  built  in  the  parish  of  Alvie,  Inverncss-shii^e, 
where  he  died  February  17,  179G. 

Mr.  Macpherson  died  wealthy.  By  his  will, 
besides  the  £1,000  for  the  publication  of  the  ori- 
ginals of  Ossian,  and  the  bequest  of  several  large 
legacies  to  his  friends,  he  left  £300  for  a  monu- 
ment to  be  erected  to  his  memory  at  Belleville. 
]  le  also  directed  that  his  body  should  be  conveyed 
to  Westminster  abbey,  and  it  was  accordingly  in- 
terred at  Poet's  corner. 

His  works  are : 

Tlie  Highlander;  an  Heroic  Poem,  in  C  cantos.   17.^8, 12mn. 

Fragments  of  Ancient  Poetrv:  coUected  in  the  Highlands 
of  Scotland,  and  translated  from  the  Gaelic  or  Krse  I^ngnnge. 
1760.    8vo. 

Fingal;  an  ancient  Epic  Poem,  in  six  books;  together 
with  several  other  Poems  composed  by  Ossian,  tlie  son  of 
FineaL  Translnted  from  the  Gaelic  I/ingnage.  I/)nilnn, 
17G2,  4to. 


Temora ;  an  ancient  Epio  Poem,  in  eight  booki ;  tofather 
with  several  other  Poems  composed  bj  Osaian,  aon  of  FSqchI* 
Translated  from  the  Gaelic  Language.    I.ondon,  1769,  4to. 

Introduction  to  the  History  of  Great  Britain  and  Irdaiid. 
Tendon,  1771,  4to.  2d  edition  revised  and  greatly  anhu^ged. 
Tendon,  3773,  4to. 

The  Iliad  of  Homer.  Translated  bto  IVoM.  177S,  S 
vols.  4to.    2d  edit.  London,  1778,  4tA. 

The  Histoiy  of  Great  Britain  from  the  Bestontioa  to  the 
Ascension  of  the  Honse  of  Hanover.  London,  1775,  2  toIb. 
4  to.    I>ublin,  4  vols.  8vo. 

Original  Papers;  containing  the  Secret  Histoiy  of  Great 
Britain,  from  the  Restoration  to  the  Accession  of  tht  Hooae 
of  HanoTcr.  To  which  are  prefixed,  Extracts  from  the  Life 
of  James  II.,  as  written  bj  himself.    Lond.,  1775, 2  Tola.  4to. 

'l*he  Rights  of  Great  Britain  assarted  against  tho  Claims  of 
the  Colonies;  being  an  Answer  to  the  Declaration  of  the 
General  Congress.    1776,  8vo. 

A  Short  History  of  the  Opposition  during  the  last  Sesston 
of  Parliament    1779,  8vo. 

Letters  from  Mohammed  Ali  Chan,  Nabob  of  Arcot,  to 
the  Court  of  Directors.  To  which  is  aimexed,  a  State  of 
Facts  relative  to  Tanjore;  with  .in  Appendix  of  Original 
Papers.     1777, 4to. 

The  History  and  Management  of  the  East  India  Company, 
from  its  origin  in  IfiOO  to  the  Present  Time :  vol.  i.  contain- 
ing the  Aflfaim  of  the  Camatic;  in  which  the  Rights  of  the 
Nabob  arc  explained,  and  tl:o  Injustice  of  the  Company 
proved.     1779, 4to. 

Ode  on  the  Arrival  of  the  Earl  Marischal  in  Scotland. 
Publiylied  in  the  European  Magazine  for  1796. 

MACPHERSON,  David,  an  industrious  histo- 
rical  writer  and  compiler,  was  born  iu  Scotland  in 
1747,  and  died  August  1, 1816.  Duiing  tlio  latter 
part  of  his  life  ho  was  one  of  the  deputy  keepers 
of  the  public  record**.  All  his  works  display  labo- 
rious research,  and  contain  much  valuable  informa- 
tion.   Thev  arc: 

I>e  Oiygynale  Cronjkil  of  Scotland,  be  Andrew  Wyntown, 
rriour  of  Sanct  Scrsis,  ruche  in  I.och  Levyn.  Kotr  first 
publi:ihed,  with  Kctes  and  a  Glossary.  Lond.  1795,  2  vols. 
4 to.    The  same.    I^nd.  1795,  8vo. 

Gongniphical  Illustrations  of  Scottish  History ;  containing 
the  Names  of  Places  mentioned  in  Chronicles,  Historiea,  Re- 
cords, &c ;  with  Corrections  of  the  corrupted  Names,  and 
Explanations  of  the  difficult  and  disputed  points  in  the  His- 
torical Geography  of  Scotland.  With  a  Compendious  Chro- 
nology of  the  Battles,  to  1603.     Lond.  1796,  4to. 

Aun.ols  of  Commerce,  Manufactures,  Fisheries,  and  Ka\-i- 
gntion ;  with  brief  Notices  of  the  Arts  and  Sciences  connected 
with  them;  contuning  the  Commercial  Transactions  of  the 
British  and  other  countries,  frotn  the  earliest  acconnta  to  the 
meeting  of  the  Union  Parliament  in  1801.  Comprehending 
the  valuable  part  of  the  late  Mr.  AnderHon*s  Histoty  of  Com- 
merce, &C.     Lond.  1805,  4  voUi.  4to. 

The  History  of  European  Commerce  with  India.  To  which 
is  subjoined,  a  Review  of  the  Arguments  for  and  against  the 
Trade  with  India,  and  the  management  of  it  by  a  Chartered 
Company ;  with  an  Appendix  of  anthentic  acconnta.  Lond. 
1812,  -If). 


>tAcriiiR,  or  Macfif,  a  contraction  of  Macduffle,  the 


MACQUARRIE 


67 


OF  UJ.VA. 


<    1 1 


I 


namt  of  a  clan  (in  tbe  Gaelic  tbe  Clann  Dhubhie,  or  the  dark 
eohmml  tribe,)  which  held  the  island  of  Colonsay  in  Arg}-le- 
thire,  till  the  middle  of  the  17th  ccnturr,  when  they  were 
dispotMMed  of  it  by  the  Macdonalds.  They  were  a  branch 
of  tbe  andent  Albionic  race  of  Scotland,  and  like  all  the 
tribes  that  claimed  to  be  so,  adopted  the  pine  for  their  badge. 
On  the  acHith  ude  of  the  diurcb  of  the  monastery  of  St 
Aofoatine  in  Colonsay,  according  to  Martin  (writing  ui  1703), 
**  Re  tbe  tombs  of  ^lacduiBe,  and  of  the  cadets  of  his  family ; 
there  b  a  sliip  under  sail,  and  a  two-handed  sword  engraven  on 
tbe  principal  tombstone,  and  this  inscription :  *  Ilic  jacet  &Ial- 
colambiis  Macduffie  de  CoUonsay ;  *  his  coat  of  arms  and  colour- 
staff  is  fixed  in  a  stone,  through  which  a  hole  Is  made  to  hold 
iL  About  a  quarter  of  a  mile  on  the  south  side  of  the  church 
therc  is  a  cmm,  in  which  there  is  a  stone  cross  fixed,  called 
Macdnifie*s  cross ;  for  when  any  of  the  heads  of  this  family 
were  to  be  interred,  their  corpses  were  hiid  on  this  cross  for 
some  moments,  in  their  way  toward  the  church.*' 

Donald  Macduf&e  is  witness  to  a  charter  by  John,  earl  of 
Rom,  and  lord  of  the  Isles,  dated  at  the  earl's  castle  of  Ding- 
wall, 12th  April  1463  {RegitUr  oftht  Great  Seal,  lib.  vi.  Ko. 
17.)  After  the  forfeiture  of  the  lordship  of  the  Isles  in  1493, 
the  clan  Duffie  followed  the  Macdonalds  of  Isl.i.  The  name 
of  the  Maodnffie  chief  in  1531  was  Murroch.  In  1609  Donald 
M:icfie  in  Colonsay  was  one  of  the  twelve  chiefs  and  gentle- 
men who  met  the  bisliop  of  the  Isles,  thu  king's  representa- 
tive, at  lona,  when,  with  their  consent,  the  nine  celebrated 
**  Statutes  of  Icolmkiir*  were  enacteil.  In  1615,  Malcolm 
Macfie  of  Colonsay  joined  Sir  James  Macdonald  of  Isla,  after 
his  escape  from  the  castle  of  Kdinburgh,  and  was  one  of  the 
principal  leaders  in  his  subsequent  rebellion.  He  and  18 
others  were  delivered  up  by  Coll  Macgillespick  Macdonald, 
the  celebrated  Colkitto  (left-handed)  to  the  earl  of  Argrle, 
It  whom  he  was  brought  before  the  privy  council.  He  ap- 
pears afterwards  to  have  been  slain  by  Coikitto,  as  by  tlie 
Conncil  Records  fur  1623  we  lenm  that  the  latter  was  accused, 
with  sereml  of  his  followers,  of  being  "  art  and  paii*t  guilty  of 
tlie  felonie  and  cruell  slaughter  of  umquhiil  M.*tIcolm  Macphle 
of  Collonsay.** 

A  branch  of  llie  dan  Duffie,  after  they  had  lost  their  in- 
heritance, followed  Cameron  of  Loch icl,  and  settled  in  I.och- 
aber.     At  the  battle  of  Culloden  several  of  them  were  slain. 

C«illonsay  was  acquired  by  the  Arg)'Ie  family  ufler  they 
had  expelled  the  M:icdonald:»,  and  in  1700  it  came  into  the 
posse^cuon  of  the  MacneilU,  iiy  whom  it  is  now  held. 

Several  gcnlU-menof  the  name  of  .Macfie  have  distinpiibhed 
themselves  us  merchants,  particularly  in  Greenock  and  Liver- 
pouL  William  Macfie,  INq.,  of  Langhoiise  who  died  in  Nov. 
1851,  was  for  sorneiime  IVovost  of  (jreenock.  « 


Macquahuik  (^Clann  Guarie),  the  name  of  a  minor  dan 
which  possessed  the  small  inland  of  Uiva,  one  of  the  Argylc- 
shire  Hebiide.'t,  with  a  portion  of  Muil,  and  the  badge  of  which 
Wiis  the  piue.  The  Gaelic  MS.  of  1450  deduces  their  descent 
from  Guarie  or  Gotlfrey,  called  hy  the  Highland  Sennachies, 
Got  or  Gorbred,  said  to  have  been  •'  a  brother  of  Fingon,  an- 
cestor of  the  Muckinnon^,  and  Anrias  or  Andrew,  ancestor  of 
the  Macgrcgors.**  I'his  is  the  bdief  of  Mr.  Skene,  who  adds, 
**  The  hlitory  of  the  2iIacquniTies  resembles  that  of  the  Mac- 
kinnons  in  many  rexpccts ;  like  them  they  had  migrated  far 
fri»m  the  bead-quarters  of  their  race ;  thoy  becime  dependent 
on  the  lord.1  of  the  I.slci%  and  followed  them  ns  if  they  had 
become  a  branch  of  the  clan.** 

According  to  a  history  of  the  family,  by  one  of  its  mem- 
bers, in  1249  Cormac  Mhor,  then  **  chief  of  Ulva*s  hde,** 
Idned  Alexander  II.,  with  bis  followers  and  three  galleys  of 


sixteen  oars  each,  in  his  expedition  against  the  western 
islands,  and  after  that  monarcirs  death  in  the  island  of  Ker- 
rera,  was  attacked  by  Haco  of  Norway,  defeated  and  slain 
His  two  sons,  Allan  and  Gregor,  were  compelled  to  take  re- 
fuge in  Ireland,  where  the  latter,  sumamcd  Garbh  or  the 
rough,  is  s:iid  to  have  founded  the  powerful  tribe  of  the  Mac- 
Guires,  the  chief  of  which  at  one  time  possessed  the  title  of 
Lord  InnUkillen.  Allan  returned  to  Scotland,  and  his  do* 
scendant.  Hector  Macquarrio  of  Ulva,  chief  in  the  time  of 
Robert  the  Bruce,  fought  with  his  clan  at  Bannockbum. 

The  first  chief  of  whom  there  is  any  notice  in  the  public 
records  was  John  Mucquarrie  of  Ulva,  who  died  in  1473. 
{Iteff,  of  Great  Seal^  31,  Ko.  159.)  His  son,  Dunslaff,  was 
chief  when  the  last  lord  of  the  Isles  was  forfeited  twenty 
years  afterwards.  After  that  event,  the  Macquarries,  like 
the  other  vassal  tribes  of  the  Macdonalds,  became  indepen- 
dent. In  war,  however,  they  followed  the  banner  of  their 
neighbour  Mai'Ienn  of  DowarL  With  the  latter,  Dunslaff 
supported  the  claims  of  Donald  Dubh  to  the  lordship  of  the 
Isles,  in  the  beginning  of  the  16th  century,  and  in  1504, 
**  MacGorry  of  Ullowaa**  was  summoned,  with  some  other 
chiefs,  before  the  Estates  of  the  kingdom,  to  answer  f«>r  bis 
share  in  Donald  Dubirs  rebellion.  The  submission  of  Maclean 
of  Dowart,  in  the  following  year,  implied  also  that  of  &Iac- 
quarrie,  and  in  1517,  when  the  former  chief  obtained  his  own 
remission,  he  stipulated  for  that  of  the  chief  of  Ulva  and  two 
other  chiefs.  Dunslaif  married  a  daughter  of  Macneill  of 
Taynish,  the  bride's  tocher  or  dower  consistmg  of  a  piebald 
horse,  with  two  men  and  two  women. 

His  son,  John  Macquarrie  of  Ulva,  was  one  of  the  barons 
and  conndl  of  the  Isles  who  in  1545  supported  the  preten- 
bions  of  Donald  Dubh,  on  his  second  escape  from  his  forty 
years*  imprisonment.  He  was  also  one  of  the  thirteen  chiefs, 
who  were  denounced  the  same  year  for  carrying  on  a  traitor- 
ous correspondence  with  the  king  of  England,  with  the  view 
of  transferring  their  allcguince  to  him.  In  1609  Gillespock 
.Macquarrie  of  Ulva  was  one  of  the  island  chiefs  present  in 
the  island  of  lona  when  the  nine  "  Statutes  of  Icolmkill" 
were  passed.  Allan  Macquarrie  of  Ulva  was  slain,  with  most 
of  his  followers,  at  the  battle  of  Inverkeithing  against  the 
Engltsh  pailinmentnry  troops,  20th  July  1651,  when  the 
Scots  anny  was  defeated,  and  a  free  passage  opened  to  Crom- 
well to  the  whole  north  of  Scothnnd. 

According  to  tradition  one  of  the  chiefs  of  Ulva  preserA'ed 
his  life  and  estate  by  the  exercise  of  a  timely  hospitality 
under  the  following  circumstances :  Maclean  of  Dowart  had 
a  natural  son  by  a  beautiful  voung  woman  of  his  own  clan, 
and  the  boy  having  been  born  in  a  bam  was  named,  from  his 
birth-place,  Allan-a-Sop^  or  Allan  of  the  strax.  The  girl 
afterwards  became  the  wife  of  Maclean  of  Torloisk,  residing 
in  Mull,  hut  though  he  loved  the  mother  he  cared  nothing  for 
her  boy,  and  when  the  latter  c.ime  to  see  ber,  he  was  very 
unkind  to  him.  One  morning  the  lady  saw  from  her  window 
her  son  approaching  and  hastened  to  put  a  cake  on  the  fire 
for  his  breakfa.Kt.  Her  husband  noticed  this,  and  snatching 
the  cake  hot  fi-om  the  girdle,  thnist  it  mto  his  stepson's 
hands,  forcibly  cl:i5ping  them  on  the  burning  bread.  The 
lad's  hands  were  severely  burnt,  and  in  consequence  he  re- 
frained from  going  again  to  Torloisk.  As  he  grew  np  Allan 
became  a  mariner,  and  joined  the  DaniKh  pirates  who  infested 
the  western  isles.  Ficm  his  connige  he  soon  got  the  com- 
mand of  one  galley,  and  subsequently  of  a  £otilla,  and  made  his 
name  both  fe.tred  and  famous.     Of  him  it  m.iy  be  said  that — 

"  Sir  R.-ilph  the  Rover  sailed  away. 
Ho  scoured  the  scu  for  many  a  day. 


MACQUARRIE. 


68 


&IACQUEKN. 


i| 


1  i 


il 


I  ■ 


And  now,  grown  rich  with  plunder*d  ttore, 
He  tteen  his  waj  for  ScuUiuid*s  shore.** 

The  thonglit  of  hb  motiier  bron^t  him  bock  onoe  mote  to 
the  itthuid  of  Mull,  and  one  morulng  he  anchored  hia  fallert 
in  front  of  the  house  of  Torloiak.  Hia  mother  had  been  kxig 
dead,  but  his  stepfUUicr  hastened  to  the  shore,  and  wcloomed 
hhn  with  apparent  kindness.  The  crafty  old  man  had  a  fiAid 
with  Maoqnarrie  of  Ulva,  and  thought  tlits  a  farourable  op- 
portunity to  execute  his  vengeance  on  that  chief.  With  this 
object  he  suggested  to  Allnn  th.it  it  wns  time  he  should  settle 
on  land,  and  said  that  he  could  r.udly  get  possession  of  the 
islaud  of  Ulva,  by  only  putting  to  death  the  htird,  who  was 
old  and  useless.  Allan  agreed  to  the  proposal,  and,  setting 
snil  next  morning,  appeared  before  Macqu:irrie*s  hun!*e.  Tlie 
chief  of  Ulva  was  greatly  alanued  when  he  saw  the  pirate 
giiUeys,  but  he  resolved  to  receive  their  commander  liosiii- 
tnbly,  in  the  hope  that  good  treatment  would  induce  him  to 
go  away,  without  plundering  his  house  or  doing  him  any  in- 
jury. He  causeil  a  splendid  fenst  to  be  prepared,  and  wel- 
comed Allan  to  Ulva  with  every  appearance  of  sincerity. 
After  faisting  together  tlic  whole  d.iy,  in  the  evening  tlic 
pirate-chief,  when  about  to  retire  to  his  ships,  thanked  tlie 
cliief  for  his  entertainment,  remarking,  at  the  same  time,  that 
it  had  cost  him  dear.  "  How  so?**  said  Macquarrie,  "  when  J 
bestowed  this  entertainment  upon  you  in  free  goo<l  will.*" 
**  It  is  true,"  said  Allan,  wliu,  notwithstanding  his  being  a 
pirate,  seems  to  have  been  of  a  fmnk  and  generous  disposi- 
tion, *'  but  it  has  disammgcd  all  my  plans,  and  quite  altervd 
the  purpose  for  which  I  came  hither,  which  was  to  put  you 
to  death,  seize  your  castle  and  hinds,  and  settle  myself  hen* 
in  your  stead.**  Macquiurie  replied  that  he  was  sure  such  a 
suggestion  was  not  his  own,  but  must  have  originated  with  his 
stepfather,  old  Torloisk,  who  was  his  personal  enemy.  He 
then  reminded  him  that  ho  had  made  but  an  indifferent  hus- 
band to  his  mother,  and  was  a  cruel  stepfather  to  himself, 
adding,  "  Consider  this  matter  better,  Allan,  and  you  will  sec 
that  the  estate  and  harl>our  of  Torloisk  He  as  conveniently 
for  you  as  those  of  Ulva,  and  if  you  must  make  n  settlement 
by  force,  it  is  much  better  yon  should  do  so  at  the  expense  of 
the  old  churl,  who  never  sljowed  you  kindness,  than  of  a  friend 
like  me  who  always  loved  and  honoured  you." 

Allan-a-Sop,  remembering  his  scorched  fingers,  straight- 
way sailed  back  to  Torloisk,  and  meeting  his  stepfather,  who 
came  eagerly  expecting  to  hear  of  lif acqnarrie's  de;ith,  thus 
accosted  him :  **  You  hoary  old  villain,  you  instigated  me  to 
nmrdor  a  better  man  than  yourself.  Have  yon  forgotten 
how  you  scorched  my  fingers  twenty  years  ago  with  a  buni- 
ing  cuke  ?  Hie  day  has  come  when  that  breakfast  nmst  be 
paid  for.**  So  8:iying,  with  one  stroke  of  his  battle-axe  he 
lilt  down  hut  stepfather,  took  possessuon  of  his  castle  and 
property,  and  establuihed  there  that  branch  of  the  clan  Mac- 
lean afterwards  represented  by  BTr.  Clephane  Maclean. 

Hector,  brother  of  Allan  Macquarrie  of  Ulva,  and  second 
son  of  Donald  the  12th  chief  of  the  Macquarries,  by  his  wife, 
a  daughter  of  Lauchlan  Oig  Maclean,  fbunder  of  tlie  Macleans 
of  Torlouk,  obtained  from  his  father  tlie  lands  of  Onnaig  in 
Ulva,  and  was  the  first  of  the  Macquarries  of  Onnaig.  This 
family  frequently  intennarried  with  the  Maelcans,  b«)tli  of 
J^ibny  and  Dowart  Lauchlan,  Donald*!  tliird  son,  was 
ancestor  of  the  Maoquanies  of  I^ggnii,  and  John,  the  fourth 
son,  of  those  of  Balh'ghartan. 

Lauchhm  Macquarrie  of  Ulva,  the  16th  chief  in  regular 
succession,  was  compelled  to  disp(Mfe  of  his  lands  for  behoof 
of  his  creditors,  and  in  1778,  at  the  age  of  C3,  he  entered  the 
army.    He  sened  ia  the  American  war,  and  died  in  1818,  at 


the  age  of  103,  witlioot  nale  issoe.  lie  wiai  the  hoA  cliief  of 
the  Macquarriei,  and  the  propricter  )if  Uhra  wbea  Dr:  Soh 
uel  Jofansou  and  Mr.  Boswvll  visited  that  island  In  1778. 

Tlie  room  where  tht  Doctor  apeut  tha  nigiil'ia  jci  libava 
in  the  old  mansion  of  tha  MaeqttarriaiL  Ur.  Jahna nn  aiid 
the  chief,  whom  he  waa  antprised  to  find  a  panoii  «f  gnat 
poHteneaa  and  iateUigenee,  had  a  «onT«natian>  atbaat'  tha 
usage  known  by  the  name  of  JIftrekekt  mm/itnmt^  wbieb  lar- 
meriy  existed  in  Ulva,  and  waa  n  fliie  pahl  to  the  dtlcf  bj  hit 
vassals  on  the  marriage  of  a  virgin.  In  anawtr  to  tha  Doe- 
tor's  reference  to  Blaekstone,  wito  haa  espvcaaed  Ua  iSafaaBef 
that  any  sndi  claim  on  the  part  of  landlorda  over  csWifd, 
Maequarrie  informed  the  Eughsfa  aage  thai  tlio  eldeat  einl- 
dren  of  marriages  were  not  esteemed  amongit  the  Gael  as 
among  other  nations,  most  of  whom  adhered  to  disttnet  Uiwt 
of  primogeniture,  on  account  of  the  parentage  of  the  eldest 
child,  from  the  abm-e-meaticMied  custom,  being  rendered 
doubtful  i  hence,  l»rotherB  were  verv  commonly  preferred  to 
the  proper  heirs  apparent  He  likewise  told  him  that  he 
himself  had  been  in  the  habit  of  demanding  a  sheep,  on  occa- 
sion of  e\-er7  marriage  iii  Ulva,  for  wbidi  he  had  subatituted 
a  fine  of  five  shillings  in  money.  Dr.  Johnson  waa  veiy  for- 
cibly impressed  with  the  following  iiistanee  of  aeoond  sight 
related  to  him  by  the  Maequarrie  chief.  He  said  that  once 
when  he  was  in  Edinbtirgh,  an  old  female  domestic  of  the 
familv  in  Ulva  foretold  that  l.e  would  return  home  on  a  eer- 
t.-tin  day,  with  a  new  aen*ant  in  a  livery  of  red  and  green, 
which  he  accordingly  did;  but  he  declared  that  the  idea  of 
the  sen'ant  and  the  liver}-  ocntrreil  to  him  only  when  lie  was 
in  Edinburgh,  and  that  the  woman  could  know  nothing  of  his 
intentions  at  the  time. 

A  large  portion  of  the  ancient  patrimonial  property  was 
repurchased  by  General  Macquarrie,  long  governor  of,  New 
South  Waleii,  and  from  whom  Macquarrie  county,  Blacqnar- 
rie  river,  and  INirt  Macquarrie  in  that  colony,  Maoqnanie's 
harbour,  and  Macqu:irrie  island  in  the  S<mth  Pacific,  derive 
their  name.  He  was  the  eldest  cadet  of  his  family,  and  was 
twice  married,  first,  to  Miss  B.niille  of  Jerviswood,  and  sec- 
ondly, to  a  daughter  of  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Airds,  by  whom 
he  had  an  only  son,  Ijiehlan,  who  died  without  issue. 

Tlie  island  of  Ulva  is  about  two  miles  long,  averaging  a 
mile  and  a  qu.nrter  in  breadth,  and  contains  about  GOO  inhab- 
itants. The  name  is  derived  from  the  Scandinavian  Vffiar^ 
and  means  the  island  of  wolves,  thoee  animals  having  .nn- 
cientlv  abounded  there. 


MikCQUECX,  the  surname  of  one  of  the  subordinate  tribes  of 
the  dan  Chattan,  the  he;id  of  which  u  Macqneen  of  Corry- 
brough,  Inveriicss-shire.  The  founder  of  this  tribe  is  add  to 
have  been  Roderick  Dhu  Hevan  MacSweynor  MacQneen,who, 
about  the  beginning  of  tl:e  15th  century,  received  a  grant  of 
territoiy  in  the  county  of  Inverness.  He  belonged  to  the 
family  of  the  lord  of  the  Isles,  and  Lis  desctiidauta  from  him 
were  called  the  clan  Revan. 

The  Alacqneeiis  fought,  under  the  standard  of  Macmtosh, 
captain  of  the  cl.iii  Cliattan,  at  the  battle  of  Hariaw  in  1411. 
On  4th  April  1G09,  Donald  Mncqueen  of  Corrybrongh  aigned 
the  bond  of  nuinrent,  with  the  chiefs  of  the  other  tribes  oom- 
posing  the  clan  Chattan,  whereby  they  bound  themaelves  to 
support  Angus  Macintosh  of  that  ilk  as  their  captun  and 
leader.  At  this  period,  we  arc  told,  the  tribe  of  Maequeen 
comprehended  twelve  distinct  families,  all  landowners  in  the 
counties  of  Inverness  and  Kaime. 

In  1778,  I^rd  Macdotiald  of  Sleat,  who  had  been  created 
an  Iribh  peer  by  that  title  two  years  before,  having  raised  a 
Highland  regiment,  conferred  a  Keutenaitcy  in  it  on  a  aun  of 


|! 


L^ 


MACQUEEX. 


CO 


MACRAE. 


Donald  Macqncen,  then  of-  C«m7broagli,  and  in  the  letter, 
dated  S6Ui  January  of  tliat  rcnr,  in  irhidi  lie  intimated  the 
appointmani,  he  mjn,  "  It  dttes  ino  great  honour  to  hnre  tlie 
■ona  of  ehieftaina  in  tlio  regiment,  and  as  tlie  Mncqneens 
liare  bera  iBTarinbly  nttadietl  to  oar  frnnilr,  to  irliom  we 
belieifv  we  oire  our  existence,  I  nni  proud  of  tlie  nomination." 
Thm  were  the  ilaoqueciis  acknowledged  to  have  been  of 
>laedoBaU  origin,  although  tliej  ranged  themeelv^s  among 
the  tribes  of  the  chin  Chattan. 

MACQUEEN,  Kobert,  of  BiaxficKl,  an  cmi- 
uent  kiir}-cr  and  jadge,  was  bom  May  4,  1722. 
Ho  was  tlic  eldest  son  of  John  ^lacqnccn,  Esq.  of 
Braxfidd^  Lanarkshire,  for  some  time  sheriff  sub- 
stitnte  of  the  npper  wanl  of  that  county.  After 
receiving  the  nidinieuts  of  education  at  tlie  gram- 
mar scliool  of  Lanark,  lie  was  sent  to  tlic  univer- 
sity of  Edinburgh,  and  apprenticed  to  a  writer  to 
the  signet  in  that  city.  In  lli-k  he  was  admitted 
advocate.  Tlie  many  intricate  and  important 
fi'ndal  qnestions  arising  out  of  the  rebellion  of 
1745,  respecting  the  forfeited  estates,  in  which  he 
had  the  good  fortime  to  be  appointed  counsel  for 
the  crown,  first  brought  him  into  notice,  and  for 
many  3'ear8  be  had  a  larger  pi^ctice  than  any 
other  member  of  the  bar  at  that  period.  As  a 
feudal  lawyer  he  was  considered  the  first  in  Scot- 
land in  his  time,  and  he  has  been  known  to  plead 
from  fifteen  to  twenty  causes  in  one  day. 

In  November  1776,  he  was  appointed  a  jndge 
of  the  court  of  session,  when  he  assumed  the  title 
of  Ix)rd  Braxfield.  In  February  1780  he  was  ap- 
pointed a  lonl  of  justiciary,  and  in  December  1787 
was  promoted  to  be  lord -justice-clerk.  This  last 
office  he  held  during  a  most  interesting  and  criti- 
cal period — that  between  1793  and  1795.  lie 
presided  at  the  memorable  political  trials  of  Muir, 
Palmer,  Skining,  Margarot,  c^c,  in  1793-4,  con- 
ducting himself  with  gi'cat  firmness  and  intrepi- 
dity, but  is  considered  to  have  U'cated  the  pris- 
oners with  nnnecessaiy  harshness.  He  failed, 
however,  in  all  his  attempts  to  intimidate  them. 
"It  is  altogether  unavailing,"  said  Skirviug  to 
him,  "  for  your  lordship  to  menace  me ;  for  I  have 
long  Icanied  to  fear  not  the  fiice  of  man."  Even 
on  the  bench  he  s]iokc  the  broadest  Scottish  dia- 
lect. '*IIae  ye  ony  coimsel,  man?"  he  said  to 
Maurice  Mar;,'arot,  when  placed  at  the  bar  on  a 
charge  of  sedition.  "  No,"  was  the  answer. 
♦'Do  you  want  to  hae  ony  appointit?"  *'Xo," 
replied  Margarot,  **I  only  want  an  interpreter 


to   make   me   nndcrstaud   what   your   lordship 
savs ! " 

Lord  Braxfield  died  May  dOtli,  1799,  in  his  78th 
year.  Ho  was  twice  married,  first  to  lilary  Ag- 
new,  niece  of  Sir  Andrew  Agnew,  baronet,  by 
whom  he  had  two  sons  and  two  daughters ;  and 
secondly,  to  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  the  lord  chief 
baron  Ord,  without  issue.  'Jlic  elder  son,  Robert 
Dundas  Macqueen,  inherited  the  estato  of  Brax- 
field, and  maiTied  Lady  Lilian  Montgomer}', 
daughter  of  the  earl  of  Eglinton.  Tlic  second  en- 
tered the  anny.  The  elder  daughter,  Mary,  be- 
came the  wife  of  William  Honyman,  Esq.,  advo- 
cate, afterwards  I^rd  Armadale,  a  lord  of  session, 
created  a  baronet  in  1804.  The  younger  married 
John  Macdonald  of  Cianronald. 

Mackar^  .1  minor  cbn  of  RoM-tthire,  which  has  fi-om  time 
immemorial  been  subordinate  to  tlio  Seaforth  branch  of  tlio 
Muckenzies.  The  badge  of  the  Macraes  was  the  fir-club 
moss,  and  tliey  are  generally  considered  of  the  pure  Gaelic 
stock,  although  they  bare  abfo  been  stated  to  be  of  Irish  ori- 
gin, and  to  have  come  over  to  Scotland  about  the  middle  of 
the  loth  ccntnn*.  They  are  said  to  have  fought  under  Fitz- 
gcntld,  tliO  Mipposed  founder  of  the  clan  Mackenzie  at  the 
battle  of  Lnrgs  in  12G3.  They  settled  fi»t  in  the  Aird  of 
Lovut,  but  snWqucntly  emigrated  hito  Glenslieil  in  the  dis- 
trict of  Kintail,  Boss-shire.  Dr.  Johnson  has  inserted  in  his 
'  Tour  to  the  Western  Isles,*  a  story  which  he  s.iys  he  heard 
in  tliO  Hebrides,  that  the  Macraes  '*  were  originally  an  indigent 
and  sul)onlinate  cUm,  senants  to  the  Mnclennans,  who,  in 
the  wars  of  Charles  I.,  took  arms  at  the  call  of  the  heroic 
Montrose,  and  were,  in  one  of  his  battles,  almost  destroyed. 
The  women  that  were  left  at  home,  being  thus  deprived  of 
their  husbands,  like  the  Scythian  ladies  of  oiii,  manied  tlirii 
servants,  and  the  Macraes  became  a  considerable  nice."  Tiie 
writer  of  the  account  of  the  parish  of  Glenshcil,  in  the  New 
Statistical  Account  of  Scotland,  pronounces  this  an  unwor- 
thy invention,  *' destitute  of  all  foundation,  and  contr:idicte<l 
by  ample  evidence,  written  and  tmditional."  Some  one  had 
imposed  on  the  crcdnlity  of  tlic  gi-eat  lexicographer.  At  the 
battle  of  Auldearn,  in  May  lC4o,  the  Macraes  fought  undci 
the  Mackenzie  chief  in  the  ranks  of  Montrose,  and  more  of 
tlicir  number  fell  than  of  the  Maclennans.  They  were  de- 
feated at  tlio  battle  of  Glenslieil,  under  William  earl  of  Sea- 
forth iu  1719,  when  u  body  of  400  Spaniards  attempted  to 
make  a  landing  in  tlic  Stuart  interest.  When  that  nobleman, 
for  his  bhai-c  in  the  troubles  of  1-715  and  1719,  was  obliged 
to  retire  to  the  Continent,  and  his  lands  wera  forfeited,  so 
strong  was  the  attachment  of  the  Macnies  and  Maclennans 
to  him,  that,  during  tlio  time  the  forfeiture  lasted  it  bafflod 
all  the  efforts  of  government  and  its  commissioner,  Ross  of 
Feame,  to  penetrate  into  his  territory,  or  to  collect  any  rents 
in  Kintail.  On  one  occasion  Koss  and  his  son  with  a  party  of 
men  set  off  to  collect  the  rents,  and  fciring  some  attack  on 
the  way,  he  sent  his  son  forward,  on  his  own  horse,  when  a 
shot  from  a  rifle  laid  him  dead.  The  father  and  his  party 
immediately  ab:mdoned  their  intentions,  and  returned  home 
in  haste.  Scaforth's  tenants  were  aided  in  their  resistance  by 
tlio  advice  uf  Donald  .Murchison  of  Auchtertyre,  uho  regu- 


I  : 


r- 

i! 


'^ 


MACRAE. 


70 


MACRAE. 


I , 


1 1 


:  I 


■  I 


lurlv  collected  the  reutd,  und  found  means  to  remit  them  to 
Seaforth,  then  in  France. 

Tlie  chief  or  head  of  the  Chnn  */c  Kath  Mhohtch^  or 
"Hairy  Mncraes,"  culled  by  Kisbet  the  "Macrncha,"  and 
pronounced  AlacCmws,  was  Macmo  of  Inverinate  in  Kintnil. 
A  ^IS.  genealog:<:ul  acconnt  of  the  M.icrr.es,  trntten  by  the 
Rev.  John  Macnic,  minister  in  Dingirnll,  trho  died  in  1704, 
was  in  possession  of  the  Lite  IJetitcnant-colonel  Sir  John 
^Iftcrae  of  Ardintoul.  This  sechided  and  primitive  tribe  were 
remarkable  for  their  f^reat  size  and  courap.\  and  it  L-i  recorded 
that  one  Duncan  Macrae,  who  lived  in  the  bepnning  of  the 
18th  centnrjf  had  such  amazing  strength,  that  ho  carried  for 
some  distance  a  btone  of  immense  size,  and  laid  it  down  on 
the  farm  of  Achnangart,  where  it  U  vet  to  bo  seen.  lie  ren- 
dered himself  famous  hj  nvovering  stolen  cattle  from  the 
reivers  of  I-,ochaber,  cither  belonging  to  himself  or  his  neigh- 
bours. He  was  the  author  of  several  p<ietical  picce.«,  and  was 
killed,  with  many  of  his  clan,  at  SherifTmuir  in  1715.  His 
claymore,  long  preserved  in  the  Tower  of  I/)ndun,  was  shown 
as  **  the  great  liiglilandcr's  swonl." 

A  prcnt  number  of  the  clan  M.ncrae  enlist od  in  the  Seaforth 
Highlanders,  when  that  regiment  w.ns  raised  in  177H,  and 
their  mutiny  at  I^ith  boon  after  their  enrolment  gave  rise  to 
a  memorable  ocairrence  whidi  was  called  ''  the  atlair  of  the 
wild  Macraws."  The  regiment  had  been  rai.-icd  chirfly  from 
.tmong  his  own  tenantry,  by  the  reston'd  earl  of  Seaforth, 
grandson  of  the  earl  who  had  been  attainted  for  his  partiei- 
p:ition  in  the  rul>cl lion  of  1715.  It  fonned  a  corps  of  l.ir>0 
men.  Of  these,  al»out  000  were  Hij;lilandei"s,  500  of  whom 
were  Mackenzies  and  M.nenies,  from  his  lordship*ii  own  e>tntc, 
and  the  remainder  were  obtained  fmm  the  estates  of  Se.nt- 
wcll,  Kilcoy,  Appleerr-5S,  Rcdcastle,  and  others  belonging 
to  gentlemen  of  the  name  of  Mackenzie,  .ill  of  whom  had 
sons  or  brothers  among  the  officers.  Knibodied  at  KIgin  in 
Mny  of  tho  year  mcnlioned,  the  regiment  was  inspected  by 
General  Skene,  when  it  was  found  so  eflVctive  that  not  one 
man  was  rejected.  In  the  month  of  August  the  regiment 
proceeded  to  Kdiubnr^h,  and  in  September  m.nrched  to  Leith 
for  embarkation  to  the  Ka<t  ludirs ;  but  it  h.id  not  been  long 
qtuirtcrcd  in  that  town  when  the  men  showed  signs  of  dis- 
Cftntcnt,  and  murmurs  began  l^)  be  e.Tpre5>ed  amonirst  them 
that  "they  had  been  sold  to  the  Kost  India  Company." 
They  had  enlisted  to  bene  only  for  a  limited  period,  and 
not  out  of  Great  Brit:iin,  and  they  complained  of  an  intringe- 
ment  of  their  agreement,  and  that  part  of  their  pay  and 
bounty  money  was  in  arrear,  kept  back  from  them,  as  they 
alleged,  by  their  officers. 

As  they  could  obtain  neither  8:itisfaction  nor  redress,  on 
Tuesday,  22d  September,  wiien  the  regiment  was  drawn  up 
on  I.eith  Links,  preparatory  to  entering  the  boats  which  were 
to  convey  them  to  the  transports  lying  in  I^ilh  roads,  .ibout 
600  of  the  men  refused  to  embark,  and  marching  out  of  Leith, 
with  pipes  playing  and  two  plaids  fixed  on  poles  instead  of 
colours,  took  up  a  position  on  Arthur's  Seat,  an  eminence 
800  feet  high,  in  the  immediate  neighbourhood  of  Fdinburgh. 
Tliere  they  remained  for  three  nights,  .imply  supplied  in  the 
U'.e.intime  with  proviaious  by  the  iiihabiUmts  of  the  capit.il. 
Two  days  were  spent  in  negotiations  with  them,  in  wiiich  the 
earls  of  Dnnmore  and  Seaforth,  Lord  Macdonald,  Sir  James 
Grant  of  Grant,  and  other  gentlemen  connected  with  the 
Highlandit,  took  an  active  and  prominent  part,  and  on  Friday 
morning  a  bond  was  signed  by  the  dake  of  Buccleuch,  the 
earl  of  Dnnmore,  Sir  Adolphus  Oughton,  and  Genenil  Skene, 
the  latter  two  tho  officers  first  and  second  in  command  of  the 
forces  in  Scotland,  cont.iining  the  following  conditions:  A 
pardim  to  the  Highlanders  for  all  past  offences ;  all  levy  mo- 


ney and  arrears  due  to  them  to  be  paid  befbn  emfaukatioii, 
and  that  they  should  not  be  sent  to  the  East  Indiei.  The 
soldiers  being  satisfied,  m.irched  down  the  lull  with  pipes 
playing,  the  earls  of  Seaforth  and  Dnnmore  at  their  hMd, 
and  returned  to  their  quarters  at  I^ith.  The  result  of  an 
inquiry  which  was  afterwards  made  was,  that  there  was  no 
foundation  for  complaints  against  tho  officers  on  the  gmnnd 
of  pay  or  arrear,  and  that  "  the  cause  of  the  retiring  to  Ar- 
thur's Seat  was.  from  an  idle  and  ill-fomided  report  that  the 
regiment  was  sold  to  the  East  India  Company,  and  th.it  tlie 
officers  were  to  leave  them  on  their  being  embarked  on  board 
the  transports."  The  regiment  subsequently  embarked  with 
the  greatest  cheerfulness,  accompanied  by  their  ctdonel,  the 
e.irl  of  Seaforth,  one-half  of  the  men  Wing  sent  to  Guernsey, 
and  the  other  half  to  Jersey.  In  May  1781,  having  express- 
ed their  willingness  to  go  to  the  East  Indies,  the  regiment 
embarked  at  Portsmouth  for  Madras.  The  colonel,  the  eflrl  o( 
Seaforth,  died  before  they  reached  St.  Helena,  when  his  cousin, 
Lieutenant-colonel  Humberston  Mackenzie,  succeeded  to  the 
command.  The  regiment  was  first  c.illed  the  78th,  but  the 
number  was  subsequently  altered  to  the  72d,  and  in  1823  it 
got  the  name  of  •*the  duke  of  Albany's  Highlanders.** 

When  the  second  battalion  of  the  Ross-shiro  Highlanders, 
or  78th  regiment,  w.is  raised  in  1804,  one  gentleman  of  this 
name,  Christopher  Macrae,  brought  eighteen  of  his  own  clan 
.18  part  of  his  portion  of  recruits  for  an  ensigncy.  This  regi- 
ment sened  in  Egypt  in  1807,  and  at  El  Hamet,  a  village  on 
tho  Nile,  nearly  six  miles  si\wve  Rosetta,  a  desperate  affair 
t«K)k  \t\iwc,  the  llritiAli  being  ntt.iekcd  by  a  strong  body  of  Turks, 
Albanians,  and  Arabs,  and  a  great  number  of  officers  and  men 
were  killed.  On  this  ccca.sion,  says  General  Stcw.irt  of  Garth, 
in  his  •  Sketches  of  the  Highlanders,'  '*  Sergejuit  John  Mac- 
rae, a  young  man  abi^ut  twenty-two  years  of  age,  but  of  good 
size  and  strength  of  ann,  showed  that  the  broadsword,  in  a 
firm  hand,  is  as  good  a  weapon  in  close  fighting  as  the  bay- 
onet. Macrae  killed  six  men,  cutting  them  down  with  his 
broadsword,  (of  the  kind  usually  worn  by  sei^ants  of  High- 
land corp:j>.)  when  at  last  he  made  a  dash  out  of  the  ranks  on 
a  Turk,  whom  he  cut  dov.  n ;  but  .is  he  w.ia  returning  to  the 
sqnarc  he  was  killed  by  a  blow  from  behind,  his  head  being 
nearly  split  in  two  by  the  stroke  of  a  sabre.  Lieutenant 
Christopher  Macrae,  aln»ady  mentioned  as  having  brought 
eighteen  men  of  his  own  name  to  the  regiment  as  part  of  his 
quota  of  recruits,  for  an  cnsigncy,  was  killed  in  this  affair, 
with  six  of  his  followers  and  n.imesakes,  besides  the  sergeant. 
On  tho  pass.ige  to  Li»bon  in  October  1805,  the  same  ser- 
geant came  to  me  one  evening  (General  Stewart  was  a  m.ijor 
in  the  regiment)  crying  like  a  child,  and  complaining  that 
tiic  ship's  cook  had  called  him  English  names,  which  he  did 
not  understand,  and  thrown  some  fat  in  his  face.  Thus  a 
lad  who  in  1805  was  so  soft  and  to  childish,  displayed  in 
1807  a  courage  and  vigour  worthy  a  hero  of  Osuan." 

Roth  males  and  females  of  the  Macraes  are  said  to  have 
evinced  an  extraordinary  tsistc  for  poetry  and  nmsic.  John 
Macrae,  Wtter  known  among  his  countrymen  as  Mac  Virtsi, 
whose  family  are  said  to  have  possessed  tho  gift  of  poetry  fur 
.•*ome  generations,  emigrated  to  America,  in  consequence 
of  the  innovations  on  the  ancient  h.ibits  of  the  Highlanders, 
and  feelingly  regretted,  in  Gaelic  verse,  his  h.iving  left  his 
native  country.  A  poem  composed  by  him  on  a  he.ivy  loss 
of  cattle  is  considered  by  many  equal  to  anything  in  the 
language. 

One  of  this  clan  was  an  able  governor  of  Madras,  in  com- 
memomtion  of  whom  a  monument  is  erected  on  a  rinng 
ground  in  the  parish  of  Prestwick,  Ayrshire. 

Captain  James  Macrae  of  Holmains  in  April  1790  had  the 


MACRDIMON. 


71 


MACVUIRICII. 


aittfortmie  to  iilioot  Sir  James  Rmnsav  of  DnniflT,  luironet,  in 
t  dnd  at  Moudburgb,  ami  tru  oblifred  in  conseqncnoe  to 
leare  Seutland.  He  was  cited  beftnre  the  l:i;;1i  court  of  justi- 
eiarjr  upoo  criiniiuil  letters  to  take  In:i  trini  for  murder,  in  the 
(uUoiring  July,  and  outlan-ed  fur  non-appearance.  He  Iind 
ptnionslj  conrered  his  estate  to  trustees,  tvlio,  in  conformity 
vith  Ilia  instruction^  exccnteii  an  entail  of  it.  He  died 
ifarmd  16th  Jauuary  1820,  learing  a  son  and  a  daughter. 

MACniMMOXf  the  surname  of  a  minor  sept,  (the  Siot 
Cknumum,')  who  irere  the  hereditary  pipers  of  Madeod  of 
Jladcod.  'riie?  had  a  sort  of  seminary  for  the  instruction  of 
learners  in  l>a«^)i;*c  mu>ic,  and  trere  the  most  celebrated  b:i<;- 
]4pe  players  in  the  Highl;mdii.  Tiie  fintt  of  wliom  there  is 
Mj  notice  was  Ian  Odhar,  or  dun-colonrcd  John,  trlio  lived 
iboot  1600.  About  the  middle  of  tlio  17th  century,  Patrick 
Mor  MacKmmofi,  liaring  lost  seven  sons,  (he  had  ciglit  in 
ill)  within  a  year,  composed  for  the  bagpipe  a  touching  *  La- 
ment for  the  cliildren,*  called  in  Gaelic  Cumhadh  na  Cloitwe. 
Id  174d  Madeod*s  piper,  e:tteemed  the  bent  in  Scotland,  was 
called  Donald  Ran  MacRimmon.  When  thnt  chief,  who  was 
(^tpoaed  to  Prince  Charles,  with  Slnnra  of  Culc;iirn,  at  the 
head  of  700  men,  were  defeated  by  I^ird  Lewis  Gordon,  and 
the  Farqnharsons,  at  Invemry,  12  miles  from  Aberdeen,  Do- 
nald Ban  was  taken  priMucr.  On  this  occasion,  a  striking 
nuufk  of  mtpect  was  paid  to  him  by  his  brethren  of  the  bag- 
pipe, vhicli  at  once  obtained  his  release.  The  pipers  in  I^rd 
Lcwift*  following  did  not  play  the  noxt  morning,  as  wn.s  their 
wont,  and  on  inquiry  as  to  tlris  unusual  circumstance,  it  was 
foand  by  liis  lonlsliip  and  his  officers  that  the  pipes  were  si- 
lent because  XacRimmon  was  a  prisoner,  when  he  was  hn- 
Rwdiately  set  at  liberty.  He  was,  however,  shortly  aflcr- 
vvds  killed  in  the  night  attempt,  led  by  the  laird  of  Macleod, 
to  capture  the  prince  at  Moyhall,  the  seat  of  I«aily  Macintosh 
Mar  Inverness. 

On  tlie  passing  of  the  heritable  jnri.Hdic-tiun  abolition  bill  in 
1747,  the  occupation  of  the  hereditary  bagpipers  was  gone. 
DonaM  Dnbh  M.ncRimmon,  the  last  of  them,  died  in  182*2, 
«^  91.  The  affecting  lament,  Tha  til,  tha  til,  tha  til,  MhJc 
OnmNiW,  "  MacRimmon  shall  never,  shall  never,  shall  never 
ittnm,**  was  composed  on  his  departure  for  Canad.i. 


Mac  Boby,  a  surname  derived  from  the  name  Rodnicic, 
ailed  Rnari  in  tlie  Highlands.  The  clan  Rory  were  so  styled 
trom  I»oderick,  the  eldest  of  the  three  sons  of  Reginald,  second 
■jun  of  Somcrltrd  of  the  I>les  by  his  second  marri.-ige.  This 
Rideridc  was  lord  of  Kintyre  and  one  of  the  most  noted  )ii- 
rates  of  Ilia  dav.  His  descendants  became  extinct  in  the 
third  generation.  The  chm  Donald  and  clan  Duugnll  sprung 
froni  Roderick's  brothers. 


MacSorij^y,  a  surname  derived  from  the  Norse  Somcried, 
vbich  means  Samu«l.  In  the  Gaelic  it  is  Somhairlc.  The 
Catnerons  of  Glennevis  were  called  5IacSorley,  while  those  of 
Stroqw  were  MacGillonies,  and  those  of  Letterfinlay  were 
MacMartins.  These  septs,  says  Gregory,  (Ilighlamda  and 
Itla,  p.  77,)  were  all  .nnciciit  families  in  Lochaber,  and  seem 
to  have  adopted  the  surname  of  Cameron,  although  not  de- 
Kended  of  the  familv. 


MacVuiiiich,  the  stuiiame  of  a  family  which  for  scvend 
;;nientions  held  the  office  of  bard  and  genealogist  to  the 
Mscdonaldi  of  Cbinrauald.  Kiel  ^facVuirich,  the  last  of  the 
bardic  race,  lived  to  a  great  age  in  South  UiAt,  and  died  in 
1726.  He  wrote  in  the  Gaelic  language  the  hi:$tory  of  the 
CLummald,  as  well  as  ctiHectetl  some  ancient  poetry,  and  the 


annals  of  past  times.  Ail  his  own  compositions  have  been 
lost,  excepting  three  pieces  which  are  given  in  Mackenzie's 
*  Reautiea  of  Gaelic  Poetry,*  pp.  05 — C7. 

The  following  curious  and  interesting  declaration  of  Lncli- 
Ian  MncVuirich,  son  of  Nicl,  taken  by  desire  of  the  Comntit- 
teo  of  the  Highland  Society  of  Scot. cnl,  appointed  to  inquire 
into  the  nature  and  autiienticity  nf  the  poems  of  Ossian,  will 
throw  much  light  on  the  bardic  office,  as  well  as  furnish  some 
information  regarding  the  celebrated  Red  Book  of  ClanniU- 
aid.  It  is  a  translation  of  the  ori^nal  written  in  Gaelic,  and 
addressed  to  Henry  ^lackenzie,  Esq.,  at  the  time  he  was 
writing  the  Society's  report  of  Ossian.  *^  In  the  house  of 
Patrick  Nicolson,  at  Torlum,  near  Castle  Burgh,  in  the  shire 
of  Inverness,  on  the  ninth  day  of  August,  compeared,  in  the 
lifty-niuth  year  of  his  age,  Lachlan,  son  of  Miel,  son  of  I«nch- 
lan,  son  of  Niel,  son  of  Donald,  son  of  I.achlan,  son  of  Kiel 
.Mor,  son  of  I«achlan,  son  of  Donald,  of  the  surname  of  ^Inc- 
Vuirich,  before  Roderick  M*Xeil,  Ksq.  of  Barra,  and  declared,. 
That,  according  to  the  l>ost  of  his  knowledge,  he  is  the  eight- 
eenth in  descent  from  Muireach,  whose  posterity  had  offici- 
ated as  bards  to  the  family  of  Clanrsinald ;  and  that  they  h:id 
from  that  time,  as  the  salary  of  their  office,  the  farm  of  Sta- 
oiligary,  and  four  pennies  of  Drinii.'vdale,  during  fifteen  gene- 
rations ;  that  the  sixteenth  descendant  lost  the  four  pennies 
of  Drimisdale,  but  that  the  seventeenth  descendant  retained 
the  farm  of  Staoiligary  for  nineteen  years  of  his  life.  That 
there  was  a  right  given  them  over  these  lands,  as  long  as 
there  should  be  any  of  the  posterity  of  Muireach  to  preserve 
and  continue  the  genealogy  and  hiKtory  of  the  Macdonalds, 
on  condition  thnt  the  bard,  failing  of  male  issue,  was  to  edu- 
cate his  brother's  s«ni,  or  repn'sentative,  in  order  to  pre:>ervo 
their  title  to  the  lands;  and  that  it  was  in  pursuance  of  this 
custom  that  his  own  father,  Niel,  had  been  taught  to  rend 
nnd  write  hiittory  and  poetry  by  Donald,  son  of  Niel,  son  of 
Donald,  his  father's  brother. 

*'  He  remembers  well  that  works  of  Ossian  written  on 
p.iR'hment,  were  in  the  custody  of  his  father,  as  received 
trom  his  predecessors;  that  some  of  the  parehments  were 
made  up  in  the  form  of  books,  and  that  othera  were  loose  and 
separate,  which  contained  the  works  of  other  burds  l)CMdes 
those  of  Ossian. 

'*  He  remembers  that  his  father  had  a  book,  which  was 
called  the  J^td  Book,  made  of  pajier,  which  he  had  from  his 
predecessors,  and  which,  as  his  father  informed  him,  contain- 
ed a  gooil  deal  of  the  history  of  the  Highland  clans,  together 
with  pnrt  of  the  works  of  Ossian.  That  none  of  those  books 
are  to  be  found  at  this  day,  bcc.ius3  when  they  (his  family) 
were  deprived  of  their  lands,  they  li>st  their  alacrity  and  zeal. 
That  he  is  not  certain  what  became  of  the  parehments,  but 
thinks  that  some  of  them  were  carried  away  by  Alexander, 
son  of  the  Rev.  Alexander  Macdonald,  and  others  by  Ronald 
his  son ;  and  he  saw  two  or  three  of  them  cut  down  by  tai- 
lors for  measures.  That  he  remembers  well  that  Clanranald 
made  his  father  give  up  the  Red  Book  to  James  Macpherson 
from  Badcnoch:  th.tt  it  was  near  as  thick  as  a  Bible,  but 
that  it  w.ns  longer  and  broader,  though  not  so  thick  in  the 
cover.  That  the  parehments  and  the  Red  Book  were  v^Tittcn 
in  the  linnd  in  which  the  Gaelic  used  to  he  so  written  of  old 
both  in  Scotland  and  Ireland,  before  people  began  to  use  the 
English  hand  in  writing  Gaelic;  and  that  his  father  knew 
well  how  to  read  the  old  hand,  lliat  he  himself  had  some 
of  the  parchments  af\er  his  father's  death,  but  that  because 
he  had  not  been  taught  to  read  them,  and  had  no  reason  to 
set  any  value  on  them,  they  were  lost  He  8.iys  that  none 
of  his  forefathera  had  the  name  of  Paul,  but  there  were  two 
of  them  who  were  called  Cathal.     He  savs  that  the  Red 


71 


!i 


=^l 


'  I 
■  I 
I 

1  I 


■I 


:       .  I 


!    i' 


MAI  I?, 


72 


JOHN. 


Rook  was  not  written  by  one  injKi,  Imt  that  it  w:i8  written, 
Innn  h;;c  to  .■i;:c.  I»y  tlic  fsmulr  of  CUn  >fliuiric1i,  «ho  were 
preserving  nnd  contuiuin;;  tlie  history  of  the  Macdonnlib,  and 
of  other  hea<]«  of  l{i|;hland  cl.-ins. 

"  Af^er  tlio  nbove  dechtmtion  was  taken  down,  it  trai  read 
to  him,  and  lie  acknowled^wl  it  was  right,  in  presence  of  I?o- 
iiald  M'Donahl  of  Balron.ild,  James  :iM>onaId  of  Garrlie- 
lich,  Kwan  M 'Donald  of  Griininish,  Alexander  M-r^ean  of 
Ifostcr,  Mr.  Alexander  Nic«»hion,  minister  of  Benliecnhi,  and 
Mr.  Allan  M 'Queen,  minister  of  North  I'ist,  who  wrote  this 
diflnration."  The  last  I-:ichlan  above  mentioned  as  father 
of  Neil  Mor  and  son  of  Dimald,  was  eallcd  for  distinct  ion's 
^ake,  I^chunn  Mor  Mac  Mhuirich  Albannaich,  or  I^ichlan 
Mor  Slac  Vuirich  of  Scotland.  He  lived  in  the  1  Jlh  ccntu- 
rv,  and  was  the  author  of  a  remarkable  war-sonp,  composed 
wholly  of  epithets  airnngod  in  alphabetical  order,  to  rouse 
the  cUn  l)«)nald  previous  to  the  b.il  tie  (if  Ilariaw.  (See  Mac- 
krmiti  Deauliei  of  Gaelic  Potti-y,  p.  G2,  Note.) 

Kverv  jjieat  Highland  family  had  their  bard,  who>c  busi- 
ness it  was  to  recite  at  cntertaiiinieiits  tho  immenue  stores  of' 
poetry  which  he  had  hoarded  up  in  his  menmrT,  and  to  pre- 
een'e  the  genealogy  and  commemoRite  the  mihtary  actions  of 
the  heroes  or  cliieJ's.  >Vhen  Neil  MacVuirich,  the  ln»t  of  the 
bards,  died  in  172G,  the  biirdic  order  became  extinct  in  Scot- 
biud. 

Maddeuty,  Uai-on.    See  Stuatiiallas,  Viscount  of. 

M.AIK,  or  ^Iajok,  Juiix,  a  scholastic  divine  .ind 
liistorinn,  was  born  at  the  villngc  of  Gleghoniic, 
parish  of  North  Honvick,  in  1469.  lie  went  to 
the  iinivcisity  of  rnris  in  140;),  and  stndicd  at  the 
colleges  of  St.  Unibc  nnd  Montncnie.  In  1496  he 
became  M.A,  and  2  years  after  removed  to  the 
college  of  XavaiTo.  In  1508  he  was  ci-cated  D.I). 
It  npiKjars  from  some  passages  in  his  writings 
that  in  the  early  part  of  the  ICth  cetitniy  he  was 
a  member  of  Christ's  college,  Cambridge.  lie 
R'tnnied  to  Scotland  in  1518,  in  which  year  he 
became  a  member  of  the  university  of  Gla.««gow, 
being  then  styled  canon  of  (he  chapel  royal  and 
>icar  of  Dunlop.  In  1521  he  was  professor  of 
theology  in  the  nniverslty  of  Glasgow.  He  snb- 
seqiicntly  held  also  the  office  of  treasurer  of  the 
royal  chajjcl  of  Stirling,  and  about  1523  he  became 
professor  of  divinity  in  the  college  of  St.  Salvator, 
St.  Andrews,  where  lie  remained  five  3'ears.  He 
was  certainly  there  in  1528,  when,  at  the  dawn  of 
the  Reformativ>ii  in  Scotland,  a  friar  who  had 
preached  a  sei«mon  at  Dundee  against  the  licenti< 
ous  lives  of  the  bishops,  and  against  the  abuse  of 
cursing  from  the  altar  and  false  miracles,  being 
accused  of  liei-esy,  "  went,**  says  Calderwood,  **  to 
Sanct  Andrewes,  and  communicated  tho  heads  of 
his  sermoun  with  Mr.  Johnc  ^laior,  A^hose  word 
was  then  hoidin  m  an  oracle  in  maters  of  reltgi- 


oiin.  Mr.  Johno  said,  his  doctrine  mlglit  wcUl  be 
defended,  and  contcancd  no  licrcsic.**  Tho  friar 
nltimatcly  was  compelled  to  fly  to  Rngland,  where 
he  was  cast  into  prison  by  command  of  Henry  the 
Eighth. 

^lair  liim<ie1f,  although  lie  remained  a  clinreli- 
man,  in  consequence  of  tlie  religious  distractions 
of  the  times,  went  back  to  Paris,  when  hereanmcd 
his  lectnres  in  the  college  of  Montacnte.  While 
in  France  he  had  among  his  pupils  scvernl  irlio 
were  afterwards  eminent  for  their  learning.  Quo 
of  the  most  distinguishe<l  of  thcin  was  his  conu- 
tryman,  George  nuehannn,  who  had  studied  logic 
under  him  at  St.  Salvator^s  college,  and  had  fol- 
lowed him  to  Paris.  In  1530  lie  returned  once 
more  to  Scotland,  and  resumed  his  lectnres  as  pro- 
fessor of  theology  in  the  university  of  St.  An- 
drews. He  was  present,  with  the  other  heads  of 
the  university,  in  the  parish  church  of  that  city, 
when  John  Knox,  who  had  been  one  of  his  stu- 
dents, preached  his  first  sermon  in  public  in  1547. 
^L•.  Tytler,  in  his  History  of  Scotland,  (vol.  v.  p. 
211)  Referring  to  Patrick  Hamilton  the  martyr, 
speaks  of  him  as  having  been  *^  educated  at  St 
Andrews,  in  what  was  then  esteemed  the  too  lib- 
eral philosophy  of  John  Mair,  the  master  of  Knox 
and  Bnchanan.^'  It  was  no  small  honour  to  have 
infused  into  the  minds  of  these  three  men,  the  fore- 
most, in  their  respective  provinces,  of  their  age, 
ideas  and  principles  far  in  advance  of  the  narrow 
and  bigoted  tenets  of  the  churchmen.  lie  was 
thus,  perhaps  unconsciously  to  himself,  a  notnn- 
important  instrument  in  helping  forward  the  great 
work  of  the  Reformation  in  Scotland,  and  in  pro- 
moting the  sacred  cause  of  civil  and  religious  lib- 
ertv. 

He  is  said  to  have  died  about  1549,  at  *^a  great 
nge,  for,''  says  Dr.  ^lackenzic,  in  his  *  Lives  of 
Kminent  Scots  Writers,'  "in  the  year  1547,  at 
the  national  council  of  the  Church  of  Scotland  at 
Linlithgow,  he  subscribed  by  proxy,  in  qnality  of 
dean  of  theology  of  St.  Andrews,  not  being  able  to 
come  himself  by  reason  of  his  age,  which  was  then 
seventy-eight,  and  shortly  after  he  died." 

His  works  were  all  written  in  I^itin.  His  Ix><- 
gicnl  Treatises  form  one  immense  folio.  His 
Commentary  on  the  Physics  of  Aristotle  makes 
anr.ihcr.     His  Theological  works,  among  which  is 


MAITLAND 


73 


OF  THIRLKSTANK. 


an  Expoeition  of  St.  Mattlicw^s  Gospel,  nmonnt 
to  scTcrnl  volnmcs  of  the  same  size.  IIo  is  best 
known,  however,  by  his  htstor}',  *•  Dc  Gestis  Sco- 
tornm,'  in  which  he  gives  an  account  of  the  Scots 
nation  from  tlio  earliest  autiquity,  and  rejects 
manj  of  the  fables  and  fictions  of  previons  liisto- 
rians,  such  as  Wjntonn  and  Fordoun. 
Tlie  titles  of  his  works  arc  ns  follows : 

I 

IiitrodiictoriQin  in  ArUtotclicnm  DlHlccticen,  totimque  T^- 
^cxau  Par.  apiitl  Joauneni  Lnmbert. — Qnicstio  de  Com- 
plexo  Signifiaibili. — Primus  Liber  Tcrminomm,  citm  fij^ni. 
— Secundoa  fiber  Tertninorum. — Siiminulae,  cnm  figiim  qun- 
twMr  PmpomtionQm  et  c»mm  Conrersionnin. — PraDdicnbilin, 
cnm  Arbore  Porplirriana. — Pncdicimentn,  &ili,  cum  fi;;iim. 
— SvlIogismL  —  Poetcrioni,  cum  ti*xta  Aristuteliii  primi  et 
Bectinibi  Capitis,  libri  primi. — ^Tractnttu  de  Jjocis. — ^IVnctntus 
Kkfiichonim. — ^Tmctntos  Conseqneiitinrum. — Abbrenationcs 
Parrwuin  fjo^^caliam. — P.ir^'a  I/>;;ienliH. — Exponibilia. — In- 
•olabilim. — Obligntioiies. — A ry^menta  Sopbistica. — Proposi- 
tum  de  fnfinitoi. — Ana1o;;iu  iiitfr  duos  Tx>gicos  et  Mngistnim. 
The  abore  were  nil  printed  in  one  voluiiie  nt  Lyons,  1514, 
fdin. 

In  qnarfnm  Sontentinrnm.  Commentnriits.  Par.  npnd 
Joannein  Granjonium,  1509.  Par.  1516.  Agnin,  npnd 
Jvdocaia  fiaditun  ABoensium. 

In  Primnm  et  Secnndnm  Scntcntiaruni  totidem  Coinmcn- 
tariu    Par.  apad  Jod.  Bad.  Asc<>nsium,  1510. 
Commentarios  in  Tertiam.    Parity  1517. 
CommentarioB  in  Secanduni.    Paris,  npud  Joanncm  Gnin- 
jnniain,  1519. 

Uteralis  in  Mattlia*nm  Kxpositin,  una  cum  Trcccntis  et 
Octo  Dabib  et  Difficultatibus  nd  pja^  KInddationem  admo- 
dora  Condncentlbus  passim  insertis ;  quibi.t  Prelectis,  pervia 
erit  qnntnor  Krangelistarum  Scries.  Paris,  apud  Joan. 
Graujonium,  1518. 

De  Auctoritate  Concilii  supra  Puntificcm  Maximum  liber, 
Excerptns  ex  ejus  Commentariis  in  S.  Mattba;)un.  Paris, 
1518,  folio. 

I)e  IlintoriA  Gentis  Scotornm,  libri  sox,  seu  ITistorin  ]Ma- 
joris  Britannia?,  tarn  Anglia;  qnam  5>cotia3,  u  Vetcrum  Moui- 
iientis  Concinnnt:!.  Paris,  npud  Jud.  nadiuui,  1521.  Edin. 
»pnd  Rob,  Frcebalrn,  1740,  4to. 
Commentnrins  in  Physica  Aristotelis.  Paris,  152C. 
Loculentas  in  quatuor  Kvangelia,  Kxpotiitiones,  Disqulsi- 
tioneii,  et  Di$putationes,  contra  Ilxretico:; ;  ad  Calccm  lin- 
jave  Operis.     Par.  1529,  fol. 

CiiUlngns  Kpiwoporum  Luciuncnsium.    Apud  Antonlum 
tVemocliarom. 


MAm-AND,  a  surname  of  Norman  origin,  in  eariy  times 
^'tten  Matulant,  lilantalent^  or  lilatal.-m.  Nisbet,  in  men- 
tionin);  the  name,  (//em/lc/ry,  vol.  i.  p.  292,)  adds,  quasi  mu- 
:  tHaiut  M  BeUOt  as  if  it  bad  been  first  given  to  one  maimed 
,  or  mntibted  in  war.  Tliere  can  be  no  doubt  that  among  the 
f"lInwerB  of  William  the  Conqueror  when  he  came  into  Eng- 
Imid,  was  one  bearing  this  name,  whatever  may  bare  been  its 
ieriTatiim. 

TliC  fintt  on  record  in  Scotland  was  Thomas  de  ^latulant, 

of  Anf;;to-Xor.nan  lineage,  the  ancestor  of  the  noble  family  of 

Livderdale.     He  flonrinlivd  in  the  reign  of  William  the  Lion, 

nd  died  in  1228.     The  eariy  history  of  the  family,  like  that 

>    of  most  of  the  .\iigIo-Nonnan  incomers,  relates  chiefly  to  the 


acquirement  of  lands  and  donations  to  some  particular  abbey 
or  religious  bonse,  for  they  were  all  groat  benefactors  to  the 
chnreh,  and  the  ^Matulants'  farmed  no  exception.  Like 
many  Anglo-Norman  and  Anglo-Saxon  families,  tltey  settled 
In  nerwii'kshire.  Hiomas*  son,  William  de  Matnlant,  was 
witness  to  several  of  the  charters  of  King  Alexander  XL, 
which  proves  that  ho  must  have  been  mudi  abtmt  the  court 
of  that  monarch.  Ho  died  about  1250,  leaving  a  son.  Sir 
Richard  Matuhmt,  who,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III.,  was  one 
of  the  most  oonsldemblc  barons  in  Scotland,  being  the  owner 
of  the  lands  and  baronies  of  Thirlestane,  BIrthe,  Tollns,  Hed' 
denviok  and  other  pmpniies,  all  in  tl:e  shirs  of  Berwick. 
To  r)r}'burgh  abbey,  which  had  been  founded  little  more  than 
a  ccntuiy  before,  lie  gifted  seveml  lands,  "  for  the  welfare  of 
his  soul,  and  the  souls  of  Avicia  his  wife,  his  predecessors 
and  successors.**  His  son,  William  de  Mautlant  of  Tliirl« 
stanc,  confirmed  these  gills.  He  was  one  of  tlie  patriots  who 
joined  King  Robert  the  Bruce  as  soon  as  he  bogsm  to  assert 
his  right  to  the  crown,  and  died  about  1315. 

Tlio  son  of  this  baron.  Sir  Robert  Maitland,  possessed  the 
lands  of  Thiriestane  in  his  fathers  lifetime.  Among  other 
charters  he  had  one  of  the  lands  of  I^thington  from  Sir  John 
Giffunl  of  Tester,  confirmed  by  King  David  II.,  17lh  Octo- 
ber, in  the  17lli  year  of  his  reign  (1345).  Jtt»t  a  year  after- 
wards, on  the  same  day  of  the  month,  he  fell  at  the  battle  of 
Durham,  with  a  brother  of  his,  whose  OliriHian  name  is  not 
given.  By  his  wife,  a  sister  of  Sir  Robert  Keith,  grpat  mar- 
ischal  of  Scotland,  who  was  killed  in  the  same  battle,  he  had 
three  sons,  John,  William,  and  Robert.  The  latter  married 
the  heiress  of  Gighf,  Aberdeenshire,  and  was  ancestor  of  the 
Mait  lands  of  Pitrichie. 

Tbe  eldest  son,  John,  got  a  8:ife-condnct  to  go  to  England 
in  13G3.  He  obtained  from  William,  earl  of  Douglas,  upon 
his  own  resignation,  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Thiriestane  and 
Tollus,  to  hintsclf  and  his  son,  Robert,  by  his  wife,  the  I^dj 
Agnes  Dunbar,  daughter  of  Patrirk,  earl  of  Marcli,  and  died 
about  1395.  His  said  son.  Sir  Robert  Mait  land,  got  the 
charge  of  the  castle  of  Dunbar,  from  his  uncle,  George,  eatl 
of  Marcli,  when  that  rebellious  nobleman  withdrew  into 
England,  in  1998,  in  consequence  of  the  contnict  of  marriage 
between  his  d.-mglitcr,  I.«idy  Elizabeth  Dunbar  and  David, 
duke  of  Rothesay,  being  cancelled,  thnatgh  the  intrigues  of 
Archibald,  earl  of  Douglas,  sumanied  the  Grim.  In  conjunc- 
tion with  Hotspur  and  lA)rd  Tall>uf,  the  earl  soon  after  re- 
turned  across  the  boixlcr,  and  laid  waste  the  lands  which, 
having  been  forfeited,  he  could  no  longer  call  his  own.  Wis 
ncplit'W,  Sir  Robert  Maitland,  having  surrendered  the  castle 
of  Dunbar  to  the  earl  of  Douglas,  escaped  being  involved  in 
his  niin.  He  and  his  family  were  afterwards  designed  of 
Lethington.  He  died  about  1434,  leaving  three  sons.  Robert, 
the  eldest,  was  one  of  the  hostages  for  James  I.,  on  his 
liberation  from  England  in  1-124,  when  his  annual  revenue 
was  estimated  at  400  merks.  As  he  predeceased  his  father, 
without  issue,  William,  the  second  son,  succeeded  to  the 
family  estates.  Janie^,  the  third  son,  married  Egidia,  daugh- 
ter of  James  Scrymgeonr  of  Dudhope,  constable  of  Dundee, 
and  from  his  grandson,  John,  descended  the  Maitlands  of 
Eccles  and  other  families  of  the  n.-ime. 

The  second  but  elder  surviving  son,  William  Maitlsnd  of 
I<ethington  and  Thiriestane,  was  the  first  to  change  the  spell- 
ing of  his  name  to  its  present  form.  He  had  a  charter  from 
Archibald,  duke  of  Turenne  and  earl  of  Douglas,  to  himself 
and  Margaret  Wardlaw,  his  wife,  of  the  lands  of  BIytho, 
Heddcrwick,  Tollus,  and  Bumclcngh,  dated  at  Linlithgow, 
23d  March,  1432,  his  father  being  then  alive.  His  only  son, 
John,  died  bcfoa>  1 171.     His  succcsror,  William  Maitland  of 


"i 


■i 


'I 


ii 


n 


Ii 


i 

! 

I  i 

it 


1 1 
1 1 


'  I 


MAITLANI), 


7i 


SIK  lUCllAKD. 


r^tliIn«^oii,  was  fntlimr  of  Willinin  Mnitlnnd  of  Ijrtbington, 
dncribcd  .is  a  insin  uf  great  brnvenr  niiil  rmilation,  wbo  wm 
killed  at  llodden,  with  Iiu  soviTei^^n,  James  IV.,  with  whom 
he  was  in  high  fnrour.  Hj  his  wife,  Martha,  dan^^hter  of 
Goori^  I^rd  Seton,  he  had  a  M>n,  Sir  Hicliard  MaithuiJ,  the 
celebrated  collector  of  the  early  Scottibh  p^^etrr,  after  whom 
the  ^laitlfliid  Club  has  been  Ciilled,  and  n  memoir  of  whom  is 
given  afterwards  in  larger  type.  Sir  Richard  manned  Mary, 
daughter  of  Sir  Tliomas  Cnmstonn  of  Crobbie,  and  with  fuur 
daughters,  had  three  sons,  the  eldest  being  William,  the  per- 
sonage so  well  known  in  the  history  of  the  reig^  of  the  unfor- 
tunate Mary,  as  "Secretary  I^thington."  Sir  John,  the 
second  son,  was  lord  high  chancellor  of  Scotland  and  first 
lord  Mailland  of  ThirIcAt;tne.  Of  iKith  these  brothers  me- 
moirs are  given  subsequently  in  largi'r  type.  Thomas, 
Sir  Richard's  third  5<)n,  was  prohfcntorwith  George  Buchanan, 
in  his  treatise  De  Jure  Hegni  a/wd  Scotos.  The  daughters, 
named  Helen.  Ixnl^eUa,  Mary,  and  Hliz^ibeth,  all  married 
Berwickshire  barons. 

Secretary  ]<ethington  was  tuice  niarrii-d.  By  his  fir^t 
wife,  Janet  Monteith,  he  had  no  is^ne.  By  his  second  witV, 
Mary,  a  daughter  of  Malcolm  I^>rd  Fleming,  he  had,  with  a 
daughter,  Mary,  the  wire  of  the  f:n<t  carl  of  Roxburgh,  a  son, 
James,  wlm,  l)cing  a  Roman  Cntliolio,  went  to  the  continent, 
and  died  there,  without  i^sue.  lie  sold  hi.s  estate  of  I^th- 
ington,  which  had  been  rcktured  to  him  by  a  rehabilitation 
under  the  great  seal,  19th  February  1583-4,  to  his  umle,  Sir 
John  Maitland,  who  carried  on  the  lino  of  the  family.  A 
Utter  from  this  James  Maitland  to  the  learned  Camden,  is 
dr.ted  from  Bnisscls  in  1G20. 

Sir  John,  first  I^rd  Maitland  of  Tiiir'estar.e,  married  Jean, 
only  daughter  and  heiress  oi  Jamc5,  lord  Fieniing,  lord  higli 
chaml)crlain  of  Scotland  in  tbe  reign  of  Queen  Mar)',  and  by 
her  had  a  sun,  John,  aec-M'.d  I^rd  Maitland  and  tirst  earl  uf 
L-iudcrdalc  (see  Lai  i>ei:iiAI.i-:u  earl  of)  and  a  daugl-.ti-r, 
Anne,  marricJ  to  Robert,  Lord  Seton,  bon  of  t]:e  lir.»t  earl  of" 
Winton. 

Connected  thn*,  by  frequent  intennnrriagi!*.  wiili  tl:c  Sit-ui 
and  Fleming  families,  who  were  the  most  di>tin;;ni>l:ed  among 
the  nobles  of  Scotland  for  their  unswerving  a'iachmcnt  to  the 
liciutirul  and  ill-fated  Mary,  it  was  no  wonder  that  the  Mait- 
lands  also  Aignalised  themselves  by  tiieir  fjiitlifnl  adhea>i:ce  to 
her  interefrtu,  even  when  her  fortmies  were  at  the  lowest,  and 
when  at  last  they  did  transfer  their  allegiance  to  her  son, 
they  served  him  with  equal  truth  and  loyalty. 


Scottish  bar,  died  in  September  1828,  leanng,  by  hit  wUsi 
Susan,  eldest  diiughter  of  Geot^  R«msay,  Esq.  of  Bamton, 
four  sons  and  two  daoghters. 

On  the  death  of  the  second  baronet,  7th  Febnimy  1848^ 
his  grandson,  Sir  Alexander  Charles  Maitland  Gibson  Mait- 
land, bom  in  182<),  succeeded  as  third  baronet  He  marriro 
in  1841,  Thom-nsina  Agnes,  daughter  of  James  Hani,  Esq 
of  I*ittencrieir,  Fifcshire,  with  ivue. 


The  Maitlands  of  Dundrennan  Abbey  and  Compstone,  in 
the  Stewart  ry  of  Kirkcudbright,  and  llennnnd,  in  Mid  L»- 
thii.n,  are  descended  from  an  early  branch  of  the  lAoderdald 
family.  Their  imnudiate  ancestor  was  William  Maitland,  a 
distingnislicd  Scots  rcclcbiastic  during  the  hitler  part  of  the 
17ih  century,  who  acquired  cnnsiderable  estatoa  in  the  stew- 
aitry  of  Kirkmubright. 

I'homas  M.iitbmd,  a  lord  uf  seMii>n  by  the  jadicial  title  of 
Lird  Dundreiman,  bom  9lh  October  1792,  passed  advocate 
ill  1813,  and  was  solicitor-general  for  Scotland,  under  tlie 
\^hig  adiiiinibtratiun  in  1840  and  1841,  and  again  from  184C 
till  the  beginning  of  18u0,  when  he  was  sppointed  a  hvtl  of  ses- 
sion. In  1845  he  was  chosen  M.P.  fur  Kirkcndbngiitshirr, 
Aiid  died  10:h  June,  1851.  He  married,  in  1815.  Isaliella 
Graham, -itii  iLiughter of  Jiuiies  Macdnwall,  Kmj.  of Gnrt bland, 
with  i.'-suc.  I  lift  bri>ther,  K.dwurd  ForliCN  Maitland,  Ki<q.,  ad- 
vocate, wa5  appointed  in  1855.  and  ag.-iin  in  1859,  Si»iicitor- 
gener;!  ior  Scotland.    He  had  j>reviously  been  depute  advocate 


The  faniilv  of  Gibson  Maitland  of  Clifton  Hall,  Mid  Lothi- 
an,  pos-<e:ise8  a  bsironetcy,  first  conferred,  SOth  November, 
1818,  on  the  Hun.  General  Alexander  Maitland,  fiiVn  son  of 
the  sixth  earl  of  I«iuderdale.  Sir  Alexander  died  14th  Fvb- 
mary  1820.  He  had,  with  two  dangliters,  four  sons,  viz., 
Alexander  Charles,  second  baronet ,  William,  a  midshipman 
on  board  the  Purtsmouth  EasI  Indiaman,  drowned  in  the 
Bay  of  Bcngiil  in  1781 ;  Angustu!«,  an  oflieer  in  the  army, 
mortally  wounded  at  Egmont  op-Zee,  Cth  October,  1797; 
and  Frederick,  of  Hullywich,  Snysex,  a  general  in  the  army, 
a  member  of  the  board  of  general  officers,  a  commis^^ioner  of 
the  Royal  military  college,  and  colonel  of  the  58th  regiment. 
General  Frederick  Maitland  was  married  and  left  a  family. 

Sir  Alexander  Cli.irles  Maitland,  second  b.aronet,  bom  2 1st 
November  1755,  married  Helen,  daughter  .and  heiress  of  Al- 
exander Gibson  Wright,  Esq.  of  Clifton  Hall,  a  scion  of  the 
Gibsons  of  Dune  in  Fifi'shire,  and  with  her  obtained  that 
estate,  at:d  a.ssumcd  in  consequence  the  name  of  Giltson.  He 
had,  by  her,  six  sons  and  live  daughters.  Alexander  Mait- 
land Gibson   Maithmd,  tlte  elile>t  sun,  an  advocate  at  the 


Of  the  name  of  Maitland  there  have  hern  many  di»lin- 
giii.ohed  naval  and  nsilitarv  officers.  Rcar-ndniirnl  John 
Maitland,  second  son  of  Colonrl  the  Hon.  Sir  Rich.nrd  Mait- 
land, third  bun  of  the  sixth  earl  of  L-mderdalo  and  uncle  of 
Rear-ndtnind  Sir  Fretlerick  Lewis  Maitland,  lirst  saw  active 
^er^'iee  in  the  West  Indies,  when  he  was  midshipman  on 
b-ard  the  Boyne  of  98  guiis,  the  flagship  of  Sir  John  Jervi^ 
and  distinpn>hed  hiniM'lf  by  hi:*  gaihmtry  at  Martinique, 
Gnadahmp,  &c.  He  was  afterwards  lientennnt  of  the  Win- 
chi-lsea  frigate ;  fi"om  which  he  removed  into  the  Lively,  and 
was  in  that  >hip  i\l.er.  in  1795  it  captured,  al'Scr  an  action  of 
three  hours,  tijc  Fiench  bhip  I.i  Tonrterclle.  In  1797  he 
was  ap{Mnntcd  to  the  Kingfisher,  and  on  the  1st  July  suc- 
ceeded in  quelling  a  mutiny  on  board  his  ship,  by,  with  bis 
officers,  attacking  the  mutineers  sword  in  hand,  and  killing 
and  woumiing  several  of  them.  This  spirited  conduct  was 
called  "  l)»»ctor  Maitland*;;  recipe,"  by  the  earl  of  St.  Vincent, 
who  recommended  its  niioptinn  to  the  fleet  on  similar  emcr- 
g'-ncics.  In  command  uf  the  Roadicea,  he  caw  mndi  Kn'ice 
in  the  Channel,  and  on  board  the  Barfleur  of  08  gims  he 
served  with  the  MeiiitciTanean  fleet  until  the  concliudun  uf 
the  war  with  Fnincc  in  1S15.  In  1821  he  attained  the  rank 
of  rear-adniind,  nikd  dietl  in  1836. 

For  a  memoir  of  his  cousin,  Rear-admiral  Sir  Frederick 
Lewis  Maitland,  to  i^hom  the  emperor  Napoleon  tairrendcrod 
on  hoard  the  Beilerophon  after  the  battle  of  Waterloo  in 
1815,  see  p.'ige  637  of  volume  2d  of  this  work,  under  the 
head  L.vi'i>Kni>Ai.i^  Earl  of. 

M.AITLANI),  Sir  KiciiAitDf  a  ditttiugublicd 
poet,  lawyer,  and  stntosmnn,  the  collector  of  tlio 
cnrly  poctr}*  of  Scotland,  was  tlic  son  of  William 
Maitlnud  of  J^thlngton,  and  ^lartlia,  daughter  of 
George,  second  I^ord  Seton,  as  alrendy  mentioned. 
He  wns  bom  in  149G,  nnd  having  finished  the 
u>iial  course  of  academical  education  at  the  unl- 


it 


•I 

i! 
I. 


I 
.  I, 


AIArrLAND, 


75 


WILLIAM. 


, 


versity  of  St.  Andrews,  he  weut  to  Frauco  to 
study  the  law.  After  hU  return  to  Scotland,  he 
recommended  himself  to  the  favonr  of  James  Y., 
and  was  employed  in  varions  public  commissions 
by  that  monarch,  and  afterwards  by  the  regent 
Arran  and  Mary  of  Guise.  In  March  1551  we 
find  him  taking  his  seat  on  the  bench  as  an  extra- 
ordinaiy  lord  of  session,  and  soon  after  he  was 
knighted.  He  was  frequently  sent  as  commis- 
sioner to  settle  matters  on  the  borders,  and  in 
1559  concluded  the  treaty  of  Upset tlington,  after- 
wards confirmed  by  Francis  and  Mary. 

Aa  early  as  October  1560,  Sir  Richard  had  the 
misfortune  to  lose  his  sight,  but  liis  blindness  did 
not  incapacitate  him  for  business.  In  November 
1561  be  was  admitted  an  ordinaiy  lord  of  ses- 
sion, when  ho  took  the  title  of  Lord  I^thington. 
Sliortly  af^cr  he  was  sworn  a  member  of  the  pri\y 
council,  and  on  20th  December  1562  he  was  no- 
minated lord  privy  seal,  lie  continued  a  lord  of 
session  during  tiic  troublous  times  of  Queen 
Mary  and  the  regents,  in  the  minority  of  James 
VI.  His  advice  to  Queen  Maiy  was  that  of  a 
judicious  and  faithfiU  counsellor,  that  she  must  see 
her  laws  kept,  or  else  she  would  get  no  obedience. 
{Douglas'  Peerage,  vol.  ii.  p.  67). 

In  1503  he  was  appointed  one  of  the  commis* 
biouers  to  whom  the  rights  of  individuals  to  the 
act  of  oblivion  were  to  be  refeiTcd,  and  on  28tli 
December  of  that  year  he  was  one  of  the  com- 
mittee chosen  to  frame  regulations  for  the  com- 
uiii«aries  then  about  to  be  established  for  the  dis- 
'   cnssion  of  consistorial  causes.    In  1567  lie  resigned 
■  the  office  of  loi*d  privy  seal,  in  favour  of  his  second 
'   ^0D,  John,  prior  of  CoUlingham,  afterwards  created 
I   liord  Maitland  of  Tliirlestane.    On  the  1st  July 
i   1584,  his  great  age  compelled  him  to  resign  his 
scat  on  the  bench,  in  favour  of  Sir  Lewis  Bellen- 
<len  of  Auchnoull,  being  allowed  the  privilege  of 
anmiug  his  successor.     He  had  been  more  than 
seventy  years  employed  in  the  public  service,  and 
the  letter  from  the  king  to  the  court  of  session  on 
occasion  of  his  retirement  from  the  bench,  recorded 
in  the  Books  of  Sederunt,  states  that  he  **  hcs  dew- 
lie  and  faithfully  sen-it  our  grandshir,  gud  sir,  gud 
dam,  muder,  and  ourself,  being  oftentymes  em- 
plojrit  in  public  charges,  quhereof  he  dewtifuUie 
>ud  honestlie  acquit  himself,  and  being  anc  of  yon 


ordinar  number  thir  mony  yeiris,  hes  diligentlie 
with  all  sincerity  and  integi*ity  servit  therein,  and 
now  being  of  wcrry  greit  ago,  and  altho'  in  S])reit 
and  jugement  able  anew  to  serve  as  appei'tenis ; 
be  the  great  age,  and  being  unwell,  is  sa  dibilitat 
that  he  is  not  able  to  mak  sic  continual  residens 
as  he  wald  give,  and  being  movit  in  conscience 
that  be  his  absence  for  hiik  of  number,  justice  may 
be  retardit  and  paities  frustrat,  hes  wiliinglie  de- 
mittit,''  <S:c.  Sir  Richard  died  March  20,  1586,  at 
the  advanced  age  of  90.  For  his  maniage  and 
children  see  previous  page. 

With  the  single  exception  of  a  passnge  in 
Knox's  History,  which  Imputes  to  him  the  having 
taken  bribes  to  assist  Cardinal  Bethune  to  escai>e 
fix>m  his  imprisonment  at  Scton,  but  for  which  it 
would  appear  there  was  no  good  ground.  Sir 
Richard  Maitland  is  uniformly  mentioned  by  con- 
temporary writers  with  respect.  He  collected  the 
**  Decisions  of  the  Court  of  Se^*sion  from  Decem- 
ber 15,  1550,  to  the  penult  July,  1565,"  the 
manuscript  of  which  is  preserved  in  the  Advo- 
cates' Library.  His  Collections  of  Kiirly  Scottish 
Poetry,  in  two  volumes,  a  folio  and  a  quarto, 
were,  with  other  MSS.,  presented  by  the  duke  of 
Lauderdale  to  Samuel  Pepys,  Esq.,  secretaiy  of 
the  admiralty  to  Charles  II.  and  James  II.,  and 
the  founder  of  the  Pepysinu  Library  at  Magdalene 
College,  Cambridge,  in  ^hich  they  now  remain. 
A  selection  from  these  will  be  found  in  Pinkerton*s 
valuable  collection  of  *  Ancient  Scottith  Poems,' 
published  in  178G.  Sir  Richard's  own  Poems 
were  for  the  fii*st  time  printed  in  1830,  in  a  quai*to 
volume,  for  the  Maitland  Club,  which  takes  its 
name  from  him.  The  best  of  his  poetical  pieces 
arc  his  ' Satyres,'  'The  Blind  Baron's  Comfort,' 
and  a  '  Ballat  of  the  Crcatioun  of  the  World,'  the 
latter  of  which  was  inserted  in  Allan  Ramsay's 
*Kvergrecu.'  Sir  Richard's  *Cronicle  and  His- 
toric of  the  House  and  Surname  of  Seaton  unto 
the  moneth  of  November  ane  thousand  five  him- 
dred  and  fifty  aught  yeires,'  with  a  continuation 
by  Alexander,  Viscount  Kingston,  was  printed  for 
the  Maitland  Club  in  1829. 

MAITLAND,  William,  accounted  the  ablest 
statesman  of  his  age,  historically  known  as  **  Se- 
cretaiy Ix5thington,"  eldest  son  of  the  preceding, 
-was  one  of  tlie  principal  characters  of  his  time  in 


1 1 


I 


I  . 


1 1 


I  . . 
■  I 


MA1TLAXI>, 


76 


WILLIAM. 


»  : 


Scotland.  lie  wns  bom  about  1525,  niid  nftcr 
being  cducatcil  at  the  college  of  St.  Andrews,  he 
travelled  on  the  Continent,  where  he  stndied  civil 
law.  In  his  ^outh,  instead  of  following  the  usual 
pnr!i>nits  and  amusements  of  young  men  of  his 
rank,  ho  applied  himself  to  politico,  and  became 
early  initiated  into  all  the  craft  and  niyster}'  of 
statesmanship.  Though  his  political  career  was 
vacillating  and  unsteady,  his  enterprising  spirit, 
great  penetration,  and  subtle  genius  are  mentioned 
with  admiration  by  contennwrary  writers  of  every 
party. 

He  was  one  of  the  first  to  attend  the  private 
preaching  of  John  Knox  at  Kdinburgh,  about  the 
end  of  1555,  when  he  became  a  convert  to  the  re- 
fonned  doctrines.     When  Knox  began  to  i*e.ision 
against  the  mass,  Krskinc  of  Dun  invited  the  j 
Ileformer  to  snp|ier,  to  resolve  some  doubts  on  the  : 
subject,  "  where  were  assembled,"  says  Cjildor-  • 
wood,  (v.  i.  p.  805)  •'  David  Forresse,  ^Fr.  Robert  [ 

i 

I^khart,  John  Willocke,  and  Wiiliam  Malhinc  of 
I^thington,  younger/'  All  their  objections  against 
giving  up  the  mass  wore  so  fully  answered  by 
Knox  that  ^faitland  said,  ^^I  see  perfytoly  that 
thir  shifts  will  serve  for  nothing  before  God,  soiiig 
they  stand  us  in  so  small  stead  lx»foix^  men/'  So 
the  mass,  which  had  been  attended  bv  ninnv  from 
custom,  and  "'  the  eschewing  of  slander/'  was  dis- 
owned by  the  Reformed  party  from  that  tiuie. 

On  4th  December  1558,  during  the  regency  of 
Mary  of  Guise,  Maitland  was,  by  that  ju-inccss, 
appointed  secretary  of  state.  The  violent  pro- 
ceedings of  the  queen  regent  against  the  Reform- 
ers, and  fenrs  for  his  life,  from  his  being  known  to 
favour  the  reformed  doctrines,  induced  him,  in 
October  of  the  following  year,  to  join  the  lords  of 
the  congregation,  who  lia<l  taken  ]X)ssession  of 
Edinburgh.  The  queen  regent  and  the  Romish 
party  withdrew  to  I^ith,  but  within  a  month  the 
lords  ied  to  Stirling,  and  the  regent  ro-entered 
the  capital  in  triumph.  Calderwood  says,  "  Wil- 
liam Matlane  of  I^thington,  younger,  secretarie  to 
the  qnecD,  perccaving  himself  to  bo  suspected  as 
one  that  favoured  the  congregatioun,  and  to  stand 
in  danger  of  his  life  if  he  sould  remaine  at  I^ith, 
bccaus  he  spnlred  not  to  utter  his  mindc  in  con- 
troversies of  religionn,  conveyed  himself  out  of 
Lciih,  a  little  before  Alllmllow  Eve,  and  randered 


himself  to  Mr.  Kirkaldie,  I^nird  of  Grange.  IIo 
assured  the  lords  there  was  nothing  bnt  craft  and 
falsliood  in  the  qiicene.*'  (//(ff.  of  the  Kirk  of 
Scotltmri^  vol.  i.  p.  558).  lie  was  gladly  received 
by  the  lords,  who  marked  their  sense  of  this  bis  open 
adhesion  to  their  canse,  by  sending  him  to  England 
to  lay  their  position  and  prospects  bc.'bro  Queen 
Elisabeth,  and  to  crave  her  aid.  Slio  at-oiiC6 
sent  a  fleet  to  the  frith  of  Forth,  to  prevent  farther 
assistance  being  sent  from  France  to  the  regent, 
and  gave  secret  instructions  to  the  dnke  of  Xorfulk 
to  meet  with  the  Scots  commissioners  nt  Benrick, 
to  arrange  the  conditions  on  which  her  assistance 
was  to  be  given.  11ic  commissions  appointed  by 
the  lorils  of  the  congregation  to  represent  them  at 
Ik^rwick  on  this  occasion  were,  lord  James  Stewart, 
nfterwanis  the  Regent  Jiloray,  I/jrd  Ruthven,  the 
mastci's  of  Maxwell  and  Lindsay,  the  laird  of 
Pitarrow,  Henry  Ralnaves  of  Ilallhill,  and  the 
si»crotniy  Maitland.  After  a  great  deal  of  nego- 
tiation, a  treaty  was  conclnded  between  Elisabeth 
and  the  loaders  of  the  congregation,  called  tho 
treaty  of  Rerwiek,  in  consequeuco  of  which,  on 
the  23ih  March,  an  English  force  under  Lord 
Grey  marched  into  Scotland,  and  joined  the  army 
of  the  congreg.it iou. 

^laitland  acted  as  speaker  of  the  parliament  in 
August  1560  which  abolished  the  power  and  sn- 
premacy  of  the  Pope  in  Scotlsnd,  Iluntly  the 
chancellor  having  declined  to  attend.  It  is  well 
known  that  when  Queen  Mary  in  the  following  year 
was  about  to  sail  direct  from  Franco  to  Scotland, 
Elizabeth  despatched  a  fleet  into  the  Channel, 
with  tho  avowed  pui7)ose  of  clearing  the  sea  from 
pirates,  but  really  with  the  view  of  intercepting 
Maiy  and  cariying  her  prisoner  to  England.  Se- 
cretary Maitland  and  the  queen  s  brother.  Lord 
James  Stewart,  arc  charged  Mith  recommending 
this  measure  to  the  English  minister.  On  Mar}''8 
arrival,  however,  they  were  chosen  her  principal 
adviser.*,  and  on  12th  November  of  the  same  year 
(1561)  Maitland  was  made  an  extraordinary  lord 
of  session.  Acconling  to  Calden>ood  (vol.  ii.  p. 
IGO),  the  ratification  of  the  Rook  of  Discipline  by 
tho  queen  met  with  strong  objections  from  Mait* 
land,  Avho,  when  it  was  pioposed,  sneered,  and 
asked  *'  how  many  of  those  who  had  snbscribed  it 
would  bo  subject  to  it/*    It  was  answered,  "All 


t: 


I 


I     I 


!     I 


I 


1 
I 

,1 
I 


l^lAlTfAND, 


n 


AVILLFAM. 


the  gOilly."  "Will  the  diikc?"  (Clirtteleranlt), 
nkl  MaiiUnd.  "  1  f  lie  will  not/*  snid  Ocbiltty,  "  I 
xrUk  lie  were  Bcnii>cd  ont,  not  only  ont  of  that 
book,  bitt  fllso  out  of  onr  number  and  company ; 
for  to  wbat  (Purpose  shall  trftvail  be  taken  to  set 
the  6fanrch  !u  order,  if  it  be  not  kept,  or  to  wbat 
end  shall  men  subscribe,  if  tbey  never  mean  to 
perform  ?•*  ^laitlaud  answcn^d, "  ^fany  subscribed 
them,  inftdeparentum^  as  tlic  bairns  are  baptized," 
"Ye  think  that  stuff  proper,**  said  Knox,  "but  it 
Is  as  untrue  as  unpropcr.'  lliat  book  was  read  in 
public  audience  i  aiid  the  heads  thereof  reasoned 
upon  diverse  days,  as  all  that  sit  here  know  rery 
well,  and  yourself  cannot  deny.  No  man,  there- 
fore,  was  desired  to  subscribe  that  whidi  be  un- 
derstood not.**  Tlio  ratification,  however,  was 
refused. 

Soon  affer  Maitland  was  sent  as  Mary*:)  ambas- 
sador to  the  court  of  Elizabeth,  to  salute  the  lat- 
ter in  his  mistress*  name,  and  to  make  known  her 
good  will  towards  her.  After  his  retnru  to  Scot- 
land, he  accompanied  the  queen,  in  Ancrust  15C2, 
in  her  expedition  to  the  north  against  the  earl  of 
Ifnntiv  and  the  Gordons.  On  their  amval  at 
Old  Abcnleen,  we  arc  told  there  was  such  a  scar- 
city of  accommodation  that  he  and  Randolph,  the 
English  ambassador,  were  obliged  to  sleep  toge- 
ther in  the  same  bed.  lie  was  present  at  the  l>at- 
tlo  of  Corricbio  where  lluutly  was  defeated.  On 
this  occ*.sion  he  exhorted  evcrj'  man  to  caU  upon 
God,  to  remember  bis  duty,  and  not  to  fear  tlic 
ninhitnde,  and  made  t!ie  following  prayer:  "O 
I/>rd,  thou  that  ruletli  the  heaven  and  the  earth, 
look  upon  thy  ser^'ants  w  hose  blood  this  day  is 
songht,  and  to  man's  judgment  is  sold  and  be- 
tRiye<l.  Our  refuge  is  now  nnto  thee,  and  our 
hope  is  in  thee.  Judge  then,  O  Lord,  this  day 
betwixt  ns  and  the  enrl  of  Unntly.  If  ever  we 
Iiave  sought  unjustly  his  or  their  destruction  and 
blood,  let  ns  fall  on  the  edge  of  the  sword.  If  we 
be  innocent,  maintain  and  preser\*e  ns,  for  thy 
great  mercy's  sake.'* 

A  short  time  after  this  Maitland  was  again  sent 
imbassador  to  England,  and  In  his  absence  the 
Qobility  blamed  him  for  serving  the  queen  to  the 
iwcjadice  of  tho  commonwealth.  On  bis  retuni 
therefore  he  deemed  it  necessary  to  strengthen 
bis  hands  by  making  friends  to  himself,  and  by 


endeavouring  to  shake  the  credit  of  tho  earl  of 
Moray  at  court.  In  lfi63,  when  Knox  appesircd 
before  the  queen  and  council  to  answer  a  charge 
of  treason,  for  wdtlng  a  circular  letter  to  tho  prin- 
cipal protestant  gentlemen,  requesting  them  to 
meet  at  Edinburgh,  to  bo  present  at  the  trLil  of 
two  men  for  a  riot  at  the  ]M>plsh  chapel  at  Holy* 
rood,  Mr.  Secretary  ^laitland  conducted  the  pro- 
secution against  him.  On  this  occasion  bo  showeil 
himself  bitterly  hostile  to  the  reformer.  When 
Knox  was  acquitted  by  the  council,  Mnitbind, 
who  bad  assured  tlie  queen  of  bis  condemnation, 
was  enraged  at  the  decision.  He  brought  her 
majesty,  who  had  retired  before  the  vote,  again 
into  the  room,  and  pi-oceeded  to  call  the  votes  n 
second  time  in  her  presence.  This  attempt  to 
overawe  them  incensed  the  nobilitv.  "What!** 
said  they,  "shall  the  laird  of  Letliington  havo 
power  to  command  ns?  Shall  the  presence  of  a 
woman  cause  ns  offend  God  ?  Shall  we  condemn 
an  innocent  man  against  onr  conscience,  for  tho 
pleasnrc  of  any  creature?**  And  greatly  to  the 
mortificatiun  of  the  queen  and  the  discomfiture  of 
the  secretary,  they  indigiiautly  repeated  their  for- 
mer votes,  absolving  Knox  from  the  chai*ge. 

fie  seems  after  this  to  have  thought  that  the  re- 
formed clergy  assumed  too  much  hi  their  public 
rebukes,  and  after  a  sermon  of  Knox's  colle.igue, 
Mr.  Craig,  against  the  comiptious  of  the  times, 
Lcthiugtou,  says  Caldcrwood,  "  in  the  presence  of 
many,  gave  himself  to  the  devil,  if  after  that  day 
he  should  regard  what  should  become  of  ministers, 
but  should  do  what  be  might  that  his  companions 
have  a  skaire  with  him,  let  them  bark  and  blow  as 
mncb  as  they  list.**  Knox  declaimed  against  liim 
from  the  pulpit,  on  which  Maitland  mockingly 
said,  "  We  must  recant,  and  burn  our  bill,  for  the 
preachers  are  angry.*' 

At  a  conference  with  the  leading  members  of 
the  General  Assembly,  held  in  June  1564,  a  long 
debate  ensued  between  Maitland  and  Knox,  on 
those  points  of  the  refonned  doctrines  which  gave 
offence  to  the  court,  but  chiefly  as  regards  the 
Reformer*s  mode  of  prayer  for  the  Queen,  and  on 
obedience  to  her  authority.  In  this  memorable 
disspntation,  allhough  Maitland  bad  the  worst  of 
the  argument,  he  is  acknowledged  to  have  acquit- 
ted himself  with  all  the  acuteness  and  ingenuity  of 


I . 


'  I 

I 
1 1 


■  1 


il 

il 


MAITLANI), 


78 


WILLIAM. 


il 

I  ■ 

il 


■  I 


I; 


I' 


a  practised  disputant.  An  account  of  this  confer- 
enco  will  be  found  at  length  in  Caldcrivood*8  lli:«- 
toiy  of  the  Kirk  of  Scotland,  vol  ii.  pp.  252—280. 

In  January  1565,  Maitlnnd  was  appointed  nn 
ordinary  lord  of  session,  and  in  April  the  same 
year  he  was  despatched  to  England,  to  intimate 
to  Elizabeth  the  intention  of  Mary  to  marry  the 
I^i-d  Damley.  In  1566  ho  joined  the  conspiracy 
i!<;:ilnst  Rizzio,  **  partly  finding  himself  projudgod 
bv  this  SavoA'anl  in  the  affiurs  of  his  office  as  secre- 
tary,  and  pai*tly  for  the  favonr  he  then  carried  to 
the  carl  of  Moray,  then  in  escile.*'  After  Ilizzio's 
nmrder,  he  was,  for  his  participation  in  it,  de- 
prived of  his  office  of  secretary,  and  obliged  to 
retire  into  concealment  in  Lauderdale,  while  the 
other  conspirators  fled  to  England,  but,  before  the 
end  of  the  year,  he  was  restored  to  favonr  and 
allowed  to  retuni  to  court. 

On  the  night  of  Sunday,  Fubruary  9,  ir)C7, 
occurred  the  murder  of  Darnley,  by  the  blowing 
up  of  the  house  of  the  Kirk  of  Field,  which  had 
been  procured  by  ^laifland  for  the  King*s  accom- 
modation, he  having  been  won  over  by  the  earl  of 
Both  well  to  liis  design.^.  With  the  earl  of  Morton 
he  solicited  and  obtained  from  several  lords  of 
Moray^s  faction,  and  from  eight  bishops  a  declara- 
tion in  writing,  avowing  their  belief  of  Bothwell's 
innocence  of  the  murder,  and  recommending  him 
as  a  proper  husband  for  the  queen.  It  is  alleged 
that  the  qnoen  had  previously  consented  to  this 
marriage ;  but  her  defenders  deny  this,  and  aver 
that  the  writings  which  she  was  said  to  have 
signed  was  a  forgery  of  the  secretary  ^laitland. 
lie  joined  the  confederacy  of  the  nobles  for  the 
removal  of  Bothwell,  and  after  the  surrender  of 
the  queen  at  Carberry  Hill,  and  her  imprisonment 
in  tlie  caslle  of  Lochleven,  he  wrote  to  her,  oflcr- 
ing  his  service,  and  using  as  an  argument  the  apo- 
logue of  the  mouse  delivering  the  lion  taken  in  tite 
not.  He  also  proposed  that,  after  providing  for 
the  safety  of  the  young  prince  and  the  security  of 
the  protestant  religion,  the  queen  should  be  re- 
established in  her  authority,  lie,  however,  at- 
tended the  coronation  of  King  James  VI.,  on  2Uth 
July  15G7,  .ind  although  he  was  one  of  the  secret 
advisers  of  the  escape  of  the  qnoen  from  Ix)clileven 
castle.  Ire  yet  fonght  against  her  on  the  field  of 
Lnngside. 


In  September  1568,  when  (he  regent  Monj 
was  called  to  the  conferences  at  York,  Maitland 
was  one  of  the  nine  commissioners  choBen  to  ac- 
company him.  The  regent,  says  Spottiswood, 
(Ilisi,  p.  218,)  was  unwilling  to  take  him,  but 
mora  afraid  to  leave  him  in  Scotland.  On  the 
other  hand,  Caldcnvood  says,  (vol.  il.  p.  429,) 
Secretary  Lethington  was  very  reluctant  to  go, 
but  he  was  induced  by  fair  promises  of  lands  and 
mone}',  *'  for  it  was  not  expedient  to  leave  behind 
them  a  factious  man,  that  inclined  secretly  to  the 
queen."  AVhilc  in  England  so  great  was  his  du- 
plicity that,  we  are  told,  almost  every  night  he 
had  secret  communication  with  Afary>  chief  com- 
missionei's,  and  forewarned  them  of  the  regent's 
intentions.  He  went  out  to  the  fields  with  the 
duke  of  Norfolk,  under  the  pretence  of  hunting, 
but  in  reality  to  consult  with  him  as  to  the  best 
means  of  forwarding  the  queen's  interests,  and  he 
it  was  who  first  conceived  the  fatal  project  of  a 
marriage  between  Mar}'  and  the  duke,  as  a  pro- 
bable means  of  restoring  her  to  liberty,  if  not  of 
replacing  her  on  the  throne. 

He  was  one  of  the  two  commissioners  selected 
by  Moray,  about  the  end  of  October,  to  proceed 
to  London  to  Queen  Elizabeth,  Mr.  James  Mack- 
gill  of  Kankeillour  being  the  other,  and  he  was 
sent  with  him  not  so  much  to  assist  him  as  to 
watch  his  proceedings.  After  his  return  to  Scot- 
land, by  his  secret  intrigues  he  prevailed  u|ton 
I^rd  Home,  Kirkaldy  of  Grange,  and  several  of 
his  former  associates,  to  join  the  queen's  faction, 
and  retired  to  Terth  for  a  time  with  his  friend  the 
earl  of  Athol.  The  regent,  suspecting  him  to  be 
the  contriver  of  all  the  plots  and  conspiracies,  in 
favour  of  ^fary,  in  England  and  Scotland,  sent  to 
him  to  attend  a  council  at  Stirling,  and  while  sit- 
ting in  council  he  was  arrested,  on  3d  September 
15C9,  by  Captain  Thomas  Cra^^ford,  a  retainer  of 
t!ie  earl  of  I^nnox,  on  the  charge  of  being  acces- 
sory to  the  murder  of  the  king's  father,  Lonl 
Darnley.  Security  to  answer  the  charge  having 
been  ofiered  and  refused,  he  was  committed  a  pri- 
soner to  the  castle  of  Stirling,  whence  he  M'as  re- 
moved to  Edinburgh,  and  given  into  the  custody 
of  Alexander  Hume  of  North  Berwick.  Kirkaldy 
of  Grange,  governor  of  the  castle,  went  to  Hume^a 
house  at  night,  and  by  pretending  a  warrant  from 


t; ... 


^r 


MAITLAND, 


79 


WILLIAM. 


.! 


the  regent,  iuduced  liiiu  to  deliver  Mnitland  to 
bim,  wben  he  was  carried  to  the  castle. 

On  the  21st  NoTcmber,  the  day  appointed  for 
Maltlaud*8  trial,  n  great  number  of  his  friends 
came  to  Edinburgh,  and  he  not  being  forthcoming, 
the  regent  found  himself  compelled  to  postpone 
bis  trial.  Kirkiddy  offered  to  produce  him,  if 
there  were  any  one  present  to  accuse  liim,  and,  as 
none  appeared,  the  secretary's  brother,  John,  af- 
tonrards  Lord  Maitland  of  Thirlestaue,  protested 
that  as  there  was  no  prosecutor  he  was  entitled  to 
his  liberty. 

After  the  murder  of  the  regent  Moray  In  Janu- 
ary 1570,  the  lords  assembled  to  consult  upon  the 
affairs  of  the  country,  when  Mnitland  had  the  ad- 
dress to  obtain  from  them  a  declaration  acquitting 
him  of  all  the  charges  against  him.  Tlio  I^rd 
Ochiltree  desired  him  to  give  his  oath  for  their 
greater  satisfaction,  which  he  did.  He  and  Kirk- 
aldy  now  exerted  themselves  to  effect  a  compro- 
mise between  the  rival  factious,  but  nil  their  en- 
deavours were  unavailing.  lie  was  the  author  of 
the  letter  sent  by  the  queen's  lords  to  Elizabeth, 
towards  the  end  of  Marcli,  in  behnlf  of  Mnry,  and 
among  the  signatures  appeni-s  his  ns  *^  William 
Matlane,  Comptroller."  At  this  time  he  was  the 
life  and  sonl  of  the  queen's  party,  and  there  was 
great  resort  to  him  of  all  who  ftivoured  her  cause. 
His  house  was,  tliercforc,  called  the  school,  and 
Ijmself  the  schoolmaster,  and  such  as  repaired  to 
him  his  disciples. 

lletiring  into  Athol,  he  attended  the  council 
of  the  queen's  friends  held  there,  which  was  called 
the  council  of  Baliach.  He  and  two  of  his  bro- 
thers i^ere  summoned  to  take  their  trial  at  Edin- 
burgh, but  as  they  did  not  appear,  they  were  de- 
nounced rebels,  lie  was  deprived  of  his  office  of 
secretar}'  by  the  regent  Lennox,  who  sent  troops 
to  ravage  his  lauds  as  well  as  those  of  liis  father, 
Sir  Richard  Maitland.  At  this  time  he  himself 
iras  corresponding  with  Mary,  sending  her  letters 
to  be  subscribed  by  her  and  forwarded  to  the 
kings  of  France  and  Spain,  the  emperor  of  Ger- 
many and  the  Guises,  that  they  might  exert 
themselves  on  her  behalf.  He  now  resolved  to 
join  Kirkaldy  in  Edinburgh  castle.  He  therefore 
arrived  at  Leith,  the  10th  April  1571,  and  was 
carried  up  to  the  castle  by  six  workmen,  says 


Bannatyne  in  bis  Journal,  (p.  ISO,)  *'with  sting 
and  ling,  (that  is,  by  poles  like  a  litter,)  and  Mr. 
Robert  Maitland  (dean  of  Aberdeen  and  a  lord  of 
session)  holding  up  his  head ;  and  wben  they  bad 
put  him  in  at  the  castell  yeat,  ilk  ane  of  the  work- 
men gat  ill  sbil :  which  they  recevit  grndginglie, 
hoping  to  have  gottin  mair  for  their  labouris." 

In  a  pai'liament  held  at  the  head  of  the  Canon- 
gate,  May  1-i,  1571,  Maitland  was  proclaimed 
a  traitor  to  his  country,  and  attainted,  with  his 
two  brothel's,  John  and  Thomas,  Ho  was  the 
principal  speaker  on  the  queen's  side  in  the  dis- 
cussion which,  soon  after,  took  place  with  certain 
of  the  king's  party,  who  bad  gone  to  the  castle 
with  the  view,  if  possible,  of  bringuig  the  two 
factions  to  an  agreement,  but  which  came  to  no- 
thing. It  was  by  his  fatal  counsels  that  Kirkaldy 
of  Grange  resolutely  held  out  that  fortress  for 
Queen  Mar}',  in  the  hope  of  receiving  succours 
from  France,  even  after  the  Hamiltons,  with 
Huntiy,  and  the  other  nobles  friendly  to  her  cause, 
had  submitted  to  the  regent.  He,  also,  like  the 
deluded  but  chivalrous  knight  of  Grange,  brought 
*^a  railing  accusation^*  againstt  Knox,  as  a  short 
time  before  the  Reformer's  death,  he  sent  to  the  kirk 
session  of  Edinburgh,  a  complaint  against  him,  for 
having  publicly  in  his  sermons  and  otherwise, 
slandered  him  as  an  atheist  and  enemy  to  all  i*eli- 
gion  ;  in  that  he  had  charged  him  with  saying  in 
the  castle  that  there  was  neither  heaven  nor  hell, 
which  were  only  devised  to  frighten  children, 
"  with  other  such  language,  tending  to  the  like 
effect.'*    His  letter  thus  continues : 

*'  Which  words,  before  Goii,  never  at  onie  time  proceeded 
from  my  month;  nor  yitt  aiile  other  Bounding  to  the  like 
purpose,  nor  wliereof  aiiie  suche  sentence  might  be  gathered. 
For,  praised  be  God,  I  have  beene  brought  up  from  my  voutli, 
and  instnicted  in  the  fearc  of  God ;  and  to  know  that  he  Imth 
appointed  lieaven  f«>r  the  habitntiun  of  the  elect,  and  hell  f»r 
tlie  everlasting  dwelling  place  of  the  n'probat.  Scing  lie  hath 
thus  ungentlic  used  uic,  and  neglected  liis  duetie,  vocatioun, 
the  rule  of  Christian  diarilie,  and  all  good  order,  malicionslie 
and  untruelie  leing  on  me,  1  crave  redresse  therof  at  your 
liands :  and  that  yee  will  take  suche  order  therewith,  that  be 
may  be  compelled  to  nominut  his  authors,  and  prove  his 
alledgance  (or  allegation);  to  the  end  that,  if  it  be  found 
true,  as  I  am  weiil  asisurcd  he  sail  not  be  able  to  vcrifie  it  in 
anie  sort,  I  may  woiihiiie  be  reputed  the  man  he  painteth 
me  out  to  be.  And  if  (whereof  I  have  no  doubt)  the  contra- 
rie  fall  out,  yce  may  U5e  him  acwnlingly :  at  least,  th:it 
hcercafter  ye  reccavc  not  cverio  word  proco«^ing  from  his 
moutli  as  oracles ;  and  know  that  he  is  but  a  man  subject  to 
vanitie,  and  maniu  ti:ne«  docth  utter  his  o^^ne  pnssionns  and 


I 


!  I 


I  I 
I 


;  I 


I 

t  : 
|. 
I  ', 

i  I 


MAITLAND, 


80 


Sill  JOHN. 


otiier  iii«r»  iiiardiiiatc  aifvctioiifl,  in  phice  of  true  doi-triiic. 
It  is  convenient  tiiut,  uccordiii^  to  the  Scriptures,  yce  beleeve 
i:iit  everie  tspirit,  but  that  yoe  trie  the  iipiritii  whether  they 
arc  of  God  or  not.    (Si^ied)  William  Matlaxk." 

Ill  Ills  itiply,  given  literally  from  his  dcntlibcd, 
mid  vcrbnllv,  Knox  declared  that  the  works  of 
Maitlnnd  aud  those  who  acted  with  him  testified 
that  they  denied  tliorc  was  any  God,  or  heaven  or 
hell,  wherein  virtue  should  be  rcwai*ded  or  vice 
punished.  He  declined  to  nninc  his  authors,  m 
required  by  Maitland,  and  rererring  to  that  pai-t 
of  his  complaint  which  affirmed  that  he  was  *^  a 
man  subject  to  vanity,"  and  that  the  words  from 
his  mouth  should  not  l)C  I'cceived  as  oracles,  &c.., 
he  said  that  the  words  which  he  had  spoken  would 
be  found  as  true  as  the  oracles  which  had  been 
uttered  bv  anv  of  the  servants  of  God  l)oroi*e ;  for 
he  had  said  nothing  but  that  whereof  he  had  a 
warrant  out  of  the  word,  namely,  thnt  the  justice 
of  Go<l  should  never  be  satisfied  till  the  blood  of 
the  shedders  of  innocent  blood  were  shed  agnin,  or 
God  moved  them  to  unfeigned  i-epentance.  IJc 
added  thnt  Maitland  was  the  chief  author  of  all 
the  troubles  raised  Itoth  in  Kngland  and  Scotlnnd. 
When  ^Fr.  David  Lindsnv  went  to  the  castle,  l»v 
Knox's  i-equest,  to  conimunicntc  the  Ucformer's 
memorable  dying  prediction  to  Kirknidy,  Maitlnnd 
sent  out  the  sneering  messngc  to  him,  *^  Go,  tell 
Mr.  Knox  he  is  but  a  dirty  prophet."  Lindsay 
reported  this  to  Knox,  who  said,  "  I  have  been 
eirnest  with  my  God  anent  the  two  men.  For 
the  one  (meaning  Kirkaldy)  I  am  sorry  that  so 
shall  befall  him,  yet  God  assni-etii  me  that  there  is 
mercy  for  his  soul.  For  the  other  (meaning  Mait- 
land)  I  have  no  warrant  that  ever  he  ifhall  be 
woill.*'    Just  a  week  thereafter,  Knox  died. 

At  length,  the  castle  being  closely  besieged  by 
the  regent  Morton,  and  an  English  force  under  Sir 
William  Drnry,  mai*shal  of  Berwick,  surrendered 
to  the  latter,  after  a  month's  obstinate  resistance, 
May  29th,  1573.  Kirkaldy  and  his  brother  were 
hanged  at  the  cross  of  Edinburgh,  but  Maitland 
escaped  this  ignominious  fate  by  dying  in  prison 
in  Ix-ith,  June  9th,  1573.  Calderwood  (vol.  iii. 
p.  285)  pavs  he  "poisoned  himself,  as  was  re- 
])orted,"  and  I^Ielvillc  (p.  250)  "  that  he  died  nt 
I^itli  befor  that  the  rest  wer  delynerit  to  the 
shamles;  some  supposing  he  took  a  drink,  and 
die<l  as  the  anid  Romans  wer  wont  to  do.**    He  is 


said  to  have  lain  so  long  unburied  that  the  veruiin 
came  from  his  corpse,  creeping  out  under  the  door 
of  the  lioiuso  where  ho  wa3  lying. 

Calderwood  (vol.  iii.  page  285)  thus  sums  np 
his  character:  "This  man  was  of  a  rare  witt,  bnt 
sett  upon  wrong  courses,  which  were  contrived 
and  followed  out  with  falsehood.  He  could  con- 
fonnc  himself  to  the  times,  and  therefore  was 
compared  by  one,  who  was  not  ignoraut  of  his 
coni*scs,  to  the  chanieleou.  A  discourse  went 
from  hand  to  hand,  before  the  siege  of  the  castell, 
intituled.  The  Chameleon,  wherein  all  his  wyles 
and  tricks  were  described.'*  lie  thus  concludes, 
at^er  showing  that  he  had  trafficked  with  nil  par- 
lies: "At  the  parliament  holdin  after  the  taking 
of  the  queene,  he,  with  some  others,  partakers  of 
the  murther  (of  Darnley),  would  have  had  her 
putt  to  death.  When  that  purpose  wrought  not, 
he  solicited  some  private  men  to  hang  her  In 
her  owne  bed,  with  her  belt,  that  he,  and  his 
partners  in  the  murther,  might  be  out  of  fcare 
of  suchc  a  witnesse.  When  this  counsel!  was 
not  heard,  then  he  turned  himself  to  flatter  the 
queene,  and  sent  to  I^chleviii  the  apologue  of 
tiie  lyoiin  delivered  by  the  mouse  out  of  the 
snare." 

Rnchanan  it  was  who  portr.\ved  the  character  of 
Secret  a  ry  Lethington  in  his  tract  called  '  Tlie 
riiameleon.*  Bannatvne  calls  him  "  the  father  of 
traitors,"  and  designates  him  "Mitchell  Wylie,"  a 
corruption  doubtless  of  Macchiavclli. 

MAITL.\NI),  Sir  John,  a  distinguished  states- 
man, the  fli*st  Lord  Maitland  of  Thirlestane,  sec- 
ond son  of  Sir  Richard  Maitland,  the  poet,  and 
younger  brother  of  the  preceding,  was  bom  in 
1587.  After  being  educated  at  home  by  his  fa- 
ther, he  was  sent,  as  was  the  custom  in  those 
days,  to  France,  wherc  he  studied  the  law.  On 
his  retuni,  through  the  influence  of  his  brother, 
the  secretary,  he  obtained  the  abbacy  of  Kelso  in 
commendam^  which  he  soon  exchanged  with  Fran- 
cis Stewart,  afterwards  carl  of  Bothwell,  the 
queen's  nephew,  for  the  prioi-y  of  Coldingham. 
The  queen's  ratiff cation  of  this  transaction  took 
place  in  February  1507.  On  the  20th  April  of 
the  same  year,  he  was  appointed  lord  privy  seal, 
on  his  father's  resignation  of  that  ofllce  in  his  fa- 
vour, and  he  was  couflnned  in  It  by  the  regent 


II 


i: 

i 

,1 
.1 


!i 


I  ■ 


I  . 


I    ! 


!l 


.! 


il 


r 


MAITLAND 


81 


Sill  JOHN. 


Moray  on  the  2GtIi  of  Ihc  following  Angiist.  On 
the  2d  Jane  1568,  he  was  constitntcd  one  of  the 
spiritual  lords  of  session. 

Like  his  brother,  Secretaiy  Letliington,  the 
prior  of  Coldinghnm  ranged  himself  on  the  regent's 
side,  on  the  dethronement  of  Queen  Mar}%  but 
after  Moray's  assassination  he  joined  the  lords 
who  met  on  the  queen's  behalf  at  Liidithgow,  and 
thereafter  remained  steady  in  his  attachment  to 
her  cause.  He  was  denounced  i*ebel  by  the  king's 
faction  in  the  end  of  1570,  and  forfeited,  with  his 
two  brothers,  in  the  parliament  which  met  in  the 
Canongatc  in  the  following  ^lay.  He  was  de- 
prived of  the  ofHcc  of  lord  privy  seal,  which  was 
given  to  George  Buchanan,  while  the  priory  of 
Coldingham  was  bestowed  on  George  Home  of 
Manderston.  He  then  retired  to  the  castle  of  Ed- 
inlmrgh,  then  held  by  Kirkaldy  of  Grange  for  the 
queen,  and  continued  with  him  till  its  surrender 
on  29th  May  1573.  The  regent  Morton  sent  him 
prisoner  to  Tantallan  cnstlc,  on  the  sea-const  of 
Haddingtonshire,  where  he  wns  confined  for  nine 
months.  His  ward  was  then  enlarged,  and  he 
was  allowed  to  raulc  at  Lonl  Somerville's  house 
of  Cowthally,  with  the  libci-ty  of  two  miles  around 
it,  under  a  penalty  of  £10,000,  if  he  went  beyond 
these  bounds.  He  was  subsequently  permitted 
the  range  of  the  counties  of  Ayr  and  Renfrew. 

On  the  fall  of  Morton,  he  wns  set  at  fidl  liberty 
by  an  act  of  council  in  1578.  He  then  went  to 
court,  and  soon  obtained  the  favour  of  the  king. 
On  26th  April,  1581,  he  was  restored  to  his  scat 
on  the  bench.  He  was  shortly  afterwards  kniglit- 
ed  and  sworn  a  privy  councillor,  and  18th  May 
1584  made  secretary  of  state.  His  forfeiture  was 
rescinded  in  the  parliament  which  met  on  the  22d 
of  that  month,  and  in  the  following  year,  he  suc- 
cce^leil,  greatly  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  king,  in 
effecting  a  reconciliation  with  the  exiled  nobles, 
on  their  retuni  to  Scotland.  On  31st  May  1586 
he  was  appointed  vice-chancellor  of  the  kingdom. 

In  1587,  Sir  John  ^laitland  was  accused  by 
Captain  Stewart,  some  time  earl  of  Arrnn,  and 
then  chancellor,  to  whom  he  had  at  one  time  ad- 
hered, but  had  latterly  deserted,  of  being  accessoiy 
to  the  execution  of  Queen  Mary  and  of  intending 
to  betray  the  king  into  the  hands  of  EliKabeth. 

Stewart  was  ordered  to  enter  within  the  palace  of 
111. 


Linlithgow,  there  to  abide  the  issue  of  his  accusa- 
tion, but  disobeyed  the  command.  He  was,  in 
consequence,  dci)rived  of  the  office  of  lord  high 
chancellor,  which  was  immediately  conferred  upon 
Maitland. 

Two  years  aftei^wards,  the  earls  of  Huntly, 
Crawford,  and  Bothwell,  pei^sonal  enemies  of  the 
chancellor,  formed  a  design  to  march,  with  their 
followers,  to  Ilolyrood-housc,  make  themselves 
masters  of  the  king's  person,  and  put  the  chancel- 
lor to  death.  On  the  night  in  which  it  was  to  be 
carried  into  effect,  however,  the  king  remained  in 
the  same  house  with  the  chancellor,  and  thus 
frustrated  their  intentions.  All  their  subsequent 
plots  against  him  were  likewise  defeated.  On  the 
22d  October  of  the  same  year  (1589)  Sir  John 
^laiiland,  as  chancellor,  embarked  with  tlie  king 
at  Leitli  on  his  voyage  to  Norway,  to  bring  home 
his  bride,  the  princess  Anne  of  Denmark,  who  had 
been  driven  in  there  by  contraiy  winds.  The 
royal  party  spent  the  ensuing  winter  at  Copenha- 
gen, where  Maitland  became  intimately  acquaint- 
ed with  Tycho  lirahc,  the  celebrated  Danish 
astronomer,  to  whom  he  addressed  several  com- 
plimentary verses.  While  in  Denmark,  he  wrote 
some  letters  on  state  affairs  to  Mr.  Kobert  Bruce 
at  home,  to  whom  had  been  intrusted  the  care  of 
the  country  in  the  king's  absence.  These  letters, 
as  well  as  those  of  James  to  the  same  faithful  and 
energetic  niinister,  were  dated  from  the  castle  of 
Cronenburgh,  and  the  last  of  Maitland's  frorn  El- 
si  nore. 

He  retunied  with  the  king  and  queen  on  the 
1st  of  May  1590,  and  on  the  17th  of  the  same 
month,  the  coronation  day  of  the  latter,  he  was 
created  a  peer,  by  the  title  of  Jjord  Maitland  of 
Thiriestane.  In  the  procession  to  the  abbey  kirk, 
where  the  ceremony  took  place,  he  carried  the 
queen's  matrimonial  crown,  llie  title  was  gi*ant- 
ed  to  him  and  the  heirs  m.ilc  of  his  body,  by  let- 
ters patent,  dated  18tli  May  1590.  The  following 
year  he  resigned  his  office  of  secretary  of  state, 
which  was  conferred  on  his  nephew,  Sir  Richard 
Cockburn  of  Clcrkington.  In  February  1592  oc- 
cuiTcd  the  murder  at  Donibristlc  in  Fife  of  the 
"bonny  earl  of  ^loray"  by  the  earl  of  Huntly, 
The  king  and  the  chancellor  were  susi>ected  of 
having  been  previously  aware  of  Huntly's  inten- 


i 


1 1 


II 


MAITLAND, 


82 


SIR  JOnN. 


lion,  and  Mnitland  Is  nald  to  have  "  liountlcd  on  " 
that  noblcinnn  to  Iho  cruel  deed.  "  Cnniden  in 
his  aimnU,"  s<i}-3  Cnldprwood,  (vol.  iv.  p.  145.) 
"Injctii  Iho  wliolc  bni'dcn  npon  tlic  clianccllor  to 
clear  the  liiiig ;  but  it  is  known  that  tlicsc  Ma  nn- 
nals  were  coin|>03cd  at  tlie  king's  direction  and 
pleasure."  So  gi'eat  was  the  murmnring  of  tlie 
citizens  of  Kdinbuigli  oii  tlie  occasion  tliitt  the 
king  niid  the  chfinccllor  found  Ihemsclves  obliged 
to  go,  for  a  lime,  to  I^ird  HaniiUon's  house  of 
Kinncil  in  T.lnlltligowHhirc,  and  it  u.is  with  great 
difflcnlty  that  tlic  provost  anil  inngistiiiles  re- 
stmincd  tiio  crnfta  of  tiio  city  from  tiiking  anns  to 
prevent  Iliciv  deparluj'c.  ITio  i>ay  of  tUc  soldiiTs 
of  llio  king's  guard  being  iii  nri'cnr,  tlrey  seized 
tlic  cliauccllor'a  trunks  and  cofll-i'^,  which  liail 
been  phiced  on  hovscbnck,  niiil  did  not  restore 
tbcni  till  11  solemn  promise  imh  ninitc  lliat  tUty 
slioiitd  1)C  duly  paid  nil  Hint  na.*  due  to  Iheui. 

Tlie  turbnleut  carl  of  liothwell,  who  kqit  the 
king  and  conrt  in  constant  fear  and  tunnoil,  j 
and  whose  billci-  hostility  bail  frcfpiently  been  ] 
directed  agiunst  the  chancellor,  lia<l  favoniors  even  ; 
in  the  jialiice,  and  the  qnpen  he^^elf  was  bronglit 
to  lend  her  powerful  inllncnee  ag^iinsl  Maitinml. 
On  the  ponnlt  day  of  March  1532,  lie  was  coni-  I 
nianded  to  remove  from  conrt,  on  whleh  lie  rctiitd  ' 
to  I>?thiiigton,  but  was  soon  i-Cr^lored  to  favoui'.  | 
It  was  principally  by  lils  advice  that  the  king  was 
indnced  to  consent  to  the  ai't  of  pailianicnt,  passed 
in  June  of  tho  same  year,  fur  tlic  raiilientlon  of 
the  liberty  of  the  pii'sbyterian  clinrch,  in  other 
words,  fur  its  legid  establislunent.  Jli.'  object  in 
persuading  the  king  1o  this  measure  is  said  to  liavo 
been  to  ingratiate  himself  n  itli  the  ministers  and 
people,  and  lo  i>treiigthen  himself  against  his  ene- 
my Both  well.  Willi  the  queen  he  had  a  di.-ipniu 
relative  to  tlie  lauds  of  Mns^clbui'gh,  wbicli  caused 
Ills  retirement  from  court  for  a  whole  year.  On 
her  coming  to  Scotland,  tbc  abbey  of  Dunfeniiline, 
with  its  lands  and  privileges,  bad  been  conferred 
npon  lier  by  the  king.  Among  these  was  the  manor 
of  Mussel  bui^li,  a  grant  of  nhieli  bad  been  made  to 
the  abbey  of  Dunfennline  by  David  I.,  that  "sair 
sannt  to  tlio  ci-oon."  The  regality  of  Mussel  burgh 
and  tbc  property  connected  with  it  had,  some 
years  before  tiie  queen's  marriage,  come  into  the 
possession  of  Chancellor  Maitlnnd,  and  as  he  re- 


fused to  resign  tliem  to  the  qnccn,  lier  tmimoalty 
was  but  the  more  increiucd  against  bim.    Dy  the 

king's  advice  he  pnsscd  tlio  following  year  In  ' 

the  conntn-,  bnt  in  May  1593,  he  returned  to  contt  ,; 

and  was  restored  lo  the  exercise  of  hTs  oflBcc.  \ 

Tlie  vast  estate,  it  may  bo  stated,  of  the  lordtliip  j. 

of  Klussclburgli,  or  of  tbo  wliolc  of  Iho  ancient  i 

Great  Invcresk  and  Little  Invcrcsk,  continued  in  ' 

the  family  till  1TU9,  wlicii  it  was  purch.ised  by  | 

Anne,  daclicss  of  Ducclcncli,  the  iridoir  of  the  I 

duke  of  Monmoiitb,  from  John,  fifth  earl  of  Lan-  | 

dcrdale,  who  died  the  folloniiig year.    Subjoined  ij 

is  the  chancellor's  portrait,  from  an  engraving  lu  | 

Smith's  leouographta  Scolica:  , 


nic  keeping  of  ibe  young  prince  Henry  had  ■ 
been  inlnisled  by  the  king  to  the  earl  of  Mar,  bnt  ' 
as  tbc  queen  iii-^bed  to  remove  him  from  Mar's 
charge,  the  ch.iucellor,  willing  lo  make  a  friend  of 
her  niajeslr,  entered  into  her  plans,  'i'hls  roused 
the  niigcr  of  James,  who  reproved  hint  Terj- 
shanily  for  bis  iuteiference  in  a  matter  with  whicii 
lie  bad  nothing  to  do.  Deeply  mortifled,  he  re- 
tired to  Lamler,  where,  after  two  mouths'  illness, 
he  died,  October  .Id,  1 505.  He  was  visited  on  bis 
ileatlibed  by  Andi'cw  Melvillo  and  his  nephew, 
Robert  Bruce,  and  had  he  lived  it  is  Ihonght  that 


MAITLAND. 


83 


MALCOLM 


tlio  eviU  with  wliicb,  soon  af^er,  tlio  imtionni 
churcli  tras  assailed,  Avonld  have  been  Averted. 
The  king  regretted  him  much,  and  composed  nu 
epitaph  to  his  memory. 

Lord  Thirlestane,  like  liis  fatlier,  Ims  obtained 
a  high  character  from  his  contempornries,  for  his 
eminent  abilities  and  amiable  disposition.  Spots- 
vrood  Bays:  *^  lie  was  a  man  of  rare  parts  and  of 
a  deep  wit,  learned,  full  of  corn-age,  and  most 
'  faithful  to  liis  king  and  master.  No  man  did  ever 
carry  himself  in  his  place  moi-e  wisely,  nor  sustain 
it  more  conrageonsly  against  his  enemies." 

Iksides  a  satire  ^Against  Slauderis  Tongnes/ 
and  ^An  Admonition  to  the  Earl  of  Mar,^  pub- 
lished by  Pinkerton,  and  described  by  him  as  the 
best  state  poem  which  he  had  ever  read,  he  iVrotc 
several  Latin  epigrams,  inserted  in  the  second 
volume  of  the  '  Delitiae  Poctarum  Scotorum.'  The 
poems  attribnted  to  him  have  been  printed  with 
those  of  his  father.  Sir  llichard  ^laitland,  by  the 
Maitland  Club,  in  a  volume  issued  in  1829. 

MAITLAND,  John,  second  earl  and  only  duke 
of  Lftoderdalc,  see  vol.  ii.  page  634. 

MAITLAND,  William,  an  historical  and  an- 
liqnarian  writer,  was  born  at  Brechin  about  1G93. 
His  original  occupation  was  that  of  a  hair  mer- 
chant, in  which  character  he  travelled  in  Sweden, 
Denmark,  and  Germany,  and  by  his  business  he 
appears  to  have  acquired  some  wealth.  At  length, 
settling  in  London,  he  turned  his  attention  to  the 
study  of  antiquities,  and  produced  several  compi- 
lations, which  were  well  received  at  the  time,  but 
are  now  of  small  repute.  In  1733,  he  was  elected 
a  member  of  the  Royal  Society,  and  in  1735  a 
fellow  of  the  Antiquarian  Society,  but  resigned  the 
latter  honour  in  1740,  on  his  return  to  Scotland. 
He  died  at  Montrose,  July  IC,  1757.  His  works 
are: 

The  History  of  Ix>ndon,  from  its  fuundntion  by  tlie  Ko- 
Dums,  to  the  rear  1730.  Also  Westminster,  Middlesex, 
Soothwark,  and  other  pnrts  within  the  Bills  of  Mortality, 
niiistnted  irith  numerous  pl.ntes.  London,  1739,  fol.  The 
ume,  contlntietl  to  tljc  year  1760.  I^nd.  1760,  2  vols.  fol. 
An  edition  oonsidcmbly  enlarged  and  improved,  was  publish- 
ed in  1765,  2  vols.  fol.  by  Mr.  Entick. 

The  History  of  Edinbnrgb,  from  its  foundation  to  tlic  prc- 
■ent  time}  cont;iining  a  fuitliful  rulatiun  of  tho  public  trans- 
actions of  the  citisens;  acconnts  of  the  seveml  Pjirishes;  its 
Gomiunent,  Cirll,  Ecclesiastical,  and  Military;  Incorpora- 
tioos  of  Trades  and  Mannfactures ;  Courts  of  Justice;  stntc 
of  Learning;  Cbaritablo  Foundations,  &c;  witli  the  several 


Accounts  of  the  Parishes  of  the  Canongate,  St.  Cuthbert, 
&c. ;  and  the  ancient  and  present  state  of  Leitb.  In  nine 
books,  with  plates.    Edin.  1753,  fol. 

The  History  and  Antiquities  of  Scotland.    I,oud.  1757,  2 
vols.  fol. 

Of  the  Number  of  Inhabitants  in  I/)ndon.    Phil.  Tranfc 
Abr.  vii  257.    1738. 


^lATXJOLir,  a  surname  originally  Gillecolane  or  Gillechal- 
lum,  derived  from  two  Gaelic  words  signifying  the  seirant  of 
St,  Columba.  Somerled,  thane  of  Argyle,  had  a  son  of  thii 
name,  who  was  slain  with  him  near  Kcnfrewin  1164. 

'llie  chief  of  the  clan  Challum  or  the  MacCallums,  an  Ar- 
gyleshii-e  sept,  originally  styled  the  clnn  Challum  of  Ariskeod- 
nish,  is  Malcolm  of  Poltalloch,  wboMS  family  has  been  settled 
from  a  very  eariy  period  in  that  county.  One  of  this  house, 
called  Zachary  Uad  Donald  Mor  of  Poltalloch,  was  killed 
Blay  25,  16*17,  at  Ederline,  in  South  Argyle,  in  single  combat 
with  Sir  Alexander  Macdonald,  called  Ailaster  Mac  CoUkit* 
tocli,  or  left-handed.  He  was  in  the  force  of  the  marquis  of 
Argyle  when  General  David  I^ie  advanced  into  Kintyre  to 
drive  out  the  rnynliiits,  and  was  renowned  in  his  day  for  his 
great  strength.  It  is  alleged  that  he  slew  seven  of  his  as- 
s;iilHnts  before  he  was  himself  slain.  He  was  getting  the 
better  of  Colkitto,  when  a  Maclean  &ime  behind  him  with  a 
sc\the  and  lianistmng  him;  he  was  then  easily  overpowered. 

In  1414,  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Locbow  granted  to 
Reginald  Malcolm  of  Corbarron,  certain  lands  of  Craignish, 
and  on  the  banks  of  I.och  Avich,  in  Nether  I«om;  with  the 
office  of  hei'editary  constable  of  his  castles  of  Jx^chaftj  and 
Craignijih.  Tliis  bmnch  became  extinct  towards  the  end  of 
the  17tli  century,  as  Corbarron  or  Corran  is  said  to  have  been 
bequeathed  by  the  last  of  the  family  to  Zachary  MacCallum 
of  Poltalloch,  who  succeeded  his  father  in  1686. 

Dugald  MacCallum  of  Poltalloch,  who  inherited  the  estate 
in  1779,  appears  to  have  been  the  first  to  adopt  permanently 
the  name  of  Malcolm  as  tho  family  patronymic.  Besides 
roltalloch,  the  family  possesses  Kihnartin  house  and  Dun- 
troon  castle,  in  the  same  county. 

John  Malcolm,  Esq.,  of  Poltalloch,  bom  in  1805,  a  mngis> 
trate  and  deputy-lieutenant  for  Argyleshire  and  Kent,  suc- 
ceeded his  brother,  Neill,  in  1857.  Educated  at  Harrow 
and  Oxford,  he  became  H.A.  in  1827  and  M.A.  in  1830.  He 
married  2d  daughter  of  the  Hon.  John  ^Yingfield,  Strat- 
ford, son  of  3d  Viscount  Powcrscourt,  with  issue.  Heir,  his 
son,  John  Wingfield. 


The  Malcolms  of  Balbeadie  and  Grange,  Fifeshire,  possess  a 
baronetcy  of  Nova  Scotia,  conferred  in  1665.  In  the  reign  of 
Charles  I.,  Sir  .lohn  Malcolm,  eldest  son  of  John  Malcolm  of 
Balbeadie,  acquired  the  lands  of  Ix>chore  in  the  same  county. 
A  branch  of  tlic  Malcolms  of  I.ochore  and  Innertiel  settled  in 
Dnmfrics-hhiro. 

In  1746.  Sir  Michael  Malcolm,  baronet,  being  related  to  the 
last  Lord  Bal merino,  was  sent  for  to  be  present  at  his  execu- 
tion on  Tower-liiil.  A  daughter  of  Lord  Chancellor  Bathnrst 
saw  him  on  the  scaffold,  and  fell  in  love  with  him.  He  sub- 
sequently manied  her. 

Sir  Michael  sold  the  estate  of  Lochore,  which  Fubsrqncntly 
came  into  the  possession  of  Mr.  Jobson,  whose  daughter  mar- 
ried the  2d  Sir  Walter  Scott,  baronet. 

On  Sir  MichaeKs  death,  the  title  devolved  npon  James 
Malcolm  of  Grange,  and  at  the  de.ith  of  tho  latter  in  1705, 
upon  John  Malcolm  of  Balbeadie,  descended  from  the  youngest 
brother  of  the  first  baroi:ct.    Sir  Johns  son.  Sir  Michael 


n^ 


.1 


!    li 


MALCOLM  ir. 


84 


BIALCOLM  IL 


:  I 
I 

il 
l| 

I 

.  r 


1 1 


:i 


Midouhn,  inarrittl  in  1824,  Marv,  yonngcst  d.-iuglitcr  of  J<'Iin 
Forbe«,  Esq.,  of  Bridgend,  Perth,  nnd  with  three  danghlcre, 
h:id  one  son,  Sir  John  Malcohn,  born  April  1,  1828,  who  mic- 
oceded  to  the  baronetcr,  on  the  death  of  hw  father  in  3838. 

^lALCOL^I  I.,  King  of  Scots,  was  Ihc  son  of 
Donal  IV.,  who  rcigiicd  fi-om  893  to  904.  On 
the  abdication  of  Constantino  III.,  Malcolm  suc- 
ceeded to  the  throne  in  944.  In  945,  Kdinund, 
the  Saxon  king  of  England,  ceded  Cumberland 
and  part  of  Westmoreland  to  him,  on  condition 
that  he  wonld  defend  that  northern  tcrritor\',  and 
become  the  ally  of  Knglaiid.  Edrcd,  the  brother 
and  successor  of  Edmund,  accordingly  applied  for, 
and  obtained  the  aid  of  l^lalcolm  again:ft  Anlnf, 
king  of  Northumberland,  which  latter  country  he 
wasted,  and  carried  cff  the  inhabitants  with  their 
cattle. 

Ju  the  time  of  Malcolm  I.,  the  people  of  the 
province  of  ^loray,  in  the  north- east  of  S<oiIaiid, 
were  a  mixed  race,  formed  of  Scandinavian  set- 
tlers, with  Scottish  and  Pictish  Celts.  Turbulent 
and  rebellious,  they  were  continually  at  war  with 
the  sovereign,  and  an  insurrection  having  occur- 
red under  CelIach,maormorof  Garmoran,  Malcolm 
marched  north  to  reduce  them  to  obedience.  lie 
slew  Cellach,  but  was,  some  time  thereafter,  as- 
sassinated in  953  at  Ulnrn,  supposed  by  Shaw  to 
be  Auldearn,  after  a  reign  of  nine  years.  Other 
accounts  state  his  death  to  have  taken  place  at 
Fodresach  or  Eoitcs.  He  was  succeeded  by  In- 
dulpli,  the  son  of  Constantino  If.,  and  Indulph 
had  for  his  successor.  Duff,  the  son  of  Malcolm, 
uho  mounted  the  throne  in  9G1.  Another  son  of 
Malcolm  L,  Kenneth  III.,  succeeded  in  971,  after 
an  intermediate  possessor  of  the  throne  named 
Culen,  the  son  of  Indulph. 

MALCOLM  II.,  King  of  Scot5,  the  son  of 
Kenneth  III.,  succeeded  to  the  throne  in  1003, 
and  had  a  troublous  rcign  of  about  thirty  years. 
He  defeated  and  slew  Kenneth  IV.  at  Monievaird 
in  Strathearn,  and  in  consequence  became  king. 
His  first  annoyance  came  from  the  Danes  who,  in 
previous  reigns,  had  made  several  attempts  to  ef- 
fect a  settlement  in  Scotland,  but  had  been  de- 
feated in  them  all.  They  had  secured  a  firm 
footing  in  England,  and  the  year  after  ^lalcolm^s 
accession  to  the  throne,  they  commenced  the  most 
formidable  preparations,   under  their  celebrated 


king,  Sweyn,  for  a  new  expedition  to  the  Scottish 
coasts.  I  Ic  onlered  Olans,  his  viceroy  in  Norway, 
and  Enet  in  Denmark,  to  raise  a  powerful  army, 
and  to  fit  ont  a  suitable  fleet  for  the  cntcrpiiBC. 

Tlie  coast  of  Moray  was  chosen  as  tlie  scene  of 
the  menaced  invasion.  Effecting  a  descent  near 
Speymouth,  the  Danes  carried  firo  and  sword 
through  that  province,  and  laid  siege  to  the  fortress 
of  Nairn,  then  one  of  the  strongest  castles  hi  the 
north  of  Scotland.  Iliey  were  forced  to  raii«e  Ihc 
siege  for  a  time  by  Malcolm,  who  hastening  against 
them  with  an  ami}-,  encamped  in  a  plain  near 
Kilflos  or  Kinlos.  In  this  position  he  was  at- 
tacked by  the  Danes,  and  forced  to  retreat,  afkcr 
being  seriously  wounded.  The  fortress  of  Nairn 
then  capitulated  to  the  invadci*s,  but  in  violation 
of  an  express  condition  that  their  lives  should 
be  saved,  the  whole  garrison  were  immediately 
hanged. 

To  cxikI  the  Danes  from  Moray,  Malcolm  mus- 
tered all  his  forces,  and  in  the  spring  of  1010,  with 
a  powerful  anny  he  encamped  at  Mortlacli.  The 
Danes  advanced  to  give  him  battle,  and  a  fierce 
and  sanguinary  conflict  ensued,  the  resnlt  of 
which  was  long  doubtful.  Three  of  the  Scottish 
commandei-s  fell  at  the  very  commencement  of  the 
engagement,  when  a  panic  seized  their  followers, 
and  the  king  was  borne  along  with  them  in  their 
retreat  till  he  was  opposite  the  church  of  Mort- 
lacli, then  a  chapel  dedicated  to  St.  Mobch. 
There,  while  his  army  were  partially  pent  up  in 
their  flight  by  the  contraction  of  the  vale  and  the 
naiTOwness  of  the  pass,  he  made  a  vow  to  endow 
a  religious  house  on  the  field  of  battle  shonld  he 
obtain  the  victory.  Tlien,  rallying  and  rousing 
his  troops  by  an  animated  appeal  to  their  patriot- 
ism, and  placing  himself  at  their  head,  he  wheeled 
round  upon  the  Danes,  threw  Enotus,  one  of  the 
Danish  generals,  from  his  horse,  and  killed  him 
with  his  own  hand.  The  Scots,  catching  his  spi- 
rit, made  an  impctuons  onset  on  the  enemy,  whom 
they  drove  from  the  field,  thickly  strewing  the 
ground  with  their  coiT^ses.  In  gratitude  to  God 
for  this  signal  victory,  Malcolm  got  the  church  of 
^fortlach  converted  into  a  cathedral,  and  the  vil- 
lage into  the  seat  of  a  diocese,  said  to  have  been 
the  earliest  bishopric  in  Scotland.  His  endowment 
of  it  was  confirmed  by  Pope  Benedict,  but  in  11S9 


M.\F.COLM  ir. 


85 


MALCOLM  IL 


ii 


the  bishopric  was  removed  to  Aberdeen.  In  the 
order  of  precedence,  while  this  see  lasted,  it  rank- 
ed next  to  that  of  St.  Andrews.  It  was  long 
thought  that,  during  tlicir  occupation  of  Moray, 
the  Danes  had  fortified  Burgh  Head,  but  tlic  re- 
mains there  found  arc  now  believed  to  be  cither 
of  Roman  or  Fictish  constructiun. 

To  revenge  this  defeat  and  other  disastera  which, 
at  this  time,  the  invadei*s  experienced  on  the  coasts 
of  Angus  and  Buchau,  Swejn,  the  Danish  king, 
despatched  Camus,  one  of  the  ablest  of  his  gene- 
rals, to  the  Scottish  shores.  He  had  scarcely, 
however,  cflfected  a  landing  on  the  coast  of  Angus, 
in  the  neighbourhood  of  Carnoustie,  than  ho  was 
attacked  in  the  plains  of  Barric  by  Malcolm,  at 
the  head  of  a  considerable  anny,  and,  after  a 
blo^Mly  contest,  defeated  with  great  loss.  He 
sought  safety  in  flight,  but  was  closely  pur.<ued, 
aud  killed.  The  place  of  his  overthrow  is  indi- 
cted by  a  monumental  stone,  called  the  Cross  of 
Camus,  which  stands  on  a  small  tumulus  at  Cu- 
muitown,  a  village  which  has  been  named  after 
him,  in  the  parish  of  Monikic.  Tlic  tumulus, 
according  to  tradition,  contains  the  rem.iins  of 
Camus,  and  the  story  of  the  old  chroniclers  is 
that,  after  his  defeat,  he  fled  northwards,  with  a 
view  to  escape  to  Moray,  wliorc  were  some  of  his 
sliifks,  but  WAS  pursued  aud  overtaken  here  by 
Hubert,  the  remote  ancestor  of  the  earls  Marischal, 
ulto  killed  him  by  cleaving  his  skull  \yitli  his  bat- 
tle-axe. About  the  year  1(320,  the  tumulus  was 
o|)ened  by  order  of  Sir  Patrick  Maulc,  afterwards 
first  earl  of  Panmure,  when  a  skeleton  of  large 
dimensions  in  good  preservation  was  discovered, 
niih  part  of  the  skull  wanting. 

The  Danes,  however,  were  not  to  bo  deterred 
even  by  the  i*epeated  defeats  which  they  had  sus- 
tained, fix)m  their  long  cherished  but  often  bnfllcd 
scheme  of  the  conquest  of  Noith  Britain.  And  as 
for  the  Scots,  the  spirit  which  animated  tlieni  has 
l»eeu  well  expressed  in  the  lines  of  Home: 

*'  The  Dnnos  have  laniU'd,  wc  must  U*:it  tlicm  back, 
Or  live  the  blares  of  Dcninark. 

In  1014,  another  Danish  force  landed  on  the 
coast  of  Buchan,  about  a  mile  west  from  Slailies 
castle,  in  the  parish  of  Cruden.  The  Danes  on 
this  occasion  were  led  by  Sweyifs  celebrated  son, 


Canute,  afterwards  king  of  England  and  Denmark, 
and  again  they  experienced  a  signal  overthrow. 
The  site  of  the  fleld  of  battle  has  been  ascertained 
by  the  discovery  of  human  bones  left  exposed  b}' 
the  shifting  or  blowing  of  the  sand.  Some  writers 
assei-t  that  a  treaty  was  entered  into  with  the 
Danes,  by  which  it  was  stipulated  that  the  field  of 
battle  should  bo  consecrated  by  a  bishop  as  a 
bin*ying-placc  for  those  of  their  countrymen  who 
had  fallen,  and  that  a  church  should  be  there  built 
and  priests  appointed  in  all  time  coming,  to  sa}' 
masses  for  the  souls  of  the  slain.  It  is  certain 
that  a  chapel  was  erected  in  this  neighbourhood, 
dedicated  to  St.  Olaus,  the  site  of  which  has  be- 
come invisible  by  being  covcixhI  with  sand.  An- 
other and  far  more  important  stipulation,  it  is  said, 
was  made  by  which  the  Danes  agreed  to  quit 
every  part  of  the  Scottish  coasts,  and  this  was  fol- 
lowed by  the  final  departure,  the  same  year,  of 
these  ruthless  invaders  from  Scotland. 

Malcolm  was  next  engaged  in  war  wiih  the 
Northumbrians,  and  having,  in  1018,  letl  his  army 
to  Carhnm,  near  Werk,  on  the  southern  bank  of 
the  Tweed,  he  was  met  there  by  Uchtred  earl  of 
Northumberland,  when  a  desperate  battle  took 
place.  The  victory  was  claimed  by  Uchtred,  who 
was,  soon  after,  assassinated,  when  on  his  way  to 
pay  his  obeisance  to  the  great  Canute.  To  prevent 
an  invasion  of  his  territories,  Eadulph,  his  brother 
and  successor,  In  the  year  1020,  ceded  to  Malcolm 
the  fertile  region  of  I-rOdonia,  or  Lothian.  That 
extensive  and  beautiful  district  had  fonnerlv  been 
a  part  of  the  Anglo-Saxon  kingdom  of  Xorthum- 
bria,  which  in  the  time  of  Kdwin,  from  whom 
Kdinburgh  derives  its  name,  and  who  began  his 
reign  in  G17,  had  extended  from  the  Ilumber  to 
the  Avon ;  but  ever  after  it  had  thus  been  ac- 
quired by  Malcolm  XL,  it  formed  an  integral  por- 
tion of  the  Scottish  dominions.  On  this  occasion, 
Malcolm  gave  oblations  to  the  churches  and  gifts 
to  the  clergy,  who,  in  return,  bestowed  on  him  the 
proud  designation  of  vir  victoriosissimus. 

In  1031,  Canute,  the  Danish  king  of  England, 
the  most  powerful  monarch  of  his  time,  invaded 
Scotland,  to  compel  Malcolm  to  do  homage  for 
Cumbria,  which  he  had  refused,  on  tho  ground 
that  Canute  was  a  usurper ;  but,  after  some  nego- 
tiations, Duncan,  Malcolm's  grandson,  afterwards 


•  I 


1 1 
1 1 


■  I 

1  i 

I 

.  I 


I  ; 


MALCOLM  U. 


87 


MALCOLM  IL 


bjT  Fordan,  Abthanus  de  DuU  ac  Seneschalhu  In- 
tukarum,  Tiio  title  of  abtlmne  appears  to  have 
belonged  to  an  abbot  who  possessed  a  thaiiedom. 
It  waj  peculLir  to  Scotland,  and  only  three  ab- 
tlianeries  are  named  in  ancient  recoi*ds,  nnmclj', 
tliose  of  Dall  in  Athol,  Kirkmichael  in  Strathardle, 
and  Madderty  in  Strnthcaru.  The  title  of  thnnc, 
previously  Icuown  in  England,  was  not  used  in 
Scotland  till  the  introduction  of  the  Saxon  policy 
hito  the  latter  kingdom  by  Edgar,  who  began  his 
reign  in  1097.  The  three  thanedoms  mentioned 
under  the  name  of  abthanerics  appear  to  have 
been  vested  in  the  croA\ii,  and  were  confcii'ed  by 
E<lg]ir  on  his  younger  brother,  Ethclred,  who  was 
abl>ot  of  Dnnkcld.  On  Ethclrcd^s  death  they  re- 
verted to  the  crown. 

In  tlie  time  of  Crinan,  "  there  was  certainly," 
says  Mr.  Skene,  ^*  no  such  title  in  Scotland,  but  it 
y  oqnally  certain  that  there  were  no  charters,  and 
although  Crinan  had  not  the  nnmc,  he  mny  have 
been  in  fact  the  same  thing.  He  was  certainly 
abbot  of  Dnnkeld,  and  he  may  have  likewise  pos- 
sessed that  extensive  territory  which,  from  tlic 
same  circnmstance,  was  afterwards  called  the  ab- 
tlianedom  of  Dull.  Fordun  cei*tainly  inspected 
the  reconls  of  Dnnkcld,  and  the  circumstance  can 
only  be  explained  by  supposing  that  Fordun  may 
have  there  seen  the  deed  gi*nnting  the  abthancdom 
of  Dull  to  Ethelred,  abbot  of  Dnnkeld,  which 
would  natnrally  state  that  it  had  been  possessed 
by  his  proavus  Crinnn,  and  from  which  Fordun 
would  conclude  that  as  Criunu  possessed  the 
thing,  he  was  also  known  by  the  name  of  Abtha- 
nus de  Dull,  From  this,  therefore,  we  learn  the 
very  singular  fact  that  the  race  which  gave  a  long 
line  of  kings  to  Scotland,  were  originally  lords  of 
that  district  in  Athol  lying  between  Strathtay 
and  lUnnoch,  which  was  afterwards  tenned  the 
Abthania  de  Dully  (^Skene's  Highlands  of  Scot- 
land, vol.  ii.  pp.  137,  138.) 

I>eparting  from  the  generally  received  history 
of  Scotland  at  this  remote  and  confused  period  of 
our  annals,  Mr.  Skene  is  of  opinion,  fi*om  the  re- 
markable coincidence  which  he  found  between  the 
Irish  annals  and  the  Noi-se  Sagas,  that  two  Mal- 
colms of  different  families  reigned  in  Scotland 
during  the  thirty  years  allotted  to  one,  the  second 
of  these  Malcolms   being  in  possession  of  the 


throne  the  last  four  yeara  of  that  time.  From  his 
account  of  the  second  Norwegian  kingdom  in  the 
north  of  Scotland,  which  lasted  only  seven  years, 
that  is,  from  986  to  993,  (vol.  i.  p.  108,)  we  learn 
that  Sigurd,  the  14th  iarl  of  Orkney,  after  having 
defeated  a  Celtic  ai-my  under  Kenneth  and  Mels- 
nechtan,  maormora  of  Dala  (Arg}'le)  and  Ross,  in 
an  attempt  on  their  part  to  recover  Caithness,  in 
which  Melsnechtan  was  slain,  was  obliged  to  re- 
tire to  the  Orkneys,  by  the  approach  of  Malcolm, 
maormor  of  Moray,  with  a  large  Scottish  force,  and 
he  was  never  afterwards  able  to  regain  a  footing 
on  the  mainland  of  Scotland.  lie  had  previously 
made  himself  master  of  the  disti'icts  of  Ross,  Mo- 
ray, Sutherland,  and  Argyle,  bnt  had  been  driven 
out  of  them  by  a  sndden  rising  of  their  maormors. 
These  districts  were  left  in  possession  of  Malcolm, 
who  was  enabled,  by  his  increased  power  and  in- 
fluence, and  great  personal  talenti>,  even  to  seat 
himself  on  the  throne  itself.  In  what  his  title  to 
the  crown  consisted  is  not  known,  but  whatever  it 
was,  he  was  supported  in  it  by  the  Celtic  inhabi- 
tants of  the  whole  of  the  north  of  Scotland.  His 
descendants,  for  many  generations  afterwards, 
constantly  asserted  their  right  to  the  throne,  and 
as  invariably  received  the  assistance  of  the  Celtic 
portion  of  its  inhabitants.  ^^  In  all  probability,** 
says  Mr.  Skene,  ^^  the  Highlanders  were  attempt- 
ing to  oppose  the  hereditary  succession  in  the 
family  of  Kenneth  M^Alpin,  and  to  introduce  the 
more  ancient  Pictish  law."  Kenneth  IIL  is  said  to 
have  got  a  law  passed  by  his  chiefs,  on  the  moot- 
hill  of  Scone,  that  the  son,  or  nearest  male  heir  of 
the  king,  should  always  succeed  to  the  throne, 
and  when  not  of  age,  that  a  regent  should  be  ap- 
pointed to  rule  the  kingdom  in  his  name  until  he 
attained  his  fourteenth  year,  when  he  should  as- 
sume the  reins  of  goveinment.  As  the  sovereign- 
ty was  not  transmitted  by  the  strict  line  of  here- 
ditary descent,  brothers,  by  the  law  of  tanistry, 
being  preferred  to  sons  in  the  succession,  rival 
contests  and  civil  wars  for  the  crown  were  fre- 
quent. Kenneth^s  law,  if  passed  at  all,  of  which 
there  is  no  evidence,  seems  not  to  have  been  acted 
upon,  as  two  princes,  Constantino  IV.,  the  son  of 
Culen,  (mentioned  on  page  84,)  and  Kenneth  IV. 
the  son  of  Duff,  succeeded  to  the  crown  before 
Malcolm ;  that  is,  on  the  hiiherto  received  suppo- 


:  t 


MALCOLM  1[.  ( 

sitioii  Uiut  Makoliii  I[.  was  tiic  son  of  Kenneth 
IIL,  antt  gi-fliKldonorMnlcolnil.  irsiii:!!  wns  llio 
cnsc,  Kcuuctb  IV.,  tlie  Mn  of  Duff,  wns  Va  cou- 
sin, and,  during  liU  I'ui^'ii,  TtUU-olin  stood  in  tlic 
position  of  licir  prcsiuniitive  to  tlic  crotvn,  nnil 
vea»  Tti/ulus  or  {irinco  ofCiinibertonil. 

According  to  Skene,  lioivcvcr,  bo  ivna  inaornior 
of  Moray,  nnd  so  hv  m  npgicni's,  not  allied  to  tlie 
roral  fiiniily  nt  all.  lie  aecnis  to  liavo  made  »'nr 
oil  Kcnnclli  IV.,  but  by  the  interposition  of  Fo- 
tliail,  one  of  tlie  Scottish  bUliops,  a  treaty  was 
ngrccit  to  iKitween  tlicm,  by  nliiuli  it  wns  stipu- 
Intuil  tbnt  Kcnnclli  Blioiild  reninUi  king  for  life, 
and  tliflt  Miilcolin  nnd  liis  bcirs  should  succeed 
aftri'  lilni.  Iinpatlciit  to  possess  the  crown,  liow- 
nvpr,  KInlcolin  again  took,  tlic  field,  and  iu  n 
bloody  battle  at  Kloiiivniril  in  StratUenm,  Ken- 
neth, nftcr  a  biiivc  rcsistuncc,  wns  killed.  Ac- 
cofdiiii;  to  Ibc  i-egister  of  St.  Andrews,  Kenneth 
wasBiain  "at  Moicglivard,"  in  1001.  Other  nc- 
coiinld  make  It  1003. 

Soon  nflcr  becoming  king  of  Scotland,  to  conci- 
liate Stgtird,  carl  of  Orkney,  cnlled  the  Stunt,  and 
described  as  "  a  grcnt  cbwitnin  and  wide-lauded," 
Alalcolin  i;avc  liini  Ids  dnnghter  for  liis  second 
wifi*.  The  isiiuo  of  this  nini'ringo  wns  fonr  sons. 
The  eldest,  Tliorlinn,  is  Siiid  in  tiic  Orkncyiiiga 
Saga,  to  have  been  "  a  great  chicOain,  one  of  tlic 
largest  nieii  in  paint  of  stature,  ugly  of  ni:g>ccl, 
bliiek  haired,  slinrp  fcalnrcd,  and  smnctvhat  taw- 
ny, nnd  the  ino«t  inarlial  looking  man ;  lie  was  n 
ei.ntcntioiis  man,  and  covetous  both  of  money  and 
iii;,'iiily;  victiiriotii  nnd  clever  hi  bnltlc,  and  n 
held  nit.ii'kei-.  He  \t:\f  llien  live  winlu-:<  old 
wlicii  Maleolm,  king  of  the  ScoIji,  IiI.h  moibcr'H 
father,  gnvc  liini  nu  inrl's  title,  nnd  (-aithne^s  to 
rule  over,  bnt  he  wns  fonrleen  winlei's  when  he 
prepared  niarltiuie  expeditions  from  liis  country, 
and  made  war  on  llic  domnins  ofotiter  prlnec." 
lie  thus  enrly  began  Ids  career  as  a  A'ikingr.  It 
was  on  the  death  of  iiis  fallicr  Sigunl,  who  wns 
slniii  in  lOU,  nt  the  bnltic  of  Clontnrf  iu  Ii-claml, 
I  I1;;1iting  against  the  renowned  llrinn  Doruliiinc, 

tlint  King  Malcolm  bestowed  on  him  tlic  district 
of  Caitlnic*!,  Ill)  eldest  half-brotlicr,  Kinnr,  hav- 
ing  succeeded  to  the  iarldoni  of  tlio  Orkneys. 

In  tlio  Irish  aiinnln,  under  the  year  1029,  it  is 
recorded  that  "  Malcolm,  sou  of  Maolbrigdc,  son 

ii 


i  UALCOUI  II. 

of  Kory,  King  of  Alban,  died."  His  reign  voold 
Ihns  appear  lo  have  lasted  only  twenty-ilx,  In- 
stead of  tliirly  years.  On  his  death,  the  Scottish 
portion  of  the  nation  succeeded  In  placlDg  upon 
the  tlirono  tlio  son  of  Kenneth  IV.,  also  named 
]kIalcolm,  for  whom,  nccording  to  Mr.  Skene's 
view,  lio  lins  been  inistnkeii.  In  the  Orkneyingn 
Snga  ho  is  known  by  tlio  name  of  Kali  IlnndaaDii, 
and  In  tlio  history  of  Scotland,  of  Itlalcoitii  IL 

This  tlilrd  hlalcotin  commenced  bis  rclga  by 
attempts  to  reduce  the  power  of  the  XonrcgliM 
in  Scotland,  bnt  found  them  too  strong  for  lum. 
Tlioi'fiiin  having  refused  to  pay  liim  tribute  for  tin 
tenilories  on  the  Scottish  mainland,  whicli  lie 
had  received  from  his  gmndfather,  ftlnlcotm  gave 
(Caithness  to  Moddaii,  liU  nepliow,  vitb  tlio  title 
of  Inri.    To  enable  1dm  to  lake  possesion  of  liis    {[ 
new  territory,  tlo<ldnn  miscii  an  srmy  En  Solhcr- 
land,  but  'Jliorllnn  collected  Ids  followers,  nnd    j' 
having  been  joined  by  Tlioikclt  Fostrl,  with  a    |l 
largo  force  fi-om  the  Oikncys,  pi-cfienied  sncb  a    ' 
strong  front,  that  Moddnu  fomid  himself  obliged    !| 
to  retire  wiihmit  linKnnling  a  battle.    On  this    i' 
Thoi'linn  subjected    to    hiinsrtr  Sutherland  and    ! 
Rons,  nnd  cnmcd  his  nmis  far  nnd  wide  In  Scot-    | 
land.    lie  then  returned  to  Cnitlinnui.  |; 

M.ilcolui,  nn  his  pnit,  with  a  fleet  of  eleven  I. 
ship^,  snik'il  ti>wnrds  the  north,  bnt  wns  attacked 
nnd  dcfcaii'd  in  the  Pcntland  Frith  by  Tliorflnn,  |. 
aud  his  licet  coinpletely  di.-^per^cd.  Tliis  sea-figlit  |i 
tonk  place  a  little  nay  cast  of  Dnraess.  Mai* 
colm  flwl  to  the  Rloniy  Frith,  followed  by  Tlior- 
linn nnd  Thorkeil.  'I1ic  latter,  however,  wns  soou 
dt'>:pnli'licd  lo  Tliur^o,  to  nttnek  Moddnn,  who 
had  nriived  tlicre  wltli  a  Inrpc  army,  lie  rcnclicd 
'niumo  at  ni^'lit,  and  hnving  set  firo  to  tlic  house 
in  which  Moddait  slept,  tlint  chicnnin  tcnpt  down 
from  tlio  beams  of  nn  upper  story,  nnd  wns  slain 
l>y  Thorkcll,  who  cut  off  his  head.  After  a  brief 
tlgbl,  dining  wldcli  a  great  number  were  killed, 
bis  anny  surrendered  to  Tlioikcll,  wlio,  with  nd- 
ditionnl  forces,  then  rejoined  TlmiUnn  in  Moray, 

In  the  inoaiitiine,  Malcobn  had  levied  forces 
both  in  the  cast  nnd  west  of  Scotland,  and  hnving 
been  joined  by  a  iininber  of  Irish  nnxillaries,  lie 
marched  to  ^vc  battle  to  Tlioriinn.  Tlic  opposbig 
nruiies  met  in  1033,  on  the  soutlicm  shoro  of  the 
Beniily  Frith,  when  Malcolm  wns  totully  defeated, 


MAIXJOUI  III. 


89 


MALCOLM  IIL 


iind,  according  to  soinc  acconnts,  slain.  Others 
state  that  be  escaped  by  flight,  and  died  the  fol- 
lowing jear.  Tliorfinn  thereafter  conquered  the 
n  hole  of  Scotland,  all  the  way  south  to  Fife.  lie 
then  returned  to  hid  ships. 

Tlie  only  portion  of  tlie  territory  of  tlic  uorthem 
Picta  that  had  not  been  snbjected  to  his  power 
was  the  diijttrict  of  Athole  and  the  greater  pni*t  of 
Arg}ie,  and  here  the  Scots,  on  the  deatli  of  Mal- 
coiin,  songlit  for  a  king;  Duncan,  (see  vol.  ii., 
page  82,)  the  son  of  Ci-innn,  abbot  of  Dunkeld, 
and  grandson  of  Malcolm  11.,  being  raised  to  tlio 
vncant  throne. 

MALCOLM  III.,  better  known  in  history  by 
tlio  name  of  Malcolm  Ctcm  Mor^  or  great  head, 
wns  the  elder  of  the  two  sons  of  Duncan,  king  of 
Scots,  by  his  queen,  a  sister  of  Siward,  earl  of 
Xorthnm1)cr1and.  He  wns  bom  about  1024,  be- 
fore his  father  was  called  to  the  throne,  and, 
when  the  latter  in  1039,  after  a  reign  of  six  year?*, 
was  assassinated  by  Macbeth,  Malcolm,  then  only 
fifteen  years  of  a;jo,  fled  to  Cumberland,  whilst 
hU  brother,  Donald  Bane,  took  refuge  in  the  lie- 
bridi'R. 

On  the  ncce.«sion  of  Kdwr.ril  the  Confessor  to 
the  throne  of  England  in  1013,  Malcolm  was 
pl:tced  by  his  father-in-law  Siward,  under  liii* 
protection,  when  he  became  a  resident  at  the 
Kn};lish  coui-t.  In  his  absence  various  attempts 
were  made  bv  his  adherents  in  Scotland  to  dis"- 
|iOs-io*s  Macbeth  of  the  throne,  in  one  of  which 
Malcolm'.s  grandfather,  the  aged  Criuan,  abbot  of 
DiinkcUl,  was  slain  in  10-15.  Nine  years  there- 
after, namely  in  1051,  Malcolm  obtained  from  Ed- 
wanl  the  a.<si<taucc  of  an  Anglo-Saxon  army, 
under  the  command  of  Earl  Siward,  to  support  his 
claims  to  the  crown.  This  force  he  accompanied 
into  Scotland,  and  a  furious  battle  is  said  to  have 
ensued,  in  which  ^lacbeth  lost  3,000  men,  and 
llic  Anglo-Saxiuis  1,500,  including  Oijibcrt,  the 
son  of  Siwanl.  Macbeth  fled  northwanls,  leaving 
Ix;tl«ian  in  posse.s.<ion  of  Siward,  who  placed  Mal- 
colm as  king  over  thnt  district,  where  the  Saxon 
iuouenee  prevailed.  Supported,  however,  by  the 
(\ltic  inhaliitants  of  the  north  of  Scotland,  and 
hv  the  Xorwedaus  of  the  districts  under  the  swav 
of  riuirfinn,  the  |)owerful  earl  of  Orkney,  Macbeth 
was  still  enabled  to  retain  possession  of  the  throne. 


In  1056,  another  English  army  was  sent  to  the 
assistance  of  Malcolm.  At  this  time  Tliorfinn, 
and  the  son  of  the  king  of  Norway,  had  gone  to 
the  south,  with  the  strength  of  the  Norwegian 
power  in  Scotland,  to  attempt  the  subjugation  of 
England,  but,  according  to  the  Irish  annals,  "  God 
was  against  them  in  that  affair,**  and  their  fleet 
was  dis|iersed  in  a  storm.  Macbeth,  deprived  of 
Thorfinn*s  aid,  was  not  able  to  withstand  this  new 
an*ay  against  him.  lie  was  driven  north  to 
Lnmphanan  in  Aberdeenshire,  where  he  was  over- 
taken and  slain,  December  5tli,  1056.  The  at- 
tempt of  his  stepson,  Lnlach,  to  succeed  him  on 
the  throne,  was,  after  a  struggle  of  fonr  months, 
put  an  end  to  by  his  defeat  and  deatli  at  Essie  in 
Strathbogie,  on  the  25th  of  the  following  April. 

Malcolm  was  soon  af^er  crowned  at  Scone. 
Except  the  territories  jiossessed  by  Tliorfinn,  con- 
sisting, besides  Orkney  and  the  Hebrides,  of  the 
nine  districts  or  earldoms  of  Caithness,  Nes.^, 
Sutherland,  Koss,  Moray,  Carmoran,  Buchaii, 
Mar,  and  Angus,  he  was  master  of  all  the  rest  of 
Scotland.  His  first  cai-c  was  to  recompense  those 
who  had  supported  him  in  his  struggle  for  the 
crown.  His  next,  to  recover  those  northern  dis- 
tricts which  still  remained  under  Norwegian  rule. 
The  most  remarkable  reward  which  he  bestowe<l 
was  on  Macduft',  maormor  of  Fife  (sec  art.  Fifk, 
page  2011,  vol.  ii.  of  this  work.)  The  titles  of 
earl  and  tlinnc  which  ^lalcolm  is  said  to  have  in- 
troduced, were  not  known  in  Scotland  till  after 
the  Saxon  colonization  in  Edgar's  time,  the  Nor- 
wegian title  iarl  being  confined  to  the  Orkneys 
and  to  Caithness. 

Sliakspere's  immortal  tragedy  of  Macbeth, 
founded  on  the  fables  of  Boecc  and  the  traditions 
of  the  times,  has  thrown  an  interest  round  the 
character  of  the  principal  personages  concerned  in 
it,  which  could  never  have  been  created  bv  the 
facts  of  sober  histoiT ;  but  there  is  sufilcieiit  in 
the  events  of  Malcolm's  reign  to  render  it  one  of 
the  most  important  \\\  our  annals.  Gratitude  to 
the  king  of  England,  as  well  as  the  unsettled  state 
of  his  own  kingdom,  led  Malcolm  to  cultivate  the 
alliance  of  Edward  the  Confessor,  and  he  paid 
that  monarch  a  vi^it  in  1059.  lie  had  contracted 
an  intimate  friendship  with  To&tig,  who  h.ijl  been 
crer.led  earl  of  Northumberland.     He  wr.s  the  sen 


il 


1 1 


:  I 


li- 


MALCOLM  IIL 


90 


MALCOLM  IIL 


^ 


of  tlio  cclcbmtcd  Karl  GckIwiu  and  brother  of  Ha- 
rold, tbo  last  king  of  Saxon  England.  Tliey 
wcrc  for  a  time  esteemed  ^^  sworn  brothers,**  but  n 
quarrel  having  taken  place  between  tliem  in  lOCl, 
Malcolm  made  a  liostilo  incursion  into  Xortlinni- 
berlaud,  and  after  laying  that  country  waste,  he 
even  violated  the  peace  of  St.  Cnthl>ert,  in  Holy 
Island. 

On  the  death  of  Thorfiun  in  10G4,  his  Norwe- 
gian kingdom  in  Scotland,  which  had  lasted  thirty 
years,  fell  to  pieces,  and  the  difTerent  di.stricts  he 
had  conquered  reverted  to  their  native  chiefs, 
"  who  were  territorially  born  to  nile  over  them," 
{Orhneyinga  Saga).  Malcolm  married  Thorfinn's 
widow,  Ingioborge,  and  by  her  he  had  a  son,  Dun- 
can 11.  (sec  vol.  ii.  p.  83.)  This  marriage,  how- 
ever, does  not  seem  in  the  slightest  to  ha\e  ad- 
vanced his  intei'ests  in  the  north.  Tlic  chiefs  of 
tlie  districts  fonncrly  in  subjection  to  the  Norwe- 
gians refused  to  acknowledge  liis  sovereignty,  and 
chose  a  king  for  themselves,  Donald,  the  son  of 
Malcolm,  niaormor  of  Moray,  and  king  of  Scot- 
land (see  page  87  of  this  volume).  It  took  Mal- 
colm twenty-one  yeai-s  to  reduce  the  northern 
districts  under  his  dominion.  In  1070,  he  is 
said  to  have  obtained  a  victory  over  his  op- 
ponents, but  it  was  not  decisive.  In  1077, 
as  the  Saxon  Chronicle  informs  us,  he  over- 
threw ^laolsneciitan,  maormor  of  Moray,  the 
son  of  Luhich,  and  in  1085  he  got  rid  of  both 
his  rivals  bv  death.  Tlic  Irish  annals  sav 
that  in  that  year,  ^^  Malsnectai,  son  of  Ln- 
lach,  king  of  Moray,  died  peacefully.  Donald, 
son  of  Malcolm,  king  of  Albnn,  died  a  \iuK>nt 
death." 

Long  previous  to  this,  however,  events  in 
connexion  with  England  had  occurred  which  exer- 
cised an  important  influence  on  his  reign,  and 
which  may  now  be  briefly  detailed.  Edward  the 
Confessor  died  5th  January  lOGO,  and  was  suc- 
ceeded by  Harold.  Tostig,  the  brother  of  the 
latter,  had,  from  his  extortions  and  his  vio- 
lence, so  irritated  the  people  of  Northumberland, 
that  they  rose  against  him  and  drove  him  from 
his  earldom.  This  happened  a  few  years  previous 
to  the  death  of  Edward  the  English  king.  Har- 
old fonnd  it  prudent  to  abandon  his  brother's 
caiue,  on  which  Tostig;  became  \m  bitterest  ene- 


my.   He  fii-st  took  refuge  in  Flanden,  with  Bald- 
win, his    father-in-law,    and  Aftcnvarda  Tisited 


William,  duke  of  Normandy.  On  Harold's 
sion,  he  collected  about  sixty  vcsseU  iu  tlie  porti 
of  Flanders,  and  committed  some  depredations  on 
the  south  and  cast  coasts  of  England.  He  next 
sailed  to  North imiberland,  and  was  there  Joined 
by  Harold  Halfager,  by  some  called  Iladradd, 
king  of  Norway,  with  uUO  sail.  Entering  the 
Hnniber,  they  disembarked  the  trooiM,  but  were 
defeated  and  put  to  flight,  when  Tostig  proceeded 
into  Scotland.  It  is  not  known  wliether  Malcolm 
received  him  at  his  court,  or  aided,  or  counte- 
nanced in  any  way,  his  projects  against  liis  bro- 
ther, the  new  king  of  England.  Lord  Ilailcs 
thinks  it  probable  that  he  was  not  received  by 
I  .Malcolm,  but  only  remained  at  anchor  iu  some 
Scottish  bay,  with  the  remains  of  his  fleet,  till 
joined  by  reinforcements  from  Norway.  On  re- 
ceiving these  he  and  Hadrada  again  invaded  Eng- 
land, and  were  both  slain  at  the  battle  of  Stam- 
ford Bridge.  25th  September  lOGC.  The  battle  of 
Hastings  took  place  on  the  14tli  of  the  following 
October,  when  Harold  was  killed  and  AYlUiam  the 
Conqueror  became  king  of  England. 

Two  years  thei*eafter,  Edgar  .\thcling,  grand- 
son of  Edmund  Ironside,  and  the  heir  of  the  Sax- 
on line,  with  his  mother,  the  princess  Agatha, 
and  his  two  sisters,  Margai-et  and  Christina,  ar- 
rived in  Scotland.  In  their  train  came  many 
An^lo-Siixon:<,  and  among  them  Gospatrick  iiud 
other  nobles  of  Northumberland.  Some  anthors 
say  that  it  was  their  intention  to  proceed  to  Hun- 
gary, the  native  country  of  Edgar  and  his  two 
sister?*,  w  hen  they  were  driven  by  a  storm  into 
the  Erith  of  Forth.  ]Malcolni  then  resided  at  the 
tower  which  still  bears  his  name,  on  the  small 
peninsular  mount,  in  the  glen  of  Pittcncricfl^,  near 
Dunferndine,  in  Fifeshire.  On  hearing  of  the 
arrival  of  the  illustrions  strangers,  he  hastened  tg 
iuvite  them  to  his  royal  tower.  There  they  were 
hospitably  entertained,  and  as  ho  was  at  this  time 
a  widower,  there  his  nuptials  with  the  pnnccss 
Margaret  were,  soon  after,  celebi-ated  with  un- 
wonted splendour. 

Margaret  was  one  of  the  most  pious  and  accom- 
plished princesses  of  her  day,  and  her  diaractcr 
and  influence  tended  much  to  improve  and  rcfiue 


ii 


•  I 


/ 


!   i 


MALCOIAIIU. 


91 


MALCOLM  IIL 


tiie  rude  manuers  of  her  hnsband^s  subjects.  On 
her  hosUaiid  himself  her  vhrtaes  and  gentleness 
exereiaed  a  most  sahitafy  power.  We  learn  from 
Tnrgoty  her  confessor  and  biographer,  that  ^falcolm 
liked  aad  disliked  whatever  she  did,  and  tliat  sncli 
was  his  veneration  for  her  worth  and  piety,  that 
bdng  mnable  to  read,  he  was  in  the  habit  of  kiss- 
ing her  mlssala  and  prayer-books,  which,  in  token 
of  ilia  devotion,  he  caused  to  be  splendidly  bound 
and  adorned  witli  gold  and  precious  stones.  She 
persuaded  him  to  pass  the  night  in  fervent  pmycr, 
moch  to  the  astonishment  of  his  courtiers.  *^I 
must  acknowledge,"  adds  Tnrgot,  ^^  that  I  often 
admired  the  works  of  the  divine  mercy,  when  I 
saw  a  king  so  religious,  and  such  signs  of  deep 
compnnction  in  a  laic.** 

Into  the  court  of  Malcolm  she  introduced  nn- 
nsnal  splendour.  She  eucoumgcd  the  importation 
of  rich  dresses  of  various  colours  for  himself  and 
bis  nobles,  which  led  to  the  commencement  of  a 
trading  Intercourse  with  foreign  countries,  and  to 
this  reign  may  be  assigned  the  introduction  of  the 
wearing  of  tartan,  wliich  came  afterwards  to  dis- 
tinguish the  clans.  In  Iier  own  attire  slic  was 
magnificent,  and  slic  increased  tlic  number  of  at- 
tendants on  the  person  of  the  king.  Under  her 
gnidance  the  public  appearances  of  the  sovereign 
were  attended  with  more  parade  and  ceremony 
than  had  ever  previously  been  the  case.  Slie  also 
caused  the  king  to  bo  siMvcd  at  table  in  gold  and 
silver  plate ;  *'  at  least,"  says  Tnrgot,  afraid  of 
going  beyond  the  truth,  '•  the  diishcs  and  ve>:seli? 
were  gilt  or  silvered  over." 

^lalcolm  seems  to  have  intrusted  the  care  of 
matters  respecting  religion  and  the  internal  polity 
of  the  kingdom,  entirely  to  her.  Anxious  for  the 
reformation  of  the  chnrch,  she  held  frequent  con- 
ferences with  the  clergy.  On  one  of  these  occa- 
sions the  pro])er  season  for  celebrating  J^ent  was 
the  subject  of  discussion  between  them.  The 
clergy  knew  no  language  but  the  Gaelic,  and  the 
king,  who  had  s]>ent  fifteen  years  in  England,  and 
nuderstood  the  Saxon  as  well  as  his  own  native 
language,  acted  as  interpreter.  **Tlu*ec  days," 
says  Tnrgot,  "  did  she  employ  the  sword  of  the 
Spirit  in  combating  their  errors.  She  seemed  an- 
other St.  Helena  out  of  the  Scriptures  convincing 
the  Jews."     At  last  the  clergy  yielded  to  her 


views.  She  was  also  the  means  of  inducing  them 
to  restore  the  celebration  of  the  I/>rd*8  supper^ 
which  had  fallen  Into  disnse,  and  of  keeping  sacred 
the  Sabbath,  which  was  scarcely  distingidahablo 
from  any  other  day  of  the  week. 

Malcolm  espoused  the  cause  of  his  brother-in- 
law  with  great  ardour.  In  September  1069,  with 
the  assistance  of  the  Danes,  and  acoompauied  by 
Edgar  Atheling,  the  Anglo-Saxon  and  Northum- 
brian nobles,  led  by  Gospatrick,  invaded  England, 
and  having  taken  the  castle  of  York  by  storm, 
they  put  the  Noiman  garrison  to  the  sword.  In- 
stead, however,  of  following  up  their  soccesa,  the 
Northumbrians  departed  to  their  own  tenitor}-, 
while  the  Danes  retired  to  their  ships.  The  secret 
of  this  change  in  their  pi*oceedings  was  that  Wil- 
liam had  gained  over  Gospatrick,  by  conferring  on 
him  the  earldom  of  Northumberland,  and  had 
bribed  Osbenie  the  Danish  commander,  to  qnlt 
the  English  shores.  Edgar  Atheling  and  his  few 
remaining  adherents  wei'C,  in  consequence,  obliged 
to  retreat  to  Scotland. 

The  following  year,  Malcolm  led  a  numerons 
army  into  England,  by  the  western  borders, 
through  Cuml>crland.  If  it  had  been  intended 
that  he  was  to  support  the  movements  of  Edgar, 
and  his  Danish  and  Northumbrian  allies,  he  came 
too  late.  Nevertheless,  his  operations  were  ener- 
getic enough.  After  wasting  Teesdale,  he  defeat- 
ed an  Anglo-Norman  anny  that  attempted  to  op- 
pose his  progress,  at  a  place  called  Hinderskell, 
penetrated  into  Cleveland,  and  thence  advanced 
into  the  eastern  parts  of  the  diocese  of  Durham, 
spreading  desolation  and  dismay  wherever  he  ap- 
peared, lie  spared  neither  age  nor  sex,  and  even 
the  churches,  with  those  who  had  taken  refuge  in 
them,  were  bunit  to  the  ground.  While  thus  en- 
gaged, ho  received  intelligence  that  his  own  terri- 
tory of  Cumberland  was  laid  waste  by  Gospa- 
trick, who,  as  alread}"  stated,  had  gone  over  to 
King  William's  interest. 

On  his  retuni,  Malcolm  led  captive  into  Scot- 
land such  a  multitude  of  young  men  and  women, 
that,  8a3's  the  English  historian,  Simeon  of  Dm*- 
ham,  "  for  many  years  they  were  to  be  found  in 
every  Scottish  village,  nay,  even  in  every  Scot- 
tish hovel.''  In  1072,  William  retaliated  by  in- 
vading Scotland  both  by  land  and  sea.     He  pene- 


.! 


MALCOLM  in. 


92 


MALCOLM  IIL 


I         ! 


I         ' 


tratcd  AS  far  as  the  Frith  of  Forth,  bat  fiiuliut;  the 
conquest  of  Scotldiid  not  so  easy  a  task  as  had 
been  that  of  Knj^land,  a  peace  was  concloded  at 
Abeniethy,  the  old  PictMi  capital,  wlicn  Malcolm 
consciitcd,  in  accordance  witli  the  feudal  custom 
of  the  Normans,  to  do  homage  for  the  lands  whicli 
he  licld  In  England.  Among  the  hostages  which 
he  gave  on  this  occasion  was  his  eldest  sou,  Dun- 
can, who  thus  had  the  benefit  of  living  many 
years  under  the  Norman  monarchs  of  England. 
hy  this  i>cace,  Malcolm,  in  a  manner,  abandoned 
the  cause  of  his  weak-minded  brother-in-law,  Ed- 
gar Atheling,  and  that  personage,  after  making 
his  i^eaco  with  the  English  monarch,  received 
from  him  a  handsome  pension,  and  went  to  rcsido 
at  Kouen  in  Nurmandy. 

AVith  Edgar  Atheling,  Malcolm  had  ivfnsed  to 
give  up  to  the  English  king,  the  exiled  nobles  and 
others  who  had  taken  refuge  in  Scotland.  Willi 
the  double  view  of  strengthening  his  power  b}*  the 
influx  of  so  nnny  brave  and  skilful  strangers,  and 
of  bcnofiling  his  subjects  by  the  introduction 
among  them  (»f  those  who  possessed  a  higher  civ- 
ilization than,  in  their  rude  and  unsettled  state, 
thoy  had  ever  known,  he  even  encouraged  them  to 
come  into  his  kingdom.  Annmg  them  were  iH*r- 
sons  of  Norman  as  well  as  of  Anglo-Saxon  line- 
age, who  had  lied  from  the  exactions  and  tyrainiy 
of  the  CoiKpieror,  or  had  been  refused  pi-oniised 
rewards  for  their  services.  Malcolm  received  and 
welcomed  them  all,  and  to  these  Norman  kni;;hts 
and  advent [irere  who  thus  came  flocking  across 
the  border,  he  gave  lands  and  heritages,  to  induce 
them  to  remain.  'Ihey  thus  became  tlie  progeni- 
tors .  f  many  of  our  n;>ble  families.  Thousands  of 
the  poorer  English,  ton,  to  escape  the  grinding 
oppressions  of  tlieir  Nurniaii  rulers,  souglit  a  re- 
fuge in  Scotland,  some  even  selling  Ihenioelves  for 
slaves,  to  obtain  a  subsistence. 

Go.-^patrick,  having  incurred  the  suspicions  of 
William,  was  deprived  of  the  earldom  of  North- 
umberland, and  returning  into  Scotland,  succeeded 
in  being  reconciled  to  Alalcolm,  from  whom  he 
obtained  the  manor  of  Dnnbar,  and  other  lands  in 
the  ^lerse  and  Lothian,  lie  was  the  ancestor  of 
the  earls  of  Dunbar  and  March.  In  1070,  in  the 
absence  of  William  in  Nuraiandy,  Malcolm  again 
invaded  Northumberland,  and  wasted  the  con  .trv 


as  far  as  tho  river  Tyno.  Tlio  following  year, 
llobert,  the  eldest  son  of  William,  entered  Soot- 
land,  but  was  obliged  to  retreat  To  check  tho 
incursions  of  the  Scots  into  England,  he  erected  a 
fortress  near  the  T^nie,  at  a  place  called  Moncas- 
ter  or  Monkchester,  from  its  being  the  residence 
of  monks,  but  the  name  of  which  was  thereafter 
in  consequence  changed  to  Newcastle. 

At  the  recpicst  of  his  queen,  who  has  been  can- 
onized in  the  Romish  Calendar  as  St.  Marigarct, 
and  of  her  confessor,  Turgot,  Malcolm  founded 
and  endowed  a  monastery,  in  the  vicinity  of  his 
n*sidence,  for  thirteen  Culdees,  which,  with  its 
church  or  cha])el,  was  dedicated  to  the  Tloly 
Trinity.  This  was  the  origin  of  the  abbey  of 
Dunfermline. 

The  latter  portion  of  MaIcolm*s  raign  was  occu- 
pied in  a  struggle  with  William  Uufus,  the  son 
and  snccessor  of  the  Conqueror  on  the  throne  of 
England.  Cumberland  and  his  other  English 
possessions  having  Ix'cn  withheld  from  him  by 
the  English  king,  Malcolm,  assembling  his  forces, 
bi*oko  across  the  borders,  in  May  1091,  when 
he  penetrated  as  fin-  as  Chester,  on  the  Wear; 
but  on  the  a])pi*oach  of  the  English,  with  a 
superior  force,  he  prudently  Retreated  without 
hazaiiling  a  battle,  and  thus  secured  his  booty 
and  his  captives.  In  the  autumn  of  the  same  year, 
Itufiis  led  a  numerous  anny  into  Scotland.  Mal- 
colm advanced  to  meet  him.  l\y  the  intercession, 
however,  of  Edgar  Atheling,  who  accompanied  the 
Scottisli  army,  anil  of  lUfbert,  duke  of  Normandy, 
the  eldest  brother  of  the  English  king,  a  [leacc  was 
concluded,  without  the  risk  of  a  battle.  Unfits  con- 
senting to  restore  to  Malcolm  twelve  manors  in 
England  which  he  had  held  under  the  Conqueror, 
and  to  make  an  annual  payment  to  him  of  twelve 
marks  of  gold,  and  Malcolm,  on  his  part,  agreeing 
to  do  homage  for  the  same,  under  the  same  tennrc 
of  feudal  service  as  before. 

In  1092,  William  Ilnfus  began  to  fortify  the 
citv  of  Carlisle  and  to  build  a  castle  there.    As 

•r 

this  was  an  encroachment  on  Malcolm^s  territory 
of  Cumberland  he  remonstrated  against  it,  when 
the  English  king  proi)osed  a  personal  interview  on 
the  subject.  Malcolm,  in  consequence,  proceeded 
to  Gloucester,  24th  August  1093.  As  a  prelinu- 
nary  measure  Kiifns  required  him  again  to  do 


I: 


.\ 


MALCOLM  Iir. 


93 


MALCOLM  II L 


Itomago  to  hiin  there,  in  presence  of  the  Engli^th 
iMrons.  Tills  Malcohn  abiiohitely  refused,  but  al- 
though he  had  done  homage  to  Rnfus  for  his  Eng- 
li;»1i  lands  not  much  above  a  year  before  at  Abcr- 
nethy,  Le  now  offcixd  to  do  it,  as  formerly  had 
oeen  the  custom,  on  the  frontiers  of  the  two  king- 
doms, and  in  presence  of  the  chief  men  of  both. 
Some  of  his  conncillora  advised  Rufus  to  detain 
the  Scottish  king,  now  that  lie  had.  him  in  his 
power,  till  lie  had  complied  with  his  request ;  but ' 
alUiongli  he  hnd  the  grace  to  reject  tliis  base  pro- 
lK)8al,  it  was  with  the  most  unkingly  contumely 
that  he  dismissed  him  fi*om  his  court.  Malcolm 
returned  home,  burning  with  ludigiintion  nnd 
vowing  revenge,  and  hastily  assembling  a  tumul- 
tuous and  undisciplined  army,  he  burst  into  Nortli- 
umbcrland,  which  he  wasted,  then,  sweeping  on- 
wards to  Alnwick,  he  laid  siege  to  the  ensile,  lie 
bad  not  been  many  days  there,  however,  before 
he  was  suqwed  by  Robert  de  Moiibray,  at  the 
head  of  a  strong  Noimnn  nnd  English  force.  A 
fierce  engngement  ensued,  when  ^lalcolm  was 
slain,  with  his  eldest  .«on.  This  fatal  fight  took 
jilacc  tSth  Xovembcr  1003.  Malcolm's  fourth 
son,  Edgar,  who  was  nbo  in  the  battle,  escaped,  and 
three  d.iys  aAer  reached  the  castle  of  Ediuburgli, 
wiierc  his  mother  lay  dying.  On  his  appearance, 
she  in  a  fmnt  voice  eagerly  enquired,  **  How  fares 
it  with  your  father,  and  your  brotiier,  Edward?" 
The  youth  was  silent,  **I  know  all,**  she  cried; 
'•  I  adjure  von  b}*  this  liolv  cross,  and  bv  vonr  filial 
afTection,  tliat  you  tell  me  the  truth."  lie  an- 
swcreil,  *'your  husband  and  your  son  are  both 
slain."  Raising  her  eyes  and  hands  to  heaven, 
the  dying  queen  said,  '*  Praise  and  blessing  be  to 
thee,  Almighty  (lod,  that  thou  hast  been  pleased 
to  ni-jke  me  endure  so  bitter  anguish  in  the  hour 
of  my  departure,  thereby,  as  I  trust,  to  purify  me, 
ill  some  measure,  from  the  corruption  of  my  sins. 
And  thou,  I^rd  Jesus  Christ,  who,  through  the 
will  of  the  Father,  hast  enlivened  the  world  by 
thy  death,  O  deliver  me!"  and  straightway  ex- 
]»ircd.  So  great  was  t!ie  benevolence  of  this  truly 
excellent  princess  that  she  secretly  paid  the  ran- 
som of  many  of  her  Saxon  countrymen  in  bondage 
ill  Scotland,  when  she  found  their  condition  too 
grievous  to  be  bonic. 
'ilic  character  of  Malcolm  Canntorc  is  that  of 


an  able,  wise,  and  energetic  monarch,  who,  after 
subjecting  to  his  sovereignty  the  various  rude  and 
discordant  tribes  that  inhabited  his  kingdom,  was 
successful  in  maintaining  its  independence  nnini- 
paired  during  a  long  reign  of  37  years,  nnd  that 
against  two  such  formidable  opponents  as  Williuiu 
the  Conqueror  and  his  son,  William  Rufiis.  As 
an  instance  of  his  personal  intrepidity  the  follow- 
ing incident  is  related :  Having  received  int(>Hi- 
gence  that  one  of  his  nobles  had  formed  a  design 
against  his  life,  he  took  an  opportunit}*,  when  out 
hunting,  of  leading  him  into  a  solitaiy  place, 
then,  unsheathing  his  sword,  he  said,  ^'  Here  we 
are  alone,  and  nrmed  alike.  You  seek  my  life. 
Take  it."  The  astonished  noble,  overcome  bv 
this  address,  threw  himself  at  the  feet  of  the  king, 
and  implored  his  clemency,  which  was  readily 
granted. 

The  removal  of  his  court  from  Abernethv  to 
Dunfermline,  about  the  year  10C3,  and  the  en- 
couragement which,  after  the  Norman  onqnest  of 
England  and  his  marriage  with  Queen  Margaret, 
he  gave  to  the  immigration  of  Anglo-Saxons  and 
Norman  adventurers  into  the  kingdom,  had  the 
effect  of  causing  the  Gaelic  population  to  retire 
inland  from  the  plains,  and  to  divide  themselves 
into  clans  and  tribes,  with  the  institution  of  sepa- 
rate chiefs,  nnd  the  preservation  of  all  those  feelings 
and  usages  which  long  kept  them  a  peculiar  and 
distinct  race  from  the  other  inhabitants  of  Scot- 
land. In  the  reign  of  Malcolm  Canmore,  the 
whole  of  the  country  south  of  the  Forth  was  pos- 
sessed by  the  Scots,  and  those  who  spoke  the 
Saxon  language,  while  the  Celtic  portion  of  the 
nation  occupied  the  remaining  districts.  Tena- 
cious of  their  native  language  and  ancient  customs, 
the  l-.itter  viewed  with  equal  scorn  nnd  disgust  the 
introduction  of  foreign  manners  nnd  races  into  the 
kingdom,  and  hence  began  that  long  struggle  be- 
tween the  Scottish  nnd  Celtic  communities  w!iich 
lasted  for  nearly  seven  hundred  years,  and  was 
only  terminated  on  the  field  of  Culloden  in  1746. 
"The  people,"  says  General  Stewart  of  Garth, 
refomng  to  the  Giielic  inhabitants  {Sketches,  vol. 
i.  p.  20),  "  now  beyond  the  reach  of  the  laws, 
became  turbulent  and  fierce,  revenging  in  person 
those  wrongs  for  which  the  administrators  of  the 
laws  were  too  distant  and  too  feeble  to  alTurd  re- 


• 


.! 


;i 

M 


ll 


I  i 


I- 


I  ; 
I  ■ 


i! 


ii 


I 


I      I 


l^IALCOL:i[  IV. 


94 


MALCOLM  IV. 


ii 


dress.  Tliencc  arose  the  iiistitntioii  of  cliicfi*,  who 
nntnrally  bccnnie  the  judges  and  arbiters  in  the 
quarrels  of  their  clansmen  and  followci-s,  and  who 
wcro  snrronnded  by  men  devoted  to  the  defence  of 
their  rights,  their  property,  and  their  power ;  and 
accordingly  the  chiefs  established  within  their  own 
territories  a  jurisdiction  almost  wholly  indepen- 
dent of  their  liege  lord." 

Malcolm  had  by  his  queen,  Margaret,  six  soui* 
and  two  daughters.  The  sons  were,  IMward, 
who  was  slain  with  his  father  nenr  Alnwick ; 
Eihelred,  who  was  bred  a  chuix'hmau  and  became 
Culdee  abbot  of  Dunkeld;  Edmund ;  Edgar,  Alex- 
ander, and  David.  'J'lie  three  last  were  succes- 
sively kings  of  Scotland.  The  elder  daughter, 
^faud,  man'ied  Henry  T.  of  England,  a  maninge 
which  united  the  Snxon  and  the  Norman  dvnas- 
ties,  and  ^Liry,  the  younger,  became  the  wife  of 
Eustace,  count  of  Ht)uK»;:ne. 

MALCOLM  IV.,  King  of  Scots,  born  in  1111, 
was  the  son  of  Prince  Ilcnrv,  son  of  David  L,  and 
succeeded  his  grnndfather,  ^Fay  24,  ll.'iG,  a  year 
after  his  father's  death,  being  then  only  twelve 
vears  old.  Tlie  same  wnr  he  was  crowned  at 
Scone.  He  acquired  the  name  of  Malcolm  the 
^Liiden,  either  from  the  effeminato  expression  ot 
his  features,  or  from  the  softness  of  hisdispossiiion. 
In  the  following  November  Somerled,  thane  of 
Argyle,  invaded  the  Scottish  coasts,  at  the  head  of 
all  the  fierce  tribes  of  the  isles.  The  accession  of 
a  new  king,  and  he  a  mere  boy,  appears  to  have 
been  deemed  by  this  formidable  chief  a  favourable 
time  to  endeavour  to  advance  the  cause  of  his 
grandsons,  the  sons  of  ihe  monk  Wimond  (.-ee 
vol.  ii.  p.  24)  otherwise  Malcolm  ISIaclleth,  who 
claimed  the  earldom  of  Moray,  and  who  had  been 
imprisoned  in  Iloxburgh  castle  by  David  L  as  an 
Impostor.  In  1150,  Donald,  a  son  of  Wimond, 
was  discovered  skulking  atAVhithorn  in  Gallowny, 
and  sent  to  share  the  captivity  of  his  fa i her. 
After  harassing  the  country  for  some  years,  So- 
merled was  at  last  forced  back  to  his  own  territo- 
ries, by  Gilchrist,  earl  of  Angus,  and  a  treaty  of 
peace  was  concluded  with  him  in  1157,  which  was 
considered  of  so  much  importance  at  the  time  as 
to  form  an  epoch  in  the  dating  of  Scottish  charters. 

Malcolm  had  no  sooner  accommodated  matters 
with  Somerled,  than  a  demand  was  made  upon 


him  by  Ilcnry  L  of  England,  for  those  pflrts  of 
the  English  territory  which  tho  Scottish  kings 
held  in  that  kingdom.  On  this  account  Malcolm 
had  an  interview  with  Henry  at  Chester,  when  he 
did  homage  to  him  for  the  same,  as  h!s  prede- 
cessors had  done,  '^resen-ing  all  his  dignities." 
Malcolm  was  then  only  sixteen  years  of  ago,  and 
Henry,  taking  advantage  of  his  Inexperioncc, 
easily  prevailed  upon  the  youthful  monarch,  to 
surrender  to  him  Cumberland  and  Nortlmmber- 
land,  at  the  same  time  bestowing  npon  him  the 
earldom  of  Huntington.  Fonlnn  says  that  the 
English  king  had,  on  this  occasion,  comipted  his 
councilloi-s. 

In  1158,  desirous  of  obtaining  the  lionoar  of 
knighthood  from  tho  king  of  England,  Malcolm 
repaired  to  Henry's  court  at  Carlisle,  for  the  pur- 
pose, but  Henry  refused  to  bestow  npon  him  an 
honour,  probably  on  account  of  his  youth,  which 
was  highly  j)nzed  in  that  age,  and  Malcolm  re- 
turned home  greatly  disappointed.  In  the  follow- 
ing year,  ]Sr«lco!m  passed  over  to  France,  where 
the  English  monarch  then  was,  and  after  serx'ing 
under  his  biunur  he  was  at  length  knighted  by 
him.  The  Sc«»ts,  indignant  at  his  subserviency  to 
Henry,  and  apprehensive  that  he  would  become 
the  mere  vassal  of  England,  sent  a  deputation  to 
remonstrate  with  Malcolm  on  his  conduct.  ""We 
will  not,*'  said  they,  *'  have  Hcniy  to  rule  over 
us."  ^lalcfilm,  ill  consequence,  hastened  back  to 
Scotland,  and  on  his  arrival  assembled  n  parlia- 
ment at  Pertli. 

The  tierce  nobles  who,  as  governors  of  their  re- 
spective provinces,  were  bound  to  maintain  tho 
independence  of  the  kingdom,  availed  themselves 
of  this  opportunity  to  attempt  to  seize  the  king*8 
IK-rson.  Accordingly,  Ferquhard,  earl  of  Strath- 
ern,  and  five  other  earls  assaulted  the  tower  in 
which  Malcolm  had  taken  refuge,  but  were  re- 
l>ulsed.  On  the  interference  of  the  clergy,  a  re- 
conciliation took  place  between  the  young  king 
and  his  offended  nobles. 

Fortunately  for  ^Falcolm  an  occasion  almost 
immediately  occurred  to  give  employment  to  them 
and  their  followers.  Fergus,  lord  of  Gallowny, 
the  most  potent  feudatory  of  the  Scottish  crown, 
and  the  son-in-law  of  Ilcnry  L,  threw  off  his  al- 
legiance, and  stirred  np  an  insnrrection  against 


/ 


/ 


MALCOLM  IV. 


95 


SIR  PULTENEY. 


Malcolm.  At  the  head  of  a  powerful  ami}',  the 
king  entered  Galloway,  and  though  twice  driven 
back,  he  at  length  succeeded,  in  1160,  in  over- 
powering its  rebellious  lord.  He  then  compelled 
Fergus  to  resign  his  lonlship,  and  to  give  his  son, 
Uchtrcd,  as  an  hostnge  for  the  peace  concluded 
between  them  ;  after  which  Fergus  retired  to  the 
abbey  of  Holyrood,  where  he  died  of  a  broken 
heart. 

In  1161,  a  still  more  formidable  insurrection 
broke  out  among  the  inhabitants  of  the  province 
of  ^lorny,  which  comprehended  all  what  is  now 
Elginshire,  all  Nairnshire,  a  considerable  i)nrt  of 
Banffshire,  and  the  half  of  continental  Invcrncss- 
shire.  The  pretext  was  the  attempt  on  Malcolm's 
part  to  intrude  the  Anglo-Norman  jurisdiction 
ii|)on  their  Celtic  customs,  and  the  settling  of 
Flemish  colonists  among  them.  The  men  of  Mo- 
r^y  were  never  wanting  in  an  excuse  for  rising  in 
arms.  Tliey  were  the  most  nnndy  and  rebellions 
of  all  the  subjects  of  the  sovereigns  of  Scotland. 
Acconliug  to  Fordun,  **  no  solatiums  or  largesses 
could  allure,  or  treaties  or  oaths  bind  them  to 
their  duty."  On  this  occasion  the  insurgents  laid 
waste  the  neighbouring  counties,  and  so  regard- 
less were  thev  of  the  roval  authority  that  thev 
actnally  hanged  the  heralds  who  wei*e  sent  to 
snmmon  them  to  lay  down  their  arms,  ^falcolni 
despatche<l  against  them  a  strong  force  under  that 
Earl  Gilchrist  who  had  been  sent  against  Somer- 
Icd,  but  he  was  routed,  and  forced  to  recross  the 
Grampians. 

Tliis  defeat  roused  nil  the  energy  of  ^lalcolnrs 
character,  and  witli  tlie  whole  array  of  the  king- 
dom ho  marched  against  tiiem.  He  found  them 
assembled  on  the  muirof  Urqnhart,  near  the  Spey, 
ready  to  give  him  battle.  A  Her  crossing  that 
river,  Malcolm's  nobles,  seeing  their  strength,  ad- 
vised him  to  negotiate  with  the  rebels,  and  to  pro- 
mise them  that  if  they  submitted,  their  lives  would 
be  spared.  The  Moraymen  accepted  the  offer, 
the  king  kept  his  word,  and  now  occurred  the  ex- 
traordinary circumstance  of  different  parts  of  the 
country  exchanging  their  populations.  To  put  an 
end,  at  once  and  for  ever,  to  the  frequent  insur- 
rections which  occurred  in  the  province,  Malcolm 
onlained  that  all  who  had  been  engaged  in  the 
rebcUioa  should  remove  out  of  Moray,  and  that 


their  plac4»s  should  be  supplied  with  people  from 
other  parts  of  the  kingdom.  In  consequence, 
some  transplanted  themselves  into  the  northern, 
but  the  greater  number  into  the  southern  districts, 
as  far  as  Galloway.  The  older  historians  say  that 
the  Moraymen  wei*o  almost  totally  cut  off  in  an 
obstinate  battle,  and  strangers  put  in  their  place, 
but  this  statement  is  at  variance  with  the  register 
of  Paisley.  Among  the  new  families  brought  in 
to  replace  those  who  were  removed,  the  principal 
were  the  powerfid  earls  of  Fife  and  Stratheni, 
with  the  Comyns  and  Bissets,  and  among  those 
who  remained  were  the  Inneses,  the  Calders  and 
others.  After  thus  removing  the  rebels,  and  colo- 
nizing the  province  with  a  quieter  race,  Malcolm, 
as  well  as  his  successor,  "William  the  Lion,  appear 
to  have  frequently  resided  in  Moray,  for  from  In- 
verness, Elgin,  and  various  other  of  its  localities, 
sever.il  of  their  charters  are  dated. 

In  July  lies,  Malcolm  did  homage  to  the  king 
of  England  and  his  infant  son  at  "Woodstock. 
The  following  year  he  founded  and  richly  endow- 
ed an  abbey  for  Cistertian  monks  at  Conpar- 
Angus.  lie  had  previously,  in  1156,  founded  the 
priory  of  Emanuel  near  Linlithgow,  for  nuns  of 
the  same  order. 

In  1161,  Somerled,  the  ambitious  and  powerful 
lord  of  the  Isles,  made  another  and  a  last  attempt 
to  overthrow  the  king's  authority.  Assembling  a 
numerous  anny  from  Argyle,  Ireland,  and  the 
Isles,  he  sailed  up  the  Clyde  with  160  galleys,  and 
landed  his  forces  near  Kenfrew,  threatening,  as 
some  of  the  old  clironiders  inform  us,  to  make  a 
conquest  of  the  whole  of  Scotland.  Here,  accord- 
ing to  the  usual  accounts,  he  was  slain,  with  his 
son,  Gillecolane,  after  a  battle,  in  which  he  was 
defeated  by  an  inferior  force  of  the  Scots.  Tradi- 
tion, however,  states  that  he  was  assassinated  in 
his  tent  by  an  individual  in  whom  he  placed  con- 
fidence, and  that  his  followers,  deprived  of  their 
leader,  hastened  back  to  the  Isles,  without  haz- 
arding an  engagement. 

Malcolm  died  at  Jedburgh,  of  a  lingering  dis- 
ease, December  9,  1165,  at  the  early  age  of  24, 
and  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  William,  styled 
William  the  Lion. 

^lALCOL^r,  Sin  Pcltexey,'  a  distinguished 
navarofficer,  an  elder  brother  of  Sir  John  Mai- 


:i 


.  I 


■  I 


-rzrzr, 


»iAix:!Our, 


9G 


SIR  PULl'ENEY. 


l! 


■  I 


colni,  tlie  subject  of  the  following  notice,  was  bom 
at  Douglan,  near  Lnngliolin,  Dumfries-shire,  Feb- 
ruary 20,  17C8.  His  father,  George  Malcohn, 
farmer,  Burufoot,  had,  by  liLs  wife,  the  daiiglitcr  of 
Jaincs  Pasley,  Kstq.of  Craig  hikI  Burn,  17  children. 
Bobert,  the  eldest  sou,  at  Iiis  deatli  was  high  in  the 
civil  service  of  tlic  East  India  Company ;  Jainos, 
Pulteney,  and  John,  tlic  next  three  sons,  were 
honoui*ed  with  the  insignia  of  l^niglits  commandci's 
of  tlic  Batli  at  the  same  time,  the  former  for  his 
distlngui.ihcd  services  in  Spain  and  Nortli  America, 
wlicn  commanding  a  battalion  of  royal  marines, 
and  Sir  John,  for  his  military  and  diplomatic  ser- 
vices in  India.  The  younger  sons  werc  Gilbert, 
rector  of  Todenham  ;  David,  in  a  commercial 
house  in  India  ;  and  Admiral  Sir  Charles  Mal- 
colm, of  whom  a  memoir  is  given  at  page  99. 

Pnltoncy  enlcred  the  navy,  October  20,  1778, 
as  .1  midsihipnian  on  board  the  Sybillc  frigate,  com- 
manded by  his  maternal  uncle,  Captain  Pasley, 
with  whom  he  sjiiled  to  the  Capo  of  Good  Hope ; 
and  on  his  return  thence,  removed  with  him  into 
the  Jupiter,  of  which  he  was  appointed  lieutenant 
in  March  1783.  At  the  commencement  of  the 
French  revolutionary  war,  he  was  first  lieiitcnant 
of  the  Penelope  at  Jamaica  ;  in  which  ship  he  as- 
.*<isted  at  the  capture  of  the  Inconstante  frigate, 
and  (jaelon  corvette,  both  of  which  he  conducted 
to  Port  Boyal  in  safety.  He  also  commanded  the 
lioats  of  the  Penelo|>e  in  several  severe  conflicts, 
and  succeeded  in  cutting  out  many  vessels  from 
the  i>orts  of  St.  Domingo.  In  April  1791  he  was 
made  a  commander,  when  he  joined  the  Jack  Tar; 
and  upon  Cape  Nichola  Mole  being  taken  jvosscs- 
sion  of  by  the  British,  he  had  the  direction  of  the 
seamen  and  marines  landed  to  garrison  that  place. 
In  October  179-1  he  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of 
post  captain,  and  the  following  month  was  ap- 
pointed to  the  Fox  frigate,  with  which  he  subse- 
quently served  in  the  North  Sea.  Having  pro- 
ceeded with  a  convoy  to  the  East  Indies,  he  cap- 
tured on  that  station  La  Modeste,  of  20  guns.  In 
1797  the  duke  of  Wellington,  then  Colonel  Wel- 
leslc}',  of  the  3i5d  regiment,  took  a  passage  with 
Captain  Malcolm,  in  the  Fox,  from  the  Cape  of 
Good  Hope  to  Bengal.  He  afterwards  served  in 
the  Suffolk,  the  Victorious,  and  the  Royal  Sover- 
eign; and  in  March  1805  was  apjiointed  to  the 


Donegal,  in  \>hich  he  nccompnnicd  Ijord  Xclaou 
in  the  memorable  pnrsuit  of  tlio  combiucd  squa- 
drons of  Franco  and  Spain  to  the  West  ludlesl 

On  his  return  to  the  Channel,  Captain  Mal- 
colm was  sent  to  reinforce  Admiral  CoHiiigwood 
off  Cadiz.  Four  days  previous  to  the  battle  of 
Trafalgar,  the  Donegal,  being  short  of  water,  and 
gi'catly  in  need  of  a  refit,  was  onlered  to  Glbrnl- 
tar.  On  the  20ih  Octol»er  Captain  Malcohn  re- 
ceived information  that  the  enemy's  fleets  were 
quitting  Cadiz.  His  ship  was  then  iu  the  Mole 
nearly  dismantled,  but  by  the  greatest  exertions 
he  succeeded  in  getting  her  ont  before  night,  ami 
on  the  2dd  joined  Admiral  Collingwood  In  time  to 
C'ipture  El  It'iyo,  a  Spanish  three-decker.  To- 
wards the  close  of  1805  the  Donegal  accompanied 
Sir  John  Duckworth  to  the  West  Indies,  In  quest 
of  a  Fi-ench  squadron  that  had  sailetl  for  that 
quarter;  and  in  the  battle  fought  off  St.  Domingo, 
Fcbrnnry  6,  180G,  Captain  Malcolm  greatlj*  dis- 
tinguished himself.  On  his  i-etuni  to  England, 
he  was  honoured  with  a  gold  medal  for  his  con- 
duct in  the  action,  and,  in  common  with  the  other 
oflicei*s  of  the  squadron,  received  the  thanks  of 
both  houses  of  pnrliameut. 

In  the  summer  of  1808  he  escorted  the  army 
under  CJcneral  Welicslcy  from  Cork  to  Portngnl, 
and  for  his  exertions  in  disembarking  the  troops, 
ho  iTceivcd  the  thanks  of  Sir  John  Moore  and  ^r 
Arthur  Wcllcsley.  The  Donegal  was  snbsequent- 
Iv  attaclicd  to  the  Channel  fleet  under  the  orders 

• 

of  Sir  John  Gambler ;  and  after  the  discomfiture 
of  the  French  ships  in  Aix  Roads  in  April  1809, 
Captain  Malcolm  was  sent  with  a  squadron  on  a 
cruise.  He  next  commanded  the  blockade  of 
Cherbourg,  on  which  station  the  ships  under  his 
oiilers  captuiTd  a  number  of  privateers,  and  on 
one  occasion  drove  two  frigates  on  shore  near 
Cape  La  llogue.  In  1811  the  Donegal  was  paid 
off,  when  Cai)tain  Malcolm  was  appointed  to  the 
Royal  Oak,  a  new  74,  in  which  he  continued  off 
Cherbourg  until  March  1812,  when  he  removed 
into  the  San  Josef,  110  guns,  as  captain  of  the 
Channel  fleet  under  I^rd  Keith.  In  the  subse- 
quent August  he  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  col- 
onel of  marines,  and  December  4, 1813,  was  ap- 
lK)inted  i-ear-admiral.  In  June  1814  he  hoisted 
his  flag  in  the  Royal  Oak,  ond  proceeded  to  North 


II 


r 


■I 


I 


/ 


MALCOLM, 


Oft 


SIR  JOHN. 


I. 

I  ■ 


ii 


Dr.  Gilbert  Faslcy,  and  assiduously  applied  him- 
self to  the  stady  of  the  manners  and  lanj^ages  of 
tlio  East.  The  abilities  which  he  displayed  at  the 
siege  of  Seringapatam,  in  1792,  attracted  the  notice 
of  Lord  Comwallis,  who  appointed  him  Pci-sian 
interpreter  to  a  body  of  British  troops  in  the  ser- 
vice of  one  of  the  native  princes.  In  1794,  in 
consequence  of  liad  healtli,  he  revisited  his  native 
country;  but  the  following  year  ho  roturncd  to 
India  on  the  staff  of  Field-mni-shal  Sir  Alured 
Clarke ;  and  for  his  conduct  at  the  taking  of  the 
Cape  of  Good  Hope,  he  received  the  public  thanks 


view  of  endeavonring  to  oouutenict  the  designs  of 
Napoleon,  who  then  threatened  an  invasion  of 
India  from  that  quarter.  In  this  difficnlt  embassy, 
however,  he  did  not  wholly  succeed.  lie  retnmed 
in  the  following  Angnst,  and  soon  after  proceeded 
to  his  residency  at  Mysore.  Eariy  in  1810,  owing 
to  a  change  in  the  policy  of  tlie  Persian  coort,  he 
was  again  api>ointi>d  ambassador  to  Persia,  where 
lie  remained  till  the  nomination  of  Sir  Grore  Onse- 
loy  as  minister  p1eni|)otentiary.  On  his  dcpartore 
the  shall  conferred  upon  him  the  order  of  the  Sun 
and  Lion,  presented  liiin  with  a  valnablo  sword. 


of  that  officer.    In  1797  he  obtained  a  captain's    and  made   him  a  khan    and   sepahdar   of  the 

commission.    In  1799  he  was  ordered  to  join  tlic    empire. 

In  1812  Colonel  ^lalcolm  again  visited  England, 
and  soon  after  his  arrival  I'cceived  the  hononr  of 
knijj^litliood.  The  same  year  lie  published,  in  one 
voliiino,  *  A  Sketch  of  the  Sikhs,  a  singular  Na- 


Nizam's  contingent  force  in  the  war  against  Tip- 
poo  Saib,  with  the  chief  command  of  the  infantry, 
in  which  post  he  continued  till  the  sniToudcr  of 
Seringapatam,  where  he  highly  distingiiishod  him- 
self, lie  was  then  appointodjuint  seciotary,  with  '  tion  in  the  province  of  the  Punjanb,  in  India.* 
Captain,  afterwards  Sir  Tlioinas  I^Iunn>,  to  the  |  In  li^Ui  appeared  his  *Iliston'  of  Persia,'  in  2 
commissionors  for  settlin;?  tlio  now  govrninicnt  of  ;  voL«.  4to,  which  is  valuable  from  the  infonnatiou 
Mvijoiv.    In  the  same  yoar  ln^  was  soiit  by  Lord    it  contains,  taken  from  oriental  sonrces,  reganling 


Wellesley  on  a  diplomatic  mission  to  Persia,  a 
conntrv  which  no  British  ambassador  had  visited 
since  the  reign  of  Queen  Klizabcth. 

Captain  Malcolm  returned  to  Bombay  in  1801, 
when  he  was  appointed  i>rivate  secretary  to  the 
govemor-genoral',  who  .stated  to  the  secret  com- 
mittee that  ^^he  had  succeeded  in  establishing  a 
connection  with  the  actual  government  of  the  Per- 
sian empire^  which  promised  to  British  natives  in 
India  political 'and  commereial  advantages  of  the 
most  important  description."  In  January  1802 
he  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  major ;  and  on 
the  death  of  the  Persian  ambassador,  who  was 
accidentally  shot  at  Bombay,  he  was  again  sent 
to  Persia  to  make  the  necessary  arrangements  for 
the  renewal  of  the  embassy.  In  February  1803 
he  was  appointed  Resident  with  the  rajah  of  My- 
sore ;  and  in  December  1804  he  attained  the  rank 
of  lieutenant-colonel.  In  June  1805  he  was  no- 
minated chief  agent  of  the  governor-general,  in 
which  capacity  he  continued  to  act  till  March 
1806,  during  which  period  he  concluded  several 
important  treaties  with  native  princes. 

On  the  arrival  in  India,  in  April  1808,  of  the 
new  governor-general,  lA>rd  Minto,  he  dispatched 
Colonel  ^lalcolm  on  a  mission  to  Persia,  with  the 


the  religion,  goveniment,  mannei-s,  and  customs  of 
the  inhabitants  of  that  country,  in  ancient  as  well 
as  ill  modern  times.  He  returned  to  India  in 
1817,  and  on  his  anival  was  attaclied,  as  politicid 
agent  of  the  governor-general,  to  the  force  nudcr 
Sir  Thomas  liislop  in  the  Deccau.  With  the 
rank  of  brigadier-general,  he  was  appointed  to  the 
command  of  the  third  division  of  the  army,  and 
greatly  distinguished  himself  in  the  decisive  battle 
of  Mehidpoor,  when  the  army  under  Mulhar  Rao 
Ilolkar  was  completely  routed.  For  his  skill  and 
valour  on  this  occasion  he  received  the  thanks  of 
the  house  of  commons,  on  the  motion  of  Mr. 
Canning,  who  declared  that  "  the  name  of  this 
gallant  officer  will  be  remembered  in  India  as  long 
as  the  British  flag  is  hoisted  in  that  country.** 
1 1  is  conduct  was  also  noticed  by  the  prince  regent, 
who  expressed  his  regret  that  the  circumstance  of 
his  not  Iiaving  attained  the  rank  of  major-general 
prevented  his  being  tlien  created  a  knight  grand 
cross,  which  honour,  however,  was  conferred  on 
him  in  1821. 

After  the  termination  of  the  war  with  the  Mah- 
rattas  and  Pindairies,  he  received  the  military  and 
political  command  of  Malwa,  and  succeeded  In 
establishing  the  Company's  authority,  both  in 


ll 


MALCOLM. 


100 


MALIJIT. 


olHccr,  tho  tenth  son  of  Ooor^^c  Malcolm  of  Bum- 
foot,  and  yonngcst  brother  of  the  pi*cce{rui;j,  was 
born  at  Banifoot,  Dnnifrins-sliirc,  in  178:?,  and 
entered  the  navy  in  1791,  when  only  nine  years 
old.  In  1798,  he  uas  master's  mate  of  the  Fox, 
of  32  guns,  commanded  by  his  brother,  Pnltenoy, 
when,  ivith  the  Sybillo,  of  38  gnns,  that  ship  en- 
tered the  Spanish  harbour  of  Manilla,  the  capital 
of  the  Philh|)pined,  under  French  coloui-s,  and  in 
the  face  of  thi*ec  ships  of  the  line  and  three  frig- 
ates, succeeded  in  capturin;;  seven  boats,  taking 
prisoner  200  men,  and  earning  off  a  large  quan- 
tity of  ammunition  and  materials  of  war.  In 
1807,  he  got  the  command  of  the  Xarcissu?,  32. 
On  boanl  tliis  ship  he  attacked  a  convoy  of  30 
sail  in  the  Couquet  Koad:(,  on  which  occasion  he 
was  slightly  wounded.  In  1809,  he  ns.^iistcd  in  the 
capture  of  I^s  Sainte?,  i;?lands  in  the  West  Indies. 
In  June  of  the  same  year  ho  was  np<)uinted  to 
the  Rhine,  38,  in  which  he  actively  co-operated 
with  the  patriots  on  the  north  coast  of  Spain. 

Subsequently  he  served  in  the  AVcst  Indies,  and 
on  the  coast  of  Brazil.  On  July  18,  1815,  he 
landed  and  stormed  a  fort  at  Currigion  near  Aber- 
vack,  which  was  the  last  exploit  of  the  kind 
achieved  during  the  war.  In  July  1822,  he  was 
nominated  to  the  command  of  the  William  and 
Mary,  royal  yacht,  lying  at  Dublin,  in  attendance 
on  the  lord-lieutenant ;  and  in  182G,  to  the  Koyal 
Charlotte,  yacht,  on  the  same  service.  In  1827 
he  was  knighted  by  the  Manpiis  Wellcsloy,  tlien 
lord-lieutenant  of  Ireland.  Soon  after  he  was  ap- 
pointed superintendent  of  the  Bombay  marine. 

During  the  ten  years  that  he  held  that  office,  he 
effected  a  complete  reform  in  the  administration 
of  the  service,  and  converted  its  previous  system 
into  that  of  the  Indian  navy.  He  also  instituted 
many  extensive  and  important  surveys,  and  was 
prominently  concenied  in  the  establishment  of 
steam  navigation  in  the  lied  Sea.  In  1837  he 
was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  rear-admii-al,  and 
in  1847  to  that  of  vice-admiral.  He  died  at 
Brighton,  Juno  14,  1851,  aged  G9.  lie  married 
first  in  1808,  his  cousin,  Magdalene,  daughter  of 
Charles  Paslcy,  Esq.,  issue,  one  daughter;  and, 
2dly,  in  1829,  Elmira  Riddell,  youngest  daughter 
of  Major-general  Shaw,  and  by  her  had  three  sons, 
two  of  whom  entered  tho  uavj. 


^r.VLF<.E'r,  David,  a  i)oet  and  mlsHrullnneoiu 
writer,  was  born  at  Crieff,  In  Perthshire,  about 
1700.  His  father,  said  to  have  been  a  descendant 
of  the  proscribed  clan  Gregor,  was  named  James 
^lulloch,  and  kept  a  small  public-hoiisc  in  that 
town.  It  is  uncertain  where  he  got  his  early  edu- 
cation, but  he  appears  to  have  8tudie«l  for  some 
time  under  a  professor  Ker  in  Aberdeen,  and  dur- 
ing his  resilience  in  that  city,  he  wrote  a  pastoral 
and  a  few  other  short  pieces,  which  attracted 
some  notice.  He  afterwards  removed  to  Ediu- 
burgli,  and  in  1720  was  employed  as  a  tutor  in 
the  family  of  a  Mr.  Home  of  that  city.  At  the 
same  time  ho  attended  the  university,  and  iu  1723 
he  was  recommended  by  the  professors  as  tutor 
to  the  two  sons  of  the  duke  of  Montrose,  with 
whom  he  made  the  tour  of  Euroj^e. 

On  their  return  to  I^ondon,  he  continueil  to  re- 
.siiKi  in  the  family  of  the  duke,  through  whom  lie 
got  iutroiluced  to  the  best  society  of  the  day.  He 
now  began  to  cultivate  his  poetical  talents  with 
gi'cat  assiduity.  In  July  1724  he  publbhed  Iu 
Aaron  HilPs  '  Plain  Dealer,'  No.  3G,  his  beautiful 
ballad  of  ^  William  and  ^largaret,'  which  at  once 
procr.rod  liiin  a  !.i^';!  i^octical  reputation.  On  sct- 
tliii;;  in  I^>ndon  he  had  Anglicised  his  name  to 
Mallet.  Having,  says  Dr.  Johnson,  "by  degrees 
cii-ared  his  tongue  from  hi:;  native  pronunciation, 
so  as  to  be  no  longer  distinguislicd  as  a  Scot,  he 
si'oinod  inclined  to  diNencumber  himself  fn>ni  all 
adiiorences  of  his  original,  and  took  upon  him 
to  change  his  name  fi*om  Scotch  Mattoch  to  Eng* 
lish  Mallet^  without  any  imaginable  reason  of  pre- 
ference which  the  eye  or  ear  can  discover."  Den- 
ni.-i,  the  Critic,  used  in  doris^ion  to  CJill  him  Moloch, 
which  was  possibly  one  reason  for  the  change. 
In  1728  he  published  a  poem,  entitled  ^Tlie  Ex- 
cursion,* being  a  series  of  landscape  descriptions 
in  blank  verse,  in  the  style  of  Thomson's  Seasou-s 
but  greatly  inferior  to  that  noble  poem.  In  1731 
he  pitMluced  a  tragedy,  entitled  '  Eurj'dice,'  which 
was  acted  at  Drury  I^nc  theatre,  but  without 
succes?. 

Ills  employment  as  tutor  in  the  family  of  the 
duke  of  Montrose  having  come  to  an  end,  he  went 
to  reside  with  a  ^Ir.  Knight  at  Gosfield,  it  Is  snp- 
posed,  as  a  teacher.  About  this  time  he  fonned  au 
acquaintance  with  Pojk?,  and  to  court  the  favour 


'i 


1 1 

!i 

* 

i  ■ 

I 

\ 


\: 


I: 


I        I 


1. 


!| 

!i 
=il 


MALLET, 


101 


DAVID. 


i! 


of  that  eminent  poet,  he  published  Iiis  poem  on 
'  Verbal  Criticism.*  Pope  introduced  liim  to  Lord 
Bolingbroke,  and  ho  was  soon  after  appointcil  un- 
der secretary  to  Frederick,  prince  of  Wales,  at 
that  time  at  variance  with  his  father,  with  a  sal- 
ary of  £200  a-year.  In  1739,  his  tragedy  of 
*  Mnstapha*  was  produced,  and  owed  its  tempo- 
rary snccess  to  some  political  allusions  in  it  to  the 
king  and  Sir  Robert  Walpole.  To  serve  and  gra- 
tify his  patron,  the  prince,  he  exhibited  Sir  Robert 
nnder  the  character  of  Ilustan  tlie  vizier,  and  the 
Ling  as  Solyman  the  Magnificent.  On  the  first 
night  of  its  representation  the  heads  of  the  oppo- 
sition attended,  and  by  then*  plaudits  sustained 
the  performance  throughout.  In  the  following  year, 
in  conjunction  with  Thomson,  he  wrote,  by  com- 
mand of  the  prince,  the  masque  of  *  Alfred,*  in 
honour  of  the  birthday  of  his  royal  highness*  eldest 
daughter.  Tlic  same  year  (1740)  he  wrote  a  life 
of  Bacon,  prefixed  to  an  edition  of  his  works, 
which  was  of  very  little  merit,  and  is  now  forgotten. 
In  1747  he  published  his  *  Ilennit,  or  Amyntor 
and  Ttieodora,*  a  poem  which  has  been  praised  by 
Johnson  for  copiousness  of  language  and  vigour 
of  sentiment,  and  censui*cd  by  Warton  for  nause- 
ous affectation. 

On  the  death  of  Pope  in  1744,  Mallet,  who  was 
indebted  to  him  for  his  introduction  to  I^ord 
Bolingbroke,  was  by  the  latter  employed  to  de- 
fame the  character  of  his  foimcr  friend,  who,  in  a 
letter  to  Mr.  Knight  had  once  thus  kindly  spoken  of 
liim:  "To  prove  to  you  how  little  essentia!  to 
friendship  I  hold  letter-writing,  I  have  not  yet 
written  to  Mr.  Mallet,  whom  I  love  and  esteem 
greatly,  nay,  whom  I  know  to  have  as  tender  a 
heart,  and  that  feels  a  friendly  remembrance  as 
long  as  any  man.**  Mallet  pcrfonned  his  ungra- 
cious task  with  the  utmost  malignity,  in  his  pre- 
face to  the  revised  edition  of  Bolingbroke*s  ^  Pa- 
triot King,*  Pope*s  offence  being  that  he  had 
allowed  tlie  first  version  of  that  work  to  be  sur- 
reptitiously printed.  Bolingbroke  rewarded  him 
with  a  bequest  of  all  his  writings,  published  and 
nupnblished,  and  Mallet  immediately  began  to 
prepare  them  for  the  press.  "  Hb  conduct,** 
Fays  Chalmers,  "  at  the  very  outset  of  this  busi- 
ness affords  another  illustration  of  his  character. 
Fraucklin,  the  printer,  to  whom  many  of  the  poli- 


tical pieces  written  during  the  opposition  to  Wal- 
pole, had  been  given,  as  he  supposed,  in  perpe- 
tuity, laid  claim  to  some  compensation  for  those. 
Mallet  allowed  his  claim,  and  the  question  was 
referred  to  arbitrators,  who  were  empowered  Ut 
decide  upon  it,  by  an  instrument  signed  by  the 
parties;  but  when  they  decided  unfavourable  to 
Mr.  Mallet,  he  refused  to  yield  to  the  decision, 
and  the  printer  was  thus  deprived  of  the  benefit 
of  the  award,  by  not  having  insisted  upon  bonds 
of  arbitration,  to  which  Mallet  had  objection  as 
degrading  to  a  man  of  honour.  He  then  pro- 
ceeded, with  the  help  of  Millar,  the  bookseller,  to 
publish  all  he  could  find ;  and  so  sanguine  was  he 
in  his  expectations  that  he  i*ejected  the  offer  of 
£3,000  which  Millar  offered  him  for  the  copyright, 
although  he  was,  at  this  time,  so  distressed  for 
money  thai  he  was  forced  to  borrow  some  of  Mil- 
lar to  pay  the  stationer  and  printer.  The  work  at 
last  appeared  in  5  vols.  4to,  and  Mallet  had  soon 
reason  to  repent  his  refusal  of  the  bookseller*8 
offer,  as  this  edition  was  not  sold  off  in  twenty 
years.  As  these  volumes  contained  many  bold 
attacks  on  revealed  religion,  they  brought  much 
obloquy  on  the  editor,  and  even  a  presentment 
was  made  of  them  by  the  grand  jury  of  West- 
minster.*' 

In  the  beginning  of  1757  Mallet  was  hired  by 
the  Newcastle  administration  to  assist  in  directing 
the  public  indignation,  for  the  disgrace  brought  on 
the  British  arms  in  the  affair  of  Minorca,  towai-ds 
the  unfortunate  Admiral  Byng ;  and,  accoi-dingly, 
while  that  oflicer  was  on  his  trial,  he  wrote  a  let- 
ter of  accusation,  under  the  character  of  "  A  Plain 
Man,**  which,  printed  on  a  large  sheet,  was  circu- 
lated with  great  industry.  "The  price  of  blood,*' 
sa3's  Dr.  Johnson,  "  was  a  pension  which  he  re- 
tained till  his  death.'*  Mallet  was  unprincipled 
enough  to  accept  of  a  legacy  of  £1,000,  left  by 
Sarah  duchess  of  Marlborough  at  her  death  in 
1744,  as  the  price  of  a  Life  of  her  illustrious  hus- 
band, of  which  he  never  wrote  a  line.  Besides 
this  bequest,  he  received  also  an  annual  sum  from 
the  second  duke,  to  encourage  him  to  proceed  with 
it,  but  he  never  «vcn  commenced  the  work. 

On  I^rd  Ba^/O  becoming  premier.  Mallet  ^vrote 
his  *  Truth  in  Rhyme.*  lie  also  wrote*  Edwin 
and  Emma,'  a  ballad.     His  tragedy  of  *  Elvira,' 


1 
.  I 

I  ! 

I! 


MAN. 


102 


MARCH. 


■  I 


I     ■( 


1 1 

: 


It 


■  I 


l! 


prodnccd  at  Drury  I>auc  in  1763,  was  written 
with  the  design  of  promoting  the  political  views  of 
the  new  administrntion.  As  ii  recompense,  he 
was  appointed  keeper  of  the  Book  of  Entries  for 
ships  in  the  port  of  London.  lie  died  April  21, 
1765.  A  collected  edition  of  his  poems  was  pub- 
lished by  himself  In  three  vols,  in  1759 ;  but  most 
of  his  writings  are  now  only  known  by  name.  He 
was  an  avowed  infidel,  and  a  venal  writer  of  the 
very  worst  description.  He  was  twice  married. 
Of  his  first  wife,  by  whom  he  had  several  children, 
nothing  is  known.  One  dauglitcr,  named  Cilesia, 
who  married  an  Italian  of  rank,  and  died  at  Ge- 
noa in  1790,  wrote  a  tragedy  called  ^Almida,' 
which  was  acted  at  Drury  Lane.  His  second  wife 
was  a  Lucy  Elstob,  a  freethinker  like  himself,  the 
daughter  of  Loixl  Carlisle's  steward,  with  whom 
ne  received  a  considerable  fortune. 

MAX.  James,  an  antagonist  of  Kuddiman,  was 
born  at  Whitewreath,  in  Elginshirc,  about  1700. 
He  studied  at  King-s  College,  Abenleen,  where  he 
obtained  the  degi*ee  of  M.A.  in  1721.    Soon  after 
leaving  college  he  became  schoolmaster  of  the 
parish  of  Tough  in  Aberdeenshire,  but  though 
licensed  to  preach,  it  never  was  Iiis  fortune  to  ob- 
tain a  church.    In  1742  he  was  appointed  Master 
of  the  Poor's  Hospital  in  Aberdeen.     In  1751  he 
published  at  Aberdeen  an  octavo  work,  entitled 
*A  Censure  and  Examination  of  Mr.  Thomas 
Iluddiman's  Philological  Notes  on  the  Works  of 
the  Great  Buchanan,  more  particularly  on  the 
Ilistor)'  of  Scotland;  in  which  al90  most  of  the 
Chronological  and  Geogiaphical,  and  many  of  the 
Historical  and  Political  Notes  are  taken  into  con- 
sideration.   In  a  lA^tter  to  a  Friend.    Necessary  for 
restoring  the  tnie  readings,  the  graces,  and  beauties, 
and  for  understanding  the  true  meaning  of  a  vast 
number  of  passages  of  Buchanan'^s  writings,  which 
have  been  so  foully  comiptedy  so  miserably  de- 
faced, so  grossly  perverted  sud  misunderstood. 
Containing  many  curious  particnlars  of  his  life, 
and  a  Vindication  of  his  Character  from  many 
gross  calumnies.'     This  work  was  answered  by 
Rnddiman  the  following  year,  in  a  publication  en- 
titled ^  Anticrisis,  or  a  Discussion  of  the  Scurrilous 
and  Malicious  Libel,  published  by  one  James  Man 
of  AbcKlecn.'    Among  other  literarv  projects,  Mr. 
Man  made  collections  for  an  edition  of  Dr.  Arthur 


Johnston's  Poems,  and  contemplated  a  '  History 
of  the  Church  of  Scotland,*  which  he  was  pre- 
vented from  accomplishing  by  hui  death  In  Octo- 
ber 1761.  Ho  had  some  time  previous  sent  his 
edition  of  Buchanan's  History  to  tho  press,  the 
Inst  sheets  of  which  were  corrected  by  ProfesMr 
Gerard,  and  it  was  published  in  1762.  By  fruga- 
lity he  had  saved  about  £155,  of  which  he  be- 
queathed £60  to  his  relations,  and  settled  the  it- 
mainder  on  the  Poor's  Hospital  for  apprentice  fees 
to  the  boys  educated  in  that  useful  institution. 

BlAJCBFUELD,  farl  of,  a  titio  in  the  peerage  of  the  United 
Kingdom  possessed  by  the  viscount  Stonnont,  (aeeSroB- 
MONT,  Mscount.)  and  first  conferred,  in  1776,  on  the  cele- 
bmted  lawyer  and  st.itesnian,  William  Mamy  (see  MintBAT, 
Wi I.T.I .VM,  first  e:irl  of  Mansfield). 


Maormok,  the  hi);:)icst  title  of  honour  amongst  the  High- 
landers of  Scothind,  in  the  10th,  11th,  and  12th  centuries, 
the  persons  bearing  it  liaving  been  the  patriarchal  ebiefii  of 
tho  great  tribes  into  which  the  Celtic  population  was  thea 
divided.  They  had  jurisdiction  and  authority  over  cxtenaTS 
districts,  as  Athole,  Blornr.  Ross,  Garmoran,  Mar,  and  Bncb- 
.10.  The  word  seems  to  h:ive  been  derived  from  tlie  Gae&e 
maorf  steward,  and  fflA<>r,* great,  and  its  office  and  dignity 
appc:ir  to  have  been  next  to  that  of  the  king.  So  great  in- 
deed was  the  power  of  the  maromors  and  so  eztensire  tlie 
territories  whidi  they  ruled  over,  that  they  sometimes  were 
enabled  to  wage  independent  war  even  against  the  sorerdjTi 
hiniseir.  The  succession  to  the  maordom  was  strictly  heredi- 
tary in  the  male  line.  In  proof  of  this,  BIr.  Skene  (^Hn^ 
landers^  vol.  i.  p.  79)  instances  the  succession  of  the  maor- 
mors  of  Moray.  In  1032,  the  Annals  of  Ulster  mention  the 
death  of  Gilcomgain  Mac  Blaolbride,  maonnor  of  Murere. 
In  1058,  they  record  the  death  of  Lulach  Mac  Gilcomgaini 
king  of  Scotland,  and  in  1085,  that  of  Maolsnecbtan  Blao- 
I.ulach,  king  or  maormor  of  Mureve.  Thus  showing,  that 
althongh  Lulach  had  been  driven  from  the  throne,  his  son 
succeeded  to  the  maordom  of  Moray  in  liis  place. 

The  title  of  maonnor  was  peculiar  to  the  Scottish  Gael, 
and  w.Hs  altogether  unknown  among  the  Irish,  althongh  thef 
too  were  a  Celtic  race.  It  was  excluuvely  confined  to  the 
north  of  Scotland,  and  was  never  held  by  any  of  those  Saxon 
or  Konnan  barons  who  obtained  extensive  territories  by  grant, 
or  rnccecded,  as  they  sometimes  did,  by  marriage  to  the  pes- 
si'SKioos  and  power  of  the  maormors.  When  the  line  of  the 
ancient  maormors  gradually  sank  under  tho  ascendant  influ- 
cnc-c  of  the  feudal  system,  the  dans  forming  the  great  tribes 
became  independent,  and  their  leaders  or  chiefs  were  held  to 
represent  each  the  conunon  ancestor  or  founder  of  his  dan, 
and  derived  all  thdr  dignity  and  power  from  the  belief  in 
such  representation.  The  chief  possessed  his  office  by  right 
of  blood  alone,  as  that  right  was  understood  in  tho  High- 
lands ;  neither  dection  nor  marriage  could  constitute  any  title 
to  this  distinction ;  it  was  purely  hereditary,  nor  conld  descend 
to  any  person,  except  to  him  who,  according  to  the  Highhmd 
rule  of  succession,  was  the  nearest  male  heir  to  the  dignity. 


Mau,  Earl  of.    Sec  Mark. 


M.\Rcii,  Karl  of,  a  title  w1iicb|  with  that  of  eari  of  Dan- 


MARCHMONT, 


103 


THIRD  EARL  OF. 


btf,  was  long  enjojed  bjr  the  descendants  of  Cospatrick,  earl 
of  NorUinmberUnd,  who  came  into  Scotland  in  the  reign  of 
Maicoini  Canmore  (see  art  DuxBAitf  vol.  ii.  p.  73).  On  the 
forfeitiin  of  Geoiige,  11th  earl  of  Dunbar  and  March,  in  1434, 
it  wag  rested  in  the  crown.  In  1478,  the  earldom  of  March 
was  confinrred  bjr  King  James  III.  on  his  brother,  Alexander, 
duke  of  Albanj,  on  whose  forfeiture  it  wns  again  annexed 
to  the  crown  bjr  act  of  the  estates,  1st  October,  1487.  It 
continued  in  the  crown  till  158^,  when,  with  the  lordship  of 
Dunbar,  it  was  confeiTed  on  Robert  Stuart,  granduncle  of 
James  VI.,  on  his  relinquishing  the  earldom  of  Lennox  to 
his  nephew,  Esme  Stuart  of  Atrtiigny  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  651). 
On  his  death,  without  legitimate  issue,  in  1586,  the  title 
Mice  more  rercrted  to  the  crown. 

Jjord  William  Douglas,  second  son  of  the  first  duke  of 
Queensbeny,  was  crented  earl  of  March,  20th  April  1G97. 
He  succeeded  as  second  duke,  and  on  the  death,  without  is- 
sue, of  his  grandson,  William,  fourth  duke  of  Queensberrj 
and  third  earl  of  Blarch,  in  December  1810  (see  Queens- 
BKSKT,  doke  of),  the  hitter  title,  with  the  great  est.itcs  of 
the  Qucensbeny  family  in  the  county  of  Peebles,  devolved  on 
the  MXth  earl  of  Wemyss,  whose  great-grandfather  married, 
for  h»  first  wife,  I^dy  Ann  Douglas,  eldest  daugliter  of  the 
first  duke  of  Queensberry,  and  sister  of  the  first  earl  of  March 
(«ee  WsuTSS,  earl  of). 

The  word  March  or  3Ierse,  signifying  boundary  or  limit, 
anaentlj  more  particularly  appUed  to  the  eastern  part  of 
the  Scottish  border,  is  now  confined  to  Berwickshire.  Chal- 
mers, however,  thinks  it  more  probable  that  the  frontier 
proviooe  got  its  name  from  the  Anglo-Saxon  inerse^  a  marsh, 
or  fipom  aioriifcia,  a  naked  plain. 


Marchmoxt,  earl  of,  a  title  (dormant  since  1794)  in  the 
peerage  of  Scotland,  conferred  by  William  III.  on  Sir  Patrick 
Hume  of  Polwarth  (a  memoir  of  whom  is  given  at  p.ige  502 
of  voL  ii.)    He  was  descended  from  Sir  Patrick  Home  of 
Polwarth,  comptroller  of  Scotland  from  1499,  when  he  was 
knighted,  to  1502,  second  son  of  David  Home,  younger  of 
Wedderbum.     The    comptroller's    great-grandson,    Patrick 
Home  of  Polwarth,  was  a  chief  promoter  of  the  Ucformation 
in  Scotland,  and  one  of  those  who  in  1500  entei-ed  into  an 
asfodation  to  protect  the  prcichers  of  tlie  gospel.    Tlie  eld- 
est ion  of  this  gentleman.  Sir  Patrick  Home  of  Polwarth, 
was,  in  1591,  appointed  muster  of  the  household  to  King 
James  VI.,  one  of  the  gentlemen  of  his  bedchamber,  and 
warden  of  the  marches.    He  died  10th  June  1609.    Sir  Pa- 
trick Home,  his  son,  had  a  pension  of  £100  sterling  fi-oin 
James  VI.,  from  whom  he  received  several  other  marks  of 
farour.    By  Cliarles  I.  ho  was  created  a  baronet  in  162'), 
soon  after  his  accession  to  the  throne.     Ho  died  in  April 
1648.    His  eldst  son  was  the  first  earl  of  Marchmont,  so 
created  23d  April  1697.    He  had  previously,  26th  December 
1690,  been  raised  to  the  peerage  by  the  title  of  Lord  Pol- 
warth.   The  patent  of  the  earldom  was  to  him  and  his  heii-s 
male  whatsoever,  and  tlie  secondary  titles  were  viscount  of 
BlaMobenifl  and  I/>rd  Polwarth  of  Polwarth,  Redbraes  and 
Graenlaw.    This  nobleman,  it  is  well  known,  when  Sir  Pa  • 
trick  Home,  sufiered  much  for  his  patriotism,  during  the  per- 
Mcation  in  Scotland  in  the  reigns  of  Charles  II.  and  James 
VII.,  and  had  many  narrow  escapes  of  being  taken.    When 
be  had  decided  upon  leaving  his  place  of  concealment  (see 
vdL  iL  pi.  503)  for  the  continent,  he  set  out  during  night  ac- 
eooipanied  by  a  trustworthy  servant  named  John  Allan,  who 
Vis  to  ooodnct  him  part  of  his  way  to  London.    In  travcl- 
lisg  tofwards  tlie  Tweed,  they  unconsciously  separated.  Sir 


Patrick  having  somehow  quitted  the  proper  road  without  be- 
ing aware  of  it  till  he  reached  the  banks  of  the  river.  This 
mistake  proved  his  safety ;  for  his  servant  Allan  was  over- 
taken by  those  very  soldiers  who  were  in  pursuit  of  him.  In 
tho  assumed  capacity  of  a  surgeon  Sir  Patrick  got  safely  to 
London.  Thence  he  proceeded  to  Holland,  and  retunied  to 
Scotland  at  the  Revolution.  He  had  four  sons  and  five 
daughters.  His  eldest  daughter,  Grizel,  aflerwards  Lady 
Grizel  Baillie  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  486)  was  the  heroine  who,  when 
only  twelve  years  of  age,  supplied  her  father  with  food  and 
other  necessaries,  at  the  time  he  was  under  concealment  in 
the  family  burial-vault,  beneath  the  parish  church  of  Pol- 
warth. His  eldest  son,  Lord  Polwarth,  predeceased  him  in 
1710.  His  second  son,  the  Hon.  Captain  Robert  Home,  also 
died  young,  without  issue. 

Tho  tliu*d  son,  Alexander,  was  the  second  earl  of  March- 
mont. Bom  in  1675,  he  was  admitted  advocate  25th  July 
1696.  He  married  in  July  1697,  Margaret,  daughter  and 
heiress  of  Su:  George  Campbell  of  Cessnock,  Ayrshire,  and 
having  been  knighted,  he  assumed  the  name  of  Sir  Alexander 
Campbell.  He  was  elected  member  in  the  Scots  parliament 
for  Berwickshire,  and  on  16th  October  1704,  appointed  a 
lord  of  session,  taking  his  scat  as  I^rd  Cessnock.  He  was  at 
the  same  time  made  a  commissioner  of  the  court  of  exchequer, 
and  sworn  a  privy  councillor.  He  supported  the  Union  in 
parliament,  and  in  November  1714  he  resigned  his  seat  m 
the  court  of  session  in  favour  of  his  younger  brother,  the 
Hon.  Sir  Andrew  Home  of  Kimmerghame,  Berwickshire.  On 
the  breaking  out  of  the  rebellion  of  1715,  he  raised  400  of  the 
Berwickshire  militia,  on  the  side  of  the  government,  and 
marched  with  three  battilions  to  join  the  duke  of  Argyle  at 
Stirling.  The  same  year  he  w.is  appointed  envoy  extraordi- 
nary to  the  courts  of  Denmark  and  Prussia.  In  December 
1716,  he  became  lord-clerk-register.  In  1721  he  was  ap- 
pointed first  ambassador  to  the  congress  at  Cambray,  and  in 
March  of  that  year  made  his  public  entry  into  that  city  in  a  style 
of  splendour  and  magnificence  becoming  the  representative  of 
the  British  nation.  He  succeeded  his  father  as  earl  of  March- 
mont, August  1,  1724,  and  the  following  ye.ir  was  invested 
with  the  order  of  the  Tliistle.  In  1726  he  was  sworn  a  privy 
councillor,  and  in  1727  chosen  one  of  the  sixteen  representa- 
tive Scots  peers.  In  1733  he  joined  the  opposition  against 
Sir  Robert  Walpole,  and  in  consequence  he  was,  in  May 
of  that  yeai',  dismissed  from,  his  office  of  lord-clerk-regis- 
ter. He  died  at  London  Febniary  27,  1740,  in  liis  65th 
year,  and  was  buried  in  Canongate  churchyard,  Edinburgh. 
In  the  Scots  Magazine  for  March  1740,  is  a  high  character  of 
this  nobleman.  He  had  four  sons  and  four  daughters.  The 
two  eldest  sons  died  young.  The  two  youngest,  Hugh,  tliird 
eari,  and  the  Hon.  Alexander  Home,  were  twins,  bom  at 
Kdinburgh  loth  Febmaiy  1708.  At  the  general  election  of 
1734  the  latter  was  chosen  M.P.  for  Benvickshire,  and  con- 
stantly rechosen  till  his  death  19th  July  1760.  He  took  an 
active  part  in  parliamentary  business,  and  was  an  eminent 
barrister  in  I^ondon.  In  1741  he  was  appointed  solicitor  to 
the  prince  of  Wales,  and  27th  January  1756,  lord-clerk- re- 
gister of  Scotland. 

Hugh,  third  earl  of  Marchmont,  became  eminent  for  his 
learning  and  brilliant  genius.  At  the  general  election  of 
1734,  he  was  chosen  ^I.P.  for  Berwick,  and  in  the  House  of 
Commons  he  made  himself  so  fomiidablc  to  the  government 
as  one  of  the  leaders  of  the  opposition,  that  Sir  Robert  Wal- 
pole, then  prime  minister,  declared  that  there  were  few 
things  he  more  ardently  desired  than  to  see  that  young  man 
at  the  head  of  his  family ;  which  would  have  had  the  effect 
of  removing  him  from  parUament  altogether.    On  the  death 


MAUISCIIAL, 


1(H 


FOURTH  KARU 


i! 


I . 


■  I 


,  I 


of  hU  father  in  Februaiy  1740,  he  Waine  third  earl  of 
Marofamont 

By  his  contein}H)rarie8  hU  lordithip  vrns  held  in  high  coti- 
mation.  Ho  fonncd  nn  intimate  friendship  with  liord  Cob- 
ham,  who  gave  his  bust  a  place  in  the  Temple  uf  Worthies  at 
Stow,  and  with  ]*t>pe,  who  introduced  hiii  name  into  the 
well-known  inscription  in  his  grotto  at  Twickenham : 

"  There  the  bright  flame  was  shot  through  lil.'irchmonfs  soul.** 

Ho  was  one  of  the  executors  of  I'opo,  .niid  also  of  Snrah, 
duchess  of  Marlborough,  both  of  whom  difd  in  17H.  The 
bttcr  left  hi'.n  a  legncv  of  £2,500.  In  17.)0  he  w:is  olirctcd 
one  of  the  sixteen  representative  peers  of  Sootlan'l,  an<l  re- 
ch^en  at  every  gcncr.il  election  till  178  J.  l>unn,«:j  the  ,'J4 
years  that  he  bat  in  the  house  of  I^mls,  he  took  an  mtivc 
part  in  the  business  of  the  hou;!ie,  few  of  tiicir  lonljihips  \ws' 
sessing  a  greater  amount  of  parliamentary  infonnation  and 
experience.  In  17-17  he  had  been  npjiointed  lii>>t  lord  of 
police,  a  department  Ion«:  since  :il)oli>ho<],  :i:id  on  28th  Janu- 
ary 1764,  keeper  of  the  pt'.'it  seal  of  Si'otl.and.  He  died  i:t 
Hemel-Hempstead,  Hortfurd.shirc,  10th  January  1791,  in  lii.s 
86th  year,  when  the  e.irld«>m  of  ^laroliniont  bcoau.e  dor- 
mant. Ho  built  Marchmont  IIouso,  in  tlie  )):ii:sh  of  Pol- 
warth,  Uerwickshire,  and  on  his  do;ith  Sir  Hn;;li  Turves, 
sixth  b.aronet  of  Purves  Hall,  gre.it-gnmdson  of  Lidy  Anne 
Pnrves,  eldeiit  sifter  of  the  third  enrl  of  Marchninijt,  assumed 
the  names  of  Hu:nc  and  Ca-itpbell  on  sucvcfding  to  the 
estates. 

His  lordship  married,  first,  in  May  1731,  Miss  Anne  Wes- 
tern, Ix)ndon,  by  whom  l:c  had  a  son.  Patrick,  I^rd  Pol- 
warth,  who  died  young,  and  three  dant;htors.  The  youn^jest 
daughter,  Lady  Diana  Home,  marrii^d,  l«tli  April,  17r)4, 
Walter  Scott  of  Harden,  Berwiokshin*,  M.P.,  who  dii-d  at 
Tonbridge,  25th  .Tanunry,  17ii.1,  and  had  one  son,  Hugh  Scott 
"f  Harden,  who,  in  1835,  made  gixnl  his  claim  to  the  title  of 
Lord  Polwarth  in  the  Scottish  peerage  (sqq  Polwauth, 
lord).  I«ndy  Diana  was  the  «»nly  c-v.c  of  tlie  enrl's  datiHitoi-s 
who  left  sun'iving  issue,  and  the  PolwnrtJi  jR-era^i',  wlion 
conferred  on  the  first  earl  of  Marchniont,  was  with  remain- 
der to  the  heirs  male  of  his  bo<ly,  and  failing  those  to  tlio 
heirs  general  of  such  heirs  male.  His  lountcs.s  havin"  dii-d 
9th  May  1747,  the  eari  married,  secondly,  at  I^ndon,  30th 
January  1748,  Miss  Elizabeth  Crompton,  daughter  of  a  linen- 
draper  in  Cheapside.  By  tliis  lady  ho  had  one  son,  Alexan- 
der, Lord  Polwarth,  born  in  175(\  n)anioil  IGth  July  1772, 
I-'idy  Annabella  Yorke,  eldest  daughter  of  Philip,  .spioml  eari 
of  Hardwicke.  He  was  created  a  jK^er  of  the  United  Kin*;- 
dom  by  the  title  of  Baron  Hume  of  Berwick,  1  Ith  May, 
1776.  He  died,  without  isy.ie,  9th  March  1781,  in  his  31st 
year,  when  his  British  title  bocan-.e  extinct. 

fiOrd  Marclnnont  bequeathed  his  library,  consisting  of  one 
of  tiie  most  curious  and  valuable  collections  of  books  and 
maimscripts  in  Great  Britain,  to  his  sole  executor,  the  Ki^'ht 
Hon.  George  Rose,  whose  son.  Sir  George  Henry  Kose,  pub- 
lished in  1831,  *  A  Selection  from  the  papors  of  the  Karis  of 
Marclnnont,  illustrative  of  Events  from  1685  to  175U,*  in  3 
vols.  8vo. 


1 1 


Mauiscii.vi^  Eari,  a  title  (attainted  in  171(5)  in  the  Scot- 
tish peerjige,  conferred  bv  James  IL,  before  4th  Julv  1458. 
on  Sir  William  Keith,  great  marischal  of  Scotland  (see  vol. 
ii.  p.  587).  The  first  eari  died  before  1476.  His  son,  Wil- 
liam, second  earl,  joined  the  confederacy  against  King  James 
HL,  in  1488,  and  Kit  in  the  first  pariiament  of  King  J.imes 
IV.,  the  nine  year.    He  had  fonr  eons.    From  John,  the 


youngest  son,  descended  tlie  Keiths  of  Gnug,  to  whidi  familj 
belonged  Sir  Robert  Murray  Keith,  K.B.,  British  ambmadoi 
to  Vienna,  St.  Petersburgh,  and  Copenhagen ;  his  bntbcr, 
Sir  Basil  Keith,  governor  of  Jamaica;  and  their  ciiter,  Mn. 
Murray  Keith,  the  well-known  Bfrs.  Bcthnne  Balid  of  fir 
Walter  Scott,  notices  of  whom  are  gireo  at  page  587  oTtoL 
ii.  of  this  work. 

Willijun,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded  as  thin!  earl  HarisduL 
In  1515,  when  the  castle  of  Stirling  was  surFcndcrcd  by  the 
queen-mother  to  the  regent  Albany,  the  young  king,  Jaines 
v.,  and  his  infant  brother,  tlie  duke  of  Ross,  were  oommitted 
to  the  keeping  of  the  earl  Mnrischal,  with  the  lords  Fleming 
and  Borthwick,  whose  fidelity  to  the  crown  wasnnsospccted; 
.ind  in  1517,  when  Albany  went  to  France,  the  yonng  king 
was  conveyed  to  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  intrusted  to  tlio 
charge  of  I.ord  Marischal  and  Lord  Erskine.  The  eari  died 
about  1530.  With  fonr  daughters  he  had  four  sons.  Robert, 
I.nrd  Keith,  and  his  brother,  William,  the  two  eldest  bohk. 
fell  at  tl:e  battle  of  Flndden,  13th  September  1513.  Tbe 
pennon  of  the  larl  .MariM-!ial  borne  in  that  fatal  battle,  hav- 
ing on  it  three  stags*  heads,  and  the  motto,  "Veritas  Vin- 
tir,*'  is  pi-esci-ved  in  the  Adt'ocates'  IJbrary,  Edinbnigh. 
1.0! d  Keith  had,  with  three  daughters,  two  sons;  William, 
fourth  eari  Marischal,  and  Robert,  commendator  of  Deer, 
whose  son,  Andrew  Keith,  was  created  Ix>rd  Dingwall,  in 
15^i7,  but  died  without  i&sr.e  (i=ee  vol.  ii.  p.  38).  From  the 
earl's  youngest  son,  Alexander  Keith,  descended  Bishop  Ro* 
bert  Keith,  author  of  the  Catalogue  of  Scotti»h  Bishops,  a 
memoir  of  whom  is  given  at  page  591  of  vol.  ii. 

William,  fourth  eail,  the  elder  of  the  two  sons  of  I»nl 
Keith,  succeeded  his  gr.nulfsither  in  1530.  Ho  accompanied 
King  James  V.,  on  his  matrimonial  expedition  to  France  in 
153<),  and  was  nppidnted  an  extnionlinary  lord  of  session,  Sd 
July  1511.  At  the  meeting  of  the  Estates,  12th  Mareh  1543, 
he  was  selected,  with  the  eari  of  Montrose,  and  the  lords 
Kr^kinc,  Buthvcn,  Lindsay,  Livingston,  and  Scton,  to  be 
keepn-s  of  the  young  Queen  Man-*8  )>erson,  and  nominated 
one  of  the  secret  council  to  the  regent  Arrnn.  Sir  R.-tlph 
Sadler,  the  Kngli&h  nmbassador  in  Scotland,  describes  him  at 
this  lime,  in  a  letter  to  his  sovereign,  as  "  a  goodly  young 
pcntlcm.in,'*  and  as  well  ii:clincd  to  the  project  of  the  mar- 
riage of  Queen  Man-  with  Prince  Edward.  He  :dao  mentions 
him  as  one  "who  hath  ever  home  a  singular  good  affection** 
t)  Henry.  In  the  list  of  the  English  king's  pcnswners  in 
Scotland,  we  find  the  eari  Marischal,  John  Chartesis  and  the 
Lord  Gmv*s  friends  in  the  North,  set  down  .it  300  marks. 
On  the  18th  Decenjber  of  the  .same  year  (1543),  his  place  in 
the  council,  with  that  of  the  earis  of  Angi:^  I.ennoz,  and 
Giencairn,  was  filled  up,  on  the  ground  that  they  were  ab- 
sent and  would  not  attend.  He  was  one  of  the  principal 
nobles  w  ho  signed  the  agreement  in  the  following  June,  to 
BupiK)rt  the  authority  of  the  queen-mother  as  regent  of  Scot- 
land, against  the  eari  of  Arran,  declared  by  that  instrument 
to  be  deprived  of  his  eff.ce.  {Tt/tlcrs  Hist  of  Scotland^  vol. 
V.  p.  3<JD,  Note.) 

The  eari  seems  early  to  have  been  well  inclined  towanis 
the  doctrines  of  tho  Reformation,  and  he  was  doabtlvss  in- 
duced, with  the  other  nobles  favourable  to  the  proposed  ma- 
trimonial alliance  with  Engl.nnd,  to  give  it  his  support^  in  the 
belief  that  it  would  tend  to  the  introduction  into  Scotland  of 
a  purer  faith  and  a  more  simple  form  of  worship,  than  the 
Ronum  Catholic.  In  1544,  when  George  Wishart,  the  mar- 
tyr, preached  in  Dundee,  and  denounced  from  the  pnlpit  the 
judgments  of  heaven  against  that  town  for  having  been  in- 
terdicted by  the  civic  authorities  from  preaching  there  any 
more,  lord  Marischal  and  sever.il  other  noblemen  were  present, 


I! 


^1 


MARISCriAL, 


105 


SEVEXTII  EARL. 


'  i; 


I 


ad  endadnronred  to  induce  him  to  remain,  or  go  with  them, 
but  he  preferred  proceeding  to  Edinburgh.  Tjtler  mentions 
liie  earl  Manachal  as  one  of  the  persons  associated  with  the 
mi  of  Caanllis  in  his  conspimcj  to  assxissinnte  Cardinal 
Bcthime,  bj  the  hands  of  one  Forstcr,  nn  Englisliman,  com- 
BMiioned  thereto  bj  Henry  VIII.  The  plot,  he  says,  he 
(bcorered  during  his  researches  in  the  secret  correspondence 
of  the  State  Paper  office,  and  was  previously  unknown  to 
my  Scottish  or  Engluh  historian.  (JIut.  ofScoilandf  vol. 
r.  p.  887).  His  lordship  fought  at  Pinkie  in  1547,  when 
Borenl  of  hui  followen  were  slain.  In  September  1550  ho 
aoeompanied  the  queen  dowager  to  France. 

la  May  155^  when  Knox  was  simimoncd  to  appear  before 
the  bishops  in  the  church  of  the  Bl.nckfriars  at  Edinbur;;h. 
**  the  earl  of  Glencaim,**  says  Caldcrn-ood,  "  allured  the  earl 
Mariiclial,  with  his  counscller.  Harie  Drummond,  to  hear  IiIh 
exhortatioii  in  the  night;"  when  they  were  so  well  pleased 
with  what  they  heard  that  they  induced  the  Hefonner  to 
mite  a  letter  to  the  queen  regent,  in  tlie  liope  that  she  mi'^lit 
be  persuaded  to  listen  to  his  preaching.  He  accordingly  sent 
bj  Glencaim  a  long  epistle  to  her  majesty,  which  is  printed 
is  Cahkrwood's  History,  (vol.  L  pages  SOS— 31G)  and  is  the 
nme  whidi  called  from  her  the  sneering  remark,  on  delivering 
it  to  Bethune.  bisliop  of  Glasgow,  "  Please  you,  inv  lord,  to 
read  a  pasqnil ! "  Lord  Marischal  was  one  of  the  noblemen 
in  the  suite  of  the  qneen  regent  when  she  made  her  entry  into 
Perth,  29tb  May  1559;  and  with  the  earls  of  Argylc  and 
Glcneaim,  and  the  lord  James  Stuart,  afterwards  the  regent 
Moray,  he  was  called  to  the  deathbed  of  that  princess  in  June 
ladO,  wlten  she  expressed  her  sorrow  for  the  calamities  under 
vhidi  Scotland  was  at  that  time  sufiering,  and  earnestly  ex- 
horted them  to  send  both  tlic  French  and  English  armies  out 
of  the  eonntry,  and  to  continue  their  allegiance  to  their  lawful 
sorcreign. 

When  the  Confesaon  of  F.iith  was  ratified  by  the  three 
estates  of  the  kingdom  at  Edinburgh,  17th  July  1560,  the 
earl  Marischal  made  the  following  remarkable  speech :  "  It  is 
long  since  I  had  some  favour  hito  the  truth,  and  was  some- 
what jealous  d*  tho  Boman  religion ;  but,  praised  be  God,  I 
am  tliis  day  fully  resolved ;  for  seeing  my  lords  the  bislmps 
who  by  their  learning  can,  and  for  the  zcnl  they  owe  to  the 
troth,  would,  as  I  suppose,  gainsay  anything  repugnant  to 
the  same,  yet  speak  nothing  ag:iinst  the  doctrine  proponed,  I 
cannot  but  hold  it  the  very  truth  of  God,  and  the  contrary  of 
it  false  and  deceavable  doctrine.  Therefore,  so  far  as  in  me 
iyeth,  I  approve  the  one,  and  condemn  the  other,  and  do 
fiutlicr  ask  of  God,  that  not  only  I,  but  also  my  posterity, 
may  enjoy  the  comfort  of  the  doctrine  that  this  day  our  cars 
have  heard.  Farther,  I  protest  if  any  persons  ecclesiasticiil 
shall  Iwrenfter  oppose  themselves  to  this  our  confession,  that 
they  have  no  place  nor  credit,  considering  that  time  of  ad- 
naement  being  granted  to  them,  and  they  having  full  know- 
ledge of  this  our  confesnon,  none  is  now  found  in  lawful,  free, 
and  quiet  parliament  to  oppose  themselves  to  that  which  wo 
profess.  And,  therefore,  if  any  of  this  generation  pretend  to 
do  after  this,  I  protest  he  be  reputeth  rather  one  that  loveth 
his  own  commodity  and  the  glory  of  the  world,  than  the 
glory  of  God,  and  salration  of  men's  souls.*'  (Calderwood'i 
BuL,  ToL  ii.  p.  87).  He  was  one  of  the  twenty- four  lords 
selected  by  the  estates,  ^m  among  whom  the  crown  was  to 
choose  eight  and  the  estates  six,  for  the  government  of  the 
eoontiy.    He  also  subscribed  the  Book  of  Discipline. 

On  the  return  of  Queen  Mary  from  France  in  August^ 
1561,  be  was  sworn  one  of  the  lords  of  her  privy  council. 
He  took  m  actire  part  in  all  questions  respecting  religion, 
aifl  in  tlie  General  Assembly  which  met  at  Edinburgh  in 


December  1563,  he  was  one  of  the  committee  appointed  to 
revi&o  the  Book  of  Discipline.  He  did  not,  however,  interfere 
much  in  political  matters,  and  when  the  nation  came  to  be 
divided  against  itself,  on  the  death  of  Damley  and  the  im- 
prisonment of  the  queen,  he  retired  to  his  castle  of  Dunnottar, 
on  the  scacoast  of  Kincardineshire,  whence  he  so  seldom 
stirred  that  he  acquired  tho  name  of  William  of  the  Tower. 
So  extensive  was  his  landed  property  at  that  time  that  his 
yearly  rental  amounted  to  270,000  marks.  It  was  situated 
in  so  many  diflfcrent  countira  that  it  is  said  he  could  travel 
from  Berwick  to  the  northern  extremity  of  Scotland,  eating 
his  meals  and  sleeping  every  night  on  his  own  estates. 
(^Douglag"  Peeroffej  vol.  ii.  p.  192.)  He  died  7th  October 
1581.  By  liis  countess,  Margiirot,  daughter  and  co-hciress 
of  Sir  William  Keith  of  Invenigic,  Banffshire,  he  had,  with 
seven  daughters,  two  sons,  William,  Lord  Keith,  and  Bobcrt, 
Lord  Altrie.    (See  vol.  i.  p.  122.) 

William,  Ixird  Keith,  the  elder  son,  was  taken  prisoner,  in 
an  inroad  into  England  in  1558,  and  placed  in  the  custody  of 
the  earl  of  Northumberland,  but  allowed  to  go  home  in  De- 
cember 1559  on  bond.  The  exorbitant  sum  of  £2,000  was 
demanded  for  his  ransom.  He  died  10th  August  1580,  leav- 
ing four  sons  and  four  daughters. 

His  eldest  son,  George,  iiflh  earl  Marischal,  the  founder  of 
Marischal  College,  Aberdeen,  succeeded  his  grandfather  in 
October  1581.  Of  this  nobleman  a  memoir  is  given  at  page 
588  of  vol.  ii.  His  eldest  son,  Willi.-im,  succeeded  as  sixth 
earl  on  his  death,  April  2, 1623.  Tho  latter  was  a  member 
of  the  Scottish  privy  council,  under  Charles  I.,  and  in  1634, 
he  fitted  out  a  fleet  which  he  sent  to  UIadi»!ans  VII.,  king  of 
Poland.  He  died  28th  October  1G35,  leaving  four  sons  and 
three  daughters.  The  two  eldest  sons,  William  and  George, 
succeeded  as  seventh  and  eighth  earls.  John,  the  fourth  son, 
was  the  fii*st  earl  of  Kintore.  (See  Kintore,  earl  of,  vol.  u. 
page  611.) 

William,  seventh  carl,  was  a  staunch  Covenanter.  When 
the  earl  of  Montrose,  in  March  1639,  went  to  Aberdeen  to 
force  the  covenant  on  the  inhabitants  of  that  city,  the  earl 
l^larischal,  according  to  Spalding,  had  one  of  the  five  colours 
carried  by  his  well  appointed  army  on  that  occasion.  Some* 
tinie  after  its  departure  to  the  south,  the  Covenanters  of  the 
north  appointed  a  connnittce  meeting  to  be  held  at  Turrifi*,  a 
sm.nll  town  in  Aberdeenshire,  on  the  24th  April,  connsting  of 
the  earls  Marischal  and  Seaforth,  the  I/>rd  Eraser,  the  Mas- 
ter of  Forbes,  and  some  others.  The  meeting  was  afterwards 
postponed  till  the  26th  of  April,  and  subsequently  adjourned 
to  Aberdeen,  to  be  held  on  the  20th  of  &Iay.  A  body  of 
about  2,000  Covenanters  having  assembled  at  Turriff  as  early 
as  the  13th,  tho  Gordons  resolved  to  attadc  Uiem  before  they 
should  be  joined  by  more,  and  having  surprised  them  on  the 
morning  of  the  14th,  they  were  soon  dispersed,  and  a  few 
taken  prisoners.  Tiie  loss  on  either  side  in  killed  and 
wounded  was  very  trifling.  This  skirmish  is  called  by  the 
writers  of  the  period,  "  the  Trot  of  Turray,"  and  is  distin  - 
guished  as  the  place  where  blood  was  first  shed  in  the  dnl 
wars. 

Marching  to  Aberdeen,  the  Gordons  expelled  the  Cove- 
nanters from  the  town,  and  being  joined  there  by  a  larger 
force,  they  sent  John  I^ith  of  Harthill  and  WMlIiam  Lums- 
den,  advocate  in  Aberdeen,  to  Dunnottar,  for  the  purpose  ot 
ascertaining  the  sentiments  of  the  earl  Marischal,  in  relation 
to  their  proceeding!*,  and  whether  they  might  reckon  on  his 
friendship.  The  earl  intimated  that  he  would  require  eight 
days  to  advise  with  his  friends.  This  answer  was  considered 
quite  unsatisfactory,  and  the  chiefs  of  the  army  were  at  a  loss 
how  to  act.    Bobert  Gordon  of  Stmloch  and  James  Burnet  of 


;  I 


I  I 


r 


MAUISCHAL, 


100 


EIGHTH  EARL. 


II 


I . 


!     I 


CnigTiiile,  a  brother  of  tlie  laird  of  hr^  proposed  to  enter 
into  a  negotintion  xrith  the  earl,  bat  Sir  Geor^ge  0g;ih7  of 
Banff  would  not  listen  to  such  a  proceeding,  and,  addressing 
Stralochf  he  said,  **  Go,  if  yon  will  go;  bat  prjtiiee,  let  it  be 
as  qaarter-inaster,  to  inform  the  earl  that  we  are  coming." 
After  having  had  an  interview  with  the  earl,  Straloch  and 
Domet  returned  with  the  answer  that  bis  lordship  had  no 
intention  to  take  up  armsi  witliont  an  order  from  the  Tables 
as  the  boards  of  representatives,  chosen  respectively  by  tlie 
nobility,  country  gentry,  clergy,  and  inhabitants  of  the  burglis, 
were  called,  that  if  the  Gordons  would  dispeme  lie  would 
give  them  early  notice  to  re-assemble,  if  nccessiiry,  fur  their 
own  defence,  but  that  if  they  should  attack  him,  he  would 
certainly  defend  himself. 

On  receiving;  this  answer  the  Gonlons  disbMiuled  their  anny 
on  the  2 1st  May.  The  depredations  of  the  Iliglilnnders  upon 
the  properties  of  the  Coven.intcrs  were  thereafter  carried  on 
to  such  an  extent  that  the  latter  complained  to  the  earl,  who 
immediately  assembled  a  body  of  men  out  of  Angus  and  the 
Mcams,  with  which  he  entered  Alterdeen  on  the  23d  M.iy. 
Two  dnys  afterwards  he  was  joined  by  Montrose,  at  the  head 
of  4,000  men,  an  addition  which,  with  other  accessions, 
made  the  whole  force  assembled  nt  Aberdeen  exceed  G.OOO. 
Tliis  army  was  soon  after  marched  into  the  Menms  by  Mon- 
trose. 

On  the  approach  to  Stonehaven  from  AWrdeen  of  a  royal- 
ist force  under  the  vi«count  of  Aboyne,  on  the  14th  June,  the 
earl  Marisclial  posted  himself  with  1,200  men  and  some  piecott 
of  ordnance  from  Dunnottar  castle,  on  the  direct  rrvid  which 
Aboyne  had  to  pass.  As  the  latter  descnuicd  the  Meagre 
hill,  on  the  morning  of  the  15th,  the  cnrl  opened  a  heavy  tire 
upon  him,  which  threw  his  men  into  complete  disorder,  and 
in  a  short  time  his  whole  army  gave  way.  This  affair  was 
called  **  the  Raid  of  Stonehaven.'* 

The  earl  Blarischal  and  Montrose  now  advanced  towards 
the  Dee  with  all  their  strength,  and  as  Aboyne  was  anxious 
to  prevent  their  ptissage  of  that  river,  a  brittle  took  place  at 
the  Bridge  of  Dee,  in  which  the  roynlibts  were  defeated  and 
theur  army  obliged  to  fly.  The  next  day,  the  20tli  June, 
1G39,  the  tidings  arrived  of  the  pacification  of  Berwick,  con- 
cluded two  days  before,  when  Iwth  parties  disbanded  their 
forces. 

The  earl  was  one  of  the  association  which  Montrose  had 
funned  at  Cumbernauld  in  Janu.iry  1641,  for  supporting  the 
royal  authority.  In  September  1644,  however,  he  joined  the 
army  of  the  earl  of  Argyle,  on  its  route  to  the  north,  to  op- 
pose the  royalist  forces  under  Montrose,  after  the  battle  of 
Aberdeen.  In  the  following  October  ho  was  one  of  the  com- 
mittee of  the  Estates  sitting  in  that  city,  when  Montrose  en- 
tered Angus,  and  on  hearing  of  his  approach,  they  issued,  on 
the  10th  of  that  month,  a  printed  order,  to  which  the  e:irl 
MarischaVs  name  was  attached,  ordaining  all  persons,  of 
whatever  age,  sex,  or  condition,  having  horses  of  the  value  of 
forty  pounds  Scots  or  upwards,  to  send  them  to  the  Bridge  of 
Dee,  the  appointed  place  of  rendesvous,  on  the  14tli  October, 
with  riders  fully  equipped  and  armed ;  with  certitication,  in 
case  of  future,  that  each  landed  proprietor  should  be  fined 
£1,000 ;  every  gentleman  not  a  landed  proprietor,  £500 
Soots;  and  each  husbandman  100  merks,  besides  confiscation 
of  their  horses.  With  the  exception,  however,  of  I/)rd  Gor- 
don, eldest  son  of  the  marquis  of  Hnntly,  who  brought  three 
troops  of  horse,  and  Captain  Alexander  Keith,  brother  of  the 
eari  Marischal,  who  appeared  with  one  troop  at  the  appointed 
place,  no  attention  was  paid  to  the  order  of  the  committee 
by  the  people,  who  had  no  desire  to  expose  themaelves  again 
to  the  vengeance  of  Montrose  and  his  troops.    In  the  battle 


of  Fyvie  which  followed,  the  only  person  of  note  who  wai 
killed  was  the  above-named  Captain  Keith. 

llie  earl  was  now  to  find  a  bitter  opponent  in  his  former 
assodate  and  friend,  the  marquis  of  Montrose.  The  latter 
took  up  his  quarters  at  Stonehaven  on  19th  March  1645,  and 
the  following  day  he  wrote  a  letter  to  l/ard  Morisdial,  who 
with  sixteen  ministers  and  some  persons  of  distinction,  bad 
aliut  himself  up  in  his  castle  of  Dunnottar.  Tlie  bearer  of 
the  letter,  however,  witliont  being  suffered  io  enter  within 
the  gate,  was  sent  away  without  an  answer.  It  is  said  that 
he  was  advised  to  this  line  of  conduct  by  his  countess  and 
the  miiiistera  who  had  taken  refuge  in  Dunnottar.  Highly 
incensed  at  the  earl's  silence,  Montro.se  desured  Ix>rd  Gordon 
to  write  to  George  Keith,  the  earVa  brother,  who  had  an  io- 
ten'icw  with  Montrose  at  Stonehaven,  when  the  latter  in- 
formed him  that  all  he  wanted  from  the  cnrl  was  that  he 
sliould  serve  the  king  his  master  against  liw  rebellious  sab- 
jects,  and  that  if  he  failed  to  do  so,  he  would  feel  his  ven- 
geance. But  the  cad  declined  to  comply,  as  lie  siud  **he 
would  not  be  against  the  country.**  {Spalding^  xtA.  ii.  p.  806.) 

In  consequence  of  this  refusal,  Montrose  at  once  subjected 
his  property  to  militan*  execution.  On  the  21st  of  Marcli, 
he  set  fire  to  the  houses  adjuining  the  castle  of  Dunnottar, 
and  burnt  the  grain  stacked  in  the  barn-yards.  He  next  set 
fire  to  the  town  of  Stonehaven.  The  lands  and  houses  of 
Cowie  8liare<l  the  s:inie  fate.  The  woods  of  Fettercsso  were 
also  burnt,  and  the  whole  of  the  lands  in  the  vicinity  ravaged. 
A  ship  in  the  harbonr  of  Stimehnven,  after  being  plundered, 
was  also  set  fire  to,  with  all  the  fishing  boats.  The  vassals 
and  dependents  of  the  earl  cniwded  before  the  castle  of  Dun- 
nottar, and  with  loud  cri(.*s  of  pity,  implored  him  \o  save 
them  from  ruin.  No  attention  was  paid  to  thear  supplica- 
tii>n.<,  and  the  earl  witncssctl  from  his  stronghold  the  total 
destruction  of  the  pn>pfrties  of  his  tenants  without  making 
any  effort  to  prevent  it.  He  \:i  said,  liowett?r,  deeply  to  have 
regretted  his  rfjfction  of  Montrose's  ])roposals,  when  he  be- 
held the  smoke  ascending  all  around  liiiii ;  *' but  the  famous 
Andrew  Cant,  who  was  among  the  number  of  his  ghostly 
company,  edified  his  resolution  at  once  to  its  original  pitch  of 
finnness,  by  assuring  him  that  that  reek  would  be  a  sweet 
smelling  incense  in  the  nostrils  of  the  Ix>rd,  rising,  as  it  did, 
from  property  which  had  been  sacrificed  to  the  holy  cause  of 
the  covenant.** 

In  1648,  the  earl  Rii^ied  a  troop  of  horse  for  the  "  Engage- 
ment,** formed  by  the  duke  of  Hamilton  for  the  release  of  the 
king  from  his  captivity,  and  was  present  at  the  rout  of  Fres- 
ton,  but  escaped.  In  1650,  he  entertained  King  Cliarles  II., 
in  the  castle  of  Dunnottar,  and  on  6th  June  1651,  his  castle 
of  Dunnottar  was  selected  by  the  Scots  Kstates  and  privy 
council,  as  the  fittest  place  for  the  preservation  of  the  regalia 
of  Scotland  (see  Kixtork,  earl  of,  vol.  ii.  p.  611).  He  was 
one  of  the  committee  of  the  Kstates  arrested  by  a  detachment 
of  English  horse  from  Dundee,  on  28th  August,  1651,  when 
sitting  at  Alyth  in  Angus.  Carried  prisoner  to  the  Tower  of 
London,  he  remained  there  till  the  Bestoration,  having  been 
excepted  from  CromwelPs  act  of  grace  and  pardon,  12th 
April,  1654.  He  was  sworn  one  of  the  privy  coundllors  of 
Charles  II.,  and  appointed  keeper  of  the  privy  seal  of  Soot- 
land.     He  died  in  1661. 

His  brother,  George,  succeeded  as  eighth  eari.  In  his 
younger  years  this  nobleman  served  in  the  French  army,  and 
rose  to  the  rank  of  colonel.  At  the  commencement  of  the 
civil  wars  in  Soothind,  he  returned  home,  and  at  the  battle  of 
Preston  in  1648,  he  commanded  a  regiment  of  foot  under  tlie 
duke  of  Hamilton.  At  the  battle  of  Worcester  in  1^1,  he 
had  tlie  eharge  of  three  regiments  appointed  to  goard  a  par^ 


: 


MARISGilAL, 


107 


TENTH  EARL. 


tieaUr  post,  when,  being  overpowered  by  nnmbers,  ]ie  xna 
nude  piiaoner.  At  the  Berolation  be  aeems  to  have  taken  no 
|Kirt  on  «tber  tide.  In  a  letter  from  Yiscount  Dundee  to  tbe 
tarl  of  Melfort,  dated  Jane  27,  1689,  giving  an  account  of 
the  position  and  views  of  several  of  the  Scots  nobility  and 
gently  in  regard  to  tlie  struggle  for  the  throne,  Dundee  sars 
of  him,  ^  Earl  Marshall  is  at  Edinburgh,  but  dues  not  med- 
dle.**   Tbe  earl  died  in  1C94. 

Ilis  only  son,  William,  ninth  earl,  took  the  oiitbs  and  his 
scat  in  the  Estates,  19th  July  1698,  and  always  opposed  the 
measures  of  King  William's  reign.  In  tbe  parliament  uf  Cth 
May  1703,  he  protested  agriinst  the  c.-illing  of  any  of  the  earls 
befme  biinsdf.  He  voted  against  the  Union  on  even*  occa- 
hiuii  when  any  question  regarding  it  was  before  the  house, 
and  when  the  treaty  was  agreed  to,  he  entered  u  solemn  pro- 
test against  it.  As  heritable  keeper  of  the  regalia  of  Scot- 
huid,  he  ordered  the  same  to  be  delivered  up  to  the  e^irl  of 
Ghogow,  treasurer-depute,  to  be  lodged  in  the  castle  of  Edin- 
burgh, pnitesting,  at  the  same  time,  tlint  this  should  not  in- 
valid.ite  his  light  as  keeper  theruof,  and  that  if  it  should  be 
found  necessary,  at  any  future  time,  to  transport  the  regalia 
to  any  other  place  within  the  kingdom,  this  should  not  be 
done  till  intimation  be  made  to  him  or  bis  successors.  The 
prindpal  instrument,  attested  by  seven  notaries  public,  in 
the  hands  <^  Alezsnder  Keitli  of  Dunnottar,  is  printed  in  the 
Hooiid  volume  of  Kisbef s  System  of  Heraldry.  At  the  gene- 
ral election,  10th  November  1710,  the  earl  was  chosen  one  of 
the  sixteen  Scots  representative  peers.  He  died  27th  May 
1712.  By  his  countess,  Jjidy  Mary  Dnimmond,  eldest 
daughter  of  the  fourth  earl  of  Tertli,  high  chancellor  of  Scot- 
hmd  at  tlie  Re\'ulution,  he  had  two  sons  and  two  daughters. 
George,  the  elder  son,  eucceedcd  as  tenth  earl  MariKchal. 
James  Francis  Edward,  the  younger  son,  was  the  celebrated 
Mandial  Kath,  a  memoir  of  whom  is  given  at  page  576  of 
rtil.  iL  I^dy  ilary  Keith,  the  elder  daughter,  married  the 
Hxth  earl  of  Wigtun,  and  was  the  mother  of  I.ady  Clementina 
Fleming,  wife  of  the  tenth  I.ord  Elpliinstune,  one  of  whose 
sons.  Admiral  Sir  George  Keith  Elphinstone,  K.B.,  was  cre- 
ated Viscount  Keith.  (See  vol.  ii.  p.  139.)  l^dy  Anne,  the 
younger  dsiughtcr,  became  comitess  of  Galloway. 

George,  tenth  earl,  was  born  about  lGi)3.  Of  tlie  once 
vast  property  of  his  family  all  that  he  inhoritud  were  the 
fttates  of  Dtmnottar,  Fetteresso,  and  Innerugic,  the  remain- 
der havir.g  been  dilapidated  in  the  time  of  Cromwell,  or  given 
Si  prm'udon  to  the  }X)unger  branches.  From  Queen  Anne, 
bis  lordship  receit'ed  the  command  of  a  troop  of  horse,  and  on 
tbe  death  of  lieutenant-general  the  earl  of  Crawford  (see  vol. 
L  p.  71G)  he  was  appointed,  3d  February  1714,  captain  of  the 
Seott'udi  troop  of  horse  grenadier  gnards.  He  signed  the  pro- 
clamation of  George  I.,  August  1,  the  same  year;  but  not 
being  acceptable  to  the  duke  of  Argyle,  he  was  deprived  of  his 
ooinmand,  at  the  same  time  that  his  cousin  the  earl  of  Mar 
was  dismissed  from  his  office  of  secretary  of  state.  Lord 
Marischal,  on  his  way  back  to  Scotland,  met  his  brother 
Janes,  the  future  Marshal  Keith,  at  York,  hastening  to  Lon- 
don, to  npply  for  promotion  in  the  army.  They  returned 
borne  together,  and  instigated  by  their  mother,  who  was  a 
Jaoobite  and  a  Roman  Catholic,  they  at  once  engaged  in  the 
rebellion  of  1716. 

Tiie  earl  was  one  of  the  disaffected  nobles  who  attended 
the  pretended  hunting  match,  summoned  by  the  earl  of  Mar 
st  Aboyne  in  Aberdeenshire,  when  he  unfolded  his  plans  in 
favour  of  tbe  Chevalier  to  those  assembled,  and  he  afterwards 
proclaimed  "King  James  VIII.**  at  Aberdeen.  At  the  battle 
of  Sheriffinnir  bs  had  the  oomMand  of  two  squadrons  of 
On  his  arrival  in  Scotland  22d  December,  the  Cheva- 


lier passed  the  next  night  at  Kewbuigh,  a  seat  of  the  earl 
Maritfchal,  and  at  Fetteresso,  the  principal  seat  of  the  earl, 
he  remained  several  days,  suffering  from  ague.  Here  he  held 
a  recepUon,  when  the  earl  of  Mnr,  the  earl  3ilarischal,  and 
about  thirty  other  noblemen  and  gentlemen,  were  introduced 
to  him,  and  had  the  honour  of  kissing  his  hand.  When  the 
Chevalier  made  his  public  entry  into  Dundee,  on  6th  January 
1716,  the  earl  of  Mar  rode  on  his  right  hand  and  the  earl 
Mnrischal  on  his  lefl.  After  the  failure  of  the  enterprise,  the 
earl  escaped  to  the  coiitinent,  but  his  titles,  with  the  here- 
ditar}'  office  of  Marischal  of  Scotland,  which  had  been  in  the 
family  since  the  days  of  Malcolm  Canmore,  wero  attainted, 
and  his  estates  forfeited  to  the  crown.   ' 

In  1719,  the  earl  returned  to  Scotland,  with  the  SpanUh 
troops  sent  by  Cardinal  Alberoni,  prime  minister  of  the  king 
of  Spain,  to  make  another  attempt  ij^  the  Pretender*s  favour, 
lliis  small  force  landed  in  the  western  Highlands,  and  was 
joined  by  some  Highlanders,  chiefly  Seaforth's  men.  A  dif- 
ference arose  between  the  eairl  Marischal  and  the  marquis  of 
Tullibardino  about  the  comm.and,  but  this  dispute  was  put 
an  end  to  by  the  advance  of  General  Wightman  from  Inver- 
ness, with  a  body  of  regular  troops.  The  Highlanders  and 
their  allies  had  taken  possession  of  the  pass  at  Glenshiel ; 
but^  on  the  approach  of  the  government  troops,  tliey  retired 
to  the  pass  at  Strachell,  which  they  resolved  to  defend.  Gen- 
eral Wightman  attacked  and  drove  them  from  one  eminence 
to  another,  when,  seeing  no  chance  of  making  a  successful 
resistance,  the  Highlanders  dispersed  during  the  night,  and 
the  Sp.iniards  on  the  following  d.ny  surrendered  themselves 
prisoners  of  war.  Marischal,  Scnforth,  and  Tnllibardine, 
with  the  other  officers,  retired  to  the  western  isles,  and  thei-e- 
after  escaped  to  the  continent. 

On  the  rupture  between  Great  Britain  and  Spain  in  1740, 
the  Chevalier  despatched  Lord  Marischal  to  Madrid  to  in- 
duce the  Spanish  court  to  adopt  measures  for  his  restoration. 
Alluding  to  his  expectations  of  assistance  from  France,  the 
Chevalier,  in  a  letter  written  to  I/Ord  Alarischal  on  11th  Jan- 
uary 1740,  while  his  lordship  was  on  his  way  to  the  Spanish 
C'lpital,  says,  "  I  am  betwixt  hopes  and  fears,  tho*  I  think 
there  ut  more  room  for  the  first  than  the  last,  as  you  will 
luive  perceived  by  what  Lord  Sempil  (so  an  active  agent  of 
James  was  called)  has,  I  suppose,  writ  to  you.  I  conclude  I 
blinll  some  time  next  month  see  clcirer  into  these  great  af- 
fairs." The  original  is  among  the  Stuart  papers  in  her  Ma- 
jesty's possession.  In  1743,  the  earl  was  at  Boulogne,  and 
in  the  following  year,  when  the  French  government  were 
meditating  im  invasion  of  Great  Britain  in  support  of  the 
Pretender,  a  small  force  in  connection  with  it  was  to  be 
landed  in  Scotland  under  his  lordship*s  command.  In  a  let- 
ter, however,  to  the  Chevalier  from  Lord  Marischal,  dated 
Avignon,  5th  September  1744,  his  lordship  insinuates  that 
there  existed  a  design,  on  the  part  of  the  French  ministry, 
or  of  the  Chevaliefs  agents  at  Paris,  to  exclude  both  the 
duke  of  Ormond  and  himself  from  any  share  in  the  expedi- 
tion. 

The  earl  took  no  part  in  the  attempt  of  Prince  Charles  ui 
1745.  Having  gone  to  reside  in  Prussia,  he  gained  the  con- 
fidence of  Frederick  the  Great,  who,  in  1750,  appointed  him 
his  ambnssador  extraordinary  to  France.  He  also  invested 
him  with  the  Prussian  order  of  the  Black  Eagle,  and  bestow- 
ed on  him  the  government  of  Neufchatel.  In  1759,  the  earl 
was  ambassador  from  Prussia  to  Spain,  and  discovering, 
while  at  the  court  of  Bladrid,  the  secret  of  the  "Family 
Comp:ict,**  by  which  the  different  branches  of  the  houw  of 
Bourbon  had  bound  themselves  to  assbt  each  other,  he  com- 
nranicated  that  important  intelligence  to  Mr.  Pitt,  then 


I . 


!i     I 


J. 


idh*a 


i 


r 


I 


:( 


MARK, 


108 


EAKL  OF. 


prfine  iiii»i»tcr  uf  Kngland,  nt*t(*r\r:in]tf  the  first  carl  of  Clint- 
\inu\.  The  hitter  having  rpprc.soiitcd  his  cum  to  Gcor^  II., 
a  ]»Hrdi>n  wnii  granted  to  him  29t1i  May  1759.  The  earl 
tiiorcniMm  quitted  Madrid,  hut  had  not  hvcii  gone  S<!  Iioun 
before  intelligence  wa.^  ncvived  of  the  conininnicatioii  he  had 
inude  to  Kngland. 

Arriving  in  London  he  was  introduced  to  George  II.,  lath 
June  17(30,  and  most  gnicioiulj  received.  An  act  of  parha- 
nicnt  priKsed  the  same  vuar,  to  enable  him  to  inherit  anv  mtate 
that  might  descend  to  him,  notwithstanding  his  attainder, 
and  he  was  thus  enabled  to  possefts  the  entailed  estates  of  the 
earl  of  Kintoro,  on  his  death  in  17CI  (see  Kintouk,  e:irl  of, 
vol.  iL  p.  Gil).  He  took  the  oaths  to  the  govcnimcnt  in  the 
court  of  king's  bench  2Gth  January,  17G1.  His  own  estates 
li.id  been  sold  in  17'20  to  tlio  York  Unilding  Company  for 
£41,172,  and  his  casile  of  Dunnott.ir  dbniantled,  but  in 
1761  an  act  of  parliament  was  passed  to  enable  his  nnijosty, 
George  III.  to  grant  to  him  out  i»f  the  principal  bum  and  in- 
terest remaining  due  on  his  forfeited  estate,  the  sum  <:f 
£8,618,  with  interest  from  WhiL^unduy  1721.  In  1704. 
I^ord  Alarischal  purchiised  back  part  of  the  family  estites, 
with  the  intention  of  taking  up  his  rfMdence  in  Scotland. 
The  king  of  Pnisjsi.-i,  hnwever,  was  urgent  for  his  return  to 
lierlin.  In  one  of  his  letters  he  s:iid,  *'If  I  had  a  fleet,  1 
would  come  and  cam*  vou  off  hv  force."    Tlie  carl,  in  conse- 

0  9  9  ' 

qnence,  went  back  to  Prussia,  where  he  si)ent  the  remainder 
of  his  days.  A  traveller,  who  visited  Iterlin  about  1777,  thus 
writes:  "We  dined  almost  every  d.iy  with  the  I/)j"d  Maris- 
chal,  who  was  then  8o  years  old,  and  was  still  as  vigorous  as 
ever  both  in  body  and  mind.  The  king  had  given  him  a 
house  adjoining  the  gardens  of  Sans  Souci,  and  frequently 
went  thither  to  see  him.  He  had  excused  himself  from  dining 
witli  him,  having  found  that  his  health  would  not  allow  him 
to  sit  long  at  table,  and  he  was  of  all  those  who  had  enjoyed 
the  favour  of  the  king  the  only  one  who  could  truly  be  called 
his  friend,  and  who  was  sincerely  attached  to  his  {)erson. 
Of  course,  every  Inxiy  paid  court  to  him.  lb  was  called  the 
king's  friend,  and  was  the  only  one  who  had  merited  that 
title,  for  he  had  always  stooJ  well  with  him  without  fhitter- 
ing  him.**  His  lordsh.ip  died,  unmarried,  at  Potsdam,  28th 
May  1778,  in  his  86th  year.  An  '  Kloge  de  My  lonl  Mar6- 
chal*  by  DWIembert,  was  published  at  Berlin  in  1779. 


MarJ(>rib.\xks,  a  territorial  surname,  from  the  lands  of 
Rjitho-Miujoric,  Renfrewshire.    See  p.  114  of  this  volume. 

Makr,  or  Mar,  earl  of,  a  title  in  the  Scots  peerage,  now 
possessed  by  the  family  of  Krskine.  The  ancient  district  of 
Alierdeenshireofthisname,  king  chiefly  between  the  Don  r.nd 
the  Dee,  was  one  of  the  old  maormonloms  into  which  the  north 
of  Scotland  was  divided,  whose  origin  is  lost  in  antiquity.  The 
first  mention  of  it  is  in  1  U6o,  when  Martachus,  maonnor  of 
3Iarr,  was  witness  to  a  charter  of  Malcolm  Canmore  in  favour 
of  the  Culdees  of  I^ochleven.  His  son,  Gratn.nch,  witnessed  in 
1114  the  foundation  charter  of  the  monastery  of  Scone  by 
Alexander  I.  Properly,  Gratnach  may  be  considered  the 
first  earl  of  Marr,  and  not  ^lartachus,  as  stated  by  Douglas 
in  his  Peerage,  the  Saxon  title  of  earl  not  being  known  in 
Scolhmd  in  Malcolm  Cnninore's  d.iys.  Ho  had  a  son,  Mor 
gundus,  who  witnessed  a  grunt  of  lands  by  David  I.,  to  the 
monks  of  Dunfennline,  and  was  father  of  Gillocher,  witness 
to  a  charter  of  the  same  monardi  in  1093.  Gillocher's  son, 
Mo.-gimd,  received  from  King  William  the  lion  in  1171,  a 
grant  of  the  renewal  of  the  inx'cstiturcs  of  the  earldom  of 
.MaiT.  He  had  five  sons,  the  three  eldest  of  whom,  Gilbert, 
C'lclirist,  and  Duncan,  acocrding  to  Dooglao,  were  soccee-  | 


sively  caris  of  Marr,  but  the  suoccsnoD,  m  given  in  tlie  Indrx 
to  Anderson's  Dijilomala  Seatkii  runs  asfoUowi:  1.  GniU 
nach;  3.  Moi^i^and;  8.  Gilchrist;  4.  Duncan,  Iiis  brotber; 
5.  William;  G.  Don.nld;  7.  Gratney;  8.  Donahl  11. ;  9.  Tho- 
mas, &C.    Earl  Duncan  died  bi'fore  1284. 

His  son,  William,  fifth  earl,  according  to  the  aboro  ■»- 
meration,  was,  in  1258,  daring  the  minority  of  Alexander 
III.,  appointed  one  of  the  regents  of  Scotland.  In  1264  be 
obtained  the  office  of  great  chambcriain,  and  in  1S70  be  was 
sent  on  a  special  mission  to  Henry  III.  of  En^and.  Ue  died 
the  same  year.  Hy  his  counters,  Elisabeth,  daughter  of  Wil- 
liam Comyn,  carl  of  Buchan,  he  had  two  mus,  DonaU  and 
Duncan. 

Donald,  the  sixth,  osoally  called  the  tenth  earl  of  Marr, 
was  knighted  at  Scone,  by  Alexander  III.,  29tb  September 
1270,  and  witnessed  a  charter  of  that  monarch  to  the  foorth 
carl  of  Ijcnnox  in  1272.  He  was  also  a  witness  to  the  mar- 
riage contract  of  the  princess  Margsiret  of  Scotland  with 
Eric,  king  of  Nor>vay,  in  1281,  and  one  of  the  Soots  nobles 
who,  in  the  parliament  of  Scone,  5th  February  1288-4,  iwoie 
to  acknowledge  the  Alaiden  of  Norway  as  their  sorrreign  in 
the  event  of  the  death  of  Alexander  II L  He  w.ns  preaeot  in 
I  ho  assembly  at  Brigham  12th  July  1290,  when  the  trndy 
for  the  marriage  of  the  Maiden  of  Norway,  Alexander's 
,';n!nd-daughter  and  successor,  with  the  prince  of  Wales,  af- 
terwards Edward  II.  of  England,  was  concluded,  but  her 
(loath  at  Orkney,  on  her  passage  from  Norway,  pat  an  end  to 
that  pniji*ct  for  the  union  of  the  two  kingdoms. 

Donald,  carl  of  Marr,  was  one  of  the  nominees  choaen  on 
the  ptrt  of  Rol>ert  Bnicc,  carl  of  Carrick,  in  liia  competition 
for  the  Scottish  ciown  in  1190.  Ho  died  in  1294,  leaving  a 
son,  Gratney,  who  succeeded  him,  and  two  daughters.  Isa- 
bella, the  eider,  as  the  wife  of  Kobcrt  the  Drnce,  waa  qneen 
of  Scotland.  Mary,  the  younger,  married  Kenneth,  third 
carl  of  Sutherland. 

Gnitney,  7th,  billed  11th  earl,  married  the  lady  Christian 
Bruce,  sister  of  Hitbert  I.,  the  Bruce  and  Marr  families  Wing 
thus  doubly  united.  With  a  S(>n,  Donald,  his  successor,  ]:e 
had  a  daughter,  Ijidy  Elyne  Marr,  thn  wife  of  Sir  John  Men- 
teith,  and  mother  of  a  daughter,  Christian,  married  to  Sir 
Eilward  Keith.  Ijidy  Keith*.s  daughter,  .Tanet.  in.nrrifd  Sir 
Thomas  Erskine,  and  her  son  by  him.  Sir  Robert  EnJcinc,  in 
her  right,  claimed  the  earldom  of  Marr.  The  I  Jidy  Cliri>tian 
Bruce  bronght  to  the  family  of  Marr  the  magnificent  castle  of 
Kildnnnmie,  in  Abenleenshire,  which,  at  an  early  period,  w:is 
royal  property.  In  1335,  when  bcMegcd  by  the  earl  of  A  thole, 
wlitim  the  Baliol  faction  had  made  governor  of  the  kingdom, 
it  was  under  her  ch:irge.  After  Earl  Gnitney*s  deatii,  the 
countess  married  Sir  Christopher  Seton  of  Seton,  and  after- 
wards Sir  Andi'ew  Moniv  of  Bothwe'.l. 

0 

Donald,  8tli,  called  12lh  earl,  was  very  young  at  hisfather*a 
death.  On  the  defeat  of  his  uncle,  Uobert  the  Brace,  at  Melb- 
ven  in  1306,  the  earl  of  .Mar  was  tiken  prisoner  by  the  Eng- 
lish. During  the  long  and  arduons  struggle  for  Sciitland*s  in- 
dependence, he  remained  a  captive  in  EnghuuL  When,  how- 
ever, it  had  at  last  been  achieved  on  the  field  of  Bannockbum, 
he  obtained  his  liberty,  being,  with  the  wife,  sister,  and  daugh- 
ter of  Bruce,  and  the  bishop  of  Glasgow,  exchanged  fur  the 
earl  of  Hereford.  He  was  present  in  the  p.irlianicnt  of  Scone 
in  1318,  but  as  he  appears  to  have  chiefly  resided  in  England 
daring  the  uneasy  reign  of  Edward  II.,  hb  name  does  not 
appear  at  the  famous  letter  of  the  Scottish  noUes  to  tlie  Pop* 
in  1820.  He  was  appointed  by  King  Edward  guardian  of 
the  castle  of  Bristol,  and  in  September  1326,  when  the  Eng- 
lish queen  Isabella,  with  her  paramoor,  Lwd  Mwtiiner, 
Unded  iu  England  firom  France,  with  an  annjr,  againat  hm 


JJ 


MARK, 


109 


EARL  OF. 


I 

i 

1 

I 

1 


bottband  nnd  hui  fiironrites  the  Despeniers,  he  delivered  up 
tlie  easCte  to  her,  nnd  retnmeJ  to  Scotland.  In  the  followin;; 
rear  he  tseld  a  tuboniiaate  command  hi  the  Scottish  nnnv 
whirii,  under  Randolph  and  Douglas,  inrade<l  England. 

On  the  death  of  Randolph,  Jiilv  80, 1332,  the  cnrl  of  Marr, 
on  2d  August,  iras  cho6en  re<^nt  iu  hut  stead,  his  principnl 
reeommendation  bein^  that  he  was  the  nephew  of  the  late 
kiD^  M  ht  was  ever/  way  niifitted  for  an  office  so  nrduotts. 
He  bdd  the  appointment,  howeTer,  only  f«>r  ten  days.  On 
the  Tirjr  daj  of  hin  election  he  received  notice  that  Edn'ard 
Befiol,  accompanied  by  the  lords  Beaumont  and  Wake,  had 
appeared  with  a  fleet  in  the  Frith  of  Forth.  After  dcfeatii);; 
a  inudl  furee  which  had  hastily  collected  to  oppose  his  land- 
in;;  at  Kinghom,  Baliul  marched  to  Perth,  and  encamped 
near  Foiteriot,  haring  the  river  Earn  in  his  front.  Tlie  earl  of 
Ifsrr  drew  np  his  army,  of  30,000  men,  npon  Dnpplin  moor, 
on  the  opposite  bank  of  the  river.  Raliors  force  did  not  ex- 
ceed 8,000  men,  bnt  he  had  friends  in  the  Scottish  camp. 
Many  of  the  Soots  nobles,  whose  rehitives  had  been  disiuher- 
Hfd  by  Brace,  secretly  favoured  his  pretensicms,  as* offering  n 
chance  of  their  being  restored  to  their  estates.  Despising  so 
small  a  force  as  Baliol  commanded,  the  Scots  abandoned 
tlicRiselves  to  careless  security,  and  af>er  spending  the  dav  in 
drunkenness,  went  to  rest,  without  taking  the  common  pre- 
caution even  of  placing  sentinels.  During  the  night  of  the 
13th  of  August,  the  English  crossed  the  river  by  a  ford 
pmnted  ont  to  them  by  Andrew  Murray  of  Tullibnrdlne,  one 
of  the  disaffected  Scottish  barons,  and  attacking  the  Scots 
snny  in  their  sleep,  put  them  to  complete  rout.  Among  the 
killed  was  the  earl  of  Man*.  He  left  a  son,  Thomas,  ninth 
earl,  and  a  daughter,  Ltdy  Margaret,  who  succeeded  her 
brother. 

Thomas,  ninth  cnlletl  thirteenth  earl,  was  one  of  the  am- 
basmdors  aent  to  treat  with  England,  for  tlio  temporary  re- 
kaM  in  1351  of  David  II..  from  his  English  captivity ;  nnd 
in  1357,  when  that  weak  king  was  at  length  set  at  liberty,  lie 
was  one  of  the  seven  great  lords  from  whom  three  were  to  be 
•elected  as  hostages  for  the  payment  of  his  ransom.  In  1 .158, 
the  earl  of  ^I.nrr  was  appointed  great  chainberlain  of  Scotland. 
In  1362,  he  was  named  an  ambassador  to  treat  with  England, 
and  in  13C9  he  was  one  of  the  guarantees  of  a  truce  with 
tli.nt  nation.  He  appears  to  have  favoured  the  English  in- 
teivst,  as  he  h.nd  a  pension  from  King  Edwanl  III.  of  COO 
merks  yearly.  He  difd  in  1377,  leaving  no  issue.  In  him 
ended  the  direct  male  line  of  the  old  earls  of  Marr. 

His  si»ter,  Margaret,  succeeded  as  countess  of  Mnrr.  She 
married,  first,  Wiiliam,  fir^t  earl  of  I)ougI:is,  who,  in  her 
ri;;ht.  became  earl  of  Marr,  and  is  designed  earl  of  Donglas 
ind  Jilarr  in  sevenil  charters.  Having  been  divorced  from 
him,  she  tot>k  for  her  second  husband  Sir  John  S  win  ton  of 
Swinton,  killed  at  Homildon  hill  in  1402.  By  the  earl  of 
Douglas  she  had  a  ion,  James,  Earl  of  Dongl:is  and  Marr,  and 
a  d.-tugliter,  Isabella.    The  second  marriage  was  without  issue. 

James,  earl  of  Douglas  and  Marr,  fell  at  Otterhum,  July 
81,  1388  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  43.) 

"  Tliis  deed  was  done  at  Otterboume, 
Alr-mt  the  brc;iking  of  the  day ; 
K:irl  Donglas  was  huritMl  at  the  braken  bnsb. 
And  the  Percy  led  captive  away." 

As  he  left  no  I»*gitimatc  issno  his  sister,  Is.'d>eIIa,  became 
cauntess  of  >Iarr.  She  married,  first,  Sir  Malcolm  Drum- 
mond  of  Druinmond,  8tyle<l,  in  her  right,  earl  of  Marr.  He 
d:*-d  without  issue,  before  27th  May,  1403.  At  this  time  the 
oounteas  was  residing  tranquilly  at  her  castle  of  Kildrummie, 


and  Alexander  Stewart^  a  natural  son  of  the  earl  of  liuchnn, 
called  the  wolf  of  Brfdenoch,  deeming  her  and  her  broad  lands 
a  prize  worth  the  having,  at  the  head  of  a  formidable  band  of 
outlaws  ar.d  robbers,  stormed  the  castle,  and  either  by  vio- 
lence or  persuasion,  obtained  her  in  marriage.  Tlie  father  of 
this  lawless  young  man  was  the  foiu'th  son  of  King  Robert 
II.,  and  as  his  father's  brother,  the  duke  of  Albany,  governor 
of  the  kingdom,  fur  his  own  piurposes,  winked  at  the  feuds 
nnd  excesses  of  the  nobles,  he  took  advantage  of  the  disturbed 
state  of  the  country  and  the  unprotected  condition  of  the 
countes.s  to  commit  an  act,  which  was  attended  with  com- 
plete success.  On  12th  August,  1404,  the  ciountess  made 
over  her  earldom  of  Marr  and  Garioch,  with  all  her  other 
land.**,  to  the  said  Alexander  Stewart,  "  and  the  heirs  to  be 
procreated  between  him  and  her,  whom  failing,  to  hu  heirs 
and  assignees  whatsoever."  To  give  a  legal  aspect  to  tlie 
whole  transaction,  on  the  19th  September,  he  presented  him- 
self at  the  castle  gate  of  Kildnimuiie,  and  surrendered  to  the 
countess  not  only  the  castle,  but  all  within  it,  and  the  title 
deeds  theivin  kt* nt :  in  testimony  of  which  he  delivered  to  her 
the  keys  to  dispose  of  as  she  pleased.  The  countes.^  holding 
them  in  her  hand,  delibemtely  and  of  her  own  free  will,  chose 
him  for  her  husband,  and  conferred  upon  him  the  cistle,  per- 
tinents, &c.,  as  a  free  marriage  gift,  of  which  he  took  instni- 
nients.  This,  however,  was  not  deemed  sufficient,  for,  on  the 
9th  December  following,  the  countess,  standing  in  the  fiehls, 
outside  the  castle  of  Kildrummie,  in  presence  of  Alexander, 
bishop  of  Ross,  and  the  whole  tenants,  that  it  might  appear  to 
have  been  conferred  without  force  on  his  part  or  fear  on  hers, 
granted  .a  charter  of  the  same  to  him,  duly  signeil  nnd  sealed. 
After  this  the  said  Alexander  Stewart  was  usually  styled  earl 
of  Marr  and  lord  of  Garioch. 

In  1406,  ho  was  one  of  the  ambassadors  sent  to  England, 
to  tre.'it  of  peace.  The  following  year  he  was  again  in  Eng- 
land, when  he  engaged  in  a  tournament  with  the  earl  of  Kent 
at  I.ondon.  In  1408,  he  went  to  Fnmco  and  Flanders,  with  a 
splendid  retinue,  and,  according  to  W}'ntoun  (jChronyhil^  vol. 
ii.  pp.  421 — 440)  gained  great  distinction  in  the  service  of  the 
duke  of  Burgimdy,  by  whom  he  was  sent  to  assist  in  qnelling 
a  rebellion  at  Liege,  of  the  inhabitants  against  John  of  Bava- 
ria, their  bishop.  It  is  said  that,  on  this  occasion,  although 
his  wife  the  countess  of  Marr  was  then  alive,  he  manied  the 
lady  of  Duffyl  in  Brabant.  In  a  charter  to  his  brother,  An- 
di-ew  Stewart,  with  his  other  acquired  titles,  he  is  styled 
"  dominus  de  Duflc."  This  was  the  earl  of  Marr  who  cora- 
mande<l  the  royal  army  against  Donald,  lord  of  the  Isles,  at 
the  battle  of  Harhiw  in  1411.  The  ostensible  cause  of  the 
battle  was  the  earldom  of  Ross,  which  had  been  held  by  his 
fatlicr,  the  Wolf  of  Badenoch,  in  right  of  his  wife,  the  countess 
of  Ross,  and  was  claimed  by  his  uncle,  tlie  regent  Albany,  for 
his  second  son,  the  earl  of  Bnchan,  as  well  as  by  Donald  of 
the  Isles  in  right  of  his  wife.  (See  vol.  i.  p.  37.)  Tlie  strug- 
gle, however,  was  only  a  part  of  that  long  contest  which  took 
place  betwixt  the  Saxon  and  the  Celtic  portions  of  the  nation 
for  the  sovereignty  of  tlic  country,  which  htsted  till  the  latter 
were  finally  obliged  to  succumb.  The  h)rd  of  the  Isles,  with 
an  army  of  10,000  men,  h.'ul  .idvanced  as  far  as  the  district  of 
Marr,  intending  to  plunder  the  c'.ty  of  Abei*deen,  and  to 
ravage  the  country  to  the  borders  of  the  Tay,  but  was  stopped 
in  his  progress  by  the  earl  of  M.arr,  as  thus  related  in  the  old 
historical  ballad  called  *  The  Battle  of  HariaiW : ' 

"  To  hinder  this  pmnd  enterprise. 
The  stout  and  mighty  earl  of  Mar, 
With  all  his  men  in  arms  did  rise, 
Even  frae  Curgarf  to  Craigievar. 


1 1 


1 1 


1 


ll 


I. 


:  I 


'  I 


^lARR, 


no 


SEVENTH  EARL  OF. 


And  doon  the  tide  of  Don  right  fur, 
Angni  and  ftlearns  did  all  convene 
To  fecht,  or  Donald  come  bm  nenr, 
The  rojal  bur|;h  of  Aberdeen. 

"  And  thus  the  martial  earl  of  ^f  ar 
Marcht  with  his  men  in  richt  armv. 

Before  the  enemy  was  aware, 
His  banner  baiildly  did  didplnr. 
For  weel  eneuch  they  knew  the  war. 

And  all  their  nemblance  weel  ther  i^nve, 
Without  all  danger  or  dehiy, 

Came  hastilv  to  the  Harlaw.** 

In  14in  the  earl  was  appointed  ambassador  extraonlinar}* 
to  England,  and  aoon  after  warden  of  the  marches.  His 
uncle,  the  duke  of  Albany,  being  at  this  time  governor  of  the 
kingdom,  may  partly  nceount  for  his  being  preferred  to  such 
high  offices,  especially  after  the  signal  service  he  hnd  done 
him  in  defeating  his  fonnidable  rival,  Donald  nf  the  Isles. 

Tho  countess  of  Marr  died  in  1419,  when  the  fee  of  thtr 
earidom  should  have  devolved  on  the  heir  of  line,  .Tanet  Keith, 
wife  of  Sir  Thom:is  Erskine,  but  Earl  Alexander,  conscious 
that  he  had  only  a  liferent  right  to  it,  used  the  device  of  re- 
signing it  into  the  hands  of  the  king,  James  I.,  on  which  a 
charter  of  the  earldom,  dated  28th  May  142G,  was  gnmte<l  by 
the  king,  to  hun.self  for  life,  and  to  his  natund  son,  Sir 
Thomas  Stewart,  after  him,  and  the  lawful  heirs  male  of  his 
bodv,  and  on  their  failure  to  revert  to  the  crown.  Earl 
Alexander  died,  without  legitimate  iMue,  in  August  1435, 
and  his  natund  son,  Sir  Thomas  Stewart,  having  predeceased 
him,  the  earldom,  according  to  the  charter,  became  vested  in 
the  crown. 

Sir  Rubert  Erskine,  only  son  of  Sir  Thomas  Er»kine  and 
Ijidy  Janet  Keith,  grcat-granddnngliter  nf  Grntner,  7th, 
Cjdled  tlie  Uth  earl,  (see  page  108)  now  advanced  his  claims 
to  the  earldom,  in  right  of  his  mother,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  144.) 
On  2*2d  April  1438,  he  was,  before  the  sheriff  of  Aberdeen, 
served  heir  to  the  Countess  Isabel,  and  in  the  following 
Xuvemlier  infeftcd  in  the  estates.  Assuming  the  title  of 
earl  of  Marr,  he  granted  various  charters  to  Yass.ils  of  the 
earldum.  lie  was  not,  however,  allowed  to  retain  possesbiun 
of  it.  In  1437,  immediately  after  the  assassination  of  James 
1.  an  act  of  parli:mient  w.is  passed  that  no  lands  or  posses- 
sions belonging  to  the  king  shouM  be  given  to  any  man  with- 
out the  consent  of  the  three  Estates,  till  the  young  king 
(James  II.,  then  only  seven  years  old)  should  l>e  twenty -one 
years  of  age,  and  in  1440,  it  was  agreed  **  fur  the  good  and 
quiet  of  the  land,  that  the  king  should  deliver  up  to  Sir 
Robert  Enskine,  calling  himself  earl  of  Marr,  the  castle  of 
Kildrummie,  to  be  kept  by  him  till  tho  king*s  majority,  when 
the  smd  Sir  Robert  should  come  before  the  king  .and  the  three 
Estates,  and  show  his  rights  and  chiinis,  as  far  as  law  will.'* 
At  the  same  time  Sir  Robert  delivered  up  to  the  king  the 
castles  of  Marr  and  Dumbarton  held  hy  him.  In  1442,  Sir 
Robert  Erskine  took  a  protest  at  StirUiig,  in  presence  of  the 
king  and  council,  complaining  against  the  cliancellor,  fur  re- 
fusing to  retour  liim  to  the  lordship  of  Garioch,  and  put  him 
hi  possession  of  the  castle  of  Kildrummie.  lie  afterwards 
besieged  and  took  the  castle,  whereupon  the  castle  of  Alloa, 
belonging  to  him,  was  taken  possession  of  in  the  king*s  mime. 
In  1448,  in  consequence  of  a  new  indenture,  Sir  Robert 
Erskine  obliged  himself  to  deliver  up  the  castle  of  Kildrum- 
mie to  the  king. 

On  Sir  Robert*8  death,  after  1449,  tho  king,  on  various 
grounds,  obtained  a  reduction  of  his  service  before  an  assize 


of  error,  held,  in  hu  presence,  at  Aberdeen,  15tb  Mny 
1457. 

llie  earldom,  being  that  unjustly  withheld  firom  the  right- 
ful ownen,  was  never  long  enjoyed  by  any  of  the  Tarioot 
personages  on  wh<nn  it  was  inbeeqnently  conferred,  the  fate 
of  all  of  whom  wai  lingularly  unfortunate.  The  Hal  of 
these  was  John,  8d  son  of  James  II.,  a  young  prince  of  great 
accomplishmenta,  and  expert  in  all  the  kniglitly  eaereiief 
and  p.x>time8  of  the  age.  Having  rendered  himself  obnoxioiis 
to  the  favourites  of  his  brother,  J.imes  III.,  he  was  in  1479 
by  them  accused  of  plotting  against  his  life  by  spells  and  in- 
cantations, and  by  the  king's  command  imprisoned  in  Cmig- 
millar  castle.  Bemg  condemned  to  die  by  the  king*s  domes- 
tic council,  he  was  removed  to  the  Canongate,  Edinbni^ 
and  bled  to  death  by  having  a  vein  opened.  The  earidom 
was  next  bestowed,  or  rather  the  revenues  of  it,  on  Coch- 
rane, the  principal  favourite  of  the  king,  who  styled  hfinselT 
earl  of  Mar,  hanged  at  Ijinder  Bridge  in  1482. 

The  next  possessor  was  Alexander  Stewart,  duke  of  Ross, 
third  son  of  James  III.,  who  had  a  charter  of  the  same,  2d 
Marnli,  1486.  After  his  death,  the  date  of  which  is  unknown, 
it  retumetl  to  the  crown,  and  in  Februaiy  1561-2,  it  w.is 
conferred  by  Queen  Mary  on  her  natural  brother,  the  lord 
James  Stewart,  afterwards  regent  A  week  previous  he  had 
been  created  earl  of  Muray,  a  title  which  he  preferred  to  that 
of  .Marr,  the  latter  being  claimed  by  the  Erskine  family. 

At  length  in  15(1.3,  the  earldom  of  Marr  was  restored  hy 
Queen  Mary  to  its  legitimate  proprietor,  John,  fifth  I^ord  Er- 
skine, after  the  family  had  l>een  deprived  of  it  for  180  years. 


John,  fifth  I^ird  Erbkine,  and  first  acknowledged  eari  of 
Mar  of  tiiat  family,  was  elected  regent  of  the  kingdom,  on 
the  death  of  the  regent  Lennox,  in  1571.  A  notice  and  por 
trait  of  him  are  given  at  page  1 14  of  vol.  ii.  From  Queen 
Mary  and  King  Henry  (l/>rd  Daniley)  he  received  a  charter, 
18th  July  l.'iG'.',  granting  to  him,  heritably  and  irredeemably, 
and  his  hein>,  bearing  the  sum.ime  and  arms  of  Enkine,  the 
office  of  sheriff  of  Stirlingshire,  and  tho  captaiiMhip  and  cus- 
tody of  the  castle  of  Stirling,  with  the  office  of  bwliary  and 
chamberlainry  of  the  lands  and  lordship  of  Stirling  and  of  the 
water  of  Forth.  The  Erskines  had  been  hereditary  keepen 
of  Stirling  castle  from  tlie  time  of  Sir  Robert  Er)»kuie,  who 
received  the  appointment  fn>m  D.ivid  II.  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  144). 
The  earl  was  by  far  too  honest  and  p.itriolic  for  tho  post  d 
regent,  to  which  he  had  been  elected  at  a  time  when  a  civil 
war  of  unexampled  ferocity  raged  in  the  kingdom,  and  being 
unable  to  prevent  the  scenes  of  blood  and  disorder  which 
were  continmilly  occurring,  or  to  bring  about  any  union  ol 
jiarties,  lie  s:tnk  beneath  the  burden  of  anxiety  and  grief 
\^hich  the  distnicted  state  of  the  kingdom  occasioned  him, 
and  died  29th  October  1572.  Ry  his  wife,  Ammbclla,  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  William  Murray  of  Tuliibanline,  he  had  n  son, 
John,  and  a  daughter,  Mary,  Cfmntess  of  Angus. 

John,  2d,  properly  7th  earl  of  .M.ir,  of  the  name  of  Erhkine, 
bom  about  ITi/iS,  w:is,  though  ci^ht  vears  older  than  the 
prince,  eductted  with  King  James  VI.  at  Stirling  cuttle,  hy 
George  Itncliaiinn,  under  the  eves  of  the  countess  of  Mar,  his 
mother,  and  Sir  Aleximder  Erskine  of  Gngar,  his  uncle,  an- 
cestor of  tlie  earls  of  Kellie.  (See  Kkluic,  earl  of.)  He  was 
only  14  years  of  age  when  he  succeeded  his  father  in  1572. 
In  April  1578  the  earl  of  Morton  prevailed  upon  him  to  re- 
move his  uncle.  Sir  Alexamler,  from  Stirling  castle,  and  to 
t.ike  the  keeping  of  the  cnstle  and  of  the  king^s  person  into 
his  own  hand.  Morton  then  obtained  admission  to  the  castle, 
with  his  friemls  and  fullowers  in  small  parties,  and  after 
that  the  young  earl  durst  do  nothing  but  what  he  commanded 


r 


I 


I 


li 
.1 


1 

I  1 


MARK,  1 

In  Aafnst  \S8S,  Uht  wai  one  of  tha  noblM  engiged  in 
A*  Bald  sf  Ruthrcn,  t1i«  ol^  of  Kliicb  niu  to  g«t  rid  of 
tin  blwuilM,  t>niMU  ud  Amn.  TbeMlDttinej-nc,  Amin 
brii>s  nodkd  to  Cowt,  Uir  tu  tiMnmittcd  to  Die  aatodj  of 
tilt  Mil  «r  Ai^l*,  and  ordvnd  to  iblirer  iqi  tlie  cutlg  uf 
Sb'iImK  to  tb*  Idng  and  council,  on  pain  of  tmaon.  On  Iiii 
ling  n,  tbe  king  gara  tlia  kHpIng  of  Stirling  oiMl*  to  Ar- 
nii,  aod  alio  ippointcd  liim  proroat  of  Sttrling.  Uar,  in  the 
RMantinw,  with  tba  olbm  concrmcd  in  tha  Rutliran  niFair, 
I  Ind  takao  nftiga  in  Inland.  IMunung  to  Scotland,  thff, 
I  ta  tha  ITth  April  IWi,  lurpriiwd  Stirling  c»tl«,  but  ncra 
fimed  honicdl^  to  Inra  it,  on  tlia  27th,  on  tlis  ippRncli  uf 
tha  kingwitb  a  Inri^  fum,  and  to  tuke  thaltar  in  Hnglnnd. 
In  tba  put inmant  vLich  mr 1 21i  Angut  of  tbM  rear,  tlie  aul 
na  iltalnlrd,  with  Ilia  otiian.  In  Konmbtr  I5S5,  bonercr, 
li«  and  tha  otlwr  bauisliad  Inrda  ra-ant«rcd  Scotland,  and  aa- 
aamUiag  tlicir  ntaiurn,  at  tlis  licad  of  6,000  man,  took  poi- 
inaioiiofStiriirgeaatlc  and  )hi  king's  pnion,tli<nnprJiiciplad 
Ann,  ilripiKd  of  al]  liis  tillca  and  calati^  1>*'°K  allcncrd  to 
drop  into  bia  original  oUcunlf.  In  Ilia  parliament  nliiFli 
mrt  in  Dacnnbcr  of  Ilia  Hina  raor,  tba  pardnia  of  tlia  con- 
frdtnltd  hmh  wm  ntitinl,  and  tlirir  liniioun  nnd  raluica 

On  lilt  anival  of  Ilia  king  with  Quaan  Anns  frnni  Den- 
mark lit  Jlaj  1S90,  IbfT  wan  rawivrd  at  the  top  of  the 
ttain  at  the  piar  of  Lallh,  bj  tliaduka  of  I^nnoi,  tlit  anrla 
of  U:ir  and  Botbwell,  nnd  otlicra;  Ilia  countaianofMnraiid 
llariichal  atanding  Ent  in  order  nmoDgit  tlit  vxltm  nobla 
wonwn  nnd  ladia*  taWctad  to  rccaii-a  tha  qnaeii.  In  loOi  lia 
iru  appointad  governor  of  the  caatia  of  Edinliurgli.  At  Ibis 
tiina  ka  waa  in  high  credit  tt  court,  and  IifIJ  tba  offica  of 
pnt  mmler  of  tlia  houieliold.  In  Uarcb  1501  he  rim  nnt 
aftUa  nciblFinen  wbo  inbicHbad  Iha  land  at  Aherdeen,  wbera 
tlie  kill);  Ihni  wni,  for  Iba  lecuritf  of  tlie  prottttant  rdi^on, 
■galnat  tba  Pupiili  eniia,  Ilniitlv,  Angna,  and  Erro),  and 
other*.  After  tha  baptiam  uf  Fiiiim  Heni;  on  the  penult 
daj  of  Angnal  that  rear,  tba  king  dubbed  the  rojal  infant 
a  kii'tglit,  when  lie  wai  "  touobcd  with  tlia  aput  br  tha  rarl  of 
Unr."  At  tlie  banquet  wbicb  (bllowcd, ''  tba  king  and  quacn, 
with  Iba  ambasH.idiir',  ut  at  tHble  in  tba  great  bill,  at  n^bt 
bnnn  at  ricn  ;  tha  ofllce  nien  to  the  king,  tbe  eail  of  JIar, 
grmt  imatar  boutcbold )  tha  lord  Flaming,  grant  ualier ;  tba 
earl  of  Montraae.  cnrreri  tha  cai4  of  Gteiicaim,  copper;  the 
nil  of  OtlmaT,  aewar ;  to  the  queen,  Iba  hwd  Selon,  cnrvar; 
Iba  lord  Hume,  cnpprr;  the  timi  Setnpill,  aewer.    'I'lie  table 

In  tha  ipring  of  1595,  tha  qnaan  iiiaiated  tlmt  tba  Toang 
prifica  ahoald  be  icniovad  from  ^T!rling  tu  Edinburgh  buIIf, 
■"  ~      '  r  oflbalaltcrlurtrcM, 


orM..t,  Hlu'li-idrhar 


of  tbe  iiifaKl,  w 


w  her  ti 


tiina  Mar  Itim,  eiceptwiib  n  ainnll  ntiiiiw,  leit  he  tliould  be 
earned  off  hi  .lulf  of  that  .'ear  the  king  hrnallj  iiitrusird 
lb*  heaping  nnd  educatian  of  tlie  piiuea  to  Iba  earl,  be  a  wnr- 
nnt  Biidrr  his  own  band,  being  the  Eflh  gtncmtion  uf  the 
lojij  (iunilj  wblcb  bud  bean  pnt  under  Iha  chaii;e  uf  an  Kra- 
kint.  At  a  ounTenliun  btlJ  at  Holjrood  pnbica.  Dec.  10, 
liOS,  the  earl  of  Mar  araaaiitom  one  of  tha  council  uppuiiiled 
Id  matt  Iwice  ■•weak  to  asiiit  tbe  king  nilh  their  lulvice. 

lo  iha  mj^eriona  InuineM  of  the  Gowrit  runnpinicj  Iba 
ami  of  Uar  via  one  of  tl«  king't  priiicip.il  allendiiiiM  («o 
Tnl.  ii.  p.  659).  In  IGOt  lit  niu  tent  to  KiiKbiiid.  a*  ainbiia- 
udor,  and  lo  Iiii  eicelkut  raansgemaiit  on  Ibi*  occauan  ii 
h)  p.irt  attributed  Ibe  imODlh  accnaion  of  King  Jainei  lo 
tbe  Kiigliali  tbroue.  When  in  Ijindun,  Itobert  Bract 
Iba  crlabcated  preacher,  than  in  baniahinent  fur  hli  diibelief 
rf  the  gnilt  of  the  Gowrie  broIliRa,  had  nn  interview  iritb 


I  EARL  OF. 

him,  and  thrnngh  tha  carl's  influence  witli  tba  king,  be 
enhaeqnentl^r  recelrad  ■  Ueenia  to  return  to  Scotland.  In 
1603,  the  earl  was  one  of  t)ie  Soots  noblas  who  accompanied 
tbe  lung  on  liia  departure  for  I^mdon  to  tnka  p( 
tba  tlirona  of  England.  Bofura  raacbing  York,  h 
waa  coTnpallad  to  return,  u  the  queen  had  tnkan  adranlaga 
of  bis  sbaenca  to  go  to  Stirling  wi^  a  large  retinoa  of  noble- 
men and  otben,  and  demand  tbnt  prince  Hanrj  should  be 
delivered  up  to  her.  The  eonnlesi  of  Slur,  tba  carl'a  motlier, 
nfuaed  to  give  him  up,  without  an  order  under  the  mrl'a 
own  hand.  Tha  qnaen,  annged  at  tbe  rrfutal,  look  lobar 
bad,  and,  aave  Ci.ldeiwooJ,  "  parted  with  child  the  lOlh  of 
Hkj,  as  wai  conitantljr  leporttd."  Ha  refueed  to  ^ra  to 
anv  one  but  banalf  tha  Irttan  be  had  brought  from 
tbe  king  to  her  niajaatj,  and  both  the  qoean  and  tbe  a.irt 
wrote  tu  Jiimes  cipreei  regarding  this  busineek  The  duke 
of  IvCnnoi  KBis  in  eonaequene*,  sent  trnm  court  to  bare  tba 
affair  s^jiuted.  Ho  arrivrJ  at  Stirling  Iha  13th  ilty,  with 
Uie  king's  approral  of  llie  proendinga  of  the  earl  and  but 
mother,  and  with  eommiaaion  to  Iranaport  both  tha  qoaen 
and  prince  lo  England.  The  earl  nf  Mar  then  rppaurd  tii 
I.oiidon,  and  on  hit  arrival  at  court,  be  ivai  awoni  a  member 
of  tha  Kiigliili  prii^r  council,  nnd  inatalled  a  kiiigbt  of  tba 
G.irter,  !7th  Juljr  the  aiune  ;ear.  In  1604  be  naa  cnaled 
I.urd  Cnrdroet  (see  vol.  i.  p.  987).  at  Iba  aania  time  obtain- 
ing tbe  kironj  of  that  name,  \vilb  the  power  of  aaugning  Iha 
hnron;  end  title  to  anj  of  his  male  heirs.  Tlie  king'*  reavm 
fur  conferring  thie  onuaual  privilege  upon  bim,  u  stated  In 
tlie  grant,  was  that  lie  "  iniglil  lie  in  a  better  coDdilion  to 
prorida  for  hit  jrounger  sona,  \iy  Lndv  llarv  Slewiict,  daugliter 
of  tha  duke  of  Lennox,  and  a  rebilion  of  liia  majealv."  Hit 
pnrlrail  ii  niljiiined. 


le  beginning  of  1606,  ha  returned  to  Scotland  Irom 
,  to  auiit  at  tbe  trial  of  lit.  John  Welch  and  five 
liniitm  at  linlithgow,  on  a  charge  of  treatnn.  for 


lilARU, 


112 


TKNTII  EARL  OF. 


I 


having  lU'i'linoJ  the  jurisdiction  of  the  privy  c<mncil  in  n  mat- 
ter purely  ecclrainstical.  He  was  nit  her  f:iroiirHlIe  than 
otherwise  to  the  prisonera,  fur  when  the  justice-depute,  on  n 
prelimiti.'iry  objection  being  taken  to  the  rvlevancy  of  the  in- 
dictment, declared  that  hv  the  unifonn  votea  of  the  whule 
CMuncil  and  lordx  there  preaent,  the  trial  should  pmceed,  the 
earl  of  Mar  and  two  others  iuterpoKcd,  and  said,  "  Say  not 
all,  fur  there  arc  here  that  are  not,  nor  ever  will  lie,  of  that 
judgment."  They  were,  however,  overruled,  lie  was  a 
member  of  the  court  uf  high  commiasiou  erected  in  IGIU  fi>r 
tiie  trial  of  ecclesiuatic;d  offencea,  and  also  on  its  renewal  in 
ICIO.  Ill  Decemlier  IClfi,  he  was  appointed  lord-high- 
trca<urvr  of  Sothuid,  an  oflico  wliich  he  held  till  IGoO.  At 
the  opening  of  the  pariiainent  at  Kdiiiburgli,  25th  July  1G2I, 
he  earned  the  sce])trc.  as  lie  had  often  done  on  »iinilar  occa- 
sions before.  It  was  at  this  parliament  that  the  obnoxious 
live  articles  of  Perth  were  ratified,  the  earl  of  Mar  being 
among  those  who  voted  for  them.  As  a  courtier  and  favour- 
ite of  King  .lames  he  could  not  have  d«ine  otherwise.  In 
1G2.3  he  w:is  one  of  the  noblemen  named  in  a  commi^^ion  to 
sit  at  Kdinburgh  twice  .n-week  for  the  redress  of  grievances, 
but  which  never  to«>k  etlVct.  lie  wa?  at  the  proclamation  of 
Charles  I.  as  king  nt  the  CrON't  of  Kdinburgh,  lietwixt  bix 
and  seven  oVI(K-k  i:i  tlie  evening  of  the  last  day  of  3Iarch 

The  earl  died  at  Stirling  castle  14th  I>ecembcr  1G3-4,  aged 
77,  and  was  buried  at  .Mloa.  He  was  twice  m:u-ried,  lirst,  to 
Anne,  second  daughter  of  David,  second  Lord  Dnmimond, 
by  whom  he  had  a  son,  John,  his  Fuccessor;  and  secondly, 
to  I^ndy  Mary  Stewart,  second  daughter  of  »me,  duke  of 
I^nnox,  nircadv  mentioned.  Bv  this  hidv  he  had  live  sons 
and  four  daughters.  The  eldest  of  these  sons,  Sir  James 
Erskine,  m.arried  Mary  Douglas,  cnnutess  of  Dnchan,  in  her 
own  right,  and  was  created  earl  of  I>iichan  (soo  lirciiAX, 
earl  of,  vol.  i.  p.  4ol,  where  his  portrait  is  gi\eii).  The  sec- 
ond son,  Henry,  received  from  his  father  the  barony  uf  Car- 
dn>ss,  and  w.hs  known  as  the  tii-ht  Lord  Cardruss.  Tlic  thinl 
son.  Colonel  the  Hon.  Sir  Alexander  Krhkii;e,  was  blown  up 
at  Dimglas-house,  in  Kiiht  I/)thian,  with  his  brother-in-law, 
the  eai-l  uf  Haddington,  in  1G40.  He  was  a  man  of  elegnnt 
person,  and  the  hero  of  the  beautiiul  and  pathetic  Scot! iith 
song,  begiiming  **  Baloo,  my  boy,*'  the  heroine  of  which  was 
Anna  liothwell,  daughter  of  I^rd  ]lolyroodhou.«e.  I  be  victim 
of  an  unfortunate  passion  (see  vol.  L  p.  3G4).  The  Hon.  Sir 
Charles  Krskinc  of  Alva,  knight,  the  4lli  s«m,  was  aiiccKtor  of 
the  Krskiiies  of  Alva  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  145),  a  family  now  iv- 
presented  i>y  the.  calls  of  Rosslyn ;  .ind  the  lion.  Wiiiiam  V.rn- 
kine,  the  youngest  son,  was  cupbearer  to  Charles  1 1.,  and  master 
of  the  Charter  House,  lA)ndon.  All  the  lord-treasm-er's  fi»nr 
daughters  were  marriinl  to  carls,  namely,  Marischal,  I?(»thes. 
Kinghom,  and  Haddington.  The  carl  himself  w.is  familiar- 
ly called  by  his  classfcllow,  James  VI.,  "Jocky  o*  Sclait- 
tis,**  that  is,  slates ;  and  this  name  ho  continued  to 
give  him  even  after  he  had  l>ecflltne  lord-treasurer.  When 
a  widower,  the  earl  had  fallen  deeply  in  love  wi:Ii  L'ldy 
Mary  Stewart,  the  d.nughter  of  I.ennox  and  cousin  of  the 
king.  As  his  lordship  was  twice  her  age,  and  had  already  a 
son  and  heir,  she  at  first  pofiitively  refused  to  take  him.  The 
king,  however,  took  his  part,  and  in  his  own  liomely  way, 
said,  "  I  say,  Jock,  yo  s:inna  die  for  ony  lass  in  .V  the  land.** 
He  is  s.aid  to  have  prev.ailed  on  the  lady  to  marry  him  by 
piiii'.iising  to  make  a  peer  of  her  eldeat  son. 

.lohn,  the  eighth  earl,  was  invested  with  the  order  of  the 
Rath  at  the  creation  of  Henry  prince  of  Wale^  SOtli  May 
IGIO;  sworn  a  Tpnvr  counciUor,  20th  July  1615,  and  ap- 
pr)ii:tetl  governor  of  Kdinburgh  castle.    On  Ist  Febmaiy 


1G20,  while  still  I.ord  Knkine,  he  was  named  one  of  the  ex- 
traordinary lords  of  session,  and  in  1G26  was  sopeneded  with 
the  rest  of  the  extraordinary  lords.  Reappunted  18th  Jnne 
1G28,  he  again  sat  on  the  bench  till  1G30.  lie  succeeded  his 
father  in  103 1,  and  in  IG38  was  deprived  of  his  command  of 
Kdinburgh  cistle.  General  Ruthven,  aflerwards  earl  of  Forth 
(ace  FoitTii,  earl  of,  vol.  ii.  p.  2o4),  having  been  recalled 
from  the  Swedisli  scrx'icc  and  by  the  king  appointed  governor 
of  the  castle,  at  tlie  conimeucement  of  the  civil  commotions  in 
Scotland,  when  the  infatiuited  Charles  resolved  to  rappreai 
the  covenant  by  forco.  He  got  security,  however,  for  a  com- 
pensation of  £3,000.  The  same  year,  he  was  prevailed  upon 
to  sell  to  the  king  the  sherifiship  of  Stirling  and  bniliarr  of 
tlie  Forth,  for  £8,000  sterling,  for  which  he  obtained  a  bond, 
1st  November  1G4I.  (^Douglni  Pttmyt^  vol.  ii.  p.  2IG.) 
He  was  one  of  the  noblemen  pn>pivsed  by  the  king  to  llw 
Scots  Kbtiites  to  be  a  prin'  councillor,  and  was  accOTdingly 
sworn  one  fur  life  on  the  13th  of  the  same  month.  Being  a 
great  pn  jector,  he  obtained  a  p:itent  for  the  tanning  of  le.i- 
ther,  but  in  consequence  of  its  having  been  compluined  of  as 
a  mono]K>ly,  it  was  disch:u'gcd  by  parliament,  on  ICth  No- 
vember the  same  year.  A  remit  wan,  however,  made  to  the 
council  to  consider  his  expenses,  that  repamtiun  might  be 
made  to  him  for  the  Mime. 

The  earl  of  Mar  at  lln»t  favoured  the  Covenanters,  bat 
soon  joined  tlie  Cumbernauld  association  to  support  the  king. 
In  consequence,  his  property  was  forfeited  by  the  Kstates.  \U 
is  said  to  have  sold  several  lands  in  Scotland,  and  with  the 
money  receiv(>d  for  them,  purchased  an  estate  in  Ireland, 
which  he  \*mX  br  the  Irish  rebellion.  He  died  in  1G54.  Bv 
his  countciNS.  Lidy  Christi:in  Hay,  danghter  of  Francis,  ninth 
earl  of  Enrol,  he  had  three  sons  and  two  daughters. 

The  elder  son«  John,  called  the  9th  earl  of  Mar  of  tlie 
name  of  Krskinc.  had,  when  btill  Ix)rd  Krakine,  the  comni.ind 
of  the  Stirlingshire  regiment  in  the  Scots  anny  which,  in 
1G40,  marched  to  Kngland.  The  following  year,  wiili  his 
father,  ho  acceded  to  the  Cumbernauld  association  to  enp- 
port  the  royal  cauM*.  In  1G45,  on  the  appro:ich  of  Montrow's 
anny  to  Alloa,  the  Irish  in  his  senice  plundered  that  town 
and  the  adjoining  lordship  which  lielonged  to  the  earl  of 
Mar.  Notwithstanding  this  unprovoked  outrage,  howe\*er, 
the  earl  and  Ix^rd  Krskinc  his  son,  g:ive  the  royalist  leader 
a<id  his  principal  oflicers  .in  elegant  entertainment,  and  for 
doing  so,  the  marquis  of  Arg}-le  subsequently  threatened  to 
burn  his  castle  of  Alloa.  {OvtIiry*i  AfeMoin,  p.  153.)  After 
tlie  battL'  of  Kiisylh,  lotli  August  1G45,  lA>rd  Erskine  joined 
Montrose,  and  was  at  the  rout  of  Philiphaugh,  on  13th  Sep- 
tember fiillowitig,  but  escaped,  and  was  sent  by  Montrose 
into  the  district  of  Mar,  to  raise  forces  to  recruit  his  discom- 
litcd  anny.  He  was  fined  by  the  Estates  24,000  meiks,  and 
his  houses  of  Erskine  and  Alloa  wero  jilundered  by  tlieir  or- 
der.  On  succeeding  his  father  in  lGo4,  his  whole  eatatei 
were  setincstrated,  and  till  the  Restoration  he  lived  privately 
in  a  small  cottago  at  tho  gate  of  Alloa  house.  To  add  to  hii 
misfortunes,  he  w.'is  stnuk  with  blindness.  In  his  portrait 
he  is  represented  as  a  fair-haired,  mild-looking  old  man. 
When  King  Charles  got  "  his  own  again,"  tlie  earl  wnt  re- 
storctl  to  his  estates.  He  died  in  September  1668.  Ha  was 
twice  married.  His  first  wife,  I<ady  Slaiy  Scott,  eldest 
daughter  of  the  first  earl  of  Dnccleuch,  had  inr^iving  issue. 
\W  bis  second  countess,  I^ly  Mary  Mackenzie,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  the  second  eari  of  Seaforth,  he  had  two  eons  and  three 
daughters. 

The  elder  son,  Charies,  tenth  earl  of  the  Erskine  name, 
bom  10th  OctoWr  1G.')0,  succeeded  to  the  earldom  in  bit  14th 
year.    In  1679  lie  raised  the  2 Ist  regiment  of  foot,  or  Rnjal 


I . 


II 


L. 


MARSHALL. 


115 


MARTIN. 


James,  bom  in  1801,  lieutenant,  East  India  Company*s  ser- 
Tiee,  died  Nor.  28,  1825.  5.  Gilbert,  born  in  1802,  went  to 
Sidnej,  New  Sootli  Walea,  and  died  there.  6.  George,  bom  in 
1806,  aoTKeon,  died  in  1828.  7.  Tliomas,  bom  in  1809,  or- 
dained in  1834,  mtuifltGr  of  Lochmiiben,  Dumfries-sbire,  and 
is  1849  tnmsbted  to  Stenton,  Haddingtonshire,  married  in 
18S5,  Blary,  only  datigbter  of  Rev.  Dr.  Cook,  Professor  of 
Uonl  Plulotophj  in  the  university  of  St.  Andrews;  issue,  3 
not  and  a  daughter.    8.  Enkins. 

Daagliten:  1.  Katherine  Krskine,  wife  of  William  Balfour, 
RKicfaant,  of  the  familj  of  Balfour  of  Pilrig,  who  died  in  1859 
without  issue.  2.  Mury,  married  Robert  Ilonbui^h,  Esq., 
factor  at  Tongue  to  the  Duke  of  Sutherland.  S.Christian, 
wife  tf  John  Soott  Moncrieff,  Esq.,  Accountant,  Edinburgh* 
4.  Sanh,  wife  of  William  TurabuII,  Esq.,  died  without  issue. 

The  eldest  son,  AloLinder  Maijoribaiiks,  bom  OcL  31, 1792i 
is  a  magistrate  for  Linlithgowshire.  The  estates  of  Balbardie 
and  Bathgate,  which  had  been  for  several  centuries  in  tlie 
family,  were  at  Whitsundnj  1861  sold  to  the  Trustees  of 
Stewart's  Hospital,  Edinburgh,  for  £48,000. 


The  desctndant  of  a  jounger  branch  of  this  family,  Kdvrnrd 
Uagoribaaksi  a  natiTe  of  Linlithgowshire  and  proprietor  of 
the  estate  of  Hallyards,  Mid  Lothian,  married  a  daughter  of 
Ardiibald  Stewart,  Esq.,  lord  provost  of  Edinburgh  wlicn 
Prince  Charles  had  possession  of  that  city  in  1745,  and  wns 
for  manj  years  a  wine  merchant  nt  Bordeaux  in  France. 
On  SQOceediug  to  the  estate  of  Lees  in  Berwickshire,  in 
1770,  as  heir  of  entail,  he  returned  with  his  family  to  Scot- 
land. His  eldest  son,  John,  bom  at  Bordeaux  in  1762, 
at  one  period  a  captain  in  the  Coldstream  guards,  became 
a  partner  in  a  banking  house  at  Edinburgh.  In  1814,  he  wns 
dected  kvd  piorost  of  thatdty,  and  the  following  year  created 
a  baronet  In  1811,  he  was  chosen  M.P.  for  Buteshire,  and 
in  1818  for  Berwickshire.  While  chief  magistrate  of  Edin- 
hnifi  ha  distinguished  himself  by  carrying  forward  the  im- 
peoTcmenta  of  the  dty,  and  was  the  diief  promoter  of  the  erec- 
tioo  of  the  new  gaol  and  the  Regent's  bridge.  In  1 825,  he  was 
agun  lord  provost  of  Edinburgh.  Sir  John  died  Feb.  5, 1833, 
in  hit  71st  year.  He  had  married  in  1790  Alison,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  WOliam  Ramsay,  Esq.,  of  Bam  ton.  His  eldest  surviv- 
ing son.  Sir  William  Maijoribanks,  2d  baronet,  bora  Dec 
15, 1792,  died  Sept.  22,  1834.  Sir  William's  son,  John,  bom 
ia  1830,  became  8d  baronet. 


Mabohall,  a  surname  derived  from  the  andent  und  hon- 
oumUe  office  of  marischa],  and  not  confined  to  Scotland. 

There  was  a  painter  of  this  name,  George  Marshall,  a  scholar 
of  the  yonnger  Scougal  (see  Soouoal,  George)  and  there- 
after of  Sir  Godfrey  Kneller,  whose  paintings  are  remarkable 
for  good  ookmring,  although  there  is  a  flatness  in  them  which 
is  displeadng  to  the  eye.  Afler  a  long  practice  in  Scotland, 
be  went  to  Italy,  but  thb  produced  no  visible  improvement  on 
his  works.    He  died  about  1732. 


MARSHALL,  William,  a  celebrated  composer 
of  Scottish  airs  and  melodies,  was  bom  at  Foch- 
abers, Morayshire,  Dec.  27,  1748,  old  style, 
In  his  12th  year  he  became  employed  under  the 
bouse  steward  at  Gordon  castle,  Banflbhire,  the 
seat  of  the  Duke  of  Gordon,  but  was  soon  ap- 
poined  batlcr  and  house  steward,  a  situation 
which   he  held    for  nearly  80  years.      *^Tho 


correctness  of  Marshall's  ear,"  snys  a  MS.  me- 
moir of  him  quoted  in  Stenhouse's  Johnson's 
Scots  Musical  Museum,  (vol.  iv.  p.  413,)  to 
which  we  are  indebted  for  this  notice,  "  was 
unrivalled,  and  his  style  of  playing  strathspeys 
and  reels  lively  and  inspiring,  while  his  fine  taste 
and  peculiarly  touching  manner  of  executing  the 
slow  and  more  plaintive  Scottish  airs  and  melo- 
dies, delighted  all  who  heard  him."  He  is  styled 
by  Bums  "  the  first  composer  of  strathspeys  of 
the  age." 

About  the  beginning  of  1790,  the  delicate  state 
of  his  health  obliged  him  to  relinquish  his  situa- 
tion at  Goi*don  castle,  when  he  retired  for  a  short 
time  to  a  small  farm  in  the  neighbourhood  of 
Fochabers.  Tlie  same  year  he  removed  to  the 
larger  farm  of  Keithmore,  belonging  to  the  duke 
of  Gordon,  in  the  lordship  of  Auchendown  and 
parish  of  Mortlach,  where  he  became  a  keen  agri- 
culturist. Shortly  thereafter  he  Was  appointed 
factor  or  land  steward  to  the  duke,  over  a  very 
extensive  range  of  his  estates  in  the  counties  of 
Banff  and  Aberdeen,  comprehending  the  districts 
of  Cabrach,  Auchendown,  Glenlivet,  Strathaveu, 
Strathdown,  &c.  This  situation  he  filled  with 
fidelity  and  honour  till  1817.  He  died  at  New- 
field  cottage,  29th  May  1833,  aged  85.  He  had 
manied,  at  the  age  of  25,  Jane  Giles,  who  prede- 
ceased him,  on  12th  December  1825,  and  by 
whom  he  had  five  sons  and  a  daughter. 

A  collection  of  Marshairs  *  Airs  and  Melodies' 
was  published,  by  subscription,  in  May  1822,  con- 
taining 176  tunes.  It  was  followed  by  a  supple- 
ment of  about  74  additional  tunes.  Many  of 
them  had  appeared  separately,  before  the  close  of 
the  18th  century,  and  were  well  known. 

MARTIN,  David,  an  eminent  artist,  the  prin- 
cipal portrait  painter  in  Edinburgh  of  his  day,  was 
bom  in  Scotland,  and  studied  under  Allan  Ram- 
say, the  celebrated  painter,  the  son  of  the  poet, 
whom  he  accompanied  to  Rome,  but  at  a  time 
when  he  was  too  young  to  receive  much  advantage 
from  the  visit.  On  his  return  to  England,  he  at- 
tended the  drawing  academy  in  St.  Martin*s  Lane, 
London,  and  obtained  some  premiums  for  draw- 
ings after  life.  He  subsequently  practised  both  as 
a  painter  and  an  engraver,  and  also  scraped  some 
portraits  in  mezzotinto.    In  the  latter  department 


MARTIN. 


IIG 


MARY  STUART. 


!l 


he  finished  a  very  good  print  of  Roubilliac  the 
scniptor.  Among  his  cntp-avcd  portraits  there  is 
a  whole  length  of  Loiil  Bath,  from  the  original 
picture  >vhich  he  painted  of  his  lordship ;  also,  a 
whole  length  of  Lord  Mansfield,  from  another  of 
his  own  pictures.  His  best  poilrait  is  a  half 
length  of  Dr.  Franklin,  said  to  be  the  truest  like- 
ness of  that  remarkable  pei'son,  from  which  a 
mczzolMito  print  was  published  in  1775.  Mr. 
^lartin  married  a  lady  of  some  fortune,  and  lived 
for  some  years  in  Dean  Street,  Soho,  but  after  her 
death,  which  was  very  sudden,  he  went  to  reside 
at  Edinburgh.  {Edwards'  Anecdotes  of  Painting), 
The  Surgeon's  Hall,  Advocates'  Libraiy,  and 
Horiot's  Hospital,  of  that  city,  possess  many  fine 
portraits  by  Martin,  of  the  most  eminent  men  of 
his  time,  in  the  several  departments  of  physic,  law, 
and  philosophy.  After  succeeding  his  brother,  a 
General  Martin,  he  lived  principally  at  No.  4,  St. 
James'  Square,  Edinburgh,  where  he  died  13th 
December  1797.  Some  time  ]>i*evious  to  his  death 
he  had  been  api>ointed  limner  to  his  royal  high- 
ness the  prince  of  Wales.  According  to  his  obi- 
tuary notice  in  the  local  papci*s,  he  was  *'very 
extensively  known,  not  only  in  his  own  but  in 
uther  countne.«,  for  his  eminence  in  his  pi*ofcssion, 
his  knowledge  of,  and  exquisite  taste  in,  the  fine 
arts,  in  general.  He  will  long  be  remembered 
and  much  regretted  by  his  numerous  acquaint- 
ances, but  more  particularly  by  his  friends,  not 
more  for  his  genius  and  taste  than  for  his  genero- 
sity and  spirit,  warmth  of  heart  and  other  amiable 
(|ualitics."  So  little  was  this  flattering  notice  re- 
alized that,  within  sixty  years  of  his  death,  he  was 
so  absolutely  forgotten  in  the  city  in  which  he 
lived  and  died,  that,  with  the  exception  of  an  old 
artist  or  two,  who  had  known  him  in  their  voutli, 
and  his  own  descendants,  few  had  ever  heard  of 
his  existence,  and  scarcely  any  knew  that  he  was 
a  Scotsman.  His  reiJUtalion  was  completely 
eclipsed  by  the  more  brilliant  talent  of  Sir  Henry 
Kaeburn  (sec  llAEBUiix,  Sir  Henry),  who  had 
his  attention  first  directed  by  David  Martin 
from  miniature  to  the  more  powerful  and  facile 
process  of  oil  painting,  in  which  he  gave  him 
some  instructions  and  advice  in  a  friendly  way, 
although,  not  behig  a  pupil  of  his,  he  refused  to 
show  him  how  to  prcpsu'e  his  colours.    The  iden- 


tity of  style  of  the  early  works  of  Baebnm  with 
those  of  Martin,  Is  very  remarkable,  and  tbe  dif- 
ference of  the  two  masters  only  begins  as  Baebnm 
became  more  confirmed  in  that  stylo  in  which  lie 
nitimately  dlstingnished  himself,  and  which  be- 
came 80  peculiarly  his  own. 

The  following  is  a  list  of  most  of  the  plates 
which  Martin  engraved:  La  Mnchcla  Gabriela, 
after  P.  Bottoni;  Lady  Frances  Manners;  Eail  of 
Mansfield;  David  Hume;  Ronssean;  The  Earl  of 
Bath ;  Roubilliac ;  a  portrut  of  Rembrandt ;  Pro- 
fessor Fergusson;  Summer  Evening,  after  Cuyp; 
and  the  Ruins  of  ancient  Bath,  after  Grasper 
Poussin. 

^lARTIXE,  George,  a  physician,  was  bom  hi 
Scotland  in  1702.  After  studying  at  Edinbnrgh, 
he  went  to  Leyden,  where  he  took  the  degree  of 
M.D.  in  1725,  and  on  his  return  home  commenced 
practice  at  St.  Andrews.  In  1740  he  accompa- 
nied I^rd  Cathcait  on  his  expedition  to  America, 
as  physician  of  the  forces  under  his  command; 
and  died  there  of  a  bilious  fever  in  1743. — ^His 
works  are : 

KssajA,  Medical  and  Philosophical.    LonJ.  1740,  8to. 

l)u  SimilibiM  Animallbus  et  de  Aiiiinalibns  Caioire,  libri 
duo.    Ix)nd.  1710. 

In  Hartholomaii  Eutitacliii  Tabulas  Anatoinicas  Onninen- 
tarii.    Edin.  1755,  8vo.    Publislicd  by  Dr.  Monro. 

Account  of  the  Operation  of  Bronchotome,  as  perfonned  at 
St.  Aiidretrs.    Phil.  Trans.  1730. 

An  Essay  on  the  alternate  motions  of  the  Thonx  .nnd 
Lungs,  in  Respiration.    Ed.  Med.  Ess.  i.  158.    173L 

An  Kssny  concerning  the  Analysis  of  Ilmnan  Blood.  lb. 
ii.  CO. 

Some  Tht^iuglits  concerning  the  ProducUon  of  Mineral 
IleaiU  and  the  DevaricatioD  of  tbe  Vascular  Srstem.  lb. 
iii.  334. 

Kxpcrinicnt  of  Cutting  tbe  Recnrrent  Kerres,  carried  far- 
ther tlian  has  hitherto  been  done.    lb.  114. 

Ki-flcctions  and  Obsen-ations  on  th«  Seminal  Blood  Ves- 
sels,    lb.  V.  227.  173G.  ' 

MAUY'  STUART,  Queen  of  Scots,  cclebrat- 
ed  for  her  bcautj,  her  accomplishments,  her  err- 
ors, and  her  misfortunes,  was  bom  at  the  palace 
of  Linlithgow,  Deci^mber  8,  1542.  She  was  the 
daughter  of  James  V.,  by  his  queen,  Mary  of 
Lonaine,  of  the  family  of  Guise.  Her  father  d}'- 
ing  wheu  she  was  only  eight  days  old,  she  became 
(lueen,  and  was  crowned  at  Stirling,  September  9, 
1548.  After  an  ineffectual  attempt  on  the  part  of 
Cardinal  Bcthune  to  obtain  the  I'egency,  the  gov- 
ernment of  the  kingdom  was,  during  her  inliuicy. 


i; 


ii 


I! 


II 


i ; 


:i 


!, 


MARY  STUART, 


117 


QUEEN  OF  SCOTS. 


vested  in  tlio  earl  of  Arran.  The  two  first  years 
of  her  childhood  were  spent  at  Linlithgow,  under 
the  care  of  her  mother ;  and  the  following  three 
jean  at  Sturling,  nnder  the  charge  of  the  Lords 
Erskine  and  Livingstone.  Owing  to  the  distract- 
ed state  of  the  country,  she  was  subsequently 
removed,  for  a  few  months,  to  the  priory  of  Inch- 
inahome,  a  small  island  in  the  beautiful  lake  of 
Menteith,  Perthshire,  where  she  had  for  her  at- 
tendants and  companions  four  young  ladies  of  no- 
ble rank,  all  named  like  herself,  Mai*}- ;  namely, 
Mary  Bethunc,  niece  of  the  cardinal ;  Mar}'  Flem- 
ing, daughter  of  I^ord  Fleming;  Mary  Living- 
stone, daughter  of  ouc  of  her  guardians;  and 
Mary  Scton,  daughter  of  the  lord  of  that  name. 
At  the  age  of  six  she  embarked  at  Dumbarton  for 
France,  where  she  was  instructed  in  every  branch 
of  learning  and  polite  accomplishment.  Besides 
making  herself  mistress  of  the  dead  langungcs,  she 
spoke  the  Frencli,  Italian,  and  Spanish  tongues 
fluently,  and  devoted  much  of  her  time  to  the 
study  of  histon*.  Tlirough  the  influence  of  tlie 
French  king  and  lier  uncles,  the  Guises,  she  was 
married,  April  20,  1558,  to  the  dauphin,  after- 
wards Francis  11.  of  France,  who  died  in  15G0, 
abont  sixteen  mouths  after  his  accession  to  the 
throne.  On  her  marriage  she  had  been  induced, 
by  the  persuasion  of  the  French  court,  to  assume, 
with  lier  own,  the  style  and  anus  of  queen  of  Eng- 
land and  Ireland,  an  offence  which  Elizabeth  never 
forgave,  although,  as  soon  as  Mai-}-  became  her 
"-'wn  mistress,  she  discontinued  the  title. 

Tlie  widowed  queen  soon  found  it  nccessaiy  to 
ntum  to  Scotland,  wliitlior  t^he  was  invited  by 
her  own  subjects,  and  arriving  at  Leith,  August 
19,  1561,  she  was  received  by  all  ranks  with  every 
demonstration  of  welcome  and  regard.  At  firet 
the  committed  the  administration  of  aflaii*s  to 
IVotestants,  her  principjd  advisers  being  her  na- 
tural brother,  the  Lord  James  Stuart,  prior  of  St. 
Andrews,  and  Maitland  of  I^thington,  and  so 
long  as  she  abided  by  their  counsels  her  reign  was 
mild,  prudent,  and  satisfactory  to  her  people.  In 
August  1562  she  made  a  progress  into  the  north, 
where,  by  the  aid  of  lier  brother,  afterwards  cre- 
ated earl  of  Moray,  she  crushed  the  formidable 
rebellion  of  the  earl  of  Iluntly.  In  February 
1563  occnrred  at  St.  Andrews  the  execution  of 


the  young  and  accomplished  French  poet  Chate- 
lard,  who,  having  fallen  deeply  in  love  with  his 
beautiful  mistress,  had  twice  intiiided  himself  into 
her  bed-chamber,  for  the  purpose  of  urging  his 
passion.  It  was  the  wish  of  her  subjects  that  the 
queen  should  marr}-,  that  the  crown  might  descend 
in  the  right  line  from  then*  ancient  monarchs,  and 
she  had  ali'eady  received  matrimonial  overtnres 
from  various  foreign  princes.  The  ardour  of 
youthful  inclination,  however,  rather  than  the  dic- 
tates of  prudence,  led  her  to  prefer  her  cousin, 
Henry  Lord  Damley,  to  all  her  suitors.  Tliis 
young  man,  whose  only  recommendation  was  the 
elegance  of  his  person  and  manners,  was  the  eldest 
son  of  the  earl  of  Lennox,  who  had  been  forced  to 
seek  refuge  in  England,  in  the  reign  of  James  V., 
and  Lady  Margaret  Douglas,  daughter  of  the  earl 
of  Angus  and  the  queen  dowager  ^fargaret,  sister 
of  Henry  VIH. ;  and  after  Mar}-  herself,  he  was 
the  nearest  heir  to  the  crown  of  England,  and 
next  to  the  earl  of  An*an  in  succession  to  the 
crown  of  Scotland.  Tlie  royal  nuptials  were  cel- 
ebrated July  29,  1565,  in  conformity  to  the  rites 
of  the  church  of  Rome,  of  which  Mary  was  n 
zealous  adherent,  while  the  majority  of  her  sub- 
jects were  Protestants. 

With  this  ill-fated  mamagc  began  the  long  series 
of  her  misfortunes,  which  were  terminated  only 
by  her  melancholy  death  upon  the  scaffold.  Tlie 
marriage  had  been  disapproved  of  by  the  earl  of 
Moray  and  the  leadei^s  of  the  protcstant  party, 
who,  having  taken  uji  arms,  were  opposed  by  the 
queen  in  person,  with  remarkable  energ}*  and 
promptitude.  At  the  head  of  a  superior  force,  she 
I>ur3ued  the  insurgents  from  place  to  place,  and 
compelled  them  at  last  to  quit  the  kingdom. 
Marj*  now  not  only  joined  the  league  of  the  popish 
princes  of  Europe,  but  evinced  her  full  dfteraiina- 
tion  to  re-establish  the  Romish  religion  in  Scot- 
land. Bnt  all  her  plans  were  frustrated  by  an 
unexpected  event  which  took  place  on  the  evening 
of  March  9,  1566.  Darnley,  upon  whom  she  had 
conferred  the  title  of  king,  and  whose  weak  and 
licentious  conduct  veiy  soon  changed  the  extrava- 
gant love  she  had  entertained  for  him  into  equally 
violent  hatred,  excited  by  jealousy  of  David  Riz- 
zio,  her  foreign  secretary,  and  favourite,  had  or- 
ganized a  conspiracy  for  his  destruction ;  and  on 


MARY  STUART, 


118 


QUEEN  OF  SCOTS. 


ii 


the  evening  mentioned,  while  the  qneen  was  at 
snpper  with  Rizzio  and  the  conntcss  of  Arg}ie,  he 
suddenly  entered  her  chamber,  followed  by  Loixl 
Ruthven  and  some  other  factions  nobles,  and 
caused  the  unfortunate  secretary  to  be  dragged 
from  her  presence  and  murdered.  This  atrocious 
deed,  aggravated  as  it  was  by  the  situation  of  his 
wife,  then  six  months  advanced  in  pregnancy, 
could  not  i\iil  to  increase  the  qucen^s  aversion  for 
her  husband.  Dissembling  her  feelings,  however, 
she  prevailed  upon  Damley  to  withdraw  fi-om  his 
new  associates,  to  dismiss  the  guards  which  had 
been  placed  on  her  person,  and  to  accompany  her 
in  her  flight  to  Dunbar.  In  the  course  of  a  few 
days,  at  the  head  of  a  powerful  army,  she  returned 
to  Edinburgh,  when  Ruthven,  Morton,  ^laitland, 
and  Lindsay,  the  chief  of  the  conspirators,  were 
forced  to  take  refuge  in  Newcastle,  and  Moray 
and  his  fiiends,  who  had  in  the  mcnntime  arrived 
from  England,  were  again  received  into  favour,  and 
intrusted  with  the  chief  management  of  aflfairs. 

The  birth  of  a  son,  afterwards  James  VI., 
on  June  19,  I0G6,  had  no  cft'ect  in  producing  a 
reconciliation  between  Mary  and  the  king,  and, 
enraged  at  his  exclusion  from  power,  the  latter 
sullenly  retired  from  court,  declared  his  intention 
to  quit  the  kingdom,  and  refused  to  be  present  at 
the  baptism  of  the  infant  prince.  He  took  up  his 
residence  with  his  father  at  Glasgow,  where,  in 
the  beginning  of  1567,  he  was  seized  with  the 
small-pox,  or  some  other  dangerous  disease.  On 
hearing  of  his  illness,  Mar}'  sent  her  own  phy&i- 
clan  to  attend  him,  and,  after  the  lapse  of  a  fort- 
night, she  visited  him  herself.  When  he  was  able 
to  be  removed,  she  accompanied  him  to  Edin- 
burgh, and  lodged  him  in  a  house  in  the  south- 
ern suburb.^,  called  Kirk- of -Field,  near  to  v.here 
the  university  of  that  city  now  stands.  Here  she 
attended  him  with  the  most  assiduous  cnre,  and 
slept  for  two  nights  in  the  chamber  under  his 
apartment.  On  the  evening  of  the  9th  of  Febru- 
ary she  took  leave  of  him  with  many  embraces,  to 
be  present  at  the  marriage  of  one  of  her  servants 
at  Holyrood.  During  the  same  night  the  house 
in  which  Damley  slept  was  blown  up  with  gun- 
powder, and  his  dead  body  and  that  of  his  page 
were  next  morning  found  lying  in  the  adjoining 
garden. 


Of  this  atrocious  deed,  the  earl  of  Bothwdl,  the 
new  favourite  of  the  qaccn,  was  openly  accused  of 
being  the  perpetrator,  and  Mary  herself  did  not 
escape  the  suspicion  of  being  accessory  to  the  crime. 
At  the  instigation  of  the  earl  of  Lennox,  the  father 
of  Damley,  Bothwell  was  brought  to  trial,  bnt  he 
was  attended  to  the  court  by  a  formidable  array 
of  aimed  followers,  and  neither  accuser  nor  Irit* 
ness  appearing  agdust  him,  he  was  foimaliy  ac- 
quitted by  the  jury.  On  the  20th  of  April,  Both- 
well  prevailed  upon  a  number  of  the  nobles  to 
subscribe  a  bond,  in  which  they  not  only  declared 
him  innocent  of  Damley^s  murder,  but  recom- 
mended him  as  a  fit  husband  for  the  qneen.  Four 
days  afterwards,  at  the  head  of  a  thousand  horse, 
he  intercepted  Mary  on  her  I'etum  from  Stu'ling 
to  Edinburgh,  and  dispersing  her  slender  suite, 
conducted  her  to  the  castle  of  Dunbar,  of  which 
he  was  governor.  Having  proposed  marriage,  on 
the  queen*s  refusal,  he  produced  the  bond  signed 
by  the  nobles,  and,  as  is  alilmied  by  Mary*s  par- 
tizans,  compelled  her  by  force  to  yield  to  his  de- 
sires, when  the  unhappy  princess  consented  to 
become  his  wife.  Mary's  accusers,  on  the  other 
hand,  say  that,  in  the  whole  of  this  transaction, 
the  queen  was  a  willing  actor.  Her  marriage  to 
Bothwell  took  place  May  15,  15G7,  only  three 
months  after  the  death  of  Damley,  and  it  is  a 
prominent  point  in  her  history,  for  which  it  is  im- 
possible to  find  any  justification.  That  act  of 
folly  virtually  dii^crowned  her.  A  confederacy 
of  the  nobles  was  immediately  foimed  for  the  pro- 
tection of  the  infant  prince,  and  for  bringing  to 
puniishment  the  mnrdei'ers  of  the  late  king.  As 
the  people  generally  shared  their  indignation,  they 
soon  collected  an  amiy,  at  the  head  of  which  they 
advanced  to  Edinburgh,  Bothwell  and  the  qneen 
retiring  before  them  to  Dunbar,  where  they  as- 
sembled a  force  of  about  2,000  men.  At  Carberry 
Hill,  near  Musselburgh,  the  two  hostile  armies 
confronted  each  other,  June  15 ;  but,  to  avoid  a 
battle,  Mary,  after  a  brief  communication  with 
Kirkaldy  of  Grange,  agreed  to  dismiss  Bothwell, 
and  to  join  the  confederates,  by  whose  conncils 
she  declai'ed  herself  willing  to  be  gnidcd  in  futnre, 
on  condition  of  their  respecting  her  "  as  their  born 
princess  and  queen."  Taking  a  hurried  farewell 
of  Bothwell,  who,  with  a  few  followers,  slowly 


MARY  STUART, 


119 


QUEEN  OF  SCOTS. 


rode  off  the  field,  and  whom  she  never  saw  again, 
she  gave  her  hand  to  Grange,  and  surrendered  to 
the  associated  lords,  by  whom  she  was  conducted 
in  trinmph  to  the  capital.  As  she  passed  along, 
slie  was  assailed  by  the  insults  and  i*eproaches  of 
the  populace,  and  a  banner  was  displayed  before 
her,  on  which  was  painted  the  dead  body  of 
Damley,  with  the  infant  prince  kneeling  beside  it, 
saying — "  Judge  and  revenge  my  cause,  O  Lord!" 
Xext  day,  she  was  conveyed  a  prisoner  to  Loch- 
levcn  castle  in  Kinross-shire,  situated  in  the  mid- 
dle of  a  lake,  and  committed  to  the  chai'ge  of 
Lady  Douglas,  mother  of  the  Regent  Moray  by 
James  V.,  and  widow  of  Sir  Robert  Douglas,  who 
fell  at  the  battle  of  Pinkie.  On  July  24, 1567, 
she  was  compelled  to  sign  a  formal  renunciation 
of  the  crown  in  favour  of  her  son,  and  to  appoint 
u  regent,  during  the  king's  minority,  her  brother, 
the  earl  of  Moray,  commonly  called  the  Regent 
Murray,  who  soon  after  arrived  from  France,  and 
entered  upon  the  government. 

Mary  now  employed  all  her  art  to  recover  her 
liberty,  and  having  gained  over  George  Douglas, 
youngest  son  of  the  lady  of  Lochleven,  on  March 
25, 1568,  she  attempted  to  escape  in  the  disguise 
of  a  laundress,  but  the  whiteness  of  her  hands  be- 
trayed her  to  the  boatmen,  by  whom  she  was 
conducted  back  to  the  castle.  Her  beauty  and 
misfortunes,  however,  had  made  a  deep  impression 
on  William  Douglas,  an  orphan  youth  of  sixteen, 
a  relative  of  the  family,  and  he  was  easily  pre- 
vailed upon  to  assist  in  a  project  for  her  escape. 
Accordingly,  on  Sunday,  May  2, 1568,  at  the  hour 
of  supper,  he  found  means  to  steal  the  keys,  and 
opening  the  gates  to  the  queen  and  one  of  her 
maids,  locked  them  behind  her,  and  then  threw 
the  keys  into  the  lake.  Mary  entered  a  boat 
which  had  been  prepared  for  her,  and,  on  reaching 
the  opposite  shore,  she  was  received  by  Lord 
Scton,  Sir  James  Hamilton,  and  others  of  her 
friends.  Instantly  mounting  on  horseback,  she 
rode  first  to  Niddrie,  Lord  Seton^s  house  in  West 
Lothian,  and  next  day  to  Hamilton,  where  she 
was  joined  by  a  number  of  the  nobility,  and  in  a 
few  days  found  herself  at  the  head  o(  about  6,000 
men.  On  May  13  her  forces  were  defeated  by 
the  regent  at  the  battle  of  Langside,  and  the  un- 
hnppy  queen,' who  had  anxiously  beheld  the  en- 


gagement from  a  hill  at  a  short  distance,  to  avoid 
falling  again  into  the  hands  of  her  enemies,  fiod 
from  the  field  of  battle,  accompanied  by  Lord 
Hemes  and  a  few  other  attached  friends,  and 
rode,  without  stopping,  to  the  abbey  of  Dundreu- 
nan,  in  Galloway,  full  sixty  miles  distant  After 
resting  there  for  two  days,  with  about  twenty  at- 
tendants, she  embarked  in  a  fisher  boat  at  Kirk- 
cudbright on  the  16th,  and  crossing  the  Sohvay, 
lauded  at  Workington,  in  Cumberland,  where  sho 
claimed  the  protection  of  her  kinswoman,  the 
queen  of  England.  "  As  well  might  the  hunted 
deer  have  sought  refuge  in  the  den  of  the 
tiger."  By  Elizabeth's  orders,  she  was  conducted 
to  Carlisle,  from  whence,  on  the  16th  of  June, 
she  was  removed  to  Bolton  castle.  But  though 
treated  on  all  occasions  with  the  honoui*s  due  to 
her  rank,  Elizabeth  refused  to  admit  her  to  a  per- 
sonal interview.  To  adjust  the  differences  be- 
tween Mary  and  her  subjects,  a  conference  was 
held  at  York  in  October  1568,  and  afterwai'ds  re- 
moved to  Westminster,  but  without  leading  to 
any  decisive  result.  Under  various  pretences, 
and  in  direct  violation  of  public  faith  and  hospita- 
lity, Elizabeth  detained  her  a  prisoner  for  nine- 
teen years;  and  after  having  encouraged  the 
Scots  commissioners  to  accuse  her  publicly  of  the 
murder  of  her  husband,  denied  her  an  opportunity 
of  vindicating  herself  from  the  revolting  chai'ge. 

In  the  beginning  of  1569,  Mary  was  transferred 
to  Tutbury  castle,  in  Stafibrdshire,  and  placed 
under  the  care  of  the  earl  of  Shrewsbury,  who  dis- 
charged the  important  trust  committed  to  him 
with  great  fidelity  for  fifteen  yeare.  She  was  sub- 
sequently removed  fi*om  castle  to  castle,  and  at 
last  consigned  to  the  custody  of  Sir  Amias  Pawlet 
and  Sir  Drue  Drary,  by  whom  she  was  finally 
conveyed  to  Fotheringay,  in  Northamptonshire. 
Throughout  all  the  sufferings  and  persecutions  to 
which  she  was  subjected  by  the  jealousy  and  per- 
fidy of  Elizabeth,  she  preserved,  till  the  closing 
scene  of  all,  the  magnanimity  of  a  queen  of  Scot- 
land. She  made  many  attempts  to  procure  her 
liberty,  and,  for  this  purpose,  carried  on  a  con- 
slant  correspondence  with  foreign  powei*s.  Being 
the  object  of  successive  plots,  on  the  part  of  the 
English  Roman  Catholics,  who  made  use  of  her 
name  to  justify  their  insurrections  and  conspira- 


MABY  STUART. 


120 


MASTERTOK. 


cics,  Elizabeth  nt  length  resolved  upon  her  death, 
and  cansed  her  to  be  an*aigned  on  a  charge  of 
being  accessary'  to  the  conspiracy  of  Anthony 
Babiugton.  A  commission  was  appointed  to  con- 
duct her  trial,  and  though  no  certain  proof  ap- 
peared of  her  connection  with  the  conspirators, 
she  was  found  guilty  of  having  compassed  divers 
matters  tending  to  tlie  death  of  the  queen  of  Eng- 
land. Although  Elizabeth  affected  great  reluc- 
tance to  put  Mary  to  death,  slic  disregarded  the 
entreaties  of  tlie  ambassadoi*s  from  Scotland  and 
Fi-auce  on  her  behalf,  and  signed  the  warrant  for 
a  mandate  to  be  made  out  under  the  great  seal  for 
her  execution.  A  commission  was  given  to  the 
earls  of  Shrewsbury,  Kent,  Cumberland,  Derby, 
and  others,  to  see  it  carried  into  effect,  and  the  two 
former  lost  no  time  in  proceeding  to  Fotheringay. 
The  sentence  was  read  to  Mary  in  presence  of  her 
own  domestics,  and  she  was  desired  to  prepare  her- 
self for  death  the  ne.xt  day.  She  crossed  her 
breast,  in  the  name  of  the  Father,  the  Son,  and 
the  Holy  Ghost,  and  said  she  was  ready  to  die  iu 
the  Catholic  faith,  which  her  forefathers  professed. 
She  forgave  them  that  were  the  procurers  of  her 
death,  yet,  she  said,  she  doubted  not  but  God 
would  execute  vengeance  upon  them.  Afaiy  then 
prepared  for  her  fate  with  the  utmost  serenity, 
fortitude,  and  resignation.  She  was  attended  to 
the  hall  of  Fotheringay  castle,  where  her  head  was 
to  be  struck  off,  by  Robert  Melville,  her  master  of 
the  household,  her  physician,  chirurgcon,  and  apo- 
thecary. At  the  foot  of  the  stau-s  leading  into  the 
hall,  she  desired  Mr.  Melville  to  commend  her  to 
her  son.  To  the  executioners  she  said  that  she 
pardoned  them,  and  she  desired  Jane  Kennedy, 
one  of  her  attendants,  to  bind  her  eyes  with  a  hand- 
kerchief. She  was  beheaded  Feb.  8,  1587,  in  the 
45th  year  of  her  age.  "  The  admirable  and  saintly 
fortitude  with  which  she  suffered,"  it  has  been  well 
remai'ked,  '^foiTued  a  striking  contrast  to  the 
despair  and  agony  which  not  long  afterwanla 
darkened  the  deathbed  of  the  English  qtieen.'* 
Mary*s  body  was  embalmed  and  interred,  August 
1,  with  royal  pomp,  in  the  cathedral  of  Peter- 
borough. Iler  funeral  was  ahso  celebrated  with 
great  pomp  at  Paris  at  the  charge  of  the  Guises. 
Twenty  years  afterwards,  her  son,  James  I.,  or- 
dered her  remains  to  be  removed  to  AVestminster, 


and  deposited  among  those  of  the  kings  of  Eng- 
land, in  Henry  the  Seventh's  chapel,  where  a  mag- 
nificent monument  was  erected  to  her  memory. 

The  portraits  of  IMary  ai*e  nnmerous,  but  many 
of  them  are  fictitious.  In  some  of  them,  says 
Pinkerton,  she  is  confounded  with  Mary  of  Gntse, 
her  mother,  with  Marj'  queen  of  France,  sister  of 
lieu  17  VIII.,  and  even  with  ^laiy  de  Medicis. 

While  the  conduct  and  character  of  Queen 
Mary  have  been  the  subject  of  much  controversy 
with  historians,  her  leaiiiing  and  accomplishments 
are  universally  acknowledged.  She  wi*ote  with 
elegance  and  force  in  the  Latin  and  French,  as 
well  as  in  the  English  language.  Among  her 
compositions  are : 

lioval  Advice  to  bvM' Son ;  in  two  books:  the  ConBolntion 
of  bcr  long  Iinpn'sonnient. 

Eleven  I^etters  to  James  Earl  of  Bothwcll.  Transl.ited  from 
Ibc  French  originals,  by  Edward  Simmondu,  of  Oxford. 
Westminster,  1726,  8vo. 

Ten  letters,  with  ber  Answer  to  the  Articles  fsbibited 
against  ber  were  publislu'd  in  Hnynes*  Stnte  Papers. 

Six  Letters ;  printed  in  Anderson's  Collections. 

A  Letter,  published  in  the  Appendix  to  ber  Lift*,  bv  I>r. 
Jebb. 

Many  of  ber  letters  to  Qneen  Elizabeth,  Cecil,  and  others, 
are  preser^-ed  in  the  Cottonian  and  Ashmoleon  libraries,  and 
in  the  library  of  the  king  of  France. 

Besides  the  above,  she  wrote  "  Poems  on  Various  Occa- 
sions," in  tbe  Latin,  Italian,  French,  and  Scotch  languages. 


2iLvsTERTON',  a  local  surname  of  great  antiquity  in  Scot- 
land, derived  from  lands  of  tbat  name  in  Fifesbire.  Accord- 
ing to  tradition,  one  of  tbe  principal  arcliitects  at  the  bml(Hng 
of  tlio  abbey  of  Dunfermline,  obtained  from  Malcolm  Can- 
more  tbe  estate  of  Mosterton,  in  that  ndgbbourhood,  and 
was  the  founder  of  a  family  of  the  name.  Among  the  barons 
recorded  in  the  Ragman  Roll  as  having  sworn  a  compulsory 
fealty  to  Edward  I.  of  England  in  1296,  appears  William  de 
M.isterton.  A  female  descendant  of  this  family,  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Alexander  Masterton  of  tbe  lands  of  Bad  in 
Perthshire  and  Parkmlll  in  Fifesbire,  and  wife  of  Mr.  James 
Primrose,  was  nurse  to  Ilcnry,  prince  of  Scotland,  eldest  son 
of  James  VI.,  for  which  she  aud  her  husband  had  a  pension 
during  their  lives. 

Mr.  Allan  Masterton,  teacher  of  writing  and  arithmetic  in 
Edinburgh,  is  known  to  all  the  admirers  of  Bums  the  poet, 
as  one  of  bis  most  intimate  companions  and  the  composer  ot 
the  ail's  to  many  of  bis  songs.  He  is  said  to  have  possessed  a 
good  ear  aud  a  fine  taste  for  music,  and,  as  an  amateur, 
played  the  violin  remarkably  well.  Among  the  tunes  C(nn- 
posed  by  him  for  Bums*  pieces  were  those  to  *  StrathaUan's 
I.ament,*  *  Beware  of  Bonnie  Ann,*  *  The  Braos  of  Balloch- 
myle,*  *  The  Bonnie  Banks  of  Ayr,*  *  0  Willie  brewed  a  peck 
u\Maut,'  and  '  Ou  hearing  a  Young  Lady  Sing/  On  Aug.  26, 
1795,  Dugnld  and  Allan  Alasterton,  and  Dugald  Masterton, 
jun.,  were  elected  writing  masters  in  the  High  School  of  Edin- 
burgh. Tbe  verses  beginning,  *'  Ye  gallants  bright,  I  rede  you 
right,**  were  written,  in  1788,  by  Bums,  in  compliment  to 
Miss  Ann  Masterton,  the  daughter  of  the  composer. 


ii 


I 


MATHESON. 


121 


MAULE. 


I    I 


I    I 


If  ATBBtoK,  the  name  of  a  dan  (CUnn  Mkatkam)^  from 
the  GwtUe  Sfatkameaekf  heroes,  or  ratheff  from  llaUian,  pro- 
noonced  Mahan,  a  bear.  The  name  is  not  the  same  as  the 
English  MatbisoD,  which  is  a  oonraption  of  Matthewson.  The 
BIocMathans  were  settled  in  Locliabh,  a  district  of  Wester 
Boes,  from  an  earlj  period.  Thej  are  derived  hj  ancient 
|>eneaIogies  from  the  same  stock  as  the  Earls  of  Ross.  Ken* 
neth  MacMathan,  who  was  constnhle  of  the  castle  of  Ellen 
Donan,  is  mentioned  both  in  the  None  nceonnt  of  the  expe- 
dition of  the  king  of  Norway  ngainst  Scotland  in  1268,  and 
in  the  Chamberlain's  Rolls  for  tliat  year,  in  connection  with 
that  expedition.  He  is  said  to  have  married  a  sister  of  the 
Earl  of  Ross.  The  chief  of  the  clan  was  engnj^ed  in  the 
rebellion  of  Donald,  lord  of  the  Isles,  in  1411  (xee  vol.  ii. 
p.  MG),  and  was  one  of  th?  chiefs  arrested  at  Invemess 
bj  James  I.,  in  1427,  when  he  is  said  to  hare  been  able 
to  master  2,(M)0  men.  The  possessions  of  the  Mathesons, 
at  one  time  very  extensive,  were  greatly  reduced,  in  the 
coarse  of  the  16th  centnry,  by  feuds  with  their  turbulent 
neighbonrs,  the  Macdonalds  of  Glengarry. 

The  clan  Matheson  was  divided  into  two  great  branches, 
namely  of  Lochalsh,  from  which  descended  the  Mathesons  of 
Attadale,  now  Ardross,  and  of  Sliinness,  Sutherlandsbire. 
Tlie  former  is  descended  from  John  Matheson  of  I/xshalsh,  con- 
stable nnder  Mackenzie,  the  9th  laird  of  Kintail,  of  the  castle 
of  Ellen  Donan,  who  was  killed  in  defending  that  fortress 
ngninal  the  MacDonalds  of  Sleat  in  1547.  His  son,  Dngnid 
Roy,  was  socceeded  by  his  son,  Alnrdoch.  The  latter  bad  2 
sons,  Roderick,  ancestor  of  tlio  Mathesons  of  Bennetsfield, 
and  Dngald,  who  inherited  Balmacarra,  and  had  8  sons. 

John  Matheson  of  Attadale,  the  6th  from  this  last  Dugrild, 
married  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  Donald  Matheson,  Esq. 
of  SkinnesB,  and  died  in  1826.  He  had  5  sons  and  2  dnugh- 
tsrs.  The  sons  were,  1.  Alexander  of  Ardross.  2.  Hugh, 
merchant,  Liverpool.  8.  Farqnhar,  minister  of  Lairg.  4. 
Donald,  settled  in  America.    5.  John,  deceased. 

The  eldest  son,  Alexander  Matheson,  Esq.  of  Ardross 
tod  Attidale,  bom  in  1805,  is  a  merchant  in  London,  (for- 
merly of  Canton,  in  China,)  a  Director  of  the  Bank  of  Eng- 
ktnd,  a  magistrate  and  deputy  lieutenant  of  the  counties  of 
R<j«s,  Crom-irty,  and  Invemess;  has  been  M.  P.  for  the  Inver- 
ness bnrghs  since  1847.  In  1851,  he  pnrchosed  the  estate  of 
lixhalsli,  forfeited  by  his  ancestors  in  1427.  He  married,  first, 
in  1840,  Mary,  onlv  daughter  of  J.  C.  2iIacI.«od,  Esq.  of  Geanies. 
Silly,  in  1853,  I^vinia  Mary,  sister  of  I«ord  Beaumont ;  issue, 
it  son  and  a  daughter  3dly.  in  1860,  Eleanor,  dnngliter  of 
Spencer  Perceval,  E>q.,  by  whom  he  has  two  son?. 

Tlie  representative  of  the  family  of  Sliinness  is  Donald  Ma- 
theson, Esq.  of  Grandon  Lodge,  Surrey,  eldest  son  of  Duncan 
)latheson,  Esq.,  Advocate,  Edinburgh.   His  uncle,  Sir  Jnmes 
Matheson  of  Achany  and  the  Lews,  Bart,  2d  son  of  Capt. 
Donald  Mathcion  of  Shinness,  was  bom  in  1796,  at  Laii^;,  Suth- 
eriandahire.  He  was  at  one  period  a  partner  in  the  house  of  Jar- 
dine,  Matheson,  and  Ca,  and  resided  many  vears  in  India 
snd  China.    On  his  return  to  Enghind,  he  received  from  the 
merchants  of  Bombay  a  service  of  plate,  with  an  address,  re- 
cording their  sense  of  his  conduct  during  the  opium  disputes 
vith  China.    Owner  of  the  estate  of  Achany  in  Sutheriand- 
ihire,  and,  jointly  with  Lord  Clinton,  lord  of  the  borough 
snd  manor  of  Ashburton,  Devonshire,  he  purchased  the  island 
of  Lewis,  which  is  abont  40  miles  long  by  about  20  broad, 
and,  with  his  other  property,  he  has  an  extent  of  territory  as 
peat  as  that  poneased  by  the  ancient  chie£i  of  Lochalsh ; 
s  deputy  fieutenant  of  the  counties  of  Ross  and  Sutherland ; 
member  of  the  board  of  tmsteei  for  manufacturse  and  of  the 


fishery  board  in  Scotland ;  a  vice-president  of  the  Caledonian 
Asylum,  London;  F.K.S.;  was  M.P.  for  Ashburton  from 
1848  to  1847,  and  in  the  latter  year  was  elected  for  the 
counties  of  Ross  and  Cromarty.  He  was  created  a  baronet 
in  1850,  on  account  of  his  benevolent  and  untiring  efforts  in 
alleviating  the  sufferings  of  the  inhabitants  of  the  I^wis  at 
the  period  of  the  famme;  authorof  a  pamphlet  on  the  China 
trade.  He  married,  in  1843,  Mary  Jane,  4th  daughter  of  M.  H. 
Perceval,  Esq.  of  Quebec,  without  issue.    Sec  Supplement 

Maule,  a  surname  of  Norman  origin,  assumed  from  the 
town  and  lordship  of  Maule  in  France,  which,  for  four  cen- 
turies, belonged  to  the  lords  of  that  name.  In  the  army  ot 
William  the  Conqueror,  on  his  invasion  of  England  in  1066, 
was  Guarin  de  Maule,  a  younger  son  of  Arnold,  lord  of  Maule. 
From  the  Conqueror,  besides  other  lands,  he  obtained  the 
lordship  of  Hstton,  in  Cleveland,  Yorkshire.  One  of  his 
sons,  Robert  de  Maule,  attached  himself  to  David,  earl  of 
Cumberland,  afterwards  David  L,  who  was  educated  at  the 
English  court,  and  accompanying  him  into  Scotland,  received 
a  grant  of  hinds  in  Mid  Lothian.  He  died  about  1180.  The 
eldest  of  his  three  sons,  William  de  Maule  of  Fowlis  in  Perth- 
shire, was  at  the  battle  of  the  Standard  in  1138,  but  died 
without  male  issue.  The  second  son,  Roger  de  Msule,  was 
the  progenitor  of  the  Maules  of  Panmure.  The  marriage  of 
his  daughter  Cecilia  to  Walter  de  Ruthvcn  brought  the  bar- 
ony of  Fowlis  into  the  Gon-rie  family,  of  which  her  husband 
was  the  ancestor. 

Roger  do  Maule*s  grandson.  Sir  Peter  de  Msule,  married, 
about  1224,  Christian,  only  daughter  and  heiress  of  William 
de  Valoniis  of  Pannomor,  or  Panmure,  and  got  with  her  the 
baronies  of  that  name  and  Benvie,  in  Forfarshire,  as  well  as 
other  lands  both  in  England  and  Scotland.  He  had  two 
sons,  Sir  William  and  Sir  Thomas.  The  hitter  was  governor 
of  the  castle  of  Brechin  in  1303,  when  it  sustained  a  siege 
for  twenty  days  by  the  English*,  under  Edward  I. ;  and  it  was 
not  till  the  governor,  Su:  Thomas  Maule,  was  killed,  by  a 
stone  thrown  from  an  engine,  that  the  garrison  surrendered. 

The  elder  son.  Sir  William  de  Maule  of  Panmure,  was  sher- 
iff of  Forfar  at  the  death  of  Alexander  III.,  and  was  among 
tlio  barons  who  swore  fealty  to  Ednard  I.  at  St.  Andrews, 
10th  July  1292. 

His  son.  Sir  Henry  de  Maule  of  Panmure,  wss  knighted 
by  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  on  account  of  bis  services.  Sir 
Henry*s  eldest  son,  Su:  Walter  de  Maule  of  Panmure,  was 
governor  of  the  castle  of  Kildrummy,  Aberdeenshu^,  in  the 
reign  of  David  11.  Ho  had  two  sons,  Sir  William  and  Hen- 
rv,  the  latter  the  first  of  the  Maules  of  Glaster. 

Sir  William's  son.  Sir  Thomas  de  Maule  of  Panmure,  led 
a  strong  body  of  his  name  to  the  assistance  of  the  e.'url  of 
Mnr  at  the  battle  of  Harluw,  against  Donald,  lord  of  the 
Isles,  in  August  1411.    As  the  old  ballad  says: 

"  Panmure  with  all  his  men  did  cum.'' 

The  Forfarshire  clans  mustered  strong  on  the  occ.ision ;  be- 
udes  the  Maules,  the  Lvons,  Ogilvies,  Camegies,  Lindsays,  and 
others  belonging  to  Angus,  hastened  to  range  themselves  under 
the  banner  of  Mar.    Sir  Thomas  Maule  was  among  the  slain. 


41 


The  knight  of  Panmure,  as  was  sene, 
A  mortal  man  in  armour  bright.** 


His  posthumous  son,  aftei-wards  Sir  Thomas  de  Maule  of 
Paxunnre,  was,  notwithstanding  his  infancy,  served  heir  to 
his  father  in  1412,  an  act  of  parliament  having  been  passed 


1 . 


I     ! 


MAXTONE. 


12S 


MAXW£LL 


I     I 


to  allow  this  in  all  cases  of  heirs  in  nooagef  where  the  fathers 
had  fallen  in  the  king*s  service.  The  lordship  of  Brechin 
held  by  the  earl  of  Athol  bj  conrtesy  since  the  death  of  his 
wife,  Elizabeth  Barclay,  belonged  by  right  to  Sir  Thomas 
Maole,  the  grandson  of  her  annt,  Jean  Barday,  bnt  although 
that  nobleman,  previous  to  his  ezecntion  for  being  concerned 
in  the  conspiracy  which  led  to  the  assassination  of  James  I., 
in  1487,  declared  this  to  be  the  case,  Sir  Thomas  received 
but  a  small  portion  of  it,  as  it  was  annexed  to  the  crown  by 
act  of  parliament.  His  great-grandson,  Sir  Thomas  Haule 
of  Panmurc,  fell  at  the  battle  of  Flodden.  With  a  daughter, 
married  to  Rumsny  of  Panbride,  he  had  two  sons,  Robert  and 
William,  the  latter  ancestor  of  the  Maules  of  Boath. 

The  elder  son,  Robert  ifaule  of  Panmure,  joined  the  earl 
of  Lennox  in  his  unsuccessful  attempt  to  rescue  James  V. 
out  of  tlie  hands  of  tlie  Douglases  in  1526,  for  which  he  got 
a  remission.  Two  years  afterwards,  the  king  granted  him  a 
dispensation  for  life,  from  all  public  duties  and  attendance, 
on  account  of  tlie  true,  good,  and  faithful  services  done  by 
him  to  his  majesty.  He  was  one  of  those  who  opposed  tlie 
projected  marriage  between  the  young  Queen  Mary  and  Ed- 
ward prince  of  Wales  in  1543.  In  1547  he  bravely  defended 
liis  house  of  Panmure  against  the  English  till  he  was  severely 
wounded,  when  he  was  taken  prisoner,  and  sent  to  London. 
He  remained  in  the  Tower  till  1549,  when,  at  the  solicitation 
of  the  marquis  d*Elboeuf,  French  ambassador  to  Scotland,  he 
was  released.  One  of  his  sons,  Henry  Maule  of  Melgum,  a 
Icimed  antiquarian,  was  author  of  a  history  of  the  Picts, 
published  after  his  death. 

Thomas  Maule  of  Panmure,  his  eldest  son,  in  his  father's 
lifetime  accompanied  David  Betliune,  abbot  of  Aberbroth- 
wick,  afterwards  archbishop  of  St.  Andrews,  when  ho  went 
to  France  as  ambassador  in  153B.  He  was  taken  prisoner  in 
the  engagement  with  the  English  at  Hadden  Rig,  25th  Au- 
gust 1542,  when  the  Scots  were  commanded  by  the  earl  of 
lluntly,  and  sent  to  Morpeth,  where  he  remained  till  afler 
the  death  of  James  V.,  when  he  was  released  by  order  of 
Henry  VIII.  He  fought  also  at  the  battle  of  Pinkie  in  1547, 
:ind  in  15G7,  lie  joined  the  association  for  the  safety  of  the 
infant  Prince  James,  on  the  marriage  of  his  mother.  Queen 
Mary,  to  Bothwcll.  He  died  17th  March  IGOO.  With  three 
daughters,  he  had  tcven  sons.  Robert  Maule,  the  fourth  son, 
commissary  of  St.  Andrews,  a  learned  and  judicious  anti- 
quary, was  the  author  of  several  treatises,  p.irticularly  Periodi 
Gentis  Scotorum,  a  history  of  his  own  family,  and  a  tract  on 
the  Antiquity  of  the  Scots  nation.  A  branch  of  tlie  Maules, 
descended  from  Tliomas  Maule,  lieutenant-colonel  of  the 
marquis  of  Ormondes  regiment,  son  of  Thomas,  the  fifth  son, 
settled  ill  Ireland.  One  of  this  family,  Henry  Maule,  dean 
of  Cloyne,  was  consecrated  bishop  of  Cloyne  in  1720,  trans- 
lated to  Dromore  in  1781,  and  to  Meath  in  1744. 

Patrick  Maule  of  Panmure,  the  eldest  son,  married  Marga- 
ret, daughter  of  John  Erskine  of  Dun,  superintendent  of 
Angus  and  Me.ims,  and  died  21st  May  1605.  With  two 
daughters  he  had  a  son,  Patiick  Maule  of  Panmure,  wiio 
WAS  one  of  the  select  few  that  accompanied  James  VI.  to 
England  in  April  1603,  when  ho  went  to  take  possession  of 
the  English  throne.  On  3d  August  1646,  he  was  by  Charles 
I.  created  Baron  Maule  of  Brechin  and  Navar  and  earl  of 
Panmure,  in  the  Scottisli  peerage  (see  Pasmurr,  carl  of). 


^I.vxTONE,  a  surname  derived  from  the  lands  of  Maxton 
in  Roxburghshire.  A  family  of  this  name  has  for  centuries 
owned  the  estate  of  Cultoquey,  Perthshire,  which,  during  the 
time  that  it  has  been  in  their  possession,  has  never,  it  is  said, 
been  larger  or  smaller  than  when  they  got  it.    They  liad  the 


same  common  unceator  as  the  Maxwells,  the  one  namt 
derived  from  Maocas-Aoi,  a  Saion  tennination,  and  the  othtf 
firom  Maoeus-ieeB^  (in  oonna  of  time  ibortaaed  into  Maitaa 
and  Maxwell,)  to  denote  the  manor  and  well  of  Maocna,  a 
Saxon  baron  who  came  into  Scotland  at  an  early  period, 
(see  next  artidc,)  and  reedred  a  grant  of  linda  upon  the 
Tweed. 

Robert  da  Maxtone  had  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Gnltoqucj 
dated  1410,  bot  that  the  family  poeaeifled  the  estate  prerioQi 
to  that  time  la  proved  by  mention  being  made  of  them  in 
charters  of  other  houses  of  older  date.  His  descendant,  Ro- 
bert Maxtone  of  Cultoquey,  who  had  a  charter  of  the  lands  of 
Ardoch  in  1487,  was  s^ain  at  Fh>dden  in  1518.  Anthony 
Maxtone  of  the  same  family,  waa,  in  the  reign  of  Charles  I., 
prebendary  of  Durham.  Tlie  succession  in  tiie  male  Une  has 
been  uninterrupted  from  father  to  son  from  the  first  The 
18th  proprietor,  James  Maxtone  Graham,  Esq.  of  Cultoquey, 
bom  June  20, 1819,  succeeded  his  father  in  1846. 

One  of  the  proprietors  of  this  house  is  celebrated  for  hav- 
ing repeated  the  following  curious  addition  to  his  litany  every 
morning  at  a  well  near  his  residence : 

**  From  the  greed  of  the  CainpbeUs, 
From  the  pride  of  the  Gruluuns, 
From  the  ire  of  the  Drummonds, 
And  tlie  wind  of  the  MumtyH, 
Good  Lord  deliver  u.^" 

His  estate  was  surrounded  by  the  Bread:ilbane,  Montrose, 
Perth,  and  Athol  families,  and  he  thus  showed  his  appre- 
hensions of  his  more  powerful  neighbours. 

James  Maxtone  Graham  of  Cultoquey,  married  in  1851, 
the  daughter  of  George  £.  Russell,  Esq.,  East  India  Com' 
pany's  Service.  In  1859  he  succeeded  to  the  estate  of 
Redgorton,  Perthshire,  on  the  death  of  his  unde,  Robert 
Graham,  Esq.,  cousin  of  the  celebrated  Ix>rd  Lynedoch,  and 
in  consequence  assumed  the  name  and  arms  of  Graham  nndii 
letters  patent  of  the  Lord  Lyon. 


Maxwkll,  a  surname  of  ancient  standmg  in  Scotland, 
orij^nally  Maccns-well,  so  called  from  the  territory  of  that 
name  on  tlie  Tweed,  near  Kelso.  In  the  history  of  the  Anglo- 
Saxons  mention  is  made  of  Alaccus,  the  son  of  Anlaf,  king  of 
Northumbriu,  (949—952.)  Anlaf  was  sumamed  Cwuran, 
and  appears  to  be  identical  with  the  Amlaf  Cuarran  whose 
name  occurs  in  the  Annals  of  Ulster,  (944 — 946.)  On  tlie 
expulsion  of  Anlaf  by  the  treachery  of  his  people,  King  Eric, 
a  son  of  the  Danish  king,  Harald  Blntdud,  was  sot  on  the 
Northumbrian  throne,  but,  with  his  son  Henry  and  his  brother 
Regnald,  was  slain  in  the  wilds  of  Staninore,  by  the  hand  of 
MaccuSj  the  soa  of  Anlaf.  (Lappenberg's  History  qfEn^^md 
under  the  Anglo-Saxon  Kings,  Thorpe^ s  TranslaHon^' xq\, 
i.  p.  125,  London^  1845.)  A  potentate  of  the  same  name, 
**Maccus  of  Man  and  the  Hebrides,**  is  also  moitioned  some- 
what later  in  the  same  century.  The  following  is  from  Lap- 
penberg  (Jhid.  vol.  ii.  p.  148),  *'  On  making  liis  annual  sea- 
voyage  round  the  island.  King  Edgar  foTmd,  on  his  arriral  at 
Chester,  eight  sub-kmgs  awaiting  him,  in  obedience  to  the 
commands  they  had  received,  who  swore  to  be  faithful  to  him, 
and  to  be  his  fellow-workers  by  sea  and  land.**  These  were 
Kenneth  of  Scotland,  Malcolm  of  Cumbria,  MaceuM  qf  Man 
and  the  Bebridesy  Dyfhwall  or  Dunwallon  of  Strat  Clyde, 
Siferth,  Isgo,  (Jacob)  and  Howell  of  Wales,  and  InchiU  of 
Westmoreland.  All  these  vassals  rowed  the  proud  Basileos 
on  the  river  Dee  in  a  barge,  of  which  Edgar  was  the  steers- 
man, to  the  monastery  of  St  John  the  BapUst,  where  tbey 


MAXWELL, 


123 


AYMEB. 


|i 


I 


offered  vp  their  orisooa,  and  then  returned  in  the  same  ordef 
to  the  palafoe." 

Tha  tame  in  snbstanoe  Is  mentioned  in  the  Chronica  de 
Mdrot,  wbicb  styles  Ifaeeus  the  **  King  of  many  Isles." 
Bogjtt  of  Wendo?er  and  William  of  Malmesbary  also  relate 
the  tarnt,  the  latter  of  whom  caUs  Maccns  **  that  Prince  of 
piimtai,*'  tfans  identifying  him  with  Afaseutnu  Arehipiraia^ 
who  aboot  the  same  time  (973)  was  a  witness  to  a  charter  by 
King  Edgur  of  England,  and  who  signs  immediately  after 
M  gSw^^jM  rex  Albania"  and  the  royal  family,  and  before  all 
the  bishops,  "  Ego  Mascnsins  Archipirata  confortavi."  (^Dug- 
dak  MomuL  yoL  L  p.  17.)  This  Maccns  wonld  therefore  ap- 
pear to  ha?e  been  a  friend  or  ally  of  Kenneth  king  of  the 
Soots,  and  may  ha?e  held  lands  under  him. 

The  name  <^  Maks  or  Max,  in  medimval  Latin  Macns,  is 
fiiund  in  Domesday  Book  as  being  that  of  a  boron  holding 
several  manors  in  England  before  the  conquest ;  and  Mex- 
borongh  in  Yorkshire,  and  Maxstoke  in  Warwickshire,  still 
pieserve  the  memorial  of  his  residence  and  possessions. 
The  latter,  Maxstoke,  is  said  to  hare  belonged  to  Almundns, 
or  Ailwynd,  the  same  name,  no  doubt,  as  Undewyn,  as  the 
father  of  Maocus,  hereafter  mentioned,  was  called.  The  sal- 
tire  cognizance  of  the  Maxwells  appears  on  the  ceiling  of  the 
ancient  priory  oi  Maxstoke,  along  with  many  others  of  Nor- 
man descent,  bnt  without  name. 

At  an  eariy  period  extensiTS  possessions  on  the  Tweed  hod 
occo  held  by  a  person  of  the  name  of  J/oocitf,  from  whom 
Maoeoston  (Maxton)  and  Maccus-well  (Maxwell)  were  de- 
feignated.  Maeeas<-well  has  been  supposed  originally  to  have 
been  called  Maocns-Yille,  but  the  old  chartularies  give  no 
countenance  to  this  supposiUon.  Maccnswel  or  Moocuswell 
means  cfidently  the  pqpl,  weii,  or  well  of  Alaccus,  (Saxon,  wtflU^ 
»ee  charters  in  Saxon  in  Dugdale,  where  the  word  is  trans- 
UtcdybM,  a  well),  probably  from  his  haying  aright  of  fishing 
there ;  in  the  same  way  as  other  fishings  on  the  Tweed,  as 
the  fishings  of  Schipwell  or  Sipwell  (Lt6.  de  Jfelrot^  Tom. 
L  pp.  16,  17),  and  of  BhuJnrell,  (Reg,  Cart  de  Kelso,  pp.  33, 
44,  Ae.)  Probably  long  before  the  time  of  David  I.,  the  name 
came  to  be  given  to  the  adjoining  territory  and  church,  in  tlio 
ume  way  that  it  was  afterwards  called  Maxwell-heugh,  from 
.mother  natural  characteristic,  probably  coincident  with  the 
well  or  pool  of  former  times. 

The  origin  of  the  family  who  held  the  lands  of  Maccus- 
well,  in  or  before  the  time  of  David  I.,  is  doubtful.  The  opin- 
ion generally  entertained  at  the  present  time  is  that  they  were 
directly  descended  from  Maccus,  from  whom  the  lands  got 
their  name,  but  this  opinion  is  far  from  certain. 

A  Maochus  was  uritness  to  a  charter  of  foundation  of  the 
monasteiy  of  Selkirk  in  1113,  afterwards  transferred  to  KeUo, 
(JZ^.  Cart  de  Kelto,  p.  4.) 

Maocus  filius  Unwein  is  a  witness  to  the  Inquisition  by 
Eari  David,  afterwards  David  I.,  into  the  possessions  of  the 
Church  of  Glasgow,  about  1117. 

Maccns  filius  Undwain  is  also  witness  to  charter  by  David 
!.  in  the  life  of  Prince  Henry ;  which  charter  mentions  a  Per- 
ambulation of  the  lands  which  took  place  "  Armo  scilicet  se- 
enmdOj  quo  Stqthanus  Rex  Anglic  captus  estV  Stephen  was 
taken  prisoner  in  1441,  so  that  the  charter  must  have  been 
between  1143  and  1152,  when  Prince  Henry  died,  and  there- 
fore the  Maccus  here  mentioned  is  evidently  not  the  ancestor 
of  the  Maxwells,  {Liber  de  Metros,  Tom.  i.  p.  4.) 

OU  writers  say  that  the  family  came  from  England.  The 
iiL^toiy  of  the  Maxwell  family,  printed  in  the  Herries  Peerage 
Case,  (page  294)  gives  tiie  same  account.  The  manuscript 
wu  got  in  a  monastery  in  Flanders,  probably  Douay,  and 
sent  to  Terrsgles  in  17G9.    It  seems  to  have  been  written 


chiefly  before  1660,  and  although  inaccurate  in  many  particu- 
lars, shows  that  the  writer  must  have  had  means  of  informa- 
tion which  probably  do  not  now  exist. 

Other  copies  of  this  manuscript  are  extant,  but  all,  as  well 
as  the  printed  one,  seem  to  have  been  carelessly  copied  from  an 
older  and  not  very  legible  manuscript,  and  added  to  in  the 
transcription.  A  more  correct  copy  is  in  tiie  possession  of 
the  Kirkconnel  family,  but  only  brought  down  to  1580,  about 
which  time  it  seems  to  have  been  originally  compiled. — The 
chronicles  and  chartularies  of  the  monasteries  in  Dumfries- 
shupe  and  Galloway  may  have  at  that  time  been  extant,  and 
furnished  materials  for  family  history  which  do  not  now  exist. 
Captwn  Grose  must  have  seen  a  copy  of  this  genealogical 
history  as  authority  for  the  facts  he  relates.  He  nientions 
tiiat  there  was  a  tradition  that  the  first  of  the  Maxwell  name 
in  Scotland  was  a  Norwegian  in  the  suite  of  Edgar  Atheling 
and  his  sisters,  on  their  arrival  in  the  Frith  of  Forth  two  years 
after  the  Norman  conquest. 

Ewin  Maccnswel  of  Carlaverock  was  at  the  siege  of  Alnwick 
with  Malcolm  Canmore  in  1093.  (Jlist.  Family  of  Maxwell, 
printed  as  mentioned  aboceJ)  This  seems  the  same  namo  as 
Engene  or  Hugh. 

Herbert  de  Maccnswel  made  a  grant  of  the  church  of 
^laccuswel  to  the  monastery  of  Kelso,  probably  in  the  time  of 
David  I.,  as  it  is  among  Uie  earlier  grants  to  that  monaster}'. 
(Reg.  Cart,  de  Kelso,  pp.  7  and  14.)  He  is  said  to  have 
died  in  1143.    (Familg  Tree  at  Terregles.) 

Edmund  de  Macheswel,  probably  a  brother  of  Herbert,  was 
witness  to  a  charter  before  1152,  {Cart,  de  Kelso,  p.  145.) 
Other  witnesses  to  the  same  charter  are  Hugo  de  Morvile, 
William  de  Sumervile,  and  William  de  liiorvile,  whose  sur- 
names have  uU  the  Norman  termination  rt/e— difitring  in  a 
marked  manner  in  tiiis  from  Edmund  de  MachesiM/. 

Eugene  de  Maxwell  was  taken  prisoner  with  King  William 
in  1174.  He  assisted  Roland,  lord  of  Gailoway,  and  married 
his  daughter,  {Hist.  Family  of  Maxwell) 

Herbert  de  Maccnswel  makes  a  grant  to  a  chapel  in  the 
church  of  St.  Michael  of  iiaccuswcl,  in  honour  of  St.  Thomas 
the  Martyr,  drca  1180,  {Ueg.  Cart,  de  Ktlso,  p.  325.)  He 
was  sheri£f  of  Tevidale,  and  witness  to  variou.s  charters  from 
1180  to  1198.  (See  Lib.  de  Kelso,  and  Chartidary  of 
Paisley.) 

Sir  John  do  iMaccuswcl  was  sherifl'  of  Koxburgh  and  Tevi- 
dale in  1207,  and  in  1215  wiis  ambassador  to  King  John. 
{Rymer's  Fadera,  v.  i.  part  i.  p.  135.)  In  1220,  he  was  one 
of  the  guarantees  of  the  marriage  of  King  Alexander  II.  uitii 
the  princess  Joan,  si&ter  of  Henry  III.  of  Enghmd,  and  he 
was  one  of  the  witnesses  to  the  grant  of  dowry  to  her  on 
June  18,  1221.  lU  w.is  chamberlain  of  Scotland  iiom  1231 
to  1233,  and  died  in  1241. 

His  son  Eumerus  or  Aymcr  de  Maxwell,  under  the  desig- 
nation of  Homer  Maxwell,  is  witness  in  the  reign  of  Alexander 
II.,  in  a  donation  of  the  kirks  of  Dundonald  and  Sanquhar  to 
Paisley,  by  Walter  the  Great  Steward.  By  his  marriage  with 
Mary,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Roland  de  fleams,  he  obtained 
the  lands  and  baronies  of  Meams  and  Nether  Pollock,  in 
Renfrewshire,  and  Dryps  and  Caldemvood  in  Lanarkshire. 
He  was  one  of  the  councillors  or  in  the  housi-huld  of  the 
young  king,  and  in  1255,  he  and  Mary  his  wife,  with  the 
Comyns,  John  de  Ballol,  Robert  dc  Ros,  and  others,  were  re- 
moved by  Henry,  king  of  England,  to  make  way  fur  Ncill, 
earl  of  Carrick,  Robert  de  Brus,  William  de  Duneglas,  and 
others  of  the  English  party.  He  was  sheriff  of  Dumfries- 
shhe,  and  great-chamberlain  of  ScoUand.  In  1258,  with 
other  barons  he  engaged  that  the  Scots  should  not  make  peace 
with  the  English  without  the  consent  of  tiie  Welsh,    in 


i 


!    ;i 


1 1 


«; 


■  I 


I 
I 


\       I 


I 


IklAXWELI^ 


124 


SIR  JOHN. 


1265,  he  WM  justiciary  of  Galloway,  (^Lib.  de  Melrote,  Tom. 
i.  p.  271.)  lie  had  three  eons:  Sir  Herbert,  his  successor; 
Sir  John,  to  whom  he  gave  tie  lands  of  Kether  Pollock  in 
Renfrewshire,  and  who  was  the  founder  of  the  family  of  that 
designation,  baronets  of  1G82 ;  and  Alexander,  of  whom  no- 
thing is  known. 

Sir  Herbert,  the  eldest  son,  sat  in  the  parliament  at  Scone, 
oth  February,  1283-4,  when  the  nobles  agreed  to  acknow- 
Icilge  the  Maiden  of  Norway  as  queen  of  Scotland,  on  the 
death  of  her  grandfather,  Alexander  ill.  He  is  witness  to 
an  afjreement  between  the  Convent  of  Pusselet  and  John  de 
Aldhus,  in  128*,  {Chartulary  of  Pauley,  p.  66.)  In  1289, 
he  was  one  of  the  biu-ons  who  subscribed  the  letter  to  Kdwurd 
I.,  from  nrigham,  as  to  the  marriage  of  the  Maiden  of  Kor> 
way  with  his  son  Edward.  On  June  6,  1292,  he  was  one  of 
those  named  on  the  part  of  John  Buliol  to  discuss  before  Ed- 
ward the  right  to  the  throne  of  Scotland,  and  in  the  same 
year  he  swore  fuulty  to  Edward.  He  died  before  1800.  Of 
three  sons  which  he  had,  the  eldest  predeceased  him. 

Sir  Herbert,  tlie  second  son,  succeeded  him,  and  soon  afler 
his  castle  of  Curlaverock  sustained  a  siege  from  the  English, 
a  singularly  curious  and  minute  description  of  which  has 
been  preserved  in  a  poem,  in  Norman- French,  supposed  to 
have  been  written  by  Walter  of  Exeter,  a  celebrated  Francis- 
can friar,  who  is  also  said  to  have  been  the  author  of  the  ro- 
mnntie  history  of  Guy,  earl  of  Warwick.  This  description  of 
the  siege  of  Carlaverock  castle  suj^gestcd  to  Sir  Walter  Scott 
the  idea  of  the  siege  of  the  castle  of  Front  de  Boeuf  in 
"  Ivauhoe.'*  About  the  1st  of  July,  1300,  the  English  army 
]«>ft  Carlisle  commanded  by  Edward  I.  in  person,  attended  by 
the  prince  of  Wales,  afterwards  Edward  II.,  and  the  whole 
chivalry  of  England.  At  thb  time  Edward  was  in  possession 
of  almost  every  stronghold  in  Scotland  between  Berwick  and 
tlic  Moray  frith.  The  strong  castle  of  Carhaverock  alone  held 
out.  The  assaults  of  the  English  were  made  by  every  de- 
rt-ription  of  engine  then  in  use,  while  the  besieged  sliowcrcd 
upon  their  assailants  such  "  huge  stones,  quarrels,  and 
arrows,  and  with  wounds  and  bruises  they  were  so  hurt  and 
exhausted,  that  it  w.is  with  very  great  difficulty  they  were 
able  to  retire."  Indeed,  the  courage  of  the  garrison,  which 
amounted  only  to  sixty  men,  was  most  conspicuous.  We  are 
told  that  as  one  of  them  became  fatigued  another  supplied  his 
place,  and  they  defended  the  fortress  gallantly  the  whole  of 
one  day  and  night,  but  the  numerous  stones  thrown  by  the 
bcjsiegers,  and  the  erection  of  three  large  battering  engines  of 
gre.it  power,  caused  them  to  surrender.  To  obtain  a  cessa- 
tion of  hostilities,  they  hung  out  a  pennon,  but  the  soldier 
who  exhibited  it,  was  shot  through  the  Ihind  to  his  face  by 
an  arrow.  The  rest  demanded  quarter,  surrendered  the  castle, 
and  submitted  to  the  mercy  of  the  king  of  England. 

Sir  Herbert's  son,  Sir  Eustace  Maxwell,  succeeded  his 
father  before  1312.  Entert:uning  the  hereditary  feelings  of 
his  family  in  ftivour  of  the  Baliols  and  Comynt*,  in  oppobltion 
to  Robert  the  Bitice,  he  regained  possession  of  the  castle  of 
Carlaverock,  and  on  April  30,  1312,  he  received  from  Ed- 
ward II.,  an  allowance  of  X20  for  its  more  secure  keeping. 
He  afterwards  juined  the  party  of  Robert  the  Bruce.  His  castle 
of  C.nrlaverock  was  again  in  consequence  besieged  by  the  Eng- 
iihh,  and  liereiided  for  several  weeks,  when  the  assailants 
were  compelled  to  retire.  Fearing  that  it  might  again  fall 
into  the  hands  of  the  English,  Sir  Eustace  demolished  a  part 
of  the  fortifications,  for  which  he  was  rewarded  by  King  Ro- 
i>ert  Bruce.  Sir  Eustace  was  one  of  the  barons  who  signed 
the  letter  to  the  Pope,  asserting  Uie  independence  of  Soot- 
Itnd,  in  1820,  and  in  the  same  year  wm  tried  for  being  ac- 
cussorr  to  a  conspuncy  ngaiiut  the  king,  hot  was  acquitted. 


In  1332,  Edward  Balid  landed  in  Scotland,  and  wucrowiwd 
at  Scone.  He  was  afterwards  besieged  in  Perth,  when  the 
men  of  Galloway,  under  Sir  Eustace  de  Maxwell,  invaded  the 
lands  of  the  besiegers,  and  eaosed  them  to  raiie  the  liege, 
(ChroH.  de  Lanerco^  p.  269,)  On  Dec.  18, 1883,  Sir  Euttace, 
with  others,  waa  chosen  by  Edward  III.,  to  ascertain  the 
value  of  the  castle,  comity,  and  city  of  Berwick  upon  Tweed, 
(^Roiuli  Seoiiat  roL  i.  p.  260.)  Jaunaiy  26,  1885-6,  he  waa 
appointed  one  of  the  conaenrators  of  the  truce  with  the  Scota, 
on  the  part  of  Edward,  and  on  August  23,  following,  a  letter 
was  sent  to  him  as  sheriff  of  Dumfries,  as  well  as  to  tlie  other 
sheriffs  of  Scotland,  rebuking  them  for  their  tardiness  in  giv- 
ing in  their  accounts,  (/Md.  vol  i.  p.  441.)  In  1887,  he 
made  a  temporary  defection  from  Baliol,  and  caused  the  men 
of  Gallow.iy  on  his  own  side  of  the  Cree,  to  rise  againit  the 
English,  although  he  had  only  immediately  before  received 
from  Edward  III ,  money  and  provuuons  for  the  more  aecnre 
keeping  of  Caihiverock  castle,  (CAroaicon  de  LanereoU,  p. 
290.)  The  castles  of  Dumku'ton  and  Carlaverock  are  sud 
to  have  been  the  only  strong  castles  then  in  possession  of  the 
Scots.  The  latter  had  therefore  been  repau^  after  its  de- 
molition. On  August  20,  1889,  Sir  Eubtaco  de  Blaxwell, 
Duncan  Makduel,  aud  Michael  Mngeth,  of  Scotland,  received 
from  Edward  IIL  letters  of  pardon,  and  admitting  them  to 
the  king's  peace,  for  having  joined  with  his  enemies,  (RotmH 
Scotia f  vol.  i.  p.  571.)  Sir  Eustace  was  a  witness  to  a 
charter  of  confinnation  by  Edward  III.,  in  1840.  He  died 
at  Curiaverock,  March  8,  1842-3. 

Sir  John  de  Maxwell,  knight,  ''son  of  the  deceased  Sir 
John  Maxwell  of  Pencateland,  and  heir  of  Shr  Eustace  de 
Maxwell,  his  brother,"  succeeded,  r.s  appeaxa  by  charter 
granted  by  him  to  the  Abbey  of  Dr}-bui^h,  confirmed  by 
William,  Prior  of  St  Andrews  in  1348,  being  '*  the  patronage 
of  the  church  of  Pencateland,  which  John  de  Maxwell  of 
Pencateland,  and  Sir  John  Maxwell,  knight,  doininna  de 
Maxwell,  granted  to  the  abbot  and  convent  of  Drybniigh** 
Sir  John  Maxwell  was  taken  prisoner,  with  David  IL,  at  the 
battle  of  Durham,  in  1346,  and  died  sliortly  after. 

Sir  Jolm  Alaxwell,  Lord  (dominus)  of  Maxwell,  his  son, 
probably  did  not  for  a  time  regain  possession  of  Carlaverock. 
Roger  de  Kirkpatrick  had  in  the  end  of  1356  taken  the  castle 
of  Ciurlaverock  and  levelled  it  with  the  ground,  and  when  re- 
siding in  the  neighbourhood,  was,  in  June  following;  assassinat- 
ed by  Sir  James  IJndsay.  Sir  John  Maxwell  sat  in  tlie  meeting 
of  the  Estates  at  Edinburgh,  26th  September  1857,  when 
the  tenns  proposed  by  Edward  III.  relative  to  the  release  of 
David  11.  were  agreed  to,  and  he  was  engaged  iu  the  nego- 
tiations relating  t  hereto.  A  charter  was  granted  by  Robert  11. 
to  Robert  de  Maxwell,  son  and  heir  of  John  Maxwell  of  Car- 
laverock, knight,  on  the  resignation  by  his  father  of  the  lands 
he  held  of  the  king,  under  resen'atiou  of  his  liferent,  and  of 
the  terce,  to  Christian  his  spouse,  iu  cose  she  somved  him, 
dated  Sept.  19,  1371.    He  is  supposed  to  have  died  in  1873. 

His  son,  Sir  Robert  Maxwell  of  Carlaverock,  succeeded.  In 
the  charter  of  resignation  mentioned  above,  he  is  called  by 
King  Robert  II.,  diUctus  coManguineus  noUer^  which  wculd 
infer  that  his  mother  ChriAtInn  was  related  to  the  lung.  He 
is  supposed  to  have  erected  the  castle  of  Carlaverock  on  ita 
present  site,  the  former  one  having  been  in  a  lower  situation 
more  to  the  east.  He  made  agrant  to  the  monastery  of  Dxy- 
burgh,  fur  the  welfare  of  his  soul  and  of  the  soul  of  Sir  Her^ 
bert  de  Maxwell,  his  son  and  heir,  before  1400,  (Liber  de 
Dtybwyh^  p.  273.)  He  seems  to  ha\'e  been  alive  in  1407,  bnt 
was  dead  befure  Nov.  23,  1413.  The  Sir  Robert  Blaxwell 
who  was  then  sent  as  ambassador  to  the  Engli|h  court  most 
have  been  Sir  Robert  M:LXwell  of  Calderwood. 


k. 


MAXWELIa, 


125 


FIFTH  LORD. 


Sir  H«rtert  llazwtll  of  CarlaTerock,  his  son,  socceeded. 
H«  Bamed  in  1885  or  1386,  Kiitherine,  dangbter  of  Sir 
John  Stout  of  DabwintoD,  under  a  dispensation  from  the 
popo.  From  hia  kinsman,  Archibald,  earl  of  Dooglaa,  he  had 
reeeiTad  a  charter  of  the  ttewaidship  of  Annandale,  dated 
Sth  Fcbniarj  1409-10.  He  was  probably  dead  before  Oct. 
20, 1420,  bat  ctrtainlj  so  before  ^arch  16,  1421.  Besides 
Hertoft,  his  soccesaor,  he  left  another  son,  Ajiner,  who  mar- 
ried the  hdress  of  Kiricoonnel  of  that  ilk  (see  Maxwkll  of 
Kibkconxel). 

Tbt  elder  son.  Sir  Herbert  Maxwell  of  Carlaverock,  sac- 
eeeded.    In  his  father*8  lifetime  he  had  a  safe  conduct,  Nov. 
8,  1418,  with  othen,  to  go  to  England  as  hostages.     On 
Maieh  16, 1421,  he  was  retonred  heir  to  his  father  in  the 
lands  of  Uekill  Dripps.    He  was  knighted  at  the  coronation 
of  James  I.,  Maj  21, 1424,  and  some  years  afterwards  was 
ereated  a  krd  of  parliament,  a  dignity  established  by  King 
Jamea  under  the  Act,  March  1, 1427.    His  ancestors,  from 
as  earij  period,  ranked  among  the  moffnatet  oxproceret  rtg- 
wi;  and  in  sereral  charteni  in  the  vernacular  yet  extant  are 
styled  hrd$  of  CarlaTerock,  b  the  same  way  as  the  lords  of 
GaDowaj  and  others.    In  1425  he  waa  arrested  with  Murdoch, 
duke  of  Albany,  hot  soon  liberated.    Albany  was  at  first  sent 
to  CarhiTerock  castle,  but  soon  taken  back  to  Stirling,  where 
be  was  ezecated.    The  tower  at  Carlarerock,  in  which  lie 
was  confined,  was  from  him  called  Mnrdoch*s  tower.      In 
the  pariiament  held  at  Perth,  M.nrch  10, 1429,  Maxwtll  is 
entovd  as  one  of  the  lords  of  purliament  who  adjndicated  on 
the  plea  between  Margaret,  lady  of  Craigy,  and  Philip  de  Mow- 
hsy.    {AcU  <tf  SeotM  Pari,  vol.  il,  p.  28).     In  1480  and 
14W  ho  was  warden  of  the  west  marches,  and  on  20th  March 
af  the  latter  year  be  was  one  of  the  conservators  of  the  truce 
with  England.  He  was  one  of  the  lords  of  parliament  present 
in  pariiament,  Jone  28, 1445.    He  is  again  named  a  conserva- 
tar  ofthe  trace,  Aprfl  29, 1450,  April  16,  1451,  and  May  SO, 
1458.    (BotmU  AoCmv.)    On  Aug.  8,  1440,  he  had  a  charter 
mder  the  great  teal  authorising  him  to  build  a  tower  on  the 
cngof  the  Heams,  and  on  May  15, 1444,  he  hud  a  letter  from 
the  king  empowering  him  to  build  the  castle  of  the  fleams. 
He  died  before  Feb.  14,  1453.    He  was  twice  married  :  first, 
to  a  daughter  of  Sir  Herbert  Herries  of  Terregles,  by  whom  he 
had  two  sons,  Bobert  his  successor,  and  Sir  Edward  Max- 
well, of  whom  descended  the  Maxwells  of  Tinwald  and 
Monreith ;    and  secondly,  to    Katherine,  daughter  of  Sir 
William  Seton  of  Seton,  widow  of  Sir  Allan  Stewart  of  Der- 
ndy,  and  mother  of  the  first  earl  of  Lennox.  By  this  lady,  he 
had,  with  otiier  issue,  Geoi^,  ancestor  of  the  Miixwells  of 
Gomsalloch,  and  Adam,  of  the  Maxwells  of  Southbar. 

The  eldest  son,  Robert,  2d  Lord  Maxwell,  waa  retoured 
heir  to  hia  father  February  14,  1453-4.  On  the  forfeiture  of 
the  Douglases  in  1455,  the  extensive  lordship  of  Eskdale  was 
aeqnired  by  him,  and  remained  with  the  Maxwell  family 
throQ^ioat  the  16th  and  17th  centmies.  He  was  a  guarantee 
to  a  treaty  with  the  English  in  1457,  and  again  in  1459. 
He  had,  before  January  20, 1424,  married  Jauet,  daughter  of 
Sir  John  Forstar  (Forrester)  of  Corstorphine.  On  March  6, 
1457,  he  waa  appointed  one  of  the  viiiitors  of  hospitals  in  Gal- 
loway. On  FeU  10,  1477,  he  executed  a  resignation  of  the 
barooies  of  Maxwell,  Carlaverock,  and  fleams,  in  favour  of 
John  Ma:|weU,  his  eldest  son,  on  which  tlie  latter  had  char- 
ter from  the  king  on  the  14th  of  the  same  month,  lie  died 
before  May  8,  1485.  He  had  three  sons,  John,  his  succes- 
sor, Thoinos,  who  married  the  heiress  of  Maxwell  of  Kirk- 
eonnel,  and  David.  An  illegitunate  son,  also  named  John, 
waa  killed  in  a  quarrel  with  the  Murrays. 
Tbt  tUest  aon,  John,  8d  Lord  Maxwell,  as  he  was  cilled 


in  his  latter  years,  although  he  predeceased  his  father  in 
1454,  married  Katherine  Crichton,  daughter  of  George  Earl 
of  Caithness.    He  waa  appointed  steward  of  Annandale. 
That  he  was  called  Lord  Maxwell  in  his  father's  lifetime, 
after: the  resignation  of  the  baronies  of  Maxwell,  Carlaverock, 
and  Meams,  to  him  as  already  mentioned,  appears  from  the 
Ada  Auditorum,    On  March  27,  1482,  "  John  Lord  Max- 
well "  is  mentioned.    On  December  12,  1482,  John  Maxwell, 
son  and  apparent  heurof ''  Bobert  Lord  Maxwell; "  and  in  a 
mutual  grant  of  certain  lands  to  endow  a  chapel  in  Car- 
laverock, "  Robert  Lord  Maxwell,"  and  "  John  Lord  Maxwell," 
his  son,  are  mentioned  by  these  titles,  and  as  then  alive,  June 
5,  1483.    Juhn  Lord  Maxwell,  or  the  Master  of  Maxwell 
was  treacherously  slain  by  one  of  his  own  countrymen  at  the 
close  of  a  battle  in  Annandale  with  a  party  of  English  and 
some  rebel  Scots,  July  22,  1484.    Besides  John,  his  succes- 
sor, he  left  numerous  sons,  from  whom  descended  the  Max- 
wells  of  Cowhill  and  Kiilylung,  of  Cavens,  of  Portrack,  o^ 
Hills,  and  Drumcoltran,  &c. 

John,  4th  Lord  Maxwell,  his  eldest  son,  was  one  of  the 
commissioners  nominated  to  settle  border  differences  by  ihe 
treaty  of  Nottingham,  Sept  28,  1484.  He  fell  at  Flodden, 
9th  September  1513.  By  his  wife,  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir 
Alexander  Stewart  of  Garlics,  ancestor  of  the  earls  of  Gallo- 
way, he  had,  with  three  daughters,  three  sons,  vis.,  Bobert, 
fourth  Ijord  Maxwell ;  Herbert,  ancestor  of  the  lilaxweUs  of 
Clowden ;  and  Edward,  taken  prisoner  with  his  brother  at 
the  rout  of  Sol  way  in  1548,  but  released  the  following  year, 
on  payment  of  a  ransom  of  jCIOO  sterling. 

Robert,  fif\h  Lord  Maxwell,  tlie  eldest  son,  was  a  conspicu- 
ous character  in  Scottish  history  in  the  first  half  of  the  16th 
century.     On  the  10th  June,  preceding  the  battle  of  Flodden 
Field,  he  had  been  knighted  by  James  IV.,  and,  at  the 
same  time,  on  the  resignation  of  his  fatlier,  he  was  ap- 
pointed steward  of  Annandale.    In  1516  he  acquired  part  of 
the  lands  forfeited  by  Lord  Home,  and  in  the  following  year 
he  was  appointed  warden  of  the  western  marches.    In  1524 
he  waa  lord  provost  of  Edinburgh,  and  in  that  capacity  cho- 
sen one  of  the  lords  of  the  articles  for  tlie  commissioners  of 
burghs.    On  21st  June  1526,  on  James  V.  being  declared  of 
age  to  assume  the  government  of  the  realm,  Lord  Maxwell 
was  sworn  a  member  of  the  secret  council,  formed  to  assist 
the  earl  of  Angus  with  their  advice  and  support  as  guardian 
of  the  king's  person.     Soon  after,  he  was  with  the  young 
monarch,  on  his  return  from  his  expedition  ag.iinst  the  Arm- 
strongs, when,  at  Melrose  bridge,  Angus*  party  was  attacked 
by  Walter  Scott  of  Buccleuch,  with  the  design  of  rescuing 
his  majesty  from  the  hands  of  the  Douglases.    In  1526  he 
was  infeflt  as  steward  of  Kirkcudbright  and  keeper  of  Threave 
castle,  offices  afterwards  made  hereditary.    On  the  escape  of 
James  from  Falkland  c;istle  to  Stirling  in  1528,  Lord  Maxwell 
was  one  of  the  first  of  the  lords  who  attended  the  council 
summoned  by  the  king.    In  the  distribution  of  offices  which 
took  place  when  the  king  soon  after  proceeded  to  Edinburgh, 
a  free  monarch,  to  his  lordship  was  intrusted  the  command  of 
the  capital  with  the  provostship  of  the  city.    Angus*  brother. 
Sir  George  Douglas,  the  late  master  of  the  king's  household, 
and  his  uncle,  Archibald  Douglas  of  Kilspindy,  the  late  trea- 
surer, having  made  an  attempt  to  raise  the  inhabitants,  wei*e 
attacked  by  Lord  Maxwell,  and  driven  from  the  C4ipital.     He 
was  rewarded  with  a  portion  of  the  lands  of  the  forfeited  An- 
gus.   (^Dougloi  Peerage^  vol.  ii.  p.  317). 

The  same  year,  his  lordship  and  other  principal  border- 
chiefs  were  arrested  and  placed  in  Kdinburgh  castle,  prepa- 
ratory to  the  king's  celebrated  journey  into  Eu.*>dale  and 
Teviotdiile  for  the  punishment  of  the  border  tliiuves,  whose 


r 


/! 


MAXWELL, 


127 


EIGHTH  LORD. 


in  tliAt  city,  with  their  foUowars,  to  aasist  him,  bat  departed 
without  carryiDg  their  design  into  effect 

The  attainder  of  the  earldom  of  Morton  was  rescinded  bj  the 
hinges  letten  under  the  great  seal,  in  Jannary  1585,  in  farour 
of  Archibald  earl  of  Angna,  the  heir  of  entail,  (ratified  by  act 
of  pariiament  of  29th  July  1587,)  who  thereby  eaoceeded  to 
the  otf  title  of  earl  of  Morton,  bat  not  affeoting  Lord  Maxwell's 
title  of  eail  of  Morton  created  in  1581  (see  MoBZOir,  earl  oQ. 
Haring  incorred  Anan*s  displeasore  for  refasing  to  exchange 
his  lands  of  Pollok  and  3f  iixwellhangh,  which  lay  contignons  to 
Arrant  estate,  for  others  of  eqoal  Yalae,  Lord  Maxwell  pro- 
aeeded  to  coUeet  a  force  in  his  own  defence,  when  he  was  de- 
nooneed  rebel,  and  pot  to  the  horn,  throng  the  malice  of  the 
eari  of  Amm,  on  which  the  lieges  were  conmianded  by  pro* 
damatioa  to  meet  the  king  on  (^wfordmnir,  on  Oct.  24,  to 
proceed  against  him.  He  joined  the  banished  nobles  in  their 
coDspiracy  for  the  removal  of  Arran,  whom  they  considered  the 
eanse  of  aU  the  eTiIs  that  afflicted  the  country,  and  was  with 
them  when,  on  Nor.  1,  they  took  the  castle  of  Stirling.  On 
this  occasion  his  followers  availed  themselves  of  the  op- 
portnnity  to  do  a  little  bit  of  bosiness  on  their  own  aocoant, 
while  in  effect  aasbting  in  the  overthrow  of  the  court  fa- 
vourite, for,  we  an  told,  they  carried  off  by  force  all  the  horses 
they  could  find,  **not  respecting  friend  or  foe.**  A  general 
act  of  indemnity  was  passed  in  favour  of  the  lords  who  had 
driven  Arran  fiom  court,  and  on  December  10, 1585,  a  special 
Act  of  Parliament  granted  Lord  Maxwell,  his  friends  and 
mrants,  entire  indemnity  for  all  their  unlawful  doings  within 
the  realm,  fipom  April  1569  to  the  date  thereof.  Of  the  men 
oamedin  the  ad,  there  wereabont  600  from  Lord  Maxweirsown 
estates  in  Kithsdale  and  Galloway,  600  from  Eakdale,  Ewes- 
dale,  and  Waochopedole,  mostly  Beattiea,  litUes,  and  Arm- 
strongs,  SIO  from  Lower  Annandale,  chiefly  Carruthers,  Bells, 
and  Irvings,  and  about  450  better  organized  soldiers,  in  three 
compunles  of  infantry,  and  two  troops  of  cavaliy,  one  troop 
bdng  from  Galloway  and  Nithsdale,  commanded  by  John 
Maxwell  of  Newlaw  and  Alexander  Maxwell  of  Logan ;  and 
the  other  from  Annandale,  commanded  by  Gearge  Carruth- 
ers of  Holmends,  and  Charles  Carruthers,  bb  son. 

Having,  coDtraxy  to  law,  caused  mass  to  be  celebrated 
openly  in  the  ooU^  of  linduden,  near  Dumfries,  on  24th, 
25th,  and  26th  Dec  of  the  same  year,  his  lordship,  and  the 
rest  of  the  hearers,  were  charged  to  appear  before  the  secret 
coundL  On  hie  appearance  be  offered  himself  to  trial,  but 
was  committed  to  the  castle  of  Edinburgh.  It  does  not 
appear  how  long  he  remained  a  prisoner.  Ty Uer  says  (^HisL  of 
Seotimtdt  vol  ix.,  p.  4),  that  when  the  king  received  Uie  news 
of  his  mother's  execution,  he  sent  for  Lord  Maxwell,  and  others 
of  the  more  warUke  of  the  border  leaders,  to  consult  as  to 
what  should  le  done.  He  was  not,  however,  employed  in  the 
matter,  for  on  April  12, 1587,  he  gave  bond,  with  John,  Ix)rd 
Hamilton,  William,  Lord  Henries,  and  Sir  John  Gordon  of 
Lodiinvar,  as  cautioners,  that  he  would  leave  the  realm  and 
go  beyond  sea  in  a  month,  and  in  the  meantime  should  not 
trouble  the  country,  nor,  when  abroad,  do  anything  to  injure 
the  religion  then  professed,  or  the  pence  of  the  realm,  and 
should  not  return  without  his  MHJesty*8  special  license.  Ijord 
Herrics,  also,  on  May  29  following,  gave  bond  that  Sir  Robert 
Maxwell  of  Dinwiddie,  John  Maxwell  of  Conheath,  and  Ed- 
ward Maxwell  of  the  Hills— probably  imprisoned  at  the  same 
time  as  Lord  Maxwell — should  not  do  or  attempt  anything 
to  the  prrjudice  of  the  religion  then  professed.  Soon  after, 
Ijord  Maxwell  went  to  Spain,  and  when  there  he  did  what  he 
could  to  promote  the  success  of  the  invasion  of  England  by 
the  Armada,  and,  with  that  view,  to  produce  a  diversion  in 
Scotland,  where  a  powerful  body  of  the  nobility  was  ready  to 


assist  (IhUL  vol.  ix.,  p.  17.)  In  the  month  of  April  1588,  he 
returned  to  Scotland  without  the  king's  license.  He  at  once 
began  to  assemble  his  followers,  that  he  might  be  ready  to 
assist  the  Spaniards  on  the  arrival  of  their  much-vaunted 
Armada.  He  fortified  the  oastle  of  Loclimaben,  the  command 
of  which  he  gave  to  Mr.  David  Maxwell,  brother  of  the  hurd 
of  Cowhill,  while  he  himself  took  refuge  on  board  a  ship. 
With  a  large  force  James  marched  to  Dumfries,  and  sum- 
moned Lord  Maxwell's  various  castles  to  surrender.  They 
all  obeyed,  except  Lochmaben,  but  after  two  days'  firing  it 
also  was  ^ven  up,  when  the  governor  and  five  of  his  officers 
were  hanged  before  the  castle  gate.  In  the  meantime,  Sir 
William  Stewart,  brother  of  Captain  Stewart,  the  quondam 
eari  of  Arran,  was  sent  after  Lord  Maxwell  Finding  himself 
pursued,  his  lordship,  quitting  the  ship,  took  to  the  boat,  and 
had  no  sooner  landed  than  he  was  apprehended.  He  was  nt 
first  conveyed  to  Dumfries,  but  aftcowards  removed  to  the 
castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  deprived  of  his  office  of  warden  of 
the  western  marches,  whidi  was  conferred  on  the  laird  of 
Johnston. 

With  other  imprisoned  nobles.  Lord  Slaxwell  was  released 
from  his  confinement  on  12th  September,  1589,  to  do  honour, 
by  theur  attendance,  to  the  queen  of  James  VI.  on  her  arrival 
in  Scotland  from  Denmark.  He  had  become,  from  policy  or 
otherwise,  a  convert  to  Protestantism,  and  on  26th  January, 
1598,  subscribed  the  Confession  of  Faith  before  the  presbytery 
of  Edinburgh,  under  the  name  of  Morton.  On  the  2d  Feb- 
ruary following  he  and  the  new  earl  of  Mwton,  striving  for 
precedency  in  the  church  at  Edinburgh,  were  parted  by  the 
provost  before  they  had  time  to  draw  their  swords,  and  con- 
veyed under  a  guard  to  their  lodging,  as  was  also  Lord  Ham- 
ilton, for  having  assisted  Maxwell. 

He  had  been  restored  to  the  wardenship  of  the  western 
marches,  but  in  consequence  of  its  having  been  held  for  a 
time  by  the  hurd  of  Johnston,  the  old  feud  was  renewed  be- 
tween the  two  families.  On  the  7th  December,  1593,  nt  the 
head  of  about  2,000  men,  I^rd  Maxwell,  having  a  commission 
of  lieutenantcy,  went  to  demolish  some  houses  belonging  to  the 
Johnstons,  when  he  was  resisted  by  the  chief  of  that  name, 
with  his  allies,  the  Scotts,  Elliots,  and  other  border  clans,  to 
the  number  of  500  men,  and  *^  being  a  tall  man  and  heavy  in 
armour,"  was  slain.  This  affair  was  colled  the  battle  of  Dryfe 
sands.  Tlic  Maxwells,  though  much  superior  in  numbers, 
were  routed  and  pursued ;  and  lost,  on  the  field  and  in  the 
retreat,  about  700  men,  besides  their  commander.  Many  of 
those  who  were  killed  or  wounded  in  the  retreat  were 
cut  down  in  the  streets  of  Lockcrby,  and  hence  the  phrnse, 
currently  used  in  Annandale  to  denote  a  severe  wound,  "  A 
Lockerby  Lick."  By  his  wife.  Lady  Elizabeth  Douglas, 
second  daughter  of  the  7th  earl  of  Angus,  Lord  Maxwell 
had,  with  three  daughters,  three  sons,  John  and  Robert,  8th 
and  9th  Lord  Maxwell,  and  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconncl 
and  Springkell,  who  lefl  no  issue. 

John,  8th  Lord  Maxwell,  the  eldest  son,  was  put  to  the 
horn  for  various  acts  of  disobedience  to  the  king^s  authority, 
and  by  the  laws  then  in  force  as  to  religion,  before  the  year 
1600.  The  old  feud  between  the  Maxwells  and  the  Johnstons 
was  kept  up  by  the  appointment  of  Sir  James  Johnston 
to  the  wardenship,  June  17,  1600.  Lord  Maxwell  w:is 
in  March  1602  imprisoned  in  the  cnstlc  of  Edinburgh  on 
account  of  his  favouring  popery.  He  aflcrwards  broke  out  of 
ward,  and  was  proclaimed  a  traitor.  A  sort  of  reconciliation 
had  taken  place  between  the  Maxwells  and  the  Johnstons,  in 
testimony  whereof  Lord  Maxwell  executed  "  Letters  of  Slayns,'* 
June  11,  1605. 

In  1607,  Lord  Maxwell,  asserting  still  his  rights  as  carl  of 


AIAXWELL, 


129 


OF  CALDERWOOD. 


detetoded  fnHn  Robert  III.,  aiid  Iind  a  son  and  3  daugbten. 
He  died  iu  1677. 

Sir  Geof^  Maxwell's  nnrau  is  associated  nitb  one  of  the 
moot  eztraordinaiy  eaiues  celibratt  in  witcbcraft  wbich  oc- 
coned  in  Benftewalure.    lla\-ing  been  token  snddenljr  ill, 
wbile  in  Glasgow,  on  tbe  night  of  Oct.  14,  1677,  bo  was,  on 
hji  xetnrn  borne,  confined  to  bed  with  severe  bodiljr  pains. 
A  ragrant  girl,  named  Janet  Dougbis,  wbo  pretended  to 
be  doinb,  and  was  considered  a  clerer  witcb-finder,  and  wbo 
ovcd  some  of  bis  tenants  a  grudge,  accused  several  of  tbem 
of  bewitching  Sir  George,  and,  to  confirm  her  assertions,  she 
coDtriTcd,  in  (me  or  two  instances,  to  secrete  small  wax  fig- 
BRs  of  tbe  snfiering  kuigbt,  stuck  witb  pins,  in  tbe  dwell- 
ii^  of  the  accused  persons.    A  special  commission  was 
iuoed  for  the  trial  of  tbe  case  on  tlie  spot,  and  after  a  long 
inrcstigatlon,  at  which  were  present,  besides  some  of  tbe 
lords  of  josticlaiy,  most  of  tbe  leading  men  of  Renfrewshire, 
tbe  following  unfortunate  creatures,  nameljr,  Janet  Slathie, 
wiUow  of  John  Stewart,  under  miller  in  Shaw  mill,  John 
Stewart,  licr  son,  and  three  old  women,  tbe  parties  accused, 
were  condemned  to  be  strangled  and  burned,  and  Annabil 
Stewart,  a  gui  14  jean  old,  tbe  daughter  of  Matbie,  or- 
dered to  be  imprisoned !    Tbe  case  is  recorded  in  Cranford^s 
*  Histoiy  of  Renfrewshire.*    A  ballad  has  also  been  written 
on  tbe  sulgect    Tbe  accused  confessed  their  guilt ! 

Tbe  son.  Sir  John  Maxwell  of  Pollok,  was  created  a  baronet 
of  Nora  Scotia  bjr  Charies  II.,  April  12, 1682,  witb  extension 
of  the  title,  in  rirtue  of  another  patent,  March  27, 1707,  to 
his  beixB  male  whatsoerer.    In  Juljr  1683,  Sir  John  Maxwell 
was  imprisoned  for  refusing  to  take  tbe  test,  and  December  2, 
1684,  be  was  fined  .£8,000  by  the  privy  council,  fur  allowing 
xvcusants  to  live  on  bis  lands,  and  refusing  the  bond  and  test. 
Tbe  ooondl,  however,  declared  that  if  paid  before  tbe  end  of 
tlie  month,  the  fine  would  be  reduced  to  £2,000.    In  1689, 
Sir  John  was  sworn  a  privy  councillor  to  King  Wililim.    The 
■ame  year  be  represented  tbe  county  of  Renfrew  at  tbe  con- 
vention of  estites.    He  was  afterwards  commissioner  for  tbe 
same  county  in  tbe  Scots  parliament.    In  1696  be  was  ap- 
pointed one  of  the  lords  of  tbe  treasuiy  and  exchequer.    On 
tbe  6tb  February  1699  be  was  admitted  an  ordinary  lord  of 
aoMon,  and  on  tbe  14tb  of  tbe  same  month  nominated  lord- 
jostice-clerk.    In  tbe  latter  ofiice  be  was  superseded  in  1702. 
He  died  July  4,  1732,  in  his  90th  year,  without  issue. 

His  cousin,  Sir  John  M.nxwcll,  previously  Atyled  of  Dlnvrcrt- 
Lill,  succeeded  as  2d  b.nronet  of  PoIIok.  lie  was  the  son 
of  Zecbarias  Mnxwell  of  Rlnwertbill,  younger  brother  of  Sir 
George  Maxwell  of  Auldhouse  and  PoIIuk.  He  married,  1st, 
Ijdy  Ann  Carmicliael,  dau{;hter  of  John,  enri  of  Hyndford, 
and  bad  a  son,  John,  and  2  daughters;  2dly,  Barbara,  daughter 
of  Walter  Stewart  of  BlairimI),  issue,  8  sons;  1,  George,  of 
UUvertbill,  wbo  died  unmiirried;  2,  Walter;  3,  James;  and 
3  daughters;  3dly,  Margaret,  of  the  family  of  Caldwell  of 
Caldwell,  without  issue.    He  died  in  1753. 

His  eldest  son,  Sir  John  Maxwell,  became  3d  baronet.  On 
liis  death,  his  half  brother.  Sir  Walter,  succeeded  as  4tl) 
baronet,  and  died  in  1761. 

Sir  Walter's  only  son,  Sir  John,  became  5th  baronet,  but 
difd  nine  weeks  after  his  father. 

The  title  and  estates  reverted  to  his  father's  youngest 
brother.  Sir  James,  6th  baronet  This  gentleman  married 
Frances,  2d  daughter  of  Robert  Colquboun,  Esq.  of  St. 
Cbristopber's,  of  the  family  of  Kenmure;  issue,  2  sons;  1, 
John,  bis  successor;  2,  Robert,  a  cnptuin  in  the  army,  died 
without  uiKue;  rjid  2  daughters,  1,  Frances,  wife  of  John 
Conningbam  of  Cnigends;  2,  Usurbara,  married  Rev.  Grerilie 
Eving.    Sir  James  died  in  1785. 

III. 


His  elder  son.  Sir  John,  7th  baronet,  was  M.P.  for  the 
Paisley  Burghs.  He  married  Hannah  Anne,  daughter  of 
Richard  Gardiner  of  Aldborougb,  Suflulk;  issue,  a  son.  Sir 
John,  and  2  daughters,  Harriet,  who  died  in  1842,  and  Elisa* 
beth,  wife  of  Archibald  Stiriing,  Esq.  of  Keir. 

The  son.  Sir  John  ^laxwell  of  Pollok,  8tb  baranet,  suc- 
ceeded July  80,  1844;  F.R.S.;  was  educated  at  Westminster 
and  Christ  Church,  Oxford;  M.P.  for  the  county  of  Ren- 
frew from  1826  to  1831,  and  for  Lanarkshire  from  1832  to 
1837;  deputy  lieutenant  for  counties  of  Lanark  and  Renfrew. 
He  married  in  1839  Lady  Matilda  Harriet  Bruce,  daughter 
of  Thomas,  earl  of  Elgin  and  Kincardine.  This  lady  died  Aug. 
81, 1827. 

Tbe  family  of  Maxwell  of  Pollok  are  in  possession  of  sev- 
eral original  writings  of  considerable  interest.  One  of  these 
is  the  letter  written  by  Queen  Mary,  after  her  escape  from 
Locbleven,  to  Sir  John  Maxwell,  whom  she  bad  knighted, 
requiring  him  to  hasten  to  her  aid  with  all  bis  people,  **  bod- 
in  in  fear  of  weir,**  that  is,  equipped  for  war.  He  obeyed 
tlio  call,  and  as  stated  above,  fought  at  tbe  battle  of  Ijing- 
side,  on  tbe  very  border  of  his  own  domains. 


:  I 


The  Maxwells  of  Calderwood  are  descended  from  Sir  John 
Maxwell  of  Pollok,  knight  (see  page  128).  He  got  from  bis 
father  tbe  lands  and  baronies  of  Kether  Pullok,  Renfrewshire, 
and  of  Dryps  and  Calderwood,  I^marksbire.  By  bis  first 
wife,  Isabel  de  Lindsay,  Sir  John  had  2  sons.  Sir  John,  bis 
successor,  and  Sir  Robert,  ancestor  of  tbe  Maxwells  of  Calder- 
wood.   He  died  in  tbe  beginning  of  the  reign  of  Darid  II. 

Tbe  younger  son.  Sir  Robert  Maxwell,  who  inherited  Pol- 
lok and  Calderwood,  died  in  1363. 

Sir  Robert's  eldest  son  and  successor.  Sir  John  Sfaxwcll  of 
Pollok  and  Calderwood,  bad  2  sons,  John,  to  whom  he  gave 
the  lands  of  Nether  Pollok,  and  Robert. 

The  latter,  Sir  Robert  Maxwell,  got  the  b.irony  of  Cal- 
derwood and  other  lands.  A  mutu.nl  indenture  was  entered 
into  by  tbe  two  brothers,  dated  at  Dumbarton,  Dec.  18, 1400, 
in  which  all  their  lands  were  enumerated,  and  under  tbe  au- 
thority of  their  father — tbe  principal  party — this  deed  allo- 
cated or  partitioned  certain  lands  to  tbe  sons  and  their  respec- 
tive heirs  at  law.  Sir  Robert  married  in  1402,  Elizabeth, 
daughter  and  co-heir  of  Sir  Robert  Denniston  of  Denniston,  by 
whom  be  obtained  the  barony  of  Newark,  in  Renfrewshire. 
From  this  marriage  lineally  descended  Sir  James  Maxwell 
of  Calderwood,  who  died  in  1622.  He  was  thrice  married, 
and  had  issue  by  all  his  wives.  His  third  wife,  Lidy  Marga- 
ret Cunningham,  daughter  of  James,  7th  earl  of  Glenc:iini, 
and  widow  of  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Evandale,  was  sister 
of  Ann,  marehioness  of  Hamilton.  Ry  her  he  had  4  daugh- 
ters and  2  sons;  1,  John,  lineal  ancestor  of  the  present  baro- 
net, and  2,  Alexander. 

His  son.  Sir  James  Maxwell  of  CaIdcrv«-ood,  who  suc- 
ceeded him,  was  by  bis  2d  wife,  Isobel,  daughter  of  Sir 
Alexander  Hamilton  of  Innerwick.  He  was  created  a  bar- 
onet of  Scotland  and  Nova  Scotia,  with  remainder  to  his  heirs 
male  whatsoever,  March  28,  1627.  On  the  death  of  Sir  John 
M:(xwell  of  Pollok  without  sun'iving  i.ssue,  in  1647,  Sir 
James  attempted  to  set  aside  a  disposition  of  the  Pollok  es- 
tates, made  some  time  before  his  death,  by  Sir  John  Max  - 
well  in  favour  of  George  Maxwell  of  Auldhouse,  but  without 
effect.  His  son.  Sir  William,  also  prosecuted  his  claim  to  tlie 
Pollok  estates,  founding,  like  bis  father,  on  the  deed  of  in- 
denture of  1400,  above  mentioned,  but  he  was  equ:dly  imM;c- 
cessful.  Sir  James  died  in  1667.  His  half  brother,  Colonel 
John  Maxwell,  has  an  bistonc:d  name  as  having  attended  h\& 
cousin,  the  duke  of  Hamilton,  on  bis  unfortunate  expedition 

I 


._.-.T-'l 


l! 


I       I, 


'j 

.1 
,  I 

I 
f   I 

M 

■  I 

:i 

'  I 
I  I 

I  i 


ii 


I 


'■\ 


!| 

I 
I 


MAXWELT^ 


180 


OF  SPRTNGKELT^ 


into  Eiigbnd  in  1648  for  the  rescue  of  Charles  I.  Od  hif 
return  lie  was  obliged  to  do  penance  forhui  ibare  in  the  *'  en- 
gagement,** as  it  was  called,  before  the  congregation  in  the 
parish  church  of  Carlake,  in  which  parish  the  fainjij  at  that 
time  resided.  He  served  as  c<^oneI  in  the  Scots  annj  which 
opposed  Cromwell  on  his  entering  Scotland  in  IGoO,  and  was 
killed  lit  the  b.nttle  of  Dunbar  that  year. 

Sir  James*  eldest  son.  Sir  William,  2d  baronet,  married 
Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Maxwell  of  Saughton  Hall, 
and  had  two  sons,  and  one  daughter,  who  predeceased  him. 

His  first  cousin,  Sir  John,  son  of  Colonel  Maxwell,  half 
brother  of  the  first  baronet,  succeeded  as  3d  baronrt.  He 
was  fifbt  designed  of  Abington,  but  uf^rwurds  of  Calderwood. 

His  only  sumving  son,  Sir  William,  4 tit  bamnet,  died  in 
1750.  Hp  mnrriod  Christian,  daughter  of  Alexander  Stew- 
art, Esq.  of  Turrcnce,  and  li.nd,  with  4  daughters,  8  sons.  1 . 
William.  2.  Juhn,  a  colonel  in  the  amir,  who  had  the  com- 
mand of  a  regiment  of  grcnadierji,  and  spn-cil  with  great  rep- 
utation in  the  German  war,  under  Prince  Ferdinand.  3. 
Alexander,  a  merchant  in  Leitli,  who  married  Mar}*,  dangli- 
ter  of  Hugh  Clerk,  Esq..  of  the  faniily  nf  Penicuik.  Their 
son,  Ctiptain  Sir  Murmjr  Max-.vell,  di.stingiiifihed  himself  as 
a  naval  officer.     A  memoir  of  him  is  given  at  page  134. 

Sir  William*s  eldest  son,  Sir  William,  5th  baninet,  died 
.Tanuarr  2,  1780. 

The  only  snn*iving  son  of  the  latter.  Sir  William,  Ctli  baro- 
net, born  in  1748,  died  without  issue,  August  12,  1S20,  and 
was  succeeded  by  liU  cousin. 

Sir  William  Maxwell,  7tli  baronet,  a  distinguished  generil 
in  the  army,  died  March  IH,  1837.     He  had  four  sons. 

'l*he  eldest  sou,  Sir  William  Alexander  Maxwell,  8th  baro- 
net, born  in  1793,  became  a  colonel  in  tho  army  in  1851,  and 
retired  in  18o3;  married,  without  issue.  Two  younger 
brothers  died  utimarried.  Hugh  Bates,  his  younger  brother, 
was  bom  in  1797;  m.vried,  issue,  a  son,  Willi.tm,  l>om  in  1828. 


His  2d  son.  Sir  Alexander,  loccecded  aa  2d  baraneC,  and 
iir  William,  the  eldebt  son  of  Sir  Alexander,  bMuna  8d  bar- 
onet. Sir  William  died  Aug.  22,  1771.  By  liis  wife,  Mag- 
dalene, daughter  of  William  Blair,  Esq.  of  BUr,  Ajnbire,  be 
had,  with  8  daughters,  8  sons.  1,  Wiliiam;  2«  Hamilton, 
lieutenant-colonel,  74tb  regiment,  who  commanded  the  gim- 
adieffs  of  the  army  under  Lord  Comwaliia,  in  the  war  agiunst 
Tippoo  Sultaun.  He  died  iu  India,  unmarried,  in  1800;  8, 
Dunbar,  li.  M.,  died  young  iu  1775. 

Sir  William,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded  as  4th  ImroncL  He 
married  his  counn,  Katlierine,  daughter  and  henreM  of  Da- 
vid Blair,  Esq.  of  Adainton,  and  had  3  sons  and  6  daoghten. 
He  died  in  1812. 

The  eldest  son.  Sir  William.  5th  baronet,  serred  as  licntcn- 
ant-colnnel  in  the  28tli  foot  under  Sir  John  Moore  in  Spain, 
and  lost  an  arm  at  Corunna.    He  died  Aug.  22,  1838L 

His  eldest  son.  Sir  William  Maxwell,  Cth  baronet,  bora 
in  1805,  succeeded.  He  was  a  captain  in  the  anny,  bnt  r»- 
tii-ed  from  the  service  in  1844;  lieutenant-cohmd  of  militia; 
married  llt-lenorn,  youngest  daughter  of  Sir  3Iicliael  Shaw 
Stewnrt,  bart..  of  Greenock  and  Blackball;  iame,  Herbert 
KuNtacc,  bo!-n  .Ian.  8,  1815,  another  son  and  4  danghtem 


The  .MnxtvdN  of  Cardoness,  Kirkcudbrightshire,  descend 
from  William  Maxwell  of  Newlands,  yonnger  son  of  Gavin 
Maxwell,  Esq.,  wlioiiu  t* Ide&t  son.  Sir  Ilobert  Maxwell,  knight, 
was  grandfather  of  tiie  tintt  baronet  of  Culderwood. 

David  Maxwell  of  Cardoness,  son  of  Major  John  Maxwell, 
by  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Irving  of  Bunshaw,  n.-is  created  a 
baronet,  June  9,  1801.  He  married  in  1770,  his  cousin,  Hen- 
rietta, daughter  of  David  Maxwell,  Esq.  of  C.iim6more.  Kirk- 
oudbriglithliire,  and  had  4  sons  and  4  daughters.  He  died 
iu  1825. 

His  2d  son,  David,  succeeded ;  his  cldostson,  Wiliiam,  having 
been  drowned  on  his  passage  to  Minorc.-i,  Feb.  17,  1801.  Sir 
David,  2d  b.aron<'t,  bom  in  1773.  vice-lieutenant  of  Kirkcud- 
bii;;htsliire,  and  honorary  colonel  of  Galloway  Rifles,  married 
Geoigina,  eldest  daughter  of  .^ainucl  Martin,  Esq.  of  Anti- 
gna,  and  had  3  sons  and  3  d.'mgliters  Sir  David  died  Nov. 
13,  18G0,  .nnd  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  Kurviving  son. 

Sir  William,  3d  baronet.  l>oni  1809,  married  Ist,  1811, 
Mary,  danghtcr  of  .T.  Spmt,  Esq  .  by  whom  (who  died  1840) 
lie  had  2  sons  and  1  daughter.  Sir  Wiili.nui  married,  2dly, 
1851.  I^uisa  Maria,  eldest  daughter  of  Geoffrey  J.  Shakerley, 
Esq..  and  by  her  als<>  (who  died  I8oG)  has  issue  4  daugiiters. 


The  Maxwt^lls  of  Monreitli,  Wigtownsliire,  are  descended 
from  Hcrl>ert  of  Carlavorock,  firbt  Lord  Maxwell  His  2d 
son.  Sir  ICdward  Maxwell,  obtiuned  a  charter  of  the  barony  of 
Mureith,  now  Monrcith,  Jan.  15,  1 181.  He  was  lineal  .nn- 
cestor  of  William  Maxwell  of  Monreitli,  created  a  baronet  of 
Nova  Scotia,  January  8, 1G81.  He  died  in  1709.  His  eldest 
son,  William,  w.is  drowned  in  the  Xitli,  in  1707. 


The  Maxwells  of  Spriiigkell,  iu  Aunandale,  barooeta,  are  a 
branch  of  the  family  of  Auldhouse,  of  which  Maxwell  of  Pol- 
lok  is  the  senior  representative.  Tliey  are  second  in  anoces- 
sion  from  PoUuk.  George  3ilaxwell,  Esq.  of  Auldhouse, 
married,  1st,  Janet,  daughter  of  John  Miller,  Esq.  of  New- 
ton, and  had  one  son,  John,  whose  son,  George,  succeeded  to 
the  PoUok  estates ;  2dly,  Jean,  daughter  of  William  Mnv, 
Esq.  of  Glanderstone,  issue,  a  son,  William;  3dly,  Janet, 
daughter  of  Dougl.is  of  Waterside,  issue,  a  son,  HnglL 

William  Maxwell,  tlie  2d  son,  acquired  in  1C09,  the  bar- 
ony of  Kirkconiiel  and  Springkell,  in  Annandale. 

His  son,  Patrick  Maxwell  of  Sprin^dl,  waa  created  a 
baronet  of  Nora  Scotia  iu  1683.  He  died  in  1720,  leaving  a 
son,  and  4  daughters. 

His  son.  Sir  William,  2d  baronet,  died  in  1760,  and  was 
sucreetled  by  his  only  son.  Sir  William,  3d  baronet,  who  died 
March  4,  1804.  The  latter  had,  with  3  daughters,  4  sons, 
namely,  1.  William,  a  lieutenant  36th  regiment,  who  died, 
unmarried,  in  1784.  2.  Michael-Stewart,  colonel  of  Dom- 
fries-shire  light  dragoons,  who  died,  unmarried,  in  1880.  8. 
Patrick,  an  ofliccr  iu  the  .irniy,  drowned  1^  the  npsettiug  of 
a  boat  in  a  river  in  Nova  Scotia,  in  1 790.  4.  Juhn.  Tho 
youngest  son  succeeded  his  father. 

I.ientenant-general  Sir  John  Maxwell,  4th  baronet,  who 
^ucv'eeded  March  4,  1804,  marrieil  Mary,  only  surviving  child 
and  heiress  of  Patrick  Heron,  Esq.  of  Heron,  in  tlie  atewart- 
ry  of  Galiuway,  M.P.,  and  on  the  death  of  his  father* in-law, 
assumed  the  surname  and  anus  of  Heron,  in  addition  to  Ida 
own.     He  died  J.inunry  29,  1830. 

His  eldest  Mtn,  Sir  Patrick  Heron  Maxwell,  died,  unmar- 
ried, August  27,  1841. 

His  next  brother.  Sir  John  Heron  Maxwell,  became  6th 
baronet ;  born  in  1 808 ;  an  officer  II,  N. ;  married,  iaaiu,  4  > 


The  Maxwells  of  Parkliill ;  and  other  families  of  the  name, 
sprung  from  the  same  C4>nimon  ancestor  us  the  Calderwood 
family.  The  Bev.  Kobert  M.oxwell,  2d  son  of  Sir  John  Max- 
well of  (Culderwood,  knight,  iu  the  end  of  the  reign  of  Queen 
Elizabeth  was  sent  over  to  Ireland,  by  James  VI.,  to  secure 
nu  interest  for  his  majesty  in  that  kingdom.  He  was  ap- 
pointed dean  of  Armagh,  and  was  ancestor  uf  the  earis  of 
Faniham  peerage  of  Ireland,  and  of  tlie  Waring- Maxwells  of 
rinnibroguc,  connty  Down. 


i> 


i  I 
I  ■ 


-J 


MAXWELL, 


131 


OP  KIRKCONNEL. 


The  Slaxwells  of  Dnrgavel  are  an  old  family  in  Reiifrew- 
•birt.  John  Hail  Uazweli,  Esq.,  present  proprietor  of  Dnr- 
jpivtl,  is  aho  the  representatiro  of  another  ancient  family  in 
the  Mine  countr,  tbr  Halls  of  Fulbar,  the  reputed  chieft  of 
the  name,  which  in  the  charters  of  the  time  is  given  in  the 
fjitbi  fonn  of  de  Ania.  The  ancestor  of  the  latter  obtained 
a  charter  of  the  hinds  of  Fnlbar  from  James,  high  steward  of 
Scotiand,  grandfather  of  King  Robert  II.,  confirmed  by  that 
nonareh  in  1870.  One  of  the  descendants  of  this  family  feU 
stFlodden. 

The  Dai^aTel  branch  of  the  family  of  Maxwell  was  a  cadet 
of  th«  house  of  Newark,  an  offshoot  of  the  family  of  Calder- 
wood  (aee  page  129).  Of  the  Maxwells  of  Newark,  Mr. 
Hall  Maxwell  ii  now  also  the  representative. 

John,  eldest  son,  by  lib  2d  wife,  of  Patrick  Maxwell  of 
Newark,  obtained  from  his  father  in  1516,  a  charter  of  the 
lands  of  Dargarel,  in  the  parish  of  Erskine,  with  tho^  of 
Ituhielee  and  Haltonridge,  in  the  adjnccnt  parishes  of  liich- 
innan  and  Kilmalcolm.  One  of  his  descendants  wss  iduin  in 
the  deq»erate  conflict  at  Lookerliy  in  1593,  between  the  rival 
clans  of  Maxwell  and  Johnston. 

John  Jifaxwell,  the  proprietor  of  Dargnvel  in  1710,  entailed 
that  estate,  and  died  without  issue.  He  was  succeeded  by 
his  brother,  William  !ilnxwell  of  Frceland,  who  also  died 
childlea. 

Their  sister,  Margaret  Maxwell,  had  married  Robert  Hal] 
of  Fnlbar,  and  the  2d  son  of  this  marriage,  John  Hall,  suc- 
ceeded to  Dargavel,  as  next  heir  of  entail,  when  he  took  the 
Dame  of  MaxwelL  By  the  death  of  his  elder  brother,  he  be- 
came proprietor  of  Fnlbar  and  mnle  representative  of  the 
family  of  HalL 

His  grandson,  John  Maxwell  of  Dargavel,  died  in  1830. 

His  brother,  William  Maxwell,  succee<led.  He  married 
Mary,  dangliter  of  John  Campbell,  Esq.  of  Fossil,  Dumbar- 
tonshire, and  had  by  her  a  numerous  family.  He  died  in 
ISM. 

His  ddest  son,  John  Hull  ]^Iaxwel1,  Esq.  of  Dargavel,  C.B., 
bom  in  1812,  passed  advocate  at  the  Scottish  bar  in  1835, 
and  in  184G  was  appointed  secretary  to  the  Highland  and 
Agricultural  Society  of  Scotland.     In  1856  he  was  m.ido  a  ' 
onnpanion  of  the  Bath ;  n  magistrate  and  deputy  iieutenant  ' 
of  Renfrewshire.     He  married  in  1843,  Anne,  daugliter  of  , 
Thomas  Williams,  Emj.  of  Bnrwood  House,  with  issue.     His 
ion  and  heir,  William  Hall,  was  bom  in  1847. 


Tlie  Maxwells  of  Rirkconnel  descend  from  one  of  the  older 
cadets  of  the  M.nxwell  family.  Representing  the  family 
of  Kirkoonnel  of  Kirkconnel,  it  is  one  of  the  oldest  families 
in  Galloway,  and  has  been  settled  in  the  parish  of  Troqueei* 
f'N-  centuries.    The  Maxwells  spell  the  name  Kirkconncll. 

The  first  of  the  house  of  Kirkconnel  of  that  ilk  is  suppose/i 
to  have  been  a  person  of  Saxon  origin,  who  had  come  from 
the  north  of  England  and  settled  at  Kirkconnel,  near  the 
mouth  of  the  Nith,  in  the  time  of  Earl  David,  afterwards 
David  J.,  or  in  that  of  King  Malcolm  his  father.  The 
names,  John,  W*illiam,  and  Thomas,  which  the  Kirkconnel 
family  used,  indicate  their  north  of  England  extraction; 
while  the  surname  of  the  family  being  the  same  as  the  name 
uf  their  lands,  gives  right  to  infer  that  they  held  these  lands 
from  the  time  of  Malcolm  Csnmore  (1057 — 1093)  when 
family  surnames  derived  from  territorial  possegsIi>ns  began 
to  be  used  in  Scotland. 

Tlie  arms  of  the  Kirkconnels,  azure,  two  crosiers,  or,  placed 
in  li^hire  ardoss^  with  a  mitre  of  the  last  placed  in  chief 
{\ubef$  Ilemldry^  Fart  2,  cli.  10)  being  the  same  as  those 
of  the  blshoDS  of  Ar^le  or  IJsmore  in  the  Tith  century. 


might  be  thought  to  show  that  the  one  was  derived  from  the 
other,  but  was  probably  assumed  from  the  name  of  the  terri* 
tory  and  its  connexion  with  the  church. 

The  first  of  the  name  on  record  is  John,  **dominus  de 
Kirkconnel,  fundavit  Saenim  Boscum.**  (Dugdal^t  3foiuu- 
ticon  (1661)  Coenobia  Scoticm,  vol.  ii.  p.  1057.)  He  founded 
the  nbl)ey  of  Holywood  some  time  in  the  12th  century,  in 
the  place  of  a  former  religious  house.  He  was  probably  the 
father  of  Michael  de  Kirkconnel,  whose  son,  William  Fits* 
Michael  de  Kirkconnel,  about  the  year  1200  made  a  grant  of 
lands  in  Kirkconnel,  in  favour  of  the  abbey  of  Hohncultram 
in  Cumberland  (JIuichesofCa  Cwnh^land^  vol.  ii.  p.  881), 

Gilchrist,  the  son  of  GUcwUl,  is  witness  to  a  charter  of 
lands  in  Dnnscore  near  Dercongall  or  Holywood,  granted  by 
Afllrica,  daughter  of  Edgar,  to  the  monks  of  Melrose,  in  the 
reign  of  William  the  lion  or  of  Alexander  II.  (Liber  de  3fel- 
ro$e,  vol.  i.  p.  182). 

There  is  no  farther  account  of  anv  one  of  the  name  until 

m 

the  contest  arose  for  the  throne  of  Scotland  between  John 
Baliul,  lord  of  Galloway,  and  Robert  Bruce,  lord  of  Annan- 
dale.  Among  those  who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  1.  in  1296, 
we  find  Thomas  de  Kirkconnel  of  the  connty  of  Dimifries, 
which  then  ineludeil  both  sides  of  the  Kith.  There  can  bo 
little  doubt  that  Thomas  de  Kirkconnel  and  his  immediate 
successors,  like  the  rest  of  the  men  of  Nithsdale  and  Gal- 
loway, supported  the  cause  of  Baliol.  In  1324  mention  is 
made  of  *'  Dominut  de  Ktrkcomtett  in  vaUe  de  NUk^  (jChahi^ 
era"  Caledonia), 

Owing  to  the  wars  and  confusion  of  the  times  little  is 
known  of  the  Kirkconnels  for  two  or  three  generations,  but 
it  is  prob.ible  that  they  generally  supported  and  shared  the 
fortunes  of  their  greater  neighbours  on  the  other  side  of  the 
Kith,  the  Maxwells  of  Carlaverock.  The  connexion  between 
the  families  of  Maxwell  of  Carlaverock  and  the  Kirkconnels 
was  drawn  closer  hy  the  marriage  of  Avmer  de  Maxwell, 
2d  son  of  Sir  Herbert  de  Maxwell  of  Cariaverock  and  brotlier 
of  Sir  Herbert  de  Maxwell  of  Carlaverock,  1st  Lord  &Iax- 
well,  with  Janet  de  Kirkconnel,  the  heiress  of  the  ancient 
fMinilv  of  Kirkconnel,  when  the  name  de  Kirkconnel  was 
merged  in  that  of  Maxwell,  and  tlie  property  went  to  their 
descendants  of  that  name.  Tlie  date  of  the  marriage  is  un- 
known, but  it  may  have  taken  place  before  the  year  1410. 

On  11th  July  1448,  there  was  a  perambulation  of  the 
niarchea  (»f  Little  Airds,  l)elonging  to  the  abbey  of  Sweet- 
lieart,  and  Meikle  Airds,  l)e1onging  to  Kirkconnel,  to  which 
Aymer  de  Maxwell  was  a  party.  {Original  Papers  and 
Deedit  at  Kirkconnel.)  On  20th  March  1456,  Aymer  de 
Maxwell  and  Janet  de  Kirkconnel,  his  spouse,  had  a  charter 
of  resignation  and  confirmation  of  their  lands  of  Kirkconnel, 
in  the  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright.  On  18th  Nuvember  1461, 
Aymer  de  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  superior  of  the  estate  of 
Kelton,  which  probably  was  his  own,  and  not  acquired  by  his 
wife,  granted  a  feu  to  George  Neilson  of  part  thereof. 

A3rmer*s  son,  Herbert  ^iaxwell  of  Kirkoonnel,  succeeded 
him.     He  left  two  sons,  and  probably  others. 

The  elder  son,  whose  Christian  name  is  not  known,  is  ftup- 
posed  to  have  predeceased  his  father.  His  brothcr*s  name 
was  John.  Tlie  former  had  a  daughter,  Elisabeth,  who  suc- 
ceeded her  grandfather,  and  another  daughter,  probably 
named  Agnes  Miixwell. 

Elix:ibeth  ]^Iaxwell  of  Kirkconnel  had  precept  from  the 
Crown  directing  sofine  to  be  given  to  her  as  heir  of  the  late 
Herbert  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel  and  Kelton,  her  grandfather, 
in  virtue  whereof  she  was  infeft  in  the  lands  of  Kelton  in  the 
sheriffdom  of  Dumfries  on  5th  November  1492.  Among  the 
witnesses  of  the  ijifeftment  were  "John  Maxwell,  undo  of 


I  ^^ 


j 


r 


■  I 


.  I 


.  I 


MAXWELL, 


132 


OF  KIRKCONNEL. 


tlic  said  EliMbetk,  Horbert  Maxwell,  son  of  the  snid  John," 
&C.  Djriiig  without  issue,  Kiisubeth  was  succeeded  bjr  her 
nephew,  Herbert. 

Herbert  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  under  precept  from  the 
crown,  had  sasine  given  to  him,  as  "  Iieir  of  tlie  late  Eliza- 
beth Maxwell,  his  aunt,**  (avtmevla — mother*s  uster,)  of  the 
hinds  of  Kiri(connel  and  Kelton,  on  12th  April  14*J5.  All 
accounts  of  tlie  Kirkconnel  and  Maxwell  families,  and  gene- 
alogists generally,  concur  in  stating  that  Thomas  Maxwell, 
2d  son  of  Bobert,  2d  Lord  ^laxweli,  married  Agnes  Max- 
well, the  heiress  of  Maxwell  of  KiHcconnel,  and  that  from 
them  the  present  Kirkconnel  family  are  descended.  It  is 
more  than  probable  that  Elizabeth's  married  sister,  whose 
son  Herbert  succeeded  his  aunt,  was  the  Af/ne*  who  l>ccaine 
the  wife  of  the  said  Thomas  Maxwell,  probably  between 
1450  and  H70,  and  that  it  was  their  son  Herbert  who  was 
heir  to  his  aunt  Elizabeth.  Tliis  might  be  inferred  from  the 
se:il  of  Herbert  att.iched  to  a  charter  granted  by  him  on  July 
4,  1517,  being  asaltire,  between  two  small  chevrons.  The 
chevron  being  often  used  as  a  mark  of  cadency,  (A'isftefjr 
IlerrUdt'jff  vol.  i.  p.  151,)  it  would  seem  that  the  tiro  chor- 
runs  were  intended  to  show  his  descent  from  two  cadets  of 
the  Maxwell  family ;  Aymer,  who  married  Janet  de  Kirkcon- 
nel, and  Tliomas,  thought  to  have  been  the  father  of  Her- 
bert. As  a  follower  of  the  chief  of  his  name.  Herbert  M.ix- 
well  of  Kirkconnel  was  present  at  the  afl'nty,  on  July  30, 
15U8,  on  the  sands  of  Dumfries,  between  John  I/)rd  Max- 
well, and  Lord  Crichton  of  Sanquhar,  and  their  respecUre 
f«>Uuwers,  when  the  latter  nobleman  was  driven  from  the 
town,  and  many  of  his  friends  slain.  QBaJfour*$  Annah, 
1508.)  For  tliis  and  other  lawless  doings  Herbert  Maxwell 
receive<1  a  general  remission  from  the  crown  on  17th  Octo- 
ber the  same  year.  He  was  twice  married,  hy  his  fintt 
wiff,  whose  name  is  not  ascertained,  he  had  four  sons:  Ro- 
bert, John,  NYJlliam,  and  Edward.  His  2d  wife  was  Euphe- 
mia  Lindsay,  issue  unknown.  William,  the  third  son,  was 
in  the  hou.<«hold  of  Mary  of  Guise,  and  afterwards  for  a  time 
in  a  regiment  of  Scots  men  at  arms  in  the  service  of  the  king 
of  Fnince  (MS.  on  Scottish  Guard  Hintorj/).  On  the  ICth 
Feliru:iry.  1557,  he  had  a  grant  of  the  lands  of  little  Airds. 
His  84)n,  Willi:im,  succeeded  him  in  IJttle  Airds.  The  latter 
had  a  son,  James,  who  wrote  his  Autobiography,  and  was 
author  also  uf  several  polemical  works. 

Herbert  died  b«rore  28th  Dec.  1548.  His  eldest  son,  Ro- 
bert, nn  July  4,  1517,  had  a  charter  from  his  father  of  the 
hinds  of  Kelton.  He  married  Janet  Crichton,  and  on  Aug- 
ust 16,  1519,  had  a  grant  ot  Anciient'iui.  Ho  predeceased 
his  father,  le.iving  2  sons,  Herbert  and  John. 

Tiie  elder  Kon,  Herbert  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  had  sasine 
in  the  lands  i)f  Kirkconnel  and  Kelton  as  heir  to  his  grandfa- 
ther, Dec.  28,  1548,  and  had  charter  of  A uchen fad,  J.innar)' 
22,  1548-9.  He  married  a  Janet  MaxwHl,  and  had  a  son, 
Bernard,  and  three  daughters,  Agnes.  Catherine,  and  Mar- 
garet.    He  died  before  1560. 

Bernard  Maxwell  ot  Kirkconnel  succeeded  his  father  in  his 
minority.  On  May  6,  1571,  with  consent  of  his  curators,  he 
executed  a  disposition  of  the  lands  of  Kirkconnel  and  Kelton, 
in  favour  of  his  uncle,  John  Mazirp!],  and  his  heirs  male, 
whom  failing,  to  his  own  heirs  general,  and  i-eserving  his 
liferent,  with  power  of  redemption,  in  the  event  of  having 
heirs  male  himself,  and  the  hmds  to  \te  held  of  himself,  for 
£1,000  Scots,  on  which  deed  sasine  was  taken  on  the  follow- 
ing day ;  also,  another  deed  of  the  same  date,  in  nearly  the 
s:unc  terms,  the  lands  to  be  held  of  the  crown,  on  which  sa- 
sine was  tiken.  He  was  alive  and  collecting  the  feu  duties 
of  Aurds  in  1574  and  1577. 


John  Maxwell,  tutor  of  Kirkconnel,  during  tlw  minority 
of  Bernard,  his  nephew,  was  infeft,  as  above  stated,  in  the 
property.  May  7, 1571.  He  died  befisn  his  nephew,  and  be- 
foro  August  1578. 

His  son,  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  succeeded  liiin,  and 
to  his  right  to  the  estate  in  his  minority,  his  tnton  or  cu- 
rators being  James  Crichton  of  Carco  and  William  Somcr- 
viile,  vicar  of  Kirkbean.  On  July  8,  1574,  he  was  retound 
heir  male  to  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  his  father,  in  the 
lands  of  Kirkconnel,  re8er\ing  the  liferent  therein  of  Bernard 
Maxwell  and  of  Janet  Maxwell,  relict  of  Herbert  Maxwell, 
in  a  part  thereof;  in  virtue  whereof  Jdm  Maxwell  was  in- 
feft  therein,  Oct.  8,  1574,  Bernard  Maxwell,  the  liferenter, 
being  a  witness  to  the  infeftment.  In  April  and  May,  1593, 
he  took  part  in  the  slaughterings  and  fend  between  the  Max- 
wells and  Johnstons.  On  Nov.  26, 1601,  John  Maxwell  of 
Kirkconnel  and  several  others  were  summoned  before  the 
pri\7  council,  for  contravening  the  Acts  of  Parliament  against 
saying  and  hearing  of  mass,  and  entertaining  priests,  espe- 
cially Dr.  John  Hamilton  and  Abbot  Gilbert  Brown,  and 
liaving  children  baptized  by  them  (^Chambert*  JJomestie  An- 
unit,  vol  i.,  pp.  358,  359).  John  Spottiswoode,  ardilriahop 
of  Glasgow,  having,  with  a  party  of  soldiers,  invaded  Kew 
Abbey,  in  search  of  priests,  broke  into  the  house  of  tlie  exiled 
abbot.  Gilbert  Brown,  and  plundered  it  of  whatever  savoured 
of  popery.  The  books  found  there  were  given  into  the  care 
of  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  who  afterwards,  being  un- 
willing to  part  with  them,  w.is  served  with  letters  of  homing 
on  ten  days*  charge,  ordering  him  to  deliver  the  same  over  to 
Spottiswoode  (jOriginal  iMtert  as  to  Ecdeiiatthal  Affmrs^ 
liannatyne  Club^  pp.  409-411).  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkcon- 
nel died  after  June  29, 1614.  He  had  five  sons — 1.  Herbert, 
his  successor.  2.  John,  of  Whitehill  and  Millhill,  suppoticd 
to  have  been  the  father  of  John  Maxwell  of  Bamcleugh,  town- 
clcrk  of  Dnmfries.     3.  J.nmes.     4.  Thomas.    6.  George. 

The  eldest  son,  Herbert  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  was  esquire 
in  ordinary  to  the  body  in  the  household  of  James  VI.,  mhen 
he  succeeded  to  Kirkconnel.  Preferring  to  continne  his  attend- 
ance on  royalty,  the  king  granted  him  a  pension  for  life  of 
£200  out  of  the  escheats  of  Scotlnnd.  He  received  diartor 
of  confirmation  of  the  lands  of  Kirkconnel  and  others,  Aug: 
28,  1616,  and  was  infeft  therein  25th  Sept  following.  He 
got  into  some  dispute  with  James  Maxwell  of  Innerwick, 
a  lord  of  the  bedchamber,  afterwards  eari  of  Dirlton,  the  son 
of  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkhonse.  The  dispute  came  before  the 
Court  of  Session,  and  four  days  after  the  hearing  of  the  c-ise 
(March  11, 1628),  and  as  if  at  the  instigaUon  of  his  opponent, 
Herbert  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  Charles  Brown  in  New 
Abbey,  Barbara  Maxwell,  I^dy  Mabie,  and  others,  werv 
charged  by  the  privy  council  with  contemning  **  excommnni- 
catiofl  and  homing,"  persisting  in  *'  obdured  and  papish  opi- 
nions and  errors,'*  and  visiting  all  parts  of  the  country,  **  as 
if  thoy  were  free  and  Kiwful  subjects."  Sir  William  Grierson 
of  I^g,  and  Sir  John  Charteris  of  Amisfield,  were  commis- 
sioned to  apprehend  those  thus  denounced,  as  well  asthrir  **  re- 
setters," or  harbourers.  How  it  fared  with  Herbert  Maxwell 
does  not  appear,  but  the  commissioners  were  successful  in 
ciptnring  in  New  Abbey  Charles  Brown  of  Chnchan,  and 
Gilbert  Brown  of  Shambellie  (/>o»ie#/iV;  i4niui&,  vol.  ii.  pp. 
18  and  19);  whereupon  Janet  Johnston  of  Newbie,  Lady 
Lochhill,  spouse  of  John  Brown,  assembling  the  women  of 
the  parish,  .nttacked  the  minister  and  schoolmaster,  their 
wives  and  servants,  with  sticks  and  stones.  For  this  ener- 
getic defence  of  her  faith  I^dy  I/>chhill  was  banished  the 
rc.ilm,  under  a  penalty  of  1,000  merks  if  she  dared  to  return. 
Herbert  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel  died  in  Oct  1637,  leaving 


ii 


I 


'  I 

I 


MAXWELL, 


ISd 


OF  KTRKCONNEL. 


-1.  John,  his  tnoeessor.  2.  Edwiird.  8.  Georf^.  4. 
Robert.  6.  Darban  (Udj  Mabie,  March  1628).  6.  Ma- 
rioa,  and  an  illegitunate  Bon,  Herbert. 

The  eldest  son,  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  was  retonied 
licir  to  his  father,  Dec.  19, 1638,  in  the  lands  of  Kirkconnel, 
with  salmon  fishings  in  the  water  of  Kith,  &c,  and  had 
usine  therein,  J;ai.  31, 1639.  James  Maxwell  of  Innerwick 
bad  receiTed  from  Charles  I.  a  gift  of  the  non-entry  of  the  lands. 
la  1642,  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkoonnel  morriftd  Agnes,  daughter 
ot'  Stephen  I^nrie  of  Maxwellton,  and  Marion  Corsone,  his 
spooM.  John  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel  got  into  difficulties 
mon  after  his  marriage,  bnt  the  estate  was  preserved  by 
the  pnident  management  of  his  lady,  liberally  assiiited  by 
l4klr  Maxwellton,  her  mother.  He  died  in  or  bet'ure  the 
Tear  1679,  his  wife  surviving  him.  They  had  4  sons  nnd 
3dai^tcis.  I.James.  2.  William.  3.  Herbert,  a  Jesuit 
priest.  4.  Stephen,  a  Jesuit  priest.  5.  Euphemia,  ;/i.  the 
i^rd  of  Corbeath.  6.  Marion.  7.  Agnes,  ni.  Edmund,  eldest 
son  of  William  Brown  of  Nunton. 

The  eldest  son,  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  nisirried,  in 
1G72,  Elizjibeth,  only  daughter  of  Alexander  Durham  of  Ber- 
wick,  son  of  Sir  John  Durham  of  Duntarvie  and  I«idy  Mnr- 
gAret  Abercrumby,  probably  of  Biricenbog.  Herbert  Max- 
v.ell,  Jesuit  priest,  was,  in  Oct.  1G86,  appointed  cli:iplain  to 
the  earl  of  Melfurt,  secretary  of  James  VII.,  and  about  the 
k.-ime  time,  his  brother,  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  was 
.nppoioted  one  of  the  receivers-general  of  the  Customs,  &c. 
(cnromiasion  dated  at  Whitehall,  Oct.  22,  1G86).  When,  on 
Dec  10,  1687,  King  James,  by  his  royal  writ,  reduced  tlie 
number  of  the  recdvers-general  fiom  four  to  two,  ho  granted 
tu  Kiricoonnel  the  office  of  superintendent  of  the  customs, 
foreign  excise,  rents,  casualties  of  royal  property,  and  funds 
allocated  for  the  payment  of  fees  and  pensions.  The  salary 
was  at  first  £200  but  afterwards  i:300  yearly.  The  Revo- 
lotion  soon  deprived  him  of  all  place  and  pension.  He  died 
in  or  before  the  year  1690.  He  had  4  sons  and  2  daughters, 
riz — 1.  James,  his  successor.  2.  William,  who  succeeded 
James.  8.  Alexander.  4.  Stephen,  Jesuit  priest.  S.Agnes. 
6.  EUzabeth. 

The  eldest  son,  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  was  edu- 
cated ot  Donay,  and  served  heir  gener.iI  to  his  father  Dec. 
21, 1699,  but  never  otherwise  made  up  his  titles.  The  I^rd 
Atlvocotc  cited  him  and  the  earl  of  Nithsdale  to  appear  befui-c 
li:c  Justiciary  Court  in  Edinburpli,  Feb.  2,  1704,  to  answer 
tor  contravening  the  acts  of  parliament  against  heaving  mass 
and  harbouring  and  concealing  Jesuits  and  prie6ts,  and  of 
wLIcU  ** shaking  off  all  fear  of  God,"  it  was  alleged,  they 
were  guilty.  This  did  not  prevent  him  from  petitioning  tlie 
Piveriiment,  in  that  very  year,  for  payment  of  a  balance  due 
:o  Lis  fxtlier  as  receiver-general.  The  books  of  the  kirk  sos- 
>:>n  f.f  New  Abbey  in  1705  stigmatised  the  Maxwells  of  Kirk- 
«  nnel  as  "  a  popish  family,"  and  warned  Protestants  not  to 
tulcc  domestic  senice  with  them.  James  Maxwell  died, 
*:tl:ont  issue,  about  1705. 

His  next  brother,  William  Maxwell,  succeeded  to  Kirk- 
Miiiel.  like  James,  he  was  eduaited  at  Donay,  whence  he 
^t1:.^lcd  to  Scotland  in  1696.  In  the  inquest  by  the  pres- 
:;:'TT  into  the  number  of  papists  in  each  parish  in  1701, 
^Vjlliam  is  mentioned  as  brother  of  the  laird  of  Kirkconnel. 
lie  WAS  scr^-ed  heir  general  to  his  brother  James,  Feb.  14, 
I'Oo,  in  which  year  he  was  called  on  as  an  heritor  to  pay  h'ls 
r-ronortion  of  £137  Gs.  Scots  money  for  building  of  the  manse 
^  Troqneer.  He  married,  April  29,  1706,  Janet,  eldest 
(loagbtcr  of  (Jeorge  Maxwell  of  C.Hrnsalloch,  widow  of  Colonel 
Jtihn  Donj;las  of  Stenhonse,  and  eventually  heiress  of  Cam- 
mIMi,  under  the  disposition  and  deed  of  entiil  executed  by 


James  Maxwell  of  Camsalloch,  her  brother,  March  11, 
1745.  On  May  6,  1708,  William  Maxwell  executed  a  dis- 
position, settling  the  succession  to  his  estates.  On  June  15, 
1733,  he  agreed  to  dispone  heritably  to  William  and  Robert 
Bimie  8  merklands  of  the  12  merklands  of  Kelton,  James 
Maxwell  of  Bamdeugh,  as  next  Protestant  heir  to  Kirkcon- 
nel, giving  his  assent  thereto,  which  was  probably  considered 
necessary  by  the  purchasers,  owing  to  the  penal  laws  then 
in  force  against  Koman  Catliolics.  John  Maxwell  of 
Barncleugh,  and  Margaret  Young,  his  spouse,  tbe  father 
and  mother  of  the  James  Maxwell  here  mentioned,  are  both 
entered  as  "  papists "  in  the  lists  made  ont  for  the  privy 
council  in  1704.  William  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel  died  April 
13,  1746.  John  Bigg,  someUme  tenant  in  Meikle  Knox,  and 
formerly  in  Townhead,  near  Kirkconnel,  used  to  relate  that 
when  James  Maxwell,  his  son  and  heir,  went  off  m  1745  to 
join  Prince  Charles,  th;  c!d  man,  his  father,  rejoiced,  sjiying 
that  his  son  was  going  in  a  good  cause,  nnd  that  if  he  lost  his 
life  it  would  bo  well  spent  He  had  issne^l.  Elizabeth, 
married,  before  1730,  to  William  Maxwell  of  Munches.  2. 
James,  his  successor.  3.  Agnes.  4.  Janet  5.  Alary.  6. 
George,  Jesuit  priest  7.  Margaret  8.  William,  Jesuit  priest 
9.  Clarion,  married  John  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels.  10.  Halbert. 
The  eldest  son,  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  commenced 
grammar  at  Dou.iy  college,  August  21,  1721,  and  was  dis- 
tinguished as  a  student  of  great  genius  and  persevering  dili- 
gence. After  concluding  his  conrse  of  philosophy,  he  re- 
turned to  Scotland  in  1728.  In  1745,  James  Maxwell,  then 
younger  of  Kirkconnel,  took  part  in  the  insurrection,  and  be- 
came an  officer  in  the  Pretender's  service,  nnd  of  sndi  rank 
as  to  have  had  access  to  know  the  most  material  things  that 
were  transacted  **  hi  the  council,  tliough  not  a  member  of  it** 
He  w.ns,  moreover,  an  "eyewitness  of  the  greatest  part  of  what 
happened  in  the  field.*'  Alter  the  battle  of  CuUoden  he 
escaped  to  France,  and  while  residing  at  St  Germains  for 
several  years,  drew  up  a  "  Narrative  of  Charlei,  Prince  of 
Wales*  Expedition  to  Scotland  in  the  year  1745  **  (printed  by 
the  Maitland  Club,  1841),  which  he  evidently  intended  for 
publication.  While  he  thus  resided  abroad,  his  mother,  Janet 
Maxwell  of  Camsalloch,  m.inaged  the  Kirkconnel  estate  to 
the  best  advantage,  and  protected  her  son's  interests  as  far 
as  in  her  power.  In  Juno  1746,  the  whole  troop  horses  of 
St.  George's  regiment  of  dragoons  were  put  into  the  Kirkcon- 
nel policies,  besides  40  or  50  galloways  belonging  to  the  offi- 
cers or  soldiers;  and  the  tacksmen  petitioned  Lieutenant- 
Gcneral  Bland,  commander-in-chief  in  Scotland,  for  compen- 
sation in  consequence.  In  1 750,  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel 
ventured  to  return  to  Scotland,  and  built,  with  bricks  made 
on  the  property,  the  modem  portion  of  the  front  of  Kirkcon- 
ncl-house.  He  sold  the  estate  of  Camsalloch,  derived  from 
his  mother  (who  died  in  1755),  to  Mr.  Alexander  Johnston, 
merchant  in  London,  ancestor  of  Major-General  Johnston  of 
Camsalloch  (1862),  and  purchased  the  estate  of  Mabie.  He 
was  a  witness  in  1755  to  the  marriage  of  his  sister  Marion 
with  John  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels.  In  1758  he  married  Marv, 
youngest  daughter  of  Thomas  Riddell  of  Swinburne  Castle. 
He  died  July  23,  1762,  aged  54  years.  *'  His  Narrative,*'  the 
Maitland  Club  editor  says,  "  is  composed  with  a  remarkable 
degree  of  precision  and  taste,  inasmuch  as  rather  to  appear 
tlie  production  of  a  practised  litterateur  than  the  work  of  a 
private  gentleman  who  merely  aimed  at  giving  memoranda 
of  a  series  of  remarkable  events  which  ho  had  chanced  to  wit- 
ness.*' He  left  3  sons — 1.  James.  2.  William.  3.  lliomas, 
who  died  June  1,  1792.  The  two  younger  sons  were  edu- 
cated at  the  New  College  of  the  Jesuits  at  Dinant,  in  France, 
arriving  there  Sept  3,  1771.     During  his  attendance  at  the 


MAXWELL, 


184 


SIR  MURRAY. 


ii 


;  I 


1 1 


i: 


incdicul  scbooU  in  France,  Willbin,  the  2d  son,  imbibed  the 
French  reTolutionaiy  idens  of  the  time,  nnd  was  one  of  the  na- 
tional giucds  present  at  the  execution  of  l^uis  XYI.,  Jan. 
21,  1793.  Ue  afterwords  settled  as  a  phjsician  in  Dumfries, 
and  wns  fur  man j  years  one  of  the  most  eminent  in  Scotland 
of  his  profession.  He  died  at  Edinlmi^h,  at  tlie  house  of  hia 
relative,  John  Meniaes  of  Pitfoddels,  Oct.  13,  1834. 

The  eldest  son,  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkconnel,  when  verj 
Toung,  was,  Nov.  IC,  1764,  rerred  heir  in  spedal  to  his  fu- 
ther,  and  infeft,  under  a  precept  from  the  crown,  April  19, 
17G5,  in.the  bnds  and  baronr  of  Kirkconnel  He  was  twice 
matried,  1st,  to  Clementinn  Kliziibeth  Frances,  unngliterof  Si- 
mon Scroope  of  Dnnbjr,  Yorkshire,  witliout  issue;  and,  2d]y, 
to  DorotliT,  dauj*hter  of  William  Witham,  Esq.,  solicitor  of 
Gmr's  Inn,  Loudon,  grandson  of  Williiim  William  of  Clifie, 
Yorksliire,  the  marriage  contract  signed  Aug.  29, 1817.  He 
died  Feb.  6, 1827,  leaving  au  only  daughter,  Dorotliy  Mary 
Maxwell. 

This  lady,  heiress  of  Kirkconnel,  was  on  July  27,  1827, 
sen'od  as  nearest  and  lawful  heir  of  tailzie  and  provision  of 
the  deceased  James  Maxwell  of  Kirkcoiinvl,  her  father.  She 
married  at  Southampton,  April  17,  184'!,  her  cousin,  Robert 
Shawo  James  Witham,  eldest  sumviiig  son  of  William  Wi- 
tliam,  solicitor,  Gray*s  Inn,  London,  and  great-grandson  of 
William  Witham.  Esq.  of  ClifTe,  Yorktihire.  The  Withain 
pedigree  is  given  in  Burke's  Commoners  of  England^  vol.  iL 
p.  5.  Tltis  gentleman,  as  Rubert  Maxwell  Withum,  w:ui, 
with  liis  spouse,  duly  infef),  under  a  precojtt  of  siisine,  dated 
Oct.  29,  1846,  contained  in  a  charter  of  Ri'^igtiation  granted 
by  the  crown,  in  the  lauds,  barony,  and  fihliiiigs  of  Kirkcon- 
nel, to  be  holden  by  them  of  the  crown,  in  conjunct  fee  and 
liferent,  and  to  tlie  heirs  of  the  marriiige.  The  sasine  was 
registered  at  Edinburgh,  Kor.  16,  1846.  lliey  had  also  sa- 
sine of  the  lands  of  Gillfoot,  recorded  Feb.  11,  1852.  They 
had  6  sons  nnd  3  daughters.  1.  James  Robert,  died,  an  in- 
fant. May  5, 1845.  2.  Frances  Man'.  3.  and  4.  James  and 
Thomas,  twins.  5.  William  Herbert.  6.  Janet,  died,  an 
infant,  May  15,  1853.  7.  Inland.  8.  Robert  Ilvrnard.  9. 
Anner  Richard. 


The  ^laxwelU  of  Itrcdiland  are  a  branch  of  the  ancient 
family  of  the  Maxwells  of  Cnrlnvcrock.  CrawfunI,  in  his 
History  of  Renfrewshire,  suys,  **  A  little  towards  the  north  of 
the  castle  of  Sttunley  lie  the  house  and  lands  of  Brediiand, 
which  have  been  possessed  by  the  Iklaxwelhs  of  this  race 
for  upwards  of  two  hundred  years.  Their  original  chnrter, 
which  1  have  seen,  is  granted  by  Robert,  abbot  of  Paisley, 
to  Thomas  Manwvll,  dcbijnicd  son  of  Artbour  Maxwell,  an- 
no 1488,  in  the  reign  of  James  IV.,  of  whom  John  Maxwell, 
now  of  Brediiand,  is  the  lineal  heur."  This  family  has  fur- 
nished some  considerable  cadets,  as  the  Maxwells  of  Castle- 
head,  the  Maxwells  of  Merksworth,  nud  the  MaxwelU  of 
Dalswinton. 

Gavin  Maxwell  of  Casllchead,  the  son  of  Hugh  Maxwell  of 
Rredihmd,  married  Janet,  a  daughter  of  Cochran  of  Clip- 
pens,  a  cadet  of  the  family  of  Dundonald.  Of  this  family  the 
second  son  (on  the  failure  of  the  eldest)  succeeded  to  Bredi- 
iand, which  estate  is  now  in  that  line. 

The  third  sou  was  James  Maxwell  of  Merksworth.  He 
married  Janet  Leckie,  of  Croy  I.eckie,  who  (through  Wil- 
liam Campbell  of  Glenfallocli)  was  lineally  descended  from 
Archibald,  2d  earl  of  Argyll,  and  from  John,  4th  earl  of 
Atbole.  He  had  a  son,  Charles,  and  a  daughter,  Ann.  The 
son  married  Anna  Maxwell,  the  heiress  of  Williamwood. 
She  was  lineally  descended  from  James  Maxwell  of  William- 
wood,  whose  sufferings  in  the  cause  of  the  Reformation  are 


so  fully  nnd  graphically  described  by  Wodfow  in  bU  Hu^ 
tory  of  the  Church.  She  sold  tli«  estate  of  WilUauwtod 
in  1812,  and,  on  her  death  in  1815,  the  was  inccecdid  in 
the  representation  of  both  the  families  of  Williamwood  and 
Merkkworth  by  her  next  sister,  Janet,  who  muriod  James 
Gmliam,  \\m^^  merchant,  Glasgow,  and  the  two  fiunifies 
came  thus  to  be  represented  by  her  eldest  son,  Jamci  Mas- 
well-Gralnuii,  Esq.  On  his  d«ith  the  estate  of  Merksworth 
was  inherited  by  his  eldest  uster,  Agnes,  whoss  dao^ter 
(by  her  marrii^;e  with  James  Smith,  Esq  of  Cmigend)  mar- 
ried David  Stuart,  8th,  properly  13ih,  eail  of  Bncban. 

Ann,  the  daughter  of  James  Maxwell  of  Merksworth, 
married  James  Black,  Esq.  of  Paisley,  the  fiithtr  of  the  late 
Mr.  BUu^  of  CUirmont,  near  Glasgow,  and  of  otheis  of  that 
name  in  Glavgow.    (See  Lecuk,  surname.) 

MAXWELL,  Siu  Murray,  a  gallant  and  dis- 
tinguished naval  ofiSccr,  was  the  son  of  Alexander 
Maxwell,  Esq.,  merchant  iu  Lcith,  and  grandson 
of  Sir  William  Maxwell,  baronet,  of  Calderwood. 
He  commenced  his  career  at  sea  under  the  aus- 
pices of  Admiral  Sir  Samuel  Hood,  and  in  179C 
was  appointed  a  lieutenant.  He  obtained  liis 
conimiiision  as  post -captain  iu  1803,  when  ho  be- 
came commander  of  the  Centaur,  a  tliird-ratc. 
After  serving  with  distinction  iu  the  West  Indies, 
and  in  the  expedition  against  Surinam,  he  cx- 
clianged,  in  the  summer  of  1805,  to  the  Galatea 
frigate ;  and  was  next  nominated  to  tlic  Alccste, 
4G,  in  whicli,  with  two  other  ships  under  his  or- 
ders, lie  greatly  signalized  himself  in  an  attack 
on  a  Spanish  fleet  near  Cadiz.  In  the  spring  of 
1811,  when  cruising  on  tlie  coast  of  Istria,  he  as- 
sisted in  the  destruction  of  a  French  18-gun  brig, 
iu  the  liarbour  of  Parenza ;  and  towards  the  close 
of  the  same  year,  after  an  engagement  of  two 
hours  and  twenty  minutes,  he  captured  the  French 
frigate  La  Pomone,  of  44  guns  and  322  men.  In 
October  1815,  Captain  Maxwell,  at  the  particular 
request  of  Loi*d  Amherst,  who  was  then  about  to 
proceed  on  his  celebrated  embassy  to  China,  was 
appointed  to  convey  him  in  the  Alccsti;,  which 
sailed  from  Spithead  Fobniary  9, 1816,  and  land- 
ed his  lordship  at  the  mouth  of  the  Peiho  river, 
on  the  9th  of  August.  During  Lord  Amhersfs 
absence  at  Pekin,  the  Alceste,  accompanied  by 
the  Lyra  brig  and  General  Hewitt,  East  India- 
man,  was  employed  in  a  8ur\'ey  of  the  coasts,  in 
the  course  of  which  cruise  considerable  accessions 
wero  made  to  the  knowledge  of  the  hydrographcr. 
Captain  Basil  Hall,  who  commanded  the  Lyra, 
published,  on  his  return  to  England,  a  very  inter- 
esting narrative  of  the  'Voyage  to  Corca  and 


r 


n 


i 


MAXWELT., 


135 


SIR  MURRAY. 


|l 


the  IsUnd  of  Loo  Clioo,*  dedicating  the  volume  to 
Sir  Murray  Maxwell,  "  to  whose  abilitj  in  con- 
ducting the  voyage,  zeal  in  giving  encouragement 
to  every  inquiry,  sagacity  in  discovering  the  dis- 
poeitton  of  the  natives,  and  address  in  gaining 
their  oonfidenco'  and  good-will,"  he  attributes 
whatever  may  be  found  interesting  in  his  pages. 

From  this  survey  Captain  Maxwell  returned  at 
the  beginning  of  li^ovembei*,  and  immediately  ap- 
plied to  the  Chinese  authorities  for  a  pass  for  the 
Alccstc  to  proceed  up  the  Hgi'is,  to  undergo  some 
needful  repairs.  His  request  was  treated  with 
evasion  and  delay,  and  on  his  attempt  to  sail 
without  the  requisite  permission,  an  inferior 
mandarin  went  on  board,  and  desii*ed  the  ship 
to  be  brought  to  anchor,  or  the  batteries  would 
fire  and  sink  her.  Instead  of  complying  with 
this  insolent  demand,  Captain  Maxwell  at  once 
detained  the  mandarin  as  his  prisoner,  and 
issued  orders  that  the  Alceste  should  be  steered 
under  the  principal  fort  of  the  Bocca.  On  her 
approach,  the  batteries,  and  about  eighteen  war- 
junks,  opened  upon  her  a  heavy,  though  ill-direct- 
ed fire ;  bnt  the  return  of  a  single  shot  silenced 
the  flotilla,  and  one  determined  broadside  put  an 
end  to  the  ineffectual  attack  from  the  batteries. 
The  Alceste  proceeded  without  farther  molesta- 
tion to  Whampoa,  where  she  remained  until  the 
return  of  Lord  Amherst  in  January  1817.  In 
consequence  of  Captain  Maxwell's  spirited  con- 
duct, it  was  publicly  announced  by  the  Chinese, 
with  their  usual  dissimulation,  that  the  affair  at 
the  Bocca  Tigris  was  nothing  more  than  a  friend- 
ly salute ! 

On  her  homewai*d  bound  voyage,  the  Alceste 
had  proceeded  as  far  as  the  Straits  of  Caspar, 
when,  on  the  18th  Februar}-,  she  struck  on  a 
sanken  and  unknown  rock,  three  miles  distant 
from  Pnlo  I^at.  A  landing  having  been  eiTcctcd 
on  that  barren  island.  Lord  Amhei-st  and  his  suite 
proceeded  in  the  barge  and  cutter  to  Batavia,  a 
distance  of  200  miles ;  and  after  a  passage  of  four 
Bights  and  three  days,  in  which  they  suffered 
much  from  the  scarcity  of  water  and  provisions, 
they  happily  arrived  at  their  destination.  The 
Company's  cruiser  Temate  was  immediately  dis- 
patched to  Captain  Maxwell,  and  those  who  re- 
mained  with  bun ;  but  in  consequence  of  contrary 


currents,  she  did  not  aiTive  for  a  fortnight.  Tlicir 
situation  in  tlie  meantime  had  attracted  the  notice 
of  the  Malay  proas,  or  pirate  boats,  who  had 
obliged  Lieutenant  Hinckman  and  his  detachment 
to  quit  the  wreck,  which  they  had  burnt  to  the 
water's  edge.  These  boats  having  inci-eased  to 
about  sixty  in  number,  each  containing  from 
eight  to  twelve  men,  completely  blockaded  the 
shipwrecked  crew;  but  on  the  approach  of  the 
Temate  they  speedily  disappeared.  For  some 
days  Captain  Maxwell  had  been  actively  employ- 
ed in  fortifying  a  hill,  and  providing  his  party 
with  ammunition ;  and  so  well  prepared  were  they 
for  an  attack,  that  at  length  they  rather  wished 
than  dreaded  it.  Mr.  Ellis,  the  third  commissioner 
of  the  embassy,  who  had  returned  from  Batavia  in 
the  Temate,  in  his  published  'Joumal,*  says, 
^'  My  expectations  of  the  security  of  the  position 
were  more  than  realized  when  I  ascended  the  hill ; 
and  many  an  assulant  must  have  fallen  before  an 
entrance  could  have  been  effected.  Participation 
of  privation,  and  equal  distribution  of  comfort, 
had  lightened  the  weight  of  suffering  to  all ;  and 
I  found  the  universal  sentiment  to  be,  an  enthu- 
siastic admiration  of  the  temper,  energy,  and  ar- 
rangements of  Captain  Maxwell." 

On  his  retm*n  to  England  he  was  tried  by  a 
court-martial  at  Portsmouth  in  August  181 7,  for  the 
loss  of  the  Alceste,  but  was  most  honourably  ac- 
quitted, the  court  at  the  same  time  declaring  that 
^^  his  coolness,  self-collection,  and  exertions,  were 
highly  conspicuous.'*  He  received  the  honour  of 
knighthood  May  27,  1818;  and  May  20,  1819,  he 
was  presented  by  the  East  India  Company  with 
the  sum  of  £1,500  for  the  services  rendered  by 
him  to  the  embassy,  and  as  a  remuneration  for 
the  loss  he  had  sustained  on  his  return  from  Chi- 
na. He  was  appohited  to  the  Bulwark,  a  third- 
rate,  in  June  1821,  was  removed  to  the  Briton 
frigate,  November  28,  1822,  and  was  afterwards 
employed  on  the  South  American  station.  In 
May  1831  he  was  appointed  lieutenant-governor 
of  Prince  Edward's  Island,  and  was  preparing  for 
his  departure,  when  he  died,  after  a  short  illness, 
June  26  of  that  year. 

His  portrait,  which  fonned  the  frontispiece  to 
one  of  the  volumes  of  the  once  celebrated  Percy 
Anecdotes,  is  given  on  the  following  page : 


MELFOET. 


MAYSE,  .Ions,  auUior  of  "ITif  Siller  Gi 
aiiil  utiici'  ]ii>ciiis,  was  bom  iu  Dumfries,  2 
Jlnvj;h  17r>3,  auil  received  his  education  at 


to  two  ciuitos,  mild  tlien  to  tbreei  ud  became  ao 
popular  tliat  it  was  Kvcml  times  reprinted.  In 
1608  it  was  publislicd  in  Tour  caotoe,  witb  notes 
and  a  glogsaiy.  Another  clcgnut  edition,  enlarged 
to  five  cantos,  was  pablislied  by  subscription  In 
1636.  It  exiiibils  taanj  exquisitely  painted  scenes 
and  skctclicB  of  clinracler,  dmwn  from  life,  aud 
described  witti  the  case  aud  vigour  of  a  tmc  poet. 
For  some  tinio  after  its  first  pnblication,  Mr. 
JIaj-ne  contiibuted  various  pieces  to  Ruddiman's 
^Veckly  MugoEiue,  nuioug  tlie  cliief  of  wliicii  waa 
\m  '  llallow-ecu.'  He  alM  rxchnnged  versea  in 
[iriiit  wiih  Telford,  tlie  cdtliratcd  engineer,  like 
liiinself  n  native  <>f  Dumfries,  wlio,  iu  liis  j^onth, 
n-aa  much  attnclied  to  the  rustic  ninsc. 

While  he  resided  at  Glasgow,  lie  passed  through 
■A  regular  tcnn  of  «en-iec  with  tiio  Messrs.  Fonlis, 
the  printers,  of  the  Glasgow  University  press, 
wjih  wlioni  he  remained  from  1782  to  1787;  on 
Uic  expiry  of  wliicli  lie  proceeded  to  London, 
whi'Tii  he  was  for  many  years  the  printer,  editor, 
niid  joint  proprietor  of  the  Star  evening  paper,  in 
which  not  a  few  of  hh  beautiful  ballads  were  first 
pnblislied.  lie  nl^o  contributed  lyrical  pieces  to 
various  of  the  Slagnziiies,  particularly  to  the  Gen- 


111*  fiitlicv's  f;iinily,  Hho  went  to  reside  on  a  pro- 
l>eriy  they  had  acqiiirod  at  llio  lieud  of  (lio  Green, 
near  that  city,  ^^']li^e  yet  a  ineii;  joutli,  " ere 
eai'c  was  bom,"  he  liegiin  to  court  the  imises,  and 
he  had  earned  a  inietic.tl  repnt.ition  before  tliu 
publication  of  tlic  [Ktoins  of  Itnnis,  wlio,  to  a  littli- 
piece  of  Mayue's,  entitled  '  Ilallow-ccn,'  is  under- 
stood to  have  been  indebted  for  the  suljeet  of  his 
iuimituble  poem  under  the  same  name. 

In  1777  the  original  of  'The  SiHer  Gun'  nan 
written,  witli  the  object  of  dcscriliing  the  celehra- 
lion  of  an  ancient  custom,  revived  in  that  year,  of 
^booting  for  n  small  silver  gun  at  Dnuifiics  on  the 
king's  birth-dny.  11ie  poem  consisted  at  first  of 
,  printed  ot  Dumfries  on  a 
It  was  shortly  nflcr  extended 


only  twelve  s 
imall  quarto  page 


Graiiiuiai'  school  of  that  town,  under  the  learned  llenian's  ^^agnKine,  from  1807  to  1817.    His  only 

Dr.  CliHinnan,  whose  memory  ho  bos  eulogised  in  other  poem  of  any  length  is  one  of  considerable 

tlic    tliii'd    canto   of  iii^   principal    poem.     On  merit,  entitled  'Glasgow,'  illustrated  with  notes, 

li'aving   seliool,   lie  was  sent  nt  an    early  agu  which  appeared  in  1800,  and  has  gone  through 

to  learn  tlie  luisiiiess  of  a  printer,  ond  was  for  several  editions.    In  the  same  year  he  printed 

some  time  in  Ilie  office  of  tbc  Dumfries  .Tour-  'English,  Peotii,  and  Irishmen,'  a  patriotic  ad- 

ii)d.     lie  nflerwanU  ivnioved  to  Glasgow,  with  dress  to  tite  inhahilants  of  the  united  kingdom. 


excelled  principally  in  ballad  poetry,  ond  lis 
'  Logan  llrae^,'  and  '  IIiTen  of  KirkconncU  Lea,' 
are  inferior  to  no  pocnu  of  their  kind  in  the  lan- 
guage. In  private  life  Mr.  Mayno  was  very  nn- 
assuming.  Alt.in  Ciinninglinm  snys  of  Iiim,  that 
"  a  better  or  wnnncr-hearled  man  never  existed." 
lie  died  at  Ixindon,  nt  nn  advanced  age,  March 
14,  18.tC.  He  left  a  sun,  W.  H.  Mnyne,  who 
held  an  official  situation  in  the  India  house. 

MBi.ranT,  enri  of,  ■  titlg  in  tlto  ScottlHli  pecnge,  «Mir«iTed 
in  \CM,  on  ihc  Iton.  John  Dnimmond,  ucond  »n  of  th« 
tliii'd  viirl  at  I'erth.  Id  IfiKO  li«  liiil  been  uppuintcd  genenl 
ufthc  ordnuin,  .nnd  deputj  garomor  uf  Kdinlrai^li  caitla,  in 
1G82  (rciuanr  dtputt,  (md  in  ScplembR  1631  OM  of  tha 
priiKipiil  wcn'tnrin  of  itnlc  for  ScotLind,  in  office  wliirh  fa« 
lidil  dnring  llic  liut  peiHcutinG  Tcan  of  tlioGtniuti.  On 
tlic  nUMbion  of  Junei  Vlt,,  be  viu,  lllli  April  IC6S,  en- 
ntu J  vLKOunt  of  ilelfoit  in  Ar^lnliin,  put  of  tlw  tailaUi 


b 


MELFORT. 


137 


MELVILLE. 


>f  the  earl  of  Ai^le,  with  tlie  tecondwrj  title  of  Lord 
lond  of  GUstoQD.  He  had  married,  first,  80th  April, 
Sophia,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Margaret  Lundin  of 
,  Fifeshire,  bj  the  Hon.  Robert  Maitland,  brotlier  of 
■JB  of  Laaderdale,  and  by  her  had  three  sons  and  tliree 
in.  He  married,  secondly,  Knphemia,  daughter  of 
omas  Wallace  of  Crnigie,  a  lord  of  session  and  lord- 
deifc,  and  bj  her  had  six  sons  and  five  daughters. 
I  created  eari  of  Melfort,  viscount  of  Forth,  Jjord 
lood  of  Rickertoon,  Castlemains,  and  Gilstoun,  12th 

1686,  the  patents  of  his  honours  being  taken  to  him 
I  heirs  male  of  his  body  of  his  second  marriage,  wliich 

to  the  heirs  male  whatever  of  his  body.  The  reason 
issue  of  his  first  marriage  being  thus  passed  over  was 
was  frustrated  by  the  Lundin  family,  who  were  zeal- 
»tC8tant8,  in  his  attempt  to  educate  his  sons  by  that 
;e  in  the  Romish  faith,  to  which  he  had  become  n 

hit  re\'ival  of  the  order  of  the  Thistle  in  1687,  Lord 

was  constituted  one   of  the    knights  eompsnions 

At  the  Revolution  he  repaired  to  the  abdicated 

France,  and  in  1690  attended  him  to  Ireland.     By 

len  monarch  he  was  invested  with  the  order  of  the 

Not  returning  to  Scotland  within  the  time  limited 

he  was  outlawed  by  the  high  court  of  justiciary,  23d 

S94,  and  attainted  by  act  of  parliament,  2d  July  1695. 

Ill  clause,  however,  provided  that  his  forfeiture  should 

ivs  affect  or  tnint  the  blood  of  the  children  of  his  first 

;e  with  Sophia  Lundin.    He  was  created  duke  de 

and  count  de  Lnssan  in  France  in  1701,  and  had  the 

Iministration  at  St.  Germains  for  several  years.    He 

ere  in  January  1714.     His  second  wife  lived  to  be 

M)  years  of  age,  and  supported  herself  in  her  latter 

y  keeping  one  of  the  two  faro  tables  authorized  by 

JV. 

sidest  son  of  the  second  marri.nge,  John,  second  duke 
nt,  died  in  1752.  Thomas,  the  second  son,  an  officer 
•ervice  of  Charles  VL,  emperor  of  Germany,  died 
led,  in  1715;  William,  the  third  son,  abbe-prirol  of 
lied  in  Spain  in  1712;  Andrew,  the  fourth  son,  a  col- 
horse  in  the  French  sen*ice,  married  a  lady  named 
me  Silria  de  St.  Ilermione,  described  as  n  licuten.int- 
in  the  French  arniy.  (^Dmujlat'  Peerage^  vol.  i.  p. 
ood's  c<'.ition.)  By  her  he  had  a  son,  designed  Count 
brt,  a  major- genernl  in  the  same  service.  The  sixth 
ilip,  also  an  officer  in  the  French  nrmy,  ilicJ  of  wonnds 
1  in  the  wars  of  Louis  XIV. 

second  duke  of  Melfort  nianied  the  widow  of  Henry 
les,  duke  of  Albemarle,  natural  son  of  James  VII., 
I  three  sons :  Thomas,  his  heir ;  I.«wis,  major-general 
Fn-nch  service  and  colonel  of  the  regiment  of  royal 
fu  the  reduction  of  which  corps  he  got  a  pension  from 
irt  of  France ;  and  John,  lieutenant  of  the  guards  of 
I  of  Poland,  elector  of  Saxony,  with  the  rank  of  ma- 

TOl. 

las,  the  eldest  son,  third  duke  of  Melfort,  had  a  con- 
e  estate  in  Lowor  I^nguedoc.  By  a  lady  of  the  name 
r  de  Bcrcnger,  he  had  four  sons  and  two  daughters, 
i«^m8  not  to  have  married  her  till  afler  some  of  them 
tm.  In  1805,  Charles  Edward  Drummond,  styling 
liuke  of  Melfort,  the  second  but  eldest  surviving  son, 
A  dnim  for  tlie  estate  of  Perth.  He  stated  himself 
been  bom  1st  January  1752,  although  his  father  was 
lied  to  Mary  de  Berenger  till  2Gth  July  1755.  His 
t  brother,  Leon  Maurice  Drummond,  residing  in  Lon- 
rth  son  of  the  third  duke,  took  a  j^rotest  that  he  was 


great-grandson  and  lawM  heir  of  John  dake  of  Melfort.  He 
married  Lace  Elizabeth  de  Longoemarre,  and  with  two  daugh- 
ters had  a  son,  George,  bom  in  London,  6th  May  1807. 
This  Gooi^,  diiko  of  Melfort,  soceecded  his  nnde  in  the 
French  honoors  in  1840,  and  in  1841  petitioned  the  queen 
for  the  restoration  of  the  Scottish  attainted  titles  of  Perth. 
In  1848  he  proved  his  descent  before  the  committee  of  privi- 
leges of  the  house  of  lords,  and  was  restored  in  blood  by  act 
of  parliament  in  1853.  The  same  year  he  was  re-invested  in 
the  earldom  of  Perth.    (See  Perth,  earl  of.) 


Melgum,  viscount  of,  a  title,  now  extinct,  in  the  peerage 
of  Scotland,  conferred  on  I/>rd  John  Gordon,  second  son  ol 
the  first  marquis  of  Huntly,  by  Charles  I.  in  1627,  with  the 
secondary  title  of  Lord  Aboyne.  He  was  burnt  to  death  in 
the  castle  of  Frendranght,  18th  October,  1630  (see  vol.  ii.  p. 
271).  He  had  married  Lady  Sophia  Hay,  fifth  daughter  of 
Frauds,  ninth  earl  of  Errol,  and  had  an  only  daughter,  llie 
ballad  called  *  The  Burning  of  Frendranght,*  thus  describes 
her  anguish  on  receiving,  by  his  servant,  the  intelligence  of 
her  lord^s  fate : 

*'  0  w.ie  be  to  you,  Geoi^^  Gordon ; 
An  ill  death  may  you  dee. 
Sac  safe  and  sound  as  ye  stand  there, 
And  my  lord  bereaved  from  me. 

*  I  bade  him  lonp,  I  bade  him  come, 
I  bade  him  lonp  to  me ; 
rd  catch  him  in  my  armis  two, 
A  foot  I  should  not  flee. 

He  threw  me  rings  from  his  white  fingers, 

Which  were  so  long  and  small, 
To  give  to  you  his  lady  fair. 

Where  you  sat  in  your  hall.* 

Sophia  Hay,  Sophia  Hay, 

0  bonnie  Sophie  was  her  name ; 
ller  waiting  maid  put  on  her  clothes. 

But  I  wat  she  tore  them  off  again." 

The  courtesy  title  of  Viscount  Melgum  is  held  by  the  eld- 
est son  of  the  earl  of  Minto,  a  peerage  of  the  united  kingdom, 
of  the  creation  of  1813,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  132). 


Mklrose,  carl  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred, 20th  March  1619,  on  Sir  Thomas  Hamilton  of  Drum- 
cairn,  an  eminent  advocate  and  lord  of  session.  After  hold- 
ing it  for  eight  years  he  exchanged  it  fur  that  of  earl  of 
Haddington,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  394).  Baron  Melros,  in  the  peer- 
age of  the  united  kingdom,  is  the  title  by  which  the  carls  of 
Haddington  have  sat  in  the  house  of  lords  since  1827. 


Melviij.e,  a  surname  of  .nncient  standing  in  Scotland, 
derived  from  lands  of  that  name  in  2ilid  Lothian.  Before  the 
middle  of  the  12th  century,  a  baron  of  Anglo-Norman  line- 
age, named  ^lale,  settled,  under  David  I.,  on  the  lands  refer- 
red to,  and  called  his  manor,  after  himself,  Maleville, 
whence  the  surname  of  Melville.  Galfrid  de  Maleville,  the 
first  of  the  family,  was  vicccomes  of  Edinburgh  castle  under 
Malcolm  IV.,  and  justidary  under  William  the  IJon.  The 
family  remained  in  possession  of  their  andent  manor 
till  the  reign  of  Robert  II.  The  original  stock  then 
terminating  in  an  heiress,  Agnes,  she  married  Sir  John 
Ross  of  Halkhead,  and    their  descendant  was,  by  James 


i; 


I 


r 


MELVILLK, 


138 


EARL  OF. 


.1 


1 1 


IVm  crented  liord  Itoss,  in  wboM  famiijr  the  barony  of  Blel- 
▼illti  I'tinaincd  till  1705. 


•  WM  much  noticed  at  the  oonrt  of  France,  and  obtained  an 
hoooarable  emplojment  nnder  Henry  II.  In  1569  he  re- 
tained to  ScotUnd,  and  waa  lent  to  England  with  Ifaitland 
of  Ijethington,  to  solicit  the  asnitance  of  Qnean  Kh'aibeth  for 
the  lorda  cf  the  congregation.  In  1562  he  was  awora  a  privy 
conncillor.  After  the  **  Chase-abont  Baid,"  in  1665,  he  was 
employed  by  the  eari  of  Moray,  one  of  the  prindpnl  nobles 
who  opposed  Mary*s  marriage  to  Damley,  to  intcitedo  for  his 
pardon  with  the  queen.  Shortly  after  he  was  sent  to  Eng- 
land as  ambassador,  und  on  his  retam  he  sidlfiilly  nnramUsd 
to  his  mijttms  the  crooked  policy  of  £Iiiabeth  and  bar  niitti- 
sten.  {SIdtiUe'9  Ifemoirg.')  After  the  *TirntfinBtiim  cf 
Damley  he  was  reappointed  ambassador  to  England,  and 
again  after  the  marriage  of  Mary  to  Bothwell. 

"When  MhiT  was  confined  in  Jjochleren  castle,  he  was  sent 
to  her  by  the  earl  of  Athole  and  the  lairds  of  Tnllibaidin  and 
Lethlngton,  her  principal  connallors,  with  a  ring  which  she 
knew  to  be  theirs,  advising  lier  to  subscribe  the  rengnation 
of  the  crown,  as  it  would  be  held  null,  being  extorted  from 
her  by  fears  of  her  life.  He  also  conveyed  to  her  a  writing 
from  Sir  Nicholas  'iliroginorton,  the  Engliah  ambassador,  de- 
siring her  to  subscribe  whatever  they  required,  as  what  she 
signed  in  her  captivity  could  not  be  held  valid,  and  assuring 
her  of  Queen  KUubeth's  protection.  This  afterwards  fonned 
the  chief  ground  of  Mnry's  ill-founded  reliance  on  her  oon- 
sin*8  promises.  On  Mar\-*s  escape  from  I/>clileven  he  joined 
her  nt  Hamilton,  and  publicly  avowed  the  restmint  nnder 
which  she  had  acted  in  resi^iing  the  crown. 

In  the  dvil  war  which  followed  the  assassination  of  the  r- 
gent  Mnmy,  he  adheretl  to  the  queen's  party,  and  with  Kiik- 
aldy  of  Grange  and  Maitlnnd  of  Lethington  held  ont  the 
castle  of  Edinburgh  till  its  surrender  in  1578.  He  would 
have  shared  the  fate  of  Kirkaldy  but  for  the  interceasioo  of 
Killigrcw,  the  English  ambassador.  During  the  remainder  of 
the  earl  of  Morton*s  regency,  he  appears  to  hare  lived  in  re- 
tirement, and  in  1579  the  benefit  of  the  pacification  of  Perth 
was  extended  to  him. 

In  August  1582,  he  was  appointed  treasurer-depute,  and 
in  October  of  the  same  year  knighted.  In  December  1586, 
he  was  sent  by  James  VI.,  with  the  master  of  Gray,  to  Eng- 
land to  entreat  Queen  Elizabeth  for  his  mother's  liife.  This 
duty  he  performed  with  fidelity  and  zeal.  According  to  hti 
brother  s  account,  *"  be  spok  brave  and  stout  language  to  the 
consaill  of  England,  sa  that  thequen  herself  hoisted  him  of  his 
lyf ;"  and  he  would  have  been  afterwards  detained  prisoner, 
but  for  the  interest  of  the  master  of  Gray.  {IfMOe*$  Jfe- 
moirSy  p.  357.)  In  1589,  when  James  sailed  for  Norway,  to 
bring  over  his  queen,  Sir  Robert  Melville  was  made  vice- 
chancellor  of  the  kingdom,  and  he  received  the  gratefol 
thanks  of  his  mnjcsty,  on  his  return,  for  the  way  in  which  he 
had  managed  mntters  in  his  absence.  On  7th  June  1693,  he 
was  again  sent  ambassador  to  England.  On  lltb  Jnoe  1694, 
he  was  admitted  an  extraordinary  lord  of  session,  and  took 
his  seat  on  the  bencli  as  Ijord  Murdocaimie.  The  king^s 
letter  of  nomination  states  that  his  majesfy  had  *'ezperienco 
of  the  fnitliFul  ser%'icc  done  to  us  at  all  tymes"  by  Sir  Robert, 
"  and  how  willing  he  is  to  dischaige  his  dewtie  therein  to  our 
honour  and  wiell  of  our  realm  and  lieges  thereof."  (Booli  ^ 
Sederunt.)  He  resigned  his  office  of  treasurer- depute  in  Jan- 
uary 159G,  in  consequence  of  the  appointment  of  tlie  Octavi- 
ans,  as  the  eight  commissionen  of  the  treasury  were  called, 
at  which  time  the  king  was  largely  in  his  debt  In  1597,  an 
act  was  passed  by  which  his  majesty,  with  advice  of  tbt 
Estates,  promised  to  pay  the  bahince  due,  and  prohibited  any 
diligence  being  executed  at  the  instance  of  his  croditors 


Mklviixe,  eari  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
joined since  1704  with  that  of  earl  of  I^even,  and  conferred, 
in  1690,  on  George,  fourth  Lord  Melville,  descended  from  Sir 
John  de  Melrille  of  Raitli,  in  Fife,  who  swore  fealty  to  Ed- 
ward I.  in  1296.  Sir  John  Melville  of  Raith,  the  ninth  in 
descent  from  this  baron,  was  a  favoorito  with  James  V.,  by 
whom  he  was  appointed  master-general  of  the  ordnance  and 
captain  of  the  castle  of  Dunbar.  In  1536,  and  again  in  1542, 
he*obtaine<l  chartora  to  himself  and  Helen  Napier  his  wife,  of 
the  king's  lands  of  Murdocairnie  in  Fife.  He  early  joined  the 
party  of  the  Reformation  in  Scotland,  and  after  sufiering 
from  the  animosity  of  Cardinal  Bethune,  at  length  fell  a  ric- 
tim  to  lii5  successor  in  the  primacy.  Archbishop  Hamilton. 
In  1550  he  was  tried  for  high  treason,  and  executed.  Cal- 
derwood  (IIimL  of  Kirk  of  Scotland,  p.  262)  says,  "  Joline 
Melville,  laird  of  Raith  in  Fife,  an  aged  man,  and  of  great 
nccompt  with  King  James  the  Fyft,  was  belieaded  for  writing 
ti  letter  to  an  Englishman,  in  favour  of  a  captive,  his  friend, 
with  whome  he  was  keeped  as  prisoner.  Although  there  was 
not  the  least  siispicioun  of  anie  fault,  yitt  lost  he  his  head, 
becaus  he  was  knowne  to  be  one  that  unfaincdlie  favoured 
the  truthe,  and  was  a  great  friend  to  those  that  were  in  the 
castle  of  Sanct  Andrews,  (the  conspiraton  against  Cardinal 
Bcthunc).  The  letter,  as  was  alledged,  was  found  in  the 
house  of  Ormiston.  Howsoever  it  was,  the  cruel  beasts,  tlin 
bishop  of  Sanct  Andrews  and  the  abbot  of  Dunfermline, 
ceased  not  till  his  head  was  strickin  frome  him.  They  were 
not  content  of  his  death,  till  he  was  forfaulted  also,  and  his 
patrimonic  bestowed  upon  Haniiltoun,  the  governor's  young- 
est son."  With  a  daughter,  Janet,  married  to  Sir  James 
Kirkaldy  of  Grange,  knight,  he  had  six  sons,  five  of  whom 
wore  eminent  during  the  reign  of  Queen  Mary  and  the  rvgen- 
cics  which  followed  her  resignation  of  the  crown. 

The  eldest  son,  John  Melville  of  Raith,  was  restored  to  his 
father's  estate  by  the  queen  regent  about  1553,  at  the  special 
request  of  Henry  II.  of  France.  He  was  one  of  the  barons 
wlio,  in  July  1567,  subscribed  the  articles  p.nssed  in  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  for  the  support  of  the  Reformed  religion  and 
the  putting  down  of  poperr.  The  second  son.  Sir  Robert 
Alelvillo  of  Murdi>cainiie,  was  the  first  I/>rd  Melville,  of  wliom 
afterwards.  Of  Sir  James  Melville  of  Hallhill,  the  third  son, 
an  eminent  courtier  and  statesman,  a  memoir  is  subsequently 
given  in  larger  type.  William  Melville,  the  fourth  son,  coin- 
mendator  of  Tongland  and  Kilwinning,  was  appointed  an  or- 
dinary lord  of  session,  14th  August,  1587,  when  he  took  the 
title  of  liOrd  Tongland.  Soon  after,  he  was  sent  by  James 
VI.  to  the  court  of  Navarre,  to  see  and  report  upon  the  prin- 
cess, as  a  wife  for  the  king,  and  Returned  with  a  portrait  of 
the  lady,  and  *'  a  good  report  of  her  rare  qualities.**  The 
marriage,  however,  did  not  take  place.  He  was  frequently 
employed  as  one  of  the  lords  commissioners  for  opening  the 
Scots  parliament,  and  is  supposed  to  have  died  in  the  autumn 
of  1613.  He  is  said,  by  his  brother,  in  his  Memoin  (p.  365), 
to  have  l»een  a  good  scholar,  and  to  have  been  able  to  speidc 
perfectly  "the  I.itin,  the  Dutche,  the  Flemyn,  and  the 
Frcnclie  tongue."  Sir  Andrew  Melville  of  Garvock,  the  filth 
son,  was  master  of  the  household  to  Queen  Mary,  and  at- 
tended her  in  her  last  momento  at  Fotheringay.  He  was 
also  master  of  the  household  to  James  VI.  Darid  Melville 
of  Nevrmill,  the  sixth  son,  wss  a  captain  in  the  army. 

To  ratum  to  the  second  son.  Sir  Robert  3Ielville,  first  Lord 
^felrille, — he  was  a  very  eminent  character  during  the  reigns 
of  Mary  and  James.    Having  gone  abroad  in  his  youth,  he  |  against  him,  until  he  should  be  so  paid.    (^Act.  Part  roi  It. 


M£LyiLL£, 


139 


THIRD  VISCOUNT. 


!i 


I  ■! 

!      t 


I     I' 


I' 
I; 


p^  147.)  On  Seth  Febmary  1601,  he  reugned  his  seat  on 
the  bench  in  faTour  of  his  son,  and  in  1604  he  was  appointed 
CM  of  the  oommissionen  for  the  projected  union  between  the 
tvo  kingdomsL  He  was  raised  to  the  peerage  bj  the  title  of 
Loid  MdvUIe  of  Monimail,  80th  April  1616,  and  died  in 
1621,  at  the  advanced  age  of  94. 

His  onlj  son,  Robert,  second  I^rd  Melville,  was  a  privy 
cooDcillor  to  King  Jamea,  bj  whom  he  was  knighted,  and  in 
FebniarT  160!,  on  the  resignation  of  his  father,  he  was  ap- 
pointed an  eitraordinary  lord  of  session,  by  the  title  of  I^rd 
Bvntishind.  He  was  removed  in  Febmaxy  1626,  wlien  nn 
CBtire  change  of  the  extraordinary  lords  took  place.  He  was 
liw  a  privy  councillor  to  Charles  I.,  and  one  of  tlie  roy»I 
commissionen  to  open  the  pariiament  of  Scotland,  18th  June 
16S8.  In  that  assembly  he  eneigetically,  though  unsuccess- 
fally,  q^posed  the  act  for  conferring  on  the  king  the  power 
of  regulating  ecclesiastical  habits,  and  addressing  the  king, 
tben  present,  he  exdaimed  aloud,  "  I  have  sworn  with  your 
fither  and  the  whole  kingdom  to  the  Confession  of  Faith,  in 
vUcfa  the  innovations  intended  by  these  articles  were  so- 
iemoly  abjured.**  He  died  at  Edinburgh,  without  issue,  9th 
Uardi  1686,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  coanin,  John  Melville 
of  Baith,  third  Lord  Melville,  whose  brother,  Thomas  Mel- 
TiUe,  aequired  from  him  the  lands  of  Murdocaimie,  and  was 
tBcestor  of  the  Mdvilles  of  Murdocaimie. 

Ihe  thbd  Lord  Melville  died  in  1643.  HU  elder  son 
Gcoige,  fbnrth  knrd,  and  first  earl  of  Melville,  in  consequence 
of  his  known  liberal  principles,  found  it  necessary  to  retire  to 
tbe  continent  on  the  detection  of  the  Ryehonse  plot  in  1683, 
iltfaougfa  he  had  no  connexion  with  that  conspiracy.  In 
Jine  1685,  he  accompanied  the  duke  of  Monmouth  when  he 
landed  at  Lyme  from  Holland,  and  on  the  failure  of  his  nt- 
tmpi  to  ovortum  the  government  of  his  uncle  James  VII., 
Lord  Melville  again  escaped  to  the  continent.  Hb  estates 
were  forfdted  by  act  of  attainder  the  same  year. 

Id  1688  he  came  over  to  England  with  William,  prince  of 
Oi«^  and,  inunediately  after,  his  forfeiture  was  rescinded. 
On  8th  April  1690,  he  was  created  earl  of  Melville,  viscount 
of  Kirkcaldy,  Lord  Raith,  l^Ionimail,  and  Balwearie.  Tlie 
iMM  year  he  was  appointed  sole  secrctniy  of  state  for  Scot- 
knd,  and  ooostitnted  high  commissioner  to  the  Scots  parlia- 
ment. As  high  commisaoner  also  to  the  parliament  which 
met  in  September  following,  he  gave  the  royal  assent  to  the 
act  for  abofishing  patronage.  In  1691  he  resigned  the  office 
of  sccrstaiy  of  state,  and  was  fippointed  keeper  of  the  privy 
leal,  an  oflBoe  which  he  held  till  1696,  when  he  became  presi- 
dent of  the  coonciL  He  died  in  1707.  By  his  countess, 
GathsriDe,  daughter  of  Alexander,  I^rd  Balgonie,  son  of  the 
iCBOwocd  military  commander,  Alexander  Leslie,  first  earl  of 
Leven,  he  had  three  sons  and  one  daughter.  His  eldest  son, 
Alexander,  Lord  Raith,  a  nobleman  of  considemble  talent, 
was  appointed  treasurer  depute  of  Scotland  in  1689,  and  died, 
without  iasne,  before  his  father  in  1698. 

The  second  son,  David,  second  eari  of  Melville,  succeeded, 
ea  the  death  of  his  mother  in  1718,  to  the  earldom  of  Leven. 
(See  Lktek,  eari  of.)    The  titles  were  thenceforth  conjoined. 


MELvnxB,  viscount  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  the  united 
kingdom,  conferred,  with  the  secondary  title  of  baron  Dnnira, 
m  tht  county  of  Perth,  December  21st,  1802,  on  tlie  Right 
Ben.  Heniy  Dundas,  a  distinguished  statesman,  a  memoir  of 
whom  is  ipven  at  vol  ii.  page  97.  By  his  first  wife,  Eliza- 
beth, daiai^ttT  of  David  Rennie,  Esq.,  who  had  purchased 
MelviOa  Castle.  Mid  Lothian,  which  he  bestowed,  with  his 
dai^ter,  on  his  soii-in-law,  he  had  one  son  and  three  dangh- 
A  leeond  maniags  was  without  isMie. 


His  son,  Robert,  second  Viscount  Melville,  was  bom  in  1771, 
He  was  educated  at  the  High  school  of  Edinburgh,  and  Em- 
manuel College,  Cambridge.  One  of  his  school  companions 
at  the  former  was  Sir  Walter  Scott,  neither  of  them  being 
then  titled,  his  friendship  with  whom  was  strengthened  by 
their  subsequent  service  together  in  the  Mid  Lothian  yeo- 
manry. In  1802  he  was  chosen  M.P.  for  ^lid  Lothian,  for 
which  he  was  subsequently  five  times  re-elected.  The  ques- 
tion of  his  father's  impeachment  caused  him  to  take  a  fre- 
quent part  in  the  debates  in  parliament  in  1805  and  1806. 
On  the  change  of  ministry  in  Marcli  1807,  when  the  duke  of 
Portland  becime  premier,  Mr.  Dundas  entered  office  as  presi- 
dent of  the  board  of  control,  and  wns  sworn  a  member  of  the 
pri\7  connciL  In  1809,  when  Sir  Arthur  Wellcsley,  after- 
wards the  duke  of  Wellington,  was  called  from  the  Irish  chief 
secretaiyship  to  take  the  command  of  the  British  armies  in 
Spain,  Mr.  Dundas  was  appointed  his  successor,  and  was  en- 
rolled in  the  privy  council  of  Irehmd.  In  January  1810,  soon 
after  the  formation  of  Mr.  Spencer  Pemval's  admiuistration, 
he  returned  to  the  presidency  of  the  board  of  control. 

Tlie  sudden  death  of  his  father,  on  29th  May  1811,  gave 
him  a  place  in  the  house  of  peers.  The  same  year  he  was 
appointed  keeper  of  the  privy  seal  of  Scotland,  a  sinecure 
office  which  expired  with  him.  On  the  formation  of  a  new 
ministry,  having  the  enri  of  Liverpool  at  its  head,  in  the  sum- 
mer of  1812,  the  office  of  first  lord  of  the  admiralty,  with  a 
seat  in  the  cabinet,  was  assigned  to  Viscount  Melville,  and  he 
continued  at  tlic  head  of  thut  department  for  fifteen  years. 
In  1814  he  was  elected  chancellor  of  the  universitv  of  St. 
Andrews.  Nominated  in  1821  one  of  the  four  exira  knights 
of  the  Thistle,  on  the  enlaigemcnt  of  the  order  in  1827  he 
was  enrolled  one  of  the  ordinary  knights.  On  the  accession 
of  Mr.  Canning  to  power  in  the  latter  year,  his  lordship  re- 
tired from  office,  declining  a  sent  in  the  cabinet.  When  the 
duke  of  Wellington  formed  his  administration  in  January 
1828,  Viscount  Melville  resumed  his  place  at  the  head  of  the 
admiralty.  With  the  dissolution  of  the  Wellington  ministry 
in  November  1830,  his  lordship's  official  career  terminated. 
He  was  a  member  of  the  royal  commission  of  1826-80  for  the 
visitation  of  the  Scottish  universities ;  in  1843-4,  of  the  royal 
commission  for  inquiry  into  the  operation  of  the  poor-law  in 
Scotland,  and  in  1817,  of  the  prison  board  for  Scotland.  He 
was  also  keeper  of  the  signet,  a  deputy-lieutenant  of  the 
counties  of  Edinburgh  and  Linlithgow,  one  of  the  commis< 
sioners  of  the  board  of  trustees  for  manufactures  in  Scotland, 
one  of  the  commissioners  for  the  custody  of  the  Scottish  re^ 
galia,  a  lieutenant-general  of  the  royal  company  of  archers  in 
Scotland,  an  elder  brother  of  the  Trinity  house,  governor  of 
the  Bank  of  Scotland,  &c.  He  died  at  Melville  castle.  Mid 
Lothian,  10th  June,  1851,  in  his  80th  year. 

His  lordship  married,  in  August  1796,  Anne,  daughter  and 
co-heiress  of  Richard  Huck  Saunders,  &I.D.,  grand-niece  of 
Admiral  Sir  Charles  Saunders,  K.B.  On  his  man-iuge  he 
assumed  the  name  of  Saunders  before  his  own.  lie  had  four 
sons  and  two  daughters. 

The  eldest  son,  Henry,  third  Viscount  Melville,  bom  in 
1801,  entered  the  .vmy  in  1819,  and  became  a  mnjor-generul 
in  1854.  He  commanded  the  83d  foot  during  the  insurrec- 
tion in  Upper  Canada  in  1837-8,  and  was  for  a  short  time 
aide-de-camp  to  the  queen.  At  the  battle  of  Gujerat  in  In- 
dia, he  commamled  a  brigade,  and  fur  his  services  he  received 
the  order  of  the  Bath  and  the  thanks  of  parliament  and  of  the 
East  India  Company.  In  1853  he  was  appointed  to  com- 
mand the  Sirhind  division  of  the  Indian  army,  and  from  1854 
to  1860  was  commander-in-chief  of  the  forces  in  Scotland ; 
colonel  of  100th  regiment  of  foot ;  unmarried. 


rv"-"i:z: 


ii 
I ' 


1 1 
1 1 


MELVILLE, 


140 


ANDREW. 


The  2d  son,  Vice-admiral  the  Hon.  Uichaxd  Saaoden  I>uii- 
das,  C.B.,  sacoeeded  Admiral  Sir  Charles  Napier  in  the  com- 
mand of  tlie  naltic  fleet,  in  the  war  with  Russia,  in  18o5; 
nnd  commanded  at  the  bombardment  of  Sweaborg,  Aug.  9  of 
tlint  jear.  Bom  Jane  11,  1802,  he  entered  the  navy  June 
15,  1817,  as  a  volunteer  on  board  the  Ganymede,  26  guns, 
nnd  remained  midshipman  of  that  sliip  and  of  the  Owen 
(jlendower  until  Dec.  1820,  on  the  lileditemmenn  and  South 
American  stations.  He  became  lieutenant  18th  June,  1821, 
:ind  post-captain  17tli  July,  1824.  In  the  MeWille,  72,  he 
t<)«)k  part  in  the  campaign  in  China.  During  this  service  he 
i*cceivod  the  warm  thanks  of  Sir  Gordon  Bremer  for  his  con- 
duct At  the  capture  of  Ty-cock-tow,  as  well  as  at  that  of  the 
forts  of  the  Bocca  Tigris.  In  1828-29-80  he  was  private 
secretary  to  his  father,  tlien  first  lord  of  the  admiralty.  In  1845 
lie  held  the  same  ofKce  under  the  earl  of  Haddington,  the  first 
lord  of  that  period.  In  1841  the  military  companionship  of 
the  Bath  was  conferred  upon  hun  for  liis  services  in  China. 
In  1851  he  was  appointed  superintendent  of  Deptford  dock- 
vard.  Rear-admiral  of  the  bine  1853 ;  rear-admiral  of  the 
white  1855',  in  1858hebecamc  vice-admiral  of  the  blue;  one 
of  the  lords  of  the  admiralty  from  1852  to  1855.  He  died 
suddenly,  June  3, 1861.  The  3d  son,  the  Hon.  Robert  Dun- 
das,  boru  in  1803,  storekeeper -general  of  the  navy.  The  4th 
son,  the  Hon.  and  Rev.  Charles  Dundas,  rector  of  Epwortli, 
born  Sept.  10, 1806,  married,  in  1833,  I^uisa  Claris,  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  William  Boothhy,  issue,  3  sons  and  7  daughter*. 

MKLVILLE,  Sir  James,  an  eminent  courtier, 
son  of  Sir  John  Melville  of  Raith,  was  bom  in 
Fifesliire  about  1535.  At  tbe  age  of  14  lie  was  sent 
to  Paris  by  the  queen-mother,  under  the  protec- 
tion of  the  French  ambassador,  to  be  a  page  of 
honour  to  the  youthful  Mary,  queen  of  Scots,  then 
the  consort  of  the  dauphin  of  France.  In  May 
lo').*),  by  the  permission  of  his  royal  mistress,  he 
entered  the  service  of  the  constable  of  France,  and 
was  present  at  the  siege  of  St.  Qucntin,  where  the 
constable  was  wounded  and  taken  prisoner,  and 
he  seems  to  have  attended  him  in  his  captivity. 
After  the  peace  he  visited  his  native  countiy  in 
1559,  on  a  sort  of  secret  mission,  to  ascertain  the 
state  of  parties  in  Scotland.  He  afterwards  tra- 
velled on  the  continent,  and  remained  three  years 
at  the  court  of  the  elector  palatine,  who  employed 
him  in  various  negotiations  with  the  German 
princes.  In  May  1564  he  returned  to  Scotland, 
having  been  recalled  by  Mary,  by  whom  he  was 
appointed  gentleman  of  the  bedchamber,  and  no- 
minated one  of  her  privy  councillors.  Soon  after 
he  was  sent  on  an  embassy  to  Elizabeth,  relative 
to  Clary's  proposed  marriage  with  Daniley,  and 
in  June  1566  he  was  again  dL^patched  to  the  Eng- 
lish court  with  the  intelligence  of  the  birth  of  the 
prince,  afterwards  James  VI.  He  maintained  a 
correspondence  in  England  in  favour  of  Mail's 


Buccession  to  the  crown  of  tliat  kingdom;  bnt  Yen- 
taring  to  remonBtrate  with  ber  on  lier  onhapiiy 
partiality  for  Bothwell,  the  queen  oommonieated 
bis  admonitions  to  tbe  latter,  and  tbe  faithful 
Melville  was,  in  consequence,  obliged  for  some 
time  to  retire  from  conrt.  He  was,  however,  pre* 
sent  at  th^  ill-starred  nuptials  of  Mary  to  that 
nobleman,  and  be  continued  her  confidential  aer- 
vant  as  long  as  she  remained  in  Scotland.  He 
appears  to  have  bad  a  high  idea  of  bis  own  im- 
portance, and  occasionally  in  bis  Memoirs  blames 
himself  for  the  unfortunate  propensity,  which  he 
says  he  possessed,  of  finding  fault  with  the  pro- 
ceedings of  the  great. 

By  James  YI.,  to  whom  he  was  recommended 
by  his  unfortunate  mother,  and  who  continued 
him  in  his  offices  of  privy  councillor  and  gentle- 
man of  the  bedchamber  to  his  queen,  Anne  of 
Denmark,  he  was  intrusted  with  various  honoura- 
ble employments.  On  the  accession  of  King 
James  to  the  English  throne,  he  declined  to  ac- 
company him  to  England,  but  afterwards  paid  his 
majesty  a  visit  of  duty,  when  he  was  graciously 
received.  On  account  of  his  age  he  retired  from 
the  public  service,  and  occupied  bis  remaining 
yeai*s  in  writing  the  ^Memours*  of  bis  life  for  the 
use  of  his  son.  He  died  November  1,  1607.  His 
manuscript,  accidentally  found  in  the  castle  of 
Edinburgh  in  1660,  and  which  affords  minute  and 
curious  descriptions  of  the  manners  of  the  times, 
was  published  in  1683,  by  Mr.  George  Scott,  uu- 
der  the  title  of  ^  Mcmoii's  of  Sir  James  Melvil  of 
Ilallhill,  containing  au  impartial  Account  of  the 
most  remai'kablc  Affaii*s  of  State  during  the  last 
Age,  not  mentioned  by  other  Historians  ;*  repub- 
lished in  1735.  He  had  acquired  the  estate  of 
Hallhill,  in  the  parish  of  Collessie,  Fifeshhx^  from 
the  celebrated  Henr}'  Balnaves,  (see  vol.  i.  pago 
229).  It  remained  the  property  of  his  descend- 
ants till  the  reign  of  Charles  II.,  when  it  was  pur- 
chased by  Lord  Melville. 

MELVILLE,  Andrew,  one  of  the  most  ilins- 
trious  of  the  Scottish  Reformers,  whose  name  is 
second  only  to  that  of  John  Knox,  was  the  young- 
est of  nine  sons  of  Richai'd  Melville  of  Baldov}% 
near  Montrose,  where  he  was  bom  August  1, 
1545.  His  father  lost  bis  life  in  the  battle  of  Pin- 
kie, when  Andrew  was  only  two  years  old,  and 


I 


■ 


MELVILLE, 


141 


ANDREW. 


his  motiier  dying  soon  after,  he  ivas  brought  np 
under  the  care  of  hla  eldest  brother,  afterwards 
minister  of  Maryton,  who,  at  a  proper  age,  sent 
him  to  the  grammar  school  of  Montroee.  Having 
acquired  there  a  thorough  linowledge  of  the  clas- 
sics, he  was,  in  1669,  remored  to  the  university 
of  St.  Andrews,  where  his  great  proficiency,  espe- 
cially in  the  Greek  language,  excited  the  aston- 
ishment of  liis  teachers.  On  completing  the  nsual 
academical  course  he  left  college  with  the  cbnrac- 
ter  of  being  "  the  best  philosopher,  poet,  and  Gre- 
dan,  of  any  young  master  in  the  land."  In  1564 
he  went  to  France,  and  remained  for  two  years  nt 
the  university  of  Paris.  He  next  proceeded  to 
Poictiers,  for  the  purpose  of  studying  the  civil 
law,  and  was  elected  regent  or  professor  in  the 
college  of  St.  Marceon.  After  continuing  there 
for  three  years,  he  repaired  to  Geneva  on  foot, 
carrying  only  a  Hebrew  Bible  at  his  belt,  and  the 
lame  of  his  great  attainments  having  preceded 
him,  by  the  influence  of  Beza  lie  obtained  the  hu- 
manity chair  in  the  academy,  at  that  time  vacant. 
In  July  1574  he  returned  to  Scotland,  after  an 
absence  of  ten  years.  Beza,  in  his  letter  to  the 
General  Assembly,  wrote  that  the  greatest  token  of 
affection  the  kirk  of  Geneva  could  show  to  Scot- 
land was  that  they  had  suffei'ed  themselves  to  be 
qiolled  of  Mr.  Andrew  Melville,  that  thereby  the 
kirk  of  Scotland  might  be  enriched.  On  his  ar- 
rival in  Edinburgh,  he  was  invited  by  the  Regent 
Morton  to  enter  his  family  as  a  domestic  tntor, 
but  he  preferred  an  academic  life  to  a  residence  at 
court,  and  declined  the  invitation.  Shortly  after- 
wards he  was  appointed  by  the  General  Assembly 
piiucipal  of  the  university  of  Glasgow,  which,  un- 
der his  charge,  from  the  improved  plan  of  study 
and  disdpline  introdaced  by  him,  speedily  acquired 
a  high  reputation  as  a  seat  of  learning.  Besides 
his  duties  in  the  university,  he  ofilciated  as  minis- 
ter of  the  church  of  Govan,  in  the  vicinity.  As  a 
member  of  the  General  Assembly,  he  took  a  pro- 
minent part  in  all  the  measures  of  that  body 
against  episcopacy ;  and  as  he  was  unflinching  in 
his  opposition  to  that  form  of  church  government, 
he  received  the  name  of  ^^  Episcopomastix,*^  or 
'The  Scourge  of  Bishops.'  A  remarkable  in- 
stance of  his  intrepidity  occurred  at  an  interview, 
which  took  place  in  October  1577,  between  him 


and  the  Regent  Moi-ton,  when  the  latter,  irritated 
at  the  proceedings  o(  the  Assembly,  exclaimed, 
**  There  will  never  be  quietness  in  this  conntr}' 
till  half  a  dozen  of  you  be  hanged  or  banished  1 " 
"Hark!  Sur,"  said  Melville,  "threaten  your 
courtiers  after  that  manner!  It  is  the  same  to 
me  whether  I  rot  in  the  air,  or  in  the  ground. 
The  earth  is  the  Lord's.  Patrui  est  ubicunque  est 
bene.  I  have  been  ready  to  give  up  my  life  where 
it  would  not  have  been  half  so  well  wared,  at  the 
pleasure  of  my  God.  I  have  lived  out  of  your 
country  ten  years,  as  well  as  in  it.  Let  God  be 
glorified,  it  will  not  be  in  your  power  to  hang  or 
exile  his  truth."  This  bold  language  Morton  did 
not  venture  to  resent. 

Melville  was  moderator  of  the  General  Assem- 
bly which  met  at  Edinburgh  24th  April  1578,  in 
which  the  second  Book  of  Discipline  was  approved 
of.  The  attention  of  the  Assembly  was  about  this 
time  du*ected  to  the  reformation  and  improvement 
of  the  universities,  and  Melville  was,  in  December 
1580,  removed  from  Glasgow,  and  installed  prin- 
cipal of  St.  Mary's  college,  St.  Andrews.  Here, 
besides  giving  lectures  in  divinity,  he  tanght  the 
Hebrew,  Chaldce,  Syiiac,  and  Rabbinical  lan- 
guages, and  his  prelections  were  attended,  not 
only  by  young  students  in  unusual  numbers,  but 
also  by  some  of  the  masters  of  the  other  colleges. 
He  was  moderator  of  the  Assembly  which  met  at 
St.  Andrews  24th  April  1582,  and  also  of  an  ex- 
traordinary meeting  of  the  Assembly,  convened  at 
Edinburgh  27th  June  thereafter,  in  consequence 
of  the  arbitrary  measures  of  the  court,  in  relation 
particularly  to  the  case  of  Robert  Montgomery, 
the  excommunicated  archbishop  of  Glasgow.  He 
opened  the  proceedings  with  a  sennon,  in  which 
he  boldly  inveighed  against  tlic  absolute  autiiority 
claimed  by  the  government  in  ecclesiastical  mat- 
ters. A  spirited  remonstrance  being  agi-ecd  to  by 
the  Assembly,  Melville  and  others  were  appointed 
to  present  it  to  the  king,  then  with  the  court  at 
Perth.  When  the  remonstrance  was  read  before 
his  majesty  in  council,  the  king's  unworthy  favour- 
ite, the  earl  of  Arran,  menacingly  exclaimed, 
"  AVho  dare  subscribe  these  treasonable  articles  ?" 
"  We  dare,"  said  the  undaunted  Melville,  and  tak- 
ing a  pen,  immediately  signed  his  name.  His 
example  was  followed  by  the  other  commission- 


i 


;» 


MELVILLE, 


142 


ANDREW. 


era,  and  so  mucli  were  LeiiDOx  and  Airan  over- 
awed by  tlicir  intrepidity,  tliat  they  dismissed 
them  peaceably. 

For  about  three  years  Melvillo  had  preached, 
assisted  by  his  nephew,  in  the  parish  church  of 
St.  Andrews.  In  February  1584  he  was  cited 
before  the  privy  council,  to  answer  a  charge  of 
treason,  founded  on  some  seditious  expressions, 
which  it  was  alleged  he  had  made  use  of  in  a  ser- 
mon ou  tlic  4th  chapter  of  Daniel,  on  the  occasion 
of  a  fast  kept  during  the  preceding  month ;  par- 
ticularly that  ho  had  compared  the  kiog^s  motlicr 
to  Nebuchadnezzar,  who  was  banished  from  the 
kingdom,  and  would  bo  restored  again.  At  his  ap- 
pearance, he  denied  using  these  words,  entered  in- 
to a  full  defence  of  those  ho  had  actually  used,  and 
presented  a  protest  and  declinature,  claiming  to  be 
tried  by  the  ecclesiastical  court.  When  brought  be- 
fore the  king  and  council,  he  boldly  told  them  that 
they  1ia<l  exceeded  their  jurisdiction  in  judging  of 
tlie  doctrine,  or  Ctilling  to  account  any  of  the  ambas- 
sadors or  messengers  of  a  king  and  council  greater 
than  tiicy,  and  far  above  them.  Tiien  loosing  a 
little  Hebrew  bible  from  his  belt,  and  throwing  it 
on  tlie  table  before  them,  he  said,  ^^  That  you  may 
sec  your  weakness,  oversight,  and  rashness,  in 
taking  upon  you  that  which  neitlier  you  ought  nor 
can  do,  there  aix!  my  instructions  and  warrant.  Lot 
me  sec  wliich  of  you  can  judge  of  them  or  control 
me  therein,  that  I  liavo  pas.<cd  by  my  injunc- 
tions." Arran,  finding  the  book  in  Hebrew,  put 
it  into  the  kiii;,'*s  hand.*;,  sayinj;,  *^  Sir,  he  seonis 
your  majesty  and  council."  **  No,  my  lord,  "  re- 
plied Melville,  "  I  sconi  not,  but  with  all  earnest- 
ness, zeal,  and  gravity,  I  stand  for  the  cause  of 
Jesus  Christ  and  his  chin-cli."  Not  being  able  to 
prove  the  charge  against  him,  and  unwii]in<;  to 
let  liini  go,  the  council  declared  him  guilty  of  de- 
clining tiicir  jurisdiction,  and  of  behaving  irrever- 
ently before  them,  and  sentenced  him  to  be  impri- 
soned in  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  to  be  further 
punished  in  his  person  and  goods  at  the  pleasure 
of  the  king.  Before,  however,  being  charged  to 
enter  him^^el^  in  ward,  his  pl.ice  of  continement 
was  ordered  to  be  changed  to  Blackness  castle, 
wliich  was  kept  by  a  dependant  of  Arran.  While 
at  dinner  the  king^s  macer  was  admitted  and  gave 
him  the  chai^  to  enter  witliin  24  hours ;  but  he 


avoided  being  sent  there  by  secretly  withdrawing 
from  Edinburgh.  After  staying  some  time  at 
Berwick,  he  proceeded  to  London,  and  in  the  en- 
suing July  visited  the  universities  of  Oxford  and 
Cambridge,  at  both  of  which  he  was  received  in  a 
manner  becoming  his  learning  and  reputation. 

On  the  disgrace  of  the  earl  of  Arran,  Melville 
returned  to  Scotland  with  the  banished  lords,  In 
November  1585.  Having  assisted  in  re-organix- 
ing  the  college  of  Glasgow,  he  resumed,  in  the 
following  March,  his  duties  at  St.  Andrews.  The 
synod  of  Fife,  which  met  in  April,  proceeded  to 
excommunicate  Adamson,  archbishop  of  St.  An- 
drews, for  his  attempts  to  overturn  the  presbyte- 
rian  form  of  government  In  the  church ;  and,  in 
return,  that  prelate  Issued  a  sentence  of  cxoom- 
raunication  against  l^Ielville,  and  his  nephew, 
James  Melville,  with  others  of  their  brethren.  Tn 
consequence  of  this  difference  with  the  archbishop, 
Melville  received  a  written  mandate  from  the 
king  to  confine  his  residence  to  the  north  of  the 
Tay,  and  he  was  not  restored  to  his  office  In  the 
university  till  the  following  August.  Some  time 
after,  when  Adamson  had  been  deprived  of  his 
archbishopric,  and  was  reduced  to  great  povcrti*, 
finding  himself  deserted  by  the  king,  he  addressed 
a  letter  to  his  former  antagonist,  l^Ielville,  expres- 
sing regi'ct  for  his  past  conduct,  and  soliciting  his 
assistance.  Melville  hastened  to  visit  him,  and 
not  only  procured  contributions  for  his  relief 
among  his  friends,  but  continued  for  several 
months  to  support  him  from  his  own  resources. 

In  June  1587,  Melville  was  again  elected  mode- 
rator of  the  Assembly,  and  nominated  one  of  the 
commissioners  for  attending  to  the  proceedings  in 
parliament.  He  was  present  at  the  coronation  of 
the  queon,  May  17,  1590,  and  recited  a  Latin  po- 
em composed  for  the  occasion,  which  was  imme- 
diately published  at  the  desire  of  the  king.  In 
the  same  year  he  was  elected  rector  of  the  univer- 
sity of  ot.  Andrews,  an  office  which,  for  a  series 
of  veal's,  he  continued  to  hold  bv  re-election.  In 
May  1594  he  was  again  elected  moderator  of  the 
Assembly.  Shortly  after,  ho  appeared  on  behalf 
of  the  church  before  the  lonls  of  the  articles,  and 
urged  the  forfeiture  of  the  po])ish  lords,  and  along 
with  his  nephew  and  two  other  ministers,  he  ac- 
companied the  kin«r,  at  his  express  request,  on  his 


II 


\ 


1 


1 

\ 


1  1 


MELVnXE, 


143 


ANDBEW. 


i 


ezpedilioo  iigaiost  them.    In  tlie  following  year, 
when  it  was  proposed  to  recall  the  popish  nobles 
fhmi  exile,  he  went  with  some  other  ministers  to 
the  eoorention  of  estates  at  St.  Andrews,  to  re- 
monstrate agjdnst  the  design,  but  was  ordered  by 
the  Idng  to  withdraw,  which  he  did,  after  a  most 
resolnte  reply.    The  commission  of  the  Assembly 
baring  met  at  Cupnr  in  Fife,  they  sent  Melville 
and  some  other  members  to  expostulate  with  the 
lung.    Being   admitted   to  a  private   andicnce, 
James  Melville  began  to  address  his  majesty  with 
great  mildness  and  respect ;  but  the  king  bccom- 
hig  impatient,  charged  them  with  sedition,   on 
which  Andrew  took  him  by  the  sleeve,  and  calling 
him  *'  God's  silly  vassal,''  said,  ''  Tliis  is  not  a 
time  to  flatter,  bnt  to  speak  plainly,  for  our  com- 
mission is  iW>m  the  living  God,  to^vhom  the  king 
is  subject.    We  will  always  humbly  reverence 
year  majesty  in  public,  bnt  having  opportunity  of 
bdng  with  your  majesty  in  private,  wc  must  dis- 
charge onr  dnty,  or  else  be  enemies  to  Clirist : 
And  now,  Shre,  I  must  tell  yon  that  there  are  two 
khigdoms — the  kingdom  of  Christ,  whicli  is  the 
church,  whose  subject  King  James  VI.  is,  and  of 
whose  kingdom  he  is  not  a  head,  nor  a  lord,  but  a 
member;  and  they  whom  Clirist  hath  called,  and 
eommaoded  to  watch  over  his  church,  and  govern 
his  spiritual  kingdom,  have  snfficient  power  and 
aotbority  from  him  so  to  do,  which  no  Cliristian 
king  nor  prince  should  control  or  discharge,  but 
A8»ist  and  support,  otherwise  they  are  not  faithful 
subjects  to  Christ."    Tlie  king  listened  patiently 
to  this  bold  admonition,  and  dismissed  tlicm  with 
many  fair  promises  which  ho  never  intended  to 
fnlftl.    For  several  years  following  King  James 
mide  repeated  attempts  to  control  the  church,  nc- 
cording  to  liis  own  arbitraiy  notions,  but  he  inva- 
riibly  encountered  a  strenuous  opponent  in  An- 
drew Melville ;  and  he  had  recourse  at  last  to  one 
ef  those  stratagems  wliich  he  thought  the  very 
essence  of  **  king-craft,"  to  secure  tlic  removal  of 
this  champion  of  presbjterianism  from  Scotland 
altogether.    In  May  1606,  Melville,  with  his  ne- 
phew, and  six  of  their  brethren,  were  called  to 
Undon  by  a  letter  from  the  king,  on  the  specious 
pretext  that  his  majesty  wished  to  consult  them 
18  to  the  affairs  of  the  church.    Soon  after  their 
arrival  they  attended  the  famous  conference  held 


September  23,  in  presence  of  the  kmg  at  Hamp- 
ton Court,  at  which  Melville  spoke  at  great  lengtli, 
and  with  a  boldness  which  astonished  the  English 
nobility  and  clergy.  On  St  Michael's  day,  Mel- 
ville and  his  brethren  were  commanded  to  attend 
the  royal  chapel,  when,  scandalized  at  the  popish 
character  of  the  service,  on  his  return  to  his  lodg- 
ing he  vented  his  indignation  in  a  Latin  epigram,* 
for  which,  a  copy  having  been  conveyed  to  the 
'king,  he  was  brought  before  the  council  at  White- 
hall. Being  by  them  found  guilty  of  ^*  scandalnm 
magnatnm,"  he  was  committed  first  to  the  custody 
of  the  dean  of  St.  Paul's,  and  afterwards  to  the 
charge  of  the  bishop  of  Winchester;  but  was  ulti- 
mately sent  to  the  Tower,  wlicro  he  remained  a 
prisoner  for  fonr  years. 

At  first  he  was  treated  with  the  ntmost  rigour, 
and  denied  even  the  use  of  pen,  ink,  and  paper ; 
but  his  spirit  remained  unsubdued,  and  he  be- 
guiled his  solitary  hours  by  composing  Latin  ver- 
ses, which,  with  the  tongue  of  his  shoe  buckle,  he 
engraved  on  his  prison  walls.  By  the  interfterence 
of  some  friends  at  court,  his  confinement  was,  af- 
ter the  lapse  of  nearly  ten  months,  rendered  less 
severe.  About  the  end  of  1607  the  ))rotestants  of 
Rochelle  endeavoured  to  obtain  his  sen*ices  as 
professor  of  divinity  in  their  college,  but^the  king 
wonld  not  consent  to  his  liberation.  At  length, 
in  February  1611,  at  the  intercession  of  the  duke 
of  Bouillon,  he  was  released  from  confinement,  on 
condition  of  his  becoming  professor  of  theology  in 
the  protcstant  univei*sity  of  Sedan,  in  France, 
where  he  spent  the  remainder  of  his  life,  and  died 
there  in  1622,  at  the  advanced  age  of  77. 

•  Tlic  following  Is  the  epigram : 

Ciir  btnnt  clntisi  AnglU  libri  duo  ro^in  in  nra^ 

Lumina  caeca  dno,  pollubra  sicca  dao? 
Num  sensuni  cultiunqne  Dei  tenet  Anglia  clanmm, 

Lnmine  ca?cn  suo,  sorde  sepnltn  raa? 
Romnno  nn  rltu,  dum  regalein  instrnit  aram, 

Piirpuream  pingit  religiosa  Inpam  ? 

Thus  rendered  in  an  old  translation : 

Why  stand  there  on  tbe  altnr  high 
Two  closed  books,  blind  lights,  two  basins  dry? 
Doth  England  hold  God*s  mind  ond  worahip  close. 
Blind  of  lier  sight,  and  buried  in  her  dross? 
Doth  she,  with  chapel  put  in  Romish  dress, 
The  purple  whore  religiously  express? 

And  fur  this  Melville  was  sent  to  the  Tower ! 


II 


■  I 


:l 


I 


MELVILLK, 


144 


JAMES. 


His  biogi'ApluT,  Dr.  M*Crie,  says  that  Andrew 
lilelvillo  "was  the  first  Scotsinnii  who  added  a 
taste  for  elegant  literature  to  an  extensive  ac- 
quaintance with  theology."  Although  he  sustain- 
ed a  conspicuous  part  in  all  the  important  public 
transactions  of  his  time,  he  neither  was  nor  af- 
fected to  be  the  lQA<ler  of  a  party.  In  private  he 
was  an  agreeable  companion,  remarkable  for  his 
cheerruluess  and  kindliness  of  disposition.  He 
was  never  married.  Beyond  the  statement  that 
he  was  of  low  stature  there  is  no  description  of  his 
pei-sonal  appearance  extant,  nor  is  there  any 
known  portrait  of  him. 

The  greater  part  of  his  writings  consists  of  Lat- 
in poems.  Dr.  M'Crie,  whose  Life  of  Andrew 
Melville  was  published  in  1821,  in  2  vols.  8vo,  has 
given  the  names  of  all  his  works,  printed  and  left 
in  manuscript,  and  there  is  none  of  any  great  ex- 
tent among  them.  The  subjoined  list  has  been 
made  up  from  his  account. 

Cannon  Mosls, — Andrea  Molvino  5H*<itn  Awtorc.  Basil- 
eir.  1573,  Svo.  'Dii.*,  liis  earliest  puMic.ition,  ^n>i5ted  of 
a  ]>octical  p.iraplirose  of  the  Sung  of  Mosca,  nnd  a  chapter  of 
tlie  Book  of  Job,  with  .several  sm.iU  poems,  nil  in  Ijatiii. 

STK*ANI5K10N.  Ad  ScotisD  Rogem,  habitnm  in  Coro- 
nationc  Kegina*.    Edinbrrgi,  lo90.    4to. 

Cannina  ex  DoctiMiinis  Poctia  Selocta,  inter  quos,  ipur- 
dtim  Ceo.  Buchanam  et  And.  Mehuni insenoitiir.  l.'iOO.  8vo. 

PrincipisSroti-Britannorvni  Natalia.  Kdinbvrgi.  loM.  4to. 

TliofiM  Tl>e<»log"u'a.' do  libero  arbitriu.  Kdiiiburgi,  1 '>1>7.  4to. 
Tbcitp,  Dr.  M'Cric  thinks,  miglit  be  the  Thc$€S  of  some  of  his 
indents. 

Schola^tica  Diatriba  du  Kebv8  Divinis  ad  Anquin^ndain  et 
inveniendani  veritatem,  a  candidatis  8.  Theol.  liabenda  (Deo 
voleiite)  ad  d.  xxvi.  I't  xxvii.  .Tidij  in  Sch<>li:i  Theolr»gicis 
Acad.  Andreana?,  Spirit u  Sancto  Praside.  D.  And.  Melvino 
S.  Tl:tH>1.  D.  et  iHi>-s  facul talis  Decano  ^vXfrr.wt*  inoderante. 
Kdinbvrgi,  Excudebat  Robert :is  Waldegrauc  Tvpograplnis 
PiCgiiis  1 J99.     Iti^.  pp.  10. 

(latlu'ln.",  bCii  Frapneiitnin  do  orijlno  Cientin  Sw)toriini. 
This  pfK-ni  was  fir^t  ])rinted  along  with  ••Tni  stoni  Inscriptio- 
iics  Ili^torica*  Rfguni  Scotoruin.'    Anl^tel.  1(502. 

Pro  .supplici  Evangelicoruni  Ministrorum  in  Aiiglia — A]>o- 
lugia,  t»ivc  Anti-Taini-Caini-Categoria.  IGOl.  A  petition 
had  been  prcsontal  to  the  king  bv  the  Engli:ih  Puritan?, 
connnonlv  calle<1,  from  the  umnbcr  of  names  attached  to  it, 
tjjc  miiitnary  ]ttfitiont  for  redress  of  their  grit-vaiice?,  whicli 
was  oppi>scd  by  the  nniversities  of  Canibridge  and  Oxfi)rJ. 
TIil?>  ."atirical  jxH'ai,  .ittacking  the  resolutions  of  the  universi- 
ties, was  written  by  Melville,  in  defence  of  the  (ictitioners,  and 
ciivulated  extensively  in  Eiigland. 

Sflcct  P^^ahn»  turned  into  Latin  verse,  and  printed  (pro- 
bal.lv  at  I^mdon  while  he  was  in  the  Tower)  in  1C09. 

Kescimus  Qvid  Vesper  Scrvs  Vehat.  Satyr.i  Mcnippxa 
Vinciiitii  Lilicrii  Holl.indii.  1G19.  4to.  Another  edition 
1G20.     Ascribed  to  Melville. 

Viri  Clarissiini  A.  ^lelvini  M\'sa*  et  P.  Adanisoni  Vita  et 
Pdliuodia  et  OIhd  oommiHionis — dcscriptio.    1620,  4to,  pp. 


07.  John  Adamaon,  aflerwards  prindpal  of  the  college  of 
Edinburgh,  was  einplmed  in  collecting  Helnlle's  fiigitire 
poems,  but  it  is  uncert;iin  whether  he  or  Caldenrood  was  tlie 
publisher  of  the  3fuMt.  Melville  himself  was  not  oomflltcd 
in  the  publication  of  them,  nor  was  he,  kitb  Dr.  M'Crie,  the 
ttutlior,  as  has  often  been  InaccnrateW  stated,  of  the  tracts 
added  to  them. 

Do  Adiaphoris.  Scoti  t«v  T0;^«i>Ttr  AphoriainL  Anno 
Domini  1G22.     12ino,  pp.  20. 

Andreni  Melvini  Scotia  TopogrnphuL  This  poem  is  pre- 
fixed to  the  Theatrwa  Scotite  in  liUau*9  Atiat. 

Melville  contributed  loxgelj  to  a  collection  of  poems,  bj 
Scotchmen  and  Zealanders,  *  In  Obitvm  Jofaannis  WaUasii 
Scoto  Belgflp.  Lndg.  Batar.  1G03.'  4to.  Tliere  are  two 
poems  by  him  in  John  Johnston's  *  Sidera  Veteris  J^ti,'  p. 
33.  Salmurii,  IGU.  He  has  also  rersea  prefixed  to  *  Com- 
ment, in  A  post.  Acta  )f.  Joannis  Malcohni  Scoti. — Middlch.' 
1615. 

Among  his  works  in  MS.  Dr.  M'Crie  enmnemteii  the  fid- 
lowing: 

D.  Andrea*  Melvini  epi»to!ip  Ix>ndino  e  turn  carceris  ad 
Jacobuni  Alelviimm  Nouocastri  exuluntem  scripts,  cnm  ejns- 
dem  Jacobi  nonnoUis  ad  cundem.  Annia  snpm  millestmfl  sex- 
centestfimo  octavo,  nono,  deciino,  nndecimo.  Item  Ecclesis 
Scoticann*  Oratio  Apologetica  ad  Regem  An.  1610,  mense 
Aprilis.  This  vulunic  is  in  the  librarr  of  the  nnirenity  of 
Edinburgh.  It  brings  down  the  correspondence  between 
Mflville  and  his  nephew,  Mr.  James  Melville,  till  the  end  of 
the  vear  1G13. 

m 

Six  I.etters  from  Andi-ew  Melville  to  Robert  Diiry  at  Lcy- 
den.    In  Rib).  Jurid.    Edin.  M.  6.  9.  nnm.  42. 

Flon-tnm  Archiepiscopale ;  id  est,  errores  Pontlficli,  as- 
sertiones  temerari:p,  et  hyperbolical  intcrprvtatbnes.  lUd. 
num.  47.  Tliey  arc  extracted  from  Archbishop  Adamson's 
academical  prelections  at  St.  Andrews,  in  Melville's  liand- 
writing,  and  subscribed  by  him. 

Paniphm.sis  £pi;<ti>la>  ad  Hebra'os  Andresc  Blelvini  (Harl. 
)!SS.  num.  G947-9'^:  a  metrical  paraphrase  of  the  epistle  to 
the  Hebrews. 

A.  Melvinus  in  cap.  4  Danielis.  In  Ribl.  Col.  S.  Trinit. 
Dublin. 

There  arc  verses  by  him,  in  his  own  handwriUng,  among 
tlie  Sempill  papers,  and  in  a  collection  of  letters  from  Ijeam- 
cd  Men  to  James  VI.  His  biographer  says  that  copies  of 
Melville's  largo  *  Answer  to  Downham*s  Sermon*  were  at  one 
time  not  uncomnion.  Four  letters  from  Melville  to  David 
Hume  of  Ci«Hlscn>ft  arc  prefi-xed  to  the  '  Lusua  Poetlci*  of  the 
latter. 

Tlio  manuscript  of  *  Coinmcntarius  in  Divinam  Panli  Epis- 
tolani  ad  Romanos,  auctoro  Andrea  Mel  vino  Scoto,*  in  posses- 
sion of  Mr.  David  Laing,  Librarian  to  the  Writers  to  the 
Signet,  was  published  for  the  lirsl  time,  with  an  EngKvli 
tranhlation,  in  one  of  tiiO  volumes  ixyued  by  the  Wodrow 
Sociefy,  under  the  editorial  rare  of  the  Rev.  David  Dickson, 
D.D.,  minister  of  St.  Cuthliert's,  Edinbnrgh. 

MELVILLK,  Jamks,  an  eminent  divine  and 
scholar,  nephew  of  the  preceding,  was  the  son  of 
Richard  Melville  of  Baldovy,  minister  of  Mary- 
ton,  Forfarshire,  by  his  sponse,  Tsalwl  Scrimgeonr, 
and  was  bom  July  25,  ir>riG.  After  receiving  his 
school  education  at  Logic  and  Montrose,  he  was, 
in  November  1571,  sent  to  St.  I^onard*8  college, 


:i 


J 


MELVILLE, 


14G 


JAMES. 


I     I 


ii 


prcsbytcriaii  cbiiix'Ii,  aud  exliortcil  the  61*61111*00 
to  cut  ofT  so  corrnpt  a  member  from  among  them. 
The  archbishop  was  in  consequence  excommuni- 
cated, but  he  retaliated  by  excommunicating  botli 
Andrew  and  James  Alelville,  and  other  obnoxious 
ministers,  in  return.  For  their  share  in  this 
trniisaction,  uiiclc  and  nephew  were  summoned 
before  the  king,  who  commanded  the  funner  to 
confine  himself  beyond  the  Tay,  and  the  latter  to 
remain  within  his  college. 

In  July  1586,  James  Melville  became,  at  the 
solicitation  of  the  people,  minister  of  Anstruthcr, 
to  which  were  conjoined  the  adjoining  parishes  of 
Pittenwcem,  Abcrcrombie,  and  Kilreniiy.  Hav- 
ing some  time  after  succeeded  in  procuring  a  dis- 
junction of  these  panshes,  and  pi-ovlded  a  minister 
for  each  of  them,  he  undertook  the  charge  of  Kii- 
rcniiy  alone,  where,  besides  building  a  manse,  he 
purchased  the  right  to  the  vicarage  and  tithe-fish, 
fur  the  support  of  himself  and  his  successors,  and 
paid  the  salary  of  a  schoolmaster.  He  likewise 
maintained  an  assistant  to  perform  the  duties  of 
the  parish,  as  he  was  frequently  engaged  in  the 
public  nffaire  of  the  church.  Some  years  after- 
wards he  printed  for  the  use  of  his  jwople  a  cate- 
chism, which  cost  him  five  hundred  inerks. 

In  1588  lie  was  the  means  of  affoixling  shelter 
and  relief  to  a  number  of  distressed  Spaniards  wlio 
had  belonged  to  the  Armada  destined  for  the  in- 
vasion of  England,  but  whose  division  of  tiie 
sqiindron,  after  being  driven  to  the  northward, 
had  been  wi*ecked  on  the  Fair  Isle,  whei*e  thoy 
had  sutTered  the  extremities  of  hunger  and  fatigue, 
and  had  at  last  taken  refuge  oft*  the  harbour  of 
Anstruther 

At  the  opening  of  the  General  Assembly  at 
Edinburgh,  in  August  1590,  he  preached  a  sermon 
from  1  Tliess.  v.  12,  13.  in  which,  after  insisting 
on  the  necessity  of  maintaining  the  strictest  disci- 
pline, ho  exhorted  his  hearers  to  a  more  zealous 
support  of  the  presbyteiian  establishment,  and  re- 
commended a  supplication  to  the  king  for  a  full 
and  free  assembly. 

In  the  spring  of  1694  he  was  unjustly  suspected 
at  court  of  having  furnished  the  turbulent  earl  of 
Bothwell  with  money  collected  for  the  pi-otestants 
of  Geneva,  and  at  the  meeting  of  the  Assembly  in 
May  of  that  year,  some  of  the  brethren  thought  that 


as  he  was  a  suspected  person  he  should  not  be  scut 
as  one  of  the  commissioners  from  the  church  to  the 
king  as  usual ;  on  which  he  stood  up  and  Mid  thtt 
he  had  often  been  employed  on  commissiotiB  iigiiinBt 
his  will,  but  now,  even  for  the  reason  alleged,vlie 
would  request  it  as  a  benefit  from  the  brethren 
that  his  name  should  be  on  the  list,  that  he  might 
have  an  opportunity  of  clearing  himself,  and  If 
they  declined  sending  him,  he  was  determined  to 
go  to  court  himself,  to  sec  if  any  one  had  aught  to 
say  against  him.  He  was  accordingly  Included 
among  the  coniniissionei's.  On  their  arrival  at 
Stirling,  where  the  king  was,  they  were  most  gra« 
ciously  received.  After  they  had  executed  theur 
business  with  the  king,  James  Melville  8tep|)cd 
forward  and  requested  to  be  informed  if  his  ma* 
jesty  had  anything  to  lay  to  his  charge?  The 
king  replied  that  he  had  nothing  to  say  against 
him  more  than  against  the  rest,  except  that  he 
found  his  name  on  every  commission.  lie  an- 
swered that  he  thanked  God  that  this  was  the 
case,  for  therein  he  was  serving  God,  his  kirk,  and 
the  king  publicly,  and  as  for  any  private,  unlaw- 
ful, or  uiidutiful  practice,  if  there  were  any  that 
had  traduced  him  to  his  majesty  as  being  guilty  ol 
such,  he  reciuested  that  they  should  bo  made  to 
show  their  faces  when  he  was  there  to  answer  for 
himself.  But  no  reply  was  made.  After  this  the 
king  took  him  into  his  cabinet,  and  having  dis- 
missed his  attendants,  conversed  with  him  alone 
on  a  variety  of  topics  with  the  greatest  affability 
and  familiarity.  He  sent  his  special  commenda- 
tions to  his  uncle,  ^Ir.  Andrew  Melville,  and  de- 
clared that  he  looked  n]X)n  both  of  them  as  fiiitli- 
ful  and  trusty  subjects.  **  So,"  says  James  Mel- 
ville, *•  of  the  strange  working  of  God,  I  that  came 
to  Stirling  the  traitor,  returned  to  Edinburgh  a 
great  courtier,  yea,  «  c^abinet  councillor."  (Jbimy^ 
p.  212.) 

AVith  his  uncle  and  two  other  ministers  he  ac- 
companied the  king,  in  October  1594,  in  his  expe- 
dition to  the  north,  against  the  popish  lords,  and 
when  the  royal  forees  were  about  to  disperse,  for 
want  of  pay,  James  Melville  was  sent  to  Edin- 
burgh and  other  principal  towns,  with  letters  from 
the  king  and  the  ministers,  to  raise  contributions  for 
then*  aid.  In  this  service  be  was  snocesafnL  For 
ten  years  subsequently,  the  life  of  James  Melville 


L 


MELVILLK. 


U7 


llOBERT. 


li 


I 

'I 


wad  principally  distinguished  by  I1I3  zealous  aud 
unwearied  opposition  to  the  desigus  of  the  court 
for  the  re-establishment  of  episcopacy,  which  he 
earijiiad  the  discernment  to  detect. 

He  went  with  bis  nncle  to  Loudon  in  Scptcuibcr 
1606,  when,  with  six  other  ministei-s,  they  wci*c 
mrited  thither  to  confer  with  the  king,  as  was  the 
pfetext,  as  to  the  measores  best  calculated  to  pro- 
note  the  tranquillity  of  the  church.  After  the 
eommittal  of  Andrew  Melville  to  the  tower,  (sec 
page  I209)  James  was  ordered  to  leave  London 
in  six  days  and  confine  himself  to  Newcastle- 
opon-Tyne,  and  ten  miles  round  it.  PrcYious  to 
his  departure  he  made  an  unsuccessful  attempt  to 
obtain  some  relaxation  of  his  uncle's  confinement. 
He  kft  London  2d  July  1607,  aud  went  by  sea  to 
Newcastle,  and  daring  his  resideuce  in  that  town 
sereral  attempts  were  made  to  gain  him  over  to 
the  support  of  the  kiug*s  views ;  but  neither  pro- 
mises nor  threats  could  shake  his  attachment  to 
presbjrterianism.  lie  even  rejected  a  bishopric, 
which  was  offered  to  him  by  Sii'  William,  or,  as 
Dr.  M^Crie  calls  him.  Sir  John  Anstruther,  in  the 
name  of  the  king.  Having  been  a  widower  for 
ibont  two  years,  he  took  for  his  second  wife, 
while  in  exile  at  Newcastle,  the  daughter  of  the 
vicar  of  Berwick.  lie  was  afterwards  ordered  to 
ranoTe  to  Carlisle,  and  subsequently  to  Berwick, 
where  he  wrote  his  *Apolog}'  for  the  Chui-ch  of 
Scotland/  which  was  not  published  till  thirty- one 
rears  after  his  death,  under  the  title  of  *•  Ecclcsia; 
ScoticansB  libelliis  snpplex  Apologeticus.* 

Althoogh  many  efforts  were  made  for  his  re- 
lease, it  was  not  till  1614  that  he  obtained  leave 
to  retnm  to  Scotland,  but  he  had  not  proceeded 
far  on  liis  way  home  when  he  was  taken  suddenly 
ill,  aud  ho  was  with  difficulty  convoyed  back  to 
Berwick,  where  he  died  the  same  year. 

His  works,  a  list  of  which  is  given  in  one  of  the 
notes  to  Dr.  M^Crie*s  Life  of  Andrew  Melville, 
may  be  mentioned  as  follows : 

In  159S,  as  he  mjn  faitnaelf,  he  "  first  put  in  priut  sum  of 
lus  poesie ;  to  wit,  the  Description  of  the  SpainjArts  Nata- 
nD,  oQt  of  Julius  Scaliger,  with  sum  Exbortationes  for  warn- 
Bg  of  Idrk  and  coontrej.** 

His  Catechism  was  published  under  the  title  of  "  A  Spii^ 
itndl  Propine  of  a  Pastour  to  his  People.  Heb.  5.  12.**  Ed- 
iabor^  1598,  4to.    Pp.  127. 

A  Poem,  called  'The  Black  Bastill,  or  a  lamentation  of 
the  Kifk  of  Scotland,  compiled  by  Mr.  James  Melville,  some- 


time minister  at  Anstmtiicr,  and  now  confyncd  in  England,' 
wns  printed  in  1611. 

EcclesiK  ScoticanoB  libellus  snpplex  an'sX^ynrtHss  »au 
iXt^ocrtifs  Auctore  Jocubo  Melrino  Verbi  Dei  Ministix),  Do- 
mini Andreas  Melvini  r«v  iravv  nepote.     Londini,  1G45,  8ro. 

His  *  Diarj,'  printed  for  the  Bannstjne  Club  in  1829,  one 
vol.  4to,  contains  much  curious  informstion  relative  to  tlie 
ecclesiastical  and  literary  history  of  Scotland  between  tbe 
years  1555  and  1600.  The  l\S.  is  preserved  in  the  Advo- 
cates* library.  New  and  improved  edition,  published  by  the 
Wodrow  Society,  with  Supplement,  &c 

A  MS.  volume  in  the  Advocates*  library,  deposited  by  the 
Kev.  William  Blackie,  minister  of  Yetholm,  contains  poems 
in  the  Sootlish  language  by  James  Melville,  in  the  handwrit- 
ing of  tlie  autlior.  They  appear,  says  Dr.  M'Crie,  to  have 
been  all  written  during  his  banishment.  The  greater  part  of 
them  are  expressive  of  his  feelings  on  the  overthrow  of  the 
liberties  of  the  dmrch  of  Scotland,  and  the  hnprisonment  and 
banishment  of  his  uncle. 

Dr.  M'Crie  thinks  that  another  MS.  in  the  same  Iibrar>', 
entitled  *  History  of  the  Declining  Age  of  the  Church  of 
Scotland,*  bringing  down  the  history  of  that  period  till  1610, 
was  also  composed  by  James  Melville. 

The  letters  which  passed  between  Andrew  Melville  and  his 
nephew,  from  1608  to  1613,  as  stated  in  the  account  of  the 
MSS.  nf  the  former,  are  preserved  in  the  Library  of  the  Col- 
lege of  Edinburgh. 

MELVILLE,  RoBEnT,  an  eminent  militar/ 
officer  and  antiquarian,  was  the  son  of  the  mini- 
ster of  the  parish  of  Monimail,  Fifeshire,  where  he 
was  bom  October  12,  1728.  In  1744  he  entered 
the  armj,  and  served  in  Flanders  till  the  peace  of 
Aix-la-Chapelle,  in  1748.  Li  1756  he  obtained 
the  rank  of  major  in  the  38th  regiment,  then  in 
Antigua,  and  soon  after  he  was  employed  in  ac- 
tive seiTiec,  particularly  in  the  invasion  of  Gua- 
daloupe,  for  which  ho  was  created  lieutenant- 
colonel  ;  and  in  1760  was  appointed  governor  of 
that  i:(land.  Shortly  after,  he  proceeded  as  sec- 
ond in  command  with  Lord  RoUo  to  the  capture 
of  Dominica.  In  1762  he  contributed  much  to 
the  taking  of  Martiuico,  which  was  followed  by 
the  sun'cnder  of  the  other  French  islands;  and 
Colonel  Melville,  now  promoted  to  the  rank  of 
brigadier-general,  was  made  govemor-in-chief  of 
all  the  captured  possessions  in  the  West  Indies. 
After  the  general  peace  he  travelled  over  Europe, 
and  made  numerous  observations  to  ascertain  the 
passage  of  Hannibal  over  the  Alps.  He  also 
traced  the  sites  of  many  Roman  camps  in  Britain, 
and  applied  his  antiquarian  knowledge  to  the  im- 
provement of  the  modem  art  of  war  in  several  in- 
ventions. He  was  a  fellow  of  the  royal  and  anti- 
quarian societies,  and  had  the  degree  of  LL.D. 
conferred  on  him  by  the  university  of  Edinburgh. 


Il-  - 


MENTEITII, 


U8 


NINTH  EARL  OF. 


A  treatise  of  his,  *  On  nn  Ancient  Sword/  is  in- 
serted iu  tlic  7tli  volume  of  the  Archaeologia.  In 
1 798  he  was  nppoiuteil  a  full  general,  and  died, 
unmarried,  iu  1809. 

Mkntkitii,  tlio  proper  spelling  of  whicli  is  MsimTrii,  a 
local  sumnine,  dcriveil  from  tlio  district  of  Monteitli,  in  the 
Kouth-wcst  of  Pertlwhire,  through  which  tiie  river  Teitli  nins, 
and  is  coinponiided  ofmcWj  a  vuUey,  and  Tcith. 


MKNTEirifi  earl  of,  a  title  of  verj  ancient  date  in  Scotland. 
Murdoch,  the  first  recorded  earl  of  Menteith,  is  mentioned  in 
the  chartularj  of  Dnnfennline,  in  the  beginning  of  the  reign 
of  David  I.,  who  ascended  the  throne  in  1124.    Gilclirist, 
second  earl  of  Menteith,  mentioned  in  a  charter  of  donation 
to  the  monastery  of  Scone  by  Malcolm  IV.,  was  witness  to 
Kcvcral  charters  of  Willi.nm  the  T.Ion.     His  successor,  ^lanri- 
tins,  third  carl,  vicecomcs  of  Stirling,  lived  in  the  end  of  the 
R-ign  of  the  latter  monarch  and  beginning  of  the  reign  of 
Alexander  II.     He  had  two  daughters,  but  their  names  have 
iiot  been  transmitted.    The  elder  married,  before  3d  Febru- 
ary, 1231,  Walter  Comyn,  second  son  of  William,  earl  of 
nuchan  (see  vol.  L  p.  453).      In  his  wife's  riglit,  ho  became 
funrth  carl  of  Menteith.     He  first  appeared,  with  his  fathcr 
and  other  nobles,  nt  the  marn.-i.<;e  of  the  princess  Joan  of 
England  to  Alexander  If.  at  Yoik  iu  1221,  and  in  1230  he 
acquired  from  that  monarch  a  grant  of  the  extensive  district 
uf  I*adcnoch,  in  Inverness-shire,  then  in  tlic  crown  (see  vol. 
i.  p.  223).     He  was  one  of  the  Scots  nobles  who  swore  to 
maintain  the  agreement  betwixt  his  own  sovereign  and  Hen- 
17  III.  at  York  in  September  1237.     On  the  death  of  his 
father  he  became  the  most  influential  man  in  Scotland,  and 
acted  a  conspicuous  part  in  the  early  part  of  the  reign  of  Al- 
exander III.  (see  vol.  i.  p.  79),  l>eing  at  the  head  of  the  na- 
tional party,  in  opposition  to  the  Eoglish  faction.     He  was 
one  of  the  regents  of  the  kingdom  at  the  time  of  liis  death  iu 
1 238.     His  only  child,  a  daughter,  m.trried  his  grand-nephew, 
Wi'iiiam  Comyn.     His  widow  married  Sir  John  Russell,  an 
English  knight,  and  they  were  both  imprisoned  on  suspicion 
of  having  poisoned  her  first  husband  (see  vol.  i.  p.  8G),  but 
afterwards  allowed  to  le.ive  the  kingdom. 

Walter  Stewart,  called  Dcuiloch^  or  the  frecklctl,  third  son 
of  the  third  high  stewiuxl  of  Scotland,  having  m:uTied  the 
countess*  younger  sister,  laid  claim  to  the  earldom  in  right  of 
his  wife,  and  by  favour  of  the  Estates  of  the  realm,  obtained 
it  in  1258,  and  kept  it.     He  diiftlnguished  himself  at  tlie 
battle  of  I^irgs  in  1263,  under  his  brother  Alexander,  the 
high  steward.      He  witnessed    the    marriage    contract   of 
the  princess  Margaret  with  Eric,  king  of  Norway,  in  1281, 
and,  with  his  countess,  accompanied  her  to  her  husband's 
kingdom.     He  was  one  of  the  nobles  who,  in  the  parliament 
of  Scone,   Feb.   5,   1283-4,    swore  to    acknowledge    ilar- 
garet,  the  Maiden  of  Norway,  as  their  sox'ereign,  in  the 
event  of  the  death  of  Alexander  III.     He  w;is  also  one  of 
the  assembly  at  Brighara  in  March  12G0,  where  the  mar- 
riage of  Queen  ^largaret  to  Prince  Edward  of  England  was 
agreed  upon.    In  1292  he  w.is  one  of  the  nominees  on  the 
part  of  Ilmce,  the  competitor  for  the  Scottish  crown.     He 
sworo  fealty  to  Edward  I.,  13th  Juno  that  year,  and  was 
present  when  Baliol  did  liomage  to  Edward,  20th  Kor.  fol- 
lowing.   He  was  summoned  to  attend  the  English  king  into 
France,  Sept.  1,  1294,  and  died  soon  after.     He  had  2  sons, 
who  assumed  the  name  of  Menteith,  although  they  ret;uned 
the  Stewart  anns;  Alexander,  Cth  carl,  and  Sir  John  de 
Menteith  of  Ruskie,  whose  name  appears  in  history  as  the  ( 


llttnijer  of  Sir  William  Wallace.    He  altered  the  Stewart 
Jute  into  a  bend,  and  the  colours  to  table  and  aryeiiL 

On  9tli  August,  1297,  Sir  John  Menteith  was  leleaaed 
from  an  English  prison,  on  condition  of  aerring  with  tlieEng^ 
lish  against  the  Firench.    In  1805  he  was,  bj  King  Edvanl, 
appointed  keeper  of  Dumbarton  castle,  and,  the  same  year, 
according  to  tradition,  he  treacherously  delivered  over  the 
heroic  Wallace  into  the  hands  of  the  KngliJi.     From  this 
charge,  howe\'er,  he  has  been  vindicated  by  Ijotd  Hailcs.    Ho 
held  the  cistle  of  Dumbarton  for  the  English  till  1809,  and 
is  said,  but  upon  very  doubtful  authority,  to  hare  fooglit 
valiantly  at  the  battle  of  Dannockbnm  on  the  side  of  Bruce, 
notwithstanding  that  Edward  II.  had  caused  his  banner  to  be 
displayed  in  the  English  army.    {Foi-dun^  b.  ii.  p.  2-13.)    He 
was  etutot  comitatut  of  Menteith  in  1820,  when  he  signed 
the  famous  letter  of  the  Scots  nobles  to  the  Pope,  .nsserting 
the  independence  of  Scothuid.    In  June  1323,  he  was  one  of 
the  commissioners  and  consen'ators  of  the  treaty  of  Berwick, 
and  dii-d  soon  after.     He  had  three  sons  and  three  danditen. 
one  of  whom,  Joanna,  married  Malise,  eurl  of  Strathearu; 
another  became  the  wife  of  Sur  Archibald  Campbell  of  Ix>ch- 
ow,  and  a  third  was  the  wife  of  Maurice  Buchanan  of  Bn- 
clianau.      His  eldest  son.  Sir  Waiter  Menteith,  was  killed 
in  one  of  the  feuds  of  tlie  pcrioil,  by  John  and  Maurice  Drum- 
mond,  and  his  eldest  son.  Sir  Alexander  Menteith  of  Ruskie, 
was  father  of  Sir  Robert  Menteith  of  Ruskie,  who  married,  in 
1392,  I-ndy  Margaret  Lennox,  a  younger  daughter  of  Dun- 
can, eighth  earl  of  I/ennox  (see  vol.  ii.  pp.  630,  631). 

Sir  John  >Ientcith  of  Arran,  2d  son  of  Sir  John  Menteith, 
the  supposed  betrayer  of  Wallace,  married  the  Lady  Eh*ne, 
daughter  of  Gratney,  seventh  earl  of  Mar  (see  p.  108  of  this 
voluiuf),  and  through  his  gnmddaughter,  the  wife  of  Sir 
Thomas  Erskine,  the  earidom  of  M:u-  ultimately  came  into 
the  Ei*bkine  family  (sec  p.  110). 

Alexander,  Cth  earl  of  .Menteith,  elder  sou  of  W:dter  Stew- 
art, DaiUocft,  was  one  of  the  rtuujnatet  Scotia  who,  in  the  par- 
liament of  Scone,  Fel).  5,  1283-81,  engaged  to  support  the 
succession  of  Margaret  of  Norw.ny  to  the  throne  of  Scotland, 
He  swore  fealty  to  Edward  I.  at  Norham,  June  12, 1292,  .md 
appears  to  have  succeeded  his  father  in  1295.  He  was  one 
of  the  leaders  of  the  Scottish  anny  which  invaded  Cumber- 
land in  March  1290.  Taken  prisoner  by  the  English  at  the 
battle  of  Dunbar,  28th  April  following,  he  was  released  on 
engaging  to  serve  Edward  in  his  foreign  wars.  Ho  died  be- 
fore 1320,  in  which  year  the  earldom  of  Menteith  was  under 
the  charge  of  his  brother,  Sir  John,  during  the  minority  uf 
his  sou,  Alan,  7lli  carl. 

The  latter  joined  Robert  the  Bnicc  when  he  asserted  his 
title  to  the  throne  of  Scotland  in  130C.  TukeA  prisoner  the 
same  year,  he  w:is  forfeited,  and  died  in  England,  leaving  a 
son,  who  died  without  issue,  and  a  daughter,  Mary,  countess 
of  Menteith  in  her  own  right.  The  eighth  carl  of  Menteith, 
Murdoch  by  name,  is  supposed  to  have  been  the  brother  of 
Earl  Alan,  but  this  is  uncertain.  It  would  seem  that,  in 
1330,  ho  made  an  agreement  with  Mary,  daughter  of  Eari 
Alan,  for  the  possession  of  the  earldom.  He  was  killed  19th 
July,  1333,  at  the  battle  of  Holidouhill,  whero  he  was  one  of 
the  commanders  of  the  second  divi>ion  of  the  Scots  armr. 

Mary,  countess  of  Menteitli,  married  Sir  John  Graham, 
who,  iu  her  right,  became  9th  earl  of  Menteith.  He  was  taken 
prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Duriiam,  17th  October,  1346,  and 
having  renounced  the  fealty  which  he  had  formerly  sworn  to 
Edward  III.,  he  was  put  to  death  as  a  traitor  in  Febmaiy 
13  J  7.  By  his  countess  he  had  one  daughter,  Margaret, 
countess  of  Menteith,  who  married  Robert  Stewart,  thiitl  son 
of  Robert  II.,  earl  of  Menteith  in  his  wife*s  riglit^  duke  of 


,'.J*-  •  .4 


".. 


:■«;■ 


<■•  » 


-.  1  \    • 


.  f 


<iy  ■■ 


■■-.->■ 

a 
I 


!  I 
I' 


i; 
( ■ 


i: 


I. 


I 


MENZIKS. 


150 


CLAN  MEXZTES. 


82).  'Ilse  p:irinh  of  AJuTfojIf  in  IVrtlisliIre,  Hub  Hny'ji  coun- 
try, J'.riK-rly  the  iir-perty  uf  the  eaiis  ut"  Mentcilli,  nine 
ti:uK  into  the  poitjiession  of  thu  Montrose  family.  The  enrl*!! 
^lll«•r  xinter,  Manr,  ntrled  I^dy  Marr  Grnh.ini,  inarried,  8lh 
«)it..hrr,  1«G2,  Sir  John  AlUrdicc  of  Allardic*',  briror.et. 
Thri:-  di'scfinditnt,  Jainefl  Allardice  of  Allurdice,  born  'i9lh 
.T:i:!ijry  1727,  murried  !n  1756,  Anne,  daughter  r»f  . Limes 
Hjirrijiy,  banker,  I^ndon,  and  by  her  had  an  only  child,  Sa- 
rali  Anne  AlUrdice,  hU  8«iie  luircss,  who  mrinlt'd  in  1776, 
IloL-rt  iJjirday  of  Urie,  Kinciniiueshire,  and  thoir  son,  Ko- 
boi  I  Hart'Iay  Allardice  uf  Urie,  well  known  in  his  day  as  Cap- 
tain Itarelay,  the  peilentrian,  claimed  the  titles  of  Airth, 
Mriitfith,  and  Strathern,  but  died  in  1855,  when  his  cLiiin 
was  Ijcfure  the  Houm  of  I<«>r.l}'.  lie  left  a  daughter,  who 
married  a  person  of  the  name  uf  Ritchie,  a!id  had  a  son.  (See 
Tol.  i.  p.  241.) 

The  second  earl's  younger  sii>W\\  EiJ7,:il)Cth,  itile  nf  Sir 
William  Graham  of  (Jartinore.  rerlhshin*,  luirfniet,  had  a 
mm.  Sir  John  Gmham,  and  a  d.iuglit*'r.  The  fiirmer  diid 
12lli  July  1708,  without  is.Mio.  The  latter,  by  lu-r  husband, 
Janit's  Hodge  of  Gladsmuir,  advocate,  Iiad  one  daughter, 
^lary  I[o<1ge,  married,  in  her  Itth  year,  to  William  Graham, 
iM);i  of  John  Graham  of  Callingad.  Tlicy  had  a  son,  William 
Graham,  b<;rn  iu  1720,  who  as.sumcd  the  title  of  earl  of  Mra- 
teith,  and  voted  as  such  at  the  general  election  of  the  sixteen 
Sj^ts  representative  peers,  5th  May  1701,  but  his  vote  was 
diitallowed  by  the  house  of  peer*,  2d  March,  1702.  He  died 
without  issue  in  1787. 


The  family  of  Stuart  Mcntcth  of  Ciusebum,  Dumlrios- 
shiro,  an  p.statc  K»liith  they  puriii:i.-ed  from  its  old  po.-^scs- 
h"r.<,  ihi*  Kiikpatricks,  descend  from  .Sir  John  Mcnteth,  tlrrt 
of  lh«!  Meutetlis  of  KarNS,  livin;*  in  t!ic  reijrn  of  David  II., 
Kcomd  sun  of  Sir  W'allcr  Mcnteth  of  Kusky,  sl:iin  by  the 
Diutnmoud.M,  (soc  p  118  of  this  volume").  A  baronetcy  of 
N'iiva  Seut!a  was  conferred  in  18."»S  on  Sir  Charles  Granvillu 
Stu.nrt  Mcnteth  of  Closebum,  who  died  in  December  1847. 
His  eldest  son.  Sir  James  Stuart  Mentelh,  bi»rn  in  1792. 
was  educntod  at  IJuiiby,  and  is  author  of  a  work  on  the  ;:eo- 
l«>j:y  iif  the  Snowdon  ran«jr».  Heir  presumptive, his  nephew. 
.Mcnteth  of  Closebum  claims  to  be  chief  of  the  ancient  house 
of  Montetli,  but  his  right  to  that  distinction  is  disputed  by 
Dalyell  of  Dinnx,  as  descended  from  Magdalen,  elder  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  Thomas  Dalyell,  the  second  baronet  of  that  family. 
This  lady  married,  in  1688,  James  Mentcith  of  Auldcathy, 
heir-malif  and  rrprcsentativc  of  the  earls  of  Meiiteith.  Their 
eldcKt  hon,  James  Menteith,  succeeding  as  the  thiid  baronet 
of  Binns,  as.sumed  ihc  nantc  of  Dalyell,  (sec  vol.  ii.  p.  lo). 


Munzii:j<,  a  surname  ori-^inally  MengUM,  or  Minj:Io.s  (pn)- 
nounced  Mcenics,)  was  one  of  the  fir^t  adopted  in  Scotland, 
al)out  the  time  of  Malcolm  Canmorc.  From  the  annorial 
lK*arings  of  the  Mcnzieses  it  has  been  conjectured  that  the 
first  who  settled  in  Scotland  of  this  surname  was  a  branch  of 
the  Angl«)-Nonnan  family  of  Meyners,  by  corruption  Man- 
ners.    But  this  supposition  does  not  seem  to  be  well-founded. 

The  family  of  Menzies  obtained  a  footing  in  Alhol  at  a 
very  early  period,  as  appears  from  a  charter  granted  by  Robert 
de  Meyners  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  II.  This  Robert  de 
Meyners,  ki.ight,  on  the  accession  of  Alexander  III.  (1249) 
was  appointed  lord  high  chamberlain  of  Scothmd.  His  son, 
Alexander  de  Meynei.«,  i>o<;.sf.ised  the  lands  of  Weem  and 
Abcrfeldy  in  Athol,  and  Gleiidocliart  in  Breadalbane,  bcbides 
his  original  seat  of  Durnsdeer  in  Xithsdale,  and  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  eldest  son,  Robert,  in  tlie  est.ntcs  of  Weem,  Abcr- 


feldy, and  Dnrrisdeer,  whilst  his  second  ion,  Thomas,  obtain- 
ed the  lands  of  FurtiMg:il. 

From  the  fumier  of  theM  is  descended  the  fiimily  of  lleo- 
sies  of  Castle  Meniies  bot  that  of  Menzieti  of  Fortingal  ter- 
minated in  an  liciress,  by  whose  marriage  with  Janrn  Stewart, 
a  natural  son  of  the  Wolf  of  Badenoch,  tlio  property  was 
tninsferred  to  the  Stewarta. 

In  1487,  Sir  RuWrt  de  Mengiie.*.  knight,  obtained  from  the 
crjwn,  in  consequence  uf  the  dcstniction  of  his  mansioo-houae 
by  fire,  a  grant  of  the  w  hole  lands  and  estate  erected  into  a  free 
barony,  under  the  title  of  the  barony  of  ^lenzies.  From  this 
Sir  Robert  lineally  descended  Sir  Alexander  Menxiei  of  Gai- 
tle  Mcuzies,  wlio  was  created  a  baronet  of  Nova  Scotia,  2d 
Septemlwr  1«»65. 

Sir  Roiiert.  Men7.:e%  the  seventh  baronet,  wlio  socoeoded 
his  father  20th  August  1814.  is  the  27th  of  tbe  family  in 
regular  descent;  married,  with  isaae.  Seats:  Ca&lle  Men- 
zif.i.  Ranr.och  I^dge,  and  Fos-i  House,  Perthshire.  The  an- 
ciei.t  de^ignatif»n  of  the  family  was  Menzies  of  Weem,  their 
omimon  ^tyle  in  old  writings.  In  1423  "DaTid  Menziea  of 
Weem  (dti  Wimo)  **  was  appointetl  governor  of  Orkney  and 
Shetland.  **  under  the  most  clement  lord  and  lady,  Krio  and 
riiilippa.  king  and  (jnecn  of  Denmark,  Swcdland,and  Nonray.** 


1'lie  i-laii  .M>.>n7.ic?>.  the  .ladge  of  which  is  a  species  of  heath 
railed  the  Menzies  heath,  like  ihe  Frasers,  the  Stewarts,  and 
til."  Chisli'-hns,  i.s  not  originally  Celtic,  though  long  ostab- 
lished  in  the  Highlands.  The  Gaelic  appellation  of  tbe  dan 
is  ,]felnnarich,  a  tenn,  by  way  of  distinction,  also  applied  to 
the  cliief.  Of  the  eighteen  clans  who  fought  under  Robert 
Tiruci'  at  Bannocklurn,  the  Mcnzieses  were  one. 

The  "Mcsiy esses**  of  Athol  and  Appin  Dull  are  named  in 
the  parliamentary  rolU  of  1587,  as  among  "  tbe  dans  that 
have  cajitain.%  chiefs,  and  chieftains.*"  Castle  Mcnxiea,  the 
principal  modem  seat  of  the  chief,  stands  to  the  east  of  Loch 
Ta y,  in  the  parish  and  near  to  the  dinrdi  of  Weem,  in  Perth- 
shire. Weem  castle,  the  old  mansion,  is  picturesquely  dtuated, 
tmder  a  rock  called  Craig  Uamh,  hence  its  name.  In  1502, 
it  w:ls  Irunit  by  Nicl  Stuart  uf  Furtingal,  in  consequence  of  a 
di>pute  respecting  the  lands  of  Rannoch. 

In  1644,  when  the  marquis  of  Montrose  .ippeared  in  anns 
for  Charles  I.,  and  had  commenced  his  march  from  Athol  to- 
wanls  Strathern,  he  sent  forward  a  trumpeter,  with  a  friend- 
ly notice,  to  the  Mcnzieses,  that  it  w.ns  his  intention  to  pass 
through  their  country.  His  messenger,  unhappily,  w.ns  nud- 
treated,  and  as  f.ovnc  writers  say,  slain  by  them,  llier  also 
harassed  the  rear  of  his  anny,  which  so  exasperated  M<m- 
trosc  that  ho  ordered  his  men  to  plunder  and  l.ny  waste  their 
lands  and  bum  their  houi-e?. 

During  the  rebellion  of  1715,  ;«vcral  gentlemen  of  the  dan 
Menzies  were  taken  prisoners  at  the  liattlc  of  Dunblane.  One 
of  them,  Menzies  of  Culdarcs,  li.tving  been  pardoned  for  his 
share  in  the  rebellion,  felt  himself  bound  not  to  join  in  that  of 
1745.  He  sent,  hovrcver,  a  valuable  home  as  a  present  to 
Prince  Charles,  but  his  s^'r^-ant  who  h.nd  it  in  charge,  was 
^icized  and  executed,  nobly  refusing  to  di^-ulge  his  master's 
name,  though  oflered  his  life  if  he  would  do  so.  In  the  lat- 
ter rebellion,  Menzies  of  Shian  took  out  the  clan,  and  held 
the  rank  of  colonel,  though  the  chief  remained  at  home.  Tlie 
effective  force  of  the  dan  in  1745  was  300. 

The  old  family  of  Menzies  of  Pitfo<ldels  in  Aberdeenshire, 
is  now  extinct.  Gilbert  Menzies  of  this  family,  canying  the 
royal  standanl  at  the  last  battle  of  ilontrose,  in  1650,  re- 
peatedly refused  qnarter,  and  fell  rather  than  give  up  Ids  chargcw 
The  last  laird,  John  Menzies  of  Pilfoddeh,  never  mnrried,  and 


i 


MERCER, 


151 


JAMES. 


I 


JtfoUri  the  p«ater  part  of  bis  htrgfi  estate  to  tbe  eudowinent 
of  a  Romuu  Catbolic  college,    lie  died  in  1843. 

MERCER,  Hugh,  brigadier  -  general  in  the 
American  ReYolntionary  army,  was  born  in  Scot- 
laud  in  1721.  Having  stndied  medicine,  lie  acted 
u  a  8nrgeon*3  assistant  in  tlie  memorable  battle 
of  Culloden,  bnt  on  which  side  he  served  is  not 
mentioned.  Not  long  after  he  emigrated  to  Fenn- 
el vnnia,  but  removed  to  Virginia,  where  he  set- 
tled and  married.  lie  was  engaged  with  Wash- 
ington in  the  Indian  wars  of  1755  and  following 
ye^rs,  and  fur  his  good  conduct  in  an  expedition 
a<,'aiust  an  Indian  settlement,  condncted  by  Colonel 
Amidtrong,  in  September  175G,  he  was  presented 
Ttith  a  medal  by  the  corporation  of  the  city  of 
Philadelphia.  In  one  of  the  engagements  with 
the  Indians  he  was  wounded  in  the  right  Mrist, 
and  being  separated  from  his  party,  on  the  ap- 
proach of  some  hostile  Indians,  he  took  refuge  in 
tlie  hollow  tmnk  of  a  large  tree,  where  he  remain- 
ed till  they  disappeared.  lie  then  pm*sucd  his 
course  throngh  a  trackless  wild  of  about  one  hun- 
dred miles,  until  he  reached  Fort  Cumberland, 
subsisting  by  the  way  on  the  body  of  a  rattlesnake 
which  he  met  and  killed.  When  the  war  broke 
out  between  the  colonists  and  the  mother  conntr}', 
he  relinqnished  an  extensive  medical  practice,  and 
immediately  joined  the  standard  of  Independence. 
Under  Washington  he  soon  reached  the  rank  of 
brigadier-general,  and  particularly  distinguished 
hunself  in  the  battles  of  Trenton  and  Princeton, 
m  tbe  winter  of  1776-7.  In  the  latter  engage- 
ment he  commanded  the  van  of  the  American 
army,  and  after  exerting  the  utmost  valour  and 
activity,  had  his  horse  killed  under  him.  Being 
tbns  dismounted,  he  was  suiTOuuded  by  some 
British  soldiers,  with  whom,  on  being  refused 
qnnrter,  he  fought  desperately,  until  he  was  com- 
pletely overpowered,  and  after  being  severely 
wonuded,  was  left  for  dead  on  the  field  of  battle. 
He  died  about  a  week  after  in  the  ai'ms  of  Major 
George  Lewis,  the  nephew  of  General  AVashing- 
ton,  whom  his  uncle  had  commissioned  to  attend 
bun.  Another  American  officer.  General  Wilkin- 
son, in  his  'Memoirs,'  observes,  "In  General 
Mercer  we  lost,  at  Princeton,  a  chief  who,  for 
education,  talents,  disposition,  integrity,  and  pa- 
triotism, was  second  to  no  man  but  the  com- 


mander-in-chief, and  was  qualified  to  fill  the 
highest  trusts  in  the  country." 

FIERCER,  James,  the  friend  of  Seattle,  and 
himself  a  poet  of  some  consideration,  was  born  at 
Aberdeen,  February  27,  1734,  and  received  his 
education  at  the  grammar  school  and  Marischal 
college  of  that  city.  He  was  the  eldest  of  two 
sons  of  Thomas  Mercer,  a  gentleman  of  fortune  in 
Aberdeenshire,  who,  in  1745,  took  arms  for  the 
Pretender,  and  for  his  share  in  the  rebellion  was 
obliged  to  retire  to  France.  At  the  commence- 
ment of  the  Seven  Years'  war,  James  Mei-cer, 
who  had  resided  with  his  father  for  several  years 
in  Paris,  came  to  England,  and  joined  the  expedi- 
tion against  Cherbourg  as  a  volnnteer.  He  after- 
wards proceeded  to  Gennany,  and  in  a  short  time 
was  promoted  to  an  ensigncy  in  one  of  the  English 
regiments  sending  with  the  allied  army.  He  sub- 
sequently received  a  lieutenant's  commission  in  a 
battalion  of  Highlanders,  then  newly  raised  by 
Lieutenant  -  colonel  Campbell.  During  several 
years  arduous  service  in  the  field,  he  distinguished 
himself  by  his  bravery  and  skill,  and  at  the  battle 
of  Mindcn  in  1-759,  his  regiment  was  one  of  the 
six  whose  gallantry  on  that  occasion  saved  the 
reputation  of  the  allied  arms. 

Shortly  before  the  peace  of  1763,  General 
Gramme,  a  relation  of  Mr.  Mercer,  presented  him 
with  a  company  in  a  regiment  which  he  had  un- 
dertaken to  raise,  and  which  was  afterwards  called 
the  Queen's.  On  his  return  to  Britain  he  took  up 
his  residence  at  Aberdeen,  where  he  enjoyed  the 
society  of  Dr.  Bcattie,  Dr.  Reid,  Dr.  Campbell, 
and  other  eminent  men,  and  where,  in  the  summer 
of  1763,  he  married  a  daughter  of  Mr.  Douglas 
of  Fechil,  the  sister  of  Lord  Glenbervie.  Tlie 
"  Queen's,"  with  other  new  corps,  being  reduced 
at  the  peace.  Captain  Mercer  purchased  a  com- 
pany in  the  49th  regiment,  and  removed  with  it 
to  Ireland,  where  he  served  for  nearly  ten  years. 
The  majority  of  his  regiment  becoming  vacant,  he 
succeeded  to  it  by  purchase.  In  1772  he  conclud- 
ed a  treaty  with  the  lieutenant-colonel  for  becom- 
ing his  successor;  bnt  the  commission  being  given 
to  another,  induced  him  to  sell  out  of  the  army, 
when  he  retired  with  his  family  to  a  small  cottage 
in  the  vicinity  of  Aberdeen.  In  1776-7  the  duke 
of  Gordon  raised  a  regiment  of  Fencibles,  the  ma- 


!j 


J 


MESTOX. 


l/)2 


METHVEK. 


1 1 


1 1 


jority  of  which  he  conferred  on  Mercer,  who  held 
it  dtirin*;  tlic  Amcrienn  war.  On  the  retimi  of 
peace,  the  major  ngntn  settled  with  his  family  in 
the  neighbonrhood  of  Aberdeen,  where  ho  died 
November  18,  1803.  In  1797  a  small  vohimo  of 
his  *  Lyric  Poems*  was  published  anonymously.  A 
second  edition,  with  seven  new  pieces,  appeared 
early  In  1804  with  his  name.  To  a  tliinl  edition 
an  account  of  his  life  was  prefixed,  by  Jjonl  Glen- 
bervie.  Major  Mercer  was  not  only  an  elegant 
and  accomplished  schohir,  but  possessed  much 
original  genius  as  a  poet,  conjoined  with  a  high 
feeling  of  refined  modesty,  which  led  him  to  con- 
ceal, even  fi-om  his  intimate  friends,  the  poems 
which  he  wrote  for  his  own  amusement.  Tliere 
are  some  interesting  notices  of  him  hi  Sir  William 
Forbes'  Life  of  Dr.  Beat  tie. 

His  daughter.  Miss  Mercer  of  Aldic,  in  Terth- 
sliire,  an  ancient  barony  at  one  time  possessed  by 
the  ^lereera  of  Meiklour,  in  the  same  county,  be- 
came the  wife  of  Ailmiral  Ix)rd  Viscount  Keith, 
and  the  mother  of  Baroness  Keith,  Countess 
Flahaut.  (Sec  vol.  ii.  \},  HO). 

MESTON,  William,  a  bmiescpic  poet,  tlie  son 
of  a  blacksmith,  was  born  in  the  parish  of  Mid- 
mar,  in  Aberdeenshire,  in  1G88.  After  completing 
his  studies  at  the  Marischal  college  of  Abenlcen, 
he  became  one  of  the  teachers  in  the  grammar 
school  of  that  city.  He  was  subsequently  for 
some  time  tutor  to  the  young  Earl  Marischal  and 
his  brother,  afterwards  ^larslial  Keith ;  and  in 
171-1,  by  the  intercsit  of  the  countess,  was  ap- 
])ointed  jirofessor  of  philosophy  in  the  Marischal 
college.  On  the  breaking  out  of  the  rebellion  in 
1715,  he  e.<[M)used  the  cause  of  the  Pretender,  and 
was  by  the  Earl  Marischal  made  governor  of 
Dunottar  castle.  After  the  defeat  of  the  rebels  at 
SherilFnniir,  he  was  forci'd  to  fiec  for  refuge  to  the 
mountains,  where,  till  the  passing  of  the  act  of 
indemnity,  he  lurked  with  a  few  fugitives  like 
himself,  for  whose  amusement  he  composed  seve- 
ral pieces  in  rhyme,  which  he  styled  'Alother 
(Srim's  Tale.*.'  lie  subsequently  chiefly  resided 
in  the  family  of  the  countess  of  Marischal,  till  the 
death  of  that  lady ;  and  some  years  aftci'i^ai'ds,  in 
conjunction  with  his  brother  Samuel,  ho  com- 
menced an  academy  in  Elgin,  which,  however,  did 
not  ultimately  succeed,     lie  then  successively 


settled  at  TurrifT,  Montrose,  and  Perth,  and  finally 
became  preceptor  in  the  family  of  Mr.  Oliphant  of 
Gask.  His  health  beginning  to  decline,  for  the 
benefit  of  the  mineral  waters,  lie  removed  to 
retcrhcad,  where  he  was  principally  supported 
by  the  bounty  of  the  conntess  of  Enrol.  Subse- 
quently he  removed  to  Abenlcen,  where  he  died 
in  the  spring  of  1740.  He  is  said  to  have  been  a 
superior  classical  scholar,  and  by  no  means  a  con- 
temptible i)hilosopher  and  mathematician.  lie 
was  much  addicted  to  convivialitv,  and  is  stated 
to  have  had  a  lively  wit,  and  no  small  share  of 
humour.  Ills  i)oems,  however,  are  very  coarse 
productions.  The  fii'st  of  them  printed,  called 
^Tlie  Knight,'  appeared  in  1723.  It  is  a  scur- 
rilous description  of  Presbyterianism,  after  the 
manner  of  Butler,  of  whom  he  was  a  professed 
imitator.  Afterwards  was  published  the  first  de- 
cade of  'Mother  Grim's  Tales;'  and  next  the 
second  decade,  by  lodocis,  her  grandson;  and 
some  years  after,  the  piece  called  ^Mob  contra 
Mob.'  Tlie  whole,  collected  into  a  small  volume, 
appeared  at  Edinburgh  in  1767,  with  a  short  ac- 
count of  his  life  prefixed.  Some  Latin  poems  are 
included  in  the  second  decade,  but  these  are  of 
inferior  merit. 

Mktiivkx,  Lord,  n  title  in  tlio  pcemge  of  ScotLnnd,  eon- 
fonvd  in  1528,  bv  James  V.,  on  Henrv  Stewart,  second  son 
of  AiiilrcTr,  I^rd  Kvaiidnle,  .nftcnrards  Ix>rd  Ochiltree,  a  de- 
£!cend:ii)t  of  Kobei*t,  duke  of  A]b.nnr,  son  of  King  Robert  II. 
He  owed  his  peerage  and  success  in  life  to  tbo  favour  of  the 
(|uecn-inother,  Margnrct,  sister  of  Heni^'  VIII.  of  Knglaud, 
and  widow  of  James  IV.  In  1524,  previous  to  her  diroite 
from  the  earl  of  Angus,  her  second  linsband,  she  raised  Stewart 
first  to  the  ofiicc  of  treasurer,  and  afterwards  to  that  of  chan- 
cellor, intrusting  to  his  inexperienced  hands  the  chief  guid- 
ance of  public  affairs.  In  the  following  ye.v,  on  the  divorce 
being  granted,  she  married  him.  Thclordship  of  Methren, 
in  rerthshire,  was  part  of  the  dowry  lands  nauallr  appropri- 
ated for  the  maintenance  of  the  qnccn-dowager  of  Scotland, 
t»;;etlior  with  the  lordsiiip  and  castle  of  Stiriing  and  the  lands 
of  lialquhidder,  &c.,  and  when  Margaret  procured  the  peer- 
age for  her  third  husband,  the  barony  of  Methven  was  dis- 
solved fi-om  the  crown,  and  ei-ected  into  a  lordsliip,  in  favour 
of  Henry  Stewart,  and  liis  Iieirs  male,  on  the  queen*s  rengn- 
ing  her  jointure  of  the  lordship  of  Stirling. 

Subsequently,  when  Angus  held  the  supremo  power,  an 
attempt  on  liis  part  to  obtain  forcible  poasesuon  of  the 
queiMi's  dowry  lands,  so  alarmed  Slargaret  and  3Iethven, 
that,  in  their  terror,  they  took  rcfngo  in  the  castle  of  Kdin- 
burgli.  That  fortress,  however,  was  soon  delivered  up  tn 
Angus,  when  he  ordered  Slethven  to  a  temporarr  imprison- 
ment. The  queen  aftenvarda  endeavoured  to  obtain  a  divorce 
from  Mcthvcn,  but  her  son,  the  young  king,  put  a  stop  to 
the  proceedings.  By  I>ord  Mcthvcn  the  queen  had  a  daugh- 
ter, who  died  in  infancy.    Her  own  death  took  pbice  at  the 


IkllCKLE, 


158 


WILLIAM  JULIUS. 


11 


CMtle  of  Methrm  in  1540.  Lord  Methvon  nftenrards  married 
Jnnet  Ste\rait,  dangliter  of  tlie  earl  of  Atbol,  by  whom  he 
hml  a  son,  Heniy,  second  Lord  Methven. 

The  second  I.ord  Methven  married  Jean,  daughter  of  Pa- 
trick fiOfd  RntbTen,  and  was  killed  at  Bronghton,  in  the  vi- 
cinity  of  Edinburgh,  bj  a  cannon-ball  shot  from  the  oastle  of 
tliat  dtj  daring  the  siege  thereof,  3d  March  1672.  He  lefl 
a  son,  Henry,  third  f.ord  Alethven,  trho  ^ed  without  heurs 
inale  in  1694,  when  the  title  became  extinct. 

The  kfdship  of  Methven  was  porchased  in  1G64,  bj  Patrick 
Smvthe  of  Braoo,  whose  great-grandson,  David  Smvthe  of 
Methven,  was  a  lord  of  session  from  1793  to  1806,  under 
the  title  of  Lord  Blethvcn. 

MICKIJB,  WiixiAM  Julius,  translator  of  *  The 
Lnsjad,'  was  born  at  Langholm,  Dumfries-sbire, 
September  29,  1734.  He  was  the  third  sou  of  the 
Rev.  Alexander  Mlcklc  or  Mciklo,  minister  of 
Langholm,  >vho,  during  lils  residence  in  London, 
previons  to  his  obtaining  that  living,  superintend- 
ed the  translation  of  Bayle's  Dictionary,  to  which 
he  is  said  to  have  contributed  the  greater  part  of 
the  additional  notes.  Ills  son  William  received 
the  early  part  of  his  education  at  tlie  gi-ammar 
school  of  his  native  parish,  and  on  the  removal  of 
his  father,  in  his  old  ago,  to  Edinburgh,  was  sent 
to  the  High  school  of  that  city,  where  he  acquired 
a  competent  knowledge  of  the  Latin  and  Greek 
langnages.  His  father  having,  on  the  death  of 
Mr.  Myrtle,  his  bi*otlier-in-law,  a  brewer  in  the 
neighbourhood  of  Edinburgh,  purchased  the  busi- 
ness for  his  eldest  son,  the  poet  was,  in  his  six- 
teenth year,  taken  from  school  to  be  employed  as 
a  clerk  in  tho  counting-house,  and  five  years  af- 
tcnvards  the  breweiy  was  transferred  to  him. 
Before  lie  was  eighteen  he  had  written  several 
pieces,  and  some  of  his  poems  appeared  in  the 
*  Scots  Magazine  ;'*  two  of  which,  one  ^On  passing 
through  the  Parliament  Close  at  Midnight  ;*  and 
the  other,  entitled  'Knowledge,  an  Ode,'  were 
reprinted  in  Donaldson's  Collection.  In  1762  he 
sent  to  l-iondon  an  ethic  poem,  entitled 'Provi- 
dence,' which  was  published  anonymously,  but  did 
not  meet  with  much  success.  Having  sustained 
considerable  losses  in  business,  which  led  to  his 
bankruptcy,  he  quitted  Edinburgh  hastily,  in  April 
1763,  and  on  the  8th  of  May  arrived  in  London. 
He  had  previously  written  a  letter  to  Lord  Lyt- 
tleton,  to  whom  he  submitted  some  of  his  pieces, 
but  without  producing  any  other  result  than  a 
complimentary  correspondence.  He  had  hoped  to 
have  obtained  through  his  lordship's  interest  some 


civil  or  commercial  appointment,  either  in  the 
West  Indies  or  at  home ;  but  in  this  he  was  dis- 
appointed, and  hearing  that  the  humble  situation 
of  corrector  to  the  Clarendon  press,  at  Oxford, 
was  vacant,  he  offered  himself  as  a  candidate,  and 
being  sncccssfhl  in  his  application,  he  entered  up- 
on his  duties  in  1765.  During  the  same  year  he 
published  » PoUio,  an  Elegiac  Ode,'  and  In  1767 
appeared  '  The  Concubine,'  a  poem,  in  two  cantos, 
in  the  manner  of  Sj^enser.  Tlie  former  did  not 
attract  much  notice,  but  the  latter  was  most  fa- 
vourably received,  and  after  it  had  gone  through 
three  editions,  the  title,  to  prevent  misapprehen- 
sion, was  changed  to  '  Sir  Martyn.' 

In  1771  Mickle  issued  proposals  for  printing  by 
subscription  a  translation  of  the  *Lusiad,'  by 
Camoens,  to  qualify  himself  for  which  he  leanit 
the  Portuguese  language.  He  published  the  first 
book  as  a  specimen,  and  from  the  encouragement 
he  received,  he  was  induced  to  resign  his  situation 
at  the  Clarendon  press,  with  the  view  of  devoting 
his  whole  time  to  the  work,  when  he  took  up  his 
residence  at  a  farm-house  at  FoiTst-hill,  about  five 
miles  from  Oxford.  During  the  progress  of  the 
translation  he  edited  Pearch's  Collection  of  Poems, 
in  which  he  inserted  several  of  his  own,  particn- 
larly  '  Ilengist  and  Mey,'  a  ballad,  an  '  Elegy  on 
Maiy  Queen  of  Scots.'  To  Evans'  Collect  ion  Jie  also 
contributed  his  beautiful  ballad  of '  Cnmnor  Hall,' 
founded  on  the  tragic  stoiy  of  the  lady  of  the  enrl 
of  I^icester,  the  favourite  of  Queen  Elizabeth. 
His  translation  was  finished  in  1775,  and  publish- 
ed in  a  quarto  volume,  under  the  title  of  '  The 
Lusiad,  or  the  Discovery  of  India,'  to  which  he 
prefixed  an  Introduction,  containing  a  defence  of 
commerce  and  civilization,  in  reply  to  the  misre- 
presentations of  Rousseau,  and  other  visionary 
philosophers;  a  History  of  the  Portuguese  con- 
quests in  India ;  a  Life  of  Camoens ;  and  a  Dis- 
sertation on  the  Lusiad,  and  Observations  on 
Epic  Poetij.  The  work  obtained  for  him  a  high 
reputation,  and  so  rapid  was  its  sale,  that  a  second 
edition  was  called  for  in  June  1778.  By  the  two 
editions  he  is  said  to  have  realized  about  £1,000. 
Previously  to  its  publication  he  had  written  a 
Tragedy,  entitled  the  'Siege  of  Marseilles,"  which 
was  rejected  by  Gamck,  and  afterwards  by  Mr. 
Harris,  and  was  never  acted. 


I 

i! 

il 


k!^- 


#   


MICKLE. 


154 


MIDDMTON. 


In  Miiy  1779  he  wns,  by  Commodore  John- 
stone, a  distant  relation  of  his  o>vn,  appointed  his 
secretar}',  and  he  sailed  on  1)onrd  of  tlic  Roniucy, 
man-of-war,  with  a  small  squadron,  destined  for 
the  Tiip^ns.  In  the  ensuing  November  he  arrived 
at  Li.sl)on,  where,  as  the  translator  of  the  national 
poet  of  Portuj^l,  he  received  many  flattering 
marks  of  attention  from  the  nobility,  gentry,  and 
literati  of  that  country,  and  was  admitted  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Royal  Academy,  at  it.s  opening.  While 
in  tliat  capital  he  wrote  his  poem  of  ^  Almada  Hill, 
an  Kpistlc  from  Lisbon,*  published  in  1781,  but 
without  adding  to  his  reputation.  In  1780  the 
squadron  returned  to  England,  and  ^licklo  re- 
mained for  a  time  at  Tendon,  as  joint  t\<;o\\t  for 
tlie  disposal  uf  some  valuable  prizes  taken  during 
the  expedition.  lie  had  acquired  considerable 
wealth,  and  in  178.'>  he  married  Mi.<s  Mary  Tom- 
kins,  the  daughter  of  the  fanner  with  whom  he 
had  resided  at  Foresthill,  and  with  this  lady  he 
received  a  handsome  dower.  He  now  went  to  re- 
side at  Wheatley,  near  Oxford,  where  he  employ- 
ed his  leisui*e  in  writing  some  occasional  pieco?,  in 
revising  his  published  poems,  and  in  contributing 
n  series  of  Essays,  entitled  *The  Fragments  of 
1-1^0,'  and  some  other  articles,  to  the  European 
]VIagazinc.  He  died,  after  a  short  illness,  October 
liS,  1788.  He  left  one  son,  for  whose  benefit  a 
volume  of  his  collected  poems  w;is  published  by 
subscription  in  1795. — His  works  are : 

Provi(lcnc<»,  or  Araniliis  and  KniiA;  a  IVm.  lA>:ii]un, 
17«2. 

The  Concubine.  170.3.  2*1  islitlon,  iindor  tlic  tiile  ot'  Sir 
Martyn;  a  l*oem,  in  the  niaisncr  of  Spcnsier.  I.«)n«lon.  1778, 
•Ito. 

TIic  first  book  of  the  I.n5i:i(] ;  publi«1ieil  ua  a  s|K'oinK>n  of 
«  Tnin»lation  of  that  celebrated  Kpic  Poem.    0.\f.  1771,  8vo. 

The  Lasiad,  or  the  Discovery  of  India ;  an  Kpic  room. 
From  the  original  Portngiicso  of  Camocus.  Oxf.  1775,  4to. 
2d  clii;.    1778,  4to.    Also  in  2  vols.  8vo. 

\  Candid  Examination  of  the  Kcnsnns  for  dopriviiij;  tlic 
East  India  Company  of  its  Charter.  177i>,  tto.  This  pam- 
phlet is  written  in  defence  of  the  Company. 

'ihe  Siege  of  Marseilles ;  a  Tragedy. 

Almada  Hill;  an  Epistle  from  Lisbon.     Lond.  1781,  Ito. 

The  Prophecy  of  Queen  Emma ;  a  Ballad.     1782. 

A  Letter  to  Dr.  Harwood,  whereby  some  of  his  fvasivc 
glosses,  fidse  translations,  and  blundering  criticisms,  in  sup- 
port of  the  Arian  Heresy,  cont:iined  in  his  liberal  tnmhhitiun 
of  the  New  Testament,  are  pointed  out  and  confuted. 

Voltaire  in  the  Shades;  or,  Dialogues  on  the  Deistical 
Controversy. 

Poems,  and  a  Tragedy.  I^nd.  1791, -Ito.  This  contains 
an  acconntof  bislife,  hj  Mr.  Ireland. 


A  more  ftUI  and  correct  collectioii  of  his  poems  ajqpeared  in 
1807,  with  a  Life,  by  the  Ber.  John  Sim. 


Mii)iii.KTt)2C,  earl  of,  a  title,  now  extinct,  in  the  peenge  af 
Scotland,  conferred  in  16G0,  on  John  MiddleCon,  the  cklcr 
MMi  of  John  Middleton  of  Caldhame,  KincanUiiesbire,  who 
was  killed  sitting  in  bis  chair,  by  Montrose's  soMien  in  1645 
He  was  a  descendant  of  Malcolm  the  son  of  Kenneth,  wlio 
got  a  charter  from  Willuim  the  lion  of  the  lands  of  Middle- 
ton  in  that  county,  confirming  a  donation  of  King  Doqcan  of 
the  same,  and  in  consequence  asirtimed  tho  name. 

The  first  rarl  was  from  his  youth  bred  to  arms.  He  st 
first  "trailed  a  pike**  in  Hepburn's  regiment  in  France,  but 
in  the  civil  wars  of  1012,  he  entered  into  tlie  service  of  the 
parliament  of  England  as  commander  of  a  troop  of  Iiorse,  and 
lientcnant-giuieral  under  Sir  William  \VuIIer.  He  afterwards 
n*tunied  tu  Scotland,  and  got  a  command  in  Oener.tl  fxslie*s 
army.  At  the  b.ittle  of  Philiphangh,  I3th  September  1643. 
he  omtributed  so  much  to  the  defeat  of  }iIontnwe,  that  the 
Kst:iti'.s  viited  him  a  gift  of  2j.0'MI  marks.  When  Moutms^, 
wMin  alter,  ^.it  down  before  lMven»es.s,  General  Middletun, 
with  a  small  brigade,  was  detached  from  Cenend  liCsUe's 
army  and  sent  north  to  watch  his  motions.  In  the  beginning 
ot  May  IGIO,  he  Inft  Alionlonn,  with  a  force  of  GOO  horse  and 
^'M0  fiMit,  and  arrived  in  the  neighbouriiood  of  Inverness,  on 
tilt;  Otli  of  that  month.  Montrose  hnmediately  withdrew  to 
a  jiosiiion  at  some  distance  from  the  town,  but  soon  quitted 
it.  Two  n'gimeiits  of  cavalry,  despatched  by  Middleton 
aftor  him,  attacked  his  rear,  cut  off  some  of  his  mm,  and 
ciptured  two  pieces  of  cinnon,  and  part  of  his  baggage. 
Kftrc;itiiig  into  Itiss-shire,  he  was  pursued  by  Middleton, 
who.  as  Montrose  avoided  an  engagement,  laid  aiegc  to  the 
castle  of  the  carl  of  Seafurth  in  the  chanonnr  of  Boss.  After 
a  siege  of  four  days  he  took  it,  but  immediately  restored  it  to 
the  countess  of  Seaforth,  who  was  witliin  the  castle  ut  the 
time. 

I.t>aming  that  the  marquis  of  Huntly  had  seised  upon 
AlM'rJccn,  Middleton  retraced  his  steps,  and  re-crossing  the 
Spn*,  made  him  retire  into  Mar.  He  then  returned  to  Aber- 
iK-en.  When  Montrose  received  orders  from  the  king  to  dis- 
hainl  his  forces,  Middleton  was  intrusted  hy  the  committee 
uf  Est.ite8  with  ample  powers  to  negotiate  with  bim,  and  in 
order  to  discuss  the  conditions  offered  to  the  former,  a  oon- 
iVrencc  was  held  between  them  on  22d  July  1646,  on  a  mea- 
dow, near  the  river  Hay  in  Angu:*,  where  they  **  conferred 
for  the  space  of  two  hours,  there  being  none  near  them  but 
o::e  man  for  each  of  them  to  hold  his  horse."  (^Guik/y* 
}[fmolr9^  p.  179).  The  conditions  were  that  his  fcdlowers, 
oil  making  tluur  submission,  should  be  pardoned,  and  that 
Montrose  and  a  few  others  of  the  principal  leaders  slioold 
liTtve  the  kingdom. 

Thr  following  year,  Middleton  was  occupied  in  pursuing 
the  nianpiis  of  Huntly,  who  ha>l  nppe.ircd  in  arms  for  the 
king,  tl'rough  (lienmoriston,  Dadencch,  and  other  places  in 
tho  north,  till  he  was  captured  by  I jeutenant -colonel  Men- 
zics  in  Strathdon.  Some  Irish  taken  at  the  s.'imc  time  were 
shut  by  MiiidK'tonV  orders  in  Strathbitgie.  In  1G18,  when 
the  "  Engag«»:iicnt*'  was  fonned  for  the  rescue  of  the  kuig, 
he  w:is  appointed  lieutenant-general  of  the  cavalry  in  the 
anny  ordered  to  bo  levied  by  tlic  Scots  Estates  for  tluit  pnr- 
IM)se.  The  levy  being  opposed  by  a  large  body  of  Covenant- 
ers and  others  at  Maucliline  in  Ayrshire,  on  the  12th  June, 
.Middleton  charged  them,  and  put  the  whole  to  the  ront^  with 
the  loss  of  eighty  killed  and  a  great  many  taken  priswiers, 
among  whom  were  some  ministers.  Ho  also  disperse*!  some 
gatherings  of  the  western  (.^jvenantcrs  at  Carsphaim  and 


:! 


,1 


ii 


I 


; ! 


.1 


I; 
J I 


MIDDLETON, 


15o 


FIRST  EARL  OF. 


tHhn-  places.  He  behaved  with  great  gnlhintrx  nt  the  battle 
of  IVntMi  in  EngUnd,  17th  Aognst  the  same  jtnr^  bat  his 
hnrvf  bcini;  shot  under  him,  he  iras  taken  prisoner  and  sent 
to  Newcastk.  He  scon  made  his  escape,  however,  and  witli 
Lfltd  Ogilvj  attempted  a  riiung  in  Athol  in  favour  of  the 
king.  The  party  being  Aspersed  by  a  force  under  the  ordere 
of  General  David  I^ie,  Middleton  was  allowed,  on  giving 
sMurity  to  keep  the  peace,  to  return  to  his  home. 

When  Charles  II.,  in  1650,  arrived  in  Scotland,  General 
^li^ldlcton  immediately  repaired  to  him.  Many  small  bodies 
uf  men  were  raised  for  the  defence  of  the  king  in  the  north, 
and  it  was  at  one  Ume  proposed  to  have  placed  General  Mid- 
dlrtnn,  who  comnundcd  a  small  division  of  tlie  army,  at  tlio 
hcid  of  all  the  loyal  forces  that  could  be  collected  for  the 
purpose  of  oppo^ng  Oromirell,  but  this  was  never  carried 
into  effect.  For  his  conduct  in  support  of  the  king  the  com- 
niiAsion  of  the  church  summarily  excommunicated  hitn  on 
the  motion  of  James  Guthrie,  who  pronounced  tlie  sentence 
from  his  pulpit  at  Stirling. 

To  compel  the  northern  royalists  to  lay  down  their  arms. 

General  Iwc^lie,  by  order  of  the  committee  of  Estates,  cn»ssed 

the  Tsy  on  the  24th  October  with  a  force  of  3.000  cavalrj', 

«ith  the  intention  of  proceeding  to  Dundee  and  scouring  An- 

pis.    At  this  time  Middleton  was  lying  at  Forfar,  and,  on 

hearing  of  I^Ie*s  advance,  he  sent  him  a  letter,  enclu^tllg  a 

copy  of  »  "  bond  and  oath  of  engagement "  which  li:id  been 

PT'tered  into  by  Huntly,  Athol,  Seaforth,  and  himself,  with 

oiliers,  by  which  they  ])ledged  tliemselves  not  to  lay  dotvn 

tl:eir  arms  without  a  gcncr.il  consent^  and  promised  and  sworc 

that  they  would  maintain  the  true  religion  as  then  estab- 

l4»lied  in  Scothtnd,  the  national  covenant,  and  the  mjlemn 

k^j^ne  and  covenant;  and  defend  the  person  of  the  king,  lils 

prerogative,  greatness  and  authority,  the  privileges  of  parlia- 

iiienf,  and  the  freedom  of  tlie  subject.     Middleton  stated 

that  Leslie  woukl  perceive,  from  the  terms  of  the  document 

*i-nt,  that  the  only  aim  of  himself  and  friends  was  to  unite 

Scotsmen  in  deFencc  of  their  common  rights,  and  he  proposed 

N>  j<Mn  I^ie,  and  put  himself  under  his  command,  as  their 

objects  appeared  to  be  precisely  the  same.    The  negotiation 

«as  fin.illy  Cimclnded  on  4lh  November  at  Strathbogic,  when 

•t  treaty  was  agreed  to  between  Leslie  and  the  chief  royalist?, 

by  vhich  the  latter  acce^>ted  an  indemnity  and  laid  down 

their  arms. 

On  the  12lh  .Tannnry  1651,  Middleton  was  relaxed  fmm 
bit  excommuniv-ntion,  and  did  penance  in  sackcloth  in  tlie 
I>ariali  church  of  Dnndce.  He  commanded  the  horse  in  the 
rm-al  armv  that  marched  into  En<;land  on  the  31st  Julv:  and 
at  the  battle  of  Worcester,  3d  September,  the  chief  rpj*istanco 
was  m.ide  by  hint.  He  charged  the  enemy  so  vigorously  that 
lie  forced  them  to  recoil,  but  being  severely  wounJetl,  he  was 
taken  priiomer  after  the  battle,  and  sent  to  the  Tower  uf 
I»ndAn.  Cromwell  was  so  incensed  against  him  that  he  de- 
«<^rd  to  grt  him  tried  fur  his  life,  as  having  formerly  served 
in  the  parlLnmentary  army,  but  he  contrived  to  make  his 
ejvnpe.  After  remaining  for  some  time  concealed  in  Ix)ndon 
le  rrtired  to  Franco,  and  juined  Charles  II.  at  Paris.  In 
ISio  he  was  sent  home  with  a  commission  from  the  king, 
appointing  him  generalNsimo  of  all  the  royal  forces  in  Scut- 
Isnd,  and  took  the  command  of  the  troops  at  Dornoch. 
Mi«idIeton  soon  fonnd  himself  sorely  pressed  by  General 
Monk,  who  had  advanced  into  the  Highlands  with  a  large 
•rmy.  In  an  attempt  to  elude  his  pursuers  he  was  surprised 
in  a  defile  near  I<ochgnrry,  2Cth  .luly  1654,  when  his  men 
vere  either  slain  or  dispersed,  and  he  himself  escaped  with 
girat  difficulty.  After  lurking  for  some  months  in  the  coun- 
tnr,  3Iiddlcton  again  got  over  to  the  king,  who  was  then  at 


Cologne,  and  was  excepted  by  Cromwell  from  pardon  in  his 
act  of  grace  and  indemnity  tlio  same  year. 

At  tlte  Restoration,  he'  accompanied  King  Charies  11.  to 
England,  and  was  created  earl  of  Middleton  and  Lord  Cler- 
mont and  Fetterc'iuni,  by  patent,  dated  1st  October  1G60,  to 
him  and  his  heii-s  male,  having  the  name  and  arms  of  Mid- 
dleton. He  was  aUio  appointed  commander-in-chief  of  tlie 
forces  in  Scotl.nnd,  governor  of  Edinburgh  castle,  and  lord 
high  commissioner  to  the  Scots  parluimont.  On  the  Slat 
December  he  arrived  at  Holyrood-liouse,  having  been  escort- 
ed from  Musselburgh  by  the  nobility  and  gentry  then  in  the 
capital,  attended  by  a  thousand  horse.  He  was  allowed  900 
mcrks  per  day  for  his  table,  and  he  lived  in  «  style  of  great 
magnificence.  He  opened  parliament  l»t  January  1661,  with 
a  splendour  to  which  the  Scots  people  had  long  been  unac- 
cnsttuncd.  In  this  '*  terrible  pariiament,*'  as  it  is  well  named 
'iiy  Kirkton,  the  king's  prerogative  was  restored  in  its  fullest 
extent,  and  a  gener.d  act  rescissory  of  the  parliaments  from 
1633  was  passed.  Various  other  acts  of  a  most  unconstitn-' 
liunal  natiure  also  bccime  law.  On  the  rising  of  parliament 
in  the  following  July,  Middleton  hastened  to  I/>ndon,  to  lay 
an  account  of  its  proceedings  before  the  king.  On  his  arriv.ol 
at  court,  he  assured  his  majesty  and  the  Scottish  privy  coun- 
cil in  London,  that  the  majority  of  the  Scottish  nation  de- 
Kii'ed  the  establishment  of  episcopacy,  and  it  w.is  accordingly 
agreed  that  "  as  the  government  of  the  state  was  monarchy, 
so  that  cf  tlie  church  should  be  prelacy.*^  3iIiddleton*s  ob- 
ject in  thus  recommending  the  establishment  of  the  episcopal 
church  in  Scotland  was  that  ho  might  strengthen  his  own 
anthority  by  that  of  the  bishops,  and  thwart  Lauderdale 
whom  he  hated,  and  who  at  that  time  was  favourable  to  pres- 
bvteriunism. 

He  was  again  appointed  lord  high  commissioner  to  the 
Swts  parliament,  which  met  6th  May  1662,  and  on  loth 
July  following,  he  was  nominated  an  extraordinary  lord  of 
session.  In  September  of  the  s.ime  year,  Middleton  and  the 
privy  council  made  a  progreitp  through  the  west  of  Scotland, 
and  when  at  Glasgow,  under  the  influence  of  drink,  as  Bur- 
net s.nys,  passed  the  act  for  depriving  the  covenanting  minis- 
ters of  their  benefices,  by  which  more  than  200  were  thrown 
out.  After  proceeding  through  Ayrshire  to  Dumfries,  they 
returned  to  Edinburgh.  Having  procured  the  passing  of  the 
famous  act  of  billeting,  by  which  I«auderdale  and  his  friends 
were  incapacitated,  that  unprincipled  nobleman  resolved  upon 
his  overthrow.  He  misrepresented  all  his  actions  to  the  king, 
and  so  prejudiced  the  royal  mind  against  him  that  Middleton 
in  1663  was  ordered  up  to  London  to  give  an  account  of  his 
administration  in  Scotland.  When  the  council  met,  I^auder- 
dalo  accused  him  of  many  misciniages  in  his  great  office, 
and  particularly  of  having  accepted  bribes  from  many  of  the 
prchbyterians,  to  exclude  them  from  the  list  of  fines.  Mid- 
dleton was  defended  by  Clarendon,  Archbishop  Sheldon,  and 
Munk,  duke  of  Albemarle.  The  Scottish  prelates  also  wrote 
in  his  favour,  and  in  vindication  of  his  general  policy.  Their 
interposition,  however,  was  in  vain.  He  was  declared  guilty 
of  arbitrary  conduct  as  commissioner,  and  deprived  of  all  his 
ofKccs,  to  the  great  joy  of  the  Scottish  people,  whom  he  had 
disgusted  by  the  oppressive  character  of  his  measures,  as  well 
as  by  his  open  debauchery  and  intemperance,  being,  accord- 
ins  to  Burnet  and  VVodrow,  most  ostentatious  in  his  vices. 
The  former  s-iys  that  he  was  "  perpetually  drunk." 

After  his  disgrace  he  retirctl  to  the  friary  near  Guildford,  to 
the  house  of  a  Scotsman  named  Dalmahoy,  who  had  been 
gentleman  of  the  horse  to  William  duke  of  Hamilton,  killed 
at  the  battle  of  Worcester,  and  who  had  married  that  noble- 
mairs  widow.    Tliere  he  built  a  bridge  over  the  river  which 


I 


\7 


MILL, 


15G 


JAMES. 


1 


:  I 


ran  tlirough  Dalmahoy'f  esUte,  and  Mrns  called  Bliddleton's 
Bridge  nfter  bim.  He  afterwards,  as  a  kind  of  decent  exile, 
received  the  appointment  of  governor  of  Tangier,  a  seaport 
town  of  Fei  in  Africa,  which  made  part  of  tho  dowiy  of  the 
princess  Catherine  of  Portngal,  whom  Charies  II.  married 
soon  after  the  Restoration.  Ho  died  there  in  1G73,  having 
fallen  in  going  down  stairs,  which  in  that  hot  climate  pro- 
duced inflammation. 

His  only  son,  Charles,  second  and  Inst  earl  of  Middleton, 
was  M.P.  for  >Yinchel8ca,  in  the  long  parliament.  He  was 
bred  in  the  conrt  of  Charles  II.,  by  whom  he  was  appointed 
envoy  extraordinary  to  the  court  of  Vienna.  On  his  return 
home  he  was  constituted  one  of  the  principal  secretaries  of 
state  for  Scotland,  2Cth  September  1C82.  On  11th  July 
1C84  he  was  sworn  a  privy  councillor  of  England,  on  the  15tli 
of  the  same  month  was  admitted  an  extrnordinary  lord  of 
session  in  Scotland,  and  on  2:3th  August  same  year  appoint- 
ed one  of  the  principal  secretaries  of  btate  for  England.  His 
seat  on  tho  bench,  however,  he  resigned  in  February  1686, 
in  favour  of  his  brother-in-law,  the  carl  of  Stratlimore. 

At  the  Revolution,  though  he  had  opposed  the  violent 
measures  of  King  James,  he  adhered  to  him  steadily.  He 
refused  all  the  offers  made  to  him  by  King  Willi.im,  and  af- 
ter being  frequently  imprisoned  in  England,  he  followed  James 
to  France,  and  was,  in  consequence,  outlawed  by  the  high 
court  of  justiciary,  23d  July  1694,  and  forfeited  by  act  of 
parliiunent,  2d  July  1695.  IJefore  the  Revolution,  we  are  told, 
lie  firmly  stooil  in  the  gap,  to  stop  the  torrent  of  some  priests 
who  were  driving  King  James  to  his  niin,  and  had  so  mean 
an  opinion  of  converts  that  he  used  to  say  a  new  light  never 
eame  into  the  house  but  by  a  crack  in  the  tilting.  Yet  this 
man,  who  had  withstood  all  the  temptations  of  James*  reign, 
and  all  the  endeavours  of  that  prince  to  bring  him  over,  to 
the  surprise  of  all  who  knew  him  declared  himself  a  Roman 
Catholic  on  tho  king's  death,  and  obtained  the  entire  mnn- 
agoment  of  the  exiled  court  at  St.  Germains.  (Mncl-t/'g 
Memoirs^  p.  238.)  He  is  described  as  having  been  a  black 
man,  of  middle  stature,  with  a  sanguine  complexion.  He 
had  two  sons  and  three  daughters.  Lady  Elizabeth,  the  eld- 
e.vt  daughter,  w.ns  the  wife  of  Edwaixi  Drummond,  son  of 
James,  earl  of  I*ertn,  high-chancellor  of  Scotland.  She  was 
stvled  duche«s  of  Perth,  and  died  at  Paris  after  1773.  The 
sons,  I.ord  Clermont  and  the  Hon.  Charles  Middleton,  were 
taken  at  sea  by  Admiral  Byng,  coming  with  French  troops 
to  invade  Scotland,  in  1708,  and  committed  to  the  Tower  of 
London.  Thev  were  soon  relcasetl,  when  tliev  i-elnmed  to 
France. 

MILL,  James,  the  liLstorinn  of  British  Lidia, 
was  born  in  the  panj?h  of  Logic-Pert,  Forfarshire, 
April  C,  1773.  The  early  part  of  liis  etlncation  he 
received  nt  the  grammar  school  of  Montrose,  on 
leaving  which,  throwgli  the  patronage  of  Sir  John 
Stuart,  baronet,  of  Fottercairn,  one  of  tlic  baron.s 
of  the  exchequer  in  Scotland,  on  whose  estate  his 
father  occupied  a  small  farm,  lie  was  sent  to  the 
university  of  Edinburgh  to  study  for  the  church. 
In  1800,  after  being  licensed  as  a  preacher,  he 
went  to  Ix)ndon  as  tutor  in  Sir  John  Stuart's  fam- 
ily, and,  settling  in  the  metropolis,  he  devoted 
himself  to  literar}*  and  philosophical  pursuits.    By 


his  powerful  and  original  prodactiona,  as  well  as 
by  the  force  of  his  personal  character,  he  soon 
earned  for  himself  a  high  reputation  as  a  writer. 
During  the  first  years  of  the  Edinburgh  Review, 
he  contributed  to  it  many  articles  on  Jnrispni- 
denco  and  Education,  and  he  was  also  the  antlior 
of  a  number  of  masterly  papers  in  tho  Westmin- 
ster, the  I>ondon,  tho  British,  tho  Eclectic,  and 
Monthly  Reviews.  Li  politics  he  belonged  to  the 
Radical  pai*ty,  and  among  other  articles  which  lie 
wi-ote  for  the  Westminster  Review  were  the  cele- 
brated ones  *  On  the  Formation  of  Opinions,*  in 
No.  11,  and  '  On  the  Ballot,'  in  No.  25. 

About  1806  he  commenced  his  *  History  of 
British  India,'  which  occupied  a  considerable  por- 
tion of  his  time  for  more  than  ten  years,  and  was 
published  about  the  end  of  1817,  in  three  volumes 
4to.  The  information  contained  in  this  valuable 
work,  with  the  author's  enlarged  views  on  all 
matters  connected  with  India,  tended  greatly  to 
the  improvement  of  the  administration  of  our  em- 
pire in  the  East,  and  induced  the  East  India  Com- 
pany to  appoint  him  in  1819  to  the  second  situa- 
tion in  the  examiner*.s  office,  or  land  revenue 
branch  of  the  administration,  at  the  India  House. 
On  the  retirement  of  Mr.  William  M^CuUoch,  he 
became  head  of  the  department  of  correspondence 
with  India.  In  1821  Mr.  Mill  published  his  'Ele- 
ments of  Political  Economy,'  containing  a  clear 
summary  of  the  leading  principles  of  that  science. 
In  1829  appeared,  in  two  vols.  8vo,  his  'Analysis 
of  the  Phenomena  of  the  Human  Mind,'  a  work 
on  which  lie  bestowed  extraordinary  labour,  and 
which  displayed  much  philosophical  acuteness. 
Besides  these  works  ho  contributed  various  valua- 
ble articles  to  the  Supplement  of  the  Encyclopic- 
dia  Britannica,  principally  on  Government,  I-K^gis- 
lation,  Education,  Jurisprudence,  Law  of  Nations, 
Liberty  of  the  Press,  Colonies,  and  Prison  Disci- 
pline, which  were  also  published  as  separate  trea- 
tises. In  1835  he  produced,  without  his  name, 
his  *  Fragment  on  Mackintosh,'  in  which  he  se- 
verelv  criticises  Sir  James  Mackintosh's  'Disser- 
tation  on  the  History  of  Ethical  Philosophy.'  Mr. 
Mill  died  of  consumption,  June  23,  1836,  and  was 
buried  at  Kensington,  where  ho  had  resided  for 
the  last  ?i^(i  years  of  his  life.  He  left  a  widow 
and  nine  children. 


MILLAR. 


167 


MILLER. 


MILL.\R,  Jame8,  M.D.,  a  learned  and  indns- 
trious  compiler,  was  -educated  chiefly  at  the  uui- 
Tersity  of  Glasgow,  where  he  acquired  an  exten- 
sive and  accurate  knowledge  of  the  classics,  and 
enrly  evinced  a  taste  for  the  varied  departments 
of  natural  history.    He  took  his  medical  degree 
at  Edinburgh,  where  he  settled.    In  1807  he  pub- 
]i:<hcd,  in  connection  with  William  Vazio,  Esq., 
an  8vo  pamphlet,  entitled  *  Observations  on  the 
Advantages  and  Practicability  of  making  Tunnels 
under  Navigable  Rivers,  particularly  applicable  to 
the  proposed  Tunnel  under  the  Forth.*    He  was 
the  ori^nal  projector  and  editor  of  the  '  Encyclo- 
pedia Edinensis,  or  Dictionary  of  Aiis,  Sciences, 
and  ^iiscellaneons  Literature.'    He  was  also  cho- 
8CU  to  superintend  the  fourth  edition  of  the  Eucy- 
cIopoHlia  Britannica,  to  the  improvement  and  in- 
terests of  which  he  devoted  a  large  portion  of  his 
time.    Some  of  his  essays  and  larger  treatises 
written  for  these  works,  when  published  sepa- 
rately, were  ^ery  favourably  received  by  the  pub- 
lic.   He  likewise  contributed  largely  to  several  of 
Uic  periodical  journals  both  of  London  and  Edin- 
burgh.   In  1819  he  published,  in  12mo,  with  col- 
oured engravings,  '  A  Guide  to  Botany,  or  a  Fa- 
miliar Illustration  of  the  Linna?an  Classification 
of  Plants.'    Dr.  Millar  was  one  of  the  physicians 
to  the  Dispensary  at  Edinburgh,  and  in  that  ca- 
pacity, while  attending  to  the  usual  duties,  he 
caught  a  fever,  of  which  he  died  in  July  1827. 

MILLAR,  John,  an  eminent  lecturer  on  law, 
^vas  bom  June  22,  17:]5,  at  the  manse  of  Sliotts, 
I^narkshiro,  of  which  parish  his  father,  who  was 
afterwards  translated  to  Hamilton,  was  minister, 
lie  studied  at  the  university  of  Glasgow,  and  was 
at  first  intended  for  the  church,  but  subsequently 
preferred  the  bar.  On  leaving  college  he  was  for 
two  years  tutor  to  the  eldest  son  of  Ix^rd  Kames, 
dnring  which  time  he  became  acquainted  with 
David  Hume,  whose  metaphysical  opinions  he 
adopted.  He  was  admitted  advocate  in  1760,  and, 
in  the  following  year,  was  api)ointed  to  the  chair 
of  civil  law  in  the  university  of  Glasgow,  which 
Ijc  filled  for  nearly  forty  years  with  signal  success. 
His  lectures  on  the  difTerent  branches  of  jurispru- 
dence, and  on  the  general  principles  of  govern - 
ment,  excited  much  interest  at  the  period ;  they 
were  attended  by  many  who  afterwards  distin- 


guished themselves  in  public  life,  oud  from  him 
Lord  Brougham,  I^ord  Jeffrey,  Lord  Chief  Com- 
missioner Adam,  the  earl  of  Lauderdale,  and  some 
other  eminent  Whigs,  received  theur  first  lessons 
in  political  science.  In  1771  he  published  *  Ob- 
servations concerning  the  Distinction  of  Ranks  in 
Society,'  which  passed  through  several  editions, 
and  was  translated  into  French.  In  1787  he  pub- 
lished ^  Elements  of  the  Law  relating  to  Insur- 
ances.' The  same  yeai*  appeared  his  more 
elaborate  work,  entitled,  ^An  Historical  View 
of  the  English  Goveimment,  from  the  Settle- 
ment of  the  Saxons  in  Britain  to  the  Acces- 
sion of  the  House  of  Stuart,'  in  which  he  follows 
the  path  of  philosophical  speculation,  as  to  the 
origin  of  the  laws  and  institutions  of  nations, 
which  had  l>ecn  previously  traced  out  by  Lonl 
Kames  and  Dr.  Adam  Smith.  He  afterwards 
brought  down  the  History  of  the  Constitution  to 
the  Revolution,  and  the  work,  with  this  addition, 
was  published  in  -L  vols.  8vo  in  1803.  Professor 
Millar  died  May  30,  1801,  leaving  four  sons  and 
six  daughters.  A  fouiih  edition  of  his  *  Origin  of 
the  Distinction  of  Ranks'  appeared  in  1808,  with  a 
memoir  of  his  life,  by  his  nephew,  Mr.  John  Craig. 

MiLLKn,  tlie  name  of  a  family  possessing  a  baronetcy  of 
Great  Biitnin,  confori-ed  hi  1788  on  Sir  Thomas  Miller  of 
Bniskimming  in  Ayrshire,  and  Glenlee  in  Galloway,  a  distin- 
guished liiwyer  and  judge,  second  son  of  Mr.  William  Miller, 
writer  to  the  signet.  He  whs  born  3d  November  1717,  and 
admitted  advocate  at  the  Scotti>h  bar,  21st  February  1742. 
In  1748  lie  \ri\A  nominated  sheriff  of  the  stewartry  of  Kirk- 
cudbright, and  the  same  year  was  elected  joint  principal  clerk 
of  the  city  of  Glasgow.  These  offices  he  resigned  in  1755  on 
being  appointed  holicitor  to  the  excise  in  Scotland.  On  17th 
March  1759  he  became  solicitor-general,  and  on  30tli  April 
1760,  he  was  constituted  lord-advocate.  The  following  year 
he  was  chosen  M.I*,  for  Dumfries.  In  November  17C2  he 
was  elected  rector  of  the  university  of  Glasgow,  and  on  14th 
June  17CC,  on  the  death  of  Sir  Gilbert  Elliot  of  Minto,  ap- 
pointed lord-justice-clerk.  On  15lh  January  1788,  he  suc- 
ceeded Robert  Dundas  of  Arniston  as  president  of  the  court 
of  session,  and  on  Tebruary  19  of  the  same  year  was  created 
a  baronet.  He  died  at  his  seat  of  Barskimming  September 
27, 1789.  Ho  was  twice  man-ied,  and  by  his  fiivt  wife,  a 
daughter  of  John  Murdoch,  Esq.  of  Rosebank,  lord  provost 
of  Glasgow,  he  Inid  a  son  and  a  daughter.  Bums,  in  his 
'  Vision,*  .alludes  to  Sir  Thomas  Miller  as  "An  aged  judge 
dispensing  good." 

The  son,  Sir  William  Miller,  second  baronet,  also  an  emi- 
nent judge,  was  admitted  advocate,  9th  August  1777.  At 
the  keenly  contested  election  in  1780,  he  was  returned  M.l*. 
for  the  city  of  Edinburgh,  in  opposition  to  Sir  Lawrence 
Dundas,  and  took  bis  seat  in  parliament ;  but  was  unseated 
upon  a  petition,  and  his  opponent  declared  duly  elected.    On 


fr" 


MIl.LKi;. 


IjH 


IIUCIL 


'I 


I . 


1 1 
I 


I  ■ 


ii 

I- 
I 


ti 
I 


'JTiid  .M:iy,  ITU.i,  hr  un-i  .'ipfKiiiiUil  :i  lunl  of  vntoioii,  irlie:)  he 
tiH>U  l]:c  title  I  if  I.:*:*!  (!!i*ii!i.-(».  He  rc/i^ird  his  neat  in  18  lU, 
liaviii;;  brtii  a  juil^^e  (or  :i*K>ve  forty-five  jenrs.  BeMJrii 
bi'in;;  an  aocomplUlied  scholar,  h^  was  ntecmed  one  of  the 
he»t  L-iw\urs  of  his  time  on  the  Scottish  bcnrh.  He  died  in 
lalu.  He  WM  the  senior  vice-pn'biJent  of  the  Rojal  Society 
of  Kuinhnr};1i,  and  iras  frequently  viee- president  of  the  So- 
ciety of  Scutliyh  Aniiquarics,  of  which  he  wok  the  first  nd- 
iiiittcd  t'vUiW  (oi*  date  1781),  and  ohlest  member.  IIh  mar- 
ried Grizel,  dau<;hter  of  George  Chnlmerr,  K>q..  hy  whom  he 
li»d  G  sons  and  3  daughters. 

Hid  eldest  son,  Thomnji  Miller,  K?q..  |>n'iiec(nved  his  father 
in  1827.  r»y  hih  wile,  the  younp^t  dau;;hter  of  Sir  Alexim- 
der  renro>e-Gordon-Cummin{;,  baronet,  he  had  five  buns. 
The  eldest  son,  Sir  William  Miller,  third  baronet,  bom  in  Kd- 
iiihurgh  in  1815,  m.'irried  in  183U  the  eldest  daughter  of 
I.ieutonnnt-Gencnil  Sir  Thomas  M'Mahun,  bui-unet,  K.C.H., 
isrfue,  2  sons  and  2  danf^htem.  He  was  educatetl  at  Eton, 
ar.d  n :ui  fur  some  years  an  officer  in  the  13th  Lancers;  ap- 
p«iinteda  magistrate  for  Ayrshire  in  lh38,  succeeded  his 
^'nuid.'ather  as  3J  h:irui:et,  May  0,  18lfi,  made  a  kni;;ht  cf>m- 
maniler  of  the  order  of  the  Temple  in  January  the  Kime  year. 

The  second  son  of  the  second  baronet,  I.ieutenant-Culoiicl 
William  Miller,  Ist  Foot  Guards,  was  mortally  wounded  at 
Quatre  Br.ix.  Jnnc  IG,  1815,  and  dic<I  .it  Urussels  the  ('oliow- 
ing  day.  **  In  his  last  mortal  scene,^  sjiys  a  letter  dated 
Brussels,  June  23,  1815,  published  at  the  time, ''  he  disjilayi>d 
the  soul  and  the  spirit  of  a  hero.  On  finding  himself  wuumied, 
lie  sent  for  Colonel  Thomas  (wlio  was  killed  two  days  after- 
wards,  at  Waterloo)  —  *  Thomas,*  said  he,  '  i  feel  1  am 
miu'tally  wounded  ;  I  am  plcabed  to  tliink  that  it  is  my  fate 
ntlier  than  rnnrs,  wlnise  life  is  involved  in  that  of  vour  v(>uii>r 
wife.'  After  a  pnnM*,  he  said  faintly,  *  1  should  like  to  see 
the  colours  of  the  rf);iment  once  more  before  I  quit  then  ffr 
ever.'  Thev  were  brouirht  to  him.  and  waved  n>und  hi.s 
wounded  bmly.  His  cc>untenanre  bri^^hteiied,  he  smiled;  niid 
di^elarin';  himself  siitisfied,  he  waa  earned  fnim  the  field.  In 
ail  this  you  will  see  the  failing  of  a  hero — a  delicacy  of  (senti- 
ment, a  belf-devution,  and  a  n■^ignation,  whicli  have  I'.vwv 
I>ei-n  surpassed.*'  His  remains  were  interivd  at  Unissols,  in 
a  cemetery  where  lie  many  of  the  more  distinguiahed  of  the 
jieroes  tvho  fell  at  Quatre  Hras  and  WaterltNi.  On  a  monu- 
mental stone  erected  to  his  meinon'.  with  a  suitable  iiisen|i- 
ti'tn,  it  is  stated  that  he  was  thirty-one  }ta!>  o!d  at  the  time 
of  his  de:ith. 


MILKKK,  Ilrciii,tlic  fnv*t  of  Scottish  gcologi.'^t.s 
was  born  in  Cromarty,  in  the  north  of  Scotland, 
October  lOtli,  1802.  lli^  fallicr,  the  owner  and 
conimandcr  of  a  nloop  in  tlie  coasting  trade,  wlio 
had  served  iu  tlic  British  nav}*,  perished  in  a  storm 
in  November  1807,  wlien  Ilujjh  was  just  five  years 
of  age.  lie  was  descended  from  a  long  line  of 
seufarinj^  men,  and  he  mentions  two  uncles  of  his 
father,  sailors,  one  of  wliom  had  sailed  round  the 
world  with  Anson,  and  tlie  other,  like  himsi'lf, 
perished  at  sea.  The  paternal  grandfather  of 
lliigh,  wlien  entering  the  frith  of  Cromarty,  was 
struck  overboard  durinjj  n  suddeu  gust,  by  the 
lioom  of  his  vessel,  and  never  rose  again,      llis 


gri*nt-gniudfnthcr,  whose  name  was  John  Feddes, 
was  one  of  the  last  of  the  buccaneer?. 

Pix*viuU5  to  his  father's  death  llngh  had  bcco 
sent  to  a  dame's  school,  where  he  rcraAined  a  year, 
and  was  taught  to  prouonuce  his  letters  in  the  old 
Scottish  mode,  a  peculiarity  wliicli  he  could  ncvei 
get  ([uit  of.  He' was  siiUseqnendy  transferred  to 
the  parish  grammar  school,  where  lie  made  some 
progress  iu  the  rudiments  of  the  I^tiu  language, 
lie  was  a  great  render,  and  as  he  read  even'  book 
that  came  in  his  way,  he  thus  came  to  acquire, 
in  course  of  time,  a  vast  fimd  of  information. 

Kveu  at  this  early  period  his  tnni  for  geological 
enquiries  began  to  develop  itself.  '^  The  shores 
of  Cromarty,"  he  says,  in  his '  Schools  and  Schoid- 
masters,*  ''  are  strewed  over  with  watcr-rolii*d 
fragments  of  the  primary  rocks,  derived  chieHy 
from  the  west  during  the  ages  of  the  boulder  d»y: 
and  I  soon  learned  to  take  a  deep  interest  in 
sauntering  over  the  various  pcbblc-bcds  when 
shaken  up  by  recent  storms,  and  in  Icaniiug  to 
distinguish  their  numerous  components.**  From 
his  uncle  Sandy,  whom  he  used  frequently  to  ac- 
company in  his  evening  walks  aloug  the  senshon*, 
he  di'rived  some  insight  into  natural  history*,  and 
especially  conchology.  He  subseqtiently  extend- 
ed  his  researches  to  the  Hill  of  Cromarty  and  the 
caves  in  the  Cromarty  Sutors,  and  begau  to  make 
culled  ion.<<.  Even  in  his  school  days  he  set  about 
writing  poetiy,  so  that  he  soon  came  to  be  looked 
upon  as  a  sort  of  village  prodig>*.  He  was  after- 
wards sent  to  a  subscription  school  which  lund 
been  opened  in  his  native  place,  where  he  only 
remained  a  few  months.  On  quitting  it,  which 
he  did  abruptly,  in  consequence  of  a  severe  drub- 
bing which  he  had  received  from  the  schoolmaster, 
he  revenged  himself  by  writing  a  satirical  poem, 
which  he  styled  *  The  Pedagogue.* 

At  the  age  of  17  he  was  bound  apprentice  to  an 
unclo-iu-law,  a  stone  mason,  tosen'e  for  the  space 
of  three  yeat?.  He  was  set  to  work  in  the  quar- 
ries of  Cromarty.  *'  llie  quarry,"  he  says,  **  iu 
which  I  commenced  my  life  of  labour  was  a  sand- 
stone one,  and  exhibited  in  the  section  of  the 
furze-covered  bank  w  hich  it  presented,  a  bar  of 
deep  red  stone  beneath,  aud  a  bar  of  pale  red  clay 
alK>ve.  Both  deposits  belonged  to  formations 
equally  unknown  at  the  time  to  the  geologist. 


MILLKK, 


159 


HUGH. 


i>Avc  for  tbe  wholesome  restraint  tlint  coufiued  me 
for  day  after  day  to  this  spot,  I  shonhl  perhaps  have 
paid  little  attention  to  either.  It  was  the  necessity 
which  made  me  a  qnarrier  that  taught  me  to  l>e  a 
geologist."  Though  both  a  skiifiil  and  vigorous 
workman,  lie  never  seems  to  have  taken  kindly 
to  his  trade;  nor  did  he  eitlier  associate  or 
sympathize  with  Ids  fellow-masons.  He  was 
seldom  with  his  fvllow-masons,  except  wlicn  at 
work,  and  he  spent  tlie  hours,  wliich  they  devoted 
to  jollity  and  drinking,  in  a  close  and  enthusiastic 
reading  of  i>oetiy  and  science. 

After  working  for  some  years  as  a  conntry  ma- 
son, storing  his  mind  all  the  time,  by  reading  and 
obser\'ation,  with  a  knowledge  of  the  facts  and 
processes  of  nature,  Mr.  Miller,  on  reaching  the 
iige  of  twenty-one,  resolved  upon  going  to  Eilin- 
burgh,  and  making  his  way  as  a  mechanic  among 
the  stone-cutters  of  the  Scottish  capital,  perhaps, 
as  he  says,  the  most  skilful  in  their  profession  in 
the  world.  lie  soon  got  employment  from  a  mas- 
ter-builder, and  was  engaged  to  work  at  a  manor 
bouse  near  the  village  of  Niddry  Mill,  a  few  miles 
to  the  sonth  of  Edinburgh,  at  twenty-four  shil- 
lings a-wcek  wages.  On  a  reduction  of  the  wages 
of  I  he  men  to  fifteen  shillings,  a  strike  took  place, 
in  which,  however,  he  took  no  part. 

In  1824  occurred  the  memorable  fires  in  the 
parliament  close  and  High  Street  of  Edinburgh, 
and  a  building  mania  having  thereafter  sot  in, 
which  ended  disastrously  in  a  year  or  two,  mnsou- 
work  was  for  a  time  exceedingly  plentiful  in  that 
lity.  Mr.  Miller,  however,  finding  his  lungs  af- 
fected, from  the  dust  of  the  stone  which  lie  had 
been  he\\ing  for  the  previous  two  veal's  lodgiug  in 
them,  instead  of  taking  employment  in  Edinburgh, 
returned  to  Ci-omarty  to  recruit  his  health.  "  I 
was,*'  he  says,  **  too  palpably  sinking  in  tlesh  and 
strength  to  render  it  safe  for  me  to  encounter  the 
consequences  of  another  season  of  hard  work  as  a 
stone-cutter.  From  the  stage  of  the  malady  at 
which  I  had  already  arrived,  poor  workmen,  nna- 
Ug  to  do  what  I  did,  throw  themselves  loose  from 
tbdr  employment,  and  sink  in  six  or  eight  months 
iato  the  grai'e — some  at  an  earlier,  some  at  a  later 
period  of  life ;  but  fio  general  is  the  affection,  that 
few  of  our  Edinburgh  stone-cutters  pass  their  for- 
tk^th  year  onacathed,  and  not  one  out  of  every 


fifty  of  their  number  ever  reaches  his  forty- fifth 
year." 

On  recovering  from  a  long  and  depressing  ill- 
ness, he  resolved  upon  following  a  higher  branch 
of  the  art  than  ordinary  stone-cutting.  Tliis  was 
the  hewing  of  oniato  dial  stones,  sculptured  ta- 
blets and  tombstone  inscriptions.  It  was  an  ad- 
vantage to  him  that  his  new  branch  of  employ- 
ment brought  him  sometimes  for  a  few  days  into 
countiy-  districts,  and  among  solitary  churchyards, 
which  presented  new  fields  of  obser^'ation,  and 
opened  up  new  tracts  of  inquiry.  But  of  this  sort 
of  work  there  was  not  a  superabundance,  at  least 
in  that  locality,  and  about  the  end  of  June  1828, 
Mr.  Miller  found  that  he  had  nothing  to  do,  and 
acting  on  the  advice  of  a  friend,  who  believed  that 
his  stylo  of  cutting  inscriptions  could  not  fail  to 
secure  for  him  a  good  many  little  jobs  in  the 
churcliyai-ds  of  Inverness,  he  visited  that  place, 
and  inserted  a  brief  advertisement  in  one  of  the 
newspapers,  soliciting  employment.  While  wait- 
ing for  it,  he  was  accosted  one  day  in  the  street 
by  the  recruiting  sergeant  of  a  Highland  regiment, 
who  asked  him  if  he  did  not  belong  to  the  Aird. 
''  No,  not  to  the  Aird,  to  Cromarty,"  he  replied. 
"  Ah !  to  Cromarty — verj-  fine  place  !  But  would 
you  not  better  bid  adieu  to  Cromarty,  and  come 
along  with  me?  We  have  a  capital  gi*enadier 
company ;  and  in  our  regiment  a  stout  steady  man 
is  always  sure  to  get  on."  Mr.  Miller  thanked 
him,  but  of  coui*sc  declined  the  invitation. 

While  at  Inverness  he  first  "rushed  into  print." 
Selecting  some  of  his  best  pieces  in  verse,  he  got 
them  printed  in  a  volume  in  the  office  of  the  In- 
verness Courier,  the  editor  of  that  pajKr,  Mr. 
Robert  Carruthoi-s,  inserting  from  time  to  time 
some  of  them  in  his  "  poet's  comer."  The  volume 
was  published  without  his  name.  On  the  title-pnge 
it  wns  simply  intimated  that  the  poems  had  been 
"written  in  the  leisure  hours  of  a  journeyman 
mason,"  and,  thus  modestly  announced,  the  book, 
for  a  first  effort,  was  very  favourably  received. 
On  his  return  to  Cromarty  he  began  to  contribute 
a  series  of  letters,  on  the  herring  fishery,  to  the 
newspnper  above  mentioned.  These  letters  at- 
tracted attention,  and  were  republished,  on  his 
behalf,  by  the  proprietors  of  the  paper,  "in  con- 
sequence of  the  interest  they  had  excited  in  the 


li 


rrJJ 


1! 


MILLEK, 


leo 


HUGH. 


northern  comities.'*  His  Verses  and  liid  Letters 
i^oon  enlarged  tlie  circle  of  liis  friends,  and  anion g»t 
01  lien*,  Sir  Tlioinns  Dick  Lander,  baronet,  author 
of  the  *  Wolf  of  Badenocli,'  and  other  work.*.  Miss 
Duiihar  of  Boath,  and  Principal  Baird  of  Edin- 
burgh, slioucd  him  much  kindness.  The  bitter 
urged  htm  to  rjuit  the  north  and  proceed  to  Edin- 
bnrgli,  as  tlic  pri;]K.'r  tield  for  a  literar}'  man  in 
Scotland,  but  as  lie  did  not  think  that  he  could 
enjoy  equal  o))i>ortunities  of  acquainting  himself 
witli  the  occult  and  the  new  in  natural  science,  as 
xvlien  plying  his  labours  in  the  provinces  as  a  me- 
ihanic,  he  determined  to  continue  for  some  years 
more  in  the  country.  At  the  principal's  dcsiiv, 
however,  he  wrote  for  him  an  autobiogrn)>hic 
sketch  of  liis  life,  to  his  return  from  Edinburgh  to 
Cromarty  in  lb'2'j. 

Mr.  Miller  next  set  himself  to  record,  in  his 
leisure  hours,  the  traditions  of  his  native  place  and 
the  :furroundiug  district,  mid  a  bulky  manuscript 
vulumc  soon  grew  up  under  bis  hands.  All  this 
liuic  he  lost  no  opi)ort unity  of  contiuuiug  his  geo- 
lo;^ncal  researches,  and,  gradually  advancing  in 
discoveries,  in  course  of  time  he  came  to  have  a 
thorough  knowledge  of  the  extinct  organisms  of 
the  inimitivc  world.  Many  of  his  friends  wished 
to  fix  him  down  to  literature  as  his  proper  walk, 
but  he  himself  thought  that  his  special  vocation 
was  science,  and  he  accordingly  devoted  his  mind 
I')  it  with  an  ardour  that  soon  enabled  him  to  at- 
tain to  jjurpassing  excellence  even  as  a  literary 
man.  Aftor  the  p.issing  of  the  Ueform  Bill,  he 
was  elected  a  member  of  the  town  council  of  Cro- 
marty, but  he  never  attended  but  one  meeting  of 
the  council. 

It  was  in  his  working  attire  that  he  lirst  met 
the  lady  who  was  destined  to  become  his  wife. 
He  had  been  hewing,  he  tells  us,  in  the  upper 
part  of  his  uncle's  garden,  and  had  just  closed  his 
work  for  the  evening,  when  three  ladies  made 
their  appearance  to  sec  a  curious  old  dial  stone 
which  he  had  dug  out  of  the  earth  long  before. 
With  the  youngest  of  the  three  he  afterwards  had 
many  opportunities  of  meeting,  and  at  length  the}' 
came  to  a  mutual  underatauding.  It  was  ngi'ccd 
between  them  that  if  in  the  course  of  three  years 
no  suitable  field  of  exertion  should  open  for  him 
ut  home,  they  should  mairy  and  emigrate  to  the 


United  States.  Two  years  of  the  time  agreed 
upon  had  passed,  and  lie  was  still  an  operative 
mason,  wlicu  in  1834  a  branch  of  tlio  Commercial 
Bank  of  Scotland  being  cstablislied  in  Cromarty, 
the  office  of  accountant  was  oflered  to  him  by  Mr. 
Ross  tiic  agent.  lie  was  at  this  time  thirty-two 
years  of  age,  and  although  afraid  that  he  would 
make  but  an  indifferent  accountant,  never  having 
had  any  experience  in  fignres,  he  was  yet  induced 
to  accept  the  appointment.  He  was  accordingly 
sent  to  the  parent  bank  at  Edinburgh,  to  acquire 
the  necessary  instructions  to  fit  him  for  his  new 
situation. 

On  his  arrival,  he  was  ordered  to  the  Commer- 
cial Bank  branch  at  J^inlithgow,  to  be  initiated 
into  the  proper  system  of  book-keeping.  Being, 
as  he  says  himself,  **  altogether  deficient  in  the 
cleverness  that  can  promptly  master  isolated  de- 
tails, when  in  ignoranco  of  their  bearing  on  the 
general  scheme  to  which  they  belong,"  lie  was  at 
first  rather  at  a  loss,  and  was  looked  upon  b}'  the 
local  agent  as  particularly  stupid.  But  as  soon 
as  ho  came  to  comprehend  the  central  principle 
by  which  the  system  was  governed,  he  at  once 
showed  his  competence  to  manage  the  business  of 
the  bank.  In  the  arena  of  science  this  law  ruled 
his  genius  with  a  necessity  not  less  inexorable 
than  in  the  commercial  field.  From  tlic  centre  of 
any  science,  when  once  he  was  able  to  master  it, 
he  could  proceed  with  the  utmost  case,  but  he  in- 
variably found  that  when  he  attempted  to  np- 
proacli  as  if  from  the  outside,  the  details  baffled 
and  repulsed  him. 

After  two  months*  probation  in  the  branch  bank 
at  Linlithgow,  he  returned  to  Cromarty,  and 
straightway  commenced  his  new  course  as  an  ac- 
countant, at  a  salary  of  £S0  a-year.  When  fairly 
seated  at  the  desk  he  felt,  he  says,  as  if  liis  latter 
days  were  destined  to  difi'er  from  his  eai'lier  ones, 
well  nigli  as  much  as  those  of  Peter  of  old,  who, 
when  he  was  ^^  young,  gli-ded  himself,  and  walked 
whither  he  would,  but  who,  when  old,  was  girded 
by  others,  and  carried  whither  he  woidd  not."  A 
sedentary  life  had  at  first  a  depressing  effect  on 
his  intellectual  pursuits,  and  for  a  time  he  inter- 
mitted them  almost  entirely,  but  as  he  became 
inured  to  it,  his  mind  recovered  its  spring,  and,  as 
before,  he  began  to  occupy  his  leisure  liours  in 


il 


■i 


I 


MILLBR, 


161 


lIUGlf. 


liteniy  and  scientific  exertions.  The  publication, 
in  18S5,  of  his  *  Scenes  and  Legends  of  the  North 
of  Scotland,*  made  his  name  known  in  literary 
drcles.  With  a  few  exceptions,  the  book  was 
highly  commended  by  the  critics.  He  relates,  with 
ftTery  natural  feeling  of  satisfaction,  that  *^  Leigh 
Hut  gave  it  a  kind  and  genial  notice  in  his  Jour- 
wd;  it  was  characterized  by  Robert  Cliambers 
not  less  farourably  in  hi$;  and  Dr.  Hetherington, 
the  future  historian  of  the  Chnrch  of  Scotland  and 
of  the  Westminster  Assembly  of  Divines — at  that 
tine  a  licentiate  of  the  church — made  it  the  sub- 
ject of  an  elaborate  aud  very  friendly  critique  in 
the  ^  Presbyterian  Review.'  Nor  was  I  less  grat- 
ified," he  continues,  *^  by  the  terms  in  which  it 
wu  spoken  of  by  the  late  Baron  Hume,  the  ne- 
phew and  realduar}*  legatee  of  the  historian— him- 
self Ytrj  much  a  critic  of  the  old  school — in  a 
note  to  a  north  country  friend.  Ho  described  it 
u  a  work  *  written  in  au  English  style  which  *  he 
'  bid  begun  to  regard  as  one  of  the  lost  arts.*  '* 
The  workf  however,  from  the  local  nature  of  the 
subjects,  attained  to  no  great  popularity,  but  as 
the  anthor^s  reputation  increased,  its  later  editions 
hsve  sold  better  than  the  first. 

After  a  courtship  of  five  years,  he  married  the 
joong  lady  formerly  mentioned,  Lydia  Fraser, 
who  was  then  residing  with  her  mother  in  Cro- 
>uuty,  engaged  in  teaching.  Aflter  their  mar- 
riage, his  wife  continued  to  take  a  few  pupils,  and 
ftt  this  time,  he  tells  us,  the  united  earnings  of  the 
household  did  not  much  exceed  a  hundred  pounds 
a-jear.  He,  therefore,  began  to  add  to  his  in- 
cone  by  writing  for  the  periodicals.  To  Wilson *s 
'Border  Tales,*  commenced  in  18;);'),  he  contri- 
bited,  after  the  death  of  Mr.  John  Mackay  AVil- 
UQ  of  Berwick-npon-Tweed,  their  originator, 
Mveral  stories,  for  which  he  got  £25  in  all,  being 
It  the  rate  of  three  guineas  n-picce,  the  stipulated 
vages  for  filling  a  weekly  number.  For  supplying 
the  same  space  with  a  tale  weekly,  which  he  did 
for  three  or  four  weeks,  the  writer  of  this  got  five 
pounds  each  story  from  the  proprietors  of  the 
Dew  *  Tales  of  the  Borders,'  published  in  Glasgow 
is  1848. 

Finding  that  some  of  his  stories  were  rejected 
bf  the  editor,  Mr.  Miller  ceased  to  write  for  the 
'Border  Tales.*    He  then  made  an  offer  of  his 

IIL 


services  to  Mr.  Robert  Chambers,  by  whom  they 
were  accepted,  and  for  the  two  following  years  he 
occasionally  contributed  papers  to  Chambers* 
Journal,  with  his  name  attached  to  his  several 
articles. 

He  still  continued  his  researches  among  the 
rocks  in  the  neighbourhood  of  Cromarty,  in  deter- 
mining the  true  relations  of  their  various  beds  aud 
the  character  of  their  organisms.  To  enable  him 
to  examine  the  best  sections  of  the  Sutors  and 
the  adjacent  hills,  with  their  associated  deposits, 
which  cannot  be  reached  without  a  boat,  he  pur- 
chased a  light  little  yawl,  furnished  with  mist  and 
sail,  and  that  rowed  four  oars,  to  enable  him  to 
carry  out  his  explorations.  At  this  time  a  letter 
of  his  on  a  local  subject,  inserted  in  one  of  the  dis- 
trict papers,  procui*ed  him  the  offer  of  a  newspa- 
per editorship,  which,  not  deeming  hunself  quali- 
fied for  it,  he  at  once  declined. 

Amongst  his  other  occupations  at  this  busy 
period  of  his  life  was  writing  the  memoir  of  a 
deceased  townsman,  Mr.  William  Forsyth  of  Cro- 
marty, at  the  request  of  his  relative  and  son-in- 
law,  Mr.  Isaac  Forsyth,  bookseller,  Elgin.  This 
little  work  was  not  intended  for  publication,  being 
pi'iiitcd  for  private  circulation  among  Mr.  For- 
syth's friends.  His  career  hitherto  had  been  pros- 
perous for  a  person  iu  his  condition  in  life.  From 
the  humble  and  obscure  position  of  a  journeyman 
stone-mason  he  had  attained  to  that  of  an  ac- 
countant in  a  bank.  He  was  known  as  an  author 
and  respected  as  an  explorer  in  geological  science. 
In  private  he  had  made  *^  troops  of  friends,"  and 
altogether  he  had  ^^  got  on "  in  the  world  better 
than  in  his  early  days  he  could  have  had  any  rea- 
son to  expect.  He  was  now  to  be  removed  to  a 
higher  sphere,  and  to  be  placed  in  circumstances 
more  favourable  for  the  full  development  of  his 
genius,  and  the  complete  display  of  his  extraordi- 
nar}'  attainments,  than  any  that  even  his  wildest 
ambition  conld  have  hoped  for  a  few  years  before. 

He  had  taken  very  little  interest  in  the  Volun- 
tary controversy,  bnt  when  the  Non-intrusion 
question  came  to  be  agitated,  he  deemed  it  time 
to  buckle  on  his  armour,  in  other  words,  to  take 
np  his  pen  manfully  in  behalf  of  the  rights  of  the 
church  when  assailed  by  the  civil  conrts.  The 
famous  Auchteranlcr  case  was  the  occasion  of  his 


1 1 


;  I 


Ij 


-    <  — 


MILLER, 


162 


HUGH. 


I     ! 


ii 
I 


■     I . 


I  ■ 


■  I 


rtrst  Appearance  as  a  writoi*  in  tlie  field  of  ecclet<i- 
afftical  controvcrs}',  In  which  lie  was  destined  to 
take  sncli  a  pi-ominent  and  influential  part.  The 
campaign  was  a  prolonged  one,  and  ended,  as 
every  body  knows,  in  the  disruption  of  the  Estiib- 
Uslicd  ChuR'h  of  Scotland.  At  no  time  of  his  life 
did  he  exhibit  greater  energy  of  intellect  than  as- 
the  champion  of  the  non-intrui*ion  and  Free  church 
party  in  the  church,  although  it  must  be  confessed 
that,  sometimes  led  away  alike  by  prejudice  and 
zeal,  lie  proved  himself  less  the  judicious  and  dis- 
criminating advocate  than  the  bitter  and  uncom- 
promising ecclesiastical  pailiznii. 

The  struggle  began  in  18o4,  with  the  passing  of 
the  celebrated  "Veto  Act,"  founded  on  the  early 
principle  of  the  church,  that  ministci's  should  not 
be  Intruded  on  parishes  contraiy  to  the  consent  of 
the  parishioners.  As  the  church  thus  considered 
the  acceptability  of  a  pi-esentec  a  necessar}*  quali- 
fication, the  object  of  the  act  wns  to  instruct  nil 
presbyteries  to  reject  presentees  to  whom  a  nmjo- 
rity  of  male  heads  of  families,  communicants,  ob- 
jected. In  the  case  of  the  Auchterarder  presen- 
tation, when  this  was  acted  upon,  the  presentee 
brought  an  action  in  the  court  of  session,  to  de- 
clare it  an  undue  interference  with  his  civil  rights. 
The  church,  in  reply,  contended  that  the  matter 
wns  purely  ecclesiastical,  and  altogether  beyond 
the  jurisdiction  of  the  civil  courts.  The  court  of 
session  thought  otherwise,  and,  in  March  18'>8. 
decided  that  as  patronage  had  been  constituted 
property  by  act  of  parliament,  the  obnoxious  pre- 
sentee, Mr.  Young,  was  entitled  to  be  "intruded 
upon '^  the  reclaiming  ]iaririh,  ns  the  rights  of  the 
patron  must  bo  mnliituined.  The  church  appe^iled 
to  the  House  of  Lords,  who,  in  ^fay  1880,  con- 
firmed the  judgment  of  the  court  of  session.  The 
General  Assembly  declined  to  ini))lement  the  de- 
cision of  the  civil  tribunals,  holding  itself  iirespon- 
sible  to  any  civil  court  for  its  obedience  to  the 
laws  of  Christ. 

On  reading  I^rd  Brougham's  speech,  and  the 
decision  of  the  House  of  Ix)rds,  in  the  Auchternr- 
der  case,  Mr.  Miller  felt  deeply  the  peril  of  the 
church.  That  night,  he  tells  us,  he  slept  none, 
and  in  the  morning,  determined  u]>on  taking  the 
])opnlar  view  of  the  question,  he  commenced  his 
famous  *  Letter  from  one  of  the  Si'Ottish  People  to 


tho  Right  Hon.  I/)rd  Broogham  and  Vaox,  on  the 
opinions  expressed  by  his  Lordship  in  tlie  Auch- 
terarder case.*  That  letter  had  an  Important  and 
decisive  cflfect  on  his  after  life.  On  finishing  it, 
he  despatched  the  manuscript  to  the  manager  of 
the  Commercial  Bank  at  Edinburgh,  Mr.  Robert  > 
Paul,  from  whom  he  had  already  cxperieneed 
some  kindness,  and  who,  in  the  great  ecclesiasti- 
cal struggle,  took  a  decided  part  with  the  cbnrcfa. 
Tliat  gentleman,  after  reading  it,  hastened  with 
it  to  his  minister,  the  Rev.  Mr.  afterwards  Dr. 
Candlish  of  St.  George's,  who,  recognising  tho 
ability  it  displayed  and  its  popular  charicter, 
urged  its  iinme<1iate  publication.  It  was  accord- 
ingly put  into  the  hands  of  Mr.  John  Johnstone, 
the  then  well-known  Church  bookseller.  The 
evangelical  paiiy  in  the  church  had  been  for  some 
time  anxious  to  establish  an  ecclesiastical  news- 
])nper  in  Edinburgh  for  the  support  of  their  prin- 
ciplos,  and  a  meeting  of  ministers  and  elders  had 
bo(Mi  held  in  that  city,  shortly  before,  to  take 
measures  for  the  purpose.  A  properly  qualified 
editor  was  wanted,  and  on  i*eading  the  manuscript 
of  Mr.  Miller's  *  Letter  to  Lord  Brougham,*  Dr. 
C'andlish  instnntly  fixed  uiK)n  its  writer  as  the 
very  pei*son  they  had  been  looking  for  to  fill  that 
oftioe. 

Meanwhile  the  *  Letter*  was  published  in  the 
fonn  of  a  pamphlet,  and  was  at  once  sncccssfuL 
It  ran  rapidly  through  four  editions  of  a  thousand 
coj)ies  each,  and  was  ivad  pretty  extensively  by 
men  who  were  not  Non-intrusionists.  '^  Among 
these,"'  says  its  author,  "  thero  were  several  mem- 
bers of  the  ministry  of  the  time,  including  Lord 
Melbounie,  who  at  first  regarded  it,  as  I  have 
been  informed,  as  the  composition,  under  a  popn* 
lar  form  and  a  nom-de-guerre^  of  some  of  the  Non- 
intrusionist  leaders  in  Edinburgh;  and  by  Mr. 

I 

Daniel  O'Conneli,  who  had  no  such  suspicions, 
and  who,  though  he  lacked  sympathy,  as  ho  said, 
with  the  ecclesiastical  views  which  it  advocated, 
enjoj-ed  what  he  tenned  its  '  racy  English,'  and 
the  position  in  which  it  placed  the  noble  lord  to 
w  horn  it  was  addressed.'*  Mr.  W.  £.  Gladstone,  too, 
in  his  elaborate  work  on  *  Church  Principles  Con- 
sidered in  their  Results,*  noticed  it  very  favoura- 
bly. His  words  arc:  ^^Over  and  above  the  judi- 
cial arguments  in  the  reports  of  the  Auchterarder 


MILT.EU, 


1^ 


HUGH. 


and  I^tlicudy  cases,  the  Oliitrcli  question  has  been 
iliscnsaed  in  a  great  varietj'  of  pamphlets,  some  of 
them  yery  long  and  veiy  able,  others  of  them  VC17 
long  withont  being  particularly  able,  and  one  of 
them  particularly  able  without  being  long ;  I  mean 
the  elegant  and  masculine  production  of  Hugh 
Miller,  entitled  '  A  Letter  to  Lord  Brougham/  " 

Almost  immediately  after  its  publication,  ^fr. 
Miller  received  a  letter  from  Edinburgh,  request- 
ing him  to  meet  there  with  the  leading  non-intrn- 
Monists.    lie  accordingly  proceeded  to  the  cnpitnl, 
and  agreed  to  undertake  the  editorship  of  their 
projected  newspaper,  the  Witness.     lie  tlicn  re- 
turned to  Cromarty  to  make  arrangements  for 
filially  quitting  tliat  place.    He  closed  his  con- 
nexion with  the  bank,  and  devoted  a  few  weeks 
very  sedulously  to  geology,  and   was  fortunate 
i'uoogli  to  find  specimens  on  which  Agsissiz  found- 
ed two  of  his  fossil  species.    On  leaving  his  native 
town  ho  was  presented  witli  an  elegant  breakfast 
service  of  plate  from  a  numerous  circle  of  friends, 
of  all  shades  of  politics  and  both  sides  of  the 
church,  and  was  entertained  at  a  public  dinner. 
After  being  fifteen  years  a  journeyman  stone-ma- 
son, and  fi\e  years  a  bank  accountant,  he  was  now 
at  last  placed  in  his  true  position,  and  was  ena- 
hled  to  giro  those  wonderful  works  to  the  press 
vliich  hftve  procured  for  him  a  world-wide  repu- 
tation. 

The  Witness  commenced  at  tlie  beginning  of 
1840.  During  the  first  twelvemonth,  he  wrote  for 
its  columns  a  series  of  geological  chapters,  which 
attracted  the  notice  of  the  geologists  of  the  British 
Aiksociation,  assembled  that  year  at  Glasgow.  In 
the  collected  fonn  they  were  afterwards  jniblislied, 
luidcr  the  title  of  '  The  Old  Ued  Sandstone ;  or, 
Xcw  Walks  in  an  Old  fiohl.'  Of  this  work  the 
Westminster  Keview  said:  "The  geological  for- 
mation known  as  the  Old  Red  Sandstone  was  long 
»ui>iK)sed  to  be  peculiarly  barren  of  fossils.  Tlie 
researches  of  geologists,  especially  those  of  Mr. 
Miller,  have,  however,  shown  that  formation  to 
Itc  us  rich  in  organic  remains  as  any  that  has  been 
explored.  Mr.  Miller's  exceedingly  Interesting 
liook  on  this  formation  is  just  the  sort  of  work  to 
render  any  subject  popular.  Jc  is  written  in  a 
ii'iuarkably  pleasing  style,  and  contains  a  wonder- 
ful amount  of  information."    The  Witness,  in  the 


meantime,  under  his  editorship  rose  rapidly  in 
circulation.  Tliat  paper,  indeed,  owed  its  success 
to  his  able  articles,  literary,  ecclesiastical,  and  geo- 
logical, and  during  the  course  of  tho  first  three 
years  his  employers  raised  his  salary  to  £400.  Tie 
had  published  another  pamphlet  on  the  church 
question,  entitled  'The  Whigg^m  of  the  Old 
School,  as  exemplified  by  the  past  histor}*  and 
present  condition  of  the  Church  of  Scotland,' 
which  soon  reached  a  second  edition. 

As  the  cnsjs  of  the  church's  fate  approached, 
Mr.  Miller's  consummately  able  articles  in  tho 
Witness  greatly  aided  in  enlightening  the  public 
mind  on  those  principles  on  which  the  Free  church 
was  formed,  and  he  may  be  said  to  have  exercised 
an  influence  among  the  supporters  of  the  spiritual 
independence  of  the  church  as  great  as  that  even 
of  Dr.  Chalmers  himself.     His  mastery  of  tho 
English  language  was  complete,  and  to  this  he 
added  a  singular  felicity  of  reasoning  and  a  won- 
derfid  vividness  of  imagination  not  usually  com- 
bined.  Tn  originality  and  appropriateness  of  illns- 
tration,  and  graphic  force  and  telling  significancy 
of  diction,  no  contemporary  could  compete  with 
him.    In  the  early  yeai*s  of  the  Witness,  a  twice- 
a-week  paper,  his  was  indeed  a  life  of  strife  and 
toil.    In  the  circumstances  of  the  time,  when  po- 
lemical feeling  was  carried  beyond  due  bounds  on 
both  sides,  as  the  editor  of  the  principal,  and  for 
a  while  the  only,  non-intrusion  paper  in  the  king- 
dom, it  was  impossible  but  that  his  combative 
spirit  would  be  exerted  to  the  utmost.     He  had 
to  contend  with  many  fierce  and  unscimpulous 
enemies,  as  almost  the  entire  newspaper  press 
was  against  him  and  the  principles  for  which  ho 
so  ably  and   fearlessly   contended.     "For   fidl 
twenty  years,"  he  says,  "  I  had  never  been  en- 
gaged in  a  quaiTcl  on  my  own  account :  all  my 
(jnan'ols,  either  directly  or  indirectly,  were  eccle- 
siastical ones ; — I  had  fought  for  my  minister,  or 
for  my  brother  parishioners ;  and  fain  now  would 
I  have  lived  at  ])cace  with  all  men ;  but  the  edi- 
torship of  a  non-intritsion  paper  involved,  as  a 
portion  of  its  duties,  war  with  all  the  world." 
This  truth  he  experienced  to  its  fullest  extent, 
but  he  was  a  match  fur  all  opponents,  and  at 
length  few  indeed  were  the  antagonists  willing  to 
cope  with  him.   From  Dr.  Chalmers,  himself '*  the 


I! 

1 1 


I 
I 


i! 


I 


w 


MILLER, 


1G4 


HUGH. 


greatest  living  Scotsman  "  of  liis  day,  he  obtained 
that  proud  title,  and  while  in  piibiic  this  self-edu- 
cated and  self-reliant  workiug-man  showed  no 
mercy  to  those  who  entered  the  lists  against  him, 
or  assailed  the  principles  of  the  Free  church,  in 
private  he  was  a  singularly  manly,  modest,  and 
sensitive  being,  whose  demeanour,  in  itself  invari- 
ably respectful,  was  at  all  times  calculated  to  win 
the  respect  of  those  who  came  personally  in  contact 
with  him.  With  his  retiring  and  unassuming 
manners,  his  life  was,  for  his  position,  as  editor  of 
such  a  paper  as  the  Witness,  a  remarkably  seclud- 
ed one.  Besides  furnishing  those  splendid  arti- 
cles to  its  columns  which  were  the  admiration  of 
all  who  read  them,  and  most  of  which  have  been 
republished  in  some  one  or  other  of  bis  works,  he 
continued  to  devote  himself,  with  characteristic 
ardour,  to  the  prosccutiou  of  scientific  inquiries, 
and  made  fi*equent  pedestrian  excursions,  for  geo- 
logical purposes,  to  different  parts  of  the  country. 
Being  now  in  circumstances  to  follow  the  natural 
bent  of  his  genius  and  inclination,  and  develop 
that  power  of  observation  and  research  which  he 
had  cultivated  from  his  early  boyhood,  whenever 
opportunity  enabled  him  to  put  it  in  practice,  he 
became  known  over  the  empire  as  a  discoverer  in 
science,  and  as  one  of  the  best  and  most  etVectivc 
writers  of  his  time. 

His  celebrated  work  on  the  ^  Old  Red  Sand- 
stone* was  published  in  1811.  While  it  placed 
him  in  the  very  front  rank  of  geologists,  it  charm- 
ed non-scientific  i-eaders  by  its  marAcUous  powers 
of  description  and  the  fascinating  graces  of  its 
style.  A  succeeding  work,  *•  First  Impressions  of 
England  and  its  People,*  was  written  after  a  visit  to 
England,  which  he  made  in  1847.  The  principal 
characteristic  of  this  small  book  was  eaniest  and 
vigorous  thought.  In  1849  he  produced  another 
geological  work  of  even  a  more  profound  character 
than  his  former  publications,  entitled  *  Footprints 
of  the  Creator,  gr  the  Asterolepis  of  Stromness,* 
which  Dr.  Buckland,  who  said  that  he  *^  would 
give  his  left  hand  to  ik)sscss  such  powera  of  de- 
scription as  this  man  had,"  made  one  of  the  text- 
books for  his  geological  lectures  at  Oxford.  Other 
teachers  of  geology  in  our  universities  followed 
his  example.  It  was  written  chiefly  with  the 
view  of  exposing  the  flimsy  sophistries  and  athe- 


istical tendency  of  a  work  published  auonymoualy 
shortly  before,  with  the  specioua  title  of '  Vestiges 
of  the  Natural  History  of  Creation,*  and  was  well 
described  as  a  contribution  to  natural  theology  of 
inestimable  importance. 

In  1846,  on  the  retirement  of  lir.  Jolinstone 
from  the  joint  proprietorship  of  the  Witness,  Mr. 
Miller  purchased  his  share  of  that  prosperous 
and  influential  jounial.  Subsequently  he  and  his 
co-partner,  Mr.  Fairley,  were  enabled  to  pay  up 
the  sum  of  one  thousand  pounds  which  had  been 
advanced  at  its  staiting,  by  a  committee  of  Non- 
intrusion nunisters  and  ciders,  and  which  gave 
them  a  certain  control  over-  its  management. 
Thi2>  being  at  last  satisfactorily  got  quit  of, 
thenceforward,  in  the  eyes  of  the  public,  who  were 
ignoraut  of  what  took  place  behind  the  scenes, 
the  paper  assumed  a  more  independent  and  com- 
manding tone  than  formerly. 

l^Ir.  Miller*s  habits  of  composition  were  pecu- 
liar. His  mind,  with  all  its  weight  and  force,  and 
in  spite  of  the  rich  intullectual  stores  which  he 
possessed,  wanted  elasticity,  and  he  was  in  gen- 
eral a  slow  and  cautious  writer.  Before  putting 
pen  to  paper  on  any  subject,  he  spent  a  long  time 
in  deep  thought,  an*anging,  as  it  were,  all  its  de- 
tails within  himself,  meanwhile  balancing  the 
poker  or  the  tongs  in  his  hands,  or  gazing  mu- 
singly into  the  fire.  The  author  of  this  work  was 
associated  with  him  for  some  time  as  sub-editor  of 
the  Witness,  and  had  many  opportunities  of  ob- 
serving his  characteristics.  He  was  fond  of  ath- 
letic exercises,  and  took  delight  in  such  acts  as 
leaping  upon  the  table,  poising  a  chair  by  one  of 
its  hind  legs  in  his  right  hand,  and  doing  other 
feats  of  strength,  in  which  no  one  present  could 
compete  with  him.  He  also  took  a  pride  in  snuff- 
ing a  candle  by  the  mere  wave  of  his  arm,  when 
no  other  arm,  though  half-a-yard  nearer,  could 
do  it. 

In  1855,  he  published  an  autobiographical  work, 
entitled  *  My  Schools  and  Schoolmasters,*  giving 
an  account  of  his  own  self-education  and  the 
means  by  which  he  overcame  the  difiiculties  of  his 
position.  Although  necessarily  somewhat  egotis- 
tical, it  furnishes  a  very  interesting  as  well  as 
most  instnictive  history  of  his  youth  and  eariy 
manhood,  and  describes,  in  his  own  characteristi- 


r 


MILLER, 


165 


HUGH. 


I, 


eally  attractive  style,  tbe  progress  of  his  aiiassist- 
ed  intdlectnal  training. 

Recognised  as  the  most  eloqncnt  Hviug  exposi- 
tor of  tlte  profonndest  traths  of  geology,  In  the 
latter  years  of  his  life  he  was  induced  to  give  a 
series  of  lectnres  on  his  favonrite  science.    As  a 
kctnrer,  however,  he  did  not  make  the  same  dis- 
tinguished appearance  as  a  writer.    His  accent 
was  against  him/being  that  of  the  Cromarty  Scot- 
tish, which,  with  his  natural  bashfulness  and  not 
very  gracefal  address,  rendered  his  delivery  bad 
as  a  lecturer.    His  lectnres  were,  therefore,  not 
'   anfreqnently  read  for  him  by  others.    Neverthe- 
less, his  high  reputation  as  a  geologist  and  the 
I  pecnliar  prestige  of  his  name,  rendered    them 
highly  popular.    Whenever  he  made  his  appear- 
ance as  a  lecturer,  tlie  lecture-room  was  crowded. 
He  began,  we  thinic,  in  Portobello,  where,  at  a 
place  called  Shrub  ^fount,  he  latterly  resided.   lie 
subsequently  lectured  in  the  Edinburgh  Philoso- 
pliical  Institution,  and  of  the  eminent  men  whom 
that  association  has  engiigcd  to  deliver  lectnres, 
no  one  commanded  such  audiences  as  assembled  in 
their  hall  to  listen  to  his  prelections.    His  lectures 
were  also  most  acceptably  and  even  enthnsiasti- 
eaily  received  by  crowded  audiences  when  he  ap- 
peared before  the  Christian  Institutes  of  Ix)ndon 
and  Glasgow.    But,  as  we  iiavc  said,  from  the  im- 
cnuthness  of  his  pronunciation,  and  his  want  of  flu- 
ency, his  carefully  written  and  elaborately  prepared 
lectures  were,  in  these  cities,  read  by  others,  he 
himself  sitting  by.      II is  pen'ices  were  always 
'   cheerfully  and  readily  given,  as  far  as  time  and 
strength  would  allow,  often,  indeed,  beyond  his 
(Strength,  solely  from  the  desire  to  do  good.   AVilh 
charactei-istic  generosity  his  lectures  were  given 
gratuitously,  as  he  invariably  refused  payment  for 
them,  being  only  anxious  to  be  serviceable  to  the 
I  cause  of  popular  education. 

His  latest  work,  *  The  Testimony  of  the  Rocks,' 
fmbodies  his  lectures,  twelve  in  number,  on  geo- 
logical science.  A  prefatory  note  informs  the 
reader  that  four  of  them  were  delivered  before  the 
members  of  the  Edinburgh  Philosophical  Institu- 
tion, one  in  Exeter  Hall,  I^ndon,  and  two  in 
Glasgow ;  while  two  others  were  read  before  the 
Geological  Section  of  the  British  Association  in 
1855.    Of  the  five  others,  written  mainly  to  com- 


plete, and  impart  a  character  of  unity  to  the 
volume  into  which  they  have  been  Introduced, 
three  were  addressed,  viva  voee^  to  popular  audi- 
ences. Tlie  third  was  published  both  in  this  coun- 
try and  in  America,  and  translated  Into  some  of 
the  continental  languages.  The  rest  appeared  in 
the  volume  for  the  first  time. 

Til  is,  the  greatest  effort  of  his  genius,  proved 
fatal  to  him.  In  the  preparation  of  it  for  the 
press,  his  intellect  exhausted  itself.  So  great  was 
the  intensity  with  which  he  wrote  upon  it  that  his 
brain  gave  way,  and  he  fell  a  victim  to  mental 
overwork.  Tlie  circumstances  of  his  death  are 
mournful  in  the  extreme.  The  statement  pub- 
lished by  his  friends  in  the  Witness,  when  that 
event  took  place,  relates  them  so  minutely,  and 
describes  the  state  of  his  mind  for  some  time  pre- 
viously so  fully,  that  it  cannot  fail  to  be  adopted, 
in  its  main  points,  by  every  one  who  narrates  the 
story  of  his  life.  For  months  his  overtasked  in- 
tellect had  given  evidence  of  disorder.  He  be- 
came the  prey  of  false  or  exaggerated  alarms,  and 
fancied  that,  occasionally,  for  brief  intervals,  his 
faculties  quite  failed  him.  He  laboured  too  close- 
ly on  his  treatise  on  the  ^Testimony  of  the  Rocks,* 
devoting  to  it  all  the  day,  and  often  half  the  night. 
This  overtoiling  of  the  brain  told  so  fearfully  on 
his  mental  powers  that  there  can  be  no  doubt  that, 
latterl}',  his  understanding  was  completely  shat- 
tered. To  guard  against  the  apprehended  attacks 
of  robbei*8  he  was  accustomed,  when  out  of  doors 
after  nightfall,  to  carry  a  loaded  pistol  with  him. 
lie  also  followed  the  same  practice  when  travel- 
ling, or  when  on  his  pedestrian  excursions.  It 
was  mentioned  in  one  of  the  local  newspapers 
that,  once  being  touched  on  the  shoulder  by  one 
of  his  oldest  friends  from  the  country  in  a  well- 
frequented  street  in  Edinburgh,  that  gentleman 
was  amazed  by  his  suddenly  turning  round  and 
presenting  a  pistol  at  him.  This  dangerous  habit 
of  carrying  loaded  fire-arms  he  is  supposed  to 
have  acquired  when  he  was  accountant  in  the 
Cromarty  branch  of  the  Commercial  bank,  and 
employed  occasionally  to  convey  specie  to  the  other 
branches. 

In  July,  1855,  when  residing  at  Portobello, 
about  three  miles  from  Edinburgh,  he  had  fur- 
nished himself  with  a  revolver.    An  impression 


II 


I  ■ 
I 


I . 


MlhLKH. 


166 


HUGH. 


took  i>o;$8CSsIon  of  Ill's  mind  thai  liis  house  would 
some  uiglit  be  broken  into,  and  robbed.  His  mu- 
seum, situated  in  a  separate  outer  building,  was 
especially,  he  thought,  exposed  to  the  depredatioii.< 
of  burglars.  Connected  with  this  morbid  fear  of 
thieves  was  the  strange  fascination  which  descrip- 
tions of  house  robberies  in  the  newspaper  had  for 
him,  and  he  was  haunted  with  the  idea  that  rob- 
bers and  other  despemte  characters  were  continu- 
ally prowling  about  his  premises.  To  guard  against 
their  assaults,  he  nightly  placed  his  revolver  within 
his  reach  on  going  to  bed,  beside  it  lay  a  broad- 
bladed  dagger,  whiUt  behind  him,  at  his  bedhead, 
stood  a  readv  clnvmore. 

A  week  or  two  before  his  death,  the  most  nlarm- 
ing  indication  of  his  mental  malady  presented  itself, 
in  sudden  and  singular  sensations  in  his  head.  It 
was  only,  however,  in  lengthened  intervals  that 
they  came,  and  mostly  at  night,  but  during  the 
short  time  that  they  lasted,  they  were  extremely 
violent.  Up  to  Monday,  the  T2i\  December.  18r>r), 
two  days  before  his  death,  lie  had  spoken  of  them 
to  no  one,  but  about  ton  o\-lock  of  that  day  he 
called  on  Dr.  Balfour  in  lV>rtobeII(>.  to  consult  hiin 
in  regard  to  them.  That  p:cntlenian,  in  a  commu- 
nication which  he  afterwards  drew  up,  thus  de- 
scribes x^hat  took  place: — ^' On  my  asking  him 
what  was  the  matter  with  him,  he  replied,  ^  My 
brain  is  giving  way.  I  cannot  ])nt  two  thouglits 
together  to-day:  I  have  had  a  dreadful  night  of  it. 
I  cannot  face  another  such.  I  was  impressed  with 
the  idea  that  my  museum  was  attacked  by  robbers, 
and  that  I  had  got  up,  put  on  my  clothe?,  and 
gone  out  with  a  loaded  pistol  to  shoot  them.  Im- 
mediately after  that  I  became  nncon^icious.  How 
long  that  continued  I  cannot  say:  but  when  I 
awoke  In  the  morning  I  was  trembling  all  over, 
and  quite  confused  in  my  brain.  On  rising,  I  felt 
as  if  a  stiletto  was  suddenly,  and  as  quickly  as  an 
electric  shock,  passed  through  my  brain  from  front 
to  back,  and  loft  a  burning  i>cnsntion  on  the  top 
of  the  brain,  just  below  the  bone.  So  thoroughly 
convinced  was  I  that  I  must  have  been  out  through 
the  night,  that  I  examined  my  trousers  to  see  if 
they  were  wet  or  covered  with  mud,  but  could 
find  none.*  He  further  said,  *  I  may  state  that  I 
was  somewhat  similarly  affected  through  the  night 
twice  last  week,  and  I  cxaniined  mv  trousers  in 


the  morning,  to  i^ee  if  I  had  been  out.  Still,  the 
terrible  sensations  wera'tiot  nearly  so  bad  as  they 
were  last  night ;  and  I  may  further  iuforin  you 
that,  towards  the  end  of  last  week,  while  passing 
through  the  Kxchauge  in  Kdiubui^gh,  I  was  seixcd 
with  such  a  giddiness  that  I  staggered,  and  would, 
I  think,  have  fallen,  had  I  not  got  into  an  entry, 
where  I  leaned  against  the  wall,  and  became  quiic 
unconscious  for  some  seconds.'"  Dr.  Balfour  told 
him  that  he  was  ovenvorking  his  brain,  and  agreed 
to  call  on  hiin  on  the  following  day,  to  make  a 
fuller  examination.  Mrs.  Miller,  that  same  fore- 
noon, went  to  Edinburgh  to  consult  Professor 
Miller,  one  of  the  most  eminent  surgeons  of  that 
city,  as  to  her  hnsband*s  health.  What  follows 
may  be  given  almost  in  the  words  of  the  narrati^'C 
of  his  melancholy  fate  which  appeared  in  the  Wit- 
ness newspaper: — "  I  an-anged,"  says  that  gentle- 
man, ^'  to  meet  Dr.  Balfour  at  Shrub  Monut,  (Mr. 
Hugh  Miller  s  house,)  on  the  aflemoon  of  next 
day.  We  met  accordingly  at  half-past  three  on 
Tuesday.  He  whs  a  little  annoyed  at  Mrs.  Mil- 
ler's having  given  me  the  trouble,  as  he  called  it, 
but  received  me  quite  in  his  ordinar}'  kind,  friendly 
manner.  We  examined  his  chest,  and  found  that 
unusually  well :  but  soon  we  discovered  that  it 
was  head  symptoms  that  made  him  nneasy.  He 
acknowledged  having  been  night  after  night  up  till 
veiy  late  in  the  morning,  working  hard  and  con- 
tinuously at  his  new  book,  *  which,'  with  mnch 
satisfaction,  he  said,  *I  have  finished  this  dav.' 
He  was  sensible  that  his  head  had  suffered  in  con- 
sequence, as  evidenced  in  two  wa^'s:  first,  occa- 
sionally, ho  felt  as  if  a  very  fine  poignard  had  been 
suddenly  passed  through  and  through  his  brain. 
The  pain  was  intense,  and  momentarily  followed 
by  confusion  and  giddiness,  and  the  sense  of  being 
^veiy  drunk  ^ — unable  to  stand  or  walk.  Ho 
thought  that  a  period  of  nnconscionsnesa  must 
have  followed  this— a  kind  of  swoon,  bnt  he  had 
never  fallen.  Second,  what  annoyed  him  most, 
however,  was  a  kind  of  nightmare,  which  for  some 
nights  past  had  i*endered  sleep  most  miserable.  It 
was  no  dream,  he  said ;  he  saw  no  distinct  vision, 
and  could  remember  nothing  of  what  had  passed 
accurately.  It  was  a  sense  of  vague  and  yet  in- 
tense horror,  with  a  conviction  of  being  abroad  in 
the  night  wind,  and  dragged  througli  places  as  if 


ii 


i! 


I- 


I '  — 


-• 


I. 


II 


I 


I 

r 


MILLER, 


167 


llUGir. 


by  aonie  iiivUiblc  power.  *  Last  Diglit,*  he  said, 
*  I  felt  as  if  I  lind  been  ridden  by  a  witch  for  fifty 
miles,  and  rose  far  more  wearied  in  mind  and  body 
than  when  I  lay  down.*  So  strong  was  his  con- 
viction of  having  been  out,  that  he  had  difficulty 
in  persuading  himself  to  the  contrary,  by  carefully 
examining  his  clothes  in  the  morning,  to  sec  if  they 
were  not  wet  or  dirty ;  and  he  looked  inquiringly 
and  anxiously  to  his  wife,  asking  if  she  was  sure 
be  bad  not  been  out  last  night,  and  walking  in  this 
disturbed  trance  or  dream.  His  pulse  was  quiet, 
but  tongue  foul.  The.  head  was  not  hot,  but  he 
could  not  say  it  was  fi-ee  from  pani.  But  I  need 
not  enter  into  professional  details.  Suffice  it  to 
say,  that  we  came  to  the  conclusion  that  he  wais 
Miffering  from  an  overworked  mind  disordering  his 
digestive  organs,  enervating  his  whole  frame,  and 
threatening  serious  head  affection.  We  told  him 
this,  and  enjoined  absolute  discontinuance  of  work 
—bed  at  eleven,  Ught  supper  (lie  had  all  his  life 
made  that  a  principal  meal),  thinning  the  hair  of 
the  head,  a  warm  sponging-bath  at  bed-time,  &c. 
To  all  our  commands  he  readily  promised  obedience, 
not  forgetting  the  discontinuance  of  ncck-nibbing, 
to  which  ho  had  unfortunately  been  pi*cvailed  to 
submit  some  days  before.  For  fully  an  hour  we 
talked  togetlier  on  these  and  other  subjects,  and  I 
lefl  falm  with  no  apprehension  of  impending  evil, 
and  little  doubting  but  that  a  short  time  of  rest 
and  regimen  would  restore  him  to  his  wonted 


tf 


vigour. 

After  the  pi*ofessor*8  departure,  as  it  was  near 
the  dinner  hour,  the  servant  entered  the  room  to 
Uy  the  cloth.  She  found  Mr.  Miller  in  the  room 
alone.  Another  of  the  paroxysms  was  on  liiin. 
His  face  was  such  a  picture  of  horror,  thnt  she 
shrunk  in  teiTor  from  the  sight,  lie  flung  himself 
on  the  sofa,  and  buried  his  head,  as  if  in  agony, 
upon  the  cushion.  Again,  however,  the  vision 
flitted  by,  and  left  him  in  perfect  health.  The 
evening  was  spent  quietly  with  his  family.  Dur- 
ing tea  he  employed  himself  in  reading  aloud 
Cowper's/ Castaway,*  the  *  Sonnet  on  Mary  Un- 
win,*  and  one  of  his  more  playful  pieces,  for  the 
special  pleasure  of  his  children.  Having  cori*ected 
some  proofs  of  the  forthcoming  volume,  he  went 
op  stairs  to  his  study.  At  the  apttointed  hour  he 
had  taken  the  bath,  but  unfortunately,  his  natural 


and  peculiar  i-epugnance  to  physic  had  induced  him 
to  leave  nutaken  the  medicine  that  had  been  pre- 
scribed, lie  had  retired  into  a  sleeping-room — a 
small  apartment  opening  out  of  his  study,  and 
which  for  some  time  past,  in  consideration  of  the 
delicate  state  of  his  wife's  health,  and  the  irregu- 
larity of  his  own  hours  of  study,  he  occupied  at 
night  alone — and  lain  sometime  upon  the  bed. 
The  horrible  trance,  more  horrible  than  ever,  must 
have  returned.  All  that  can  now  be  known  of 
what  followed  is  to  be  gathered  from  the  facts, 
that  next  momung  his  body,  half-dressed,  was 
found  lying  lifeless  on  the  floor— the  feet  upon  the 
study  rug,  the  chest  pierced  with  the  ball  of  the 
revolver  pistol,  which  was  found  lying  in  the  bath 
that  stood  close  by.  The  deadly  bullet  had  per- 
forated the  left  lung,  grazed  the  heart,  cut  through 
the  pulmonary  artery  at  its  root,  and  lodged  in  the 
rib  in  the  right  side.  Death  must  have  been  in- 
stantaneous. 

On  lookmg  round  the  room  in  which  the  body 
had  been  discovered,  a  folio  sheet  of  paper  was 
seen  lying  on  the  table.  On  the  centre  of  the  page 
the  following  lines  were  written — the  last  which 
that  pen  was  ever  to  trace :   - 

*'  Deabrst  Lydia, 

"  Mjr  brain  burns.  I  mutt  havo  icalked;  and  a  fenr- 
ful  dream  rises  upon  uie.  1  cannot  benr  tlio  horrible  tiionjilit. 
God  and  Fntber  of  the  Ix>rd  Jesus  Christ  have  mercj  upon 
me.  I )cn rrst  Ly din,  dear  children,  farewell.  BIy  brain  bums 
as  the  recollection  gi-uws.    llj  dear  dear  wife,  farewell. 

**  Hugh  Millkii.** 

A  post-mortem  examination  of  the  bo<1y  was 
made  by  Professor  Miller,  and  Drs.  A.  II.  Balfour, 
W.  T.  Gairdner,  and  A.  M.  Edwards.  The  fol- 
lowing is  the  conclusion  to  which  they  came: — 

"Ei>ix»rRr.if,  December  2C^  185C. 

"  We  hereby  certify  on  soul  and  conscience,  that  we  have 
this  day  examined  the  body  of  Mr.  Hugh  Miller,  ut  Shrub 
MoTint.  Portobello. 

**  llie  canse  of  death  we  found  to  be  a  pistol-shot  tlirough 
the  left  side  of  the  chest ;  and  this,  we  are  satisfied,  was  in- 
flictetl  bv  his  own  hand. 

"  From  tlie  diseased  appearances  found  in  the  brain,  taken 
in  connection  with  the  history  of  the  case,  we  have  no  donbt 
that  the  net  was  suicidal,  under  the  impulse  of  insanity." 

It  is  impossible  to  convey  any  adequate  iilea  of 
the  gloom  which  pervaded  Edinburgh  on  the  par- 
ticulars of  Hugh  Millcr*s  lamentable  death  being 
known.  And  this  gloom  was  deepened  by  the  oc- 
cun'ence  of  another  sad  tragedy  iii  connexion  with 


MILLER.  II 

ibe  fatal  revolver  witlt  whicb  ho  bad  Urininated 
bis  life.  After  the  medical  inquirf  into  tlie  cauM 
of  bis  deotli  hod  liceD  completed,  Frofeasor  Miller 
took  tbe  revolver  to  tbo  gnnsmitb  in  Edinborgb 
from  whom  it  had  bcou  porcbased  hy  Mr.  Miller, 
to  ascertain  bow  many  sbols  bid  been  Bred,  and  how 
manj  still  remained  in  tbo  cbamber.  In  llio  maa- 
liir'a  absence,  tlic  roi'cman,ThoraiL8  Leslie,  received 
the  wciipoii  from  the  professor,  and  iooiicd  into  the 
tnoXEle,  holding  the  hammer  witli  hia  lingers,  while 
be  tnmed  the  cliamlKr  round  to  connt  the  cliarges. 
Tbe  hammer  slipped  from  his  fingers,  struck  the 
cap,  and  tbe  dtarge  in  the  barrel  exploded.  Tbo 
ciiirge  entered  his  right  eye  and  penetrated  the 
bralu,  and  be  fell  dead  ou  tbe  floor.— Subjoined  in 
Mr.  Miller's  portrnit: 


Mr.  Miller  nm  bmicd  in  tlic  Giiiiigu  ccmctcrj*, 
on  the  south  side  of  Ediubnrgb,  ]jis  grave  being 
on  tbo  Bamc  Hue,  and  a  few  paues  distiiiil,  from  that 
of  Dr.  Cbolmer^.  Tlie  atteiidanco  of  moniiicis 
lit  the  funeral  nns  very  great,  and  tbe  concourse  of 
R|icctatoi-s  ciiaally  so.  At  one  part  of  the  rontc 
(he  procession  nns  joined  by  tbe  kirk  session  of 
Free  St.  Joliu'ij  eiiurcli,  of  which  Mr.  Miller  was  a 
deacon,  by  the  members  of  the  Royal  Physical 
Society,  by  the  coui|>ositOTS  in  tbo  Witness  office, 


8  HUGH. 

and  by  several  hnndreda  of  geutlwien.  Along 
all  the  streets  throngb  whicli  tbt  proceesbin  puwd, 
tlie  shops  were  sbat  at  the  reqoat  of  the  ma^ 

In  persou  Mr.  Miller  was  Urge  and  muscaliir. 
He  had  a  stalwart  form,  and  a  broad  and  missy 
forebeod,  with  n  lingular  conformation  of  head. 
No  one  could  sea  bim  williout  being  coiivioced 
that  there  was  something  remarkable  about  bim,    | 
and  tho  Individuality  of  his  appearancs  waa  ren- 
dered the  more  striking  by  the  homely  dreos,  In-    l 
cinding  the  plaid  thrown  across  the  shoulder,  lu    ; 
nhlch  be  was  accustomed  to  attire  blmnelf.    It    I 
was  emphatically  said  of  liim  by  tbe  dnke  of  Ar-    | 
gy\e,  that  "Hugh  Miller  waa  not  aleomad  man. 
lie  knew  no  langungo  but  his  own.    He  could 
rend  notbing  but  English;  and  yet,  by  earefnl 
nnd    industrious  habits,  by  spending  liia  Bptn 
hours  on  tbe  writings  of  the  greatest  anthers  to    { 
whom  he  could  get  access,  be  was  enabled  to    | 
nrile  books  which  bavo  attained  a  classical  rank    | 
ill  the  literature  of  the  English  language."  i 

His  townsmen  have  erected  a  statne  of  hiro  at  ' 
Cromarty.  His  much-cherished  geological  collec- 
tion WIS,  iu  1858,  purchased  by  government  for 
£.')00,  to  bo  preserved  in  the  Mosenm  of  the  oni-  i 
vereity  of  Edinburgh.  An  additional  sum  of  £600, 
subscribed  by  various  persons,  with  a  view  to  ita 
private  piircbnsc,  was  paid  over  to  his  widow,  mak- 
ing ill  all  £1,100,  which  the  family  received  for 
(his  memento  of  lier  husband's  scientific  labours. 

The  'Testimony  of  tlie  Rocks'  was  publiahed 
soon  after  his  deatli,  and  fi'om  tho  peculiar  circum- 
stances in  which  it  apjiosrcd,  as  well  aa  from  ita 
oivn  extraordinary  merits,  it  .ittracted  on  nuusttol 
share  of  public  attention.  Ita  object  is  to  demon- 
stinte  tlio  bearing  whicli  geology  haa  on  both  na- 
tural and  revealed  religion,  and  whatever  may  be 
tbe  opinions  entertained  of  the  author's  peculiar 
and  thoroughly  original  views  na  to  tbe  ereatloa 
nnd  deluge,  the  work  mast  certainly  be  eoiiudered 
one  of  (Ije  most  remarkable  contribntiona  to  science 
of  tlic  present  century.  He  bad  long  projected  K 
great  work  on  ''Ilie  Geology  of  Scotland,'  as  tbe 
completion  of  his  scientific  labours,  and  one  on 
which  bis  reputation  was  permanently  to  nat,  bat 
his  strong  Intellect  lind  run  its  course,  and  It  never 
shone  clearer,  aa  appears  oonsplcnoua  on  vnrj 


U 


MTLT.ER. 


169 


MILNE,  WILLIAM. 


page  of  his  finul  volume,  than  just  before  it  sud- 
denly sunk  in  darkness,  to  be  relumed  no  more  in 
this  world. 

^Ir.  Miller  left  a  Tamily  of  two  sons  and  a 
dangliter.  Tlie  eldest  son  was  fourteen  years  old 
flt  the  time  of  his  father^s  death.  He  himself  was 
54  years  of  ngfi  when  that  event  took  place. 

Tlie  works  of  Hugh  Miller  are: 

Poems  written  in  the  I^isyre  Hours  of  a  Journcjman 
Mason.    Inrerness,  1829.    12mo. 

On  the  Herring  Fishery.  A  pnmplilet.  Inverness,  1829. 
Contriboted  orif^nidlj  in  a  series  of  letters  to  the  Inverness 
Conner. 

Ijetter  from  one  of  the  Scottish  People  to  the  Right  Hon. 
Ijotd  Brougham  and  Vanx,  on  the  opinions  expressed  by  his 
Ijordship  on  the  Auchtcmrder  case.  Edinburgh,  1839. 
Foorth  edition,  1857. 

Tbo  Whiggism  of  the  Old  School,  as  exemplified  hy  the 
past  history  and  present  condition  of  the  Church  of  Scotland. 
K«linbaigh,  1839.    8vo.    Second  edition. 

Scenes  .ind  I.egends  of  the  North  of  Scotland.  Edinburgh, 
1835.    Fifth  edition,  crown  8vo,  1857. 

The  Old  Red  Sandstone ;  or  New  WhIIcs  in  an  Old  Field. 

Edinburgh,  1811,  crown  8vo,  with  plntos.    7th  edition,  1857. 

The  Fosailiferous  Deposits  of  Scotland ;  being  an  address 

to  the  Bojal  Phyiical  Society,  delivered  22d  November  1854. 

Edinburgh,  12mo,  185J. 

The  Sites  Bill  and  the  Toleration  I^iws.     Being  an  Ex- 
amination of  the  Resolutions  of  the  Kcv.  Dr.  .\lexan(ler  of 
Aq^lc  Square  Chapel  Congregation.  Edinburgh,  1848,  r2uio. 
First  Impressions  of  Enghuid  and  its  People.     Edinburgli, 
1847.    Fourth  edition,  1857,  crown  8vo. 

Footprints  of  the  Creator;  or.  The  Asterolopis  of  Strom- 
ness.  I»ndon,  1849,  IGmo.  Sixth  edition,  foolscap  8vo, 
1857,  with  numerous  woodcut  illustrations. 

The  Two  Parties  in  the  Church  of  Scothmd  Exhibited  as 
^fusionary  and  Anti-Missionnrr.     Their  contendings  in  these 
I    f^Plmtute  diameters  in  the  P:tst  and  their  Statistics  now. 
'    ''•'Jinburgh,  1842,  8vo.     Second  edition. 

Words  of  Warning  to  the  People  of  Scotland  on  Sir  Robert 
'*ecrs  Scottish  Currency  Bill.     Edinburgh,  1844,  8vo. 

'My  Schools  and  Schoolmasters ;  or.  The  Story  of  my  Edu- 
^•"^tion.     Edinburgh,  1854.     8th  edition,  crown  8vo,  1857. 

The  Testimony  of  the  Rocks;  or,  Geology  in  its  bearing  on 
'■*•  Two  Theologies — Natural  and  Revealed.  Posthumous. 
*-^sinburgh,  18.>7,  post  8vo,  profusely  illustrated. 

The  Cruise  «»f  the  Bctsev ;  or,  A  Summer  Ramble  among  the 
*^o»xliferons  Deposits  of  the  Hebrides.  With  Rambles  of  a 
^ eulogist;  or,  Ten  Thousand  miles  over  the  Fosf»iiiferous 
deposits  of  Scotland.  Edinburgh,  1858.  8vo.  Pohthumous. 
He  also  contributed  an  account  of  the  geology  of  the  Bass 
^^<)ck  to  a  work,  published  in  1850,  having  for  its  object  a 
^Uil  description  of  tiiat  once  celebrated  state  prison. 

A  Sketch  Book  of  Popular  Geology.  Posthumous.  Edited 
**y  his  widow.  Being  Lectures  delivered  before  the  PhiloHO- 
Pliical  Instilntion  of  Edinburgh.  With  an  Introductory  Pre- 
^^ct.    By  Mrs.  Miller.    Edinburgh,  1859,  8vo. 

On  Mr.  MiIIer*8  widow  government  settled  a 
pension  of  £70,  and  on  his  aged  motlier  at  Crom- 
arty, one  of  £30. 


MILNE,  CouN,  LL.D.,  a  writer  on  botany, 
bom  at  Aberdeen  in  1744.  He  became  tutor  to 
Lord  Algernon  Percy,  younger  son  of  the  duke 
of  Northumberland,  and  entered  Into  holy  orders. 
He  was  afterwards  rector  of  North  Chapel,  in 
Essex,  and  also  obtained  the  lectureship  of  Dept- 
ford.  He  received  the  degree  of  LL.D.  from  Mar- 
ischal  college,  Aberdeen,  and  was  likewiso  D.D. 
and  F.L.S.     He  died  in  1815.    His  works  are : 

Botanical  Dictionary;  or.  Elements  of  Systematic  and 
Philosophical  Botany.  I^ndon,  1770,  8to.  2d  edit  1777, 
8vo.  A  Supplement.  1778,  8ro.  3d  edit,  revised,  corrected, 
and  enlarged,  25  plates.     I»ndon,  1805,  8vo. 

Institutes  of  Botany.  In  two  parts.  London,  1770-72, 
4  to.     Supplement  to  the  same.    1778,  4 to. 

The  Boldness  and  Freedom  of  Apostolic  Evidence ;  a  Ser- 
mon.   1775,  8vo. 

Sermon  preached  at  the  Anniversary  Meeting  of  the  Royal 
linnasan  Society.     1779,  8vo. 

Sermons.     I/>ndon,  1780,  8vo. 

Indigenous  Botimy,  or  Habitations  of  English  Plants. 
Vol.  i.   I/>nd.  1793,  8vo.   In  conjunction  with  Alex.  Gordon. 

MILNE,  WiLLTAM,  D.D.,  a  distinguished  mis- 
sionary to  the  Chinese,  was  bom  of  poor  parents, 
in  the  parish  of  Kinnethmont,  Aberdeenshire,  in 
April  1785.  He  received  his  education  at  the 
parish  scliool,  and  afterwards  resided  in  one  or 
two  families  in  the  capacity  of  a  servant.  He 
emiy  began  to  entertain  religions  impressions,  and 
having  read  the  Transactions  of  the  London  Mis- 
sionary Society,  and  the  Life  of  David  Brainerd 
and  of  Samuel  Pearce,  he  was  induced  to  offer 
himself  to  that  society  as  a  missionar}'.  In  con- 
sequence he  was  called  up  to  England,  and  put 
under  the  care  of  the  Rev.  David  Bogne  at  Gos- 
port,  with  whom,  having  gone  through  a  regular 
course  of  study,  and  made  great  progress  both  in 
classical  and  theological  knowledge,  he  was  or- 
dained at  Portsca,  July  16,  1812. 

Soon  after  he  was  appointed  colleague  to  Mr. 
Morrison  in  China,  and  having  married  a  young 
lady  in  his  native  county,  he  sailed  with  his  wife 
from  Portsmouth,  September  4,  1812,  and  arrived 
at  Macao,  July  4,  1818.  He  immediately  com- 
menced the  study  of  the  Chinese  language,  but 
was  soon  compelled  by  the  Portuguese  authorities 
to  proceed  to  Canton.  After  remaining  there  a 
short  time,  he  made  a  tour  throngh  the  chief  set- 
tlements of  the  Malay  Archipelago  for  the  purpose 
of  distributing  tracts  and  New  Testaments,  and 
afterwards  returned  to  China.    In  April  1815  he 


r 


MINTO. 


170 


MITCIJKI.I. 


ciubni'kcd  with  his  family  for  Mulacca  to  take 
charge  of  the  missionary'  establishment  at  that 
place,  where  he  also  preached  once  a- week  to  the 
Dntch  protcstants.  On  application  to  the  gover- 
nor at  Penang,  a  grant  was  made  of  ground  for 
the  erection  of  missionary  buildings,  and  a  free 
press  was  allowed  at  Malacca.  Having  esta- 
blished a  school  for  the  instruction  of  the  children 
of  the  poor,  ho  composed  for  his  Cliincse  scholars 
the  Yontirs  Catechism,  and  printe<l  various  tracts 
for  their  use.  He  also  translated  iuto  the  Cliiuese 
language  a  part  of  the  Old  Testament,  of  which 
the  Book  of  Deuteronomy,  after  being  revised  by 
Mr.  Morrison,  was  printed  in  1816.  lu  May  1817 
Mr.  Milne  commenced  ^  Tlie  Ciiinese  Gleaner,*  a 
periodical  work  containing  extracts  from  the  cor- 
respondence of  the  Eastern  missionai-ies,  with 
miscellaneous  notices  relative  to  the  philosophy 
and  mythology  of  the  Indo-Chinese  nations.  In 
September  1818  Malacca  was  by  treaty  restored 
to  the  Dutch  government,  and  on  November  10  of 
the  same  year  tlie  foundation  stone  was  laid  of  the 
Anglo-Chiuese  college,  on  which  occasion  both 
the  English  and  Dutch  authorities  attended. 

Previous  to  this  period,  Mr.  Milne,  along  with 
Mr.  Moniiion,  had  received  from  the  univereity  of 
Glasgow  the  degree  of  D.D.,  which  had  been 
granted  them  December  24,  1817.  In  March 
1819  he  had  to  mourn  the  loss  of  his  wife.  In 
November  of  the  same  year  the  whole  of  the  Old 
Testament,  translated  by  him  and  his  colleague, 
1  was  completed,  Dr.  Milne  having  undertaken  the 
historical  portions,  and  Dr.  Morrison  the  books  of 
Solomon  and  the  Prophets.  In  1820  Dr.  Milue 
published  ^  A  Retrospect  of  the  First  Ten  Years 
of  the  Protest|int  Mission  to  China,'  in  which  he 
gives  an  interesting  account  of  the  history  of  that 
country,  its  manners,  its  morals,  and  its  religion, 
and  of  the  various  attempts  to  introduce  the  know- 
ledge of  the  gospel  into  that  benighted  land.  Af- 
ter suffering  much  from  the  effects  of  the  climate, 
Dr.  Milno  died  at  Malacca,  1822,  at  the  age  of 
37,  leaving  four  children. 

MiXTo,  earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peenif^  of  Great  Britain  oon- 
iiectrd  wiih  Scotland,  see  vol.  ii.  p.  182,  article  Eixnyc 


MrrcRRLi.,  a  stimame  from  the  Anf;k>-Saxon  Blicliel,  si^- 
nifyinK  gnat ;  or  it  mar  be  from  the  German  Aitt  tekukr,  a 
diwipie,  literallr  "  with  a  mIiooI.**  The  Daniah  Mod-ichiold. 


means  oourage-vliield.    'llie  crrht  of  the  AlitcheUa  is  a  kaihi 
holding  a  pen;  motto,  FavwU  deo  wt^ptro, 

MITCHELL,  Sir  David,  an  eminent  naval 
commander,  in  the  reign  of  William  III.,  was  de- 
scended from  a  respectable  family  in  Scotland, 
where  ho  was  born  abont  the  middle  of  the  seven- 
teenth century.  lie  early  entered  the  navj,  and 
after  the  intermediate  steps  he  was  promoted  to 
the  command  of  the  Elizabeth,  of  70  guns.  At 
the  battle  of  Beachy-head  he  behaved  with  great 
gallantn-;  and  in  1693  he  was  appointed  rear- 
admiral  of  the  blue.  In  1694  he  was  knighted, 
and  about  the  same  time  attained  the  rank  of 
rear-admiral  of  the  red.  In  1698,  when  Peter  tlie 
Groat  was  invited  by  King  William  to  visit  Lon- 
don, Admiral  Mitchell  was  commissioned  to  brin;; 
him  over  to  England,  aud  after  a  stay  of  three 
months  he  conveyed  him  back  to  the  Continent. 
He  was  subsequently  sent  to  Holland,  on  a  diplo- 
matic commission.  He  died  soon  after  his  retnni 
to  England,  June  1,  1710. 

MITCHELL,  Sir  Andkew,  an  able  diploma- 
XUt^  was  the  only  son  of  the  Rev.  William  Mit- 
chell, originally  of  Aberdeen,  and  latterly  one  of 
the  ministers  of  the  High  Church  of  Edinboi^gh. 
The  date  of  his  birth  is  not  specified,  but  ho  is 
said  to  have  been  married  in  1715,  when  very 
young,  to  a  lady,  who  died  four  years  after  in 
childbirth,  aud  whose  loss  he  felt  so  deeply  as  to 
be  obliged  to  discontinue  the  study  of  the  law,  for 
which  his  father  had  designed  him,  and  divert  his 
grief  by  travelling.  In  17-11  he  was  appointed 
secretary  to  the  marquis  of  Tweeddale,  minister 
for  the  affairs  of  Scotland,  and  in  1747  was  elect- 
ed M.P.  for  the  Banff  district  of  burghs.  On  the 
death  of  Thomson  the  poet  in  1748,  he  and  Lord 
Lyttleton  were  named  his  executors. 

In  1751  he  was  nominated  his  majesty's  repre- 
sentative at  Bnissels,  where  he  resided  for  two 
years.  Soon  after  his  return  to  Ix>ndon  in  1753 
he  was  created  a  knight  of  the  Bath,  aud  appoint- 
ed ambassador  extraordinary  to  the  court  of  Prus- 
sia, where,  by  his  abilities  and  address,  he  suc- 
ceeded in  detaching  his  Prussian  majesty  from  the 
French  interest.  At  Berlin  he  was  much  cele- 
brated for  the  liveliness  of  his  conversation  and 
the  readiness  of  his  repartees,  and  he  became  so 
much  a  favourite  with  the  Great  Frederick  that 


M1TCM£LL, 


171 


SIU  THOMAS  LIVINGSTONE. 


be  Qsnally  accompaiiled  him  iu  his  campai{,nis.  In 
consequence  of  bad  health  he  returned  to  Eugland 
in  1765,  and  spent  some  time  at  Tnnbridge  Wells. 
In  the  following  year  he  resumed  the  duties  of  his 
office  at  Berlin,  where  ho  died,  January  28,  1771. 
The  court  of  Prussia  honoured  his  funeral  i^ith 
their  presence,  and  the  king  himself,  from  a  bal- 
cony, is  said  to  have  beheld  the  procession  with 
tears. 

MITCHELL,  JosEPU,  a  dramatist  and  third- 
rate  poet,  was  the  son  of  a  stone-cutter,  and  was 
bom  about  1684.  He  received  a  university  edu- 
cation, and  is  described  as  "  one  of  a  dub  of  small 
wits  who,  about  1719,  published  nt  Edinburgh,  a 
ver}'  poor  miscelKiny,  to  which  Dr.  Young,  the 
wdl-known  author  of  the  'Night  Thoughts,*  pre- 
fixed a  Copy  of  Vcrecs."  He  afterwards  repaired 
to  London,  where  he  was  fortunate  enough  to  ob- 
tain the  patronage  of  the  earl  of  Stair  and  Sir 
Robert  Walpolc :  on  the  latter  of  whom  he  was 
for  a  great  part  of  his  life  almost  entirely  depend- 
ent, and  was  styled  *'*•  Sir  Robert  Walpole's  Poct/^ 
His  dissipation  and  extravagance,  however,  kept 
him  constantly  in  a  state  of  distress ;  and  having 
on  one  occasion  applied  to  Aaron  Hill  for  some 
pecuniary  assistance,  that  gentleman  made  him  n 
present  of  hb  tragedy  of  'The  Fatal  Extniva- 
gance,*  which  was  acted  and  published  in  Mit- 
chell's name,  and  produced  him  a  considerable 
Slim.  He  was  candid  enough,  however,  to  inform 
the  public  who  was  the  real  author  of  the  piece, 
and  ever  after  gratefully  acknowledged  his  obli- 
gations to  Mr.  Hill.  A  collection  of  Mitclieirs 
Miscellaneous  Foems,  in  two  volumes  8vo,  was 
published  in  1729;  and  in  1731  he  brought  out 
'Tlie  Highland  Fair,  a  Ballad  Opera,*  which  was 
his  own  composition.  He  died  6th  February, 
1788. 

He  was  the  author  of  several  popular  Scottish 
songs,  inserted  in  Jolinson*s  Musical  Museum, 
particularly  *  I^ave  Kindred  and  Friends,  sweet 
Betty,'  adapted  to  the  tune  of  ^  Blink  over  the 
Bnm,  sweet  Betty,'  and  '  By  Pinkie  House  ofl  let 
me  walk,'  also  ^  As  Sylvia  in  a  Forest  lay.'  To 
the  air  of  Pinkie  House  be  also  wrote  another 
song,  beginning  *  As  lovesick  Croydon  beside  a 
nnnnnriiig  rivulet  lay,'  which  is  printed  in  Watt's 
Musical  Miscellany,  vol.  v.    London,  1731.    The 


ballad  called  the  '  Duke  of  Argyle*s  Levee,'  usu- 
ally ascribed  to  I/>rd  Binning,  was  written  by 
Mitcheil. 

MITCHELL,  Sir  Andkeav,  a  gallant  adniirali 
was  bom  m  Scotland  about  1767,  and  received  his 
education  at  Edinburgh.  In  1776  he  accompanied 
Admiral  Sir  Edward  Vei-non  to  India  as  a  mid- 
shipman, and  during  his  services  in  the  East,  he 
was  rapidly  advanced  to  the  rank  of  post-captain. 
At  the  conclusion  of  the  war,  he  returned  to  Eng- 
land with  a  convoy,  and  on  the  breaking  out  of 
hostilities  with  the  French  republic,  he  was  ap- 
pointed to  the  command,  first  of  the  Asui,  64,  and 
then  of  the  Impregnable,  90.  In  1795  be  became 
a  rear-admiral;  and  in  1799,  on  being  promoted 
to  the  rank  of  vice-admiral  of  the  White,  he 
hoisted  his  flag  on  board  the  Zealand,  64,  from 
which  ship  he  removed  to  tiie  Isis,  50,  in  which 
he  joined  I^rd  Duncan  off  the  coast  of  Holland. 
At  the  end  of  August  he  entered  the  Texel,  where 
the  Dutch  fleet  surrendered  to  him  without  firing 
a  shot.  For  this  service  he  was  made  a  knight  of 
the  Bath.  In  1802  he  was  appointed  commander- 
in-chief  on  the  coast  of  America.  Ho  died  at 
Bermuda,  February  26,  1806. 

MITCHELL,  Sir  Thomas  Livinostonr, 
D.C.L.,  a  distinguishod  Australian  explorer,  w  as 
bom  in  1792.  He  was  the  eldest  son  of  John  Mit- 
chell, Esq.,  of  Grangemouth,  descoidcd  from  the 
MitchclU  of  Cniigeud,  oue  of  the  oldest  families  in 
Stirlingshii-e,  whicli  took  tlie  additional  name  of 
Livingstone.  Entering  the  aimy  as  lieutenant  of 
tlie  95th  lliflcs,  now  the  Rifle  Brigade,  at  an  early 
age,  he  passed  through  the  most  active  period  of 
the  Pcninsulnr  War.  After  1815  he  was  sent  into 
Spain  and  Portugal  to  survey  the  different  fields 
of  battle  in  those  countries.  Tiiis  service  he  suc- 
cessfully accomplished,  and  several  of  his  models 
may  be  seen  in  the  United  Service  Institution, 
London.  Al)Out  1827  he  was,  by  George  IV., 
ap})oiuted  surveyor-general  of  New  South  Wales. 
To  this  arduous  service  he  devoted  the  remaining 
twenty-eight  years  of  his  life.  He  cut  all  the 
passes  which  lead  through  the  mountains  to  the 
interior  of  the  Australian  continent ;  laid  out  up- 
wards of  200  towns  and  villages ;  and  conducted 
four  expeditions  of  discovery,  during  one  of  which 
he  conquered  from  the  aborigines,  and  surveyed, 


I. 


■  I 


MITCHELL, 


372 


SIR  THOMAS. 


at  the  same  time,  Anstralia  Felix,  afterwards  cel- 
ebrated for  its  gold  fields.  He  has  been  deserv- 
edly called  **  the  Cook  of  the  Australian  conti- 
nent.^' In  1839  he  was  knighted  by  Qneen  Vic- 
toria, on  presenting  her  Majesty  with  a  map  of 
his  surveys  and  discoveries. 

In  1838  he  published,  in  2  vols.  8vo,  his  ad- 
mirable work,  entitled  ^  Three  Expeditious  into 
the  Interior  of  Eastern  Australia,'  and  in  1848  he 
brought  out  a  second  work  on  his  Australian  dis- 
coveries, being  *  A  Journal  of  an  Expedition  into 
the  Interior  of  Tropical  Australia,  in  search  of  a 
route  from  Sydney  to  the  Gulf  of  Carpentaria.' 
Sir  Thomas  was  the  author  of  several  other  works. 
His  *  Manual'  and  ^  Platoon  Exercises'  long  form- 
ed part  of  the  requisite  equipment  of  young  oflficcrs 
joining  the  nrmy,  as  his  plans  of  battles,  drawn  at 
the  royal  military  college,  have  been  for  many 
years  the  only  studies  for  militaiy  students  of  the 
senior  department  at  Sandhuret.  He  prepai-ed 
and  published  several  maps  of  Australia,  a 
beautiful  Trigonometrical  survey  of  Port  Jackson 
on  a  large  scale,  and  a  translation  of  the  *  Lusiad 
of  Camocns.'  He  also  invented  the  boomerang 
propeller,  which  was  patented  in  Great  Britain 
and  America,  and  was  adopted  in  many  vessels  as 
superior  to  cvciy  other.  In  1853  he  published  a 
pamphlet  entitled  ^  The  Origin,  History,  and  De- 
scription of  the  Boomerang  Propeller.' 

Sir  Thomas  represented  Melbourne  for  some 
years  in  the  I-KJgislativc  Assembly  of  New  South 
Wales,  and  died  at  Sydney  on  Oct.  5,  1855.  lie 
was  doctor  of  civil  law  of  the  university  of  Oxford, 
and  a  fellow  of  the  Royal  Geographical  and  Geo- 
logical Societies,  and  other  learned  bodies.  He 
was  much  beloved  and  respected  in  the  colony  of 
Xew  South  Wales,  and  was  honoured  with  a  public 
funeral.  He  married  in  1818,  Mary,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  General  Richard  Blunt,  colonel  of  the  66th 
regiment,  by  whom  he  had  a  numerous  issue. 
His  younger  brothers  are:  J.  M.  Mitchell,  of 
Mayville,  merchant  and  Belgian  consul  in  Leitli, 
knight  of  the  order  of  I^opold  of  Belgium,  and 
Houston  Mitchell  of  Polmood  and  Meadowbank. 

On  16th  April  1857  Sir  Thomas' second  daughter, 
Emily,  married  at  Sydney  the  Right  Hon.  George 
Edward  Thicknesse  Touchet,  20tli  Lord  Audley, 
descended  from  a  family  who  were  barous  by 


tenure  before  the  reign  of  Heuiy  III.^  bnt  tbe  ex- 
isting peerage,  created  in  1318,  dates  fttmi  tbe 
earliest  writ  of  snmmonfi.  Camiila  Victorit,  Sir 
Thomas'  third  daughter,  was  married  the  sane 
day  to  J.  F.  Mann,  Esq.,  son  of  General  Mann. 
Lady  Audley  died  April  1, 186a 

Sir  Thomas  was  chief  of  tbe  familjr  of  Mitebell 
of  Craigend,  which,  as  above  mentioned,  sssomed 
the  name  of  Livingstone,  on  a  marriage  irith  the 
heiress  of  a  brother  of  Lord  Viscount  Kilsytb,  at- 
tainted in  1716.  He  was  chiefly  remarkable  far 
energy  and  perseverance  in  whatever  he  vnder- 
took,  and  a  determination  to  do  his  dncy  in  all 
circumstances.  Wlien  sent  to  the  Peniosnia,  after 
the  battle  of  Waterioo,  in  1815,  to  sorrej  the 
different  fields  of  battle  in  which  onr  troops  had 
been  engaged,  although  he  was  there  under  tlie 
direct  auspices  of  the  Duke  of  Wellington,  and  al- 
though he  had  been  introduced  by  Mr.  Cannuig, 
then  British  ambassador  at  Lisbon,  to  the  imme- 
diate protection  of  General  Ballasteros,  tbe  Span- 
ish prime  minister,  his  surveys  excited  a  good  deal 
of  jealousy  amongst  the  Spaniards,  and  he  was  ex- 
posed to  so  much  danger  that  he  had  freqnentij 
to  work  wiih  the  theodolite  in  one  hand  and  the 
rifle  in  the  other.  On  his  return  to  Britaui  be 
was  employed,  under  Sir  Henry  Torrens,  in  draw- 
ing plans  for  the  manoeuvres  of  the  army,  accord- 
ing to  a  design  of  his  own  invention,  by  which 
their  accuracy  could  be  tested  on  mathematical 
principles,  and  under  which  test  many  old  erron 
of  movement  in  echelon  and  wheeling  were  ex- 
ploded, and  new  methods  of  forming  squares  were 
introduced  from  his  drawings. 

The  publication  of  his  work,  *^  Plans  of  the  Fields 
of  Battle  in  the  Peninsula,"  which,  connected  as 
they  were  with  the  days  of  his  early  service  in  the 
ai-my,  naturally  had  stronger  claims  on  him,  was 
delayed  to  allow  him  to  publish  his  '*  Throe  Ex- 
peditions into  the  Interior  of  Eastern  Australia," 
undei-taken,  as  these  expeditions  were,  by  order 
of  government.  The  most  attractive  of  his  duties, 
as  he  himself  tells  us  in  his  preface  to  his  "  Tro- 
pical Australia,"  ever  was  to  explore  the  interior 
of  that  country.  Australia  was  then  very  little 
known  to  the  world,  and  Sir  Thomas  Mitchell's 
works  on  the  subject  have  been  of  vast  use  to  all 
subsequent  explorers. 


'I 


MOIR, 


178 


DAVID. 


MOIR,  David  Macbeth,  an  accomplished  poet 
and  oiJsceUaneona  writer,  the  Delta  of  Black- 
wood's Magaxine,  was  bora  at  Musselburgh,  5th 
Jannaiy  1798,  being  the  second  of  four  children 
which  his  parents  had.  He  got  the  rudiments  of 
bis  edacation  at  a  school  of  minor  note  in  his 
native  place,  and  was  then  entered  at  tlie  grammar 
school,  where  he  learned  the  Latin,  Greek,  and 
French  languages,  and  the  elements  of  geometry 
and  algebra.  When  thirteen  years  old,  he  was 
placed  as  an  apprentice  for  four  years  with  Dr. 
Stewart,  a  medical  practitioner  of  Mnsselburgh. 
In  the  last  year  of  his  apprenticeship  he  began  to 
attend  the  medical  classes  in  the  university  of 
Edinburgh,  and  after  pui*suing  the  usual  course  of 
study,  he  received  his  diploma  as  surgeon  in  the 
spring  of  1816,  when  he  was  only  eighteen  years 
of  age.  Soon  after  he  joined  Dr.  Brown  of  Mus- 
selburgh, as  junior  partner,  in  his  medical  practice, 
which  was  extensive. 

His  first  poetical  attempt  beara  date  1812,  being 
then  in  his  fifteenth  year.  He  soon  after  sent  two 
sliort  prose  essays  to  *  Tlie  Cheap  Magazine,'  a 
small  Haddington  publication.  He  subsequently 
contributed  to  the  Scots  Magazine,  and  having  in 
1817  instituted  adebating  society  in  his  native  place, 
called  *^  The  Mnsselburgh  Forum,**  he  became  its 
secretary,  and  took  an  active  part  in  its  proceed- 
ings. So  pleased  were  the  members  with  his  ser- 
vices tliat  at  the  end  of  their  session  they  unani- 
mously voted  him  a  silver  medal  with  a  suitable 
inscription.  Towards  the  close  of  the  same  year 
he  ventured  to  print  anonymously  a  small 
volume  entitled  ^Tho  Bombardment  of  Algiers 
and  other  Poems,*  which  he  distributed  almost 
entirely  among  his  friends.  Having  become  ac- 
quainted with  Mr.  Thomas  Pringle,  the  poet,  one 
of  the  editors  of  Constable*s  Edinburgh  Magazine, 
he  contributed  various  articles,  both  in  prose  and 
verse,  to  that  periodical. 

His  fii*st  contribution  to  Blackwood's  Magazine 
was  some  verses,  shortly  after  the  starting  of  that 
[>eriodica1,  when  he  was  only  nineteen  years  of 
age.  They  were  sent  without  any  signature,  but, 
to  distinguish  his  pieces,  ho  adopted  the  subscrip- 
tion of  Delta,  by  which  nom-de-plume  he  was  ever 
afterwards  known.  His  earliest  poem  with  that 
subscription,  first  entitled  *  Emma,*  but  subse- 


quently altei-ed  to  Sur  Ethelrcd,  appeared  in  Janu- 
ary 1820.  For  more  than  thirty  years  he  conti- 
nued to  enrich  its  pages  with  the  productions  of 
his  pen.  His  poems,  in  particular,  were  remark- 
able for  thehr  smoothness  and  facility  of  style,  and 
evinced  a  delicate  and  graceful  fancy,  with  a  sweet 
pure  vein  of  tenderness  and  pathos. 

Towards  the  dose  of  1824,  he  published  in  a 
separate  volume,  *  The  Legend  of  Genevieve,  with 
other  Tales  and  Poems,*  consisting  chiefly  of 
selections  from  his  contributions  to  the  Magasines, 
with  some  new  pieces.  This  work  was  well  re- 
ceived, and  greatly  increased  his  poetical  reputa- 
tion. In  October  of  the  same  year  he  began  to 
contribute  also  to  Blackwood*s  Magazine,  one  of 
the  most  laughable  as  well  as  lifelike  embodiments 
of  Scottish  humour  known  to  literature,  entitled 
^  The  Autobiography  of  Mansie  Waugh.'  It  was 
not  concluded  till  1828,  when  it  was  published 
in  a  volume  by  itself,  with  additions,  and  in  a 
short  time  ran  through  several  editions.  It  was 
also  reprinted  in  America  and  France.  That  the 
author  of  the  touching  *  Legend  of  Genevieve,*  and 
the  writer  of  the  facetious  history  of  'Mansie 
Waugh,'  the  Dalkeith  tailor,  was  one  and  the 
same  person,  could  scarcely  be  believed  at  the 
time.  In  the  literary  world  the  authorship  was 
universally  assigned  to  John  Gait,  then  in  the  ze- 
nith of  his  fame.  But  this  was  not  the  only  hu- 
morous piece  which  the  Magazine  received  from 
his  pen.  Among  his  other  jocose  papers  ftirnished 
to  that  periodical  were  *  The  Eve  of  St.  Jerry,' 
*  The  Auncient  Waggonere,*  *  Billy  Routing,*  &c. 
some  of  which  were  ascribed  to  Maginn,  then  also 
a  fi*equent  contributor  to  its  pages. 

Mr.  Moir  wrote  likewise  for  the  Edinburgh  Lit- 
erary Gazette,  and  his  contributions  were  prized 
so  highly  that  in  the  end  of  July  1829,  he  was 
presented  by  the  proprietors  with  a  handsome 
silver  jug,  in  token  of  their  gratitude.  On  8th 
June  of  the  same  year,  he  had  married  Miss  Char- 
lotte £.  Bell  of  Leith,  by  whom  he  had  eleven 
children,  eight  of  whom  survived  him. 

In  1830  he  edited  the  collection  called  '  Weeds 
and  Wildflowers,*  a  posthumous  volume  of  prose 
and  poetry,  by  Alexander  Balfour,  published  for 
the  benefit  of  his  family,  and  ifvix>te  the  memoir 
prefixed  of  Balfour*s  life. 


I 
If' 


■v.. 


MOIR. 


174 


MOLYSON. 


Meantime  his  profeMional  career  as  a  medical 
man  had  kept  pace  with  his  literary  success.  Dnr- 
iiig  the  terrible  visitation  of  the  cholera  in  1882, 
AT nsselbnrgh  was  one  of  its  first  points  of  attack, 
and  Mr.  Moir  was  night  and  day  in  attendance  on 
!  i  the  sufferers.  "  Being,"  sa3'8  his  biographer,  Mr. 
Ainl,  '*  medical  secrctaiy  of  the  Board  of  Health 
at  Musselburgh,  the  inquiries  which  he  had  to  an- 
swer from  all  parts  of  the  country,  as  to  the  pre- 
vention and  treatment  of  the  malady,  were  innu- 
merable, and,  Almost  in  self-defence,  in  order  to 
answer  if  possible  once  for  all,  he  hun-iedly  tlu-ew 
together  his  *  Practical  Observations  on  Malignant 
Cholera.*  A  second  edition  was  called  for  in  a 
few  days  after  the  publication  of  the  first.  He 
followed  it  up  with  *  Proofs  of  the  Contagion  of 
Malignant  Cholera.*  The  second  visitation  of 
cholera  in  1848-9  only  confirmed  him  in  his  doc- 
trine of  contagion.** 

In  1831  he  published  his  ^  Outlines  of  the  An- 
cient History  of  Medicine,  being  a  view  of  tlie 
Progress  of  the  Healing  Art  among  the  Egyptians, 
Ci  reeks,  Romans,  and  Arabians,*  a  work  of  great 
research  and  diversified  erudition.  He  had  been 
the  same  year  pi*escnted  with  the  freedom  of  his 
native  place,  and  being  also  elected  a  member  of 
the  town  council,  he  took  an  active  part  in  the 
public  affairs  of  the  burgh.  It  may  also  be  men- 
tioned here  that  in  1844,  he  was  chosen  a  member 
of  the  kirk  session  of  Invcresk,  and  discharged 
the  duties  of  the  eldership  with  cxcmplaiy  fiilelit}-, 
and  that  in  1840  he  was  appointed  to  represent 
the  burgh  of  Annan  in  the  General  Assembly  of 
tliQ  church  of  Scotland,  an  ofiicc  which  was  con- 
fon-ed  upon  him  every  succeeding  year,  during  the 
remainder  of  his  life. 

In  the  beginning  of  1833,  Dr.  Bro^*n  having 
retii*ed  from  business,  Mr.  Moir  became  senior  in 
the  practice,  having  admitted  a  junior  partner. 
On  the  death  of  Mr.  Blackwood,  the  ])ublislicr,  in 
1834,  Mr.  Moir  was  named  one  of  the  executors 
for  his  family,  the  only  one  who  was  not  a  relative, 
a  proof  of  the  confidence  which  was  placed  in  his 
judgment  and  integiity. 

In  1837,  on  the  death  of  Dr.  M-Nish  of  Glas- 
gow, Mr.  Moir,  with  whom  he  had  been  in  habits 
j     !       of  intimacy  and  constant  cori-cspondence  for  years, 
collected  his  fugitive  pieces,  and  published  them 


with  a  life  of  the  anihor.  Ho  also  oonCrilmtcd 
memoirs  of  Mr.  Kennie  of  Fhantanie,  the  emment 
agriculturist,  and  Sir  John  Sinclair,  to  the  *  Jour- 
nal of  Agriculture,*  and  n-rote  a  biograpldcal 
sketch  of  Admiral  Sir  David  Milne ;  besides  edit- 
ing a  collected  edition  of  the  works  of  Mn.  He- 
mans,  with  notes.  A  memoir  of  Gait,  written  by 
Mr.  Moir,  was  published  in  1841.  In  the  end  of 
1843  Mr.  Moir  published  his  'Domestic  VcrKS.* 
His  last  contribution  to  Black wood*s  Magasfaw, 
*Thc  Lament  of  Selim,*  was  sent  In  only  about  a 
fortnight  before  his  death.  From  first  to  last  he 
contributed  in  all  to  its  pages  370  articles  in  prose 
and  verse.  He  was  a  zealons  member  of  the  So- 
ciety of  Antiquaries  of  Scotland,  and  in  1850,  at  a 
meeting  of  the  Society,  he  read  a  paper  on  the 
Roman  antiquities  of  Musselburgh. 

For  the  benefit  of  his  health  Mr.  Moir,  on  the 
1st  of  July  1851,  set  out  with  Mrs.  Mohr,  and  their 
little  boy,  John  Wilson,  to  Ayrshire  and  Dnm- 
frles,  to  see  if  a  short  release  from  professional 
care  and  change  of  scene  would  do  him  any  good. 
At  the  latter  place  he  was  seized  with  a  severe 
attack  of  spasms,  to  which  he  had  been  for  some 
time  subject,  and  died  at  the  King*s  Arms  iuu, 
Dumfries,  on  the  Gtli  of  the  same  month,  in  the 
53d  year  of  his  age.  lie  was  buried  in  the  church- 
yard of  Invcresk.  A  full  length  statue  of  him 
has  been  erected  to  his  memory  in  his  native 
place. 

His  poems,  with  a  well-written  life  of  him  by 
his  friend,  Mr.  Thomas  Aird,  were  published  at 
Edinburgh,  in  2  vols,  small  8vo,  in  1852. 

^lOLYSON,  David,  a  poet  of  considerable 
lociil  reputation  in  Fifeshu*e,  was  the  eldest  son  of 
a  small  shopkeeper,  who  had  been  originally  a 
tailor,  and  was  born  in  the  village  of  Monimail, 
May  4,  1789.  After  receiving  the  rudiments  of 
his  education  at  the  parish  school,  he  was  removed 
to  the  school  of  Collcssie,  where  he  studied  IjUin 
and  Greek.  He  was  then  sent  to  leani  the  trade 
of  a  printer  with  Mr.  Robert  TuU is,  in  Cupar-Hfe. 
His  leisure  hours  he  devoted  to  the  classics, 
and  without  the  assistance  of  a  teacher  he  ob- 
tained a  knowledge  of  the  Italian  language.  By 
an  an-angement  with  his  employer  he  was  enabled, 
during  his  apprenticeship,  to  attend  the  nniversity 
of  St.  Andrews,  where  he  distinguished  himself  by 


I, 

ii 


]^[OLYSON. 


175 


MONCREIFF. 


:i 


his  acqnireinents,  and  obtained  prizes  in  tlic  ma- 
thematical, natural  pliilosopliy,  and  Latin  classes. 
Soon  after  liis  rctnrn  to  Monimail,  ho  was  ap- 
pointed editor  of  a  daily  newspaper  in  Dublin, 
called  *  Saunders*  News-Letter,*  wlicre  he  remaiu- 
e<1  for  about  two  years,  when  an  unfortunate  dis- 
agreement with  the  proprietor  caused  him  to  re- 
sign bis  situation.  During  liis  residence  in  the 
Irisli  capital,  lie  acquired  a  knowledge  of  the 
Spanish  and  German  languages,  and  became  so 
far  master  of  architecture  and  drawing,  that  lie 
once  had  the  intention  of  going  to  London  and 
following  the  profession  of  an  architect. 

On  leaving  Dublin,  he  returned  to  Monimail  on 
a  vi:sit  to  his  parents,  and  soon  after  accepted  the 
situation  of  conductor  of  a  private  academy  in 
KirlEcaldy,  of  which  tlie  Rev.  John  Martin  was  one 
of  the  chief  mnnagei's.  Tliis  office,  however,  he 
only  held  during  a  few  months.  Owing  to  some 
misunderstanding  with  one  of  tlie  managers,  he 
resigned  the  appointment,  in  July  1814,  and  en- 
listing as  a  private  soldier  in  the  service  of  the 
East  India  Company,  immediately  embarked  for 
Bombay.  In  this  capacity  he  soon  .attracted  the 
notice  of  his  snperiors.  Having  drawn  up  a  me- 
morial for  one  of  his  comrades,  the  officci*s  were 
stmck  with  the  superior  style  in  which  it  was 
written,  and  made  inqnlr}'  as  to  the  author.  Soon 
after,  the  following  circumstance  occun-ed.  The 
officers  of  the  regiment  had  been  unsuccessfully 
^endeavouring  to  work  some  difficult  problem  in 
engineering,  relative  to  the  throwing  of  shells, 
which  they  left  unsolved  on  the  table  of  their 
room.  Molyson  had  occasion  to  see  it  lying  there, 
when  lie  solved  it  at  once.  The  ofiicers  found  it 
next  morning,  and  on  inquiry  were  informed  that 
private  Molyson  was  the  name  of  the  person  who 
had  solved  the  problem  which  had  so  much  puzzled 
them,  on  which  they  promoted  him  at  once  to  the 
rank  of  sub-conductor  of  the  ordnance.  He  had 
also  some  connection  with  the  post-ofiice,  and  all 
the  letters  which  came  to  soldiers  who  were  dead 
fell  into  his  possession.  Of  some  of  these  he  made 
an  interesting  use  afterwards,  in  a  series  of  arti- 
cles which  he  wrote  for  Chambers'  Edinburgh 
Jonmal,  entitled  *  The  Dead-Letter  Box.* 

After  a  residence  of  twenty-two  months  in  Bom- 
bay, his  health  began  to  fail  under  an  eastern  cli- 


mate; and,  having  obtained  his  discharge,  he 
returned  tq  Scotland  with  a  broken  constitution 
and  a  small  pension  of  about  two  shillings  a-day. 
He  now  took  up  his  residence  at  Monimail,  where 
he  devoted  himself  to  study,  and  particulariy  to 
poetry.  During  his  stay  in  India,  he  had  made 
himself  thoroughly  acquainted  with  Hindostanee, 
and  in  Ids  retirement  he  translated  a  long  poem 
from  that  language,  which,  on  his  death,  was 
found  among  his  manuscripts.  He  wrote  a  great 
many  poems  for  Blackwood*8  Magazine,  the  prin- 
cipal of  which,  entitled  *  Hubert ;  an  Indian  Tale,* 
in  blank  verse,  extended  over  six  or  eight  pages 
of  that  periodical.  He  also  contributed  largely  to 
the  Caledonian  Magazine,  a  Dundee  publication. 
About  1829  he  was  appointed  editor  of  the  Fife 
Hci-ald,  which  he  conducted  with  talent  and  spirit 
during  the  peculiarly  arduous  period  which  fol- 
lowed Earl  Grey*s  installation  into  office.  Hav- 
ing paid  some  attention  to  the  Gaelic  language,  he 
wi-ote  several  papers  for  the  Herald,  showing  that 
many  places  in  Fifeshire  derive  their  names  fVom 
the  Gaelic.  In  July  1881  bad  health  obliged  him 
to  resign  his  situation,  when  he  returned  to  his 
native  village,  where  he  commenced  the  business 
of  a  ]and-sui*veyor.  In  this  profession  he  obtain- 
ed so  much  employment  as  enabled  him,  with  the 
assistance  of  his  pension,  not  only  to  support  him- 
self, but  also  to  provide  for  those  who  remained 
of  his  father's  family.  His  father  died  July  80, 
1832  ;  and  to  recruit  his  own  health  lie  went  with 
his  brother,  for  a  short  time,  to  the  fishing  village 
of  Buckhaven,  an  interesting  description  of  which 
he  afterwards  contributed  to  Chambers*  Journal, 
lie  died,  unmarried,  at  Monimail,  after  a  linger- 
ing illness,  March  4,  1834.  He  was  of  a  modest 
and  retiring  disposition,  and  much  esteemed  by  all 
who  knew  him.  To  him  his  native  village- is  in- 
debted for  a  library,  of  which  lie  was  the  fii*st 
suggcster  and  president,  and  a  tribute  of  esteem 
and  gi'atitude  is  recoi*ded  in  its  minutes  to  his 
memory. 
MOXnODDO,  Lord.    See  Burnett,  James. 

MoNCREiFK,  tlio  surname  of  an  old  family,  originallj  of 
Pcrthsliiro,  the  progenitor  of  which  in  Scotland  is  stated  to 
have  been  a  Mortimer,  of  Anglo-Norman  lineage,  who  as- 
sumed the  name  of  Moncreiflf  on  obtaining  the  lands  of  Mon- 
creifT  in  that  county.  Ramcrus  de  Moncreiff,  who  lived  in 
the  beginning  of  tho  12th  centur}*,  was  keeper  of  the  ward- 


I 


I      I 


MONCREIFF, 


17C 


REV.  Slli  iI£NRY  WELLWOOD. 


I ; 


•  I 


I 


robe  to  Alexander  I.  In  the  Kaginan  ISolI,  among  those  who 
■wore  fealtj  to  Edward  I.  in  1296,  u  mentioned  Johannes  de 
Moncrief,  cheralier.  A  charter  of  the  baronr  of  Moncreiff 
was  granted  in  1495  to  Sir  John  Moncreiff,  whose  great- 
grandson,  Sir  John  Moncreiff  of  Moncreiff,  was  created  a  har- 
onet  of  Nova  Scotia,  with  remainder  to  his  hein-male  what- 
soever, 22d  April  1626.  This  baronetcj'  is  thus  one  of  the 
oldest  in  Scotland,  the  order  of  knight  baronet  projected  hv 
James  VI.  in  1621,  being  instituted  by  Charles  I.  on  28th 
Maj  1625. 

The  first  baronet  diod  in  1630.  The  second  baronet,  the 
eldest  son  of  this  gentleman,  bang  embarrassed  in  liis  affairs, 
was  compelled,  in  1633,  to  sell  the  estate  of  Moncreiff  to  a 
vounger  cadet  of  the  familv,  Thomas  Moncrciffe,  Esq.,  one 
of  the  clerks  of  the  Exchequer,  who  was  created  a  baronet  in 
1685.  Sur  John  died,  unmarried,  in  1G75,  when  the  title  de- 
volved upon  his  brother,  Sir  David,  third  baronet,  on  whose 
death,  also  unmarried,  his  younger  brother,  Sir  James  Mon- 
creiff, became  fourth  baronet.  With  him  the  direct  line  of 
the  first  baronet  expired,  and  the  baronetcy  reverted  to  his 
heir-at-law,  Sir  John  Moncreiff  of  Tippermalloch,  fii^h  baro- 
net, an  eminent  physician,  descended  directly  from  Ilugh 
Moncreiff,  a  brother  of  the  first  baronet.  Sir  John  married 
Nicholas,  daughter  of  Moncreiff  uf  Easter  Moncreiff,  .tud  died 
about  1710. 

His  only  son,  Sir  Hugh,  uxth  baronet,  died,  unmarried,  in 
1644,  when  he  bequeathed  the  estate  of  Tippermalloch  to  his 
nephew,  Mr.  George  Moncreiff,  the  son  of  his  sister.  The 
title  devolved  on  his  kinsman,  the  Rev.  Sir  William  Mon- 
creiff, minister  of  Blackford,  in  Perthshire,  seventli  baronet, 
descended  from  Archibald  Moncreiff,  uncle  of  tlie  first  baru- 
net.  Sir  William  was  eldest  son  of  the  Rev.  Archibald  ^lon- 
creiff,  by  Catlierine,  eldest  daughter  of  John  Halliday,  Esq. 
of  Tulliebole,  Kinruss-ahire.  By  his  wife,  Catherine,  clde:»t 
daughter  of  Robert  Wcllwood,  Esq.  of  Gorvock,  he  had  six 
sons  and  one  daughter,  and  died  9th  December  17C7. 

His  eldest  son,  the  Rev.  Sir  Henry  Well  wood  Moncroiff, 
D.D.,  eighth  baronet,  a  distinguished  divine  of  the  Church  of 
Scotland,  was  bom  at  Blackford  manse  in  February  1750. 
He  received  his  early  education  at  the  parish  school  of  his 
native  place,  and  being  destined  for  the  ministry,  he  was 
sent  to  the  university  of  Glasgow,  where,  after  the  usual 
course  of  preliminary  study,  he  entered  the  divinity  hall.  On 
his  father*s  death,  which  took  place  during  his  attendance  at 
college,  he  was  fixed  upon  as  his  successor  in  the  parish  of 
Bluckford,  but  as  he  was  then  too  young  to  be  ordained,  an 
assistant  was  appointed  in  the  meantime,  and  the  young  bar- 
onet removed  to  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  to  complete  his 
theological  studies.  In  1771  he  was  licensed  to  preach  the 
gospel,  and  August  loth  that  year,  was  ordained  minister  of 
the  church  and  parish  of  Blackford.  In  October  1775  he 
was  translated  to  St.  Cuthbcrt's  parish,  Edinburgh,  one  of 
the  most  populous  and  iniportunt  charges  in  the  metropolis. 
Here  he  soon  became  distinguished  for  his  devoted  zc;tl  and 
fidelity  in  the  discharge  of  his  ministerial  duties,  for  the  mild- 
ness and  benevolence  of  his  disposition,  and  for  his  great  per- 
sonal worth,  as  well  as  for  his  genius  and  eloquence  as  a 
preacher.  Taking  from  the  first  an  active  share  in  the  busi- 
ness of  the  cimrch  courts,  in  opposition  to  the  moderate,  then 
the  dominant  party,  he  soon  became  the  leader  of  the  evan- 
gelical soctiun  of  the  church;  and  in  1785  he  was  unanunou.s- 
Jv  elected  moderator  of  the  General  Assemblv. 

In  1784,  he  had  been  appointed  collector  of  the  fund  for 
the  widows  and  rliildreu  of  the  clergy,  and  filled  that  impor- 
tant situation  till  his  death,  receiving  annually,  for  the  long 
period  of  forty-three  years,  the  thanks  of  the  Assembly,  for 


the  able,  faithful,  and  affiBctkmate  manner  in  which  be  d»- 
charged  the  dutiei  of  tlie  office.  He  was  also  oos  of  the 
original  members  of  the  society  of  the  sons  of  the  dajj,  and 
by  bis  influence  and  exertk»s  contribnted  greatly  to  its  sac- 
cess.  He  died,  after  a  lingering  illness,  Aognst  9, 1827,  in 
the  78tli  year  of  bis  age  and  56th  of  his  minutnr. 

His  funeral  sermon  was  preached  by  Dr.  Andrew  Thom- 
son, minister  of  St.  George's,  Edinburgh,  and  sltenrarda 
published.  In  the  folbwing  eloquent  passages.  Dr.  Tbomson 
has  fiuthfully  described  his  public  and  private  character : — 
*'  It  was  in  early  life  that  he  began  to  take  an  active  part  in 
the  government  of  our  national  church.  The  principks  of 
ecclesiastical  polity  which  ho  adopted,  as  soon  as  he  entered 
on  his  public  career,  he  adopted  from  full  and  firm  convic- 
tion, and  he  maintained  and  cherished,  and  avowed  tbem  to 
the  very  last.  They  were  the  very  same  principles  for  which 
our  forefathers  had  contended  so  nobly,  which  thej  at  length 
succeeded  in  establishing,  and  which  they  bequeathed  as  a 
sacred  and  blood*bonght  legacy  to  their  descendants.  But 
though  that  circumstance  gave  a  deep  and  solemn  interest  to 
them  in  his  regard,  he  w.hs  attached  to  them  on  matt  ra- 
tional and  enlightened  grounds.  He  viewed  them  ss  founded 
on  the  word  of  God.  as  essential  to  the  rights  and  liberties  of 
the  Christian  people,  as  identified  with  the  prosperity  of 
genuine  religion,  and  with  the  real  welfare  and  efficiency  of 
the  Establishment ;  and,  therefore,  he  embraced  eiciy  oppor- 
tunity of  inailcating  and  upholding  them ;  resisted  dl  the 
attempts  that  were  made  to  discredit  them  in  theory,  or  to 
violate  them  in  practice,  rejoiced  when  they  obtained  even  a 
partial  triumph  over  the  opposition  they  had  to  enoonnter, 
and  clung  to  them,  and  struggled  for  them,  long  after  they 
were  borne  down  by  a  system  of  force  and  oppresncm,  and 
when,  instead  of  the  numerous  and  determined  host  that 
fought  by  his  side  in  happier  times,  few  and  feeUe,  compa- 
ratively, were  those  who  seconded  his  manly  eflbrts,  and  held 
fast  their  ovt-n  confidence ;  but  he  lived  to  see  a  better  spirit 
returning.  This  re\-ival  cheered  and  consoled  him.  Fer- 
vently did  he  long  and  pray  for  its  continuance  and  its  spread. 
Nor  did  he  neglect  to  employ  his  influence,  in  order  to  intro- 
duce pastors  who  would  give  themselves  consdentionsly  to 
their  Master's  work,  preadiing  to  their  flocks  the  truth  as  it 
is  in  Jesus,  watching  for  souls  as  those  that  must  give  an  ac- 
count, and  faithfully  and  fearlessly  performing  all  the  duties 
incumbent  on  them,  both  as  ministers  and  as  rulers  in  tlie 
Church. 

*^  He  stood  forth  from  among  his  contemporaries,  confess- 
edly pre-eminent  in  strength  of  personal  and  social  character. 
There  was  a  magnanimity  in  his  modes  of  thinking  and  of 
acting,  which  was  as  evident  to  the  eye  of  observation  as 
were  tlie  lineaments  of  his  face  and  the  dignity  of  his  gait. 
His  great  and  primaiy  dutinction  was  a  clear,  profound,  and 
powerful  understanding,  which  spumed  from  it  all  trifles,  and 
advanced  to  the  decision  it  was  to  give  with  nnhesitating 
promptitude  and  determined  firmness.  Those  who  knew  him 
best  can  best  give  witness  how  faithfully  and  habitually  he 
embodied  his  knowledge,  and  his  principles,  and  hia  hopes,  ns 
a  Christian,  into  his  life  and  deportment,  his  daily  walk  and 
conversation;  how  tenderiy  he  cared  for  the  fatherless  and 
the  widow  that  were  so  often  committed  to  his  charge ;  how 
active  and  asuduous  he  was  in  helping  forward  deserving 
youth,  in  giving  counsel  and  aid  to  the  many  who  had  re- 
course to  him  in  their  difficulties,  and  in  doing  good  to  all  his 
brethren,  with  unaffected  kindness,  as  he  had  opportunity ; 
how  paUent  and  resigned  amidst  the  severest  bereavements 
(and  of  these  he  experienced  not  a  few)  with  which  Provi- 
dence can  vibit  the  children  of  mortality ;  how  fervent  in  bis 


:i 


MONCUR. 


178 


MONRO. 


bnuioer  in  the  Scottiah  exchequer  court,  and  wu  afterwardi 
appomted  one  of  the  barons  of  the  exchequer  in  SooUand. 

Sir  Thomas  Moncreiffe,  the  fifth  baronet,  the  nephew  of 
this  {^tleman,  married  Ladj  Elisabeth  Ramsay,  daughter 
of  the  earl  of  Dalhousie,  and  bj  her  had  one  son,  the  sixth 
baronet.  The  match  is  said  not  to  hmrt  been  a  happy  one, 
and  as  it  was  mainlj  brought  about  bj  Baron  Moncreiffe,  he 
deemed  himmlf  bound  to  take  the  lady's  part,  and  at  his 
death  he  left  her  the  estate  of  Moredun  in  the  parish  of  Lib- 
erton,  near  Edinburgh.  It  afterwords  became  the  property 
of  David  Anderson,  Esq.  She  died  3d  June.  1848,  from  in- 
juries sustained  by  her  dress  accidentally  catching  fire. 

Sir  Thomas.  7th  baronet  of  tliis  branch,  bom  Jan.  9, 1822, 
succeeded  on  the  death  of  his  father,  Not.  20, 1880.  He  mar- 
ried, MttT  2, 1848,  Lady  Louisa  Hay,  eldest  daughter  of  the 
earl  of  Kinnoul ;  issue,  8  sons  and  8  drt,  Robert  Drum- 
mond  Moncreiffe,  his  eldest  surviving  son,  bom  Nov.  3, 1855. 

The  Moncreiffe  family  possesses  the  patronage  of  two  bur- 
saries in  the  university  of  St  Andrews.  The  view  from  tlie 
beautiful  hill  of  Moncreiff,  within  two  miles  of  Perth,  whence 
they  derive  their  name,  was  called  by  Pennant  "  the  glory  of 
Scotland.**  In  Soott^s  *  Fair  Maid  of  Perth*  there  is  a  most 
graphic  deseriptiou  of  iL 


BfoxcuR,  a  surname  derived  from  the  French  words  mon 
%  my  heart  There  was  an  old  family,  Moncur  of  that 
ilk,  in  Perthahiia.  In  the  charters  of  Robert  I.  and  David 
IL  this  name  of  Moncur  is  mentioned,  and  in  the  reign  of 
Robert  III.,  Andreas  Moucur  de  eodem  is  witness  in  a  char- 
ter of  Rait  of  Hallgreen.  Hie  ruins  of  the  ancient  castle  of 
Moncur  are  still  to  be  seen  in  the  parish  of  Inchture,  in  the 
earse  of  Gowrie. 


Monro,  the  name  of  the  clan  Roich.    See  Mukbo. 

MONRO,  Alexander,  M.D.,  an  eminent  ana- 
tomist, the  foander  of  the  medical  school  at  Edin- 
burgh, styled  Primus^  to  distingnish  him  from  his 
son  and  successor,  was  descended,  by  his  father, 
from  the  family  of  Munro  of  Milntouu,  in  Ross- 
shire,  and  by  his  mother,  from  that  of  Forbes  of 
Cullodeu,  though  he  himself  was  bom  in  London, 
September  8,  1697.  Ills  father  John,  youngest 
son  of  Sir  Alexander  Monro  of  Bearcrofts,  who 
was  a  colonel  in  the  army  of  Charles  II.  at  the 
battle  of  Worcester,  served  for  some  years  as  a 
surgeon  in  the  army  of  King  William  in  Flandcro ; 
and,  on  his  retirement,  settled  at  Edinburgh, 
where  he  soon  acquired  an  extensive  practice, 
lie  gave  his  son  Alexander  the  best  education 
which  that  city  afforded,  and  then  sent  him  to 
London,  where  he  attended  the  anatomical  lec- 
tures of  Chcsclden.  Young  Monro  afterwards 
pursued  his  studies  at  Paris  and  Leyden,  at  the 
hitter  place  under  the  celebrated  Boerhaave.  On 
his  return  to  Edinburgh  m  the  autumn  of  1719, 
Messrs.  Dmmmond  and  M^Gill,  who  were  then 
conjunct  nominal  professors  and  demonstrators  of 


anatomy  to  the  Company  of  SorgeonB,  resigned  in 
his  favour.  In  1720  by  the  advice  of  his  father, 
he  began  to  give  public  lectures  on  anatomy ;  and 
at  the  same  time  Dr.  Alston,  (see  vol.  i.  p.  181,) 
then  ft  young  man,  also  at  the  suggestion  of  the 
elder  Monro,  commenced  delivering  lectures  on 
the  materia  medlca  and  botany.  His  father  like- 
wise communicated  to  the  physicians  and  surgeons 
of  Edinburgh  a  plan  for  having  the  different 
branches  of  physic  and  snrgery  regularly  taught 
at  Edinburgh;  and  by  their  interest,  professor- 
ships of  anatomy  and  medicine  were  instituted  in 
the  university.  To  complete  the  plan,  subscrip- 
tions were  set  on  foot  for  the  establishment  of  an 
hospital,  and  considerable  sums  raised,  chiefly  by 
the  exertions  of  Mr.  George  Dmmmond,  lord  pro- 
vost, and  Dr.  Alexander  Monro,  who  wrote  a 
pamphlet,  strongly  pointing  out  the  advantages  of 
such  an  institution.  The  Royal  Infirmary  was  in 
consequence  founded.  Provost  Dmmmond  and  Dr. 
Monro  being  appointed  a  committee  to  superin- 
tend its  building;  and  on  its  being  opened,  he 
delivered  clinical  lectures  there  for  the  benefit  of 
the  students.  Thus  was  commenced  at  Edin- 
burgh that  regular  course  of  instmction  which  ob- 
tained for  the  medical  school  of  that  city  the  repu- 
tation of  being  the  best  in  the  world. 

Dr.  Monro  had  been  elected,  in  1721,  the  first 
professor  of  anatomy  in  the  college  of  Edinburgh, 
but  he  was  not  received  into  the  university  till 
1725,  when  he  was  inducted  along  with  the  cele- 
brated mathematician,  Mr.  Colin  Madaurin.  In 
1726  appeared  his  *  Osteology,  or  Treatise  on  the 
Anatomy  of  the  Bones,*  which  passed  through 
eight  editions  during  his  life,  and  was  trans- 
lated into  various  foreign  languages.  In  the 
later  editions  he  added  a  concise  description  of 
the  Nerves,  and  of  the  Lacteal  Sac  and  Thoracic 
Duct.  A  society  having  been  established  at 
Edinburgh  by  the  professors,  and  other  practi- 
tioners of  the  town,  for  the  purpose  of  collecting 
and  publishing  papers  on  professional  subjects, 
Dr.  Monro  was  appointed  secretary,  and  under 
his  active  superintendence,  six  volumes  of  *  Medi- 
cal Essays  *  were  published,  the  first  of  which  ap- 
peared in  1732.  Of  this  collection  many  of  the 
most  valuable  papers  were  written  by  Dr.  Monro, 
on  anatomical,  physiological,  and  practical  sub- 


MONRO, 


180 


ALEXANDER. 


Ad  JSaaj  oo  Um  Dropsj,  and  iti  different  SpecMS.  Lond. 
17M,  ISmo.    1756, 1765,'  Sto.    Par.  1760.    Lrii*.  1761. 

An  Aoooont  of  tlit  DiaeaMS  which  an  moat  fraqoent  in 
the  Britiih  Hifitarf  Hoapitab  in  Gennanj,  from  Janoary, 
1761,  till  the  reton  of  the  Troopa  to  England,  in  March, 
1763 :  to  which  ia  added.  An  Eiwar  on  the  lleana  of  Pr^ 
■erring  the  Health  of  Soldiers,  and  Conducting  Military 
Hoapitala.     Lond.  1764,  8ro. 

Treatiae  on  Mineral  Waters.    Lond.  1770,  2  rola.  8to. 

Pnelectionca  Mectica  ex  Cronii  Institnto,  &c,  etOratio 
Harreii,  &c    Lond.  1775,  8to. 

Ohaerrations  on  the  Meana  of  Preserring  the  Health  of 
Soldiers,  and  of  Conducting  Military  Hospitals;  on  the  Dis- 
eases incident  to  Soldiers  in  the  time  of  service ;  and  of  the 
aame  Diseases,  as  thej  hare  appeared  in  Lcmdon.  Lond. 
1780,  2  Tola.  8ro. 

A  Treatise  on  3fedical  and  Pharmacentical  Chemistry,  and 
the  Materia  Medica ;  to  which  is  added,  An  English  Transla- 
tion of  the  Pharmacopeia  of  the  Roral  College  of  Physicians 
in  liondon,  of  1788.  Lond.  1788,  8  vols.  8to.  Appendix 
1789,  8vo.    To  this  a  4th  volume  w:is  added  in  1790,  8vo. 

An  Account  of  aome  Neutral  Salts,  &c.  PhiL  Trans.  Abr. 
xii479.    1767. 

On  the  good  Effecta  of  the  Quiissia  Root  in  some  Fevers, 
lb.  515.  1768. 

Of  a  pure  Native  Cr^-stallized  Natron,  or  Fossil  Alkaline 
Salt,  found  in  the  Country  of  Tripoli,  in  Barbary.  lb.  xiiL 
216.  1771. 

On  the  Sulphnreoua  Mineral  Waters  of  Castle-Leed  and 
Fairbnm,  in  Roat-ahire,  and  of  the  Salt  Purging  Water  of 
Piteaithly,  in  Perthshire,  ScotUnd.    lb.  271.  1772. 

DisMCtion  of  a  Woman  with  Child,  and  Remarks  on  Gra- 
vid Uteri.     Platea.    Ess.  Phys.  and  Lit.  i  403.  1754. 

Cases  of  Aneurism ;  with  Remarks.     lb.  iiu  178.  1771. 

Account  of  the  Lisbon  Diet  Drink,  in  Venereal  Cases, 
lb.  402. 

On  the  State  of  the  Intestines  in  Old  Dysenteries.  lb.  516. 

On  the  Use  of  Mercury  in  Consumptive  Disorders.  lb.  551. 

Uncommon  Cases.  Violent  Scurvy.  Venereal  Disorders. 
Obstinate  intermittent  Fever.  Tumour  in  the  Brain.  Hy- 
drocephalus. Ossifications  in  the  ^lysenterr.  Med.  Trans. 
U.  325.  1772. 

Of  the  Method  of  making  the  Otto  of  Roses,  as  it  is  pre- 
pared in  the  East  Indies.    Trans.  Soc.  Edin.  L  12.  1790. 

He  also  wrote  the  life  of  hb  fathtT^  prefixed  to  the  edition 
of  his  works  of  1781,  as  above  8t:iteJ. 

MONRO,  Alexandek.  M.D.,  styled  Secundus^ 
also  a  distiugaished  physician  and  professor, 
youngest  son  of  Dr.  Alexander  Monro,  Primus^ 
was  l>om  at  Edinbiu^h  March  21,  1733.  He  re- 
ceived the  mdiments  of  his  education  nnder  Mr. 
Mnudell,  an  eminent  teacher  of  lan^ages,  and 
went  throngh  the  usual  academical  course  at  the 
university  of  his  native  city.  About  the  eighteenth 
year  of  his  age,  he  entered  on  his  medical  studies 
under  his  father,  and  soon  became  a  useful  assist- 
ant to  him  in  the  dissecting  room.  In  October 
1755  he  obtained  the  degree  of  M.D.,  on  whicli 
occasion  he  published  and  defended  an  inaugural 
dissertation,   *Dc  Testibus  ct  Scmine  in  variis 


Animalibus.'  In  July  1756  he  was  admitted 
joint-profefltor  of  anatomy  and  smgery  with  his 
father ;  but  previouB  to  entering  upon  the  duties, 
with  the  view  of  further  proeecnting  his  atodiee, 
he  visited  both  London  and  Paris,  and  nfterwardd 
attended  for  some  time  the  anatomical  lectures  of 
the  celebrated  Professor  Meckell  at  the  nnlTemty 
of  Berlin.  Ho  returned  to  Edinburgh  in  the  sam- 
mer  of  1758,  when  he  was  admitted  a  licentiate  of 
the  Royal  College  of  Physicians,  of  which  he  was 
afterwards  president.  He  was  soon  chosen  a  Fol- 
low of  the  Royal  College  of  Physicians ;  and  on  the 
resignation  of  Dr.  Monro,  IVnmcf,  in  1759,  he  be- 
came full  professor  of  anatomy.  He  also  succeeded 
his  father  as  secretary  of  the  Philosophical  Society 
of  Edinburgh,  in  whose  *  Essays  and  Observations, 
Physical  and  Literary,^  appeared  several  able 
articles  from  his  pen,  on  important  subjects  in 
medical  science. 

Having  early  adopted  the  idea  that  the  valvular 
lymphatics  over  the  whole  of  the  animal  body 
were  one  general  system  of  absorbents,  he  pub- 
lished at  Berlin,  in  1758,  a  short  treatise,  'De 
Venis  Lymphaticis  Valvulosis.*  This  idea  wu 
afterwards  claimed  by  Dr.  William  Hunter  of 
Lfonaon,  which  led  to  a  controversy  between  these 
two  distinguished  physicians,  and  produced  from 
Dr.  Monro  his  *  Observations,  Anatomical  and 
Physiological,  wherein  Dr.  Hunter's  claim  to  some 
discoveries  is  examined,*  and  his  *  Answer  to  the 
Notes  in  the  Postscript  to  Observations,  Anato- 
mical and  Physiological.*  In  1782  the  Philoso- 
phical Society  was  incorporated  by  royal  charter, 
when  it  took  the  name  of  the  Royal  Society  of 
Edinburgh.  Dr.  Monro  was  elected  one  of  its 
first  fellows,  and  enriched  its  Transactions  with 
various  valuable  contributions.  In  1783  he  pub- 
lished a  large  folio  volume  ^  On  the  Structure  and 
Functions  of  the  Nervous  System,*  illustrated  by 
numerous  engravings,  which  was  translated  into 
the  German  and  other  languages.  In  1785  he 
produced  another  folio  volume  ^On  the  Struc- 
ture and  Physiology  of  Fishes,*  illustrated  with 
figures,  which  also  was  honoured  with  various 
foreign  translations.  In  1788  appeared  his  *  De- 
scription of  all  the  Burss  Mucosa  of  the  Human 
Body,*  which  at  once  became  a  standard  wock. 
His  last  publication  was  a  quarto  volume,  consist- 


MONTGOMERY. 


182 


MONTGOMERY. 


account  states  that  having,  in  consequence  of  bis 
loyalty,  taken  refuge  in  France,  be  ingratiated 
himself  with  Cardinal  Richelieu,  and  was  offered 
a  situation  under  government,  provided  be  could 
show  a  pedigree.  Ho  said  ho  was  of  the  family  of 
Salmonet  in  Stirlingshire,  and  was  promoted  ac- 
cordingly. According  to  tradition  his  father  had 
been  a  salmon  fisher  in  the  Borough  meadow  of 
Stirling ;  and  the  son  had  taken  his  title  from  the 
net  in  which  the  salmon  were  caught.  But  thl 
is  not  correct.  He  was  the  son  of  an  old  and  re- 
spectable family,  and  there  was  once  a  place  in 
Stirlingshire  called  Salmonet. 

He  wrote  a  work  in  French,  embracing  the 
period  of  Scottish  history  from  the  coronation  of 
Charles  I.  to  the  conclusion  of  the  rebellion ;  a 
translation  of  which,  by  James  Ogilvie,  appeared 
at  London  in  1735,  under  the  title  of  *  History  of 
the  Troubles  of  Great  Britain,  containing  an 
Account  of  the  most  remarkable  Passages,  from 
1633  to  1650.*  The  date  of  his  death  is  unknown. 
It  must  have  been  previous  to  the  publication  of 
the  original  work,  as  in  the  privilege  for  printing 
it,  granted  September  13,  ICCO,  to  Jacques  St. 
Clair  de  Rosclin,  the  author  is  styled  ^^  Lc  defunct 
St.  Montct."  He  must  not  be  confounded  with 
another  Robert  Monteith,  the  compiler  of  a  scai*ce 
and  valuable  collection  of  all  the  epitaphs  in  Scot- 
land, published  under  the  name  of  *•  An  Theater  of 
Morality,'  in  1704. 

Mo2CTGOMERT,  the  surnaiiie  of  tlio  noble  family  of  Eglin- 
ton,  wliich  traces  its  descent  from  Roger  do  Mundegumbrie, 
Visconnt  do  Hiesmes,  son  of  Hugh  de  Mundegumbrie  and 
Joceline  de  Beaumont,  niece  of  Gonnora,  wife  of  Richard, 
doke  of  Normandy,  grent -grandmother  of  William  the  Con- 
queror. Roger  de  Mundegumbrie,  thus  nearly  allied  to  the 
ruling  house  of  Xonnandy,  after  having  obtained  great  dis- 
tinction under  the  Norman  banner  in  France,  accompanied 
his  kinsman,  William  the  Conqueror,  into  England,  and  com- 
manded the  van  of  the  invading  army  at  the  decisive  battle 
of  Hastings  in  10G6.  In  reward  of  his  bravery  he  was,  by 
the  Conqueror,  created  ear!  of  Chichester  and  Arundel,  and 
soon  after  of  Shrewsbury.  He  also  received  from  him  large 
grants  of  land,  becoming,  in  a  short  time,  lord  of  no  fewer 
than  fifty-seven  lordships  throughout  England,  with  ezten- 
nve  possesions  in  Salop.  Having  made  a  hostile  incuruon 
into  Wales,  he  took  the  castle  of  Baldwin,  and  gave  it  his 
own  name  of  Montgomery,  a  name  which  both  the  town  in 
its  virinity  and  the  entire  county  in  which  it  stands  have 
permanently  retained. 

It  is  not  known  whence  the  name  was  derived.  Eustace, 
in  his  *  Clasncal  Tour,'  vol.  i.  p.  298,  mentions  a  lofty  hill, 
called  Ifonie  Gomero^  not  far  from  Loretto;  and  in  the  old 
ballad  of  *  Chevy  Chase,*  the  name  is  given  as  ^longon-byrry. 


The  first  of  the  name  In  Scothmd  was  Bobvt  d«  llootgo- 
meiy,  supposed  to  havo  been  a  grandtoo  of  Eari  Roger. 
When  Walter,  the  ion  of  Alan,  the  first  high  ftawaid  of 
Scotland,  whose  castio  of  Oswotiy  was  in  the  Tidnity  of 
Shrewsbury,  came  to  Scotland  to  take  pomiiion  of  wroral 
grants  of  hmd  which  bad  been  oonferreii  npon  him  by 
David  I.,  Robert  de  Blontgomery  wag  one  of  the  barons  who 
accompanied  him  from  Wales,  and  received  from  hbn  the 
manor  of  Eglisham,  in  the  oonnty  of  Renfrew.  Tliis  wag  Ibr 
two  centuries  the  chief  possession  of  the  ScotUsh  section  of 
the  Montgomeries,  and  still  remains  their  property  nndinun- 
ished  as  at  first  Robert  de  Montgomeiy  ia  n  witness  to  tbt 
foundation  charter  of  Walter,  the  high  steward,  to  the  mon- 
astery of  Paisley  in  1160,  and  to  other  charters  between  that 
year  and  1175.    He  died  about  1177. 

In  the  Ragman  Roll  appear  the  names  of  John  de  Mont- 
gomery, and  his  brother  Mnrthaw,  as  among  the  barons  who 
swors  fealty  to  Edward  I.  in  1296.  The  former  is  designated 
of  the  connty  of  Lanark,  which  then  comprehended  the  oonn- 
ty of  Renfrew.  The  latter  was  the  reputed  ancestor  of  the 
Montgomeries  of  Thornton. 

Sir  John  Montgomery,  the  seventh  baron  of  Eaglesham, 
one  of  the  heroes  of  the  battle  of  Otterbnm,  married  Elisa- 
beth, only  daughter  and  sole  heiress  of  Sir  Hugh  de  EgUnton, 
justiciary  of  Lothian,  and  niece  of  Robert  II.,  and  obtained 
with  her  the  baronies  of  Eglinton  and  Ardrossan.  He  was 
the  ancestor  of  the  earis  of  Eglinton,  as  mentioned  nnder 
that  title,  where  the  line.ige  of  that  noble  family  has  been 
already  ^vcn,  (see  voL  iL  page  119). 


A  baronetcy  of  the  LTnited  Kingdom  was  posbessed  by  the 
family  of  Montgomery  of  Macbeth  Hill,  or  Magbie  Hill,  Pee- 
bles-shire, descended  from  Troilus  Montgomery,  son  of  Adsm 
Montgomery  of  Giffen,  a  cadet  of  the  Eglinton  family,  living 
in  the  reigns  of  James  V.,  and  Mary  queen  of  Scots.  It  was 
conferred,  28th  May,  1774,  on  William  Montgomery  (^Mag- 
bie Hill,  hut  expired  on  the  dcatli  of  his  son,  Sir  Geoi]^* 
Montgomery,  FPcond  baronet,  9th  July  1831. 

Sir  William's  brother.  Sir  James  Montgomery,  of  Stsn- 
hope,  Peebles-shire,  an  eminent  lawyer,  waa  also  created  a 
baronet.  Bom  at  Magbie  Hill,  in  1721,  he  was  educated  for 
the  Scottish  bar,  and  attained  to  considerable  distinction  as 
an  advocate.  On  the  abolition  of  the  heritable  juris^ctioos 
in  ScotLind  in  1748,  he  was  one  of  the  first  sberifis  then 
named  by  the  crown,  and  he  was  the  last  sun'ivor  of  those 
of  this  first  nomination.  He  rose  gradually  to  the  ofiices  of 
solicitor-general,  and  lord-advocate,  and  in  1775  was  ap- 
pointed lord-chief>baron  of  the  court  of  exchequer  in  Scot- 
land. Upon  his  retirement  from  the  bench  in  1801,  he  was 
created  a  baronet  of  the  United  Kingdom.  His  exertions  in 
introducing  the  most  improved  modes  of  sgricultnre  into 
Peebles-shire  gained  for  him  the  title  of  *  Father  of  the  oonn- 
ty.* He  died  April  2,  1803,  at  the  age  of  82.  His  eldest  son, 
William,  lieut.-col.  43d  foot,  having  predeceased  him,  he  was 
succeeded  by  his  2d  son,  Sir  James,  2d  baronet,  bom  Oct  9, 
1766;  appointed  lord-advocate  in  1804,  resigned  in  1806;  at 
one  time  M.P.  for  Peebles-shire.     He  died  May  27, 18S9. 

His  sons  by  a  first  wife  having  predeceased  him,  he  was 
succeeded  by  his  eldest  son  by  his  2d  wife,  daughter  of  Thomas 
Graham,  Esq.  of  Kinross.  This  son.  Sir  Graham  Graham 
Montgomery,  3d  baronet,  bom  July  9,  1823,  gradnated  at 
Chriht  Church,  Oxford,  B.A.;  m.  in  1845,  Alice,  dangbtarof 
.John  James  Hope-Johnston,  Evq.  of  Annandule,  &LP.  lasoe 
4  sons  and  4  drt.  Sons:  James  Gordon  Henry,  bora  Feb.  6, 
1850.  Basil-Teinpler,  Charles  Percy,  and  Arthur  CecU.  ILP. 
for  Peebles-shire,  1852;  lord-lient  of  Kinrosi  ihirs,  1854 


MONTGOMERY, 


184 


JAMES. 


Hart.  In  1822  a  complete  edition  of  his  poems 
was  published  at  Edinburgh,  nnder  the  superin- 
tendence of  Mr.  David  Laing,  with  a  biographical 
preface  by  Dr.  Irving. 

MONTGOMERY,  Jambs,  an  eminent  religious 
poet,  was  bom  in  Irvine,  in  Ayrshire,  November 
4,  1771.  His  father,  the  Rev.  John  Montgomery, 
of  Irish  birth  though  of  Scottish  extraction,  was  a 
preacher  In  the  church  of  the  United  or  Moravian 
brethren.  When  the  poet  was  about  four  years  and 
a  half  old,  his  parents  returned  to  their  native  par- 
ish in  the  county  of  Antrim,  in  the  north  of  Ire- 
land. About  two  years  afterwards  he  was  sent  to 
the  seminary  of  the  United  Brethren  at  Fulneck, 
near  I^cds,  for  his  education,  and  he  remained 
there  for  ten  years.  In  1783,  his  parents  went  to 
preach  the  gospel  among  the  slaves  in  the  West 
Indies,  wliere  they  both  died,  his  mother  at  Toba- 
go in  1790,  and  his  father  at  Barbadoes  in  1791. 

He  was  early  inspired  with  a  desire  to  write 
poetry  by  hearing  a  portion  of  Blair's  *  Grave ' 
read.  When  only  ten  years  old,  the  bent  of  his  mind 
was  shown  by  his  composition  of  various  little 
hymns.    About  15  he  began  to  write  a  heroic  po- 
em on  the  subject  of '  Alfred.'  He  was  first  placed 
as  an  assistant  in  a  general  dealer's  shop,  at  Mir- 
field    near  Fulneck,   but   anxious   for   a  higher 
occupation,  he  one  day  set  ofi^,  with  three  shillings 
and  sixpence  in  his  pocket,  to  walk  to  London. 
He  was  at  a  little  public  house  at  AVentworth, 
when  a  youth  of  the  name  of  Hunt  entered,  and 
getting  into  conversation  with  him,  infoimed  him 
that  his  father,  who  kept  a  general  store  at  Wath, 
in  a  neighbouring  village,  required  an  assistant. 
He  accordingly  applied,  and  was  successful.    Tlie 
following  year  (1790)  he  obtained  an  introduction 
to  Mr.  Harrison,  a  London  publisher,  and  having 
offered  him  a  manuscript  volume  of  his  verses,  the 
latter  took  him  into  his  shop  as  an  assistant,  although 
he  declined  to  publish  his  poems.    In  two  years 
more,  namely  in  1792,  he  was  fortunate  enough 
to  obtain  a  situation  in  the  establishment  of  Mr. 
Gales,  a  bookseller  of  Sheffield,  who  had  set  up  a 
newspaper  called  the  Sheffield  Register,     In  a 
short  time  his  employer  had  to  leave  England,  to 
avoid  imprisonment  for  printing  articles  too  liberal 
for  the  then  government,  and  Montgomeiy,  at  the 
age  of  twenty-two,  became  the  editor  and  pub- 


lisher of  the  paper,  the  name  of  which,  on  its  be- 
coming his  part  property,  be  changed  to  the  more 
poetical  one  of  The  SheffiM  Iri», 

At  that  period,  the  government,  ^yprehenrive 
of  the  diffusion  in  England  of  the  democratic  and 
republican  principles  of  the  first  French  revolation, 
watched  with  a  Jealous  eye  the  freedom  of  the 
press.  In  January  1794,  amidst  the  keen  political 
excitement  that  prevailed,  Montgomery  was  {ffo- 
secuted  by  the  Attorney  General  on  a  charge  of 
having  reprinted  and  sold  to  a  street  hawker, 
six  quires  of  a  ballad,  written  by  a  clergjrman 
of  Belfast,  commemorating  '  The  fall  of  the  Bas- 
tile*  in  1789,  which  by  the  crown  was  interpreted 
into  a  seditious  libel.  Being  found  guilty,  not- 
withstanding the  innocence  of  his  intentions,  he 
was  sentenced  to  three  months  imprisonment,  ui 
the  castle  of  York,  and  to  pay  a  fine  of  £20.  In 
the  following  January  he  was  agam  tried,  for  a 
second  imputed  political  offence,  the  publication  m 
his  paper  of  a  paragraph  which  reflected  on  the 
conduct  of  a  magistrate  in  quelling  a  riot  at  Shef- 
field. He  was  again  convicted,  and  sentenced  to 
six  months'  imprisonment  In  York  castle,  to  pay 
a  fine  of  £80,  and  to  give  security  to  keep  the 
peace  for  two  yeai-s.  *'A11  the  persons,**  said 
Montgomery,  writing  in  1825,  *^who  were  ac- 
tively conceined  in  the  prosecutions  against  me  in 
1794  and  1795,  are  dead,  and,  without  exception, 
they  died  in  peace  with  me.  I  believe  I  am  quite 
correct  in  saying  that  from  each  of  them  distinct- 
ly, in  the  sequel,  I  received  tokens  of  good  will, 
and  from  several  of  them  substantial  proofs  of 
kindness.  I  mention  not  this  as  a  plea  in  exten- 
uation of  offences  for  which  I  bore  the  penalty  of 
the  law ;  I  rest  my  justification,  in  these  cases, 
now  on  the  same  grounds,  and  no  other,  on  which 
I  rested  my  justification  then.  I  mention  the 
circumstance  to  the  honour  of  the  deceased,  and 
as  an  evidence  that,  amidst  all  the  violence  of  that 
distracted  time,  a  better  spirit  was  not  extinct, 
but  finally  prevailed,  and  by  its  healing  influence 
did  indeed  comfort  those  who  had  been  conscien- 
tious sufferers.** 

After  his  release,  his  health  having  been  af- 
fected by  the  confinement,  he  went  for  a  few 
weeks  to  Scarborough,  and  then  resumed  his  du- 
ties as  editor  of  the  /ru.    The  proprietorship  ui 


produced  liim  upwards  of  £800,  aod  more  than 
twelve  thousand  copies  had  been  8<dd,  besides 
about  a  score  of  editions  printed  in  America. 

In  Byron's  *  English  Bards  and  Scotch  Beview- 
ers,*  published  in  1809,  Montgomery  found  him- 
self noticed  in  this  strain : 

"  With  broken  lyre  and  cheek  serenely  pale, 
Lo !  sad  Alcxos  wanders  down  the  Tale ! 
Though  fair  they  rose,  and  might  hare  bloomed  at  last, 
His  hopes  have  perished  by  the  northern  blast: 
Kipped  in  the  bud  by  Caledonian  gales, 
His  blossoms  wither  as  the  blast  prevails! 
0*er  his  lost  works  let  ckutie  Sheffield  weep ; 
May  no  rude  hand  disturb  their  early  sleep!** 

And  in  a  note  ho  adds,  ^^Poor  Montgomery, 
though  praised  by  every  English  Review,  has  been 
bitterly  reviled  by  the  Edmburgh  1  After  all,  the 
Bard  of  Sheffield  is  a  man  of  considerable  genius ; 
his  ^  Wanderer  of  Switzerland '  is  worth  a  thou- 
sand ^Lyrical  Ballads,'  and  at  least  fifty  *  De- 
graded Epics.'" 

Mr.  Montgomery's  next  work  was  *•  The  West 
Indies,'  a  poem  in  four  parts  and  in  the  heroic 
couplet,  written  in  honom*  of  the  abolition  of  the 
African  slave-trade  by  the  British  legislature  in 
1807.  It  was  produced  at  the  request  of  Mr. 
Bowyer,  the  London  publisher,  to  accompany  a 
series  of  engravings  representing  the  past  suffer- 
ings and  the  anticipated  blessings  of  the  long- 
wronged  Africans,  both  in  their  own  land  and  in 
the  AVcst  Indies,  and  appeared  in  1809  in  connec- 
tion with  poems  on  the  same  subject,  by  James 
Grahame,  author  of  *  The  Sabbath,'  and  Miss  Ben- 
ger.  When  Montgomery's  poem  was  republished 
by  itself,  accompanied  by  about  twenty  occasional 
poems,  upwards  of  ton  thousand  copies  were  sold 
in  ten  years.  His  parents  had  laid  down  their 
lives  in  behalf  of  the  enslaved  and  perishing 
negro,  and  in  this  poem,  their  son,  with  a  vigour 
and  freedom  of  description  and  a  power  of  pathetic 
painting  entirely  his  own,  raised  his  generous  ap- 
peal to  public  justice  in  the  negro's  behalf,  which, 
no  doubt,  had  its  effect  when,  twenty  years  after, 
slavery  itself  was  abolished  in  all  the  colonics  be- 
longing to  Britain. 

In  the  spring  of  1813,  Mr.  Montgomery  pub- 
lished *  The  World  before  the  Flood,'  a  poem  in 


ten  cantos  in  the  heroic  coaplet,  soggested  to  the 
poet  by  a  paasage  in  the  eleventh  book  of  Fan- 
diae  Lost  referring  to  the  tranalation  of  Eoocb. 
He  had  now  begun  to  take  an  active  and  promi- 
nent part  in  the  religions  and  benevolent  meeUngs 
of  Sheffield  and  its  neighbonrbood,  particolarly  in 
connexion  with  missionary  movements,  the  BiUe 
Society,  and  the  Sabbath  School  Union,  and  in 
1814  he  was  regularly  admitted  a  member  of  the 
Moravian  church,  of  which  his  brother,  the  Rev. 
Ignatius  Montgomery,  was  a  minister.  He  him- 
self had  been  intended  for  the  ministry  in  connex- 
ion with  the  United  Brethren,  had  not  his  early 
tendency  to  poetry  prevented  his  entering  upon 
the  studies  necessary  for  it.  Another  of  his  bro- 
thers, Robert  Montgomery,  was  a  grocer  at  Wool- 
wich. They  were  all  three  educated  at  the  Mora- 
vian scmmary  at  Fulueck.  While  the  poet  was 
there,  the  institution  was  on  one  occasion  visited 
by  no  less  a  personage  than  Lord  Monboddo,  the 
celebrated  Scottish  judge.  None  of  the  boys  had 
ever  seen  a  lord  before,  and  Monboddo  was  a  very 
strange-looking  lord  indeed.  He  wore  a  large, 
stiff,  bushy  periwig,  smmounted  by  a  huge,  odd- 
looking  hat ;  his  very  plain  coat  was  studded  with 
broad  brass  buttons,  and  his  breeches  were  of 
leather.  He  stood  in  the  schoolroom,  with  his 
grave  absent  face  bent  downwards,  drawing  and 
redrawing  his  whip  along  the  floor,  as  the  Mora- 
vian teacher  pointed  out  to  his  notice  boy  after  boy. 
'^  And  this,"  said  the  Moravian,  coming  at  length 
to  young  Montgomery,  "  is  a  countryman  of  your 
lordship's."  His  lordship  raised  himself  up,  look- 
ed hard  at  the  little  fellow,  and  then  shaking  his 
huge  whip  over  his  head,  *'  Ah,"  he  exclaimed, 
^*  I  hope  his  country  will  have  no  reason  to  be 
ashamed  of  him."  *^  The  circumstance,"  said  the 
poet,  ^^  made  a  deep  impi*ession  on  my  mind,  and 
I  determined, — I  trust  the  resolution  was  not 
made  in  vain, — I  determined  in  that  moment  that 
my  country  should  not  have  reason  to  be  ashamed 
of  me." 

In  January  1817  a  volume  was  published,  enti- 
tled *  The  State  Lottery,  a  Dream,'  by  Samuel 
Roberts,  a  friend  of  Montgomery,  directed  against 
that  species  of  national  gambling,  which,  too  long 
authorized  by  government,  was  some  years  after 
put  an  end  to  by  act  of  parliament.    The  book 


\  r 


MONTGOMERY, 


188 


JAMES. 


1 1 


1 1 
I 


II 
II 


II 


I      M 


copjhold ;  I  borrowed  it,  I  leased  it  from  none. 
Every  foot  of  it  I  enclosed  from  the  common  mj- 
telf ;  and  I  can  saj  that  not  an  inch  which  I  had 
once  gained  have  I  ever  lost.**  Some  of  his 
friends  who  could  not  attend,  including  many 
ladies,  afterwards  presented  him  with  200  goineas, 
to  be  applied  to  the  revival  of  a  mission  which  his 
fother,  the  Rev.  John  Montgomery,  had  begun  in 
Tobago,  but  which  had  been  suspended  since  his 
death  in  1791.  The  proprietor  of  the  estate 
on  which  it  was  situated,  Mr.  Hamilton,  a 
Scotchman,  had  in  his  will  bequeathed  £1,000, 
contingent  on  the  renewal  of  the  mission.  To 
this  sum,  the  two  hundred  guineas  were  to  be 
added,  and  the  gift  was  accompanied  by  the  deli- 
cate request  that  the  renewed  mission  should  be 
distinguished  by  the  name  of  Montgomery,  in 
honour  both  of  himself  and  his  father. 

At  the  close  of  1825  appeared  '  The  Christian 
Psalmodist;  or  Plymns,  Selected  and  Original.* 
These  compositions,  662  in  number,  are  frx>m  a 
great  yariety  of  authors,  including  one  hundred 
from  his  own  pen,  which  form  part  fifth  of  the 
collection.  The  compilation  was  made  for  Mr. 
Collins,  the  Glasgow  publisher  (who  died  January 
2,  1858)  and  for  it  he  received  one  hundred 
guineas.  The  prefatory  essay  contains  some  Judi- 
cious remarks  on  the  writing  of  hymns,  as  one 
branch  of  the  poetic  art,  and  on  the  works  of 
Bishop  Kenn,  Dr.  Isaac  Watts,  Addison,  Top- 
lady,  Charles  Wesley,  and  others  who  have  ex- 
celled in  it.  Montgomery  also  wrote  an  Intro- 
ductory essay  to  an  edition  of  Cowper^s  poems, 
then  about  to  be  issued  by  Messrs.  Chalmers  and 
Collins. 

In  1827,  appeared  *  The  Pelican  Island,*  by  Mr. 
Montgomery,  a  poem  in  blank  verse,  suggested  by 
a  passage  in  Captain  Flinders*  *  Voyage  to  Terra 
AuitraHi^^  describing  the  existence  of  the  ancient 
haunts  of  the  pelican  in  the  small  islands  on  the 
coast  of  New  Holland.  The  narrative  is  supposed 
to  be  delivered  by  an  imaginary  being  who  wit- 
nesses the  series  of  events  related  after  the  whole 
has  happened.  To  the  *  Pelican  Island'  was 
added,  as  usual,  some  of  his  smaller  poems.  Pre- 
vious to  its  publication  a  work  called  *  The  Chris- 
tian Poet*  was  issued  by  Mr.  Collins  of  Glasgow, 
with  an  admirable    introductory  essay  by  Mr. 


Montgomery,  a  species  of  writing  in  which  he  ex- 
celled. He  also  wrote  the  Introdnctory  EflsajB  to 
new  editions  of  *  The  Pilgrim's  Progress,'  *  The 
Olney  Hymns,*  the  '  life  of  the  Rev.  David  Bral- 
nerd,'  and  other  works  published  by  the  same 
firm.  In  1830  he  contributed  to  the  Cabinet  Qy- 
clopedia  the  brief  memoirs  of  Dante,  Ariosto,  and 
Tasso,  which  appeared  in  the  series  of  *  literary 
and  Scientific  Men  of  Italy.*  The  same  year  he 
compiled  for  the  London  Missionary  Society,  ^The 
Missionary  Journal,*  from  a  yast  mass  of  valuable 
materials  which  had  been  placed  in  his  hands,  fbr 
which  he  received  £200.  He  also  delivered  a 
course  of  lectures  on  the  History  of  En^ish  lite- 
rature before  the  members  of  the  Royal  Instlta- 
tion  of  Great  Britain  at  London.  The  following 
year  he  lectured  on  Poetry  at  the  same  Institu- 
tion. Both  courses  he  prepared  for  the  press  and 
published  in  1833. 

In  1841  he  visited  Scotland,  for  the  first  and 
only  time  since  his  childhood.  On  this  occasion 
he  accompanied  the  Rev.  Mr.  Latrobe.  Their 
main  object  was  the  promotion  of  the  missions  of 
the  United  Brethren,  but  Montgomery  had  also  a 
great  desire  to  see  the  land  of  his  birth.  '*  Scot- 
land,** he  said,  in  a  letter,  written  in  July  1844, 
to  the  committee  of  the  Bums*  Festival,  **took 
such  early  and  effectual  root  in  the  soil  of  my 
heart  that  to  this  hour  it  appears  as  green  and 
flourishing,  in  the  only  eyes  with  which  I  can  now 
behold  it,  as  when,  after  an  absence  of  more  than 
threescore  years,  I  was  favoured  to  see  it  with  the 
eyes  that  are  looking  on  this  paper.  Though 
scarcely  four  and  a  half  years  old  when  removed, 
I  have  yet  more  lively,  distinct,  and  delightful 
recollections  of  little  Irvine,  its  bridges,  its  river, 
its  street  aspect,  and  its  rural  landscape,  with  sea- 
glimpses  between,  than  I  have  equal  reminiscen- 
ces of  any  subsequent  period  of  the  same  length 
of  time,  spent  since  then  in  fairer,  wealthier,  and 
more  familiar,  and  therefore  less  romantic,  Eng- 
land. Yet  those  fond  recollections  of  my  birth- 
place, and  renewals  of  infant  experience  had  be- 
come, through  the  vista  of  retrospect,  so  ideal, 
that  when,  in  the  autumn  of  1841,  for  the  first 
time,  I  returned  to  the  scenes  of  my  golden  age, 
the  humble  realities,  though  as  beautiful  as  hea- 
ven*s  daylight  could  make  them  in  the  first  week 


MONTROSE, 


1!K) 


THIRD  EARL  OF. 


and  Conycrsations  on  yarioos  sabjects ;  by  John 
Holland  and  James  Eyerett  ;*  have  been  pnbliahed 
in  six  yolnmes  8yo,  London,  1854-56. 

Mo2mt08B,  DokA  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland, 
ronferred  by  James  IIL  on  David,  fifth  earl  of  Crawford,  by 
roral  charter,  dated  18th  ^laj,  1488,  to  himself  and  his  hors 
(see  ToL  i.  p.  710).  On  the  19th  September  1489,  a  new 
patent  or  charter,  nnder  the  great  seid,  was  granted  to  him 
by  James  IV.,  conferring  the  dokedom  upon  him  for  life  on- 
ly. He  died  at  Fmhaven  at  Christmas  1495,  and  the  duke- 
dom is  said  to  have  then  become  extinct.  In  1848  a  petition 
was  presented  to  the  qneen  by  the  eari  of  Crawford  and  Bal- 
carres,  claiming  it  on  the  gnnmd  of  its  being  Tested  in  the 
heir  male.  This  petition  wss  referred  to  the  House  of  Lovds, 
and  the  claim  was  opposed  by  the  Crown  and  the  duke  of 
Montrose,  on  the  ground  that  the  charter  of  18th  May  1488, 
was  annulled  by  the  act  of  the  first  year  of  the  reign  of 
Jumes  IV.,  called  the  Act  Rescissoiy,  and  that  the  grant  of 
the  dukedom,  made  in  1489,  was  never  regi»tered.  After  hc-ur- 
ing  parties,  on  Aug.  5, 1853,  their  lordships  adopted  a  resolu- 
tion to  the  effect  that  the  claimant  had  not  made  out  his  right 
to  the  dignity.  Soon  after,  Lord  Lindsay,  son  of  the  earl  of 
Crawford  and  Balcarres,  addressed  a  letter  to  the  Timet 
newspaper,  protesting  against  the  resolution  of  the  House  of 
Ix>rds,  and  stating  that  he  had  published  a  full  *'  Report  of 
the  Montrose  Claim,**  containing,  among  other  documents, 
"  an  Address  to  her  Majesty,  in  humble  remonstrance  against 
the  opinion  reported  to  her  Mnjesty.**  Lord  lindsay  sub- 
mits that  the  principles  on  which  the  decision  of  the  peera  is 
founded  are,  one  and  all,  wholly  repugnant  to  the  under- 
standing and  practice  of  past  times,  and  to  plain  equity  and 
Justice.  The  opinion,  he  farther  asserts,  is  entitled  to  less 
than  usual  weight  in  respect  to  the  unwonted  and  strange 
departure  from  established  forms  of  procedure — ^the  decision 
h.nving  been  given  before  the  roluminons  evidence  was  or- 
dered to  be  printed,  and  the  eridence  thus  *'  arbitrarily  de- 
graded to  a  mere  cipher  or  phantom.**  lie  adds,  in  ooncln- 
sion :  **  I  therefore  now,  on  these  and  various  other  grounds, 
formally  protest,  before  her  majesty  and  the  conntiy,  against 
the  opinion  or  report  (which,  be  it  observed,  is  certainly  not 
in  law  a  sentence  or  final  judgment)  delivered  by  the  House 
of  Lords  on  the  5th  of  August  1858  as  unjust  in  itself,  pro- 
ceeding on  error  and  misrepresentation  throughout,  and  as 
having,  in  its  principles,  and  in  its  application  of  those  prin- 
ciples, a  direct  tendency  to  revolutionise  the  whole  system  of 
peerage  law,  and,  indeed,  to  innovate  on  other  departments 
of  kw,  and  certainly  of  justice,  hitherto  sacred  from  such  en- 
croachments.** 


Mo!CTR08E,  Eari,  marquis  and  duke  of,  titles  in  the  peerage 
of  Scothind,  possessed  by  the  noble  family  of  Graham,  whose 
origin  and  descent  have  been  already  given  (see  vol.  iL  pp.  341, 
842).  They  were  first  ennobled  in  the  person  of  Patrick  Graham 
of  Kincardine,  who  in  1451  was  created  Lord  Graham.  His 
grandson,  William,  third  I/nd  Graham,  was  on  8d  March 
1505,  created  earl  of  Montrose,  the  title  being  derived  from 
bis  hereditary  lands  of  *'  Auld  Montrose  **  and  not  from  the 
town  of  that  name,  (see  vol.  ii.  pp.  842,  84S).  He  fell  at 
tlio  battle  of  Flodden,  9th  September  1513.  He  was  thrice 
married.  Ry  his  first  wife,  Annabella,  daughter  of  John, 
liord  Drummond,  he  had,  William,  second  earl.  By  his  sec- 
ond wife,  a  daughter  of  Sir  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Dun- 
treatli,  he  had  three  daughten;  and  by  his  third  wife,  Chris- 
fjnn  Wawane  of  Segy,  relict  of  Patnck,  sixth  Lord  Halyburton 


of  Dirletono,  behad  twoiOBs:  PatiisiE^sneeilorortlMGnip 
hams  of  Inchbraco,  Gortby,  Bocklivie,  and  othar  fiunilies  of 
the  name;  and  Andrew,  consscrsted  biibop  of  DanUaiM  in 
1675. 

William,  second  eari  of  Montrose,  was  one  of  tba  pens  to 
whom  the  regent  duke  of  Albany  committed  tbt  duigs  ti 
the  young  king,  James  V.,  when  he  bbnaelf  w«ot  to  Vnat^ 
in  1517.  He  was  one  of  the  oommisnonera  of  regSDej  n^ 
pointed  by  that  monarch  oa  29th  August  1688,  during  Us 
roidesty*s  absence  in  France,  and  in  1548,  he  was  choasn  by 
the  Elates  of  the  kingdom,  along  with  Lord  Erskine,  lo  re- 
main continually  in  the  castle  of  Stirling  with  Qoflsn  Maij, 
for  the  sure  keeping  of  her  person.  He  died  24th  May  1671. 
By  his  countess.  Lady  Janet  Keith,  eldest  danghter  of  Wil- 
Ham,  third  eari  Marischal,  he  had  four  sons  and  five  daagh- 
tsn.  Boboit,  Lord  Graham,  the  eUflitaQB,fsU  at  thabirttis 
of  Pinkie,  10th  Septomber  1647.  Hia  posfthunoot  aon, 
John,  by  his  wife,  &Iargaret,  daughter  of  Mnhwlm,  Lovd 
Fleming,  became  third  earl  of  Montrose.  The  Hon.  Mvigs 
Graham  of  Orchill,  the  third  son,  was  great-grandfather  of 
James  Graham  of  Orchill,  who,  as  nearest  agnate  above  26 
yean  of  age,  waa  served  tutor  at  law  of  Jsmes,  fonrth  mar- 
quis of  Montrose,  16th  March  1688.  llie  Hon.  WiUiam 
Graham,  the  fourth  son,  waa  ancestor  of  the  Grahams  of 
inileam. 

John,  third  eari  of  Montrose,  succeeded  his  grandfiitliflr  b 
May  1571,  and  on  7th  September  the  same  year,  bo  waa  ap- 
pointed a  privy  councillor  at  the  election  of  the  r^ent  Msr. 
He  was  one  of  the  oommisnonen  for  the  king,  who  condoded 
the  Pacification  of  Perth,  Februaxy  8d,  1572.  On  the  king's 
assumpti(m  of  authority  in  1578,  he  was  appointed  a  privy  coun- 
cillor. He  joined  the  faction  against  the  regent  Morton,  and 
was  one  of  the  principal  among  those  who,  in  1581,  broo^ 
him  to  the  block ;  with  the  court  favourite,  the  eari  of  Ama, 
he  guarded  him  from  Dumbarton  to  Edinburgh,  to  stand  his 
trial,  and  as  chancellor  of  the  jury  returned  the  verdict  of 
"guilty  art  and  part**  against  him,  drcumstaneea  whidi  ne- 
cessarily led  to  a  feud  between  Montrose  and  the  powerful 
family  of  Douglas.  In  1583  the  castle  of  Glasgow,  then  held 
for  the  duke  of  Lennox,  surrendered  to  him.  He  waa  ap- 
pointed an  extraordinary  lord  of  session,  12th  May  1584,  in 
the  room  of  the  earl  of  Gowrie,  who  wss  beheaded  on  the  4th 
of  that  month,  and  on  the  13th  he  succeeded  that  nobleman 
as  lord-treasurer.  After  the  return  of  the  eari  of  Angns  and 
the  banished  lords  in  November  1585,  he  was  deprived  of 
both  offices.  On  6th  November  1591,  he  was  again  adnuttcd 
an  extraordinary  lord  of  session,  the  king*s  letter  bearing 
that  he  had  ^*  been  dispossessed  of  the  place  of  befoir  without 
ony  guid  cans  or  occasion.**  lie  was  appointed  high-treasarsr 
of  Scotland,  13th  May  1584,  and  lord-chancellor,  15th  Janu- 
ary 1599,  after  the  office  had  been  vacant  for  more  than  three 
years. 

After  James*  accession  to  the  throne  of  England,  the  esri 
of  Montrose  was  nominated  lord-high-commissioner  to  the 
Estates  which  met  at  Edinburgh  10th  April  1604.  In  a 
continuation  of  this  parliament  held  at  Perth  11th  July, 
1604,  he  was  sppointed  one  of  the  oommissionere  for  the 
treaty  of  union  then  projected  between  the  two  kingdoms  of 
Scotland  and  England.  Having  resigned  the  office  of  chan- 
cellor, it  was  conferred  on  Alexander  Seton,  Lord  Fyvie,  one 
of  the  lords  of  session,  and  in  recompense,  a  patent  was 
granted  by  the  king  to  the  earl,  dated  at  Royston,  in  Decem- 
ber 1604,  creating  him  viceroy  of  Scotland  for  life,  the  hi^- 
est  dignity  a  subject  can  ei\joy,  and  bestowing  on  him  a 
pension  of  £2,000  Scots.  In  virtue  of  this  commission  ha 
presided  at  the  meeting  of  the  Estates  at  Perth,  9th  July 


fv 


life,  in  that  ooontry.  He  had  another  safe-conduot,  14th 
Julj  1447,  in  which  he  was  styled  Natif  d'EtcoM$e,  eacuiar 
(TetciMeref  of  the  king  of  France,  to  negotiate  the  marriage 
of  the  princess  Eleanor  of  SootUnd  to  the  danphin.  Three 
oommisnons  passed  the  great  seal  of  Scotland,  Stli  Norember 
1458,  to  the  same  William  Monypenny,  baron  of  Betre,  lord 
of  Conqaensnlt  in  France,  and  John  Kennedy,  provost  of 
St.  Andrews,  to  proceed  on  an  embassy  to  the  French  king, 
to  demand  the  earldom  of  Xantoign,  which  had  been  granted 
to  James  I.  They  were  also  directed  to  form  a  treaty  with 
the  king  of  Castile,  to  settle  the  debt  doe  by  Scotland  to  the 
Idng  of  Denmark,  and  afterwards  to  pass  to  Kome,  to  testily 
the  king's  obedience  to  the  new  pontiff  Pins  IL 

This  William  Monypenny  was  created  a  peer  of  Scotland, 
under  the  title  of  Lord  Monypenny  of  Gonquersall,  a  corrup- 
tion of  Congressanlt,  by  James  IL,  before  1464.  He  was 
ambassador  from  France  to  England,  16th  February  1471. 
His  son,  Alexander,  second  Lord  Monypenny,  having  no  male 
issue,  exchanged,  in  1495,  his  barony  of  Earlshall,  in  Fife, 
with  Sir  Alexander  Bmoe  of  the  Airth  family,  for  his  lands 
of  Escariot  in  France,  and  on  his  death  the  peerage  became 
exUnct. 

David  Monypenny  of  Pitmilly,  an  eminent  lawyer,  bom  in 
May  1769,  (eldest  son  of  Lieutenant-colonel  Alexander  Mo- 
nypenny of  Pitmilly  of  the  56th  foot,  who  died  in  1800,) 
passed  advocate  2d  July  1791,  was  appointed  sheriff-depute 
of  the  county  of  Fife,  7th  February  1807,  solid  tor-general, 
22d  February  1811,  admitted  a  lord  of  session,  25th  Febru- 
ary 1818,  when  he  took  the  title  of  Lord  Pitmilly.  He  also 
became  a  lord  of  justiciary,  and  at  the  original  constitution 
of  the  jury  court  in  civil  cases  in  Scotland,  he  was  nominated 
one  of  the  lords  commisnoners,  18th  June,  1815.  His  lord- 
ship retired  from  the  bench  in  October  1830.  In  1831  be 
published  a  pamphlet  on  the  Scottish  poor  laws.  With  one 
sister  he  had  two  brothers,  Alexander  Monypenny  of  Edin- 
burgh, and  William  Monypenny,  collector  of  customs,  Kirk- 
caldy. 

A  branch  of  the  Pitmilly  family  is  settled  at  Hole  House, 
Bolvenden,  Kent,  which  property  was  acquired  by  the  mar- 
riage, Slfft  May,  1714,  of  a  Monypenny  with  Mary,  daughter 
and  heiress  of  Robert  Gybbon,  Esq.  of  Hole  House. 

MOOR,  James,  LL.D.,  an  emiuent  Greek 
scholar,  the  son  of  Mr.  Kobert  Moor,  teacher  of 
mathematics  in  Glasgow,  and  his  wife,  Mai*garet 
Park,  was  born  in  that  city,  June  22,  1712.  He 
entered  the  university  of  his  native  city  in  No- 
vember 1725,  and  while  at  college  acquired  much 
distinction  for  his  proficiency  in  the  ancient  lan- 
guages, mathematics,  and  geometry.  On  com- 
pleting his  academical  courac,  he  kept  a  school  for 
some  time  at  Glasgow.  He  was  afterwards  tutor 
in  the  families  successively  of  the  earls  of  Selkirk 
and  Kilmarnock,  and  travelled  with  his  pupils  on 
the  continent.  When  Dean  castle,  the  seat  of 
the  latter  nobleman,  was  accidentally  burnt,  Mr. 
Moor  lost  his  valuable  collection  of  books,  as  well 
as  his  manuscript  speculations  on  philological 
and  mathematical  subjects.  In  November  1742 
he  was  appointed  librarian  to  the  university  of 


Glasgow,  and  in  July  1746,  be  became  protaor 
of  Greek  there,  on  which  occasion  the  earl  of  Sel* 
kirk  advanced  him  £600,  to  enable  him  to  pn^ 
chase  the  resignation  of  his  predecessor. 

In  conjunction  with  professor  Moirhead,  he  sa- 
perintended,  at  the  request  of  the  miiTenity,  a 
splendid  edition  of  Homer,  published  by  the  Foa- 
lises  of  Glasgow.  He  also  edited  their  Herodo- 
tus. In  1761  he  was  appointed  vioe-rector  of  the 
university,  which,  in  April  1763,  conferred  on  him 
the  degree  of  LL.D.  Besides  other  works,  he  was 
the  author  of  various  Essays  which  pmported  to 
have  been  *^  read  to  a  Hterary  Society  in  Glasgow, 
at  their  weekly  meetings  within  the  College." 
Several  of  these  were  never  printed.  He  resigned 
his  chair  in  May  1774,  and  died,  unmarried,  Sep- 
tember 17,  1779.  His  library  and  cabinet  of  me- 
dals were  purchased  by  the  university,  of  which 
he  was  such  a  distinguished  member. 

Dr.  Moor  was  possessed  of  considerable  poeti- 
cal powers,  and  among  other  pieces,  is  stated  to 
have  been  the  author  of  the  popular  Scots  ballid 
of  *  The  Chelsea  Pensioners,*  which  was  published 
in  the  newspapers  at  the  commencement  of  the 
French  revolution,  as  the  production  of  a  young 
lady. — His  works  are : 

Three  Essays.     Glasgow,  1759,  12mo. 

Ou  the  End  of  Tragedy,  according  to  Aristotle ;  an  Esi^ 
in  two  parts,  read  to  a  Literary  Society  in  Glasgow,  at  their 
weekly  meetings  within  the  College.     Glasg.  1764,  8to. 

On  the  Prapositions  of  the  Greek  Language ;  an  Introdae- 
tory  Essay,  read  to  a  literary  Society  in  Glasgow,  at  tber 
weekly  meetings  within  the  College.    Glasg.  1766,  12mOb 

Vindication  of  Virgil  from  the  charge  of  a  Puerility  which 
wss  imputed  to  him  hy  Dr.  Pearce,  in  his  Notes  on  Laa^ 
nus.    1766. 

Elements  lingua  Gmca.  Glasg.  1783,  8vo.  Edin.  1798, 
1809,  8vo.  Gbsg.  1817,  8vo.  This,  his  prindpal  week, 
though  incomplete  in  some  respects,  soon  became  a  standsrd 
schoolbook. 

He  ahra  contributed  a  few  poems  to  '  The  Edinburgh  Msg- 
azine  and  ReTiew.' 

MOOR,  Jacob,  an  eminent  landscape  painto-, 
a  native  of  Edinburgh,  was  the  author  of  three 
Essays;  on  the  Influence  of  Philosophy  on  the  Fine 
Ai*ts ;  on  the  Composition  of  the  Picture  described 
in  the  dialogue  of  Cebes,  and  on  Historical  Com- 
position ;  which  were  read  before  a  literary  society 
held  in  the  college  of  Glasgow  in  the  years  1752, 
1754,  and  1755,  and  afterwards  printed  by  An- 
drew and  Robert  Foulis,  in  1759.  He  went  to 
Rome  about  1773,  where  he  attained  considerable 


MOORE, 


196 


SIR  jony. 


II 


:  I 


called  a  innciiitodli,  aiul  other  gutta  petx^a  arti- 
cles (see  vol.  ii.  p.  752.)    Dr.  Moorc*8  works  arc : 

A  View  of  Society  and  Mwinera  in  France,  Switierland, 
and  Gerroanr.  l/md,  1779,  2  vols.  8vo.  Several  editions,  and 
translated  into  the  French,  Gennan,  and  Italian  languagoi. 

A  View  of  Society  and  Manners  in  Italy.  Ix>ndon,  1781, 
2  Tola.  8vo. 

liledical  Sketches,  in  two  Farts.    Ix>ndon,  1786,  8to. 

Zeluoo,  a  Novel.     London,  1789,  2  vola.  8vo. 

A  Jounml  daring  a  Residence  in  France,  from  the  bcgtn- 
niiif;  of  Anciut  to  the  middle  of  December,  1792.  Ixindon, 
1792,  2  voiit.  Svo. 

A  View  of  the  Canees  and  Progress  of  tlie  French  Revola- 
tion.     1/ondon,  1795,  2  vuls.  Svo. 

Kdward :  a  Kovel.    J^ondon,  1796. 

Mordannt,  a  Novel.    London,  1800,  8  vols.  8vo. 

MOORE,  Sir  Jonx,  a  distinguished  British 
commander,  son  of  the  subject  of  the  preceding 
article,  by  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Professor  Sim- 
son,  of  the  university  of  Glasgow,  was  bom  in 
that  city,  Nov.  13,  1761.  lie  received  the  rudi- 
ments of  bis  education  at  the  local  High  School, 
and  at  the  age  of  eleven  accompanied  his  father, 
then  engaged  as  travelling  physician  to  the  duke 
of  Hamilton,  to  the  continent.  In  1776  he  ob- 
tained an  ensign*s  commission  in  the  5 1st  foot. 
He  was  next  promoted  to  a  lieutenancy  in  the  82d 
regiment,  and  served  in  America  till  the  conclu- 
sion of  the  war  in  1783,  when  his  regiment  being 
reduced,  he  was  put  upon  half-pay.  On  his  re- 
turn to  Britain,  with  the  rank  of  captain,  he  re- 
sumed the  studies  of  fortification  and  field  tactics, 
and  on  the  change  of  ministry,  which  soon  fol- 
lowed the  peace,  he  was,  by  the  Hamilton  influ- 
ence, elected  to  represent  the  Lanark  district  of 
burghs  in  parliament.  In  1787  he  obtained  the 
rank  of  major  in  the  4th  battalion  of  the  60th 
regiment,  and  in  1788  ho  exchanged  into  his  first 
regiment,  the  51st.  In  1790  ho  succeeded  by 
purchase  to  the  lieutenant-colonelcy,  and  in  1791 
he  went  with  his  regiment  to  Gibraltar. 

In  1794  Colonel  Moore  was  ordered  to  accom- 
pany the  expedition  for  the  reduction  of  Corsica, 
and  at  the  siege  of  Calvi  he  was  appointed  by 
(icneral  Charles  Stuart  to  command  the  reserve, 
nt  the  head  of  which  he  gallantly  stormed  the 
Mozzello  foi*t,  amidst  a  shower  of  bullets,  hand 
grenades,  and  shells,  that  exploded  among  them 
at  every  step.  Here  he  received  his  first  wound, 
in  spite  of  which  he  mounted  the  breach  with  his 
brave  followers,  who  drove  tiie  enemy  before 
them.    Soon  after  the  sairender  of  the  garrison, 


lie  was  nominated  adjataot-general,  u  a  step  to 
farther  promotion. 

A  disagreement  having  taken  place  between  the 
Biitish  commander,  General  Stnart,  and  Sir  Gil- 
bert Elliot,  the  viceroy  of  the  Island,  the  former 
was  recalled,  and  Colonel  Moore  was  ordered  by 
the  latter  to  quit  Corsica  within  48  honn.  He 
returned  to  England  in  November  1795,  and  was 
almost  immediately  promoted  to  the  rank  of  bri- 
gadier-general in  an  expedition  against  the  French 
West  India  islands.  He  sailed  from  Spithead 
February  28,  1796,  to  join  the  army  nnder  Sir 
Ralph  Abercromby  at  Barbadoes,  where  he  ar- 
rived April  13.  His  able  services  nnder  this  gal* 
lant  veteran  during  the  West  India  campugn, 
especially  in  the  debarkation  of  the  troops  at  St 
Lucia,  and  the  siege  of  Mome  Fortunee,  were,  u 
declared  by  the  commander-in-chief  in  the  pablie 
orders,  **  the  admiration  of  the  whole  army.** 

On  the  capitulation  of  St.  Lnda,  Sir  Ralph  ap- 
pointed General  Moore  commandant  and  governor 
of  the  island,  a  charge  which  he  undertook  with 
great  reluctance,  as  he  longed  for  more  active 
service.  But  he  performed  his  duty  with  his  ac- 
customed energy  and  success,  notwithstanding  the 
hostility  of  the  natives,  and  the  numerous  bands 
of  aimed  Negroes  tliat  remained  in  the  woods. 
Two  successive  attacks  of  yellow  fever  compelled 
him  to  return  to  England  in  August  1797,  when 
he  obtained  the  rank  of  mnjor-general.  In  the 
subsequent  December,  his  health  being  complete- 
ly re-established,  he  joined  Sir  Ralph  Abercromby 
in  Ireland  as  brigadier-general,  and  during  the 
rebellion  of  1798  was  actively  engaged.  At  Hore- 
town,  he  defeated  a  large  body  of  the  rebels 
under  Roche,  and  immediately  encamped  near 
Wexford,  which  he  delivered  from  the  insurgents. 

In  the  disastrous  expedition  to  Holland,  in 
August  1799,  he  had  the  command  of  a  brigade 
in  the  division  of  the  army  under  Sir  Ralph  Aber- 
cromby ;  and  in  the  engagement  of  the  2d  Octo- 
ber, he  received  two  wounds,  which  compelled 
him  to  return  to  England.  In  1800  he  accompa- 
nied Abercromby  in  the  expedition  to  Egypt; 
and,  at  the  disembarkation  of  the  troops,  the  bat- 
talion which  he  commanded  carried  by  aaaanlt  the 
batteries  erected  by  the  French  on  a  neighbonriog 
eminence  of  sand  to  oppose  their  landing.    At  the 


.fll#      ■■«>«J.-       ■#■"  ■      **■!■*•■•* 


MORAY, 


202 


BONNY  EARL  OF. 


Argyle  presented  a  oompUunt  to  the  leerat  eoimdl,  agiinst 
Alexander  of  Iila,  which  be  did  not  appear  to  fostaiii,  but 
prooeoded  again  to  the  Islet,  in  oonoert  with  the  enl  of 
Morajr,  for  which  he  was  sommoned  before  the  king,  and  im- 
prisoned, while  Moray's  oondaot  on  the  occasion  seems  to 
hare  given  the  Idng  great  dissatisfaetioii,  if  wemayjndge 
from  an  original  letter  in  the  State  Paper  office,  dated  New- 
castle, 27th  December  1581,  from  the  earl  of  Northomber- 
Und  to  Heniy  VIII.,  which  alludes  to  ^  the  sore  imprison- 
ment of  the  earl  of  Argjle,  and  the  little  estimation  of  the 
earl  of  Mnrraj,'*  bj  the  king  of  Soots. 

In  1584,  the  earl  of  Moray  and  Lord  Erskine,  with  the 
bishop  of  Aberdeen  and  one  Robert  Reid,  were  sent  on  an 
embassy  to  France,  to  negotiate  the  marriage  of  James  V. 
with  a  French  princess.  The  eari  married  Lady  Elisabeth 
Campbell,  only  daughter  of  Colin,  third  eari  of  Argyle,  and 
had  a  daughter.  Lady  Mary  Stewart,  wife  of  John,  mas- 
ter of  Bnchan.  Dying,  without  issue  male,  14th  June  1544, 
the  earidom  rererted  to  the  crown,  and  was  conferred  on 
George,  fourth  eari  of  Huntly,  high-chancellor  of  Scotland, 
his  heirs  and  assignees,  by  charter,  dated  18th  February 
1549.  The  grant,  however,  was  recalled  in  1554.  (See  toI. 
ii.  p.  519.) 


The  earidom  of  Moray  was  next  bestowed,  in  1562,  by 
Queen  Mary,  on  her  half-brother,  Lord  James  Stewart,  natu- 
ral son  of  James  V.,  and  afterwards  regent  of  Scotland,  as- 
sassinated by  Hamilton  of  Bothwellhaugh  at  Linlithgow  in 
1570.  For  a  memoir  of  the  regent  Moray,  see  Stuart, 
James,  Eari  of  Moray.  He  held  his  titles  by  a  variety  of 
grants,  which  occasioned  perplexity  respecting  their  inherit- 
ance. In  Febmary  1562  he  obtained  the  charter  of  the 
earldom.  In  January  1564  he  had  another  charter,  limiting 
the  succession  to  heirs  male ;  in  June  1566  a  third  charter 
was  granted  to  him,  throwing  open  the  succession  to  his 
heirs  general,  and  in  1567  he  obtained  from  parliament  a 
ratification  of  the  charter  of  1563,  again  limiting  the  succes- 
non  to  his  heirs  male.  He  married  Lady  Ann  Keith,  daugh- 
ter of  William,  fourth  earl  Marischal,  afterwards  countess  of 
Argyle,  and  hod  by  her  two  daughters,  Lady  Elizabeth, 
countess  of  Moray,  and  Lady  Margaret,  afterwards  countess 
of  Errol. 

In  1580,  James  Stuart,  eldest  son  of  I^rd  Donne,  and  lin- 
eally descended  from  Robert  Stuart,  doke  of  Albany,  gover- 
nor of  Scotland  from  1389  to  1419,  received  from  James  VI. 
the  ward  and  marriage  of  the  two  daughters  of  the  regent 
Moray,  and  a  few  days  thereafter  he  married  the  elder.  Lady 
Elizabeth,  and  assumed  the  title  of  ear!  of  Moray.  Thus,  on 
both  sides,  the  first  of  each  that  branched  from  the  royal 
family  were  regents  of  Sc^jtland. 

Sir  James  Stewart  of  Beith,  father  of  Lord  Doune,  was  the 
thud  son  of  Andrew,  Lord  Avandale,  (see  vol.  i.  p.  170). 
He  was  gentleman  of  the  bedchamber  to  James  V.,  and  lien- 
tenant  of  his  guards.  That  sovereign  also  granted  him  the 
custody  of  Doune  castle  in  Menteith,  which  afterwards  came 
into  the  possession  of  his  son.  He  was  killed  at  Dunblane 
at  Whitsunday  1547,  by  the  Edmonstones  of  Duntreath,  in 
resentment  for  the  office  of  steward  of  Menteith,  formerly  in 
their  family,  having  been  conferred  on  him. 

His  son,  Sir  James  Stewart^  Lord  Doune,  obtained  the  ab- 
bey of  St.  Colmo  in  commmdam.  He  early  joined  the  Refor- 
mation, and  was  one  of  the  lords  of  the  articles  in  the  Estates 
of  Angnst  1560,  when  the  popish  religion  was  overturned. 
In  1561  he  was  sent  to  England  to  demand  a  safe-conduct 
from  Elizabeth  for  Queen  Mary,  then  about  to  return  to 
Scotland,  and,  in  the  end  of  the  same  year,  was  despatched 


as  ambassador  to  Frsnoe.  He  was  kni^itsd  when  Loid 
Damley  was  created  eari  of  Ros,  15th  May  1685,  and  a^ 
pears  to  bate  been  concerned  in  tba  murder  of  Riiao,  m^ 
among  otiiers,  be  was,  by  act  of  privy  oooncQ  19t]|  Marah 
1566,  ordered  to  be  summoned  to  eompear  and  answer  udv 
pain  of  rebellioD,  Ac.  He  joined  the  assodation  againsk 
Mary  and  Botbwell  in  June  1567,  and  attended  the  eoroiia* 
tion  of  James  VI.,  but  on  the  escape  of  Mary  fiem  Lochkren 
castle  in  the  following  year,  he  went  over  to  her  side,  and 
was  in  the  castle  of  Edinburgh  with  the  qiieen*s  party  in  An- 
gnst 1570,  when  his  caatle  of  Donne,  t  pUee  of  prodigioDs 
nse  and  strength,  was  rendered  without  slaughter  to  the 
regent  Lennox.  Of  this  celebrated  stronghold,  Grose  has 
given  a  view.  Several  modem  views  of  it  have  also  been 
painted  by  Stevenson  and  others.  Appointed  a  privy  eoon- 
dllor  by  James  VI.,  11th  November  1579,  he  was  created 
Lord  Doune,  24th  November  1581.  He  was  oolleetor-geiienJ 
of  his  majesty's  revenues,  and  on  28d  January  1588,  was  ad- 
mitted an  extraordinary  lord  of  sesnon,  an  office  which  he 
held  for  three  years.  He  died  20th  Jannaiy  1590.  By  his 
wife.  Lady  Elisabeth  Campbell,  eldest  daughter  of  the  fooxth 
earl  of  Argyle,  he  had,  with  two  daughters,  two  sons,  James, 
called  "the  bonny  earl  of  Moray,**  and  Henry,  Lord  St 
Colme,  (see  St.  Colme,  Lord). 

The  elder  son,  James  Stuart^  as  the  royal  samame  was 
usnally  spelled  after  Qneen  Mary*s  return  from  France,  was 
the  husband  of  Lady  Elizabeth,  the  elder  danghter  of  the  re- 
gent Moray.  As  his  claim  to  the  earldom  was  doubtfhl,  a 
charter  was  given  to  him  in  1592  by  James  VI.  and  the 
Scottish  Estates,  ratifying  to  his  son  all  the  charters  granted 
to  the  regent  and  the  Lady  Elizabeth.  This,  as  it  confinned 
both  what  declared  the  succession  general,  and  what  limited 
it  to  heirs  male,  rendered  the  entire  principle  of  the  fiunily 
succession  bexplicable.  The  eari,  therefore,  lost  no  time  in 
obtaining  an  entirely  new  ch.\rter  to  himself  and  liia  heirs 
male.  Deemed  the  handsomest  man  of  his  time  in  Scotland, 
he  is  known  in  history  and  in  song  as  *'  the  bonny  eari  of 
Moray.**  His  personal  attractions  and  accomplishments  are 
said  to  have  made  a  deep  impression  on  the  heart  of  the 
young  queen,  Anne  of  Denmark,  soon  after  her  coming  to 
Scotland ;  according  to  the  old  ballad : 

"  He  was  a  braw  gallant. 

And  he  played  at  the  ginve ; 
And  the  bonny  earl  of  Moray  , 

Oh  I  he  was  the  queen's  luve.** 

Some  commendations  of  his  beauty,  imprudently  but  no 
doubt  innocently  enough  made  by  her  majesty  in  the  king's 
hearing,  as  to  Uie  car1*s  being  "  a  proper  and  gallant  man," 
excited  his  jealoasy,  and  he  granted  a  commission  to  the  earl 
of  Iluntly,  to  bring  Moray  to  his  presence.  Between  these 
noblemen  a  deadly  feud  existed,  the  earl  of  liloray  haiang  in 
1589  joined  the  combination  against  Huntly,  (see  vol.  ii.  p. 
522).  On  the  pretence  that  the  eari  of  Moray  had  given 
harbour  to  the  turbulent  earl  of  Rothwell,  Huntly,  on  7th 
February  1592,  beset  his  castle  of  Donibristle  in  Fife,  and 
summoned  him  to  snrronder.  A  gnn  being  fired  from  the 
castle,  which  mortally  wounded  one  of  the  Gordons,  HunUy's 
men  set  fire  to  the  house.  Dunbar,  Hheriff  of  Moray,  who 
was  with  the  earl  at  the  time,  anxions  to  save  him,  said  to 
him,  *'  Let  us  not  stay  to  bo  burned  in  the  flaming  house. 
I  will  go  out  first,  and  the  Gordons,  taking  me  for  your  lord- 
ship, will  kill  me,  while  you  escipe  in  the  confusion.**  He 
accordingly  rushed  out,  and  was  at  once  slain.  Moray  fol- 
lowed, and  fied  towards  the  rocks  on  the  sea-shore,  but  the 


MORAY, 


2Ji 


LORD  OF  BOTHWELL. 


FnmcU,  10th  eari«  bom  Kor.  7, 179d,  died  unnuuried  May 
6,  1859,  when  hU  broth«r,  th«  Hon.  John  Stoart  of  Boiland, 
born  jMoary  2a,  1797,  «  capUin  in  th«  army,  niootedod  at 
1 1  th  earl.  Ilia  sunriviiig  brothen*  naniea  are  Hon.  Archibald 
George,  bom  in  1810,  and  Hon.  Geoige,  bom  in  1814. 

MoRAT,  a  nimanie,  originally  Mnrrefl^  now  Uubrat, 
which  Bee.  The  acknowledged  chieftainship  of  the  great 
family  of  this  name  is  vested  in  Moraj>Stirling  of  Abercair- 
nj,  and  Ardoch,  both  in  Perthshire,  descended  from  one 
Fre»kinc,  a  Fleming,  who  settled  in  Scotland  in  the  rdgn  of 
David  I.  (1122—1153),  and  acqiured  from  that  monarch  the 
lands  of  Stmthbrock  in  Unlithgowshire,  and  of  Dnffos  in 
Moray.  In  1158  he  was  succeeded  bj  his  elder  son,  William. 
His  vonngcr  son,  Hugh,  was  the  ancestor  of  the  earls  of 
SuthcrLiiid,  (see  Sutiikrijind,  Earl  of).  William's  elder 
son,  slso  called  William,  succeeded  his  fatlier  in  1200.  He 
assumed  tlie  name  of  William  do  Moravia,  having  eztenuve 
estates  and  great  local  inflaenoe  in  the  province  of  Moray. 
He  married  the  daughter  and  heiress  of  David  de  Olifard, 
son  of  Walter  de  Olifard,  justiciary  of  Lothian,  who  died  in 
1242,  and  acquired  witli  her  the  lands  of  Bothwell  and  Dram- 
sargonl,  in  I^onarkshirc,  and  Smailholm  in  Berwickshire. 
Dmmsargard,  anciently  Drumshargat,  is  now  called  Cambus- 
lang,  and  furms  a  part  of  the  entailed  estate  of  the  duke  of 
Hamilton.  Be^ddes  Sir  Wailter,  his  heir,  he  had  several  sons, 
who,  says  Chalmers,  "  propagnted  the  name  of  Moray,  by 
founding  other  liuusen,  one  of  which  was  the  Murrays  of  Tul- 
libardine,  now  reprcsent<Hi  by  the  duke  of  Athol.**  Sir  Wal- 
ter succeeded  in  1226  to  the  family  estates,  and  was  the  first 
of  the  name  designated  of  Bothwell.  He  died  in  1284.  He 
had  married  a  daughter  of  Malcolm,  earl  of  Fife,  a  marriage 
which  enabled  his  descendant  in  the  fiAh  degree  to  plead  the 
privileges  of  that  family.  His  elder  son.  Sir  William  de  ^lo- 
ravia,  dominus  de  Bothwell,  was,  by  Alexander  III.,  appoint- 
ed heredUariu*  panUarius  Scotite^  an  office  similar  to  that  of 
the  great  mobter  of  tlie  household  in  modem  times.  He  was 
one  of  the  magnates  of  Scotland  who  were  summoned  to 
Berwick  as  an  auditor  of  the  claims  to  the  crown  of  Brace 
and  Baliol.     He  died  without  issue  in  1293. 

His  brother.  Sir  Andrew  Moray  of  Bothwell,  the  celebrated 
patriot,  succeeded  him.  He  was  one  of  the  first  to  juin  Wal- 
lace, when  he  reared  the  standard  of  national  independence. 
Among  the  barons  who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  1.  in  1292 
end  1296,  whose  names  appear  in  the  Bagman  Roll,  there 
are  no  less  than  17  named  Moray,  MurrefT,  or  Moravia.  But 
Sir  Andrew  Moray  of  Bothwell  is  not  found  amongst  them. 
Of  all  the  barons  of  Scotland,  he  and  Sir  William  Wallace 
form  the  exceptions.  There  is  an  Andrew  Moray  in  the  roll, 
but  that  name  was  a  common  one  at  that  time,  and  the 
statement  in  Douglas*  Peerage  that  it  was  the  lord  of  Both- 
well,  is  a  mistake.  In  1297,  when  Wallace  was  basely  de- 
serted by  tlie  leaders  of  the  Scots  at  Ir\ine,  Sir  Andrew  Mo- 
ray alone  remained  faithful  to  him.  He  fell  at  the  battle  of 
Stirling,  13th  Scptctnber  that  year,  being  the  only  person  of 
distinction  slaiu  on  the  Scottish  side.  This  was  the  most 
complete  victory  which  Wallace  ever  gained  in  a  regularly 
fought  field,  yet,  such  was  his  modesty  that  he  allowed  the 
name  of  Sir  Andrew  Moray  to  stand  before  his  own  as  the 
leader  of  the  Scottish  anny.  By  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Sir 
John  Cuniyn,  lord  of  Badenoch,  the  lord  of  Bothwell  had 
two  bon8,  Sir  Andrew,  his  successor,  and  Sir  William  Moray 
of  Dmmsargard,  from  whom  the  Moniys  of  Abercaimy  arc 
lineally  descended. 

Sir  Andrew  Moray  of  B<ithwell,  the  elder  son,  was,  when 
rery  young,  yAnad  in  command  with  Sir  William  Wolhice, 


iUaHe^  Atmalt,  vol.  iL  p.  Sit.)  wben  bt  invadad  EogbBd, 
soon  after  the  battle  of  Stirling,  and  hia  nama  tak«  pne»* 
denee  of  WaUaoe*s  in  tlit  pratectioo  Krantad  to  tiM  cmmnm  of 
Hexham,  in  Northumberland,  bj  whicb  the  priory  and  cath 
vent  were  admitted  under  the  poaoa  of  tha  khig  <^  SfintlinH, 
and  all  penons  prohibitad,  on  pain  of  death,  from  doing  thoa 
iijuiy.  Hemingfofd  has  inaarted  in  hia  historj  a  eopj  of 
tiiis  remarkable  document,  which  is  still  extant,  and  ia  dated 
Hexham,  8th  November  1297. 

Sir  Andrew  Moray  aftarwarda  joined  tha  atandaid  of 
Bmoe,  and  adhered  to  him  under  every  changa  of  fortune. 
Hia  faithful  servioea  were  rewarded  by  his  receiving  in  mar- 
riage, in  1326,  in  tha  abbey  of  Cambnikenneth,  tha  king's 
sister,  the  Lady  Christian  Bmoe,  widow  of  Gratnej  aaii  of 
Mar  and  of  Sir  Christopher  Seton.  Tha  kidahip  of  Both- 
well  hod  by  Edward  I.  been  given  to  Aymer  da  Valleooe, 
esri  of  Pembroke,  whom  he  had  appointed  hia  governor  of 
the  south  part  of  Scotland,  but  upon  his  foffeiturs  it  was  re- 
stored by  Robert  the  Bmoe  to  Sir  Andrew  Moray.  After  the 
fatal  battle  of  Duplin,  12th  August  1832,  and  the  eorooatioo 
of  Edward  Baliol  as  king  at  Scone,  on  the  24th  September, 
Brace*s  party  chose  Sir  Andrew  Moray  regent  of  the  king- 
dom. One  of  his  first  acta  was  to  send  the  yonng  king,  Da- 
vid II.,  and  his  queen,  for  safety  to  Fiance.  Early  in  the 
following  year  he  attempted  to  surprise  Baliol  in  Boxbugh 
castle,  but  was  unfortunately  token  prisoner.  One  of  bis 
soldiers,  named  Balph  Qolding,  hanng  advanced  before  his 
companions,  was  thrown  to  the  ground.  The  r^ent  gener- 
ously attempted  to  rescue  him,  but  not  being  promptly  sop- 
ported  by  his  followers,  he  fell  into  the  power  of  his  enemies. 
Disdaining  to  surrender  to  Baliol,  he  cried  out,  **  I  yiehi  to 
the  king  of  England;  conduct  me  to  him."  Ha  was 
conveyed  to  Edward  at  Durham,  and  detained  in  cUmo 
custody,  but,  the  following  year,  he  eitlier  escaped,  or 
W21S  set  at  liberty.  His  return  to  Scotland  infused  new  qnrit 
into  the  national  party,  and  he  was  even  joined  by  some  of 
the  English  malcontents.  Marching  into  Buchan,  at  the 
head  of  a  considerable  force,  he  laid  siege  to  the  castle  of 
Dundarg,  then  hvid  by  Henry  de  Beaumout,  one  of  BalioTs 
adherents,  whom  he  compelled  to  capitulate. 

In  1335,  when  Cumyn,  eorl  of  Athol,  whom  the  English 
faction  had  made  governor  of  Scotland  under  BoUol,  was  be- 
sieging the  castle  of  Kildrammie,  which  w.is  then  onder  the 
charge  of  Lady  Christian  Bmce,  tlie  wife  of  Sir  Andrew 
^loray,  he  was  attacked  by  the  latter  and  others  of  the 
loyal  nobility,  defeated  and  slain,  SOth  September  thot  year. 
Sir  Andrew  Moray  was,  thereafter,  at  a  meeting  of  the 
Estates  held  at  Dunfermline,  re-elected  regent. 

In  the  summer  of  1336,  Edward  III.  again  invaded  Scot^ 
land,  and  wasted  the  country  wherever  he  went,  when  the 
Scots,  remembering  the  lessons  of  the  good  king  Robert,  had 
recourse  to  a  sort  of  guerilla  warfare,  taking  refiige  in  forests 
and  morasses,  where  the  English  could  not  follow  tliem.  On 
Edw.ird's  departure.  Sir  Andrew  Aloray  issued  from  hia  fast- 
nesses, and  laid  siege  to  the  castle  of  Stirling.  Edward  has- 
tened to  its  relief,  when  the  regent  retiring  to  the  north, 
made  himself  master  of  the  castle  of  Dunnottar,  in  Kincar- 
dineshire, which  Edward  had  refortiiied  in  his  progress 
through  Scotland.  He  also  took  the  castles  of  Lanrieston,  in 
the  same  county,  and  Kinclaven,  in  Perthshii-e,  and  during 
the  following  winter,  he  harassed  the  Meams  and  Angns. 
'llie  tower  of  Falkland  he  likewise  wrested  from  the  Englisli, 
and  in  February  1337,  assisted  by  the  earls  of  Fife  and  March, 
he  got  possesion,  after  a  siege  of  three  weeks,  of  both  tha 
town  and  cattle  of  St.  Andrews.  In  this  siege  he  is  said  to 
have  employed  very  powerful  battering  machines,  from  aomo 


MORAY. 


206 


M0RDIN6T0K. 


1608,  after  bang  fonr  Team  and  a  half  in  Leith,  be  wai  auin- 
nioned  to  eppear  before  the  conudl,  to  answer  fur  a  aennon 
preached  bj  him,  on  Galatians  r.  1,  at  a  sniodal  assemblr  at 
Edinborgb,  aa  moderator  of  the  preceding  ajnod,  wherein  he 
inreighed  against  the  ararice  and  ambition  of  some  of  the 
prelates.  Tliis  sermon  was  printed  at  London  without  his 
knowledge,  he  baring  given  a  written  oopj  of  it  to  a  friend 
who  had  requested  it  of  him.  He  acknowledged  it  to  be  his, 
but  gave  in  a  general  answer  to  the  ooandl,  which  in  effect 
was  a  declinature  of  their  jurisdiction,  in  the  form  of  a  sup- 
plication that  the  matter  might  be  remitted  to  bis  own  eccle- 
siastical superiors.  Although  favourablr  dismissed  from  the 
council,  he  waa,  at  the  instigation  of  the  bishops,  apprehend- 
ed on  a  warrant  from  the  king,  and  put  in  ward  in  the  castle 
of  Edinburgh.  After  being  detained  there  a  year,  he  was 
remored  to  Newabbey  near  Dumfries,  and  ordered  to  confine 
himself  within  four  miles  of  that  place.  His  charge  at  Leith 
was  declared  vacant,  and  Mr.  David  Lindsay  inducted  there 
in  his  stead.  He  remained  at  Dumfries  about  a  year  and  a 
half,  preaching  nther  there  or  at  the  kirk  of  Traqnair,  on 
the  other  side  of  the  Kith,  and  then  went  with  his  wife  and 
children  to  Dysart  in  Fife,  where  he  remained  privately  half- 
•-year.  Removing  to  Prestonpans,  then  called  Saltpreston, 
he  resumed  his  public  preaching.  In  1617,  at  the  urgent  re- 
quest of  the  parisliioners  and  the  presbytery,  he  was  pl.iced 
at  Dnnfennline.  On  the  12th  December  1621,  he  was  sum- 
moned by  the  bijthop  of  St.  Andiews  to  appear  before  the 
high  commission,  at)d  answer  for  not  conforming  to  tlie  five 
acta  of  Perth,  and  as  he  paid  no  attention  to  the  summons, 
though  twice  cited,  lie  was  removed  from  Dunfermline,  and 
ordered  to  confine  himself  within  tlic  parish  of  Foulis  in 
Strathem. 

The  fiflh  son,  Captain  Andrew  Murray,  and  the  sixth, 
who  was  named  James,  both  died  without  issue. 

The  eldest  son.  Sir  William,  succeeded  his  father  in  1594. 
Being  about  Uie  same  age  as  James  VI.,  he  was  brought  up 
with  him  at  Stirling,  his  majesty  being  then  under  the  charge 
of  the  old  countess  of  Mar,  Abercaimy's  aunt  on  the  mother's 
side.  Ho  was  knighted  by  the  king  and  appointed  master  of 
the  horse  to  the  queen.  He  lived  mostly  at  court,  both  in 
Scotland  and  nftcr  James'  accession  to  the  crown  of  England, 
nnd  died  in  1640,  leaving  his  estate  greatly  encumbered  with 
debt.  I  If  had  a  son,  Robert,  who  predeceased  him  in  1628, 
and  left  two  sons,  William  and  David. 

William,  Robert's  eldcT  son,  succeeded  his  grandfather,  and 
was  a  great  loyalist,  bat  died  while  still  a  young  man,  in 
16-12.  His  cldfst  son.  Sir  Robert  Moray  of  Abercaimy,  bom 
in  1G36.  wits,  immediately  after  the  Restoration,  knighted  by 
Charles  II.  He  died  in  April  1704,  in  his  68th  year.  With 
two  daughters,  he  had  five  sons,  namely,  1st,  William,  his 
heir;  2d,  Robert,  wlio  was  so  strongly  attached  to  the  inter- 
ests of  the  Stuart  family  that  he  waited  upon  James  VII., 
afler  his  expatriation,  at  St.  ftermains,  and  was  by  him,  it  is 
said,  intrusted  with  some  commission  of  importance  to  his 
adherents  in  Scotland.  8d,  Captain  John  Moray,  who,  after 
the  Revolution,  went  into  the  French  service,  and  rose  to  the 
rank  of  lieutenant-colonel  After  the  accession  of  Queen 
Anne,  he  and  Captun  James  Murray,  brother  of  Sir  David 
Murray  of  Stanhope,  were  by  the  exiled  family  at  St.  Ger- 
mains,  sent  over  to  Scotland,  under  the  protection  of  her 
majesty's  indemnity,  as  a  check  upon  Simon  Fraser  of  Beau- 
fiift,  afterw.irds  the  celebrated  I^ord  Lovat,  and  to  sound  the 
dispositions  of  the  people.  He  died,  unmarried,  in  1710. 
4tli,  James,  and  5th,  Maurice,  both  died  young  and  unmar- 
ried. 

The  eldest  son,  William  Moray  of  Abereumy,  greatly  im- 


prored  bis  pttcinal  eitate,  and  entirdj  nliend  it  from  til 
the  encambnuicci  upon  it  He  died  in  1785.  By  liis  wifii, 
a  daughter  of  Graham  of  Balufpowao,  he  bad  •  son  and  two 
dangjhten.  Hie  only  eon,  Jamee,  bed,  with  fonr  dan|^tcn» 
two  sons,  Aleiender  end  Cheriee,  who  both  inbtriled  the 
estate.  The  hitter,  Colonel  Cheriee  Monj  of  Aberadziiy, 
manied  the  eldest  daughter  end  horeee  of  Sir  William  Stir- 
ling, bezxmet  of  Ardoch,  end  died  in  1810.  With  fiTe  dan|^- 
ters,  he  bed  three  eone.  Jamee,  the  eldeet  eon,  encrwiihd 
him.  He  was  e  megistrete  end  deputy-lienteneat  of  Perth- 
shuv;  ceptaio,  15th  hnaeers,  end  snbeeqnently  lienlcnant- 
cobnel  of  the  Perthshire  locel  militie.  He  died,  withont 
issue,  in  Deoem'ser  1840,  end  wee  enooeeded  by  hie  braCfaer, 
Mijor  William  Moraj-Stirling  of  Abereeurnj  and  Ardoch. 
He  married  the  Hon.  Fennj  Dooglee,  den^^ter  of  ArbhibeU, 
Lord  Douglas,  and  sored  for  a  long  period  in  the  ennj.  He 
was  ten  years  in  India,  end  wee  eererdy  wounded  at  Water- 
loo. He  sncoeeded  hie  mother  in  Ardoch,  when  he  eaenned 
the  additional  name  of  Stirling. 


MoRDuroToy,  Lord,  a  (dormant)  title  in  the  pesr^  of 
Scotland,  conferred  in  1641,  on  Sir  James  Douglaa,  eeesnd 
son  of  the  tenth  earl  of  Angus.  He  had  married  Anne,  only 
child  of  Lawrence,  fifth  Lord  Oliphant  Thie  ledy  dauncd 
the  peerage  of  Oliphant,  but  in  the  court  of  session  in  16SS, 
it  was  determined,  in  presence  of  Charies  I.,  in  faToor  of  the 
heir  male.  The  king,  however,  was  pleased  to  ereete  hsr 
husband  a  peer  by  the  title  of  Lord  Hoidington,  14th  No- 
vember 1641,  with  the  precedency  of  OUphant  (1458).  He 
obtained  a  grant  from  the  crown  of  the  lande  end  barony 
of  Over  Mordington  in  Berwickshire,  on  S4th  August 
1634.  These  lands  at  one  period  belonged  to  the  cele- 
brated Randolph,  earl  of  Moray,  by  gift  from  his  uncle,  Ro- 
bert the  Bruce,  and  at  the  death  of  John,  third  earl,  passed 
to  his  sister,  Black  Agnes,  countess  of  Dunbar.  They  were 
given  as  a  dowery  with  her  daughter,  Agnes,  on  her  marriage 
to  Sir  James  Douglas  of  Dalkeith,  and  continued  in  the  pos- 
session of  his  successors,  the  earls  of  Morton,  till  the  attam- 
der  of  the  regent  Morton  in  June  1581,  when  they  reverted 
to  the  crown.  The  first  Lord  Mordington  died  11th  Febmi- 
ry  1656. 

His  son,  W^illUm,  second  Lord  Mordington,  married  Eliia- 
both,  eldest  daughter  of  Hugh,  fifth  Lord  Sempill,  by  whom 
he  had  two  sons ;  James,  third  Lord  Mordington,  and  the 
Hon.  James  Douglas.  James,  third  lord,  during  the  lifetime 
of  his  father,  had  a  charter,  *'  To  James,  master  of  Mording- 
tuun,"  of  the  lands  of  Nether  Mordington,  of  date  2d  August, 
1662.  His  son,  George,  fourth  Lord  ilordington,  has  ob- 
tained a  place  in  Walpole's  Royal  and  Noble  Authors,  (Park's 
edition,  vol.  v.  p.  147,)  as  the  author  of  a  work  called  *The 
groat  bles-ning  of  a  monarohical  government,  when  fenced 
about  with,  and  bounded  by,  the  laws,  and  these  laws  se- 
cured, defended  and  obser^'ed  by  the  monarch.  Also,  that  as 
a  Popish  government  is  inconsistent  with  the  true  happlnese 
of  these  kingdoms,  so  great  also  aro  the  miseries  and  oocfn- 
sions  of  anarchy.  M(»t  humbly  dedicated  to  his  majesty  by 
George  Douglas,  Lord  Mordington.*  Loudon,  1724.  Two 
p'.eces  against  a  weekly  paper,  called  the  Independent  Whig, 
are  also  mentioned  there  as  written  by  his  lordship.  He 
died  lOUi  June  1741.  His  only  son,  Charies,  went  to  sea 
when  young,  and  did  not  return  till  after  his  father's  deeth. 
As  he  had  no  landed  property,  he  did  not  assume  the  title. 
Engaging  in  the  rebellion  of  1745,  he  was  taken  prisoner, 
and  tried  llth  September  1746,  under  the  dengnation  of 
Charles  DougUs,  Esq.  He  tlien  pleaded  his  peerage,  which 
was  objected  to  bj  the  counsel  for  the  crown ;  but  on  profinf 


MORTON, 


208 


TWELFTH  EAAL  OF. 


Ii 


I 
i 


h 


family  tbe  Inndi  of  Abenloor  oontinned  for  mora  than  a 
oentaiy,  when  tbej  came  to  the  ancaitora  of  tht  oarl  of  Mor- 
ton, the  present  proprietor. 

MoBTON,  earl  of«  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Sootland.  con- 
ferred br  Jamea  II.  14th  Mardi  1458,  on  James  Douglas  of 
Dalkeith,  descended  from  Sir  John  Doogbi,  second  son  of 
Sir  James  de  Dooglas,  of  London,  who  was  assassinated  br 
order  of  Sir  David  BardsT  of  Brechin  in  1850,  and  whose 
eldest  son.  Sir  James  Donglaa,  had,  in  1851,  a  grant  of  the 
baronj  of  Aberdnnr  in  Fife,  from  his  nnde,  William  de  Dou- 
glas, lord  of  liddisdale,  and  some  time  earl  of  Athol,  (nee  vol. 
i.  p.  163).  'I'he  remote  ancestor  of  the  noble  family  of  &Ior- 
tnn  was  Andr«*w,  second  son  of  Archibald  de  Douglas,  tlie 
second  of  thnt  illuittrions  race  who  bore  the  name  of  Douglas. 
The  title  is  taken  from  the  lands  of  Mortonne  in  the  parisli 
of  East  Calder,  Mid  Ixthian,  ancientlr  called  Calder-Gere; 
having  been  at  one  time  the  property  of  the  family  of  de  Clf  re. 

James,  first  earl  of  Morton,  had  a  safe-conduct  into  Eng- 
land, as  one  of  the  ambassadors  from  Scotland,  14th  June 
1491,  and  again,  28th  July  1494.  He  married  Johanna,  the 
widowed  countess  of  Angus,  daughter  of  King  James  I.,  and, 
with  two  daughters,  hnd  a  son,  John,  second  earl. 

The  second  earl  of  Morton  was  present  in  the  estates  of 
pariiament  when  the  settlements  on  the  princess  Margaret  of 
England  by  James  IV.  were  confirmed,  18th  May  1504.  He 
was  succeeded  by  his  son,  James,  third  eari,  who  received  u 
safe-con.iuct  6th  February  1516,  to  go  to  England.  The  Dou- 
glases of  London  obtained,  in  early  time«,  a  baronial  juruulic- 
tion  over  many  lands,  in  several  shires,  which  was  called  the 
regnlity  of  Dalkeith.  In  1541,  James,  third  earl  of  Morton, 
obtained  a  charter  from  James  V.,  confirming  this  regaKty.  On 
the  abolition  of  the  heritable  jurisdictions  in  Scotland  in  1747, 
the  duke  of  Buccleuch,  to  whom  this  regality  then  belonged, 
received  £3.400  for  it  The  earl  of  Morton  married  Cathe- 
rine, natural  daughter  of  .Tames  IV.,  by  Margaret  Royi,  and 
had  3  daughters ;  I^dy  Margaret,  married  to  the  earl  of  Arran, 
dnke  of  Chatelherault,  regent  of  Scotland;  Lady  Beatrix, 
wife  of  Robert,  fiflh  I>ord  Maxwell;  and  I^dy  Elizabeth, 
wife  of  James  Douglas,  second  son  of  Sir  Geoi^  Douglas  of 
Pittendreich,  (see  vol  ii.  p.  47,)  the  brother  of  the  sixth  curl 
of  Angus.  Having  no  male  issue,  he  made  an  entail  of  his 
estates  and  honours  in  favour  of  Sur  Robert  Douglas  of  I^i- 
loveii,  who  had  a  charter  of  the  same,  17th  October  1540. 
Afterwards,  however,  he  altered  the  destination,  and  a  char- 
ter of  the  lands  and  earldom  was  granted  in  favour  of  his 
son-in-law,  James  Douglas,  and  the  I^dy  Elizabeth,  his 
wife,  and  the  longest  liver,  in  conjunct  fee,  and  the  heirs 
male  to  be  procreated  between  them,  the  remainder  to  others 
therein  mentioned,  and  the  heirs  male  of  their  bodies  respec- 
tively, which  was  contirme<l  by  royal  charter,  22d  April  1543. 
The  third  eari  died  in  1558. 

His  son-in-law,  .Tames  Douglas,  became  fourth  earl  of 
Morton,  in  terms  of  the  above-mentioned  settlement,  and 
W.1S  the  famous  regent  Morton,  of  whom  a  memoir  is  given 
in  vol.  ii.  p.  53,  in  larger  type.  He  left  no  lawful  issue,  sl- 
though  he  had  several  natural  children.  On  his  execution  in 
1581,  his  estates  and  titles  became  forfeited  to  the  crown. 
John,  7th  f/>rd  Maxwell,  grandson  of  the  3d  e:u-l,  obtainetl, 
in  right  of  his  mother,  a  new  charter  of  the  earldom  of  Morton, 
June  5,  1.581  (see  p.  126  of  this  volume),  and  was  5th  earl  of 
Morton.  The  attainder  being  reversed  in  Jan.  15H5,  I^rd 
Maxwell  had  to  relinquish  the  title,  which  devolved  on  the 
next  heir  of  entail,  Archibald,  8th  e:irl  of  Angus  of  the  Dong- 
las  family,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  47).  The  latter,  6tli  earl  of  Morton, 
died,  without  sunriving  issue,  in  1588.    In  the  superstition  of 


tlie  tioMi  he  was  lospacted  to  htsn  fied  bj  witdienft;  lUt 
•ari,  laji  Calderwood,  (vol.  ir.  p.  680,)  was  **mon  nor  aoio 
of  hb  predeoessors,  yea,  nor  aoie  of  all  the  eriei  in  tha  eoon- 
trie,  much  beloved  of  the  godCa.  The  king  was  wont  oora« 
monly  to  call  him  *  the  ministen*  king.'  He  gave  •  proof  of 
kla  religion  and  pietie  at  kia  last  and  greatert  cxtramitie; 
for  howbeit  bo  was  astnrsd  he  was  beiHtclMd,  yitt  relbwd  ha 
all  belpe  by  witdiea,  but  lefeiiad  the  event  to  God.** 

On  the  eari  of  Angus*  death.  Ear  William  Dooglas  of  Lodi- 
leven  becomo  7th  aarl  of  Morton.  Ho  was  deooendcd 
from  Sir  Henry  Douglas  of  Logton,  who,  in  the  reign  of 
Robert  II.,  obtained  a  grant  of  the  castlo  of  I^ochloren,  in 
the  neiglibonrhood  of  Kinross,  with  lands  <m  the  sliore  of  the , 
lake.  He  was  the  third  son  of  Sir  John  Donglaa  of  Dalkailh, 
by  Agnes  Monfode.  In  1566,  Sur  William  Donglaa  of  Lneh- 
leven,  the  near  kinsman  of  the  regent  Morton,  and  half- 
brother  to  the  regent  Aloray,  was  selected  as  the  jailer  of 
the  unfortunate  Queen  Maiy  when  she  was  imprisoned  in 
I.ocIi1even  castle,  IGth  June  1567.  She  made  her  escape,  it 
is  well  known,  on  the  2d  >Iay  1568,  by  meana  of  Geoige 
Douglas,  youngest  son  of  Sir  Robert.  The  sixth  eari  died  24th 
September,  1606.  His  grandson,  William,  seventh  eari,  was 
a  privy  councillor,  and  one  of  the  gentlemen  of  the  bedcham- 
lier  both  to  King  James  VI.  and  Charles  I.  On  12th  April 
1630,  he  wss  constituted  high-treasurer  of  Scotbnd,  and  held 
that  office  till  1635,  when  he  was  appointed  captain  of  tlie 
yeomen  of  the  guard,  and  bcMdes  being  made  a  knight  of  the 
Garter,  was  sworn  a  member  of  the  English  privy  connriL 
In  1641  he  was  nominated  high-chancellor  of  Scotland,  bnt 
the  appointment  being  opposed  in  p.'urliament  by  his  own 
son-in-law,  the  famous  marquis  of  Argyle,  the  husband  of 
his  second  daughter.  Lady  Mai^ret  Douglas,  the  king  did 
not  persist  in  it. 

On  the  breaking  out  of  the  civil  wars,  tlie  earl  of  Morton, 
who  was  then  one  of  the  richest  noblemen  in  the  kingdom, 
sdvanced  largo  sums  for  the  support  of  the  royal  cauM. 
Among  other  estates  disposed  of  for  that  purpose,  the  estate 
of  Dalkeith  was  in  1642  sold  to  the  Buccleurh  family.  On 
that  account  the  islands  of  Orkney  and  Zetland  were,  15th 
.Tune  1648,  with  all  the  regalities  belonging  to  them,  granted 
by  royal  charter  in  mortgage  to  the  earl,  redeemable  by  the 
crown  on  the  payment  of  X.10.000  sterling.  In  1646,  when 
Cliarles  I.  took  refuge  with  the  Scots  army  at  Newcastle,  the 
earl  of  STorton  went  to  that  town  to  wait  on  his  majesty. 
He  afterwards  retired  to  Orkney,  where  he  died  7th  August 
1648,  in  his  OCth  year.  \Yith  five  daughters,  he  h.id  four 
sons. 

His  eldest  son,  Robert,  ninth  earl,  mortgaged  the  islands 
of  Oricney  .ind  Zetland,  to  assist  Charles,  but  died  towards 
the  end  of  the  year  1649.  His  son,  William,  tenth  earl,  re- 
ceived in  1662  a  new  grant  of  Orkney  and  Zetland,  which 
had  been  confiscated  by  Cromwell,  not  in  his  own  name, 
however,  but  in  that  uf  the  Viscount  Grnndison,  the  brother 
of  his  countess,  in  trust  for  the  Morton  family.  Both  this 
and  the  former  grant  were  contested  by  the  lord-advocate, 
and  being  reduced,  these  islands  were,  hy  act  of  parliament, 
27th  December  1669,  annexed  for  ever  to  the  crown.  The 
earl  died  in  1681,  without  surviving  issue,  when  the  title  de- 
volved on  his  uncle,  the  Hon.  Sir  .Tames  Douglas  of  Smith- 
field,  who  was  kni;;hted  by  the  earl  of  Lindsay  under  the 
royal  standard  at  the  Isle  of  Rhee  for  his  gallant  behaviour. 
He  was  a  gentleman  of  the  privy  chamber  to  Charlea  I. 

The  11th  earl  died  in  1686.  He  had,  with  one  daughter, 
five  sons.  Tlie  eldest,  Charles,  I<ord  Aberdour,  was  drowned 
at  sea  on  his  p.nssage  to  Holland,  unmarried. 

The  second  son,  .Tames,  tweltlh  earl,  supported  the  Revo- 


MOTHERWELL, 


210 


WILLIAM. 


Aberdoor,  b.  Nor.  6,  1844 ;  2dly,  in  1853, 1^7  Alice  Lamb- 
ton,  8d  dftnghter  of  the  1ft  earl  of  Durham.  Appmnted 
depotj  lieutenant  of  Mid  Lothian  in  1848,  and  of  Argyleshire 
in  1859.  In  April  of  the  latter  jear  be  was  elected  •  repre- 
sentative peer  of  Scotland. 

MoRiiTLLB,  snmame  of.    See  Supflkmesct. 

MOTHERWELL,  William,  a  highly-gifted 
poet,  was  bom  in  Glasgow,  October  13,  1797. 
His  family  originally  belonged  to  Stirlingshire, 
where  for  several  generations  they  resided  on  a 
small  property  of  their  own,  called  Mnirmill.  At 
an  early  age  he  was  placed  under  the  care  of  an 
uncle  in  Paisley,  and  after  receiving  a  good  edu- 
cation, was  apprenticed  to  the  shcriflf-derk  of  the 
county,  with  the  view  of  following  the  legal  pro- 
fession. On  the  termination  of  his  apprenticeship 
he  was  employed  for  some  time  by  Dr.  Robert 
Watt,  in  assisting  in  the  compilation  of  that  valu- 
able and  useful  work,  the  '  Bibliotheca  Britanni- 
ca,'  in  which  occupation  he  displayed  a  passionate 
love  of  antiquarian  lore,  that  characterized  all  his 
after  years.  Having  early  begun  to  "try  his 
^prentice  hand"  on  poetry,  he  about  the  same 
time  contributed  some  pieces  to  a  small  periodical 
published  at  Greenock,  called  *  The  Visitor.'  At 
the  age  of  twenty-one  he  was  appointed  deputy  to 
the  shcriflf-clerk  at  Paisley,  which  office  he  held 
for  about  ten  years.  In  the  year  1819  he  contri- 
buted an  Essay  on  the  Poets  of  Renfrewshire,  to 
a  collection  of  Songs  and  other  poetical  pieces 
published  at  Paisley,  entitled  ^  The  Harp  of  Ren- 
frewshire,* in  which  a  few  of  his  own  productions 
also  appeared.  He  subsequently  become  editor  of 
a  work  of  a  somewhat  similar  nature,  but  of  high- 
er pretensions  and  greater  merit,  being  a  valuable 
collection  of  ballads,  published  in  parts,  and  com- 
pleted in  1827,  under  the  title  of  'Minstrelsy, 
Ancient  and  Modem,*  illustrated  by  a  most  inter- 
esting historical  introduction  and  notes,  which  ex- 
hibited his  extensive  acquaintance  with  the  ballad 
and  romantic  literature  of  Scotland. 

In  1828  Mr.  Motlierwell  became  editor  of  the 
'  Paisley  Advertiser,*  a  paper  of  conseiTative  po- 
litics, which  he  conducted  with  spuit  and  success 
for  nearly  two  years.  At  the  same  time  he  edited 
the  'Paisley  Magazine,*  a  monthly  periodical, 
which,  though  it  displayed  much  talent  and  liveli- 
ness, only  existed  for  a  year.  In  the  beginning 
of  1880,  on  the  retirement  of  Mr.  MacQueen,  the 


able  and  at  that  period  well-known  advocate  of 
the  West  India  Interests,  from  the  *  Glasgow  Cou- 
rier,* Mr.  Motherwell  was  engaged  as  editor  of 
that  journal,  and  he  continued  to  conduct  it  till 
his  death.  He  entered  upon  the  editorslilp  at  a 
period  of  great  public  excitement,  when  the  prin- 
ciples he  supported,  those  of  conservatism,  were, 
for  the  time,  exceedingly  nnpopnlar,  but  he  advo- 
cated the  cause  which  he  conscientiously  believed 
to  bo  the  true  one  with  signal  intrepidity,  un- 
flinching zeal,  and  consummate  ability,  and  for 
upwards  of  five  years  sustained  with  distinction 
the  character  of  the  newspaper  under  his  charge. 
Of  Motherwell  it  may  be  truly  said  that  **  he  gave 
up  to  party  what  was  meant  for  mankind,"  for 
politics,  in  a  great  measure,  thus  withdrew  him 
from  the  more  congenial  pursuits  of  literature. 
He  did  not,  however,  wholly  forsake  poetiy,  for, 
in  1832,  a  volume  of  his  '  Poems,  Narrative  and 
Lyrical,*  was  published  at  Glasgow,  and  was  most 
favourably  received.  A  few  months  previously 
he  had  furnished  his  friend,  Mr.  Andrew  Hender- 
son, with  an  able  and  interesting  preface  for  his 
collection  of  Scottish  Proverbs,  in  which  he  show- 
ed a  thorough  acquaintance  with  the  "  saws*'  and 
sayings  of  his  countrymen. 

The  same  year  he  contributed  a  number  of 
pieces  in  prose  and  verse  to  *  Tlie  Day,*  a  periodi- 
cal then  published  at  Glasgow.  His  '  Memoirs  of 
Peter  Birnic,*  a  Paisley  bailie,  formed  one  of  the 
most  amusing  papers  in  that  publication.  In 
1834-5  he  superintended  with  Hogg,  the  Ettrick 
Shepherd,  an  elegant  edition  of  the  works  of  Burns, 
in  five  volumes,  published  by  Messrs.  A.  Fullar- 
ton  &  Co.  A  large  amount  of  the  notes,  critical 
and  illustrative,  was  supplied  by  him. 

Mr.  Motherwell  was  of  short  stature,  but  stent 
and  muscular.  The  engrossing  and  exciting  na- 
ture of  his  duties,  combined  with  other  causes, 
gradually  undcimiaed  his  health,  and  he  was  lat- 
terly subject  to  occasional  attacks  of  illness.  On 
the  evening  of  31st  October  1835,  he  was  seized 
with  an  apoplectic  fit,  and  though  medical  aid 
was  speedily  procured,  in  less  than  three  hours, 
during  which  he  scarcely  spoke,  he  died,  Novem- 
ber 1,  in  his  39th  year.  He  was  never  married. 
A  monument  to  his  memory  was  erected  in  Glas- 
gow Necropolis,  where  he  was  buried. 


II 
ii  ! 


1,  ; 

I 
I 
■  I 


MOWAT. 


212 


MUDIE. 


1 1 


1  ■ 


!; 


creif  and  Balniachin  to  Uatthew,  who  from  thera  usamed 
the  name  of  Moncreif. 

The  family  uf  Cockairny  have  oontinned  in  an  nnintenrnpt- 
ed  male  line.  Sir  Robert  Moubraj,  who  nicceeded  in  1794, 
wai  kniglited  in  1825,  and  died  in  1848. 


MowAT,  a  inimame  originallj  Montealt.  A  familr,  de- 
riving their  name  from  the  lands  of  Montealt  in  the  oonntj  of 
Flint,  North  Wales,  settled  in  Scotland  in  the  rngn  of  David 
L,  and  in  course  of  time  the  name  was  softened  into  Mowat. 
In  the  Ragman  Roll  is  the  name  of  Willielmos  de  Monte 
Alto,  miles.  There  is  a  charter  of  William,  eari  of  Douglas 
and  Mar,  to  James  Mowat  of  the  lands  of  Easter  Fowlis, 
dated  at  the  castle  of  Kildmmmv,  26th  JvAj  1377.  The 
principal  family  of  the  name  was  Mowat  of  BalqnoUie,  Aber- 
deenshire. There  were  also  ^ilowat  of  Stanehonse  in  Clydes- 
dale, and  Mowat  of  Bnabie  in  Cunningham,  but  all  these 
families  have  long  been  extinct. 

MUDIE,  Robert,  a  volaminons  niTitcr,  author 
of  The  Feathered  Tribes  of  the  British  Islands/ 
aud  nnmerous  other  popular  and  scientific  works, 
was  a  native  of  Forfarshire,  and  was  bom  in 
1777.  The  son  of  a  country  weaver,  he  received 
the  rndiinents  of  his  education  at  a  humble  rural 
school  in  his  native  place,  about  six  or  seven  miles 
north-west  from  Dundee.  For  whatever  leaniing 
he  afterwards  possessed,  he  was  solely  indebted 
to  his  own  industiy  and  native  vigour  of  mind, 
and  he  Aimishes  another  remarkable  example  of 
those  individuals  who,  by  the  force  of  their  genius, 
application,  and  steadiness,  have  raised  them- 
selves from  a  lowly  rank  in  life,  without  the  aid 
of  either  school  or  college,  to  a  conspicuous  posi- 
tion among  the  higher  class  of  literary  and  scien- 
tific men  of  their  day.  In  his  early  youth,  he 
was  put  to  the  loom,  and  plied  the  shuttle  for  sev- 
eral years,  until  he  was  drawn  for  the  militia. 
From  his  boyhood  he  had  evinced  an  insatiable 
desire  for  knowledge  of  every  description,  and  all 
the  hours  which  he  could  spare  from  his  employ- 
ment as  a  weaver,  or  his  militiaman^s  duties,  were 
devoted  to  the  reading  of  books.  He  used  to 
mention  that  before  he  left  home,  he  was  much 
indebted  to  a  gentleman  who  lent  him  some  vol- 
umes of  the  ^  Encyclopedia  Britannica,*  in  which 
he  indulged  at  large  his  taste  for  variety,  and  that 
in  the  towns  where  his  regiment  was  stationed  he 
always  contrived  to  find  a  good  supply  of  books. 
By  the  time  that  his  militia  service  of  four  years 
expired,  he  had  attained  to  so  much  knowledge 
that  he  was  emboldened  to  undertake  the  duties 
of  a  village  school  in  the  south  of  Fife.    Besides 


other  accomplishments,  we  are  told,  he  had  ac- 
quired considerable  skill  in  the  art  of  drawing,  a 
respectable  acquaintance  with  arithmetic  and  ma- 
thematics, and  great  facility  in  English  composi- 
tion.   He  also  wrote  verses  with  ease. 

He  was  soon  appointed  to  the  sitnation  of  draw* 
ing-master  in  the  academy  of  Inremess,  and 
afterwards  in  that  of  Dundee,  where  he  was  not 
long  till  he  was  transferred  to  the  department  of 
aiithmetic,  theoretical  and  practical,  and  English 
composition.  At  Dundee  he  remained  for  abont 
twelve  years,  and  besides  contributing  mnch  to 
the  local  newspaper,  and  conducting  for  some 
time  a  monthly  periodical,  he  published  a  novel, 
called  '  Glenfnrgas,*  in  3  volumes.  Becoming  a 
member  of  the  Dundee  tovm  council,  he  engaged 
eagerly  in  the  cause  of  bnrgh  reform,  in  conjunc- 
tion with  R.  S.  Riutoul,  afterwai-ds  the  editor  of 
the  London  Spectator. 

About  1820,  Mr.  Mudie  left  Dundee  for  Lon- 
don, and  at  first  obtained  employment  as  a  pariia- 
mentary  reporter  for  the  newspapers.  He  was 
for  some  time  connected  with  the  Morning  Chron- 
icle, and  subsequently  editor  of  the  Sunday  Times. 
He  also  contributed  largely  to  several  of  the  peri- 
odicals of  the  day.  His  life  thenceforward  was 
that  of  a  laborious  literary  hack,  and  as  he  wrote 
with  great  facility,  he  produced  altogether  up- 
wards of  ninety  volumes,  on  almost  every  subject 
Many  of  his  works  were  hastily  produced,  to  pro- 
vide for  the  passing  wants  of  the  day,  and  he  has 
been  known  to  throw  off  a  volume  of  his  *'  Sea- 
sons* in  eight  days.  He  was  an  able  writer,  an 
expert  compiler,  an  acute  and  philosophical  ob- 
server of  nature,  and  particularly  happy  in  hia 
geographical  dissertations  and  works  on  natural 
history.  With  all  his  acquirements,  howenr, 
and  with  all  his  industry  and  perseveranee,  kla 
was  but  the  fate  of  too  many  literary  men,  con- 
stant drudging  and  perpetual  poverty,  and  at  lait 
complete  bodily  exhaustion.  He  died  29th  April 
1842,  aged  64,  leaving  the  widow  of  a  second 
maiTiage  in  poor  circumstances. 

In  the  Appendix  to  Dr.  Hannah's  life  of  Dr. 
Chalmers,  a  brief  account  of  Mr.  Mudie  is  given 
by  Professor  Duncan,  of  the  university  of  St.  An- 
drews, who  was  rector  of  the  academy  of  Dandee, 
when  the  subject  of  this  notice  was  one  of  the 


d 


^lUNRO 


2U 


OFFOULIS. 


1 1 


lie  eztlngnuhed  and  slain.**  The  Munrocs  and  Dioupvalls 
lost  a  great  many  men.  Dingwall  of  Kildon,  and  mmtk 
■core  of  the  surname  of  Dingwall  were  killed.  No  len  than 
eleven  Munroet  of  the  house  of  Fonlis  who  were  to  succeed 
one  after  another,  fell  in  this  battle,  so  that  the  iDooession  of 
Foulis  opened  to  an  infant  **  then  I ving  in  his  cradel.**  The 
carrs  son  was  rescued,  and  to  requite  the  service  performed 
he  made  various  grants  of  land  to  the  Munroes  and  Ding- 
walls. 

The  child  Ijing  in  his  cradle  was  afterwnrds  Sir  Robert 
Munro,  the  sixth  of  his  house.  lie  fought  in  the  armj  of 
Bruce  at  the  battle  of  Bannockbum.  His  onlj  son,  George, 
fell  there,  leaving  an  heir,  who  succeeded  his  grandfather. 
This  George  Munro  of  Foulis  was  slain  at  Ilalidonhill  in 
1333.  The  same  jear,  according  to  Sir  Robert  Gordonf  al- 
tliough  Shaw  makes  the  date  1454,  the  following  remarkable 
event  occurred  in  the  clan  historv :  John  Munro,  tlie  tutor  of 
Foulis,  in  travelling  homeward  from  Kdinburgh  to  Ross, 
stopped  in  a  meadow  in  Strathardle  that  he  and  his  ser- 
vants might  obtain  some  rest.  While  thev  were  asleep,  the 
owner  of  the  meadow  cut  off  the  tails  of  their  horses.  To 
revenge  this  insult,  on  his  return  to  Ross,  he  summoned  his 
whole  kinsmen  and  followers,  and  having  selected  350  of  tlie 
best  men  amongst  them,  he  returned  to  Strathardle,  which 
he  waste<l  and  spoiled ;  killing  some  of  the  inhabitants  and 
carrying  off  their  cattle.  In  passing  by  the  castle  of  Moy, 
on  his  way  home,  the  laird  of  M.Hcintosh  sent  a  message  to 
him  demanding  a  share  of  the  spoil.  This  was  customary 
among  the  Highlanders  when  a  party  drove  cattle  so  taken 
through  a  gentleman's  lanJ,  and  the  part  so  exacted  was 
called  a  Staoig  Ratliaid^  or  Staoig  Crtich^  that  is,  a  road 
collop.  Munro  offered  Macintosh  a  reasonable  share  of  the 
booty,  but  the  latter  would  not  accept  of  less  than  the  half. 
This  Munro  refused,  and  drove  off  the  cattle.  Collecting  his 
clansmen,  Macintosh  went  in  pursuit  of  him,  and  came  up 
with  him  at  Glach-na-haire,  near  Inverness.  On  perceiving 
his  approach,  ^lunro  sent  home  fifty  of  his  men  with  the  cat- 
tle, and  in  the  contest  that  ensued,  Macintosh  and  the  great- 
er part  of  his  men  were  killed.  Several  of  the  Munrocs  were 
also  slain,  and  John  Munro  himself  was  left  for  dead  on  the 
field  of  battle,  when  Lord  Lovat  had  him  carried  to  his  house 
in  the  neighbourhood,  where  he  was  cured  of  his  wounds. 
One  of  his  hands  was  so  mutilated,  that  he  lost  the  use  of  it, 
on  which  account  he  was  afterwards  culled  John  Bac-Lniinh, 
or  Ciotach.  The  Munrocs  had  great  advantage  of  the  ground, 
by  taking  up  a  position  among  rocks,  from  which  they  an- 
noyed the  Macintoslies  with  their  arrows. 

Robert,  the  fi;;hth  baron  of  Foulis,  married  a  niece  of  En- 
phame,  daughter  of  the  ciirl  of  Ross,  and  queen  of  Robert  II. 
He  was  killed  in  an  obscure  skirmish  in  13G9.  and  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son,  Hngh,  ninth  baron  of  Foulis,  who  joined 
Donald,  second  lord  of  the  Isles,  when  he  claimed  the  earl- 
dom of  Ross  in  right  of  his  wife.  The  decisive  battle  of 
Harlaw,  in  1411,  put  an  end  to  his  protcnsions. 

The  forfeiture  of  the  earldom  of  Ross  in  1476,  made  the 
Munroes  and  other  vassal  families  independent  of  any  supe- 
rior but  the  crown.  In  the  charters  which  the  familv  of 
Foulis  obtained  from  the  Scottish  kings,  at  various  times, 
they  were  declared  to  hold  their  lands  on  the  singular  tenure 
of  furnishing  a  ball  of  snow  at  Midsummer  if  required,  which 
the  hollows  in  their  mountain  property  could  at  all  times  snp- 
ply ;  and  it  is  said  that  when  the  duke  of  Cumberland  pro- 
ceeded north  against  the  Pretender  in  174G,  the  Munroes 
actually  sent  him  some  snow  to  cool  his  wines.  In  one 
charter,  the  addendum  was  a  pair  of  white  gloves  or  three 
psnnieti. 


L 


In  1497,  when  Sir  Alexander  Macdmiald  of  T^onhslih  a 
second  time  invaded  Ross,  be  was  ettcounterad  hj  ths  Mim- 
ncs  and  the  Mackensies,  at  a  place  csllcd  Dmmdiatt,  wlwn, 
after  a  rinurp  skirmish,  he  and  his  followanB  were  again  root- 
ed, and  driven  eat  of  the  oonntxr.  In  1502,  a  oomminioo 
was  given  to  the  eari  of  Hnntly,  the  Lord  Lorat,  and  Wil- 
liam Munro,  twelfth  baron  of  FMis^  to  prooeed  to  Lochsber, 
and  let  the  king's  lands  of  Lochsber  nd  ifamors^  for  tko 
space  of  five  years,  to  true  men.  Sir  William  Mmm  of  Fon- 
lis was  nominated  Jostidaij  of  Invemees  bj  James  IV.  He 
fell  in  battle  in  1505.  In  16U  Munro  of  Fonlis  and  Mao- 
kenzie  of  Kintail  were  appointed  lieutenants /»ro  iemport  of 
Wester  Ross.  Robert,  the  14th  baron,  fell  at  the  battle  of 
Pinkie  in  1547.  Robert  More  Munro,  the  fifteenth  cbicl| 
was  a  faithful  friend  of  Mary,  queen  of  Scots.  Buohansa 
states  that  when  that  unfortunate  princess  went  to  Inver- 
ness in  15C2,  **as  soon  as  they  beard  of  their  soTereign*8 
danger,  a  great  number  of  the  most  eminent  Soots  poured  in 
around  her,  especially  the  Fraseni  and  Munroes,  who  were 
esteemed  the  most  valiant  of  the  clans  inhabiting  those  coun- 
tries.** These  two  clans  took  for  the  queen  Inverness  castle, 
which  had  refused  her  admisnon. 

With  the  Mackenues  the  Munroes  were  often  at  feud,  and 
Andrew  Munro  of  Milntown  defended,  for  three  yean,  the 
castle  of  the  canonry  of  Ross,  which  he  had  received  from 
the  regent  Moray  in  1569,  against  the  clan  Kenzie,  at  the 
expense  of  many  lives  on  both  sides.  It  was,  however,  ef*  I 
terwards  delivered  up  to  the  Mackenzies  under  the  act  ol  I 
pacification. 

The  chief,  Robert  More  Munro,  became  a  protestant  at  an    | 
early  period  of  the  Scottish  Reformation.     Of  the  family  of   | 
Foulis,  there  is  a  sketch  appended  to  Dr.  Doddridge*s  weD-    . 
known  *  Life  of  Colonel  Gardiner,*  and  Robert  More  Mnnr» 
is  there  described  as  *'  a  wise  and  good  man,  who  left  an  opu- 
lent estate  to  the  family.**    James  VI.  granted  to  him  a 
lease  of  certain  crown  customs  or  dues  in  the  shires  of  lover-    , 
ness,  Ross,  Sntherland,  and  Caithness.     He  died  in  1588L 
His  son,  Robert,  sixteenth  baron  of  Foulis,  died,  without    . 
issue,  in  July  1589,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  brother.  Hec- 
tor Munro,  seventeenth  baron  of  Foulis.    The  latter  died 
14th  KovemW  1C03.  | 

Hector's  eldest  son,  Robert  Munro,  eighteenth  chief  of 
Foulis,  styled  "  the  Black  Baron,"  was  the  first  of  his  hooM 
who  engnged  in  the  religious  wars  of  Gustavus  Adolphus,  is 
the  seventeenth  century.  In  1626  he  went  over  with  the  , 
Scottish  corps  of  Sir  Donald  Mackay,  first  Lord  Reay,  ac- 
companied by  sis  other  ofiicers  of  his  name  and  near  Idndred. 
Doddridge  says  of  him,  that  **  the  worthy  Scottish  gentle-  • 
mnn  was  so  struck  with  a  regard  to  the  common  cause,  in 
which  he  himself  had  no  concern  but  what  piety  and  virtue 
gave  him,  that  he  joined  Gustavus  with  a  great  number  of 
his  friends  who  bore  his  own  name.  Many  of  them  guned 
great  reputation  in  this  war,  and  that  of  Robert  their  leader  < 
wns  so  eminent  that  he  was  made  colonel  of  two  regiments  ; 
at  the  same  time,  the  one  of  horse,  the  other  of  foot  in  that 
ser\'ice.**  In  1629  the  laird  of  Foulis  raised  a  reinforcement 
of  700  men  on  his  own  lands,  and  at  a  later  period  joined 
Gusta\*us  with  them.  The  ofiicers  of  Mackays  and  Mnnro's 
Highland  regiments  who  served  under  Gustavus  Adolphus,  in 
addition  to  rich  buttons,  wore  a  gold  chain  round  their  necks, 
to  secure  the  owner,  in  case  of  being  wounded  or  taken  pris- 
oner, good  treatment,  or  payment  for  future  ransom. 

The  *'  Black  Baron  '*  died  at  Ulm,  from  a  wound  in  his  foot, 
in  the  year  1633,  and  leaving  no  male  issue,  he  was  succeeded 
by  his  brother.  Hector  Munro,  nineteenth  baron  of  Foulis, 
who  had  also  distinguished  himself  in  the  German  wars,  and 


MURE 


218 


OF  ROWALLAN. 


ii 


!i 


ancholy  souud  of  the  minate  gans  reverberating 
among  the  hills ;  the  grand  and  frowning  appear- 
ance of  the  fortress  towering  above  the  Goar,  all 
tended  to  make  the  awfol  ceremony  more  impres- 
sive." An  equestrian  statoe,  bj  Chantrej,  has 
been  erected  to  his  memory  at  Madras.  In  1830 
was  pablished  ^  The  Life  of  Sir  Thomas  Monro, 
with  Extracts  from  his  Correspondence  and  Pri- 
vate Papers.    By  the  Rev.  G.  R.  Gleig,*  3  vols. 

In  the  Extraordinary  Gazette  issned  at  Ma- 
dras, after  his  death,  the  following  tribute  was 
paid  to  his  merits.  After  stating  that  he  had 
l>ccn  more  than  47  years  in  the  service  of  the  East 
India  Company,  it  coutinnes,  *^  From  the  earliest 
period  of  his  service,  he  was  remarkable  among 
other  men.  His  sonnd  and  vigorous  nnderstand- 
ing,  Iiis  transcendent  talents,  his  indefatigable 
application,  Iiis  varied  stores  of  knowledge,  Iiis 
attainments  as  an  Oriental  scholar,  his  intimate 
acquaintance  with  tlie  habits  and  feelings  of  the 
native  soldiers,  and  inhabitants  generally,  his  pa- 
tience, temper,  facility  of  access,  and  kindness  of 
m«iuucr,  would  have  insured  liim  distinction  in  any 
line  of  employment.  These  qualities  were  admi- 
rably adapted  to  the  duties  which  he  had  to  per- 
form in  those  provinces  where  he  had  long  been 
known  by  the  appellation  of  Father  of  the  people." 

Mure,  a  surname,  the  same  as  More,  Miur,  and  Moore. 
The  chii'f  uf  the  nuir.e  ui  Scotland  was  Mure  of  Rovallan,  in 
Ayrshire,  whose  family,  termin.iting  in  an  heiress,  is  now  re- 
presented by  the  noble  family  of  Loudoan,  the  head  of  which 
in  marquis  of  Il.'ustings  in  the  peerage  of  Great  Britain.  Id 
1825  was  published  .it  Gl.-i^gow  a  work  entitled  The  Histo- 
ric and  Dcscifnt  of  the  House  of  Rownllane.  By  Sir  William 
3Iun>,  kniglit,  of  Kowallan,  written  in,  or  prior  to  1657/  in 
which  it  is  stated  that  it  was  a  tradition  of  their  hoose  that 
they  came  originally  from  "  the  ancient  tribe  of  0*More  in 
Ireland."  In  a  note,  the  editor,  William  Muir,  says,  "The 
Humame  *Muro*  certainly  occurs  very  early  in  all  the  three 
British  kingdoms,  and  is  most  probably  of  Celtic  origin,"  and 
adds,  *'  in  most  early  writings  in  which  the  name  is  found, 
accordant  with  the  idiomatic  usngc  of  Celtic  patronymics,  the 
preposition  de  is  omitted,  which  so  invariably  accompanies 
all  early  Saxon  designations."  This,  however,  is  a  mistake,  as 
David  do  More,  of  the  hoiisc  of  Polkelly,  Renfrewshire,  ap- 
pears as  a  witness  to  a  charter  of  Alexander  II.  WUlidmi 
de  Mora  and  Ijaurtntli  de  Mora  also  occur  in  two  charters 
irrnntcd  bv  Robert  the  Bruce. 

The  first  on  record  of  the  family  is  stated  to  have  been  the 
.iliovo-nanied  David  de  More.  His  successor  is  supposed  to 
have  been  Sir  Gilchrist  More,  the  first  of  the  name  mention- 
ed in  the  family  *  Ilistorie.'  In  the  beginning  of  the  reign  of 
Alex.nnder  111.,  Sir  Walter  Cumyn  took  foreible  possession  of 
the  house  and  living  of  Kowallan,  "  tlie  owner  thereof,  Gil- 
ihrist  More,  being  rfdnctcd  for  his  safety  to  keep  dose  m  his 
cistle  of  Pokellie."    The  latter  distinguished  himself  at  the 


battto  of  Luigi  in  1268,  and  Ibr  Us  bimvay  wm  knigJbUd. 
"At  which  time,**  nyt  the  < Hiatorie,* " Sir  GDdnirt  wm n- 
poned  to  liif  whole  inberitance,  and  gifted  with  the  Imb 
belonging  to  Sir  Walter  Gaming  before  mentioned,  a  man 
not  of  the  meanest  of  that  powerful  tribe,  which  lor  migiit 
and  nunber  hare  ecaroelie  to  thii  day  been  equalled  in 
this  land.**  He  married  Isobel,  dangbter  and  heiress  of  the 
said  Sir  Walter  Cnmjn,  and  on  the  death  of  his  father-in- 
law  he  foond  himself  secnred  not  only  in  the  title  and  M 
poesession  of  his  old  inheritance,  bat  also  in  the  besder  lands 
wherrin  he  sncoeeded  to  Sir  Walter  Gaming^  within  the  sbsr- 
iflUom  of  Rozbargh.  Sir  Gilchrist  "  disponed  to  his  kinsmsn 
Ranald  More,  who  had  come  pnrposlie  from  Ireland  lor  his 
assistance**  in  the  time  of  his  troaUes,  and  also  at  the  battle 
of  Largs,  the  lands  of  PoUuUie,  which  appear  to  have  bscn 
the  original  inheritance  of  the  family.  He  died  **  aboot  the 
year  1280,  near  the  80  year  of  his  age,"  and  was  bnried 
"  with  his  forfathers  in  his  own  bariell  place  in  the  Mmes 
Isle  at  Kilmarnock.**  He  had  a  son,  Archibald,  and  two 
daughters,  KlizalM>th,  the  wife  of  Sir  Godfrey  Ross,  and  Ani- 
cio,  married  to  Ricliard  Boyle  of  Kclbnme,  ancestor  of  the 
earls  of  Glasgow. 

Arehibald  was  slain  at  Berwick  when  that  town  was  taken 
by  the  English,  and  the  army  of  John  Baliol  totally  rooted, 
in  1297.  By  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Sir  John  Montgomerii 
of  Eastwood,  he  had,  with  two  daughters,  William,  his  sao- 
cessor.  He  is  said  to  havo  had  other  sons,  the  sopposed  an- 
cestors of  the  Mures  of  Caldwell  and  Auchindrane. 

In  the  Ragman  Roll,  among  those  barons  who  swore  Unity 
to  Edward  I.  in  1296,  we  find  the  names  of  Gilchrist  Moif 
of  Craig  and  Reginald  More  de  Craig,  that  is,  the  Craig  ol 
Rowallan.  The  former  is  stated  to  have  been  the  ancestor  cl 
the  ^lures  of  Polkellie,  who,  Kisbet  thinks,  were  **  the  stm 
of  the  Mnres,  and  an  ancienter  family  than  the  Rowallan." 
The  latter  was  in  1329  chamberlain  of  Scotland. 

William  More,  the  son  .ind  successor  of  Arehibald,  married 
a  daughter  of  the  house  of  Craigie,  then  Lindsay,  and  with 
two  daughtent,  h.od  a  son,  Adam,  who  saoceeded  him.  Of 
William  honourable  mention  is  made  in  an  indenture  of  trace 
with  England  in  the  nonage  of  King  David,  wherein  be  ii 
designated  Sir  William.  He  died  abont  the  time  when  KinK 
David  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Durham,  fought 
17th  October  1.34G.  There  is  snpposcd  to  have  been  an  older 
son  than  Adam,  named  Revnold.  The  editor  of  the  '  Htito- 
rie,*  on  the  authority  of  Crawford's  Offi(xn  of  State,  (vol  L 
p.  290,)  says  in  a  note :  R^/noIdy  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Wil- 
liam More,  was  one  of  the  hostages  left  in  England  at  Da- 
vid's redemption.  This  is  certainly  the  s.ime  Sir  William 
mentioned  above,  but  whether  of  Rowallan  seems  still  doubt- 
ful ;  if  so,  he  must  have  lived  long  after  1348.  There  is  a 
William  More,  Miles,  mentioned  in  M'Farlane's  MS.,  as  liv- 
ing in  1363.  Supposing  this  Sir  William  Bfore  to  have  been 
of  Rowallan,  Reynold  probably  never  returned  from  England, 
and  thus  the  ei^tate  mny  have  fallen  to  Sir  Adam,  a  yonngfr 
son.  During  the  long  protracted  payment  of  the  king's  ran- 
som, many  of  the  host.iges  died  in  confinement. 

Sir  Adam  More,  who,  *'  in  1ms  father's  anld  nge,"  had  the 
management  of  all  his  affairs,  both  priv.ite  .ind  public,  conri- 
derably  enlarged  and  improved  the  estate.  He  married,  in 
his  younger  years,  Janot  Mure,  heiress  of  Polkellie,  grand- 
daughter of  Ranald  More,  and  thus  restored  that  estate  to 
the  family.  By  this  mnrri.ige  he  had  two  sons.  Sir  Adam, 
his  successor,  and  Andrew,  and  a  daughter,  Elizabeth,  mar- 
ried in  1348,  to  Robert,  the  high  steward,  afterwards  King 
Robert  II.  She  was  a  Indy  ofgre.it  beauty  and  rare  virtues, 
and  attracted  the  high  steward's  reganl  in  his  yonnger  yean 


T.J.  I  j 


MURE 


220 


OF  ROWALLAN. 


three  dauj^bteni.  The  sons  were,  John,  his  itncceMor ;  Arch- 
ibmli],  called  *Mickle  Arvhihald;'  Patrick  Bord.  and  James. 
From  Pitcaim*8  Criminal  Trialis  we  learn  tiiiit  **Nov.  3. 
ir>08.— Pat  rick  Bojde,  brother  to  the  laird  of  Rowallan,** 
and  27  others,  were  **  conricted  of  art  and  port  of  convocation 
of  the  lie^s  against  the  act  of  parliament,  coming  to  the  kirk 
of  Stewarton,  in  company  witli  John  Mare  of  Rowallan,  for 
the  ofBoc  of  parish  clork  of  tlie  same  kirk,  against  Robert 
Cunyn^liame  of  Cnnynghamehed  and  his  senrantM,  in  the 
year  1508 ;"  and  that  "  James  Muir,  brother  to  tlie  laird  of 
Rowalloun  was,  in  1508,  convicted  of  art  and  port  of  the 
forethonglit  felon j  and  oppression  dona  tu  John  Mowat,  ju- 
nior, laird  of  Busbie,  and  Andrew  Stevinstone,  in  the  town  of 
Stewarton,  in  company  with  the  laird  of  Rowalloun.**  John 
is  said  tu  have  "  d<>cea8t  before  Robert  his  father  in  1501  ;** 
if  so,  he  must  have  possessed  the  estate  on  his  father's  resig- 
nation. Tiie  editor  adds  in  a  note,  that  he  was  dead  in  1495. 
A  long  feud  had  cxihted  betwixt  the  lairds  of  Crawfbrdland 
anil  Rijvrallan,  the  latter  being  superior  of  the  lands  of  Ar- 
doch  OS  Crawfurdland  was  fint  called,  during  which  the  evi- 
dents  of  both  hoOM-s  were  destroyed.  In  a  justice-eyre,  held 
at  Ayr  alnrnt  1470  by  John,  I^rd  Carlyle,  chief  justice  of 
Scotland  on  the  snath  side  of  the  Forth,  Robert  Muir  of 
Rowallan  and  .John  Muir  hb  son,  and  others  their  accom- 
plices, were  iiidicteil  for  breaking  the  king's  peace  against 
Archibald  Craufunl  uf  Cniufurdland. 

John  Mure  of  Rowallan,  the  eldest  son,  and  grandson  of 
Robert  "  the  Rud,"  married  Margaret,  third  daughter  of  Ar- 
chiball  Boyd  of  Bonshaw,  brother  of  Thomas,  master  of 
Bovd.  created  earl  of  Arran  about  14C7.  This  ladv  was  the 
means  of  putting  an  end  to  the  foud  df  the  Rowallan  f:imily 
with  the  Crawfurds.     In  her  vouth  she  had  been  nn'strcss  to 

* 

James  IV.,  by  uhoni,  with  a  sun,  Alexander,  bishop  of  St. 
Andrews,  sin*  had  a  dau£;htcr,  Catherine  Stewart,  married  to 
the  third  carl  of  Mt)rton.  She  afterwards  "  procured  to  her- 
self the  ward  of  the  laird  of  Rowallan,  John  Muir,  and  mar- 
ried him."  Tliev  had  saline  of  the  lands  of  Waruockland, 
the  gift  of  Jamt-s  IV.,  in  January  1498.  This  John  ilure  of 
Rowallan  was  .sl.iin  at  Flodden  in  September  1513.  He  had 
four  sons  and  four  daughters. 

Mungo,  his  clde«it.  son,  succeeded  him.  His  half-sister, 
Catherine,  countess  of  Morton,  had  three  daughters,  the  eld- 
est of  whom,  Ijidy  Margiret  Douglas,  married  the  regent 
earl  of  Arran,  duke  of  Chatelheniult,  ancestor  of  the  dukes 
of  Hamilton  ;  the  second.  Lady  Beatrix,  married  Ix>rd  Max- 
well ;  and  the  younj^st,  Lady  Elizabeth,  became  the  wife  of 
the  regent  Morton.  These  noblcnien,  therefore,  stood  in  near 
relit Ion.«4liip  to  Mumj;o  Mure  of  Rowallan,  which  they  were 
all  very  ready,  tlu!  regent  Morton  in  partic»il:ir,  to  acknow- 
ledge. Mungo  Mure  of  Kowallnn  was  with  Robert  Boyd  of 
the  Kilmarnock  family  when  he  arrived,  with  a  party  of  horse, 
to  the  n.4si.stance  of  the  regent  An\in  in  the  skirmish  at  GIxh- 
gow,  ill  lolJ,  with  the  earl  of  Glencaim.  In  the  Appendix 
to  the  Mlistorie*  there  is  an  account  of  "  the  behaviour  of 
the  house  of  Kilmarnock  towardis  the  house  uf  Rowallaue, 
and  of  thair  house  towards  them,"'  in  which  he  is  thus  refer- 
red to:  *'  It  is  understandit  that  Mungow  Muir  of  Rowallane, 
quhoi.H  mother  wes  Boyd,  joj-nit  with  Robert  Boyd  guidmane 
of  Kiimnmock,  in  seeking  revengement  of  the  slaughter  of 
James  Boyd,  the  king's  sisteris  sone,  qnlio  sould  h.nve  bene 
Lord  Boyd,  hot  befoir  he  was  fullie  restorrit  was  slaiuo  be  the 
earl  of  Kglintoune.  Kixt,  my  lord  of  Glencaime  proponing 
ane  richt  to  the  barronrio  <-f  Kilmarnock  pn)cla»rnir  ane  court 
to  be  lioldin  at  the  Knockanlaw,  quhair  the  said  Robert  Boyd 
guidmane  of  Kihiiuniock  and  Mongow  Muir  of  Rowallane, 
with  the  assistance  of  thair  friends,  keipit  the  said  day  and 


plaee  of  eoort,  oflbit  battel  to  the  tud  earl  of  GlaDedm,  ad 
Btayit  liim  from  his  pictendit  ooort  hoildin^  Tfaridfie,  tbe 
foirsud  Robert  Boyd  goidmaoe  of  Kilmaraock,  and  the  wd 
Mnngow  Muir  of  Rowallane,  entirit  in  the  field  of  QUagom, 
the  said  Mungow  being  lauglie  better  aooompanied  then  the 
foiraaid  Robert,  they  behaTit  thenuelfe  to  ndiantlie  in  that 
fact  that  the  Dnik  Hamiltone  qnho  raekonit  both  his  Ijfeaad 
honour  to  be  picaenrit  be  thair  handfai,  mud  the  sud  Robat 
Boyd,  gnidman  of  Kilmarnock,  Lord  Bojd,  lyk  alao  at  he 
revardit  the  said  Mungow  Muir  with  djren  faar  g^ftia.  The 
aaid  Robert  Boyd  hichlie  eateemit  of  the  mid  Mnngow  Moir 
of  RowalUne  and  gave  him  the  fiist  plaee  of  hononr  al  Uf 
dayia,  acknawleging  the  alteration  of  hia  eetait  to  the  worthi- 
nea  of  the  said  Mnngowia  handia."  Thia  Mimgo  is  pvtico- 
lariy  mentioned  as  baring  greatly  improved  the  old  eastle  of 
Rowallan.  He  was  slain  in  battle  at  nnkiefield  **  at  the 
black  Satterday,  in  the  yeare  of  our  lord  1547."  He  married 
Isabel,  daughter  of  Sir  Hugh  Campbell  of  Loodonn,  sheriff  of 
Ayr,  and  had  five  sons  and  six  daughters. 

His  eldest  son,  John  Mnre  of  Rowallan,  took  great  delight 
in  ydanting,  and  built  a  portion  of  Rowallan  castle.  He 
*Mived  gratiouslie,**  says  the  *  Historic,*  and  'Mied  in  1581,  in 
the  66th  year  of  his  age."  The  year  xa  snppnsed  to  be  s 
mistake  for  1591,  as  it  is  given  in  the  family  Genealogical 
tree,  drawn  up  in  1597.  A  *  letter  of  Sleance,'  subscribed  at 
Imne  and  Kilwinning,  16th  and  17th  March  1571,  is  insert- 
ed in  the  .Appendix  to  the  '  Historic*  so  often  qooted,  fron 
Alexander  Cowper,  mason  in  Kilwinning,  *^  wyth  consent  snd 
assent**  of  ccitain  persons  named,  his  "  chafe  and  captall 
bnmchis,  bayth  on  the  father  sydc  and  mother  syde,**  grant> 
ing  his  remiMion,  free  forgiveness  and  pardon  to  John  Mwe 
of  Rowallan,  William  Murvf,  his  son  and  heir,  John  Mnre  and 
Mungo  Mure,  his  sons,  and  two  others,  and  "  thair  oomplieei, 
kin,  freindis,  allys,  assiittaris  and  parttakeria,  the  crewaD 
wonding,  hurting  and  binding  of  me,  the  said  Alexander,  to 
the  great  efiusione  of  my  blude,  done  and  committit  be  the 
saidis  persones  thair  seruandis  and  complicis,**  in  the  month 
of  Febmarv,  1570.  In  March  1571  Robert  Lord  Bord  and 
John  Mure  of  Rowallan  were  charged  hy  the  regent  Mar  to 
appear  before  the  secret  council,  with  a  view  to  adjust  the 
feud  which  prevailed  between  the  families  of  Kilmarnock  and 
Rowallan.  The  account  abox-e  quoted  of  the  mutual  friendly 
ofEces  between  these  families  appears  to  have  been  drawn  up 
in  reference  to  this  charge.  It  redtes  many  good  deeds  done 
by  the  Mnres  to  the  Boyd.«,  in  particular,  amongst  others^ 
that  after  Robert,  master  of  Boyd,  had  slain  Sir  NeO  Mont- 
gomcrie  of  Ijiinshaw,  he  w.is  received  and  concealed  by  John 
Muir  of  Rowallan,  who,  with  his  friends  and  servants,  was 
the  means  of  saving  his  life,  when  pursued  by  the  Montgom- 
eries ;  and  also  that  after  the  battle  of  I^ngside  he  kindly 
received  the  said  Robert,  being  then  Lord  Boyd,  although  he 
had  fallen  into  disfavour  with  the  regent  Moray,  and  modi 
more  to  the  s;ime  purport.  John  Muir  of  Rowallan  subscribed 
the  bond  in  support  of  the  Reformation  in  1562,  and  the 
sjime  vear  he  was  a  member  of  the  Scottish  estates.  In 
1568,  when  Queen  Maiy  escaped  from  Ix>chleven  castle,  sbe 
wrote  the  laird  of  Rowallan  a  letter  dated  6th  I^Iay  that  year, 
requiring  him  to  meet  her  at  Hamilton,  as  soon  as  he  ounld 
muster  his  retainers,  all  well  armed  for  her  service.  It  does 
not  a])pe:ir,  however,  that  he  complied  with  the  summoni. 
In  1584  .John  Mure  of  Rowallan,  *'  and  his  spouse  and  sx 
|)crsons  with  them  in  company,**  received  a  license  fmm  James 
VI.,  to  eat  flesh  in  Lent,  and  upon  Wednesdays,  Fridai's,  and 
Saturdays  "  for  ane  zeir  next  hereafter,**  and  in  Febmarv  1588 
he  had  the  present  of  a  gray  ci<urser  from  his  kinsman,  the  earl 
of  I^Iorton,  on  the  latter  going  abroad.     In  the  letter  wUch 


It 


MCRE, 

of  that  ilk,  th«  Hnu 
ID  tlw  murder  of  hit  oouim,  Hngh, 

of  Citldvtil,  wu  OD*  ef  th>JDi7 
■ppointcd  In  1580  ta  tc;  lb«  Lord  Rul]i?«i, 
Scotlmd,  for  Uie  mOnlir  of  David  Riuio.    ]Ia  vaa  oo  1 
of  groat  intimaGJ  and  confidenn  bj  v 

ha  waa  knighted,  and 

I  letten  addrentd  to  liim  |^ 


it  Caldwc 


,  haTobi 


B  lint 


>^\% 


ir  AtchibiJd  Murr,  lord  proroat  of  '^^^^^ 
pDainl  bj  bis  lirir  fFmalo  to  John 
and  ia  now  held  by  Uii  deacenduit,  iu  fan  of  th«  Caldircll 

n'miam  Mon  of  Caldwell,  tho  foarth  in  HKOnuon  to  Sir 
Robert,  iraa  *  atnoRch  a  fair  othtr 

iFMt'CODntrj  etntlsmtn  of  tntt  in  anni 

at  ChitlerilHt,  in  Iho  pariah 

less,  and  having  collected  a  bodj  of  hononwn,  amonntinf; 
to  abgut  Bfij  tiutBj  of  the  trnantiy  of 

Caldwdl  and  TNP'^  VS 


Lanark.     On  the  way,  finding 
StMMiUKI  hj  tb«  king's  troops,  under  General 

DalitU,  tlioj  retraced  tlirir  steps,  and 
wu  attainted,  fled  £Vfl  died  in  eiUe.   Hiacstaira 

;?c:t^  ;  and  Caldireiri  ladt.  a 

with  two 
^?  nnderwent  ^^ 

Barbara  obtain,  hj 

■pecial  act  of  parluiment,  'k        reatontion 

of  the  fsmilj  ettates.  She  married  John  Fairlie  of  that  itk, 
but  djlnf!  witliout  isiue,  was  succeeded,  in  '"Hi 

man,  William  llun,  fourth 
from  William,  WiHi  i 

Caldwell  in  15S9.    This  William  in  the 

{wnecation  of  the  timea.  liBring  been  impriioned  and  Sued, 
on  a  oharf^  of  A  Journal  of  a  tour 

bt  him  tliroDgli  '^i  169C,  is 

printed  amonc  Ilie  '  Cnldwell  Paprn.'  Djing  without  inar, 
he  was  nicnednl  br  hii  nephew,  William  Mnre,  eldnt  aon 
DfMare  of  RhodJcna  in  Ireland,     lliaaon,  v4: 

if^^K^  from  1742  to  17GI,  was  ap- 
pointed onaS  in  Sfolland  in  Ihn 
latter  jear.  In  I  ^<  or  Uttie  Caldwell 
of  tlie  estate  Uie 
Mures  had  preTiouslj  izn  Eastn- Caldwell. 
BiTDD  Mura  was  an  i  of  Daiid  Hume  tlie 
bistorian,  and  the  author  of  one  or  two  tracts  on  apocalatire 
p«nta  of  political  economj.  printed  for  priralo  ciicnlatioi. 
i-g!^;^^  and  miecrlbneooa  papen  oceapjr  the 
(jrealer  part  of  two  of  the  three  rolnmes 
Papen.'  He  wiui  rector  of  the  univcru^  of  Glasgow  in 
lTS4-e,  and  died  in  177G. 

His  eldest  eon,  Colonel  William  Iilnre  of  Caldwell,  was  the 
friend  of  Sir  John  Moore,  He  waa 

rector  of  the  Dnirenilj  of  married 

Anne,  eldest  daughter  of  ffi  barLofDna- 

•ksT,  with  baoe,  and  diwl  Februaij  9,  USt. 


5IK  AVlLLIA^ir. 


doB^tarof 

wilhiaaBa;  oolonslof  A 

miUtia;  was  ».P.  fur  that  1BS3;  Isrd- 

reetOF  of  Glaapiw  nniTenitj  ia  ^  *Brirf 

Renia^  on  of  the  Egrptian   Djimtm; 

■lowing  the  FatlaCT  of  thi  Ejatem  laid  down  bp  Ummt. 

Champollioa,  in  Two  I.etten 

don,  18S9,  8to; 

disc  of  Anoent 

Gnees^'  IMt;  tml 

eompilerr>i!£  Papen.'  R*  did  at  London,  Apil 

1, 18eo,:y 

Hia  eUest  son,  WilEnn  Unn  of  Caldwril,  limt.-atla)ul 

Scots  fnailier  gnarda,  m.  3U  duugbler  "^ 

David  Mure,  bom  in  1810,  3d  son  of  CoL  VVilliam  H 
wtiodiedin  - '^  the  Scotliah  bar  intbs 

latter  je:ir.  In  1853hewai  appointed  iheriffof  PefthaUn, 
and  in  IBoS  aolicitsr-genenl  fur  Scotland;  lord-advocati  ia 
April  lSo9,  and  elected  M.P.  (or  Duleshire  looa  after. 

The  Mutts  of  Aoehiudiune  were  loof;  a  flourialiing  toil; 

in  tlie  In  IGll,  .Tahn  Mura  of  Aneliin- 

drane  murder  of  a  retainer  of  Kennedjef 

where  tliera        «c  WXI. 

was  discovered  in  a  remarkable 
nurdeied  man  h»i  been  buried  in  Girvan  diDRhjard,  but 
he  laird  of  Cnliean  dreaming  of  him  in  hia  sleep,  oaoaid  Ui 
odT  to  ha    ^W  all  who  lited  n««  lo 

ome  *o  bat  AnebindtiM 

and  S^  till  -^t. 


blood  sprang  fram  it, 
'j  pnt  to  the  tot- 
-_3«imndff. 
Sir  Walter  ScolL 


mn.  -The  •Mgmam 

is  one  of  lbs  dramatic 

lilURC,  Sir  AVili.iam,  of  Rowallan,  a  p 
the  I'lli  centur}-,  w«a  borii  in  1594.  He  wu  tlie 
eldest  soil  of  Sir  AVilliam  Muro  of  Bowttlliin,  li.r 
his  wife,  Elizabctb,  dangliler  of  Uont^meiy  «l 
Ilazlehead,  and  sister  of  Alexander  Montgomerj, 
aathor  of  '  Tlio  Clicrrie  and  the  Sloe.'  Be  ob- 
tained an  excellent  classical  education,  ood  in  hii 
earl7  years  began  to  cultivate  a  taite  fi>r  poetiy. 
The  '  Historic '  of  Uis  fiimilj'  above  qaoted  uyi  of 
him:  "Tliis  Sir  William  was  plotis  and 
and  liad  an  excellent  vein  in  poeslc ;  he  dcljied 
mnch  iu  bailding  and  plantiug."  Befi 
liclli  Tcar  lie  attempted  a  poetical  v 
story  of  Dido  and  Eiicoii,  from  Virgil.  Ia  Iba 
Muse's  Welcome,'  a  collection  of  poems  and  ad- 
diTisses  mndc  to  King  James  on  liis  viuting  Scot- 
Iniid  in  IGIT,  there  ia  an  address  by  Mnre  of  Bow- 
allnu.    In  1628,  he  published  a  translation,  : 


MURRAY 


224 


OF  TOnCHADAM. 


il 


i  I 


II 


qntnoe  Mramed  tbe  lurnmina  and  •mil  of  Pultcaej.  He 
BubHcquentl V  lield  the  office  of  lecretary  at  war ;  was  oolonel 
of  the  18th  foot,  and  a  general  in  the  armj.  He  died  April 
26,  1811,  learing  no  iarae,  when  hie  half-brather,  Sir  John 
Moirmj,  became  8th  baronet.  Sir  John  was  a  lientanant- 
l^eral  in  the  ann  j,  and  colonel  of  the  56th  foot  He  died, 
withoat  ieane,  in  1827,  when  the  title  and  estates  derolred 
upon  his  brother,  the  Rev.  Sir  William  Murray,  who  died 
Maj  14, 1842.  The  eldest  son  of  the  latter,  Sir  James  PnU 
teney  Mnrrar,  10th  baronet,  died  nnmarried,  Feb.  2,  1848. 
His  brother,  Sir  Robert  Mnrrav,  bom  Frb.  1, 1815,  became 
11th  baronrt;  married,  in  1839,  Sosan-Catherine  Sanders, 
widow  of  Adolplins  Cottin  Murray,  Esq.,  and  2d  daughter 
and  co-heir  of  John  Alarray,  Esq.  of  Ardelerbary,  Herts, 
lineally  deitcended  from  Sir  William  Mnrray,  father  of  1st 
enrl  of  Tullibardine ;  with  issue,  a  son,  William  Robert,  28d 
rusiliers,  bom  in  1840,  and  a  daughter. 


The  first  baronet  of  the  Stanhope  family  was  Sir  H^HIliam 
Murray  of  Stanhope,  an  active  supporter  of  the  royal  cause 
during  the  ci\*il  wars,  who  for  his  loyalty  was  created  a  bar- 
onet of  Nora  Scotia,  after  the  Restoration,  with  remainder  to 
hit  heirs  male  whatsoever,  13th  Febraary  1C64.  His  ances- 
tor, John  Murray  of  Falahill,  descended  from  Archibald  dc 
MoraTia,  mentioned  in  the  chartnlary  of  Newbottle  in  1280. 
was  Icnown  in  history  as  the  outlaw  Murray.  He  died  in 
the  early  part  of  the  reign  of  James  V.  His  exploits  are  com- 
memorated in  one  of  the  ballads  of  the  *  Minstrelsy  of  the  Scot- 
tish Border.*  He  married  Lady  Margaret  Hepbum,  and  had. 
with  three  daughters,  two  sons.  Ilis  eldest  son,  John  Mnr- 
ray of  Falaltill,  was  sncestor  of  the  Muirays  of  Philiphaugh. 
His  second  son,  William  Murray,  married  Janet,  daughter 
and  heiress  of  William  Romanno  of  that  ilk,  Peeble»-shire, 
and  had  a  son,  William  I^furray  of  Romanno,  Hying  in  De- 
cember 1531.  The  great-grandson  of  the  latter,  Sir  Dairid 
Murray,  who  was  knighted  by  Charles  I.,  acqmred  the  lands 
of  Stanhope  in  the  same  county,  and  was  the  father  of  Sir 
William  Murray,  the  fint  baronet  of  Stanhope.  Sir  Darid 
Murray,  the  fourth  baronet,  was  implicated  in  the  rebellion 
of  1745,  and  received  sentence  of  death  at  York  the  follow- 
■ng  year,  but  was  subaequently  pardoned  on  condition  of  his 
leaving  the  conntry  for  life.  The  family  estatet  were  sold 
rmder  the  sutliority  of  the  court  of  sesrion.  Sir  David  died 
in  exile,  without  issue,  when  the  representation  of  the  family 
Jevolved  on  his  uncle,  Chsries  IMurray,  collector  of  the  cus- 
toms at  Borrowstownnen,  who,  had  the  title  not  been  forfeit- 
ed, would  have  been  fifth  baronet.  His  son,  Sir  David  Mnr- 
ray, died  without  issue  at  Tieghom,  19th  October  1770.  Tlie 
represent.ition  of  the  family  then  devolved  on  John  Murray 
>if  Rrougliton,  the  well-known  secretary  to  Prince  Charley. 
This  personage  having  assumed  the  title  after  the  general  art 
•if  revisal,  became  Sir  John  Murray  of  Broughton,  baronet 
'  fe  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Colonel  Robert  Ferguson, 
'•rother  of  William  Ferguson  of  Carloch,  Nithsdale,  and  had 
'■  Iiree  sons,  David,  his  heir,  Robert,  and  Thomas,  the  last  a 
Mcutenant- general  in  the  army.  Sir  John  died  6th  Decem- 
'>er  1777.  His  eldest  son,  Sir  David,  a  naval  officer,  was 
succeedeil,  on  his  death  in  June  1791,  by  his  brother,  Sir 
Robert,  ninth  baronet  The  son  of  the  latter,  Sir  David, 
lieoame  the  tenth  baronet  in  1794,  and  on  his  death,  without 
■ssue,  was  succeeded  by  his  brother.  Sir  John  Murray,  elev- 
enth baronet ;  married,  witli  issue. 


The  first  baronet  of  the  Ochtertyre  family  was  William 
Moray  of  Ochtertyre,  who  was  created  a  baronet  of  Nova 
Sootia,  with  remainder  to  his  heira  male,  Tth  Jnoe  1678. 


He  was  deseended  from  Patrick  Moray,  tbt  jbit  glyled  if 
Ochtertyre,  who  died  in  1476.  a  too  of  Sir  Da^  Hony  if 
Tullibardine.  The  family  continued  to  spell  their  oama  Mo- 
ray till  1739,  when  the  present  orthogra^y  wia  adopted  hf 
Sir  William,  8d  baranet  Sur  WUliam  Muny,  6th  fawmsC, 
married  Ijidy  Augusta  Mackeniie,  youngtit  dangfatv  of  Id 
earl  of  Cromartie ;  issue,  8  sons  and  2  daughters  He  disd 
in  1800.  Of  General  Sir  George  Murray,  G.CB.,  bk  neopd 
son,  a  memoir  is  given  at  page  282  in  larger  type. 

The  eldeat  son.  Sir  Patrick  Murray,  6th  baronet,  bom  Feb. 
8,  1771,  passed  advoi-ate  at  the  Scottish  bar  in  1798,  and  was 
appointed  a  baron  of  the  court  of  exchequer  in  ScoUaad  in 
1820.  He  died  June  1,1887.  By  hit  wife.  Lady  Maiy  Hops^ 
youngest  daughter  of  the  2d  eari  of  Hopetoun,  he  had  5 
and  4  daughtem  Capt  John  Murray,  the  2d  snn, 
the  name  of  Gartahore,  on  succeeding  to  the  estate  of  thst 
name  in  Dumbartonshire.    (See  vol.  iL  page  284.) 

Sir  William  Keith  Murray,  the  eldest  son,  7th  bannoC  of 
Ochtertyre.  bom  in  1801,  married  l»t,  Helen  Margaret  OG- 
phant,  only  child  and  heiress  of  Sir  Alexander  Keith  of  Dm- 
nottar,  knight  marischal  of  Scotland ;  issue,  10  sons  and  8 
daughters;  2dlv,  Ijidy  Adelaide,  youngest  daughter  of  1st 
marquis  of  Hastings.  He  assumed  the  name  of  Keith,  on  his 
marriage  with  liia  first  wife,  and  on  her  death  in  Oct.  1852, 
his  eldest  son,  Putrick,  bom  Jan.  27,  1835,  captain  grena- 
(iier  guarda,  (retired  in  June  1861.)  feucceeded  to  the  estates 
of  Dunnottar,  Kiucardineshiro,  and  Ravelston,  &!id  Lothiso. 
Sir  William  died  Oct  16,  1861,  wlicn  liia  eldest  son.  Sir  Pa- 
trick, became  8th  baronet. 

The  Mnrrays  of  Tonchadam  arc  supposed  to  derive  fnn 
the  Morays,  lords  of  Botliwell.  Tlieir  progenitor.  Sir  Wil- 
lism  de  Moravia,  demgned  of  Sanford,  joined  Robert  the 
Brace,  but  being  taken  prisoner  by  the  English,  was  sent  to 
Tendon  in  1306,  and  remained  in  captivity  there  until  ex- 
changed after  the  battle  of  Bnnnockbnm.  His  son  and  iue- 
cmor,  Sir  Andrew  de  Mor.ivia,  called  by  David  II.  "our 
dear  blood  relation,**  obtained  from  that  monarch  a  charter 
of  the  lands  of  Kepmad  in  Stirlitig»lnrc,  dated  10th  Msv 
1365.  This  was  his  first  acquisition  in  that  county.  On 
28th  .Tulv  1369  he  received  another  roval  charter  of  the  laadi 
of  Toulclieadam,  as  Touchadam  was  tlien  called,  and  Tulch- 
maler,  in  the  same  county.  His  great-grandson  and  reprs- 
sentative,  William  Mnrray  of  Tonchnd.im,  waa  grvtiflr  to 
James  II.,  and  was  appointed  constable  of  Stirling  castle 
under  James  TIT.  Hia  eldest  son,  David  Murray  of  Tonch- 
adam, having  no  iaane,  made  a  resignation  of  his  whole  estate 
to  his  nephew,  John  Murray  of  Gawamore,  captunofthe 
king*s  guards  and  lord  provost  of  Edinburgh,  who  aucoeeded 
to  the  same  on  the  death  of  his  uncle,  about  1474.  He  was 
n  firm  and  devoted  adherer.t  of  Jamea  IIT.,  and  after  tlie  bit* 
tie  of  Sauchiebum  he  was  deprived  of  a  considerable  portioo 
of  his  lands.  A  great  number  of  the  family  writs  were  at 
the  same  time  embezzled  or  lost  Win  son,  William  Mnrrsy, 
the  seventh  from  the  founder  of  the  family.  Sir  Andrew  dt 
Mora^ia,  alMiit  15G8,  married  Agnes,  one  of  the  daughtsa 
and  coheireaxcs  of  James  Cuninghame  of  Polmaise,  Stirlii^ 
ahire.  whereby  he  acquired  that  estate.  His  son  and  sucesi 
sor.  Sir  ,Tohn  Mnrray,  knight,  got  a  charter  under  the  gnat 
seal  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Polmaise,  8th  April  1588L 
Hift  grandson,  Sir  William  Murray  of  Touchadam  and  Pol- 
niaise,  obtained  firom  Charles  I.  a  charter  of  the  lands  ef 
Cowie  in  1636.  During  the  civil  wars,  he  mpported  the 
royal  cause,  and  was  at  the  battle  of  Preston  in  1648,  when 
the  army  of  the  royalists  under  the  duke  of  Hanulton  was 
defeated.     In  1654  he  was  fined   by  Cromwell  £1,500. 


MURRAY, 


226 


SIR  ROBERT. 


1 


His  eldest  son,  Sir  James  Murray  of  Phinpluiii<;h,  bum  in 
IGod,  was  admitted  a  lord  of  session  in  1689,  and  appointed 
lord-ref^ter  in  1705.  On  his  death  in  1708,  he  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  eldest  son,  John  Mnrraj  of  Philiphaogh,  M.P. 
from  1725  till  his  decease  in  1753.  This  gentleman's  fourth 
son,  Charles,  married  a  sister  of  Robert  Scott,  Esq.  of  Danes- 
field,  Bucks,  and  was  grandfather  of  Chariet  Robert  Soott 
Murray,  Esq.  of  Danesfield,  M.P.  for  that  county. 

The  eldest  son,  John  Murray  of  Philipiiauglt,  was  several 
times  M.P.  for  the  county  of  Selkirk,  and  once  fur  the  Sel- 
kirk burghs,  after  a  severe  and  expensive  contest  with  Mr. 
Dundas.  He  died  in  1800.  His  eldest  son,  John  Murray  of 
Philiphaugh,  died,  unmarried,  in  1830,  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  only  sun-iving  brother,  James  Murray  of  Philiphaugh, 
the  17Ui  of  the  family,  in  a  direct  lino;  married,  with  issue. 


The  Murrays  of  Lintrose,  Perthshire,  are  a  junior  branch 
of  the  Murrays  of  Ochtertyre,  bein;;  derived  from  Mungo 
Murray,  bom  15th  July  1G62,  youngest  son  of  Sir  William 
Murray  of  Ochtertyre,  baronet,  by  Ifabel,  his  wife,  the 
daughter  of  John  Oliphant,  Esq.  of  Badielton.  Captain 
William  Murmv,  a  son  of  this  familv,  8er%'ed  with  the  42d 
Highlanders,  under  Wulfe,  in  America,  und  afterwards  in  the 
West  Indies.  Subsequently,  with  the  rank  of  major  in  the 
same  distinguished  regiment,  he  served  under  General  Howe 
against  the  American  revulutionists.  On  the  15th  Septem- 
ber 1776,  when  the  reserve  of  the  British  army  were  in  pos- 
session of  the  heights  above  New  York,  &I:ijor  Murray  was 
nearly  carried  off  by  the  enemy,  but  saved  himself  by  ub 
strength  and  presence  of  mind.  Attacked  by  an  American 
officer  and  two  soldiers,  he  kept  his  assailants  at  bay  for 
Mine  time  with  his  fusil;  but  dosing  upon  him,  his  dirk 
slipped  behind  him,  and  being  a  corpulent  man,  he  was  una- 
ble to  reacli  it.  Snatching  the  sword  of  the  American  officer 
from  him,  he  soon  compelled  the  party  to  retreat.  He  wore  the 
sword  as  a  trophy  dnring  the  campaign.  He  became  lien- 
tenant-colonel  27th  regiment,  and  died  the  following  year. 


The  Miirmys  of  Giingletie,  Pecbles-shire,  are  descended 
fn)m  a  junior  brunch  of  the  family  of  Murray  of  Blnckburony. 
James  Wolfe  Murray,  Esq.  of  Cringletie,  bom  in  1814,  eldest 
son  of  James  Wolfe  3Iurray,  Lord  Cringletie,  a  senator  of  the 
College  of  Justice,  by  Isabella  Katherine,  duu^htcr  of  Jam?s 
Cliarles  Edward  Stuart  Strange,  Esq.,  (godson  of  Prince 
Charles  Edward,)  succeeded  his  father  in  1836;  appointed 
to  42d  Royal  Highlanders  in  1833;  married  in  1852,  Elisa- 
beth Charlotte,  youngest  daughter  of  John  Wliyte  Melville, 
Ei^q.,  and  grand- daughter  of  5th  duke  of  l^eeds,  with  issue. 
His  son,  James  Wolfe  Murray,  bom  in  1853. 


Other  old  families  of  the  name  are  the  Murrays  of  Brongh- 
ton,  Wigtownshire;  Murray  of  Murrnythwaite,  Dumfries- 
shire; and  Murray  of  Murrayslmll,  Perthshire.  The  family 
of  Murraythwaite  have  been  settled  there  since  about  1421. 

The  Murrays  of  Murrayshall  derive  in  the  male  line  from 
the  ancient  family  of  Grsme  of  Italgowan,  and  in  the  female, 
firom  that  of  Murray,  Lord  Balvuird,  (see  vol.  i.  p.  231,) 
whose  eldest  son  succeeded  as  Viscount  Sturmont,  (nee  Stok- 
XOiCT,  Viscount  of).  John  Murray,  advocate,  son  of  An- 
drew Murray  of  Murrayshall,  at  one  period  bheriff  of  Aber- 
deenshire; bom  in  1809,  succeeded  in  1847;  m.  in  1853, 
Robina,  dr.  of  Thomas  Hamilton,  Esq. ;  educated  at  Edin- 
burgh univer»ity,  M.A.  1828.    Passed  advocate  in  1831. 

Tlie  Murrays  of  Henderland,  Pcebles-shuv,  have  given  two 
Judges  to  the  court  of  session,  namdy,  Alexander  3fnrray, 
Lord  Henderland,  who  died  in  1795,  and  his  second  son,  Sir 


John  Archibald  Murray,  appointed  in  1889,  when  he  assnroed 
the  judicial  title  of  Lord  Murray.  He  had  previooaly  been 
lord-advocate,  and  reooider  of  the  great  roll,  or  deik  of  the 
pipe,  in  the  court  of  exchequer,  Scotland,  a  ainecnre  office 
which  had  also  been  held  by  his  father,  and  was  rengned  bv 
Lord  Murray,  some  time  before  his  first  appointment  as  lord- 
advocate  in  1834.  He  waa  M.P.  for  the  Ldth  district  of 
buighs  from  1832  to  1838.    He  died  in  1859. 

l^IURRAY,  Sir  Robert,  one  of  the  fonndcrs 
and  the  first  president  of  the  Royal  Society  of 
London,  was  tbe  son  of  Sir  Robert  Murray  of 
Craigic,  by  a  daughter  of  George  Ilalkct  of  Pit- 
ferrau.    lie  is  supposed  to  have  been  bom  about 
the  beginning  of  the  seventeenth  century,  and  re- 
ceived his  education  portly  at  St.  Andrews  and 
p.irtly  in  France.    Early  in  life  he  entered  tlie   j 
Frcncli  army,  and  became  so  great  a  favourite 
with  Cardinal  Richelieu  tliat  he  soon  obtained  the 
rank  of  colonel.    He  returned  to  Scotland  about 
the  time  tliat  Charles  I.  took  refuge  witli  tlie  Scots 
army ;  and,  wliile  his  majesty  was  with  tlie  latter 
at  Newcastle  in  December  16-i6,  he  formed  a  pUn 
for  the  king*s  escape,  which  was  only  frustrated 
by  Charles'  want  of  resolution.    ^^The  design,'* 
says  Burnet,  ^^  proceeded  so  far  that  the  king  pat 
himself  in  disguise,  and  went  down  the  back  stairs 
with  Sir  Robert  Murray ;  but  his  majesty,  appre- 
hending it  was  scarce  possible  to  pass  through  all 
the  guards  without  being  discovered,  and  judgmg 
it  highly  indecent  to  be  catched  in  such  a  condi- 
tion, changed  his  resolution,  and  returned  back.** 
In  May  1651,  being  then  in  Scotland  with  Charles 
II.,  he  was  appointed  justice-clerk,  an  oflScc  which 
appears  to  have  remained  vacant  since  the  depri- 
vation of  Sir  John  Hamilton  in  1649.    A  few  days 
after  he  was  sworn  a  privy  councillor,  and  in  the 
succeeding  June  was  nominated  a  lord  of  session, 
but  he  never  exercised  the  functions  of  a  judge. 
At  the  Restoration  he  was  reappointed  a  lord  of 
session,  and  also  justice-clerk,  and  made  one  of 
the  lords  auditors  of  the  exchequer;  but  these 
appointments  were  merely  nominal,  to  secure  bis 
support  to  the  government ;  for,  thongh  he  was 
properly  the  first  who  had  the  style  of  lord-justice- 
clerk,  he  was  ignorant  of  the  law,  and  it  does  not 
appear  that  he  ever  sat  on  the  bench  at  all.    He 
was  high  in  favour  with  the  king,  Charles  11.,  by 
whom  he  was  employed  in  his  chemical  processes, 
and  was,  indeed,  the  conductor  of  his  laboratory. 
He  was  succeeded  in  the  office  of  justice-clerlrin 


^1 


* 


MURRAY, 


228 


LORD  GEORGE. 


which  he  did  twice  afterwards.  DariDg  the  Rock- 
iDgliam  administration  in  1765,  Lord  Mansfield 
acted  for  a  short  time  with  tlie  opposition,  espe- 
cially as  regards  the  bill  for  repealing  the  stamp 
act.  As  a  jadge  his  conduct  was  visited  with  the 
severe  animadversions  of  Jnnias,  and  made  the 
subject  of  much  unmerited  attack  in  both  houses 
of  parliament.  He  was  uniformly  a  friend  to  re- 
ligious toleration,  and  on  various  occasions  set 
himself  against  vexatious  prosecutions  founded 
upon  oppressive  laws.  On  the  other  hand,  he  in- 
curred much  popular  odium  by  maintaining  that, 

in  cases  of  libel,  the  jur}'  were  only  judges  of  the 
fact  of  publication,  and  had  nothing  to  do  with 

the  law,  as  to  libel  or  not.    This  was  particularly 

shown  in  the  case  of  the  trial  of  the  publishers  of 

Junius'  letter  to  the  king. 

With  regard  to  his  thrice  refusal  of  the  great 
seal,  Lord  Campbell,  in  his  Lives  of  the  Chief 
Justices  of  the  King's  Bench,  (vol.  iii.  p.  469,) 
says,  "Li  1770,  the  king  and  the  duke  of  Grafton, 
repeatedly  urged  Lord  Mansfield  to  become  lord 
chancellor,  but  whatever  his  inclination  may  have 
been  when  Lord  Bute  was  minister,  in  the  present 
ricketty  state  of  affaii's  he  peremptorily  refused  the 
ofEce,  and  suggested  that  the  great  seal  should  be 
given  to  Charles  Yorke,  who  had  been  afraid  that 
he  would  snatch  it  from  him.  By  Lord  Mans- 
field's advice  it  was  that  the  king  sent  for  Charles 
Yorke,  and  entered  into  that  unfortunate  negotia- 
tion with  him  which  teiminated  so  fatally — oc- 
casioning the  comparison  between  this  unhappy 
man,  destroyed  by  gaining  his  wish,  and  Semele 
perishing  by  the  lightning  she  had  longed  for. 
For  some  months  the  chief  justice  presided  on  the 
woolsack  as  Speaker  of  the  House  of  Lords,  and 
exercised  almost  all  the  functions  belonging  to  tiie 
office  of  the  Lord  Chancellor.'' 

In  October  1776,  having  been  previously  cre- 
ated a  knight  of  the  Thistle,  Ix)rd  Mansfield 
was  advanced  to  the  dignity  of  an  earl  of  the 
United  Kingdom  by  the  title  of  earl  of  Mansfield, 
with  remainder  to  the  Stormont  family,  as  he  had 
no  issue  of  his  own.  During  the  famous  London 
riots  of  June  1780,  his  house  in  Bloomsbury 
Square  was  attacked  and  set  fire  to  by  the  mob, 
in  consequence  of  his  having  voted  in  favour  of 
the  bill  for  the  relief  of  the  Roman  Catholics,  and 


all  his  furniture,  pictures,  books,  manuscripts,  and 
other  yaluables,  were  entirely  conanmed.  His 
lordship  himself,  it  is  said,  made  his  escape  m 
disguise,  before  the  flames  burst  out.  He  declined 
the  offer  of  compensation  from  government  for  the 
destruction  of  his  property.  The  infirmities  of 
age  compelled  him,  June  S,  1788,  to  resign  the 
office  of  chief-justice,  which  he  had  filled  with 
distinguished  reputation  for  thirty-two  years. 
The  latter  part  of  his  life  was  spent  in  retirement, 
principally  at  his  seat  at  Caen  Wood,  near  Hamp- 
stectd.  He  died  March  20,  1793,  and  was  buried 
in  Westminster  Abbey.  The  earldom,  which  was 
granted  again  by  a  new  patent  in  July  1792,  de- 
scended to  his  nephew.  Viscount  Stormont.  (See 
Stormont,  Viscount  of.)  A  life  of  Lord  Mans- 
field, by  Holliday,  was  published  in  1797,  and 
another,  by  Tliomas  Roscoe,  appeared  in  ^Thc 
Lives  of  British  Lawycrs,Mu  Lai*dner's  Cydopsdia. 

MURRAY,  Lord  George,  lieutenant-genertl 
of  the  rebel  Highland  army  in  1745-6,  was  the 
fouith  son  of  the  fii*st  duke  of  Athol,  and  brother 
of  the  second  duke.  Bom  in  1705,  he  took  a 
share  in  the  insurrection  of  1715,  though  then  but 
ten  years  old,  and  he  was  one  of  the  few  persons 
who  joined  the  Spanish  forces  which  were  defeat- 
ed at  Glenshiel  in  1719.  He  afterwards  served 
several  years  as  an  officer  in  the  king  of  Sardinia's 
army ;  but  having  obtained  a  pardon  he  returned 
from  exile,  and  was  presented  to  George  I.  by  his 
brother  the  duke  of  Athol.  He  joined  Prince 
Charles  at  Perth  in  September  1745,  and  was  un- 
mediately  appointed  lieutenant-general  of  the  m- 
surgent  forces.  The  battle  of  Preston,  where  he 
commanded  the  left  wing  of  the  prince's  army, 
was,  in  a  gi<eat  measure,  gained  through  his  per- 
sonal intrepidity.  *^  Lord  George, "  says  the 
chevalier  Johnstone,  in  his  *■  Memoirs  of  the 
Rebellion,'  ''  at  the  head  of  the  first  line,  did 
not  give  the  enemy  time  to  recover  from  their 
panic.  He  advanced  with  such  rapidity  that 
General  Cope  had  hardly  time  to  form  his  troops 
in  order  of  battle  when  the  Highlanders  rushed 
upon  them,  sword  in  hand,  and  the  English  cav- 
alry was  instantly  thrown  into  confusion." 

On  the  advance  of  the  rebel  army  into  England, 
Lord  George  had  the  command  of  the  blockade  of 
Carlisle,  which  soon  surrendered.    Owing  to  the 


MURRAY, 


230 


ALEXANDER,  D.D. 


thinning  his  ranks  when  he  gave  orders  to  charge. 
The  first  line  of  the  English  army  reeled  and  gave 
way  before  them.  But  their  opponents  were  so 
numerous  that  before  the  Highlanders  could  reach 
the  second  line  of  the  English  they  were  entirely 
destroyed.  On  this  occasion  Loi*d  George  dis- 
played all  his  former  heroism.  While  advancing 
towards  the  second  line,  in  attempting  to  dismount 
from  his  horse,  which  had  become  unmanageable, 
he  was  thrown ;  but,  recovering  himself,  he  ran 
to  the  rear  and  brought  up  two  or  three  regiments 
from  the  second  line  of  the  Highlanders,  to  support 
the  first ;  but  although  they  gave  their  fire,  no- 
thing could  be  done, — all  was  lost. 

After  their  defeat,  Lord  George  and  the  other 
chiefs  who  remained  with  the  army  retired  to 
Ruthven,  where  they  assembled  a  force  of  about 
3,000  men,  but  two  or  three  days  after  the  battle 
they  received  orders  from  the  prince  to  disperse. 
His  lordship  had  written  to  Charles,  pointing  out 
the  principal  causes  which  had  led  to  the  loss  of 
the  battle,  and  requesting  him  to  accept  of  the 
resignation  of  his  commission,  but  when  he  found 
that  it  was  the  intention  of  the  prince  to  depart 
for  France,  ho  sent  a  message  to  him  eaniestly 
dissuading  him  from  such  a  course,  and  advising 
him  to  remain  in  Scotland  and  try  another  cam- 
paign. Ho  maintained  that  the  Highlanders 
"  could  have  made  a  summer's  campaign  without 
the  risk  of  any  misfortune ;"  and  "  though  they 
had  neither  money  nor  magazines,  they  would  not 
have  starved  in  that  season  of  the  year  so  long  as 
there  were  sheep  and  cattle." 

On  the  prince's  escape.  Lord  George  withdrew 
to  the  Continent,  and  having  spent  some  years  in 
France  and  Italy,  died  in  Holland  on  the  8th  July 
1760.  His  character  is  thus  sketched  by  John- 
stone:— "Lord  George  Murray,  who  had  the 
charge  of  all  the  details  of  our  anny,  and  who  had 
the  sole  direction  of  it,  possessed  a  natural  genius 
for  military  operations ;  and  was  a  man  of  surpris- 
ing talents,  which  had  they  been  cultivated  by 
the  study  of  military  tactics,  would  unquestiona- 
bly have  rendered  him  one  of  the  greatest  gener- 
als of  his  age.  He  was  tall  and  robust,  and  brave 
in  the  highest  degree ;  conducting  the  Highland- 
ers in  the  most  heroic  manner,  and  always  the 
first  to  rushj  sword  in  hand,  into  the  midst  of  the 


enemy.  He  used  to  say,  when  ire  advanoed  to 
the  charge,  *  I  do  not  ask  yiM,  my  lads,  to  go  b^ 
fore,  but  merely  to  follow  me.*  Ho  c^pt  little, 
was  continually  occupied  with  all  manner  of  de- 
tails; and  was,  altogether,  most  Inde&ttgable, 
combining  and  directing  alone  all  our  operations: 
— in  a  word,  he  was  the  only  person  capable  of 
conductmg  our  army.  He  was  vigilant,  actire, 
and  diligent ;  his  plans  were  always  jadidonsly 
formed,  and  he  can'ied  them  promptly  and  vigor* 
ously  into  execution.  However,  with  an  infinity 
of  good  qualities,  he  was  not  without  his  defects: 
— proud,  haughty,  blunt,  and  imperions,  he  wish- 
ed to  have  the  exclusive  ordering  of  ever}' thing, 
and,  feeling  his  superiority,  he  would  listen  to  no 
advice.  Still,  it  most  be  owned,  that  he  had  no 
coadjutor  capable  of  advising  him,  and  his  havmg 
so  completely  the  confidence  of  his  soldiers  ena- 
bled him  to  perform  wondei's." 

MURRAY,  Alexander,  D.D,  a  celebrated 
self-taught  philologist,  was  born  at  Dunkitterick, 
in  the  parish  of  Minuigafi*,  stewartr}"  of  Kirkcad* 
bright,  October  22,  1775.  His  father  was  a  ham- 
ble  Galloway  shepherd,  an  occupation  followed 
by  his  anccstoi-s  for  several  generations,  and  for 
which  he  himself  was  originally  designed.  He 
was  taught  to  i*ead  by  his  father,  who  was  in  bis 
seventieth  year  at  the  time  of  his  biith.  'ihe 
method  which  the  old  man  adopted  was  to  draw 
the  figures  of  the  lettei*s  on  an  old  wool  caiii  with 
the  ends  of  the  bmnit  roots  of  the  heather  that 
grew  on  the  hills.  After  thus  learning  the  letters 
by  means  of  the  burnt  sticks,  he  was  advanced  to 
the  catechism,  which  was  the  child^s  primer  in 
those  days.  Then  he  somehow  obtained  a  New 
Testament,  and  afterwards  a  whole  Bible,  by  go- 
ing to  a  place  where  an  old  tattered  copy  of  it  lay, 
which  he  carried  ofi*  bit  by  bit.  In  the  wild  soli- 
tary glen  where  his  father  lived,  he  made  himself 
master  of  the  whole  contents  of  the  sacred  vol- 
ume, and  also  devoured  eveiy  printed  scrap  of 
paper  on  which  he  could  lay  his  hands,  and  so 
strong  was  his  mcmoiy  that  even  when  he  was 
but  a  boy  he  could  repeat  the  names  of  the  patri- 
archs and  scripture  characters  from  Adam  to  onr 
Saviour  without  omitting  one.  When  about  seven 
years  old,  he  was  employed  on  the  hills  in  herd- 
ing sheep.    The  poverty  of  the  family,  and  the 


r= 


MURRAY,  2: 

Scotland,  lie  was  appoiuted  iu  1806  assiBtant  aod 
successor  to  the  Rev.  Mr.  Muirhead,  minister  of 
UiT,  in  the  stcwnrtrjr  of  Kirkcniibriglit,  and  on 
the  death  of  the  latter  in  1808,  lie  succeeded  to 
the  full  incumbency  of  the  parish.  In  1612  be 
becama  a  candidate  for  the  Tscsnt  profesaor^ip 
of  Oriental  Languages  in  the  uniTersitjr  of  Edin- 
burgh, and  among  tlie  numerous  testimonials  of 
his  qnalifi cations  which  iri>re  pnbliabed  on  the  oc- 
casion, was  one  from  Wr.  Salt,  formerly  envoy  to 
Abyssinia,  wliose  admiration  of  Ihe  deep  erndilion 
and  extensive  research  displayed  in  his  edition  of 
Rmco's  Travels,  caused  him,  on  his  return  to 
ICngland  in  February  1811,  to  recommend  him  to 
the  marquis  of  Weliealey,  "  ns  the  only  person  in 
the  British  dominions"  adequate  to  translate  an 
Ethiopic  letter  wliich  he  had  bronght  from  the 
gOTcmor  of  Tigre  to  George  III.  In  remembrance 
of  Mr.  Mnri'ay's  services  in  translating  this  letter. 
a  pension  of  £80  a-ycar  was  after  his  death  grant- 
ed by  his  majesty  to  iiia  widow.  He  was  elected 
jiiofcssor  of  Oriental  Languages  on  July  8,  by  a 
majority  of  two  votes,  and  a  few  days  thereafter 
tliu  scnntiis  of  the  university  conferred  on  him  the 
degree  of  D.D.  lie  was  not  destined,  however, 
to  occupy  long  a  chair  which  he  was  so  admirably 
qualiricd  to  till.  On  October  31  ho  entered  upon 
the  discharge  of  liis  professional  duties  in  a  weak 
rotate  (if  health,  and  continued  witii  the  utmost  ar- 
diur  to  teach  his  chs^cs  during  the  winter.  At 
the  commcncemi'iit  of  the  se^-iion  he  published  his 
'  Outlines  of  Oriental  I'iiilology,'  an  elementary 
^vork,  designed  for  the  use  of  Ids  students.  In 
the  bi-^nning  of  Febniary  a  new  impression  of 
his  eriitlon  of  Itruce's  Travels  al^o  made  its  ap- 
pearance. Soon  after,  his  illness  assumed  such 
an  alarming  aspect  as  to  prevent  his  lecturing, 
though  he  continued  his  literary  labours  to  the 
last,  having  been  the  vcrj-  day  before  his  death 
engaged  nearly  twelve  hours  in  arranging  his 
papers,  &c.  lie  died  on  the  morning  of  April 
15, 181.1,  in  the  37lh  year  of  his  age.  In  his  lat- 
ter years  ho  had  written  a  work  of  great  learning, 
entitled  '  History  of  Enropenn  langungcs,'  which 
was  pnblished  after  his  death  in  2  vols.  Svo,  un- 
der the  auspices  of  Sir  Henry  Moncreiff  and  Dr. 
Scott  of  Corstorphino.  By  his  wife,  whora  he 
married  while  residing  at  Urr,  Dr.  Murray  had  a 


son  and  daughter,  the  latter  of  whom  died  in  18SL 
Snlijoined  is  hia  portrait,  Iroin  a  pnioting  bj  Ged< 
desi  engraved  by  Boniet : 


MURRAY,  Sir  Gi^orge,  an  able  military  of 
cer  and  diplomatist,  the  second  son  of  Sir  Willi" 
Murray,  the  fifth  baronet  of  Ochtertyre,  was  born  | 
at  the  family  seat  in  Perllisliire,  Febiuary  6, 1778. 
He  was  educated  at  the  high  school  and  univer- 
sity of  Edinburgh,  and  on  12th  March  1789, 
gazetted  an  ensign  in  tlic  71st  foot.  Soon  al 
he  removed  to  the  34th  regiment,  and  in  June 
1790  to  the  3d  Guards.  In  1793  he  was  in  the 
ai-my  under  llie  duke  of  York  which  was  employed 
iigainst  the  French  in  Flanders,  and  in  January 

1794  he  was  promoted  to  a  lieutenancy,  with  the 
rank  of  captain.  In  April  of  that  year  he  rettnn- 
ed  to  England,  but  having  rejoined  the  army  hi 
Flanders  during  the  summer,  he  was  present  in 
the  retreat  through  Holland  and  Germany.    In 

1795  he  was  appointed  aide-de-camp  to  Major-  i 
general  Sir  Alexander  Campbell,  on  the  staff  of  | 
I-ord  Moira's  anuy  in  the  expedition  intended  for 
Qujberon.  In  the  autumn  of  the  same  year,  he  , 
proceeded  to  the  A\'est  Indies  under  Sir  Ralph  1 
Abercromby,  but  in  consequence  of  ill-health  he  ( 
soon  returned,  and  ho  served  on  the  sUff  In  Eng- 


MYLNE, 


S34 


BOBEBT. 


bill  of  1829,  Aiid  after  the  wbig  gOTermncnt  came 
into  power  iu  November  1830,  be  was  ooe  of  the 
principal  members  of  the  opposition.  Iu  that 
year,  and  again  in  1831,  be  was  re-elected  for 
Perthshire,  bat  on  the  dissolution  of  parliament  in 
1832,  after  the  passhig  of  the  Reform  Bill,  he  was 
defeated  by  the  earl  of  Ormelie,  afterwards  mar- 
quis of  Brcadalbanc.  In  1834  his  lordship  became 
a  member  of  the  House  of  Lords,  and  Sir  George 
Murray  was  again  elected  M.P.  for  Perthshire. 

In  Sir  Robert  Peel's  administration  of  1834-5, 
Sir  George  held  the  office  of  master-general  of  the 
ordnaucc.  At  the  general  election  which  ensued 
he  wns  opposed  by  Mr.  Fox  Maule,  afterwards 
Lonl  Panmure,  who  defeated  him  by  a  majority 
of  82.  At  the  general  election  of  1837,  Sir  George 
stood  for  AVestminster,  but  was  unsuccessful. 
Two  years  subsequently  he  became  a  candidate 
for  Manchester,  and  was  again  defeated. 

On  the  death  of  Lord  Lynedoch  in  1843,  he 
succeeded  him  as  colonel  of  the  1st  or  Roynl  regi- 
ment of  foot.  He  attained  the  rank  of  lieutenant- 
general  May  27,  1825.  and  that  of  general,  No- 
vember 23,  1841.  He  was  editor  of  'llio  Duke 
of  Marlborougii's  Lettcra  and  Despatches,*  from 
1702  to  1712,  which  Averc  published  in  1845,  He 
will  be  remembered  as  a  successful  soldier,  an  able 
minister,  and  a  skilful  and  fluent  debater.  He 
died  in  London  2Gth  July  184G,  aged  74,  and  was 
buried  at  Kcusal  Green.  At  the  time  of  his  death 
lie  was  governor  of  Fort  George  and  president  of 
the  Royal  Geographical  Society.  Ho  had  mar- 
ried ill  182G,  in  the  54th  year  of  his  age.  Lady 
Louisa  Erskinc,  sifter  of  the  marquis  of  Anglesey 
and  widow  of  Lieutenant-general  Sir  James  Er- 
skinc, baronet.  Lady  Louisa  was  tlien  48.  She 
died  23d  January  1842.  They  had  one  daughter, 
who  married  H.  G.  Boycc,  Esq.,  of  the  2d  life 
guards,  and  died  in  1849. 

MYLNE,  Robert,  an  eminent  architect,  was 
bom  at  Edinburgh,  January  4, 1734.  His  father, 
Thomas  Mylne,  an  architect  and  magistrate  of 
that  city,  belonged  to  a  family  who  held  the  here- 
ditaiy  office  of  master-mason  to  the  kings  of  Scot- 
land, conferred  by  King  James  III.  Robert 
Mylne  of  Balfargie,  who  died  24th  December  1667, 
built  Mylue*s  Court,  and  Mylne^s  Square,  Edin- 
burgh, as  well  as  the  additions  to  Ilolyrood-house, 


in  the  reign  of  Charles  IL  Young  Mylne  teoeifed 
liis  edncfttion  in  hia  native  city,  nnd  sfterwards 
travelled  to  Bome,  where  he  Raided  for  five  jman^ 
In  September  1758  he  gained  the  fint  priw  in  the 
academy  of  St.  Luke,  in  the  first  class  of  architee- 
tnrc,  and  was  unanimonsly  elected  a  member  of 
that  body,  the  necessary  dispensation  having  been 
obtained  from  the  Pope,  on  account  of  his  being  a 
Protestant.  Ho  was  also  elected  a  member  of  the 
academies  of  Florence  and  Bologna.  He  subse- 
quently visited  Naples  and  Sicily,  and  his  profes- 
sional skill  and  classical  knowledge  enabled  him 
to  illustrate  several  obscure  passages  in  Yltrnvlos. 
His  account  of  this  excursion,  with  his  fine  coUec- 
tion  of  drawings,  intended  for  publication,  was 
left  in  manuscript  to  his  son,  bnt  never  published. 

After  makiug  the  tour  of  Europe  he  repaired  to 
London,  where  his  plan  for  constructing  a  bridge 
at  Blackfriars  was  preferred  to  those  of  twenty 
other  candidates,  and  he  was  employed  to  super- 
intend that  vast  public  undertaking ;  which  was 
commenced  in  1760.  It  was  the  first  structure  d 
the  kind  erected  in  Great  Britain,  in  which  arches 
approaching  to  the  form  of  an  ellipsis  were  sub- 
stituted for  semicii*cles ;  and  the  great  superiority 
of  Mr.  Mylne's  mode  of  centriug,  though  disputed 
at  the  time,  is  now  universally  allowed.  Amongst 
others.  Dr.  Johnson  came  forward  to  condemn  the 
form  of  the  arch,  bnt  the  short  controversy  that 
took  place  between  Mr.  Mylne  and  his  illustrious 
opponent,  on  this  occasion,  did  not  prevent  their 
afterwards  becoming  intimate  friends.  The  bridge 
was  completed  in  1769,  for  the  exact  sum  speci- 
fied in  Mr.  Mylne's  estimate,  namely,  £153,000; 
his  own  remuneration  being  an  annual  salary  of 
£800,  with  five  per  cent,  on  the  money  actually 
laid  out  on  the  work. 

On  completing  the  bridge,  Mr.  Mylne  was  ap- 
pointed suiTcyor  of  St.  PauFs  Cathedral,  and 
he  it  was  who  suggested  the  felicitous  inscrip- 
tion, placed  over  the  entrance  of  the  choir,  to 
the  memory  of  Sir  Christopher  AVren,  ending, 
^^  Si  monnmentum  requiras,  circumspice?  "  Among 
the  buildings  erected,  altercd,  or  repaired  by  him, 
may  bo  enumerated  Bochester  Cathedral ;  Green- 
wich Hospital,  of  which  he  was  clerk  of  the  works 
for  fifteen  years ;  King's  Weston,  the  seat  of  Lord 
do  Clifford ;  Blaze  Castle,  near  Bristol ;  the  duke 


NAIRNE, 


236 


OF  DDNSINNAN. 


i( 


Athol  brifcade,  he  inarched  with  the  priooe  into  England. 
He  shared  in  all  the  dangers  of  tlie  rebellion,  and  after  the 
battle  of  Calloden,  escaped  to  the  continent.  He  wns  in- 
dnded  in  the  act  of  attainder,  1746,  and  died  in  France,  11th 
Jalj  1770,  aged  79.  By  his  coantcss,  Lady  Catherine  Mur- 
ray, third  daughter  of  the  first  e.irl  of  Danmore,  he  had  eigbt 
sons  and  three  daughters.  The  eldest  son,  .Tames,  died  un- 
married. John,  the  second  son,  succeeded  to  the  representa- 
tion of  the  family.  Charles,  the  third  son,  an  officer  in  the 
service  of  the  States-^neral,  died  in  June  1795.  Thnmits, 
the  fourth  son,  an  officer  in  Lord  John  Drummond's  regi- 
ment, was  t»ken  in  October  1745,  on  board  *  L^Espcrance,* 
a  French  vessel,  on  his  passage  from  France  to  Scotland,  to 
join  the  prince.    He  died  at  Sancerrc  in  France,  8d  April  1777. 

John  Nuirne,  the  eldest  surviving  son,  entered  the  army, 
and  rose  to  the  rank  of  lieutenant  colonel.  But  for  the  at- 
tainder, he  would  have  been  fourth  lord.  He  liad  two  sons 
and  a  d.iughtcr.  John,  the  elder  son,  an  officer  in  the  army, 
died  unmarried.  William  Murray  Naime,  the  younger  son, 
horn  in  1757,  was  assistant  inspector-general  of  barracks  in 
Scotland,  and  a  major-general  in  the  army.  The  title  was 
restored  to  him  by  act  of  parliament  17th  June  18*24.  He 
had  married  in  June  1806,  Carolina,  third  daughter  of  Lau- 
rence Oliphant  of  Gask,  a  Indy  whose  fine  lyrical  genins  and 
enthuuastic  love  of  music  have  caused  her  name  to  be  en- 
rolled among  the  most  gifted  poetesses  of  Scotland. 

Carolina,  Lady  Nairne,  the  authoress  of  the  popular  songs 
of  *  The  Liird  o'  Cockpen  *  and  *  The  Land  o'  the  Leal,'  was 
bom  in  the  old  mansion  of  Gask,  Perthshire,  16th  July  1766. 
So  be.Hutifiil  was  she  in  her  youth  that  she  was  known  in  her 
native  district  by  the  poetical  designation  of  *  The  Flower  of 
Stratheam.'  In  the  *  Modem  Scottish  Minstrel,*  by  Charles 
Rogers,  LL.D.,  vol.  i.,  there  is  a  well-written  and  compre- 
hensive memoir  of  Lady  Naime,  with  a  selection  from  her 
songs  and  other  pieces,  some  of  them  published  there  for  the 
first  time.  From  this  memoir  we  learn  that  her  first  compo- 
sition in  Scottish  verse  was  a  piece  called  'The  Pleuchman,* 
which  she  sent  anonymously  to  the  president  of  an  agricul- 
tural dinner  that  took  phice  in  her  youth  in  the  ncighlwur- 
hood  of  her  father's  house.  The  production,  on  being  publicly 
read,  was  received  with  warm  approbation,  and  speedily  set 
to  music.  Her  motive  in  first  entering  upon  the  composi- 
tion of  Scottish  verse  was  a  very  laudable  one,  namely,  the 
purificjition  of  the  national  minstrelsy  from  the  loose  ribaldry 
which  tainted  the  songs  and  ballads  that  then  were  popular 
.imong  the  poas.intry,  and  in  this  she  was  eminently  success- 
ful. To  this  early  period  of  her  life,  says  Dr.  Rogers,  may  be 
ascribed  some  of  her  best  lyrics.  '  The  Laird  o'  Cockpen,' 
and  *The  I.:ind  o'  the  Leal,'  at  the  close  of  the  last  century, 
were  sung  in  every  distriit  in  the  kingtlom.  Dr.  Rogers  at- 
tributes the  restoration  of  her  hu^b^md'8  title  in  1824  to 
George  the  Fourth  having  learned  during  his  visit  to  Scot- 
land in  1822,  that  the  song  of  *  The  Attainted  Scottish  No- 
bles' was  the  composition  of  I.ady,  then  Mrs.  Major  Naim. 
At  the  request  of  several  ladies,  her  acquaintances,  she  con- 
tributed various  sonpjs  to  *The  Scottish  Minstrel,'  begun  in 
1821,  and  completed  in  1824,  in  six  royal  8vo  volumes,  form- 
in  f^  one  of  the  best  collections  of  our  Scottish  melvnlics  yet 
pirblishcd.  It  was  brought  out  by  Mr.  Robert  Purdie,  mu- 
sic-seller, Edinburgh,  and  edited  by  R.  A.  Smith.  Her 
pieces  were  contributed  on  the  express  condition  that  her 
name  should  be  kept  secret,  and  it  docs  not  appear  that 
cither  Mr.  Purdie  or  Mr.  Smith  e%-er  knew  it.  The  signa- 
ture which  she  assumed  was  *  B.  B.,'  and  these  gentlemen 
believed  that  her  real  name  was  'Mrs.  Bogan  of  Bogan.' 
Dr.  Rogers  says  in  a  note,  that  a  daughter  of  Baron  Hume 


wM  one  of  the  ladies  who  indnosd  Lidy  NairiM  to  bseoBM  a 
contributor  to  *  The  Scottish  MinstreL*  If  any  of  the  m^ 
were  sent  to  the  editor  through  the  mediiiin  of  Mm  Home, 
who  thus  expresses  herself  in  a  letter  to  s  fnend  ^— ^  My  fa- 
ther's admiration  of  *  The  Land  o'  ths  Lsal*  was  noh  that 
he  said  no  woman  but  Miss  Ferrier  was  eapabls  of  writing  it 
And  when  I  used  to  show  him  song  after  song  in  MS.,  when 
I  was  receiving  the  anonymous  verses  for  the  nniaie,  and  ask 
his  criticism,  he  said — *  Your  unknown  poetess  has  only  Ms, 
or  rather,  two^  letters  out  of  taste^  vix.  cboodng  '  B.  B.'  for 
her  signature.' "  Lady  Naime  lierself  never  divulged,  beyond 
a  small  circle  of  confidential  friends,  tlie  authorship  of  any  of 
her  verses,  even  when  she  saw  them  attributed  to  otben. 
Her  ladyship  died  at  Gask  27th  October  1845,  aged  79. 
During  the  last  ye.nrs  of  her  lifis,  she  devoted  all  her  eatrpu 
to  the  service  of  religion,  and  her  benevolence,  we  axe  tdd, 
extended  towards  the  support  of  every  institnti<m  likely  to 
promote  the  temporal  comforts  or  advance  the  spiritual  inter- 
eats  of  her  count r3rmen.  Her  contributions  to  the  poUie 
charities  were  ample,  and  from  the  extreme  modesty  of  her 
disposition,  they  were  almost  always  anonymously  given. 
To  the  Free  church  and  school  in  the  West  Port,  Edinbuj^ 
she  contributed  £300,  under  the  strictest  injunctions  of  s»> 
crccy,  and  Dr.  Chalmers,  in  an  address  delivered  at  Edin- 
burgh on  29th  December  1845,  only  revealed  the  fact  when 
her  death  left  him  at  liberty  to  do  so.  Some  years  after  her 
death,  appeared,  in  an  elegant  fulio  volume,  *Lays  firam 
Stratheam :  by  Carolina.  Baroness  Nairn.  Arranged  with 
Symphonies  and  Accompaniments  for  the  THanofbrte  hj  Fin- 
lay  Dun.'    It  bears  the  imprint  of  I^ndon,  and  has  no  date. 

Lord  Naime,  ber  husband,  had  died  July  9,  1880.  Their 
only  son.  William,  sixth  I^rd  Naime,  bora  in  1808,  was  m 
his  22d  year  when  he  succeeded  to  the  title.  In  the  spring 
of  1837  he  was  seized  with  a  severe  attack  of  influensa,  and 
for  the  recovery  of  his  health  he  went  with  his  mother  to  the 
Continent,  and  died  at  Brassels,  27th  Dec.  that  year,  withoot 
issue.  The  title  is  claimed  by  Margaret,  Baroness  Keith, 
mentioned  on  the  previous  page. 

This  lady,  bom  in  1788,  married  in  1817,  the  count  de 
Flahault  de  la  Billarderie,  in  France,  a  general  in  the  army  of 
Napoleon  I.,  and  French  ambassador  at  the  British  eoort, 
18()1 ;  issue,  5  daughters.  In  her  youth  she  was  the  bosom 
friend  of  the  lamented  Princess  Chariotte.  She  succeeded 
her  father  (see  vol.  i.  p.  139)  in  1823,  .is  Baroness  Keith  of 
Stonchaven-Marihchal  in  the  peerage  of  Ireland,  and  as 
Baroness  Keith  of  Banheath  in  that  of  the  United  Kingdom. 

A  baronetcy  was  possessed  by  the  family  of  Kume  of  Dnn- 
sinnan,  Perthshire,  the  supposed  site  of  a  stronghold  d'Mao- 
beth,  15  miles  from  Bimam,  celebrated  by  Shakspere: 

"  Macbeth  shall  never  vanquished  be,  until 
Great  Bimam  wood  to  high  Dunsinane  hill 
Shall  come  against  him." 

It  was  conferred,  Slst  March  1704.  on  Sir  William  Naime  of 
Dunsinnan,  descended  from  Michael  de  Naim,  who  lived  in 
the  reign  of  Robert  IIL  Sir  William  Naime,  the  fifth 
baronet,  a  younger  son  of  the  second  baronet,  was  a  lord 
of  session.  Admitted  advocate  in  1755,  he  was,  in  1768, 
appointed  commissary  clerk  of  Edinburgh,  conjunctly  with 
Alexander  Naime,  a  relative  of  his  own.  In  1786  he  was 
promoted  to  the  bench,  and  took  his  seat  as  Lord  DonsinnsB. 
In  1790  he  succeeded  to  the  baronetcy,  on  the  death  of  his 
nephew.  At  the  same  time  he  bought  the  estate  of  Don* 
sinnan  from  another  nephew,  for  the  sum  of  £16,000.    It 


NAPIEU 


238 


FIRST  BARON. 


nl  of  Scotland,  being  so  dewgned  in  a  Mfo-condnet  to  him 
M  one  of  tlie  ambosiadora  to  the  court  of  England,  24th 
September  1461.  He  had  another  aafe-condact  to  go  to 
England  in  1464.  In  1468  he  was  sent  to  Denmartr,  with 
the  lord-chancellor,  to  negotiate  the  marriage  between  King 
James  III.  and  the  Danish  king*s  daughter,  the  princess 
Margaret.  He  w.is  employed  on  several  other  public  occa- 
sions, and  held  the  office  of  master  of  the  household  to  James 
III.    He  died  about  the  end  <^  1473. 

His  son,  John  Napier  of  Merchiston,  was  in  the  household 
of  lilarr,  dowuger  of  James  II.,  and  having  been  employed  in 
several  ne«::otiations  with  the  court  of  England,  had  a  pen- 
«on  for  life  of  50  marks  sterling  from  King  Henrj  VI., 
granted  when  that  monarch  came  to  Scotland,  after  the  to 
him  disastrous  battle  of  Tuwton  in  1461.  He  married  Eli- 
sabeth, one  of  the  two  daughters  of  Murdoch  Mentcth  of 
Rusky,  whose  mother  was  Ijidy  Maigaret,  second  daughter 
of  Duncan  earl  of  Lennox.  Elizabeth  Menteth  was  co-heircss 
with  her  sister  Agnes,  wife  of  John  Haldane  of  Glencagles, 
of  her  brother,  Patrick  Menteth  of  Rnsky,  snd  John  Napier, 
after  his  marriage  with  her,  used  the  designation  of  Merdiis- 
ton  and  Rusky  indiscriminately.  The  diyputes  (see  vol.  ii. 
p.  648)  between  Stewart  of  Demely,  Haldane  of  Gleneagles, 
and  Elisabeth  Menteth,  about  the  earldom  of  Lennox,  appear 
to  have  been  finally  adjusted,  19th  June  1492,  when  Eliza- 
beth Menteth  was  left  peaceably  in  possession  of  the  fourth 
part  of  the  earldom.  By  this  rasrriage  his  descendants  were 
allied  to  the  first  families  in  Scotland,  and  even  claimed  a 
connection  with  the  royal  family  of  Great  Britain,  in  conse- 
quence of  the  union  of  Lord  Damley  with  Mary,  queen  of 
Scots.  The  I.ennox  snns  appear  to  have  been  previously 
those  of  the  Kaplers,  as  they  were  used  by  Alexander  Napier 
the  first  of  Merchiston,  and  were  not  first  assumed  by  this 
John  de  Napier,  on  account  of  his  marriage.  (^Daufflas' 
Peeragty  Wood*8  edition,  vol.  ii.  p.  283.) 

John's  eldest  son,  Archibald  Napier,  the  next  laird  of  )[er- 
chiston,  was  dead  before  8th  May  1529.  Among  various 
charters  which  he  obtained  was  one  of  the  lands  of  Gartness, 
Rusky,  Csilzemuch,  &c.,  on  his  own  resignstion,  the  whole 
incorporated  into  the  free  barony  of  Edinbellie  Napier,  21st 
^fay  1509.  lie  was  the  father,  with  other  children,  of  Sir 
Alexander  Napier,  who  succeeded  him,  and,  by  a  second 
marriage,  of  Alexander  Napier  of  Inglistoun,  who  is  sup- 
posed to  have  been  the  ancestor  of  the  Napiers  of  Linton-hoo 
in  Bedfordshire,  baronets,  the  direct  male  line  of  which  ter- 
minated in  1747. 

Tlie  eldest  son,  Sir  Alexander  Napier  of  Merchiston,  fell 
at  the  battle  of  Flodden,  9th  September  1513.  His  only 
son,  Alexander  Napier  of  Merchiston,  was  little  more  than 
four  years  old  at  his  father's  death,  and  after  he  came  of  age 
he  spent  scvenil  years  in  France.  He  was  killed  at  the  battle 
of  Pinkie,  in  September  1547,  being  then  about  38  years  old. 

His  son,  Sir  Archibald  Napier  of  Merchiston,  bom  before 
1535,  was  knighted  in  1565,  and  appointed  master  of  the 
mint  in  1587.  He  died  at  Merchiston  castle  in  May  1608, 
aged  about  74.  His  eldest  son  wss  John  Napier,  the  inven- 
tor of  the  IjOgarithms,  of  whom  afterwards.  Another  son, 
by  a  second  msrriage.  Sir  Alexander  Napier  of  Lauriston, 
was  appointed  a  lord  of  session  14th  Februaxy  1626,  and  died 
in  1629.  His  brother,  Archibald  Napier,  was  slain  in  No- 
vember 1  GOO,  by  five  of  the  name  of  Scott  and  Thomas  Crich- 
ton,  riding  home  to  his  own  house  to  the  Wowmit,  in  revenge 
for  the  death  of  one  of  theur  relations,  who  was  killed  by  him 
in  self-defence. 

John  Napier  of  Merchiston,  the  inventor  of  the  Logarithms, 
was  twice  married.    His  son,  by  his  first  wife,  Sir  Archi- 


bald, was  the  first  Lord  Napier.  John  Kapier,  tlie  ddcrt  br 
the  second  marriage,  wo  designed  of  Easter  Torrie.  Bobcrt, 
the  second  son  by  that  marriage,  designed  of  Dmnbcoy, 
was  editor  of  his  father's  posthnmoos  worin^  and  tnosrtor  of 
the  Nspiers  of  Culcrench,  now  of  ^lUliken,  btnmeCi,  of  whom 
sflerwards.  Alexander,  the  third  eon,  was  designed  of  Tor- 
rie. William,  the  fonrth  son,  styled  of  Ardmore,  was  men- 
tor of  the  Napiers  of  Crsigamet ;  and  Adam,  the  fifth  no,  of 
the  Najuers  of  Blackstonn,  Renfiewsbire. 

The  eldest  son,  Sir  Archibald  Napier  of  Merchiston,  wss 
matriculated  at  Gla^w  university  in  March  1598.  His  st- 
tention  having  been  eariy  directed  to  agricnitnxal  improre- 
ment,  he  received  in  June  1598,  firom  James  VI.,  with  ad- 
vice of  the  lords  of  the  secret  council,  to  him  only  and  to 
such  as  he  should  depute,  the  royal  license  for  21  years,  to 
use  such  manure  o\'er  all  the  lands  in  the  kingdom  as  be 
should  publicly  set  forth  and  recommend  in  prinL  He  se- 
cordingly  published  his  plan,  entitled  *The  new  order  of 
gooding  and  manuring  idl  sorts  of  field  land  with  eommoo 
salt,  whereby  the  same  may  bring  forth  in  more  abnndanee, 
both  of  grass  and  com  of  all  sorts,  and  far  cheaper  than  by 
the  common  way  of  dunging  used  heretofore  in  Scotland.' 

He  was  appomted  gentleman  of  the  privy  chamber  te 
James  VI.,  whom  he  sccompanied  to  London,  on  his  aeees- 
sion  to  the  Englwh  throne  in  1608.  He  was  iwnm  a  priiy 
councillor,  20th  July  1615,  constitnted  treasnrer-depnts  of 
Scothind  for  life,  21st  October  1622,  appointed  lord-josties* 
dcrk,  23d  November  1623,  snd  two  days  thereafter  admitted 
one  of  the  lords  of  session.  He  resigned  the  office  of  knd- 
justice-clerk,  9th  Augnst  1624.  He  had  a  license,  14th  Jan- 
uary 1625,  allowing  him  to  export  12,000  stone  weight  of 
tallow  annually,  fi>r  seven  years,  **  in  remembrance  of  the 
mony  good  serviceis  fra  tyme  to  tyme  done  to  his  majestie 
thir  mony  years  bigane,  be  his  right  trustie  and  wd  bdovcd 
Sir  Archibald  Naper."  The  officers  of  state  having  been,  by 
a  new  regnlation  entered  into  after  the  accession  of  Chsrks 
I.,  incapacitated  from  sitting  iu  the  court  of  sesnon  as  erdi- 
nsry  judges,  his  msjesty  appointed  Sir  Archibald  Nafner  one 
of  the  extraordinary  lords  of  session,  15th  February  1626. 
He  was  created  a  baronet  of  Nova  Scotia,  2d  March  1627, 
and  by  warrant  of  privy  seal  of  1st  Msy,  the  same  year, 
a  pension  of  £2,400  Scots  yearly  was  granted  to  bim,  for 
having,  at  the  king's  speciaJ  desire,  advanced  to  Walter 
Stewart,  gentleman  of  the  privy  diamber,  the  sum  of  £6,000 
Scots. 

He  was  created  a  peer  of  Scotland  by  the  titleof  Baron 
Napier  of  Merchiston,  by  patent  dated  at  Whitehall,  4th 
May  1627,  the  honours  being  limited  to  the  heire  male  of  his 
body.  He  was  sppointed  one  of  the  commisrioners  of 
tithes,  and  obUuned  a  lease  of  the  crown  lands  of  Orkney  for 
45,000  marks  annually,  which  he  sublessed  to  William  Dick 
for  52,000  marks.  In  March  1631,  he  surrendered  the  lease 
of  Orkney,  his  pension,  and  the  office  of  treasurer-depute, 
and  wss  allowed  £4,000  sterling,  as  compensstion. 

On  the  breaking  out  of  the  civil  war  in  Scotland,  he  took 
a  decided  part  in  favour  of  Charles  I.  When  the  marquis  of 
Hamilton,  with  the  king's  fleet,  arrived  in  Leith  Roads  in 
l^Isy  1639,  I^rd  Napier  was  sent  to  him  with  a  oondliatoiy 
proposal  from  the  committee  of  Estates,  snd  the  marquis 
soon  after  retired  from  the  Frith  of  Forth.  Lord  Na|ner  was 
one  of  those  who  signed  the  association  formed  by  M<mtroee 
at  Cumbernauld  in  January  1641,  for  the  support  of  the 
royal  authority.  On  11th  June  the  same  year,  he  was  appre- 
hended, with  Montrose  and  Sir  George  Stirling  of  Kcir,  and 
committed  prisoner  to  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  bnt  released 
16th  November  following.    In  1644  he  was  confined  by  the 


NAPIER, 


240 


SIR  CHARLES. 


1 1 


1 1 


:  I 


own  expense,  he  procured  a  sun'ey  of  a  navigable  canal  to 
form  a  communication  betwixt  the  Furtb  and  Cijde.  He 
(lied  at  I/Cwes,  Sussex,  11th  April  1773.  He  married,  first, 
I^dy  Henrietta  Hope,  third  dauf;hter  of  tlie  first  earl  of 
lUpetonn,  and  by  her  had,  with  one  dau|;htiT,  who  died  in 
infancy,  fire  sons,  namely,  1.  William,  sixth  I/)rd  Napier; 
2.  The  Hon.  Charles  Napier  of  Mercliistoun  Hall,  Stirlingsliire, 
Captain  R.N.,  who  died,  19th  December  1807,  in  his  77th 
year,  leaving  issue  by  his  second  wife.  Christian,  duughtGr  of 
Gabriel  Hamilton,  Esq.  of  Westbum,  I^narksliire.  His 
eldest  son  was  the  celebmted  Admiral  Sir  Charles  Napier,  of 
whom  afterwards.  8.  The  Hon.  Francis  Napier,  lieutenant- 
colonel  of  marines,  who  died  without  issue  at  Dublin  in  1779. 
4.  The  Hon.  John  Napier,  lieutenant  25th  regiment,  who  died 
in  Gcnnany,  31st  July  1759.  5.  Tlie  Hon.  Mark  Napier, 
major-general  in  the  army,  who  died  10th  June  1809,  aged 
71,  leiiving  isbue.  His  lordship  married,  secondly,  Henrietta- 
Marin,  daughter  of  George  Johnston,  Ksq.,  a  cadet  of  the 
Hilton  family,  and  had  by  her  three  daughters  and  five  nnns. 
The  eldest,  the  Hon.  Gcoi^  Napier,  bom  at  Edinburgh  in  1751, 
died  a  colonel  in  the  army  and  comptroller  of  army  accounts 
in  Ireland  13th  October  1804.  He  had  served  in  the  Ameri- 
can campaign  in  1777,  was  on  Lord  Moira*8  staff  in  the  duke 
of  York's  expedition  in  Holland,  and  was  selected  to  take  the 
command  of  the  102d  or  Londonderry  regiment,  on  its  being 
raised.  He  was  one  of  the  most  powerful  and  active  men 
in  the  British  anny,  and  at  his  death  it  was  said  of  him  that 
"  a  better  or  braver  soldier  never  ser\*ed  his  countr\',  a  more 
upright  or  more  diligent  servant  of  the  public  never  filled  an 
office  of  trust."  In  consideration  of  his  senices  his  majt^sty 
granted  a  yearly  pension  of  £1,000  to  his  widow.  I^y  Surah 
I,cnnox,  seventh  daughter  of  the  second  duke  of  Richmond. 
By  this  lady  he  had  eight  children.  HLi  eldest  son.  Lien- 
tenant-general  Sir  Charles  tJames  Napier,  G.C.B.,  the  con- 
queror of  Scinde,  was  bom  10th  August,  1782,  of  whom 
on  page  242. 

Vice-admiral  Sir  Charles  Napier,  K.C.B.,  one  of  the  most 
distinguished  of  British  naval  commanders,  and  remarkable 
especially  for  his  during  and  intrepidity,  the  eldest  son  of 
Captain  the  Hon.  Charles  Napier  of  Merchistoun  Hall,  Stir- 
lingshire, R.N.,  above  mentioned,  was  bom  at  Falkirk,  Gth 
March  1786.  In  the  male  line,  as  has  been  seen,  he  wasa  Scott, 
one  of  the  rough  border  clan  of  that  name,  to  whicli  the  author 
of  Waverley  l)elonged.  At  the  time  of  his  birth,  his  father 
was  regulating  captain  on  the  I^ith  station,  where  his  duty 
was  to  superintend  the  entry  of  seamen  for  the  navy,  and  to 
forward  them  to  their  (Icstination  at  the  Nurc.  He  spent  a 
great  portion  of  his  early  years  at  Merchistoun  Hall,  with  his 
younger  brother,  afterwards  Mnjor-general  Thoni.is  Erskiiie 
Napier,  in  1854commander-in-cliiefof  the  forces  in  Scotland. 
He  received  his  education  principally  at  the  high  schoul  of 
Edinbui^h,  and  in  1799,  at  the  age  of  thirteen,  he  joined  the 
Martin  sloop  of  war,  as  n  first  class  volunteer,  and  went  to 
the  Noith  Seas.  Removed,  in  the  following  spring,  to  the 
Renown,  74,  the  fiagship  of  Sir  John  Borlase  Warren,  he 
sailed  to  the  coast  of  Spain,  and  was  present  in  the  attack 
on  Ferrol.  He  afterwards  went  to  the  Mediterranean,  and 
in  November  1802  became  a  midshipman  in  the  Greyhound, 
32.  On  his  return  from  a  visit  to  St.  Helena  in  the  Egypti- 
enne,  he  joined  successively  in  1804-5,  the  Mediator  and 
Renommee  frigates.  In  November  1805,  he  got  his  lieuten- 
ancy, as  soon  as  he  "  passed,*"  at  19  years  of  age.  He  was  ap- 
pointed to  the  Couragcux,  74,  which  formed  part  of  the  squa- 
dron of  Sir  J.  B.  Warren ;  and  assisted  at  the  capture  of  the 
French  80  gnn  sliip  the  Marengo,  and  the  44  gun  frigate  the 
Belle  Poule.    In  March  1807,  being  then  in  the  West  Indies 


in  the  Prince  George,  98,  he  was  Dominated  acting  oomniaBd- 
er  of  the  Pultusk  frigate,  and  the  appdntment  was  oonfimwd 
by  the  admiralty  on  80th  November  following.  He  wis  pn- 
sent  at  the  reduction  of  the  Danish  islands,  St  Tlioaiai  and 
St.  Croix,  and  on  17th  July  1808,  be  assisted,  with  the  botts 
of  the  Fawn  sloop,  in  cutting  oat  a  Spanish  merebantmaa 
from  under  two  batteries  on  the  coast  of  Porto  Rioo,  the 
guns  of  one  of  which  he  spiked.  In  August  of  the  same 
year  ho  removed  to  the  Recruit  brig  of  18  gnns.  A  day  or 
two  after  recdving  the  command  he  came  in  sight  of  the 
French  corvette  Diligente  of  22  gnns,  maldng  in  the  direetioD 
of  the  island  of  Martinique.  He  immediately  gare  chase, 
and  the  two  vessels  exchanged  broadsides  within  pistol-sbot 
of  each  other.  Captain  Napier  was  struck  by  a  diot  at  the 
very  commencement  of  the  action,  which  broke  his  thif^ 
bone,  but  he  refused  to  go  below.  The  result  he  told  the 
public,  in  his  own  characteristic  way,  in  one  of  his  election 
speeches  at  Portsmouth  in  1833.  '*  I  had  once  the  misfisr- 
tune,"  he  said,  **  of  receiving  a  precious  licking  from  a  Fzencfa 
con-ette;  the  first  shot  she  fired  broke  my  thigh,  and  a 
plumper  carried  away  my  main-mast.  The  enemy  escaped, 
but  the  British  flag  was  not  tarnished.**  In  Febmarr  1809 
he  a>sisted  at  the  reduction  of  ^lartiniqoe.  The  JEolna,  Cle- 
opatra, and  Recruit  were  ordered  to  beat  up  in  the  nigiit  be- 
tween Pigeon  island  and  the  Main,  and  anchor  dose  to  Fort 
Edward.  The  enemy  fearing  an  attadc,  burnt  their  shipfung. 
With  five  men  he  landed  in  open  day,  scaled  the  walls  o( 
Fort  Edward,  and  phmted  the  Union  Jack  on  the  nunpartt^ 
A  regiment  being  landed  in  the  night,  Fort  Edward  was  takaa 
possesbion  of,  and  the  mortars  turned  agunst  the  enoity. 
Sir  Alexander  Cochrane,  his  commander-in-chief,  wrote  him 
a  letter  saying,  that  his  *'  conduct  was  the  means  of  ssTing 
many  lives,  and  of  shortening  the  siege  of  Martinique." 

In  the  enstung  April  he  assisted  Sir  Alexander  Cochrsnt 
in  a  chose  of  three  French  ships  of  tlie  line,  which,  after  a 
runnin^^  fight  of  nearly  fifly-five  hours,  terminated  in  the 
capture  of  the  Huutpolt,  74.  For  his  services  in  this  sffiur, 
the  cominander-in-diief  appointed  him  to  the  command  of 
the  captured  vessel,  and  the  post  commission  thus  confened 
upon  him  was  confirmed  by  the  admiralty  22d  May  1809. 
At  this  time  he  was  only  23.  In  the  following  summer  he 
returned  with  convoy  to  England  in  the  Jason  frigate,  and 
did  not  again  go  afloat  till  1811.  During  this  intenral  bs 
served  a  campaign  as  a  volunteer  with  the  army  in  the  Pen- 
insula, and  was  present  at  the  battle  of  Busaoo,  at  which  be 
carried  off  the  field  his  cousin,  Msjor  Napier,  afterwanls 
Lieutenant-general  Sir  Charles  James  Napier,  who  was  shot 
through  the  face.  In  the  course  of  the  campaign  he  himself 
was  wounded. 

In  the  early  part  of  1811  he  was  appointed  to  the  Thames 
frigate  of  34  guns,  in  which  he  served  in  the  Mediterranean 
under  Sir  Edward  Pellew,  afterwards  Lord  Exmouth.  On 
26th  July  that  year,  in  concert  with  the  Cephalus  under  Cap- 
tain Augustus  Clifford,  he  silenced  the  fire  of  eleven  gun- 
boats and  a  felucca  moored  across  the  harbour  of  Porto  dd 
Itifreschi,  as  well  as  that  of  a  round  tower,  and  captured  14 
merchantmen,  and  a  quantity  of  spars  destined  for  a  slup  cf 
the  line  and  a  frigate.  On  1st  November,  in  command  of  hii 
own  boats  and  those  of  the  Imperieuse,  he  landed  with  250 
men  of  the  G2d  regiment,  at  the  back  of  the  harbonr  of  Pdi- 
nuro,  and  carried  the  neighbouring  hdghts,  under  a  heavy 
fire  from  the  enemy,  who  were  compelled  to  retire.  Kext 
day  he  succeeded  in  capturing  10  gunboats,  22  richly  laden 
feluccas,  and  the  battery  of  24-pounder8  by  which  they  had 
been  protected.  In  the  spring  of  1812  he  was  employed  si 
the  senior  oflicer  on  the  coast  c^  Cdabria.    On  14th  May  hi 


i       I 


KAPIEK.  2- 

bee*m*TiH-adiiiiraloft1i*w1iit*,  and  in  lB5fl  ■dmiralariht 
Ua«.  In  NavemlxT  of  tht  uint  ynt,  on  tb«  d*atb  oF  Sir 
William  Mulnwortli.  ha  wu  cIhsIh]  M.P.  for  Sootliwuk. 
Ila  mamfd  tli«  kMov  of  Edvinl  Elen,  Eiq.,  RtT.,  and 
their  vm.  CnpUin  Cliarlrt  M>|Her,  wu  droimed  in  Daombct 
18J7,  wliilut  in  command  dT  lb*  Avmgtr  itCKin  fiigiitt,  wliin 
kha  wu  nm'lwd  on  Iha  Sonllt  rocki  in  Ilia  kladitamnean. 
Sir  CharlfS  X;<pi(r  died  at  liii  Mil,  Mtnliiaton  Hull,  Hainp- 
ebira,  KovcmlKr  6.  ISCO.      llii  portmit  jn  mTlijointd. 


G.C.B,,  mil  [if  Colonri  Gtor)^  Kapirr,  Ur  I^dvSarBli  l^onoi, 
wu  born  at  Wliildinll,  I»]idon,  lOth  Aupiitt.  1782.  Wbm 
he  w;is  bi'Ineiii  two  and  tlirec  Tr:in>  old.  bin  futbir  rnnaml 
lo  Irclnnd,  mid  in  .lanaan-  ITK  baforr  bir  liad  c<Hn|Jated  iiii 
InclIUi  }(uir.  lie  olmillFd  ■  ooRimiNlioii  in  Ilic  S3d  raginwiit. 
Ha  fine  Mrvrd  in  Hit  Iriili  rebellion  of  IT9S,  and  in*  aide- 


>  Dnir,  c 


luidine  in  Limerick,  i 


ISnO.    In  ISOS  be  .ipiin  aerted  in  Eniinet'a  rtbclli 

In  IHOl  lie  received  a  enptain's  commiuion  in  tba  sOth,  of 
ohich  rrgimciit  he  became  iikjdt  in  IBOS,  and  eommaiidad  it 
nil  Ibrougb  Sir  Jokn  Moon'a  ineniomble  retreat  to  Cuninna. 
At  Ibat  fiimoiu  batllt,  lie  and  Jifnjor  Stnnliopa  charcad  llta 
French  moat  eHllantIr,  ulilrli  rnturd  Sir  Jolin  to  cioUuiii, 
■hortlf  before  receiving  bi«  deiilli- wound.  "  Weil  done,  the 
£Olb!  U'vil  done,  my  inojon  1 "  In  endeuvonrin;;  to  ailirnce 
an  advanced  pin  which  waa  innkin;;  KreM  havoc  in  Ibe  BKt- 
iih  lineE,  JIajor  Napier  waa  arverely  wonnded  and  taken 
prisoner,  llmidet  u  iKijonet  atab  in  hui  bacic  from  a  French 
■cildier  wlio  Rime  behind  liim.  he  had  received  a  niukct.bnll 
in  Ilia  Itg,  and  a  ul>re.CDt  OD  hia  lie:id.  'Die  »1dien  were 
about  lo  dcapnlcli  biiii,  when  he  waa  Mved  by  ibe  iiilervpn- 
tion  of  a  dmmnier,  named  Gilicrt,  whom  Soult  afttnvanla 
reward!^  f.ir  liis  conduct-  Having  been  returned  in  liic  Gn- 
lettc  la  BiiiDiig  the  siaiii,  liii  friendi  want  inio  inourDing  fur 


3  SIB  CHARI.es  JAMES.  .: 

Km,  and  obtximd  from  Iba  Praiogatiira  court  adndiotnliM  \- 

of  hia  ptraaoal  utile.     la  the  meantime^  be  waa  hwlii  Ij 

with  the  ijrealeit  kindneaa  bj  Uanbal  Soolt,  who  naa«-  I 

inandrd  him  to  tba  conaidnation  of  bla  ipeemnr,  S*f.    Tka  | 

latter  parmittcd  bim  to  retiun  on  b!i  parok  to  Fn^MJ.  '- 

when  be  anived  SOth  Jlaith  1809,  and  aventnallT  pneMl  ' 
hia  liberation  hj  an  eiebanjra.     I'or  hia  gaUant  ossdM  ii 
thig  batlle  he  obtained  ■  medal,  then  (eldoni  siren  *ai  mA 

lie  aabacqaenllf  joined  Ijnd  VTellington'a  am*  is  Potit-    i 
Kal  u  a  Tolunterr.     At  the  Coa  two  bonea  wen  ahot  aDdv    ' 
him,  and  at   Dshco,  27th  September  ISIO,  ha  wu  Aat 
thTaii!:h  the  fnee,  th«  bullet  lod)!ing  behind  the  mt.     Ha  m 
compelled  lo  Innl  a  bandr«d  milea  lo  I jabon,  for  rSdeat 
eurpeal  afaiatance,  when  the  ballet  waa  extracted.     Ha  wia 
procnt  at  Fiieitei.  at  Iba  aecond  nege  of  Badajoa,  radii 
manj  akirmiahti.    In  181!  he  attained  the  rank  of  Eantas- 
ant-eolentl  in  tba  lOSd  rrpmrnt,  and  went  out  to  Dennada 
in  command  of  it.     In  1813  he  aerced  in  Ilia  eipeditia  te 
Cheaupeake  liar,  under  Sir  Sidner  Deckwilh.     Aftctwarii     | 
be  commanded  it  tba  affair  of  Little  Hampton,  which  proud 


anng  fiiada  nil  baate  to  meh  Wnlerlon  aa  «  Tolnnlwr, 
urived  fnmi  Client  on  the  field,  on  the  evening  nf  the 
I  June,  too  late  to  talce  part  in  the  battle,  bat  be  na 
rnt  thmti|:lu>ut  the  manb  upon  Pari*,  and  at  the  itoni- 
uf  CambmT.  On  Ilia  homeward  vorafie  to  Engiand.  the 
ho  looli  pa!<sB^  in  nunli  olT  Flnsbing,  and  ha  aarad  hin- 


acifbvhwi 

818  he  wan  nppcuiiled  inrpeclinR  field  o 
iaiandi,  when  b*  executed  inaiir  public 
Hjrned  hv  bimeelf,  nnd  in  1834  waa  tniide  litatenan 
IT  reaidcnt  of  Cephidiniin.  nhrn  lie  intniduced  moat  hnpnr-  '■ 
ant  impnivtmenta  in  the  adiniiiiitratinn  of  justice  and  in  tbt 
ntemal  condition  of  Hie  iilnn.l.  After  bin  TTlum  to  Eng- 
und.  he  puhliahed  a  work,  entitled  'Tbe  Colnnie*  ami  (h« 
••ninn  laUindi;'  also,  aiiotlieron  ' Tlie  Koad*  and  Bndgn  if 
Ccpbalonin.* 

In  183.';.  the  cnmmiMnneni  fiir  tbecfllonication  of  Snlk  j 
Anitralia  obtained  for  him  tin  offer  of  the  povenHH»hip  ef  j, 
that  colnnv.  bat  «»  the  poi-emment  would  not  allow  bin  ji 
noiier  to  promote  ita  impma-  | 
meni,  he  declined  tba  nppoinlinent.  At  thia  time  Iw  pgb-  | 
lialicd  '  ColoniLilion,  with  Remnrkt  np»n  Small  Farm)  aad  :i 
Over  Papulation.' in  which  he  eNiqniii Mr  advocate*  Ibeti^    l[ 

itiibea.     Harin);  fixed  bia  ri'^ldence  for  aome  time  ia 
Dnblin,  he  publialied,  in  1^8,  a  pumphlet  treatingoftk     | 
nej-lecteti  waiite  binds  and  di<fectii*e  njjricnlture,  at  that  pe-     ' 
riod,  nf  Irrbind.  ' 

In  1 837  ha  ublalned  tlio  brevet  nink  iif  mnjor-cmrral.  and 
won  aAerwarila  be  published  liis  '  Ileinarks  on  Militaij  Lae. 
md  the  ronialimcnt  of  Flngeini;,'  whicii  be  diupprorcd  of  in 
lime  of  peace.     Ha  alno,  about  Iba  aume  time,  edited  t>t     i 
ViKnj'a  ■I.iRbta  nnd  ShiidDwi  of  French  Jiilil.irr  Life.'    In     i 
ThIS39hewai  appuin[e<t  to  tbc  command  of  the  noftb-    .[ 
dialrict  of  Kngbind,  and  u  uid  to  have  prevented  a     i 
.t1i«t  onlbreak  itt  Kotlingham,  hy  brinf^lng  the  leaden  lo      1 
lesa  a  review  of  Ibe  troopa  under  his  command,  when  hi 
ili-d  out  Id  them  Ibe  fearful  infrrioritj  of  thrir  half- 


idis,iplii,e 


In  11 


if  the  troopa  in  the  Boinhaj  piai- 
idencT,  and  in  1S4S  be  was  aent  In  Scinde,  lo  take  tlic  com- 
mand of  nn  army  of  rcMrcc  sl.nlinned  Ibcie,  to  keep  open  tlic  | 
comnmnicationa'helween  Generali  Kott.  EiigUsb,  and  PolUi.  | 
then  iidv.ineing  inIo  AfTtihanialan.     Here  he  had  to  fi^t  at  I 
an  iimiienae  disadvantage.     At  Meeanee,  on  ITlh  Fibnuir,  | 


NAPIER, 


2U 


JOHN. 


battered  about  the  ears  of  the  Chinese  soldieri.  This  oocnx^ 
red  on  tlie  7th  September,  but,  owing  to  calms,  the  ships 
were  obliged  to  come  to  an  anchor  for  several  dajs.  On  the 
14th,  Lord  Napier  became  seriously  indisposed,  and  that  the 
interests  of  the  Britisli  merchants  miglit  not  be  injured  by  a 
farther  suspension  of  tlieir  trade,  the  men  of  war  were  ordered 
"  to  more  out  of  the  river,**  and  he  returned  to  Macao,  where 
lie  died  11th  October  1834,  of  a  lingering  fever,  brought  on 
by  anxiety.  He  was  one  of  the  16  Scots  representative  peers. 
With  four  daughters,  he  had  two  sons ;  Francis,  who  suc- 
ceeded him,  and  William,  clerk  of  the  works  at  Hong-Kong. 
Francis,  the  elder  son,  9th  Lord  Napier,  bom  Sep.  15, 1819, 
married,  in  1845,  the  only  daughter  of  Rol>ert  Manners  I.ock- 
wood,  Esq.,  issue,  4  sons.  In  Aug.  1840,  he  was  attached 
to  the  embiissy  at  Vienna,  and  in  Sep.  1842,  appointed  paid 
attach^  at  Teheran.  In  Jan.  following  he  became  pud 
attach^  at  Constantinople,  in  May  1846,  secretary  of  lega- 
tion at  Naples,  in  April  1852  secretary  of  legation  at  St 
Petersburg,  and  in  April  1854,  secretary  of  embassy  st  Con- 
stantinople. In  1857  lio  was  apfiointed  British  minister  at 
Washington,  and  in  1858  at  the  Hague.  His  eldest  son, 
William  John  George,  was  bom  Sep.  22,  1846. 


The  head  or  chief  of  the  ancient  family  of  N.np-er,  is  Sir 
Robert  Milliken  Napier  of  Napier  and  Milliken,  Renfrewshire, 
bart,  descended  from  Robert  Napier  of  Culcreuch,  Stirliiig- 
sliire,  the  2d  son  of  the  2d  marriuge  of  John  Napier  of  ^ler- 
chiston,  the  inventor  of  Logarithms.  He  is,  therefore,  his 
lineal  representative  and  male  heir.  Robert  Napier  left  one 
son,  Alexander  Napier  of  Culcreuch,  bom  in  1621,  who  married 
Alargaret,  eldest  daughter  of  John  I.ennox  of  Woodhead,  or 
I^nnox  castle,  Stiriingshire,  and  died  in  1692.  His  eldest 
son,  John  Napier  of  Culcreuch,  bom  in  1605,  married  his 
couitin,  Jean  Ix^nnox  of  Woodhend,  snd  died  in  1734.  The 
son  of  John,  William  Napier  of  Culcreuch,  a  general  in  the 
army,  married  Jane,  daughter  and  heii-ess  of  James  Milliken, 
Ksq.  of  Milliken,  Renfrewshire,  and  on  his  death  in  1780, 
lofl  a  son,  Robert  J(»hn  Milliken  N.ipier,  who  took  the  name 
of  Milliken,  in  compliance  with  the  will  of  his  maternal 
grandfather.  He  was  senior  colonel  in  the  army,  and  com- 
manded at  the  siege  of  Mangalore,  in  the  East  Indies.  He 
died  in  1808,  from  wounds  received  in  action,  at  the  nge  of  43. 

His  only  son,  Sir  William  Milliken  Nnpier  of  Napier  and 
Milliken,  baronet,  bom  in  1788,  married  in  1815,  Elizabeth 
Christian,  5th  daughter  of  John  SlirUng.  Esq.  of  Kippenross, 
Perthshire,  with  issue,  2  sons  and  1  daughter.  He  was  ser^'ed 
heir  male  general  of  Archibald,  3d  Lord  Napier,  March  17, 
1817,  and  succeeded  to  the  baronetcy  of  Nova  Scotia,  which 
had  been  conferred  on  the  first  Lord  Napier,  March  2,  1627. 
Sir  William  died  Feb.  4,  1852. 

His  eldest  son,  Sir  Robert  John  Milliken  Napier  of  Napier 
and  Milliken,  10th  baronet,  bom  Nov.  7,  1818,  married,  April 
4, 1850,  issue,  3  sons  and  8  daughters.  Archibald  I^nnoz, 
the  eldest  son,  was  bom  Nov.  2,  1855. 


The  Napiers  of  Ballikenrain,  Stirlingshire,  were  an  ancient 
family.  The  last  in  the  male  line,  John  Napier,  Esq.  of  Bal- 
likenrain, was  the  16th  of  the  name  and  family  of  Napier 
who,  in  succession,  possessed  the  estate.  His  heiress  mar- 
ried Robert  Dunmore,  Esq.,  whose  second  son,  John  Dunmore 
Napier,  Esq.,  inlieritcd  his  mother's  lands. 

NAPIER,  John,  of  McrcListon,  the  celebrated 
inventor  of  the  Ix)garithm8,  was  bom  at  Mercliis- 
ton  castle,  near  Edinburgh,  in  1550.    Local  tradi- 


tion had  pointed  to  Dmmbeg,  a  commoii  thatched 
farmhouse  in  the  parish  of  Drjmen,  Stirlingahue, 
as  his  birthplace,  when  the  earl  of  Bnckan,  who 
wrote  a  biography  of  him,  showed,  by  an  inscrip- 
tion on  Napier^s  portrait,  engraved  by  Cooper 
from  an  original  painting,  that  he  was  bom  at 
Merchiston  castle.  Part,  however,  of  his  patri- 
monial inheritance  lay  in  the  parish  of  Drymen. 
He  was  the  eldest  son  of  Sir  Alexander  Napier  of 
Edinbellie  and  Merchiston,  master  of  the  mint  to 
James  VI.,  by  his  first  wife,  Janet,  only  daughter 
of  Sir  Francis  Bothwell,  a  lord  of  session,  and  sis- 
ter of  Adam,  bishop  of  Orkney.  At  the  time  of 
his  birth,  his  father  was  only  sixteen  years  old. 
He  was  educated  at  St.  Salvator^s  college,  St.  An- 
drews, which  he  entered,  it  is  stated,  in  1562-3. 
He  afterwards,  according  to  Mackenzie,  spent 
several  years  in  France,  the  Netherlands,  and 
Italy ;  and  on  his  return  to  his  native  conntry, 
about  1571,  he  applied  himself  closely  to  the  study 
of  mathematics.  It  is  conjectured  that  he  ac- 
quired a  taste  for  this  branch  of  learning  doriog 
his  residence  abroad,  especially  in  Italy,  where  at 
that  period  there  were  a  considerable  number  of 
mathematicians  of  reputation. 

While  at  college,  during  his  "  tender  years  and 
bairn  age,^'  he  contracted  an  intimate  friendship 
with  a  Roman  Catholic  gentleman,  whom  he  styles 
his  ^*  familiar,"  and  frequently  defended  the  Re- 
formers and  their  doctrines  against  his  attacks. 
At  the  same  time,  he  was  also  an  attentive  hearer 
of  the  sermons  of  tlmt  worthy  Englishman,  Mr. 
Christopher  Goodman,  on  the  Apocalypse;  and 
his  iutei'pretation  of  its  m3'steries,  as  applied  to 
the  papists,  determined  him,  to  use  his  own  words, 
^^  with  the  assistance  of  God^s  Spirit,  to  employ 
his  study  and  diligence  to  search  out  the  remanent 
mysteries  of  that  holy  booke."  The  fruits  of  thii 
resolution  appeared  in  his  *  Plain  Discovery  of  the 
whole  Revelation  of  St.  John,*  published  at  Edin- 
burgh in  1593;  in  the  dedication  of  which  to  the 
king,  he  urged  his  majesty  to  attend  to  the  en- 
forcement of  the  laws  and  the  protection  of  reli- 
gion, beginning  reformation  ^*  in  his  own  house, 
family,  and  court."  From  this  work  it  appean 
that,  amidst  Iiis  various  mathematical  specula- 
tions, Napier  paid  some  attention  also  to  the  cul- 
tivation of  poetry,  for  prefixed  is  a  metrical  ad- 


|i 


-J 


NASMYTH. 


246 


NASMYTH. 


■  I 


I    I 


!       I 


I ; 


was  to  have  the  tliii*d  of  what  was  found,  and  to 
bo  safely  guarded  by  Logan  back  to  Edinburgh. 
And  in  case  he  should  find  notliing,  he  refers  the 
satisfaction  of  his  labonr  and  pains  to  the  discre- 
tion of  Logan.  It  hns  been  suspected  by  Mr. 
Mark  Kapicr,  in  liis '  Memoh-s '  of  his  great  name- 
sake, that  I-K)gan  had  another  object  in  view  than 
that  expressed  in  the  contract.  Napier  seems  to 
have  sustained  some  serious  injury  from  the  un- 
principled laird  of  Rcstnlrig,  as  appears  from  the 
terms  of  a  lease  granted  in  1596,  by  which  his 
tenant  is  prohibited  from  subletting  his  land  to 
any  one  who  should  bear  the  surname  of  I»gan. 

Nasxa'TH,  a  surname,  fonncrly  and  properly  N.ieamyth. 
The  family  tradition  accounts  for  the  origin  and  spelling  of 
the  name  by  the  follovrin;;  romantic  incident.  In  tue  reign  of 
Alexander  III.,  the  aiicextur  uf  the  family,  beinf;  in  attendance 
on  the  king,  was,  on  the  eve  of  a  battle,  required  by  him  to 
repair  his  armour.  Although  a  man  of  great  htature  and 
power,  he  was  unsuccessful.  After  the  bnttle,  Iiaviug  per- 
formed prodigies  of  valour,  he  was  knighted  by  tlie  king, 
with  the  remark  that  **  although  he  was  nae  Smithy  lie  was  a 
brave  gentleman.**  The  armoriul  beiirings  of  the  family  have 
reference  to  this  origin  of  the  name,  viz.,  u  drawn  sword  be- 
tween  two  war  hammers  or  **martels''  broken,  with  the 
motto,  "  Xon  arte  sed  marte^**  in  old  Scotch,  "  Not  by  kna- 
▼erie  but  by  braverie,**  (arte  and  huirery  meaning  skill,  not 
cunning  Kaesmyth  of  Posso  is  the  head  of  this  ancient 
family,  being  descended  from  the  stalwart  knight  of  the  legend. 

The  Nacsmyths  of  Posso,  created  baronets  of  Kova  Sco- 
tia, have  held  Innds  in  Tweeddale  since  the  13th  century, 
Their  ancestor.  Sir  Michael  Kaesmyth,  fought  in  the  wars 
with  Bruce.  Another  Sir  Michael  Naertmvth  was  chamber- 
lain  to  the  archbishop  of  St.  Andrews,  nnd  obtained,  in  1544, 
in  marriage  with  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  John  Raird  of  Pos- 
so, tlie  estate  of  tlut  name  in  Peebles-shire.  He  was  a 
staunch  adherent  of  Queen  Mary,  and  the  tower  of  Posso 
was  frequently  inhabited  by  her  on  hawking  excursions.  It 
was  fitted  up  for  her  reception  by  her  royal  mother,  Mary  of 
Guise,  from  the  palace  at  I^ith.  The  tower  was  burnt  down 
in  the  reign  of  Clcirlcs  I.,  and  is  now  a  ruin.  Sir  Michael 
Naesmyth  fought  on  Queen  Mar}''s  side  at  I-angside  in 
the  year  15G8.  He  was  subsequently  banu*hed,  and  his 
property  confiscated  by  the  regent  Moray.  He  died  at  an 
advanced  age  in  1609.  His  second  son,  John,  was  chief  chi- 
rurgeon  to  James  VI.,  and  to  the  king  of  France.  "  Johne 
Nesmith,  chirurgian,*'  was  by  chance  riding  beside  King 
James,  as  he  was  hunting  at  Falkland  on  5th  August  1600, 
the  morning  of  tlie  Gowrie  conspiracy  catastrophe,  when  Al- 
exander Ruthven  came  to  his  majesty,  and  was  the  person 
sent  by  the  king  to  bring  Ruthven  back,  after  he  had  spoken 
witli  him,  to  s:iy  that  he  had  determined  to  proceed  to  the 
earl  of  Gowrie*8  house  at  Perth,  in  search  of  some  imaginary 
treasure,  aa  soon  as  the  chase  was  ended.  He  died  at  I^n- 
don  in  1613,  and  in  his  last  will  he  bequeathed  his  *'hert  to 
his  young  maister  the  prince*s  grace,**  me^ining  Henry,  prince 
of  Wales.  His  son,  James  Kaeimyth  of  Posso,  was  falconer 
to  James  VI.  The  royal  eirie  of  Posso  Craig  is  on  the  fam- 
ily estate,  and  the  lure  worn  by  Queen  Mary  and  James,  pre- 
sented to  him  by  the  latter,  is  preserved  as  an  heirloom. 


James  Naesmyth,  sbcriff  of  Periilw  Ati<>  m  «r  tk 
falconer,  wai  a  mtmber  of  the  Soottiah  pariianMnt  m  1827. 
Under  his  sberiflahip  the  Ust  ••weapoMbaw"  was  bdi 
for  the  county  of  Peeblee  on  tlie  SherifTa  mnir.  His  eUeit 
son,  James  Naesmyth,  an  eminent  lawyer,  wm  knewa  ai 
*«  tlie  deil  o*  Dawick,**  that  ia,  Dalwidc,  the  family  seat  He 
died  in  1706.  A  younger  aon  of  Jamei  the  Sheriff  was  a 
loyal  gentleman ;  having  raised  a  troop  of  bone,  be  Krved 
under  CUrerfaooie  in  behalf  of  the  roval  caoM.  Tbe  deed 
signed  by  Charies  XL  at  Windsor  is  in  tbe  fiunilj  cfaaiter 
chest.  Another  Naesmyth  (John,)  foogbt  at  tbe  btttb  cf 
Preston.  Hit  cUymore,  inUid  with  gold,  bearing  on  eos 
aide,  **  For  God,  my  Conntry  and  Kii^  James  tbe  Eigjbt," 
and  on  the  other,  '*  Proaperitie  to  SootUnd  and  Nae  Union," 
is  retained  in  the  family 

Tlie  biwyer*s  aon.  Sir  James  Naesmyth,  was  created  a  bar* 
onet  of  Nova  Scotia,  81st  July  1706,  with  limitation  to  Us 
heirs  male.  On  his  death  in  1720,  his  eldest  aon,  Sir  Jama 
Naeamvth.  M.P.,  became  the  second  baronet.  He  distu- 
guished  himself  by  his  improvementa  and  plantations  on  the 
estate  of  Dalwick,  and  is  described  by  Sir  Tboinaa  Dick  Len- 
der, as  *'  a  gentleman  of  much  scientific  acquirement.  He 
Wiis  u  pupil  of  I.innaius,  and  htudied  under  him  in  Nonraj. 
In  addition  to  his  own  ordinary  gardena,  be  created  oCbcis  ftr 
extensive  botanical  collections,  with  greenbonaes  for  rat , 
plants;  and  on  these  he  put  tlie  strikingly  appropriate  mot- 
to :  *  Solomon,  in  all  his  glory,  was  not  arrayed  like  one  of 
these.'  **  In  1735  be  planted  an  avenue  of  silver-firs  at  Dsl- 
wick,  most  of  the  trees  of  which  are  nearly  of  equal  magni- 
tude. He  had  travelled  into  Switzerland  and  Italy,  and  was 
the  first  who  brought  over  and  planted  the  lareb  in  Scotland, 
which  he  did  in  1725,  some  years  before  the  Doke  of  Atboki 
He  died  4th  February*  1779.  He  bad  tn-o  sons.  Tbe  elder. 
Sir  James  Naesmyth,  3d  baronet,  married  in  1785,  Eleanor, 
2d  daughter  of  John  Murray,  Esq.  <^  Philipbangb.  Wbea 
a  diild,  this  lady  was  siived  from  the  flamea  of  Hangingshaw 
castle,  on  its  accidentsilly  catching  fire,  by  being  let  down  in 
a  basket  through  a  window.    Sir  Jamee  died  Dec.  4,  1829. 

His  only  son.  Sir  John  Alurray  Naesmyth,  4th  baronet, 
bom  at  Dalwick,  Dec.  30, 1803,  was  educated  at  Rugby,  and 
greatly  exceeded  his  grandfather's  example,  in  improving  the 
beauty  of  the  family  seat.  He  married,  1st,  Mary,  4tb  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  John  Marjoribanks,  Ist  baronet  of  Lees,  issne,  5 
sons  and  1  dr.;  2dly,  Hon.  Kleanor  Powys,  daughter  ot 
Thomas,  2d  I^>rd  IJlfurd,  issue,  a  son  and  a  dr.  The  eldest 
and  only  surviving  son,  James,  of  the  Bengal  civil  service, 
born  Feb.  9,  1827,  married  Eliza  Gordon  Urodie,  eldest  dr. 
of  F.  Whitworth  Russell,  Esq.,  Bengal  civil  service,  2d  son  of 
Sir  Henry  Russell,  Bart  of  Swallowfield,  chief  justice  of  Indis. 

NASMYTH,  Alexaxdeu,  a  celebrated  artist, 
the  father  of  the  Scottish  school  of  landscape 
painting,  was  bom  at  Edinburgh  in  1757,  and  re- 
ceived his  elementary  education  in  that  city.  In 
his  3'outh  he  went  to  Tendon,  and  became  the  np- 
prenticed  pupil  of  Allan  Ramsay,  the  son  of  the 
poet,  at  that  period  one  of  the  most  esteemed  por- 
trait painters  of  the  metropolis}.  He  aderwards 
repaired  to  Italy,  where  he  pursued  his  studies  for 
several  years  in  the  society  of  the  best  Roman 
artists  of  the  time.  On  his  return  to  his  native 
city  he  commenced  practising  with  great  success 


NEWALL. 


248 


NEWBUBGH. 


ner,  he  may  be  said  to  have  iufased  their  spirit 
into  his  works,  and  he  was  honourably  distin- 
guished by  the  name  of  the  English  Ilobbima. 
So  high  is  the  estimation  in  which  his  pictures 
are  held,  that  many  of  them  have  sold  for 
more  than  ten  times  the  sum  which  the  artist 
received  for  them. 

In  his  habits  he  is  described  as  having  been  pe- 
culiar. From  the  age  of  17,  in  consequence  of 
sleeping  in  a  damp  bed,  he  had  been  afflicted  with 
total  deafness.  He  died  at  South  Jjmibeth,  near 
London,  August  17,  1831,  aged  45. 

KswALL,  derived  from  Nkvilxjc,  or  Nobl,  the  ramame 
of  a  family  of  Norman  extraction,  which  canie  to  Scotland 
about  the  16th  centnry,  and  settled  in  GallowaT. 

WiHiam  Newall  of  Barskeoch  in  Kella,  and  of  Earlaton  in 
Dairy,  in  the  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright,  mtirried  Jean  Boyle 
Cunningham,  eldest  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Cunningham 
of  Cor^ill,  great-grandson  of  Juines,  earl  of  Glencaim,  and 
had  5  sons  and  2  daughters.  The  sons  were,  1.  John.  2. 
Robert    8.  Chnrles.     4.  William.     5.  James. 

John,  the  eldest  son,  married,  1st,  Jean  Blair,  daughter  of 
—  Blair  of  Duiirod,  issue,  5  sons;  and  2dly,  Agnes,  daugli- 
ter  of  W.  Rorison  of  Ardoch,  and  had  2  sons  and  some  daugh- 
ters. The  sons  of  both  marriages  all  died  without  issue. 
The  last  uf  them  was  Colnnel  Newall  31  ax  well  of  Goldielea, 
he  having  taken  the  name  of  Maxwell  from  his  wife. 

James,  the  youngest  son  of  William  Newall  of  Bar&keoch, 
married  hi»  2d  cousin,  Agnes  Montgomery  M'Culloch,  daugh- 
ter of  John  M'Culloch,  Esq.,  his  mother  being  descended 
from  the  Eglinton  family.  They  left  one  son,  Thomas  Cuth- 
bert,  and  three  daughters. 

Tlie  son,  Thomas  Culhbert  Newall,  married  Janet  Brack- 
enridge,  eldest  daughter  of  William  Brackenridge,  Dowhill, 
Ayrshire,  issue,  6  sons  and  3  daughters. 

James,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded  Colonel  Newall  Maxwell 
as  proprietor  of  Goldielea,  and  represents  the  male  line  of 
the  Newalls  of  Barskeoch  and  Earlston. 


Nkwark,  I^rd,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland  (now 
extinct)  conferred,  8 1st  August,  1661,  on  the  celebrated 
General  David  I.«slie,  a  memoir  of  whom  is  given  in  a  previ- 
ous part  of  this  work,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  600,)  with  limitation  to 
the  heirs  male  of  his  body.  His  son,  David,  second  Lord 
Newark,  succeeded  his  father  in  1682,  and  died  15th  May 
1694,  without  surviving  male  issue,  when  the  title  properly 
became  extlncL  His  eldest  daughter,  Jean,  on  his  death,  as- 
sumed the  title  of  Baroness  Newark.  She  married  Sir  Alex- 
ander Anstruther,  knight,  and  on  her  death,  21st  February 
1740,  her  eldest  son,  William,  styled  himself  Lord  Newark. 
He  frequently  voted  at  elections  of  representative  peers  in 
Scotland,  without  challenge,  till  2d  January  1771,  when  the 
duke  of  Buccleuch  objected,  on  the  ground  that  he  was  not 
the  heir  male  of  the  body  of  the  first  Lord  Newark.  He  was 
captun  of  marines,  but  the  corps  to  which  he  belonged  was 
reduced  in  1749,  and  in  1755  he  got  a  company  of  invalids. 
He  died  at  Edinburgh  8d  February  1773.  His  brother, 
Alexander,  a  merchant  at  Boulogne,  also  assumed  the  title  of 
Lord  Newark,  and  voted,  as  such,  at  the  general  election  of 
Soota  representative  peers  in  1774,  without  challenge ;  but 


■t  that  of  1790  the  duke  of  Bncdencb  pnt«t«d  apiiiit  hii 
Tote  in  the  same  tenns  as  agaioat  his  hrotbo^i.  H«  &d 
10th  Maxt^  1791,  aged  80.  Hb  tldeat  ton,  the  Uob.  Joha 
Leslie,  assumed  the  title,  but  the  bonss  of  hmb  hinag  h 
1793  decided  that  the  votes  gtvan  by  his  father  wen  not  good, 
he  was  obliged  to  relinquish  it  He  was  Beatenant-eokiKl 
of  the  8d  regiment  of  foot,  and  aide-de-camp  to  the  kisg. 
The  family  is  represented,  it  is  said,  by  Leslie  U  Wavdes  aid 
Findrassie,  baronet 


Nkwbuboh,  Earl  of,  a  title  oonferued  m  1660,  on  Sir 
James  Livingfttone,  of  Kmnaird,  baronet  (see  toL  iL  pw  677)l 
He  had  been  one  of  the  gentlemen  of  the  bedchamber  to 
King  Charles  L,  who  created  him  Visooont  Newbngh,  11th 
September  1647,  to  him  and  the  heirs  male  of  his  body.  On 
Cromwell's  disco\'ering  that  he  corresponded  with  Chaiks  IL 
in  his  exile,  his  lordship  in  1650  escaped  into  HoBand,  sad 
repaired  to  the  king  at  the  Hague.  He  was  ezeepted  firan 
pardon  by  Cromwell's  act  of  grace  in  1654.  At  the  Resto- 
ration he  was  appointed  captain  of  the  guards,  and  by  pa- 
tent, dated  3l8t  December  1660,  created  earl  of  Newbui|^ 
viscount  of  Kinnaird,  and  Baron  Livingstone  of  Flacraig,  to 
him  and  his  heirs  whatsoever.  He  died  26th  December  1670. 
His  only  son,  Charles,  second  earl  of  Newburgh,  died  in  1694, 
leaving  a  daughter,  Chariotte  Maria,  countess  of  Newborgk 
in  her  own  right.  Thii  lady,  who  possessed  the  title  61  yean, 
died  4th  Angust  1755.  She  was  twice  married ;  fint,  to 
'iliomas,  eldest  son  of  Hugh,  Lord  Clifford  of  Chndldgh,  by 
whom  she  had  two  daughters ;  and,  secondly,  to  the  Hon. 
Charles  Raddiffe,  third  son  of  Francis,  lA)rd  Radcliffe,by 
Mary  Tudor,  a  daughter  of  King  Charies  IL,  by  whom  she 
had  three  sons  and  four  daughters.  Her  second  husband, 
Charles  Radcliffe,  was  the  brother  of  the  unforiimate  eari  of 
Derwentwater,  who  was  beheaded  24th  February  1716,  for 
engaging  in  the  rebellion  of  the  prerious  year.  He  hinuelf, 
after  being  condemned  to  death  for  his  share  in  that  insurrec- 
tion, escaped  out  of  Newgate,  and  took  refuge  in  France, 
wheie  he  married  the  countess  of  Newburgh.  After  the 
breaking  out  of  the  rebellion  uf  1745,  he  was  taken  on  board 
a  French  privateer,  when  on  her  way  to  Scotland  with  sup- 
plies for  Prince  Charles,  and  beheaded  on  Towerhill,  in  tenni 
of  his  former  sentence,  8th  December  174G.  On  the  death 
of  his  nephew.  Lord  Radcliffe,  in  December  17S1,  he  bad  as- 
sumed the  title  of  earl  of  Derwentwater.  The  Chevalier  de 
St.  George  wrote  a  letter  of  condolence  to  his  widow,  under 
the  title  of  *  I^dy  Derwentwater,*  on  her  husband's  execu- 
tion, and  in  her  answer  she  informed  ^'  his  majesty  **  that  the 
king  of  France,  on  the  recommendation  of  **the  prince  of 
Wales  and  the  duke  of  York,"  had  given  her  son,  **  that  was 
Captain  in  Dillon's,'*  the  brevet  of  colonel,  with  appointments 
of  1 ,800  li\Tefl  a-jear,  and  to  his  sisters  150  livres  a-yoir 
each,  *'  with  his  royal  promise  of  his  protection  of  the  family 
for  ever."  The  son  referred  to,  James  Clement  Radcliffe 
Livingstone,  rose  to  be  a  general  in  the  French  service.  By 
an  act  of  parliament  pasHod  in  1749,  the  forfeited  Derwent- 
water estates  were  invested  for  the  benefit  of  Greenwick 
Hospital,  after  allotting  £30,000  out  of  the  sum  derived  from 
the  sale  of  a  portion  of  them  for  the  relief  of  the  children  of 
the  said  Charles  Radcliffe. 

James  Bartholomew,  the  eldest  son,  bom  at  Vincennes  in 
Fnmce,  23d  April  1725,  was  the  third  earl  of  Newburgh. 
WliWe  I^rd  Kinnaird,  he  was  aiptured,  with  his  father,  on 
board  the  French  vessel  in  1745.  Ten  years  afterwards,  he 
succeeded  his  mother,  and  died  at  Slindon  in  Sussex,  the 
property  of  his  wife,  the  only  daughter  and  heiress  of  As 


I 


.J  I 


NICHOL. 


260 


NICHOLSOK. 


I . 


parish  Bclioolmaster  at  Hawick,  and  thereafter  at 
Cupnr-Fifc.  Subseqaently  he  became  rector  of 
the  academy  at  Montrose,  in  which  capacity  he 
frequently  delivered  lectures  upon  chemistry,  geo- 
logy, electricity,  and  astronomy,  elucidated  with 
audi  apt  experiments  and  illnstrations,  as  made 
them  extremely  popular. 

Meanwhile,  he  had,  at  intervals,  attended  the 
divinity  class  at  college,  where  he  studied  for  the 
Kstablislied  Church  of  Scotland,  and  in  due  time 
was  licensed  to  preach  the  gospel.  His  tastes, 
however,  led  him  to  the  pursuits  of  science,  and 
having  been  in  early  life  a  keen  mathematicmn, 
he  soon  abandoned  the  pulpit,  and  devoted  him- 
self to  the  more  congenial  study  of  astronomy. 
AVithout  having,  in  his  early  years,  special  ad- 
vantage or  encouragement,  he  was  indebted  for 
the  position  which  he  attained  in  the  world  of 
science  solely  to  his  own  merit  and  perseverance. 
While  teaching  others,  he  continued  an  ardent 
student  himself.  By  his  writings  and  by  his  lec- 
tures, which  latter  were,  in  a  high  degree,  popu- 
lar, fascinating,  and  instructive,  he  soon  became 
generally  known,  and  in  1836,  when  the  profes- 
sorship of  practical  astronomy  in  the  university 
of  Glasgow  became  vacant,  I^rd  Melbourne,  then 
prime  minister,  at  once  appointed  ^fr.  Nicliol  to 
the  chair. 

From  that  period  ho  resided  in  Glasgow,  and 
it  was  owing  mainly  to  his  exertions  that  the  mag- 
nificent Observatory  in  its  immediate  vicinity  was 
erected.  He  ex])ended  upon  it  a  large  amount  of 
his  own  private  means,  and  there,  by  the  aid  of  some 
of  the  finest  instniments  in  Great  Britain,  he  pur- 
sued hid  favourite  studies,  and,  from  time  to  time, 
gave  to  the  world  the  results  of  his  observations 
in  solar  regions.  He  was  the  first  to  make  the 
public  famliinr  with  that  which  is  called  the  *'  Ne- 
bular Hypothesis."  He  delivered  frequent  courses 
of  lectures  on  his  favourite  science  to  crowded  au- 
diences in  the  City  Hall  of  Glasgow,  and  also  in 
many  of  the  larger  and  smaller  towns  throughout 
the  kingdom ;  and  appeared  to  take  as  much  de- 
light in  explaining  the  laws  that  regulate  the  hea- 
venly bodies  to  the  unpretending  mechanic  as  to 
the  carefully  educated  student.  He  died  at  Rothe- 
say, September  19,  1859.  He  was  twice  married, 
and  left  a  son  and  a  daughter.    His  works  arc  : 


laaiKiiitf 


View  of  tht  Arehitactoraoftlie  Hmviml 
Utters  to  a  I^y.    Edinb.  1887,  8ni. 

The  Solar  Sjitem.    Edinbmjgb,  1M2,  8t«. 

Tbe  PUmet  Neptnne.    Kdinli.  1848,  8f«. 

Tho  Stellar  Univene.    Edinb.  1848,  I611M. 

Thoagiitt  on  tome  Important  Points  rriatiag  to  tlit  8|yB- 
tern  of  tbe  World.    1848,  8to. 

The  PhinetaFy  System.    Edinbm^,  1851. 

The  Crdopiedia  of  tbe  Pbjsieal  Sdencet.     EdinboriL 
1857,  8ro. 


N1CHOL8OX,  the  name  of  a  familr  which  possesses  a  bar- 
onetcj  of  Nora  Sootia,  conferred,  2d  Jolj  1829,  oo  Joba 
Nicbolsoo  of  Kicholaon  and  Lasswade,  with  reroaindv  to  hit 
heirs  male  generallr.  Sir  James  Kicholaon,  tbe  sixth  banm- 
et,  djing  withont  issue,  Artliur  Kicholson,  Esq.  of  T<offhend, 
was  served  heir-male  to  the  family  in  1828,  and  m  sndi  in- 
herited the  title  as  serenth  baronet  Sir  Aitbnr  Nidiolsoa 
married  Miss  Jack,  daughter  of  the  renr  Iter.  William  Jack, 
D.D.,  principal  of  King*s  oollege,  Aberdeen.  The  famOj 
seatfl  aro  Brungb  I^ge,  FetUr,  and  Gremista,  near  Lerwick, 
Shetland. 

XICHOI^Oy,  Peter,  an  eminent  architect, 
the  son  of  a  stone-mason,  was  bom  in  the  parish 
of  Frestonkirk,  East  Lothian,  on  20th  Jnly  1765, 
and  received  the  rudiments  of  his  education  at  tbe 
parish  school.  When  a  boy,  mathematics  formed 
his  principal  study,  in  which  he  became  remarka- 
bly proficient.  At  the  age  of  twelve  he  was  taken 
from  school  to  assist  his  father.  He  had  before 
this  employed  himself  in  making  drawings  and 
models  of  the  numerous  mills  in  the  neighbour- 
hood of  his  native  place,  and  having  expressed  a 
wish  to  be  a  cabinetmaker,  he  served  an  appren- 
ticeship to  it  of  four  years  at  Linton,  the  principal 
village  in  the  parish,  and  afterwards  worked  as  a 
journeyman  first  in  Edinburgh  and  subsequently 
in  I/ondon.  Having  commenced  teaching  at  an 
evening  school  in  Berwick  Street,  Soho,  he  was  so 
successful  that  he  soon  abandoned  his  trade  for 
authorship,  and  in  1792  published  *•  The  Carpenter's 
New  Guide,'  the  plates  of  which  were  engraved  by 
his  own  hand.  Among  subsequent  works  of  his, 
at  this  period,  were  *  The  Student's  Instructor  to 
the  Five  Orders,'  and  *Tlie  Principles  of  Architec- 
ture,' 3  vols.  8vo.  The  latter  work,  commenced 
in  numbers  in  1795,  was  not  completed  till  1799. 

In  1800  Mr.  Nicholson  returned  to  Scotland, 
and  went  to  reside  in  Glasgow.  He  built  a  wood- 
en bridge  across  the  Clyde,  long  since  removed. 
He  also  designed  Carlton  Place,  Laurieston,  and 
the  large  and  singulariy  out -of- place  Grechm 
structure  which  terminates  the  second  qoadrangla 


NICOLL, 


262 


ROBERT. 


I! 


II 


I ; 


and,  at  the  close  of  his  first  session  at  college,  he 
gained  the  prize  of  the  silver  pen,  bestowed  on 
the  best  Greek  scholar  in  the  first  class.  In  1806 
he  entered  the  class  of  mathematics,  then  taught 
by  Dr.  Hamilton,  the  celebrated  writer  on  finance, 
and  also  attended  the  prelections  of  Professor 
Beattie  in  natural  and  civil  history. 

In  1807  he  went  to  Oxford,  having  been  in- 
formed that  there  was  a  vacancy  at  Baliol  college, 
in  one  of  the  exhibitions  on  Snell's  foundation. 
He  carried  with  him  a  letter  of  recommendation 
from  Bishop  Skinner  of  Aberdeen  to  Dr.  Parsons, 
the  Master  of  the  college,  and  was  at  once  elected 
to  the  vacant  exhibition.  For  the  next  fonr  years 
he  prosecuted  his  studies  with  great  diligence  and 
success,  and  in  1811  obtained  the  degree  of  B.A. 
In  1813  he  turned  his  attention  to  the  oriental 
languages,  and  of  these  soon  acquired  an  exten- 
sive knowledge,  on  account  of  which  he  was  ap- 
pointed one  of  the  sub-librarians  of  the  Bodleian 
library,  with  the  salary  of  about  £200  a-ycar.  In 
1817  he  received  deacon's  orders,  and  became  cu- 
rate of  one  of  the  churches  in  Oxford. 

He  now  applied  himself  to  cataloguing  the  ori- 
ental manuscripts  in  the  Bodleian,  a  very  arduous 
task,  when  it  is  considered  that  these  amounted 
to  about  thirty  thousaud.  After  preparing  and 
publishing  a  catalogue  of  the  MSS.  brought  from 
the  east  by  Dr.  E.  D.  Clarke,  he  set  himself  to 
complete  the  unfinished  general  catalogue  of  the 
eastern  MSS.,  which  had  been  begun  about  a  hun- 
dred yeara  before  by  Uri,  the  celebrated  Hunga* 
rian.  His  first  fasciculus  of  this  great  work  made 
his  name  known  throughout  £m*opo.  He  had 
made  himself  master  of  so  many  of  the  modem 
languages,  that  it  was  commonly  said  of  him  that 
he  could  walk  to  the  great  wall  of  China  without 
requiring  an  inteipretcr. 

In  June  1822,  on  the  promotion  of  Dr.^  Richard 
Lawrence  to  the  archbishopric  of  Casliel,  NicoU 
was,  without  solicitation  on  his  part,  appointed 
regins  professor  of  Hebrew  in  the  university  of 
Oxford,  to  which  chair  was  attached  the  cauonry 
of  Christ  church.  In  the  letter  in  which  the 
carl  of  Liverpool,  then  prime  minister,  announced 
the  appointment,  he  said,  that  it  had  been  con- 
ferred by  his  majesty  on  account  of  his  high  repu- 
tation as  an  oriental  scholar  and  the  value  at- 


tached to  his  labours*  His  income  was  now  about 
£2,000.  He  soon  after  took  the  degree  of  doctor 
of  dvil  law.  He  died  of  bronchitis,  September  24, 
1828,  in  the  36th  year  of  his  age.  He  was  twice 
married:  first  to  a  Danish  lady,  who  died  hi 
1825 ;  secondly,  to  Sophia,  daughter  of  the  Rev. 
J.  Parsons,  editor  of  the  Oxford  Septoagint,  who 
wrote  a  Memoir  of  Dr.  NicoU,  prefixed  to  a  poet- 
humous  volume  of  his  Sermons.  By  his  second 
wife  he  had  three  daughters,  who  survived  him. 

NICOLL,  Robert,  one  of  the  most  precocious 
poets  that  has  appeared  in  Scotland,  was  bom 
January  7,  1814,  at  a  farm-house  at  Little  Tnlly- 
beltane,  in  the  parish  of  Auchtergaven,  Perthshire. 
He  was  the  second  son  in  a  family  of  nine  chil- 
dren. His  father,  at  the  time  of  his  birth,  was 
tenant  of  a  small  faim  in  Auchtergaven,  but  hav- 
ing become  securit}',  to  the  amount  of  five  or  six 
hundred  pounds,  for  a  connexion  by  marrkge, 
who  failed  and  absconded,  the  utter  ruin  of  his 
own  family  was  the  consequence ;  he  gave  up  his 
whole  property  to  his  creditoi-s,  and  engaged  him- 
self as  a  day-labourer  on  the  fields  he  had  former- 
ly rented.  Robert  received  the  little  education 
he  ever  got  at  the  parish  school,  and  at  an  early 
age  he  was  sent  to  a  neighbouring  farmer,  who 
employed  him  to  tend  cattle,  or  assist  in  mml 
operations,  during  the  summer  months,  while  be 
continued  to  attend  the  parish  school  in  winter. 
His  propensity  for  reading  early  showed  itself. 
In  going  to,  or  returning  from  school,  or  when 
herding  upon  his  own  "Ordie  braes,"  he  was 
never  without  a  book,  and  his  friends  bestowed 
upon  him  the  familiar  nickname  of  *  the  minister.* 
When  he  was  about  thirteen  he  first  began  to 
write,  and  at  the  same  time  became  a  correspond • 
ent  of  one  of  the  Perth  papers. 

When  he  was  eighteen  yeai*s  of  age  he  left  bis 
home,  *^  by  the  bonnie  Ordie's  side,"  and  became 
an  appi-entice  to  a  grocer  in  the  High  Street  of 
Perth.  Being  employed  in  the  shop  from  seven 
in  the  morning  until  nine  in  the  evening,  it  was 
chiefly  during  the  night  that  he  wrote  and  studied. 
During  his  stay  in  Peith,  and  when  no  more  than 
nineteen  years  of  age,  he  wrote  his  prose  tale,  en- 
titled ^11  Zingaro,'  his  first  production  of  an/ 
length,  which  was  published  ui  Johnstone's  Edin- 
burgh Magazine.    It  is  the  story  of  an  ardent 


NIDDRIE, 


254 


NIMMO. 


his  cocufiii  and  he ir  miile.  Sir  Tliomu  Nicolton  of  lllliooiiltiy, 
ClackiiiannaiiMljire,  who  became  otii  baronet.  The  Utter  told 
that  efttate  in  1693,  and  n-tired  to  Holland.  On  the  death 
of  his  grandson,  Sir  David,  8th  baronet,  without  issne,  at 
Breda,  OcL  19,  1808,  the  boronetcr  devolved  on  his  kinsman, 
lilujor-geueral  Sir  William  Nicolson,  Uth  baronet,  bom  in 
Scotland  in  1759.  He  died  in  1830,  and  was  succeeded  bj  his 
son.  Sir  Frederick  William  Krskine  KicoUon,  captain  R.N., 
bom  April  22, 1 815.  The  hitter  married.  Ikt,  oiilv  Jr.  of  James 
I»ch,  Knq.,  M  I\,  isftue,  2  sons  and  a  dr. ;  and  2dir,  only  <2r. 
of  Hubert  Cuilington,  Esq..  iaxne,  a  sou  and  a  (//*. 


KiDDUiK,  a  surname,  meaning  king's  champion,  derived 
from  two  Gaelic  words,  Niadhy  champion,  and  Hi  or  J?JbcA, 
king,  and  denoting  that  it  was  once  the  place  of  his  resi- 
dence. Niddr}'-Marshal,  in  the  parisli  of  Liberton,  Mid  Lo- 
thian, Wtis  so  called  from  the  Wauchopes,  who,  in  ancient 
times,  were  gnardians  of  part  of  the  south  borders  of  Scot- 
hind,  (see  Wauciiopk,  surname  of,)  and  to  distinguish  it 
from  I^ngtiiddrjr  in  East  i^thiau,  and  Niddry  Seton,  Lin- 
lithgowshire. 

KIMMO,  Alexandeu,  F.R.S.E.,  M.R.I.A.,  au 
eminent  civil  enf^ineer,  Avas  born  at  Kirkcaldy,  in 
Fifeshire,  In  1783.  His  father  was  originally  a 
watchmaker,  bnt  latterly  kept  a  hardware  shop. 
From  the  Grammar  school  of  his  native  town, 
Alexander  was  sent  for  two  years  to  the  college  of 
St.  Andrews,  and  finally  completed  his  education 
at  the  university  of  Edinbnrgli.  lie  was  an  ex- 
cellent Greek  and  Latin  scholar,  and  the  bent  of 
his  mind  was  early  directed  towards  the  higher 
branches  of  mathematics  and  algebra.  At  the  age 
of  nineteen  he  was  appointed  rector  of  the  Inver- 
ness academy  by  the  unanimous  vote  of  the  pro- 
prietors, after  a  severe  competition  with  other  can- 
didates, daring  an  examination  which  lasted  three 
da3's.  AVliilst  in  this  situation  he  was,  at  the  re- 
commendation of  Mr.  Telford,  fii'st  employed  in  a 
public  capacity  by  the  parliamentaiy  commission- 
el's  for  fixing  and  determining  the  boundaries  of 
the  Scottish  counties ;  and  his  cervices  in  this  un- 
dertaking, which  were  perfoiined  during  the  vaca- 
tions, gave  great  satisfaction  to  his  em])loyers. 
His  report  on  the  occasion,  which  is  of  considera- 
ble length,  is  one  of  the  most  interesting  documents 
of  the  kind  ever  published.  Soon  after  he  was 
again  recommended  by  Mr.  Telford  to  the  com- 
missionei-s  for  reclaiming  the  bogs  of  Ireland.  In 
tliis  situation  he  became  well  acquainted  with  the 
habits  and  wants  of  the  Irish  peasantry ;  and  his 
reports  and  maps  of  the  Irish  bogs  were  in  tiie 
highest  degree  creditable  to  him. 

After  completing  the  bog  surveys,  Mr.  Kimrno 


visited  France,  Germany,  and  Holland,  and  peN 
sonally  inspected  the  great  pnbllc  work*  of  tboM 
nations.  On  his  retnin  he  waa  employed  in  the 
construction  of  Donmore  Iiarbonr — a  woriL  of  im- 
mense magnitude  and  utility,  on  a  shore  much 
exposed  to  the  roll  of  the  Atlantic,  and  where 
the  depth  of  water  at  the  extremity  of  the  pier 
exceeds  that  of  the  Flyinonth  breakwater.  He 
was  also  engaged  by  the  Fishery  Board  in  maktag 
surveys  of  the  harbours  of  Irclaud,  and  constrnct- 
ing  harbours  and  piers ;  and  by  the  Ballast  Board 
to  make  a  chart  of  the  whole  coast,  which  wu 
executed  with  great  skill  and  accni*acy.  Besides 
these  labours  ho  compiled  a  book  of  sailing  direc- 
tions of  St.  George's  Channel  and  the  Irish  coast. 
During  the  great  distress  of  1822,  he  was  ap- 
pointed engineer  to  the  western  district  of  Ire- 
land ;  and,  between  that  year  and  1830,  he  cansed, 
by  the  improvement  of  land  and  the  formation  of 
what  may  be  tei'med  new  settlements,  an  Increase 
of  revenue  in  that  district  to  the  amount  of  not 
less  than  £106,000  per  annum.  Mr.  Ninuno's 
engagements,  in  extent  and  variety,  were  sur- 
prisingly great.  Upwards  of  thirty  piers  or  har- 
bours on  tlie  Irish  coast  were  built  nuder  bis 
direction ;  also  Perth  Cawl  in  South  Wales.  He 
designed  the  Wellesley  bridge  and  docks  at  Lim- 
erick ;  and  in  his  latter  years,  was  engaged  in  Lan- 
cashire, projecting  a  railway  from  Liverpool  to 
Leeds,  and  also  the  Manchester,  Bolton,  and  Borr 
railway.  He  was  consulting  engineer  to  the  duchy 
of  Lancaster,  the  Mersey  and  Irwell  navigation,  the 
St.  Ilelcn^s  and  Runcorn  Gap  railway,  the  Fi-eston 
and  Wigan  railway,  and  the  Birkenhead  and 
Chester  railway.  In  addition  to  his  classical  and 
mathematical  attainments,  he  was  well  versed  iu 
modem  languages,  particularly  French,  German, 
Dutch,  and  Italian.  He  was  also  thoroughly  ac- 
quainted with  practical  astronomy,  chemistry,  and 
geology.  To  the  latter  science,  in  particular,  he 
was  much  attached,  and  wrote  an  excellent  paper, 
showing  how  it  might  become  available  in  navi- 
gation, which  was  published  in  the  Transactions 
of  the  Royal  Irish  Academy,  of  which  he  was  s 
member.  He  was  likewise  a  fellow  of  the  Royal 
Society  of  Kdinburgh.  Mr.  Kimmo  was  the  an- 
thor  of  the  article  on  Inland  Navigation  in  Dr. 
Brewster^s    Encyclopa^ia ;    also,  in  conjunction 


I 


NISBET. 


256 


NTTHSDALE. 


;  I 


h 


ber  1638,  wu  in  1639  sheriff-depute  of  the  oonntj  of  Edin- 
burgh. He  WAS  afterwards  appointed  one  of  the  commissa- 
ries of  Edinhurgfa.  He  purchased  tlie  lands  of  Dirleton  in 
1663,  and  was  appointed  lord-advocate  and  admitted  a  lord 
of  session,  14th  October,  1664.  As  lord-adrocate  he  was 
Teiy  se^'ere  on  the  unfortunate  Presbyterians,  wlio  were  pro- 
secuted at  the  instigation  of  the  prelates,  and  as  an  instance 
of  the  zeal  with  which  he  persecuted  tliem,  Wodrow  (vol.  i. 
p.  293)  relates  that  one  Robert  Gray  having,  when  brought 
before  the  council,  refused  to  tell  the  hiding-places  of  certain 
proscribed  individuahi  of  that  partj.  Sir  John  Nisbet  took  a 
ring  from  the  man*s  finger,  and  sent  it  with  a  messenger  of 
his  own  to  Mrs.  Graj,  with  an  intimation  that  her  husband 
had  told  all  he  knew  as  to  the  whigs,  and  that  the  ring  was 
sent  to  her  as  a  token  that  she  might  do  the  same.  The 
poor  woman,  in  consequence,  revealed  the  places  of  conceal- 
ment, which  so  affected  her  husband  that  he  died  in  a  few 
days  thereafter.  Ixird  Dirieton  resigned  his  offices  in  1677, 
and  was  tlie  lost  who  held  the  office  of  lord-adrocate  with  a 
seat  on  the  bench.  He  was  succeeded  as  lord-advocate  bj 
Sir  George  Mackenzie,  a  still  more  bitter  persecutor,  and 
died  in  April  1687,  aged  about  78.  Bishop  Burnet,  (Jlutcry^ 
vol.  i.  p.  484,)  describes  him  as  a  man  of  great  learning,  chieflj 
in  the  Greek,  and  adds,  "  he  was  a  person  of  great  integrity, 
only  he  loved  monej  too  much."  Forbes  says  that  **  at  tlie 
burning  of  his  house,  Lord  Dirleton  lost  a  curious  Greek 
manuscript,  written  with  his  own  hand,  for  rccovenr  whereof 
he  offered  £1,000  steriing.** 

Lord  Dir]eton*s  Law  Doubts,  methodized  by  Sir  William 
Hamilton  of  Whitelaw,  and  his  Decisions  from  7th  Decem- 
ber 1665  to  26th  June  1677,  were  published  in  1698. 

The  Dirleton  family  ended  in  an  heiress,  Mrs.  Hamilton 
Kisbet  Ferguson  of  Raith,  previously  countess  of  Elgin,  the 
daughter  of  William  Hamilton  Kisbet  of  Dirleton,  the  last 
proprietor  in  the  male  line.  Mrs.  Hamilton  Nisbet  Ferguson 
died  in  18o5,  when  R.  A.  Christopher,  formerly  Dundas,  of 
Bloxholm  llall,  Lincolnshire,  became  possessed  of  Dirleton, 
and  for  the  second  time  changed  his  name  to  Hamilton  Nis- 
bet   (See  vol.  ii.  pp.  95,  128,  and  197.) 


A  branch  of  the  Dirleton  family,  designated  of  Woodhill, 
settled  in  county  Donegal,  Ireland.  Another  Irish  family  of 
the  name,  the  Nisbets  of  Derrycaime,  county  I^itrim,  are 
descended  from  Captain  James  Nisbet,  who  went  from  Ber- 
wickshire to  Ireland,  about  1640,  and  engaged  in  the  wars 
between  King  Charles  I.  and  the  Irish  insurgents. 


A  family  of  the  name  of  Nisbet,  which  settled  in  Ayrshire, 
was  distinguished  in  the  religious  history  of  Scotland.  One 
of  the  most  eminent  martyrs  of  the  Covenant  was  John 
Nisbet  of  Hardhill,  in  the  parish  of  Loudoun,  in  tliat  coun- 
ty. Bom  about  1627,  he  was  a  lineal  descendant  of  Mur- 
doch Nisbet  of  Hardhill,  one  of  those  who,  about  1500,  were 
ityled  the  Lollards  of  Kyle.  He  spent  his  youth  in  military 
sen'ice  on  the  Continent,  but  returning  to  Scotland  in  1650, 
he  was  present  at  the  coronation  of  Charles  II.  at  Scone,  and 
swore  the  Covenants  at  the  same  time  that  that  profligate 
monarch  subscribed  them.  He  soon  after  married,  and  went 
to  reside  at  Hardhill.  He  was  a  man  of  a  bold,  decided,  and 
straightforward  character,  and  a  fine  specimen  of  the  Cove- 
nanters of  his  class.  In  1664  he  incurred  the  displeasure  of 
the  Episcopalian  incumbent  of  his  parish,  fur  having  had  a 
child  baptized  by  one  of  the  ejected  ministers ;  and  in  conse- 
quence of  his  attachment  to  Presbyterianism,  he  was  much 
exposed  to  the  persecutions  of  those  tyrannical  times.  In 
1666  he  joined  in  renewing  the  Covenant  at  Lanark,  and  in 


the  engagement  at  Pentland  Hills,  Norember  M,  be  behind 
witli  great  courage  and  resolution,  and  wai  io  ttTeralj  woond- 
ed  that  he  was  left  for  dead  among  the  slain.  On  hii  reeor- 
ety  he  retonwd  home,  but  was  not  allowed  to  ramaiB  kogh 
peace,  and  again  taking  np  arms,  he  distingidslied  lumidf  at 
Dmmdog  and  Bothwell  Brig,  where  he  had  the  rank  of  cap- 
tain. After  the  defeat  and  dispersion  of  the  Corenanten,  he 
was  denounced  a  rebel,  and  a  reward  of  three  hundred  moikt 
was  offisred  for  his  apprehennon.  Lieutenant  Niibet,  a  eon- 
Bin  of  his  own,  with  a  party  of  Colonel  Buchan'a  drsgoom, 
iurpriaed  him  and  three  others  in  a  hoose  called  Midland,  hi 
the  parish  of  Fenwick,  upon  a  Sabbath  morning,  in  therocBlk 
of  November  1685.  Hie  companions  were  killed  upon  the 
spot,  but  Nisbet  was  preserved  for  the  sake  of  the  nwarl 
He  was  carried  first  to  Ayr,  and  then  to  Edinbnigb»  when 
he  was  examined  before  the  privy  ooandl,  and  finally  eon- 
demned  to  be  hanged.  He  behaved  with  much  oonaisteDt 
firmness  both  during  his  confinement  and  at  hie  trial,  and  ht 
met  his  death  with  the  utmost  fortitude.  Hia  exeentkm 
took  place  at  Edinburgh,  December  4, 1685.  Byhiewift, 
Margaret  Law,  he  had  aeveral  cliildren,  but  onlj  three  earn 
survived  him,  namely,  Hugh,  Jamea,  and  Alexander.  The 
second  of  these  was  author  of  the  *  Private  Life  of  the  Pcm- 
cuted,  or  Memoirs  of  the  first  years  of  one  of  the  Scottish 
Covenanters,*  published  from  the  original  MS.,  at  Edinborgfa, 
in  1827. 

The  first  preudent  of  Dickinson  college,  FennijlTinis, 
United  States,  was  Charles  Nisbet,  D.D.,  bom  at  Had- 
dington in  1786,  and  educated  at  Edinbuq^  After  being 
for  some  years  minister  of  Montroee,  in  1783,  when  IKcUb- 
son  college  was  instituted,  he  was  invited  to  become  ita  prsi- 
ident,  and  in  1785  he  went  to  America.  He  held  the  ap- 
pointment till  his  death,  Janoaiy  17,  1804.  He  is  deaeribed 
as  having  been  an  admirable  classical  scholar,  and  partidi- 
hirly  conversant  with  Greek.  His  memory  was  so  retentivs 
that  .it  one  period  of  his  life  he  could  repeat  the  whole  of  the 
iEiieid  and  also  the  whole  of  Young*s  Night  Tlionghtu 


NrmsDALE,  Earl  of,  a  title  (attainted)  in  the  pecnge  of 
Scotland,  conferred  by  patent  dated  at  Famham,  Aug.  29, 
1620,  on  Robert,  ninth  Ix>rd  Maxwell,  (see  page  128  of  this 
volume,)  with  precedency  from  29th  October  1581,  the  date 
of  his  father's  charter  of  the  earldom  of  Morton ;  the  title 
being  changed  from  earl  of  Morton  to  earl  of  Nithsdakk 
At  the  meeting  of  the  Estates  at  Edinburgh  25th  July  1621, 
he  was  cliosen  one  of  the  lords  of  the  articles.  It  was  in  this 
parliament  that  the  five  articles  of  Perth  were  ratified,  and 
I^rd  Nithsdale  was  one  of  the  noblemen  who  voted  for  them. 
In  May  1628,  he  was  one  of  the  members  of  the  ooundl  ap- 
pointed by  the  king  to  sit  twice  a-week  to  hear  grievancsi, 
but  this  commission,  says  Calderwood,  ''took  no  effect* 
In  1625,  he  was  named  by  King  Charies  I.  commianoner  for 
obt'uning  an  unconditional  surrender  of  the  tithes,  but  wu 
deterred  by  the  violent  opposition  of  the  proprietors  from 
carrying  out  his  instructions.  He  joined  the  marquis  of 
Montrose,  with  his  son,  I^ord  Maxwell,  in  support  of  the 
king,  in  1644,  for  which  they  were  excommunicated  by  the 
General  Assembly.  His  lordship  died  at  Edinburgh  in  Msf 
1646.  His  only  son,  Robert,  second  earl,  was  taken  prisoner 
at  the  capture  of  Newcastle  by  the  Scots  GovenanteiB,  wbee 
he  retired  from  the  contest,  and  was  restored  by  act  of  per 
liament,  Sd  February  1647,  against  his  father's  forfeitnre. 
He  died,  unmarried,  in  October  1667.  He  was  oomnunly 
styled  the  Philosopher.  At  his  death  hia  titles  and  estates 
devolved  on  John,  7th  I^ord  Herries.    (See  vol.  iL  p.  475.) 

Juhn,  third  earl  of  Nitlisdale,  had  also,  when  Loi^  Herrioii 


XORTIIESK. 


358 


OCHILTBEE. 


I ; 

I 

r. 


.  I 


I . 


On  the  death  of  liis  father,  in  Janoaiy  1792,  lie  became 
earl  of  Northesk,  and  in  Jannaiy  1798,  proceeded  to  the  West 
Indies  in  command  of  the  Beanlien  frigate.  He  returned  in 
the  Andromeda  in  December,  and  was  soon  after  pbced  on 
half-paj.  In  1796  he  was  appointed  to  the  Monmonth,  64, 
and  joined  the  North  Sea  fleet  under  the  command  of  Ix>rd 
Duncan.  In  Maj  1797  the  mutinj,  which  had  commenced 
in  the  Channel  fleet,  extended  to  the  sliips  employed  in  the 
North  Sea,  and  the  Monmonth  was  brought  bj  her  refractoiy 
crew  to  the  Nore.  On  the  first  symptoms  appearing  of  the 
men*s  return  to  duty,  the  mutineers  on  board  the  Sandwich 
sent  for  Lord  Northesk,  to  endeavour  to  efiect  a  reconcilia- 
tion with  the  government  On  reaching  the  Sandwich,  his 
lordship  was  ushered  into  the  cabin,  where  Richard  Parker, 
as  president,  and  about  sixty  seamen,  acting  as  delegates 
from  the  several  ships,  were  sitting  in  close  deliberation. 
Parker  requested  him,  as  "  the  seamen's  friend,**  to  proceed 
to  the  king,  with  a  declaration  of  the  terms  on  which  they 
were  willing  to  give  up  the  ships.  His  lordship  consent- 
ed, but  told  them  he  had  no  expectation  of  success.  He  im- 
mediately hastened  to  London,  but,  of  course,  the  terms, 
from  the  unreasonableness  of  the  demands,  were  at  once  re- 
jected. Lord  Northesk  afterwards  resigned  the  Monmouth, 
and  remained  unemployed  till  1800,  when  he  was  appointed 
to  the  Prince,  of  98  guns,  in  the  Channel  fleet,  in  which  ship 
he  continued  till  the  peace  in  1802.  On  the  renewal  of  the 
war  in  1803,  he  was  appointed  to  the  Britannia  of  100  guns. 
In  May  1804  he  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  rear-admiral, 
and,  in  the  following  month,  hoisted  his  flag  in  the  Britan- 
nia, and  served  in  the  arduous  blockade  of  Brest  till  August 
1805,  when  he  was  detached  with  a  squadron,  under  the  or- 
ders of  Sir  Robert  Calder,  to  reinforce  Vice-admiral  Colling- 
wood  off  Cadiz.  At  the  battle  of  Trafalgar,  he  was  third  in 
command,  and  maintained  his  well-earned  reputation  by  a 
display  of  the  most  undaunted  valour.  In  his  ship  the  Bri- 
tannia, he  broke  through  the  enemy's  line  astern  of  their 
fourteenth  ship,  and  pouring  in  on  each  side  a  most  tremen* 


dous  and  destructive  fire,  he  oontinned  fngtpng  fieqiallj 
on  both  sides,  and  with  two  or  three  at  a  thne,  witk  vnj 
little  intermission  for  five  hours,  when  all  iissiitinfi 
For  his  eminent  services,  on  this  ooessioii,  be  was,  ea  Ji 
aiy  29,  1806,  honoured  with  the  insignia  of  the  order  of  the 
Bath.  He  also  received  the  thanks  of  both  booses  of  psifis- 
ment,  tlie  freedom  of  the  city  of  London,  and  of  tbs  Gsld- 
siniths*  Company,  with  a  sword  of  the  vslns  of  one  bnodrad 
guineas  from  the  city  of  London,  an  adnuraTs  medsl  fimoi 
his  majesty  to  be  worn  round  the  neck,  and  a  ram  of  Ihi 
value  of  £800,  from  the  Patriotic  Fund  at  Lloyd's.  In  Apd 
1808  he  became  a  vice-admiral,  and,  Jane  4,  1814,  so 
admiral.  In  November  21,  1821,  be  was  appointed  iisr- 
admiral  of  Great  Britain,  and  on  May  27,  eoamander- 
in- chief  at  Plymouth,  where  be  remained  till  1880. 
He  died  May  28,  1831.  His  lordship  married  Maiy, 
only  daughter  of  William  Rieketts  of  Longwood  in  Hamp- 
shire, by  Mary  Jen-is,  eldest  sister  of  the  first  eail  of  SL 
Vincent,  and  had  by  her  four  sons  and  fkvt  danghten. 
George,  Lord  RosehtU,  the  eldest  son,  was  lost  in  his  l€ch 
year,  on  board  his  majesty's  ship,  *  The  Blenheim,'  in  wUcli 
he  was  a  midshipman,  2d  February  1807,  when  that  ship 
foundered  in  the  East  Indies. 

The  second  son,  \MIliam  Hopetoun,  eighth  eari,  bom  I61I1 
October  1794,  married  4th  February  1843,  Georgiana  Maria, 
eldest  daughter  of  Rear-admiral  the  Hon.  George  Elliot,  witib 
issue  a  son,  George  John,  I/>rd  Rosehill,  bom  1st  Deoenber 
1843,  and  a  daughter,  T^dy  Margaret  Maria  Adeliza  Csmcgie. 

In  the  early  part  of  1853,  the  countess  of  Nortliesk  pob- 
lislied  a  compilation,  entitled  'The  Sheltering  Vine,*  a sdee- 
tion  of  passsges  of  holy  writ,  and  of  extracts  from  fathcn  of 
the  English  church,  *with  a  view  to  present  comfort  snd 
consolation  to  persons  laid  low,  either  bodilj  or  sfMntasSr, 
by  afflicting  providences.* 

The  title  of  Viscount  St  Vincent  in  the  peerage  of  Great 
Britain  is  in  remainder  to  the  male  issue  of  the  seventh  esrTs 
countess,  after  her  brothers  and  their  hdrs  male. 


^V^«.^^^^^<WS/VXX^-».V^-.«  ^-k^X,".-.  ■•S^-»-W»V  >-^-V\.VN^^'«X^>>  WS^.  ^V>.V^N/V^-w.^^^^>.A*>w«/<^^iM/^^'^^^^^^V^^.^X^><S^,^  «\^^^>W»  %>^>«VS^«\^^^^'X.'V  W^'Vk'^lfk>^V^^ 


I.' 
I 

i 


0 


OciiiLTKRK,  IjotH  Stewart  of,  a  title  (dormant)  in  the 
peerage  of  Scotland,  the  first  possessor  of  which  was  Andrew 
Stewart,  third  I^ord  Avandale,  (see  vol.  i.  p.  170,)  who,  hav- 
ing exchanged  his  lordsliip  of  Avandale,  with  Sir  James 
Hamilton  of  Fyiinart,  for  the  barony  of  Ochiltree  in  Ayrshire, 
the  regent  Arran,  with  consent  of  the  Estates,  ordained  him 
to  be  called  Lord  Stewart  of  Ochiltree,  15th  March,  1543. 
He  died  in  1548.  By  his  wife,  I^-idy  Margaret  Hamilton, 
only  child  by  his  first  wife,  of  James,  first  earl  of  Arron,  he 
had  a  son,  Andrew,  second  Lord  Ochiltree,  commonly  called 
the  good  Lord  Ochiltree,  the  father-in-law  of  John  Knox. 
He  was  one  of  the  lords  of  the  congregation,  and  a  principal 
actor  in  all  the  transactions  and  negotiations  with  the  queen 
regent,  Mary  of  Guise,  in  1559*60,  and  afterwards  in  all 
the  proceedings  of  the  Reformers  in  the  reign  of  Queen  Ma- 
ry. When  Knox  was  called  before  the  queen,  I^rd  Ocliiitree 
.nccompanied  him  to  the  palace  of  Uolyrood.  He  opposed 
the  queen*s  marriage  with  Ijord  Damley,  and  declared  openly 


that  he  would  never  consent  that  any  of  the  poplah  foctioo 
should  be  king  of  Scotland.  After  "  the  Chase-about  Raid,** 
in  which  he  was  actively  engaged,  he  took  refuge  in  Eng- 
land, with  the  Lord  James  Stewart,  afterwards  the  nfent 
Moray,  and  the  others.  At  the  battle  of  Langride,  where  be 
fought  against  Queen  Marr,  he  was  wounded  by  the  Lord 
Henries.    He  had  fire  sons  and  two  daughteis. 

His  eldest  son,  Andrew,  master  of  Ochiltree,  died  befon 
10th  September  1578,  leaving  two  sons  and  six  daughtfis. 
His  lordship*s  second  son.  Captain  James  Stewart  of  Botb- 
wellmuir,  was  the  unworthy  favourite  of  James  VI.,  the 
usurper  of  the  titles  and  estates  of  the  eari  of  Arras,  and 
lord-high -chancellor  of  StH>tland,  (see  vol.  L  p.  160).  The 
third  son,  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Monkton,  was  killed  in 
Blackfriars-wynd,  Edinburgh,  80th  January  1588,  by  Frsa- 
cis,  earl  of  BothwelL 

Andrew,  the  elder  of  tlie  two  sons  of  the  master  of  Odiil- 
tree,  succeeded  his  grandfather  as  tliird  Lord  Ochiltreei    He 


1 

I 
I 


1^ 


Shirley.  The  same  year  he  publislied  at  Cam- 
bridge, with  the  assistance  of  Dr.  John  Worthing- 
toD,  and  other  learned  men,  a  superb  edition  of 
the  *  English  Bible,'  embellished  with  illostratiye 
maps  and  engraviugs.  A  copy  of  this  work  was 
presented  to  the  king,  and  another  to  the  house  of 
commons,  and  from  the  latter  be  received  a  gra- 
tuity of  £60. 

On  the  coronation  of  Charles  II.  in  1661,  OgiU 
by  was  employed  to  supply  the  poetical  part  of 
the  pageantry,  Including  the  speeches,  emblems, 
mottoes,  and  inscriptions.  He  accordingly  wrote 
*Tho  Relation  of  his  Majesty's  Entertainment 
passing  through  the  City  of  London  to  his  Coro- 
nation,' &c.,  in  ten  sheets  folio.  This  work, 
afterwards,  by  his  majesty's  command,  published 
in  a  large  folio  volume  on  royal  paper,  with  five 
engravings,  is  said  to  have  been  found  useful  in 
succeeding  coronations. 

In  1662  Ogilby  obtained  the  patent  of  master 
of  the  revels  in  Ireland,  when  he  again  went  to 
Dublin,  and  built  a  larger  theatre  than  his  former 
one.  Soon  after  he  returned  to  England,  and  in 
1GG5  published  a  second  volume  of  Translations 
from  .£sop,  with  some  fables  of  his  own.  Tlie 
same  year  he  produced  a  translation  of  the  Odys- 
sey, with  notes  and  embellishments. 

Though  Ogilby's  poetry  was  of  inferior  merit, 
he  contrived  to  get  rid  of  his  diflferent  works  as 
they  were  published,  by  means  of  a  lottery,  by 
which  he  acquired  large  sums  of  money.  In  the 
great  fire  of  I^ndon,  his  house  in  Whitefriars, 
with  all  that  it  contained,  was  burnt  to  the  ground. 
Besides  his  whole  stock  of  published  works,  thci*e 
perished  in  the  flames  three  unpublished  poems  of 
his  own,  two  of  them  heroic  poems,  entitled  ^  The 
Ephesian  Matron'  and  ^Thc  Roman  Slave,'  and 
the  third  an  epic,  in  twelve  books,  styled  ^  The 
Carolics,'  in  honour  of  Charles  I.  He  immedi- 
ately set  about  reprinting  all  his  former  publica- 
tions, and  revived  his  lottery  scheme,  whereby  he 
obtained  money  to  the  amount  of  £4,210,  which 
enabled  him  to  set  up  a  printing  office.  By  his 
interest  at  court  he  received  the  appointment  of 
cosmogiapher  au  '  geographic  printer  to  the  king, 
and  in  this  capaci  «'  he  projected  a  General  Atlas 
of  the  World,  of  \i  ich  several  parts  were  pub- 
lished.    He  also  pn  luced  several  minor  works, 


illustrative  of  the  topography  of  England,  and 
issued  several  Maps  of  London.     Ogilby  died 
September  4, 1676. 
His  works  are : 

The  Cluuncter  of  a  Trooper:  a  HmnonroDS  Piece. 

The  Works  of  Vu|^,  tnuukted  and  puUiabed;  wifihhk 
PortraiL  London,  1S19-50,  Sfo.  Elegantly  nprinted  in 
1654,  royal  folio.  Aleo,  a  beaotifal  edition  of  it  in  Latia. 
1658,  foiio.    Again,  with  aculptnita  and  annotetiona.    Sra 

Fables  of  JEsopperaphraaed,  in  Tcne;  adorned  with  senlp- 
tores,  and  illnstrated  with  Annotations  1661, 4ta  160^ 
2  vols,  folio.    1673-4,  3  vols.  8r«L 

Homer's  Iliad,  translated  into  English  TeiBe;  adaniid 
with  eofipravingi  by  Hollar  and^others.    1660. 

Relation  of  tlie  Entertainment  of  his  Uajesty  Chaika  IL, 
in  his  Passage  through  the  citf  of  London,  to  hia  Conns- 
tbn ;  containing  an  exact  account  of  the  whole  Sokmnitjr; 
the  Triumphal  Arches  and  Cavalcade,  delineated  in  sealp- 
ture ;  the  Speeches  and  Impresses  illnstrated  from  Antiqsi- 
ty :  to  these  is  add(*d,  a  brief  Narrstive  of  lus  Majesty's  »- 
lemn  Coronation,  with  his  magnificent  Proceeding  and  Royil 
Feast  in  Westminster  Hall ;  with  cuts.  London,  1661, 1662, 
1669,  folio. 

A  Translation  of  Homer*8  Odyssey.    1665. 

Africa ;  being  an  accurate  Deecription  of  the  Begions  of 
Egypt,  Barbary,  Libya,  and  Billedulgerid,  the  Land  of  Ke- 
groes,  Guinea,  Ethiopia,  and  the  AbyasineB,  with  all  the  ad- 
jacent Islands,  either  in  the  Mediterranean,  Atlantic,  Sootk- 
em,  or  Oriental  Seas,  belonging  thereunto.    Loud.  1670,  fi)L 

America ;  containing  the  Original  of  the  Inhahitsnti,  snd 
tlie  remaricable  Voyages  thither ;  the  Conqnest  of  the  vnt 
Empires  of  Mexico  and  Peru,  and  other  lar^ge  PkorineM  end 
Territories,  with  the  several  European  Plantatiooa  m  tbon 
parts.    Lond.  1670,  folio. 

Atlas  Japanensis ;  being  remarkable  Addresses,  by  way  of 
EmbasKV,  from  the  East  India  Company  <^  the  United  Pio- 
vinces  to  the  Emperor  of  Japan :  containing  a  Description  of 
their  several  Territories,  Cities,  Temples,  Fortresses,  4e^ 
with  the  Character  of  tlie  Ancient  and  Modem  JapanncK 
Lund.  1G70, 1671,  1673,  folio. 

Atlas  Chinensis ;  being  a  relation  of  remarkable  Paaagcs 
in  two  Embassies  from  the  East  India  Company  of  the  Unit- 
ed Provinces  to  the  Vice-Roy  Singlamong  and  General  Tai- 
sing,  Lipovi,  and  to  Eonclii,  Emperor  of  China  and  East  Tsi^ 
tnry ;  containing  a  more  exact  Geographical  Descriptioa  thsa 
formerly,  of  the  whole  Empire  of  China,  from  the  original  of 
A.  Montanus.    Lond.  1671,  1673,  3  vols,  folio. 

Asia,  the  fin>t  part ;  being  an  accurate  description  of  Par- 
sia,  the  Empire  of  the  Great  Mogul,  and  other  parts  pf  India, 
and  their  several  Kingdoms  snd  Begbns ;  with  the  Descrip- 
tion of  their  Cities,  Towns,  the  various  CostoDui,  Bdigion, 
and  I^^nguages  of  the  inhabitants,  theur  Government  and 
Commerce;  ako  the  Plants  and  Animals  pecnKar  to  each 
country.  Part  ii. ;  containing  an  Embsssy  from  the  Esit 
India  Company  of  the  United  Provinces  to  the  Grand  Tsrtar 
Cham,  Emperor  of  China,  delivered  by  their  Exodkacis 
Peter  Goyer  and  Jacob  de  Eeyser,  at  hia  Impacial  CUy  of 
Pekin ;  together  with  a  general  description  of  the  Empnt  of 
China.    Lond.  1673,  2  vols,  folio. 

Britannia;  being  an  Illustration  of  the  Kingdom  of  Eng- 
land, and  Dominion  of  Wales,  by  an  Historical  and  Geognh 
phical  descripdon  of  the  Principal  Boods  theiwrf';  dcicribfd 
by  100  ftlape  on  copperplates.  London,  1675,  1688^  loGc 
1719,  4to. 


i 


OGILVIE. 


262 


OUPHAKT. 


in  1754,  Charlotte,  daughter  of  Dr.  Walter  Talliedelph  of 
TnlUedelph,  Forfarshire,  and  died  in  1802.  Sir  John*i  eldest 
son,  Sir  William,  6th  baronet,  and  his  2d  son,  Sir  John,  7tli 
baronet,  both  died  onmarried,  when  the  8d  sod,  Sir  William, 
became  8th  baronet,  an  admiral  in  the  rojal  navy,  who  died  in 
1828,  leaving  8  sons  and  1  daughter.  Sir  John,  9th  baronet, 
the  eldest  son,  bom  at  Edinbniigb,  Slareh  17, 1808,  and  edu- 
cated at  Christ  Church,  Oxford,  was  an  officer  in  the  guards ; 
twice  married,  with  issue,  by  the  first  marriage  a  son  and 
daughter,  and  by  the  2d,  2  sons  and  4  daughters. 


The  family  of  Ogilvy  of  Camousie,  Banffshire,  possess  a 
baronetcy,  conferred  in  1626.  Its  representative.  Sir  William 
Ogilvie  of  Boyne,  bom  in  1810,  succeeded  his  father,  Sir  Wil- 
liam Ogilvie  of  Camousie,  in  1824.  He  wss  educated  at 
Westminster,  and  the  Militaiy  college,  Edinburgh,  and  wss 
at  one  time  in  the  army.  He  married  in  18S8,  Augusta  Por- 
ter, youngest  daughter  of  James  Grange,  Esq.,  formerly  of 
Her  Majesty^s  Treasury.  He  daimed  the  dormant  titles  of 
Baron  Banff  and  Earl  of  Findlater,  in  the  peerage  of  Scot- 
hind.  He  died  ut  Christchurch,  New  Zealand,  Feb.  20, 1861. 


The  family  of  Ogilvy  of  Barras,  Kincardineshire,  also  pos- 
sessed a  baronetcy,  conferred  in  1661.  The  first  baronet  was 
Sir  George  O^lvy,  lieut.-govemor  of  the  castle  of  Duunottar, 
in  CromwelKs  time,  he  being  so  created  for  his  exertions  in 
the  preservation  of  the  regality  of  Scotland  during  the  siege, 
in  1652,  of  that  celebrated  stronghold  by  the  English  parlia- 
mentary forces  under  General  I<ambert.  Ogilvy  did  not  sur- 
render till  the  siege  had  been  converted  into  a  blockade,  when 
he  was  reduced  by  famine  and  a  consequent  mutiny  iu  the 
garrison.  He  had  previously,  however,  removed  the  regalia, 
by  a  stratagem,  on  account  of  which  he  was  long  imprisoned 
in  England,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  611,  article  Kintore,  earl  of). 
In  1660  the  reg.iliu  was  by  him  presented  to  Charles  II.,  and 
for  this  good  service,  with  his  long  imprisonment  and  loss  of 
property,  he  received  no  farther  reward  than  the  title  of  a 
baronet  of  Nova  Scotia  and  a  new  coat  of  arms.  The  family 
of  Barras  had  in  their  possession  a  receipt  granted  by  the  earl 
Marischal  on  the  delivery  of  the  regalia.  Sir  William  Ogilvy 
of  Barras,  the  7th  baronet,  succeeded  his  father  in  1887. 

OGILVIE,  John,  D.D.,  a  poet  of  considerable 
gciilus,  was  the  son  of  the  Rev.  Mr.  Ogilvie,  one 
of  the  ministers  of  Aberdeen,  where  lie  was  bom, 
about  17S3.  He  was  educated  at  the  Marischal 
college,  which  afterwards  honoured  him  with  the 
degree  of  doctor  in  divinity.  Having  been  duly 
licensed  for  the  Church,  he  was  appointed,  in 
1759,  minister  of  Midmar,  Aberdeenshire,  where 
he  continued  till  his  death,  in  1814.  His  life  was 
devoted  to  literary  pursuits,  and  the  faithful  dis- 
charge of  his  pastoral  duties;  and  his  personal 
history  was  only  varied  by  the  publication  of  his 
numerous  works,  and  an  occasional  visit  to  I^n- 
don,  whore  he  became  acquainted  with  Dr.  John- 
son, by  whom  be  was  much  esteemed.  He  was  a 
fellow  of  the  Royal  Society,  Edinburgh.  Scai'cely 
one  of  Dr.  Ogilvie's  works  is  known  to  the  general 
reader,  even  by  name,  at  the  present  day.    *'  Tlie 


truth  is,''  says  the  writer  of  bu  memoir,  in  the 
Lives  of  Eminent  Scotsmen,  "  Ogilvie,  with  pow- 
ers far  above  the  common  order,  did  not  know  how 
to  nse  them  with  effect.  He  was  an  able  man  lost. 
His  intellectual  wealth  and  Indnstry  were  wasted 
in  huge  and  nnhappy  specnlations.  Of  all  his 
books,  there  is  not  one  whichj  as  a  whole,  can  be 
expected  to  please  the  general  reader.  Noble 
sentiments,  brilliant  conceptions,  and  poetic  gra- 
ces, may  be  culled  in  profusion  from  the  mass; 
but  there  is  no  one  production  in  which  they  so 
predominate,  if  we  except  some  of  his  minor  pie- 
ces, as  to  induce  it  to  be  selected  for  a  hi^cr 
fate  than  the  rest.  Had  the  same  talent  which 
Ogilvie  threw  away  on  a  number  of  objects  been 
concentrated  on  one,  and  that  one  chosen  with 
judgment  and  taste,  he  might  have  rivalled  in  po- 
pularity the  most  renowned  of  his  contemporaries." 
His  works  are : 

The  Day  of  Judgment;  a  Poem.     Edin.  1759,  4to. 

Poems  on  several  subjects :  to  wliich  is  prefixed,  an  Esnr 
on  the  Lyric  Poetry  of  the  Ancients.  In  two  Letters.  Loa- 
don,  1762,  4to. 

Providence;  an  Allegorical  Poem,  in  3  hooks.  London, 
1764,  4to. 

Solitude ;  or,  the  Elysium  of  the  Poets ;  a  \1son :  to  vluch 
is  subjouied,  on  Elegy.    1766,  4  to. 

Six  Sermons  on  several  subjects.    Lond.  1767,  8vo. 

Paradise ;  a  Poem.     1769,  4to. 

Poems  on  several  subjects,  (including  those  above  men- 
tioned).    I^nd.  1769,  2  vols.  8vo. 

Philosophical  and  Critical  Observations  on  the  Kstnie, 
Characters,  and  various  Sjiecies  of  Compositions.  LonditD, 
1774,  2  vols.  8vo. 

Kona ;  a  Poem,  in  seven  books.  Illustrated  with  a  cor- 
rect map  of  the  Hebrides,  and  elegant  engravings.  London, 
1777,  4to. 

Inquiry  into  the  Causes  of  InfideUty  and  Sceptidsm  of  the 
Times ;  with  occasional  Observations  on  the  Writings  of  Her- 
bert, Shaftesbury,  Bolingbroke,  Hume,  Gibbon,  Tonhnm,  &c. 
Lond.  1783,  8vo. 

The  Theology  of  Plato  compared  with  the  Prind]Jc8  of 
Oriental  and  Grecian  Philosophers.    1793,  8vo. 

Britannia ;  a  Kational  Epic  Poem,  in  20  books :  to  wlut-'h 
is  prefixed,  a  Critical  Dissertation  on  Epic  Machinery.  Aber- 
deen, 1801,  4to. 

An  Examination  of  the  Evidence  from  Propliecy,  m  behalf 
of  the  Christian  Beligion ;  a  Sermon.    1803,  8vo. 


OLirnAKT,  a  surname  originally  Olifard.  The  first  in 
Scotland  of  this  name  was  David  de  Olifurd,  who  accompanied 
David  I.  from  Winchester  in  1141.  A  branch  of  the  Olifard:! 
settled  in  Kincardineshire.  Under  Malcolm  IV.,  Osbert 
Olifard  was  sheriff  of  Mcams,  and  his  only  daughter  nuurried 
Hugo  dc  Aberbothenoth,  ancestor  of  the  visconnts  Axhuth- 
nott,  (sec  vol.  L  p.  143). 

OuniANT,  Lord,  a  title  (dormant)  in  the  Scottish  peer- 
age, conferred  before  1458,  on  Sir  Lawrence  Oliphant.  de- 


OLIPIIANT. 


264 


ORKNBT. 


n 


two  jouthet  of  greftt  expectation.**    (£fiit  i^Kirk  qfScot- 
Umd,  Tol.  iv.  p.  46.) 

Hii  wn,  Lanrenoe,  fiflh  IxntL  Oliphant,  bom  24th  Maich, 
156S,  succeeded  Lii  grandfatber  ten  jean  afterwanU.  He 
dissipated  most  of  the  extensive  estates  of  the  familj.  Bj 
bis  wife,  Liliss  Drummond,  eldest  daughter  of  Jamea,  foartb 
Lord  Maderty,  be  bad  a  daugliter,  Anne,  married  to  Sir 
James  DongUs  of  Mordington,  brother  of  the  marquis  of 
I>oug1a8.  Wiih  the  view  of  preserving  the  peerage  in  the 
male  line,  his  lordship  resigned  his  bonoors  and  estates  in 
fitvoor  of  Patrick  Oliphant,  his  oonun-german  and  h«r  male; 
but  this  settlement  not  having  been  ratified  bj  the  crown. 
Anno  Oliphant,  his  daughter,  cUimed  both,  bj  action  before 
the  court  of  session.  The  ciise  was  decided  11th  Julv  1638, 
in  presence  of  Charles  1.  It  wss  found  that  the  deed  bj 
which  Lord  Oliphant  had  ditiposed  of  his  honoun  barred  the 
snocession  of  his  daughter,  while  it  did  not  vest  the  peerage 
in  the  heir  male,  and  the  dignitj  was  declared  to  be  at  the 
disposal  of  the  king.  In  conseqfoence  of  tliis  decision  Charles 
created  the  heir  male  Lord  Oliphant,  with  the  fonner  prece- 
dency, bj  a  new  patent,  dated  17th  Julj  1638,  and  at  the 
same  tune  raised  Sir  James  Douglas,  husband  of  Anne  Oli- 
phant, to  the  peerage,  by  the  title  of  Lord  Mordington,  (see 
p.  206  of  this  volume,)  with  the  precedency  of  Lord  Oliphant 

Patrick,  sixth  I^ord  Oliphant,  the  heir  male,  on  whom  the 
king  thus  conferred  the  title,  was  tlie  son  of  John  OKphant 
of  Kewland,  second  son  (^  I^anrence,  fourth  liord  Oliphant, 
and  previously  had  the  designation  of  master  of  Oliphant 
He  was  twice  married :  first,  to  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Sir 
Patrick  Cheyne  of  Esslemont,  by  whom  he  had  a  daughter, 
Lilias,  wife  (^  Sir  Laurence  Oliphant  of  Cask ;  and,  second- 
ly, to  Manr,  daughter  of  James  Crichton  of  Frendranght,  and 
had  by  her  three  sons,  Charles,  William,  and  Frauds,  who 
all  succeeded  to  the  title. 

Charles,  seventh  Lord  Oliphant,  took  the  oaths  and  his 
seat  in  parliament,  12th  0<iober,  1706,  and  opposed  the 
treaty  of  Union.  His  son,  Patrick,  eighth  Lord  Oliphant, 
died  without  issue,  in  1721,  when  the  title  devolved  on  his 
uncle,  William,  ninth  lord,  a  colonel  in  the  army,  who  also 
died  without  issue.  His  brother,  Francis,  tenth  lord,  voted 
at  the  elections  of  Scots  peers  down  to  1747.  On  his  death, 
19th  April  1748,  William,  son  of  Charh»  Oliphant  of  Lang- 
ton,  one  of  the  clerks  of  session,  assumed  the  title,  and  voted 
at  an  election  in  1750,  since  when  no  one  has  voted  as  Ix>rd 
Oliphant  at  the  elections  of  Scots  peers.  He  died  3d  June, 
1751,  acknowledging  loiurence  Oliphant  of  Cask  to  be  heir 
to  his  peerage.  That  gentleman,  however,  having,  with  his 
eldest  son,  been  attainted  for  engaging  in  the  rebellion  of 
1745,  did  not  assume  the  title.  John  Oliphant  of  Bachilttm, 
who  died  in  March  1781,  was  styled  Lord  Oliphant  His 
posthumous  daughter,  Janet  Oliphant  of  Badiilton,  was  the 
wife  of  the  eighth  Lord  Elibank,  and  their  children,  in  con- 
sequence, adopted  the  name  of  Olipliant-Murray  as  their 
family  name.    (See  vol.  iL  p.  131.) 

The  Oliphants  of  Gask  were  descended  from  William  Oli- 
phant of  Newton  in  Perthshire,  2d  son  of  Colin,  master  of 
Oliphant,  slain  at  Flodden.  They  were  devoted  Jacobites. 
The  paternal  grandfather  of  Carolina  Oliphant,  (Lady  Naime 
the  poetess,  see  p.  236  of  this  volume,)  had  attended  Prince 
Charles  Edward  ss  aide-de-camp  during  his  disastrous  cam- 
paign of  1745-6,  and  his  wife  had  cut  off  a  lock  of  his  hair 
on  the  occasion  of  his  accepting  the  hospitality  of  the  family 
mansion.  The  portion  of  hair  is  preserved  at  Gask;  and 
Lady  Naime  lias  alluded  to  tlie  ciroomstanoe  in  her  song  of 
*The  Auld  House.*    The  estate  of  Gask  oicsped  forfeiture, 


but  tlie  father  of  Lady  NaimOi  Laawnei  Ofiphait 
did  not  renoonee  bui  Jaeobito  sentineBta.  H«  aaiiMi  Ui 
daughter,  Caiolina,  in  bonoorof  PrinflsChariea;  ndwidi 
not  permit  the  nsmss  of  the  rogning  nounsh  and  Us  qpMa 
to  be  mentioned  in  bis  prsisncs,  nor  allow  Aom  to  bt  dsrig- 
noted  otherwise  than  by  the  initial  lettm,  "^K.  aadQ." 

In.  17(5,  IjiBrenet  Oliphant  of  Gask  marriad  Uaoooria, 
Margaret,  daughter  of  Doocaa  Robartaon  of  Strowaa,  bjtts 
daughter  of  Lord  N«ma.  Od  the  death  of  her  bnONr,  Oi 
aged  chief  of  Strewan,  his  grand-nepbaw  of  Gask  baeaaa  hair 
ofKnsoTtbefamUy.  Mr.  Oliphant  died  Jan.  1, 1791  Hii 
grandson,  James  Bhur  Oliphant  of  Gask,  ■Dccaadad,  on  tbi 
death  of  his  elder  brother,  namanied.  Dee.  81,  18S4,  and 
was  the  18th  in  descent  from  tba  fint  lord,  and  S8d  fiaai 
David  de  Oli&rd,  the  fimt  of  the  nama  in  Seotland. 

Mr.  Oliphant  of  Gask  waa,  Aug.  18,  1889,  aarvad  bsv 
male  of  Frmnds,  10th  T^nrd  Oliphant,  al«»  bdr  oTtfao  bedysf 
William  Oliphant  of  Newton,  brotbar  of  Lanmea,  8d  Lori 
Oliphant  He  was  also  heir  general  to  tba  last  acknowladgri 
Ijw^  Oliphant  and  to  the  prindpal  branch  of  tba  fanOy. 
He  married  in  1840,  Henrietta  Gnenw,  only  sarviving  daogb- 
ter  of  Margaret  Anne  Grssme,  daugliter  of  William  GiahaaN 
of  Orohill  by  James  Gillespie-Grahama,  Esq.  Mr.  Blar 
Oliphant  died  in  1847. 

I^urenoe  Oliphant  of  Condie  and  Newton,  Perthahira,  da- 
scended  from  LNnrenoe  Oliphant,  fint  of  Condia,  grandHi 
of  William  Oliphant  of  Newton,  by  his  wife,  tlie  bdrM  sT 
Berriedale,  suooeeded  to  the  esUte  in  1806.  Tbo  eldest  iSB 
of  Ebeneser  Oliphant  of  Condie  and  Newton,  by  Maiy,  8i 
daughter  of  Sur  William  Stiriing,  baronet,  of  Ardoeb,  be  was 
bom  in  1791,  and  has  been  thrice  married.  His  aon  and  bdr, 
by  his  8d  wif^  Marianne,  eldest  daughter  of  Stoaxt  Olipkaat, 
Esq.  of  Roasie,  named  Lanrenoe-James,  waa  bom  in  1816. 
Tba  estate  of  Condie  was  purchased  by  this  family  in  169L 


Orksiet,  Iahl,  or  eari  of,  a  very  ancient  title  beld  ander 
the  Korse  kings.  When  Harald  Harfuger,  or  the  fair-bMiad, 
one  of  the  diiefs  of  Norway,  subdued  the  Orkney  idands  in 
876,  he  conferred  tlie  government  of  them  on  Bonald  or  B<^ 
novald,  count  of  Merca,  father  of  Bdlo,  the  fiamons  mvadv 
of  Norway,  and  the  great-great-grandfatlier  of  WllUam  the 
Conqueror.  Ronsld  ceded  the  government  of  the  Orimegri  to 
his  brother,  Sigurd.  A  long  line  of  Scandinavian  iaris 
cceded,  who  all  affected  the  style  of  independent 
About  the  year  1325,  tlie  mole  line  of  the  anctant  iaris  &iled 
in  the  person  of  Magnus  V.,  who  married  the  oonnteoi  of 
Caithness,  and  his  daughter,  Isabella,  having  baeome  the 
wife  of  Mulise,  earl  of  Strothem,  her  husband,  in  her  ri|^ 
possessed  also  the  earldoms  of  Caithness  and  Orkney.  Oos 
of  their  daughters,  Isabella,  married  Sur  William  Sindair  of 
Ruslin,  and  her  son,  Henry,  obtained  the  earldom  of  Oikn^, 
in  1379,  from  the  Norse  king,  Haco  IV. 

His  son,  HentT,  second  earl,  was  admiral  of  Scotland,  and 
chief  attendant  on  Prince  James,  afterwards  James  L,  when 
he  was  captured  by  the  English  at  sea  in  1405,  on  Ida  voy- 
age to  France.  The  earl  of  Orkney  was  sent  to  the  Towv 
of  London,  and  his  brothers  were  permitted  to  vittt  bim  in 
August  of  the  same  year.  In  the  following  month  he  was 
allowed  to  return  to  Scotland,  his  brothers  apparent^  re- 
maining as  hostages  for  him.  He  died  before  1418.  Foidan 
erroneously  states  1420. 

His  son,  William,  third  earl  of  Orimey,  was  one  of  tfaa  boi- 
tages  fiH-  James  I.,  when  allowed  to  viut  Scotland,  81at  Mi^ 
1421,  and  he  had  a  safts-conduct  to  meet  him  at  Daibm, 
13th  December  1423.  As  admiral  of  Scotland  ha  cuutayad 
the  princess  Margaret  to  France  in  1436|  on  her  nmiingi 


=n 


I    i 


ORKNEY. 


266 


OSWALD. 


Upon  the  Accession  of  Qaeen  Anne,  Lord  Orknej  wm,  in 
1702,  promoted  to  the  rank  of  inMJor-jceneral,  and  in  1703  to 
that  of  lieatenant-general,  and  was  likewise  made  a  knight 
of  the  Thistle.  He  afterwanis  senred  under  the  dnke  of  Marl- 
horongh,  and  by  his  gallantry  contriboted  to  the  Tictories  of 
Blenheim,  Ramillies,  Oodenard,  and  Malplaqnet.  In  1708  he 
was  elected  one  of  the  sixteen  peers  of  ScotUnd,  and  was  re- 
chosen  at  every  general  election  till  1784.  In  1710,  his  lordsliip 
was  sworn  of  the  privy  coancil,  and  made  general  of  the  foot  in 
the  I^w  Countries.  In  1712  he  received  the  colonelcy  of  the 
royal  regiment  of  Fiuuleers,  and  again  in  Flanders  nnder  the 
duke  of  Ormond.  In  1714  he  was  appointed  gentleman  ex- 
traordinary of  the  bedchamber  to  George  the  First,  and  soon 
after  governor  of  Virginia.  Subsequently  he  was  constituted 
governor  of  Edinburgh  castle,  and  lord-lieutenant  of  Lan- 
aricshire,  nnd  promoted  to  the  rank  of  field-m.nnhal  of  tlie 
forces.  Ho  died  at  London  in  1737,  in  his  71st  year.  He 
had  3  daughters ;  Lady  Anne,  who  succeeded  as  countess  of 
Orkney;  Lady  Frances,  countess  of  Scarborough;  and  Lady 
Harriet,  countess  of  Orrery,  afterwards  of  Cork. 

The  eldest  daughter.  Lady  Anne,  countess  in  her  own 
right,  die<i  in  1756.  She  married,  in  1720,  her  cousin- 
gennan,  the  4th  earl  of  Inchiquin  in  Ireland,  and  had  4  sons 
and  4  daughters.  Lady  Mary  O^Hrien,  the  eldest  daughter, 
succeeded  her  mother  as  countess  of  Oricney,  and  died  March 
10,  1791.  She  married  in  March  1753,  her  cousin-german, 
Murrough,  5th  earl  of  Inchiquin,  afterwards  marquis  of  'l*ho- 
mond.  This  lady  was  deaf  and  dumb.  Shortly  after  the 
birth  of  her  firat  child,  the  nurse  saw  her  cautiously  approach 
the  cradle  in  which  the  infimt  was  asleep,  nnd  fling  down  a 
large  stone  with  all  her  force  upon  the  floor.  The  noise  it 
made  awoke  the  diild,  who  cried.  The  countess  fell  on  her 
knees  in  a  transport  of  joy.  She  had  discovered  that  her 
child  possessed  the  sense  wliich  was  wanting  in  herself.  She 
had  4  sons,  who  all  died  young,  and  4  daughters. 

Her  eldest  daughter.  Lady  Mary  O'Brien,  bom  in  1755, 
jecanie,  on  the  death  of  her  motlier,  countess  of  Orkney. 
She  m:irried,  Dec.  21,  1777,  the  Hon.  Thomas  Fitzmaurice, 
M.P.,  brother  of  the  Ist  marquis  of  I^nsdowne,  and  had  one 
son,  John,  viscount  of  Kirkwall,  born  Oct  9,  1778,  elected 
M.P.  for  Heytcabury,  Wiltshire,  in  1802,  and  married,  11th 
August  that  year,  the  Hon.  Anne  Maria  De  Blacquiere,  eld- 
est daughter  of  the  first  I/)rd  De  Blacquiere.  He  died  Nov. 
28,  1820,  leaving  2  sons.    Tlie  countess  died  in  1831. 

Her  elder  son,  John,  Viscount  Kirkwall,  having  prede- 
ceased her,  she  was  succeeded  by  her  grandson,  Thomas  John 
Hamilton  Fitzmaurice,  born  Aug.  8, 1803.  In  1833  he  was 
elected  one  of  the  16  Scots  representative  peers.  He  married, 
in  1820,  the  second  daughter  of  the  3d  Lord  Boston ;  issue,  5 
sons  and  3  daughters.  His  eldest  son,  George  William  Ham- 
ilton, Viscount  Kirkwall,  born  in  1827,  entered  the  army  as 
an  ensign  in  the  92d  fo.»t,  in  18-15,  and  in  1862  was  a  cap- 
tuiu  Scots  Fusileer  guards. 

Ormistox,  a  surname  derived  from  lands  of  that  name, 
now  a  parish,  in  East  Lothian.  Thoy  were  so  called  from  an 
Anglo-Saxon,  named  Orme,  who  possessed  them  in  the 
riMgn  of  Malcolm  the  Maiden.  Whether  this  was  the  same 
Onnc,  tlie  son  of  Hugh,  who  was  abbot  of  Abemethy,  in 
Perthshire,  in  the  reign  of  William  the  Lion,  and  whose  de- 
scendants, from  his  possessing  the  lands  of  Abemethy,  as- 
sumed that  name,  (sec  vol.  i.  p.  14,)  is  not  known.  There 
are  various  places  in  Scotland  of  the  name  of  Ormiston. 


OiiMOND,  eorl  of,  a  title  conferred  \n  1445  on  Hugh  Dou- 
glas, fourth  son  of  James,  seventh  eari  of  Douglas.    He  had 


a  safe-coodoct  to  psa  throog^  England  iritb  Mi  hraCbci^ 
the  earls  of  Don^  sud  Monr,  IStli  May  1451,  and  ^rin 
on  2d  May  1458.  For  sngsging  in  the  rriwllioo  of  his  brs- 
ther,  the  eighth  esri  of  Doi^^os,  in  the  spring  of  145S,  be 
was  executed  for  high  treason  in  May  of  thai  year,  and  at- 
tainted. (See  vol.  ii.  p.  44.)  His  son,  Hngh,  dean  of  Bit- 
chin,  died  without  issoe. 

The  title  of  marquis  of  Qnnood  was  bestowed,  at  bis  bap- 
tism, on  Prince  James  Stewart,  seoond  son  of  James  IIL, 
"  an  empty  title,**  says  Don|^  (Peerage,  toL  iL  p.  845.) 
^^unnsnal  in  Scotland,  without  territory,  and  uritboat  jnris- 
dictton."    He  was  afterwards  created  dnke  of  Boas. 


Orr,  a  nuTMune  common  in  Renfrewshire,  partienlariy  ii 
the  parish  of  Lochwinnoch,  where,  at  one  period,  there  wen 
some  heritors  of  the  name.  Hewe  de  Orr  appean  in  tiie 
Ragman  Roll  as  having  sworn  fealty  to  Edward  L  in  1296. 
The  name  occnn  also  in  writs  of  the  time  of  James  IV.  The 
family  of  Orr  of  Barrowfield  came  originally  from  the  par- 
ish of  Cambusnethan,  in  the  upper  ward  of  Lanarkshire. 

Hugh  Orr,  bom  at  I.ochwinnoch,  January  13, 1717,  and 
bred  a  gunsmith  and  door^lock  filer,  went  to  America,  at  the 
age  of  twenty,  and  settled  at  Massachusetts.  At  Bridgevs- 
ter,  in  that  State,  he  set  up  the  first  tilt  hammer  in  that  part 
of  the  countnr,  and  for  several  years  he  was  the  only  makfr 
in  that  quarter  of  edgetooK  the  manufacture  of  which  he  wu 
the  means  of  spreading  through  various  parts  of  Massachu- 
setts, Rhode  Island,  and  Connecticut.  In  1748  he  made  500 
muskets  for  the  province  of  Massachusetts  Bay,  and  during 
the  revolutionary  war  he  engaged  actively  in  the  mannfSK- 
ture  of  arms.  In  conjunction  with  a  French  gentleman,  be 
established  a  foundry  for  the  casting  of  cannon  and  cannoo- 
shot.  He  also  originated  the  business  of  exporting  flax-ssed 
from  the  part  of  the  country  in  which  he  resided.  F<jr  ser- 
eral  years  he  was  elected  a  senator  for  the  county  of  Ply- 
mouth.   He  died  in  December  1798,  in  his  82d  year. 


Orkok,  a  surname  derived  from  lands  in  the  parisli  of 
Burntisland,  Fifeshire,  long  possessed  by  a  family  of  that 
name,  but  subsequently  the  property  of  J.  £.  DrinkwaterBe- 
thune,  Esq.  of  Balfour.  Simon  de  Orrok  is  mentioned  in  the 
Ragman  Roll.  The  name  is  supposed  to  have  originated  fitsn 
the  rocks  on  that  part  of  the  Fife  coast,  where  the  lands  lie. 

The  Orroks  of  that  ilk,  says  Nisbet,  for  armorial  bearings 
had  sable,  on  a  chevron,  betwixt  8  mullets  argent,  as  many 
chess  rocks  of  the  first.  Crest,  a  falcon  pcrdiing  proper. 
Motto,  "  Solus  Christus  mea  Rupes.** 


Oswald,  an  Anglo-Saxon  name,  llie  firet  sylUble,  like 
Ead  or  Ed,  in  Edward,  Edmund,  Edwin,  Edgar,  ftc,  was 
intended  to  show  derivation  and  family  relationship  by  the 
use  of  similar /lersona/  names,  a  practice  which  seems  to  hare 
been  common  in  Anglo-Saxon  families,  thus,  Oswald,  Oslaf, 
Oslac,  Oswin,  Osfrith,  Osric,  Osbald,  &c.  Mr.  KemUe,  ui 
liis  ingenious  and  valuable  work  *  On  the  Names,  Surnames, 
.md  Nicknames  of  the  Anglo-Saxons,*  gives  several  instances 
of  this  practice. 

Since  the  end  of  the  17th  century  a  family  of  the  name  of 
Oswald  have  possessed  the  estate  of  Dunnikier,  in  the  parish 
of  Dysart,  Fifeshire,  on  part  of  which  the  village  of  Pathhead 
is  built.  This  property  anciently  belonged  to  the  family  of 
Lundin  of  Balgonie,  and  afterwards,  according  to  Sibbald,  to 
a  Mr.  John  Watson,  who  bniit  the  old  house  in  Pathheai!, 
mid  mortified  several  acres  of  Und  near  Bumlishind  for  main- 
taining poor  widows. 


<    ( 


II 

i; 


I 


ii 


I 


:    1 


I 


OSWALD, 


268 


JOHK. 


L 


ally  entotamed  towards  the  Britiah  naroe  and  controL  In 
Februaiy  1811  General  Oawald  was  appointed  colonel  of  the 
Greek  light  infantiy,  a  corps  he  bad  formed  and  discipUiMd 
cbieflj  from  the  prisoners  of  that  nation.  Upon  quitting  the 
Ionian  isles,  he  received  from  their  respective  inhabitants  ad- 
dresses expressive  of  their  sense  of  the  benefits  which  they 
bad  derived  from  bis  administration,  with  an  appropriate  gift 
from  each.  In  June  1811  be  was  promoted  to  tba  rank  of 
major-general;  and  in  November  of  the  same  year  was 
placed  on  the  staff  of  the  Western  district  of  England.  Dur- 
ing that  command  be  succeeded  in  re-establishing  the  peace 
of  Bristol,  which  bad  been  endangered  by  the  fnrj  of  a  mob 
stimulated  to  mischief  bj  seditious  harangues. 

In  August  following  General  Oswald  was  nominated  to  the 
Peninsular  sta£  He  jmned  the  army  under  the  marquis  of 
Wellington,  October  22,  and  accompanied  it  during  the  se- 
vere cavaliy  affair  of  the  28d  and  24th.  He  was  pUced  in 
command  of  the  iifth  division  of  the  army,  vacant  in  conse- 
quence of  General  I^tb  being  wounded,  and  took  the  direc- 
tion of  the  left  of  the  army,  at  the  moment  when  warmly 
engaged,  both  at  Villa  ^lorilla  and  Palencia.  He  oootmned 
to  conduct  that  division  during  the  remamder  of  the  arduous 
retreat ;  and  after  placing  it,  with  little  comparative  loss,  in 
cantonments  on  the  Douro,  he  returned  to  Britain. 

In  May  1812  be  rejomed  the  array  on  taking  the  field, 
when  he  resumed  the  command  of  the  fifth  division,  form- 
ing a  portion  of  tlie  left  column  under  the  orders  of 
General  Sir  Thomas  Graham,  afterwards  Lord  Lynedoch. 
He  directed  that  division  during  the  masterly  march 
through  the  north  of  Portugal,  and  the  Spanish  pro- 
vinces of  Zamora,  Leon,  and  Palencia,  till  it  crossed  the 
Ebro.  At  the  battle  of  Vittoria  he  had  the  command  of  all 
the  troops  composing  the  advance  (^  the  left  column,  with 
which  be  attacked  and  drove  the  enemy  from  the  heights. 
He  held  tlie  same  command  during  the  blockade  of  St.  Sebas- 
tian, until  the  return  of  Sir  James  Leith  on  the  dOth  August, 
when  he  continued  bis  services  as  a  volunteer,  and  accompa- 
nied the  lieutenant-general  to  the  trendies  on  the  occasion  of 
the  ass.anlt  On  General  Leith  being  again  wounded,  the 
command  of  the  fifth  division  once  m<we  devolved  upon  Gen- 
eral Oswald ;  but  family  affairs  soon  after  obliged  him  to 
return  to  Britain. 

This  distinguished  officer  was  twice  honoured  with  his  sov- 
ereign's gracious  acknowledgment  of  ben'ioea,  in  which  he 
held  chief  command ;  and  three  times  for  those  in  whioh  be 
held  a  subordinate  situation.  Twice  by  name  be  obtained 
the  thanks  of  parliament ;  and  he  bore  three  medals,  one  for 
Maida,  one  fur  Vittoria,  and  one  for  the  siege  of  St.  Sebas- 
tian. He  was  nominated  a  knight  commander  of  the  Bath 
at  the  eniaigement  of  the  order  in  1815 ;  was  advanced  to 
the  grade  of  Grand  Cross,  February  25, 1824,  and  was  in- 
vested at  Carlton  House  9th  June  following.  In  July  1818 
he  obtained  the  colonelcy  of  the  rifle  brigade.  In  August 
1819  he  received  the  brevet  of  lieutenant-general,  and  the 
9th  October  following  was  removed  from  the  rifle  brigade  to 
the  colonelcy  of  the  85th  foot  Sir  John  Oswald  died  at 
Dunnikeir,  June  8,  1840.  He  was  twice  nuuried ;  first,  in 
Januaiy  1812,  to  Charlotte,  eldest  daughter  of  the  Rev. 
Lord  Charles  Mumy-Aynsley,  unde  of  the  duke  of  Athdl, 
and  that  lady  having  died,  February  22,  1827,  he  married, 
secondly,  in  October  1829,  her  cousin,  Emily  Jane,  daughter 
of  Lord  Henry  Murray,  who  survived  him. 

OSWALD,  Joiix,  a  poet  and  political  writer, 
who  pnbllslied  under  the  assumed  name  of  Syl' 


vester  Otway,  was  a  native  of  Edinbnni^  wliers 
his  mother  is  said  to  have  kept  John^s  CoiliBe- 
honse.  He  served  an  apprenticeship  to  ajewd- 
ler,  and  followed  that  ocenpatlon  till  a  relation  of 
his  died,  and  left  him  a  considerable  legacy. 
With  this  money  ho  pnrcliased  a  commission  in 
the  42d  Highlanders.  Some  accounts  say  that 
his  father  was  a  goldsmith,  that  he  was  brought 
up  to  the  same  business,  tiiat  he  enlisted  in  the 
18th  or  Royal  Irish  regiment,  and  from  his  good 
education  was  soon  made  a  sergeant,  and  that 
when  quartered  at  Deal,  he  married  a  naUve  of 
the  place,  with  whom  he  got  a  sum  of  money  suf- 
ficient to  purchase  his  discharge,  as  well  as  to  buy 
him  a  commission  as  an  ensign  in  tlie  42d,  thea 
engaged  in  active  service  in  America.  In  1780, 
when  the  2d  battalion  was  raised,  he  went  out  si 
lieutenant  with  it  to  the  East  Indies.  On  the 
passage  out,  he  fought  a  duel  with  the  oflScer  com- 
manding the  two  companies,  in  the  transport,  m 
which  he  was  not  the  aggressor.  They  fired  two 
rounds  at  each  other,  luckily  without  bloodshed. 
His  finances  not  permitting  him  to  join  the  mess 
on  board  the  transport,  he  lived  upon  the  same 
rations  that  were  served  out  to  the  soldiers.  Af- 
ter being  in  India  a  short  time,  he  sold  his  com- 
mission, and  returned  to  England,  overland,  m 
1783.  On  his  outward  voyage  he  had  obtained  t 
knowledge  of  Latin  and  Greek  without  the  ss- 
sistance  of  a  master ;  and  during  his  residence  m 
India,  he  made  himself  acquainted  with  the  Ara- 
bic. In  politics  he  was  a  republican,  and  in  reli- 
gion somewhat  of  an  infidel.  In  London,  it  is 
believed,  he  snppoilcd  himself  chiefly  by  his  pen. 
He  wrote  both  in  pix)se  and  verse.  His  poetical 
effusions  were  mostly  of  an  amatory  cast,  and 
some  of  them  received  the  appix)bation  of  Bums. 
In  his  habits,  Oswald  was  very  singular,  and,  in 
imitation  of  the  Brahmins,  he  rigidly  abstamcd 
from  animal  food. 

On  the  breaking  out  of  the  first  French  Revo- 
lution, Oswald  went  to  Paris,  whei*e,  in  1792,  he 
published  a  new  edition,  translated  into  Freiidi, 
with  considerable  additions,  of  a  pamphlet  which 
he  had  brought  out  iu  London  in  1784,  entitled 
*  Review  of  the  Constitution  of  Great  Britain.' 
This  pamphlet  displayed  some  ability,  and  as, 
from  its  extreme  views,  it  was  quite  in  accord- 


!l 


,  I 

■  I 

1 
I 

1 1 


'■  I 
\- 


;  I 

I    I 

ii 


I 


OXFURD. 


270 


PANMUBE. 


12th  March  1594.  His  non,  D.nvid  Makgill,  was  also  a  lord 
of  sesaon,  appointed  25th  Maj  1597,  and  died  in  1607. 
Tills  p:pntIemAn*s  eldest  son,  David  Makgill  of  Cranston- 
Riddell,  died  without  male  issue,  15th  May  1619. 

His  hrotlier.  Sir  James  Mnkgill,  suooeeded  him  in  liis  es- 
tates, and  WAS  the  first  Visconnt  Ozfnrd.  He  was  created  a 
baronet  in  1627,  appointed  a  lord  of  session,  Sd  November 
1629,  nnd  conKtituted  one  of  the  commismoners  of  exche- 
quer, l8t  Fcbmaiy  1645.  He  was  elevated  to  the  peerage, 
iiv  the  title  of  viscount  of  Oxfurd,  and  Lord  Makgill  of  Coos- 
land,  by  patent,  dated  19th  April  1651,  to  him  and  his  heirs 
male  of  entail  and  provision  whatsoever.  He  died  5th  ^fay 
166.3. 

His  son.  Robert,  second  visconnt,  died  8th  December  1706, 
flge<l  about  58.  He  was  twice  married,  but  had  issae  only 
by  his  first  wife,  I«ady  Henriet  livingston,  only  dsQf^hter 
of  the  third  earl  of  Linlithgow,  namely,  a  son,  the  Hon. 
Colonel  Tliomas  M.Hkgill,  who  died  without  issue,  in  Septem- 
ber 1701,  and  thnn;  daughters.  The  eldest  daughter,  the 
Hon.  Cliristian  Makgill,  married  the  Hon.  William  Mait- 
land.  a  younger  son  of  the  third  earl  of  I^nudcrdale,  and  died 
in  1707,  in  her  30th  year,  leaving  a  son,  Robert,  who  assum- 
ing the  title  of  visconnt  of  Oxfurd,  voted  as  such  at  an  elec- 
tion of  a  representative  peer,  2l8t  September  1783.  In  1734, 
James  M.ikgill  of  Nether  Rnnkeillonr,  the  sixth  in  descent 
from  Sir  James,  I/ord  Rankeilloor,  claimeti  the  title.  His 
claim  was  refcrre<l  to  the  lords'  committee  of  privilegtps,  but 
was  by  them  refused,  on  the  ground  that  although  he  had 
proved  his  being  heir  male  whatsoever,  he  did  not  possess 


the  other  reqaisites  in  the  patent,  that  of  beir  of  entail  and 
of  provision.  The  title,  therefere,  has  remained  dormant 
since  the  death  of  the  second  visooont  in  1706.  On  the  death 
of  her  nephew,  Robert  Makgill,  above  mentioned,  in  1755, 
the  Hon.  Henriet  Makgill,  youngest  daughter  of  the  aeoimd 
viflconnt  and  wife  of  Jnmee  Hamilton,  yoanger  of  Orbiitoan, 
assumed  the  title  of  visoonnteis  of  Oxford.  She  died  11th 
October  1758,  without  issue. 

James  Makgill,  the  claimant,  having  ^cd  without  inoCi 
he  was  succeeded  in  Nether  Rankallonr,  and  fail  other  es- 
tates, by  his  sister,  Isabella  Makgill,  who  manied  the  Rev. 
William  Dick,  one  of  the  ministers  of  Cupar.  Thdr  daugh- 
ter, Margaret,  heiress  of  Nether  Rankeillour  and  Liudarei^ 
married  the  Hon.  Frederick  Lewis  Mnitland,  idxtfa  son  of  tht 
sixth  eari  of  I^iuderdale,  a  captain  R.N.  Tlieir  ddest  loo, 
Colonel  Charles  Maitland,  when  captun  in  the  17th  li^ 
dragoons,  was  aide-de-camp  to  hii  cousin,  Major-general 
Thomas  Dundas,  in  the  West  Indies,  in  1794.  He  was  soe- 
ceeded,  in  1827.  by  his  eldest  surviving  son,  David  Mait- 
land !iTukgill,  Eiiq.  of  Rankeilloor,  who,  in  June  1889,  was 
served  heir  of  line  in  general  to  the  first  viscount  of  Ftvn- 
draught,  (see  vol.  i.  p.  727.)  when  he  assnmed  the  additional 
name  of  Cricliton,  his  ancestor.  Sir  James  Mnkf;^]  of  Ras- 
kcillonr,  having  married  in  1665,  the  Hon.  Janet  CriditflB, 
only  daughter  of  the  first  Visconnt  Frendranght.  Mr.  Da- 
vid Maitland  ^Takgill  Crichton  of  Rankeillour,  who  distin- 
gulshiHl  himself  by  his  support  of  the  Free  church  of  Scot- 
land, died  llth  July  1851,  leaving  issue. 


^^  ^i^^^^  J^.'S.^'Si^.^^^  ^ 


^^*  ^^^^.^•.^^•-■^■* 


^.•w^^^i/^^i^<%^WW%A^A^^^» 


P 


Panmurk,  Karl  of,  a  title  (attainted)  in  the  peerage  of  ; 
Scotland,  conferred  3d  August  1646,  with  the  secondary  title 
of  Baron  Manic  of  Itrecliin  and  Xav.v,  on  Patrick  Maule  of 
Panmure.  (see  p.  122  of  this  volume,  .irticle  Maui.k).  He 
was  a  f:uthful  adherent  of  Charles  I.,  and  attended  that  un- 
fortunate monarch  in  his  imprisonment  at  Holdenby  and 
Carishrook,  till  compelled  to  leave  liim  by  the  orders  of  par- 
liament. By  CromviL'll  he  was,  in  1654.  fined  in  the  exorbi- 
tant sum  of  X'lOfCOO  sterling,  and  X2,'>00  on  account  of  his 
younger  son,  llcnr}'.  who  had  the  command  of  a  regiment  in 
the  duke  of  Hamilton's  army,  raised  for  the  rcM'ue  of  the 
king  in  1618,  and  who,  ut  the  battle  of  Dunbar  in  16')0,  also 
commanded  a  regiment.  The  earl^s  fine  was  mitigated  to 
£4,000,  and  that  for  his  s.»n,  Henry,  to  £1,000.  His  lord- 
ship died  22d  December,  1G61. 

His  elder  son,  George,  second  earl,  when  I»rd  Maule, 
fought  at  the  head  of  the  Fcirfarshire  regiment  of  horse,  of 
which  he  was  colonel,  at  the  battle  of  Dunbar,  3d  5)epteniber 
1650,  and  also  at  an  engagement  with  the  English  at  Inver- 
keithing,  20tli  July  following,  when  he  was  wonnded.  After 
the  defeat  of  the  royalists  at  Worcester,  many  of  them  re- 
paired to  I^rd  Maule,  but,  finding  that  he  could  be  of  no  fur- 
ther service  to  the  king*s  cause,  he  made  his  peace  with  Gen- 
eral Monk  in  1652.  The  second  earl  of  Panmure  died  at 
Edinburgh  24tli  March  1671.  By  his  countess,  Lady  .Jean 
Campbell,  oldest  dsnghtor  of  .Tohn,  earl  of  Ix>ndoun,  high- 


chancellor  of  Scotland,  he  had  nine  children,  of  whom  four 
sons  and  one  daughter  died  young. 

The  eld«*«t  sur\iving  son,  Geoi^,  third  eari,  was  n  privy 
councillor  to  Charles  II.  and  James  VII.,  and  died  Ist  Feb- 
ruary 1686.  He  had  a  son,  George,  I^ird  Maule,  who  prede- 
ceased him.  Tlie  third  c:\tVs  brother,  the  Hon.  .Tames  Maule 
(»f  Ballnmby,  succeeded  him  as  fonrth  earl.  In  his  yootb,  he 
served  as  a  vilnnteer  at  the  siege  of  Luxembourg.  He  wss 
n  pri%7  coiuuillor  to  James  VII.,  but  was  removed  for  (^ 
posing  the  abrogation  of  the  i>enal  laws  sgainst  popery.  At 
the  convention  of  estates  in  March  1689,  he  vigorously  sop- 
ported  the  interest  of  the  al»dicated  monarch.  Whm  the 
crown  wan  settled  on  King  William  and  Queen  Mary,  the 
earl  of  Pannmre,  with  his  hrother,  the  Hon.  Harry  Maule  of 
Kelly,  who  was  also  a  member  of  the  convention,  left  the 
mei'ting,  and  never  appears]  again  in  the  parlLiment  of  Scot- 
land. When  the  rebellitm  of  1715  bn>ke  out,  the  eari  and 
his  brother  joined  the  standard  of  the  Pretender,  and  the  for- 
mer proclaimed  James  VIII.  at  Brechin.  At  the  battle  of 
Sherifltnuir,  his  lonlship  commanded  a  battalion  of  foot,  and 
was  taken  prisoner,  but  rescued  by  his  brother.  He  after- 
wards took  rul'uge  in  France,  and  wtui  attainted  by  act  of 
parliament.  Tlie  yearly  rental  of  his  e8t.ite8  w.is  £3,456 
sterling,  the  largest  of  the  confiscated  properties,  and  tboogh 
the  government  twice  offered  to  restore  them,  if  he  would  re- 
turn nnd  take  the  oath  of  allegiance  to  the  house  of  Hanofrcr, 


H 
■  I 


I 


\^ 


.Li 


J 


1 

i 


PANTHER. 


J72 


PARK. 


tlM  dtatb  of  Lord  MtlriUe,  wu  eoofcfred  npon  hnn.  Uadcr 
the  AbcrdMO  coalition  ministrj  bo  held  no  office,  bok  when 
Lord  Paliiianloa  beeaine  prime  minietar  in  18M,  be  accepted 
the  office  of  minietcr  of  war.  In  1858  be  was  enated  a 
knigfat  of  the  Tbietle,  and  in  1855  was  decorated  with  tbe 
order  of  tlie  BatiL  On  tbe  death  of  bio  conun,  Jamea  Andraw 
Bainuj,  10th  eari  and  1st  marqois  of  Dulbovde,  withoot 
male  iwae.  Dee.  19,  1880,  be  sncoeeded  to  tbe  earldom  of 
Dalhonsie  in  the  Scottish  peerage;  tbe  marqoisate,  a  ov- 
ation of  tbe  United  Kingdom,  became  extinct.  In  1861  be 
resumed  the  funilj  surname  of  Rsmsaj  after  that  of  Manic. 
He  married  in  1831,  3Iontaga,  eldest  daughter  uf  George,  2d 
Lord  Abererombj.    She  died,  witboot  issoe.  Nor.  11, 1853. 

PAXTUEU,  or  Paxitkr,  David,  a  stateanum 
and  prelate  of  tbe  16th  century,  belonged  to  an 
ancient  family  in  Forfarsbire.  He  was  first  prior  of 
St.  Mary's  Isle,  In  Galloway,  and  afterwards  Ticar 
of  the  eharch  of  Carstairs,  in  the  diocese  of  Glas- 
gow, and  commeddator  of  the  abbey  of  Cambos- 
kenneth.  For  some  time  prerions  to  1545,  he  was 
principal  secretary  of  state  and  a  priry  cooncillor. 
In  that  year  he  was  elected  bishop  of  Ross,  bat' 
not  then  consecrated,  being  at  that  time  ambassa- 
dor from  Scotland  at  the  coart  of  France,  where  he 
resided  for  7  years,  and  daring  all  that  period  he 
regnlarly  received  the  rcvenaes  of  the  see.  On 
his  retaru  he  was  consecrated  bi^ihop  at  Jedbnrgh. 
At  the  rcqacst  of  the  king  of  France  he  induced 
the  carl  of  Arran  to  resign  the  regency  into  the 
hands  of  the  queen  dowager,  and  as  a  reward  for 
this  service,  the  French  monarch  conferred  on  him 
an  abbey  in  Poitoa.  lie  was  one  of  the  commis- 
sioners sent  from  the  Scottish  parliament  to  Eng- 
land, in  1550,  to  conclude  a  peace  with  that 
country.  When  Queen  Mary  was  married  to  the 
dauphin,  Panther  and  sercral  other  eminent  men 
went  over  to  Paris  to  be  witnesses  of  the  royal 
nuptials.  This  prelate,  who  is  represented  as 
having  been  a  man  of  the  most  immoral  habits, 
died  at  Stirling,  October  1,  1558.  Calderwood 
(vol.  1.  p.  332)  says  that  *^  he  departed  eating  and 
drinking,  which,  together  w^ith  the  rest  that  there- 
upon depended,  was  the  pastime  of  his  life.** 
Shortly  before  his  death,  he  advised  the  popish 
clergy  against  entering  into  disputations  with  the 
refoi-med  ministers.  In  Calderwood^s  *  llistorie,* 
(vol.  i.  p.  414,)  it  is  stated  that  ''Mr.  David  Pan- 
tcr,  then  lying  at  Restalrig,  dissuaded  them,  af- 
firming that,  if  ever  they  disputed  but  where 
themselves  were  both  judge  and  party,  and  where 
fire  and  sword  should  obey  their  decree,  that  then 


their  cawe  was  marred  for  trtarz  for  their  Tietory 
stood,  neither  in  God  nor  liis  word ;  bat  in  Hut 
own  wills,  and  tUnp  oondnded  by  tiidr  owns 
ooonccls,  *  whereto,'  said  he,  *  these  feUoweswill 
give  no  place,  bat  will  call  yon  to  yoor  eompt- 
booke,  that  is,  to  tbe  BOrfe,  and  bj  it  ye  will  not 
be  foond  the  men  tliat  ye  are  called.  Tbeieibre, 
if  ye  love  yonrselTea,  enter  never  in  diqmtatioo 
with  them,  nor  call  tlie  matter  in  question,  bnt 
defend  yonnelves,  or  else  ail  is  lost.* " 

Panthcr'soffidal  letters,  written  in  elegantLatia, 
were  published  by  Rnddlman,  in  two  Ttrfomes,  ia 
1722-24.  The  whole  of  the  second  Tolnme  wti 
composed  by  him,  the  first  being  the  prodnctioa 
of  his  uncle,  Patrick  Panther,  D.D.,  professor  of 
divinity  in  the  nniversity  of  St.  Andrews,  and  au- 
thor of  a  Latin  poem,  entitled  'Yalliados,'  u 
praise  of  the  heroic  exploits  of  Sir  William  Wallioe. 

PARK,  MuKGO,  an  enterprising  traveller,  tbe 
third  son  and  seventh  child  of  a  respectable  fkrai- 
er,  was  bom  at  Fowlshiels,  a  farm  on  the  estate  of 
the  duke  of  Bocclench,  near  Selkiric,  September 
10, 1771.  He  received  the  rudiments  of  hu  edn- 
cation  in  his  father*s  family,  and  was  afterwards 
sent  to  the  grammar  school  of  Selkirk,  where  he 
distinguished  himself  by  his  application  and  profi- 
ciency. He  was  originally  intended  for  the  church, 
but,  preferring  the  medical  profession,  he  was,  at 
the  age  of  fifteen,  apprenticed  to  Mr.  Thomas  An- 
derson, a  respectable  surgeon  in  Selkirk,  with 
whom  he  resided  three  years.  In  1789  he  re- 
moved to  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  where  for 
three  successive  sessions  he  attended  the  cnstom- 
lury  medical  classes.  His  favourite  study  at  this 
time  was  the  science  of  botany,  to  prosecute  his 
researches  in  which  he  made  a  tonr  through  the 
Highlands  with  his  brother-in-law,  Mr.  James 
Dickson,  who  had  settled  in  London  as  a  nnrseiy- 
man  and  seedsman.  On  leaving  college.  Park  re- 
paired to  Loudon,  and  was  introduced  by  Mr. 
Dickson  to  Sir  Joseph  Banks,  by  whose  recon- 
mendation  he  obtained  the  appointment  of  assist- 
ant-surgeon to  the  Worcester,  East  Indiaman. 
In  February  1792  he  sailed  for  Bcncoolen,  in  tbe 
island  of  Sumatra,  where  he  collected  a  variety  of 
specimens  in  natural  history.  He  returned  tbe 
following  year,  and,  November  4,  1794,  he  com- 
municated  to  the  Linn  jean  Society  a  paper  oon- 


PARK, 


274 


MUNGO. 


ii 


with  tlio  brevet  commission  of  a  captiun  in  Africa, 
]iis  brother-in-law,  Mr.  Alexander  Anderson,  snr- 
gcon,  with  a  similar  commission  of  lieutenant,  and 
Mr.  George  Scott,  draughtsman,  five  artificers 
from  the  Royal  dock-yards,  Isaaco  the  guide,  and 
Lieutenant  Martyn  and  thirty-five  men  of  the 
Ro3'al  African  corps,  as  their  military  escort.  In 
two  days  they  arrived  at  Pisania,  which  they 
quitted  on  May  4,  and  on  the  11th  reached  Me- 
dina, the  capital  of  the  kingdom  of  Woolli.  On 
the  15th  they  arrived  at  Kussai,  on  the  banks  of 
the  Gambia,  and  about  this  time  one  of  the  sol- 
diers died  of  epilepsy. 

Parkas  hopes  of  completing  the  objects  of  his 
mission  in  safety  depended  entirely  on  his  reach- 
ing the  Niger  before  the  commencement  of  the 
rainy  season,  the  effects  of  which  are  always  fatal 
to  Europeans.  The  half  of  his  journey,  however, 
had  not  been  finished  when  the  wet  season  set  in, 
and,  in  a  few  days,  twelve  of  the  men  were  seri- 
ously ill,  and  others  were  soon  affected  in  a  great- 
er or  less  degree  by  the  climate.  On  the  morning 
of  June  13,  when  they  departed  from  Dindikoo, 
the  sick  occupied  all  the  horses  and  spare  asses, 
and  by  the  15th  some  were  delirious.  On  the 
18th  they  arrived  at  Toniba,  from  whence  they 
ascended  the  mountains  south  of  that  place ;  and, 
having  attained  the  summit  of  the  ridge  which 
separates  the  Niger  from  the  remote  branches  of 
the  Senegal,  Mr.  Park  had  the  satisfaction  of 
once  more  seeing  the  Niger  rolling  its  immense 
stream  along  the  plains.  But  this  pleasure  was 
attended  with  the  mortifying  reflection,  that,  of 
the  party  that  had  set  out  with  him  from  the 
coast,  there  survived  only  six  soldiera  and  one 
carpenter,  with  Lieutenant  Martyn,  Mr.  Ander- 
son and  the  guide.  Mr.  Scott,  the  draughtsman, 
who  had  been  left  behind  at  Koomikoomi,  on  ac- 
count of  sickness,  died  without  reaching  the  Ni- 
ger. On  August  21  Mr.  Park  and  the  few  sur- 
vivors embarked  in  a  canoe,  and  on  the  23d  they 
arrived  at  Maraboo.  Isaaco  was  immediately  de- 
spatched to  Sego,  the  capital  of  Bamban*a,  to  ne- 
gotiate with  Mansong,  the  sovereign,  for  permis- 
sion and  materials  to  build  a  boat  for  the  purpose 
of  proceeding  down  the  Niger.  Whilst  waiting 
for  his  return  Mr.  Park  was  seized  with  a  severe 
attack  of  dysenter}-,  but,  by  the  aid  of  medi- 


cine and  a  good  constitntion,  he  soon  reooTend, 
After  many  delays,  Manaong  sent  a  measeofer 
to  conduct  the  traveller  towards  Sego.  The  king 
and  his  chiefs  were  much  gratified  by  the  piesenti 
which  they  received  from  Mr.  Park,  who,  on  Sep- 
tember 26,  proceeded  to  Sansandiog.  It  was  with 
difficulty,  however,  that  he  procored  from  Min- 
song,  in  return  for  his  presents,  two  old  canoes, 
wherewith  ho  constmcted,  with  his  own  hsiids, 
and  some  assistance  from  one  of  the  snnrlving 
soldiers,  a  fiat-bottomed  boat,  to  which  ho  gave 
the  title  of  his  majesty's  schooner,  the  Joliba.  In 
the  meantime  he  was  informed  of  the  death  of  Mr. 
Scott,  and  he  now  had  to  lament  the  loss  of  his 
friend  Mr.  Anderson,  who  died,  alter  a  lingering 
illness,  October  26.  On  November  16  every 
thing  was  ready  for  the  voyage,  and,  daring  the 
succeeding  days,  previous  to  his  embarkation, 
which  was  on  the  19th,  Mr.  Park  wrote  scvoal 
letters  to  his  friends  in  Great  Britain,  with  which 
Isaaco  the  guide  was  sent  back  to  the  British  set- 
tlements on  the  Gambia. 

Some  time  elapsed  without  any  farther  intelli- 
gence being  received  of  ^(r.  Park  and  his  com- 
panions ;  but  in  the  course  of  1806  various  unfa- 
vourable reports  became  current  regarding  their 
fate.  Information  was  brought  down  to  the  coast 
by  the  native  traders  from  the  interior  of  Africa, 
to  the  effect  that  Mr.  Park  and  those  with  him 
had  been  killed  during  their  progress  down  the 
river.  Lieutenant-general  Maxwell,  the  gover- 
nor of  Senegal,  in  consequence,  engaged  Isaaco, 
Mr.  Park's  former  guide,  to  proceed  to  the  Niger, 
to  ascertain  the  truth  of  these  rumours,  and  in 
January  1810  he  left  Senegal  on  this  mission.  He 
retunied  on  September  1,  1811,  bringing  a  full 
confirmation  of  the  reiK)rts  of  Mr.  Park's  death; 
and  delivered  to  the  governor  a  Jonmal  frMD 
Amadi  Fatouma,  the  guide  who  had  accompanied 
Park  from  Sansanding  down  the  Niger,  which, 
after  being  translated  from  Arabic  into  English, 
was  transmitted  by  him  to  the  secretary  of  state 
for  the  colonial  department.  From  the  information 
procured  by  Isaaco,  it  appeared  that  the  expedi- 
tion proceeded  from  Sansanding  to  Silla,  whence 
Mr.  Park,  I/icnt.  Martyn,  three  other  white  men, 
three  slaves,  and  Amadi,  as  guide  nnd  interpreter, 
nine  in  number,  sailed  down  the  Niger ;  and  in 


I 


;^i 


PARK. 


276 


PATERSON. 


Thomas  Campbell  tbo  poet,  and  General  Sir 
Charles  Napier.  His  fine  bust  of  Napoleon  III. 
was  remarkable  for  its  faithAil  likeness  and  beanty 
as  a  work  of  art.  So  also  are  his  busts  of  the  Duke 
of  Cambridge  and  Mr.  Layard,  M.P.  Another  of 
his  master-pieces  Is  the  ^*  Scottish  Lassie,'*  a  beau- 
tiful head  of  a  female  in  marble,  an  idealized 
likeness  of  his  wife,  belonging  to  the  Royal 
Scottish  Academy,  which  is  placed  in  the  Na- 
tional Gallery  of  Scotland  at  Edinburgh.  His 
genius  was  peculiarly  fitted  for  large  open-air 
statues,  but  he  was  never  employed  in  this  the 
highest  branch  of  the  art.  Perhaps  his  eccentric 
character  and  independent  disposition  interfered 
to  prevent  his  being  engaged  in  what  was  all  his 
life  the  object  of  his  great  desire.  He  wrote  well 
on  Sculptui'al  subjects,  and  in  1846,  printed  at 
Glasgow,  for  private  circulation,  A  Letter  to 
Archibald  Alison,  Esq.,  LL.D.,  sheriff  of  Lanark- 
shire, *'  On  the  Use  of  Drapery  in  Portrnit  Sculp- 
tm-e.'  He  died  at  Warrington,  Aug.  16,  1855. 
He  had  gone  from  Manchester  to  give  a  gentle- 
man whose  bust  he  was  taking  a  sitting,  and  on 
his  return  to  the  station  at  Warrington,  he  per- 
ceived a  porter  endeavouriug  to  cany  a  heavy 
trunk.  Rushing  forward  to  his  assistance,  in  the 
attempt  to  lift  it,  the  weight  of  the  box  caused 
him  to  burst  a  blood  vessel.  In  the  28th  Anuual 
Report  of  the  Royal  Scottish  Academy,  dated  Nov. 
14  of  that  year,  the  Council  thus  alludes  to  his 
merits  and  decease : 

"  A  vacancy  has  occurred  in  the  list  of  academicians,  bj  the 
premature  and  lamented  death  of  their  hi|;hlj  talented  bro- 
ther academician,  Patric  Park,  Esq.,  sculptor,  an  event  wliicb 
occurred  suddenly  at  Warrington,  on  the  16th  August  last 
Mr.  Park  bad,  at  the  time  of  his  decease,  only  attained  the 
age  of  furty-fuur  years,  and  being  un  enthuiuastic  student 
and  lover  of  liis  profession,  bis  works,  especially  his  portrait 
^•usts — long  dUtinguished  by  some  of  the  highest  qualities  of 
his  noble  art,  seemed  every  succeeding  year  to  gain  in 
strength  and  refinement,  so  that,  hud  life  been  spare«l,  many 
works  of  still  higher  excellence  might  have  been  looked  for 
from  his  prolific  studio.  The  Academy  exhibitions,  for  a 
long  scries  of  years  past,  and  none  of  them  more  strikingly 
than  that  of  1855,  when  his  fine  bust  of  tlie  Kmperor  of  tlie 
French  occupied  a  place  of  honour,  sufficiently  attest  the 
justice  of  this  brief  eulogium  of  the  council,  and  justify  their 
sorrow  that,  in  the  death  of  Patric  Park,  the  Academy  has 
lost  one  of  its  most  talented  members,  and  the  department 
of  sculpture,  in  which  he  more  peculiarly  excelled,  une  of  its 
most  eminent  professors.** 

He  married  a  daughter  of  Robert  Carruthers, 
Esq.,  Inverness,  and  had  4  sons  and  a  daughter. 


Pablkt,  the  turname  of  a  Dnmiiies-ihix*  familj,  Mvml 
members  of  which  haw  diltiiigiiislMd  thcmwlvM  in  the  aer- 
rice  of  their  coantry.  James  Paaley,  Esq.  of  Cnig  and 
Bom,  near  Langholm,  who  died  April  13,  1773,  at  the  agi 
of  78,  left  six  lona  and  four  dangjhtcn.  His  wiA  waa  Mag- 
dalene, daoghter  of  Bobert  Elliot,  £«q.  of  Middlemlln,  Bos- 
burghshue,  and  grand-daughter  of  Sir  Gilbert  EUioi  of 
Stobs,  baronet 

The  fifth  ion,  Admiral  Sk  Thomas  Pasley,  bom  If ardh  2, 
1734,  commanded  a  dimion  of  the  fleet  under  Earl  Howe,  in 
the  memorable  defeat  of  the  Freooh  fleet,  Jnne  1, 1794,  and 
greatly  distinguislied  himself.  For  his  gallant  conduct  en 
the  occasion,  he  was  created  a  baronet  of  the  United  King- 
dom, Sept.  1,  of  that  year,  with  remainder,  having  no  sons, 
to  the  heirs  male  of  his  danghters  snocesuTelj.  Ho  married 
Mary,  daughter  of  Thomas  Heywood,  Esq.,  of  the  Nonncrr, 
Isle  of  Man,  one  of  His  Majesty's  deemsters  for  that  ishmd, 
and  had  two  daughtem,  the  elder  of  whom,  Maria,  manied, 
in  1800,  John  Sabine,  Esq.,  of  the  i^Tenadier  gnarda,  and  bad 
an  only  son,  who  succeeded  his  grandx'ather.  Sir  Thomas  died 
Kov.  29,  1808. 

His  grandson.  Sir  Thomas  Sabine,  bom  Dec:  26,  1801, 
became  2d  baronet,  and  by  royal  permisiuon,  assumed,  in 
lbU9,  the  surname  and  anus  of  PaaleT ;  married,  with  issue, 
7  sous  and  4  daughters.  In  1857  Sir  Thomas  was  raised  to 
the  rank  of  Rear-admural  of  the  White. 

The  first  Sir  Thomas*  sister,  Margaret,  8d  danghtcr  of 
James  Pasley,  Esq.  of  Craig  and  Burn,  above  mentimcd, 
married,  in  1761,  George  Malcolm,  Esq.  of  Bnrafoot,  Domfiics- 
shire,  and  was  the  mother  of  a  huge  family.  Three  of  her 
sons  were  Col.  Sir  James  Malcolm,  died  in  1829,  Admiral 
Sir  Pulteney  Malcolm,  and  General  Sir  John  Malcolm  (See 
pp.  95  and  97  of  this  vol.) 

General  Sir  Charles  William  Pasley,  E.C.B.,  (1845)  woi, 
in  his  time,  well  known  for  his  attainments  in  Uterature  and 
science.  He  entered  the  army  as  2d  lieutenant  iu  the  artil- 
lery in  1797,  and.  removed  to  the  Koyal  engineers  in  1798. 
He  served  at  the  defience  of  Gaeta  in  1806,  at  the  battk  of 
Maida,  at  the  siege  of  Copenhagen,  and  at  Corunna  in  1809, 
and  was  twice  wounded.  He  was  chief  engineer  of  the  Mar- 
quis of  Huntly*s  division  at  Walchenen.  In  1841  he  became  a 
niiijor-generul,  and  in  1851  a  lieutenant-general.  He  was  alto 
a  colunel  commanding  a  corps  of  engineers.  In  1844  he  was 
created  D.C.L.  at  Oxford.  He  was  the  inventor  of  some  im- 
provements in  pontoon  bridges,  and  author  of  a  treatise  on 
*  Military  lubtruction,'  and  'An  Essay  on  the  Militaiy  Po- 
licy and  In»titutiuns  of  the  British  Empire.*  For  some  yean 
he  was  inspector-general  of  railways.    He  died  in  April  1861. 


Pateks:in.  a  family  of  this  name  at  one  period  possessed 
the  estate  of  Bannockbum,  Stirlingbhire,  and  also  a  baronel- 
cy  of  Kova  Scotia,  conferred  in  1686,  but  which  has  been 
long  extinct.  In  1745,  Sir  Hugh  Paterson  of  Bannockbom, 
baronet,  joined  the  rebellion.  His  mother,  Lady  Jean  £r- 
ekine,  was  sister  of  the  Earl  of  Mar,  a  strong  Jacobite  con- 
nection, and  Prince  Charles  Edward  slept  at  Bannockbom 
house  on  the  14tb  Srptember  of  that  year.  Bannockbom 
house  was  also  the  princess  head-quarters  during  January  1746. 
Sir  Hugh's  grand-daughter  is  said  to  have  been  privatdy 
married  to  the  prince,  but  she  released  him  to  promote  the 
Stuurt  cause.  Another  Miss  Paterson,  belonging  to  an- 
spectable  family  at  Baltimore,  made,  in  the  present  century, 
an  equally  romantic  match,  having  married  Prince  Jerome, 
brother  of  Napuleon  I. ;  but  was  obliged  to  separate  from  her 
husband  by  a  dynastic  divorce. 

Jolm  Paterson,  one  of  the  ministere  of  Aberdeen,  was 


r 
I, 


di 


,j 


PATERSON, 


278 


WILLIAM. 


secretaries  of  state,  with  Sir  Jauics  Stuart,  the 
lord  advocate,  also  gave  their  sanction  to  the 
scheme ;  and,  in  June  1695,  a  statute  was  passed 
in  tlie  Scots  parliament,  followed  by  a  charter 
from  the  crown,  for  creating  a  trading  Company 
to  Africa  and  the  Indies,  with  power  to  plant  col- 
onics in  places  not  possessed  by  other  Europeans. 

Patci*son*s  plan  was  to  form  nn  emporium  on 
each  side  of  the  isthmus  of  Darieu,  for  the  trade 
of  the  opposite  continents.  Tlie  manufactures  of 
Europe  were  to  be  sent  to  the  Gulf  of  Darien,  and 
thence  conveyed  by  land  across  the  ridge  of  moun- 
tains that  intersects  the  Isthmus,  there  to  be 
exchanged  for  the  produce  of  South  America  and 
of  Asia ;  and  thus,  to  use  his  own  emphatic  lan- 
guage, he  would  wrest  the  keys  of  the  world  from 
Spain,  then  in  possession  of  South  America.  Eng- 
lish as  well  as  foreigners  were  admitted  into  the 
Company.  The  original  leaders  in  the  scheme, 
whose  names  are  inserted  in  the  Act  1695,  were 
nine  rc;$idcnts  in  Scotland,  with  Lord  Belhaven, 
and  Sir  Robert  Chiesley,  lord  pix)vost  of  Edin- 
bnrgh,  at  their  head,  and  eleven  merchants  of 
London,  headed  by  William  Patcrson  and  Tho- 
mas Coutts.  The  sum  of  £300,000  was,  in  a  few 
days,  subscribed  in  London,  and  there  the  fii*st 
meetings,  for  the  constitution  of  the  Company, 
were  held. 

Tills  mngnificcnt  project  was  ruined  through 
the  infamous  partiality  of  William  III.,  who  was 
mainly  indebted  for  his  crown  to  the  Presbyteri- 
ans of  Scotland,  and  the  mean  jealousy  of  the 
English  nation.  The  alarm  was  fii*st  excited  by 
the  East  India  Company,  and  the  West  India 
merchants.  In  Holland  and  Hamburg  the  sum 
of  £200,000  had  been  subscribed.  In  the  latter 
city  the  English  consul  presented  a  memorial  to 
the  senate,  disowning  the  Conipan}-,  and  warning 
them  against  all  connection  with  it.  But  thongh 
the  assembly  of  merchants  returned  a  spirited  re- 
ply, they  soon  withdrew  their  subscriptions,  and 
the  Dutch  followed  their  example.  Botli  houses 
of  parliament,  on  December  13,  1695,  concurred 
in  a  joint  address  to  the  king,  remarkable  for  its 
absurd,  narrow,  and  illiberal  views,  against  the 
establishment  of  the  Company.  The  House  of 
Commons  instituted  an  inquiry  into  the  case,  and 
afler  examining  Paterson,  his  Scottish  colleagues 


in  London,  and  their  English  pftrtncn,  inned  an 
impeachment  against  them  for  raising  money  in 
England  by  shares  in  their  Company,  under  an 
act  of  the  Scottish  parliament.  Although  the 
impeachment  was  soon  abandoned,  the  Englidi 
subscriptions  were  withdrawn,  and  the  prospects 
of  the  Company  in  London  were  nipped  in  the  bnd. 

Patcrson,  however,  was  not  easily  intimidated, 
and  the  Scots  people,  indignant  at  the  opposition 
which  the  scheme  had  met  with  in  England, 
avowedly  because  it  wonld  be  beneficial  to  Scot- 
land, immediately  subscribed  £400,000,  although 
at  that  time  there  was  not  above  £dOO,000  of 
cash  in  the  kingdom.  So  great  was  the  national 
enthusiasm,  that  young  women  threw  their  little 
fortunes  into  the  stock,  and  widows  sold  their 
jointures  to  get  the  command  of  money  for  the 
same  purpose.  Paterson  himself  subscribed  £3,000 
to  the  stock  of  the  compau}'.  At  the  very  outset 
a  mishap  befell  the  Scottish  company  and  its  pro- 
jector which  had  an  advei-se  influence  on  the  for- 
tunes of  both.  This  was  the  loss  of  a  large  por- 
tion of  the  Company*s  capital,  amounthug  to 
£25,000,  which  had  been  entrusted  by  Paterson 
to  an  agent  in  Holland,  for  the  purchase  of  stores 
for  the  Company*s  projected  expedition  of  five 
ships  to  America,  but  misappropriated  by  the  lat- 
ter. A  board  of  inquiry  was  appointed  to  inves- 
tigate the  circumstances,  and  their  report  fully 
acquitted  Paterson  of  all  blame,  and  recommended 
that  his  services  should  be  continued  by  the  Com- 
pany. 'J'hc  directors  approved  of  the  report,  ex- 
cept as  to  that  part  relative  to  the  acceptance  of 
his  services,  and  to  the  great  detriment  of  the  in- 
terests and  prospects  of  the  Company,  the  verj 
man  who  had  called  it  into  being,  was  not  em- 
ployed officially  in  its  first  expedition,  and  had  no 
part  in  its  guidance.  He  sailed  simply  as  a  pri- 
vate adventurer,  with  his  wife,  and  one  servant 
The  name  of  the  latter  stands  in  the  Company's 
books  for  a  subscription  for  £100. 

On  the  26th  of  July  1C98,  five  large  vessels 
laden  with  merchandise,  military  stores,  and  pro- 
visions, with  1,200  persons  on  board,  sailed  from 
Lcith  to  foi-m  the  projected  colony.  On  the  ar- 
rival of  the  colonists  at  the  isthmus  of  Daiicn, 
they  purchased  lands  from  the  natives,  and  estab- 
lished their  settlement  at  Acta,  a  place  midway 


PATERSON, 


280 


WILUAIL 


personal  interviews  on  tlie  subject.  The  decided 
diameter  of  the  llevolntion  in  the  politics  of  Eu- 
rope and  tlio  acknowledgment  of  King  James'  son 
by  the  French  king,  had  led  his  majesty  at  last  to 
turn  a  favourable  ear  to  the  project  of  the  Darien 
Company.  Unfortunately,  his  death,  soon  after, 
put  an  end  to  the  scheme  altogether. 

Patersou  was  a  warm  advocate  of  the  union 
with  England,  and  he  was  employed,  both  in 
London  and  Edinburgh,  to  settle  one  of  the  most 
difScult  branches  of  the  treaty,  namely,  the  ar- 
rangement of  the  public  accounts  between  the  two 
kingdoms.  In  this  office  two  other  gentlemen 
were  associated  with  him,  Dr.  Gregor}'  and  Mr. 
Bower,  and  thoy  had  £200  sterling  each  for  the 
work.  He  was  elected  a  member  of  the  fii-st  Im- 
perial parliament  for  the  Dumfries  burghs,  but 
there  being  a  double  return,  a  Mr.  Johnstone  hav- 
ing been  also  chosen,  he  was  unseated  on  petition. 

In  the  last  Scots  parliament,  resolutions  had 
been  passed  recommending  Patcrson  to  her  Ma- 
jesty for  his  good  services,  but  the  recommenda- 
tion, like  many  others,  was  disregarded.  By  the 
treaty  of  union,  a  sum  amounting  to  nearly 
£400,000  was  agreed  to  be  paid  by  the  united 
kingdom,  as  an  indemnity  to  Scotland,  for  the  loss- 
es sustained  by  the  Darien  Company,  and  this 
was  secured  by  an  act  of  the  Imperial  parliament. 
Of  this  money  Patcrson  claimed  about  £30,000, 
chiefly  founded  on  his  contract  when  foiming  the 
Company,  and  a  special  act  of  parliament  passed 
in  his  favour  in  1708.  The  Court  of  Exchequer 
decided  that  he  had  ^*a  just  right  to  be  paid 
out  of  the  equivalent  mone}',"  and  "in  regard 
that  he  had  been  very  insti-nmental  in  cany- 
ing  on  other  matters  of  a  public  nature,  much 
to  nis  country's  service,  the  judges  thought  it  just 
that  some  way  should  be  found  to  give  him  the 
recompense  for  his  services  he  merited,  and  of 
which  he  had  been  disappointed.^'  Pursuant 
thereto,  the  House  of  Commons,  March  18,  1708, 
passed  a  resolution  in  Paterson's  favour,  in  regard 
to  his  Darien  claims,  "  and  likewise  that  such  a 
recompense  be  given  to  him  as  might  be  suitable 
to  his  services,  expenses,  losses,  and  public  cares.** 
The  ministers  of  Queen  Anne,  however,  were  not 
to  be  moved  into  doing  him  justice,  and  it  was 
not  till  after  the  accession  of  George  I.,  and  he 


had  been  reduced  to  great  porerty,  that  be  ob* 
tained  the  sum  due  to  him. 

Meantime  he  continued  to  iifge  financial  refiwm 
on  the  attention  of  ministers.  A  represenUtkm 
which  he  made  to  Lord-treasorer  GodolpUn,  ia 
December  1709,  on  the  disorders  of  the  finaacei, 
was  disregarded.  Lord-treasurer  Harley,  Godol- 
phin's  successor,  adopted  some  of  his  riewst  but 
did  not  employ  him.  He  had  presented  a  memo- 
rial  to  ministers  on  his  daimst  and  stating  hit 
distress,  but  all  the  relief  he  seems  to  have  got 
were  two  or  three  sums  of  £100  and  £50,  which 
stand  opposite  to  his  name  in  Queen  Anne*s  boun- 
ty list  in  1712  and  1713. 

His  latter  years  were  spent  in  London,  and  it 
is  believed  that,  in  the  period  of  his  extreme  dis- 
tress, he  taught  mathematics  in  Westminster.  In 
1703  he  proposed  that  a  public  library  of  agricul- 
ture, trade,  and  finance,  should  be  formed,  and 
gave  his  own  books  towards  founding  such  an  in- 
stitution in  London.  It  is  thought  that  he  vai 
the  original  of  Addison's  Sir  Andrew  Freeport  u 
the  *  Spectator.*  Having,  on  the  accession  of 
George  I.  to  the  throne  in  1714,  presented  a 
memorial  to  his  Majesty,  the  latter  referred  it  to 
his  Treasury,  and  an  act  of  parliament  was  passed, 
whereby  Patersou  obtained  the  sum  of  £18,241 
10s.  103d.,  charged  on  the  Scottish  equivalent 
His  last  successful  effort  in  finance  was  the  con- 
struction of  the  Sinking  Fund  in  1717,  for  the  re- 
demption of  the  national  debt,  which  is  still  u 
essential  element  in  our  financial  system.  He 
died,  January  22,  1719.  In  the  obitnaiy  of  the 
*  Register*  of  1718-19,  he  is  styled  ''the  great 
calculator." 

He  was  a  voluminous  writer  on  mercantile  and 
financial  subjects,  but  all  his  works  were  pub- 
lished anonymously.  A  volume  entitled  '  WUliam 
Patcrson,  the  Merchant  Statesman,  and  Founder 
of  the  Bank  of  England :  his  Life  and  Trials.  By 
S.  Bannister,  M.A.,  formerly  Attorney-general  of 
New  South  Wales,*  was  published  at  Edinbuigh 
in  1857.  The  author  mentions  the  following  as 
among  his  principal  publications : 

A  Brief  account  of  the  Intended  Bank  of  England.  Lon* 
don,  1694,  4to. 

The  Occasion  of  Scotland's  Decay  in  Trade ;  with  a  proper 
Expedient  for  Recovery  tliereof,  and  the  Increafing  oor 
Wealth.     1705,  4to. 


J 
I. 


PEDEN. 


282 


PENNECUIK. 


I ' 


■  I 


and  knocked  three  times  on  it  with  his  Bible, 
saying  as  often,  **I  arrest  thee  in  my  Master's 
name,  that  none  ever  enter  thee  bat  such  as  come 
in  by  the  door  as  I  have  done.'*  It  so  happened, 
that  none  of  the  Indulged  or  Episcopal  ministers 
ever  officiated  in  the  pulpit  of  New-Luce  diurch, 
which  was  not  again  opened  till  the  Revolution 
restored  it  to  the  Presbyterians.  This  remarka- 
ble circumstance,  witli  several  striking  coinciden- 
ces of  a  similar  kind,  procured  for  Pcden  the  credit 
of  possessing,  in  a  high  degree,  the  gift  of  foresee- 
ing and  foretelling  future  events,  relating  to  him- 
self and  the  oppressed  Church  of  Scotland. 

After  his  ejection  he  lurked  in  various  retired 
parts  of  the  country,  and  had  frequent  narrow  es- 
capes from  his  persecutors.  In  1G66  a  proclama- 
tion was  issued  against  him  and  several  of  the 
ejected  ministers,  for  having,  contrary  to  law, 
continued  to  exercise  their  ministerial  functions ; 
and  as  Peden  disregarded  a  summons  to  appear 
before  the  privy  council,  he  was  declared  a  rebel, 
and  foifcitcd  in  both  life  and  fortune.  For  greater 
safety,  he  occasionally  passed  some  time  in  Ire- 
land. At  length,  in  1673,  ho  was  apprehended 
by  Major  Cockburn,  in  the  house  of  Hugh  Fer- 
guson of  Knockdow,  in  Carrick,  who  was  fined 
1,000  mcrks  for  hapbouring  him.  Being  earned 
prisoner  to  Edinburgh,  Pcden  was,  after  exami- 
nation, sent  to  the  Bass,  where  ho  was  kept  in 
close  confinement  till  1678.  In  December  of  that 
year  he  was,  with  sixty  others,  removed  to  Edin- 
burgh, and  condemned  to  be  transi)ortcd  to  Vir- 
ginia, not  to  return  to  Scotland  under  pain  of 
death.  After  this  sentence  was  passed,  Peden 
frequently  exclaimed,  "  That  the  ship  was  not  yet 
built  which  should  take  him  and  his  fellow-prison- 
ers to  America !"  They  were  sent  by  sea  to  Lon- 
don, and  on  their  arrival  there,  the  captain  of  the 
vessel  that  was  engaged  to  convey  them  to  Virgi- 
nia, finding  that  they  were  pious  Christians,  who 
were  banished  for  their  Presbyterian  principles, 
and  not  thieves  and  robbers,  as  he  had  been  given 
to  understand,  indignantly  refused  to  be  the  in- 
strument of  carrying  their  iniquitous  sentence  into 
execution,  and  tliey  were  in  consequence  soon  set 
at  liberty.  Peden  spent  some  time  in  London 
and  other  places  in  England,  and  ventured  to  re- 
turn to  Scotland  in  1679,  but  during  the  remainder 


of  his  life  was  forced  to  loik,  as  before,  in  diiEr- 
ent  places  of  concealment.  He  aometimes  fbud 
a  retreat  in  Ireland,  sometimes  In  Scotland,  tfll, 
at  length,  worn  out  with  hla  prolonged  tculs  and 
sufferings,  he  returned  to  Som,  and  liTcd  cfaiefly 
in  an  artificial  cave  in  the  immediate  vldnitj  of 
the  garrison  posted  in  Som  castle,  nnifoimly  pro- 
tected, as  ho  had  been  in  a  hundred  places  before, 
from  the  peering  searches  of  the  bloodthirsty  sol- 
diery. Ho  was  visited  on  his  deathbed  by  the 
celebrated  James  Renwick,  and  after  he  bad  been 
vainly  searched  for  In  his  brother^s  bonse,  he  died 
there  January  1686,  in  his  sixtieth  year.  He  wii 
interred  in  the  churchyard  of  Ancliinleck;  hot 
forty  days  afterwards  his  body  was  lifted  by  i 
troop  of  dragoons,  who  carried  it  two  miles  to  the 
village  of  Old  Cumnock,  with  the  view  of  hangup 
it,  as  a  mark  of  ignominy,  on  a  gallows  there,  but 
they  eventually  buried  it  at  the  gallows  foot 
"  The  place,"  says  ^Ir.  M^Gavin,  "  is  now  the 
common  bniying- ground  for  Cumnock  parish." 
What  are  styled  ^  Tlie  Prophecies  of  Alexander 
Peden,*  fathered  upon  him  after  his  deaUi,  were 
collected  into  a  small  tract,  which  long  formed 
one  of  the  publications  most  highly  prized  by  the 
peasantr}'  of  Scotland. 

Pknnecuik,  a  enrname  derived  from  tlie  parish  of  Peoi- 
cuick,  in  ^lid  Lothian,  belonging  to  Sir  George  Clerk,  baron- 
et. The  name  was  in  early  times  spelled  Pettieok,  and  is 
believed  to  have  been  derived  from  the  Gaelic  &ui-na-CMod^ 
or  the  British  Pen-y-coc^  both  of  which  mean  the  Cnckoo'shiO. 

PENNECUIK,  Alexander,  M.D.,  an  enuoent 
physician  and  poet,  was  bom  at  Xewhall,  near 
Edinburgh,  in  1652.  His  father,  of  the  same 
name,  served  as  a  surgeon  in  the  Swedish  army, 
during  the  Thirty  Yeai*s'  War,  and  was  after- 
wards surgeon-general  to  the  Auxiliary  Scots  ar- 
my sent  into  England  in  1G44.  He  was  proprie- 
tor  of  the  estates  of  Ncwhall  in  the  county  of 
Edinburgh,  and  Romanno  in  Peebles-shire,  and  is 
said  by  his  son  to  have  lived  to  be  "  the  oldest 
uEsculapius  of  the  age."  After  receiving  his  edn- 
cation,  which  he  completed  on  the  Contin<;Dt, 
Alexander  went  to  reside  with  his  father  on  the 
family  property,  which  he  inherited  at  the  old 
gentleman's  death.  There  he  continued  to  prac- 
tise as  a  physician,  and  to  cultivate  poetry  and 
science.  Ho  wrote  a  '  Description  of  Tweeddale,* 
esteemed  for  the  antiquarian  and  botanical  Infor- 


}■ 


I- 


PERRY. 


284 


PERTH. 


I 


Bisted  efforts,  in  each  house  of  parliament,  as  had 
been  till  then  the  practice.  For  several  jears  ho 
acted  as  editor  of  Debrett's  Parliamentary  De- 
bates. He  afterwards  purchased  the  *  Morning 
Chronicle,*  and  for  a  few  months  carried  it  on  in 
couj auction  with  his  friend  Mr.  Gray,  after  whose 
death  be  conducted  it  himself  as  sole  editor  and 
proprietor.  Under  his  management  that  paper 
became  the  organ  of  the  whig  opposition ;  and  it 
id  mentioned,  as  a  proof  of  the  ability  and  judici- 
ous care  with  w^ch  he  conducted  it,  that  in  the 
course  of  forty  years  he  was  only  twice  prosecut- 
ed under  ex  officio  informations.  The  first  time 
was  for  printing  in  it  the  ^  Resolutions  of  the 
Derby  Meeting,*  and  the  second  for  inserting  a 
paragraph,  copied  from  the  Examiner,  regarding 
the  prospective  populai'ity  of  the  prince  of  Wales, 
if  he  adopted  a  liberal  policy  on  succeeding  to  the 
throne.  On  the  former  occasion  he  was  defended 
by  Lord  Erskine;  on  the  latter  he  pleaded  his 
own  cause  in  person  with  great  tact  and  ability, 
and  in  both  cases  he  was  honourably  acquitted, 
lie  had  twice  an  opportunity  of  entering  the  house 
of  commons,  having  been  solicited  by  Mr.  Pitt, 
and  afterwards  by  Lord  Shelbume,  to  accept  of  a 
scat  in  parliament ;  but  firm  to  the  cause  he  had 
espoused,  he  declined  both  offers. 

In  1798  he  married  Miss  Anne  Hull,  by  whom 
he  had  eight  children,  one  of  whom  died  young. 
For  a  considerable  time  previous  to  his  decease, 
his  declining  health  compelled  him  to  relinquish 
the  management  of  the  Chronicle ;  and  during  the 
four  last  months  of  his  life  he  resided  at  Brighton, 
where  he  died,  December  4,  1821,  in  his  C5th 
year.  Having,  by  a  long  course  of  useful  indus- 
try and  active  exertion,  amassed  a  considerable 
fortune,  he  had  the  happiness  to  maintain  his  aged 
parents  in  comfort,  and  bring  up  the  orphan  fami- 
ly of  his  sister  by  her  first  marriage.  She  was 
afterwards  married,  for  the  second  time,  to  the 
celebrated  Professor  Porson,  and  died  in  179G. 
His  second  son,  Sir  Thomas  Erskine  Perr}',  born 
In  1807,  was  called  to  the  bar  at  the  Inner  Tem- 
ple, in  1834,  and  in  1841  was  appointed  a  judge 
of  the  supreme  court  at  Bombay,  when  he  was 
knighted.  In  September  1847  he  was  promoted 
to  be  chief  justice  of  Bombay,  but  resigned  his 
seat  on  the  bench  in  1852,  and  in  May  1854  was 


elected  M.P.  for  DeTonport  He  married  in  1888, 
the  only  child  of  James  M'Elkiney  of  Brighton, 
and  niece  maternally  of  Madame  Jerome  Bona- 
parte.   She  died  in  1841. 

Putni,  Earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peenge  of  Seotlaad,  eooAr- 
red  4th  March  1605,  on  Jamei,  ibnrth  Land  DnunmoDd,  (m 
vol.  ii.  p.  68,)  to  him  and  his  hon  male  vhateoerer.  D]^ 
without  isnie  male,  his  brother,  John,  became  aeeond  tiri, 
18th  December  1611.  This  nobleman  wai  one  of  thoM  who 
voted  for  the  five  articles  of  Perth  in  1621.  With  his  sod, 
James,  Lord  Dnmimond,  he  joined  the  assodation  formed  by 
the  marqnis  of  Montrose  at  Cnmbemaiild  in  1641,  ftr  the 
support  of  the  rqjal  antboritj,  and  in  1664  be  was,  with  fail 
son,  fined  bj  Cromwell  £5,000.  He  died  11th  June  1661 
With  two  danghters,  he  had  five  sons:  1.  Ueny,  Lord 
Dmmmond,  who  died  in  infunej.  2.  James,  third  eari  ef 
Perth.  3.  Tlie  Hon.  Robert  Drammond  of  Anchindliot, 
who  died  young.  4.  The  Hon.  Sir  John  Drammond  of  Lo- 
gie>  Almond,  who  also  joined  Montrose.  Dmmmond  of  Lepe- 
Almond  was  one  of  the  partisans  of  the  Pretender  in  1715, 
and  was  taken  prisoner  at  tlie  battle  of  SherifTmnir.  To  thii  - 
family  belonged  the  distinguished  scholar  and  antiquary,  The 
Right  Hon.  Sir  William  Dmmmond  of  Logie-AImond,  a  me- 
moir of  whom  is  given  at  toI.  ii.  p.  67 ;  and  5.  William,  SM- 
ond  earl  of  Rozburghe,  (see  Roxburghe,  earl  of). 

James,  third  earl,  joined  the  marqtus  of  Montrose  in  Au- 
gU8t  1645,  and  on  the  13th  of  the  following  month  was  taken 
prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Philiphangh.  He  died  2d  Jane 
1675.  By  his  countess,  I^dy  Anne  Gordon,  eldest  dandier 
of  the  secnnd  marquis  of  Huntly,  with  whom  he  got  a  tocher 
of  £30,000  Scots,  he  had  a  daughter,  Anne,  counten  of 
Errol,  and  two  sons,  James,  fourth  earl  of  Perth,  and  John, 
fint  earl  of  Melfort,  (see  p.  186  of  this  volume). 

James,  fourth  earl  of  Perth,  bora  in  1648,  studied  at  the 
uni\'erBity  of  St.  Andrews,  and  afterwards  minted  the  conti- 
nent In  1678  he  was  sworn  a  privy  councillor.  Hejouied 
the  opposition  to  the  duke  of  Lauderdale,  after  whose  fall  be 
was,  in  May  1682,  appointed  lord-jnstice-general.  On  16th 
November  following,  be  became  one  of  the  eztraordinaiy 
lords  of  sesdon,  and  on  23d  June  1684,  lord-chancelkir  of 
Scothind,  and  sheriff-principal  of  the  county  of  Edinburgh. 
On  the  accesnon  of  James  VII.,  he  was  continued  in  sH  hii 
offices,  and  had  the  management  of  affairs  in  Scotland.  He 
declared  himself  a  Roman  Catholic,  and  was  invested  with 
the  order  of  the  Thistle,  on  its  revival  in  1687.  Having  ren- 
dered himself  obnoxious,  by  the  crael  proceeduigs  of  the  gov- 
ernment against  the  persecuted  Presbyterians,  on  Jamei^ 
abdication,  the  mob  plundered  his  house  in  Edinbnrgb,  snd 
in  attempting  to  make  his  escape  to  the  continent,  in  a  ves- 
sel from  Burntisland,  he  was  pnrsued  by  some  seamen  from 
Kirkcaldy,  and  taken  near  the  Bass,  at  the  mouth  of  the 
Forth.  After  being  detained  for  five  days  in  the  GommoB 
prison  of  Kirkcaldy,  he  was  sent  to  Alloa,  where  he  was  de- 
livered into  the  custody  of  the  earl  of  Mar,  and  he  remained 
for  nearly  four  years  a  close  prisoner  in  Stirling  castle.  A 
guard  of  300  was  kept  up  at  Kirkcaldy  for  four  monthii 
as  information  was  received  tlint  a  body  of  his  clansmen  wen 
coming  from  the  Highlands,  to  bum  the  town,  in  revenge  for 
the  earPs  apprehension.  On  his  liberation  in  August  1693, 
his  lordship  went  to  Rome,  where  he  resided  for  two  yean. 
King  James  sent  for  him  to  St  Germains,  and  created  him 
duke  of  Perth,  first  lord  of  his  bedchamber,  and  knight  of  the 
Garter.  He  was  also  made  chamberlain  to  the  exiled  queen, 
and  governor  of  the  young  prince  of  Wales,  afterwards  the 


L_ 


_l| 


PiCKEX. 


PKEEKIOX. 


I     I 


w^^aa.    \\  trJii  loixz^  Apcee^  kfif  popular  ifri 

•:i*vi«  »«  cc«  -Oa  tc.*  Oias«*s  ia  tie  Wt*t 
c^  .w,cUc/l  -f -irlaj  th^  !*«  Half  Octcrj/  wfcSch 
%\r.ixir,*A  iz.zfii  yjkjii'^  saxlr^.  I'::  K.r(£«  of  :2^«  re- 
.V.  if£»  ^sfo.tcaAt^Ir  rar*  -ifftnc*  to  the  dL2«as 
^'  Oii'^'i-*:  ar.'!  ihL*.  » ::h  oth«r  cLr:::ni»ta=':w. 
;..  I.'>/i  M.-.  K'-i^in  to  'i-I:  tha:  p!i?;'»r-    He  re- 

•  ft 

i  :  ^  '/.•'.i.*f:%J:'7, 

\Zi  V*i^t.  wh^n  the  znicia  for  fpecnlatlon  »?»! 
Ik-i  »:.  ^r^-i^TT.:':  In  t'.e  w.rl'i  of  l»Ti=iBe?s,  Pickeii 
j'/r.'^i  In  i'.r:-*:  oft:.';  lizar  ]oa»  pir«j^ct5  of  the  tixe. 
f.r.'I  lo'i  ;.>.  a:;.    Wji  -ireditors  wonW  i*adilv  have 
x*'.'.**.f-A  i.I:n  to  ':omm'';nce  hzsintzs  ane^.  b3t  he 
pref'-fT':'l  foI*'/win^  the  precarioM  profe*.'*ion  of  an 
author:  he  r'Tpa-re*!  to  Ixndon  with  the  manu- 
script of  a  rov*:I,  called  *  The  SocLirian/  which 
wxH  paMi-iK:d  in  IH'Jf*.  and  excited  considerable 
interest  on  it)!  first  apf^^.-arance.     It  showed  great 
MM  in  what  niav  be  terrned  the  morbid  an  atom  v  I 
of  t!ie  mind ;  but,  owin^  in  a  great  degree  to  the  ' 
ii at II re  of  the  «nbjrrct,  it  did  not  meet  with  the  sue-  | 
r/'-yj  wiiich  it<  merits  deser^'cd.    It  had  the  effect,  ' 
V.ftwovt-T.  of  making  the  antlior  known  to  the  cdi-  I 
torn  of  thf;  principal  periodicals ;  and,  from  this  ' 
ti Ill's  Mr.  rick-n  Wrcame  a  rognlar  contributor  to  \ 
tlie  I'Mdiii;:  Ma^rajjinfrs  and  Review?.    Tlie  pnbli-  ! 
cation  of  *The  hoiuhnc's  Lf^acv'  in  1830  finnllv  ' 
evtalili.Hhed  iiis  fame  a.s  the  delineator  of  Scottish 
himilile  life.    "When  Colbum's  *  Juvenile  Library*' 
was  projected,  Mr.  Pickcn  undertook  to  supply 

*  The  Liven  of  Kmincnt  Miflsionaries ;'  but  before 
he  had  fnii.'shed  hi.s  ])art  of  the  contents,  the  work 
waH  diMcontinued.  The  *  Lives'  were,  however, 
jMibliHhed  in  ^H'^0  by  Ki^ld,   under  the  title  of 

*  Travels  and  lU-searclies  of  Eminent  English  ^lis- 
Kionaric.«,'  and  two  large  impressions  were  sold. 

His  next  publication  was  ^  The  Club  Book,  to; 
which  several  of  the  most  popular  living  writers 
contributed.  Tiic  tales  written  by  the  editor  were 
in  his  happiest  style.  The  story  entitled  'The 
Threj!  Kearneys,'  founded  on  circumstances  which 
he  had  witnes.Hed  during  his  residence  in  Ireland, 
showed  that  the  author  had  thoroughly  investi- 
gated tlie  mixed  character  of  the  Irish  peasantr}'. 
The  *  Deer- Stalkers,'  also  a  talc  of  great  interest, 
was  dramatized,  and  acted  at  the  Queen's  Tlica- 


trt  vi:^  c^ea  faeccsa.  Sooa  after,  hi  te 
c«r  cf  l^Zt.  ht  pfcdaeed  a  work  cb  te  Caaada, 
profs«««i}r  a  ccKpilataos.  the  mfbmatioa  it  eoa- 
ulsed  bexzr  cc4»2esjcd  from  ori^caal  '^t^'iifntf 
fsrsbhed  br  Lif  Inaad  3lr.  Gait,  to  wImmHIk 
Toicme  U  dedlca&ed.  To  Lettcfc  RitdUe's  ^Libn* 
rj  of  B.'/maiKe '  ht  ci-ntriboted  '  Waltham,  a  Tale,* 
which,  thoszh  cc<  rerr  fiTOonblr  reottred,  dis- 
played high  pover«  of  thought  and  sentnneaL 

In  the  course  cf  1^3  he  pnblxsbcd  'Tiadition- 
ary  Scorie»  of  OM  Yiaullts.'  in  two  tqIs  ,  intesded 
a*  the  tm  p>art  cf  a  series,  which  vonld  cmbiacc 
the  legendary  hb:ory  of  Srotland,  England,  and 
Ireland.  The  p reject  excited  considerable  inter* 
eit.  and  many  ci embers  of  the  aristocracy  offered 
to  aid  the  author  by  giving  him  access  to  their 
family  papier?.  Bit  he  wa«  not  destined  to  finidi 
the  work,  or  avail  himself  vf  the  ample  stores  this 
openr-il  to  him.  On  November  10,  ld33,  while 
crnrer>;ng  with  his  son.  he  was  suddenly  struck 
down  with  apoplexy.  He  was  conveyed  home 
insensible,  but  in  the  course  of  a  few  dars  seemed 
to  be  recovering,  when  a  second  stroke  caused  his 
death  on  the  23d  of  the  same  month.  He  left  a 
widow  and  six  children.  A  novel,  which  he  had 
completed  shoiily  before  his  last  illness,  and  which 
he  himself  regarded  as  the  best  of  his  productions, 
was  published  after  his  death  under  the  title  of 
'  The  Black  Watch ;'  the  original  name  of  the  gal- 
lant 42d  regiment. 

PiNKERTOX,  m  local  surnaTRe,  Jfrired  from  lands  in  tLe 
pariiKli  of  Cr.-iil,  Fifeshire.  There  is  also  a  Tillage  of  the 
name  in  tlie  ne ighbonrhood  of  Dunbar. 

PINKEUTON  Jonx,  F.S.A.,  an  eminent  an- 
tiquary and  industrious  miscellaneous  writer,  was 
bom  at  Edinburgh,  February  13, 1768,  and  claim- 
ed to  be  descended  from  an  ancient  family,  origi- 
nallv  seated  at  Pinkerton,  near  Dunbar.  His 
gi-andfather,  a  yeoman  at  Dalserf,  I^narkshire, 
lind  a  numerous  family.  His  father,  James  Pink- 
erton, settled  in  Somersetshire,  where  having  ac- 
quired a  moderate  property  as  a  dealer  in  haur,  an 
article,  as  wigs  were  generally  worn,  then  greatly 
in  request,  lie  returned  to  Scotland  about  1755, 
and  married  a  Mrs.  Bowie,  whose  maiden  name 
was  Heron,  the  widow  of  a  respectable  merchant 
in  Edinburgh,  who  brought  him  an  increase  of 
fortune  and  three  sons.    James,  the  eldest,  Joined 


I 


I       t 


PITCAIRNE, 


290 


ARCHIBALD. 


I 


I 


1 1 


, 


practice.  In  November  1G81  the  royal  college  of 
physicians  of  Edinburgh  was  incorporated,  and 
his  name,  as  one  of  the  first  members,  graced  the 
onginal  patent  from  the  crown.  He  settled  as  a 
physician  in  his  native  city,  and  ere  long  rose  to 
the  highest  eminence  in  his  profession. 

Soon  after  establishing  himself  in  Edinburgh, 
he  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Colonel  James 
Hay  of  Pitfour,  who  died,  after  bearing  him  a  son 
and  a  daughter,  when  he  wrote  an  elegiac  poem 
to  her  memory.  The  children,  also,  were  soon 
removed  by  death.  In  1688  he  published  his 
'  Solutio  Problematis  de  Historicis,*  in  vindication 
of  Harvey^s  claim  to  the  discovery  of  the  circula- 
tion of  the  blood.  In  consequence  of  his  high 
reputation,  he  was  invited,  in  1692,  by  the  cura- 
tors of  the  university  of  Leyden,  to  fill  the  chair 
of  physic  there,  at  that  time  vacant.  His  well- 
known  Jacobite  principles  excluding  him  from  all 
public  employments  at  home,  he  accepted  the  in- 
vitation, and  delivered  his  inaugural  oration  the 
26th  April  of  that  year.  During  his  residence  at 
Leyden,  where  among  his  pupils  was  the  celebrat- 
ed Boerhaave,  he  published  several  dissertations, 
chiefly  with  the  view  of  showing  the  utility  of 
mathematics  in  the  study  of  medicine.  In  little 
more  than  a  year  after,  he  returned  to  Scotland  to 
fulfil  a  matrimonial  engagement  with  Elizabeth, 
daughter  of  Sir  Archibald  Stevenson,  one  of  the 
king's  physicians  at  Edinburgh.  Tliis  lady  he 
married  in  1693,  and  as  her  friends  were  unwilling 
that  she  should  leave  her  native  place,  he  resigned 
his  chair  at  Le3'den,  and  once  more  settled  in 
practice  in  Edinburgh.  His  great  success,  how- 
ever, as  well  as  his  powers  of  satire,  soon  raised 
around  Iiim  a  host  of  enemies,  and  ho  was  attacked 
in  various  publications  of  the  period,  particularly 
in  a  sarcastic  little  volume,  entitled  ^  Apollo  Ma- 
thematicus,'  the  production  of  Di\^  afterwards  Sir 
Edward,  Eyzat.  Sir  Robert  Sibbald  having  pub- 
lished a  treatise  in  ridicule  of  the  new  metliod  of 
applying  geometry  to  physic.  Dr.  Pitcairae  pub- 
lished an  answer  in  1696,  under  the  title  of  ^  Dis- 
sertatio  de  Legibus  llistoriie  Natnralis.'  The 
opposition  to  him  was  shown  even  witliin  the 
college  of  physicians  itself.  Having,  on  Novem- 
l)er  18,  1695,  tendered  a  protest  against  the  ad- 
mission of  certain  Fellows,  one  of  whom  was  Dr. 


Eyzat,  on  account  of  its  having  been  oondQCtad  ia 
an  irregular  manner,  the  matter  was  referred  to  a 
committee,  who,  on  the  22d,  deUvered  in  a  report 
that  Dr.  Pitcaime*8  protestation  was  "  a  calumni- 
ous, scandalous,  false,  and  arrogant  paper.**  The 
meeting  approving  of  this  report,  did  thempon 
suspend  him  "  from  voting  in  the  college,  or  sit- 
ting in  any  meeting  thereof;**  nay,  it  wasevea 
proposed  to  prohibit  him  from  the  pFBCtloe  of  phy- 
sic. After  a  violent  and  protracted  contentiofl, 
during  which  various  attempts  at  reooncillatioQ 
were  made,  the  president.  Dr.  Dnndas,  on  Jann- 
ary  4,  1704,  proposed  an  act  of  oblivion,  wUdi 
was  unanimously  agreed  to,  and  Dr.  Pitcalme  re- 
sumed his  seat  in  the  college. 

In  October  1701  the  college  of  surgeons  admit- 
ted him  a  Fellow,  an  honour  whicli^had  never 
been  bestowed  upon  any  other  physician.  He 
appears  to  have  held,  also,  the  nominal  appomt- 
mcnt  of  medical  professor  in  the  university  of 
Edinburgh.  During  the  year  last  mentioned  be 
republished  his  Medical  Treatises,  with  some  nev 
ones,  at  Rotterdam,  in  one  volume  4 to,  under  the 
title  of  '  Dissertationes  Medics,*  dedicating  the 
work  to  Lorenzo  Bellini,  professor  at  Piaa,  who 
had  inscribed  his  'Opuscula'  to  him.  A  more 
correct  edition  of  the  same  appeared  a  few  months 
before  his  death. 

Dr.  Pitcaime  died  at  Edinburgh,  October  20, 
1713,  and  was  interred  in  the  Greyfriars'  church- 
yard. By  his  second  wife  he  had  a  son  and  four 
daughters,  one  of  whom,  Janet,  was,  in  October 
1731,  married  to  the  earl  of  Kelly.  He  was  nni- 
vcrsally  considered  the  first  physician  of  his  time. 
He  is  said  to  have  had  one  of  the  best  private 
libraries  of  that  day,  wliich,  after  his  decease,  wu 
purchased  by  the  czar  of  Russia.  His  Latin  po- 
ems, collected  after  his  death,  were,  with  others, 
published  by  Ruddiman,  in  1727,  in  a  small  vol- 
ume, entitled  '•  Selecta  Poemata  Archibaldi  Fit- 
caimii  et  aliorum  ;*  and,  according  to  Lord  Wood- 
Iiouselcc,  they  comprise  abnost  all  that  are  of  any 
value  in  that  publication.  He  was  also  the  author 
of  a  comedy  called  ^Thc  Assembly,*  printed  at 
I^ondon  in  1722,  wliich  Mr.  George  Chabners 
says  is  ^^  personal  and  political,  sarcastic  and  pro- 
fane, and  never  could  have  been  acted  on  any 
stage.'* 


prrsLiGO. 


292 


PriTENWEEBL 


Edinburgh  for  four  years,  he  attended  the  classes 
at  the  university  of  Glasgow  till  be  was  twenty ; 
spending  much  of  bis  leisure  time  with  the  family 
of  the  Rev.  James  BaiUie,  minister  of  Botbweli, 
Lanarkshire,  father  of  Dr.  Matthew  Baillie  and 
Joanna  Baillie.  In  1769  Mr.  Pitaum  entered  at 
the  university  of  Edinburgh,  and  studied  medicine 
there  for  three  years.  In  1772  he  went  to  Lon- 
don, and  attended  the  lectures  of  Dr.  William 
Hunter  and  Dr.  George  Fordyce.  About  the 
same  time,  that  he  might  obtain  an  English  de- 
gree in  physic,  he  entered  at  Bennet  college,  Cam- 
bridge, where  he  graduated.  In  1780  he  was 
elected  physician  to  St.  Bartholomew's  hospital, 
London,  and  in  1792  physician  to  Christ's  hospi- 
tal. The  former  office,  on  account  of  the  great 
Increase  of  his  private  practice,  he  resigned  in 
1793.  By  the  death  of  Dr.  Warren  in  June  1797, 
Dr.  Pitcaim  was  placed  at  the  head  of  his  profes- 
sion in  Loudon.  It  was  his  friendship  for  Dr. 
Matthew  Baillie  which  first  brought  that  emineut 
physician  into  notice.  Although  there  was  a 
great  disparity  of  years,  there  existed  betwixt 
them  a  long  and  uninterrupted  friendship,  and  the 
confidence  reposed  by  Dr.  Pitcaim  in  the  profes- 
sional abilities  of  his  friend  was  sincere,  Dr.  Bail- 
lie  being  his  only  medical  adviser  to  the  last  mo- 
ment of  his  existence. 

Dr.  Pitcaim  died  in  April  1809.  He  was  a 
man  of  elegant  litcraiy  accomplishments,  joined 
to  much  professional  knowledge.  In  person  he 
was  tall  and  erect.  He  was  fond  of  country  sports 
and  athletic  games,  particularly  of  golf.  It  was  a 
saying  of  his  that  ^^  the  last  thing  a  physician 
learns  in  the  course  of  his  experience  is  to  know 
when  to  do  nothing/'  A  flattering  tribute  to  liis 
memory,  written  by  Dr.  Wells,  was  inserted  in 
the  Grentleman's  Magazine  soon  after  his  decease. 
It  thus  concludes :  ^^  Although  of  great  practical 
knowledge,  and  having  made  many  original  obser- 
vations on  disease,  he  never  published  anything, 
but  he  fell  a  victim  to  a  disease  which  had  before 
escaped  the  observation  of  medical  men,  inflam- 
mation of  the  larynx,  and  so  had  the  peculiar  and 
melancholy  privilege  of  enlightening  his  profession 
in  the  very  act  of  dying." 

PiTSLiuo,  Buroii  Furbes  of,  a  title  (attainted  in  174G)  in 
the  peerage  of  Scotland,  conferred  by  patent,  dated  at  Uolv- 


rood,  24th  March,  1688,  to  him  and  his  bdn  nudt 
ever,  on  Alexander  Forbes  of  PitsUgo,  Abodecnsldn^  dtsesodsd 
from  Sir  William  Forbes,  second  son  of  Alexander  de  Feitei^ 
josticiary  of  Aberdeen,  who  died  in  1405,  (sea  toL  iL  p.  tS7> 
On  the  death  of  the  first  Lord  mtsligo,  i5th  Oelobsr,  16K, 
his  son,  Alexander,  became  seeoiid  loid,  and  wn  spcessdsd 
bj  his  onlj  son,  Alexander,  third  krd,  who  died  in  189L  Of 
his  son,  Alexander,  fourth  and  last  Lord  PitsKgo^  oMbntH 
for  his  share  in  the  rebellion  of  1745,  and  for  bis  vnioos  aA- 
ventures  and  escapes  sabsequent  to  it,  a  memoir  is  g^fsa  it 
page  288  of  volnme  2d.  After  Cnlloden,  with  Latd  Ojphy 
and  Hunter  of  Bumside,  he  got  safe  to  Borgm  m  Hervajr, 
whence  the  part j  proceeded  to  Sweden.  Loid  PitsUgo  thit- 
wards  returned  to  Scotland,  and  lurked  amongst  his  tensntir 
in  Aberdeenshire,  till  his  death  in  1782,  at  the  adTaneed  sgs 
of  85.  His  sister,  the  Hon.  Maiy  Foibes,  by  her  fint  hus- 
band, John  Forbes,  younger  of  Monymusk,  was  the  mother 
of  Sir  Williani  Forbes,  baronet,  father  of  the  eminent  banker 
of  that  name,  a  memoir  of  whom  is  giren  at  page  242  cf 
volume  2d.  Lord  Pitsligo's  only  son,  John,  master  of  FitiS- 
go,  died  in  1781,  without  issue. 

The  title  is  claimed  by  Sir  John  Forbes  of  Pitd^  sad 
Fettercaim,  baronet;  by  Sir  Charles  Forbes  of  Newe  sod 
£din|;1as8ie,  baronet ;  and  by  John  Alexander  Forbes,  Esq., 
formerly  lieutenant-colonel  of  the  92d  Highland! 


PriTSMiTV'EEM,  Baron,  a  title  (extinct)  in  the  peerage  of 
Scotland,  conferred  in  1C06,  on  Frederick  Stewart,  sod  of 
Colonel  Willium  Stewart,  captain  of  the  king's  guard,  who, 
on  Slst  July  1583,  obtained  a  charter  of  the  priory  and  lands 
of  Pitteuweem,  and  was  thenceforth  styled   conunendstor 
thereof.    This  Colonel  William  Stewart,  one  of  the  nnwortbj 
favourites  of  James  YL,  was  the  second  son  of  Thomas 
Stewart  of  Galston,  in  Avrehire,  third  in  descent  from  Alex- 
ander Stewart  of  Dregliorn,  second  son  of  Alan  Stewart  of 
Damley.     On  obtaining  favour  at  court  he  seems  to  hare 
changed  the  spelling  of  his  name  to  Stuart,  as  being  of  Idn 
to  his  majesty.    Calderwood  (vol.  iv.  p.  448)  says  of  him : 
*^CoIoneIl  Stuart  was  (as  is  constantlie  reported)  first  a 
cloutter  of  old  shoes.    He  went  to  the  Low  Countries,  where 
he  sen'cd  in  the  warrcs,  first  as  a  souldiour,  then  as  a  cap- 
tane,  at  last  as  a  colonelL    He  retumeth  home,  and  was  im- 
ployed  by  the  king  to  apprehend  anie  subject,  in  anie  comer 
of  the  kingdom,  that  the  court  had  anie  querrell  at.    He 
wanted  not  likewise  his  rewaird,  for  he  was  gifted  with  the 
prrorie  of  Pittinweme,  and  maried  the  Ladie  Pitfirrane,  not 
witliout  suspicioun  of  the  murther  of  her  former  husband." 
In  October  1582  he  and  Mr.  James  Halyburton,  provost  of 
Dundee,  were  the  king's  commissioners  to  the  General  As- 
sembly.    In  January  1583,  after  the  Raid  of  Ruthven,  by 
Colonel  Stuart's  interest,  the  king  obtained  permission  fhm 
tlio  confederated  lords  to  vibit  the  earl  of  March  at  St  An- 
drews, and  on  his  entrance  into  the  castle  there,  the  colonel 
ordered  the  gates  to  be  shut,  and  his  followers  excluded. 
The  profligate  earl  of  Arran  soon  regained  his  former  place 
in  the  royal  favour.    In  April,  Colonel  Stuart  was  sent  sm- 
ba&uidor  to  England.    At  u  parliament  held  at  Edinbmgii, 
4th  December  of  the  same  year  (1583),  those  who  had  been 
cnncemcd  in  the  Kuid  of  Ruthven  were  declared  guilty  of 
high  tre:i.son.     At  tliis  parliament  it  was  also,  says  Caldrr- 
wood,  (vol.  iii.  p.  7G1,)  ^^statutcd  that  the  old  placks,  ba- 
bees,  three  pennie  peeces,  and  twelve  pennie  poeces,  aonld  be 
brought  in  betwixt  and  Julie  next,  to  be  brokin ;  and  that  a 
new  ooine  be  strickin,  foure  pennie  groats,  eight  pennie  giosts, 
Kixteen  pennie  groats,  and  that  tliey  be  three  pennie  fyne. 
Yitt  were  they  not  so  fyne.    This  was  done  to  gett  ttlver  to 


PLAYFAm, 


294 


JOHN. 


for  bis  love  of  stadjr,  and  especially  for  the  rapid 
progress  which  he  made  in  mathematical  learning. 
While  yet  a  mere  student,  he  was  nsaally  selected 
by  Dr.  Wilkie,  author  of  ^  The  Epigoniad,*  then 
professor  of  natural  philosophy,  to  deliver  the  lec- 
tures to  his  class  during  his  own  absence  from  in- 
disposition. In  1766,  when  only  eighteen  years 
old,  he  became  a  candidate  for  the  professorship 
of  mathematics  in  Marischal  college,  Aberdeen. 
After  a  lengthened  and  very  strict  examina- 
tion, only  two  out  of  six  rival  competitors  were 
judged  to  have  excelled  him,  namely,  Dr.  Trail, 
who  was  appointed  to  the  chair,  and  Dr.  Hamil- 
ton, who  subsequently  succeeded  to  it.  In  1769 
he  went  to  reside  at  Edinburgh ;  and  on  the  death 
of  Dr.  Wilkie,  in  1772,  he  offci*cd  himself  as  his 
successor,  but  was  again  unsuccessful.  The  same 
year  his  father  died ;  and  the  care  of  providing 
for  the  support  uf  his  mother  and  her  young  fam- 
Uy  having  in  consequence  devolved  upon  him,  he 
considered  it  his  duty  to  enter  upon  the  ministry, 
for  which  he  had  been  educated,  notwithstanding 
his  strong  predilection  for  scientific  pursuits.  lie 
accordingly  .applied  to  Lord  Gray,  the  joint  pa- 
tron with  the  Crown,  for  the  vacant  living  of  Liff 
and  Benvie,  and  his  request  was  at  once  complied 
with ;  but  his  lordship^s  right  of  presentation  be- 
ing disputed,  he  did  not  obtain  induction  till  Au- 
gust 1773. 

During  the  nine  following  years  his  time  was 
chiefly  occupied  with  his  pastoral  duties,  and  the 
superintendence  of  the  education  of  his  brothers. 
He  did  not  neglect,  however,  the  prosecution  of 
his  own  philosophical  researches.  In  1774  he 
visited  Schichallion,  in  Perthshire,  to  witness  the 
experiments  of  Dr.  Maskclyne,  the  astronomer 
royal,  on  the  attraction  of  the  mountains  in  that 
district,  on  which  occasion  he  formed  a  perma- 
nent friendship  with  that  celebrated  philosopher. 
His  earliest  contribution  to  science  was  a  paper 
communicated  to  the  Royal  Society  of  London, 
and  inserted  in  their  Transactions  for  1779,  '  On 
the  Arithmetic  of  Impossible  Quantities,*  which  is 
said  to  exhibit  a  greater  taste  for  purely  analyti- 
cal investigation  than  had  been  shown  by  any  of 
the  British  mathematicians  of  that  age. 

In  1782  he  was  induced,  by  an  advantageous 
offer  made  to  him  by  Mr.  Ferguson  of  Kalth,  to 


resign  his  charge,  and  to  become  the  tator  of  his 
two  sons,  Mr.  Robert  Ferguson,  sabseqnently  a 
member  of  parliament,  and  his  brother,  afterwardi 
Sir  Ronald.  In  consequence  of  this  tmngement, 
he  removed  to  Edmbnrgh  with  hla  pupils. 

In  1785,  when  Dr.  Adam  Fergnson  exchanged 
his  chair  of  moral  philosophy  for  that  of  mathe- 
matics, taught  by  Mr.  Dngald  Stewart,  and.  In 
consequence  of  declining  health,  retired  from  the 
duties  of  the  professorship,  Mr.  Playlkir  was  ad- 
mitted into  the  university  of  Edinburgh  as  his 
assistant,  being  appointed  joint  professor  of  math- 
ematics. On  the  institution  of  the  Royal  Societj 
of  Edinburgh,  in  1783,  he  became  one  of  its  ori- 
ginal Fellows,  and  in  subsequent  years  he  contri- 
buted many  valuable  papers  to  its  Transactions. 
In  1789  he  communicated  his  *  Remarks  on  the 
Astronomy  of  the  Brahmins,'  which  excited  con- 
siderable attention  both  in  Europe  and  India,  and 
gave  rise  to  much  speculation  and  controversiAl 
discussion.  The  same  year  he  succeeded  Dr. 
Gregory  as  secretary  to  the  physical  class  of  the 
society ;  and,  owing  to  the  illness  of  Dr.  Robi- 
son,  the  duties  of  general  seci-etary,  with  the  ar- 
rangement of  the  Society's  Memoirs  for  publica- 
tion, were  for  many  years  chiefly  pciformed  by 
him.  In  1792  he  communicated  to  the  Society's 
Transactions  a  learned  treatise  ^Ou  the  Origin 
and  Investigation  of  ForLsms,'  in  which  he  gives  a 
clear  and  beautiful  philosophical  analysis  of  this 
cloifs  of  geometrical  propositions. 

In  1795  he  published  his  *  Elements  of  Geome- 
try,' for  the  use  of  the  pupils  attending  Ids  class, 
a  work  which  has  gone  through  numerous  edi- 
tions. In  1802  he  published  his  'Illustrations 
of  the  Iluttonian  Theory  of  the  Earth,'  in  one 
vol.  8vo,  a  work  on  which  he  had  been  engaged 
for  five  years,  and  in  which  he  powerfully,  and 
with  all  the  arguments  he  could  derive  from  rea- 
son, science,  and  philosophy,  effectively  supports 
the  geological  system  of  his  friend  Dr.  James 
Ilutton,  an  admirable  biogi*aphical  account  of 
whom  he  communicated  in  1803  to  the  Transac- 
tions of  the  Royal  Society. 

On  the  death  of  Dr.  Robison  in  1805,  Mr.  Phy- 
fair  succeeded  him  as  general  secretary  to  tlie 
Royal  Society,  and  also  as  professor  of  natural 
philosophy  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh.    He 


PLA.YFAIR, 


296 


WILLIAM. 


On  the  Cmnm  which  nflect  the  Aocnracy  of  Barometriod 
Mc«sarement«.    Trans.  Soo.  Edin.  1786,  toL  i.  87. 

The  Life  of  Matthew  Stewart    lb.  vol.  i.  p.  67. 

Remarka  on  the  Aitronomy  of  the  Brahmins.  lb.  1789, 
vol.  ii.  185. 

On  the  Origin  and  Investigation  of  Porisma.  lb.  1792, 
vol.  iiL  154. 

On  the  Trigonometrical  Tables  of  the  Brahmins,  lb.  1795, 
▼ol.  iv.  88. 

Meteorological  Abstract  for  the  jears  1794,  1795, 1796. 
lb.  218. 

Investigation  of  certiun  Theorems  relating  to  the  Fignre  of 
the  Earth.  lb.  1798,  voL  v.  1 ;  and  in'Nicholson*s  Jonmal, 
vii.102. 

Meteorological  Abstract  for  the  jears  1797,  1798,  and 
1799.    lb.  193. 

Biographical  Account  of  the  late  Dr.  James  Button.  lb. 
1808,  vol.  V.  89. 

On  Solids  of  Greatest  Attraction.     lb.  1807,  vol  vi.  187. 

On  the  ^rognn  of  Heat  when  communicated  to  Spherical 
Bodies  from  their  Centres,    lb.  353. 

Biographical  Aoonnntof  the  late  John  Robison,  LI4.D.,  &c. 
lb.  1815,  vol.  viL  495.  The  same,  in  Thoni.  Ann.  I'liilos. 
▼ii.  169,  1816. 

Dissertation  second ;  exhibiting  a  general  view  of  the  Pro- 
gress of  Mathematical  and  Physical  Science  since  the  revival 
of  letters  in  Europe.  Part  I.  Part  II.  unfinished,  in  the 
Supplement  to  the  Encyclopaedia  Britannica.    1816  and  1819. 

From  1804  Professor  Playfair  was  a  frequent  contributor 
to  the  Edinburgh  Review,  the  majority  of  his  articles  being 
of  a  scientific  nature.  The  most  celebrated  of  these  is  his 
admirable  analysis  of  the  *  Mecanique  Celeste*  of  Laplace, 
and  his  masterly  re\-iew  of  *  Leslie^s  Geometry.'  In  general 
literature  he  wrote  for  the  same  periodical  an  able  and  inter- 
esting paper  on  Madame  de  Staers  *  Corinne.'  The  whole  of 
his  articles  are  reprinted  in  the  fourth  volume  of  the  collect- 
ed edition  of  his  works  published  at  Edinburgh  in  1822,  iu 
four  vols.  8vo,  with  a  Life  prefixed  by  his  nephew,  Dr.  James 
G.  Playfair.  An  unfinished  Memoir  of  John  Clerk  of  Eldin, 
the  inventor  of  the  Naval  Tactics,  left  by  him  in  manuscript, 
was  published,  after  his  death,  in  the  9th  volume  of  the  Ed- 
inburgh Transactions.  An  interesting  account  of  the  char- 
acter and  merits  of  this  illustrious  mathematician,  from  the 
pen  of  I/)rd  Jeffrey,  has  been  inserted  in  the  En<nrclopirdia 
Britannica,  and  in  the  3femoir  prefixed  to  his  works  by  his 
nephew. 

PLAYFAIR,  AViLLiAM,  an  ingcnions  mechanic 
and  miscellaneous  writer,  brother  of  the  preced- 
ing, was  bom  in  1759.  His  father  dying  when 
he  was  very  young,  liis  education  and  support 
devolved  on  bis  brother.  lie  early  discovered  a 
strong  predilection  for  mechanical  science,  and 
when  of  sufficient  ago  was  apprenticed  for  a  short 
period  to  a  niilhvright  of  the  name  of  Meikle,  in 
Dundee,  where  he  had  for  his  fellow- apprentice 
John  Rcnnie,  the  celebrated  engineer.  He  subse- 
quently went  to  Birmingham,  and  was  engaged, 
in  1780,  as  a  draughtsman,  at  the  Soho  Works, 
in  the  employment  of  Mr.  James  Watt.  Being 
ambitious  to  be  known  as  an  author,  ho  tinned 


his  attention  to  politics  and  political  eoonomy,  aid 
published  a  great  variety  of  pamphlets  oonnected 
therewith.  Daring  the  eariy  period  of  Ills  litenuy 
career,  however,  ho  did  not  altogether  ne^^  his 
mechanical  pursuits,  having  successively  obtahied 
five  patents  for  various  inventions.  He  also  m- 
vented  a  machine  to  complete  the  ornamental 
part  or  fretwork  of  silver  tea-boards  and  sngar- 
tongs,  which  had  hitherto  been  executed  by  the 
hand  only.  The  same  machine  was  applicable  to 
the  manufacture  of  coach  ornaments,  buckles  and 
even  horse  shoes. 

After  residing  some  time  at  Birmingham  be 
went  to  London,  where  he  opened  a  silversmitii^s 
shop  for  the  sale  of  plate  of  his  own  manufacture; 
but  this  he  soon  relinquished,  and  proceeded  to 
Paris,  where  he  entered  on  some  mechanical  qw- 
culations,  particularly  a  rolling-mill  on  a  new 
plan,  for  the  manufacture  of  which  he  obtained  an 
exclusive  privilege.  One  of  the  most  important 
of  his  discoveries  was  that  of  the  plan  of  the  tele- 
graph, then  in  constant  nse  in  France,  whidi, 
with  an  alphabet  invented  by  himself,  he  commn- 
nicated  to  the  British  government;  though  the 
great  service  he  thus  rendered  to  his  country  was 
not  only  totally  unrewarded,  but  was  even  very 
tardily  acknowledged.  He  happened  to  be  at 
Frankfort-on-the-Maine,  when  a  member  of  the 
parliament  of  Bordeaux  arrived  at  the  same  inn, 
and  described  to  him  a  telegraph  which  had  been 
erected  on  the  mountain  of  Belville.  Having  at 
once  comprehended  the  plan,  in  the  course  of  the 
next  day  he  executed  two  working  models  of  the 
instrument,  which  he  sent  to  the  duke  of  York; 
*^and  hcnce,^*  says  the  Encyclopaedia  Britannica, 
**  the  plan  and  alphabet  of  the  machine  came  to 
England." 

While  residing  in  Paris,  Mr.  Playfair  became 
acquainted  with  Mr.  Joel  Barlow,  who  had  been 
sent  to  France  as  agent  for  the  sale  of  about  three 
million  of  acres  of  land,  on  the  banks  of  the  Sci- 
oto, a  river  falling  into  the  Ohio,  which  had  been 
purchased  by  a  company  at  New  York,  to  be  dis- 
posed of  in  lots  to  intending  emigrants.  As  Mr. 
Barlow  was  without  connections  in  Paris,  and  un- 
acquainted with  the  French  language,  Playfaur 
undertook  the  management  of  the  business.  The 
lands  were  to  be  sold  at  five  shillings  per  acre, 


POLLOK, 


2€-8 


ROBERT,  M.A. 


ii 

II 


PoUok  wu  also  possessor  of  the  httmj  of  Rothes,  Aberdeen- 
shire, which  he  gave  to  his  daughter,  Mauricle  de  Pollok,  or,  as 
some  sar,  his  grand-daughter,  Eva  de  Mortadi,  who  married 
Sir  Korman  Leslie,  and  was  the  ancestress  of  the  earis  of 
Rothes,  (see  Rothks,  earl  of).  Peter  de  Pollok  was  iuc- 
ceeded  by  his  brother  Robert,  who  is  witoeis  in  the  donation 
of  the  kirks  of  Strathgr)-fe  and  Innerwick  bj  Walter,  dapifer, 
founder  of  the  monastery  of  Paisley  in  the  beginning  of  the 
reign  of  William  the  Lion.  He  is  also  a  witness  in  several 
of  the  charters  of  Allan  the  son  of  Walter.  Robert,  son  of 
Robert  de  Pollok,  mortified  a  yearly  rent  to  the  same  mon- 
asteiy,  fur  the  soul  of  Peter  de  Pollok,  and  Ri>bert,  son  of 
Fnlbert,  his  father.  In  the  reigns  of  Alexander  IL,  and  Al- 
exander III.,  Thomas  de  PuIIok  is  witness  in  many  charters. 

John  Pollok  of  Pollok,  the  twelfth  in  descent  from  the  first 
Robert,  fonght  on  Queen  Mary*s  side,  at  the  battle  of  Lang- 
side,  for  which  he  was  forfeited.  His  son,  John  Pollok  of 
Pollok,  was  killed  at  the  faction  fight  of  Lockerbie  in  1593, 
when  assisting  hia  kinsman,  Lord  Maxwell,  agaiutt  the  laird 
of  Johnstone. 

His  descendant.  Sir  Robert  Pollok  of  Pollok,  for  his  dis- 
tinguished services  in  the  reigns  of  William  II L  and  Queen 
Anne,  was,  by  the  latter,  created  a  baronet  of  Nova  Scotia, 
13th  November  1703.  He  was  a  commissioner  for  the  shiro 
of  Edinburgh  to  the  Scottish  Estates,  and  after  the  Union  he 
represented  that  county  in  the  Imperial  parliament  On  his 
death  in  1736,  his  grandson,  Sir  Robert,  became  the  second 
baronet.  He  married  Ann,  daughter  of  the  Rev.  Cornelius 
Crawfurd,  of  the  family  of  Jordaiihill,  and  had  an  only  daugh- 
ter, Cornelia,  who  succeeded  to  the  estate,  on  her  father's 
death  in  1783.  Dying  in  infancy  two  years  afterwarda,  the 
estate  was  next  inherited  by  her  aunt,  Jean  Pollok,  daugh- 
ter of  Walter  Pollok,  2J  son  of  the  1st  baronet,  and  sister  of 
the  2d  baronet.  She  was  succeeded  by  her  couun,  Robina, 
only  child  of  Captain  John  Pollok  of  Balgray,  8d  son  of  the 
1st  bart.  Tliid  Captain  Juhn  Pollok  was  killed  at  the  battle 
of  Fontenoy  in  1745.  She  married  Sir  Hew  Crawfurd  of  Jor- 
danhill,  hurt.,  (see  vol.  i.  p.  706,)  and  had  2  sons  and  3 
daughter?.  On  the  death  of  Sir  Hew,  July  1,  1794,  he  was 
succcedrd  in  the  baronetcy  of  Kilbiniie,  by  his  eldest  son.  Sir 
Robert,  in  whose  person  the  families  of  Pollok  of  Pollok  and 
Crawfurd  of  Kilbimie  and  Jordanhill  were  miited.  On  the 
death  of  his  mother  in  1820,  he  became  possessed  of  her  es- 
tate, when  he  assumed  the  additional  name  of  Polluk,  in  tenns 
of  the  settlement  of  the  Renfrewshire  property.  He  died, 
without  issue,  Aug.  7, 1845,  when  his  nephew.  Sir  Hew  Craw- 
furd Pollok  of  Pollok  and  Kilbimie,  born  in  1794,  eldest  son 
of  Captain  Hew  Crawfurd,  deceased,  succeeded  to  the  estates 
and  the  baronetcy  of  Kilbimie,  which  last  dates  from  1638. 
He  married  Elizabeth  Oswald,  daughter  of  Matthew  Dunlop, 
Esq.,  issue,  a  son.  Hew,  born  in  1843,  and  a  daughter,  Jane. 

POLLOK,  Robert,  M.  A.,  author  of  'The 
Coui*se  of  Time,'  was  born  iu  1799,  in  the  pariah 
of  Eaglesham,  Kcnfrewshirc,  at  the  fai'in  of  North 
Muirhouse,  of  which  his  father,  Johu  Pollok,  was 
tenant.  The  farmhouse  was  oversliadowed  by  some 
trees,  to  which  he  thus  alludes  in  his  poem : 

"  Much  of  my  native  scenery  appears. 
And  presses  forward  to  be  in  my  song ; 
But  must  not  now ;  for  much  behind  awaits 
Of  higher  note.    Four  trees  I  pass  not  by, 


Which  o'er  our  hooso  their  ertning  shadoir  tkmrh— 
Three  ash,  and  one  of  dm.    Tall  trees  tfaej  wbn^ 
And  old ;  and  bad  been  old  •  century 
Before  my  day.    None  Hring  oonld  say  aii^t 
About  their  yonth ;  but  they  were  goodly  trees: 
And  oft  I  wondered,  as  I  sat  and  tlioagfat 
Beneath  their  sommer  shade,  or  in  the  ni^ 
Of  winter  heard  the  spirits  of  the  innd 
Growling  amoog  their  boogha— bow  tfasj  had  grown 
So  high  in  such  a  roogh  tsmpestnons  plaoe: 
And  when  a  hapless  branch,  ton  bj  ths  Uast, 
Fell  down,  I  monmed  as  if  a  ftiend  had  fallen." 

Ills  mother,  Margaret  Dickie,  was  from  the  par- 
ish of  Fenwick.  Her  ancestors,  of  the  name  of 
Gemmel,  were  for  many  generations  possessors  of 
a  property  in  that  parish  called  HorsehiU.  He 
acquired  the  rudiments  of  his  education  at  Lang- 
lee,  and  at  a  school  at  Newton-Meams.  For 
some  time  he  assisted  his  father  on  the  farm,  hnt 
finding  the  laborious  duties  of  an  ^*  upland  firm- 
er^' too  arduons  for  his  constitution,  he  abandoned 
the  plough,  and  went  to  reside  at  Barrhead  with 
David  Young,  a  brother-in-law,  for  the  purpose 
of  learning  the  carpenter  trade.  After  making  a 
few  chairs  and  some  other  trifling  articles,  he  be- 
came dissatisfied  with  a  mere  mechanical  employ- 
ment, and  took  up  his  abode  with  an  nnde,  Mr. 
David  Dickie,  at  Fenwick,  where,  with  a  vieir 
to  the  ministry  of  the  United  Associate  church, 
lie  applied  himself  to  study.  He  learned  Latin 
and  Greek  under  Mr.  Fairlie,  the  parish  teadier, 
and  subsequently  went  to  the  university  of  Glas- 
gow, where,  after  the  usual  cunicolnm,  he  took 
his  degree  of  master  of  arts.  He  next  attended 
the  divinity  hall  of  the  United  Secession  church, 
at  Glasgow,  under  the  Rev.  Dr.  Dick  of  that  city, 
at  that  time  sole  professor  of  theology  in  that 
communion.  He  seems  also  to  have  attended  the 
theological  lectures  of  Professor  MacGill  in  Glas- 
gow univei'sity. 

In  the  spring  of  1827,  he  was,  by  the  United 
Associate  presbytery  of  Edinburgh,  with  his  bro- 
ther, licensed  to  preach  the  gospel.  In  the  begin- 
ning of  the  same  year,  his  celebrated  poem,  'The 
Coui-se  of  Time,'  was  published  by  the  Messrs. 
Blackwood  of  Edinburgh,  and  at  once  took  a 
foremost  place  in  his  country's  literature.  It  is 
in  blank  verse,  extending   to   ten   books,  and 


i;  I 
I 


I  I 


POLWARTH. 


300 


PONT. 


ouly  poets  he  read.  The  spirit  of  poetry  and  In- 
spiration was  formed,  and  *' became  a  living  sonP 
within  him,  in  the  green  moorland  solitudes  round 
about  his  fathcr*s  house,  in  the  wild  and  beautiful 
pai*ishes  of  Eaglesham  and  Meams.  His  short 
compositions,  written  in  early  youth,  gave  little 
promise  of  power,  and  most  of  them  were  destroy- 
ed about  the  time  of  the  publication  of  'The 
Course  of  Time/  Ho  was  only  27  when  he  died. 
He  may  be  described  in  his  own  words : 

*'  A  youth  of  great  rdigions  aonl,  who  ul 
Ri^tired  in  voluntarj  lonelinen, 
In  reverie  extra viigant  now  wrapped, 
Or  poring  now  on  book  of  ancient  date, 
With  filial  awe,  and  dipping  ofl  his  pen 
To  write  immortal  things.** 

His  father  died  in  1841.  His  mother's  death  took 
place  in  1825.  Besides  his  brother,  his  cousin, 
the  Rev.  Robert  Pollok,  was  a  minister  of  the 
United  Associate  Synod,  the  latter  at  Buckhavcu 
in  Fife. 

PoLWARTH,  Baron,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred 26tli  December,  1690,  on  the  distingoiabed  statesman 
and  patriot.  Sir  Patrick  Hnme,  who,  on  23d  April  1G97,  was 
raised  to  the  higher  dignity  of  eari  of  Marchmont,  (see  page 
103  of  this  vol.,  and  page  502  of  toI.  ii.).    The  Polwarth 
peerage  was  in  remainder  to  the  hein  male  of  his  bodr,  and 
failing  these  to  the  heirs  general  of  such  heire  male.    The 
title,  with  that  of  earl  of  Marchmont,  became  dormant  on 
the  death  of  the  third  earl,  lOtb  January  1794.    His  young- 
est daughter,  I<ady  Diana  Hume,  married  Walter  Scott  of 
Harden,  Herwickshire,  M.P.,  who  died  25tb  January  1793. 
She  was  the  only  one  of  the  earrs  three  daughtera  who  left 
8nr\'iving  issue.    Their  only  son,  Hogfa  Scott  of  Harden, 
succeeded,  in  1835,  in  establishing  hu  claim  to  the  title  of 
Lord  Polwarth,  before  the  House  of  Lords,  and  thus  became 
fourth  Lord  Polwarth.    He  married  the  daughter  of  Hans 
Morits,  Count  von  Bruhl,  Saxon  minister  in  England,  and 
died  Dec.  28,  1841,  aged  83.    His  aon,  Heniy  Francis  Uep- 
burne-Scutt,  bom  Jan.  1,  1800,  succeeded  as  5th  Baron  Pol- 
warth.   In  1843  he  w.is  elected  one  of  the  16  representative 
Scota  peers,  and  in  1845  was  appointed  lord-lieutenant  and 
sheriff-principal  of  Selkirkshire.    In  1835  he  married  Geor- 
gina,  8d  daughter  of  George  Baillie  of  Jenriswoode  and  Mel- 
lerstain,  with  issue,  2  sons  and  8  daughters.    His  elder  son, 
Walter  Hugh,  master  of  Polwarth,  was  bom  Nov.  30, 1838. 

His  lordship  assumed  the  additional  surname  of  Hepbume 
m  consequence  of  the  estates  of  the  Hepbumes  of  Humbie 
(see  vol.  IL  p.  468}  baring  descended  to  bim  through  Helen 
Hepbume,  countess  of  Tanras,  his  great-great-grandmothcr. 
I/>rd  Polwarth  is  twelfth  baron  of  Harden,  representative  of 
the  Scotts  of  Synton,  and  twenty-second  in  lineal  male  de- 
scent from  Uchtred  Fitz-Soott,  who  flourished  in  the  reign  of 
David  I.  By  the  failure  of  the  male  heirs  of  Sur  Robert 
Soott  of  Murdochstone,  from  whom  derives  the  ducal  house  of 
Buccleucb,  the  chieftainship  of  all  the  Scotts  in  Scotland, 


devolves  on  Lord  Polwarth,  both  fiunlliei  beiig  dmetoM 
from  sons  of  Sir  Michael  Soott,  who  wat  kilkd  in  lUL 


Po2rr,  a  surname  rare  in  Scothmd,  cod  in  tbt  eue  of  tbi 
subjects  of  the  two  following  memoin,  a  eootnetioa  «f  EI- 
pont  Lord  Kilpont  was  the  secondary  title  of  the  eari  ef 
Airth,  a  peerage  dormant  since  1694.  *«  The  kindnd  names,* 
says  I/iwer,  (Engliak  Smmamet,  voL  L  p.  81,)  ^PoaOm, 
Pofflo,  Dupont,  Da  Ptrnte,  Ac.,  occur  in  moot  of  fStm  aaeint 
and  modern  languages  of  Europe,**  and  are  dented  finom 
Pons,  a  bridge. 

PONT,  Robert,  an  eminent  chnrchman,  Jndge, 
and  miflccUaneons  writer,  generally  called,  in  his 
yonnger  years,  Kynpont  or  Kylpont,  was  bom  at 
Calross  about  1524.  Dr.  Andrew  Crichton,  in  a 
note  to  his  Life  of  the  Rev.  John  Blackadder,  says 
that  he  was  the  son  of  John  da  Font,  an  lUnstri- 
ons  Venetian,  wlio,  being  banished  his  coontiy 
for  professing  the  Reformed  religion,  came  to 
Scotland  in  the  tmin  of  Mary  of  Gnise,  qneen  of 
James  y. ;  and  that  Nicholas  dn  Pont,  or  da 
Ponte,  father  of  the  said  John  du  Pont,  was  elect- 
ed doge  of  Venice  in  1578.  Qneen  Mary  of 
Guise,  however,  did  not  arrive  in  Scotland  till 
1588,  which  is  inconsistent  with  the  date  of  Ro- 
bert Pont*s  birth,  and  the  probability  is  that  hb 
parents,  like  himself,  were  natives  of  Scotland; 
where  the  surname  of  Pont  is  stated  to  have  heea 
Icnown  long  before  the  Reformation.  He  received 
the  rudiments  of  his  education  at  Culross  school, 
and  in  1543  went  to  the  nniversity  of  St.  An- 
drews, where,  after  finishing  the  philosophical 
curriculum,  he  entered  on  the  study  of  theology. 
It  is  conjectured  that  he  afterwards  stndied  law  at 
one  of  the  continental  universities.  In  1559  his 
name  appears  as  an  elder  in  the  kirk-session  rec- 
ord of  St.  Andrews,  and  he  was  sent  as  one  of  the 
commissioners  from  that  place  to  the  first  General 
Assembly,  by  which  he  was,  with  twenty  others, 
declared  fully  qualified  for  the  ministry. 

In  1562  Pont  was  appointed  to  preach  till  tbe 
next  Assembly  at  Dunblane,  and  in  the  followuig 
December  he  was  named  minister  of  Dnnkeld. 
In  1563  ho  was  put  upon  the  leet  with  Bishop 
Alexander  Gordon  for  the  office  of  superintendent 
of  Galloway,  but  was  not  elected,  and  by  the  As- 
sembly of  the  same  year  he  was  appointed  com- 
missioner to  visit  the  diocese  of  Moray.  Being 
deeply  skilled  in  the  canon  and  civil  laws,  and 
highly  esteemed  for  his  pnidencc,  zeal,  and  learn- 
ing, ho  took  an  active  and  influential  part  in  all 


PONT. 


302 


FOBTMORE. 


consolidntione,  deque  multiplici  ejus  unionU  utilitate,  dialo- 
gns.    Edin.  1C04,  8vo. 

PONT,  Timothy,  a  celebrated  topographer, 
eldest  son  of  the  preceding,  is  styled,  in  the  Books 
of  Assignation  1601-8,  "Minister  of  Dwnet." 
Very  little  is  known  of  his  personal  history,  and 
the  precise  date  of  his  death  has  not  been  record- 
ed. According  to  Sibbald,  he  andertook,  in  1608, 
a  pedestrian  expedition  to  explore  the  more  re- 
mote parts  of  Scotland.  Bishop  Nicholson  de- 
scribes him  as  "  a  complete  mathematician,  and 
the  first  projector  of  a  Scotch  Atlas,  for  which 
f^reat  pnrpose  he  personally  surveyed  all  the  sev- 
eral counties  and  isles  of  the  kingdom."  The 
originals  of  his  maps  are  preserved  in  the  Advo- 
cates' Library.  They  were  ordered  by  King 
James  to  be  purchased  from  his  heirs ;  and  Sir 
John  Scott  of  Scotstarvet  afterwards  prevailed 
upon  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Straloch  to  prepare 
them  for  publication.  Their  revision  was  conti- 
nued by  his  son,  Mr.  James  Gordon,  parson  of 
Uothiemay,  with  whose  corrections  and  amend- 
ments they  were  published  in  Blean's  Atlas,  un- 
der the  title  of  *  Theatrnm  Scotis.* 

PopR,  a  sumnme  common  to  both  England  and  Sootland, 
though  somewhat  rare  in  the  latter.  In  the  liat  of  thoee 
present  at  the  meeting  of  the  General  Assemblj  at  Glasgow, 
in  June  1610,  we  find  the  names  of  Mr.  William  Pope  and 
Mr.  Tliomns  Piiipe,  both  ministers.  The  Rev.  Alexander 
Pope,  minister  of  Reajr,  Caithness-shire,  who  died  in  1776, 
was  the  author  of  a  Description  of  the  Shires  of  Caithness, 
Strathnaver,  and  Sutherland,  in  Pennant's  Tour.  He  also 
wrote  a  Description  of  the  Dune  of  Domedilla,  for  the 
Archax)lopy,  1779,  vol.  v.  p.  216.  In  the  summer  of 
1732  he  rode  on  his  pony  all  the  way  from  Caithness  to 
Twickenham,  in  order  to  visit  liis  namesake,  the  poet, 
when  the  latter  presented  Iiim  with  a  copy  of  the  sub- 
scription edition  of  the  Odvssey,  in  five  volumes  quarto, 
and  a  handsome  snuffbox.  They  subsequently  corresponded 
with  each  other,  and  from  this  and  other  circumstances 
it  is  thought  probable  that  a  relationship  existed  between 
them. 


PoRTMORB,  Earl  of,  a  title  (now  extinct)  in  the  peerage 
of  Scotland,  conferred  in  1703  on  Sir  David  Colyear,  elder 
son  of  Sir  Alexander  Robertson,  of  the  family  of  Strowan, 
Perthshire,  who  was  created  a  baronet  of  England  20th  Feb- 
ruary 1677,  and  settled  in  Holland,  where  he  acquired  a  con- 
siderable property,  and  assumed  the  name  of  Colyear.  Be- 
sides Sir  David,  he  had  another  son,  Walter  Philip  Colyear, 
who  had  the  command  of  a  regiment  in  the  Dutch  service  in 
1695,  and  was  appointed  governor  of  Namur  in  1718.  He 
attained  the  rank  of  field  -  marshal,  and  died  at  Ikfaes- 
tricht  in  November  1747,  aged  90.  His  daughter  Elizabeth, 
maid  of  honour  to  Queen  Anne,  and  lady  of  the  bedchamber 
to  Queen  Caroline,  consort  of  George  L,  married  in  January 
1709,  Lionel,  duke  of  Dorset,  and  died  12th  June  1768. 


Sir  David  Colyear,  first  ctri  of  Portmora,  wot « t  fohi- 
teer  into  the  army  of  William  prinoe  of  Orangeii  m  1C71 
He  had  the  command  of  a  Scottish  reguncnt  in  the  Dikk 
servioe,  and  came  to  England,  with  King  WiUiaii,  tt  tin 
Revolution.    He  served  with  great  reputation  in  Iitladii 
1689  snd  1690,  and  sfUnrards  in  Flanden.    Hewn  st- 
ated a  peer  of  Scotland,  by  the  title  of  Laid  Pbrtnnn  tai 
Blackness,  to  him  and  the  bein  male  of  his  body,  Jist  19B$, 
and  took  the  oaths  and  his  seat  in  parliuMDt,  Slsfc  (ktokcr 
1700.    We  leara  from  a  contemporary  writer  that  UiM- 
slitp  had  but  one  eye.    In  1702  he  became  mijor  g—il, 
and  on  27th  February  1708,  had  the  conmaadcf  detd 
regiment  of  foot.    He  was  raised  to  the  dignitSfs  of  «sl«f 
Portmore,  \'isoonnt  of  Milsington,  and  Lord  Coljesr,  ly  pip 
tent,  dated  at  St.  James*  18th  April  1708,  toMmsidthi 
heirs  male  of  his  body.    He  wss  sent  with  the  dnki  rfO^ 
leans  to  Cadiz,  and  served  in  the  war  of  snooesnoD  in  Spdi 
as  lientenant-generaL    In  1710  he  was  appointed  eaaam^ 
er-in-chief  of  the  forces  in  Scotland,  and  in  Januiy  1711, 
was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  general    In  1712  ht  eon- 
manded  in  Flanders,  under  the  duke  of  Onnond.    The  mm 
year  he  was  sworn  a  privy  councillor,  and  made  a  kni^  «f 
the  Thistle.     In  August  1713,  he  was  created  garaw 
of  Gibraltar,  and  in  October   following  was   diOieB  osi 
of  the  Nxteen  representative  peers  of  Scotland.    WbestiM 
Spaniards  in  March  1727  hiid  siege  to  Gibraltar,  the  eol  if 
Portmore  embarked  for  that  place,  to  assnme  the  connnsai 
as  governor.    The  siege  was  raised  upon  the  approach  of 
Admiral  Wager,  with  eleven  ships  of  the  line.    Spain  tha 
offered  two  millions  sterling  for  possession  of  Gibnltar,  bsk 
in  vain,  and  by  a  compact  at  Seville  in  1729,  the  SpsaiA 
government  agreed  to  renounce  all  its  chums  upon  it    Lord 
Portmore  died  2d  January  1730.    He  had  married  Cathe- 
rine, countess  of  Dorchester,  the  mistress  of  James  VIL,  and 
the  only  child  of  the  witty  and  accomplished  Sir  Chsila 
Sedley,  of  Soutliflect  in  Kent,  baronet    Her  father  took  an 
active  part  in  bringing  about  the  Revolution,  and  it  is  rahtel 
of  him,  that  on  being  reproached  by  James  for  dnng  soi,  be 
sarcastically  rcplied,  that  his  majesty  having  made  his  dang^ 
ter  a  countess,  in  gratitude  he  could  not  do  less  than  sid  ia 
making  hit  daughter  a  queen !    Tlie  countess  had  a  penaoa 
of  £5,000  per  annum  on  the  Irish  establishment,  and  died  at 
Bath,  26th  December  1717,  having  had,  by  Lord  Portmon, 
two  sons,  David,  viscount  of  Milsington,  who  predeceased  hii 
father,  and  Charles,  second  earl  of  Portmore. 

The  second  earl,  bom  27th  August  1700,  was  in  1782  sp- 
pointed  ambassador  to  compliment  Don  Carios,  afterwardi 
king  of  tlie  Two  Sicilies,  son  of  Philip  V.  of  Spain,  oo  his 
obttdning  possession  of  the  duchies  of  Parma  and  Piaoentia. 
The  same  year  he  was  invested  with  the  order  of  the  Thistle. 
At  the  general  election  of  1734,  he  was  chosen  one  of  the 
sixteen  Scots  rcpresentative  peers,  and  in  1741  waa  rechflieo. 
He  was  remarkable  in  his  day  for  the  splendour  of  his  equi- 
pages and  the  magnificence  of  his  dress.  He  wss  also  a 
conspicuous  member  of  the  turf.  He  died  in  London,  5lh 
July  1755.  By  his  countess,  Juliana,  duchess  dowagv  of 
I.«eds,  he  had  two  sons  and  two  daughters.  The  elder  sob, 
Da\id,  viscount  of  Milsington,  an  ensign  in  the  Coldstream 
guards,  died,  unmarried,  16th  January  1736,  aged  18. 

The  younger  son,  William  Charles,  third  earl  of  Portmort, 
married  5th  November  1770,  I^dy  Mary  Leslie,  seoood 
daughter  of  the  ninth  earl  of  Rothes,  and  had  fonr  ions  snd 
three  daughters.  His  two  eldest  daughters  died  at  Bath,  die 
same  day,  11th  August,  1800. 

The  eldest  son,  Thomas  Charies,  fourth  earl,  was  an  officer 
in  the  army.    He  married  Lady  Mary  Elisabeth  Bertie,  only 


J 


PRESTON 


804 


OF  VALLETFIELD. 


king's  anthoritie,  and  that  through  his  own  deraulte,  wanting 
dae  care  and  cour:i);e  to  minuter  jnstice.** 

The  magnificent  rains  of  Craigmtllar  castle,  tlie  ancient 
sent  of  the  familj,  stand  about  two  miles  and  a  half  south  of 
Edinburgh,  on  n  rocky  eminence  commanding  a  fine  view  of 
the  citj  and  surmunding  country.  Tht  outer  wall  displays 
the  armorial  bearings  of  tlie  Prestons.  About  the  time  of 
the  Restoration,  it  wns  acquired  bj  Sir  John  Gilmour,  lord 
president  of  the  court  of  session,  who,  in  1G61,  built  some 
additions  to  it  It  now  belongs  to  hu  descendant,  Walter 
Little  Gilmour,  Esq. 

William  Preston  of  Craigmillar  had  two  soun.  Sir  Simon, 
whose  line  failed  with  Robert  Preston  of  Craigmillar  in  1G39, 
and  Henry,  father  of  James  Preston,  who,  in  1544,  acquired, 
by  charter,  from  William,  commendator  of  Culross,  the  lands 
and  barony  of  Vidleyfield,  Perthshire,  which  ever  after  be- 
came  the  designation  of  tlie  family.  James  Preston*s  great- 
grandson.  Sir  John  Preston,  succeeiled  his  father.  Sir  James, 
as  fourth  baron  of  Vallevfield.  and  obtained  a  crown  charter, 
Feb.  4,  1594.  He  married  Grizell,  daughter  of  Alexander 
ColTille,  commendator  of  Culross  (whose  son  succeeded  as 
tldrd  baron  Colville  of  Culruss),  and  with  three  daughters, 
the  eldest  of  whom,  Mary,  married  to  Sir  George  Bruce  of 
Camock,  he  had  three  sons,  James,  who  died  without  issue, 
George,  his  successor,  and  Robert,  whose  descendants  carried 
on  the  line  of  the  family. 

George  Preston,  the  sixth  of  Vnlleyfield,  was  created  a 
baronet  of  Kova  Scotia,  March  31,  1637.     He  married  in 
1C34  Marion,  only  child  of  Hugh,  5th  Lord  Sempill,  by  bis 
first  wife,  Lndy  Anna  Hamilton,  daughter  of  James,  1st  earl 
of  Abercom,  and  died  Nov.  26,  1679.     He  had,  with  two 
daughters,  two  sons,  Sir  Williaui,  2d  banmet,  and  George, 
a  general  in  the  army,  who,  on  the  arrival  of  Prince  Charles 
Edward  at  Edinburgh  in  1745,  was  supersetled  in  the  com- 
mand of  the  garrison  in  the  castle  by  General  Guest,  but  af- 
terwards resumed  the  command  of  the  fortress.     It  is  said 
that  he  was  instnimental  in  preventing  General  Guest  from 
capitulating,  which  was  at  one  time  his  intention.     General 
Preston  was  subsequently  commander-in-chief  in  Scotland, 
when  80  years  of  age.     He  died,  July  7,  1 748.    He  paid  off 
incumbrances  on  the  estate  of  Vallevfield,  and  thus  acquired 
the  right  to  entail  the  property  on  the  heirs,  male  and  female, 
of  his  brother,  Sir  William,  and  his  nephew,  Sir  George. 
The  latter,  son  of  Sir  William,  and  third  baronet,  on  his 
death  in  1741,  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son,  Sir  George, 
fourth  baronet,  who  died  in  1779,  having  had  five  sons  and 
a  daughter.    The  daughter,  Mary,  miurried,  in  1744.  Robert 
Welwitod,  Enq.  of  Gurvoi-k,  advocate,  and  had,  with  other 
issue,  a  daughter,  Elizabetli,  who  married  Allan  Maconocliie 
of  Meadowbank,  a  lord  of  session.    (See  Macoscixiiiik,  p. 
60  of  this  vol.,  and  Wklwood,  jyost.)    Patrick,  the  eldest 
son,  and  Alexander,  the  next,  predeceased  their  father.    The 
former  had  two  daughters,  the  elder  of  whom,  Ann,  I.ady 
liaird  Preston  of  Vallevfield  and  Fern  tower,  widow  of  General 
Sir  David  Baird,  died  without  issue  in  1847. 

Sir  Charles,  the  8d  son,  was  the  5th  baronet.  An  officer 
in  the  army,  he  distinguished  himself  by  his  gallant  defence 
of  Fort  John  against  the  Americiu  general,  Montgomery, 
Iiaving  only  surrendered  at  the  last  extremity.  Subsequently 
u  comuiiiMioner  of  the  customs,  and  M.P.  for  the  KirkciUuy 
burghs,  he  died,  without  ibhue,  March  23.  1800. 

His  brother,  Sir  Robert,  born  in  1740,  succeeded  him  as 
sixth  baronet.  lie  was  commander  of  the  East  India  C<mi- 
pany^s  ship  Asia.  Ho  is  said  to  have  been  the  originator  of 
the  Ministerial  White  Bait  dinners,  which  take  place  at 
Greenwich  towards  the  close  of  each  session  of  parliament. 


He  was  for  some  time  M.P.  for  Dovtr,  and  had  a  «ott4|i  it 
Dagenhain  Beach  in  Enex,  on  the  bank  of  a  lake  fcnaed  hf 
the  radden  emptioB  of  the  watan  of  the  ThamM  onr  tht 
adjacent  ooantiy,  aboat  the  middle  of  the  laat  etttmy.    Ht 
called  it  hit  **  fishing  oottag*,**  end  often  in  Spring  he  VMt 
thither  with  a  friend  or  two  for  a  Icir  weeka"  nlazatkn  hi 
the  country.    Hit  moat  frequent  goeet  waa  Sir  Gmrgt  2m, 
eecretaiy  of  Uie  Treasniy,  and  an  elder  brDthar  of  the  IMbUj 
Honae,  of  which  Sir  Robert  alao  waa  an  active  member.    Oi 
the  inggeation  of  Sir  Geofge,  Mr.  Pitt,  than  prime  ninirtir, 
waa  invited,  and  for  a  few  yean  be  waa  an  annnal  Tiatar  it 
Dagenham  Beach,  always  accompanied  by  Roee.    Findfav 
the  dittanoe  from  town  inconvenient  for  the  pfemicr,  8k 
Robert  propoeed  that  they  ahonld  io  fntnre  dine  nearer  Ia- 
don.    Greenwich  waa  named,  and  Mr.  Pitt  leqncsted  to  to 
permitted  to  bring  Lord  Camden,  tlma  making  the  poly 
four.    Soon  after,  a  fifth  gneat  waa  added,  Mr.  Long,  aft»- 
warda  Lord  Famborough.    In  oonrte  of  time  othen  wMt  iiH 
vited,  all  belonging  to  the  toiy  party.    Ultimately  Laid 
Camden  considerately  remarked  that,  aa  they  were  all  du- 
ing  at  a  tovem,  it  waa  only  fair  that  Sir  Robert  PrHtei 
sliould  not  bear  all  tlie  expenae.    It  waa  then  arranged  that 
the  invitations  should  be  issued  aa  usual  by  Sir  Robert,  and 
he  insisted  on  still  contributing  a  buck  and  champagne,  bat 
the  rest  of  the  charges  were  thenceforward  defrayed  by  tto 
several  guesta,  and  on  this  plan  the  meeting  continnid  to 
take  place  annually  till  the  death  of  Mr.  Titt.    The  Ett 
of  guests,    by   this   time,  included  most  of  tlie  eabimt 
ministers.    The  time  for  meeting  waa  naually  after  Trinity 
Monday,  a  short  period  before  the  end  of  the  nation.    By 
degrees  the  meeting  appears  to  have  assumed  a  aemi-pofi- 
tical  character,  and  it  now  one  of  the  established  cmteni 
of  the  party  in  power.    Sir  Robert  died,  withont  latoe,  Uaj 
7,  1834,  at  the  advanced  age  of  95.    He  bought  Cnfaott  ah* 
liev  from  the  earl  of  Dundonald,  who  died  in  Paria  in  1831, 
and  who  ruined  himself  by  his  coal-tar  and  other  tcicatilie 
speculations.    In  Sir  Walter  Scott's  diary,  under  date  Jane 
19,  1830,  there  is  the  following  entry:  ** After  bieakbstto 
Culross,  (from  Blair-Adam,  being  then  on  a  visit  there,)  what 
the  veteran.  Sir  Robert  Prestim,  showed  us  hia  cnrioaitieB. 
Life  has  done  as  much  for  hiui  as  most  people.    In  his  9Sd 
year,  be  has  an  ample  fortune,  a  sound  understanding,  not 
the  least  decay  of  eyes,  ears,  or  taste,  is  as  big  as  two  mea. 
and  eats  like  three.     Sir  Robert  nmusea  himaelf  with  repair- 
ing the  old  House  of  Culross,  built  by  the  Lord  Bruce.  What 
it  is  destined  ftir  is  not  very  evident.    It  is  too  near  hit  ova 
mansion  of  Valleyfield  to  be  useful  at  a  retidence.** 

The  whole  male  descendants  of  Sir  George  PreatOD,  tht 
first  baronet,  having  become  extinct,  tlie  baronetcy,  in  tenns 
of  the  patent  of  creation,  devolved  on  Sir  Robert  Preston,  ton 
of  General  George  Pretton,  after  mentioned,  as  nearest  coUa- 
teral  heir  male  general,  descended  from  Robert,  thiid  ton 
of  Sir  John  Preston  of  Valleyfield,  knight  Thi^  Robert  ob- 
tained a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Preston,  Mid  Lothian,  SOlh 
August.  1633,  was  knighted,  and  admitted  a  lord  of  teasioB, 
4th  March,  1672,  when  he  took  the  title  of  liord  Prsttea. 
and  died  in  October  1674.  His  son,  William  Prestoa  of 
Gorton,  an  estate  acquired  by  Sir  John  Preston  in  1542,  was 
a  major  in  the  army,  and  died  in  1733.  He  had  two 
and  a  daughter.  John,  tho  elder  son,  succeeded  to  tlie 
of  Gorton,  which  he  left  to  his  son,  John,  who  died  unnar- 
ried.  The  major's  younger  son,  George,  entered  the  amy, 
and  greatly  diMtingulshed  himself  by  hw  couRige  and  akiU  in 
the  wars  of  Germany.  He  rose  to  tlie  nmk  of  general,  and 
was  colonel  of  the  Scots  Greys. 
His  only  child.  Sir  Robert  Preston,  7th  banmet  of  Valky- 


PRBIROSE. 


805 


PRINGLE. 


I 


field,  was  born  Jan.  8, 1737,  and  established  hia  title  to  the 
aocceeaion  bj  aerrice  before  tlie  sheriff  of  Edinburgh,  Nor. 
9,  1885.  He  married  his  cousin,  Euphemia,  daughter  of 
John  Preston,  Esq.  of  Gorton,  iftsue,  2  sons  and  1  daughter, 
lira.  Boawell  of  Blackadder,  Berwickshire.  On  his  death  in 
1846,  hia  elder  son.  Sir  Robert,  at  one  period  a  major  in  the 
army,  became  8th  baronet;  married,  without  iasne.  Sir 
Robert  died  Oct  28,  1858,  when  his  brother,  Sir  Henry- 
Lindsay,  succeeded  as  9th  baronet.  He  entered  the  rojal 
naty  in  1801,  and  became  a  commander  in  1830. 


A  baronetcy  of  Nora  Scotia  was  conferred  in  1628,  on  Sir 
John  Preston  of  Airdrie,  Fiieshire,  the  son  of  John  Preston 
<^  Fentonbams,  lord  pre^dent  of  the  court  of  session  from 
1809  to  1616,  by  his  wife,  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  William 
Tnmbull  of  Airdrie.  The  president  died  14th  June  of  the 
latter  year,  and  on  29th  April  1652,  Sir  John,  his  son,  mar- 
ried Lady  Maijory  Soot,  relict  of  Sir  James  Scot,  younger  of 
Sootstarvet,  director  of  the  Chancery,  and  daugliter  of  the 
fint  earl  of  Northesk.  In  1663,  Sir  John  Preston  was  served 
heir  to  his  father  and  mother  in  the  lands  of  Airdrie.  One 
of  the  family  erected  a  mansion-house  on  these  lands,  to 
which  was  given  the  name  of  Prestonhall.  The  baronetcy 
has  long  been  extinct. 


Pkocrose,  Visconnt  of,  a  title  in  the  Scottish  peerage, 
conferred  80th  November  1703,  on  Sir  James  Primrose,  bar- 
onet, of  the  Roaebery  family.    (See  Rosebbbt,  Earl  of.) 


PBIXOL.E,  a  surname  prevalent  in  the  south  of  Scotland,  a 
eorraption,  as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  conjectures,  of  the  word 
Pderin  or  pilgrim.  The  account  of  the  Pringles  states  that  one 
Pderin,  who  had  gone  on  pilgrimage  to  the  Holy  Land,  having 
settled  in  Teviotdale,  his  descendants  were  called  from  him  Hop 
Pringle.  The  prefix  Hop  being  synonymous  with  the  British 
Ap  or  Irish  0,  signifying  a  son  or  descendant,  Hop  Pringle 
is,  therefore,  supposed  to  have  meant  the  son  of  the  pilgrim. 
The  pilgrim's  badge  of  a  scallop  shell  forms  a  part  of  the  ar- 
Biorial  bearings  of  all  the  families  of  the  name. 

The  Hop  Pringles  of  that  ilk,  afterwards  the  Pringles  of 
Toraonce,  on  Gala  Water,  were  the  head  of  one  branch  of  the 
name  settled  in  Mid  Lothian,  and  the  adjoining  portions  of 
East  Lothian  and  Berwickshire.  The  principal  families  of 
this  branch  were  the  Pringles  of  Bumhouse,  Hawtrec,  and 
Glengelt,  and  those  of  Rowchester  and  Lees  in  the  Merse. 
Their  male  line  failed  on  the  death  of  John  Pringle  of  Tor- 
sonoe  in  1738.  His  only  danghter,  Margaret,  having  mar- 
ried Gilbert  Pringle,  one  of  the  Pringles  of  Stitchell,  carried 
the  estates  into  that  family.  She  had  no  children.  John 
Pringle  of  Lees  then  became  heir  male,  but  his  family  also  is 
extinct    (finrlVf  Ixmded  Gentry,  Supp.  p.  202  ) 

Another  branch  of  the  Pringles  were  the  descendants  of 
the  family  of  Whitsome,  Berwickshire,  afterwards  designed 
of  Smailholm  and  Galashiels.  Robert  Hop  Pringle  of  Whit- 
some is  mentioned  in  a  donation  to  the  monastery  of  Soltray, 
confirmed  by  King  Alexander  III.  For  their  sujiport  of  the 
Brace  family,  in  their  competition  for  the  crown,  the  Pringles 
of  Whitaome  were  deprived  of  their  lands  by  King  John  Ba- 
Eol,  who  conferred  them  upon  John  de  L*yle,  confirmed  by  a 
chvter  firom  King  Edward  I.  of  England,  13th  October 
1293.  After  the  buttle  of  Bannockbum,  the  lands  were  re- 
stored to  Reginald  Hop  Pringle  of  Whitsome,  by  charter 
from  Robert  Bruce  in  1315.  During  the  brief  and  shadowy 
iomwgnty  of  Edward  Baliol,  after  that  monarches  death,  by 
t  mandate  from  King  Edward  III.  of  England,  they  were 
eriorsd  to  be  deliTer«4  up  to  **  Walter  de  Insula,"  son  of 
lU. 


John  de  L*yle.  They  were  restored,  in  1886,  to  Thomas 
Hop  Pringle  of  Whitsome,  who,  in  1368,  had  a  safeguard  to 
go  into  England,  with  his  son  and  twelve  persons  in  their 
retinne. 

The  Pringles  of  Whitsome  were  adherents  of  the  house  of 
Donglas,  and  held  the  o£Soe  of  acu/i/er,  or  squire,  to  the  earls 
of  that  name.  Robert  Hop  Pringle  of  Whitsome  was  pres- 
ent, in  that  capacity,  with  James,  second  earl  of  Douglas,  at 
the  battle  of  Otterboume  in  1888,  where  the  earl  was  slain. 
From  Archibald,  third  earl  of  Douglas,  lord  of  Galloway, 
styled  the  Grim,  he  got  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Smailholm, 
Roxburghshire,  in  1408,  as  well  as  a  grant  of  the  lands  of 
Pilmuu:  and  Blackchester  in  Lauderdale,  which  remained  foi 
nearly  three  centuries  in  possession  of  the  family.  From  the 
Douglases  also,  who  were  then  lords  of  Ettrick  forest,  he  got 
the  forest  steadings  of  Galashiels  and  Mosalee,  which  were 
held  by  the  Pringles  as  kindly  tenants  till  the  forfeiture  of 
the  Douglases  in  1455.  They  were  subsequently  held  by 
them  as  kindly  tenants  of  the  crown  till  1587,  when  they 
were  feudalized  by  charter  and  sasine.  It  was  this  Robert 
Pringle  who  built  the  tower  of  Smiulholm,  a  large  square 
building,  now  entirely  ruinous,  and  originally  a  border  keep, 
situated  among  a  cluster  of  rocks  on  an  eminence  in  the  farm 
of  Sandy-knowe.  The  apartments  rise  above  one  another  in 
separate  floors  or  stories,  and  mutually  communicate  by  a 
narrow  stau:.  A  wall  surrounds  the  building,  enclosing  an 
outer  court,  and  being  defended  on  three  sides  by  predpice 
and  morass,  the  tower  is  accesuble  only  by  a  steep  and  rocky 
path  on  the  west  At  the  farm  of  Sandy-knowe,  which  was 
leased  by  his  paternal  grandfather,  Sir  Walter  Scott  spent 
some  years  of  his  boyhood.  In  a  note  prefixed  to  the  ballad 
of '  The  Eve  of  St.  John,*  he  says  that  he  wrote  that  ballad 
in  celebration  of  Smailholm  tower  and  its  vicinity ;  and  in 
the  epistle  preliminaxy  to  the  third  canto  of  Marmion,  he  no- 
tices the  influence  which  the  place  had  exerted  on  his  tastes. 
In  1406,  Robert  Pringle  of  Smailholm,  which  became  his  de- 
signation after  the  erection  of  the  tower,  had  a  safe-conduct 
from  Henry  IV.,  to  go  to  England,  and  in  1419  he  had  ano- 
ther, from  Henry  V.,  with  John  Wallace,  to  pay  the  ransom 
of  James  de  Douglas,  who  succeeded  his  grand-nephew  as 
seventh  earl  of  Douglas,  November  24,  1440,  and  was  called 
James  the  Gross.  The  laird  of  Smailholm  accompanied 
Archibald,  fourth  earl  of  Douglas,  duke  of  Touraine,  (the 
Douglas  of  Shakspere,)  on  his  famous  expedition  to  France, 
in  1423,  and  was  slain,  with  him,  at  the  battle  of  Verneuil, 
the  following  year.     (See  vol.  it  p.  43.) 

His  son  and  successor,  Robert  Pringle  of  Smailholm,  b 
said  to  have  been  the  person  who  erected  a  drawbridge  of  a 
very  peculiar  construction  over  the  Tweed,  a  river  long  re- 
markable for  the  very  few  bridges  it  possessed,  at  a  small 
hamlet  about  a  mile  and  a  half  above  Melrose,  called  from 
the  circumstance,  Bridge-end.  It  is  thus  described  by  Sir 
Walter  Scott  in  *  The  Monastery,*  from  the  account  of  it  in 
Gordon*s  Itinerarium  Septentrionale:  **Two  strong  abut- 
ments were  built  on  either  side  of  the  river,  at  a  part  where 
the  stream  was  peculiarly  contracted.  Upon  a  rock  in  the 
centre  of  the  airrent  was  built  a  solid  piece  of  masonry,  con- 
structed like  the  pier  of  a  bridge,  and  presenting,  Uke  a  pier, 
an  angle  to  the  current  of  the  stream.  The  masonry  conti- 
nued solid  until  the  pier  rose  to  a  level  with  the  two  abut- 
ments upon  either  side,  and  from  thence  the  building  rose  in 
the  form  of  a  tower.  The  lower  story  of  this  tower  consisted 
only  of  an  archway  or  passage  throngh  the  building,  over 
either  entrance  to  which  hung  a  drawbridge  with  counterpoi- 
ses, either  of  which,  when  dropped,  connected  the  archway 
with  the  opposite  abntment,  where  the  farther  end  of  the 

U 


PRINGLE. 


306 


OF  WHYTBANK. 


drawbridge  rested.  When  both  bridges  were  thus  lowered, 
the  passage  over  the  river  \v:u  complete/*  Sir  Walter  Scott 
says  in  a  note  that  the  vestiges  of  tiiis  uncommon  species  of 
bridge  still  exist,  and  that  he  often  saw  the  foundations  of 
tlie  columns  when  drifting  down  the  Tweed  at  niglit,  for  the 
purpose  of  kiUing  salmon  by  torchlight.  A  stone,  taken 
from  the  river,  bore  this  inscription : 

"  I,  Robert  Pringle  of  Pilmore  stede. 
Give  an  hundred  nobles  of  gowd  sae  reid, 
To  help  to  bigg  my  brigg  owcr  Tweed."* 

Sir  Walter  Scott  quotes  the  first  line  as 

"  I,  Sir  John  Pringle  of  Palmer  stede." 

It  is  ccrt^n  that  the  bridge  belonged  to  this  family  of  the 
PringU'S,  and  the  money  here  mentioned  may  have  been  spent 
in  repairing  it,  but  the  original  builder  of  it,  according  to  ac- 
counts likely  to  be  more  correct,  was  that  **  sore  buint  to  the 
crown,"  David  I.,  to  iiffurd  a  pasfsage  to  his  abbey  of  Melrose, 
and  to  facilitate  the  journeys  of  the  devout  to  the  four  great 
pilgrimages  of  Scotlaml,  namely,  Scoiio,  Dundee,  I^^i^!^•y, 
and  Melrose.  By  his  wift*,  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Sir  James 
Dishington  of  Ardross,  Kifebhire,  Robert  Pringle  of  Smail- 
holm  bad  four  sons  and  three  daughters.  Over  the  doorway 
of  the  old  house  of  Galashiels  belonging  to  the  family,  the 
following  inscription,  under  the  date  1457,  was  cut,  wliich  is 
supposed  to  have  reference  to  this  lady : 

**  Elspeth  Dishington  builted  mc. 
In  8}'ne  lye  not ; 
The  thynge  thou  canst  not  gctte 
Desyre  not." 

The  eldest  son,  David  Pringle  of  Smailholni,  w:is,  after 
the  forfi'ituro  of  the  Doughiscit,  as  we  learn  from  the  Exche- 
quer Rolls  of  145G,  np^Mjintcd  cursor  or  ranger  of  the  ward 
of  Tweed,  an  otlicc,  held  also  by  his  son  and  grandson.  In 
14G7  he  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  James,  who  appears  to 
have  been  ranger  from  1457  to  1495.  Desides  David  his 
heir,  he  had  a  son,  William,  progenitor  of  the  Pringles  of 
Torwoodlee,  and  another,  John,  ancestor  of  the  Pringles  of 
Ulyndlee. 

David  Pringle  of  Smailholm  and  Galashiels  was  ranger  of 
the  ward  of  Tweed  for  ten  years.  In  1505,  Alexander, 
Lord  Homo,  great-chanilK-rlaln  of  Scotland,  became  rangrr 
or  chamberlain  of  the  whole  of  Ettrirk  Forest.  In  1510 
David  Pringle  obtained  a  cliartcr  of  the  lands  of  Redhead 
and  Whytbank,  which  had  been  occupied  by  the  ranger  of 
the  ward  of  Tweed  j)ro  officio  cursorit^  and  these  lands  arc 
htill  in  possession  of  the  family.  He  and  his  brother,  ^\  il- 
liam,  are  subscribing  witnesses  in  the  sasinc  of  ^largaret, 
queen  of  James  IV.,  in  her  jointure  lands  of  Ettrick  Forest, 
1st  June  1505.  He  was  twice  married.  By  his  first  wife 
he  had  a  son,  David,  younger  of  Galashiels  and  Smailholm, 
wao,  with  four  of  his  sons,  was  shun  at  Flodden,  and  a 
daughter,  Isabella,  w  ife  of  Sir  David  Home  of  Wedderbum, 
and  mother  of  the  seven  spears  of  Wedderbum.  By  his  sec- 
ond wife,  Margaret,  daughter  of  Thomas  Lundie  of  Lundie, 
Fifeshire,  he  had,  with  two  daughters,  a  son,  James  of  Wood- 
house  and  Whytbank,  from  whom  the  Whytbank  family  are 
descended,  of  whom  afterwards. 

John  Pringle,  youngest  son  of  David,  slain  at  Flodden, 
succeeded  his  grandfather  on  his  death  in  1535.  This  John 
Pringle  of  Smailholm  and  Galashiels  fought  at  Pinkie  in 


1547,  and  afterwards,  witli  Geoi^ge  Priogk  of  Tonroodki 
and  William  Pringle  of  Wolfhonsebyre,  wag  tonty  to  tki 
English  for  100  gold  nobles,  tho  ransom  of  Hugh  Bon 
of  Kilrarock,  taken  in  that  battle.  He  died  abont  U6i 
By  Ills  wife,  Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  Jama  Gotdoorf 
Stitchell  and  Lochinvar,  he  had  three  aons  and  one  dai^tcr. 

His  eldest  son,  Andrew  Pringle  of  Galaahieb  and  Souil- 
holm,  made  an  entail  of  his  estates  in  1585,  the  year  of  Ui 
death.  He  had  two  sons,  James  Ids  heir,  and  Bobeitof 
llowhitstown,  on  Gala  Water,  and  a  danghter,  f—h^iu  nar. 
ried  to  George  Pringle  of  Blyndlee. 

The  elder  son.  Sir  James  Pringle  of  Smailholm  and  Gals- 
sliiels,  was,  in  1610,  bailie  of  the  regality  of  Stow,  and,  ia 
1G22,  ho  had  a  commiiision  under  the  gnat  sea]  as  sheriff 
principal  of  Ettrick  Forest.  He  was  knighted  bj  JamM  VL, 
and  being  much  about  court,  and  living  eztraTagsotly,  be 
was  compelled  to  alienate  a  considerable  portion  of  kiseitstai 
In  1G23,  he  and  George  Pringle  of  Torwoodlee  were  oomuus- 
sioners  to  the  1-Istates  for  the  county  of  Selkirk.  He  died  ia 
1C35.  He  had  four  sons  and  as  m.iny  daugliters.  Job, 
his  eldest  daughter,  married  Hugh  Scott  of  Denehar,  who 
got  possession  of  the  estate  of  GaLishiels,  having  chums  upon 
it.     From  him  :ire  descended  the  Scotts  of  Gala. 

The  two  eldest  sons  having  predeceased  him.  Sir  Jama 
was  succeeded  by  his  third  son,  John,  debigiied  of  Smulhoioi, 
but  his  inheritance  was  small,  and  even  of  that  portion  of 
the  property  which  came  to  him,  being  encumbered  with 
debt,  he  w.is  ultimately  deprived  through  legal  diligenee,  bj 
Sir  Hugh  Scutt  of  Harden.  John  Pringle  died  in  1650,  aod 
his  youngest  bmther,  George,  having  predeceased  him,  Robert 
Pringle  of  Howlatstown,  youngest  son  of  Andrew  Prin^of 
Smailholm  and  Galashiels,  and  brother  of  Sir  James,  beesiDB 
the  male  representative  of  the  family.  lie  died,  without 
issue,  in  1G53,  when  the  male  representation  devolTcd  opon 
James  Pringle  of  Whytbank,  gre.it-grandson  of  James  Prin- 
gle of  Woodhouse  and  Whytbank  above  mentioned. 

In  early  life,  James  Pringle  of  Whytbank  served  foriODe 
years  in  France  as  an  officer  in  the  Scottish  guards.  He  and 
James  Murray  of  Philiphaugh  represented  the  county  of  Sd- 
kirk  in  the  Estates  in  1C33.  For  his  adherence  to  the  enw 
of  King  Charles  I.,  he  was  heavily  lined  by  the  committee  of 
Estates  ill  1G4G.  He  greatly  improved  his  estate,  and  added 
scvend  lands  to  it,  both  in  Selkirkshire  and  Mid  Lothiu. 
He  married  in  1G22,  Sophia  Schoner,  a  Danish  lady,  maid  of 
honour  to  Anne  of  Denmark,  queen  of  James  VI.,  on  which 
occasion,  wo  ai-e  told,  **  her  majesty  presented  her  with  hrr 
portrait,  enamelled  on  mother  of  pearl,  and  set  with  small 
rubies  and  emeralds,  suspended  by  a  massy  gold  diain,  a 
relic  still  preserved  by  the  family."  On  his  death  in  1667, 
he  was  succeeded  by  his  only  son,  Alexander  Prin^  of 
Whytbank,  who,  in  1G52,  was  sheriff  principal  of  Sdldric* 
shire.  Wannly  att:iched  to  the  Presbyterian  form  of  chnrA 
government,  he  was  a  frequent  member  of  the  eccleoialtiGsI 
courts.  He  died  in  1G95,  without  issue,  and  was  succeeded 
by  John  Pringle,  grandson  of  his  fathers  next  brother,  Geofgi 
Pringle  of  B.-Umungn,  Fifeshupe,  a  major  in  the  army  of  Qot- 
tavus  Adolphus  of  Sweden,  who,  after  serving,  with  oonadi- 
erable  reputation,  during  the  Thirty  years*  war,  retoned 
home,  having  married  one  of  the  daughters  of  Sir  Pitridc 
Rut  liven,  a  general  in  the  same  service,  created  by  Cbaxki 
I.,  earl  of  Forth  in  Scotland,  and  Brentford  in  England,  (mo 
vol.  ii.  p.  254).  His  only  son,  the  Rev.  John  Pringle,  min- 
ister of  Fogo,  descriited  as  an  elegant  scholar,  wasfittherof 
John  Pringle  of  Whytbank,  who  succeeded  his  fatlier's  conan 
in  1G95,  and  died  of  a  fever  in  1703,  tit  the  age  of  25.  He 
had  a  son,  Alexander  Pringle  of  Whytbank,  who  died  in 


I 


PRIXGLE 


308 


OF  STITCIIELL. 


■old  BowUnd,  and  acquired  the  lands  of  fiuckhoim  and  Wil- 
liamlaw,  Ruxburghbliirc.  He  studied  at  Cambridge  and 
Lejden,  for  the  law,  but  on  succeeding  his  uncle  in  Torwood- 
lee,  lie  devoted  hiuiself  entirelj  to  the  improvement  of  Lis 
property.  He  was  a  friend  and  neighbour  of  Sir  Walter 
Soott,  and  b>ckhurt,  in  his  Life  of  Suott,  (p.  383,  folio  edi- 
tion,) records  a  jujous  evening  spent  in  November  1818,  at 
his  beautiful  scat,  which,  though  mentioned  in  Scott*s 
poetr/  as  "  distant  Turwoodlee,**  is  only  about  five  miles  from 
Alibot^furd.  Mr.  Pringle  w:is  convener  of  the  county  of  Sel- 
kirk,  Hnd  commandant  of  the  Selkirkshire  troop  of  yeomanry 
cavalry  from  1797,  when  it  was  raised,  for  about  twelve  years. 
From  1827  to  1830  he  whs  ince-lieutensnt  of  that  county. 
He  died  in  1840,  when  his  eldest  son,  Rear-admirul  James 
Pringle,  became  tenth  laird  of  Torwoodl<fe;  married,  with  is- 
sue. The  Adiniml's  eldest  son,  James  Thomas,  Livutcuant, 
R.N.,  was  bora  in  1832. 


The  Pringles  of  Cliflon  were  ahio  an  old  family.  In  17G0, 
Robert  Pringle  of  Clifton  mode  an  entail  of  his  estates,  and 
died,  unmarried,  in  1780.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  cousin, 
John  Pringle  of  Haining,  second  son  of  his  uncle,  John  Prin- 
gle, who  was  the  second  son  of  Andrew  Pringle  of  Clifton 
(deceased  in  17U2)  and  his  wife,  Violet  Buthcrfurd,  daughter 
of  John  Rutherfurd  of  Edgerstone.  This  John  Pringle  passed 
advocate  18th  June  1G98,  and  in  1702  purch:uicd  the  estate  of 
Haining,  parish  of  Selkirk.  On  Ist  July  1729,  he  was  ad- 
mitted a  lord  of  wtuiiun,  when  he  took  the  title  of  Lord  Hain- 
ing. His  lonisliip  died  19th  August  1754.  With  three  daugh- 
ters he  had  three  sons,  namely,  1.  Andrew,  also  a  lurd  of 
session,  niidcr  the  title  of  ImtiI  Alemoor ;  2.  Juhn  Pringle  of 
Haining ;  and  3.  Robert,  a  doctor  of  medicine. 

The  eldest  son,  Andrew^  did  not  take  up  his  father's  succes- 
sion to  Haining,  as  his  affairs  were  embarms^eil,  and  his  noxt 
brother,  Juhn,  wlio  had  made  a  handsome  fui-tune  as  a  mer- 
chant in  ^Lndeira,  purchased  it  on  his  father's  death,  and 
cleared  off  all  the  incumbrances  upon  it.  Admitted  an  ad- 
vocate in  1740,  Andrew  Pringle  was  ver}'  eminent  at  the  bar, 
being  greatly  distinguished  for  his  scholarship  and  eloquence. 
In  1750  he  was  appointed  sheritfof  Wigtonvhire,  and  in  the 
following  year  slieritf  of  Selkirkshire.  In  17o-'i  he  was  ap- 
pointed solieitor-gencral  fur  Si-otland,  and  11th  June  1759 
ho  was  raided  to  tlie  bench,  as  Lord  Alcmour,  from  a  pro|iorty 
which  he  had  acquired  in  Selkirkshire.  At  the  same  time 
he  was  appointed  a  lurd  of  justiciary.  IIu  dii*d  nt  his 
villa  of  Ilawkhill,  near  Kiiinburgh,  14th  January  177G.  un- 
married, and  was  succeeded  in  all  his  pn>pvrty  by  his  next 
brother,  Juhn  Pringle  of  Haining.  The  latter  for  a  long 
time  represented  Selkirkshire  in  parliament.  On  the  death 
of  his  cousin,  Robert  Pringle  of  Clifton,  in  1780,  he  was 
served  heir  of  pruvihion  to  hnn  under  his  iMitail,  and  thereaf- 
ter assumed  tlic  dcMgnation  of  Pringle  of  Clifton,  with  the 
arms  of  the  elder  branch,  undiHereneed.  He  died  in  1792, 
unmairied,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  cousin  and  gnind- 
nephew,  Mark  Pringle  of  Fairnalie,  grand&on  of  Mark  Prin- 
gle of  Crichtun,  third  and  youngcnt  son  of  Andrew  Pringle  of 
Clifton,  by  Violet  Rutherfurd  of  Kdgerhtone,  above  mentioned. 
On  2d  October  1707,  the  day  of  the  head  court  at  Selkirk. 
Mark  Pringle  had  an  afler-dinner  quarrel  with  William  So>tt 
of  Raeburn,  then  only  about  twenty-  one  ye:u^  of  age,  the 
great-granduncle  of  Sir  Walter  Scott,  and  next  morning  they 
fought  with  swonl.t,  as  was  the  faidiion  of  the  time,  says  the 
latter,  in  a  field  near  Selkirk,  when  Raeburn  was  killed. 
Tho  field  *'  was  called,  from  the  catastrophe,  the  Ilntburn 
Meadow  SjH)t.  Pringle  fled  from  Scotland  to  Spain,  an<l 
Tras  lung  a  captive  and  slave  in  Burbary.**     Having  at  length 


made  a  considerable  fivtnnt  ai  a  merdiaiit,  be  ittancd  Is 
Scotland  in  1738,  and  purchased  the  caUta  of  Criditon  it 
Mid  Lutliian.  He  died  in  1751.  His  eldeit  too,  Joho  Pim- 
gle  of  Crichton,  who  had  married  Ami,  eldest  dMu^tAa  of 
Robert  Rutherfurd  of  Fairnalie,  sister  of  Mra.  Coekbmni,  ib- 
thoress  of  "  The  Howers  of  the  Forest,*  (see  toL  L  p.  660  sf 
this  work,)  continued  to  be  engaged  ezteoAvely  in  oominer- 
eial  punnits,  till  the  house  with  which  he  wisamncctad 
became  bankrupt.  He  was  then  forced  to  part  irith  Ui 
lands,  and  his  father-in-law,  Mr.  Buthcrfurd,  being  inrolved 
along  with  him,  liad  to  sell  lome  of  bis  estates.  His  sod, 
Mark  Pringle,  advocate,  first  designed  of  Fairnalie,  en  the 
death  of  his  granduncle,  John  Pringle,  became  poeseMed  of 
the  estates  of  Haining  and  Clifton,  the  former  as  heir  of  Ubc^ 
through  hu  grandmother,  Ann  Pringle,  the  wife  of  Robert 
Rutherfurd  of  Fairnalie,  and  the  latter  as  hrir  male,  thnn^h 
the  entail  executed  by  Robert  Pringle  of  Clifton.  At  At 
general  election  of  1790,  Mr.  Pringle  of  Cliflon  wae  eleettd 
M.P.  for  Selkirkshire,  and  he  sat  for  that  county  till  the  dis- 
solution in  1802.  He  died  in  1812.  He  had,  with  oot 
daughter,  two  sons,  John,  and  Robert,  of  Fairnalie. 

The  elder  son,  John  Pringle  of  Clifton,  was  a  minor  oo 
succeeding  to  the  estates.  He  studied  at  Christchnrch  ecH- 
lege,  Oxford,  and  at  the  peace  of  1815,  entered  the  army  si 
a  comet  in  the  7th  hussars,  and  served  in  the  army  of  occn- 
patiou  in  France.  In  1819,  when  the  general  reductioo  took 
]>Iace,  he  w:ls  obliged  to  go  on  half-pay.  In  1830,  he  was 
elected  M.P.  for  the  Selkirk  burghs,  on  the  Whig  intcfeit 
In  1831  he  was  kilU'd  by  being  thrown  out  of  his  open  car- 
riage near  liu  own  house  of  Haining.  Dying  unmarried,  bo 
was  succeeded  by  his  brother,  Robert  Pringle  of  Fainulie, 
.ifierwards  of  CHtlon,  also  an  officer  in  the  7th  husMUSb  In 
the  first  parliament  after  the  p.nssing  of  the  Refonn  Bill  be 
sat  as  member  for  Selkirkshire.  He  died  at  Haining  in  1811, 
when  the  estate  of  ClitVm  passed,  under  the  powers  of  the 
entail,  to  Robert  Klliot  of  Harwood,  whose  father  was  the 
eldest  sou  of  the  eldest  sister  of  the  entailer,  Robert  Pringle 
of  Clifton,  which  made  him  heir  of  line  of  that  family.  Hain- 
ing and  the  other  estates  of  RolH>rt  Pringle  descended  to  hii 
only  sister,  Margaret  Violet  Pringle.  This  lady  msrrird 
Archibald  Dougl.Hs,  Esq.  of  Adderston,  whose  family  are  ca- 
dets of  the  house  of  Cavers :  issue,  oue  d.tughter.  In  com- 
pliance with  her  brother*s  settlement,  she  and  her  hn8b.nnd 
assumed  the  name  and  tleaignation  of  Prir.gle  of  Haining  is 
addition  to  that  of  Douglas. 


The  PringU»s  of  Stitchell  arc  sprung  from  the  Hop  Prin- 
f^les  of  Craiglatch  and  New  hall,  Selkirkshire,  believed  to  hsw 
bi'en  verv  old  csdet.i  of  the  house  of  Smailholm.     In  the 

m 

crown  rentals  of  Kttrick  Forest  fur  14t<5  and  1490,  the  lands 
of  Craii^latch  are  mentioned  as  having  been  in  the  posseuion 
of  William  Hop  Pringle  and  Alexander,  his  son.  AVilliain 
IMngle  of  Craiglatch,  also  designed  of  W'hittoun,  Roxbofgh- 
shire,  had  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Hut,  on  the  river  Kak, 
in  that  county,  in  1-192,  and  crown  tacks  of  Craiglatch  in 
148.')  and  1490.  IIu*  great  gnmdson,  Alexander,  was  retooRd 
in  1539.  In  1587,  Alexander's  son,  George  Pringle  of  Cnij;- 
latch,  obtained  a  charter  of  his  Kttrick  Forest  lands.  For  tlie 
crime  of  march-treason  lie  and  his  eldest  son,  George,  incnr^ 
i-ed  the  forfeiture  of  the  lands  of  Craiglatch.  March-tresson 
included  several  species  of  oflences  ]H*cu1iar  to  the  Under, 
such  as  holiling  communication  with  the  English,  and  aiding 
them  in  their  depredations  on  the  Scottisli  side,  as  well  as 
breaking  border  tnice.  The  ])ena1ties  for  this  crime  were 
very  severe.  In  *The  Jmx  of  the  Ijist  Minstrel,*  the  herald 
of  the  llnglish  warden  lords  thus  begins  liis  address  to  the 


I 


.    I 


I  I 


I    ■ 


il 


PRINGLE, 


310 


SIR  JOHN. 


appointed  by  tbo  magistrates  and  town  council 
assistant  and  sncccssor  to  Mr.  Scott,  in  the  chair 
of  moral  pliilosopliy  in  that  university.  In  1742 
ho  was  nominated  physician  to  the  carl  of  Stair, 
then  commander-in-chief  of  the  British  army; 
and,  through  the  interest  of  this  nobleman,  he  was 
constituted,  in  August  of  the  same  year,  pliysician 
to  the  military  hospital  in  Flanders.  During  his 
absence  from  the  university,  Messrs.  Muirhead 
and  Clcghorn  were  appointed  to  teach  the  moral 
philosophy  class  in  his  stead.  At  the  battle  of 
Dettingen,  fought  June  26,  1743,  Dr.  Fringic  was 
present  in  a  coach  with  Lord  Carteret,  and  at  one 
period  of  the  engagement  was  exposed  to  great 
danger.  Through  his  exertions  a  convention  was 
entered  into,  in  the  early  part  of  the  campaign  of 
that  year,  between  I^rd  Stair  and  Marshal  No- 
ailles,  for  the  mutual  protection  of  the  hospitals  of 
the  contending  armies,  which  was  fiiilhfiilly  ad- 
hered to  by  both  geuerals. 

After  the  retirement  of  Lord  Stair,  Dr.  Friiigle 
attended  the  army  in  Flanders  througliout  the 
campaign  of  1744.  Having  by  his  dili;:ence  and 
ability  recommended  himself  to  tlic  duke  of  Cum- 
berland, he  was  in  the  following  spring  appointed 
physician-general  to  his  mnjesty's  forces  in  the 
Netherlands,  and  also  i)liysician  to  the  royal  hos- 
pitals there.  IIo  now  resigned  his  professorship 
in  the  university  of  Edinburgh.  In  the  end  of 
1745  he  was  recalled  from  Flanders  to  attend  the 
forces  under  the  duke  of  Cnmborland,  ordered 
against  the  rebels  in  Scotland.  At  this  time  he 
was  chosen  a  member  of  the  Koyal  Society  of 
London,  lie  remained  with  the  royal  troops  till 
after  the  battle  of  Culloden,  April  IG,  174G,  and 
in  the  two  succeeding  years  he  again  served  with 
the  army  on  the  Continent.  On  j^cace  being  con- 
cluded by  the  treaty  of  Aix-la-Chapelle  in  1748, 
he  embarked  with  the  forces  on  his  return  to  Eng- 
land. From  this  time  he  principally  resided  in 
London,  and  in  1749  was  appointed  physician  in 
ordinary  to  the  duke  of  Cumberland.  In  1750  he 
published  '  Obsen-ations  on  the  Jail  or  Hospital 
Fever.'  The  same  year  he  communicated  to  the 
Royal  Society  his  famous  *  Experiments  upon 
Septic  and  Antiseptic  Substances,  with  Remarks 
relating  to  their  Use  in  the  Theory  of  ^ledicine,* 
which  were  comprehended  in  several  papers,  for 


which  he  received  the  Copley  medal.    Many  of 
his  papers  after  this  period  appear  in  the  Fbiloso-  I' 
phical  Transactions;  and,  besides  these oommB- 
nications,  he  wrote  in  the  £dinbnr«;h  Medial 
Essays,  volume  fifth,  *  An  Account  of  the  Soooeai 
of  the  Yltrum  Ceratum  Antimonil.'    In  1752  1m 
published  his  celebrated  work  *■  On  the  Diseases 
of  the  Army,*  wliich  passed  through  muneroos 
editions,  and  was  translated   into  the  Frencb, 
German,  Italian,  and  other  languages.    In  1758 
he  was  elected  one  of  the  council  of  the  Bonl 
Society.    In  1758,  on  relinquishing  his  appoint- 
ment  in  the  army,  he  was  admitted  a  licentiate  of  ! 
the  London  college  of  physicians. 

Soon  after  the  accession  of  George  III.  he  was, 
in  17G1,  appointed  physician  to  the  qncen*8  house-  ! 
hold,  and  in  1763  ph^'sician  cxtraordinan*  to  ber  i 
majesty.    The  same  year  he  was  chosen  a  mem- 
ber of  the  academy  of  sciences  at  Haarlem,  and 
follow  of  the  college  of  physicians,  London;  and 
in  1764  he  succeeded  Dr.  A^''ollaston  as  physiciau 
in  ordinary  to  the  queen.    In  1766  the  king  was  II 
pleased  to  testify  his  sense  of  his  long  services,  as 
well  as  of  his  abilities  and  merit,  by  raiangbim 
to  the  dignity  of  a  baronet  of  Great  Britain.   In 
1772  he  was  elected  president  of  the  Royal  Soci- 
ety, and  in  1774  was  appointed  physicum  extra- 
ordinary to  his  majestv.    In  1776  he  became  a  i 

.,   i' 
member  of  the  acadomv  of  sciences  at  Madrid, 

I 

and  most  of  the  other  learned  bodies  of  Europe  at  '. 
diflorent  periods  enrolled  his  name  in  the  list  of 
their  members.  In  1778  he  succeeded  Linnajns  i; 
as  one  of  the  eight  foreign  members  of  the  acade- 
my of  Sciences  at  Paris;  and  in  1781  he  became  a 
I'l-How  of  the  then  recently  instituted  society  of 
antiquaries  at  Edinburgh. 

His  declining  health  induced  him,  at  the  close 
of  1778,  to  resign  the  presidency  of  the  Royal 
Society.  The  discourses  which  he  delivered  as 
president,  six  in  number,  were  published  the  year 
after  his  death,  by  his  friend  Dr.  Kippis,  in  one 
volume  8vo.  Hoping  to  derive  benefit  from  the 
air  of  his  native  country,  he  spent  the  summer  of 
1780  in  Scotland,  residing  chiefly  in  Edlnburgli, 
and  formed  the  design  of  fixing  his  i*esidence  alto- 
gether in  that  city.  With  this  view,  in  1781,  he 
disposed  of  his  house  in  Pall  Mall,  with  the  great- 
er part  of  his  library,  and  removed  to  Edinbui^h ; 


PRIXGLE, 


312 


THOMAa 


i  I 
I! 


|i 


I  ■ 


"I 


il 


soon  falling  into  the  hands  of  new  proprietors,  be- 
came *  Blackwood^s  Magazine,'  he  Iiad  relinquished 
his  situation  in  the  Register  Office ;  and  about  the 
same  time  he  undertook  the  editorship  of  the 
'Edinburgh  Star'  newspaper.  lie  also  became 
joint-editor  of  Constable's  *  Scots  Magazine.* 

Owing  to  some  dii«pute  with  Mr.  Blackwood, 
he  soon  retired  from  all  connection  with  his  Mag- 
azine, a  circumstance  which  drew  down  upon  him 
the  abuse  of  some  of  his  former  coadjutors.  Pre- 
vious to  this  separation  he  had  married  lilargaret, 
daughter  of  Mr.  William  Brown,  an  East  Lothian 
farmer  of  great  respectability.  In  January  1819, 
having  relinquished  the  editorship  of  the  *  Star,' 
he  resumed  his  foimer  occupation  of  copying  old 
records  in  the  Register  Office ;  and  in  the  same 
year  he  published  the  *  Autumnal  Excursion,  or 
Sketches  in  Teviotdale,  with  other  Poems.'  His 
earnings  being  totally  inadequate  to  the  support 
of  his  family,  and  circumstances  compelling  the 
other  members  of  his  father's  house  to  have  re- 
course to  emigration,  he  applied,  through  his 
friend  Scott,  to  Lord  Melville,  for  an  allotment  of 
land  in  Southern  Africa  for  his  father  and  brother, 
and  readily  obtained  a  grant  of  eleven  hundred 
acres  of  the  unoccupied  territory  at  the  Cape. 
The  little  band  of  emigrants,  consisting  of  twelve 
men,  including  three  farm  sen-ants,  six  womcnj 
and  six  children,  his  wife,  her  sister,  and  himself, 
being  of  the  number,  sailed  from  London  in  Feb- 
rnary  1820,  and  arrived  at  Algoa  Bay  on  the  loth 
^lay,  where  they  disembarked.  On  reaching 
their  place  of  settlement,  they  called  it  Glen- 
Lynden,  which  is  now  the  official  name  of  the 
river,  and  the  whole  of  the  valley,  confoired  in 
compliment  to  Pringle  by  General  Bourke,  when 
lieutenant-governor.  In  this  remote  location 
Pringle  acted  as  the  physician  and  surgeon  of  the 
party,  there  being  no  other  within  a  hundred 
miles ;  and  was  at  the  same  time  the  civil  and 
military  chief  of  the  settlement,  aud  the  religious 
instructor  and  officiating  minii>ter.  In  June  1821 
he  obtained  from  Sir  Rufane  Doukin,  the  acting 
governor,  an  extension  of  the  location,  which  put 
his  party  in  possession  of  twenty  thousand  acres 
of  land. 

Through  the  interest  of  Sir  Walter  Scott,  and 
others  of  his  friends  at  the  colonial  department, 


he  was  appointed  librarian  of  the  govenuMBl 
library  at  Cape  Town ;  and  in  September  IffiS, 
with  his  wife  and  her  sister,  he  commenced  a  reii-  ; 
dence  there  of  neariy  three  years.    His  atlaiy  be- 
ing only  £75  a-jear,  he  at  first  received  pnpilsfbr 
private  instruction,  and  tlien,  in  conjonction  with 
a  Dutch  clergyman  of  the  town,  made  airuge- 
mcnts  for  publishing  a  periodical  in  both  the  Eig- 
lish  and  Dutch  languages.    The  governor,  how- 
ever, Loi-d  Charles  Somerset,  withheld  his  sanctkm 
from  the  latter  project,  and  it  did  not  make  iCi 
appearance  till  some  time  afterwards,  when,  hav- 
ing obtained  the  approval  of  the  government  it 
home,  it  was  at  last  published,  under  the  name  of 
the  'South  African  Journal.'    Previous  to  this 
he  had  been  joined  by  ]^[r.  John  Fairbadm  from 
Kdinburgh,  with  whom  he  organized  a  private 
academy  on  an  extensive  scale,  which  succeeded 
to  his  utmost  wishes ;  and  soon  after  the  appear- 
ance of  his  *  Journal,'  he  was  appointed  joint- 
editor  of  the  'Sontli  African  Commercial  Adver- 
tiser,'  a  paper  recently  started  by  ^Ir.  Grcig,  a 
printer.    A  dispute  with  the  governor,  however, 
arising  from  an  attempted  censorship  of  the  press, 
to  which  Pringle  would. not  subroli,  soon  led  to 
the  discontinuance  of  both  publications,  the  min 
of  his  academy,  and  the  rcstgnation  of  his  office  of 
government  librarian.     From  October  1824  to 
April  1826  he  was  diligently  employed  in  making 
himself  acquainted  with  the  tmc  condition  of  the 
colony,  and  more  especially  of  the  frontier  where 
his  own  relatives  were  located.   During  the  great- 
er part  of  1825  he  was  in  correspondence  with  the 
commissioner  of  inquiry,  not  only  respecting  liifl 
own  case,  but  on  the  subject  of  various  abuses  in 
the  local  administration,  the  treatment  of  the  col- 
oured race,  and  the  defence  of  the  frontier.    He 
was  one  of  the  originators  of  the  second  great 
measure  next  to  the  political  emancipation  of  the 
Hottentots,  namely,  their  establishment  as  inde- 
pendent occupiers  of  land.    A  paper,  given  in  by 
him  to  the  commissioners  in  1823,  was  entitled 
'  Hints  of  a  Plan  for  defending  the  Eastern  Fron- 
tier of  the  Colony  by  a  Settlement  of  Hottentots.* 
He  also  acted  as  secretarj-  to  the  Society  for  the 
relief  of  the  distressed  Settlers  in  Albany,  in  which 
capacity  he  sent  a  pamphlet  for  publication  to 
London,  entitled  ^  Some  Account  of  the  Present 


:l     1 


QUEENSBERRY, 


314 


SECOND  EARL  OF. 


I     I 


Upon  various  oilier  occnsions  he  liod  also  a  Bafe-condnct  to 
^o  to  KnglanJ,  pnrticulnrly  ono  on  ICth  December  1414,  to 
liim  and  bix  persons  cliosen  bj  liini,  attended  bv  eighty 
Iior^incn,  to  |;o  to  Carlisle,  to  perform  certain  foata  of  anna 
beforo  jiii];:^^,  n;;ainst  Sir  John  de  ClilTord  and  six  persons 
of  hiri  noniiuatiun.  In  1420  he  accompanied  the  Scottiidi 
auxiliiiricd  to  France  under  the  carl  of  Buchan.  He  was 
knighted  at  the  coronation  of  James  I.,  21st  Mav  1424,  and 
\a  huid  to  have  been  killed  in  battle  against  the  Knglisli  in 
Franco  in  1427.  Bj  his  wife,  Kliznbcth,  daughter  of  Sir 
]*obert  Stcwairt  of  Durrisdcer  and  Rosjtfa,  he  had  a  son, 
Williniii  Duugl.'is  of  Drumlaiirigf  who  was  ono  of  the  hostages 
for  King  James  I.,  9th  November  1427,  in  the  room  of  Sir 
Adam  de  Ilebbum.  In  1448  he  was  in  the  annr  command- 
ed  by  the  earl:i  of  Douglas  and  Ormoud,  when  a  sanguiuarr 
buttle  was  fought  with  the  Kngli^h  on  the  banks  of  the  river 
Sark  in  Annnndale,  and  the  latter  were  defeated  with  great 
slaughter.     He  died  in  1458. 

His  sun,  William  Douglas  of  Drumlnnrig,  disUnguished 
himself  at  the  siege  of  Roxburgh,  where  James  II.  was  killed 
in  MGO,  and  also  in  December  1462  in  the  expedition  of  the 
earl  of  Angus  to  the  relief  of  Alnwick,  then  held  by  a  French 
garrison,  under  Breze,  high-steward  of  Normandy,  (see  vol. 
ii.  p.  4'>.)  when  he  succeeded  in  bringing  them  off,  in  sight  of 
a  supcrinr  English  force,  commanded  by  King  P'dward  IV.  in 
persitn.  He  died  in  14GL  His  son.  Sir  William  Douglas  of 
Drumlanrig,  was  killed  while  fi;;hting  on  the  king's  side 
iigahisl  the  duke  of  Albany  and  the  ninth  and  last  earl  of 
Douglas,  in  the  engagemrnt  near  Li»chmaben,  when  they  in- 
v.ided  Scotland  22d  July  1484.  With  three  daughters,  he 
had  four  sons,  namely,  1.  .Tames,  liis  succcsyor.  2.  Archi- 
bald, ancestor  of  the  Douglases  of  Ca^hogIe.  3.  George,  an- 
ci^>ti'r  of  the  Douglases  of  IVnziere;  and  4.  John,  vicar  of 
KitUconnell. 

The  eldest  son,  J.imes  D<»uglas  of  Dmmlanrig,  manied,  in 
1470,  Janet,  eldceit  daughter  of  Sir  David  Scott  of  Branx- 
hohn,  ancestor  of  the  duko  of  Buccleuch  .ind  Queenslx-rry, 
and  diod  in  14DS.  lit;  had,  with  ono  daughter,  a  son.  Sir 
William  DongI:us  of  Drumlanrig,  who  fell  at  the  battle  of 
P'h)ddcn,  9th  September  15115.  Willi  two  daughters  the  lat- 
ter had  two  sons.  Sir  James,  and  Hobfrt,  ap{>ointed  provast 
of  Linehiddrn  in  ir>47.  He  was  the  la>t  pritvo&t  of  that  an- 
cient religions  house,  and  was  allowed  to  enjoy  the  benefuM' 
for  about  llnty  years  after  the  lli-funnation.  He  was  one  ol" 
the  prrsiii'.s  who  accompanit-d  King  .Tames  VI.,  when  he  viu- 
barked  fur  Norway,  22d  October  15M>,  and  aji|>par8  to  hav«' 
been  ciilleeSor  of  the  revenue,  a.s  on  the  appoirslment  of  tlw; 
Oi.ta\iai'.s  in  l.'iO»I.  he  demirted  tiiat  ofliie,  on  being  required 
to  do  si>.  The  Donijlases  of  liiirturd  were  des<vnded  t'r»iii 
him.  He  is  saitl  to  have  bvL-n  u  natnral  .son,  but  Ie;:itiinated 
in  l.O.'iO. 

The  elder  son,  Sir  James  Douglas  of  Drumlanrig,  was  one 
of  the  b;;rons  who.  with  Sir  Walter  Scott  of  Buccleuih,  at- 
tempted to  re.«cue  King  James  V.  from  the  hands  of  tln'  earl 
of  Angus,  near  Melmse,  in  June  l.')2G,  for  which  lie  obtainc*! 
a  rcmisrion.  The  oldest  extant  charter  of  the  town  of  Haw- 
ick is  one  of  coniimiation  grar.led  by  this  James  Douglas  of 
Drundanrig,  baron  of  llavviek,  dated  11th  Octoler  15."7.  He 
was  knighted  by  the  regent  Arran,  duke  of  Chatellienmlt, 
and  in  ITi^G  appointed  guardian  of  the  west  marches,  with 
full  powers  of  justici.iry.  He  subscrihed  the  Book  of  Disci- 
pline 27th  Jaimary  1561,  .ind  w-as  one  of  the  confederated 
ban)ns  who  marched  against  Qneen  Mary,  in  T5C7,  when  ^he 
Furrendered  at  Carherry  hill.  On  this  occahion,  bus  son,  Sir 
William  Dou^'las  of  Iluwick,  with  Hume  nf  M.inderston  and 
Hume  of  Iluttonhall,  was  scut  forw.ird  to  break  the  arrav  of 


thft  qoeen^a  gunnen,  when  she  itood  with  lier  annj  on  thi 
liill.  When  the  queen  escaped  from  Locblcren,  the  foa,  Sir 
William  Dougiss,  joined  the  regent  Moraj  at  Gla^gov,  aid 
on  the  latter  being  advised  to  retire  to  Stirling,  he  dcdaid, 
**  If  ye  depart,  I  will  go  to  the  queen,  aa  mj  Lord  Bojd  kiU 
done.*'  At  the  battle  of  Langude,  be  had  the  oommaadof  a 
party  of  lione  on  tlie  regent's  side.  Old  Dnunlanr^  ai  )m 
father  was  called,  waa  with  the  foroea  under  the  carl  of  Jll^ 
ton  at  Lcith,  in  1571,  and  engaged  in  some  of  the  akirBuba 
with  the  cistle  of  Edinburgh,  then  held  by  the  qoeea  a  partf. 
On  the  23d  of  June  the  same  year,  he  waa  taken  priiooer  m 
he  waa  riding  homo,  on  some  busincas  betwixt  him  aod  laid 
Herriea,  and  others  who  were  at  variance.  Lord  Hcnki 
treacherously  appointed  to  meet  him  where  the  laird  cf 
Wormeston  lay  in  wait  for  him,  and  he  waa  eomeved  te  Ai 
castle  of  Edinburgh.  On  this  occasion  hia  aon.  Sir  WlHiia, 
narrowly  escaped.  Not  being  certain  whether  hia  no  bd 
been  kille<l  or  not,  he  sent  him  the  following  cnriona  e|»tli: 
**  Willie,  Thou  sail  wit  that  I  am  haill  and  feare.  Sendne 
word  thuirfoir  how  thow  art,  whether  deid  or  brand?  Gif 
thow  be  deid,  I  doubt  not  imt  freindis  will  let  me  know  die 
treuth ;  and  gif  thow  be  weill,  I  de^yre  na  mair,**  &c  He 
showed  this  letter  to  his  captors,  that  they  might  be  nut  it 
contained  no  treason;  and  to  save  his  purse,  he  sent  it  with 
the  Utter,  desiring  the  me>senger  to  deliver  it  toLisaa. 
{Caldenrood^  vol.  iii.  p.  105,  note.)  He  was  one  <^  tboN 
who  vi^ited  Knox  on  his  deathbed,  and  died  in  1578.  Bi> 
son.  Sir  William  Douglas,  having  predeceasi'd  him  in  1571 
ho  was  sui.-ceeded  by  his  grandson,  Sir  James  Doaglu  of 
Dmmlanrig,  who  diatinguibhed  himself  in  cuppreninjr  di»* 
turbances  on  the  borders,  and  died  10th  October  1615. 
With  two  daughters,  Sir  James  had  four  sons.  1.  Sir  WD' 
liam.  2.  Sir  ilames  Douglas  of  Mouswald,  Dumfries-BbiRi 
derived  from  Moswold,  '•  the  wood  near  the  moss.**  8.  IH- 
vid  Douglas  of  Ainioch  ;  .ind  4.  (leorge  Douglas  of  Peniio*- 
The  eldest  son.  Sir  William  Douglas  of  Drumlanrij:,  wa* 
the  fu'bt  earl  of  Queensbern*.     He  had  obtained  a  rcvi-ni<A    {\ 


I 


I 


of  the  provost ry  of  LincludJen,  and  after  the  death  of  kii 
gramiuncle,  Ilobert  Douglas,  ab«»ve  mentioned,  he  enji>ywiu 
revenues  during  his  own  life.     He  was  a  member  of  the  Grt- 
eral  Assembly  which  moi  at  Glasgow  8th  June  IGIO,  and 
ent'Ttained  King  James  VI.,  at  his  hor.se  of  DrunilaDri^ 
when  his  majesty  visited   Scotland   in    1G17.     By  patent, 
dated  .it  Whitehall,  1st  April  l<i28,  he  was  cre.-ited  apcer,  bv 
tho  titles  of  viscount  of  Dnnnlanrig,  and  Lord  Duuglas  rf 
Hawick  and  Tibberis,  to  him  and  his  heirs  male,  bearing  thf 
name  and  arms  of  Douglas.     He  got  vested   in  himself  and 
his  heirs  the  patronage  and  tithes  of  the  churches  of  Tenr- 
gli-s,  IxK'hrutton,  Colvend,  Kirkbean,  and  Cnerlarerock,  be- 
longing to  the  pvovostr}-  of  I.inchidden,  and  also  a  small  part 
of  its  lands.     When  Charles  I.  visited  Scotland  in  ICSS,  he 
advanced  the  visi*ount  of  Drnndanrig  to  the  title  of  eaii  of 
Queensberry,  to  him  and  his  heirs  male  liearing  the  name 
and  anus  of  Duughns,  by  patent,  dated  at  Seton,  loth  Jane 
of  that  rear.     The  title  was  taken  fmm  a  mountain  called 
Quecnsbcrr}',  in   the  parish  of  Closcbum,    Dumfries-shnt, 
having  its  name  from  the  Anglo-Saxon  6ery,  a  hill,  softened 
into  berry.     Situated  nndd  a  collection  of  heights,  it  isUter- 
:iliy  the  "queen  hill**  of  the  district.     He  died  8th  March 
1(M0.     He  had,  with  two  daughters,  four  sons:  1.  James, 
second  earl  of  Qufensberrj*.     2.  Hon.  Sir  William  Douglas  of 
Kelhead.     3.  Hon.  Archibald  Douglas  of  Domock,  ancestor 
of  the  Dougla>es  of  Dornock  ;  ar.|i  4.  Hon.  George  Douglas, 
who  died  unmarried. 

James,  second  e:»rl  of  Queensberry,  the  eldest  son,  adbend 
to  the  cause  of  Charles  I.  in  the  civil  wars,  and  was  on  his 


\' 


r 
I' 


viHount  of  Tililjeru,  and  I.nrd  lionfi-i  at  1j>ckcrbir,  Dul-  in  it  ■ometbiiif;  of  ■  miuHiitic  cliui-actrr.     It  ii  sUled  (Ul  I» 

vtim,  irK]  'I'lKiniliill,  by  pntciit,  dnttd  at  WtniiaoT  cnstle  ITIb  bud  bMoina  ciiuinuurcd  uf  ■  Jlisa  Jlmkii}-,  lod  «u  duino* 

Juna  1706  (the  Mtiit  date  u  Ibut  of  (be  new  pntrat  of  ibe  of  innrrviiif;  brr,  but  tlie  duclie»,  liii  motlin,  oppoMd  lb) 

diiluilum  vf  ljucenbberry  granted  to  lui  filber]^  to  him  uul  mfttdi,  ind,  Iii  intcmptjng  tlicir  lettin,  eaiued  in  eatnap- 


QUEENSBERRY. 


818 


RAEBUBN. 


I    I 


I 


the  turf,  lie  sold  his  house  at  Newmftrket,  and  betook  bim- 
self  to  ttie  study  of  books  and  omns,  the  enjoyment  of  pic- 
tures and  statues,  and  the  acquisition  of  one  of  the  noblest 
and  most  expensive  coIIccUons  of  shells  in  the  kingdom. 

His  Inter  vcors  were  spent  in  retirement  at  his  boose  in 
Piccadilly,  London.  He  had  an  ear  for  mnuc,  and  is  said  to 
have  dispUiycd  great  taste  in  a  song.  A  munificent  patron 
of  musicians,  especially  foreign  ones,  in  his  house  wen  to  be 
seen  all  the  great  singen  who  were  attracted  to  England  in 
his  time.  "  In  point  of  person,**  says  a  writer  in  the  Soots 
Magazine  for  February  1811,  "  his  grace  was  of  the  middle 
size,  neat,  slim,  and  at  an  early  period  of  life,  graceful  and 
elegant  In  consequence  of  a  speck  in  one  of  his  eyes,  a 
ridiculous  story  previuled  that  he  wore  a  glass  one.  He  spent 
the  greater  part  of  his  later  yean  at  the  south-east  extrem- 
ity of  his  parlour  bow  window,  where  he  sat  eight  or  ten 
houra  daily.  Behind  bim  stood  a  serrant  out  of  livery  who 
acted  the  part  of  a  nomendator,  and  pronounced  the  names  of 
such  of  the  passengen  as  were  of  any  distinction.  So  uniform 
was  his  grace  in  attendance  during  certain  fixed  hours,  and 
of  such  long  continuance  of  practice,  that  a  gentleman  who 
set  out  for  India  in  quest  of  a  fortune,  on  his  return  after  ten 
yeare*  absence,  actually  found  him  fixed  in  the  same  spot. 
His  favourite  pony  was  saddled  every  forenoon,  and,  until 
the  day  of  his  death,  stationed  nearly  opposite  the  door,  in 
constant  re.idines8,  precisely  at  the  same  moment  as  for- 
merlv.** 

m 

His  grace  died  at  London,  23d  December  1810,  in  his  8Cth 
year,  unmarried.  The  titles  of  duke  of  Queensberry,  mar- 
quis of  Dumfries-shire,  earl  of  Drumlanrig  and  Sanquhar, 
viscount  of  Nith,  Torthorwald  and  Ross,  with  Drumlanrig 
castle,  passed,  by  special  limitation,  to  the  duke  of  Bucdeuch, 
the  grandson  of  Lidy  Jean  Douglas,  duchess  of  Buccleucli. 
Those  of  marquis  and  earl  of  Queensberry,  viscount  of  Drum- 
lanrig and  baron  Douglas,  devolved  upon  Sir  Charles  Doug- 
las, sixth  baronet  of  Kelhead,  heir  male  of  the  family,  of 
whom  below.  With  these  titles  he  got  the  liaronies  of  Tin- 
wald  and  Torthorwald,  and  other  estates  in  Dumfries-shirc. 
The  titles  of  earl  of  Marofa,  viscount  of  Peebles,  and  Ix)rd 
Neidpath,  Lyne,  and  Munard,  with  Neidpath  castle,  and  the 
estate  attached  to  it  in  Peebles-sliire,  passed  to  the  earl  of 
Wemyss ;  while  those  of  earl  of  Ruglen  and  Lord  Douglas  of 
Amesbury  became  extinct.  The  Wiltshire  property  of  Ames- 
bury  went,  in  accordance  with  a  settlement  executed  by  the 
third  duke  of  Queensberry,  to  Arohibald,  Lord  Douglas  of 
Douglas.  His  grace's  personal  fortune,  amounting  to  about 
a  million  sterling,  was  devised  in  legacies  to  various  persons, 
the  earl  of  Yarmouth  being  the  residuary  legatee.  A  list  of 
those  is  given  in  the  number  of  the  Scots  Magazine  above 
quoted. 


Sir  Charles  Douglas  of  Kelbead,  baronet,  who 
fifth  marquis  of  Queensberry,  derived  his  datecntfienfti 
Hon.  Sir  William  Douglas  of  Kelhesd,  aeeond  soo  of  tbofat 
eari  of  Queensbeny.  He  was  an  oflker  in  the  mij,  nd 
governor  of  Carlisle  in  1647.  He  was  crested  a  btroKt  of 
Nova  Scotia,  by  patent  dated  2ath  Febnuuy  1668,  ssd&d 
before  1673.  He  was  twice  married ;  first,  to  Agnes,  in^ 
ter  of  Fswsyde  of  Fawsyde,  parish  of  Thuent,  Haddiigta- 
shire;  and,  secondly,  to  Jean  Stswait,  of  thaTnqodr&B- 
ily,  relict  of  Andrew  Riddell  of  Hsining,  and  by  ihefioMr 
had  five  sons  and  several  daughters. 

His  3d  eldest  surviving  son.  Sir  James  Doof^  td  bat 
of  Kelhead,  bom  Sept  19, 1639,  soccceded  him,  snd  ^  bs- 
fore  April  1708.  By  his  wife,  L.ndj  Catherine  Dooglii,U 
daughter  of  the  2d  eari  of  Queensbeny,  Sir  James  had  an 
son,  Sir  Willism  Douglas,  dd  baronet,  who  died  is  1781. 
The  latter  had  10  sons  and  4  daughten.  Theddotsos, 
Sir  John  Douglas,  4th  baronet,  was  chosen  M.P.  for  DnmfiiM 
county  at  the  general  election  of  1741.  Apprehended  in  Jaly 
1746,  on  suspicion  of  having  favoured  the  cause  of  the  Pre- 
tender, be  was,  on  Aug.  14th,  committed  to  the  Tover  of 
London,  and  not  liberated  till  March  1748,  when  he  got  oot 
on  ball.  He  died  at  Drumlanrig,  Nov.  13,  1778.  His  eldest 
son.  Sir  William  Douglas,  5th  baronet,  M.P.  for  the  Dum- 
fries burghs,  died  May  16,  1783.  He  married  the  elde&t 
daughter  and  coheir  of  William  Johnston,  Esq.  of  Lodcerbf, 
Dumfries-shire,  and,  with  3  daughters,  had  5  sons. 

Sir  Charles,  the  eldest  son,  6th  baronet  of  Kelhead,  bore  in 
1777,  l>ecame  in  Dec.  181U,  as  already  shown,  5th  msrqms 
of  Queensberry.  He  was  a  knight  of  the  Thistle,  a  lord  of 
the  bedchamber,  lord-lieutenant  of  Dumfries-shire,  and  colo- 
nel in  its  militia.  In  1833  he  was  created  Baron  Solway  of 
Kinmount,  in  the  peerage  of  the  United  Kingdom,  a  title 
which  became  extinct  at  his  death  in  1837.  By  his  march- 
ioness, Lady  Caroline  Montague,  dd  daughter  of  Henry,  duke 
of  Buccleuch  and  Queensberry,  he  had  5  daughters. 

He  was  succeeded  by  his  next  brother,  John,  6th  marquis 
of  Queensberry,  bom  in  1779 ;  appointed  a  lord  of  the  bed- 
chamber in  April  1835.  He  died  Dec  19,  1856.  He  had 
married,  in  1817,  Sarah,  daughter  of  James  Sholto  Doughu, 
Esq.,  with  issue.  His  son,  Arohibald  William,  7th  marquis, 
born  in  1818,  was  educated  at  Eton,  and  became  a  comet  in 
the  2d  Life  Guards,  but  retired  in  1844.  As  Viscount  Drum- 
lanrig, he  was  elected  ^I.P.  for  Dumfries-shire  in  1847:  mar- 
ried the  daughter  of  Major-general  Sir  William  Robert  Ch«y- 
ton,  baronet ;  i.ssue,  4  sons  and  2  daughters.  He  was  killed 
at  Kinmount,  Dumfries-shire,  by  the  accidental  discharge  ot 
his  gun,  while  shooting  rabbits,  Aug.  6,  1858. 

His  eldest  son,  John  Sholto  Douglas,  Viscount  Dmmias- 
rig,  bom  July  20,  1844,  succeeded  as  8th  marquis. 


I 


M 


<k  -*^^  ^"w  ■^.  V  -v^  ^ 


R 


Rak,  surname  of,  sec  Supplkmrxt. 

IIAEBURX,  Slit  Henry,  a  distinguished  por- 
trait painter,  the  younger  son  of  Mr.  William 
llaebimi,  manufactnrcr  at  Stockbridge,  a  suburb 


of  Edinburgh,  was  bom  there,  March  4,  1756. 
His  ancestors  lived  on  the  border,  and  his  father, 
on  his  removal  to  Stockbridge,  married  Ann 
Elder,  and  commencing   manufacturer,  becamo 


RAEBUR]!^, 


319 


SIR  HENRY. 


)rietor  of  mills.  He  had  two  sons,  Wil- 
lio  succeeded  him  in  his  business,  and 
;he  subject  of  this  notice. 
St  both  his  parents  while  yet  yonng,  and 
his  education  in  Heriofs  Hospital,  Edin- 
lalled  by  those  who  have  been  brought  up 
Heriot's  Wark.'  At  the  age  of  fifteen,  he 
)renticed  to  a  goldsmith  in  Edinburgh, 
ter  he  began  to  amuse  himself  by  drawing 
•es,  which,  although  he  had  never  received 
ons,  were  finished  in  such  a  superior  man- 
to  excite  attention.  His  master,  aston- 
i  his  performances,  took  him,  about  the 
r2,  to  see  the  paintings  of  David  Martin, 
e  principal  portrait  painter  in  the  Scottish 
lis.  Martin,  who  painted  many  portraits 
Allan  Cunningham  calls  "  the  first  starch- 
son  style  of  Sir  Joshua  Reynolds,"  at  that 
jidcd  in  St.  James'  Square.  He  received 
ig  aspirant  courteously,  and  lent  him  sev- 
turcs,  with  permission  to  copy  them.  He 
however,  to  teach  him  how  to  prepare  his 

leaving  him  to  find  that  out  for  himself, 
maintaining  the  mystery  of  his  profession, 
acted  properly  enough.  He  had  given 
the  assistance  which  a  younger  artist,  not 
is  entitled  to  expect  from  an  elder,  in  the 
advice  and  encouragement,  and  so  far  was 
to  praise  rather  than  censure.  But  when 
ousy  of  the  rising  talents  of  the  youth,  or 
captions  temper,  led  him  somewhat  hast- 
iccuse  him  of  selling  one  of  the  copies 
ic  had  permitted  him  to  make,  the  case 
Fcrent.  Raeburn  indignantly  established 
)ceuce,  and  refused  all  further  assistance 
n. 

ontinued  to  paint  miniatures,  for  which 
as  soon  a  general  demand,  and  ho  usually 

two  in  a  week.  As  this  employment 
ily  withdrew  his  time  from  trade,  an  ar- 
mt  was  entered  into  with  his  master, 
T  the  latter,  on  receiving  part  of  his  eam- 
spenscd  with  the  young  painter's  attend- 
[n  the  course  of  his  apprenticeship  he  be- 
paint  in  oil,  and  on  a  large  scale,  a  style 
c  soon  adopted  in  preference  to  miniature 

I  the  expiration  of  his  apprenticeship  ren- 


dered him  free,  ho  became  professionally  a  por- 
trait painter.  At  the  age  of  twenty -two,  he 
married  Ann,  daughter  of  Peter  Edgar,  Esq.  of 
Bridgelands,  with  whom  he  received  a  handsome 
fortune.  He  had  fallen  in  love  with  this  young 
lady  while  she  sat  to  him  for  her  portrait.  With 
the  view  of  improving  himself  in  his  art,  he  re- 
paired to  London,  where  he  was  introduced  to 
Sir  Joshua  Reynolds.  That  artist,  struck  with 
the  genius  displayed  in  his  works,  advised  him  to 
enlarge  his  ideas  by  a  visit  to  Italy,  and  even 
offered  to  supply  him  with  money  for  the  pur- 
pose, which,  however,  Raeburn  did  not  need.  He 
accordingly  set  ont  for  Rome,  accompanied  by  his 
wife,  and  well  furnished  with  letters  of  introduc- 
tion from  Sir  Joshua  to  the  most  eminent  artists 
and  men  of  science  in  that  capital.  He  spent  two 
yeai's  in  Italy,  diUgently  engaged  in  stndying  the 
most  celebrated  works  of  art.  Returning  to  Ed- 
inburgh in  1787,  he  established  himself  in  George 
Street  of  that  city,  where  he  soon  rose  to  the  head 
of  his  profession  in  Scotland,  an  eminence  which 
he  maintained  to  the  end  of  his  life. 

In  1795  he  built  a  large  house  in  York  Place, 
the  npper  part  of  which  was  lighted  from  the 
roof,  and  fitted  np  as  a  gallery  for  exhibition, 
while  the  lower  was  divided  into  convenient  paint- 
ing rooms.  His  dwelling-house  was  at  St.  Ber- 
nard's, near  Stockbridge,  on  the  banks  of  the  Wa- 
ter of  Leith.  The  histoiy  of  his  life  is  limited  to 
his  professional  pursuits.  He  painted  the  por- 
traits of  many  of  the  most  eminent  of  his  cotem- 
poraries  in  Scotland,  and  his  likenesses  are  nni- 
versally  regarded  as  most  striking  and  exact, 
while  they  are  executed  with  a  freedom,  vigour, 
and  dignity,  in  which  he  was  excelled  by  none. 
His  style  was  free  and  bold ;  his  drawing  criti- 
cally con'ect ;  his  colouring  rich,  deep,  and  hai*- 
monious ;  the  accessories,  whether  drapeiy,  funii- 
ture,  or  landscape,  were  always  appropriate ;  and 
he  had  the  peculiar  power  of  rendering  the  head 
of  his  figure  bold,  prominent,  and  imposing.  His 
equestrian  pieces,  in  particular,  are  univereally 
admired.  The  most  interesting  of  his  later  works 
are  a  series  of  half-length  portraits  of  his  literary 
and  scientific  friends,  which  he  painted  solely  for 
his  own  private  gratification.  A  gi*eat  number 
of  his  portraits  have  been  engi*aved.    Constantly 


,  I 


RAEBURN.  3M  RAIT. 

employed  u  a  portrait  painter,  he  devoted  no  dccar,  Jnljr  8,  1823.    Hii  widow  nrriTied  Urn 

part  of  bis  mtcniion  cither  to  )ii«torical  or  land-  ten  jean.    He  had  two  aona,  Peter,  wbo  died  it 

Bcnpc  painting,    lie  was  elected  a  member  of  the  nineteen,  and  Henr}-,  who  with  his  wife  aod  &- 

So^al  Society  of  Edinburgh,  of  tlie  Imperial  Aca-  milj,  lived  under  th«  tame  roof  iritb  hi*  hikr, 

dem;  of  Florence,  and  of  the  New  York  and  and  to  wboae  children  he  left  the  tmlk  of  Ui  Ibr- 

South  Carolina  AendcmiGS.     On   November  2,  Inne,  coniislbg  of  houes  and  gronnd-renU  ei  Ui 

1813,  or,  aa  etated  b;  some,  in  1814,  the  Boyt)  propertf  at  St.  Bernard'!,  Stockbridge,  whiek,  it 

Academy  of  l^indon  elected  liiui  an  associate,  and,  his  latter  years,  be  had  occofued  bii  Idnre  ii 

on  February  10,  ISlfi,  be  was  chosen  an  acade-  planning  out  bto  elegant  Tlltaa  and  atneti,  tad 

mician.  now  forma  part  of  one  of  the  aDbnTba  of  Edinbuft. 

la  1822,  when  George  IV.  visited  Edinbnrgh,  a^„^  „  ^^  ,  ton^t,  origioJlj  fibc.  npfod  k 

Ills  majesty,  oa  a  compliment  to  the  fine  arta  in  hmn  been  d«ri(ed  fmn  >  Gmuiu,  who  euot  to  ScBtlMJii 

Scotland,  conferred  the  honour  of  knighthood  on  '!"  ™K°  "^  ""^^  l-*  M*^".;™"  "«  "^fZ*?^ 

^  tb,  irliEnn  tlu  dud*.     He  u  imJ  to  Lin  gut  fim  IM 

Sir.   IlaCbnm,  a  dignity  wbicb  was  wholly  UnCX-     „mmh  ■omr  Undt  in  PenluliiK,  wfaieh  be  called  ite  Ui 

pected  on  his  part.    A  few  weeks  thereafter  bis   <>"  =»"•■   i" "«  "^  "^  John  Baiioi  atetMo  i>  miitd 

,        ,  ,      r.i   ■  .    ■      •     J,     Sir  Gerrue  ILuldF [lilt  ilk.    Tb«  nine  ippgui  is tte bc- 

brothcr  artists,  as  a  mark  of  their  respect,  invited  „  ,,     ..  ,  r        ,,,    e.^.  v  _       iT  __-fZ!I. 

*  '^      ^  iRin  ItulJ  M  rh:it  of  one  of  tlie  5cvt4  bjroni  who  wwortlttaj 

liim  to  a  public  dinner.    Soon  after,  be  was  nomi-    to  EuKmrd  I.  of  Englimd  in  1196.    In  th*  rtigii  of  BuM 
iiiited  portrait  painter  to  hia  mnjesty  for  Scotland,    '"  ■  **'■■  A"'™^"  ^t  "f »'"''  i'k  b-ring  kilM  tbi  tl— 

,.,       .  of  Calder,  aedlollia  Ueinii,iuidobtuiied  thepnteaioarf 

an  appointment  wb.cb,  however,   was  not  an-    ,i„  ^^  i,«i«l..l.    Hiisa,  Jl«k  B.Ut.  n«m«l  ih.b«« 

HOUnced    to   blm    till   the   very  day  wben  he  was     of  Hillftrem,  n»m»d  Dnnnel  or  Dorud,  ud  got  with  k* 

selzca  wltb  tbo  illness  wbicl.  terminated  in  his    '^.  ";*"•  ^^!''^,  ^'"^^  ^}['  '"-W""*""  "^  ?"  ^ 

Duni)  Rut  of  IlMllEnen  uid  DramQagu-  bad  a  ebuttr  bta 
death.     His  portrait  is  subjoined :  Ki„g  j^^^  m  ^f  time  lunde.    A  «««md  »n  of  tbk  ba- 

il; wu  uCMtoi  tf  Die  Bull  uf  Pitforllite. 

The  lUiu  of  AnuiMon  Uouw,  Focfanhire,  *n  iha  t 
bruKh  of  llie  Hullgrten  fnini);. 

Joba  Bait,  D.D.,  biUiop  of  Abndeen  in  1361,  'a  wUiHto 
■  cbirter  tlie  lut  dij  of  FeliiuuiT  is  (be  SSd  j«u  of  Dmd 
II.  He  died  in  tlie  Sfitb  jtM  uf  tbe  ume  Une,  TU.,  HO. 
Aiiuttier  of  llie  fmniU  waa  Buaiitcr  of  ItiTukeilloBr,  Fichc- 
hl.in,>Dd  died -bout  IGGS. 

Th 

^Maiil  lUil." 

Ur.  Geui^  Rait,  Irolher  of  Rut  of  H:illgit«i,  minM 
Calbeiine,  daugliter  of  li\d<oy  Uouglai  of  Duubliuie,  udbid, 
irilli  ■  d.iugbl«r,  Udv  R^imxHT  of  B^iiff,  s  n.o,  Willum  Rajt, 
Kaq.,  wboH  ton,  Jolin  Ituil  of  AnniBtun  lluUM,  muried  in 
IT;i9  Eliialicth,  duigliler  oF  Jiuiee  tiutbrie,  £gq.  of  Cnupt, 
Furfiiftliire,  witb  iuue. 

Ilia  tan,  Juint»  Itait  of  Annuton  Huuse,  Iwni  Xov.  It, 
18115,  tduvated  at  Ktoii,  EdiiiLur](li,  and  the  Uuireiutj  of 
.St.  Andrijiiii  miyur  of  the  FDrfaiiibiK  itiUiUa,  aiid  ■  atffi- 
Irate  uid  depot]'  lieuteiiiot  of  the  cuntit};  w«i  fvminlf 
i:a;>tain  IStb  llubaare.  He  conn  landed  attgiinent  of  Uooen 
ill  liie  Uriliib  legion  in  Spain  in  1B33-7,  and  guined  UmW 
rlaat  medal  o[  St.  t'erdiiiando.  Ue  wh  iLu  decorated  if 
Ueiienl  Curdocn  in  lie  lielil  icitli  Ibe  Sti  cLisi  medal  of  tin 
.ami.  He  Inanird  .luir  IT,  1838,  Ijidj  Clemcnlina  Dnn- 
iiiund  Ogilrf,  2d  daugblerof  Ibe  ml  of  Alrlie,  with  inb*. 

R.vLSTiiN,  a  snmanie  drrivi-d  from  lands  oii^nalli  nllnl 
Italphilon,  in  Renrnvrkbire.    Tbe  ancient  fainilj  of  Rabtoa 
The    la^t   I>ICt1ll-CJ    on    nbicb    he    was  engaged     of  that  ilk  descended  from  one  Ralpb,  a  coatnctioQ  of  Baa- 
were  two  iKirtrnirs  of  Sir  Waiter  Si-olt,  one  for    '*<■'?''■  "'"'  """""^^  '"""'  1^">^  f™"  'he  bigh.tewud  rf 
Scutland,  wbicb  be  called  aftnr  liia  own  natna,  RalpbtMi. 
himself,  and  tbc  oilier  for  I»rd  Jlontngnc.     He    |„  ^,^^  ^  ,],„,  „ftened  into  Kalaum,  it  becum  the  far- 
died,  after  a  sbort  ilhic-^,    urisiiig   from  general    name  of  tbe  fauiilj.    Kicobnu  da  BaUton  ii  witaM  tea 


RAMSAY, 


822 


OF  BAMFF. 


li 


I ; 

ii 


ricd  Balfour  of  Balbiruie.  The  two  younger  sons  were  Geurge 
Ramsay  of  Hallhouae  and  Lekbemard,  Alid  Lotliian,  and 
William  Ramsay.  Sir  Alexander  made  an  entail  of  his 
estate,  by  charter,  dated  3d  April  14dG,  in  favour  of  his 
grandson,  Alexander,  and  the  Iieirs  male  of  his  body,  which 
fuUng,  to  his  remaining  sons  in  their  order,  and  the  hcin 
male  of  tiicir  bodies  respectirely. 

The  grandson.  Sir  Alexander  Ramsay  of  Dalhousie,  was  a 
minor  at  the  death  of  iiis  grandfather.  The  baronies  of  Foul- 
den  nnd  Dalhousie  were  confirmed  to  him  by  James  III., 
22d  March,  1473.  lie  was  slain  at  (loddcn  in  September 
1513.  His  son,  Nicol,  who  succeeded  him,  had  a  commis- 
sion of  justicl.'iry  on  Dalhousie,  Kerrington,  and  Foulden,  2d 
Mnv  1542,  and  died  in  1551. 

>iii-ors  son,  George  RHnuuty  of  Dalhousie,  signed  the  bond 
of  association  in  1&C7  for  the  defence  of  James  VI.,  but  on 
the  escape  of  Queen  Mary  from  liochleren  castle,  he  joined 
her  party,  and  entered  into  the  band  at  Hamilton  to  support 
ner  cause,  8th  May  15Cd.  He  died  in  December  1579.  In 
Carr*s  History  of  Culdingliam  Priory,  under  the  head  of 
Foulden  (pngo  158),  it  is  stated  that  he  was  the  last  of  the 
family,  probably  meaning  that  possessed  Foulden,  and  that 
he  died  4th  January  1592,  aged  74.  He  was  buried  in  the 
churchyard  of  Futdden,  where  a  tombstone  bearing  the  hitter 
date,  with  a  quaint  inscription,  marks  his  dust.  His  eldest 
son,  John  Ramsay  of  Dalhousie,  who  succeeded  him,  died  in 
1592,  without  issue.  His  next  brother,  James,  predeceased 
him,  but  Icfl  two  sons,  George,  first  I/)rd  Ramsay,  and  John, 
viscount  of  Haddington  and  earl  of  Hulderness.  The  latter, 
when  Sir  John  Ramsay,  was  the  chief  instrument  in  saving 
the  life  of  James  VI.,  when  attacked  in  Gowrie  house  in 
1600,  (see  Hai>dinotox,  vi^icount  of,  vol.  ii.  p.  894). 

George  Ramsay  of  Didhousie,  the  elder  son,  had  the  bar- 
ony of  Dalhousie,  on  his  own  resignation,  and  the  lordship 
of  Mi'lroso  on  the  resignation  of  his  brother  John,  viscount  of 
Haddington,  erected  into  the  free  b.nrony  of  Melrose,  to  him- 
self and  his  heirs  m.nlo  of  entail,  with  the  title  of  Lord  Ram- 
say of  ^lelrose,  by  charter,  dated  25th  August  1618.  He 
aftcr^vards  obtained  a  letter  from  King  James  VI.,  dated  nt 
Whitehall  5th  January  1619,  ch.onging  the  title  to  Lord  Rani- 
s.iy  of  Dalhousie.  Ho  died  in  1629.  Ho  married,  first, 
Margaret,  dau;:hlcr  and  heiress  of  Sir  George  Douglas  of 
Helcnhill,  brother  of  William,  earl  of  Morton,  and  had,  with 
two  daughters,  a  son,  William,  second  I/}rd  Rams.iy  of  Dal- 
housie, and  first  earl  of  Dalhousie,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  2).  By  a 
second  marriage  he  had  two  sons,  the  Hon.  John  Ramsay 
and  the  Hon.  James  Ramsav. 


A  baronetcy  of  Nova  Scotia  was  conferretl,  3d  Si-jitenibcr 
1625,  on  Gilbert  Ramsay  of  Balmain  and  Fo^qiie  in  Kinc^ir- 
diiieshire,  grandson  of  Sir  John  Ramsay,  knight,  the  page  of 
James  III.,  and  the  only  one  of  his  favourites  not  put  to 
death  at  Lauder  Bridge,  who  w.ms  created  by  that  monarch 
Lord  Bothwell  (see  Botiiwell,,  I^rd,  vol.  1.  p.  353).  Sir 
Alexander,  the  sixth  baronet  of  this  family,  died  11th  Febru- 
ary 1806,  without  issue,  when  his  kinsman  and  heir-at-law, 
Sir  Thomas  ILimsay,  colonel  E.ist  India  Company's  Rorvice, 
became  seventh  baronet.  Sir  Thomas  died  in  1830,  without 
issue,  when  the  title  became  extinct. 

Sir  Alex.inder,  the  sixth  baronet,  had  bequeathed  the 
estates  to  his  nephew,  Alexander  Buniet,  Esq.,  second  son  of 
Sir  Thomas  Burnet  of  I^ys,  baronet,  by  Catherine  R<inis;iy, 
his  sister.  2ilr.  Burnet,  in  consequence,  assumed  by  sign 
manual  the  surname  and  arms  of  Ramsay,  and  was  created 
a  baronet  in  M.iy  1806,  by  the  designation  of  Sir  Alexander 
R.imRay  of  Balmain.    Ho  died  17th  May  1810.    By  his  wife, 


Elizabeth,  daughter  and  oobor  of  Sir  Alexander  Banmnnn 
of  Elsick,  barunet,  he  bad  eight  eoni  and  three  dan^teoL 
The  four  eldest  eons  were,  Sir  Alexander,  aeeond  bannci; 
Thomas,  a  captain  in  the  47th  regiment,  who  waa  twiee  mar- 
ried, with  issue;  Robert,  a  captain  in  the  14th  regiment, 
married,  with  itene ;  and  the  Very  Rer.  Edward  Bamaay, 
dean  of  Edinbuigb,  in  the  Soots  Epiieopal  chureli,  mairied. 
The  eldest  son,  Sir  Alexander,  thud  baronet,  bom  lAih  Feb- 
roary  1785,  waa  twice  married,  and  bad  imne  by  both  mar- 
riages. His  2d  wife  waa  Elizabetli,  2d  danghtar  of  the  lit 
Lord  Panmure.    Sir  Alexander  died  April  26, 1852. 

Sir  Alexander,  the  eldest  eon,  3d  baronet,  bom  May  26, 
1813.  married  Dec.  29,  1835,  Ellen  Alatilda,  eldest  dangfatcr 
of  John  Entwisle,  Esq.  of  Foxholea,  county  of  Lancaster, 
issue,  4  sons  and  a  daughter.  The  eldest  son,  Alexander 
Entwisle,  was  bom  Jatiuaiy  14, 1837. 


A  baronetcy  of  Kova  Scotia  is  also  poesessed  by  the  fiuniiy 
of  ILimsay  of  Bamff,  Perthsliire,  conferred  in  1G66,  on  Sir  Gil' 
bert  Ivamsay,  knight,  grandson  of  George  Ramsay  of  BamC 
descended  from  Adam  de  Ramsav  of  BamfT,  one  of  the  Soottisk 
barons  who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  I.  of  England  in  1296, 
.ind  the  father  of  Alexander  Ramsay,  physician  to  King 
James  and  Charles  I. 

Sir  Gilbert's  son.  Sir  James,  sectmd  baronet,  died  in  1780, 
when  his  eldest  son.  Sir  John,  became  third  baronet  He 
was  succeeded  in  1 738  by  his  eldest  son.  Sir  James,  whose 
eldest  son,  Sir  John,  fifth  baronet,  advocate  and  sheriff  <tf 
Kincardineshire,  died  without  issue.  The  title  then  devolved 
upon  his  brother.  Sir  George,  the  sixth  baronet,  who  fell  in  a 
duel  with  Captain  James  Macrae  of  Holmains  in  April  1790, 
(see  pp.  69,  70  of  this  volume).  The  dispute  between  theni 
arose  out  of  some  insolent  behaviour  which  one  of  Lady  Ram- 
say's footmen  had  offered  to  Captain  Macrae  at  the  Edin- 
burgh theatre,  for  which  that  gentleman  beat  him  severely 
on  the  spot.  This  was  on  the  evening  of  the  7th  ApriL 
The  footman,  James  Merry,  having  on  the  12th  raised  sn 
action  against  him,  the  captain  wrote  to  Sir  George,  insisting 
on  the  prosecution  being  stopped  or  that  the  footman  should 
be  inst.mtly  dismissed.  Sir  George  declined  to  interfere,  and 
a  duel  w.is  the  consequence.  On  the  14th  the  parties  met  at 
^lusselburgh,  when  Sir  George  received  a  wound  of  which  he 
died  on  the  16th.     Captain  Macrae  took  refuge  in  France. 

leaving  no  issue,  Sir  George  was  succeeded  by  his  brother. 
Sir  William,  7th  baronet,  who  died  in  1807.  The  latter  had 
3  sons :  James ;  George ;  and  William,  professor  of  human- 
ity in  the  university  of  Glasgow,  appointed  in  1831.  who 
married  Catlierine,  daughter  of  Professor  Davidson,  of  the 
same  university,  issue,  one  daughter. 

Sir  Jame^,  M.A.,  baronet,  bom  Sep.  26,  1797,  married  in 
182S,  Jane,  only  child  and  heiress  of  John  Hope  Oliphant, 
Esiq.,  first  in  council  of  Prince  of  Wales  Island.  He  died 
without  issue,  Jan.  1,  1859. 

His  brother.  Sir  George,  bom  March  19,  1800,  succeeded 
as  9th  hart.  He  married  in  1830  Emily-Eugenie,  daughter 
of  Henry  I^nnox,  Esq.,  county  Westmeath,  issue,  3 


In  the  reign  of  David  II.,  families  of  the  name  of  Ramssy 
acquired  lands  in  various  parts  of  the  kingdom.  In  Fife 
there  were  the  Ramsiiys  of  Korthbames,  the  Ramssyi  of 
Lumqnhat,  and  the  R.-ims-iys  of  Balbartan ;  in  Forfanhire, 
the  Ramsays  of  Mains ;  and  in  Kincardineshire  the  Ramssjs 
of  Cracknestown. 

One-third  of  the  lordship  of  Uuchars,  in  Fife,  that  to 
which  the  castle  was  attached,  was  conferred  by  Bobeit  IL 
on  Sir  Alexander  Ramsay,  and  to  distinguish  it  fnm  tin 


I'  J 
'    I 

i 


\ 

\ 

\ 


— _J 


RAMSAY, 


324 


ALLAN. 


!  I 


I' 


ground  of  liis  having  rcuoiiuccd  the  Protestant 
religion.  After  his  return  to  Franco  he  resided 
some  time  at  Fontoise,  a  scat  of  the  prince  de 
Tnrenne,  duke  de  Bouillon,  in  whose  family  he 
continued  in  the  capacity  of  intendant  till  his 
death,  which  happened  at  St.  Germain-en-Laye, 
May  6,  1743.  He  was  the  author  of  the  follow- 
ing works : 

Discours  sur  le  PuSme  Epiqne,  prefixed  to  the  hitter  edi- 
tions of  Telemacliua. 

I^  Vie  de  M.  Fenelon,  of  wliicb  there  is  an  English  tnins- 
liition. 

Es&'ii  sur  le  Gonvemement  CiriL  In  English.  London, 
17C9,  8vo. 

Ij6  Psvchometi-e,  on  Reflexions  sur  les  difTercns  Charac- 
teres  de  rKKprit,  par  un  Milord  Angl«)is.  Tliese  are  Remarks 
upon  I^rd  Sliafteabur/s  Characteristics. 

I..es  Voyages  de  Cyrus,  avec  un  Discours  sur  la  Mythologie 
des  Payens.  Parin,  1727,  I'iino.  Jjond.  1728,  2  vol«.  8vo. 
Kt  avec  Additions,  &c.  Und.  1730, 1733,  4to.  In  Englbh. 
I^nd.  1730,  4to.  1739,  12ino.  With  Additions.  Giasgijw, 
1755,  2  vols.  r2mo.  This  is  the  only  Work  by  which  he  is 
much  known  in  tliis  country.  It  is  written  in  hnitution  of 
Telemachus. 

Poems.     Edin.  1728,  4to. 

Plan  of  Education  for  a  Young  Prince.    I^nd.  1732,  8vo. 

I/Histoire  de  M.  Turenne.  Par.  1735,  2  torn.  4to.  llaye, 
1736,  4  torn.  12n)o.     In  English.    I^nd.  1735,  2  vols.  8vo. 

Phiiosopliical  Principles  of  Katuml  and  Revealed  Religion, 
explained  and  uufolded,  in  a  geometrical  order.  Glasgow, 
1749,  2  vols.  4 to.  (posthumous). 

Two  Letters  in  French  to  M.  Racine,  upon  the  True  Sen- 
timents of  Mr.  Pope  in  his  Es^.iy  on  Man.  Printed  in  Les 
(Euvres  de  M.  Racine  le  Fils,  toin.  ii.  1747. 

Puema  Sacra.     Lond.  1753,  8vo. 

RAMSAY,  Allan',  next  to  Bums  the  most  dis- 
tinguished of  the  national  poets  of  Scotland,  was 
born  October  15,  1C8G,  at  Leadhills,  in  the  parish 
of  Crawfordmuir,  in  Lanarkshire.  He  was  gi'cat- 
grandson  of  Captain  John  Ramsay,  a  son  of  Ram- 
say of  Cockpen,  a  branch  of  the  family  of  Ramsay 
of  Dalhousie.  His  grandfather,  Robert  Ramsay, 
a  writer  in  Edinburgh,  and  after  him,  his  father, 
also  named  Robert  Ramsay,  was  superintendent 
of  Lord  Hopetoun^s  lead  mines  at  I^ad-hills, 
and  his  mother,  Alice  Bower,  was  the  daughter 
of  a  gentleman  of  Derbyshire.  His  grandmother, 
Janet  Douglas,  was  a  daughter  of  Douglas  of 
Muthil.  All  the  education  which  he  ever  re- 
ceived was  obtained  at  the  parish  school.  He 
lost  his  father  at  the  early  age  of  twenty- 
five,  and  bis  mother  soon  after  married  Mr. 
Crichton,  a  small  landholder  of  Lanarkshire, 
by  whom  she  had  several  children.  In  1700 
his  mother  died,  and  in  the  following  year  his 


stepfatlier  took  him  into  Edinburgh,  and  bonnd 
him  apprentice  to  a  periwigmaker,  an  occapation 
which  most  of  his  biographers  are  yery  anxious 
to  distinguish  from  that  of  a  barber.  In  those 
days,  however,  from  the  prevalent  fashion  of 
wearing  periwig8,  wig-making  was  a  very  Incratire 
and  liighly  respectable  profession.  Allan  himself, 
it  would  seem,  was  not  ashamed  of  his  trade,  but 
continued  at  it  long  after  his  apprenticeship  had 
terminated.  The  earliest  of  his  poems  wliich  can 
now  be  traced  is  an  epistle  addressed,  in  1712, 
*  To  the  most  happy  members  of  the  Easy  club,* 
a  convivial  society  which,  in  1715,  appointed  him 
their  poet  laureate ;  but  it  was  soon  after  broken 
up  by  the  Rebellion.  In  171C,  while  still  a  wig- 
maker,  Ramsay  published  an  edition  of  James  the 
Fii-st's  poem  of  *  Christ's  Kirk  on  the  Green,'  with 
a  second  canto  by  himself,  to  which,  two  years 
after,  he  added  a  third.  From  the  imprint  of  this 
latter  edition,  it  appears  that  he  had  shortly  be- 
fore abandoned  his  original  occnpation,  and  com- 
menced the  more  congenial  business  of  a  book- 
seller. His  first  shop  was  '^at  the  sign  of  the 
Mercury,  opposite  to  Niddr}''8  Wynd."  In  1721 
he  published  a  collection  of  his  poems,  in  one  vol- 
ume 4to,  which  was  so  liberally  subscribed  for, 
that  he  is  said  to  have  cleared  four  hundred  gui- 
neas by  it.  The  gi-eater  part  of  the  pieces  in  this 
volume  had  previously  api>eared  at  different  times 
in  the  detached  form  of  sheets  or  half-sheets,  at 
one  penny  each,  and  so  popular  had  his  name  be- 
come, that  it  was  quite  customary  for  the  citizens 
of  Edinburgh  to  send  their  children,  with  a  pen- 
ny, for  "  Allan  Ramsay's  last  piece."  In  1724  he 
published  the  first  volume  of  'Tlie  Tea-Table 
Miscellany,*  a  collection  of  songs,  Scottizfh  and 
p]nglish,  which  was  speedily  followed  by  a  second ; 
a  third  volume  appeared  in  1727,  and  a  fourth 
after  another  interval.  This  publication  went 
through  no  less  than  twelve  editions  in  a  few 
years.  The  rapid  sale  of  the  fn-st  volume  induced 
him  in  the  same  year  (1724)  to  bring  out  •  Tlie 
Evergi-een,  being  a  Collection  of  Scots  Poems, 
wrote  by  the  Ingenious  before  1600.'  It  professed 
to  be  chiefly  selected  from  the  Bannatyne  MS., 
and  was  equally  successful.  Ramsay,  who  was  a 
Jacobite  in  principle,  inserted  in  this  publication 
a  poem  of  affected  antiquity,  under  an  assumed 


I         '        ■ . 


■    J-  .V  I 


•I ' 


jj 


- 1 . 


■  ;    ■  I.-   , 


r- 


*i 


RAMSAY, 


825 


ALLAN. 


name,  entitled  '  The  Vision/  Laving  reference  to 
the  Pretender. 

His  next  publication  at  once  established  his 
fame  upon  a  permanent  foundation.  In  1725 
appeared  *  The  Gentle  Shepherd/  a  pastoral  com- 
ed}',  in  five  acta — the  best  poem  of  its  kind,  per- 
haps, in  anj  language.  In  1721  he  had  published 
an  eclogue,  under  the  title  of  *  Patie  and  Roger,' 
and  in  1723  a  sequel  under  that  of  '  Jenny  and 
Maggie.'  The  public  approbation  of  these  de- 
tached scenes  encouraged  him  to  make  them  the 
groundwork  of  the  complete  drama  called  ^  The 
Gentle  Shepherd,'  the  success  of  which  was  in- 
stantaneous and  unprecedented.  Edition  rapidly 
followed  edition,  and  in  a  few  years  it  was  known 
to  every  admirer  of  poetiy  in  the  three  kingdoms, 
and  had  secured  a  welcome  place  in  almost  ev- 
ery cottage  in  Scotland.  The  great  popularity  of 
Gay's  '  Beggar's  Opera,'  not  long  after,  induced 
Ramsay  to  print  a  new  edition  of  *  The  Gentle 
Shepherd,'  with  songs  abundantly  interspersed, 
adapted  to  popular  Scottish  aii*s,  and  these  it  has 
ever  since  retained. 

In  1726  he  removed  to  a  house  at  the  east  end 
of  the  Luckenbooths,  afterwards  occupied  by 
Creech  the  bookseller,  and  instead  of  Mercury, 
adopted  for  his  sign  the  heads  of  Ben  Jonson  and 
Drummond  of  Ilawthoniden.  Ramsay  is  said  to 
have  been  the  fii*st  who  established  a  circulating 
library  in  Scotland.  After  his  death,  it  passed 
into  the  hands  of  Mr.  Sibbald,  and  subsequently 
into  those  of  ^Ir.  Mackay,  by  whose  respective 
additions  it  was  rendered  the  most  extensive 
establishment  of  the  kind,  perhaps,  in  Britain. 

In  1728  a  second  quarto  volume  of  his  poems 
appeared,  and  was  reprinted  in  8vo  during  the 
same  year.  In  1730  he  published  his  *  Thirty 
Fables,'  undoubtedly  the  best  of  his  minor  pro- 
ductions. Among  them  is  *The  Monk  and  the 
Miller's  Wife,'  a  story  which,  though  previously 
told  by  Dunbar,  "  would  of  itself,"  as  a  compe- 
tent critic  has  remarked,  "be  Ramsay's  passport 
to  immortality  as  a  poet."  With  these  he  seems 
to  have  concluded  his  poetic  labours.  "I  e'en 
gave  over  in  good  time,"  he  says  in  a  letter  to 
Smibert,  the  painter,  "  before  the  coolness  of  f m- 
cv  that  attends  advanced  yeai-s  should  make  me 
risk  the  reputation  I  have  acquired."    His  fame 


had  now  extended  beyond  the  limits  of  his  native 
country.  An  edition  of  his  poems  was  published 
by  the  London  booksellers  in  1731,  and  another 
appeared  at  Dublin  in  1733.  His  acquaintance 
was  courted  by  the  rich  and  the  noble,  and  his 
shop  was  the  usual  resort  of  the  literaiy  charac- 
ters and  wits  of  Edinburgh.  His  intercourse  with 
contemporary  poets  was  pretty  extensive.  Ham- 
ilton of  Bangour,  Hamilton  of  Gilbertfield,  Gay, 
and  others,  were  among  the  number  of  his  friends, 
and  he  addressed  verses  to  Pope  and  Somerville, 
author  of  *  The  Chase,'  the  latter  of  whom  return- 
ed his  poetical  gi-eetings  in  two  epistles. 

In  1736  his  passion  for  the  drama  and  enter- 
prising spirit  prompted  him  to  erect  a  new  theatre 
in  Carrubber's  Close ;  but  in  the  ensuing  year  the 
act  for  licensing  the  stage  was  passed,  and  the 
magistrates  ordered  the  house  to  bo  shut  up.  By 
this  speculation  ho  lost  a  good  deal  of  money ; 
and  it  is  remarked  by  his  biographers,  that  this 
was,  perhaps,  the  only  nnfortnnate  project  in 
which  he  ever  engaged.  In  1743  he  lost  his  wife, 
Christian  Ross,  daughter  of  a  writer  in  Edinburgh, 
whom  ho  had  married  in  1712,  and  who  left  him 
a  son  and  three  grown-up  daughters,  out  of  seven 
children  she  had  bonie  to  him.  Soon  after  her 
death,  with  the  view  of  spending  his  days  in  dig- 
nified retirement,  he  erected  a  house  on  the  north 
side  of  the  Castlehill,  commanding  a  magnificent 
view,  though  now  intercepted  by  the  houses  of 
the  New  Town  of  Edinburgh.  The  mansion  it- 
self, however,  is  built  in  rather  a  whimsical  style 
of  architecture.  Here  he  spent  the  last  twelve 
years  of  his  life,  although  he  did  not  give  up  his 
shop  until  1755,  three  years  before  his  decease, 
lie  died  January  7,  1758,  aged  72,  and  was  bur- 
ied in  the  Greyfriars'  churchyai'd,  where  a  monu- 
ment was,  after  the  lapse  of  more  than  half  a 
century,  erected  to  his  memory.  Allan  Ramsay's 
works  are : 

Christ's  Kirk  on  the  Green.  With  a  second  Canto  by 
Rnin8;ij.  Eiiin.  1716,  8vo.  In  3  Cantos,  the  third  also  by 
lUmsay.     Edin.  1718.     Fifth  edition,  1722. 

Scots  Songs.     E(iin.  1718,  8vo.     Second  edition,  1719. 

Klegien  on  Mn^gie  Johnston,  John  Cowper,  and  Lucky 
Wooti.     Edin.  1718,  8vo. 

Many  of  his  Poems  were  originally  published  at  Edin- 
burgh in  separate  forms.  They  were  afterwanis  collected  and 
printed  in  one  volume,  with  a  portrait  of  the  author  by 
Smibert.     Edin.  1721,  4to. 


RAMSAY, 


826 


JAMES. 


Tnrtana;  or  the  PUid.    Edin.  1721,  8vo. 

Fables  and  Tales.    Edin.  1722. 

Tale  of  Tliree  Bonnets.    Edin.  1722. 

Fair  Assembly.    Edin.  1723. 

Health;  a  Poem.    Edin.  1724. 

The  Tea  Table  Miscellany ;  a  Collection  of  the  most  Choice 
Sonp,  Scottish  and  English.  Edinborgh,  1724,  24mo.  The 
2d  volume  appeared  soon  after;  the  8d  volume  in  1727,  and 
the  4th  at  I^ndon  in  1740.  A  pirated  edition  of  the  three 
volumes  then  ready  was  published  at  Dublin  in  1729,  8  vols, 
in  one,  12mo,  pp.  334,  printed  for  E.  Smith.  On  the  publi- 
cation of  the  9th  edition  in  1732,  Ramsay,  as  we  learn  from 
a  contribution  of  Mr.  Peter  Cunningham  to  the  Gentleman*s 
^fagnzine  for  April  1853,  addressed  a  letter,  dated  13tli  July 
of  that  year,  to  Mr.  Andrew  Millar,  the  London  publisher,  in 
which  he  granted  him  permission  to  print  the  three  volumes 
of  the  Tea  Table  Miscellany  then  published,  in  what  form  he 
]>leased,  on  pnrmcnt  to  him  of  five  pounds  sterling  at  Mar- 
tinmas following.  He  also  empowered  Mr.  Millar  to  take  up 
fur  him  five  guineas  from  the  printers  of  his  poems,  the  un- 
piiid  moiety  as  agreed  on  between  them  and  Mr.  M'Ewen, 
who  had  instructions  from  him  to  transact  with  them,  and 
to  whom  they  paid  the  first  moiety.  Tlie  letter  was  taken 
by  his  son,  Mr.  Allan  Ramsay,  the  celebrated  painter,  and 
ho  added  in  a  postscript :  **  My  son  brings  you  this,  if  he  ap- 
proves of  it.  If  we  agree,  I  desiro  that  you  send  none  to 
this  country — it  is  scarce  worth  your  while.**  This,  says 
Mr.  Cunningham,  relates  to  the  ninth  edition  of  the  first  col- 
lected edition  of  the  Tea  Tnble  MiscelLnny,  that  in  three  thin 
duodedmo  volumes,  printed  for  Andrew  Millar  in  1783,  and 
called  "  the  ninth  ediUon,  being  the  compleatest  and  most 
correct  of  any  yet  published  by  Allan  Ramsay.**  The  tenth 
edition  appeared  in  1740,  with  the  addition  of  150  songs. 
The  eleventh  edition  was  published  at  London,  four  volumes 
in  one,  12mo,  1750.    The  18th  at  Edinburgh  in  1792. 

The  Evergreen ;  being  a  Collection  of  Scots  Poems  wrote 
by  the  Ingenious  before  ICOO.  Edin.  1724,  2  vols.  12mo. 
Edin.  1761,  2  vols.  12mo. 

A  Scots  Ode  to  the  British  Antiquarians.  Edin.  1726, 8vo. 

The  Gentle  Shepherd;  a  Pastoral  Comedy.  Edin.  1725, 
8vo.  The  same,  with  a  Glossary,  published  by  DaNid  Allan, 
Glasgow,  by  Foulis,  1788,  4to.  Again,  with  Illustrations  of 
the  Scenery;  an  Appendix,  containing  Memoirs  of  David 
Allan,  the  Scots  Hogarth ;  besides  original  and  other  Poems 
connected  with  the  Illustrations ;  and  a  comprehensive  Glos- 
sary. To  which  are  prefixed,  an  authentic  Life  of  Allan 
Ramsay;  and  an  Inquiry  into  the  Origin  of  Pastoral  Poetr}*; 
the  propriety  of  the  Rules  prescribed  for  it ;  and  the  Practice 
of  Ramsay.  Edin.  1808,  2  vols.  8vo.  The  editions  which 
this  admirable  Pastoral  has  gone  through  are  very  numerous, 
but  the  above  are  the  best.  It  has  been  translated  into  Eng- 
lish by  Cornelius  Vanderstop.  Lond.  1777,  8vo.  By  Wil- 
liam Ward.  Lond.  1785,  8vo.  And  by  Margaret  Turner. 
I^nd.  1790,  8vo. 

Collection  of  Scotch  Proverbs,  more  correct  and  complete 
than  a^  hitherfore  published ;  to  which  are  added,  the  Tales 
of  the  'fhree  Bonnets.    Edin.  1776, 1797,  12mo. 

Poems,  including  the  Gentle  Shepherd.  Edin.  1720, 172-1, 
2  vols.  12mo.  Poems  (subscription  edition).  Edin.  1721, 
1728,  2  vols.  4to,  and  many  subsequent  editions.  The  fol- 
lowing are  the  most  valuable  and  perfect, — Poems ;  to  which 
are  prefixed,  a  Life  of  the  Author,  from  authentic  documents, 
and  Remarks  on  his  Poems,  by  George  Chalmers,  Esq., 
F.R.S.  I-.ond.  1800,  2  vols.  8vo.  The  works  of  Alhin  Ram- 
say, with  Life  of  the  author,  by  Georgo  Chalmers ;  and  an 
Essay  on  his  genius  and  writings  by  Lord  Woodhousolec ; 


an  appendix  and  additional  pieces,  portnit,  and  Tttimii 
illnstntlons.    8  vda.    Edia.  Follarton  &  Co.  1848-1861. 

RAMSAY,  Allan,  an  eminent  portrait  paint- 
er, eldest  son  of  the  preceding,  was  bom  at  Edin- 
burgh in  1713.  Having  shown  an  early  attach- 
ment to  art,  after  receiving  some  instructions  in 
London,  ho  went  to  Italy,  wliere  he  studied  under 
artists  of  great  celebrity.  On  his  return  he  prac- 
tised for  some  time  in  Edinburgh,  but  afterwards 
resided  chiefly  in  London,  where  ho  acqmred  con- 
siderable reputation  as  a  portrait  painter.  By 
the  interest  of  Lord  Bute  he  was  introduced  to 
George  III.,  when  pnnce  of  Wales,  whose  por- 
trait he  painted  both  in  whole  length  and  in  pro- 
flic,  the  former  being  engraved  by  Ryland  and 
the  latter  by  Woollett.  Several  mezzotinto  prints 
were  also  published  after  poi-traits  by  him,  of  sev- 
eral of  tlie  most  distinguished  of  his  own  country- 
men. In  Mai*ch  1767  he  was  appointed  principal 
painter  to  the  king ;  a  situation  which  he  retained 
till  his  death,  though  he  retired  from  practice 
about  1775,  in  consequence  of  having  injured  his 
arm  bv  an  accident.    He  visited  Rome  at  four 

if 

dificreut  times,  and  on  the  last  occasion  he  spent 
several  vcnrs  in  Italv.  Finding  his  health  decline 
he  rctunied  to  England,  but  died,  a  few  days  af- 
ter landing,  at  Dover,  August  10,  1784.  His 
portraits  are  celebrated  for  their  resemblance  to 
nature,  and  their  unstudied  simplicity;  and  he 
himself  Is  described  as  having  contributed  to  im- 
prove the  style  of  portrait  painting  in  Great  Bri- 
tain. 

llamsay  possessed  considerable  literary  taste, 
and  was  the  founder  of  the  "  Select  Society"  of 
Edinburgh  in  1754,  of  which  all  the  eminently 
learned  men  of  that  capital  were  membei-s.  Ho 
was  the  author  of  some  able  pamphlets  on  histoiy, 
politics,  and  criticism,  published  at  difierent  times, 
but  aftein^-ards  collected  into  a  volume,  entitled 
*Tiie  Investigator.*  lie  also  wrote  a  pamphlet 
on  the  subject  of  Elizabeth  Canning.  He  was  an 
excellent  classical  scholar ;  spoke  the  Italian  and 
German  languages  fluently,  and,  like  Cato,  learn- 
ed Greek  in  his  old  age.  He  Is  frequently  men- 
tioned by  Boswcll  as  being  of  Dr.  Johnson^s  par- 
ties. He  niaiTled  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of 
Sir  Alexander  Lindsay  of  Evellck,  baronet,  a 
niece  of  Lord  ^lansfield,  by  whom  he  had  a  son, 


\ 


RAMSAY. 


327 


RANDOLPH. 


John,  who  attained  the  rank  of  major-general  in 
tbo  army,  and  two  daughters,  Amelia,  married  to 
Sir  Archibald  Campbell  of  Inverness,  and  Char- 
lotte, who  became  the  wife  of  Colonel  Malcolm  of 
Ford  Farm,  Surrey. 

RAMSAY,  James,  an  eminent  philanthropist, 
and  one  of  the  first  who  wrote  against  the  slave 
trade,  was  bom  at  Frascrburgli,  Aberdeenshire, 
Jnly  26,  1733.    After  receiving  his  grammatical 
edacation,  he  was  apprenticed  to  Dr.  Findlay,  a 
medical  practitioner  in  his  native  town,  and  in 
1 760  entered  as  a  student  of  King's  college,  Aber- 
deen, where  he  obtained  one  of  the  principal  bur- 
saries.   In  1756  he  repaired  to  London,  and  stud- 
ied surgery  and  pharmacy  under  Dr.  Macauly,  in 
'ivhoso  family  he  lived  for  two  years.    Ho  after- 
"wards  obtained  an  appointment  as  surgeon  in  the 
royal  navy,  in  which  he  served  for  several  years. 
While  on  board  the  Arundel  he  unfortunately  fell 
on  the  deck  and  broke  his  thigh-bone,  by  which 
lie  was  confined  for  ten  months,  and  rendered 
lame  for  life.    This  accident  determined  him  to 
Quit  the  navy,  and  turn  his  thoughts  towards  be- 
ooming  a  minister  of  the  church  of  England.    Ac- 
oordingly,  while  the  Arundel  lay  at  St.  Christo- 
pher's, he  obtained,  from  some  of  the  principal 
inhabitants,  strong  recommendations  to  the  bishop 
of  London,  by  whom,  on  his  coming  to  England, 
lie  was  admitted  into  holy  orders.    Returning  to 
St.  Christopher's,  he  was  presented  by  the  gover- 
nor to  two  rectories,  valued  at  £700  a-year.    In 
1763  he  man-ied  Rebecca  Akers,  the  daughter  of 
a  planter  of  high  respectability. 

On  his  first  settlement  in  the  West  Indies  he 
mnde  some  public  attempts  to  instruct  the  slaves ; 
which,  however,  were  misunderstood  and  misre- 
presented ;  and,  in  addition  to  nis  clerical  duties, 
he  took  the  charge  of  several  plantations  in  the 
capacity  of  medical  adviser.    In  1777  he  returned 
to  Britain,  and  visited  his  native  place.    In  the 
following  year  he  was  appointed  chaplain  to  Ad- 
miral Harrington,  then  about  to  proceed  to  the 
West  Indies.     He  resigned  his  pastoral  charge  in 
the  island  of  St.  Christopher's,  and  retunied  to 
England  with  his  wife  and  family  in  the  end  of 
1781.     On  his  arrival  he  was,  through  the  inter- 
eat  of  his  friend  Admiral  Sir  Charles  Middleton, 
Iirescnted  to  the  livings  of  Teston  and  Nettlcstead 


in  Kent.  In  1786  he  published  an  *  Essay  on  the 
Treatment  and  Conversion  of  African  Slaves  in 
the  British  Sugar  Colonies,*  which  involved  him 
in  a  controversy  on  the  slave  trade  that  embit- 
tered his  latter  years.  He  died  at  London,  Jnly 
20,  1789.    His  works  are : 

Sermon  on  Dent  xxzii.  29,  30.    1778,  4to. 
Twelve  Sermons  for  the  use  of  the  Royal  Navy.  1782,  8vo. 
An  Essay  on  the  Treatment  and  Conversion  of  African 
Slaves  in  the  British  Sugar  Colonies.     Tendon,  1785,  8to. 
A  Manual  for  African  Slaves.    Lond.  1787,  12mo. 
Essay  on  the  Duty  and  Qualifications  of  a  Sea-officer. 
A  Treatise  on  Signals. 

RANDOLPH,  earl  of  Moray,  one  of  the  chief 
companions  in  arms  of  Robert  the  Bruce,  and 
afterwards  regent  of  Scotland,  was  the  son  of 
Thomas  Randolph,  lord  of  Strathnith,  and  lord- 
liigh-chamberlain  of  Scotland,  (see  p.  200  of  this 
volume).     T}*tler,    apparently   not  aware   that 
Sti*athnith  or  Stranith  was  the  original  name  of 
Nithsdale,  erroneously  styles  him  lord  of  Strath- 
don,  a  district  in  Aberdeenshire,  with  which  he 
had  no  connection  whatever.    Randolph's  mother 
was  the  Lady  Isabella  Brnce,  eldest  daughter  of 
Robert  carl  of  Carrick,  and  sister  of  the  conqueroi 
at  Bannockbum.    We  first  find  him  in  public  life 
present  with  his  father  on  the  26th  December 
1292,  when  Ballol  did  homage  to  King  Edward  I. 
of  England.    After  the  murder  of  the  Red  Comyn, 
in  February  1305,  Randolph  was  among  the  small 
band  of  patriotic  barons  who  hastened  to  join  his 
uncle,  Robert  the  Brace,  in  his  attempt  to  obtain 
the  crown.    In  the  defeat  at  Methven,  in  June 
1306,  Sir  Thomas  Randolph,  then,  says  Barbour, 
"a  young  bacheler,"  was  among  the  prisoners 
taken  by  the  English.    Through  the  intercession  . 
of  Adam  de  Gordon  he  obtained  a  pardon  from 
King  Edward,  to  whom  he  swore  fealty,  and  at 
once  joined  his  forces  against  his  uncle.    *'  What 
was  the  pnvate  history  of  this  alienation,"  says 
Tytler,  **  it  is  now  impossible  to  ascertain,  but  it 
is  evident  that  he  was  animated  by  a  very  deter- 
mined spirit  of  hostility  to  the  royal  cause."    Ho 
was  in  the  army  of  the  earl  of  Pembroke  when, 
with  John  of  Lorn,  that  nobleman  attacked  the 
small  force  of  Bruce  in  his  retreat  in  Carrick,  and 
forced  it  to  disperse  and  seek  safety  in  flight.  The 
following  year  he  xvns  taken  prisoner  by  the  good 
Sir  James  Douglas  in  Tweeddale,  and  conducted. 


U^ 


RANDOLPH, 


3i'8 


EARL  OF  MORAY. 


with  Stewart  of  Boiikyl,  also  a  prisoner,  to  tlie 
king.    Witli  Adam  de  Gordon,  and  two  otlicr 
barons  in  tlic  English  interest,  tli oy  had  led  a 
strong  force  into  Scotland,  and  occnpicd  a  fortalice 
situated  on  the  water  of  Line,  which  Joins  the 
Tweed  a  little  above  the  town  of  Peebles,  but  the 
place  was  attacked  by  Douglas  during  night,  and 
after  abloodystnigglc,  Randolph  and  Stewart  were 
made  prisoners,  while  Gordon    and  the  others 
escaped.    AVhen  Randolph  was  brought  into  the 
presence  of  his  royal  uncle,  the  following  conver- 
sation, as  we  learn  from  Barbour  (pp.  188,  189), 
took  place  between  them.     "  Nephew,"  said  the 
king,  **  thou  hast  for  a  while  forawoni  thine  alle- 
giance, but  we  must  now  be  reconciled.'*    *'Thon 
meanest  to  rebuke  me,"  replied  Randolph,  haugh- 
tily, *^  but  the  rebuke  applies  with  more  force  to 
thyself.    Since  thou  hast  chosen  to  make  war 
upon  the  king  of  England,  it  became  thee  to  sup- 
port thy  title  on  a  plain  field,  and  after  the  fash- 
ion of  a  brave  monarch,  instead  of  having  recourse 
to  subtle  and  cowardly  ambuscades."    ^'Snch  a 
contest,"  Bruce  calmly  replied,  "must  yet  arrive, 
and  perchance  it  is  not  far  distant.    In  the  mean- 
time it  is  fitting  that  thy  proud  words  and  nide 
demeanour  should  bo  punished  as  they  deserve, 
till  thou  hast  been  taught  to  bow  to  my  right,  and 
to  understand  thine  own  duty."    lie  then  ordered 
him  into  close  confinement.     On  due  submission, 
he  was  soon,  however,  pardoned,  and  restored  to 
his  uncle*s  favour,  and  ever  after  continued  stcadv 
in  his  attachment  to  the  national  cause.     By  his 
faithful  sorviccs  and  the  high  capacity  for  com- 
mand which  he  displayed,  it  was  not  long  befoi'e 
he  acquired  the  complete  confidence  of  the  king, 
who  bestowed  on  him  the  district  of  Annandale, 
with  the  Isle  of  Man,  and  various  baronies  in  dif- 
ferent parts  of  the  kingdom.    Bruce  also  conferred 
upon  him  tlie  earldom  of  Moray,  and  the  charter 
conveying  it  to  him  fonns  the  basis  of  the  Essay 
on  Honour  and  Dignity  by  Lord  Kamos.     It  has 
no  date,  as  was  usual  with  charters  in  those  days, 
but  is  supposed  to  have  been  granted  in  1312.    In 
failure  of  heirs  male,  the  earldom  was  to  return  to 
the  king  and  his  heirs. 

On  the  14th  I^Iarch  1313,  the  earl  of  liloray 
took  by  assault  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  which 
had  been  in  possession  of  the  English  since  1296. 


This  celebrated  fortress,  which  before  the  inven- 
tion of  artillery  was  deemed  impregnable,  wu 
then  commanded  by  Sir  Piers  Leiand,  a  knight  of 
Gascony,  in  the  service  of  the  king  of  EngUnd. 
The  garrison  was  strong,  well  disciplined,  asd 
resolute,  and  Randolph  endeavoured  at  first  to 
rednce  the  place  by  famine.    But,  finding  it  well 
provisioned,  he  opened  a  communication  with  the 
governor,  and  the  garrison,  snspecting  the  fidelity 
of  the  latter,  deposed  and  imprisoned  bim,  and 
chose  another  commander  in  his  place.    Randolph 
then  I'esolved  upon  attempting  to  take  the  castle 
by  surprise.    Among  his  followers  was  a  soldier 
named  William  Frank  or  Francis,  who  appesn 
to  have  been  at  a  foimer  period  in  the  English 
ser\'ice.     This  man,  whom  Barl)our  designates 
*'  wycht  and  apert,  wyss,  and  curyuss,"  that  is, 
strong,  active,  prudent,  and  skilful,  was  well  tc- 
qnainted  with  the  castle  rock,  which  he  had  often 
scaled  in  his  youth,  while  engaged  in  a  love-afikir 
in  the  city.     One  day,  when  Randolph  was  sur- 
veying the  castle  from  below,  he  came  to  him,  and 
thus  addressed  him:  ^^Methinks,  my  lord,  yon 
would  rejoice  if  some  one  were  to  devise  some 
means  of  putting  this  fortress  into  your  posses- 
sion, or  show  you  how  the  walls  could  be  scaled." 
"  Thou  sayest  truly,"  replied  the  earl,  "  and  conld 
such  a  man  be  found,  I  pledge  myself  that  his 
services  shall  be  amply  rewarded,  not  only  by  me, 
but  by  my  royal  uncle."    "  The  generosity  of  the 
king  and  of  thyself,  noble  Randolph,"  said  the  sol- 
dier, **is  well  known,  but  the  love  of  countiy 
should  be   above  such  a  consideration.     Know 
that  I  can  enable  vou  to  enter  the  castle  with  no 
greater  aid  than  what  a  twelve  feet  ladder  afibrdfl. 
If  you  wish  to  know  how  this  can  be  done,  I  shall 
explain  it  in  a  few  words.    Know,  then,  that  my 
father  in  my  youth  was  keeper  of  yonder  fortress, 
and  that  I,  thou  a  wild  gallant,  loved  a  certain 
maid  in  the  town  beneath.    That  I  might  repau' 
to  her  when  I  pleased,  I  was  wont  to  lower  my- 
self from  yonder  wall  by  night  with  the  help  of  a 
ladder  of  ropes  which  I  procured  for  the  purpose, 
and  by  a  secret  path  which  I  discovered,  descend- 
ed, returning  by  the  same  way  unperccived  by 
the  garrison.    I  did  this  so  often  that  I  coald 
find  my  way  in  the  darkest  night.     If,  therefore, 
you  should  think  of  trying  to  obtain  access  to  tl>e 


1 


RANDOLPH, 


830 


EARL  OF  MORAY. 


I J 


When  the  Iriish  of  Ulster  tho  same  year  offered 
Edward  Bnico  tlio  crown  of  Ireland,  Randolph 
nccompanied  him  to  that  country,  as  principal 
leader  of  the  6,000  Scots  troops  which  his  bro- 
ther, King  Robert,  sent  along  with  him.  Em- 
barking at  Ayr,  they  landed  at  Carrickfergns  on 
the  25th  of  ^lay,  and  when  attacked  soon  after  by 
a  body  of  English  and  Irish,  Randolph,  who  com- 
manded the  advance,  charged  them  with  such 
impetuosity  that  they  were  speedily  put  to  flight. 
Ho  continued  with  Edward  Bruce  in  all  the  re- 
markable successes  which  attended  him  in  the  first 
part  of  the  campaign  in  Ireland.  On  the  29th 
June  Dundalk  was  stormed  and  burnt.  Ather- 
dec  and  other  places  of  less  note  experienced  a 
similar  fate.  After  tho  battle  of  Coleraine,  in 
which  the  English  were  defeated,  Randolph  on 
the  15th  September  passed  over  to  Scotland  for 
the  purpose  of  obtaining  a  reinforcement,  and  in 
three  months  he  i-etnrned  with  a  select  body  of 
500  men  at  arms.  He  found  Edward  Bruce  en- 
gaged in  pressing  the  siege  of  Can-ickfergus,  but 
on  being  rejoined  by  Randolph  ho  abandoned  it, 
and  marching  southward  by  Dundalk,  they  pen- 
etrated through  Mcnth  into  Kildare.  At  Aracoll, 
in  tho  province  of  T>einster,  they  encountered 
Butler,  the  lord  justiciary,  whose  army,  although 
superior  in  numbci*8,  was  enfeebled  by  discord, 
and  was  broken  and  defeated  at  the  first  onset. 

The  Scots  now  became  a  prey  to  famine,  and 
dreading  its  effects  amongst  their  followers,  Ran- 
dolph and  Edward  Bruce  broke  up  their  encamp- 
ment, and  i*etreatod  through  Meath  into  Ulster. 
On  arriving  near  Kenlis,  they  were  met  by  a  large 
and  tumultuary  force  of  English  and  Irish,  which 
attempted  to  intercept  their  progress.  At  the 
fii-st  attack,  however,  they  were  put  to  flight. 
In  April  1316,  Randolph  again  proceeded  to  Scot- 
land for  reinforcements,  and  in  the  spring  of  the 
following  year,  King  Robert  tho  Bruce,  at  his  so- 
licitation, accompanied  him  in  person  to  Ireland, 
to  the  assistance  of  his  brother.  Soon  after  his 
arrival,  an  Anglo-Irish  army,  40,000  strong,  un- 
der the  command  of  Sir  Richard  Clare  and  other 
barons,  was  defeated  by  him,  while  passing 
through  a  wood  near  Carrickfergns,  Randolph  with 
himself  leading  the  Scots  rearward.  King  Robert, 
the  same  year  returned  to  Scotland,  taking  Ran- 


dolph with  him.  The  deatli  of  Edward  Bmce  in 
the  disastrous  battle  of  Dnndalk,  October  6, 1817, 
rendered  a  new  settlement  of  the  snccession  to  the 
crown  of  Scotland  necessary,  and  at  a  paiiiament 
held  at  Scone  in  December  1318,  the  offices  of 
tutor  and  curator  of  the  heir,  if  nnder  age,  and 
guardian  of  tho  kingdom,  were  granted  to  Sir 
Tliomas  Randolph,  earl  of  Moray  and  lord  of 
Man,  and  failing  him  to  Lord  James  of  Douglas. 

A  short  time  previous  to  this,  the  town  of  Ber- 
wick had  been  taken  by  the  Scots.  Barbonr  gires 
this  account  of  its  capture.  A  citizen  of  the  town 
named  Spalding,  having  been  harshly  treated  by 
the  governor,  vrrote  to  a  nobleman  in  Bmce^s 
camp,  supposed  to  have  been  Patrick  earl  of 
March,  offering  to  betray  at  night  the  post  where 
he  kept  guanl.  Tlic  earl  communicated  Spaldmg's 
offer  to  King  Robert,  and  was  commended  by  the 
king  for  having  come  direct  to  himself,  instead  of 
going  to  Randolph  or  Douglas,  as  these  two  chiefs 
were  emulous  of  each  other's  glory.  "  You  did 
well,"  said  Bruce,  "  to  make  me  your  confident, 
for  if  you  had  told  this  either  to  Randolph  or  to 
Douglas,  you  would  have  offended  the  one  to 
whom  yon  did  not  at  first  tell  it.  Both  of  them, 
however,  shall  assist  you  in  executing  the  enter- 
prise." Bruce  then  commanded  him  to  assemble 
a  body  of  troops  at  a  place  called  Dunse  Park, 
and  gave  separate  orders  to  Randolph  and  Doug- 
las to  meet  the  earl  at  the  same  place.  At  a  part 
of  the  wall  left  unguarded,  a  portion  of  the  Scots 
entered  the  town,  and  concealed  themselves  till 
daydawn,  when,  aided  by  their  comrades  without 
the  walls,  they  were  masters  of  the  town  before 
the  hour  of  noon.  The  castle  soon  after  capitu- 
lated. 

On  the  investment  of  Berwick  in  September  of 
the  following  year  by  Edward  II.,  at  the  head  of 
the  whole  English  force,  Bruce  sent  Randolph 
and  Douglas,  at  the  head  of  an  arm}'  of  15,000 
men,  across  the  bonlers,  with  the  object  of  com- 
pelling Edward  to  raise  the  siege.  They  entered 
England  by  the  west  marches,  and  penetratui; 
into  Yorkshire,  ravaged  all  the  districts  throagh 
which  they  passed.  The  whole  of  the  military 
strength  of  England  was  at  this  time  with  Ed- 
ward before  Berwick,  but  tho  archbishop  of  York, 
at  the  head  of  an  undisciplined  force  of  about 


\ 


"  •.  TJT 


F  HORAT. 


•  --rra  ::t2t-  -.iifsHT  -rrr  raer  ^amp.  and  •: 
jct^fa  ■'^jfn  .iT    i  Toer  Tear,  tb 

—1         linni    3iS    mjirrVToz  "act  ±as  dii^ 
ii    -^fSTF-i     XT    :  \:!  .jzxoa.     rie  .Tsvic  vai 


.1  -  .1 


V  :_. 


■\  . 


'  •    • 


t  zi  .'.aric  3rxcs.  Rja- 

i    '—re.      '".  i:e  inthuf 

■r:r:usce  "r::a  ±e  JCS  of 

•^.:?2r-    xd   ^!3iTXim  of 

1   .L-   ::ir:2:r  :-=  aiaorrzr. 

-:  iZLsti:  T-::ii  ^ii  rls- 
'  "??r:mr:.s  i  'Ly^  Jicenui 
:_=:-     Hr  ^roa  rnrrt  ji  the 

r.zi^z — :.      It'  ::i4J  rn}  In- 

-  ■  ■::_-   TT*  ^linztHi  :^r  i 

-  :•.■■»■• .'  ir:::^  t-xiL  Vti 
:   -TT"?!'.-:  "r-?rf.  if  ae  rr- 

.    li"  r^  :-=n  xsritir.    la 

-.    ::: ;   t.c!!   bs^teaic^  to 
.  ?-    ::.  2  r-:ai  lie  j:*?{w  for 

.  ..ii  -:r"  i'f<:renc nocioDS 
•.  a^:  "*»'^r£I»?*<  of  popeor 
■  • .  - 1  :'  l;-*  2:  zr^Urer  thit 
;:-•:<-.  Ti?  :"e  5uljectof 


1 


.    •      "        ..'■''...     i   ■     i-  .'■.:■.    ::.-.:  -i  7=^:7. ire-I  :o  invade  Scot- 

•^ -■    ■   -  '     ■        /    .  .    ..    /     '  .'  .  ,         ■»      -    ^..-. .        .  :_.i^i  iLca  snffonngM- 

:^.  «..";   r,;    I':  .•.-.;..  y>   -  ,  '•/:::....  ;.;    v  f-  -   :  .^  '::i-.  ii^c^ibled  an  armr,  and 

•■\\V  l.:i^«   'Jr.  .w.    ..v,'J.     i.'wr;.;.wt,    ^r,...  -.^.,:..:;     ■:..:,    Ikr^^^LIr*    to    or|K)?C    tliem. 

more."     Ai  il.i^.  M;iy«-,  Jf:ii!'!/,l;.|,  A-^n.u  i-.tr-  ^  h'rA'.j.'j;.  l.owcver.  xl^ai  tUy  were  coming  bj  «ci, 


REAY, 


388 


LORD. 


needed  towards  the  Forth,  but  died  at 
jargh,  on  the  20th  July  of  that  year.  The 
lat  the  English  king  had  employed  a  va- 
nonk  to  poison  iiim,  has  been  shown  by 
ailes  to  be  a  pure  iuventiou. 

LVT,  A  surname,  see  Supplement. 


Lord,  A  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  conferred 

on  Sir  Donald  Mnckay  of  Fur,  baronet,  the  elder 
[acheon  or  Hugh  Mackav,  by  liis  second  wife,  I^dy 
don,  eldest  daugbter  of  tlie  eleventh  enrl  of  Sutber- 
e  p.  7  of  this  volume).  He  was  bom  in  February 
1  in  1612,  in  bis  fatber's  lifetime,  was  engaged,  un- 
mmission  from  the  king  to  bim  and  John  Gordon, 
of  Embo,  In  arresting  at  Thurso  a  notorious  coiner 
irtbur  Smith,  a  servant  of  the  wicked  earl  of  Caith- 
m  a  tumult  ensued  in  which  Jolm  Sinclair  of  Strick- 
epbew  of  the  latter,  was  killed.  The  matter  was 
before  the  privy  council,  on  the  complaint  of  both 
md  the  proceedings  that  took  place  thereupon  are 
t  pngc  523  of  vol.  i.      lu  December  1613  Donald 

with  others  concerned,  obtained  a  remission  and 
)r  their  share  in  tlie  transaction.     He  succeeded  bis 

1G14,  and  in  1G16  was  knighted  at  TheobaId*8  by 
nes  VI.  I>elievinp  himself  to  have  been  ill  used  by 
a  Sir  Robert  and  Sir  Alexander  Gordon,  in  1618  he 
d  the  house  of  Sutherland  with  which  be  was  con- 
nd  formed  an  alliance  with  the  rival  family,  that  of 
of  Caithness,  who  had  long  been  their  mortal  ene- 
)rincipal  object  of  this  alliance  being  the  destruction 
an  Gun.  Through  the  interference,  however,  of  his 
•  Rol)ert  Gordon,  be  was  soon  after  reconciled  to  the 
id  family,  and  in  1622,  when  Caithness  was  de- 
a  rebel,  his  name  was  included,  with  those  of  his 
d  James  Sinclair  of  Murkle,  in  the  new  commission 
id  sword  issued  against  him.  In  1626  Sir  Donald 
the  king's  license  to  raise  a  regiment  in  the  north  to 
tunt  Mansfeldt  in  his  campaign  in  Germany,  and 

about  3,000  men,  the  greater  part  of  whom  em- 
t  Cromarty  in  October  of  that  year.  On  account  of 
tb  be  was  obliged  to  delay  his  own  departure,  and 
March  1627  he  was  created  a  baronet.  Soon  after 
eded  to  Germany,  and  distinguished  himself  in  the 
f  the  king  of  Denmark.  In  1628  he  was  again  in 
when  be  was  raised  to  tlie  peerage  by  the  title  of 
»y,  by  patent  dated  20th  June  of  that  year,  to  bim 
heirs  male  for  ever.  Returning  to  Germany,  be 
vo  campaigns  against  the  imperialists,  and  in  1630 
1  the  king  of  Sweden  with  his  regiment,  in  conse- 
fa  peace  having  been  concluded  between  the  king  of 
:  and  the  emperor  of  Germany.  A  considerable 
of  gentlemen,  chiefly  from  Ross,  Sutherland,  and 
),  joined  him  on  this  occasion,  some  of  whom  rose 
rank  in  the  army  of  Gustavus  Adolphus.  In  1631, 
ed  to  England,  and  was  accused  by  one  David  Ram- 
aving  said  that  tlie  troops  raised  by  the  marquis  of 
I  for  the  Swedish  8er\'ice  were  intended  to  assist 
lascrting  liis  right  to  the  Scottish  crown.  I.ord 
lied  the  charge,  but  Ramsay  persisting  in  his  story, 
lip  challenged  bim  to  combat.  As  the  case  involved 
-  of  treason,  it  was  considered  so  important  that  a 
rt  of  chivalry  was,  by  commisuon  under  the  great 
ititated,  to  superintend  the  combat,  which  was  ap- 


pointed to  be  fought  in  Tothill  Fields,  Westminster,  12th 
April  1631,  the  English  earl  of  lindsey  being  nominated  for 
the  occasion  high  constable  of  England,  and  the  earl  of  Ar- 
undel, earl  Miuiscb.'il.  The  parties  were  ordained  to  be 
armed  each  with  a  long  sword,  a  short  sword,  a  pike  And 
dagger.  The  meeting  was  adjourned  to  17th  May,  and  on 
the  12tb  the  court  assembled,  when  both  I..ord  Reav  and 
Ramsay  were  committed  to  the  Tower  of  London  till  they 
found  security  to  keep  the  peace. 

On  the  breaking  out  of  the  civil  wars,  his  lordship,  with 
the  earl  of  Satberland  and  others,  joined  the  Covenanters  on 
the  north  of  the  river  Spey.  He  afterwards  took  arms  in 
defence  of  Charles  I.,  and  in  1643  arrived  from  Denmark, 
with  ships  and  arms,  and  a  large  sum  of  money,  for  the  ser- 
vice of  the  king.  He  was  in  Newcastle  in  1644,  when  that 
town  was  stormed  by  the  Scots,  and  being  made  prisoner, 
was  conveyed  to  Edinburgh  tolbooth.  He  obtained  bis  re- 
lease after  the  battle  of  Kilsyth  in  August  1645,  and  em- 
biu-ked  at  Thurso  in  July  1648  for  Denmark,  wliere  he  died 
in  February  1649.  He  married,  first,  in  1610,  Barbara,  eld- 
est daughter  of  Kenneth,  I^rd  Kintail,  and  bad  by  Iter  Y 
Mackay,  who  died  in  1617;  John,  second  Jxird  Reay,  two 
other  sons  and  two  daughters.  By  a  second  wife,  Rachel 
Winterfield  or  Harrison,  he  had  two  sons,  the  Hon.  Koliert 
Mackay  Forbes  and  the  Hon.  Hugh  Forbes.  Of  this  mar- 
riage he  procured  a  sentence  of  nullity,  and  then  took  to  wife 
Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Robert  Thomson  of  Greenwich,  but  in 
1637  was  ordained  to  pay  bia  second  wife  £2,000  steriing 
for  part  maintenance,  and  £3,000  steriing  yearly  during  his 
non-adherence.    By  Elizabeth  Thomson  he  had  one  daugbter. 

John,  second  I^rd  Reay,  joined  the  royalists  under  the 
earl  of  Glencaim  in  1654,  and  was  taken  at  Balveny  and  un- 
prisoned.  By  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Donald  Mackay  of 
Scourie,  be  had  three  sons :  1.  Donald,  master  of  Reay,  who 
predeceased  his  father,  leaving  by  his  wife  Ann,  daugliter  of 
Sir  George  Munro  of  Culcaim,  a  son,  George,  third  Lord 
Reay.  2.  The  Hon.  Brigadier-general  J£neas  lilackay,  who 
married  Margaretta,  countess  of  Puchlor ;  and  3.  The  Hon. 
Colin  Mackay.  Apneas,  the  second  son,  was  colonel  of  the 
Mackay  Dutch  regiment.  His  family  settled  at  the  Hague, 
whera  they  obtained  considerable  possessions,  and  formed 
alliances  with  several  noble  families.  Their  representative, 
Oerthold  Baron  Mackay,  died  26th  December  1854,  at  bis 
chateau  of  Ophemert,  in  Guelderland,  aged  eighty-one.  He 
married  the  Baroness  Van  Renasse  Van  Wilp,  and  bis  eldest 
son,  the  Baron  iEneas  Mackay,  at  one  tune  chamberlain  to 
the  king  of  Holland,  became  next  heir  to  the  peerage  of 
Reay,  after  the  present  family. 

George,  third  I^rd  Reay,  F.R.S.,  took  the  oaths  and  bis 
seat  in  parliament,  29th  October  1700.  In  the  rebellion  of 
1715,  he  raised  his  clan  in  support  of  the  government.  In 
1719,  when  the  earls  Marischai  and  Seaforth,  and  the  mar- 
quis of  Tullibardine,  with  800  Spaniards,  landed  in  the 
Western  Highlands,  he  did  tlie  same,  and  also  in  1745.  He 
died  at  Tongue,  21st  March  lV48.  He  was  thrice  married; 
first,  to  Margaret,  daughter  of  lieutenant-general  Robert 
Mackay  of  Scourie,  colonel  of  the  21st  regiment  of  foot, 
killed  at  Steinkirk  in  1692,  and  had  by  her  one  son,  Donald, 
fourth  Lord  Reay;  secondly,  to  Janet,  daugbter  of  John 
Sinclair  of  Ulbster,  by  whom  he  bad  a  son,  the  Hon.  Colo- 
nel Hugh  Mackay  of  Bigboose,  and  a  daughter,  Anne,  wifii 
of  John  Watson  of  Mnirhonse,  Mid  I^thian ;  and,  thirdly,  to 
Mary,  daughter  of  Joba  Dowel,  Esq.,  writer  in  Edinburgh, 
and  had  by  her  four  dAUghtera  and  two  sons,  the  Hon. 
George  Mackay  of  Skibo,  and  the  Hon.  Alexander  Mackay, 
captain  in  the  earl  of  Londonn's  HighUmders,  on  that  regi- 


r 


REID, 


334 


THOMAS. 


n.-...i  ?»^-'r-;r  ralvi.  felh  Jar.e  1745.  At  the  La£t!e  of  Prrstoti 
or  fjlri-: '.rr.xr  ti-ijt  ;-«ar,  he  corr.rnir.ced  one  of  the  three 
c»:^;.l^^»  of  his  r-inrr.*-".:  t:.;^'s^l  in  it,  snj  wai  taken 
prl^-zi-'-r  ^T  the  reikis.  }Ie  attained  the  nnk  of  Iientmar.t- 
p-fi^T-,;  in  the  amjT.  a:.-i  wan  f^-^ir-Tiiarider-in-cLief  of  the  forces 
i:j  y.'A'.n.:.'!,  f/I'.:;*!  «f  !i;e  21 -t  f'>ft,  anii  gorernor  of  Stir- 
Ilr.r  '^-A't!'*.  H?  r:!ii:  /Jlst  Mar  IT^d.  Chrutian,  the  third 
caj/i.ler,  WAS  the  r.Ife  r,f  :Le  ll*:'.:  Juhn  ErAkine.  I>.D..  of 
C-r;;'.< ):.  ::.;:.;.t»:r  '-f  the  '-'.l  Gnjir'tzrn  c':jQrcfa.  Kdinhar;:h. 

I^onai-l,  f'i::rt;j  ly.r-i  R«:r.r,  tucceed*^!  Lia  fa: her  ir.  1748. 
a:i  ]  ':'.'-'\  a:  lf\irii*-h*,  lf«tii  AugBkt,  17C1.  He  was  tnlce 
L'i »rr'.«- :,  .'ir.i],  wi;;j  one  dauzhtt'r.  the  Hon.  Mrs.  £']pir.  hai 
two  »'#;js,  i\':;z^^^  fi::h  i-/'rJ  R<-:it,  who  die«l  at  Bosel^rmi:. 
i.^ar  K<:iribur;;:i.  'J7tU  Febmarj  17G8,  and  Ha^,  bizth  lord. 
'J  h<j  fiftli  I^ir  i  l£«ar  was  also  twite  marned,  hat  had  iasae 
or.ly  hr  his  ff^cor.<l  wife,  a  snn,  who  died  jonnir,  and  three 
dau;:htifrj(.  il(i;:n.  his  haif-brother,  who  succeeded  him. 
nns  for  tome  jears  in  a  fctate  of  mental  imhecUItj.  He 
oi**'!  at  Sk*rr;iy,  2Cth  Jiinurirr  1797,  nnmarried,  when  the 
title  devolvfii  i.n  Kric  Mackrir.  son  of  tiie  Hon.  Georf^  Mac- 
kaj  of  Skiho.  third  E^iii  of  tJje  third  Lord  lieay.  Adri.iited 
advocate  in  17^7,  Mr.  Mackar  of  .Ski'oo  was,  in  1757,  electM 
M.P.  for  the  count T  of  Suth^fnnnd,  and  two  rears  aftentnrds 
WAV  appointed  Tn:i^ter  of  the  mint  f»f  Scotland.  Hf  died  at 
Tun^e,  June  25,  17tJ2.  Br  Lis  wife,  Anne,  third  daughter 
of  Hon.  Kric  .Sutherland,  onlr  inm  ot  the  attainted  I.ord  Duf- 
fu^  he  iiiiil  h  sons  and  4  diiu^htere.  His  eldest  von,  George, 
died  in  17'J0.  Kric,  the  2<i  son.  became  7lh  Ljrd  Rear. 
Alexander,  the  nnxt,  :in  officer  in  tije  annv,  succeeded  as  8th 
I>ini  \\f.t\v.  I)on.ii-i  Hu^h,  the  4th  son,  a  vice-.idiniral,  died 
March  2*!,  IHOU.     r:ilrick,  the  y(mn;;est,  died  an  infant. 

Kric,  7tii  I»rd  ]l«ur,  w;m.  in  180G,  elected  one  of  the  repre- 
sentative  Scots  jiveri*.  He  di*fd,  unmarried,  ,Iu!j  8,  1847,  and 
was  fiiicci-«-dt'd,  :is  >^tl»  I^ird  It^.'iy,  hj  his  brother  AifX.-mder, 
liarr«ck-m:ister  ut  Malta,  boni  in  1775.  He  married  in 
l^OU,  M.-irian,  dau^iiter  of  Coh  Goll.  military  secretary  to 
Warren  Hantirics,  and  n'lict  of  David  Koss,  Ksq.  of  Caicutt:i, 
^Idtf.st  WfU  of  tli<>  Scottish  jud;;e,  I.or<l  Ankerville,  issue,  2 
fi<uis  and  G  <hiii;;!it«-rs.  Go^jrj^e,  tiie  eldest  sun,  died  in  1811. 
TJie  2d  Ktm,  Kric,  muster  of  K'-ay,  was  U>m  in  1813. 


I'r.ii),  a  siirnnme,  hcin;;  the  old  spellinf^of  lied.  The  fam- 
ily of  Kfiii  of  Harra,  Aherde^nsliire,  posses-nes  a  baronetcy  of 
Nov.i  SfMtiii,  oiiffiTed  in  17U<}  on  Alexander  Reid  of  Bam. 
'i'iii*  liftli  i>;ironet,  Sir  Ali'xamlcr  ISeid,  succeeded  his  brother. 
Sir  Juiiii,  Capt.  K.N.,  in  I81o;  married,  with  issue. 


(JiMioral  .T(din  Ueid  of  .Stratl;i4>cli,  the  founder  of  the  pro- 
fesjiiimliip  of  music  in  tiie  university  of  Kdinbur^h,  adopted 
that  surname  in  prcferencu  to  his  patronymic,  Robertson. 
Ho  was  the  son  of  Alexiiiider  Robertson  of  Strathloch,  a  pro- 
}>crty  near  Strathurdle  in  rcrthshirc,  whose  forefathers  for 
more  than  three  centuries  were  .'dways  called  Rarons  Rua, 
Roy,  or  Red,  from  the  first  of  the  family  having  red  hair. 
They  wcifl  descended  from  the  youn;;est  son  of  Patrick  Ro- 
bertson, the  first  of  Ludc.  All  the  youn^r  children  bore  the 
n.'Uiie  of  Ilobnrtson.  The  general,  however,  though  the  heir, 
cliosn  the  nnmo  of  Reid.  Ho  was  born  Feb.  13,  1721,  and 
e(lu(vited  at  the  univcrhity  of  Kdinburgh.  He  became  a 
lieutenant  in  the  earl  of  Loudoun's  Highlanders,  raised  in 
1745,  and  rosu  to  tho  rank  of  general.  He  had  a  fine  taste 
for  muMic,  :ind  Wiui  one  of  the  best  flute-players  of  tho 
age.  In  177U  ho  published  a  set  of  Minuets  and  Marches, 
ntylnd  General  Reid's  Minuets,  inscribed  to  the  Right  Hon. 
I.ady  Catherine  Murray.  In  this  collection  appeared  the  cele- 
brated and  well  known  air,  composed  by  him  when  major  of 


tije  42  i  repxnect.  to  tht  words  c^  **  Tlac  Gar^  of  OU  Gid* 
written  Ly  Captain  afterwards  Sir  Harrr  Enki&eef  JUi^ 

'  hannet.     It  is  there  enlitJed  ''The  HxfUacd.  v 4Sd Iqei- 

j  meet's  March,"  which  it  has  errr  uatt  coBtiBwd  Is  W   Hi 
iikewise  pt;':#Ii»hed  Six  So'oa  for  a  Gcnnaa  Flnie  or  ^^tSi, 

'■  with  A  thortfOgh  LaM  for  the  harpsicfaord.  in  wUd  htrtns 
hixseif  **A  member  of  the  Temple  of  ApoOo.*    Thoici 

'  lunAlly  cailed  Ciptain  Bead's  Sulos.  he  hirinj^hccBalri 
capt-iin  when  he  cnmpnecd  tliem.  He  died  at  Londdi,  Feb- 
ruary 6.  1807,  a;:ei  65.  In  his  will,  dated  at  LoodaB,Ulk 
April  1^03.  he  describes  liimself  as  -*  John  Bcid.  Esq.  Go- 
era!  in  his  Majesty's  army  and  Colocd  of  the  88lh  repaet 
of  foot,**  and  tXaXn  iVaX  he  was  ^  the  last  lepimntaliierf 
an  old  famI!T  in  Pertushirv,  which  on  hit  death  wQ  be  a- 
tinct  in  the  male  line.**  He  left  Xo3,000  in  the  Spereofti^ 
subject  to  the  liferent  of  his  daughter,  fur  thepoipoistf 
establishing  a  profeaaonhip  of  music  in  the  nnirersity  tfEiU 
inLur;^h.  where  he  was  educated,  the  sxlarr  not  to  1«  ks 
than  £300  per  annum.  He  dxrtfcts  in  his  wiU  that  asniliT 
on  his  birthday,  the  13th  of  Kebmanr.  there  shall  be  a  coo- 
cert  of  music  held,  including  a  fnll  miiitair  band,  to  com* 
znence  with  some  pieces  of  his  own  composition,  tn  ^^vn  Hut 
»tyle  of  music  that  prerailed  about  the  middle  of  tlie  IStli 
century,  among  the  first  of  which  is  that  of  ^TbeGirbof 
Old  (lauh*  The  chair  of  music  was  founded  in  1839,  vhri 
nearly  £80,GUU  became  arailable  for  its  endowment 

KEID,  TnoMAS,  a  philosopher  aud  Latiu  poet 
of  considerable  reputation  in  his  time,  the  8oa  of 
James  Reid,  the  first  minister,  after  the  Selbr- 
matlon,  of  Banchory -Teman,  iu  KiocardineshiR, 
flonrished  in  the  seventeenth  centniy.  lie  studied 
nt  ^lari&chul  college,  A1)erdcen,  and  afterwards 
travelled  through  tho  greater  part  of  Europe. 
Having  maintained  public  disputations  in  screnl 
of  the  foreign  universities,  he  collected  Into  arol- 
unie  the  theses  he  defended.  His  Latin  poems 
are  preserved  in  tlie  *  Delitiaj  Poetarum  Scotonun.' 
On  his  return  to  Britain,  he  was  appointed  Latin 
secrctaiy  to  James  I.  of  England.  AVhileonthe 
Continent  he  had  purchased  the  best  editioDS  of 
all  the  classics  which  were  printed  from  the  tiooe 
of  Aldus  Manntius  until  IClo,  also  several  curiooa 
manuscripts,  particularly  a  Hebrew  Bible,  of  most 
beautiful  wi-itlng,  supposed  to  have  l>een  the  woii 
of  the  twelfth  century,  all  of  which  he  bequeathed 
to  the  Marischal  college,  Aberdeen,  with  a  con- 
siderable sum  of  money  as  a  fund  for  a  yearly  sal- 
ary to  a  librarian.  He  belonged  to  the  family 
from  which  the  celebrated  philosopher,  Dr.  Tho- 
mas Keid,  was  descended. 

Ills  brother,  Alexander  Held,  an  eminent  phy- 
sician, was  the  first,  it  is  said,  who  read  physicti 
lectures  to  the  Company  of  barber-chirurgeons  at 
Loudon.  Li  1G20  ho  was  created  doctor  of  physic 
at  Oxfoi*d  by  i*oyal  mandate.    Ue  was  afterward! 


.1  I 


I 


■  I 


I   I 


I. 
i  1 

I   . 


RENNIE, 


337 


GEORGE. 


For  a  year  he  acted  as  clerk  or  assist- 
sician  fn  the  clinical  department  of  the 
^h  Infirmary,  and  in  the  autumn  of  1831 
eded  to  Paris,  for  the  purpose  of  improv- 
lelf  in  its  medical  schools.    While  in  the 
capital,  as  he  himself  tells  us,  his  habit 
go  to  one  of  the  hospitals  for  three  hours 
lorning  before  breakfast ;  after  breakfast 
lissecting  rooms  for  three  or  four  hours 
id  then  he  attended  a  lecture  or  two. 
3wing  year  he  returned  to  Edinburgh, 
li  three  other  medical  men  was  sent  to 
J,  where  the  cholera  was  then  raging,  to 
e  physicians  of  the  district  during  the 
3C  there  of  that  fcai-ful  scourge.    He  sub- 
T  became  a  pai-tner  in  the  school  of  ana- 
Old  Surgeon*s  Hall,  Edinburgh,  and  for 
ars  discharged  tlie  duties  of  demonstra- 
i  high  reputation  to  himself  and  to  the 
vantage  of  the  numerous  students  who 
there.    In  1836  he  was  appointed  lec- 
physiology  in    the  Edinburgh  Extra- 
cal  Medical  School,  and,  two  years  after, 
pathologist  to  the  Royal  Infiimaiy  of 
,  of  which  institution  in  the  ensuing  year 
le  the  superintendent. 
8  time  he  was  engaged  in  some  of  those 
ig  physiological  researches  which  caused 
to  be  held  in  high  estimation  by  his  pro- 
brethren.     An  abridgment  or  abstract  of 
;  *  Experimental  Investigations  into  the 
s  of  the  Eight  pair  of  Nerves,  or  the 
aryiigeal,     Pneumogastric,     and    Spinal 
^,'  made  at  this  period,  was  intimated 
tritish  Scientific  Association  at  the  meet- 
847  and  1848,  and  published  in  detail  in 
nburgh  ^ledical  and  Surgical  Joumal* 
nry  1848,  and  April  1849.     In  Mai-ch 
vas  appointed  Chandos  professor  of  ana- 
1  medicine  in  the  university  of  St.  An- 
id  besides  the  regular  lectures  which  bc- 
)  the  chair,  he  delivered  also  a  couree 
irative  anatomy  and  general  physiology, 
directed  his  inquiries  to  the  natural  his- 
le  marine  animals  on  the  coast  of  Fife,  he 
cated  the  results  in  several  papers  to  the 
and  Magazine  of  Natural  History.'    In 
published  in  one  volume  his  *  Physiolo- 


gical, Anatomical,  and  Pathological  Researches,' 
being  the  papera  and  essays,  twenty-eight  in  all, 
which  he  had  for  thirteen  years  contributed  to  va- 
rious scientific  Journals. 

Dr.  Reid  had  long  been  afflicted  with  cancer  in  the 
tongue.  In  the  year  mentioned  an  operation  was 
performed,  and  in  consequence  his  health  rallied 
so  gi'eatly  that  hopes  were  entertained  of  his  ulti- 
mate recovery ;  but  the  insidious  disease  had  made 
progress  in  his  neck  and  throat,  which  caused  his 
death,  on  30th  July  1849,  at  the  early  age  of  41. 
In  his  latter  years  ho  gave  evidence  of  having 
come  under  the  power  and  influence  of  religion, 
and  died  a  trae  Christian.  By  his  wife,  a  lady  of 
the  name  of  Ann  BIyth,  he  had  two  daughters, 
one  of  them  a  posthumous  child.  His  Life,  by 
George  Wilson,  M.D.,  was  published  in  1851. 

RENNIE,  George,  an  eminent  agriculturist, 
was  bom  on  the  farm  of  Phantassie,  in  the  connty 
of  Haddington,  in  1749.  His  father,  James  Ren- 
nie,  a  respectable  farmer,  was  one  of  the  most  ac- 
tive promoters  of  agricultural  improvements  in  his 
day,  and  his  brother,  John  Rennie,  was  the  cele- 
brated civil  engineer,  of  whom  a  short  notice  fol- 
lows. He  early  exhibited  indications  of  that  ac- 
tivity, penetration,  and  intelligence,  for  which  he 
was  remarkable  in  after  years.  When  scarcely 
sixteen,  his  father  sent  him  to  Tweedside  to  make 
a  suiTcy  of  the  state  of  agriculture  in  that  part  of 
the  country,  where  several  gentlemen,  among 
whom  were  Lord  Kames,  Hume  of  Ninewells, 
Renton  of  Lammerton,  Fordyce  of  Ayton,  and 
othcra,  had  commenced  a  system  of  extensive 
improvement  of  their  own  estates ;  and  here  his 
powcra  of  observation  enabled  him  to  obtain  much 
of  that  practical  knowledge  which  afterwards  ren- 
dered him  so  distinguished.  In  1765  he  was  in- 
trusted with  the  superintendence  of  a  brewery, 
erected  by  his  father  on  the  ground  afterwards 
occupied  by  the  Linton  distillery ;  but  Mr.  Ren- 
nie, senior,  dying  the  following  year,  the  estab- 
lishment was  relinquished,  and  in  1770  was  let  to 
a  tenant.  In  1783  he  again  undertook  the  man- 
agement of  the  works,  and  commenced  the  busi- 
ness of  distilling  on  a  large  scale.  The  distillery 
remained  in  his  hands  until  1797,  when  the  whole 
work  was  let  on  lease.  His  reputation  as  a  suc- 
cessful agriculturist  had,  in  the  meantime,  become 


RENNIE. 


838 


RENTON. 


1 1 

;  I 
il 

i; 


known  over  Scotland,  and  in  1787  be  caused  Mr. 
Meikle,  the  inventor  of  the  drum  thrashing  ma- 
chine, one  of  the  most  important  discoveries  which 
the  agricultural  art  owes  to  mechanical  genius,  to 
erect  on  the  Fhantassio  property,  the  first  machine 
in  the  county  worked  witli  horses,  the  only  previ- 
ous one  being  tliat  of  Mr.  Meikle  himself,  at 
Knowsmill,  near  Tyningham,  which  was  impelled 
by  water.  The  merit  of  this  useful  discovery  be- 
ing disputed  by  several  persons,  Mr.  Reunie  came 
forward  in  vindication  of  his  friend  Meikle,  who 
was  then  between  eighty  and  ninety  years  of  age, 
and  completely  established  his  claim  to  the  inven- 
tion, in  a  letter  originally  inserted  in  a  pamphlet 
by  Mr.  Sheriff,  entitled  'A  Reply  to  an  Address 
to  the  Public,  but  more  particularly  to  the  Land- 
ed Literest  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  on  the 
subject  of  the  Thrashing  Machine.  Mr.  Rennic 
died  October  C,  1828.  His  sou,  George  Rcnuie, 
at  one  period  governor  of  the  Falkland  Islands, 
and  in  1841  elected  M.P.  for  Ipswich,  died  March 
22,  18G0.  lu  early  life  he  devoted  himself  to 
sculpture,  and  produced  at  Rome  some  remark- 
able works,  one  of  which,  the  *  Grecian  Archer," 
he  presented  to  the  Atheuseum  Club. 

RKXNIE,  John,  a  celebrated  engineer,  brother 
of  the  precedin;r,  and  uncle  of  govemor  Rennie, 
was  bora  on  the  fai-m  of  Pliantassie,  East  JjOthian, 
June  7,  17G1.  He  acquired  the  rudiments  of  his 
education  at  the  parish  school,  and  after  being 
for  two  years  with  Mr.  Andrew  Meikle,  an  emi- 
nent millwright,  he  was  sent  to  the  school  of 
Dunbar.  On  the  promotion  of  the  master  to  Perth 
Academv,  the  latter  recommended  him  as  his  sue- 
ccssor;  but  preferring  mechanical  employment,  he 
soon  resumed  his  laboura  with  Mr.  Meikle.  After 
acting  for  a  short  time  on  his  own  accouut,  in 
1783,  he  was  induced  to  remove  to  London,  and 
soon  after  was  employed  by  Messi*s.  Boultou  and 
Watt  in  the  construction  of  two  steam  engines, 
and  the  machinery  connected  therewith,  at  the 
Albion  flour  mills,  near  Blackfriars  Bridge ;  wliicli 
in  1791  were  unfortunately  destroyed  by  wilful 
fire.  He  was  next  engaged  in  superintending  the 
construction  of  the  new  machinery  of  Whitbread's 
brewery,  the  execution  of  which  increased  his 
reputation.  Having  commenced  business  for  him- 
self as  a  civil  engiueer,  from  1794  he  was  regard- 


ed as  standing  at  the  head  of  the  professkm  ia 
Great  Britain,  and  was  oonnected  with  emy 
public  work  of  magnitude  in  the  kingdonL  Ca- 
nals, bridges,  harboars,  wet  docks,  and  maduim 
of  every  description,  were  extensively  executed 
from  his  designs,  and  under  his  direction.  Among 
his  principal  works  may  be  mentioned  Ramsgite 
harbour ;  Waterloo  and  SonthwaiiL  bridges,  Lon- 
don ;  the  London  docks,  and  the  East  and  West 
India  docks,  at  Blackwall ;  the  Prince's  dock  at 
Liverpool ;  the  docks  at  Hull,  Dublin,  Greened, 
and  Leith,  and  the  breakwater  at  Plymouth,  with 
several  similar  stnictnres,  where  submarine  ma- 
sonry was  carried  to  the  utmost  perfection.  The 
greatest  effort  of  his  genius  is  generally  considered 
to  be  the  Bell  Rock  lighthouse,  constructed  on  the 
same  principle  as  that  on  the  Eddystone  rocks, 
ei*ected  by  Smeaton.  He  built  the  stone  bridges 
at  Kelso,  Musselbnrgli,  and  other  places  in  Soot- 
land,  and  the  ii-on  bridge  over  the  Witham  m 
Liucolnshire,  and  superintended  the  formation  of 
the  Grand  Western  canal,  and  the  execution  of 
the  Aberdeen  canal  which  unites  the  Dee  and  the 
Don,  as  well  as  other  canals  in  different  parts  of 
the  couutr}'.  Before  his  death  he  had  given  plans 
for  improving  the  docks  at  Sheemess,  which  were 
executed  by  his  sons,  George  and  John,  after- 
wards Sir  John  Rennie,  architect,  who  was  knighted 
in  1831.  He  also  furnished  the  designs  for  the  new 
London  bridge,  the  charge  of  the  construction  of 
which  was  intrusted  to  Sir  John  Reunie,  who,  in 
1831,  fiuished  that  magnificent  structure. 

^Ir.  Rennie  was  remarkable  for  his  steady  reso- 
lution and  perseverance,  and  for  his  indefatigable 
industry.  On  going  to  France  for  a  short  time  in 
18 IG,  he  declared  it  to  be  the  first  relaxation  he 
liad  taken  for  nearly  thirty  years.  He  married  m 
1789,  and  had  four  sons  aud  two  daughters.  He 
died  of  infiammation  of  the  liver,  October  16, 1831, 
and  was  bmied  in  St.  PauKs  Cathedral,  London. 

Rrnton,  a  surname  derived  from  lands  in  BerwickshiR  of 
that  nanie,  forming  part  of  tlie  baronj  of  ColdinghaiD.  hi 
old  charters  it  is  spelled  Regiiintun,  Reignintan,  Rajnton, 
&C.  The  ancient  family  of  Renton  of  Rcnton  held  the  office 
of  forester  over  the  woods  of  the  priorr  of  Coldingham  from 
the  days  of  William  the  Lion,  and  this  being  hexvdiuiy,  kd 
them  to  assume  the  name  of  Forester  in  preference  to  that  cf 
Ronton.    In  the  15th  century  the  family  ended  in  a  femala. 

David  Renton  of  Billy  in  the  Merse,  a  descendant  of  tbt 
ancient  foresters  of  Coldingham,  became,  in  Um  beginning  of 


REN  WICK, 


839 


JAMES. 


the  Mzteenth  century,  proprietor  of  the  estate  of  Lamberton, 
in  the  lame  ooontj.  Agnes,  daughter  of  Benton  of  Billv, 
was  the  first  wife  of  Alexander  I^eslj,  first  earl  of  Leven,  the 
oommunder  of  the  covenanting  armj  at  Dunse  Law  in  Maj 
1689.  The  family  sold  the  estate  of  Billy  about  the  begin- 
ning of  the  18th  century. 

Sir  Thomas  Renton,  M.D.,  second  son  of  William  Renton 
of  Moacastle,  of  the  house  of  Billy,  became  so  eminent  in  his 
day,  by  his  skill  in  the  cure  of  ruptures,  that  he  was  called  to 
London  in  1719,  and  appointed  physician  to  Chelsea  Hospi- 
tal. He  was  knighted  by  George  L,  who  made  him  his  own 
pliyadan  extraordinary,  and  conferred  on  him  a  present  of 
£5,000  in  money,  with  a  yearly  pension  of  £500.  His  ma- 
jesty also  gave  orders  to  Lord  Carteret,  then  secretary  of 
state,  to  cause  a  patent  to  be  drawn  out  creating  Sir  Thomas 
a  baron  of  Great  Britain,  under  the  title  of  Lord  Renton,  but 
he  declined  the  peerage.  He  often  attended  the  king  in  his 
journeys  to  Hanover. 

The  Rontons  of  I^mberton  were  in  1836  (Hist,  of  Cold- 
w^uxm  Priory^  p.  147)  represented  by  Alexander  Campbell 
Renton,  Esq.,  grandson  of  the  last  lineal  descendant,  lieu- 
tenant-colonel Alexander  Renton. 

RENAVICK,  James,  a  celebrated  field-preach- 
er, and  the  last  martyr  for  the  covenanted  work 
of  Reformation  in  Scotland,  was  bom  in  the  par- 
ish of  Glencalrn,  in  Nitbsdale,  Febrnarj  15, 1662. 
He  was  the  son  of  Andrew  Hcnwick,  a  weaver, 
hy  his  wife,  Elizabeth  Corsan.  From  his  child- 
hood he  evinced  a  pious  disposition,  and  even  at 
two  years  of  age  was  observed  to  be  aiming  at 
prayer.  His  parents,  being  in  very  poor  circnm- 
Btances,  with  difficnlty  kept  him  at  school,  and 
daring  the  time  he  attended  the  university  of  Ed- 
inburgh, he  supported  himself  chiefly  by  assisting 
some  gentlemen^s  sons  in  their  education.  On 
the  conclusion  of  his  academical  course,  having 
refused  to  take  the  oath  of  allegiance,  he  was  de- 
nied laureation,  but,  with  two  others,  afterwards 
received  it  privately  at  Edinburgh,  where,  for 
some  time,  he  remained  prosecuting  his  stu- 
dies. He  subsequently  attached  himself  to  the 
persecuted  Presbyterians,  and  attended  their  se- 
cret meetings,  taking  an  active  pait  in  all  their 
proceedings.  Having  been  present  at  the  m.ar- 
tyrdom  of  Mr.  Donald  Cargill,  July  27,  1681,  he 
determined  to  unite  with  the  small  remnant  that 
adhered  to  his  principles;  and  when  the  more 
xealous  of  the  Covenanters  agreed  to  publish  the 
Lanark  Declaration,  Renwick  was  employed  to 
proclaim  it,  which  he  did  Januaiy  12,  1682,  al- 
thoagh  he  had  no  hand  in  its  composition,  and 
disapproved  of  some  of  its  expressions. 

FindiDg  it  impossible,  in  the  then  circtmistances 


of  the  times,  to  obtain  license  in  his  own  country, 
he  was,  by  his  party,  sent  over  to  Holland,  in 
December  1682,  when  he  entered  a  student  at  the 
university  of  Groningen.  In  six  months  he  was 
found  qualified  for  the  ministry,  and  accordingly 
received  ordination  there.  He  commenced  his 
ministerial  labours  in  his  native  land,  his  first 
public  sermon  being  preached  November  23, 1683, 
in  a  moss  at  Darmead,  in  the  parish  of  Cambus- 
nethan ;  when,  in  vindication  of  himself,  and  for 
the  information  of  his  hearere,  he  gave  an  account 
of  his  call  to  the  ministiy,  and  declared  his  fiim 
adherence  to  the  persecuted  Church  of  Scotland. 
At  the  same  time  he  fully  explained  his  mind  as 
to  the  various  religions  questions  then  in  agita- 
tion, and  described  particularly  the  class  of  preach- 
ers and  professors  he  was  resolved  to  hold  no 
communion  with.  This  gave  great  oficnce  to 
some  of  the  indulged  ministers  and  false  brethren, 
who  had  been  led  away  by  the  defections  of  the 
times,  and  exposed  him  to  much  calumnions  mis- 
representation. 

His  fame  and  success  as  a  field-preacher  at- 
tracted the  notice  of  the  council,  by  whom  he  was 
publicly  proclaimed  a  traitor,  and  all  his  adher- 
ents were  treated  as  abettors  of  rebellion.  In 
1684  his  troubles  and  discouragements  began 
still  more  to  thicken  around  him;  nevertheless, 
he  continued  to  preach  wherever  and  whenever 
he  could  find  opportunity.  During  that  year  his 
enemies  became  more  vigilant  in  their  search  after 
him,  and  letters  of  intcrcommuning  were  issued 
ngainst  him  and  his  followers,  which  led  to  the 
latter  publishing,  at  the  market-cross  and  church 
doors  of  several  towns,  their  famous  Apologetical 
Declaration,  November  8,  1684.  After  this,  the 
unhappy  fugitives  were  hunted,  like  beasts  of 
prey,  through  the  mosses,  muirs,  and  mountains 
of  their  native  land,  having  often  no  place  of  ref- 
uge or  retirement  but  a  desert  glen,  or  wild  cavern 
of  the  earth.  Renwick  himself  was  often  hotly 
pursued  by  the  sanguinary  soldiers,  and  had  many 
signal  escapes  and  remarkable  deliverances. 

On  the  accession  of  James  VII.  to  the  throne, 
Renwick,  and  about  two  hundred  men,  went  to 
Sanquhar,  May  28,  1685,  and  published  a  protest 
against  his  succession,  at  the  same  time  renounc- 
ing their  allegiance  to  him,  which  was  afterwards 


RICHARDSON. 


940 


EIDDELL. 


'  I 


called  tlio  Sanquhar  Dedaratlon.  In  October 
1687  a  reward  of  one  hundred  pounds  sterling 
was  offered  for  his  apprehension.  Having  gone 
to  Edluburgli  in  January  1688,  to  deliver  to  tlio 
Synod  of  indulged  ministers  a  protestation  against 
the  toleration  they  had  accepted,  which  he  lodged 
in  the  hands  of  Mr.  Hugh  Kennedy,  their  mode- 
rator, he  was  discovered,  and  after  a  short  resist- 
ance, seized,  on  February  1.  and  committed  close 
prisoner  to  the  Tolbooth.  On  the  8th  he  was 
tried  before  the  high  court  of  justiciary,  on  an  in- 
dictment which  charged  him  with  disowning  the 
king's  authority,  refusing  to  pay  the  cess,  and 
maintaining  the  lawfulness  of  defensive  ai-ms.  He 
was  found  guilty,  on  his  own  confession,  and  exe- 
cuted in  the  Grassmarket  of  Edinburgh,  on  the 
17th,  being  then  only  twenty-six  years  and  two 
days  old.  His  life  was  written  by  a  contemporary 
field-preacher,  Mr.  Alexander  Shields;  and  in 
1777  appeared  at  Glasgow,  '  A  Choice  Collection 
of  very  valuable  Prefaces,  Lectures,  and  Ser- 
mons, preached  upon  the  Mountains  and  Muirs 
of  Scotland,  in  the  hottest  time  of  the  Persecu- 
tion,' by  Mr.  James  Renwick ;  to  which  are  add- 
ed, by  the  same  author,  the  Form  and  Order  of 
Ruling  Elders,  a  Reply  to  Mr.  Langlan's  Letter 
to  Gavin  Wotliei'spoon,  &c.,  whicli  work  has  been 
scvei*al  times  reprinted. 

RicirAKDSoy,  the  name  of  a  fuinilv  which  possesses  a 
baronetcy  of  Nova  Scotin,  conferred,  IStli  November  1G30, 
on  Sir  llobert  Ricliard:son  of  Pencaitland,  Haddingtonshire, 
whose  son,  Sir  Robert,  second  baronet,  sold  that  estate,  and 
died  without  i^sue  in  1G40.  The  baronetcj  devolved  on  his 
cousin.  Sir  James  Richardson  of  Smeaton,  third  baronet,  who 
died  in  1G80.  His  son.  Sir  James  Richardson,  fourth  baro- 
net, sold  tlje  Smeaton  estate  in  1708,  and  died  in  1717.  On 
the  death  of  Sir  John  Richardson,  the  twelfth  baronet,  12t1i 
April,  1821,  the  baronetcy  became  dormant.  In  1837,  Sir 
John  Stewart  Richardson,  son  of  James  Richardson,  Esq.  of 
Pitfour,  Perthshire,  was  serx-ed  heir  male  general  to  this  bar- 
onetcy as  heir  of  tlic  first  baronet's  elder  brother,  and  accord- 
ingly became  13th  baronet.  Roni  Sep.  1, 1797,  in  Anjr.  1843 
lie  was  appointed  secretary  to  the  order  of  the  Thistle.  In 
1826  he  married  Mary,  d.'iughter  of  James  H.ny,  Esq.  of  CoU 
liepriest,  Devonshire,  issue  4  sons  and  3  drs.  Jatnes  Thomas, 
the  eldest  son,  78th  Highlanders,  was  born  Dec.  24,  1840. 

RICIIARDSOX,  WiLLi.vM,  a  niiscellaneons 
writer,  son  of  Rev.  James  Richardson,  minister 
of  Aberfoylc,  was  born  there  Oct.  1,  1743,  and 
educated  at  the  parish  school.  In  his  14th 
year  he  was  sent  to  the  university  of  Glasgow, 
and  after  fiuidhiug  the  usual  curriculum,  entered 


on  the  study  of  divinity ;  bat,  before  he  had  com- 
pleted his  theological  conrse,  he  was  appobited 
tutor  to  the  two  sons  of  Lord  Cathcart,  whom  1m 
accompauied  to  Eton,  where  he  remained  for  two 
3'ears.  In  1768  he  went  with  his  pnpilstoSt 
Petersburg,  their  father  having  been  nominated 
ambassador-extraordinary  to  the  empress  of  Bu- 
sia ;  and,  during  his  residence  there,  he  acted  as 
secrctaiy  to  Lord  Cathcart.  In  1772  he  retonied 
with  his  only  surviving  pupil  to  Glasgow,  and 
soon  after,  through  the  interest  of  Lord  Cathcart, 
then  lord  rector  of  the  university  there,  he  wsi 
chosen  professor  of  humanity,  having  snoceeded 
Professor  Muirhead  in  that  chair.  He  died  No- 
vember 3,  1814.    His  works  arc : 


A  Philosophical  AnalysiB  and  Illostntiofi  of  aome  «f 
Shakcspear*8  Remarkable  Characters.     Glasg.  1774, 12ma 

Cursory  Remarks  on  Tragedy,  Shakespear,  and  oertaii 
Italian  and  French  Poets.    Glagg.  1774,  8to. 

Poems,  chiefly  Rural.    Glasg.  1774,  12mo.     1781,  8ro. 

Kfrsays  on  Shakcspear's  Drmmatic  Cbaracten  of  Kk]»ri 
III.,  King  I.«>ar,  and  Timon  of  Athens;  withsnEsuyoo 
the  Faults  of  Shakespear.  I^nd.  1783,  8ro.  Loud.  1785, 
2  vols.  12mo.     1797,  8vo. 

Anecdotes  of  tlio  Russian  Empire,  in  a  series  of  Letten, 
written  a  few  years  ago  from  SL  Petersbargfa.  Ghufow, 
1784,  8vo. 

Essays  on  Shakespear*8  Dramatic  Character  of  Falsttfi^ 
and  on  his  imitation  of  Female  Characters:  to  which  an 
added,  some  General  Observations  on  the  Study  of  Sbake- 
spe.ir.  Lond.  1789,  12mo.  The  same ;  to  which  is  added, 
an  Essay  on  the  Faults  of  Shakespear.     Lond.  1797,  8vo. 

The  Indians;  a  Tragedy.     I^nd.  1790,  8va 

Essays  on  Shakespear^s  Dramatic  Characters  of  MadMth, 
Hamlet,  Jacques,  Imogen,  Richard  III.,  Sir  John  Falsts^ 
King  I^ar,  Timon  of  Athens;  with  an  illustration  of  his  it- 
presentations  of  National  Cliaracter  in  that  of  Fluellen ;  sod 
Observations  on  the  chief  Objects  of  Critidsm  in  bis  Worin, 
8vo.  The  whole  of  his  Essays  on  Shakspere,  as  the  name  b 
now  spelled,  were  collected  into  one  volume. 

The  Maid  of  Lochlin ;  a  Lyrical  Drama ;  with  Odes,  and 
other  Poems.    Lond.  1801,  small  8vo. 

The  rhilantlirope,  a  periodical  Essaybt,  published  at  Lon- 
don in  1797. 

Poems  and  Plays.    Lond.  1805,  2  vols.  12mo. 

On  the  Dramatic  or  Ancient  Form  of  Historical  Compoa- 
tion.    Trans.  Soc  Edin.  1788,  vol.  i.  99. 

IIo  was  also  a  contributor  to  Gilbert  Stewart's  Edinboi^gli 
Magazine  and  Review,  and  to  the  Mirror  and  Lonngier;  and 
wi-oto  the  Life  of  Professor  Artlmr  prefixed  to  IuswoIei^ 
and  an  Essay  on  Celtic  Snperstitions,  appended  to  Dr.  Gn- 
ham*s  Inquiry  into  the  Authenticity  of  the  Poems  of  Osnan. 
He  lefl  in  manuscript  an  Essay  on  figurative  Language,  and 
some  other  papers. 


RiDDELT.,  the  surname  of  an  ancient  Roxburghshire  fion- 
ilv.  The  first  in  Scotland  of  the  name  was  Gerrase  de 
Riddel,  who  accompanied  from  England  David,  prines  of 
Cumberland,  afterwards  David  L,  and  recdved  from  bim 
considerable  hinds  in  that  conntj.    He  was  of  Monnaa  es^ 


I 


RIDDELL, 


341 


OF  RIDDELL. 


tracUoo,  his  gmndfather,  the  Sieor  de  Riddel,  having  come 
orer  with  William  the  G>nqaeror.    The  latter  is  particularly 
named  in  the  roll  of  Battle  Abbej,  with  *'  Avenell  and  Roe/* 
and  lands  in  varions  parts  of  England  were  bestowed  on  him 
bj  the  Conqueror.    From  Dugda]e*s  Baronage,  (vol.  i.  p. 
655.)  we  learn  that  his  son  Geoffrej,  Lord  Riddel,  father  of 
Gcnrase,  was  lord-cliief-justice  of  England  in  1107,  and  that 
lie  married  Geva,  daughter  of  Hugh  de  Abrincas,  earl  of 
Chester,  of  whom  descended  Matilda  or  Maud,  wife  of  Da- 
rid,  earl  of  Huntingdon,  and  grandmother  of  Robert  Bruce 
tb«  competitor,  grandfather  of  King  Robert  the  Brace.    He 
perished  at  sea  in  the  same  ship  with  Prince  William,  son  of 
Henrj  I.,  on  their  return  from  France  in  1120.     His  son, 
GervAse  or  Geoffrey,  was  progenitor  of  the  Scottish  family  of 
Bidden  of  RiddelL 

This  Genrase  or  Geoffrey  Riddell  was  the  earliest  sheiiff  of 
Rozbarghsbire.  He  was  witness  to  most  of  the  charters  and 
donations  of  King  David  I.,  and  also  to  the  well-known  In- 
quisition made  by  that  monarch  when  prince  of  Cumberland, 
for  the  old  possessions  belonging  to  the  church  of  Glasgow. 
He  died  about  1140,  leaving  two  sons,  Walter,  his  heir,  and 
Sir  AnkettI,  who  succeeded  his  brother. 

Tlie  elder  son,  Walter  de  Riddell,  had  a  charter  from  Da- 
rid  I.,  of  the  lands  of  Lilliexleaf,  Wliittunes,  &o.,  in  the 
county  of  Roxburgh,  to  be  held  of  iho  king  per  servitium 
mttiw  militu^  ticut  tmut  haronum  nostrorum^  &c.  This  is 
Admitted  to  be  the  oldest  charter  extant  by  a  Scottish  king 
to  a  laic.  It  is  without  a  date,  as  was  usual  in  those  days, 
but  mQ5t  have  been  granted  sometime  between  1140  and 
1153.  Kisbet,  (vol.  i.  p.  374)  says  that  he  had  seen  a  tran- 
snmpt  of  it,  mnde  by  order  of  Lord  Gray,  justice-general  of 
Scotland,  in  a  justiciary  court  held  at  Jedburgh  in  150G. 
The  lands  named  were  afterwards  called  the  bnrony  of  Rid- 
dell. In  the  '  Liy  of  the  Last  MinstrcV  Sir  Walter  Scott 
mentions 

"  Ancient  Riddell's  fair  domain.'* 

J^nd  in  a  note  he  says,  *'  The  family  of  Riddell  hare  been 
"wery  long  in  possession  of  the  barony  ca)icd  Riddell  or  Rey- 
dale,  part  of  which  still  bears  the  latter  nnine.     Tradition 
carries  their  antiquity  to  a  point  extremely  re.:  .)te;  and  is  in 
some  degree  wmctioned  by  the  discovery  of  two  «:one  cofEns, 
one  containing  an  earthen  pot  filled  with  a^hcM  and  arms, 
l>earing  a  legible  date,  A.  d.  727,  the  other  dated  930,  and 
^lled  with  the  bones  of  a  man  of  gigantic  size.     These  cof- 
"fins  were  discovered  in  the  foundatiuns  of  what  was,  but  has 
long  since  ceased  to  l>e,  the  chapel  of  Riddell,  and,  as  it  was 
argued  with  plamibility  that  they  cont.nined  the  remains  of 
some  ancestors  of  the  family,  they  were  deposited  in  the  mo- 
dem place  of  sepulture,  comparatively  so  tonned,   though 
bnilt  in  1110."    There  is  nothing  in  the  discovery  of  two 
ttone  coffins  with  the  respective  dates  mentioned,  to  support 
the  supposition  that  the  family  of  Riddell  was  settled  at  that 
place  in  the  seventh  or  eighth  century,  as  has  been  rather 
lustily  assumed.     The  first  grant  of  land  they  had  in  Scot- 
land was  in  the  reign  of  David  L,  as  above  shown,  when  the 
first  of  the  name  came  from  England  and  obtained  posses- 
•ioni  in  Roxburghshire. 

Of  Sir  Anketil  de  Riddell,  Walter*s  brother  and  succes.sor, 
^e  find  in  Dalrymple*s  Collections  many  remarkable  docu- 
'vtenta,  particularly  two  bulls  in  confirmation  from  Popes 
Adrian  IV.  and  Alexander  III.,  of  the  lands  of  Lilliesleaf, 
^hittnnes,  &c,  subsequently  called  Riddell,  which  have  re- 
Hiaioed  in  the  family  through  a  long  train  of  unbroken  lineal 
•oeecwon.  Sir  Anketil  had  three  sons :  t.  Walter,  his  heir ; 
^  Hngo  or  Hugh,  who  was  one  of  the  hostages  for  King 


William  the  Lion,  when  taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Aln- 
wick in  1174 ;  and  3.  Jordanus  de  Riddell,  who  is  witness  to 
a  charter  of  King  William  to  the  abbey  of  Dunfermline. 
Hugh,  the  second  son,  was  progenitor  of  the  Riddells  of 
Cranstonriddell,  baring  received  a  grant  of  the  manor  of 
Cranston  in  Mid  Lothian  from  Earl  Henrv.  The  familv 
tenninated  in  an  heiress,  who,  about  1478,  married  a  son  of 
the  house  of  Crichton. 

The  eldest  son,  Walter  de  Riddell,  had  two  sons :  Sur  Pa- 
trick, who,  after  succeeding  to  the  estate,  made  donations  of 
portions  of  his  lands  of  Wliittunes  to  the  church  at  Melrose, 
in  the  reigns  of  William  the  Lion  and  Alexander  II. ;  and 
Radulphus  or  Ralph,  who  is  mentioned  in  several  charters, 
and  is  supposed  to  have  been  progenitor  of  the  Riddells  of 
Swinbum  castle  in  Northumberland.  Sur  Patrick's  son, 
Walter  de  Riddell,  gut  all  his  lands  erected  into  the  firee  barony 
of  Riddell,  and  was  the  first  of  the  family  designated  of  that 
ilk.  He  confirmed  his  father^s  donations  to  Melrose,  and 
himself  made  many  donations  to  the  monks  of  that  place 
and  Kelso.  He  had  two  sons.  Sir  William,  and  Patrick,  who 
is  mentioned  in  several  writs. 

Sir  William,  the  elder  son,  was  knighted,  when  a  young 
man,  by  King  Alexander  II.  He  left  two  sons.  Sir  William, 
who,  with  his  kinsman,  Sir  Hugh  Riddell  de  Cranston, 
swore  a  forced  fealty  to  Edward  I.  of  England  in  1296,  and 
Galfrid  or  Geoffrey,  who  succeeded  his  brother.  Galfrid*8 
son.  Sir  WMIliam  de  Riddell,  succeeded  about  1325,  and  died 
in  the  reign  of  Robert  II.  His  son,  Quintin  de  Riddell,  was 
the  next  proprietor,  and  the  fifth  in  regular  descent  from 
him,  but  the  fourth  who  possessed  the  lands,  was  Walter  de 
Riddell  of  that  ilk,  who  married  Mariuta,  daughter  of  Sur 
James  Pringle  of  Galashiels,  and  died  in  the  beginning  of  the 
reign  of  James  VI.  He  had  three  sons :  Walter,  Robert, 
progenitor  of  the  Riddells  of  Klnglasa,  and  William. 

The  eldest  son,  Walter,  was  served  heir  to  his  father  in 
1588.  His  son,  Andrew  Riddell  of  Riddell  and  Haining  in 
Selkirkshire,  succeeded  in  1595.  llie  latter  was  twice  mar- 
ried, his  second  wife  being  Violet,  daughter  of  William  Dou- 
glas of  Pompherston,  Esq.  He  died  in  the  beginning  of  the 
reign  of  Charles  I.  With  four  daughters,  he  had  four  sons : 
1.  Sir  John,  the  first  baronet  of  the  family.  2.  William,  an- 
cestor of  the  Riddells  of  Kewhouse.  3.  James,  progenitor  of 
the  Riddells  of  Maybole ;  and  4.  Walter,  upon  whom  he  be- 
stowed the  lands  of  Haining.  This  gentleman*s  last  heir 
female,  Magdalene  Riddell,  married  David  Erskine  of  Dun, 
H  lord  of  session,  and  the  family  is  now  represented  by  the 
marquis  of  Ailsa,  through  the  Erskines  of  Dun. 

The  eldest  son,  John,  was  by  Charles  I.  created  a  baronet 
of  Nova  Scotia,  14th  ALiy  1G28.  With  two  daughters,  he 
had  four  sons,  namely,  Sir  Walter,  second  baronet ;  Sir  Wil- 
liam Riddell,  governor  of  Desburgh  in  Holland ;  and  John 
and  Thomas,  both  captains  in  the  Dutch  service. 

The  eldest  son.  Sir  Walter,  was  knighted  in  his  father*s 
lifetime,  and  succeeded  him  aa  second  baronet.  He  had 
three  sons :  Sir  John,  third  baronet ;  William,  progenitor  of 
the  Riddells  of  Glenriddel  in  Dumfries-shire,  of  whom  after- 
wards; and  Archibald,  one  of  the  ministers  of  Edinburgh, 
commemorated  by  Wodrow.  He  took  part  with  the  cele- 
brated Blackadder  in  conducting  field-preachings  in  the 
south,  and  about  the  year  1679,  suffered  imprisonment  fur 
his  adherence  to  the  covenant.  He  had  two  sons :  Captain 
Walter  Riddell  of  Granton,  who  died  without  issue,  and  Dr. 
John  Riddell,  phyMcian  in  Edinburgh. 

Sir  John  Riddell,  third  baronet,  got  a  remission  from 
James  VII.  in  1687,  for  having  been  engaged  in  some  trea- 
sonable practices  against  the  government.     His  son,  Sir 


RIDDELL, 


842 


OF  GLENRIDDELL. 


WalUfr,  died  in  1747.  The  fifth  bjironft,  his  son,  also  named 
Sir  Walter,  was  succeeded  in  1765,  by  his  son,  Sir  John, 
sixth  baronet,  who  died  at  Hampstead,  near  London,  16th 
April  1768.  By  his  wife,  Jane,  eldest  daughter  and  erentu- 
ally  heiress  of  James  Buchanan,  Esq.  of  Sunden,  Bedford- 
shire, he  had  three  sons,  who  all  succeedeil  to  the  baronetcy, 
namely,  Sir  Walter,  Sir  James  Bndianan  Kiddell,  an  officer 
l&t  foot- guards,  who  died  at  Brunswick  a  few  months  after  in- 
heriting tlie  title ;  and  Sir  John  Buchanan  Riddeli,  M.P.  for 
Selkirkshire.  The  latter  died  in  April  1819,  leaving  4  sons 
and  5  daughters.  The  eldest  son,  Sir  Walter  Buchanan  lUd- 
dell,  barrister-at-luw,  10th  baronet,  bom  Aug.  8,  1810,  has 
been  since  February  1842  steward  of  the  manori.tl  courts  of 
the  duke  of  Northuuib^frland.  Recorder  of  Maidstone.  He 
married  in  1859  Alicia,  youngest  daughter  of  William  Ripley, 
Esq.,  62d  foot. 

The  Riddells  of  Ardnamurch.nn,  in  Argrleshire,  are  snid  to 
be  descended  from  G.ilfridns  Riddel,  baron  of  Blare  in  Gui- 
enne,  who  aided  the  Normans  in  the  conquest  of  Apulia,  and 
accompanied  William  the  Conqueror  to  England.  From 
that  monarch  he  obtained  considerable  grants  of  land.  John 
Riddeli,  the  sixteenth  in  descent  from  Gnlfridus,  was  the 
first  of  the  family  in  Scotland.  He  married  a  daughter  of 
Thomas  Urquhart  of  Cromarty,  and  w.ns  succeeded  in  1584 
by  his  son  James  Riddeli,  who,  engaging  in  commercial  pur- 
suits, was  for  some  time  a  merchant  at  Kasimier  in  Craco- 
nia,  Poland.  In  Douglas'  Baronage,  (page  20!,)  his  father's 
name  is  said  to  have  been  Robert,  the  second  son  of  William 
Riddeli  of  that  ilk.  The  annorial  bearings  of  the  two  fami- 
lies are  difierent,  and  as  it  does  not  appear  that  the  stock 
from  which  they  both  were  derived  was  tlie  same,  it  is  prob.-ibk' 
that  there  is  some  mistake  in  this  sLitement.  About  1595 
James  Riddeli  was  made  a  fi*ce  denizen  of  the  mval  city  of 
Kusimier,  and  in  1602  he  ha<1,  from  Alexander,  then  king  of 
Poland,  all  the  privileges  of  a  free  citizen  ct^nfimied  to 
him.  On  his  return  to  Scotland,  he  became  a  burgess  and 
guild  -  brother  of  Edinburgh,  and  died  in  1G20.  By  his 
wife,  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Adam  Allan,  merchant  in  Edin- 
burgh, he  had  a  son.  James,  who  acquired  the  lands  of  Kin- 
gla-si,  in  Linlithgowshire,  and  was  the  first  deMgnated  by  that 
title.  During  the  civil  wars  in  the  time  of  Charles  L,  he 
was  much  in  the  confidence  of  Oliver  Cromwell  and  General 
Monk.  The  former  lodged  with  him  in  his  house  at  Leith,  and 
he  aflcrwartls  cnrriod  on  a  correspondence  with  him.  He 
was  app<jinted  by  the  Scots  Estates  commissary  genenil  to 
their  forces  in  tlicir  expedition  to  the  north,  and  is  so  desig- 
nated in  his  burgess  ticket  from  the  town  of  Brechin  in  1645. 
This  gentleman  was  among  the  first  who  established  the 
woollen  manufactures  in  Scotland.  Mr.  Hogc,  the  mini.^ter 
of  South  I^ith,  having  remembered  the  king  in  his  pra\crs, 
the  church  was,  by  General  Monk's  order,  turned  into  a  sta- 
ble, and  the  parishioners  prevented  from  worshipping  then\ 
Previous  to  Monk's  return  to  England,  he  asked  Mr.  Riddeli 
if  there  was  anything  wherein  he  could  be  scnicrable  to  lilm 
or  his  family.  He  replied  that  the  only  favour  ho  cnulJ 
show  him  was  that  he  would  rewtore  their  church  to  the  par- 
ishioners of  South  Leith,  and  allow  them  their  fanner  liluTty 
of  meeting  in  it  for  divine  sen'ice.  Monk  not  only  granted 
the  request,  but  ordered  a  new  roof  to  be  put  upon  the  church 
at  his  own  expense.  In  return  the  inhabitants  conferred  on 
Mr.  Riddeli  a  large  ep.nce  in  the  body  of  the  church  for  a 
seat  for  his  family.  Ho  afterwards  got  a  pass  from  Genenil 
Monk,  dated  25th  November  1659,  allowing  him  to  pass  and 
repass,  free  from  molestation,  with  his  sen'ants,  horses,  arms, 
&&,  about  his  private  affau^    After  the  Restoration,  he  ob- 


tained from  Chvlee  II.  en  order  to  lumidf  and  nme  oths^ 
for  erecting  a  new  manofactoiy  of  woollen  and  tow  ends,  tbt 
first  of  the  kind  in  Scotland,  for  which  he  obtained  ao  set  ef 
the  Scott  parliament  held  at  EdinKmgh,  SSd  Septadbg 
1663,  and  John,  earl  of  Crawford  and  lindiay,  joiDtd  ii 
partnership  with  him,  their  indenture  of  oopartnciy  h&m 
dated  6th  December  1663.  He  died  in  1674.  Bj  Us  wife. 
Elizabeth,  daughter  of  George  Foulia  of  Barelston,  nuuter  «f 
tlie  king's  mint,  he  had  four  soni  and  two  dangfaterL 

The  eldest  son,  James  Riddeli  of  Ejnglan,  waa  a  eapCu 
in  the  Dutch  service.  He  greatly  enenmhered  bii  patnal 
estate,  and  dying  nnmarried,  in  1688,  waa  snoeeeded  by  ha 
brother,  Geoip^,  a  wine  merchant  at  Leith.  Tfab  gcBtlnua 
married  Jane,  eldest  daughter  of  Captain  John  Taylor,  ad 
dying  in  1706,  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Captain  Gsorp 
Riddeli,  who  married  Christian,  daaghter  of  Andrew  Patir- 
son  of  Kirktown,  and  had  5  sons  and  2  dnnghterL  The  son 
were,  1.  George,  who  became  an  eminent  physician  in  York- 
shire, Virginia.  2.  Andrew  Riddeli  of  Enfield,  an  oSea  m 
the  armv.  3.  James  Riddeli  of  Belt  on,  the  first  of  Ardoa* 
murchan,  of  whom  afterwards.  4.  John,  who  aoqnireil  a 
considerable  estate  by  commerce  in  Virginia;  and  5.  Robot 
Riddeli  of  Carzield,  Dumfries-shure,  an  officer  in  the  njil 
regiment  of  horsegnards  blue.  ■ 

The  extensive  estate  of  Ardnamarchnn  was,  with  Saniit  | 
and  the  lead  mines  of  Strontian,  in  Arg}-leshire,  aoqnitvd  bj 
James  Riddeli,  LLD.,  the  third  son.     He  was  for  soras  tiat  | 
superintendent-general  to  the  Hon.  society  of  the  British  fitb- 
cry,  which  ofiice  he  resigned  in  1754.     He  was  also  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Society  of  Arts  and  Sciences  in  England,  sod  M 
the  degree  of  LLD.  confeircd  upon  him  by  the  nnifmu'tfof 
Edinburgh,  27th  February  1767.     He  was  created  a  bmnet. 
2d  September  1778,  and  died  2d  November  1797.    hj  Idi 
wife,  Mary,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Thomas  Milles  of  Bil- 
luckby  Hall,  Norfolk,  he  had  two  sons,  Thomas  Milles  Bid- 
dell  and  George  James  Riddeil,  who  both  possessed  property    > 
in  the  county  of  Norfolk.    The  former  predeceased  bis  fithcr 
on  17th  July  1796,  leaving,  by  his  wife,  Margaretts,  dsogb-   ■■ 
ter  of  Colonel  Dugald  Campbell  of  Lochueil,  Ai^leshin,  t*o    , 
sons  and  a  daughter. 

Mr  James  Milles  Riddeil,  the  elder  son,  bom  June 3, 1787i 
succeeded  his  grandfather  as  2d  baronet  in  1 797.  He  gradostcd    i 
at  Christ  Church,  Oxford,  and  was  made  D.C.L.    Henanied 
in  1^22,  Mary,  youiige>t  daughter  of  Sir  Richard  Broc^   . 
hart,  of  Norton  I'riory.  Chester,  issue,  two  sons  and  adsagb- 
ter.     He  died  Se])t.  28,  18til.     His  elder  son,  Sir  Tbonm   ■ 
.Milles  Riddeli,  born  Dec  25,  1822,  married  in  1851  l\»xj   \ 
Aniie,  daughter  of  John  Hodg.son,  Esq.  of  St.  Petersbnrgi 

The  Riddells  of  Glenriddell,  Dumfries-shur,  were  dewend- 
cd  fn>ni   Sir  Walter  Riddeil,  second  baronet  of  that  ilki 
through  William,  his  second  son,  an  advocate  at  the  Soottiik 
har.    This  William  acquired  the  lands  of  Kriarshaw  ui  Te 
viotdale,  and  afterwards  Glenriddell,  and  married  EliiabeCb, 
daughter  of  Captain  Francis  Wauchope  of  the  Kiddry  fsmilr. 
Mis  son,  Walter,  married  Catharine,  eldest  daughter  of  Sir 
Robert  Lawrie  of  Maxwellton,  baronet,  and  had,  with  two 
daughters,  two  sons,  Robert,  who  succeeded  him,  and  John, 
who  married    Helen,   daughter  of   Sir   Michael   Balfbnr  of 
Denmilne,  with  issue.    The  elder  son,  Robert,  married  Jano, 
danghter  of  Alexander  Fergusson  of  Craigdarroch,  by  whom 
he  hail  sevenil  daughters. 

Of  this  family  was  Robert  Riddeil  of  GlenriddeU,  an  oni- 
ncnt  antiquarian  and  mubical  amatenr,  and  an  earij  prttOB 
and  correspondent  of  Bums.  He  composed  the  ain  to  at*^ 
ral  of  Boma*  wwg^  partkolarij  'Tha  Banks  of  Kith,'  *nt 


ROBBRT  II.  34 

the  Bruce.  In  ncconlnncc  wiLli  the  act  of  settlC' 
iDGut  of  the  crown,  lie  sncceedcd  to  the  throne  on 
the  death  of  David  II.,  Fcbniarf  22,  1371,  being 
at  tliat  time  55  years  of  age,  and  in  the  followiag 
month  bo  woa  crowned  at  Scoue  br  the  nrchbbliop 
of  St.  Audrcwj.  William,  Sxrsl  carl  of  Douglas, 
at  flret  opposed  liis  accession,  and  nrgcd  n  riglit  to 
the  throne  as  representative  of  tlic  fiiniilies  of 
Coinya  and  Baliol,  but,  finding  all  the  nobles  ad- 
verse to  ills  cldm,  he  prudently  withdrew  bis  pre- 
tensions. For  some  yean  immediately  following 
Robert's  succession,  Scotland  was  visited  by  n 
grievous  scarcity,  and  for  the  space  of  two  years 
the  plague  lagcd  with  great  violence.  Fur  the 
princip.'Xl  events  of  bis  reign,  none  of  which  were 
of  gi'cat  importauce,  reference  may  bo  made  to 
the  article  Albany,  first  dake  of  (vol.  i.  p.  33). 
Tlic  year  before  bb  father's  death,  the  duke,  tlieii 
cnrl  of  rife  and  Menteith,  n-as  .ippoiiitcd  governor 
of  the  liiugdom.  King  Robert,  now  relieved  of 
the  cnres  of  sovereignty,  retired  from  Dnufemiline, 
nlicrc  ihc  court  was  then  held,  to  hk  castle  of 
Duiidonnld,  in  Kyle,  wliero  ho  died,  lOtb  April 

I  1390,  in  his  75rh  year,  and  the  19tU  of  his  reign. 
The  fullowiiig  tvuodciit  is  t.iken  frani  a  )iortrait  of 

i    Robert  II.  in  Piukertou's  Scottish  Gallery: 


I 


■^ 


t  ROBERT  III. 

ilc  was  twice  muiied,  first  to  Elizabeth,  du^> 
ter  of  Sir  Alexander  Mure  of  Rotrallan,  by  wham 
he  liod  fottr  sous  and  aix  dangbten,  all  bom  h-  j 
foro  marriage;   and,  Hcondiy,  to  Enphemii,  i  | 
dangliter  of  the  earl  of  Ross,  by  whom  bahid  ! 
two  sons  and  four  daughters.    Besides  t^ctc,  be  | 
had  a  numerous  illegitimato  progeny  by  Tirioni  I 
women.    Ho  was  popularly  designated  "filev- 
£ye,"  from  the  breaking  oat  of  an  inflammitiu  { 
in  Ills  eyelids,  which  deformed  his  originally  bud-  | 
some    conntcnoncc.     According   to  a  trodilini,   ' 
which  Lord  Hailes  has  been  at  pains  to  refBte,bis 
mother  was  killed  by  being  thrown  from  her  hooe 
wlien  pregnant  with  him;  and,  being  cat  out  of 
her  side,  by  the  Ca^arcan  operation,  he  Rceind 
a  wound  in  one  of  bis  eyes  from  the  surgtoo'i 
Imifi',  which  left  there  an  unseemly  marii  ever 
afternards. 

ROBCUT  III.,  eldest  son  of  Robert  n.,  by  EC- 
zabetli  Alni-e,  w.is  bom  abont  1340,  and,  dnrin; 
his  father's  reign,  bore  the  title  of  earl  of  CinkL 
Ilis  Christian  name  was  John,  bnt  on  sncceeding 
to  the  throne,  be  changed  it  to  Robert,  to  wIdcL 
the  Scots  wcie  partial,  and  considered  John,  liter 
John  Bnliul  and  King  John  of  England,  aaim- 
lucfcy  name  for  a  king.  He  married  Annabello, 
a  daughter  of  Sir  John  Dnimmond  of  Stobball,  by 
whom  he  hnU  several  children.  During  the  great- 
er pni-t  of  his  reign,  the  kingdom  was  di9tnri>e(l 
by  the  fcuda  aud  dissensions  of  a  rude  and  turbn- 
Icnt  nobility.  In  his  youth,  the  king  had  ^^ 
colvcci  a  kick  from  a  horse,  ivhich  rendered  Lira 
latne,  uud  us  he  wiis  of  nu  indolent  and  pficlfic 
disposition,  but  nmiabic  and  intelligent  wilhal, 
the  administration  of  afliiirs  devolved  upon  his 
brother,  the  carl  of  Fife,  created  by  bim  daks  of 
Alb;tny,  with  the  title  of  gnai-dian  of  Ihc  kuig  ul 
kingdom.  Robert's  eldest  sou,  the  duke  of  Rotbe- 
say,  w.is  by  a  strong  party  of  the  nobility  cooii- 
d(.-red  to  hare  a  belter  riglit  to  that  post  than  llio 
king's  lirotbcr,  and  in  1306,  Albany  was  com- 
pelled 10  resign  his  oDicc.  When  Henry  IV.  of 
England  invaded  Scotland  in  1400,  the  govern- 
ment was  in  the  hands  of  the  heir  apparent.  Bnt 
the  licentious  habits  of  that  lll-fnted  prince  led 
his  father,  in  1402,  to  give  Albany  an  order  to  «- 
rest  him.  He  was  iinprlsgned  in  tho  casllt  of 
Falkland,  and  there  he  died,  iu  his  29tb  year. 


ROBERTSON 


346 


OF  STROWAN. 


on  her  marriage  witli  Menziea  of  Fothergill.  Robert  took 
fur  liiB  second  wife  one  of  the  dnughtera  and  oo-hetreMes  of 
Fordell,  and  had  nn  odIj  aon,  Dnnoui.  In  the  celebrated 
foray  whicli  the  Hif;hlander8  made  into  Angoa  in  1392,  the 
cinn  Dunacliio  acted  a  conspicuooa  part.  It  was  on  this  oo- 
casion  tliat  it  appeared  for  the  finit  time  as  a  distinct  tribe. 

Tliom:is,  the  2d  son  of  the  2d  marriage,  had  a  dr^  who  ob- 
tained part  of  her  father*s  possesuons  on  manning  Alexander, 
2d  sun  of  Tatrick  of  Lude,  but  tlie  estate  of  Strowan  went, 
probabijr  by  marriage  of  an  elder  dr.  of  Thomas,  to  Duncan, 
tlie  son  of  itcibert,  who  is  mentioned  in  the  RokUi  ScotuB  as 
Duncanut  d«  Atholin,  dominut  d«  Ranagh^  or  Rannoch. 
From  his  von,  Robert  JRiach  (grizzled),  who  sacceeded  him, 
the  clun  derive  their  name  of  llubertson. 

Tliis  Robert  was  noted  for  his  predatory  incursions  into 
the  lowlands,  and  is  historically  known  as  tlie  chief  who  ar- 
retted and  delirercd  up  to  the  vengeance  of  the  government, 
Robert  Graham  and  tlie  master  of  AthoU,  two  of  the  mur- 
derers of  James  I.,  for  which  he  was  rewarded  with  a  crown 
charter,  dated  in  1451,  erecting  his  whole  lands  into  a  free 
barony.  He  also  received  the  honourable  augmentation  to 
his  arms  of  a  naked  man  manacled  under  the  achievement, 
with  the  motto,  Virtuiis  gloria  mercfs.  He  was  mortally 
wounded  in  the  head  near  tlie  village  of  Auchtergaven,  in  a 
conflict  with  Robert  Forrester  of  Torwood,  with  whom  he 
had  a  dispute  regarding  the  lands  of  Little  Dunkeld.  Bind- 
ing up  his  head  with  a  wliite  cloth,  he  rode  to  Perth,  and 
obtained  from  the  king  a  new  grnnt  of  the  lands  of  Strowan. 
On  his  rctuiTi  home,  he  died  of  his  wounds.  He  had  three 
sons,  Alexander,  Robert,  and  Patrick.  Robert,  the  second 
son,  was  the  ancestor  of  the  earls  of  Portmore,  a  title  now 
extinct,  (see  Poutmokr,  Earl  of). 

Tlie  eldest  son,  Alexander,  was  twice  married.  By  his 
first  wife,  a  dau^liter  of  the  third  Lord  Glammis,  grandson 
of  Lady  Jane  Stewart,  daughter  of  Robert  XL,  he  hnd  four 
sons  and  a  dnugiitcr.  The  sons  were,  Dnncin,  who  prede- 
ceased iiis  father,  leaving  a  son,  William ;  Robert;  Andrew, 
progenitor  of  the  Robertsons  of  Ladrkirk.  and  other  families 
of  the  name ;  and  Jiinics,  ancestor  of  the  Robertsons  of  Auch- 
loeks,  &c.  The  dau;;hter  married  Moray  of  Ogilvy  and  Aber- 
c;tiniic.  His  second  wife,  a  dan^rhter  of  the  earl  of  Atholl, 
bore  to  hiui  two  sons  and  one  daughter.  The  sons  were. 
Alexander,  progenitor  of  the  Robertsons  of  Faskally,  and 
John,  of  whom  sprung  the  Robertsons  of  Muirtown,  Gladney, 
&c.     The  daughter.  Marjjarct,  married  the  earl  of  Errol. 

Alexan«lcr  Robertson  of  Strowan  died  in,  or  shortly  prior  to, 
1  .'>U7,  and  w;is  siucceedeii  by  hi*  grand«on,  William.  This  chief 
had  some  dispute  with  the  carl  of  Atholl  concerning  the  marches 
of  their  estates,  and  was  killed  by  a  party  of  the  earl's  follow- 
ers, in  ir»30.  Taking  advantage  of  a  wadset  or  mortgage 
which  he  held  over  the  lands  of  Strow.-m,  the  earl  seized  near- 
ly the  hnlf  of  the  family  estate,  which  the  Robertsons  cjiuld 
never  again  recover.  William's  son,  Robert,  had  2  sons,  Wil- 
liam, who  died  without  issue,  and  Donald,  who  succeeded  him. 

Robert,  the  son  of  Donald,  was  the  tenth  laird  of  Strowan. 
He  sold  a  considerable  part  of  the  estate,  but  the  sale  was 
reduced  by  a  decreet  of  recognition,  .and  a  grant  thereof  given 
to  John  Robertson,  merchant  in  Kdinbnrgh,  a  near  relation 
of  the  family.  The  latter  got  a  charter  under  the  great  seal, 
dated  Aug.  7,  IfiOG,  but  he  reconveyed  the  same,  under  a 
htrict  entail,  to  the  said  Robert  Robertson  of  Strowan,  and  his 
heirs  male.  This  Ri»bort,  by  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Macdo- 
nald  of  Keppoch,  had  4  sons  and  1  daughter,  who  married 
.Macintosh  of  Strone.  Tlio  sons  were,  Alexander,  Donald, 
tutor  of  Strowan,  Dunc.in  .Uor  of  Drumuchune,  and  James. 

The  eldest  son,  Alexander,  married  a  daughter  of  Graham 


of  Inchbraikie,  and  died  in  1636,  leaving  an  infant  iob,  Al- 
exander, in  whose  minority  the  government  of  tlw  dan  de- 
volved upon  his  nncle,  Donald.  Devoted  to  the  eaaa  flf 
Charles  I.,  the  Utter  raised  a  regiment  of  hia  name  sad 
followers,  and  was  with  the  marqoia  of  MontroM  ia  ill  Ui 
battles.  Montmsc*8  commission  to  him  aa  eolooel  cf  Ik 
regiment  is  dated  June  10,  1646.  From  Monlmie,  fhm 
Charles  IL  in  his  exile,  and  fnmi  General  Middleton  sod 
others,  he  received  several  lettera  which  are  still  prenrred. 
AAer  the  Restoration,  the  king  settled  a  pension  upon  liin. 

His  nephew,  Alexander  Robertson  of  Strowan,  wu  semd 
heir  to  nine  of  hui  predecessors,  22d  FelmiaiT,  1681,  nsmdf, 
up  to  the  Duncan  de  Atholia  designed  Dominna  de  Banned 
before  mentioned.  He  was  twice  married,  but  his  soo,  R»- 
bert,  by  his  first  wife,  a  daughter  of  Dmmmond  of  Micfasny, 
predeceased  him.  By  his  second  wife,  Marion,  dangbttr  of 
General  Baillie  of  Ijelham,  he  had  two  sons  and  one  dsa^ 
ter,  and  died  in  1688.  Dancan,  the  2d  son  by  the  2(1  msr- 
riage,  serve^l  in  Russia,  with  distinction,  under  Peter  the  GresL 

Alexander,  the  elder  son  of  the  second  marriage,  was  tbt 
celebrated  Jacobite  chief  and  poet.     Bom  about  1670,  he 
was  destined  for  the  church,  and  sent  to  the  university  of  St 
Andrews;  but  his  father  and  brother  by  the  fintmarrisf^e 
dying  within  a  few  months  of  each  other,  he  snooeeded  to  thi 
family  estate  and  the  chief^ihip  in   1688.     Soon  after,  lie 
joined  tlie  Viscount  Dundee,  when  he  appeared  in  arms  in 
the  Highlands  for  the  ciuse  of  King  James,  but  thoogh  hi 
does  not  appear  to  have  been  at  Killiecrankie,  and  was  still 
under  age,  he  was,  for  his  share  in  this  rising,  attainted  by 
a  decreet  of  parliament  in  absence  in  1690,  and  his  nbtes 
forfeited  to  the  crown.    He  retired,  in  consequence,  to  the 
court  of  the  exiled  monarch  at  St.  Gennains,  where  he  fired 
for  several  years,  and  serx-ed  one  or  two  campaigns  in  tb« 
French  army.     In  1703,  Queen  Anne  granted  him  a  remis- 
Mon.  when  he  returned  to  Scotland,  and  resided  nnmoksted 
on  his  estates,  but  negiccting  to  get  the  remission  psned 
tlic  seaLi,  the  forfeiture  of  1690  was  never  legally  lepesled. 
With  .about  oOO  of  his  clun  he  joined  the  earl  of  Mar  in  1715, 
and  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  SheriiTmuir,  bat  rrs- 
cued.     Soon  after,  however,  he  full  into  the  hands  of  a  partr 
of  soldiers  in  the  Highlands,  and  was  ordered  to  becondact- 
ed  to  Edinburgh,  but,  with  the  a^<i<istance  of  his  sifter,  he 
contrived  to  csi*ape  on  the  w:iy,  when  he  again  took  refuge  in 
France.     In  172^1,  the  estate  of  Strow.m  was  granted  by  the 
government  to  Margaret,  the  chiefs  sifter,  by  a  chaiter  un- 
der the  gi'eat  seal,  and  in  17'JG  she  di>poned  the  Sji;ne  In 
trust  for  the  behoof  of  her  brother,  substituting,  in  the  event 
of  his  death  witiiout  lawful  heirs  of  his  b'Hly,  Duncan,  soo  of 
Alexander  RobcrtKon  of  Drnmachune,  bur  father's  cousin,  and 
t)ie  next  lawful  heir  male  of  the  fainilv.     Marjiaret  died  an- 
married  in  1727.     Her  brother  had  returned  to  Scotland  the 
previous  year,  and  obtaining  in  1731  a  remisMon  for  his  life, 
took  possefiiion  of  his  estate.     In  1745  he  once  more  "mar- 
shalled his  clan**  in  behaif  of  the  Stuarts,  but  his  age  pre- 
venting him  from  personally  taking  any  active  part  in  the 
rebellion,  his  name  w:is  passed  over  in  the  list  of  prescrip- 
tions tint  followed.     He  died  in  his  own  house  of  Carie  in 
RanniK^h,  April  18,  1749,  in  his  Slst  year,  without  lawfol 
issue,  and  in  him  ended  the  direct  male  line.     A  volume  of 
his  poems  wiis  publibhed  after  his  death.     An  edition  t:i» 
reprinted  at  Edinburgh  in  1785,  r2nio,  containing  al^»o  the 
'  History  and  Martial  Achievements  of  the  Ri>bcrt»ons  of 
Strowan.*     He  is  said  to  have  fonned  the  prototype  of  the 
Baron  of  Rradwardine  in  Waverley. 

The  portion  of  the  original  estate  of  Strowan  which  remain- 
ed, devolved  upon  Duncan  Rol>ertson  of  Drumachune,  a  pro- 


ROBERTSON 


347 


OF  LUDE. 


pertj  which  his  great-grandfuther,  Duncan  Mor^  (who  died 
in  1687,)  brother  of  Donald  the  tutor,  had  acquired  from  the 
AthoU  family.  As,  however,  his  name  was  not  included  in 
the  last  act  of  Indemnitj  passed  bj  the  government,  he  was 
dispossessed  of  the  estate  in  1 752,  when  he  and  his  familj 
retired  to  Franco.  His  son,  Colonel  Alexander  Kubertson, 
obtained  a  restitution  of  Strowan  in  1784,  and  died,  unmarried, 
in  1822.  Duncan  J/or*s  second  sun,  Donald,  had  a  son, 
called  Robert  Bane^  wlioise  grandson,  Alexander  Robertson, 
sow  succeeded  to  the  estjite. 

The  son  of  the  latter,  Mujor-general  George  Duncan  Rob- 
ertson of  Strowan,  C.B.,  passed  upwards  of  thirty  years  in 
active  service,  and  received  the  cross  of  the  Imperial  Austrian 
order  of  Leopold.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Geoige 
Dancan  Robertson,  bom  2Gth  July  1816,  at  one  time  an  offi- 
cer in  the  42d  Highlanders. 

The  force  which  the  Robertsons  could  bring  into  the  field 
'Was  estimated  at  800  in  1715,  and  700  in  1745.  Tiie  prin- 
cipal seat  of  Robertson  of  Strowan  was  formerly  the  castle  of 
Invervack;  it  is  now  Mount  Alexander  in  Rannoch.  The 
badge  of  the  clan  is  the  fern  or  bracken. 


Of  the  branches  of  the  family,  the  Robertsons  of  Lude  in 
Bl&ir-Athol  are  the  oldest,  being  of  contemporary  antiquity 
to  that  uf  Strowan. 

Patrick  de  Atholia,  eldest  son  of  the  2d  marriage  of  Dun- 

caxx  de  Atholia,  received  from  his  father,  at  his  death,  about 

lo58,  the  lands  of  Lude.    He  is  mentioned  in  1391,  by  Wyn- 

toun  (Book  iL  p.  367)  as  one  of  the  chieftains  and  leaders  of 

Itie  clan.     He  had,  with  a  daugiiter,  married  to  Donald,  son 

of    Farquhar,  ancestor  of  the  Farquharsons  of  Inverciiuid,  2 

sons,  Donald  and  Alexander.     The   latter,  known   by  the 

naine  of  Hua  or  Red,  from  the  colour  of  his  hair,  acquired 

tli«  estate  of  Stmthloch,  fur  whicli  he  had  a  charter  from 

«laK.ines  IL  in  1451,  and  w:(s  anceiitor  of  the  Robertsons  of 

^trathlocli,   Perthshire.     His  descendants   were  called   the 

I^  xuuns  Rua.    The  last  male  heir  of  the  family  was  General 

•'ohn  Rcid,  who  left  his  lar^e  fortune  to   found  a  music 

<^ia  air  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh  (see  page  334  of  this 

'^'olume). 

Donald,  the  elder  son,  succeeded  his  father.  He  resigned 
'>\s  land.H  of  Lude  into  ti)e  king's  luinds  on  Fek  7,  1447,  but 
^m^ed  before  he  could  receive  his  infeftmcnt.  He  hud  two 
^<^ns:  John,  who  got  the  charter  under  the  great  seal,  dated 
^^:irch  31,  1448,  erecting  the  lands  of  Lude  into  a  barony, 
C^  proceeding  on  his  father's  rei»i  gnat  ion  ;  and  Donald,  who  got 
*^^  his  patrimony  the  lands  of  Strathgarry.  This  branch  of 
^  — nde  ended  in  an  heiress,  who  married  an  illegitimate  son  of 
^^tewart  of  Invermeath.  About  1700,  Strathgarry  was  sold 
^«  another  family  of  tlie  name  of  Stewart. 

By  his  wife,  Margaret,  d.iughter  of  Sir  John  Drummond, 
^%>ncestor  of  the  Citrls  of  Perth,  John  Robertson  of  Lude  had 
"^  wn  sons,  Donald,  his  succet^sor,  and  John,  ancestor  of  the 
^^iubertaons  of  Guny.  "  Robertson  of  Guay"  joined  the  in- 
^^urgents  in  1715,  was  taken  prisoner,  and  confined  in  New- 
^^ate  in  1716,  when  the  estate  was  forfeited. 

Donald,  the  elder  son,  the  next  laird  of  Lude,  died  in  1476. 
Charles,  his  son,  married  Lilias,  daughter  of  Sir  John  I«i- 
'^nont  of  I  jmiont.  chief  of  the  name.    This  lady  brought  with 
Iker  a  curious  old  harp,  ailled  the  **  Lamont  Harp,*'  which 
^as  been  in  the  possession  of  the  family  for  several  centuries, 
mnd  is  mentioned  in  Gunn's  historical  work  on  the  Perform- 
aance  of  the  Harp.     He  had  a  son,  John,  c:illed  M*Charlick, 
SOD  of  Charles,  and  a  daughter,  Manon,  who  married  Alex- 
ander Red,  eldest  son  of  Alexander  Red  of  Strathloch. 
The  SOD,  John  M'Charlick,  also  called  Tarloson,  married 


Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Ogilvie  of  luchmartiD,  of 
the  family  of  Findlater. 

His  son,  also  named  John,  succeeded  while  still  a  minor, 
and  was  afterwanls  induced,  by  his  mother  and  her  brother.  Sir 
Patrick  Ogilvy  of  Inchmartin,  to  resign  the  barony  of  Lude  in 
favour  of  the  latter,  reserving  his  liferent.  The  estate  was  not 
entirely  recovered  from  the  Ogilvies  till  the  time  of  his  grand- 
son, and  then  only  by  the  payment  of  a  large  sum  of  money. 
In  1563,  Queen  Mary  presented  John's  wife,  Beatrix  Gardyn, 
widow  of  Finla  More,  ancestor  of  the  Farquharsons  of  Inver- 
cauld,  with  her  own  harp,  which  has  been  carefully  pre- 
ser%'ed  as  a  family  heirloom.  (See  Gunn's  work,  as  above.) 
John  had,  with  one  daughter,  Marjory,  married  to  Farqnhar- 
Bon  of  Invercanld,  2  sons;  Alexander,  and  John,  of  Monzie. 

Alexander,  the  elder  son,  the  first  of  the  family  who  ceased 
to  add  the  Christian  name  of  his  father  to  that  of  Robeitson, 
the  family  surname,  was  served  heir  in  1565.  He  married 
Agnes,  daughter  of  Alexander  Gordon  of  Abergeldie,  and 
died  in  1615.  With  5  daughters  he  had  8  sons.  1.  Alexan- 
der, his  successor.  2.  Donald,  who  got  from  his  father  the 
lands  of  Kincraigie^  and  was  ancestor  of  that  family.  8. 
John,  who  got  the  lands  of  Inver.  The  latter,  with  his  bro- 
ther, Donald,  greatly  assisted  Montrose  in  bringing  the 
Atholl  men  to  the  royal  standard  in  1644.  By  Montrose, 
John  of  Inver  was  made  captain  and  keeper  of  Blair  Castle. 
Numerous  letters  to  him  from  the  great  marquis  are  printed 
in  Napier's  Memoirs  of  Montrose.  His  son,  Donald,  acquired 
the  estate  of  Tuliybelton,  and  from  him  descends,  in  a 
direct  line.  Major-general  Richardson  Robertson,  C.B.,  of 
Tuliybelton,  Perthshire  (1862).  Isabel,  Sd  danghter  of  Alex- 
ander Robertson  of  Lude,  married  Alexander  Forbes  of  Newe. 

The  eldest  son,  Alexander,  a  zealous  protestant,  assisted, 
in  1627,  in  raising  3,000  men  for  the  service  of  Gustavua 
Adolphus,  king  of  Sweden.  He  married  Beatrix,  daughter 
of  George  Graham  of  Inclibraco,  now  Inchbraikie,  and  had, 
with  a  daughter,  2  sons,  Alexander,  his  successor,  and  John, 
of  Fowlis,  afterwards  tutor  of  Lude.  He  died,  suddenly,  in 
1639,  at  Dulcaben,  the  seat  of  the  earl  of  Portmore. 

The  elder  son,  Alexander,  was  a  minor  at  his  father's 
death,  and  his  uncle,  Patrick  Graham  of  Inchbraikie,  known 
as  '*  Black  Pate,"  beciime  his  guardian,  and  commanded  the 
Atholl  Highlanders  under  Montrose.  Though  quite  a  youth, 
Alexander  Robertson  of  Lude  also  joined  Montrose,  in 
"■  Highland  weed,"  and  was  with  him  at  Tippennuir.  His 
house  was  burned  by  Cromwell's  troops,  and  a  fine  levied  on 
the  estate.  Ho  died  in  1673.  He  was  three  times  married. 
By  his  1st  wife,  Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Menzies  of 
that  ilk,  he  had  a  daughter,  wife  of  Alexander  Robertson  of 
F.iskally.  By  his  2d  wife  he  had  no  issue.  By  his  Sd  wife, 
Catherine,  sister  of  the  &v&t  earl  of  Breadalbane,  he  had  3 
sons  and  a  daughter. 

His  eldest  son,  John,  in  1716,  gave  up  part  of  his  lands  to 
save  the  life  of  a  brother  who  was  taken  prisoner  for  having 
been  engaged  in  the  cause  of  the  StUJirts. 

He  was  succeeded  by  his  only  son,  also  John,  serA'ed  heu: 
in  Nov.  1730.  He  was  only  a  few  years  in  possession,  and  at 
his  death  left  2  sons  and  a  danghter. 

His  eldest  son,  James,  succeeded  when  only  4  years  old, 
and  was  served  heir  to  Ids  father  in  1758.  He  m.  his  cousm- 
gennan,  Margaret  2klercer  of  Aldie,  eldest  daughter  of  Hon. 
Robert  Nairne  and  Jean  Mercer,  heiress  of  the  ancient  family 
of  Aldie  and  Meikleour,  in  the  counties  of  Kinross  and  Perth 
(see  Sufplbment),  and  had  6  sons,  of  whom  five  entered 
the  army,  two  were  killed  in  actions,  one  at  Seringapatam, 
and  the  other  in  India,  and  one  died  in  the  West  Indies.  He 
himself  died  in  1802.    This  laird  was  62  years  in  possession. 


ROBERTSON 


348 


OF  LADYKIRK. 


He  was  Bucceeded  hj  his  eldest  son,  General  William 
Robertson  of  Lutic.  This  f^allant  officer  entered  the  armr  at 
15  years  of  ag^,  served  in  the  American  wnr,  and  in  Holland, 
and  also  at  the  taking  of  SL  Lucia,  and  seversd  of  the  West 
Iiiiiia  Islands.  In  179-1  he  raised  a  re;;lment  of  infantrj 
Called  the  Perthshire  Fencibles,  and  in  18U4  a  corps  of  volun- 
teers. In  1805  ho  accompanied  the  expedition  to  the  coast 
of  Spain  under  Sir  James  Murraj  Pulteney,  was  subsequently 
apIHiinted  to  the  ntufF  in  Scotland,  and  served  in  that  capa- 
city, :is  a  commanding  oflicer  in  tiie  Channel  Islands  and  in 
various  districts  in  England,  until  the  end  of  1813,  when  he 
wiis  promoted  to  the  rank  uf  liuutenant-general.  He  m.,  Ist, 
Margaret,  eldest  daughter  uf  George  Ilaidane  uf  Gleneagles, 
Perthshire  (represented  by  the  earl  of  Caniperdown),  and 
Hon.  Margaret  Drummond,  eldest  daughter  of  James,  viscount 
of  Strathallan  ;  issue,  2  mmis,  uf  whom  the  younger  died  in 
1814,  at  a  very  early  age.  General  Uobertson  married,  2dly, 
Mi>s  Menzies  of  Culdarcs ;  wilhuut  issue. 

His  eldi'.st  son,  Colonel  James  Alexander  Robertson,  f<ir- 
meriy  uf  the  82d  regiment,  is  now  the  representative  of  the 
family.  In  1860  he  printe<l,  for  private  circulation,  an  ac- 
count of  the  *  Comitatus  de  Atholi.i,  the  Earldom  of  Atholl. 
Its  l>oundaries  stated.  Also,  the  extent  therein  of  the  Pos- 
st^ssions  of  the  family  of  De  Atholia,  and  their  Descendants, 
the  lki)b«*rts(>ns.  With  Proofs  and  a  Map.*  The  estate  was 
sold,  in  1821,  to  a  gentleman  of  the  name  of  Mlnrov. 


The  Robertsons  of  Iiislics>,  Invcrness-shire,  are  de.<tcended 
from  Duncjiii,  second  son  of  Duncan  de  At/iolia^  dominut  Je 
lianaf/h^  above  mentioned.  One  of  this  family.  John  Robert- 
son, burgess  of  Inverness,  Ciilied,  fn>m  his  great  strength  and 
C4>urace,  "  Sta:w:irt  John,"  was  Kt:mdard- bearer  to  I^ird  lA>vat 
at  the  battle  of  Loch-Lftcliy  in  1544.  I'rom  William,  his 
ttiird  son,  .sprung  the  Robertsons  of  Kiiideaco,  Ross-shire, 
whicli  branclicd  off  abcmt  1511,  and  from  James,  William's 
Yoniii:cr  brother,  came  the  Robertsons  of  Shipland.  Another 
of  the  familv,  William  Rnbcrtson.  the  second  stvled  of  lushes, 
w;is  bred  to  the  law,  and  stiuiii-d  at  I^yden  with  the  cele- 
brated Sir  George  ^lackcnzie  of  Rosohaugh.  He  w:i8  em- 
ployed in  several  conlideiitial  puliticil  negotiations  by  the 
guvernment  of  iiis  time.  A  letter  from  him  to  the  duke  uf 
IL-uniitoii,  k>d,  it  is  st.-ited,  to  the  terms  of  Union. 

Arthur  John  Robertson  of  Inshe.s,  the  fittli  in  descent  from 
him,  possesses  in  Upp^r  Canada  a!id  the  United  States  an 
e.Kten.sive  territory,  derived  throu'^li  n;arri.age  wiili  a  Canadian 
latiy,  his  lirst  wit'e.  By  her  he  liad  two  sons  and  two  dangh- 
ters.  Arthur  Masterton,  the  elder  son,  wjus  Iwrn  January 
1),  182G;  Th'unas  Gilzean,  the  2d  son,  in  1827.  By  a  second 
mariia;:e  he  had  a  liaughter.  His  estates  in  Upper  Canada 
are  held  under  a  sisij^ular  old  original  grant,  signed  by  the 
hieroglypliics  of  18  Indian  cljiels,  March  15,  1791),  and  cer- 
tified officially  May  12,  171)7.  Captain  A.  Robertson,  4lli 
dragoon  guards,  is  the  son  of  Rolwrtson  of  Inshes. 


The  Robertsons  uf  Kindeaee  descend  fi-osn  William  Robert- 
son, 3d  son  of  John,  ancestor  of  the  Robertsons  of  Inshes,  by 
his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Fearn  of  PitiMillen.  Ho  obtained  from 
his  father,  in  patrimony,  several  lands  about  Inverness,  and 
having  accpiired  great  rielies  :ia  a  merchant,  pnrcha.sed,  in 
1G15,  the  lands  of  Orkney.  Xairnshi»e,  and  in  1639,  those  of 
Kindeace,  Ross-shire;  the  latter  becoming  the  chief  title  of 
the  family. 

Charles  Robertson.  Esq.  of  Kindeace,  Greeny.-irds,  and 
Glencabre,  bom  Jnly  26, 1790,  lieutenant-colonel  in  the  army, 
furmerly  in  the  78th  and  96th  regiments;  a  justice  of  the 
peace  and  deputy  lieutenant  of  Ross-shire;   succeeded  his 


father  in  1844;  married,  in  1816,  Helen,  4th  duster  and 
co-heir  of  Patrick  Cmikahank,  Esq.  of  Stracathru,  Forfiir^ 
shire,  issue,  William  Cmiksluuik,  bom  Maj  17,  1817,  tut 
other  sous  and  two  danghtert. 


The  family  of  Robertson  of  Ancbleeki,  PertLihire, 
from  James  Kobextson  of  Calvine,  2d  ton  of  the  5th  Inran  of 
St  rowan,  who  died  in  1505,  Donald,  the  fixst  of  Anchletki, 
being  his  2d  son. 

Charles,  an  ancestor  of  this  family,  called  CiarKol  mb 
Jead^  that  is,  **  Charles  of  the  Strings,**  from  hb  grrai  skili 
,'ts  n  harper,  married  Beatrix  Bobertaon,  of  the  famllj  of  Lode. 

In  1661  Duncan  Robertson  of  Anchleeka  was  a  eonmiit- 
sioner  of  supply  for  Perthshire. 

In  1821  Duncm  Robertson  of  Anchleeks  sold  the  estate  to 
liis  cousin,  Robert  Robertaon,  dtli  proprietor,  bom  Feb.  7, 
1777.  In  1827  this  gentleman  purchased  tbe  eatate  of  Mom- 
bland,  Devonshire.  In  1836  he  was  high  sheriff  of  Devon. 
A  justice  of  the  peace  and  deputy  lieutenant.  He  married, 
in  181G,  Bridget,  daughter  of  George  Atkinson,  Esq.  of  Tem- 
ple Sowerby,  Westmoreland ;  issue,  5  sons  and  6  danghters. 


The  Robertsons  of  Kinhtchmoid.nrt,  Inveniess-ahire,  are 
descended  from  John  Robertson  of  ^luirton,  Elginshire,  3d 
son  of  Alexander  Ri>bertson  of  Strowan,  by  his  wife,  Lady 
Klizabeth,  daughter  of  the  earl  of  .Atholl. 

The  fifth  in  succession,  the  Rev.  William  Rubertson,  one  of 
the  ministers  of  Edinbui^h,  w.ns  fatlier  of  Prindpal  Robert- 
son, a  memoir  of  whom  follows,  and  of  Mary,  who  married 
the  Rev.  James  Syme,  and  had  an  only  child,  Eleonora, 
mother  of  Henry,  Lord  Brougham.  The  prindpul  bad  three 
sons  and  two  daughters. 

D.ivid,  the  eldest  son,  born  in  17C4,  a  lientenant-cdonel  in 
the  armv,  raised  the  first  Malay  regiment  in  Cevlon.  He 
married,  in  1799,  Margaret  Macdouald  of  Kinlochmoidnrt, 
sister  and  heiress  of  Lioutenant-Cidonel  Domdd  Macdonald, 
governor  of  Tobago,  and  assumed  the  name  of  Macdonald. 
By  her,  he  had  3  sons,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son, 
William,  «if  whom  below. 

William,  the  second  son  of  Piincipal  Robertson,  was  a 
judge  of  the  court  of  session.  Boni  in  December  1754,  be 
passed  advocate  in  177.'>.  In  1779  he  was  chosen  procurator 
of  the  Ciiurch  of  Scotland,  and  in  1805  was  appointed  a  lonl 
of  session,  when  he  took  the  title  of  Lord  Robertson.  He 
retired  from  the  bench  in  182G,  and  died  20th  Nov.  1835.  He 
was  twice  married,  but  left  no  children  bv  either  of  his  wires. 

For  James,  the  3d  son,  and  the  two  daughters  of  Principal 
Robertson,  see  end  of  the  memoir  of  the  PrincipaPs  life,  page 

William  Robertson  of  Kinlochmoidart,  bom  May  26,  1803, 
the  eldest  son  of  Col.  David  Robertson,  married,  in  1828, 
Sarah  Adams,  daughter  of  James  Beck,  Esq.  of  Prior's  Hard- 
wick,  Warwickshire,  issue  3  sons.  W'illiam  .Tamejs  the  eld- 
est, bom  June  10,  1829,  married,  in  1857,  a  daughter  of 
Frederick  Sydney  Crawley,  Esq. 


The  Robertsons  of  I^ndykirk,  Berwickshire,  descend  from  a 
branch  of  the  Robertsuns  of  Strowan.  David  Ma^joribank^ 
youngest  son  of  Sir  John  Marjorib.inks  of  I..e4's,  Bart.,  mar- 
ried in  1834,  Mary  Sarah,  eldest  daughter  of  Sir  Tliomss 
Haggerston,  Bart,  of  Ellingham,  Northumberland,  and  co- 
heir of  her  mother  Margaret,  only  child  and  heir  of  Wiiliam 
Robert^son  of  I^dykirk,  with  issue,  and  assumed  the  name  of 
Robertson,  on  succeeding  to  the  est'ites  of  his  wife's  matonud 
grandfather.  Bora  April  2,  1797,  elected  M.P.  for  Berwick- 
shire in  May  1859. 


J. 


K 


[ 

\ 
I 

t 


*■ 


llOBER'l^ON, 


349 


WILLIAM,  D.D. 


The  fjimilT  of  Robkrtson- Glasgow  of  Aloantgreeniin, 

Arnbire,  trHciitionalljr  cinims  descent  from  the  Robertsons  of 

Strow^n,  Perthshire,  and  in  the  female  line,  represents  the 

Setons  of  Monkmylne,  Hsddinf^tonshire,  lineally  descended 

/rom  Sir  Chnstopher  Setoa  amd  Christian  Brace,  sister  of 

Bo)>ert  I. 

In    1C24,  'William  Robertson  parchased  from  Alexander 

3Ieims  certain  lands  and  heritaj^  in  the  parish  of  £ye- 

iiioath,  Dorwickshire.     Dying  in  1638,  he  was  sncoeeded  by 

his  elde5t  son,  John  Rol>ertRon.     The  latter  died  before  1668. 

His  eldest  son  died  previous  to  Sept  10, 1686.    His  son, 

William,  married  Margaret  Seton,  heiress  of  Robert  Seton  of 

^lonkmylne,  and  was,  in  consequence,  designated  of  that 

plaice.     His  sister,  Margaret,  married  Andrew  Home  of  Fair- 

xi«Tside,  and  had  an  only  daughter,  Elizabeth,  of  Faimeyude. 

William  Robertson  of  Monkmylne  died  in  1720.    He  had 

t  -wro  sons,  Willi:im,  who  succeeded  him,  and  Robert^  of  whom 

nfterwards,  and  a  diughter,  Isabelhi,  wife  of  William  Grame, 

ICaq.  of  Jordanstown. 

The  elder  son  of  William  Robertson  of  Monkmylne,  also 
itzamed  William,  died,  without  issue,  Aug.  7,  1738. 

He  was  succeeded  by  his  brother,  Robert  Robertson  of 
I^renderguest  and  Brownsbank,  born  Nov.  4,  1713,  married, 
X  s»t,  in  1743,  Margaret,  daughter  of  Rev.  George  Hume  of 
<3bimsidc,  2d  son  of  Alexander  Hume  of  Kennetsidehend,  one 
«>£*the  martyrs  of  the  Covenant.    (See  vol.  ii.  p.  501.)  Tliis 
la%«ljr  was  cousin-german  of  David  Hume,  the  historian.    He 
lY^arried,  2dly,  in  1761,  Anne  Martin  of  Headrigg,  Berwick- 
Claire,  and  Sdly,  in  1778,  his  cousin-german,  Elizabeth  Home 
oF  Fnimeyside.  (See  Homes  of  Kimmerghame  and  Redhaugh, 
^^^ol.  ii.  p.  483.)  He  died  July  SO,  1788,  having  had  issue  only 
^jr  his  first  wife,  2  sons,  Alexander,  born  in  1748,  and  Wil- 
1  inin  Robert,  of  Eyemouth,  born  in  1761,  died  July  7, 1833. 
*X*h6  latter  married  in  1801  Margaret,  daughter  of  John  Ja- 
tsieson,  E«q.,  sheriff-clerk  of  Clackmannanshire,  issue,  8  sons 
<a%3id  6  daughters.     Sons,  1.  Robert,  bom  in  1802,  passed  ad- 
'^rocate  in  1823;  sheriff-substitute  of  Stirlingshire;  married, 
S  zi  1827,  Alicia  Catherine,  eldest  daughter  of  Rev.  Charles 
^^ustace  of  Robertstown,  co.  Kildure,  heir-male  and  repre- 
afr«nt«Uve  of  the  ancient  viscounts  of  Baltinglass,  issue,  2  Sons 
««nd  2  daughters.    2.  John  James,  of  Gledswood,  co.  Dnb- 
1  in,  bom  in  1804,  issue,  4  sons  and  3  daughters.     3.  Rev. 
"William,  minister  of  New  Grnyfriars  parish,  Edinburgh,  born 
1  n  1805,  married,  in  1834,  Georgiana  Touchet.  daughter  of 
•John  Cossins,  Esq.  of  Weymouth,  by  his  wife,  Hon.  Eliza- 
Ijeth  Susanna,  a  daughter  of  George,  18th  Lord  Audley,  is- 
siae,  4  sons  and  a  daughter.   Jean,  the  3d  daughter  of  Robert 
llobertson  of  Prenderguest  and  Brownsbank,  married  Thomas 
l*otts,  Esq.,  grandson  maternally  of  Haig  of  Bemersyde  (see 
"^rol.  iL  p.  397),  issue,  a  son,  Thomas,  of  the  Daison,  Tor- 
quay, Devonshire. 

Alexander  Robertson  of  Prenderguest,  the  elder  son  of 
^bert  Robertson  of  Prenderguest  aud  Brownsbank,  died  in 
3804. 

The  eldest  of  his  six  sons,  Robert  Robertson  of  Prender- 
Itruest,  Brownsbank,  and  Gunsgreen,  married,  in  1804,  Anne, 
^^tighter  of  Robert  Glasgow,  Esq.  of  Mountgreenan,  Ajrr- 
*^tre,  and  having  thereby  acquired  that  estate,  and  also  the 
Pvt^perty  of  Glennrback,  Dumbartonshire,  he  assumed  the 
of  Glasgow  only.  He  died  January  27,  1845. 
He  was  succeeded  by  his  only  surviving  son,  Robert  Ro- 
!rt8on-Gl:i5gow  of  Mountgreenan,  born  in  1811,  died  Sept. 
1860.  By  his  wife,  Mary  Wilhelmina,  daughter  of  John 
^mmpbell,  Esq.  of  Stonefield,  Argyleshire,  he  had  two  sons 
^nd  a  daughter. 

His  elder  son,   Robert  Biuce  Robet*tson- Glasgow,  born 


April  3, 1842,  succeeded ;  an  ensign  in  the  27th  reg.  of  foot 

AnoUier  judge  (see  p.  348),  who  assumed  the  title  of  Lord 
Robertson,  was  Patrick  Robertson,  the  son  of  James  Robert- 
son, writer  to  the  signet  Bom  in  Edinburgh  in  1794.  he 
passed  advocate  in  1816,  and  the  clearness  of  his  intellect, 
with  the  readiness  and  versatility  of  his  powers,  enabled  him 
in  A  short  time  to  attain  considerable  practice  both  in  the 
court  of  session  and  at  the  bar  of  the  General  Assembly  of 
the  Church  of  Scotland.  His  real  strength  lay  in  liis  powers 
of  wit  and  humour,  united  with  acute  perception  and  know- 
ledge of  human  nature.  In  slieer  power  of  ridicule  no  one 
approached  him,  and  his  convivial  and  social  qualities  were 
of  the  highest  order.  He  was  croupier  at  the  famous  Edin- 
burgh Theatrical  Fund  dinner  in  1827,  when  Sir  Walter 
Scott  announced  himself  the  author  of  Waverley,  and  took 
his  seat  as  chairman  after  Scott  had  left  the  room.  In  No- 
vember 1842,  Mr.  Robertson  was  chosen  dean  of  the  faculty 
of  advocates,  and  a  year  afterwards,  on  the  resignation  of 
I/)rd  Meadow  bank,  he  was  promoted  to  the  bench.  In  1845 
he  astonished  the  literary  worid  by  the  publication,  at  Ten- 
don, of  A  voltune  entitled  *  Leaves  from  a  Joumal,  and  other 
Fragments,  in  Verse,*  8 vo;  and  in  1847  appeared  his  *  Gleams 
of  Thought,  reflected  from  the  writings  of  Milton ;  Sonnets 
and  other  Poems,*  Edinburgh,  8vo.  In  1848  he  was  elected 
by  the  students  lord  rector  of  Marischal  college  and  university 
of  Aberdeen,  and  in  1849  he  published  *  Sonnets,  Reflective 
and  Descriptive,  and  other  Poems,*  Edinburgh,  8vo.  As  a 
poet  his  attainments  were  not  nearly  so  brilliant  as  were 
those  he  possessed  as  a  lawyer  and  a  judge.  Lord  Robertson 
died  suddenly  by  a  stroke  of  apoplexy,  January  10,  1855. 
In  Lockhart's  Life  of  Sir  Walter  Scott  there  will  be  found 
various  interesting  notices  of  his  lordship. 

ROBERTSON,  William,  D.D.,  a  distinguished 
historian,  the  sou  of  the  Rev.  William  Robertson, 
minister  of  Borthwlck,  in  Mid-Lothian,  was  bom 
in  the  manse  of  that  parish,  in  1721.  His  mother 
was  Eleanor  Pitcairn,  daughter  of  David  Pitcairn, 
Esq.  of  Dreghom,  and  by  his  father^s  side  he  was 
descended  from  the  Robertsons  of  Gladney  in 
Flfeshire,  a  branch  of  the  Robertsons  of  Struan. 
He  received  the  first  rudiments  of  his  education  at 
the  school  of  Dalkeith,  under  Mr.  Leslie,  then  a 
teacher  of  high  reputation.  His  father  having 
been  appointed  minister  of  the  Old  Greyfriars* 
church,  Edinburgh,  he  removed,  in  1783,  with  the 
family  to  that  city,  and  towards  the  close  of  the 
same  year  he  entered  on  his  course  of  academical 
study  at  the  university  there.  From  this  period 
until  1759,  when  the  publication  of  his  *  History 
of  Scotland'  commenced  a  new  era  in  the  literary 
annals  of  his  country,  the  habits  and  occurrences 
of  his  life  offer  but  few  materials  for  biography. 

In  1741,  he  was  licensed  to  preach  by  the  pres- 
bytciy  of  Dalkeith ;  and,  in  1743,  he  was  pre- 
sented by  the  earl  of  Hopetoun  to  the  living  of 
Gladsmuir,  in  East  Lothian.    Not  long  after,  his 


ROBERTSON, 


850 


WILLIAM,  D.D. 


II 


!| 


r 
1 1 


i| 


father  and  mother  died,  within  a  few  hours  of 
each  other,  leaving  six  danghtera,  and  a  younger 
son,  Mr.  Patrick  Robertson,  afterwards  a  jewel- 
ler in  Edinburgh,  almost  entirely  dependent  on 
him  for  subsistence.  Though  his  stipend  was 
small,  not  exceeding  sixty  pounds  a-year,  he  at 
once  took  his  father*s  family  to  Gladsmuir,  and 
continued  to  educate  and  support  his  sisters  until 
they  wore  all  respectably  settled  in  the  world. 
One  of  them,  ^Irs.  Syme,  was  the  grandmother  of 
Henry  Lord  Bi-ougham. 

On  the  breaking  out  of  the  rebellion  of  1745, 
he  was  induced,  by  the  critical  circumstances  of 
the  times,  to  lay  aside  his  clerical  character,  and 
hasten  to  Edinburgh,  where  he  joined  the  volun- 
teera  collected  for  the  defence  of  the  city.  When, 
however,  it  was  resolved  to  surrender  the  capital 
to  the  Highlanders,  he  was  one  of  a  small  band 
who  repaired  to  Haddington  and  offered  their  ser- 
vices to  General  Copo,  who  declined  receiving 
them,  on  account  of  their  not  being  properly  dis- 
ciplined, lie  then  returned  to  the  duties  of  his 
parish,  by  the  faithful  discharge  of  which  he  in 
a  short  time  acquired  the  veneration  and  attach- 
ment of  Ills  people.  He  al.'^o  soon  became  distin- 
guished for  his  eloquence  and  good  taste  as  a 
preacher,  and  made  himsolf  known  as  a  powerful 
speaker  in  the  General  Assembly  of  the  Church  of 
Scotland.  His  great  talents  for  public  business 
soon  obtained  for  him  an  ascendency  in  ecclesias- 
tical matters,  and  he  was  for  a  long  time  the 
leader  of  the  Moderate  party  in  the  church.  In 
1757  he  ably  defended  his  friend  Mr.  Home,  the 
author  of  the  tragedy  of  'Douglas,'  in  the  pro- 
ccediugs  adopted  against  him  in  the  church  courts, 
aud  contributed  greatly,  by  his  j)ersuasivo  elo- 
quence, to  the  mildne^'s  of  that  sentence  in  which 
the  prosecution  at  la>t  terminated. 

The  earliest  of  Dr.  Rolx-rtson's  publications 
was  a  Sermon  preached  in  1755  before  the  Society 
for  Propagating  Christian  Knowledge.  This  ser- 
mon, the  only  one  he  ever  published,  passed 
through  several  editions,  and  was  translated  into 
the  German  language.  In  1758  he  received  a 
call  to  the  charge  of  Lady  Tester's  church,  Edin- 
burgh, to  which  he  was  translated  the  same  year. 
In  February  1759  he  published  at  Ix)ndon  his 
^  History  of  Scotland,  during  the  Reigns  of  Queen 


^lary  and  James  VI.,*  In  two  vols.  4to,  whidh 
was  received  with  snch  general  Approbation,  thit, 
before  the  end  of  the  month,  he  was  desired  bj 
Ills  publisher  to  prepare  for  a  second  edition.  He 
is  said  to  have  cleared  by  this  work  £600;  and 
he  was  gratified  by  receiving  congratnlatory  let- 
ters from  the  most  eminent  men  of  the  time; 
among  others,  from  David  Hume,  between  whom 
and  Dr.  Robertson,  notwithstanding  religions  sad 
political  differences,  an  unintermpted  friendship 
was  maintained  through  life. 

From  this  period  the  whole  complexion  of  liii 
fortunes  was  changed.  The  distinction  which  he 
acquired  by  the  publication  of  his  Mlistoiy  of 
Scotland'  led  to  his  immediate  preferment.  In 
the  same  year  he  was  appointed  chaplain  of  Stir- 
ling castle,  and  in  the  following  year  one  of 
the  kiug*s  chaplains  for  Scotland.  In  1761,  on 
the  death  of  Principal  Goldie,  he  was  elected 
principal  of  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  and 
translated  to  the  Greyfiiars'  chureh.  Two  years 
aften^'ards  the  office  of  historiographer  for  Scot- 
land was  revived,  and  confen*ed  upon  him  by  the 
king,  with  a  salary  of  £200  per  annum. 

In  17C9  appeared  his  *  History  of  the  Reign  of 
Charles  V.,'  in  three  vols.  4to,  which  fully  main- 
tained and  extended  his  already  high  repntation. 
For  the  copyright  of  this  work  he  received  no  less 
than  £4,500,  the  largest  sum  then  known  to  have 
ever  been  paid  for  a  single  book.  It  was  trans- 
lated into  French  by  M.  Suard,  afterwards  an 
eminent  member  of  the  French  Academ}*.  In 
1777  he  published,  in  two  volumes  4to,  his  'His- 
tory of  America,'  which  was  received  with  the 
same  success  as  his  former  works.  On  its  pnUi- 
cation  he  was  elected,  August  8,  1777,  an  hono- 
rary member  of  the  royal  academy  of  history  at 
^Madrid,  one  of  its  members  being  at  the  same 
time  appointed  to  translate  the  work  into  Spanish; 
an  undertaking,  however,  which  wos  interdicted 
by  the  Spanish  government.  In  1780  Dr.  Robert- 
son retired  from  the  business  of  the  Church  courts, 
but  still  continued  his  pastoral  duties.  In  1781 
he  was  elected  one  of  the  foreign  members  of  tbe 
academy  of  sciences  at  Padua,  and  in  1783  one  of 
the  foreign  members  of  the  imperial  academy  of 
sciences  at  St.  Petersburg.  His  last  work  came 
out  in  1791,  in  quarto,  under  the  title  of  ^Histo- 


I    I 


I' 


ROBERTSON, 


856 


JOHN  PARISH. 


I  by  the  British.    Ho  had  been  bred  a 

his  yonth,  and  making  his  way  to  Cor- 

ad  got  employment  there  in  a  large  tan- 

t,  when  the  revolution  broke  out,  he  of- 

scrvices  to  Artigas,  and,  having  pcr- 
lany  daring  exploits,  he  soon  acquired 
lence  of  that  powerful  chieftain,  and  at 

held  a  command  under  him.  His  fol- 
on  Edwardo,  was  like  himself  from  Tip- 
ell  had  previously  seen  Mr.  Robertson 
)nsoner  in  the  camp  of  Artigas,  and  on 
il  at  Corrientes,  he  conceived  a  plan  of 
3  for  their  mutual  benefit.  "  I  know," 
"  you  have  the  control  of  large  property 

that  you  are  endeavouring  to  convert  it 
ice  to  take  to  Buenos  Ayrcs ;  but,  in  the 
isturbcd  state  of  the  countrv,  vou  will 
;  all  vou  want  till  vou  emplov  mv  ser- 
I  command  my  humble  abilities.  There 
estanciero  that  has  the  courage  to  go  to 
state,  or  to  peep  out  of  his  own  window, 
tcr  one  of  liis  own  animals,  unless  he 
at  I  am  out  to  protect  him ;  nor  is  there 
amongst  them  who  dares,  knowing  that 

on  your  business,  to  interfere  with  it. 
,  let  me  go  out  and  scour  the  country 
r  money,  carried  by  Edwardo  (his  fol- 
]d  I  promise  you  that  in  a  year  the  hides 
lousand  bullocks  and  one  hundred  thou- 
ses  shall  be  sent  here  or  to  Goya,"  (a 
ilet  of  the  river  Parana,  150  miles  nearer 
Lvres,  where  ^Ir.  Robertson  formed  an 
lent).  *'I  don't  want  much  salary,"  he 
;  **  I  like  the  occupation.  Give  me 
mdrcd  dollars  a-ycar  (about  £250  ster- 

mysclf  and  Edwardo,  and  I  am  your 
want  nothing  for  my  expenditure  either 
;  horses :  my  friends  are  ever  too  happy 
to  admit  of  any  remuneration  for  either." 
ome  consideration,  this  agreement  was 
to.  ^loney  to  a  large  amount  was  from 
ue  advanced  to  tliis  man,  and  he  alwavs 
accounted  for  it.  lie  made  many  large 
of  hides  for  t!ie  Robertsons,  so  that  tlioy 
ime  not  only  tlie  Ijide  merchants  but  the 
f  the  province,  and  for  the  transport  of 
chandise,  they  put  into  operation  three 


of  the  best-appointed  troops  of  waggons,  drawn 
by  bullocks,  that  had  ever  been  seen  in  that  part 
of  the  world.  The  porch ase  and  outfit  of  these 
cost  about  £5,000,  and  they  worked  them  at  a 
monthly  expense  of  abont  £500.  As  the  coantry 
people  returned  to  their  abandoned  and  dilapidat- 
ed farm-houses,  Campbell  and  his  men  assisted 
them  in  putting  them  and  their  corrales  or  pens 
for  cattle  into  proper  repair,  and,  under  his  pro- 
tection, they  were  not  long  in  resuming  their  for- 
mer occupations.  With  unwonted  industry  they 
applied  themselves  to  the  furnishing  the  Messrs. 
Robertson  with  their  produce,  especially  hides, 
so  that  in  a  very  short  time,  throngh  Campbell*s 
energetic  exertions  and  the  enterprise  and  liberal- 
ity of  his  employee,  the  province  of  Corrientes 
was  restored  to  active  prosperity  and  to  general 
security  of  life  and  property.  After  a  year,  how- 
ever, the  Robertsons  were  induced,  by  prudential 
considerations,  to  wind  up  their  business,  and  retire 
to  Buenos  Ayres. 

In  1817  Mr.  Robertson  made  a  voyage  to  Scot- 
land, at  once  to  revisit  his  native  country  and  esta- 
blish more  extensive  and  intubate  relations  with  it, 
leaving  his  brother  and  an  English  friend  in  charge 
of  matters  in  Buenos  Ayres.  He  in  due  time  set- 
tled in  Liverpool,  for  the  purpose  of  forming  connec- 
tions there  and  at  Manchester ;  to  which  he  added 
Glasgow,  Paisley,  and  London.  In  the  end  of 
1820  he  sailed  again  for  Buenos  Ayres,  but  des- 
tined for  Chili  and  Pern.  In  those  countries  he 
likewise  efiVicted  settlements,  and  thus,  as  he 
states,  in  the  last  of  his  '  Letters  on  South  Amer- 
ica,* their  connection  extended  "  from  Paraguay 
to  Corrientes,  from  Corrientes  to  Santa  Fd,  from 
Santa  Fe  to  Buenos  Ayres,  and  round  Capo  Horn, 
and  across  the  Andes,  to  Chili  and  Peru." 

In  the  autumn  of  1824  Mr.  Robertson  returned 
to  Scotland,  landing  at  Greenock,  whence  he  had 
originally  sailed  to  enter  upon  his  active  and  pros- 
perous career  in  South  America.  Ho  brought  with 
him  claims  and  assets  to  the  value  of  £100,000,  in 
a  ship  chartered  for  his  solo  use,  and  beai'ing  the 
character  of  political  agent  and  representative  in 
this  countrv  of  several  of  the  South  American  re- 
publics.  Soon  after,  he  established  himself  in 
London,  in  connection  with  some  of  the  first  mer- 
chants there,  and  was  prepared  to  carry  on  South 


ROBERTSON. 


;)5U 


ROBISON. 


American  business  with  new  spirit  and  new  means, 
when  the  wide-spi-end  ruin  of  1826  seriously  in- 
volved him,  and  ho  was  compelled  to  return  to 
South  America  to  attempt  the  recovery  of  some 
part  of  his  fortune.  In  this  object,  however,  he 
was  unsuccessful,  owing  to  the  unsettled  state  of 
the  country.  Even  his  estate  of  Monte  Grande 
was  almost  devastated  by  the  savage  followers  of 
the  different  political  parties  then  contending  for 
power ;  the  trees  on  it  being  broken  down  for  fire- 
wood, and  the  walls  of  the  gardens  and  houses 
used  as  fortifications.  In  1830  he  returned  to 
England,  comparatively  an  impoverished  man. 

Finding  that  he  could  not  prosecute  his  usual 
business  avocations,  till  he  had  better  prospects  of 
success,  he  quietly  entered  himself  a  student  in 
Corpus  Christi  college,  Cambridge,  that  he  might 
acquire  some  scholarship,  in  which  he  felt  himself 
very  deficient.  lie  was,  at  this  time,  approach- 
ing forty  years  of  age,  nevertheless  he  pursued 
his  new  studies  with  characteristic  enthusiasm. 
Though  under  the  middle  size,  Mr.  Robertson  was 
of  a  robust  frame  of  body ;  but  in  the  course  of 
his  adventurous  career  in  South  America  he  had 
undergone  much  f^itigne  and  hardship.  While 
still  a  youth  he  had  made  many  long  journeys  on 
horseback  across  the  Pampas  and  the  Cordilleras, 
and  in  various  other  directions,  in  pui*suit  of  busi- 
ness objects.  With  his  constitution  thus  severely 
tried,  three  yeai-s'  close  application  to  study,  so 
different  from  his  former  course  of  life,  soon  began 
to  affect  his  health,  and  he  found  it  necessary  to 
retire  from  college  sooner  than  he  intended,  and 
seek  for  new  vigour  in  a  beautifully  situated  cot- 
tage in  the  Isle  of  Wight. 

Here,  for  about  a  year,  he  was  chielly  occupied 
with  endeavours  to  obtain  an  ari-angoment  of  his 
business  affairs.  In  1834  he  returned  to  London, 
where  for  some  years  more  his  pursuits  were  al- 
most solely  of  a  literary  kind.  In  1838,  he  and 
liis  brother  published  by  subscription,  at  London, 
a  work  entitled  '  Letters  on  Paraguay ;  compris- 
ing an  account  of  a  four  yeaiV  residence  in  that 
Republic,  under  the  government  of  the  dictator 
Francia.  By  J.  P.  and  W.  P.  Robertson.'  2 
vols.  8vo.  They  subsequently  issued  another 
work  of  an  equally  interesting  kind,  bearing  the 
title  of  'Francia's  Reign  of  Terror.'      Besides 


these  two  works,  which  sapplied  new  and 
ble  infonnation  on  Sonth  America,  as  well  as  eoD«-« 
tained  a  graphically  written  account  of  hia  owik: 
adventures,  Mr.  Robertson  contribnted  muj^ 
papers  on  similar  subjects  to  the  magaxines, 
thus  was  enabled  to  realize  some  moderate 
In  1843  he  and  his  brother  published  *  Letters 
South  America ;  comprising  Travels  on  the 
of  the  Parana  and  Rio  de  la  Plata.*  3  vols.  Srcra 
London.  He  is  said  to  have  contemplated  a  thir=r: 
series  of  Lettei-s  on  South  America,  but  was  pr^^ 
vented  by  death  from  carrying  his  purpose  in  % 
execution.  He  died  Ist  November  1843,  at  C  .^ 
lais,  whither  he  had  gone  for  the  benefit  of  amK  !< 
climate.    He  left  a  widow. 

RO BISON,  John,  LL.D.,  a  distinguished  me- 
chanical philosopher,  was  bom  at  Bogliall,  Stir- 
lingshire, in  1739.  His  father,  of  the  same  ntme^ 
a  respectable  merchant  in  Glasgow,  had  acquired 
some  fortune  in  business,  and  purchased  the  estafa 
of  Boghall,  where  he  resided  during  the  latter 
period  of  his  life.  Young  Robison  received  bis 
education  at  the  grammar  school  and  univenityoC 
Glasgow,  and  completed  his  academical  studlei 
before  he  was  ninteteeu.  lie  was  originally  in- 
tended for  the  church,  but  early  manifested  i 
peculiar  predilection  for  the  mathematical  scien- 
ces. In  1758  he  went  to  London,  with  the  view 
of  applying  for  the  situation  of  mathematical  m- 
structor  to  the  young  duke  of  York,  at  that  time 
intended  for  the  navy;  but  being  disappointed,  as 
his  royal  highness  was  not  going  to  sea,  he  ac- 
cepted the  office  of  tutor  to  the  son  of  Admural 
Knowles,  who,  as  midshipman,  was  then  about  to 
accompany  the  expedition  under  General  Wolfe, 
for  the  reduction  of  Quebec.  Besides  instructing 
his  pupil  in  mathematics  and  navigation,  he  was 
employed  in  making  surveys  of  the  coasts  and 
harbours  on  the  river  St.  Lawrence,  having  been 
rated  as  a  midshipman  on  board  the  Royal  Wil- 
liam, in  which  his  pupil  was  soon  made  a  lieuten- 
ant. After  quitting  that  situation,  he  was,  by 
Admiral  Knowles,  recommended  to  Ix)rd  Anson, 
then  first  lord  of  the  admiralty,  and  iu  1762  was 
appointed  by  the  Boartl  of  Longitude  to  proceed 
to  Jamaica  on  a  trial  voyage,  to  take  charge  of 
the  chronometer  recently  completed  by  Mr.  Har- 
rison, the  celebrated  horologist.     On  his  return, 


ROBISOK 


857 


RODGER. 


finding  no  prospect  of  promotion  in  the  navy,  in 
1763  he  went  back  to  Glasgow,  and  resumed  his 
studies,  devoting  himself  more  particularly  to  me- 
chanical philosophy.  At  this  period  he  foimed  an 
intimacy  with  tlie  celebrated  James  Watt,  then 
employed  in  perfecting  the  steam-engine.  In 
1766,  when  Dr.  Black  was  called  to  Edinburgh, 
Mr.  Robison  was,  on  his  recommendation,  ap- 
pointed by  the  univci*sity  of  Glasgow  to  succeed 
him  as  lecturer  on  chemistry,  without  the  ap- 
pointment of  a  professor,  and  for  about  four  years 
he  accordingly  read  lectures  on  that  science.  In 
1770  his  friend  Admiral  Enowles  having  been  re- 
commended by  the  British  government  to  the  em- 
press of  Russia  as  a  fit  person  to  superintend  the 
improvement  of  her  navy,  was  appointed  president 
of  the  Russian  board  of  admiralty,  and  invited 
Mr.  Robison  to  accompany  him  to  St.  Petersburg 
as  his  private  secretary,  with  a  salary  of  £250 
a-year.  This  situation  he  accepted,  and  in  1772  he 
was  appointed  by  the  empress  inspector-general  of 
the  marine  cadet  corps  of  nobles  at  Cronstadt, 
with  the  rank  of  colonel.  He  relinquished  that 
office  in  1773,  on  being  offered  by  the  magistrates 
and  town  council  of  Edinburgh  the  vacant  chair 
of  natural  philosophy  in  that  city.  The  empress 
parted  with  him  reluctantly,  and  requested  that 
he  would  undertake  the  charge  of  two  or  three  of 
the  cadets,  promising  him  for  his  care  of  them  a 
pension  of  400  rubles,  or  £80  a-ycar.  During 
three  years  that  the  young  men  resided  in  Edin- 
burgh, the  pension  was  regularly  paid,  but  after 
their  departure  it  was  discontinued. 

In  the  winter  of  1774  he  commenced  the  duties 
of  his  professorship  at  Edinburgh.  Ilis  lectures 
were  universally  allowed  to  be  distinguished  for 
the  extent  and  value  of  the  information  commu- 
nicated, rather  than  for  pei*spicuity  of  style  or 
liveliness  of  illustration.  In  1783,  when  the  Royal 
Society  of  Edinburgh  was  incorporated  by  royal 
charter,  Dr.  Robison  was  elected  the  general  sec- 
retary, and  discharged  the  functions  to  their  en- 
tire satisfaction.  A  few  years  before  his  death, 
had  health  obliged  him  to  resign  the  situation. 
To  the  Transactions  of  that  learned  body  he  con- 
tributed several  very  interesting  papers.  In  1798 
he  received  the  degree  of  LL.D.  from  the  univer- 
sity of  New  Jersey,  America;  and  in  1799  the 


university  of  Glasgow  conferred  on  him  a  similar 
honour.  After  the  death  of  Dr.  Black,  he  pub- 
lished in  1799  the  lectures  of  that  great  chemical 
discoverer,  with  notes,  a  copy  of  which  he  sent  to 
the  emperor  of  Russia,  and  received  in  return  a 
box  set  with  diamonds,  with  a  letter  of  thanks. 
He  died  January  30, 1805.    His  works  are : 

Proofs  of  a  Conspiracy  against  all  tlie  Religions  and  Gov- 
ernments of  Europe,  carried  on  in  the  Secret  Meetings  of  Free 
I^Insons,  Illaminati,  and  Reading  Societies ;  collected  from 
good  authorities.  2d  edition,  corrected,  to  which  is  added,  a 
Postscript.     Edin.  1797,  8vo. 

Elements  of  Mechanical  Philosophy,  being  the  Substance 
of  a  Course  of  Lectures  on  that  Science ;  vol.  i.  including 
Dynamics  and  Astronomy.    Edin.  1804,  8vo.    With  Plates. 

I1ie  Orbit  and  Motion  of  the  Georginm  Sidus.  Trans. 
Soc  Edin.  1788,  vol.  i.    lb.  1790,  vol.  ii.  37. 

On  the  Motion  of  Light,  as  affected  by  refracting  and  re- 
flecting Substances  which  are  in  motion.    lb.  83. 

Dr.  Robison  furnished  some  most  valuable  contributions  to 
the  dd  edition  of  the  *  Encyclopaedia  Britannica,*  and  to  the 
Supplement  to  the  same  work,  which  was  superintended  by 
hb  friend  Dr.  Gleig. 

A  collected  edition  of  his  works,  with  addirions  and  anno- 
tations, was  published  in  1822,  in  4  vols.  8vo,  edited  by  Dr. 
Brewster. 


RocHEiD,  (pronounced  Roughdd,)  a  surname  obviously 
having  a  personal  origin.  The  old  family  of  Rocheid  of 
Craigleith  and  Inverleith,  near  Edinbiu-gh,  in  allusion  to 
the  name,  bore  a  crest  of  the  head  of  a  man  in  profile  all 
rough  and  hairy.  In  1704  a  baronetcy  was  conferred  on  this 
ancient  family,  which  terminated  with  Sir  James  Rocheid, 
the  second  baronet,  whose  daughter  and  coheir,  Mary,  mar- 
ried Sir  Francis  Kinloch  of  Gilmerton,  baronet,  and  her  third 
son,  on  succeeding  to  the  estates  of  his  maternal  grandfather, 
took  the  name  of  Rocheid.  His  son,  James  Rocheid  of  In- 
verleith, an  eminent  agriculturist,  on  whose  property  the 
villas  of  Inverleith  Row,  in  the  immediate  neighbourhood  of 
Edinburgh,  are  built,  died  in  1824. 


Rodger,  or  Roger,  a  surname  obviously  of  Norman  ori- 
gin. Among  the  immediate  retainers  of  William  the  Con- 
(jueror  was  **  a  valiant  captain  of  the  name  of  Roger."  Cam- 
den aflBrms  that  Roger  was  "mollified  from  Rodgerus  or 
Rotgerus."  The  name  Roger  is  common  in  Normandy  to 
this  day,  and  it  occurs  in  the  Russian  dominions  under  the 
fonn  of  Rudiger.  As  a  baptismal  name,  it  appears  to  have 
been  frequent  both  in  Scotland  and  England  previous  to  its 
being  adopted  as  a  surname. 

It  is  of  considerable  antiquity  in  Scotland.  Roger,  bishop 
of  St  Andrews,  (1188—1202,)  the  son  of  the  eari  of  Leices- 
ter, of  the  stock  of  the  ancient  earis  of  Mellent  in  Normandy, 
and  a  cousin  of  William  the  lion,  was  appointed  by  that 
monarch  lord-chancellor  of  Scotland,  (Balfour's  Annals,  vol. 
i.  p.  28)  His  seal  is  given  in  Anderson's  Diplomata  Scotics, 
Roger,  liis  nephew,  is  witness  to  a  charter  of  David  I.  There 
was  also  a  Roger,  prior  of  Dunfermline. 

The  earliest  notice  of  any  one  bearing  this  surname 
in  our  annals  is  that  of  Sir  William  Roger,  an  English 
musician  (a.  d  1482),  one  of  the  favourites  of  James  III., 
who  was  hanged  over  the  bridge  of  Lauder  by  the  incensed 
nobles  of  that  monarch.    John  Roger,  a  Black  friar,  was  in 


i^i 


ROSE, 


868 


GEORGE. 


■oo,  Ha|^  Bofle,  was  twentieth  laird  of  Kilnvock.  The  lat- 
ter died  in  1827.  He  was  twice  married,  and  had  issae  by 
both  marriages.  Isabella,  his  eldest  daughter,  married  Cos- 
mo Innes,  Esq.,  adTOcate,  editor  of  the  family  papers. 

Hng^  Rose,  twenty-first  laird  of  KilrsTock,  the  eldest  son, 
having  obtained  an  appointment  in  the  civil  service  of  the 
East  India  Company,  went  to  Bengal  immediately  after  his 
fiither^s  death,  and  died  in  1847,  of  the  effects  of  fever,  on 
his  way  to  the  coasL  His  brother,  John  Baillie  Rose,  at  one 
time  an  officer  in  the  army,  succeeded  hun  as  twenty-second 
laird. 

The  badge  of  the  clan  Rose  is  the  wild  rosemary.  In  1724 
those  of  his  name  are  said  to  have  been  able  to  mnster  500 
fighting  men,  but  in  1725  Marshal  Wade  estimated  their 
force  at  only  300.  They  were  always  well  affected  to  the 
government. 

ROSE,  George,  an  eminent  statesman,  the 
son  of  the  Rev.  David  Rose,  an  Episcopal  cler- 
gyman at  Lethnot  in  Forfarshire,  was  born  at 
Brechin,  June  11,  1744.  His  mother  was  the 
daughter  of  Donald  Rose  of  Waterclunie,  and  was 
descended  from  the  Roses  of  Ealravock,  or  Eil- 
raak,  an  ancient  family  In  l^airnshire.  Owing  to 
the  poverty  of  his  father,  George,  when  little 
more  than  five  years  of  agc^  was  sent  to  the  care 
of  an  nncle,  who  kept  an  academy  near  Hampstead, 
where  he  obtained  his  education.  He  was  early 
apprenticed  to  a  surgeon  in  that  village,  but,  not 
liking  the  profession,  he  went  into  the  navy,  and 
soon  obtained  the  situation  of  purser.  His  father 
having  become  tutor  to  Lord  Folwarth,  eldest  son 
of  the  earl  of  Marchmont,  young  Rose  was  induced 
to  retire  from  the  sea,  and  through  the  interest  of 
the  latter  nobleman,  he  was  made  deputy-cham- 
berlain of  the  Tally  court  of  the  Exchequer. 
Soon  after  he  was  appointed  keeper  of  the  public 
records,  which  he  found  in  a  state  of  great  confu- 
sion, and  in  consequence  an-nngcd  and  classed 
them  in  alphabetical  order.  His  punctuality,  dis- 
patch, and  aptitude  for  business,  having  recom- 
mended him  to  the  notice  of  Lord  North,  then 
premier,  in  1767,  he  was  selected  to  superintend 
the  completion  of  the  Jouinals  of  the  House  of 
Lords,  in  thirty-one  folio  volumes ;  for  which  he 
was  liberally  remunerated.  From  this  period  he 
was  constantly  employed  by  nearly  all  succeeding 
ministers,  except  Mr.  Fox. 

When  the  Pitt  and  Dundas  administration  came 
into  power,  he  was  appointed,  in  1784,  joint  sec- 
retary to  the  treasury,  and  readily  obtained  a  seat 
in  parliament  as  member  for  Christ-church,  in 
Hampshire.    In  all  matters  connected  with  the 


trade  of  the  country,  he  was  allowed  to  possess 
great  practical  information,  and  he  gave  the  most 
important  assistance  to  Mr.  Pitt  in  all  his  finan- 
cial measures.  In  1801,  on  the  elevation  of  Mr. 
Addington  to  the  premiership,  he  retired  with  Mr. 
Pitt,  and  became  an  active  member  of  the  oppo- 
sition. When  Mr.  Pitt  returned  once  more  to 
power,  he  was  admitted  into  the  privy  council, 
and  in  consequence  became  entitled  to  be  ad- 
dressed as  right  honourable.  He  was  likewise 
nominated  firat  vice-president,  and  afterwards 
president,  of  the  Board  of  Trade  and  treasurer  of 
the  navy. 

After  the  death  of  Mr.  Pitt  in  1806,  Mr.  Rose 
was  again  for  a  short  time  forced  into  the  opposi- 
tion, but  when  the  coalition  ministry  of  Lord 
GrenvlUe  and  Mr.  Fox  retired,  he  resumed  his 
former  office,  which  he  retained  during  the  re- 
mainder of  his  life.  To  enumerate  all  the  speech- 
es made,  and  the  various  occasions  on  which  he 
came  before  the  notice  of  the  public,  in  the  course 
of  his  political  career,  would  be  to  detail  all  the 
important  occmTcnces  in  parliament  for  nearly 
forty  years.  He  was  a  great  encourager  of  friend- 
ly societies  and  savings'  banks,  and  introduced 
laws  for  the  protection  of  the  propeity  of  such 
associations.  He  published  several  pamphlets, 
principally  on  commercial  and  financial  subjects ; 
and  the  manuscript  translation  of  a  History  of 
Poland,  which  he  presented  to  the  king,  is  now  in 
the  Royal  Library.  In  1767,  when  the  House  of 
Lords  passed  a  vote  for  publishing  a  superb  en- 
graved edition  of  'Domesday  Book,'  Mr.  Rose 
was  appointed  to  superintend  this  great  national 
work,  and  executed  his  task  with  due  cai-e  and 
uudeviating  fidelity.  In  1809  he  produced  his 
'  Observations  on  the  Historical  Work  of  the  late 
Right  Hon.  Chai'les  James  Fox ;  with  a  Narra- 
tive of  the  Events  which  occun-ed  in  the  Euter- 
prise  of  the  Earl  of  Argjie,  in  1685 ;  by  Sir  Pa- 
trick Hume.'  Mr.  Rose  died  at  his  seat  of  Cuffnels, 
near  Lyndhurst,  in  Hampshire,  January  13,  1818, 
in  the  75th  year  of  his  age.  He  married  a  lady 
belonging  to  the  island  of  Dominica,  by  whom  he 
had  several  children.  On  his  eldest  son  devolved 
the  lucrative  reversionary  office  of  clerk  of  the 
parliament,  which  he  himself  had  enjoyed  for 
many  yeara.    His  works  are : 


ROSE. 


3G4 


llOSEBERY. 


'J'he  proposed  System  of  Trade  with  Ireland  explained. 
1785,  8vo. 

Considerations  on  the  Debt  of  the  Civil  list     1802,  87a 

Obsenrations  on  the  Poor  Laws,  and  on  the  Management 
of  the  Poor  in  Great  Britjiin.     Lond.  1805,  8vo. 

A  Brief  Examination  into  the  Increase  of  the  Revenue, 
Commerce,  and  Navigation  of  Great  Britain  during  the  ad- 
ministration of  the  Ut.  Hon.  William  Pitt,  with  a  Sketch  of 
Mr.  Pitt's  Character.     I^nd.  180G,  8vo. 

Observations  on  the  Historical  Work  of  the  late  Rt. 
Hon.  Charles  James  Fox ;  with  a  narrative  of  Events  which 
occurred  in  the  enterprise  of  the  Earl  of  Ai^le  in  1685,  by 
Sir  Patrick  Hume.     I^nd.  1809,  4to. 

Observations  with  respect  to  the  Public  Expenditure  and 
the  Influence  of  the  Crown.     I^nd.  1810,  8vo. 

Ijetter  to  I^rd  Melville  respecting  a  Naval  Arsenal  at 
Northfleet.     1810,  8vo. 

Substance  of  his  Speech  in  the  House  of  Commons  on  the 
Report  of  the  Bullion  Committee.     Ix>nd.  1811,  8vo. 

Speech  on  the  Com  I^ws.    Lond.  1814,  8vo. 

Speech  on  the  Property-Tax.     Lond.  1815,  8vo. 

ROSE,  J.  A.,  one  of  the  most  extraordinary 
actors  in  the  first  French  Revolution,  was  bom  in 
Scotland  in  1757,  and  went  early  to  Paris.  Named 
usher  of  the  National  Assembly,  Rose,  by  his 
conduct,  raised  himself  above  his  position,  and 
became  the  friend  of  the  most  distinguished  men 
of  that  eventful  epoch.  !RIirabean  was  particu- 
larly attached  to  him,  and  when  dying  appointed 
liim,  by  will,  to  execute  his  wishes.  On  the  eve 
of  the  10th  of  August  1792,  he  found  means  to 
warn  the  unfortunate  Louis  XVI.  of  the  evils 
which  threatened  him.  During  the  time  the  king's 
trial  la.sted,  Rose  paid  every  attention  to  the 
monarch,  and  he  rendered  the  same  services  to  the 
queen  on  her  arraignment.  Those  good  actions, 
as  well  as  many  others,  were  unknown  to  the 
world.  I'lie  friends  of  Rose  alone  were  acquaint- 
ed with  the  number  of  persons  whose  lives  he  had 
saved.  Rabaut  St.  Etienne  owed  his  life  to  him, 
but  lost  it  at  a  later  period.  The  duke  de  Mon- 
tesquieu, more  fortunate,  awaited  the  end  of  the 
"reign  of  terror"  in  the  asylum  which  Rose  had 
procured  for  him.  As  usher  of  the  Convention,  it 
was  Rose  who  arrested  RobespieiTC.  Having 
then  gone  with  Conrvoi  to  carry  the  decree  of  ac- 
cusation to  the  commune,  he  was  pursued  by  a 
furious  multitude,  and  was  only  indebted  for  his 
safety  to  his  physical  strength  and  his  intrepidity. 
This  circumstance  made  an  impression  upon  him 
which  was  never  effaced.  "  It  was  this  fist,"  he 
used  to  say  with  strong  emotion,  at  the  same  time 
holding  up  his  large  hand,  **  it  was  this  fist  which 


arrested  the  monster."  Ue  preserved  his  func- 
tions at  the  Council  of  Ancients,  who  voted  bim  a 
sword  of  honour  for  the  firmness  he  displayed  dur- 
ing a  stormy  debate. 

In  1814  M.  de  Semonville  attached  him  to  the 
chamber  of  peers.  The  duke  de  Choiseul  haying 
met  Rose  in  the  lobby  of  the  chamber,  threw  him- 
self on  his  neck,  exclaiming,  "  This  is  one  of  the 
happiest  days  of  my  life."  He  only  resigned  his 
situation  when  weighed  down  by  the  infirmities  of 
old  age.  From  that  period  he  led  a  retired  life, 
devoted  to  literature  and  the  practice  of  all  Chris- 
tian virtues.  He  was  a  Protestant  in  religion. 
He  died  at  Paris,  March  19,  1841,  at  the  age  of 
84.  The  Abbd  Coquei-el  accompanied  his  remains 
to  the  grave,  and  in  an  eloquent  oi*ation  i-ecapitn- 
lated  the  principal  events  of  his  history.  He  died, 
he  said,  with  the  tranquil  conscience  of  a  man 
who  had  concluded  a  well-spent  life. 

RosBBKRY,  earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peern^  of  Scotland,  o(m« 
ferrcd  in  1703  on  Archibald  Primrose  of  Carrington,  descend- 
ed from  Duncan  Primrose,  who  was  settled  at  Culroain 
Perthshire,  in  the  rei;^  of  Queen  Marj.  The  surname  of 
Primrose  was  onginull v  derived  from  lands  of  that  name  in 
Fife.  The  said  Duncan  had  two  sons,  Gilbert  and  Archi* 
bald,  the  former  principal  sur(;eon  to  James  VI.  and  his 
queen,  and  father  of  Gilbert  Primrose,  D.D.,  one  of  the 
ministers  of  the  Protestant  church  of  Bordeaux  in  Fnnce, 
afterwards  of  the  French  Church  in  I^ndon,  chaplain  in  w- 
dinary  to  James  VI.  and  Charles  I.,  dean  of  Windsor,  1628, 
and  author  of  several  works  on  religious  subjects,  llic  sec- 
ond son,  Archibald,  was  father  of  James  Primrose,  who,  in 
1602,  was  appointed  clerk  of  the  privy  council,  and  on  17th 
August  1G23,  clerk  of  the  council  for  the  prince's  revenues  in 
Scotland.  This  James  was  twice  married,  and  had  nineteen 
children.  His  eldest  daughter,  Alison,  was  the  second  wife 
of  the  celebrated  George  Heriot,  jeweller  to  King  James  VI. 
On  his  death  in  1G41,  he  was  succeeded  in  his  office  of  clerk 
to  the  privy  council  by  his  eldest  son  by  the  second  marrisge, 
afterwards  Sir  Archibald  Primrose  of  Carrington,  appointed 
thereto,  2d  September  that  year. 

A  steady  royalist,  after  the  battle  of  Kilsyth,  15th  Augnst 
1645,  Sir  Archibald,  then  Mr.  Primrose,  joined  the  marqnii 
of  Montrose,  and  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  rout  of  Philip- 
haugh,  13th  September  following.  In  1G46  he  was  tried  by 
the  parliament  at  St.  Andrews,  and  found  guilty  of  high 
treason,  but  by  the  interposition  of  the  marquis  of  Arpyle  his 
life  was  spared.  He  was,  however,  detained  in  prison  till  tbt 
C'ipitulation  of  Montrose  in  the  end  of  that  year.  On  ob- 
taining his  release,  he  repaired  to  the  king,  who  was  then  st 
Newcastle  with  tlie  Scots  army,  and  received  from  him  tb« 
honour  of  knighthood.  In  1G48  he  was  one  of  the  promoters 
of  the  *  Engagement'  for  the  rescue  of  his  captive  sovereign. 
He  attended  Charles  II.  when  he  marched  into  England  in 
1651,  and  was  created  a  baronet  1st  August  of  that  year. 
After  the  battle  of  Worcester,  his  estates  were  sequestrated, 
and  all  sums  of  money  due  to  him  ordered  not  to  be  paid. 

After  the  Restoration,  Sir  Archibald  was,  in  August  I66Q1 


ROSEHILL. 


866 


ROSS. 


Soots  representative  peers,  and  in  March  1771  lie  was  made 
a  knight  of  the  Thistle.  He  died  25th  March  1814.  He 
was  twice  married,  and  bj  his  second  wife,  Manr,  only  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  Francis  Vincent,  baronet,  he  had,  with  four  daugh- 
ters, two  sons,  Archibald  John,  fourth  earl,  and  the  Hon. 
Francis  Ward  Primrose,  barrister  at  law. 

Archibald  John  Primrose,  D.C.L.,  fonrth  earl  of  Roseberr, 
bom  14th  October  1783,  studied  at  Cambridge,  and  was  M.P., 
first  for  Helston,  and  afterwards  for  Carlisle.  He  was  created 
a  baron  of  the  United  Kingdom,  by  the  title  of  liOrd  Rose- 
bery,  17th  January,  1828.  He  became  a  privy  coundllor  in 
1831,  and  a  knight  of  the  Thistle  in  1840,  and  in  1843  was 
appointed  lord-lientenant  of  Linlithgowshire.  He  married, 
Ist,  in  1808,  Henrietta,  second  daughter  of  the  Hon.  Bartho- 
lomew Bouverie,  which  marriage  was  dissolved  in  1815,  and 
she  died  in  1834;  2dly,  in  1819,  Anne  Margaret,  daughter 
of  the  first  Viscount  Anson.  By  his  first  wife  he  had  two 
sons  and  a  daughter,  viz.,  Archibald,  Lord  Dalmeny,  bom  in 
1809,  M.P.  for  the  Stirling  burghs  from  1832  to  1847,  was  a 
lord  of  the  admiral^  from  April  1835  till  August  1841,  mar- 
ried in  1843,  Lady  Catherine  Lucy  'VVilhelmina,  only  daugh- 
ter of  the  fourth  Earl  Stanhope,  and  died  23d  January  1851, 
leaving,  besides  another  son  and  two  daughters,  Archibald 
Philip,  Lord  Dalmeny,  bom  7th  May  1847 ;  Lady  Harriet, 
bom  in  1810,  married  in  1835,  Sur  John  Dunlop  of  Dnnlop, 
baronet;  the  Hon.  Bouverie  Francis,  bom  in  1813,  receiver- 
general  of  the  post-office  in  Scotland,  married  in  1838,  Fre- 
derica  Sophia,  sister  of  the  first  earl  of  Lichfield,  with  issue. 
The  offspring  of  the  second  marriage  were  Lady  Anne,  bora 
in  1820,  married  in  1848,  the  Right  Hon.  Henry  Tufnell, 
with  issue ;  and  Lady  Louisa,  bom  in  1822. 


RosEHiiJ^  Lord,  the  courtesy  title  of  the  eldest  son  of  the 
e;irl  of  Northesk. 


Ross,  the  name  of  a  clan,  called  in  Gaelic  Clan  Rosich  na 
GiUe  AndraSy  or  the  offspring  of  the  followers  of  St  An- 
drew, one  of  the  early  chiefs  having  devoted  himself  to  that 
saint.  The  badge  of  the  clan  Ross  was  the  juniper,  and  in 
former  times,  when  its  chiefs  were  earls  of  Rqss,  they  pos- 
sessed a  largo  portion  of  the  county  of  that  name  in  the 
north  of  Scotland.  Ross  of  Pitcalnie  is  the  representa- 
tive of  the  ancient  earls.  The  clan  Ross  was  one  of  the 
eighteen  Highland  clans  that  fought  on  Brace*s  side  at  Ban- 
nockbnm.  In  1427  they  could  muster  2,000  fighting  men ; 
in  1715  but  300,  and  in  1745,  500. 


Ross,  Earl  of,  nn  ancient  territorial  title  in  Scotland,  the 
first  who  bore  it  being  Mnlcolm,  in  the  reign  of  Malcolm  the 
Maiden  (1153 — 11G5).  Fcrquhard,  the  second  earl,  called 
Feardiar  Mac  an  i-Sagairt,  or  son  of  the  priest,  at  the  head 
of  the  tribes  of  Moray,  repulsed  Donald  M 'William,  the  son 
of  Donald  Bane,  when,  soon  after  the  accession  of  Alexander 
XL  in  1214,  that  restless  chief  made  an  inroad  from  Ireland 
into  that  province.  In  12.05  the  earl  of  Ross  marched  again.st 
the  Gallowegians,  who  had  appeared  in  arms  in  support  of 
the  claims  of  Thomas,  the  illegitimate  son  of  Alan  the  last 
lord  of  G.illoway,  and  defeated  them  with  great  slauphter. 
In  September  1237  ho  witnessed  the  treaty  entered  into  by 
Alexander  II.  with  Henry  III.  of  England  at  York.  This 
earl  was  the  founder  of  the  abbey  of  Feam  in  Ross-shire. 

In  the  time  of  William,  third  earl  of  Ross,  about  1250,  an 
insurrection  broke  out  against  him  of  some  of  the  people  of 
his  own  province,  and  having  apprehended  their  leader,  he 
imprisoned  him  at  Dingwall.  In  retaliation,  the  Highland- 
ers seized  upon  tiie  earl's  second  son  at  Babagowan,  but 


were  pursued  by  the  Monroes  and  the  Dingwalls,  and  after  a 
sanguinary  conflict  the  youth  was  rescued.  In  requital,  the 
earl  made  Tarious  grants  of  land  to  those  who  had  so  bravely 
asnsted  him,  (see  page  218  of  this  volume).  He  was  one  of 
the  Soots  nobles  who  entered  into  an  agreement,  8th  Mardi 
1258,  with  I^wellyn,  prince  of  Wales,  that  the  Soots  and 
Welsh  should  only  make  peace  with  England  by  mutual  con- 
sent He  sat  in  the  parliament  at  Scone,  5th  Febraaiy 
1283-4,  when  the  succession  to  the  throne  of  Scotland  wis 
settled  on  Margaret  of  Norway. 

His  son,  William,  fourth  earl,  was  one  of  the  magnatBt 
ScoHcB^  and  was  present  in  the  convention  of  Brigham,  12th 
Hilarch  1290,  when  the  marriage  of  Queen  Margaret  with 
Prince  Edward  of  England  was  proposed.  In  1292  he  was 
one  of  the  nominees  on  the  part  of  Baliol  in  his  competi- 
tion for  the  crown,  and  he  swore  fealty  to  Edward  L,  at 
Berwick,  Sd  August  of  the  same  year.  He  was  in  the 
Scots  army  at  the  battle  of  Dunbar,  28th  April  129(», 
and  on  its  defeat  ho  took  refuge  in  Dunbar  castle, 
which,  at  that  period,  was  considered  the  key  of  Scotland  on 
the  south-east  border.  The  day  following.  King  Edward, 
with  the  main  body  of  the  English  army,  arrived  before  the 
castle,  and  compelled  the  garrison  to  surrender.  The  eari  of 
Ross  was  sent  a  prisoner  to  I^ondon,  but  soon  obtained  his 
release.  He  was  one  of  the  witnesses  to  the  treaty  of  Bruce 
with  Haco,  king  of  Norway,  28th  October  1312.  With  his 
clan  he  was  at  the  battle  of  Bannockbum,  and  he  dgned  the 
memorable  letter  to  the  Pope  in  1320,  asserting  the  indepen- 
dence of  Scotland.  He  had  two  sons,  Hugh,  his  successor, 
and  John,  who  with  his  wife,  Margaret,  second  daughter  of 
Alexander  Comyn,  fourth  earl  of  Buchan,  got  the  half  of  her 
father's  whole  lands  in  Scotland.  He  had  also  a  daughto', 
Isabel,  who  became  the  wife  of  Edward  Brace,  earl  of  Car- 
rick  and  king  of  Ireland,  brother  of  Robert  the  Brace,  Ist 
June  1317. 

Hugh,  the  next  earl  of  Ross,  fell,  in  1333,  at  Halidonhill,  the 
holy  hill  or  mount,  (the  additional  word  hill  is  superfluous,)  so 
called  from  the  superaatural  aid  which  Oswald  king  of  Nor- 
thuinbria  is  said  to  have  received  in  battle  with  Cedwoll,  a  no- 
ble British  chief,  and  it  was,  in  consequence,  long  known  by 
the  name  of  Heaven-field.  Hugh's  successor,  William,  left 
no  male  heir.  His  eldest  daugliter,  Eupheinia,  married  Sir 
W^alter  I-«sley  of  Lesley,  Aberdeenshire,  and  had  a  son,  Al- 
exander, earl  of  Ross,  and  a  daugliter,  ^Margaret.  Earl  Alex- 
ander married  a  daughter  of  the  regent  Albany,  and  his  only 
child,  Kuphcmia,  countess  of  Ross,  becoming  a  nun,  she  re- 
signed the  earldom  to  her  uncle  John,  earl  of  Buchan,  Alba- 
ny's second  son.  Her  aunt  Margaret  had  married  Donald, 
second  lord  of  the  Isles,  and  that  potent  chief  assumed  in  her 
right  the  title  of  earl  of  Ross,  and  took  possession  of  the  earl- 
dom. This  led  to  a  contest  witli  the  regent  Albany,  and  at 
Donald  asserted  his  claim  witli  all  the  clans  of  the  Hebrides 
to  back  it,  the  battle  of  Harlaw  in  1411  w.os  t^:3  result. 
(See  vol.  i.  of  this  work,  pp.  37  and  38,  and  vol.  ii.  p.  54&) 

On  the  de.ith  of  the  earl  of  Buchan  and  Koss  at  the  battle 
of  Vcraeuil  in  France  in  1424,  the  earldom  of  Ross  reverted 
to  the  crown.  James  I.,  on  his  rctnm  from  his  long  captir- 
ity  in  England,  restored  it  to  the  heiress  of  line,  the  motbef 
of  Alexander  lord  of  the  Isles,  who,  in  1-1'JO,  had  succeeded 
his  father,  Donald,  above  mentioned.  In  1425,  Alexander, 
lord  of  the  Isles  and  master  of  Ross,  was  one  of  the  jury  on 
the  trial  of  Murdoch,  duke  of  Albany,  and  his  sons,  and  the 
aged  earl  of  Lennox.  Having  become  embroiled  with  his 
kinsmen,  the  descendants  of  the  first  lord  of  the  Isles  by  hif 
first  wife,  (sec  vol.  ii.  p.  546,)  and  been  a  participator  in  va- 
rious feuds  and  disturbances  which  had  thrown  the  Ilebridef 


L 


ROSS  OF  HAWKIIEAD, 


368 


LORD. 


der,  the  poethumoiis  son  of  James  lY.,  bom  30Ui  April  1514, 
died  December  18,  1515. 

Lord  Damlcjr,  the  liusband  of  Qaeen  Mary,  was  by  her 
created  earl  of  Hoss,  by  charter  dated  15th  May  1565.  One 
I  f  tlie  titles  conferred  on  Charles  !.,  at  his  baptism,  23d  De- 
cember IGOO,  was  earl  of  Ross,  and  the  lands  of  the  earldom 
which  were  possessed  by  his  mother,  Anne,  queen  of  James 
VI.,  were  conferred  upon  him,  after  her  death,  by  charter, 
dated  20th  Jmie  1619. 


Ross,  lord  of  Hawkhead,  a  title  of  the  earl  of  Glasgow, 
(see  vol.  ii.  p.  308),  by  which  he  Iiolds  his  seat  in  the  house 
of  lords.  The  title  had  been  previously  held,  for  nearly  three 
centuries,  by  a  different  family,  originally  from  England,  the 
first  of  whom,  Godfrey  do  Uo.s,  came  into  Scotland  in  the 
twelfth  century.  He  belonged  to  a  Norman  family  which  took 
their  designation  from  the  lordship  of  Ros  in  Yorkshire.  From 
Richard  de  Morville  he  received  the  lands  of  Stewarton  in 
Ayrshire,  and  many  of  that  potent  baron*s  charters  were 
witnessed  by  him  and  his  sons,  James,  Reginald,  and  Peter 
de  Ros.  His  descendant.  Sir  John  Ross  of  Hawkhead,  was 
that  Sir  John  Ross  who,  in  1449,  with  James  Douglas,  bro- 
ther of  the  earl  of  Douglas,  and  James  Douglas,  brother  of 
Douglas  of  Ix>chlcven,  fonned  one  of  the  combatants  against 
three  Burgundian  knights,  in  pi'esence  of  James  II.  and  his 
court,  and  who,  in  1673,  was  one  of  the  ambassador  to 
England. 

The  son  of  this  doughty  knight.  Sir  John  Ross,  first  Ijord 
Ross  of  Hawkhead,  was  one  of  the  barons  of  parliament,  dd 
February  1489-90,  and  Ross  de  Halklicad  is  inserted  among 
the  domini  barones  in  the  parliament,  11th  ^larch  1503-4. 
He  appears  to  have  died  in  1506.  His  son,  John,  second 
Lord  RoKs  of  Hawkhead,  fell  at  Flodden,  leaving  a  son,  Nin- 
ian,  third  Lord  Ross.  Tiie  latter  was  one  of  the  Scots  nobles 
who,  in  1515,  were  sent  ntnbasitadors  to  France,  to  endea- 
vour to  get  Scotland  included  in  the  pacification  with  Eng- 
land, and  in  1581  he  ratified  a  treaty  with  the  English.  By 
a  first  wife,  a  daughter  of  John,  earl  of  Lennox,  be  had  a 
son,  Robert,  master  of  Ross,  who  was  killed  at  the  battle  of 
Pinkie  in  1547,  in  the  lifetime  of  liis  father.  By  a  second 
wife,  Elizabeth,  the  widowed  countess  of  EitoI,  daughter  of 
the  first  Lord  Ruthven,  he  had  another  son,  James,  fourth 
Lord  Ross,  who  was  one  of  the  jury  on  the  mock  tri;U  of  the 
earl  of  Both  well  in  April  1567,  and  entered  into  the  associa- 
tion in  support  of  Queen  Mary  at  Hamilton,  8th  May  1568. 
He  was  one  of  the  lords  of  the  queen's  party  who  subscribed 
the  letter  to  Queen  Elizabeth  on  Mary^s  behalf,  in  March 
1570.  He  died  in  April  1581.  The  fourth  lord  had,  with 
two  daughters,  two  8ons,  Robert,  fifth  lord,  who  died  in  Oc- 
tober 1695,  and  Sir  William  Ross  of  Muiriston,  who  carried 
on  the  line  of  the  family. 

The  fifth  lord's  son,  James,  sixth  Lord  Ross,  married  Mar- 
garet, eldest  daughter  of  Walter,  first  Lord  Scott  of  Buc- 
deuch,  afterwards  countess  of  Eglinton,  and  had,  with  three 
daughters,  three  sons,  James,  seventh  Lord  Ross,  who  voted 
against  the  five  articles  of  Pertli  in  the  parliament  of  1621 ; 
William,  eighth  Lord  Ross ;  and  Robert,  ninth  Lord  Ross, 
who  all  died  unmarried:  the  first  in  March  1C36,  the  second 
in  1640,  and  the  third  in  August  1648.  On  the  death  of  the 
ninth  lord,  the  title  and  estates  devolved  on  the  heir  male, 
Sir  William  Ross  of  Muuiston,  appointed  sheriff  principal  of 
Renfrewshire  in  1646,  son  of  Sir  William  Ross  of  Muiriston, 
above  mentioned. 

William,  tenth  lord,  was  colonel  of  foot  in  the  counties  of 
Ayr  and  Renfrew  in  1648,  and  one  of  the  committee  of  tlie 
EsUtes  in  1649.    In  1654  he  was  fined  by  Cromwell  £3,000 


sterling,  and  died  bx  1656.  His  son,  George,  dermth  Lord 
Ross,  was,  at  the  Restoration,  sworn  a  privy  councillur,  and 
appointed  lieutenant-colonel  of  the  royal  regimeDt  of  gaanl& 
He  died  in  1682.  He  married  first,  Lady  Grizel  Codmue, 
only  daughter  of  the  first  earl  of  Dundonald,  by  whom  kt 
had  a  son,  William,  twelfth  lord,  and  a  danghter,  the  Hoo. 
Grizel  Ross,  the  wife  of  Sir  Alexander  Gilmonr  of  Craigmil- 
Ur,  baronet,  with  issue.  By  a  second  wife,  Lady  Jean  Baa- 
say,  eldest  daughter  of  the  second  earl  of  Dalhonaie,  after- 
wards viscountess  of  Oxford,  he  had  a  son,  the  Hon.  Chariii 
Ross,  who  purchased  Balnagowan.  This  gentleman,  an  offi- 
cer in  the  anny,  entered  heartily  into  the  BeTolntioo,  bat 
engaged  in  the  plot  of  Sir  James  Montgomery  of  Skdounfii 
in  1690,  for  the  restoration  of  the  abdicated  family,  for  wkidi 
he  was  committed  to  the  Tower  of  London.  In  1698  he  was 
one  of  the  lessees  of  the  poll  tax,  and  in  1695  he  becaiM 
colonel  of  the  5th,  or  Royal  Irish  regiment  of  dragoon 
Elected  i^I.P.  for  Ross-shire,  in  1707,  he  took  an  active  ptit 
in  the  debates  of  the  House  of  Commons,  in  support  of  tk 
Tory  administration.  In  1712  he  was  promoted  to  the  rank 
of  general  in  the  anny.  On  the  accession  of  George  L  in 
1714,  he  was  deprived  of  the  command  of  the  Royal  Irish 
regiment  of  dragoons.  In  1720  he  was  one  of  the  seoet 
committee  of  the  House  of  Commons  to  inquire  uito  the  con- 
duct of  the  South  Sea  directors,  and  having  made  a  cam- 
plaint  against  2ilr.  Vernon,  M.P.  for  Whitchurch,  for  making 
corrupt  application  to  him  on  behalf  of  Mr.  Aialabie,  one  of 
the  directors,  that  gentleman  waa  expelled  parliament,  I2tk 
May  1721,  and  Genend  Ross  received  the  thanks  of  tin 
house.  In  1729,  soon  after  the  accession  of  George  IL,  be 
was  restored  to  the  command  of  his  regiment.  He  died  on- 
married  at  Bath,  5th  August  1732.  He  had  a  sister,  the 
Hon.  Jean  Ross,  who  married  the  sixth  earl  of  Dalhoaae, 
with  issue. 

William,  the  twelfth  lord,  bom  about  1656,  succeeded  bii 
father  in  1682,  and  entered  zealously  into  the  Revolution  of 
1689.  He  was  a  privy  councillor  to  King  William  and  after- 
wards to  Queen  Anne,  and  in  1704  was  lord-high-commis- 
sioner to  the  Church  of  Scotland.  He  was  also  one  of  the 
lords  of  the  treasury,  and  a  commissioner  for  the  Union,  uf 
which  treaty  he  was  a  staunch  promoter.  At  tlie  general 
election  in  1715  he  was  chosen  one  of  the  sixteen  Scots  re- 
presentative peers,  and  the  same  year  was  appointed  Icrd- 
lieutenunt  of  Renfrewshire.  He  died  15th  March  1738.  He 
was  four  times  married.  By  his  first  wife,  Agnes,  danghter 
and  heiress  of  Sir  John  Wilkie  of  Fouldean,  Berwickshire,  be 
had  a  son,  George,  thirteenth  I^rd  lioss,  and  three  dauj^- 
ters.  1st,  Euphemia,  countess  of  Kilmarnock,  mother  of  that 
earl  of  Kilmarnock,  who  was  beheaded  on  Towerhill  for  his 
share  in  the  rebellion  of  1745.  2d,  Mary,  duchess  of  Athol; 
and  3d,  the  Hon.  Grizel  Ross,  wife  of  James  I.x>ckhart  of 
Oarstairs,  I^narkshire,  baronet,  with  issue.  None  of  his 
lordship's  other  wives  had  issue,  except  I^dy  Anne  Hit, 
eldest  daughter  of  the  second  marquis  of  Tweeddale,  by 
whom  lie  had  a  daughter,  Anne,  who  died  unmarried. 

George,  thirteenth  lord,  was  appointed  one  uf  the  commis- 
sioners of  excise  in  Scotland,  24th  Kovember  1726,  and  mm 
of  the  commissioners  of  the  customs,  21st  September  1730. 
He  succeeded  his  father  in  1738,  and  made  a  settlement  of 
his  estates,  17th  June  1751,  on  his  son  and  tlie  heirs  male  of 
his  body,  and  failing  them  on  his  daughters,  Jane,  the  wife 
of  John  Mackye  of  Polgowan,  advocate,  and  M.P.,  who  took 
the  name  of  Ross,  but  had  no  isbue ;  Elizabeth,  who  married 
the  third  earl  of  Glasgow,  with  issue ;  and  Mary,  who  died 
uinnarried,  and  the  heirs  male  of  their  bodies,  nmiainder  to 
his  nearest  heirs  and  assigns.    He  died  17th  Jnue  1754,  in 


his  78d  year.  By  bis  wife,  J^ady  Elisabeth  Kerr,  third 
dangfater  of  the  second  marquis  of  Lothian,  be  had,  with  the 
three  daaghters  already  mentioned,  three  sons :  1.  William, 
fonxteeoth  Lord  Ross ;  2.  The  Hon.  Charles  Ross,  who,  on 
the  death  <^  his  grand-nncle,  General  Ross,  in  August  1782, 
inhcniied  the  estate  of  Balnagowan.  In  1741  he  was  elected 
3LP.  for  Ross -shire.  He  was  an  officer  in  the  army,  and 
fell  at  the  battle  of  Fontenoy,  30th  April  1745,  unmarried. 
His  untimely  fate  was  commemorated  by  Collins  in  one  of 
bis  beaatiful  odes.  Balnagowan  devolved  on  his  father. 
3.  The  Hon.  George  Ross,  who  died  without  issue. 

William,  14th  lord,  was,  when  master  of  Ross,  an  officer  in 
the  royal  army,  commanded  by  the  eail  of  Loudoun  at  Inver- 
ness in  1745.  In  the  attempt  to  surprise  Prince  Charles 
Edward  at  Moy  in  February  1746,  he  was  thrown  down  by 
the  csvalry  in  their  flight,  and  much  hurt.  He  declared  that 
he  had  been  in  many  perils,  but  never  found  himself  in  such 
a  grieTous  condition  as  on  that  day.  He  succeeded  his  fa- 
ther in  Jnne  1754,  but  possessed  the  title  little  more  than 
two  months,  as  he  died  19th  August  the  same  ytar,  ag^  34, 
unmarried,  when  the  title  became  extinct. 

The  estate  of  Balnagowan,  after  an  ineffectual  opposition 
from  Sir  Alexander  Gilmour,  went  to  his  lordship's  cousin, 
Sir  James  Lockhart,  second  baronet  of  Curstairs.  The  fifth 
baronet  of  the  Lockhart  family.  Admiral  Sir  John  Lockhart, 
assnmed  the  name  of  Ross,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  685,)  and  the 
estat«  of  Carstwrs  being  sold  in  1762,  he  adopted  the  desig- 
nation of  Balnagowan,  by  which  the  family  is  now  known. 
The  admirars  eldest  son,  Ijeutenant-general  Sir  Charles 
Ross,  sixth  baronet,  married,  first,  Matilda  Theresa,  a  coun- 
tess of  the  Holy  Roman  empire,  the  daughter  and  heiress  of 
General  Count  James  Ix)ckliart  of  Camwath,  and  by  her  had 
a  SOD,  who  died  in  childhood,  and  a  daughter,  Matilda.  He 
married,  secondly,  ^lary,  eldest  daughter  of  the  second  duch- 
ess of  I^nster,  with  issue.  His  brother,  Lieutenant-colonel 
John  Ross  of  the  Coldstream  Guards,  was  killed  at  the  battle 
of  Talavera.  The  sixth  baronet's  eldest  son,  Sur  Charles 
WiUism  Augustus  Ross,  seventh  baronet,  bom  in  1812,  suc- 
ceeded his  father  8th  February  1814.  He  married  his  cousin, 
Elisabeth,  eldest  daughter  of  Colonel  Robert  Ross  of  the  4th 
dragoon  guards,  with  issue. 


The  family  of  Ross  of  Dalton,  Dumfries-shire,  and  Ross 
House,  Shropshire,  are  descended  from  Randolph  Ross,  sec- 
ond son  of  John,  second  Lord  Ross,  who  fell  at  Flodden,  and 
brother  of  Ninian,  thu-d  Lord  Ross. 


L 


The  sncient  family  of  Ross  of  Craigie,  Perthshire,  were 
li«reditar|r  governors  of  Spey  castle  in  Perth,  till  the  Refor- 
i»ation,  when  the  keys  of  the  fortress  were  surrendered,  un- 
^cr  protest,  to  the  provost  and  council,  by  John  Ross  of 
Oraigie.    This  gentleman,  one  of  the  chief  favourites  of  King 
^^  ames  V.,  was  taken  prisoner  by  the  English  at  the  rout  of 
^olwsy.    On  the  11th  September  1618,  Mr.  Thomas  Ross, 
time  s  minister,  a  son  of  the  laird  of  Craigie,  was  exe- 
st  the  Cross  of  Edinburgh,  for  that  while  studying  at 
Oxf<»d,  be  affixed  upon  the  principal  gate  of  one  of  the  col- 
leges a  libel  against  his  own  countrymen  in  England,  liken- 
^^g  them  to  the  seven  lean  kine  of  Egypt,  and  using  many 
^Opprobrious  terms  against  them.     The  vice-chancellor  of 
Oxford  sent  him  to  the  king,  who  ordered  him  down  to  Scot- 
lamd.    At  his  examination,  he  said  that  necessity  drove  him 
%o  it,  that  he  might  procure  some  benefit  from  the  king.    He 
«oofcsaed  at  his  execution  that  he  was  a  man  of  a  proud 
spirit,  but  thought  the  punishment  greater  than  the  fault. 
iCaUkrwood's  Historie,  vol  vii.  p.  836.) 

m. 


General  Patrick  Ross  of  Innemethie,  descended  from  the 
Craigie  line,  by  his  wife  Mary  Clara  Maule,  related  to  the 
Panniure  family,  had,  with  other  issue,  Major-general  Sir 
Patrick  Ross,  bom  26th  January  1778.  He  entered  the  ar- 
my in  1794,  and  served  in  India  for  nine  years,  as  captain  of 
the  22d  light  dragoons.  During  the  Peninsular  war,  he  was 
lieutenant-colonel  of  the  48th  foot,  and  served  in  the  Ionian 
blands  for  seven  years  as  lieutenant-colonel  of  the  75th  foot. 
After  being  resident  and  commandant  of  St.  Maura  and 
Zante,  he  served  as  major-general  on  the  staff  at  Corfu,  and 
in  1819  was  croated  a  knight  grand  commander  of  the  order 
of  St.  Michael  and  St.  George.  He  was  afterwards  governor 
and  commander«in-chief  of  Antigua,  Montserrat,  and  Bar- 
buda, and  on  his  return  to  England  in  1834  he  was  made  s 
knight  commander  of  the  royal  order  of  the  Guelphs  of  Han- 
over. In  1821  he  attuned  the  rank  of  major-general,  and 
in  1846  was  appointed  governor  of  St.  Helena. 


The  family  of  Ross  of  Netherley  in  Kincardineshire,  for- 
merly of  Rossie,  Forfarshire,  is  a  branch  of  the  Rosses,  Lord 
Ross  of  Hawkhead,  and  therefore  of  Norman  lineage.  In 
Febraary  1853,  Mr.  Horatio  Ross,  at  one  period  M.P.  for 
Aberdeen,  having  sold  Rossie,  purohased  the  estate  of  Neth- 
erley for  £33,000.  He  married  a  Miss  MacRae  of  Inveraess- 
shire,  with  issue.  Rossie  castle,  a  handsome  pile  near  Mon- 
trose, was  erected  by  his  father,  Hercules  Ross  of  Rossie,  in 
1805. 

ROSS,  Alexander,  a  voluminoas  miscellane- 
ous writer,  the  author  of  about  tliirtj  different 
works,  in  prose  and  poetry,  most  of  which  are 
now  forgotten,  was  bom  at  Aberdeen,  in  1590. 
After  being  episcopallj  ordained,  he  left  Scotland 
some  time  in  the  reign  of  Charles  I.,  and  was  ap- 
pointed one  of  his  majesty's  chaplains,  and  master 
of  the  free  school  of  Southampton.  He  retired 
from  the  latter  a  short  time  before  his  death,  and 
passed  the  remainder  of  his  days  in  the  family  of 
the  Ilenleys  of  Hampshire,  to  whom  he  left  his 
library  and  a  sum  of  money  concealed  among  his 
books.  Very  little  Is  recorded  concerning  him, 
except  that,  notwithstanding  the  troubles  of  the 
times,  he  contrived  to  accumulate  much  wealth, 
and  died  in  1654,  leaving,  among  numerous  other 
benefactions,  £200  to  the  town  council  of  Aber- 
deen, for  the  foundation  of  two  bursaries,  £50  to 
the  poor  of  Southampton,  £50  to  the  poor  of  the 
parish  of  All-Saints,  and  £50  to  the  Bodleian  Li- 
brary. Ross  appears  to  have  enjoyed  considera- 
ble reputation  in  his  day,  and  is  alluded  to  by 
Butler,  in  his  Hudlbras,  in  the  well-known  lines : 

"  There  was  an  ancient  sage  Philosopher, 
And  he  had  read  Alexander  Ross  over.'* 

His  works  are : 

Reram  Judaicaram,  Libri  2.  Carmine.  Lond.  1617,  8vo. 
Lib.  Tertius.    Lond.  1619.   Liber  quartos.    Lond.  168  i,  Uo, 

2  A 


1' 


=^1 


ROSS, 


870 


ALEXANDER. 


Questions  and  Answers  on  the  first  vL  Chapters  of  Gene- 
Bifl,  the  first  book.    Lond.  1620,  8vo. 

Tonsor  and  Cntem  Rasas.    Lond.  1627,  8vo. 

Three  Decads  of  Divine  Meditations,  whereof  each  one 
containeth  three  parts ;  1.  Ilistoiy ;  2.  An  Allegory ;  3.  A 
Prajer;  with  a  commendation  of  a  prioato  oountrej  life. 
Lond.  (without  date,  but  about  1630,)  4to. 

Commentum  de  Teme  motu  circulari,  refutatum,  2  libris, 
contra  Lansbergum  et  Carpentarium.    Lond.  1634,  fol. 

Virgilii  Evangelizantis  Christiadus,  libri  xiii.  Lond.  1634, 
1638,  8vo.  A  work  much  admired  in  its  time,  being  a  Cento 
on  the  life  of  Christ,  collected  from  Vii^ 

The  New  Planet  no  Planet;  or,  the  Earth  no  wander- 
ing Star,  against  Galilseus  and  Copernicus.    London,  1640, 

1646,  4to. 

Mel  Helioonium ;  or,  Poeticall  Honey  gathered  out  of  the 
weeds  of  Parnassus.  The  first  book  is  divided  into  viL  Chap- 
ters, according  to  the  first  vii.  letters  of  the  alphabet,  con- 
tainmg  zlviiL  Fictions;  out  of  which  are  extracted  many 
historicall,  naturall,  morall,  politicall  and  theologicall  obser- 
vations, both  delightfull  and  useful!,  witli  zlviii.  Meditations 
in  verse.    Lond.  1642,  12mo. 

God's  Uouse,  or  the  House  of  Prayer  vindicated  from  Pro- 
faneness;  a  Sermon.    Lond.  1642,  4to. 

God's  House  made  a  Den  of  Thieves ;  a  Sermon.  Lond. 
1642,  4to. 

Medicus  Medicatus;  or,  the  Physician's  Religion  cured. 
Lond.  1645,  8vo. 

Philosophical  Touchstone;  or,  Observations  on  Sir  Ken- 
elm  Digby's  Discourse  on  the  Nature  of  Bodies  and  of  the 
reasonable  Soul;  and  Spinoza's  opinion  of  the  Mortality  of  the 
Soul  briefly  confuted.    Lond.  1645,  4to. 

llie  Picture  of  the  Conscience.    Lond.  1646, 12mo. 

Mystagogus  Poiiticus,  or  the  Muses'  Interpreter.    Lond. 

1647,  8vo.     Of  this  work  the  6th  edition  was  printed  at 
London,  1675,  8vo. 

Enchiridium  Oratorium  et  Poeticum.    Lond.  1650,  8vo. 

Arcana  Microcosm! ;  or  the  Hid  Secrets  of  Man's  Body 
discovered  in  Anatomical  Duel  between  Aristotie  and  Galen ; 
with  a  refutation  of  Tliomas  Browne's  vulgar  errors  from 
Bacon's  Natural  History,  and  W.  Harvey's  book  De  Genera- 
tione,  &c    Lond.  1651, 12mo.  1652,  8vo. 

View  of  all  the  Religions  in  the  World,  with  the  Lives  of 
certain  notorious  Heretics.  Lond.  1652,  12mo.  1672, 1675. 
sixth  edit  1683,  8vo. 

The  History  of  the  World,  the  second  Part,  in  six  Books, 
being  a  Continuation  of  Sir  Walter  Raleigh's.  Lond.  1652, 
folio. 

Observations  upon  Hobbes's  Leviathan.  Lond.  1653, 12rao. 

Animadversions  and  Observations  upon  Sir  Walter  Ra- 
leigh's History  of  the  World,  wherein  his  mistakes  are  noted, 
and  some  doubtful  passages  cleared.    Lond.  1653,  8vo. 

Abridgement  and  Translation  of  John  Wollebius*s  Chris- 
tian Divinity.    Lond.  1657,  8vo. 

Chymera  Pythagoria. 

Meditations  upon  Predestination. 

Melissomachia. 

Four  Books  of  Epigrams  in  Latin  Elegiacs. 

Colloquia  Plant!  na. 

Chronology  in  English. 

There  was  another  Alexander  Ross,  an  episco- 
pal divine  at  Aberdeen,  and  author  of  ^  A  Conso- 
latorie  Sermon,  preached,  April  15, 1635,  npon  the 
Death  of  Patrick  Forbes,  late  Bishop  of  Aber- 


dene,'  who  is  frequently  confounded  with  the  pre- 
ceding. He  was  the  son  of  James  Ross,  minister 
of  Strachan,  in  Kincai'dineshire,  and  afterwards  at 
Aberdeen.  He  is  supposed  to  have  been  bom 
between  1570  and  1580,  and  was  minister  first  of 
Insch,  then,  in  1631,  of  Footdec,  and  lastly,  in 
1636,  of  St.  Nicholas  church,  Aberdeen.  He  died 
August  11,  1639. 

ROSS,  Alexander,  an  eminent  poet,  the  son 
of  a  farmer  in  the  parish  of  Kiucardine-0*NeO, 
Aberdeenshire,  was  born  there,  April  13,  1699. 
He  studied  at  Marischal  college,  Aberdeen,  where 
he  obtained  a  bursaiy,  and  took  the  degree  of 
M.A.  in  1718.    Soon  after  he  was  engaged  as  tn- 
tor  in  the  family  of  Sir  AVilliam  Forbes  of  Craig- 
icvar,  baronet,  and,  on  quitting  this  situation,  ho 
became  for  some  time  teacher  first  at  the  parish 
school  of  Aboyne,  and  subsequently  at  that  of 
Laurencekirk.    In  1726  he  married  Jane  Cattan- 
ach,  the  daughter  of  a  faimer  in  Aberdeenshire, 
by  whom  he  had  a  numerous  family.    In  1732,    ; 
through  the  interest  of  Mr.  Garden  of  Troup,  he    i 
was  appointed  schoolmaster  of  Lochlce,  in  Forfar-    j 
shire,  where  ho  spent  the  remainder  of  his  simple    i 
and  unvaried  life  in  the  discliarge  of  the  duties  of    | 
his  humble  office.    His  beautiful  pastoral  poem,    j 
entitled  '  Helcnore,  or  the  Fortunate  Shepherdess,'    : 
was  published  at  Aberdeen  in  1768,  together  with 
a  few  Scottish  songs,  among  which  aie  the  fav-    , 
ourite  ditties  of  'Woo'd  and  Married  and  a';* 
'The  Rock  and  the  wee    Pickle    Tow;'    'The 
Bride's  Breast  Knot ;'  *  To  the  Begging  we  will 
go,'  &c.    A  second  edition  appeared  in  1778,  de-    I'l 
dicatcd  to  the  duchess  of  Gordon,  and  the  work 
has  since  been  frequently  reprinted.    A  fifth  edi- 
tion of  'The  Fortunate  Shepherdess'  was  pub- 
lished at  Dundee  in  1812,  with  a  Life  of  the 
author,  prefixed  by  his  grandson,  the  Rev.  Alex- 
ander Thomson,  minister  of  Lentrathen,  in  For- 
farshire.   On  the  first  publication  of  the  poem,  a 
letter,  highly  laudatory  of  it,  appeared  in  the 
Aberdeen  Journal,  under  the  fictitious  signatore 
of  Oliver  Old  Style,  accompanied  by  an  epistle  in 
vei*se  to  the  author,  from  the  pen,  it  is  under 
stood,  of  Dr.  Bcattic,  being  the  latter's  only  at- 
tempt in  tho  Scots  vernacular.    In  the  north  of  > 
Scotland,  where  tho  Buclian  dialect  is  spoken,    i 
'The  Fortunate  Shepherdess*  continues  to  be  as 


ROSS, 


372 


SIR  JOHN. 


The  saffeiings  of  Captaia  Ross  and  his  crew, 
daring  their  protracted  stay  in  tlie  Arctic  regions, 
were  of  the  severest  description.  After  passing 
three  winters  of  unparalleled  rigour,  finding  their 
provisions  nearly  consumed,  they  were  obliged,  in 
May  1832,  to  abandon  the  Victory,  and  set  out 
upon  a  journey  of  nearly  300  miles  over  the  ice, 
which  proved  one  of  uncommon  hardship  and 
difficulty.  In  the  month  of  July  they  reached 
Fury  Beach.  "  During  this  journey,"  we  are  told, 
"  they  had  not  only  to  carry  their  provisions  and 
sick,  but  also  a  supply  of  fuel.  Without  melting 
snow  they  could  not  procure  even  a  drink  of  wa- 
ter. Winter  set  in,  and  no  choice  was  left  but  to 
retrace  their  steps,  and  spend  another  inclement 
season  in  canvas,  covered  with  snow."  In  August 
1833,  they  fell  in  with  the  Isabella,  and  were 
taken  on  board,  "  after  having  been  for  four  years 
lost  to  the  civilized  world." 

The  narrative  of  this  second  expedition  was 
published  in  1835,  in  a  quarto  volume  of  350 
pages.  Its  great  results  were  the  discovery  of 
Boothia  Felix,  a  conntiy  larger  than  Great  Bri- 
tain, and  so  called  after  Sir  Felix  Booth,  and  that 
of  the  true  position  of  the  north  magnetic  Pole. 
The  latter  was  discovered  by  Captain  Ross's  ne- 
phew, who  had  the  honour  of  placing  thereon  the 
British  flag.  This  intrepid  officer,  whose  whole 
life  may  almost  be  said  to  have  been  passed  in  the 
Arctic  and  Antarctic  seas,  commanded  the  expe- 
dition to  the  South  Polar  regions  from  1839  to 
1843,  and  attained  the  highest  latitude  ever 
reached  (78  deg.  lOmin.).  lie  approached  with- 
in 160  miles  of  the  south  magnetic  Pole,  and  dis- 
covered a  southern  continent  which  he  named 
*  Victoria  Land,'  and  an  active  volcano  of  nearly 
13,000  feet  elevation,  which  he  called  Mount  Er- 
ebus, after  his  ship.  For  these  services  he  was 
knighted  in  1844.  In  1847  he  published  at  Lon- 
don, in  2  vols.  8vo,  *  A  Voyage  of  Discovery  and 
Research  in  the  Southern  and  Antarctic  Regions 
during  the  years  1839-43,  by  Captain  Sir  James 
Clark  Ross.* 

In  consequence  of  his  Arctic  voyages,  Captain 
Ross  received  numerous  marks  of  public  approba- 
tion. In  1834  he  was  knighted  and  made  a  com- 
panion of  the  order  of  the  Bath.  The  freedom  of 
the  cities  of  London,  Liverpool,  Bristol,  Hull, 


and  other  towns,  was  bestowed  npon  him.  He 
was  presented  with  gold  medals  from  the  Geo* 
graphical  Society  of  London,  the  Geographical 
Institute  of  Paris,  the  Royal  Societies  of  Sweden, 
Austria,  Denmark,  &c.  Foreign  powers  also 
marked  their  sense  of  his  discoveries.  He  was 
appointed  a  commander  of  the  Sword  of  Sweden ; 
a  knight  of  the  second  class  of  St.  Anne  of  Roi- 
sia  (in  diamonds) ;  the  second  class  of  the  legion 
of  honour  of  France ;  the  second  class  of  the  Bed 
Eagle  of  Prussia ;  and  the  second  class  of  Leo- 
pold of  Belgium.  He  also  got  six  gold  snuff- 
boxes from  Russia,  Holland,  Denmark,  Anstiii, 
London,  and  Baden ;  a  sword  of  the  value  of  £100 
from  the  Patriotic  Fund ;  and  one  of  the  value  of 
£200  from  the  king  of  Sweden,  for  service  in  the 
Baltic  and  White  Seas,  and  various  other  acknow- 
ledgments. 

In  1838  Sir  John  Ross  was  appointed  British 
consul  at  Stockholm,  and  he  held  that  office  till 
1844.  The  following  year,  when  Sir  John  Frank- 
lin went  out  on  his  last  fatal  expedition  to  the 
Polar  seas,  his  friend.  Sir  John  Ross,  made  him  t 
promise,  that  if  he  should  be  lost,  be  would  sail 
for  the  Arctic  regions  and  look  for  liim.  This 
promise  he  kept.    In  1850,  at  the  age  of  seventy-   i 

three,  Sir  John  went  out  in  the  Felix,  a  small   ' 

'  I 

vessel  of  no  pioro  than  90  tons,  and  remained  a 
winter  in  the  ice.  He  relinquished  his  half-pay 
and  his  pensions  for  the  cause  he  had  so  much  at 
heart,  yet  the  admiralty  refused  to  contribute  even 
a  portion  of  the  necessary  stores.  Though  the 
first  of  our  Arctic  voyagers,  he  was  excluded 
from  the  Arctic  councils,  at  which  his  experience 
and  advice  would  have  been  very  valuable.  In 
the  spring  of  1855,  he  published  a  pamphlet  on 
his  ill  treatment.  At  the  time  of  his  death  be 
was  a  rear-admiral.  He  died  in  London,  Aug. 
31,  1856.  He  was  twice  married:  first,  in  1816, 
to  the  daughter  of  T.  Adair,  Esq.,  writer  to  the 
signet,  Edinburgh ;  and,  2dly,  in  1834,  to  a  daugh- 
ter of  T.  Jones,  Esq.  of  I^ndon.    His  works  are: 

Voyage  of  DiscoTery  in  H.  M.  S.  Isabella  and  Alexudtf, 
for  the  purpose  of  exploring  Baffin*8  Baj,  and  enquiring  into 
the  possibility  of  a  North-west  passagei     London,  1819, 4tai 

A  Treatise  on  Navigation  by  Steam,  comprising  a  Hiitorf 
of  the  Steam  Engine.    London,  1828,  4to. 

Narrative  of  a  Second  Voyage  to  the  Arctic  B^iou. 
London,  1834,  ]2mo. 

Narrative  of  a  Seoood  Voyage  by  Capt.  Rom,  ILK.,  io 


ROSSLYN. 


874 


ROTHES. 


he  united  with  Lord  North  in  forming  the  celebrated  coalition 
ministry,  in  which  he  held  the  appointment  of  first  commis- 
sioner for  keeping  the  great  seal.  On  its  dissolution  he  was 
thrown  out  of  office,  and  joined  the  opposition  under  Mr. 
Fox ;  but  in  January  1793,  under  the  alarm  produced  by  the 
French  Revolution,  with  many  others,  he  gave  in  his  acces- 
sion to  Pitt*8  administration,  and  on  the  27th  of  that  month 
he  succeeded  Lord  Thurlow  as  lord-high-chancellor.  He  re- 
tired from  that  office  in  April  1801,  when  he  was  created  earl 
of  Rosslyn,  in  Mid-Lothian,  with  remainder  to  his  nephew,  Sir 
James  St.  Clair  Erskine  of  Alva,  leaving  no  children  of  his 
own.  He  had  been  twice  married,  his  second  wife  being  the 
Hon.  Charlotte  Courtney.  He  died  at  Bayles,  in  Berkshire, 
January  3, 1805,  and  was  interred  in  St  Paul's  Cathedral. 

Lord  Rosslyn  was  an  able  lawyer,  and  an  eloquent  speaker, . 
and  "  appeared,**  says  Sir  Egerton  Bridges,  **  to  be  a  man  of 
subtle  and  plausible,  rather  than  solid  talents.  His  ambition 
was  great,  and  his  desire  of  office  unlimited.  He  could  aigue 
with  great  ingenuity  on  either  side,  so  that  it  was  difficult  to 
anticipate  his  future  by  his  past  opinions.  These  qualities 
made  him  a  valuable  partizan,  and  a  useful  and  efficient 
member  of  any  administration.**  In  1755  he  contributed  to 
the  first  Edinburgh  Review,  Critiques  on  Barclay's  Greek 
Grammar,  the  Decisions  of  the  Court  of  Session,  and  the 
Abridgment  of  the  Public  Statutes;  and  in  1793  he  published 
**  Observations  on  the  State  of  the  English  Prisons,  and  the 
means  of  improving  them.** 

Sir  James  St.  Clair  Erskine,  sixth  baronet  of  Alva,  second 
earl  of  Rosslyn,  was  the  eldest  son  of  Lieutenant-general  Sir 
Henry  Erskine,  fifth  baronet  of  that  family  (see  vol.  ii.  page 
145),  by  his  wife,  Janet  Wedderbum,  daughter  of  the  above- 
named  Wd  Chesterhall  and  sister  of  the  first  earl  of  Rosslyn. 
Bom  in  1762,  he  succeeded  his  father  in  the  baronetcy  the  fol- 
lowing year,  and  in  1778  entered  the  army  as  comet  in  the 
1st  horse-guards.  In  1782  he  served  on  the  staff  in  Ire- 
land, as  aide-de-camp  to  the  lord-lieutenant,  and  was  subse- 
quently appointed  assistant-adjutant-general  in  that  country. 
In  1783  he  became  major  in  the  8th  light  dragoons.  In 
1789  he  succeeded  Colonel  Paterson,  son  of  the  Hon.  Grizzel 
St.  Clair  and  John  Paterson  of  Prestonhall,  in  the  St  Clair 
estates,  parish  of  Dysart,  Fifeshire,  and  in  consequence  as- 
sumed the  name  and  arms  of  St.  Clair.  These  estates  at 
one  period  belonged  to  the  Ix>rd8  Sinclair,  and  had  been  set- 
tled on  the  Hon.  James  St.  Clair,  second  son  of  the  seventh 
liord  Sinclair,  John,  master  of  Sinclair,  the  eldest  son,  hav- 
ing been  attainted  for  his  share  in  the  rebellion  of  1715.  On 
the  latter  receiving  a  pardon  in  1726,  his  brother,  who  was 
afterwards  a  general  in  the  army,  generously  gave  the  estates 
up  to  him,  but  succeeded  him  in  them  in  1750.  On  General 
St.  Clair*s  death  in  1762,  without  issue,  he  was  succeeded  in 
his  heritable  property  by  his  nephew.  Colonel  Paterson,  who 
assumed  the  name  of  St.  Clair,  and  died  unmarried.  In 
1792  Sir  James  Erskine  received  the  lieutenant-colonelcy  of 
the  12th  light  dragoons.  The  following  year  he  ser%'ed  with 
his  regiment  at  Toulon,  and  afterwards  as  adjutant-general 
to  the  forces  in  the  Mediterranean.  In  1795  he  obtained  the 
rank  of  colonel,  and  was  appointed  aide-de-camp  to  the  king. 
From  November  1796  to  the  end  of  1797  he  was  employed  as 
brigadier-general  and  adjutant-general  to  the  British  army 
in  Portugal.  In  1798  he  attained  the  rank  of  major-general, 
and  was  present  at  the  reduction  of  Minorca.  In  January 
1805  he  succeeded  his  uncle  as  second  earl  of  Rosslyn.  The 
same  year  he  became  lieutenant-general,  and  was  placed  on 
the  staff  in  Ireland.  Before  his  accession  to  the  peerage  he 
had  been  for  23  years  a  member  of  the  House  of  Commons. 
In  1806  he  again  served  in  Portugal.    In  1807  he  was  at  the 


siege  of  Copenhagen,  and  in  1809  in  the  Zealand  expeditioo. 
In  June  1814  he  attained  the  full  rank  of  genenL  In  1829 
he  was  appointed  keeper  of  the  privy  seal,  and  swoni  t 
member  of  the  privy  council,  and  in  December  1884  he  wai 
lord- president  of  the  council  in  Sir  Robert  Peri's  brief  ad* 
ministration.  He  was  a  knight  grand  cross  of  the  Bath,  and 
lord-lieutenant  of  Fifeshire.    He  died  18th  January  1837. 

His  eldest  son,  James  Alexander  St  Clair,  Lord  Loog^ 
borough,  bora  16th  Febraary  1802,  succeeded  as  third  aari  of 
Rosslyn.  Ih  1841  he  was  swom  a  member  of  the  privy 
council,  and  from  September  of  that  year  to  July  1846  he 
was  master  of  the  buckhounds  to  the  queen.  In  1864  he 
became  a  major-general  in  the  army.  He  msnied,  10th 
October  1826,  Frances,  daughter  of  Lieutenant-general  We- 
myss  of  Wemyss;  issue,  a  daughter.  Lady  Harriet  Elisabeth, 
and  two  sons,  James  Alexander,  Lord  Loughborough,  bon 
10th  l^Iay  1830,  an  officer  in  the  Iife-guardS|  who  died,  un- 
married, 28th  December  1851,  and  Robert  Francis,  Loid 
Loughborough,  bom  2d  March  1833. 


Rothes,  earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred, before  20th  March,  1457-8,  on  George  de  Lesley  of 
Rothes,  Fifeshire,  the  ninth  in  descent  from  Bartholomew,  s 
Flemish  baron,  ancestor  of  the  family  in  Scotland,  (see  xaL 
ii.  p.  656).  The  first  earl  died  about  1488,  and  having  been 
predeceased  by  his  only  son,  Andrew,  master  of  Rothes,  vti 
succeeded  by  his  grandson,  George,  second  earl,  who,  with 
his  younger  brother,  William,  was  killed  at  Flodden.  The 
latter  had  two  sons :  George,  who  succeeded  as  third  esri, 
and  John,  one  of  the  prisoners  taken  by  the  English  at  the 
rout  of  Sol  way  in  1542.  He  has  obtained  an  historical  name 
as  being  one  of  the  chief  conspirators  in  the  assasanatioo  of 
Cardinal  Bethune.  After  the  martyrdom  of  George  Wtshiit, 
March  1,  1546,  he  declared  in  all  companies,  holding  hii 
dagger  in  his  hand,  that  "  that  same  dagger  and  that  same 
hand  shall  be  priest  to  the  cardinal,'*  and  he  kept  his  word. 

George,  third  earl,  was  in  1529  appointed  sheriff  of  Fife. 
He  attended  King  James  V.,  on  his  matrimonial  expeditioo 
to  France  in  1536.  He  was  admitted  a  lord  of  session,  Nov. 
16, 1532,  and  on  Dec  7, 1541,  he  had  a  charter  of  the  office  of 
sheriff  of  Fife  to  himself  in  liferent,  and  to  Norman  his  sod 
in  fee,  on  his  own  resignation.  In  1543  he  fell  under  the 
suspicion  of  the  governor  Arran  and  Cardinal  Bethune,  and  ia 
Nov.  of  that  year  was  apprehended  at  Dundee,  with  Lord 
Gray  and  Balnaves  of  Halhiil.  The  following  year  he  ms 
set  at  liberty,  and  on  Nov.  7  was  appointed  a  lord  of  the 
articles.  In  June  1546,  after  the  murder  of  Cardinal  Bethmw, 
in  which  his  brotlier  John  and  his  son  Norman  were  the  two 
principal  actors  (see  vol.  i.  pp.  293,  294),  the  friends  of  the 
cardinal  prevailed  on  the  governor  to  have  him  tried  for  ac- 
cession to  the  murder,  while  the  Scots  army  was  on  its  way 
to  repel  an  invasion  on  the  western  borders,  when  he  was  ae- 
quitted.  In  June  1550,  he  was  sent  ambassador  to  Denmaifc, 
and  on  Dec  18,  1557,  he  was  one  of  the  eight  oommissionen 
elected  by  the  estates  to  represent  the  Scots  nation  at  the 
nuptials  of  Queen  Mary  and  Francis  the  dauphin  in  Peril, 
April  24,  1558.  The  firm  conduct  of  these  oommissionen  in 
refusing  the  crown  matrimonial  to  that  prince,  gave  greet 
offence  to  the  French  court,  and  it  was  thought  that  potton 
was  administered  to  them,  as  the  carls  of  Rothes  and  CasiilliSi 
and  Reid,  bishop  of  Orkney,  three  of  their  number,  died  at 
Dieppe,  on  their  way  home,  in  November. 

The  carl  was  four  times  married.  By  his  1st  wife,  and  his 
4th,  he  had  no  issue.  His  2d  wife,  (according  to  Donf^* 
Peerage)  was  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Soniervilie  of  Can- 
busnethan,  and  by  her  he  had  4  sons  and  2  if  not  8  dangb* 


ROTHES, 


376 


SEVENTH  EARL  OF. 


side  of  the  Tweed,  about  three  miles  from  Berwick.  In 
Hardwicke's  State  Papers  (vol.  ii.  pp.  130—139),  is  printed 
an  interesting  account  of  a  conference  held  between  the  king 
and  Rothes  and  the  other  Scottish  commissionerSf  in  the  tent 
of  the  lord-general,  the  earl  of  Arundel,  11th  June  1639, 
which  led  to  the  pacification  of  Berwick.  So  keen  was  he 
at  this  time  in  the  cause  of  the  Covenant,  that  in  one  of  his 
letters  to  the  earl  of  Pembroke,  then  lord-chamberlain,  dated 
Edinburgli,  29th  January  1639-40,  *'  he  threatens  the  Eng- 
lish nation  with  war,  if  the  hierarchy  of  the  church  was  not 
new-molded,  to  the  minds  of  the  Scottish  commissioners.** 
The  same  year  (1640)  he  was  nominated  chief  of  the  com- 
missioners sent  to  London  to  treat  with  the  king.  His  resi- 
dence there  and  his  intercourse  with  the  court  appear  to  have 
had  some  influence  in  moderating  his  views,  if  not  of  gaining 
him  entirely  over  to  the  king's  party.  Clarendon  says: 
**  Certain  it  is,  that  he  had  not  been  long  in  England  before 
he  liked  both  the  kingdom  and  the  court  so  well,  that  he 
was  not  willing  to  part  with  either.  He  was  of  a  pleasant 
and  jovial  humonr,  without  any  of  tliose  constraints  which 
the  formality  of  that  time  made  that  party  subject  them- 
selves to.**  He  was  to  have  been  appointed  one  of  the  lords 
of  the  bedchamber  and  a  privy  councillor,  and  he  liad  the 
prospect  of  a  marriage  with  Lady  Devonshire,  "  a  very  wise 
lady,"  says  Boillie,  «*  with  £4,000  steriing  a-year.**  A  life- 
pSMion  of  £10,000  Scots  (£833  6s.  8d.  steriing)  had  been 
Mitlad  on  him,  and  was  confirmed  by  parliament  in  August 
1C41|  in  which  month  he  was  to  have  accompanied  the  king 
to  Scotland,  had  not  illness  prevented  him.  He  died  at 
Richmond  upon  Thames  on  the  23d  of  the  same  month,  and 
bis  death  was  considered  a  great  blow  to  the  king's  hopes  of 
accommodation  with  the  Soots,  happening  as  it  did  so  sud- 
denly, just  at  that  particular  time.  By  his  countess.  Lady 
Ann  Erskine,  second  daughter  of  John,  earl  of  Mar,  he  had 
a  son,  John,  created  duke  of  Rothes,  who  was  as  much  op- 
posed to  the  Covenant  as  his  father  had  been  for  it,  and 
two  daughters,  Lady  Margaret,  who  was  thrice  married,  being 
successively  Lady  Balgonie,  countess  of  Buccleuch,  and  coun- 
tess of  Wemyss,  an<l  hod  issue  to  all  her  husbands,  and  Lady 
Mary,  countess  of  P^glinton. 

John,  sixth  euri,  was  the  duke  of  Rothes  of  Charles  the 
Second's  reign.  Bom  in  1630,  he  was  eleven  years  of  age 
when  he  succeeded  his  father.  On  the  arrival  of  Charies  II. 
in  Scotland,  in  1650,  he  waited  on  the  king,  and  carried  the 
sword  of  state  at  his  coronation  at  Scone,  Ist  January  1651. 
The  following  month  he  was  appointed  colonel  of  one  of  the 
two  regiments  of  horse  levied  in  Fife  for  the  king's  scnici», 
and  was  taken  at  the  battle  of  Worcester,  3d  September  the 
same  year.  He  was  confined  in  the  Tower  of  Ix>ndon  till 
1654,  when  he  was  removed  to  Newcastle.  By  the  interest 
of  the  countess  of  Dysart,  afterwards  duchess  of  Lauderdale, 
with  Cromwell,  he  obtained  his  liberty  in  July  1655.  In 
January  1658,  he  was  committed  to  Edinburgh  cattle,  by 
order  of  Cromwell,  in  order  to  prevent  a  duel  between  him 
and  Tiscount  Howard,  on  account  of  the  eorPs  supposed 
gallantry  to  the  viscount's  wife.  His  estate  was  sequestrated 
in  April  the  same  year,  and  through  the  good  offices  of 
General  Monk,  he  was  liberated  the  first  of  December  follow- 
ing. He  afterwards  went  to  Bi'edn,  to  wait  on  Charles  II. 
At  the  Restoration  he  was  appointed  lord-president  of  the 
council  of  Scotland  **  by  the  joint  consent  of  all  the  opposite 
parties,  for  his  youth  had  as  yet  suffered  him  to  have  no 
enemies,  and  the  subtlety  of  his  wit  obliged  all  to  court  his 
friendship.'*  (i1/acl;enzie'f  Memoirs^  p.  8).  He  was  also 
named  a  lord  of  session,  1st  June  1661,  and  &t  the  same  time 
was  appouited  one  of  the  commissioners  of  exchequer.    On 


the  fall  of  the  earl  of  Middleton,  he  was  constituted  lord-higb- 
commissioner  to  the  parliament  which  met  at  Edinbaigh, 
18th  June  1663,  and  Uie  same  year  he  received  the  staff  of 
high-treasurer  of  Scotland,  in  room  of  his  father-in-law,  tlie 
earl  of  Crawford.  He  was  also  appointed  captain  of  tlie 
troop  of  life-guards  and  general  of  the  forces,  and  twora  a 
privy  councillor  of  England.  The  following  year,  on  tiic 
death  of  the  earl  of  Glencaim,  he  was  appointed  keeper  of  tin 
privy  seal  of  SooUand,  so  that  be  held  the  three  highest 
offices  in  the  kingdom.  In  all  matters  relating  to  the  dmrefa 
the  earl  of  Rothes  followed  the  violent  counsels  of  Aichbisbop 
Sharp,  and  his  conduct  in  reference  to  the  oppreawd  Piresby- 
terians  was  in  consequence  of  the  most  perMCUting  kind. 

In  1667,  Lauderdale  supplanted  him  in  the  royal  finronr, 
and  on  16th  April  that  year,  he  was  stripped  of  all  his  em- 
ployments, except  the  chancellorship.  He  had  been  repre- 
sented to  the  king,  and  that  not  by  the  Presbyterians,  batbj 
some  of  his  own  colleagues  in  the  government,  as  unfit  to  hdd 
such  high  offices,  on  account  of  his  dissolute  and  lasdrioos 
life,  which  it  was  said  was  wholly  given  up  to  debaucbenr. 
He  afterwards  joined  the  party  of  the  duke  of  York,  thnrach 
whose  influence  he  was,  by  patent,  dated  at  Windsor,  29th 
May  1680,  created  duke  of  Rothes,  marquis  of  Ballenbreich, 
earl  of  Lesley,  viscount  of  Lugton,  I/)rd  Auchmutie  ami 
Caskiebery,  with  limitation  to  the  heirs  male  of  his  bodr. 
He  did  not  long  enjoy  his  new  titles,  as  he  died  of  jaundice 
at  Holyrood-house,  Edinburgh,  27th  July  1681,  aged  51.  As 
he  had  no  male  issue,  his  ducal  titles  became  extinct  at  lis 
death.  He  had  two  daughters,  Lady  Margaret,  on  whom  ih» 
earldom  devolved,  and  Lady  Christian,  marchioness  of  Moo- 
trose,  mother  of  the  first  duke  of  Montrose. 

The  duke  of  Rothes  does  not  bear  an  enviable  charsctrr 
among  the  Scots  statesmen  of  his  time.  His  talents  were  of 
no  mean  order,  though  he  w.is  totally  devoid  of  leaning 
Lord  Fountainhall  says,  he  gave  himself  '*  great  libertte  in 
all  sorts  of  pleasures  and  debaucheries,  particularly  with 
Lady  Anne,  sister  to  the  first  duke  of  Gordon,  whom  he  tobk 
along  with  him  in  his  progress  through  the  country  in  hat 
and  feather,  and  by  his  bad  f>xample  infected  many  of  the 
nobility  and  gentry."  He  is  said  to  have  excused  his  gallan- 
tries on  the  ground  that,  as  Charles'  commissioner,  it  became 
him  in  all  things  to  represent  the  royal  peri>on.  The  follow- 
ing passage,  suppressed  in  the  cnrlier  editions  of  Bnmet'i 
history,  gives  a  singular  account  of  Iiis  intemperance :  **  He 
was  unhappily  made  for  drunkenness.  For  as  he  drank  sll 
his  friends  dead,  and  was  able  to  subdue  two  or  three  sets  of 
drunkards,  one  aflter  another,  so  it  scarce  ever  appeared  that 
he  was  disordered,  and  after  the  greatest  excesses,  an  honr 
or  two  of  sleep  carried  them  all  off  so  entirely  that  no  sign  of 
them  remained.  He  would  go  about  his  business  witboat 
any  unca.siness,  or  discovering  any  heat  either  in  body  or 
mind.  This  had  a  terrible  conclusion;  for,  after  he  bad 
killed  all  his  friends,  he  fell  at  last  under  such  a  weakness  of 
stomach  that  he  had  perpetual  cholics,  when  he  was  not  hot 
within  and  full  of  strong  liquor,  of  which  he  was  presentlr 
seized ;  so  that  ho  w.is  always  either  sick  or  drunk." 

His  elder  daughter,  Margaret,  countess  of  Rothes,  marrifd 
Charles,  fifth  earl  of  Haddington,  and  died  20th  Angitft 
1700.  They  had  three  sons,  viz.,  John,  seventh  eari  of 
Rothes ;  Thomas,  sixth  earl  of  Haddington,  and  the  Horu 
Ch.irles  Hamilton,  who  died  young. 

John,  seventh  earl  of  Rothes,  the  eldest  son,  was  appmnttd 
keeper  of  the  privy  seal  of  Scotland  in  1704,  but  the  follow- 
ing year  he  was  removed  from  that  office.  At  the  geowtl 
election  of  1708,  he  was  chasen  one  of  the  sixteen  Soots  re- 
presentative peers,  and  subsequently  was  twice  re-elected. 


ROW, 


378 


JOHN. 


ll 


Scotland,  the  earldom  of  Carrick,  the  lordship  of  the  Isles, 
and  the  baronj  of  Renfrew,  has  been  vested  in  the  first-born 
son  and  heir  apparent  of  the  sovereign,  with  all  the  privileges 
of  a  peer  of  Scotland.  In  the  event  of  the  death  of  the  eld- 
est son,  these  Utles  pass  to  the  king's  next  sorviving  son, 
to  the  exclusion  of  a  grandson,  the  son  of  the  eldest  prince ; 
and  when  the  king  has  no  son  or  heir  apparent,  thev  vest  in 
himself,  as  the  representative  of  tlie  prince  who  ought  to  pos- 
sess them.    He  can  neither  give  them  nor  withhold  them. 

In  the  Union  roll  of  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  that  is,  the 
list  of  Scottish  peers  as  it  stood  on  1st  Mav  1707,  laid  before 
the  House  of  Ix)rd8,  the  title  of  duke  of  Rothesay  is  not  in- 
serted, as  the  then  sovereign,  Queen  Anne,  had  no  son  in 
existence  at  the  time.  On  the  accession  of  George  I.  in 
1714,  his  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent,  George,  prince  of 
Wales,  afterwards  George  II.,  became  of  course  duke  of 
Rothesnv,  and  that  title  was  accordingly  placed  at  the  head 
of  the  roll  of  the  peers  of  Scotland.  His  Royal  highness  as 
duke  of  Rothesay,  voted  twice  by  proxy  at  the  election  of 
Scots  peers,  the  first  time  on  3d  March  1715,  and  the  second 
time  on  28th  February  1716.  When  he  succeeded  as  king, 
his  eldest  son,  Frederick,  prince  of  Wales,  became  duke  of 
Rothesay  of  right,  but  he  never  cxerdsed  his  privilege  of 
voting  for  a  Scotttiih  peer.  He  predeceased  his  father,  20th 
March  1751,  and  on  20th  April  following,  his  eldest  son, 
George,  afterwards  George  III.,  was  created,  by  patent, 
prince  of  Wales  and  earl  of  Chester  in  England.  In  this  pa- 
tent the  titles  of  prince  and  steward  of  Scotland,  duke  of 
Rothesay,  earl  of  Carrick,  lord  of  the  Isles,  and  baron  of 
Renfrew,  in  Scotland,  as  well  as  that  of  duke  of  Cornwall  in 
England,  were  omitted,  these  honours  being  annexed  to 
estates  limited  by  law  to  the  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent  of 
the  sovereign.  In  1751,  a  signature  being  presented  to  the 
barons  of  Exchequer  in  Scotland,  for  expediting  a  charter  by 
the  king  as  prince  and  steward  of  Scotland,  a  doubt  arose  as 
to  whether  the  principality  did  not  belong  to  Prince  George, 
the  eldest  son  of  the  late  prince  as  heir  apparent  of  the 
crown.  In  December  of  the  same  year,  the  question  became 
the  subject  of  a  conference  between  the  whole  judges  of  the 
courts  of  session  and  exchequer,  but  they  differed  in  opinion, 
and  the  point  was  not  then  determined.  Subsequently  a 
temporary  act  of  parliament  was  passed,  entitled  an  act  to 
obviate  doubts  that  had  arisen  with  regard  to  the  admission 
of  vassals  within  the  principality  of  Scotland  until  the  prince 
became  of  age,  and  authorizing  the  king  to  possess  the  prin- 
dpality  and  to  exercise  all  acts  connected  with  it.  The 
prince  of  Wales  attained  majority  4th  June  1759,  but  no  far- 
ther steps  were  adopted  for  ascertaining  the  right  to  the 
principality.  On  his  accession  to  the  throne,  25th  October 
1760,  that  right  became  vested  in  his  majesty,  and  so  conti- 
nued till  12th  August  17G2,  when  his  eldest  son,  af^enn'ards 
George  IV.,  was  bom.  His  Royal  highness  exercised  his 
privilege  as  a  peer  of  Scotland  by  voting  by  proxy  for  two 
representatives  of  the  Scottish  peerage  28th  March  1787, 
and  at  several  subsequent  elections.  (See  Dovylas"  Peerage^ 
Wood*s  edition,  vol.  ii.  p.  436.) 

ROW,  John,  a  celebrated  Reformer,  and  the 
first  Protestant  minister  of  Perth,  was  bom  in 
the  neighbourhood  of  Stirling,  abont  1525.  At 
that  period  there  were  in  Scotland  several  fami- 
lies of  the  name,  supposed  to  have  come  originally 
from  England,  but  to  which  of  them  he  belonged 
is  not  known.    His  parents  were  in  good  circum- 


stances, and  he  received  a  liberal  edncatioiL  Af- 
ter being  taught  Latui  at  the  grammar  school  of 
Stirling,  he  was  sent  to  the  university  of  St  An- 
drews, where  he  particularly  addicted  himself  to 
the  study  of  the  civil  and  canon  laws.  Soon  after 
taking  the  degree  of  M.A.  he  entered  as  an  advo- 
cate in  the  diocesan  court  of  St.  Andrews,  in 
which  he  is  supposed  to  have  commenced  prac- 
tising about  two  years  before  the  death  of  Cardi- 
nal Bethune.  In  1550  his  reputation  as  a  pleader, 
and  superior  knowledge  of  the  canon  law,  induced 
the  Scottish  Popish  clergy  to  send  him  to  Rome 
as  their  agent  and  i*epresentative  there ;  and  on 
Ills  arrival  in  the  papal  city,  he  was  gradouslj 
received  by  Pope  Julius  III.  While  lie  remained 
in  Italy,  his  most  intimate  friend  was  Guide  Ab- 
canius  Sforza,  created  by  Paul  III.  cardinal  of 
Sancta  Flora,  at  the  early  age  of  fifteen ;  and,  at 
his  desire,  Mr.  Row  took  the  degree  of  doctor  of 
laws  in  the  university  of  Padua,  of  which  the 
youthful  cardinal  was  chancellor.  Ho  returned 
to  Scotland  in  September  1558,  in  the  character 
of  nuncio  or  legate  from  the  then  reigning  pon- 
tifl!",  Paul  IV.,  with  the  view  of  opposing  the  pro- 
gress of  the  Reformation.  A  wicked  fraud  prac- 
tised by  the  Popish  priests  on  the  credulity  of  the 
populace,  whereby  they  pretended  to  have  re- 
stored the  sight  of  a  supposed  blind  boy  at  Oar 
Lady's  Chapel  of  Loretto,  Musselburgh,  in  the 
beginning  of  1559,  was  the  means  of  directing 
Mr.  Row's  mind  to  an  impartial  consideration  of 
the  new  doctrines,  the  result  of  which,  and  his 
attending  the  preaching  of  John  Knox,  led  to  bis 
conversion  soon  after  to  the  Reformed  religion,  of 
which  he  became  a  zealous  and  influential  mm- 
ister. 

For  some  time,  like  the  rest  of  the  Protestant 
clergy,  he  visited  different  parts  of  the  countiy  as 
an  itinerant  preacher,  but  especially  Perth  and 
the  neighbourhood.  In  April  1560  he  was  one  of 
the  six  ministers  appointed  to  compile  the  old 
Confession  of  Faith,  and  the  First  Book  of  Dis- 
cipline. In  July  of  the  same  year  he  was  nomi- 
nated by  the  committee  of  parliament  minister  of 
Perth,  where  he  was  finally  settled,  after  officiat- 
ing for  some  time  at  Kennoway,  in  Fife.  As 
minister  of  Perth,  he  was  present  in  the  first 
general  assembly  of  the  Church  of  Scotland,  which 


I 


ROW, 


879 


JOHN. 


met  at  Edinburgh,  December  20,  1560.  After 
this  he  took  a  prominent  part  in  all  the  ecclesias- 
tical transactions  of  the  period,  being  almost  con- 
stantly elected  a  member  of  the  Assembly,  and 
was  at  least  four  times  chosen  its  moderator. 

In  Jnly  1568  Mr.  Row  was  appointed  by  the 
Assembly  commissioner  or  ecclesiastical  superin- 
tendent of  Galloway;  and  in  Angost  1569  he  re- 
ceived from  the  Regent  Moray  the  first  foundation 
charter  of  King  James  YI.^s  Hospital  at  Perth. 

On  the  arrival  of  Andrew  Melville  from  Geneva, 
in  Jnly  1575,  a  debate,  of  two  days'  continuance, 
took  place  in  a  committee  of  the  Assembly,  on  a 
question  proposed  by  Mr.  John  Diirie,  one  of  the 
ministers  of  Edinburgh,  as  to  **  whether  bishops, 
as  now  allowed  in  Scotland,  had  their  function 
from  the  word  of  God,"  when  Mr.  Row  was 
chosen,  with  three  others,  to  argue  on  the  side  of 
episcopacy.  On  the  point  being  decided  against 
him,  however,  he,  witli  all  that  took  part  with 
)iim  in  the  argument,  yielded,  and  afterwards, 
lays  his  manuscript  history,  **  he  preached  down 
prelacy  all  his  days."  That  he  fully  approved 
of  Presbyterianism  is  sufficiently  evident,  as  is 
shrewdly  remarked  by  Mr,  James  Scott,  in  his 
History  of  the  Lives  of  the  Reformers,  from  his 
being  one  of  the  compilers  of  the  Second  Book  of 
Discipline,  the  eleventh  chapter  of  which  decidedly 
condemns  the  office  of  bishops.  He  died  at  Perth, 
October  16th,  1580.  lie  is  said  to  have  been  the 
first  who  introduced  the  study  of  the  Hebrew 
language  into  Scotland,  a  knowledge  of  which  he 
had  acquired  on  the  Continent.  He  married,  about 
1560,  Margaret  Bcthune,  daughter  of  the  laird  of 
Balfour  in  Fife,  and  by  her  he  is  said  to  have  had 
eight  sons  and  two  daughtei*s.  Three  of  the  sons 
became  eminent  ministers  of  the  Church  of  Scot- 
land. 

The  eldest,  James  Row,  bom  in  1562,  was, 
in  1587,  ordained  minister  of  Kilspindy,  in  the 
Presbytery  of  Perth,  and  died  suddenly  in  bed, 
December  29,  1614. 

ROW,  William,  the  second  son  of  John  Row, 
the  Reformer,  is  supposed  to  have  been  bom 
at  Perth,  about  1568,  although  his  name  does 
not  appear  in  the  parish  register.  About  1590 
be  was  appointed  minister  of  Forgandenny,  in 
the  presbytery  of  Perth,  in  which  he  succeed- 


ed a  person  of  the  same  name  with  his  father, 
probably  a  relative  of  the  family.  Some  writers 
state  that  he  was  at  one  time  minister  of 
Strathmiglo,  in  Fife ;  but  this  is  evidently  a  mis- 
take. For  his  declared  disbelief  of  the  tmth  of 
the  Gowrie  Conspiracy,  in  1600,  he  was  prose- 
cuted by  the  king.  In  1606  he  joined,  with  his 
brother  James  and  some  other  ministers,  in  a  re- 
monstrance to  parliament  against  bishops ;  and  in 
Calderwood^s  History,  [vol.  vi.,  pp.  645-651,]  will 
be  found  related  at  length  his  intrepid  behaviour 
in  a  meeting  of  the  Synod  of  Perth  in  April  1607, 
of  which  he  was  moderator,  in  opposition  to  the 
king's  wish  for  a  constant  moderator.  We  are 
told  that  as  old  moderator,  "  being  commanded  by 
the  Assembly  to  proceed,  and  gather  the  votes  for 
the  choice  of  a  new  moderator,  he  took  the  cata- 
logue in  his  hand.  The  comptroller,  (Sir  David 
Murray,  one  of  the  three  commissioners  appointed 
by  the  king  to  be  present),  raged,  and  began  to 
rise  out  of  his  chair,  and  take  the  catalogue  out  of 
the  moderator's  hand  per  force ;  but  he  held  it  in 
his  left  hand,  the  comptroller  sitting  on  his  right 
hand.  He  held  the  comptroller  with  his  right 
hand  in  his  chair,  till  he  called  all  the  names."  For 
his  contumacy  on  this  occasion  he  was  summoned 
to  take  his  trial ;  but,  not  appearing,  was  put  to 
the  hom,  and  obliged  for  a  time  to  keep  himself 
concealed.  By  the  favour  of  Alexander  Lindsay, 
bishop  of  Dnnkeld,  patron  of  his  parish,  his  son 
William  was,  June  29, 1624,  ordained  his  assistant 
and  successor  in  Forgandenny.  He  died  in  the 
beginning  of  October  1684.  William,  his  son  and 
successor,  distinguished  himself  in  the  time  of  the 
civil  wars,  as  a  zealous  Covenanter,  and  attended 
the  Scots  army  into  England  as  one  of  its  chap- 
lains.   He  died  in  1660. 

ROW,  John,  a  well-known  ecclesiastical  histo- 
rian, third  surviving  son  of  John  Row,  the  Re- 
former, was  bom  at  Perth,  about  the  end  of 
December  1568.  He  was  a  twin,  but  his  brother 
of  the  same  birth  was  still-born.  Being  very 
weakly  in  his  earlier  years,  he  was  at  first  in- 
stracted  at  home,  and  when  only  seven  years  of 
age  he  had  acquired  a  knowledge  of  the  Hebrew 
language.  Subsequently  put  to  the  grammar 
school  at  Perth,  he  taught  his  master  to  read  the 
Hebrew.    After  his  father^s  death,  both  he  and 


ROW, 


880 


JOHN. 


his  brother,  William,  enjoyed  a  friar*8  peusiou 
from  King's  Hospital,  Perth.  He  was  first  em- 
ployed as  tutor  to  his  nnclc's  childrcu,  Bethane  of 
Balfour,  and  in  1586  was  enrolled  a  student  iu  the 
then  newly  created  college  of  Edinburgh.  Ue  took 
the  degree  of  M.A.  in  August  1590,  and  was  for 
two  years  schoolmaster  at  Aberdour.  In  the  end  of 
1592  he  was  ordained  minister  of  Carnock  in  Fife, 
and  three  yeara  afterwards  he  married  Grissel,  a 
daughter  of  the  lie  v.  David  Fergusson,  minister 
of  Dunfermline,  and  by  her  had  a  numerous  family. 
In  1619  he  was  summoned  before  the  court  of  high 
commission  at  St.  Andrews  for  nonconformity  and 
opposition  to  prelacy,  and  on  6th  February  1622, 
he  was  charged  by  the  council  to  keep  within  Iiis 
own  parish  bounds.  (Calderwood^  vol.  vii.  p.  543.) 
lie  was  a  member  of  the  famous  Glasgow  Assem- 
bly of  November  1638,  and  was  one  of  the  four 
oldest  of  the  ministers  present  put  in  nomination 
with  Alexander  Henderson,  as  a  mark  of  respect 
to  their  years,  for  the  moderatorship.  At  this  as- 
sembly he  was  appointed  one  of  the  committee  to 
report  upon  the  state  of  the  church  registers,  and 
npon  their  report,  which  is  contained  in  the  piintcd 
acts  of  the  assembly,  these  volumes  were  received 
as  authentic  registers.  In  this  and  subsequent 
assemblies  he  took  an  active  interest.  He  died 
2Gth  June  1046,  having  been  for  54  years  minister 
of  Caniock.  His  *  Historic  of  the  Kirk  of  Scot- 
land from  the  year  1558  to  August  1637,  with  a 
continuation  to  July  1639,  by  his  son,  John  Row, 
principal  of  King's  College,  Aberdeen,'  was  printed 
in  1842,  for  the  Wodrow  Society.  In  compiling 
it,  he  made  use  of  the  pnpei*s  of  his  father-in  law, 
Mr.  David  Fergusson,  minister  of  Dunfermline. 
An  edition  of  Row's  History  has  also  been  printed 
for  the  Maitland  Club  of  Glasgow. 

ROW,  John,  a  learned  and  eminent  divine, 
grandson  of  John  Row  the  Reformer,  and  second 
son  of  the  preceding,  was  bom  about  the  year 
1598.  He  studied  at  the  university  of  St.  Andrews, 
and  on  leaving  it,  became  tutor  to  George  Hay, 
afterwards  second  carl  of  Kinnoul.  He  was  sub- 
sequently for  some  time  master  of  the  grammar 
school  of  Kirkcaldy.  On  the  recommendation  of 
the  father  of  his  pupil,  who  was  then  lord-chan- 
cellor of  Scotland,  he  was,  in  1632,  appointed  rec- 
tor of  the  grammar  school  of  Perth.    In  1634  he  | 


published  the  first  edition  of  his  Hebrew  Gnun- 
mar,  to  which  were  prefixed  some  commendatoiy 
verses  from  Alexander  Henderson,  Samvel  Bath- 
erford,  and  others  of  his  friends.  In  1641  be 
was  persuaded  by  the  celebrated  Andrew  Cant  to 
remove  to  Aberdeen,  and  become  minister  of  the 
church  of  St.  Nicholas  in  that  city.  In  1648  he  pnb- 
lished  a  vocabnlary  of  the  Hebrew  language,  which 
he  dedicated  to  the  Town  Conncil  of  Aberdeen,  for 
which  he  received,  "  for  his  paines,  fonr  hundred 
merk  Scotts  money."  In  1644  he  brought  out,  at 
Glasgow,  the  second  edition  of  his  Hebrew  Gram- 
mar, nnder  the  title  of  *  Hebreie  Lingnn  Instita- 
tiones  Compendiosissimc,*  &c. ;  the  work  beingdedi- 
catcd  to  George,  earl  of  Kinnoul.  About  the  same 
period  he  wrote  some  other  books,  relating  chieflj 
to  the  political  controversies  of  the  times.  In 
1645,  on  the  approach  to  Aberdeen  of  the  mtr- 
qnis  of  ^fontrose  with  the  royalist  forces,  Row, 
with  Cant,  and  othci*s  of  the  Presbyterian  partr, 
took  refuge  in  the  castle  of  Dunnottar.  In  1651 
he  was  appointed  principal  of  King's  college.  Old 
Aberdeen,  in  the  room  of  Dr.  Guild,  deposed  bj 
Plonk's  military  commission,  for  his  opposition  to 
the  Covenants.  It  has  been  incorrectly  stated  io 
some  of  the  biogrnpliies  of  him,  that  on  October  8, 
1656,  Principal  Row  preached  before  the  parlia- 
ment in  Westminster  Abbey,  on  a  day  appointed 
for  a  public  thanksgiving,  but  the  John  Row  who 
preached  on  that  occasion  was  an  Independent 
minister  in  London. 

At  the  Restoration,  with  the  view  of  ingratiat- 
ing himself  with  the  new  authorities,  he  published 
at  Aberdeen,  in  small  quarto,  a  poetical  address 
in  Latin  to  the  king,  which  was  no  less  landatoiy 
of  his  majesty  than  abusive  of  Cromwell,  whom 
ho  characterized  as  "  Trux  vilis  vermis,"  being 
the  anagram  of  '*  0  vile  cruel  woim,"  (Oliver 
Cromwell,)  latinised.  This  truckling,  however, 
did  not  save  him,  as  some  of  his  works,  which  re- 
flected severely  on  the  royal  famil}',  were  taken 
from  the  college  and  burnt  at  the  cross  of  Aber- 
deen, by  the  common  hangman.  In  1661  he  re- 
signed his  office  of  principal,  and  removed  to  New 
Aberdeen,  where  ho  endeavoured  to  maintahi 
himself  by  keeping  a  school,  being  occasionally 
assisted  by  donations  from  charitable  persons.  In 
his  latter  years  he  took  up  his  residence  with  hii 


l! 


ROXBURGHE, 


382 


DUKE  OF. 


Plants  of  the  Const  of  Coromandol ;  selected  from  Draw- 
ings and  Descriptions  presented  to  the  Court  of  Directors  of 
the  East  India  Company.    Lond.  1795, 1802,  2  vols,  folio. 

Botanical  Description  of  a  new  species  of  Swietenia,  or 
Mahogany;  with  Experiments  and  Observations  on  the  Bark 
thereof,  in  order  to  determine  and  compare  its  powers  with 
those  of  Pemvian  Bark,  for  which  it  is  proposed  as  a  substi- 
tute.   London,  1793,  4to. 

An  Essaj  upon  the  Natural  Order  of  the  Sdtaminen. 
Calcutta,  4to. 

A  Meteorological  Diary,  &c.,  kept  at  Fort  George  in  the 
East  Indies.  Phil.  Trans.  1778,  Abr.  sir.  322.  Continna- 
Uon,  lb.  1780,  681. 

An  Account  of  the  Trigonometrical  Operation,  by  which 
the  Distance  between  the  Meridians  of  the  Royal  Obserrato- 
ries  of  Greenwich  and  Paris  has  been  determined.  lb.  1790. 
ZTi.  649. 

Chermes  Lacca.    lb.  1791,  zriL  62. 

Account  of  the  Tusseh  and  Arrindy  Silk-Worms  of  Ben- 
gal.   Trans.  Linn.  Soc.  1802,  vol.  vii.  p.  33. 

A  Botanical  Description  of  Urseola  Elastica,  or  Caout- 
chouc Vine  of  Sumatra  and  Pullo  Pinang;  with  an  Account 
of  the  Properties  of  its  inspissated  Juice,  compared  with  those 
of  the  American  Caoutchouc  Nicholson*s  Journal,  iii.,  435, 
1799. 

On  the  Culture,  Properties,  and  Comparative  Strength  of 
Hemp,  and  other  Vegetable  Fibres,  the  Growth  of  the  East 
Indies.    lb.  xi.  32,  1805. 

The  Botanical  and  Economical  Account  of  the  Bas«a  Bu- 
^rracea,  or  the  East  India  Butter  Tree.    lb.  jux.  372, 1808. 

On  various  Natural  Productions  of  the  East  Indies.  lb. 
zxviL  69,  1810. 

Some  Account  of  the  Teak  Tree  of  the  East  Indies.  lb. 
xxxiii.  348,  1812. 

His  general  descriptive  work  of  the  plants  of  India,  called 
*  Flora  Indica,*  did  not  appear  till  some  years  after  his  death. 
A  complete  edition,  in  three  volumes,  was  published  by  his 
sons  in  1832. 


BoxBUROiXE,  Duke  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland, 
possessed  by  the  noble  family  of  Ker  of  Cessford,  date  of 
creation,  1707.  The  Kers  of  Cessford  and  of  Femihirst, 
the  former  the  Roxburghe,  and  the  latter  the  Lothian  branch 
(see  vol.  ii.  p.  601,  article  Kerr,  and  p.  690,  article  Lothi- 
an), sprang  from  the  same  Anglo-Norman  ancestor;  and 
are  regarded  as  in  common  the  head  of  the  sept  of  Ker,  Kerr, 
or  Carr,  a  name  derived  from  the  British  word  Car,  a  forta- 
lice  or  strength.  The  surname  abounds  in  the  south  of 
Scotland,  particularly  in  the  counties  of  Roxburgh  and  Ber- 
wick. Robert  Ker  got  from  David  II.  the  lands  of  Olton- 
bum  or  Auldtounbum,  lying  upon  the  water  of  Bowmont, 
Teviotdale.  John  Ker  of  Oltonbnm  had  two  charters  of  the 
same,  dated  in  1357  and  1858.  Andrew  Ker  of  Oltonbum, 
the  third  in  succession  from  John,  had  several  charters  from 
Archibald  Douglas,  duke  of  Touraine,  among  others  of  the 
barony  of  Cessford,  in  1446.  His  eldest  son,  Andrew  Ker  of 
Oltonbum  and  Cessford,  was  one  of  those  selected  to  accom- 
pany the  earl  of  Douglas  to  Rome  in  1450.  He  had  a  char- 
ter of  the  king's  lands  of  the  burony  of  Auld  Roxburghe,  6th 
Febraary  1451-2.  He  was  ooncemed  with  the  Boyds  in  car- 
rying off  James  III.  from  Linlithgow,  for  which  he  received 
a  remission,  13th  October  1466. 

His  son,  Walter  Ker  of  Cessford,  a  powerful  border  baron, 
was,  under  the  name  of  Wat  Carre,  one  of  the  commissioners 
for  settling  border  disputes  with  the  English,  18th  October, 
1484.    In  1499  he  received  from  James  IV.  a  grant  of  the 


site  of  the  nuned  town  and  castle  of  Roxburgh,  and  diad  25tli 
November  1501.  With  one  daughter,  be  bad  two  aona,  Sr 
Robert  Ker,  his  successor,  and  Mark  Ker  of  DolpbingirtoB 
and  LitUedean,  from  whom  was  descended  Major-gcaenl 
Walter  Ker  of  Littledean,  who,  on  18th  June  1804,  wm 
served  nearest  lawful  heir  male  of  Robert,  first  earl  of  Boz- 
burghe,  and  his  son,  Hary,  Lord  Ker. 

Sir  Robert  Ker  of  Cavertoun,  the  elder  son,  was  in  greni 
favour  wiUi  James  IV.,  being  his  chief  cupbearer.  He  was 
also  master  of  the  king's  artilleiy,  and  warden  of  the  middle 
marches.  He  died  before  6th  November  1500.  I^kerton 
(vol.  ii.  p.  71)  states  that  having  shown  great  aereritj  as 
warden  on  the  borders,  he  was  slain,  in  1511,  by  the  bastard 
Heron,  lilbum,  and  Starked,  three  Englishmen,  and  that  his 
son,  Andrew  Ker,  having  sent  two  of  his  adherents  after  hii 
assaihints,  they  brought  him  the  head  of  Starked,  which  wis 
exposed  on  one  of  the  most  public  places  in  Edinburgh.  The 
date,  1511,  is  however  erroneous.  By  his  wife,  Christian, 
daughter  of  James  Rutherford  of  Rutherford,  he  had  two 
sons,  Sir  Andrew  Ker,  and  George  Ker  of  Fawdonside. 

Sir  Andrew,  the  elder  son,  was  one  of  those  %\  ho  signed 
the  letter  to  the  lung  of  France  about  comprehending  Scot- 
land in  his  treaty  with  England,  15th  May  1515.  Like  Ids 
father,  he  was  guardian  of  the  middle  marches,  and  in  the 
summer  of  1526  was  in  the  expedition  to  the  borders,  under 
the  earl  of  Angus,  which,  on  its  return  by  Melrose  to  Edin- 
burgh, was,  on  18th  July,  intercepted  by  his  brother-Lo-Uw, 
Scott  of  Bnccleuch,  with  a  thousand  men,  assembled  to  fret 
King  James  V.  from  the  power  of  the  Douglases.  In  the 
engagement  that  ensued,  Ker  of  Cessford  was  the  only  per- 
son of  note  killed  on  the  side  of  Angus.  His  death  was  h^ 
mented  by  both  parties,  and  occasioned  a  deadly  feud  be- 
tween the  Scotts  and  the  Kers,  which  led  to  much  blood 
being  shed  on  the  borders.  His  two  daughters,  Catherine 
and  Margaret,  were  married  to  two  powerful  border  ehieft, 
Sir  John  Ker  of  Fernihirst,  and  Sir  Jolm  Home  of  Colding- 
knows.  He  had,  besides,  three  sons,  Sir  Walter,  his  succes- 
sor; lilark  Ker,  commendator  of  Kewbottle,  father  of  the 
first  earl  of  Lothian  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  G90),  and  Andrew. 

Sir  Walter  Ker  of  Cessford,  the  eldest  son,  had  a  letter 
of  remission  under  the  great  seal  to  himself  and  John  Ker  of 
Femihirst,  for  being  art  and  part  in  the  crael  murder  of  Sir 
Walter  Scott  of  Buccleuch,  committed  in  October  1552.  Rt 
was  one  of  the  commissioners  of  Francis  and  Maiy  to  treat 
with  the  English,  28th  August,  1559.  He  promoted  the 
reformation,  and  in  1567,  after  the  marriage  of  Queen  Mary 
with  Bothwell,  he  was  among  the  border  chiefs  commanded 
to  enter  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  during  Bothwell's  intended 
excursion  against  the  thieves  of  Liddesdale.  All  of  them, ' 
**  suspecting  some  other  thing,  went  home  in  the  night,  ex- 
cept Sir  Andrew  Ker  of  Femihirst,  who  was  judged  not  ig- 
norant of  the  murder  of  the  king,  and  Walter  Ker,  hurd  of 
Cessford,  a  well  meaning  man,  suspecting  nothing.**  (^Colder' 
wood^  vol.  ii.  p  360.)  When  the  queen  and  Bothwell  were 
in  Berth  wick  castle,  from  which  they  were  forthwith  obliged 
to  flee,  "  Lord  Hume  came,  with  eight  hundred  men  armed 
with  jack  and  spear,  of  which  number  a  hundred  gentlema 
came  with  young  Cessford,  to  assist  him.*'  (Ibid.  p.  361.) 
Sir  Walter  Ker  of  Cessford  was  one  of  the  chief  leaden 
against  the  queen  and  Bothwell  at  Carbery  hill.  He  entered 
into  the  association  in  support  of  the  young  king,  James  VL, 
and  fought  on  the  side  of  the  regent  Moray  at  the  battle  of 
Langside.  When  the  queen*s  faction  in  1571  had  posseniao 
of  £dinbui*gli  castle,  the  Iiurd  of  Cessford  was  with  the  party 
in  arms  for  the  king  at  Leith,  and  took  part  in  some  of  the 
conflicts  of  that  unhappy  time.    In  a  parliament  held  by  the 


ROXBURGHE, 


884 


DUKE  OF. 


breaking  oat  of  the  civil  war,  he  returned  to  Scotland,  and 
Joined  the  royalists,  for  wliich  he  was  fined  £6,000  by  Crom- 
well in  1G54.  On  his  marriage  with  Lady  Jean  Ker,  he  be- 
came second  earl  of  Roxbnrghe.  In  1661,  he  obtained  a  par- 
liamentary confirmation  of  the  deed  of  nomination  executed 
by  the  first  earl  in  his  favour  in  1648 ;  and  in  1663,  he  pro- 
cured a  ratification  of  the  same  deed  from  Sir  Walter  Ker  of 
Fawdonside,  then  the  nearest  male  heir  of  the  Cessford  family. 
He  died  2d  July  1675.  The  new  line  introduced  by  this 
marriage  retained  the  name  of  Ker,  and  carried  on  the  peerage 
as  if  the  succession  had  been  direct  by  male  descent  With 
a  daughter,  Jane,  countess  of  Balcarres,  he  had  four  sons, 
vis.,  Robert,  third  earl ;  the  Hon.  Hury  Ker,  and  the  Hon. 
William  Ker,  sheriff  of  Tweeddale,  both  of  whom  died  with- 
out issue ;  and  John,  second  Lord  Bellenden.  His  grand-aunt, 
Margaret,  sister  of  the  first  earl  of  Roxburghe,  having  mar- 
ried Sir  James  Bellenden  of  Broughton,  father  of  the  first 
Lord  Bellenden,  he  succeeded  the  latter  in  his  title  and 
estates.    (See  vol.  i.,  page  283.) 

Robert,  third  earl,  was  a  privy  councillor  of  King  Charles 
IL  He  was  one  of  the  retinue  of  the  duke  of  York  when  he 
embarked  in  the  Gloucester  frigate  for  Leith,  on  3d  May 
1682.  On  the  night  of  the  5th  the  Gloucester  struck  on  a 
sandbank  about  16  leagues  from  the  month  of  the  Humber, 
and  was  wrecked.  The  duke  escaped  by  going  out  at  the 
large  window  of  the  cabin  into  a  small  boat.  He  and  those 
who  went  with  him  were  forced  to  draw  their  swords  to  keep 
the  people  off.  Before  going  he  inquired  for  Lord  Roxburghe 
and  Lord  O'Brien,  but  the  confusion  was  so  great  that  they 
could  not  be  found.  The  earl  of  Roxburghe  was  drowned, 
and  about  200  other  persons.  By  his  countess,  Lady  Mar- 
garet Hay,  eldest  daughter  of  John,  first  marquis  of  Tweed- 
dale,  lord-high-chancellor  of  Scotland,  he  had  three  sons, 
Robert,  fourth  earl,  who  died,  unmarried,  at  Brussels,  13th 
June,  1696,  in  his  19th  year;  John,  fifth  earl,  and  the  Hon. 
William  Ker,  a  heutenant- general  in  the  anny.  The  latter 
8cr\-cd  with  reputation  on  the  continent  under  the  duke  of 
Marlborough.  At  the  battle  of  Sheriffmuir,  13th  November 
1715,  he  was  wounded  in  the  thigh,  and  had  his  horse  shot 
under  him.  He  died,  unmarried,  7th  January  1741.  The 
third  earl's  countess  survived  her  husband  in  constant  widow- 
hood for  the  long  period  of  71  years,  and  died  at  Broomlands, 
near  Kelso,  in  January  1753,  in  her  96th  year.  She  is  said 
to  have  been  the  heroine  of  the  Scottish  song  called  **  John 
Hay's  Bonnie  Lassie."  Her  walking-stick  is  still  preserved 
at  Fleurs  castle,  the  family  scat  in  Roxburghshire. 

John,  fiflh  earl,  a  most  accomplished  nobleman,  was,  in 
1704,  appointed  one  of  the  secretaries  of  state  in  Scotland. 
He  heartily  promoted  the  union  with  England;  nor  was  he 
without  his  reward,  for,  by  patent,  dated  at  Kensington,  25th 
April  1707,  he  was  created,  in  the  Scots  peerage,  duke  of 
lioxburghe,  marquis  of  Bowmont  and  Cessford,  earl  of  Kelso, 
viscount  of  Broxmouth,  and  Lord  Ker  of  Cessford  and  Caver- 
toun,  to  himself  and  the  heirs  male  of  his  body,  with  remain- 
der to  the  other  heirs  destined  by  the  former  patents  to  suc- 
ceed to  the  title  and  dignity  of  earl  of  Roxburghe.  His  grace 
was  one  of  the  sixteen  Scots  representative  peers,  and  one  of 
the  lords  of  the  regency  before  the  arrival  of  George  I.  in 
England.  By  that  monarch  he  was  appointed  keeper  of  the 
privy  seal  of  Scotland,  24th  September  1714,  and,  on  1st 
October,  sworn  a  privy  councillor  at  St.  James*.  Ou  the 
breaking  out  of  the  rebellion  of  1715,  he  accompanied  the 
duke  of  Argyle  to  Scotland,  and  ser%'ed  under  him  as  a  volun- 
teer at  the  battle  of  Sheriffmuir.  The  following  year  he  was 
constituted  secretary  of  state  for  Scotland.  During  the 
king's  absence  in  Hanover  the  same  year,  and  again  in  1716, 


1720, 1723,  and  1725,  he  was  one  of  the  lords  ji»tic«s  of  tht 
kingdom.  On  10th  October  1722,  he  was  invested  with  tht 
order  of  the  garter.  He  joined  Lords  Carteret  and  Cadogm 
in  their  attempt  to  remove  Sir  Robert  Walpole  and  hit  bro- 
ther-in-law, Lord  Townshend,  from  the  goremment,  ftr 
which  he  was  dismissed  from  his  place  as  secretaiy  of  state, 
25th  August  1725.  At  the  coronation  of  George  IL  he  offi- 
ciated as  deputy  to  the  countess  of  Errol,  high  oonstable  of 
Scotland.  His  latter  years  were  spent  on  lus  eitateL  Ht 
died  at  Fleurs,  24th  February  1741. 

His  only  son,  Robert,  second  duke  of  Roxburghe,  wn,  la 
early  youth,  created  a  British  peer,  as  earl  and  baron  Ecr  of 
Wakefield,  county  of  Yoric,  24th  May  1722.  He  died  it 
Bath,  23d  August  1755.  He  had  four  sons  and  three  daugh- 
ters. His  two  youngest  daughters.  Lady  Essex  Ker,  and 
Lady  Mary  Ker,  were  two  of  the  bridesmaids  to  Quaes  Char- 
lotte, on  her  nuptials  with  George  III.  in  1761. 

His  eldest  son,  John,  third  duke  of  Roxburghe,  was  tba 
celebrated  bibliomanist,  of  whom  a  memoir  is  given,  in  laifcr 
type,  in  another  part  of  this  work.  (See  vol.  ii.,  p.  COl.)  Oo 
his  death,  unmarried,  in  1804,  he  left  a  vast  accumulation  of 
wealth,  as  well  as  an  extensive  library  of  rare  books,  the  sile 
of  which  realized  a  prodigious  sum.  While  travelling  on  the 
continent,  he  and  Christiana,  eldest  danghter  of  the  daks  of 
Mecklenburg-Strelitz,  formed  a  mutual  attachment,  and  were 
on  the  eve  of  being  married,  when  Charlotte,  her  younger 
sister,  became  espoused  to  George  II L,  and  German  etiquette 
forbade  that  the  elder  sister  should  assume  a  statioa  which 
would  render  her  the  subject  of  the  younger.  The  duke  and 
the  princess,  in  consequence,  broke  off  their  match,  but  testi- 
fied the  warmth  of  their  nmtuol  affection  and  esteem  by  re- 
maining single,  during  their  lives. 

The  direct  line  having  again  failed,  the  heir  of  entail,  Wil- 
liam, seventh  I^rd  Bellenden,  a  descendant  of  the  seeond 
carl,  succeeded  as  fourth  duke  of  Roxburghe.  The  Lords 
Bellenden  held  the  ofiice  of  usher  of  exchequer,  with  a  salaiy 
of  about  £250  sterling  a-year,  and  appear  not  to  have  beec 
in  opuU'nt  circumstances.  John  Ker,  second  Lord  Bellenden, 
fourth  son  of  the  second  earl  of  Roxburghe,  (see  previeu 
column,  and  vol.  i.  p.  283,)  died  in  March  1707.  He  had  five 
sons  and  a  daughter.  The  sons  were,  1.  John,  third  Lmd 
Bellenden,  died  16th  March  1740.  2.  The  Hon.  Robert  Bel- 
lenden, died  unmarried.  3.  The  Hon.  William  Bellenden,  a 
lieutenant-colonel  in  the  army,  who  died  in  1759,  leaving  a 
son,  William,  who  succeeded  as  seventh  Lord  Bellenden  and 
fourth  duke  of  Roxburghe.  4.  The  Hon.  James  Bellenden,  a 
captain  in  the  anny ;  and  5.  The  Hon.  Sir  Henry  Bellenden, 
gentleman  usher  of  the  Blnck  Hod  of  the  order  of  the  Garter, 
who  died  without  Issue  .it  London,  7th  April  1761.  Both 
Sir  Henry  and  his  sister,  the  Hon.  Mary  Bellenden,  one  of 
the  maids  of  honour  of  Caruline,  princess  of  Wales,  and  af- 
terwards duchess  of  Argyle,  are  mentioned  by  Horace  Wal- 
pole. For  the  latter  particularly,  see  Lord  Orford  s  Woiks 
(vol.  iv.  p.  800).  With  six  daughters  the  third  Lord  Bellen- 
den had  two  sons,  Ker  and  Robert  Ker,  fourth  fx»d  Bd- 
lenden,  an  oflicer  in  the  royal  navy,  died  23d  May  1754^ 
leaving  an  only  son,  John  Ker,  fifth  Lord  Bellenden,  who 
died,  insolvent,  at  Edinburgh,  without  issue,  20th  October 
1796,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  uncle,  Robert,  sixth  Lord 
Bellenden.  The  latter  died,  unmarried,  14th  October  1797, 
when  the  title  devolved  on  the  above-mentioned  William 
Bellenden. 

William,  seventh  Ix>rd  Bellenden,  for  some  time  an  offiecr 
in  tlie  army,  succeeded  in  1804  as  fourth  duke  of  Roxbnigbe^ 
being  then  in  hb  76th  year.  He  enjoyed  his  new  boooon 
only  about  a  year,  dying  at  Fleurs  castle  22d  October  1805. 


ROY, 


385 


WILLIAM. 


Hb  widow,  Mary,  daughter  of  Benjamin  Bechenoe,  Esq., 
captain  RN.,  married,  a  second  time,  John  Manners,  Esq., 
afterwards  Talmash,  second  son  of  the  countess  of  Dvsart 

As  the  fourth  duke  died  without  snrriving  issue,  the  whole 
male  line  of  the  second  evr\  of  Roxburghe  ftiiled  with  him. 
The  title  of  Lord  Bellenden  became  dormant,  and  the  Eng- 
lish titles  extinct.  For  the  Scottish  honours  and  the  estates 
a  lengthened  contest  arose  between  Lady  Essex  Ker,  as  heir 
of  line ;  Sir  James  NorclifTe  Innes,  afterwards  designed  Sir 
James  Innes  Ker,  baronet,  as  heir  mule  of  Margaret,  daugh- 
ter of  Harj,  Lord  Ker ;  Major-general  Walter  Ker  of  Little- 
dean,  as  heir  male  of  tlie  first  earl;  and  the  Right  Hon. 
William  Dromraond  of  Logic- Almond,  as  heir  male  of  the 
second  earl.  The  fourth  duke  had  executed  an  entail  of  the 
estates  in  favour  of  51r.  Bellenden  Ker  Bellenden,  nephew  of 
the  fiflh  Lord  Bellenden,  and  others,  but  the  court  of  session 
set  aside  the  entail,  and  decided  in  favour  of  Sir  James  Innes 
Ker.  On  appeals,  the  whole  decisions  in  his  favour  were  af- 
firmed bj  the  House  of  Lords,  and  on  11th  May  1812,  he 
was  declared  duke  and  earl  of  Roxburghe. 

James,  fifth  duke  and  ninth  earl  of  Roxburghe,  bom  about 
1738,  son  of  Sir  Hary  Innes,  fifth  baronet  of  Innes  (see  vol. 
iL  p.  536),  was  in  his  youth  an  officer  in  the  army.  He  died 
19tb  July  1823.  He  married,  first,  Mary,  eldest  daughter 
of  Sir  John  Wray  of  Glentworth,  county  of  Lincoln,  baronet, 
snd  annmed  the  additional  surname  of  Korcliffe,  upon  Lady 
Innes*  inheriting  the  estate  of  her  maternal  ancestors  at 
Langton,  Yorkshire.  He  afterwards  dropped  that  surname 
on  assuming  the  name  of  Ker.  He  married,  secondly,  Har- 
riet, daughter  of  Be^amin  Charlewood  of  Windlesham,  Esq., 
and  by  her  had  an  only  son,  James  Henry  Robert,  sixth  duke. 
The  duchess  survived  him  till  19th  January  1855,  having 
taken  for  her  second  husband,  Lieutenant-colonel  Walter 
FMeriek  O'Reilly,  C.B.  41st  foot,  who  died  4th  March  1844. 

James  Henry  Robert  Innes  Ker.  6th  duke  of  Roxburghe, 
K.T.,  bom  July  12.  1816,  created  Eari  Innes  in  1838,  he 
married  Dee.  20,  1836,  Susanna  Stephenia,  only  child  of 
Tieatenant-General  Sir  Charles  Dalbiac,  K.C.H.,  issue,  James 
Henry  Robert,  marquis  of  Bowmont  and  Cessford,  bom  Sept. 
5, 1839;  another  son,  and  two  daughters,  the  elder  of  whom, 
I*ady  Snsan  HHrriet,  m.  in  1859  J.  Grant  Suttie,  Esq.  eldest 
son  of  Sir  George  Grant  Suttie,  Bart 


Rot,  a  surname,  from  a  Gaelic  word  signifying  red,  and 
like  Afore,  great,  Begg^  little,  Bofuij  fair,  and  similar  names, 
originally  assumed  from  some  personal  quality,  such  as  the 
colour  of  the  hair  or  complexion,  in  the  first  bearer. 

ROYf  Rob,  that  is  Red  Rob,  see  Macoregor, 
(vol.  11.,  page  740). 

ROY,  William,  Major-General,  an  eminent 

tntiqnarian,  was  born  in  the  parish  of  Carluke, 

upper  ward  of  Lanarkshire,  about  the  year  1720. 

In  the  winter  of  1746,  while  colonel  of  ai-tillery,  he 

and  his  engineere,  under  Colonel  Watson,  made 

an  actual  survey  of  Scotland  on  a  very  large  scale, 

and  the  result  of  their  labours  is  now  known  as 

the  "Duke  of  Cumberland's  Map,"  the  original  of 

which  18  in  the  Ordnance  Office.    This  map,  on 

which  the  sites  of  all  the  Roman  camps  and  other 

remarkable  objects  are  accurately  pointed  out,  he 
m. 


afterwards  reduced  to  a  smaller  size,  and  had  a 
few  engraved  as  presents  to  his  friends.  He  con- 
tributed many  important  papers  to  the  Transac- 
tions of  the  Royal  Society ;  and  for  one  of  these, 
being  a  cnrious  account  of  the  measurement  of  a 
base  on  Hounslow- Heath,  he  obtained  the  Copley 
medal.  A  short  time  before  his  death,  he  had 
completed,  by  command  of  the  king,  a  most  elabo- 
rate set  of  trigonometrical  experiments  and  ob- 
servations, to  determine  the  exact  latitude  and 
longitude  of  the  royal  observatories  of  Greenwich 
and  Paris,  according  to  a  mode  proposed  by  him- 
self in  some  of  his  papers  in  the  Philosophical 
Transactions.  They  were  illustrated  by  tables 
computed  by  actual  measurements,  to  enable  him 
to  take  which  his  majesty  had  furnished  him  with 
some  very  expensive  trigonometrical  instruments, 
lie  had  drawn  up  and  presented  to  the  Royal 
Society  an  account  of  these  experiments,  the 
printing  of  which  he  was  engaged  superintendmg 
for  their  Transactions,  when  he  was  seized  with 
an  illness  of  which  he  died  in  two  hours,  July  1, 
1790.  At  the  time  of  his  death,  besides  being  a 
major-general  in  the  army,  he  was  deputy  quarter- 
master-general, colonel  of  the  30th  foot,  surveyor- 
general  of  the  coasts,  and  a  fellow  of  the  Royal 
Society,  as  well  as  of  the  Society  of  Antiquaries. 
His  valuable  work,  entitled  *  Military  Antiquities 
of  the  Romans  in  Britain,'  was  published  at  the 
expense  of  the  Antiquarian  Society  of  London,  in 
1793.    His  works  are  ; 

Experiments  and  Observations  made  in  Britain,  in  order 
to  attain  a  Rule  for  Measuring  Heights  with  the  Barometer. 
Lond.  1778,  4to. 

An  Account  of  the  Mode  proposed  to  he  followed  in  the 
Trigonometrical  Operation  for  determining  the  relative  situa- 
tion of  the  Royal  Observatories  of  Greenwich  and  Paris. 
Lond.  1787,  4to. 

An  Account  of  the  Trigonometrical  Operations  whereby 
the  distance  between  the  Meridians  of  the  Observatories  of 
Greenwich  and  Paris  has  been  determined.    I^nd.  1790,  4to. 

The  Military  Antiquities  of  the  Romans  in  Britain,  and 
particularly  their  ancient  System  of  Castramentation,  illus- 
trated from  vestiges  of  the  Camps  of  Agricola  existing  there ; 
published  by  the  order  and  at  the  expense  of  the  Society  of 
Antiquaries  of  London.     Lond.  1793,  fol.  (Posth.) 

Experiments  and  Observations  made  in  Britain,  in  order  to 
obtain  a  Rule  for  measuring  Heights  with  the  Barometer. 
Phil.  Trans.  1777,  Abr.  xiv.  226. 

Account  of  a  Measurement  of  a  Base  on  Hounslow-Heftth. 
lb.  1785,  xvi.  22.     Reprinted  separately  same  year. 

An  Account  of  the  Mode  proposed  to  be  followed  in  Deter- 
mining the  relative  Situation  of  the  Royal  Observatories  of 
Greenwich  and  Paris,    lb.  1787,  240. 

2b 


RUDDIMAN, 


886 


THOMAS. 


RUDDIMAN,  Thomas,  an  eminent  grammari- 
an and  scholar,  the  son  of  a  respectable  farmer, 
was  born  in  the  parish  of  Bo3rndie,  Banffshire,  in 
October  1674.  He  received  the  grammatical  part 
of  his  education  at  the  parish  school,  and,  in  No- 
vember 1690,  he  obtained,  by  his  superior  know- 
ledge of  Latin,  the  first  bursary  in  King's  College, 
Aberdeen.  In  Juno  1694  he  took  the  degree  of 
^I.  A.,  and  soon  after  was  engaged  by  Mr.  Robert 
Young,  of  Auldbar,  as  tutor  to  his  sou.  In  Febru- 
ary 1695  he  was  appointed  schoolmaster  of  Lau- 
rencekirk, in  Kincardineshire,  where  he  remained 
about  three  years  and  a  half.    About  the  end  of 

1699,  the  celebrated  Dr.  Fitcaim  being  detained 
for  a  night  by  bad  weather  at  the  village  inn,  sent 
for  the  schoolmaster  to  partake  of  his  dinner,  and 
spend  the  evening  with  him,  when  he  was  so  much 
pleased  with  his  conversation  and  attainments, 
that  he  invited  him  to  Edinburgh,  with  the  pro- 
mise of  his  patronage.  Ruddiman  accordingly 
repaired  to  the  metropolis  about  the  beginning  of 

1700,  and  on  his  arrival  Dr.  Fitcaim  procured 
him  employment  in  the  Advocates'  Library.  In 
1701  he  married  Barbara  ScoUay,  the  daughter  of 
a  gentleman  of  Orkney,  and  May  2,  1702,  he  was 
formally  appointed  assistant  librarian  in  the  Advo- 
cates' Library,  with  the  insignificant  salary  of  £8 
6s.  8d.  sterling  per  annum.  He  contrived  to  as- 
sist his  income,  however,  by  copying  chronicles 
and  cliartularics  for  the  university  of  Glasgow, 
and  revising  and  editing  works  for  the  booksellers. 
Ills  first  publication  of  this  kind  was  Sir  Robert 
Sibbald's  *  Introductio  ad  Historiam  Rerum  a  Ro- 
manis  Gestarum  in  ea  Boreali  Britannia  parte 
quo;  ultra  Murum  Ficticum  est;*  and  he  next  re- 
vised '  The  Fractiqucs  of  the  Laws  of  Scotland,' 
by  Sir  Robert  Spotiswoode.  In  1707  he  published 
an  edition  of  the  *  Animi  Tranquillitate  Dialogns,' 
by  Yolusenus,  or  Wilson,  with  a  new  preface,  and 
a  sketch  of  the  author's  life.  The  same  year  he 
commenced  practising  as  a  book  auctioneer,  con- 
fining himself  principally  to  the  sale  of  learned 
works  and  school-books.  In  1709  he  published 
a  new  edition,  with  notes,  of  '  Johnstoni  Cantici 
Solomonis  Faraphrasis  Foetica,'  which  he  dedi- 
cated to  Dr.  Fitcaim.  To  an  edition  of  the  trans- 
lation of  Virgil's  iEneid,  by  Gavin  Douglas,  pub- 
lished in  1710,  Mr.  Ruddiman  added  a  glossary, 


explanatoiy  of  the  difficult  words,  and  serving  for 
a  dictionary  to  the  old  Scottish  language.    A  va- 
cancy happening  soon  after  in  the  grammar  school 
of  Dundee,  the  magistrates  invited  him  to  fill  the 
office  of  rector,  but  the  faculty  of  advocates  volui- 
tarily  increased  his  salary,  and  he  declined  the 
ofifer.    In  1711  he  aided  in  pi*eparing  for  publica- 
tion a  new  edition  of  the  works  of  Dmmmond  of 
Hawthomden,  and  assisted  Abercromby  in  pub- 
lishing the  fii*st  volume  of  his  '  Martial  Achieve- 
ments of  the  Scots  Nation.'    In  1713  he  published 
a  new  and  Improved  edition  of  the  Latin  Yocabn- 
lary  of  John  Forrest ;  and,  on  the  death  of  bis 
friend.  Dr.  Fitcaim,  the  same  year,  in  his  charac- 
ter of  auctioneer,  he  managed  the  sale  of  his  libra- 
r}',  which  was  purchased  by  Feter  the  Great, 
emperor  of  Russia. 

In  1714  Ruddiman  published  his  *  Rudiments  of 
the  Latin  Tongue,'  which  at  once  superseded 
eveiy  work  of  a  similar  nature,  and  continues  to 
bo  the  standard  elementaiy  class-book  for  the 
Latm  language  in  the  schools  of  Scotland.  In  1715 
appeared  his  accurate  and  valuable  edition  of  the 
works  of  Buchanan,  with  notes,  in  two  volumes 
folio ;  but  his  free  strictures  on  Buchanan's  char- 
acter and  political  principles  involved  him  in  a 
lengthened  controversy  with  various  persons.  In 
the  same  year  (1715),  he  commenced  printer,  in 
partnership  with  his  brother  Walter,  who  had 
been  brought  up  to  the  business,  and  the  first 
production  of  their  press  was  the  second  volume 
of  *  Abercromby's  Martial  Achievements.'  In  1725 
he  published  the  first  part  of  his  '  Grammatic® 
Latinos  Institutioncs,'  and  the  second  part  ap- 
peared in  1732. 

In  1724  he  began  to  print  'The  Caledonian 
Mercuiy;'  and  in  1729  he  acquired  the  whole 
property  of  that  newspaper,  which  continued  in 
his  family  till  1772,  when  it  was  sold  by  the  trus- 
tees of  his  gi-andchildren.  In  1728  he  was  nomi- 
nated, conjunctly  with  James  Davidson,  printer 
to  the  university;  and  in  1730,  on  the  death  of  Mr. 
John  Spottiswood,  he  was  appointed  principal  keep- 
er of  the  Advocates'  Library.  In  1739  he  edited 
the  *  Diplomata  et  Numismata  Scotiae,'  a  work  left 
incomplete  by  the  death  of  the  author,  Mr.  James 
Anderson,  to  which  he  prefixed  an  admirable 
introduction  in  Latin.    In  1745  he  published  a 


brouebt  tbc  nimc  into  Scotlxnd.  Tlie  Barname,  in  nnu  in- 
ilunB,  miy  hire  been  derived  rnm  tbe  livalrt  Rale  on  tbe 
■anthem  ude  of  TeviotdsJc,  t)ie  channel  oF  Kliich  ii  i  deep 
gallet  tbronf-b  aaadatane,  and  of  which  Lejdcn  ujg, 

'1. 
RowU.- 

KL'NCISIAN,  Alexander,  !i  celebrated  paint- 
er, the  BOD  of  an  architect,  waa  bom  at  Ediiiburgli 
Id  1736.  lie  enily  evinced  n  decided  taste  for  draw- 
ing, and  while  jet  a  mere  boy  employed  liimaelf 
almost  constantly  in  sketching  landscapes.  In 
1750  he  nas  sent  as  an  apprentice  to  Messrs.  John 
ODd  Robert  Nonic,  house -painters  in  his  native 


of  Peuicuick,  baronet,  tlion  a  cliief  patron  of  Scot-    ! 
lisli  art,  lie  wag,  in  17C6,  sent  by  lliat  gentleman  to    i 
Italy,  to  study  the  woi'ks  of  tlie  great  masters ;  aod,    , 
while  in  that  countiy,  lie  made  such  a  good  use  or  ji 
his  opportunities  .is  to  excel  many  of  Lis  coDtempo- 
raries,  parlicnlaily  in  the  rich  yet  clinstcned  style    ' 
of  colouring  of  the  VcDetian  sctiool.     He  relamed    I 
to  Scotland  in  1771,  and  the  same  year  was  ap- 
pointed, by  the  trustees  for  the  Encouragement  of 
Ai'ts  and  Manufactures,  master  of  the  academy 
established  at  Ediubaigh  for  the  study  of  draw* 
ing,  with  a  salary  of  £120.     Ilia  principal  mA, 
of  which  the  design  vas  entirely  bia  own,  wu  tbe 


RUSSELL, 


889 


PATRICK. 


paintiogs  in  the  Hall  of  Ossian  at  Penicaick.  To 
this  great  nndertaking  he  devoted  himself  so  closely 
as  to  contract  an  illuess,  from  which  he  never  re- 
covered, from  being  obliged  to  lie  constantly  on  his 
back  while  decorating  the  ceiling  with  scenes  from 
Osslan's  Poems.  These  paintings,  with  the  pic- 
ture of  *  The  Ascension'  on  the  ceiling  above  the 
altar  of  the  old  Episcopal  chapel,  Cowgate,  Edin- 
burgh ;  his  ^  King  Lear;'  his  ^  Andromeda;'  and  his 
*  Agrippina  landing  with  the  Ashes  of  Germanicas,' 
fally  established  his  fame  as  an  historical  painter. 
He  executed  several  other  pieces,  of  most  of  which 
engravings  were  published.  He  died  October  21, 
1785,  dropping  down  suddenly  on  the  street,  when 
about  to  enter  his  lodgings.  His  brother,  John 
Rnnciman,  was  also  a  painter  of  some  eminence 
In  his  day. 

RusBELL,  a  sonuune  originally  English,  having  the  same 
maaning  aa  Bufits,  Bous^  and  the  French  Bousseau,  namelj 
red,  and  deriTed  from  colour  or  complexion. 

Tha  familj  of  Raseell  of  Aden,  Aberdeenshire,  descends 
from  ona  Roxel  or  Rnssell,  an  English  boron  who  accompa- 
nied Edward  IIL  to  the  siege  of  Benvick  and  battle  of  Hali- 
don  Hill  in  1833,  and  settled  in  Scotland,  being  designed 
BoMell  of  that  ilk.  In  1600  Alexander  Russell  of  this  fam- 
Uj  purchased  property  near  Elgin,  and  his  son,  Patrick  Rus- 
sell, wlio  married  a  sister  of  Archbishop  Sharp,  in  1680 
bought  part  of  the  lands  of  Moncoffer,  Banffiihire,  which 
wen  aold  by  his  grandson,  Alexander  Rossell,  who,  on  his 
part,  purchased  Aden  and  other  estates  in  Aberdeenshire. 

Of  the  family  of  Russell  of  Ashiesteel,  Selkirkshire,  two 
merobari  have  distinguished  themselves  by  tlieir  military 
aervioea,  namely,  Colonel  William  Russell  of  Ashiesteel,  who, 
when  lientfuant  of  the  79th,  led  the  storming  party  at  the 
siege  of  Alaiiilla,  and  afterwards,  as  aiijutaut-general  of  the 
Madraa  army,  was  eii|;aged  in  ull  the  memorable  expeditions 
in  India,  nnder  Ciive,  Cuute,  Laurence,  &c.,  and  his  son,  (by 
his  wife,  a  daughter  of  John  Kuthed'urd,  M.D.  of  Edinburgh,) 
Major-general  Sir  Jameit  Russell,  born  in  1781,  who  served  in 
tita  East  Indies  from  1799  to  1825,  commanded  a  brigade  of 
cavalry  at  the  battle  of  Muhedpoor,  and  in  1837  was  nomi- 
nated K.C.B.  The  latter  died  in  1860.  He  married  in  1834 
Katherine,  daughter  of  Sir  J.  Hall,  Bart.,  with  issue.  Ue 
was  sncceeued  by  his  daughter,  Helen  Jane  Mountstuart 

RUSSELL,  Alexander,  an  eminent  physician 
and  natui-alist,  the  son  of  a  lawyer,  was  bom  aud 
edacatcd  in  Edinburgh.  He  studied  in  the  nni- 
yersity  of  his  native  city,  and  having  taken  his 
degree  of  M.D.  he  repaired  about  1734  to  Lon- 
don. Shortly  after  he  sailed  for  Aleppo,  and  in 
1740  was  appointed  physician  to  the  English  fac- 
tory there.  He  soon  became  the  principal  prac- 
titioner in  the  place,  being  honoured  by  the  par- 
ticular regard  aud  coufidcaco  of  the  pasha.    He 


returned  to  England  in  1754,  and  in  1756  he  pub- 
lished his  'Natural  History  of  Aleppo,*  with  a 
diary  of  the  progress  of  the  plague  in  1742-3-4.  In 
1759,  a  vacancy  occurring  in  St.  Thomas'  Hospital, 
London,  Dr.  Russell  was  elected  physician  to  that 
institution,  which  office  he  retained  till  his  death, 
November  25, 1768.  He  contributed  several  pa- 
pers to  the  Royal  and  Medical  Societies,  which  will 
be  found  in  their  Trausactions.    His  works  are  : 

Tentamen  Modicum  et  ^ledicastrorum  audacitate.  £din. 
1709,  8vo. 

The  Natural  History  of  Aleppo  and  parts  adjacent,  con- 
taining a  Description  of  the  City,  and  the  principal  Natural 
Productions  in  its  neighbourhood ;  together  with  an  Account 
of  the  Climate,  Inhabitants,  and  Diseases,  particularly  the 
Plague ;  with  the  methods  used  by  the  Europeans  for  their 
preservation.  Lond.  1756, 4 to.  2d  edition  revised,  enlarged, 
and  illustrated  with  Notes,  by  his  brother,  Patrick  Russell, 
M.D.  Lond.  1794,  2  vols.  4to.  This  valuable  histoiy  has 
been  translated  into  different  European  languages. 

Of  a  remarkable  Marine  Production.  Phil.  Trans.  1762, 
Abr.  xi.  635.    Vorticella  Ovifera  Lin. 

Letter  describing  the  Scammony  Plant.  Med.  Obs.  and 
Inq.  L  p.  12, 1755. 

Account  of  two  Paralytic  Cases.    lb.  p.  296. 

Cases  of  Lues  Venerea  cured  by  a  solution  of  Corrosive 
Sublimate.    lb.  il.  p.  88. 

Of  several  Hydatids  discharged  with  the  Urine.  lb.  iii.  p. 
146.    1767. 

Experiments  made  with  the  Decoction  of  Mezereon  in 
Venereal  Nodes.    lb.  p.  189. 

Case  of  almost  universal  Emphysema.    lb.  p.  397. 

An  Essay  on  his  Character.    Lond.  1770,  4to. 

RUSSELL,  Patrick,  M.D.,  a  younger  brother 
of  the  preceding,  was  bom  at  Edinburgh  in  1726. 
After  completing  his  medical  studies  at  the  univer- 
sity of  that  city,  he  went  out  to  Aleppo,  where  he 
resided  with  his  brother,  whom  he  succeeded,  in 
1754,  as  physician  to  the  British  factory  there. 
During  his  residence  at  Aleppo,  the  great  plague 
of  1760  and  the  two  following  years  broke  out  in 
Syria;  and  his  quarto  Treatise  on  the  subject, 
published  in  1791,  some  years  after  his  return  to 
England,  contains  an  historical  and  medical  ac- 
count of  the  disease  in  all  its  varieties.  Besides 
superintending  the  publication  of  an  enlarged  edi- 
tion of  his  brother's  *  Natural  Ilistoiy  of  Aleppo,* 
in  1796  he  published  an  account  of  the  Indian 
serpents  collected  on  the  coast  of  Coromandel. 
lie  was  a  fellow  of  the  Royal  Society,  and  con- 
tributed various  articles  to  the  Transactions  of  that 
body.     He  died  July  2,  1806.     His  works  are : 

A  Treatise  on  the  Plague,  containing;  an  Historical  Journal, 
and  Medical  Account  of  the  Plague  at  Aleppo  in  the  years 


\i 


RUSSELL. 


390 


RUTHERFORD. 


1760-1-2 ;  also,  Remarks  on  Qaarantines,  I^jizarettoes,  and 
the  administration  of  Police  in  times  of  Pestilence.  Witli  an 
Appendix,  containing  Crises  of  the  Plngue,  and  an  Account  of 
the  Weather  daring  the  Pestilential  Season.    Lond.  1791, 4to. 

An  Account  of  the  Indian  Serpents,  collected  on  the  Coast 
of  Coromandel,  containing  descriptions  and  drawings  of  each 
Species;  together  \rith  Experiments  and  Remarks  on  their 
several  Poisons.    I^nd.  1796,  fol.    Lond.  1801-6, 2  parts,  4to. 

Of  the  late  Earthquakes  in  Syria.  Phil.  Trans,  xl  1760, 
437. 

On  the  Inoculation  in  Arabia.     lb.  17G8,  xii.  529. 

Account  of  the  Tabasheer.    lb.  1790,  xvi.  G53. 

Observations  on  the  Orifices  found  in  certain  Poisonous 
Snakes,  situated  between  the  Nostril  and  the  K ye ;  with  Re- 
marks, by  Everard  Home,  Esq.,  F.R.S.    lb.  1804,  70. 

Remarks  on  the  voluntary  Expansion  of  the  Skin  of  the 
Neck,  in  the  Cobra  de  Capello,  or  Hooded  Snake  of  the  East 
Indies;  with  a  Description  of  the  Structure  of  the  Parts 
which  perfonn  tliat  ofBce.     lb.  353. 

An  Account  of  two  Cases,  showing  the  existence  of  the 
Smoll-Pox  and  the  Measles  in  the  same  person  at  the  same 
time ;  and  an  Account  of  a  Cose  of  Ague  in  a  Child  in  Utero. 
Trans.  Med.  and  Cliir.  ii.  p.  90,  1800. 

RUSSELL,  William,  an  able  historian,  poet, 
and  misceilaneoas  writer,  eldest  son  of  Alexander 
Rnssell  and  Christian  Ballantync,  was  bom  in 
1741  at  Windydoors,  a  farm-house  in  Selkirkshire. 
lie  was  educated  at  the  school  of  Innerleithen  and 
Edinburgh,  and  was  bound  apprentice  to  the  book- 
selling and  printing  business.  About  17G3  he 
published  at  Edinburgh  a  *  Collection  of  Poems,' 
which  seems  to  have  attracted  some  tcmporar}' 
attention,  and  recommended  him  to  the  notice  of 
Lord  Elibank. 

In  May  1767  Russell  set  out  for  London,  and 
became  corrector  of  the  press  to  Mr.  Strahan.  In 
1769  he  was  appointed  overseer  of  the  printing 
office  of  Brown  and  Adlard.  He  published  vari- 
ous pieces  in  prose  and  verse,  and  in  1779  brought 
out  the  first  and  second  volumes  of  his  *  Historv 
of  Modem  Europe,'  the  work  by  which  he  is  host 
known.  The  three  volumes  which  complete  'The 
Histoiy  of  ^lodem  Europe '  made  their  appear- 
ance in  1784.     He  died  in  1793.     His  works  are: 

Collection  of  Jlodem  Poems.  Printed  at  Edinburgh  about 
17C3. 

An  Ode  to  Fortitude.  Lond.  1769,  4to.  Peprintcd  at 
Edinburgh  same  vear. 

Sentimental  Talcs.     1770. 

Collection  of  Fables,  liloral  and  Sentimental,  in  Verse. 
Lond.  1772,  sm.  8vo. 

Ess-iT  on  the  Character,  Manners,  and  Genius  of  Women ; 
from  the  French  of  M.  Thomas.     1772. 

Julia;  a  Poetical  Romance.     1774. 

The  History  of  Modern  Europe ;  with  an  Account  of  the 
Decline  and  Full  of  the  Roman  Empire,  and  a  View  of  tlio 
Progress  of  Society  from  the  5th  to  the  18th  ccnturr :  in  a 


series  of  Letters  from  a  Nobleman  to  his  ion.  Lond.  1779, 
2  vols.  8vo.  Part  IL,  from  the  Peace  of  Westphalia  in  1648, 
to  the  Peace  of  Paris  1763 ;  with  a  View  of  the  Progress  of 
Society  during  the  present  century:  in  a  series  of  Letten 
from  a  Nobleman  to  his  Son.  Lond.  1784, 8  toIs.  Sro,  The 
first  of  these  was  anonymous,  but  the  author  in  the  Isrt 
subscribed  bis  name,  in  the  Dedication  to  the  doke  of  Bed- 
ford. An  enlarged  and  improved  edition  of  the  two  parts 
conjoined  was  published,  1786,  5  vols.  8ro.  New  editkm  in 
6  vols.  8vo;  the  last  volume  written  by  Dr.  Coote. 

Tlie  History  of  America,  from  its  first  Discovery  by  Colom- 
bns,  to  the  concln«on  of  the  late  War.     I^nd.  1779,  4to. 

The  Tragic  Muse.  1783.  A  just  compliment  to  the  sbi- 
lities  of  Mrs.  Siddons. 

The  History  of  Ancient  Europe ;  with  a  View  of  the  Re- 
volutions in  Asia  and  Africa :  in  a  series  of  Letters  to  a  young 
Nobleman.     Lond.  1793,  2  vols.  8vo. 

Besides  the  above  Dr.  Russell  wrote  an  immense  number  of 
Articles  for  the  Various  London  Magazines,  which,  if  col- 
lected, would  form  several  volumes.  He  also  left  a  great 
many  unfinished  Productions,  which  have  not  been  printed. 

A  Life  of  him,  by  Irvine,  was  published  in  1801,  12mo. 


Rutherford,  a  border  surname,  borne  originally  by  the 
ancient  Teviotdale  family  of  Rutherford  of  that  ilk.  The 
surname  is  traditionally  said  to  have  had  its  derivation  fivm 
the  circumstance  that  their  ancestor  guided  Ruther,  one  vi 
the  Scots  kinp:s  of  *^  hoar  antiquity,**  through  a  ford  in  the 
river  Tweed,  in  an  expedition  against  the  Britons,  and  the 
lands  adj:icent  being  conferred  upon  him  were  thereafter 
called  Rutherford,  which  name  his  posterity  adopted,  when 
surnames  became  hereditary  in  Scotland.  Another  tradi- 
tionary story, — which,  if  correct,  must  refer  to  a  time  pre- 
ceding the  epoch  of  authentic  border  history, — gives  a  diflerent 
account  of  the  origin  of  the  name.  It  says  that  an  English 
anny  once  occupied  for  several  days  a  position  on  a  rocky 
height,  overhanging  the  Tweed,  in  the  p.irish  of  Maxton, 
Roxburghshire,  called  Ringly  Hnll,  when,  finding  itself  con- 
fronted by  a  Scottish  force  ensconced  on  the  opposite  bank  of 
the  river,  it  forded  the  Tweed,  and  was  defeated  after  a  se- 
vere encounter.  The  spot  was  afterwards  called  Rue-the- 
fonl,  on  account  of  the  disaster  sustained  by  the  English  in 
fording  the  river,  and  the  name,  altered  into  Rutherfoni,  was 
transferred  to  the  lands  around  it,  and  to  a  village,  now  ex- 
tinct, in  its  vicinity. 

In  the  frequent  border  forays  into  England  under  the 
Douglases,  the  RuthcrfDrds  bore  a  conspicuous  part.  Among 
the  first  of  them  on  record  were  Robertas  dominus  de  Ruth- 
erford, witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  David  I.  to  Jervasim 
Ridal  in  1140,  and  Hugo  de  Rutherford,  in  a  grunt  by  Philip 
de  Valoniis  of  some  lands  in  Northumberland  in  1215.  Ha- 
go's  son.  Sir  Xicliol  de  Rutherford,  mentioned  in  a  charter  of 
Alexander  III.,  in  12G1,  is  also  witness  in  several  donatioDS 
to  the  monastery  of  Kelso,  and  in  1270  and  1272  is  de«gncd 
Kicholaus  de  Rutherford,  miles.  He  had  two  Fons,  Sir  Nichol, 
who  succeeded  him,  and  Aymcr  de  Rutherford,  both  of  whoss 
names  are  in  the  Ragman  Roll  as  among  the  Scots  baroui 
who  swore  a  forced  fealty  to  Edward  I.  of  England  in  1296. 
The  son  of  the  former,  Sir  Robert  de  Rutherford,  is  particu- 
larly mentioned  in  B.irbour's  History  as  fighting  valiantlj 
under  Robert  the  Brnce,  for  the  independence  of  Scotland. 
His  son.  Sir  liichard  Rutherford  of  that  ilk,  was  witness  in  s 
charter  granted  to  the  abbacy  of  Coup.ir  in  1328.  Sir  Ricli- 
ard*s  grandson,  Sir  Richard  Rutherford,  a  distinguished  fa- 
vourite of  lioliert  III.,  WHS  in  1390  witness  to  a  charter 
granted  by  William  Turnbull  to  William  Stewart,  his 


RUTHERFORD, 


393 


SAMUEL. 


was  erected  bj  him  in  the  Deaa  oemeterj,  Edinbugb,  to  her 
memory  and  his  own. 

RUTHERFORD,  Samuel,  a  celebrated  refor- 
mer and  divine,  was  bom  about  1600  in  the  parish 
of  Nisbet,  now  annexed  to  Crailing,  in  the  pres- 
bytery of  Jedburgh.    Of  his  parentage  tliere  is  no 
certain  Infoimation,  but  his  father  is  believed  to 
have  been  a  farmer.    The  editor  of  the  first  edi- 
tion of  his  Letters,  which  appeared  in  1664,  states, 
that  he  was  *^  a  gentleman  by  extraction ;"  while 
Wodrow  says,  that  he  was  sprung  of  mean  but 
honest  parents  in  Teviotdale.    He  is  supposed  to 
have  received  his  early  education  in  the  school  of 
Jedburgh.    In  1617  he  was  sent  to  the  univer- 
sity of  Edinburgh,  where,   four  years  later,  he 
took  the  degree  of  M.A.    His  attainments  at  col- 
lege, particularly  in  classical  literature,  were  so 
great  tliat,  in  1623,  after  a  comparative  trial,  he 
was  elected  professor  of  humanity  thei*e,  in  prefer^ 
ence  to  three  other  candidates.    Two  years  after- 
wards, however,  some  reports  connected  with  his 
marriage  having  been  raised  to  his  prejudice,  for 
which  there  does  not  appear  to  have  been  any 
foundation,  he  resigned  his  professorship,  and  de- 
voted himself  to  the  study  of  theology.    Where  or 
when  he  obtained  license  to  preach  is  not  known, 
bnt  about  1627  he  was  settled  as  parish  minister 
of  Anwoth,  in  the  stewartiy  of  Kirkcudbright,  an 
appointment  which  he  obtained  through  Gordon 
of  Kenmure,  who  was  soon  after  raised  to  the 
peerage.    Prelacy  being  at  that  period  in  the  as- 
cendant in  Scotland,  no  minister  could  be  induct- 
ed Into  a  parish  without  declaring  his  submission 
to  the  bishop  of  the  diocese.    Mr.  Rutherford, 
however,  was  allowed  to  enter  upon  his  charge 
"without  coming  under  any  engagement  to  the 
bishop."    While  he  was  at  Anwoth,  we  are  told, 
it  was  his  custom  to  rise  every  morning  at  three 
o'clock,  and  after  dedicating  the  early  part  of  the 
day  to  study  or  private  devotion,  he  spent  the  re- 
mainder of  it  in  visiting  and  instructing  his  peo- 
ple.   His  reputation  being  soon  spread  throughout 
the  country,  multitudes  came  from  all  quarters  to 
hear  him  preach.    His  unwearied  zeal  in  the  dis- 
charge of  his  ministerial  duties  was  the  occasion 
of  his  being  summoned,  in  June  1630,  before  the 
high  court  of  commission  of  Edinburgh ;  but  the 
archbishop  of  St.  Andrews  was  prevented  by  tem- 


pestnoos  weather  from  attending,  and  the  diet 
against  him  was  in  consequence  deserted.  About  the 
same  time  he  lost  his  first  wife,  Eapham  Hamilton, 
after  a  protracted  Illness  of  thirteen  months,  while 
he  himself  sufibred  severely  for  thirteen  weeks  un- 
der a  tertian  fever.  About  ten  years  afterwards 
he  man-led  a  second  wife,  by  whom  he  had  only 
one  child  alive  at  the  time  of  his  own  death. 

Rutherford's  elaborate  works  in  Latin  on  the 
Arminian  controversy,  entitled  ^  Exercitationes 
Apologetic®  pro  Divina  Gratia,'  was  first  pub- 
lished at  Amsterdam  in  1636.  In  consequence  of 
this  publication,  he  was  accused  by  Thomas  Syd- 
serff,  bishop  of  Galloway,  of  non-conformity,  be- 
fore a  high  commission  court  held  the  same  year 
at  Wlgton,  and  deprived  of  his  ministerial  office. 
To  obtain  a  confirmation  of  this  sentence,  Sydserff 
cited  him  before  a  similar  court  at  Edinburgh. 
On  his  appearance  he  declined  the  jurisdiction  of 
the  court ;  bat  after  a  lengthened  examination  of 
the  charges  against  him,  which  lasted  for  three 
days,  he  was,  July  27,  1636,  deposed  from  his 
pastoral  charge,  and  sentenced  to  confine  himself 
to  the  town  of  Aberdeen,  there  to  remain  during 
the  king's  pleasure. 

During  his  residence  in  that  city,  which  was 
then  noted  for  its  strong  attachment  to  episcopacy, 
he  wrote  most  of  his  celebrated  Letters,  of  which 
there  have  been  numerous  editions ;  the  latest  of 
which,  in  two  vols.,  with  a  life  of  the  author  an- 
nexed, appeared  at  London  in  1836,  edited  by  the 
Rev.  Charles  Thomson  of  North  Shields,  who  has 
judiciously  modeiiiized  the  language.  These  Let- 
ter have  long  formed  one  of  the  most  cherished 
books  of  the  peasantry  of  Scotland,  especially  in 
the  sou  them  districts. 

In  February  1638,  when  the  king's  arbitrary 
enforcement  of  prelacy  had  roused  the  people  of 
Scotland  to  the  most  determined  resistance,  Ruth- 
erford ventm'ed  to  return  to  his  fiock  at  Anwoth. 
He  was  a  member  of  the  famous  Assembly  which 
met  at  Glasgow  In  November  of  that  year,  and 
which  has  become  memorable  in  the  ecclesiastical 
annals  of  Scotland  for  the  abolition  of  episcopacy, 
and  the  re-establlshment  of  presbyterianism.  Two 
months  after  he  was  elected  one  of  the  ministers 
of  Edinburgh,  but  the  commission  of  the  Assem- 
bly appointed  him,  in  preference,  professor  of  divi- 


RUTHERFORD, 


394 


SAMUEL. 


nity  in  the  New  college  of  St.  Andrews,  and  col- 
league to  Mr.  Robert  Blair,  the  minister  of  that 
town.  In  1642  he  published  his  *  Peaceable  Plea 
for  Paul's  Presbytery.'  In  1643  he  was  chosen 
one  of  the  commissioners  from  the  Church  of 
Scotland  to  the  Assembly  of  Divines  at  Westmin- 
ster. On  this  occasion  he  remained  in  Ijondon 
for  four  yeai*s.  By  his  talents  and  learning  he 
acquired  considerable  influence  in  that  venerable 
synod,  and  took  an  important  share  in  the  busi- 
ness before  them. 

While  in  London  he  preached  several  times 
before  the  parliament,  and  published  various  the- 
ological treatises,  some  of  them  controvei'sial,  and 
othere  of  a  practical  nature,  and  also  his  celebrat- 
ed *  Lex  Rex,'  or,  the  Law  and  the  King,  which 
appeared  in  1644,  intended  as  a  reply  to  a  book 
published  by  John  Maxwell,  the  excommunicated 
bishop  of  Ross,  in  support  of  absolute  monarchy. 
At  length,  in  October  1647,  the  principal  business 
of  the  Westminster  Assembly  being  concluded, 
he  returned  to  St.  Andrews,  and,  in  January 
1649,  he  was  appointed  principal  of  the  New  col- 
lege ;  and,  a  few  months  thereafter,  rector  of  the 
univeraity.  From  the  following  letter  it  would 
appear  that  in  the  summer  of  this  year  he  received 
a  call  to  Edinburgh ;  but  whether  it  was  to  be 
one  of  the  ordinary  ministers  or  a  professor  in  the 
university  does  not  appear.  We  think,  however, 
from  the  terms,  "  that  worth ie  societie,"  as  well 
as  from  the  fact  of  Rutheiford's  being  at  that  pe- 
riod a  professor  at  St.  Andrews,  that  it  was  to 
fill  the  latter  situation. 

RtGT  IIOXOKABLE 

The  mater  of  my  transportation  is  so  poor  a  con- 
trovcrsie,  I  tniely  not  beeing  desyrous  to  be  the  suliject  «)f 
any  dinn  in  tlie  General  Assemblie  of  the  Kirk  of  Scotland 
wlio  have  greater  bussieness  to  doe,  and  haveing  suffered  once 
the  paine  of  transportation,  most  humbly  intreat  yor  I^)  that 
favour  as  to  cast  yor  thoughts  upon  some  fitter  man,  for  as 
it  is  unbeseeming  me  to  lie  or  dissemble  so  I  must  frieiy  shew 
yon  it  will  but  mak  me  the  subject  of  suffering  and  passive 
obedience.  And  I  trust  yor  I>o)  intends  not  that  hurt  to  me. 
And  I  am  persuaded  it  is  not  yor  mind.  It  shal  be  my 
prayer  to  God  to  send  that  wortliio  sccietie  an  hable  and  pi- 
ous man.    Grace  be  witli  vou. 

Yours  at  all  humble 

observance  in  the  Jjord 

Samuel  Rutherford. 

St.  Andrews  the  last  of  June  1649. 

Tlie  Rygt  honorable  my  verie  good  I^ord,  Sir  James  Stewart, 
Provost  of  Edinburgh  and  remanent  Magistrates  of  the 
dtie. 


About  the  same  time  he  received  an  invitation  to 
fill  the  chair  of  divinity  and  Hebrew  in  the  then 
newly  established  university  of  Hardcrwyck,  in 
Holland,  which  be  declined,  having  no  desire  to 
leave  bis  native  land  in  the  midst  of  lier  troubles. 

The  Dutch,  however,  appear  to  have  been  very 
anxious  that  he  should  accept  of  a  chair  in  one  of 
their  universities,  for  on  May  20,  1651,  he  was 
elected  professor  of  divinity  in  the  University 
of  Utrecht.  Rutheiford's  brother,  Mr.  Jamei 
Rutherford,  then  an  officer  in  the  Dutch  service, 
was  intrusted  with  the  charge  of  conveying  the 
appointment  to  Scotland,  but  on  tlie  voyage,  the 
ship  on  board  of  which  he  had  embarked,  was  taken 
by  an  English  cruiser.  James  Rutherford,  stripped 
and  plundered  of  cveiything,  including  the  notifi- 
cation of  his  brother^s  appointment,  was  carried  a 
prisoner  into  Leith,  and  it  was  only  by  the  inter- 
vention of  the  States  that  he  obtained  his  release. 
Rutherford  being  made  aware  of  his  election  as 
Utrecht  divinity  professor,  and  having  no  other 
voucher  of  the  same  than  his  brother's  word,  did 
not  feel  himself  at  liberty  to  accept  it.  Thereupon, 
James  Rutherford  returned  to  Holland,  and  m 
the  end  of  the  same  year,  the  magistrates  of 
Utrecht,  the  patrons  of  the  University,  sent  him 
back  to  Scotland  with  his  brother's  appointment, 
cordially  inviting  him  to  become  a  professor  m 
their  college. 

In  1648  he  had  published  a  controversial  work 
against  the  Antimonians,  entitled  *  Sur\'cy  of  the 
Spiritual  Antichrist  ;*  and,  the  year  following,  he 
produced  his  *Frce  Disputation  against  Pretended 
Liberty  of  Conscience/  directed  against  the  Inde- 
pendents. On  the  death  of  his  patron,  Loi*d  Ken- 
mure,  he  wrote,  in  Latin,  an  elegiac  poem  to  his 
memory,  and,  in  1649,  he  published  '  The  Last 
and  Heavenly  Speeches,  and  Glorious  Departure 
of  John,  Viscount  Kennuire,'  a  work  in  which  he 
gives  a  detailed  account  of  the  Fpiritual  conferen- 
ces which  he  had  held  with  that  nobleman.  With 
Lady  Kenmuro  he  continued  to  maintain  a  fre- 
quent correspondence  on  religious  subjects  throngh- 
out  the  whole  of  his  life,  and  one  of  the  last  letters 
he  ever  wrote  was  to  that  lady.  At  the  Restora- 
tion, he  was  one  of  the  first  marked  out  for  perse- 
cution by  the  government.  His  work  *  Lex  Rex* 
was  ordered  to  be  burnt  at  the  cross  of  £dinbui|fb 


RUTHERFORD, 


395 


JOHN. 


by  the  hands  of  the  common  hangman,  an  indig- 
nity to  which  it  was  also  sabjected  at  the  gates  of 
the  New  college  of  St.  Andrews.  He  himself  was 
deprived  of  his  stipend  and  his  offices  both  in  the 
nniversity  and  the  chnrch,  and  cited  to  appear 
before  the  ensuing  parliament  on  a  charge  of  high 
treason,  a  summons  which  he  did  not  live  to  obey. 
His  health  had  long  been  declining,  and,  when  he 
received  the  citation,  he  was  on  his  deathbed. 
Sensible  that  he  was  dying,  he  emitted,  in  Febru- 
ary 1661,  a  Testimony  to  the  Tnith  of  Jesus 
Christ,  and  to  the  Covenanted  Work  of  Reforma- 
tion in  Great  Britain  and  Ireland.  He  died  March 
19, 1661,  about  five  o^clock  in  the  morning,  the 
exact  hour  which  he  himself  had  foretold.  His 
works  are : 

ExerdUtiones  Apolocretic8B  pro  Divina  Gratin,  contra  Ar- 
inmium,  &c.    Amst  1636,  8vo.    Franck.  1660, 12ino. 

A  Peaceable  and  Temperate  Pica  for  Panics  Presbyterie  in 
Scotland ;  or,  a  modest  and  brotherly  Dispute  of  the  Govern- 
ment of  the  Church  of  Scotland.     Lond.  1642,  4to. 

Sermon  on  Dan.  vi.  26.     Lond.  1643,  4to. 

Fast  Sermon;  preached  before  the  Hoase  of  Commons, 
Jan.  31,  1643.    Lond.  1644,  4to. 

The  due  Right  of  Presbyteries ;  or,  a  peaceable  Plea  for 
the  Goremment  of  the  Church  of  Scotland.  London,  1644, 
1645,  4to. 

Lex  Rex:  the  Law  and  the  Prince;  a  Dispute  for  the  just 
Prerogative  of  King  and  People,  containing  the  Reasons  and 
Causes  of  the  most  necessary  defensive  Wars  of  the  Kingdom 
of  SootUnd,  and  of  their  Expedition  for  the  ayd  and  help  of 
thdr  dear  brethren  of  England;  in  which  their  innocency  is 
asserted,  and  a  full  Answer  is  given  to  a  seditions  Pamphlet 
intituled,  Sacrosancta  Regum  Majestas,  under  the  name  of  J. 
A  but  penned  by  Jo.  Maxwell,  the  excommunicate  P.  Pre- 
late.    Ix)nd.  1644,  1657,  4to.  (Anon.) 

The  Tryal  and  Triumph  of  Faith.     Lond.  1645,  4to. 

Fast  Sermon,  before  the  House  of  Lords,  25th  June  1645. 
Lmd.  1645,  4to. 

Sermon  on  Luke  viii.  22,  23,  24,  25.     Lond.  1645,  4to. 

The  Divine  Right  of  Church  Government  and  Exoommn- 
nicatioD;  wherein  the  removal  of  the  Service- Book  is  justi- 
fied :  Also,  a  brief  Tractate  of  Scandal ;  with  an  Answer  to 
the  Doctors  of  Aberdeen.     I/ond.  1646,  4to. 

Christ*!  Dying  and  drawing  Sinners  to  himself;  delivered 
in  Sermons  upon  John  xii.  27,  28,  &c  Lond.  1647,  4to. 
Edin.  1727,  12mo. 

Sunrey  of  the  Spiritual  Antichrist;  opening  the  Secrets  of 
Familisme  and  Antinomianism.  In  2  Parts.  Lond.  1648, 4to. 

A  free  Disputation  against  pretended  Liberty  of  Conscience, 
tending  to  resolve  Doubts  moved  by  Mr.  Jo.  Goodwin,  Jo. 
Baptist,  Dr.  Jer.  Taylor,  the  Belgick  Arminians,  Socinians, 
Sat,  oontending  for  lawlesse  Liberty,  or  licentious  Toleration 
of  Sects  and  Heresies.     Lond.  1649,  4to. 

Dispotatio  Scholastica  de  Divina  Providentia,  variis  pne- 
lectionibns  tradita.    Edin.  1649,  1650,  4to. 

The  Covenant  of  Life  opened ;  or,  a  Treatise  of  the  Cov- 
floant  of  Grace.     Edin.  1655,  4to. 

Tieatiae  of  Civil  Policy.    Lond.  1657,  4to. 


Influences  of  the  Life  of  Grace,  &c.    Lond.  1659,  4to. 

A  Survey  of  Mr.  Thomas  Hooker's  Survey  of  the  Church 
Discipline  of  New  England.    Lond.  1658,  4to. 

A  Testimony  to  the  Truth  of  Jesus  Christ,  or  to  the  Doc- 
trine, Worship,  Disdpline,  and  Government  of  the  Kirk  of 
Scotland,  against  the  Errors  and  Heresies  of  the  Times ;  by 
him  and  others.     Edin.  1660, 12mo.     1703,  4to. 

Joshua  Redivivus ;  or,  (Religious)  Letters,  divided  into  2 
parts.  1664,  12mo.  Religious  Letters,  in  2  parts,  written 
during  his  Confinement  in  Aberdeen.  1671,  8to.  1675,  8vo. 
1692,  12mo.  Glasg.  1765,  8vo.  Numerous  editions;  the 
13th,  Edin.  1809,  12mo. 

Examen  Arminianismi  reoenatum  et  editum  h  Matthia 
Netheno.    Ultraj.  1668,  8vo. 

Discourse  on  Prayer.    8vo. 

Several  Sermons ;  Sacramental  Discourses,  &c.,  have  like- 
wise been  published  in  his  name. 

Among  his  posthumous  works  are,  his  Letters,  and  several 
Discourses  and  occasional  Sermons. 

RUTHERFORD,  John,  a  learned  physician, 
and  one  of  the  founders  of  the  medical  school  of 
Edinburgh,  the  son  of  the  Rev.  Mr.  Rntherford, 
minister  of  Yarrow,  Selkirkshire,  was  bom  Aug- 
ust 1, 1695.  He  received  his  classical  education 
at  the  school  of  Selkirk,  and  after  going  through 
the  usual  course  of  literary  and  philosophical  study 
at  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  he  became  appren- 
tice to  Mr.  Alexander  Nesbit,  a  respectable  sur- 
geon of  that  city.  In  1716  he  repaired  to  London, 
where  he  '^  walked  the  hospitals,"  and  attended 
lectures  on  anatomy,  surgery,  and  materia  medi- 
ca.  He  next  proceeded  to  Ley  den,  where  he  be- 
came a  pupil  of  the  celebrated  Boerhaave.  In 
1719  he  went  to  France,  and,  about  the  end  of 
July  of  that  year,  he  was  admitted  to  the  degi*ee 
of  M.D.  in  the  university  of  Rheims.  In  1721  he 
returned  to  Edinburgh,  and  commenced  practising 
there  as  a  physician.  As  Edinburgh  in  those 
days  had  no  botanical  garden,  in  November  1724, 
he  and  Di*s.  Sinclair,  Flummer,  and  Innes  pre- 
sented a  mcmoiial  to  the  town  council  of  that 
city,  stating  that  having  purchased  a  house  for  a 
chemical  laboratory,  adjoining  to  the  college  gar- 
den, they  desired  "  that  they  might  be  allowed 
the  use  of  that  ground  for  the  better  furnishing 
the  apothecary  shops  with  chemical  medicines, 
and  instructing  the  students  of  medicine  in  that 
part  of  the  science,"  which  the  town  council  grant- 
ed. At  a  meeting  of  the  town  council  on  9th 
February,  1726,  in  accordance  with  a  petition 
from  "John  Rutherford,  Andrew  Sinclair,  An- 
drew Plnmmcr,  and  John  Innes,  fellows  of  the 
royal  college  of  physicians  at  Edinburgh,"  these 


RUTHERFORD, 


896 


RUTHVEN. 


gentlemen  were  appointed  joint  medical  professors 
in  that  miiversity,  "  with  fall  power  to  them  to 
examine  candidates,  and  to  do  every  other  thing 
requisite  and  necessary  to  the  graduation  of  doc- 
tors of  medicine,  as  amply  and  fully,  and  with  all 
the  solemnities,  that  the  same  is  practised  and 
done  by  the  professors  of  medicine  in  any  college 
or  nnivereity  whatever."  On  the  death  of  Dr. 
Innes,  soon  after,  Dr.  Flummer  wns  appointed 
professor  of  chemistiy  and  materia  medica.  Dr. 
Sinclair  of  the  institutes  of  physic,  and  Dr.  Ruth- 
erford of  the  practice  of  medicine.  As  long  as  he 
continued  in  that  chnir,  he  lectured  to  his  class  in 
Latin,  using  as  a  text-book  a  work  of  his  old  mas- 
ter, Boerhaave.  About  1748  he  began  to  deliver 
clinical  lectures  in  the  Infirmary,  being  the  first  to 
introduce  a  practice  which  is  now  an  essential 
part  of  medical  education.  In  17G5  he  resigned 
his  professoi-ship,  and  was  succeeded  by  Dr.  John 
Gregoiy. 

Dr.  Rutherford  died  at  Edinburgh  in  1779,  in 
the  84th  year  of  his  age.  He  was  twice  married, 
fii-st  to  a  daughter  of  Sir  John  Swinton  of  Swin- 
ton,  and  secondly  to  Miss  Mackay,  and  had  chil- 
dren by  both  his  wives.  His  daughter  by  his  first 
marriage,  Anne  Rutherford,  became  the  wife  of 
"My.  AValter  Scott,  writer  to  the  signet,  and  was 
the  mother  of  the  author  of  Waverley. 

RUTHERFORD,  Daniel,  an  eminent  chemi- 
cal philosopher,  and  professor  of  botany,  the  son 
of  the  preceding,  by  his  second  wife,  was  born  at 
Edinburgh,  November  3,  1749.  lie  studied  at 
the  university  of  his  native  place  for  the  medical 
profession,  and  in  1772  took  the  dcgi'ee  of  M.D. 
For  his  thesis  on  this  occasion  he  chose  a  chemical 
subject,  being  *  De  Acre  Mephitico,'  which,  from 
the  originality  of  its  views,  obtained  the  highest 
encomiums  of  Dr.  Black  and  other  distinguished 
chemists  of  the  time.  In  this  dissertation  he  de- 
monstrated the  existence,  though  without  explain- 
ing its  properties,  of  a  peculiar  air,  or  new  gaseous 
fiuid,  to  which  some  eminent  modem  philosophei-s 
have  given  the  name  of  azote,  and  others  of  nitro- 
gen. That  Dr.  Rutherford  first  discovered  this  gas 
is  now  generally  admitted,  and,  as  has  been  remark- 
ed, the  reputation  of  his  discovery  being  speedily 
spread  through  Europe,  his  character  as  a  chemist 
of  the  first  eminence  was  fii*mly  established. 


On  completing  his  academical  coarse,  Dr.  Ruth- 
erford visited  London,  France,  and  Italy,  withtl» 
view  of  prosecuting  his  professional  studies.  Af- 
ter passing  about  three  years  abroad,  he  returned 
to  Edinburgh,  and  immediately  entered  npon  pnc- 
tice  as  a  physician.  In  1776  he  became  a  Uoenti- 
ate,  and,  in  ^lay  1777,  was  admitted  a  fellow  of 
the  Royal  College  of  Physicians  there.  He  was 
also  elected  a  member  of  the  Philosophical  Soci- 
ety, afterwards  incorporated  by  charter  under  the 
name  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Edinburgh ;  and  to 
that  body  he  furnished,  in  1778,  an  InterestiDg 
paper,  containing  some  valuable  and  original  sug- 
gestions on  nitre  or  nitrate  of  potass.  In  Decem- 
ber 1786,  on  the  death  of  Dr.  John  Hope,  Dr. 
Rutheiford  was  elected  his  successor  as  professor 
of  botany  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  and 
nominated  a  member  of  the  faculty  of  roediciDe  m 
that  institution.  lie  was,  at  the  same  time,  ap- 
pointed king*s  botanist  for  Scotland,  in  conse- 
quence of  which  he  was  intrusted  with  the  charge 
of  the  royal  botanical  garden  at  Edinburgh.  In 
1791  he  succeeded  Dr.  Henry  Cullen  as  one  of 
the  physicians  in  ordinary  to  the  royal  infinnary. 
From  his  boyhood  he  had  been  afilicted  with  he- 
rcditar}'  gout,  both  his  father  and  grandfather 
being  subject  to  this  disease  at  very  early  periods 
of  life ;  and  he  died  suddenly,  December  16, 1819, 
in  the  71st  year  of  his  ago.  It  is  somewhat  re- 
markable that  one  of  his  sisters  died  two  days 
after  him,  on  tlic  17th,  and  another,  the  excellent 
mother  of  Sir  Walter  Scott,  expired  on  the  24th 
of  the  same  mouth,  and  that  none  of  the  three 
knew  of  the  death  of  the  other.  Dr.  Rutherford 
married,  in  December  178G,  Harriet,  youngest 
daughter  of  John  Mitchclson,  Esq.  of  T^Iiddleton, 
by  whom  he  had  several  children. 

RuTHVKX,  a  surname  derived  from  lands  in  Perthshire. 
From  the  similurity  of  their  armorial  bearinj^  it  has  been 
supposed  tliat  the  family  who  first  bore  it  in  Scotland  came 
orifjinally  from  Arapoii  hi  Spain.  On  more  authentic  groondi, 
however,  they  are  believed  to  have  derived  their  descent  from 
Swan,  (Suanus,)  the  son  of  Thor,  a  person  of  Saxon  or 
Danish  blood,  who  settled  in  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  David 
I.  Swan,  who  flourished  in  the  rei«;n  of  William  the  Lion, 
possessed  the  manors  of  Huthven,  Tibbermore,  and  other  landi 
in  Perthshire,  He  was  also  superior  lord  of  the  territorrof 
Crawford,  in  Upper  Clydesdale,  which  the  progenitors  oi  tbe 
Lindsays  held  as  vassals  under  him.  In  the  Ragman  Bdl, 
among  those  who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  I.  of  England  in 
129G,  aro  the  names  of  VVillielmus  de  Rothein,  Sir  William 
de  Ruthwen,  and  Dominos  Willielmus  de  Ruthven. 


RUTHVEN. 


S98 


RYMER. 


I 


;l 

!  I 


James  Stewart  and  Kirkaldj  of  Grange,  annoyed  the  French 
by  incessant  attacks,  intercepted  tlieir  provisions,  and  bent  off 
their  straggling  parties.  In  Janusiry  1560,  Lord  Ruthvcn 
was  engaged  against  a  party  of  the  French  troops  who  were 
fortifying  Bumtishmd.  The  ft>llo\ving  month  he  was  one  of 
the  commissioners  selected  by  the  lords  of  the  Congregation 
to  meet  with  the  duke  of  Norfolk  at  Berwick,  to  arrange  the 
conditions  on  which  the  assistance  of  Queen  Elizabeth  was  to 
be  given  to  the  reformers  iu  Scotland. 

In  1563,  when  John  Knox  wns  accused  before  the  council 
for  writing  a  circular  letter,  requesting  several  of  the  Protestant 
leaders  to  meet  at  Edinburgh  on  the  24tli  October,  and  the 
queen  asked,  "Who  gave  him  authority  to  convocate  my 
lieges?  Is  not  that  treason?"  Lord  Iluthven  at  once  an- 
swered, "No,  Madam,  he  convocatcth  the  people  to  hear 
prayers  and  sermons  almost  daily ;  and  whatever  your  grace 
or  others  will  think  thereof,  we  think  it  no  treason.**  **  Hold 
your  peace,"  said  the  queen,  *'  and  let  him  answer  for  him- 
self." lie  did  answer  for  himself,  and  was  acquitted  of  trea- 
son, very  greatly  to  the  chagrin  of  poor  Mary.  In  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  which  met  at  Edinburgh  on  the  25th  December 
of  the  same  year,  I^rd  Ruthven  was  one  of  the  noblemen 
appointed  with  others  to  revise  the  Book  of  Discipline.  His 
last  public  appearance  was  on  the  memorable  night  of  Riz- 
zio*s  murder,  9th  March  15G6,  when  lean;  wan,  and  ghost- 
like from  a  long  illness,  he  appeared  in  armour,  with  his  son 
•nd  others,  behind  Lord  Damley,  in  presence  of  the  queen, 
and  dagger  in  hand,  commanded  the  Italian,  who,  though 
Bf^y  and  deformed,  was  from  his  accomplishments  a  favour- 
ite with  the  unfortunate  Mary,  to  leave  a  place  of  which  he 
was  unworthy.  After  the  murder,  abandoned  by  Damley, 
be  fled  into  England,  and  died  there  13th  June,  just  three 
months  afterwards.  "  Ho  made  a  Christian  end,"  says  Cal- 
derwood  (vol.  ii.  p.  317),  "thanking  God  for  the  leisure 
granted  to  him  to  call  for  mercy."  Ho  is  included  in  Wal- 
polc's  Catalogue  of  Royal  and  Noble  Authors,  (vol.  v.  p.  49,) 
for  having  written  a  memoir  of  Rizzio*s  murder,  in  which,  it 
has  been  remarked,  there  is  not  one  expression  of  regret,  or 
one  symptom  of  compunction  for  the  crime.  He  was  twice 
married,  first,  to  Janet  Douglas,  natural  daughter  of  Archi- 
bald, earl  of  Angus,  and,  secondly,  to  I^dy  Janet  Stewart, 
eldest  daughter  of  the  second  earl  of  Athol,  who  was  thrice  a 
widow,  and  was  then  Lady  Methven.  By  his  first  wife,  he 
had,  with  two  daughters,  three  sons.  1.  Patrick,  master  of 
Ruthvcn,  who  predeceased  him ;  William,  fourth  I^rd  Ruth- 
ven  and  first  earl  of  Gowrie ;  and  3.  Alexander.  By  his  sec- 
ond wife,  he  had  a  son,  the  Hon.  James  Ruthven. 

William,  fourth  Loi*d  Ruthven,  was  created  carl  of  Gowrie 
23d  August  1581.  (For  an  account  of  the  earls  of  Gowrie 
see  vol.  ii.  of  this  work,  pp.  339,  340.)  The  title  of  Ix>rd 
Ruthven  was  forl'cited  in  IGOO,  on  the  attainder  of  that  of  the 
earl  of  Gowrie,  on  account  of  the  mysterious  affair  known  in 
history  as  the  Gowrie  conspiracy.  At  the  meeting  of  the 
Estates  of  parliament  in  November  of  that  year,  an  act  w:ts 
passed  that  all  of  the  surname  of  Ruthven  should  choose 
other  names,  as  their  own  they  would  no  longer  be  allowed 
to  retain. 


RirriivEX,  Baron,  a  title  in  the  Scottish  peerage,  re- 
vived in  1651,  in  the  person  of  Sir  Thomas  Ruthven  of 
Freeland,  grandson  of  Alexander  Ruthven,  third  wm  of  the 
second  Lord  Ruthven  of  the  first  creation.  Previous  to  being 
raised  to  the  peerage.  Sir  Thomas  was  a  commissioner  for 
the  treaty  of  Rippon  in  1641.  In  1644  he  was  colonel  of  one 
of  the  regiments  sent  against  the  marquis  of  Huntly,  and  in 
1646  and  the  following  year,  he  was  one  of  the  committee  of 


Estates.  After  the  ezecntion  of  Charles  I.,  in  1&19,  be 
one  of  the  colonels  for  Perthshire  for  putting  the  nation  in  a 
posture  of  defence.  The  same  year  he  was  a  commiawHMr 
of  exchequer.  By  King  Charles  II.  he  was  created  a  peer  «f 
Soothind,  by  the  title  of  Lord  Rathven,  in  1651.  He  died 
6th  May  1673.  In  Park*8  edition  of  Walpole^s  Royal  and 
Noble  Authors,  (vol.  v.  p.  49,)  and  also  in  \Vatt*8  BibliotlMeB 
Britannica,  a  publication  entitled  *  The  I^ica*  Cabinet  en- 
larged and  opened,*  (4th  edition,  London,  1677,)  is  attributed 
to  that  "  learned  chymiat  the  Lord  Rathven.**  This,  how- 
ever, is  a  mistake  for  Lord  Grey  de  Bnthyn,  an  English  peer. 
By  his  wife,  Isabel,  third  daughter  of  Robert,  Lofd  Balfimr 
of  Burleigh,  he  had,  with  three  danghten,  a  son,  David,  Me- 
ond  Lord  Ruthven.  This  nobleman  was  one  of  the  kids  ot 
the  treasury  in  the  reign  of  William  III.,  and  died  without 
issue  in  April  1701. 

The  patent  of  the  Ruthven  peerage  had  been  burnt  with 
the  lionse  of  Freeland,  15th  March  1570,  and  its  limitatiooi, 
not  being  on  record,  were  understood  to  be  to  the  heirs  general 
of  the  first  baron*8  body,  (^Douglas  Pttrage^  Wood*s  edition, 
vol.  ii.  p.  464).  In  consequence,  Isabel,  niece  of  the  second 
lord,  and  d.iughter  of  his  sister  the  Hon.  £liz:ibeth  Ruthven, 
by  her  husband.  Sir  Francis  Ruthven  of  Redcastle,  a  descend- 
ant of  the  house  of  Go^vrie,  succeeded  as  baroness  Rntliven. 
She  was  summoned  as  a  baroness  to  the  coronation  of  Georj^e 
L,  and  also  to  that  of  George  II.  She  died  in  1732.  ^ 
had  married  Colonel  James  Johnston  of  Gratney,  Dumfries- 
shire,  who  assumed  the  name  of  Ruthven,  and,  with  one 
daughter,  had  a  son,  James,  third  Lord  Ruthven,  who  died 
at  Edinburgh,  3d  July  1783.  He  was  twice  married,  first, 
to  Janet,  daughter  of  William  Nisbet  of  Du^eton,  by  whom 
he  had  two  sons,  James,  fourth  Lord  Ruthven,  and  the  Hod. 
Willi.im  Ruthven;  and,  secondly,  to  I^dy  Anne  Stewart, 
second  daughter  of  the  second  earl  of  Bute,  and  by  her  had 
two  sons  and  eight  daughters. 

James,  fourth  Lord  Ruthvcn,  the  eldest  son,  was  a  captain  in 
the  army  when  he  succeeded  to  the  title.  He  died  27th  De- 
cember 1769.  By  his  wife,  Lzuiy  Mary  Eliz.nbeth  Leslie, 
second  daughter  of  the  sixth  carl  of  Leven  and  Melville,  be 
had  three  sons  and  six  daugliti'rs.  James,  the  eldest  son, 
fifth  Lord  Ruthven,  bom  17th  October  1777,  was  a  m.ij<>r  io 
the  90th  regiment  of  foot,  but  quitted  the  army  in  1807. 
He  married,  in  lilay  1813,  Mary,  daughter  of  W'alter  Camp- 
pell  of  Shawficld,  and  died,  without  issue,  27th  July  185S. 
The  title  then  devolved  on  his  only  suniving  sister,  the  Hob. 
Mary  Elizabeth  Thornton  Iluthven,  who  married,  13th  Octo- 
ber 1806,  Walter  Hore,  Esq.  of  Harperstown,  county  Wex- 
ford, Ireland,  with  issue,  five  sons  and  six  daughters.  On 
her  ladyship  succeeding  to  the  titl<*  her  husband  and  family 
assumed  the  surname  and  arms  of  Ruthven.  The  eldest  sob, 
Wiliiam,  married,  iu  Ibol),  Dells  Honuria,  daughter  of  Major 
Lowcn,  and  died  in  1847,  leaving  Walter-James,  lienteoant 
rifle  brigade,  Charles  Stewart,  and  3  daughters.  The  5th 
son,  the  Hon.  Cavendish  Bradstreet  Ruthven,  heutenant  R.K^ 
died  in  1855  of  wounds  received  before  SebastopoL 

RYMER,  Thomas,  of  Ercildoiiiic,  otherwise 
called  Thomas  the  Rhymer,  or  Thomas  Lear- 
month,  which  is  erroneously  supposed  to  be  bis 
family  name,  was  a  poet  or  romancer  of  high  tra- 
ditional reputation,  who  flourished  about  the  close 
of  the  thirteenth  centur}-.  Sir  Walter  Scott,  who 
styles  him  the  earliest  Scottish  poet,  conjectures 
that  ho  was  born  between  1226  and  1229.    The 


SAGE, 


899 


JOHN. 


fiunilj  to  which  he  belonged  seems  to  have 
taken  its  territorial  title  from  Ercildonne,  or,  ac- 
cordiag  to  the  modern  name,  Earlstouii,  a  Tillage 
in  Berwickshire.  He  himself  resided  in  a  tower 
at  the  western  extremity  of  tliis  village,  the  mins 
of  which  are  still  pointed  out ;  and  on  a  stone  yet 
preserved  in  the  front  wall  of  the  church  of  that 
place  is  the  inscription : — 

'*  Auld  Rymer's  Race 
Lies  in  this  Place.** 

Among  his  countrymen  he  is  celebrated  as  a 
prophet  as  well  as  a  poet,  and  many  of  the  popu- 
lar rhjrmes  ascribed  to  him  will  be  found  in  the 
second  volume  of  '  The  ^linstrclsy  of  the  Scottish 
Border.'    *  The  Pi*ophecies  of  Thomas  the  Rhy- 


mer* were  published  in  Latin  and  English,  at 
Edinburgh,  in  1691,  and  have  been  repeatedly 
reprinted.  He  is  mentioned  by  Fordun,  Barbour, 
Wiutoun,  Henry  the  Minstrel,  and  other  early 
historians;  and  Robert  de  Brunne,  an  English 
poet  who  was  contemporary  with  him,  commemo- 
rates him  as  the  author  of  a  metrical  Romance, 
entitled  *  Sir  Tristrem,*  which  was  considered  to 
be  lost,  till  a  copy  of  it  was  discovered  among  the 
Auchinleck  manuscripts  in  the  Advocates'  Libra- 
17,  and  published  in  1804,  with  an  introduction 
and  notes,  by  Sir  AValter  Scott.  The  day  previ- 
ously to  the  death  of  Alexander  III.  in  1286, 
Thomas  the  Rhymer  foretold  that  disastrous  event. 
(See  vol.  i.  p.  98).  He  is  supposed  to  have  died 
before  1299. 


»^  V>/^.VN  V<  " 


s 


SAGE,  John,  a  learned  episcopalian  divine, 
and  controversial  wi'iter,  the  son  of  Captain  Sage, 
a  royalist  officer  of  merit,  was  born  in  the  parish 
of  Creich,  Fifeshu-c,  in  1652.  He  received  his 
education  at  the  university  of  St.  Andrews,  and 
obtained  the  degree  of  M.A.  nboiit  1672.  He  was 
afterwards  appointed  schoolmaster  of  Bingry  in 
his  native  county,  and  subsequently  of  Tipper- 
muir  in  Perthshire.  In  1684  he  was  admitted 
into  priest's  orders  by  the  archbishop  of  Glasgow, 
when  he  became  minister  of  one  of  the  churches 
in  that  city,  and  soon  after  he  was  appointed  clerk 
of  the  diocesan  synod.  At  the  Revolution,  when 
the  episcopalian  clergy  were  deprived  of  their 
charges,  he  went  to  Edinburgh,  where  he  em- 
ployed himself  in  writing  some  of  his  controver- 
sial works.  As  he  occasionallj^  preached  in  the 
episcopalian  chapels  of  that  city,  he  was  sum- 
moned before  the  privy  council  to  take  the  oath 
of  allegiance ;  but  refusing  to  compl}",  he  was  pro- 
hibited from  exercising  his  ministerial  functions 
ydihin  the  city  and  suburbs,  and  formally  ban- 
ished from  tlie  metropolis.  He  found  a  refuge  at 
Kinross,  in  the  house  of  Sir  William  Bruce,  sheriff 


of  that  county.  In  1695  he  published  at  London  a 
work  without  his  name,  entitled  '•  The  Fundamental 
Charter  of  Presbyteiy  examined,*  directed  against 
the  presbyterian  form  of  church  government. 
"  Although,**  says  his  biographer  Gillan  (Life  of 
Sage^  1714,  8vo,  pp.  21,  22),  **all  care  was  taken 
to  conceal  the  author,  yet  it  was  to  no  purpose. 
In  spite  of  all  the  caution  that  was  used,  it  was 
soon  discovered  by  the  presbyterians  that  Mr. 
Sage  was  the  person  who,  to  their  eternal  re- 
proach, had  thus  exposed  their  principles  and 
practices ;  and  this  filled  them  with  the  highesu 
resentments  against  him,  which  they  did  not  fail 
to  express  as  often  as  they  had  opportunity ;  for 
his  affaii*s,  and  a  passionate  desire  of  visiting  his 
dear  friends  at  Edinburgh,  obliged  him  to  ven- 
tni'e  thither  for  a  few  days.  But  though  some  of 
his  colleagues  who  had  been  banished  with  him 
were  allowed  to  stay  there,  or  at  least  were  con- 
nived at,  yet  he  no  sooner  came  to  the  city  than 
he  was  observed  on  the  street  by  a  privy  coun- 
cillor, whose  greatest  pleasure  was  to  persecute 
the  episcopal  clergy,  and  by  his  order  he  was 
carried  before  the  magistrates  of  the  city,  and 


SAGE. 


400 


SALTOUN. 


obliged  to  fiud  bail  to  leave  the  town  and  never 
to  return  tliither."    The  following  year,  when  his 
friend,  Sir  AVilliam  Biuce,  was  imprisoned  in  the 
castle  of  Edinburgh,  on  suspicion  of  carr}'ing  on  a 
treasonable  correspondence  with  the  exiled  mon- 
arch, an  order  was  issued  for  the  apprehension  of 
Mr.  Sage,  who  had  ventured  to  return  to  Edin- 
burgh.   The  captain  of  the  town-guard,  with  a 
party  of  soldiers,  searched  all  the  houses  where  be 
was  accustomed  to  lodge  or  visit.    After  being 
concealed  for  about  eight  days,  he  escaped  in  a 
boat  from  I^ith  to  Kinghom,  and  subsequently, 
under  the  name  of  Jackson,  lurked   for  many 
months  in  concealment  in  the  hills  of  Angus.    lie 
afterwards  became  chaplain  to  the  countess  of 
Callcndar  and  tutor  to  her  son,  the  earl  of  Lin- 
lithgow, and  subsequently  accepted  the  invitation 
of  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  in  Perthshire, 
to  reside  in  his  family  as  chaplain.    To  preserve 
the  episcopal  succession  in  Scotland,  Mr.   Sage 
was,  on  25th  Januaiy  1705,  consecrated  a  bishop, 
by  the  titular  archbishop  of  Glasgow  and  the 
bishops  of  Edinburgh  and  Dunblane ;  Mr.  John 
Fnllarton,  formerly  episcopal  minister  at  Paisley, 
being  also  consecrated  a  bishop  at  the  same  time. 
We  are  told  that  "  they  concealed  their  charac- 
ters, and  performed  no  episcopal  deed,  without 
special  advice  and  authority  from  the  consecra- 
tors."    In  consequence,  Bishop  Sage  assumed  no 
Jurisdiction  over  any  body  of  presbytei-s,  but  only 
assisted  the  bishops  who  had  been  consecrated 
before  the  Revolution.    Being  aflSicted  with  con- 
sumptive symptoms,  in    1709   he  proceeded  to 
Bath,  for  the  recoveiy  of  his  health,  and  after- 
wards visited  I-.ondon,  where  he  formed  the  ac- 
quaintance of  many  learned  and  eminent  men  of 
that  age.     He  wrote,  but  never  published,  a  tract 
against  ^Ir.  DodwelFs  '  Natural  Mortality  of  the 
Soul.'    He  returned  to  Scotland  in  1710,  and  died 
at  Edinburgh  June  7,  1711.    His  works  are: 

Tlie  Second  nnd  Third  I/Ctters  concerning  the  Persecution 
of  the  Epiitcopal  Clergy  in  Scotland.  Lond.  1G89,  4to.  The 
Her.  Tlioinas  Morer  having  written  the  First,  and  Professor 
^lonro  the  Fourth. 

Tlie  Case  of  the  Afflicted  Clergy  in  Scotland.  London, 
1690,  4to. 

An  Account  of  the  lata  Establishment  of  Pittsbyterian 
Government  by  the  Parliament  of  Scotland  in  1690.  Lond. 
1G93. 

The  Fundamental  Cliarter  of  Preshrtcnr,  as  it  hath  latelv 
been  established  in  Scotland,  examined  and  disproved ;  with 


a  Preface  in  answer  to  the  Vindicator  of  the  Kirk  (Gilb«t 
Rule).    I^nd.  1695,  8vo.  (Anon.).    Lond  1697,  8vo. 

The  Principles  of  the  Cyprianio  Age,  with  regard  to  Epb- 
oopal  Power  and  Jurisdiction,  asserted.     Lond.  1695,  4to. 

A  Vindication  of  the  Principles  of  the  Cyprianie  Age,  in 
answer  to  G.  Rule.    Lond.  1701,  4to. 

Some  Remarks  on  a  Letter  from  a  Gentleman  in  the  City 
to  a  Mininter  in  the  Country,  on  Mr.  David  WilliamaonVi 
Sermon  before  the  General  Assembly.    Edin.  1703. 

A  brief  Examination  of  some  tilings  in  Mr.  Mddrom'i 
5>ermon  against  a  Toleration  to  those  of  the  Episcopal  Per- 
suasion.     Lond.  1703,  4to. 

Tlie  Reasonableness  of  a  Toleration  of  those  of  the  Episco- 
pal PereuaKion,  inquired  into  purely  on  Chnrch  Principles 
Lond.  1705,  8vo. 

The  Life  of  Gawin  Douglas,  Bishop  of  Dunkeld ;  prefixed 
to  Ruddiman*8  edition  of  Douglas's  VirgiL     1710. 

An  Introduction  to  Drummond's  History  of  the  Firs 
James's,  with  Notes  by  Ruddiman.     Edin.  1711. 

He  left  in  manuscript  several  treatises  on  various  snbjecta, 
which  were  publihhed  at  Tendon  in  1714,  and  projected,  ammg 
other  things,  the  publication  of  *  An  impartial  and  accurate 
Sur\'ey  of  the  Westminster  Confessinn  of  Faith.*  lie  also 
intended  to  have  employed  his  pen  *  on  the  Rise  and  Histoiy 
of  the  Commission  of  the  General  Assembly,'  a  design  which 
he  did  not  live  to  execute. 


St.  COI3IE:,  Baron,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred in  1611,  on  Ilrnr}'  Stewart,  second  son  of  James, 
I^rd  Doune,  and  brother  of  "the  bonny  earl  of  Moray." 
(See  p.ige  202  of  this  volume.)  He  got  from  his  father 
the  abbey  of  St.  Culme  in  the  Frith  of  Forth,  and  the  lands 
thereto  bejunging.  The  cliarter  is  dated  23d  August  1584. 
By  special  favour  of  James  VI.  he  had  a  charter  of  the  mon- 
astery of  St.  Coline's  Inch,  and  the  l.Hnds  of  the  same,  erect- 
ed into  the  tomporal  lordsliip  of  St.  Culme,  with  the  title  <^ 
a  lord  of  pariiament,  7th  March  1611.  He  died  12th  July 
1612.  His  son,  James,  second  Lord  St.  Colme,  a  colond  in 
the  Ber\'ice  of  Gustavus  Adolphus,  king  of  Sweden,  died  with- 
out issue,  when  the  title  and  e.states  devolved  upon  the  eari 
of  Moray,  in  which  family  they  still  remain. 


Sat.toun,  Baron,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  coo- 
ferrcd  28th  June  1445,  on  I^urcnce  Abemethv  of  Saltoon 
and  Rothiemay,  (see  vol.  L  of  this  work,  page  15,  article 
Adeknetiiy).  That  family  having,  in  the  diivct  line,  ended 
in  1669,  in  the  person  of  Alexander,  ninth  I^rd  Abemetby 
of  Saltoun,  the  title  devolved  on  his  cousin,  Sir  Alexander 
Fniser  of  Philorth,  (see  vol.  ii.  page  261,  article  Fraseb  of 
Philortli).  Bom  in  March  1604,  Sir  Alexander  hod  the 
command  of  a  regiment  in  the  Scots  army  that  marched  into 
England  in  1648,  to  attempt  the  mtcue  of  Charles  I.  Hii 
cousin  sold  the  estate  of  Saltoun,  which  is  in  Ea5t  LothisBt 
in  1643  to  Sir  Andrew  Fletcher,  but  he  succeeded  him  in  his 
title  as  heir  of  line.  It  was  confirmed  to  him  by  Charles  IL, 
who  had  borrowed  large  sums  of  money  from  him  when  is 
Scotland  in  1651.  The  patent,  dated  at  Whitehall  llth  Jnly 
1670,  was  ratified  in  parliament  2lKt  of  the  same  month. 
The  tenth  I^rd  Saltoun  died  llth  August  1693,  in  his  90tk 
year.  His  son,  Alex.indor,  master  of  Saltoun,  predeceaicd 
him  in  1682.  The  latter  was  thrice  married,  and  bylui 
first  wife,  I.ady  Anne  Ker,  eldest  daughter  of  the  third  eari 
of  I^thian,  he  left  a  son,  William,  eleventh  I.onl  Saltoun. 
This  nobleman  was  a  great  promoter  of  the  Darien  scheme^ 
and  opposed  the  treaty  of  union  with  England.  He  died 
18th  March  1715,  in  his  6Ist  year.    By  his  wife,  Maiputt, 


Jl 


SAKDEI^S, 


402 


GEORGE. 


bj  Ijovd  Lyttlcton,  aud  assisted  his  lordsliip  in 
preparing  for  pablication  liis  ^  History  of  Henry 


II.'    He  was  engaged  on  a  treatise  on  GcuamI-'  to  paint  a  portrait  of  tlieTnncessTyinwMlA.  Jlie 


Chronology  when  he  died  of  an  a^hma  in  March 
1783.    His  works  are : 

The  Complete  EngUsh  Traveller.    Fol. 

The  Kewgate  Calendar ;  or  Memoirs  of  those  unfortnnate 
Calprits  who  fall  a  sacrifice  to  the  injured  Laws  of  their 
Conntijf  and  therdiy  make  their  exit  at  Tyboume.  Lond. 
1764,  6  vols.  8vo. 

GuffUr  Greybeard.  4  vols.  12mo.  A  Satire  upon  several 
dissenting  Divines. 

Roman  History,  written  in  a  series  of  Letters  from  a  No- 
bleman to  his  Son.    2  toIs.  12mo. 

He  was  also  the  compiler  of  Notes  on  the  Bible,  pnbli^thed 
under  the  name  of  Dr.  Henry  Southwell. 

SANDERS,  George,  an  eminent  portrait  paint- 
er, was  bom  in  Kinghom,  Fifeshire,  in  April 
1774.  After  receiving  an  ordinary  education  at 
Kinghom  parish  school,  he  was  bound  apprentice 
to  Mr.  Smeaton,  a  coach-painter  in  Edinburgh, 
and  had  for  his  fellow-workman  the  afterwards 
celebrated  Sir  William  Allan,  president  of  the 
Royal  Scottish  academy.  It  is  interesting  to  no- 
tice two  men,  who  subsequently  attained  so  high  a 
position  in  their  respective  departments  of  art, 
thus  associated,  at  the  commencement  of  their  ca- 
reer, in  a  vocation  so  comparatively  humble  as 
that  of  panel  painting. 

On  completing  his  apprenticeship,  Mr.  Sanders 
commenced  to  practise  in  Edinburgh,  as  a  minia- 
ture painter,  and  met  with  considerable  success. 
At  this  period  his  leisure  studies  were  devoted  to 
marine  subjects,  and  several  beautiful  sea-pieces, 
then  executed  by  him,  arc  still  in  fine  preserva- 
tion and  repute.  About  this  time  also,  ho  painted 
a  panoramic  view  of  Edinburgh,  taken  from  Leith 
Roads,  which  was  publicly  exhibited  and  vciy 
much  admired.  From  the  high  reputation  which 
his  miniatures  had  attained,  he  was  advised  to 
remove  to  London,  and  devote  himself  exclusive- 
ly to  that  branch  of  art.  By  Mr.  Thomas  Bryd- 
son,  author  of  a  work  entitled  *  Distinctions  of 
Rank,*  he  was  introduced  to  several  of  the  Scot- 
tish nobility,  as  an  artist  of  great  promise,  and  he 
became,  ere  long,  the  firat  miniature  painter  of  the 
day.  His  miniatures  commanded  the  highest 
prices,  80  to  100  guineas,  and  by  competent  judg- 
es they  were  regarded  as  faithful  in  likeness  as 
they  were  exquisite  in  execution. 


About  1811,  his  name  came  under  the  observa- 
tion of  the  royal  family,  aud  he  was  commanded 


great  estimation  in  which  this  beantifnl  pictnre 
was  held  secured  for  Mr.  Sanders  the  patronage 
of  her  royal  highness,  and  she  commissioned  him 
to  paint  the  portraits  of  several  of  her  personal 
friends.  Having  become  afflicted  with  ophthal- 
mia, he  was  obUged  to  discontinue  his  laboon  for 
a  time.  The  Princess  Chaiiotte  sent  frequently 
to  inquira  for  his  health,  and  when  he  was  aaffi- 
ciently  restored  to  be  enabled  to  take  carriage 
exercise,  she  wrote  to  him  a  kind  invitation  to 
pass  a  few  days  at  Windsor.  This  note,  and  sev- 
eral others  from  that  amiable  princess  to  him,  were 
left  in  the  possession  of  one  of  the  artistes  most 
intimate  friends  in  Leith. 

This  severe  attack  of  ophthalmia  was  speedily 
followed  by  others,  and  their  frequency  at  length 
obliged  Mr.  Sanders  to  abandon,  in  a  great  mea- 
sure, the  miniature  branch  of  the  art,  and  apply 
himself  to  the  department  of  life-like  portrait- 
painting,  as  less  trying  to  the  eyes.  Nor  did  his 
i*cputation  suffer  from  the  change.  He  became  as 
great  in  portrait-painting  as  in  miniature,  and  the 
circle  of  his  admii-ers  and  patrons  was  soon  large- 
ly increased.  Amongst  these  was  Loi-d  Byron, 
the  poet,  whose  portrait  by  Sanders,  painted  in 
1807,  is  the  only  one  considered  worthy  of  the 
noble  bard. 

Mr.  Sanders,  with  all  his  genius,  was  of  a  proud 
and  very  eccentric  disposition,  aud  his  peculiari- 
ties operated  greatly  to  the  prejudice  of  his  popu- 
larity.   Even  at  the  commencement  of  his  career 
in  London,  he  prefeiTcd  the  indulgence  of  his  own 
whims  to  the  benefit  of  being  on  a  good  footing 
with  the  Royal  Academy,  and  declined  member- 
ship with  that  body,  rather  than  adopt  the  usual 
course  for  obtaining  it.    This  early  display  of 
temper  caused  a  jealousy,  if  not  dislike,  to  spring 
up  in  the  academy  against  him,  and  this  was  so 
strongly  returned  by  him  that  he  would  not  for 
many  years  allow  any  of  his  works  to  be  sent  to 
the  Exhibition,  although  his  portraits  were  paid 
for  by  his  sitters  at  prices  ranging  from  one  hun- 
dred to  one  hundred  and  fifty  guineas  for  half- 
lengths,  two  hundred  to  four  hundred  for  whole 
lengths,  and  eight  hundred  guineas  for  gronps. 


il 

■  I 

l! 


SCOTT, 


406 


OF  ANCRUM. 


tiier  causing  throa  all  the  bail  realme.**  (^Aet  Pari,  ii.  815.) 
He  was  on  two  occasions  appointed  a  commissioner  for  effect- 
ing a  treaty  of  peace  with  England.  On  the  first  institntion 
of  the  College  of  Justice  in  Scotland  on  13th  May  1682,  Sir 
William  Scott,  as  laird  of  Balwearie,  was  nominated  the  first 
senator  on  the  temporal  side ;  bnt  lie  died  shortly  after  his 
appointment.  He  had  two  sons.  Sir  William,  and  Tliomas. 
The  latter  obtained  a  churter  of  the  Innds  of  Pitgomo,  under 
the  great  seal,  on  2d  January  1526,  and  was  named  a  sena- 
tor of  the  college  of  justice  in  his  fath<>r*8  place  in  November 
1532.  The  following  is  the  record  of  his  admission :  **  The 
derk-registcr  presented  a  letter  from  the  king,  bearing  that 
his  grace  had  chosen  Thomas  Scot  of  Pctgomo,  ane  of  the 
lords,  in  place  of  umqnhile  William  Scott  of  Balwery,  knicht, 
lately  deceasit,  his  father,  and  desiring  the  lords  to  admit 
him  yrto,  and  tak  his  aith  for  administration  of  justice.  The 
said  lords,  at  the  king*s  command,  hes  .ndmitted  the  said 
Thomas  to  ye  said  session,  and  to  be  yr  college  in  that  be- 
half, quhilk  hes  sSvom  in  their  presens  lelely  to  administer 
justice  efler  his  knowledge  and  conscience,  and  to  keep  all 
statutes  maid  hereupon  of  before.**  He  was  a  great  favour- 
ite of  King  James  V.,  by  whom  he  was  appointed  justice- 
clerk  in  1535.  He  died  in  1539.  The  following  are  the  cir- 
cumstances as  related  by  Knox,  (^Hist.  edit.  1G44,  p.  25,) 
under  which  his  death  occurred :  **  How  terrible  a  vision  the 
said  prince  saw  lying  in  Linlithgow,  that  night,  that  Thomas 
Scot,  justice-clerk,  died  in  Edinburgh,  men  of  good  credit 
can  yet  report ;  for,  afraid  at  midnight  or  after,  he  called 
aloud  for  torches,  and  raised  all  that  lay  beside  him  in  the 
palace,  and  told  that  Thomas  Scott  was  dead,  for  he  had 
been  at  him  with  a  company  of  devils,  and  had  said  unto  him 
these  words :  *  0  wo  to  the  day  that  ever  I  knew  thee  or  thy 
service ;  for  serving  of  thee  against  God,  against  his  servants, 
and  against  justice,  I  am  adjudged  to  endless  torment.*  How 
terrible  voices  the  said  Thomas  Scott  pronounced  before  his 
death,  men  of  all  estates  heard,  and  some  that  yet  live  cnn 
witness  his  voice  ever  was,  '  Justo  Deijusticio  condemnatu$ 


I  »f 


$um. 

The  elder  son.  Sir  William  Scott,  in  his  father's  lifetime  de- 
signated of  Invertiel,  married  Isabel,  daughter  of  Patrick,  fifth 
liOrd  Lindsay  of  the  Byres,  and  had  by  her  two  sons,  Sir  Wil- 
liam, and  Andrew,  progenitor  of  the  Scotts  of  Ancnim,  of 
whom  next  article.  Sir  William  Scott  of  Balwearie,  the  elder 
son,  who  was  .nlso  in  his  father's  lifetime  designed  of  Inver- 
tiel,  had  two  sons,  Michael,  who  predeceased  his  father,  and 
Sir  William,  who  succeeded  as  laird  of  Balwearie  and  Strath- 
miglo.  His  son.  Sir  James,  was  in  1579  served  heir  to  his 
father.  He  was  one  of  the  twelve  gentlemen  knighted  by 
King  James  VL  at  the  coronation  of  his  queen,  Anne  of 
Denmark,  in  1590.  In  his  person  the  barony  of  Strathmiglo 
was  at  its  greatest  extent,  but  with  him  the  wealth  and  dig- 
nity of  the  family  came  to  an  end.  Unfortunately  for  him- 
self, he  was  involved  with  the  popish  earls  of  Anga%  Errol, 
and  Huntly  in  their  various  rebellions  against  James  VI. 
He  was  also  connected  with  the  turbulent  earl  of  Bothwell, 
(see  vol.  i.  of  this  work,  p.  358,)  whom  the  popish  lords  so 
often  excited  against  the  king,  and  was  repeatedly  fined  for 
real  or  alleged  assistance  given  to  that  unprincipled  noble- 
man in  his  various  frantic  attempts  to  gain  possession  of  the 
king's  person  in  1591,  and  three  following  years.  In  Octo- 
ber 1594,  Sir  James  Scott  was  with  the  eari  of  Huntlv  at  the 
battle  of  Glenlivet,  in  which  that  nobleman  defeated  the  roval 
troops  under  the  earl  of  Argyle.  On  the  25th  February 
1 595,  however,  he  obtained  a  remission  under  the  great  sent, 
for  himself,  his  brother  Robert,  and  John  Kinnaird,  younger 
of  tiiat  ilk,  for  which,  doubtless,  he  was  obliged  to  pay  heav- 


ily to  the  needy  courtiers  of  the  king.  In  couMquenee  of  the 
numerous  fines  to  which  he  was  subjected,  be  was  obSged 
from  time  to  time  to  sell  off  various  portions  of  bis  otatei, 
till,  towards  the  year  1600,  his  whole  barony  of  Stnthnri^ 
was  disposed  off,  excepting  the  tower  and  fortalioe  with  tbs 
lands  adjoining,  and  the  village  of  that  name.  In  that  jesr, 
he  granted  a  charter  to  nineteen  different  feuars  who  held  of 
him,  erecting  the  village  of  Strathmiglo  into  a  burgh  of  fauv- 
ny,  in  virtue  of  the  crown  charter  granted  to  his  aneettor  Sr 
William  Soott,  in  1509,  which  had  not  been  acted  on  by  him. 
By  three  subsequent  charters  granted  immediately  aftff- 
wards,  Sir  James  included  three  other  fenars  wbobddof 
him  in  the  bui^li.  The  small  remaining  portions  of  Ua  onoe 
extensive  estates  were  sold,  either  immediately  before  or  sf- 
ter  his  death.  Mr.  John  M.  Leighton,  in  his  Histoiy  of  tbt 
county  of  Fife,  (vol.  ii.  p.  186,  note,)  says:  **Sir  Jsnvi 
Scott  is  among  the  few  Fife  gentlemen  wbo  are  characterised 
by  John  Knox  as  being  *■  enemies  to  God  and  traitors  to  their 
country.*  His  opposition  to  the  Reformation,  and  his  cod- 
nection  with  tlie  popish  party  may  explain  the  reason  why, 
notwithstanding  his  having  conferred  the  honour  of  a  borglt 
on  Strathmiglo,  his  memory  has  been  so  little  revered  by  the 
inhabitants.  The  traditions  of  the  place  represent  him  as  a 
persecutor,  and  the  downfall  of  the  family  is  looked  upon  as 
a  punishment  from  heaven  for  his  treatment  of  tlie  Reform- 
ers. He  is  also  blamed  for  avarice,  although  he  certainly 
made  little  by  it,  if  he  possessed  that  vice,  and  harshness  to 
the  poor.  An  instance  of  this  latter  is  still  handed  down. 
He  was  looking  over  a  window,  it  is  said,  of  his  castle  of 
Strathmiglo,  situated  to  the  east  of  the  village,  while  his  ser- 
vants were  throwing  a  great  quantity  of  o.itmeal  into  the 
moat  which  surrounded  the  castle,  owing  to  its  being  old  snd 
unfit  for  use.  An  old  beggar  man  came  to  the  outer  end  of 
the  drawbridge,  and  requested  to  be  allowed  to  fill  his  wallets 
with  the  meal,  but  the  haughty  baron  of  Balwearie  refosed 
this  humble  request,  on  which  the  poor  man  pronounced  a 
wo  upon  him.  declaring  he  should  beg  before  his  death.  It 
cannot  be  said  that  the  curse,  if  ever  perpetrated,  was  liter- 
allv  fulfilled,  but  certain! v  Sir  J:imcs  saw  the  ruin  of  his  fsm- 
i!y ;  and  the  tradition  still  is  that,  such  was  his  pover^  st 
liis  death,  a  subscription  was  raised  among  the  neighbouring 
proprietors  to  pay  the  expenses  of  his  funeral.** 

He  had  two  sons,  William  and  James.  The  former,  it  is  be- 
lieved, (lied  before  his  father.  His  son,  Walter  Soott,  styled  of 
Balwearie,  having  been  deprived  of  all  portion  of  the  familr 
estates,  through  the  misconduct  of  his  grandfather,  entered  the 
army,  rose  to  the  rank  of  colonel,  and  died  unmarried  in 
Flanders,  during  the  reign  of  Charles  I.  Shortly  before  bis 
death,  he  sent  over  from  Holland,  to  Sir  John  Scott  of  An- 
ernm,  baronet,  the  seal  of  the  family  of  Balwearie,  with  a 
letter  acknowledging  him  to  be  his  heir  male,  which  is  still 
pi-oservcd  in  that  family.  In  Colonel  Walter  Scott  ended  tbe 
whole  male  line  of  the  ancient  familv  of  Scott  of  Balwearie, 
which  had  continued  for  sixteen  generations,  the  eldest  mo 
having  always  succeeded  during  that  long  period.  What  ii 
still  more  remarkable,  from  the  time  of  the  original  Sir  Mi- 
chael Scott,  who  lived  in  the  reign  of  Willi.am  the  IJon,  till 
Sir  James,  the  fonrteenth  baron,  in  who!>e  time  the  estates  of 
the  family  were  lost,  thirteen  of  the  barons  had  attained  tbe 
honour  of  knighthood,  the  only  exception  being  Duncan,  sob 
of  the  first  Sir  Michael. 


The  Scotts  of  Ancrum,  Roxburghshire,  descend  from  An- 
drew, the  younger  of  the  two  sons  of  Sir  William  Soott  of 
Balwearie  above  mentioned.  This  Andrew  Scott  lived  in 
the  time  of  Queen  Mary,  and  had  from  his  father  tbe  lands 


SCOTT, 


408 


OF  HARDEN. 


the  laird  of  Harden  had,  with  six  daughters,  foar  sons,  vix., 
1.  Sir  William,  his  heir.  2.  Walter,  who  was  killed  in  a  Amr, 
at  a  fishing,  hy  one  of  the  Scotts  of  Newhouse.  8.  Hugh, 
progenitor  of  the  Scotts  of  Gala ;  and  4.  Francis,  who  mar- 
ried Isabel,  sister  of  Sir  Walter  Scott  of  Whitslead,  from 
whom  the  modem  family  of  Scott  of  Synton  are  descended. 
By  a  second  wife,  a  daughter  of  Edgar  of  Wedderlie,  widow 
of  William  Spotswood  of  that  ilk,  he  had  a  daughter  named 
Margaret,  after  her  mother.  According  to  tradition,  Wat  o* 
Harden  had  six  sons,  five  of  whom  8ur\'ived  him.  The  sixth 
was  slain  at  a  fray  in  a  hunting  match  by  his  kinsman,  Scott 
of  Gilmnns-cleugh.  His  brothers  prepared  to  revenge  his 
death,  but  the  old  laird  secured  them  in  the  dungeon  of  his 
tower,  hurried  to  the  king  at  Edinburgh,  stated  the  crime, 
and  obtained  a  gift  of  the  lands  of  the  offender.  He  returned 
to  Harden  with  equal  speed,  releiised  his  sons,  and  showed 
them  the  charter.  "  To  horse,  lads !  **  he  cried,  **  and  let  us 
take  possession ;  the  lands  of  Gilmans-cleugh  are  well  worth 
a  dead  son."  He  died  about  1629,  in  extreme  old  age.  One 
of  his  daughters,  Margaret,  commonly  called  '*  .Maggy  Fen- 
dy,"  was  married  to  Gilbert  Elliott  of  Minto,  "  Gibbie  wi*  the 
gowden  garters.**  Mary  Scott,  the  Flower  of  Yarrow,  is 
said  to  have  fostered  an  unknown  boy  brought  home  by 
'*Anld  Wat,"  from  one  of  his  predatory  excursions,  who 
was  80  gifted  that  he  is  believed  to  have  been  the  anonymous 
author  of  not  a  few  of  the  border  songs.  In  I^yden*s  *  Scenes 
of  Infancy,*  there  is  the  following  allusion  to  Mary  of  Harden 
and  her  interesting  charge : 

**  Amid  the  piles  of  spoils  that  strewM  the  ground, 
Her  ear,  all-anxious,  caught  a  wailing  sound ; 
With  trembling  haste  the  lovely  nymph  then  ficw. 
And  from  the  plundered  heaps  an  infant  drew ! 
Scared  at  the  light,  his  feeble  hands  he  flung 
Around  her  neck,  and  to  her  bosom  clung. 
While  beauteous  Mary  soothed  in  accents  mild 
His  fluttering  soul,  and  kissM  her  foster  child. 
Of  milder  mood  the  gentle  captive  grew, 
Kor  loved  the  scenes  that  scared  his  infant  view ; 
In  vales  remote  from  camps  and  castles  fur, 
He  shunn*d  the  cruel  scenes  of  strife  and  war. 
Content  the  lovos  of  simple  swains  to  sing. 
Or  wake  to  fame  the  harp^s  heroic  string ; 
He  lived  o*er  Yarrow*s  fairest  flower  to  shed  a  ti:ir, 
And  strew  the  holly  leaves  o'er  Harden's  bier; 
But  none  was  found  above  the  minstrePs  tomb, 
Emblem  of  peace,  to  bid  the  daisy  bloom ; 
He,  nameless  as  the  race  from  whence  he  spnmg, 
Sung  other  names,  and  left  his  own  unsung." 

The  eldest  son,  Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden,  was  knighted 
by  James  VI.  in  the  lifetime  of  his  father.  He  had  charters 
of  various  lands  in  the  counties  of  Dumfries,  Selkirk,  Rox- 
burgh, Berwick,  and  Peebles.  During  the  civil  troubles  in 
Scotland  in  the  reign  of  Charles  I.,  he  continued  loyal  to  the 
king.  He  was  one  of  the  commissioners  for  conserving  the 
treaty  of  Rippon,  16th  November  1641,  and  in  1644  one  of 
the  committee  of  parliament  On  8th  March  following  he 
was  appointed  one  of  the  committee  of  estates,  and  on  7th 
March  1647,  sheriff  of  Selkirkshire.  For  his  attachment  to 
the  royal  family  he  was  fined  by  Cromwell  in  1654,  £3,000. 
He  married,  first,  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  Gideon  Murray  of 
Elibank,  treasurer-depute  of  Scotland,  in  the  reign  of  James 
VI.,  and  had  by  her  five  sons  and  three  daughters.  He  mar- 
ried, secondly,  Margaret,  daughter  of  William  Ker  of  Linton, 
without  issue.   His  sons  were :  1.  Sir  William,  his  heir.  2.  Sir 


Gideon  Scott  of  Highchester.  8.  Walter,  ancestor  of  the  Seokti 
of  Raebum.  4.  James,  ancestor  of  the  Scotts  of  Thiriestant 
(see  next  article) ;  and  5.  John,  progenitor  of  Uie  Sootta  t§ 
WuoL  He  died  in  1655,  at  an  advanced  age.  Aeeording  to 
tradition,  his  marriage  with  his  first  wife  was  thus  biDOgfat 
about :  In  his  youth,  engaging  in  a  foray  upon  the  lands  of 
Sir  Gideon  Murray  of  Klibank,  he  was  overpowered  bj  that 
baron's  retainers,  and  carried  prisoner  to  bis  castle,  now  a 
heap  of  ruins,  on  the  banks  of  the  Tweed.  Elibank  was  oo 
the  point  of  ordering  him  to  be  instantly  hanged,  when  his 
more  considerate  dame  interposed,  suggesting  that  bt  was 
heir  to  a  good  estate,  and  that  they  bad  three  nmnamea 
daughters.  To  save  his  life,  young  Harden  oonseoted  to  wed 
the  plainest  of  the  three. 

His  eldest  son.  Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden,  was  kn^ted 
by  Charles  II.,  immediately  after  the  Restoration.  His  son, 
Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden,  was  engaged  in  the  rebdHoo  of 
the  earl  of  Argyle,  but  obtained  a  remission  from  King  Janes 
VII.,  dated  12th  December  1685.  He  died  in  1707,  witboat 
issue,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  only  brother,  Rob«t  Scott, 
till  then  styled  of  Iliston.  The  latter  died,  also  without  issoe, 
in  1710,  when  the  estates  devolved  on  his  nearest  male  heir, 
Walter  Scott  of  Highchester,  lineally  descended  fnm  Sir 
Gideon  Scott,  second  son  of  the  first  Sir  William  Scott  of 
Harden,  and  grandson  of  "  Auld  Wat.**  Sir  Gideon,  who, 
by  Charles  I.,  was  appointed  sheriff  of  Roxburghsliire,  mar- 
ried  Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  Thomas  Hamilton  of  Preston, 
and  had  by  her  two  sons  and  three  daughters. 

The  elder  son,  Walter,  when  little  more  than  fourteen 
years  of  age,  married  Mary,  countess  of  Bucclench  in  her 
own  right,  then  only  eleven  years  old.  In  consequence  of 
this  match  he  was  created,  for  life  only,  earl  of  Tarras,  Lord 
Alemoor  and  Campcastell,  by  patent  dated  4th  September 
1660.  His  principal  title  was  token  from  the  small  butro- 
mantle  river  Tarras,  in  Eskdale,  Dumfries-shire,  celebrated 
for  its  "good bull  trout,'*  also  for  the  ruggedness  of  its  chan- 
nel. An  old  rhyme,  referring  to  its  rocky  bed  and  precipi- 
tous falls,  says : 

**  Was  ne'er  ane  drown'd  in  Tamm,  nor  yet  in  doubt. 
For  ere  the  head  can  win  down,  the  horns  are  out." 

Tlie  countess  died  two  years  after  the  marriage,  a  giri  of 
thirteen.    The  earl  succeeded  his  father  in  Harden  in  1672. 
The  mantel- piece  of  one  of  the  rooms  in  Harden  cattle  com- 
memorates his  title,  by  bearing  an  earl's  coronet  inscribed 
with  the  letters  W.  E.  T.,  the  initials  of  ♦»  Walter,  earl  of 
Tarras."     In  1683,  his  lordship  joined  in  the  treasonable 
designs  of  the  duke  of  Monmouth,  who  had  married  his  de- 
ceased wife's  sister,  Anne,  duchess  of  Buecleuch.     A  plan  of 
insurrection  was  fonned  for  a  simultaiieous  rising  in  England 
and  Scotland,  and  Lord  Tarras  engaged  to  take  arms  with 
his  friends  on  the  border.     When  apprehended  he  confessed 
his  guilt,  and  threw  himself  on  the  king's  mercy.    An  at- 
tempt was  made  by  the  tyrannical  government  of  that  day  to 
obtain   from   him  evidence  against   Baillie   of  Jerviswood, 
whose  nephew  he  was  by  his  lady,  and  although  his  te^ 
mony  was  objected  to,  the  objections  were  repelled  by  the 
court,  and  Baillie  was  condemned.     His  lordship  was  hinueif 
brought  to  trial  5th  January  1685,  and  being  found  guiltj, 
his  titles  and  estates  were  forfeited  and  his  arms  ordered  to 
be  torn.     He  was  confined  in  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  and 
the  time,  place,  and  manner  of  his  execution  were  left  to  tb« 
king.     A  remission  was  granted  to  him  5th  Februaiy  fol- 
lowing, and  he  was  at  once  set  at  liberty.     He  was  rehabili- 
tated by  letter  under  the  great  seal  28lh  June  1687.    Uf 


scorr, 


410 


OF  TU3HIELAW. 


The  Scotts  of  Itaebnrn,  Duinfries-sblre,  are  descended 
frum  Walter,  third  son  of  Sir  William  Scott,  third  laird  of 
Harden.  He  lived  at  the  time  of  the  Restoration,  and  both 
lie  and  his  wife,  Isobel,  daughter  of  William  Makdougall  of 
Makerston,  became  Quakers,  the  tenets  of  that  sect  having 
at  that  period  made  their  way  into  Scotland.  They  were,  in 
consequence,  subjected  to  much  persecution  bv  tlie  tyrannical 
government  of  the  day.  By  an  edict,  dated  June  20,  1665, 
the  Scottish  privy  council  directed  his  brother,  Sir  William 
Scott  of  Harden,  to  toke  away  his  three  children,  and  edu- 
cate them  separately,  so  that  they  might  not  become  infected 
with  tlie  same  heresy.  By  a  second  edict,  dated  July  5, 
1666,  tlie  coundl  directed  two  thousand  pounds  Scots  money 
to  be  paid  by  the  laird  of  Raebum  for  the  maintenance  of  the 
children.  He  was  at  this  time  confined  in  the  tolbooth  of 
Edinburgh.  The  council,  however,  ordered  him  to  be  con- 
veyed to  the  jail  of  Jedburgh,  where  his  wife  was  incarce- 
rated, and  where  no  one  was  to  have  access  to  liim  but  sudi 
as  might  be  expected  to  convert  him  from  the  principles  of 
Quakerism.  '*  It  appears,**  says  Sir  W^ilter  Scott,  **  that  the 
laird  of  Makerston,  his  brother-in-law,  joined  with  Raebum*s 
own  elder  brother,  Harden,  in  this  singular  persecution,  as  it 
will  now  be  tenned  by  Christians  of  all  persuasions.  It  was 
observed  by  the  people  that  the  male  line  of  the  second  Sir 
William  of  Harden  became  extinct  in  1710,  and  that  the  re- 
presentation of  Makerston  soon  passed  into  the  female  line. 
Tliey  assigned  as  a  cause  that  when  the  wife  of  Raebum 
found  herself  deprived  of  her  husband,  and  refused  permission 
even  to  see  her  children,  she  pronounced  a  malediction  on  her 
husband's  brother  as  well  as  on  her  own,  and  prayed  that  a 
male  of  their  body  might  not  inherit  their  property."  {Lock- 
hares  Life  of  Scott,  p.  20.)  With  two  daughters,  Walter 
Scott  of  Raebum  had  two  sons,  William,  his  heir,  and  Wal- 
ter. The  latter  received  a  good  education  at  the  university 
of  Glasgow,  under  the  auspices  of  his  uncle.  Sir  William 
Scott  of  Harden.  He  was  a  zealous  Jacobite,  and  a  friend 
.nnd  correspondent  of  Dr.  Pitaiim.  "They  had,"  says  Sir 
Walter  Scott,  *'  a  Tory  or  Jacobite  club  in  Edinburgh,  in 
which  tlie  conversation  is  said  to  have  been  maintained  in 
J^tin."  He  was  called  *  Beardie,'  from  a  vow  which  he  had 
made  never  to  shave  his  beard  till  the  exiled  royal  family  of 
Stuart  were  restored.  In  I/)ckhart*s  Life  of  Scott,  there  are 
some  interesting  notices  of  the  Scotts  of  Raebum  by  Sir  Wal- 
ter Scott  himself.  Of  his  great-grandfather  Beardie  he 
says,  that  it  would  have  been  well  if  his  zeal  for  the  ban- 
ished dynasty  of  Stuart  h.id  stopped  with  his  letting  hh 
beard  grow.  '*But  he  took  arms  and  intrigued  in  their 
cause,  until  he  lost  all  he  had  in  the  world,  and,  as  I  have 
heard,  run  a  narrow  ri:»k  of  being  hanged,  had  it  not  been  fur 
the  interference  of  Anne,  duchess  of  Bucclench  and  Mon- 
mouth." On  the  death  of  his  brother,  William  Scott  of  Rae- 
bum, *'  Beardie  became,  of  course,  tutor  of  Raebum,  as  the 
old  Scottish  phrase  c.nlled  him,  that  is,  guardian  to  IiIh  infant 
nephew.  He  also  managed  the  estates  of  Makerston,  being 
nearly  related  to  that  family  by  his  mother,  Isobel  Makdou- 
gall. I  suppose  he  bad  some  allowance  for  his  care  in  either 
case,  and  subsisted  on  that  and  the  fortune  he  had  bv  his 
wife,  a  Miaa  Campbell  of  Silvercraigs."  He  left  three  sons. 
The  eldest,  Walter,  h.id  a  family,  of  which  any  that  now 
remain  have  been  long  settled  in  America, — the  male  heirs 
are  long  since  extinct.  The  third  was  William,  father  of 
James  Scott,  well  known  in  India  as  one  of  the  original  set- 
tlers of  Prince  of  Wales  island.  The  second  son,  Robert 
Scott,  was  Sir  Walter's  grandfather.  He  was  originally  in- 
tended for  the  sea ;  "  but  being  shipwrecked  near  Dundee  in 
his  trial  voyage,  he  took  such  a  sincere  dislike  to  that  ele- 


ment, that  he  ooald  not  be  persuaded  to  a 
Robert  was  one  of  thoee  active  apirita  to  whom  this  waa  ■§ 
mitfortnne.  He  turned  whig  upon  the  spot,  and  fairiy  ab- 
jured hw  father's  politics,  and  his  learned  poverty.  Hk  ohuf 
and  relative,  Mr.  Scott  of  Harden,  gave  him  a  leeM  of  tha 
farm  of  Sandyknowe,  comprehending  the  roeki  in  the  eeotn 
of  which  Smailholm  or  Sandvknowe  Tower  ia  ntnated.    Ha 

• 

took  for  his  shepherd  an  old  man  called  Hogg,  who  wilfin^ 
lent  him,  out  of  respect  for  hit  family,  his  whde  lanngii^ 
about  £30,  to  stock  the  new  farm.**  With  the  money  he  ia 
the  tirst  instance  bought  a  high  mettled  hunter,  greatly  to 
the  old  man's  dismay ;  but  having  speedily  iold  the  hone  ftr 
double  its  original  price,  he  was  enabled  to  stock  the  £ffm  m 
earnest,  and,  says  Sir  Walter  Scott,  **  the  rest  of  my  gmd- 
father's  career  was  that  of  successful  industry.  He  was  ens 
of  the  first  who  were  active  in  the  cattle  trade,  afterwaidi 
carried  to  such  extent  between  the  Highlands  of  Scotland 
and  the  leading  counties  of  England,  and  by  his  drorug 
transactions  acquired  a  considerable  sum  of  nsoney.**  He 
married,  in  1728,  Barbara,  daughter  of  lliomas  Halibnrtoo 
of  Kewmuins,  Berwickshire,  who  at  one  time  possessed  the 
part  of  Dr}'burgh  comprehending  the  rains  of  the  abbey,  and 
were  descended  from  the  ancient  family  of  Halibnrton  of 
^lertoun.  Of  these  Haliburtons  Sir  Walter  Scott  was,  ia 
right  of  his  father's  mother,  the  lineal  representative,  and  in 
1820,  he  printed  fur  private  circulation  a  work  entitled  *]fe- 
morials  of  the  Haliburtons.*  In  the  Introduction  to  the  thini 
canto  of  Marmion,  he  gives  a  fine  description  of  his  grand£ip 
ther,  Robert  Scott  of  Sandyknowe.  The  latter's  eldest  sob, 
the  poet's  father,  Mr.  Walter  Scott,  writer  to  the  signet,  was 
bom  in  1729,  nnd  admitted  a  writer  to  the  signet  in  1755. 
He  is  said  to  have  been  "  by  no  means  a  man  of  shimng 
abilities.  He  was,  however,  a  steady,  expert  man  of  bua- 
ne>s,  insomuch  as  to  prosper  coubiilerably  in  life;  andnothiag 
could  exceed  the  gentleness,  sincerity,  and  benevolence  of  bis 
character." 

The  Quaker-laird's  elder  son,  William  Scott  of  Raebum,  a 
peruon  of  considerable  emdition,  married  Anna,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  John  Scutt  of  Anorum,  baronet,  and  died  6th  Au- 
gust, 1G99.  His  widow  married,  secondly,  in  1702,  John 
Scott  of  Synton.  With  a  daughter,  Isjibel,  the  wife  of  John 
Rutherford,  M.D.,  he  had  a  son,  W.nlter  Scott  of  Raebum, 
who  was  killed  in  a  duel  by  one  of  the  Pringles  of  Crigfaton, 
no.ir  Selkirk,  3d  October  1707,  in  a  field  still  named  Rae- 
Imrn's  Meadow,  at  the  early  age  of  24.  He  had  married, 
19th  November  1703,  Anne,  third  daughter  of  Hugh  Scott 
of  Gala,  and  had  one  son,  William,  and  two  daughters,  Iso- 
bel and  Anne.  His  only  son,  Wiiliuni  Scott  of  Raebum, 
married  in  1743,  being  then  in  his  fortieth  year,  Jean  Elli<^ 
and  had  a  son,  Walter  Scott  of  Raebum,  and  a  daughter, 
Anne,  the  wife  of  Thomas,  second  son  of  Robert  Scott  of 
Sandvknowe. 


llie  Scotts  of  Tushielaw  in  Ettrick,  at  one  period  a  pow- 
erful section  of  the  clan  Scott,  were,  like  all  the  race,  rearers 
and  freebooters.  Their  tower  of  Tushielaw,  now  in  ruins,  is 
celebrated  alike  in  S(;ng,  tradition,  and  story.  The  exploits 
of  Adam  Scott  of  Tu&hieluw,  one  of  the  most  famous  of  their 
chiefs,  and  usually  called  '*  King  of  the  thieves  "  and  *'  Ki^ 
of  the  border,"  with  the  excesses  of  the  other  border  baroUi 
roused  the  wrath  of  J.imes  V.,  and  in  1528,  he  "  made  pro- 
clamation to  nil  lords,  barons,  gentlemen,  laiidwardmen,  and 
freeholders,  that  they  should  compc'ir  at  Edinburgh,  with  a 
month's  victuals,  to  pass  with  the  king  where  he  pleased,  to 
danton  the  thieves  of  Tiviotdale,  Annandale,  Liddisdale,  and 
other  parts  of  that  country ;  and  ah»  warned  all  gootkoMB 


SCOTT, 


412 


OF  SCOTSTARVET. 


many  years  M.P.  fur  Forfursliire.  Darinf^  tlie  rebellion  of 
1745,  he  was  a  faithful  adherent  of  the  house  of  Hanorer, 
and  when  the  rebels  arrived  in  Montrose  a  pnrtj  of  them 
went  to  Duniiiald  bouse,  and  threatened  him  with  instant 
deatii,  for  his  support  of  the  government  His  wife,  Ann 
Middleton  of  Seton,  Aberdeenshire,  Uiinally  called  I^v  Dud- 
innld,  entered  the  hall  at  the  time  they  had  her  Imsband  in 
their  hands.  Deing  a  woman  of  a  line  appearance  and  man- 
ner, and  near  her  accouchement,  her  entreaties  that  thoy 
would  spare  his  life  prevailed ;  bnt  he  wns  carried  off  to  the 
tolbootli  of  Montrose,  and  there  immured.  On  the  advance 
of  the  duke  of  Cumberland,  however,  Im  was  at  once  set  at 
libertv.     He  died  in  December  1780. 

His  son,  David  Scott  of  Duninald,  married  Mrs.  I^nisa 
Jervis,  a  widow,  daughter  and  coheiress  of  William  Delugard, 
K.*iq.,  and  died  Oct.  4,  1805.  He  had  one  son,  aUto  named 
David,  born  July  25,  1782,  and  3  daughters. 

1^1  rs.  Scott's  sister,  Elizabeth,  the  other  coheiress,  married 
James  Sibbald,  1C»).  of  Sillwood  Park,  Sussex,  who  was  cre- 
ated a  baronet  of  the  United  Kingdom,  Dec.  13,  1806,  and 
died,  issueless,  Dec  17,  1819.  As  the  b:uT>netcy's  remainder, 
in  default  of  male  ia^ue,  was  to  the  nephew  of  his  wife,  the 
only  son  uf  Mr.  David  Scott  of  Duninnld,  accordingly,  became 
Sir  David  Scott,  2d  hart,  of  Sillwood  Park.  On  succeeding  to 
this  title  and  estate,  he  sold  Duninald  to  Patrick  Arklay,  Esq. 
Sir  David  was  a  knight  of  the  order  of  the  Guelphs  of  Hano- 
ver, and  for  some  years  M.P.  fur  Yarmouth.  He  died  June 
18,  1851.  By  his  wife,  Caroline,  daughter  and  coheiress  of 
Benjamin  Grindull,  Esq.,  of  the  Bengal  Civil  service,  a  lineal 
descendant  of  Edmund  Grindall,  archbishop  of  Canterbury  in 
the  time  of  Queen  Elizabeth,  he  had  2  sons  and  3  daughters. 

His  elder  son.  Sir  James  Sibbald  David  Soott,  3d  baronet 
of  Sillwood  Park,  bom  June  14,  1814,  graduated  at  Christ 
church,  Oxford,  B.A.,  in  1835 ;  a  deputy- lieutenant  and  cap- 
tain  in  the  royal  Sussex  militia,  1846.  By  his  wife,  Harriet 
Anne,  only  daughter  of  Henry  Shank,  E»q.  of  Castlerig, 
Fifesbire,  lie  has  3  sons  and  3  daughters.  Heir,  his  son  Mi- 
chael David  Sibbald,  born  in  1849. 


The  Scotts  of  Bcnholme,  Forfarshire,  descended  from  the 
family  of  I^gie,  are  represented  by  Hercules  James  Robert- 
son, a  lord  of  session  under  the  title  of  Lord  Bcnholme,  the 
son  of  George  Robertson-Scott,  Esq.,  by  Ids  wife  Istibella  Scott 
of  Benholme  and  Hedderwick.  Bom  in  Edinburgh  in  1796, 
he  was  educated  at  the  High  school  and  university  of  Edin- 
burgh, and  passed  advocate  in  1817.  In  1842,  he  was  ap- 
pointed sheriff  of  Renfrewshire,  and  in  1853  raised  to  the 
bench  as  Lord  Benhohne.  In  1829  ho  married  the  youngest 
daughter  of  the  Right  Hon.  Charles  Hope  of  Granton,  lord- 
president  of  the  court  of  session.     His  wife  died  in  1840. 


The  Scotts  of  Brotherton,  Kincardineshire,  are  also  a 
branch  of  the  Scotts  of  Ix>gin.  Hercules  Scott,  bom  in  1621, 
third  son  of  James  Scott,  the  first  of  Ix)gie,  (see  ante,  page 
378,)  had,  with  five  daughters,  two  sons,  Hercules,  the  first 
of  Brotherton,  and  James  Scott  of  Commieston,  a  general  in 
the  army.  The  elder  son,  the  laird  of  Brotherton,  married 
in  1707  Helen,  daughter  of  Sir  Charles  Ramsay  of  Balmain, 
baronet.  Their  marriage  contract,  signed  by  seventeen  wit- 
nesses, and  dated  at  Fosque  in  1706,  is  mentioned  as  a  curi- 
ous old  document.  The  Chevnlier  St.  George,  a  short  time 
previously  to  his  embarkation  for  France  from  Montrose  in 
1716,  was  concealed  in  the  garden  of  Brotherton.  The  last 
night  he  was  in  Scotla::d  he  slept  in  the  house  of  Scott  of 
Logic.  Hercules  Scott  died  in  1747,  leaving  two  sons  and 
six  daughters.    His  elder  son,  James  Scott  of  Brotherton, 


bom  in  1719,  was  succeeded  on  his  death  in  1807  hr  Ui  Bt- 
phew,  James,  son  of  his  brother,  David  Scott  of  Nether  Ben- 
holme.  Dying  Sept.  22,  18 H,  he  was  soooeeded  by  In 
brother,  David  Scott,  Esq.  of  Brotherton,  born  Jnae  16, 17BL 
The  latter  died  Deo.  18,  18.i9.  His  son,  Hercules  Seott, 
Bengal  civil  service,  liom  in  1823,  succeeded  to  Brotfaatos. 
He  also  left  eight  daughters. 


Of  the  Scotts  of  Scotstarvet,  Fifeshire,  the  unme&ti  sb- 
cestor  was  David,  second  son  of  Sir  David  Soott  of  Bocdnek, 
the  eleventh  generation  of  that  noble  house  In  a  diieet  insle 
line.  David  Scott,  designed  of  Allanhangh  and  Whit^csttr, 
lived  in  the  reigns  of  James  IV.  and  V.,  and  died  at  sn 
advanced  age  about  1530,  l<?aving  three  sons,  Robert,  Alei- 
ander,  and  James.  The  youngest^  a  churchman,  waspce- 
Tost  of  Corstorphine,  where  he  built  a  manse  for  himsdf  sid 
bis  successors  in  office.  He  was  clerk  of  the  treasmr  sod  a 
lord  of  session  on  the  spiritual  side  of  the  bendu  acoocfisft 
to  the  distinctions  of  that  court  on  its  first  institation  io 
Scotland.  Sir  Alexander  Scott,  the  second  son,  was  br 
James  v.,  in  1534,  appointed  vice-register  of  Scotland,  sad 
died  six  ye.nrs  thereafter.  His  son,  Robert  Soott,  acqaind 
the  lands  of  Knightspottie,  and  was  appointed  derk  of  tW 
parliament  and  director  of  the  chancery,  17th  October  157B. 
With  one  daughter,  he  had  two  sons,  Robert  and  James,  tlM 
latter  de.signed  of  Vogrie.  He  resigned  his  office  of  director 
of  the  chancery,  first,  in  favour  of  his  elder  son,  Robert,  who 
pre<lecea.sed  him  in  1588,  and,  secondly,  in  favour  of  Sir 
William  Scott  of  ArdrosK,  his  stepson,  to  be  held  till  h»i 
grandson,  .lohn,  son  of  Robert,  became  of  age.  The  latter 
succeeded  his  grandfather  28ch  March  1592,  when  be  was 
only  seven  years  of  age.  He  was  the  celebrated  Sir  John  Seott 
of  Scotstarvet,  and,  on  coming  of  age,  he  obtained  tlie  elBee 
of  director  of  the  chancery.  (^Doufflas'  Baronage,  p.  221) 
Among  other  charters  he  had  one  of  the  lands  and  barony  of 
Tarvct,  Fifeshire,  dated  28th  November  1611.  These  lands 
he  called  Scotstan'et.  He  was  knighted  by  King  James  VL 
in  1617,  and  appointed  of  his  privy  council.  Sir  James  Bal- 
four stales  him  " a  busy  man  in  foul  weather."  In  Bruntaa 
and  Haig's  Senaton  of  the  College  nfjuttice,  (p.  280,)  there 
is  a  somewhat  elaborate  life  of  him.  We  learn  from  it  that 
he  was  admitted  an  extraordinary  lord  of  session  14th  Jaoa- 
ary  1629,  when  he  took  the  judicial  title  of  Lord  Sct>t»tarTet. 
He  was  displnced  in  November  1630,  and  appointed  an  ocdi- 
nary  lord  28th  July  1632.  He  was  one  of  the  four  judges  of  the 
court  who,  in  1639,  refused  to  take  the  king^s  covenant  vbcn 
tendered  by  the  royal  commissioner,  in  respect  that  he  did  not 
conceive  the  innovations  which  had  been  introduced  into  the 
church  since  1580,  could  subsist  with  the  covenants  then  sab- 
scribed,  of  which  it  was  a  copy,  and  that  it  belonged  to  the 
General  Assembly  to  clear  doubts  of  this  nature.  (^Bajfbv'e 
Annab,  vol.  ii.  p.  147.)  In  1640,  he  was  appointed  one  of 
the  committee  of  estates  established  for  the  defence  of  the 
country.  In  November  1641,  he  was  reappointed  by  tbs 
king,  with  consent  of  the  estates,  a  judge  ad  viiamoMted* 
pam.  On  l»t  Febmary  1645,  he  was  named  one  of  the  coro- 
mis^ioners  of  the  exchequer,  and  in  1648  and  1649,  a  mm- 
l>cr  of  the  committee  of  war.  During  the  commonwealth  he 
lived  retired,  and  in  1654  he  was  fined  by  Cromwell  £1,500 
sterling.  At  the  Restoration,  notwithstanding  his  vril- 
known  lovaltv,  liis  office  of  director  of  the  cbancerv  was  taken 
from  him  and  bestowed  on  another,  and  by  Charles  IL  be 
was  fined  £6,000  Scots.  He  died  in  1570,  in  his  84th  year. 
According  to  Nisbct,  {Heraldry,  vol.  ii.  p.  293,)  he  was  "a 
bountiful  patron  of  men  f>f  learning,  who  came  to  him  froo 
nil  quarters,  so  that  his  house  became  a  lund  of  coU^' 


I    ; 


I.    ' 


I    ! 


Among  otliei-s,  he  enoournf^  Timothy  Pont,  in  his  snrrey  of 
Sootland,  and  prevailed  npon  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Straloch 
to  prepare  the  maps  which  he  left,  for  publication.  Thej 
compose  the  *  Theatram  Scotiie,*  published  by  John  Bleau  in 
the  sixth  Tolnme  of  his  celebrated  Atlas,  which  appeared  in 
1662,  dedicated  to  Sir  John  Scott  of  Scotstarvet  Being 
anxioQs  that  the  maps  of  the  different  counties  should  be  ac- 
companied by  correct  topographical  descriptions,  Sir  John 
petitioned  the  General  AKseiiibly  that  these  might  be  fur- 
nished by  some  of  the  ministers  of  every  parish,  in  the  way 
that  a  century  and  a  half  later  was  done  for  the  New  Statis- 
tical Account  of  Scotland ;  but  although  his  request  was  ac- 
ceded to^  very  few  complied  with  the  order.  In  consequence, 
most  of  the  descriptions  were  supplied  by  himself  and  his 
friends.  So  anxious  was  he  as  to  the  publication  of  this  great 
woric  that  he  made  a  second  visit  to  Holland  for  the  purpose 
of  superintending  it,  and,  according  to  Bleau,  spent  whole 
daji  in  his  house  in  Amsterdam,  writing  the  description  of 
the  counties  from  memoiy.  (Senators  of  College  ofJwtlct^ 
p.  282.)  In  the  old  tower  of  Scotstarvet,  parish  of  Ceres, 
be  wrote  his  curious  work  alliteratively  entitled  *■  The  Stag- 
gering State  of  Scots  Statesmen,  by  Sir  John  Scott  of  Scots- 
tarret,'  published  by  Ruddiman  in  1754.  He  took  a  great 
interest  in  the  work  entitled  '  Delitise  Poetarum  Scotorum,' 
edited  by  Arthur  Johnston,  and  to  superintend  the  printing 
ef  it,  we  are  told,  that  he  took  a  voysge  to  Holland,  and  dis- 
horaed  **  a  hundred  double  pieces.*'  Some  of  his  pieces  of 
ioother  kind  appear  among  the  contents,  but,  as  has  been 
remarked,  they  are  not  quite  deserving  of  the  high  compli- 
nent  paid  to  him  on  their  account,  that  he  shines  among  the 
other  poets  whose  works  are  contained  there  as  a  moon 
among  stars.  Sir  John  Scott  of  Scotstarvet,  among  other 
benefits  conferred  on  learning,  founded  a  professorship  for 
teadiing  the  Latin  language  in  St.  I.«onard's  college,  St.  An- 
drtwf,  and  gave  a  mortification  to  the  smiths  of  Glasgow, 
for  which  his  descendants  had  the  presenting  of  apprentices. 
(AiS&aU*t2irwtory^/*i/tf,  ed.  1803,  p.  344.)  He  was  three 
timce  married ;  first,  to  Anne,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Drum- 
mond  of  Hawthomden,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons  and  seven 
daughters ;  secondly,  to  Margaret,  daughter  of  James  Mel- 
II  ^le  of  Hallhill,  by  whom  he  had  one  son,  George  Scott  of 
Pitlochie;  and,  thirdly,  to  Margaret,  daughter  of  Monypenny 
of  Pitmilly,  relict  of  Rigg  of  Aithemey,  by  whom  he  had  a 
aon,  Walter  Scott  of  Edenshead. 

His  eldest  son,  Sir  James  Scott,  conjunct  director  of  chan- 
with  his  father,  was  knighted  by  Charles  I.     He  prede- 
his  father  in  1650,  and  his  elder  son,  James  Scott, 
Succeeded  to  Scotstarvet  on  his  grandfather's  death  twenty 
3'ears  thereafter.   Dying  without  issue,  James  Scott  of  Scots- 
tarvet was  succeeded  by  his  brother  David,  who  greatly  im- 
XMtyved  the  family  estate,  and  died  in  1718,  in  his  73d  year. 
*Xhe  son  of  the  latter,  David  Scott  of  Scotstarvet,  advocate, 
"^ras  long  a  member  of  the  Imperial  parliament.    He  died  in 
'3766.    His  elder  son,  David  Scott  of  Scotstarv'et,  was  suc- 
^xedcd  hj  his  brother  Iblajor-general  John  Scott,  who  pur- 
^diased  the  estate  of  Balcomie,  parish  of  Crail,  and  was  M.P. 
'Mat  Fifeehire.    General  Scott  died  without  male  issue.     His 
^dest  daughter  married  in  1795  the  marquis  of  Titchfield, 
'^ho  in  consequence  assumed  the  name  of  Scott  in  addition 
%»  his  own  of  Bentinck.    She  subsequently  sold  Scotstar\'et 
4Uid  the  other  Fifeshire  estates  belonging  to  herselfl     Her 
]iosband  became  fourth  duke  of  Portland  in  1809,  and  the 
^Qcbces  died  in  1844,  leaving  issue.    Her  eldest  son,  William 
•John  Cavendish  Soott-Bentinck,  succeeded  his  father  as  fifth 
4nke  of  Porthuid  in  1856. 


The  Scotts  of  Gala,  Roxburgh.«ihire,  are  deacended  from 
Hugh,  third  son  of  Walter  Soott  of  Harden,  by  his  wife,  Ma- 
ry Scott,  the  Flower  of  Yarrow.  This  Hugh  Scott  lived  in 
the  reigns  of  James  I.  and  Charles  I.,  and  was  designed  of 
Deuchar.  He  married  Jean,  eldest  daughter  of  Sir  James 
Hop-Pringle  of  Galashiels,  and  had  several  sons,  namely, 
James,  his  heir ;  Walter,  a  major  in  the  army ;  George,  pro- 
genitor of  the  Scotts  of  Auchty-Donald,  Aberdeensbue; 
John,  settled  in  Italy ;  and  David,  a  surgeon  in  Edinbuigh. 
On  the  death  of  her  only  brother,  John  Hop  Pringle,  without 
issue,  their  mother  became  heir  of  line  of  that  ancient  fami- 
ly. Hugh  Scott  died  in  1640  or  1641.  His  eldest  son  and  suc- 
cessor, Jame.'t,  got  a  charter  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Gala, 
dated  9th  June  1640,  and  was  the  fin>t  designed  by  that 
name.  His  son,  Hugh  Scott  of  Gala,  by  his  wife,  a  danghter 
of  Sir  James  Kerr  of  Cavers,  had  five  sons  and  three  daugh- 
ters. Sir  James,  the  eldest  son,  married  Euphemia,  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  Willuun  Douglas  of  Cavers,  heritable  sheriff  of 
Roxburghshire,  and  had  four  sons  and  two  daughters.  Hugh, 
the  eldest  son,  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Colonel  John 
Stewart  of  Stewartfield,  near  Edinburgh,  and  had  two  sons 
and  8  daughters.  The  elder  son,  John  Soott  of  Gala,  was 
cousin-genn.in  and  heir  of  line  of  the  last  John  Stewart  of 
Stewartfield.  By  his  wife,  Anne,  only  daughter  of  Colonel 
George  Makdougall  and  Mukerston,  he  had  1  son,  and  2  dn. 

In  August  1815  John  Scott  of  Gala,  an  intimate  friend  of  his 
kinsman  Sir  Walter  Scott,  accompanied  him  on  his  visit  to  the 
Held  of  Waterloo,  and  returned  with  him  to  Scotland.  His 
reminiscences  of  Sir  Walter  in  London  in  1831,  are  published 
in  I^ockhart's  Life  of  Scott.  Mr.  Scott  of  Gala  died  at  Edin- 
burgh, April  19,  1840,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Hugh 
Soott  of  Gala,  bom  in  1822;  at  one  time  Captain  92d  High- 
landers, and  major  of  militia;  appointed  in  1848  one  of  the 
deputy  lieutenants  of  Selkirkshire;  married  in  1857  Elizabeth 
Isabella,  daughter  of  Capt.  Johnstone  Gordon  of  Craig,  with 
issue.  Heir,  his  son,  John  Henry  Francis  Kinnaird,  bom  in 
1859. 


The  first  of  the  Scotts  of  Hassendean,  Roxburghshire,  was 
David  Scott,  who  lived  in  the  middle  of  the  15th  centuiy. 
He  was  the  eldest  son  of  Sir  William  Scott  of  Kirkurd  who 
exchanged  Murdieston  fur  Branksome.  Captain  Walter  Scott 
of  Satchells,  in  his  rhyming  and  *  True  History  of  the  families 
of  the  name  of  Scott,'  alludes  to  him  in  the  lines,— 

**  Hassendean  came  without  a  call. 
The  ancientest  house  of  them  aU.** 

Sir  Alexander  Scott  of  Hassendean  fell  at  the  battle  of  Flod- 
den  in  September  1518.  Among  the  border  barons  who  in 
1530  neglected  to  fulfil  their  bonds  there  was  a  William  Scott 
of  Hassendean.  He  is  again  mentioned  in  1539,  as  hanng 
been  robbed  by  Thomas  Tumbull  of  Rawflat,  of  some  impor- 
tant legal  documents.  The  Criminal  Trials  record  the  slaugh- 
ter in  1564  of  a  David  Scott,  laird  of  Hassendean,  by  William 
Elliot  of  Horsliebill.  It  does  not  appear  to  be  ascertained 
at  what  period  the  male  line  of  this  family  failed.  Perhaps 
it  was  at  the  death  of  the  said  David  Scott  In  the  appen- 
dix to  Scott  of  Satchell's  curious  work,  it  is  stated  that  the 
lands  returned  by  purchase  to  the  Scotts  of  Bnccleuch,  while 
the  representation  of  the  family  devolved  on  William  Scott  of 
Bumhead  and  Crowbill,  as  lineal  male  descendant  of  the  first 
John  Scott  of  Bumhead,  younger  brother  of  David  Soott  of 
Hassendean,  and  second  son  of  Sir  Walter  Scott  of  Kirknrd, 
(see  New  Stat,  Account  of  Scotland,  vol.  iii.  p.  368).  The 
original  barony  of  Hassendean  now  forms  the  estates  of  Has- 
sendean-bank,  Hassendean-bum,  and  Teviot-bank,  and  some 


f~z" 


SCOTT, 


414 


MICHAEL. 


I  ! 


I 


I  . 
I 
I  . 


Umds  1>eloi)ging  to  the  duke  of  Buccleuch.  In  old  charters 
the  name  vrnn  flpelled  Halstaneadene,  Halstenden,  HaUitani- 
dene,  and  Haatendene,  supposed  to  sif^nify  dean  of  the  holj 
stone,  or  Ilalstein's  dean,  Halstein  being  a  common  Scandi- 
navian name.  The  modem  name  Hassendean,  simpi/  a  sof- 
tened form  of  the  old  one,  has  been  changed  into  Haaeldean 
in  song  merelj  by  tlie  caprice  of  poets.  Both  Sir  Walter 
Scott  und  Leyden  (in  his  Scenes  of  Infancy)  are  wrong  when 
they  give  Hazeldean  as  the  ancient  name. 

SCOTT,  Michael,  a  celebrated  philosoplier  of 
the  thirteenth  century,  whoaa  knowledge  of  the 
more  abstruse  branches  of  learning  acquired  for 
him  the  reputation  of  a  magician,  was  born  about 
1214,  at  his  paternal  estate  of  Balwearie,  in  the 
parish  of  Abbotshall,  Fifcsliirc.  He  early  became 
versant  in  the  occult  sciences,  and  in  his  youth, 
after  studying  with  unusual  success  at  home, 
went  to  Oxford,  where  he  had  Koger  Bacon  for  a 
fellow-student,  who  afterwards  was  not  sparing  in 
his  censures  of  him,  and  in  no  very  measured 
phrase  accused  him  of  being  both  a  plagiarist  and 
an  impostor.  He  then  proceeded  to  the  univer- 
sity of  Paris,  where  he  remained  for  some  yeara, 
being  styled  Michael  the  Mathematician,  and  for 
his  attainments  in  theology,  he  obtained  the  de- 
gree of  doctor  in  divinity.  He  subsequently  re- 
paired to  the  nnivei*sity  of  Padua,  and  afterwards 
resided  for  some  time  at  Toledo  in  Spain.  Be- 
sides mnthematics,  chcniistiy  and  medicine,  as- 
tronomy and  the  sister  art  of  astrology  became 
his  favourite  pursuits.  In  Spain  he  acquired  an 
intimate  knowledge  of  the  Arabic  language,  which, 
in  the  general  ignorance  of  the  Greek  which  then 
prevailed,  was  the  only  source  whence  an  ac- 
quaintance with  the  Aristotelian  philosophy  could 
bo  obtained.  From  the  Arabic  of  the  famous 
physician  and  philosopher  Avicenna,  who  flour- 
ished in  the  eleventh  centuiy,  he  translated  into 
Latin  Aristotle's  nineteen  books  of  the  llistorj'  of 
Animals.  This  work  recommended  him  to  the 
notice  of  the  Emperor  Frederick  II.  of  Gennany, 
a  prince  the  most  eminent  of  his  time,  both  for  his 
own  learning  and  for  the  encouragement  of  learn- 
ed men.  He  invited  him  to  his  court,  and  ap- 
pointed him  royal  astrologer.  At  that  monarch  s 
desire  he  translated  from  the  Arabic  the  greater 
part  of  the  works  of  Aristotle,  assisted  by  one 
Andrew  a  Jew.  He  predicted  the  time,  place, 
and  circumstances  of  the  Emperor  Frederick's 


iu  all  its  details.  After  leaving  his  court,  he 
practised  for  some  time  as  a  physiciau  with  suc- 
cess, and  then  repaired  to  England. 

He  was  received  with  great  favour  by  Edward 
I.,  and  permitted  by  him  to  return  to  Scotland. 
He  arrived  in  his  own  country  shortly  before  the 
death  of  Alexander  III.  At  this  time  he  is  styled 
Sir  Michael  Scott,  having  been  knighted  by  that 
monarch.  In  1290  he  was,  by  the  regents  of 
Scotland,  appointed  one  of  the  ambassadors  sent 
to  Norway  to  bring  over  the  infant  qneen  Mar- 
gai-et,  styled  the  ^laiden  of  Norway.  In  this 
embassy,  Sir  David  Wemyss,  another  Flfeshire 
gentleman,  was  associated  with  him.  They  suc- 
ceeded so  far  in  their  mission  as  to  get  the  young 
princess  intrusted  to  their  care ;  but  the  royal  in- 
fant, as  is  well  known,  sickened  on  her  passage  to 
Scotland,  and  died  in  Orkney,  an  event  which  in- 
volved Scotland  in  many  dire  calamities.  Sir 
Michael  Scott's  name  docs  not  again  appear  in 
history.  He  died  at  an  advanced  age  about  1300, 
and  by  some  accounts  he  is  represented  as  having 
been  buried  at  Home-Cultram  in  Cumberland, 
where  Henry,  son  of  David  I.  of  Scotland,  had 
founded  a  Cistercian  abbey,  of  which  Lysons  says 
^lichael  Scott  was  a  monk  about  the  year  1190. 
It  is  more  generally  believed,  however,  that  he 
was  buried  in  Melrose  abbey,  where  his  magical 
books  are  said  to  have  been  buried  with  him. 

Some  curious  traditionary  notices  of  this 

"  Wizard  of  dreaded  fame" 

i 

will  be  found  in  the  notes  appended  to  '  The  Laj 
of  the  Last  Minstrel.'    "It  is  well  known," sajs  | 
Tytler,  in  his  *  Lives  of  Scottish  Worthies,'  (vol. 
i.  p.  121,)  "that  many  traditions  arc  still  preva-  I 
lent   in  Scotland   concerning  the  extraordinary  j 
powers  of  the  wizard;  and  if  we  consider  the 
thick  cloud  of  ignorance  which   overspread  the 
country  at  the  period  of  his  retuni  from  the  conti-   , 
nent,  and  the  very  small  materials  which  are  re* 
quired  by  Superetition  as  a  groundwork  for  her 
dark  and  mysterious  stories,  we  shall  not  wonder 
at  the  result.   The  Arabic  books  which  he  bronglit 
along  with  him,  the  apparatus  of  his  laboraton', 
his  mathematical  and  astronomical  instruments, 
the  oriental  costume  generally  worn  by  the  astro- 


death,  and  his  prophecy  is  said  to  have  come  true  |  logers  of  the  times,  and  the  appearance  of  the 


^i  :. 


I 

.TEU.  i 


»cmoir  of  whom  is 

eternal  graml- 

"^f  Sir  John 

'■INTON, 


scorr, 


415 


SIR  WALTER. 


wbite-haired  and  venerable  sage,  as  he  sat  on  the 
roof  of  his  tower  of  Balwearie,  observing  the  face 
of  the  heavens,  and  conversing  with  the  stars, 
were  all  amply  sufficient  to  impress  the  minds  of 
the  vulgar  with  awe  and  terror."  His  own  pro- 
dnctlons  are  '  De  Procreatione,  ct  Hominis  Phisi- 
onomia,'  also  printed  under  tlie  title  of  *•  De  Sccre- 
tis  Naturae  ;^  a  chemical  tract  on  the  transmuta- 
tion of  metals  into  gold,  styled  *  De  Natura  Soils 
et  Lnnsd;*  and  ^Mensa  Philosophica,'  a  treatise 
relating  to  the  visionary  sciences  of  chiromancy 
and  astrology.  His  commcntaiy  on  the  *  Sphere 
of  Sacrobosco*  was  thought  worthy  of  being  pre- 
sented to  the  learned  world  of  Italy  at  so  late  a 
period  as  1495. 

SCOTT,  David,  author  of  a  History  of  Scot- 
land, was  bom  near  Haddington,  in  1675,  and 
became  a  lawyer  in  Edinburgh.  After  the  Revo- 
lution, he  was  for  some  time  imprisoned  for  his 
Jacobite  principles.  His  History  was  published 
in  1727  in  folio,  but  is  now  little  known.  He  died 
at  Haddington  in  1742. 

SCOTT,  Helexus,  M.D.,  an  able  physician, 
the  son  of  a  clergyman,  was  born  at  Dundee,  and 
received  his  grammatical  education  there.     He 
studied  at  Aberdeen  and  Edinburgh  for  the  medi- 
cal profession,  and,  after  visiting  London,  tra- 
velled as  far  as  Venice,  with  the  intention  of  pro- 
ceeding overland  to  Bombay ;  but  the  want  of 
money  compelled  him  to  return  to  Eugland,  where 
he  married.    Shortly  after  ho  obtained  an  ap- 
pointment in  the  East  Indies,  and  having  written 
an  entertaining  Romance,  styled  *  Tlic  Adventures 
of  a  Rupee,'  he  sent  it  to  a  friend  in  London,  and 
it  was  published  in  one  small  volume  in  1782. 
Daring  his  residence  in  India,  he  acquired  a  con- 
siderable fortune  by  his  practice.     He  died  on  his 
voyage  to  New  South  Wales,  November  16, 1821. 
SCOTT,  Sir  Walter,  baronet,  a  distinguislied 
poet  and  the  most  cclebrnted  novelist  of  his  day, 
bom  at  Edinburgh,  August  15,  1771,  was  the 
third  child  of  Mr.  Walter  Scott,  writer  to  the  sig- 
net, the  son  of  Mr.  Robert  Scott,  faimer  at  San- 
^J^knowe  in   Roxburglishire,  lineally  descended 
^tt>m  the  Scots  of  Harden.    For  tlie  pedigree  of 
'^lie  family,  see  p.  410  of  this  volume).   His  mother, 
Anne  Rutherford,  was  the  daughter  of  Dr.  John 
fi^itherford,  professor  of  the  practice  of  medicine  in 


the  uni?ersity  of  Edinburgh,  a  memoir  of  whom  is 
given  at  p.  395  of  this  vol.  His  maternal  grand- 
mother was  Jean  Swinton,  a  daughter  of  Sir  John 
Swinton  of  Swinton,  Berwickshire  (see  Swinton, 
samame).  His  father^s  family  consisted  of  eleven 
sons  and  one  daughter.  An  elder  brother,  Robert, 
was  an  officer  first  in  the  navy,  and  afterwards  in 
the  East  India  Company^s  sendee.  Another 
brother,  John,  major  in  a  foot  regiment,  was  obliged 
to  retire  from  the  army  on  account  of  his  health. 
Tliomas,  the  next  brother  to  Sir  Walter,  a  writer 
to  the  signet  like  his  father,  was  for  some  years 
factor  to  the  marquis  of  Abcrcom,  but  died  in 
Canada  in  1822,  in  the  capacity  of  paymaster  to 
the  70th  regiment.  The  youngest  brother,  Daniel, 
died  on  his  return  fi*om  the  West  Indies,  in  1806. 
The  house  in  which  the  novelist  was  born  stood 
at  the  head  of  the  College  wynd,  a  nanx>w  alley 
leading  from  the  Cowgate  to  the  gate  of  the  old 
college  of  Edinburgh,  and  was  long  since  pulled 
down  to  make  way  for  the  new  university.  While 
yet  a  child  of  three  years  old.  Sir  Walter  was  re- 
moved, on  account  of  his  delicate  health,  to  the 
faim  of  his  paternal  grandfather  at  Sandyknowe, 
situated  near  the  bottom  of  Leader  water,  among 
the  romantic  hills  of  Roxburghshire.  In  the 
neighbourhood  stands  the  deserted  and  niincd 
border  fort  of  Smailholm  Tower.  In  the  fourth 
year  of  his  ago  he  was  taken  to  Bath  for  the  ben- 
efit of  his  health,  where  he  spent  about  a  twelve- 
month, and  acquired  the  rudiments  of  reading  at 
a  day-school  kept  by  an  old  dame.  He  then 
returned  to  Edinburgh,  and  thereafter  went  back 
to  Sandyknowe,  where  he  chiefly  resided  till  his 
eighth  year,  and  where  he  stored  his  mind  with 
much  of  that  traditionary  lore  which  he  afterwards 
introduced  with  such  admirable  eficct  into  his 
writings.  At  this  time  he  spent  half-a-year  with 
an  aunt  at  Kelso,  where  he  attended  a  school,  kept 
by  a  Mr.  Launcelot  AVhale,  and  had  for  school- 
fellows, James  and  John  Ballantyne,  the  printers, 
with  whom  he  afterwards  became  so  closely  asso- 
ciated. In  1779  he  was  sent  to  the  second  class 
of  the  High  school  of  Edinburgh,  at  that  time 
superintended  by  Mr.  Luke  Eraser,  and  two  years 
afterwards  was  transferred  to  the  rector*s  class, 
then  taught  by  Dr.  Alexander  Adam,  but  he  nev- 
er was  in  any  way  remarkable  for  his  proficiency 


I". 


I  • 
h 


I     i 


SCOTT, 


416 


SIR  WALTER. 


us  a  scholar.  He  quitted  the  High  school  in  1783, 
and  at  that  early  period  of  his  life  he  had  a  strong 
desire  to  enter  the  army,  but  this  his  lameness 
prevented,  the  malady  which  afflicted  his  early 
years  having  had  the  effect  of  contracting  his  right 
leg,  so  that  ho  conld  hardly  walk  erect. 

In  October  1783  he  entered  the  university  of 
Edinbnrgh ;  but  the  precarious  state  of  his  health 
interfered  much  with  his  academical  studies.  He 
appears  to  have  attended  only  the  Greek  and 
I^tin  classes  for  two  seasons,  and  that  of  logic 
one  season.  At  the  age  of  fifteen,  the  rupture  of 
a  blood-vessel  caused  him  to  be  confined  for  some 
time  to  his  bed.  During  this  illness,  he  had  re- 
course for  amusement  to  the  books  contained  in 
the  circulating  library  founded  by  Allan  Ramsay, 
and  he  read  nearly  all  the  old  romances,  old  plays, 
and  epic  poetry,  which  the  library  contained. 
After  his  sixteenth  year  his  health  gradually  im- 
proved, and  being  designed  for  the  bar,  he  at- 
tended the  lectures  on  civil  and  municipal  law  in 
the  university,  as  well  as  those  on  history.  On 
May  15,  178G,  he  was  apprenticed  to  his  father  as 
a  writer  to  the  signet,  to  enable  him  to  acquire  a 
technical  knowledge  of  his  profession.  About 
this  period  he  applied  himself  to  the  study  of  for- 
eign languages,  and  soon  made  a  considerable 
proficiency  in  Italian,  French,  and  especially 
German.  He  passed  advocate  July  10,  1792, 
and  in  the  course  of  time  obtained  a  tolerable 
practice  at  the  bar. 

In  179G  his  first  publication,  a  thin  quarto, 
made  its  appearance,  without  his  name,  being  a 
translation  of  two  of  Biirger^s  Ballads,  entitled 
*Leonore,'  and  *The  Wild  Huntsman.'  The  suc- 
cess of  this  work  was  by  no  means  flattering,  the 
translator  having  distributed  so  many  copies  among 
his  friends  as  materially  to  injure  the  sale.  In  the 
spring  of  1797  his  loyal  feelings  were  gratified  by 
his  being  made  quarter-master-general  of  the  Ed- 
inburgh corps  of  volunteer  cavalry.  In  December 
of  that  year  he  married  Miss  Charlotte  Margaret 
Carpenter,  a  young  French  lady  of  good  parent- 
age and  some  fortune,  daughter  of  a  gentleman  of 
Lyons,  whom  he  had  accidentally  met  in  the  pre- 
ceding autumn,  while  on  an  excursion  to  Gilsland 
Wells  in  Cumberland.  Early  in  1799  he  pub- 
lished at  London  '  Goetz  of  Berliclilngen,'  a  tra- 


gedy, translated  from  the  German  of  Go6the. 
The  ballad  called  *  Glenfinlas*  was  his  first  origi- 
nal poem.  His  next  was  'The  Eve  of  St.  John,* 
the  scene  of  which  was  at  Smailholm  Tower. 
Having,  on  his  marriage,  taken  up  his  rendcnce 
at  Lasswade,  a  village  south  of  Edinburgh,  he  was 
accustomed  occasionally  to  make  what  he  called 
*^  raids'*  into  Liddesdale,  for  the  purpose  of  col- 
lecting the  ballad  poetry  of  that  romantic  district 
He  not  only  visited  many  of  the  scenes  alluded  to 
in  the  metrical  narratives,  but  gathered  all  the 
local  anecdotes  and  legends  preserved  by  tradition 
among  the  peasantry ;  and  of  the  cxtraordlnaiy 
retentiveness  of  his  memory  at  this  period  several 
interesting  proofs  have  been  recorded.  In  De- 
cember 1799  he  obtained,  through  the  influence  of 
the  duke  of  Buccleuch,  the  crown  appointment  of 
sheriff-depute  of  Selkirkshire,  to  which  was  at- 
tached a  salary  of  £300  a-year,  when  he  removed 
to  Ashestiel,  on  the  banks  of  the  Tweed.  His 
first  publication  of  any  note  was  '  The  Minstrelsy 
of  the  Scottish  Border,'  consisting  of  his  Liddes- 
dale collections,  and  various  other  contributions; 
which  work  issued  from  the  printing-press  of  i^f r. 
James  Ballantync  of  Kelso,  in  1802,  in  two  vol- 
umes 8vo.  In  the  ensuing  year  he  added  a  third 
volume,  consisting  chiefly  of  original  ballads,  by 
himself  and  others.  In  1804  he  published  the 
ancient  minstrel  Ul\q  of  'Sir  Tristi-em,'  said  to 
have  been  composed  by  Thomas  the  Rhymer 
in  the  13th  centur}',  the  notes  to  which  showed 
the  extent  of  his  acquirements  in  metrical  anti- 
quities. 

In  1805  appeared  his  first  decidedly  original 
poem,  'The  Lay  of  the  Last  Minstrel ;'  the  poeti- 
cal beauty  and  descriptive  power  of  which,  with 
the  singular  construction  of  the  verse,  at  once  at- 
tracted public  attention,  and  secured  for  the  work 
an  extensive  popularity.  Tli is  work  produced  to 
him  £C00.  In  the  spring  of  1806,  on  the  retire- 
ment of  Mr.  George  Home,  he  obtained  the  rever- 
sionar}'  appointment  of  one  of  the  principal  clerks 
in  the  conrt  of  session,  the  duties  of  which  he  per- 
formed without  salary  till  the  death  of  his  prede- 
cessor in  1812,  when  he  became  entitled  to  the 
full  emoluments,  which  usually  amounted  to 
£1,200  a-year.  In  1808  he  brought  out  his  sec- 
ond considerable  poem, '  Marmion,'  for  which  he 


II 


SCOTT, 


418 


SIR  WALTER. 


this  work  to  a  close — ^namely,  the  success  of  Miss 
Edgeworth*s  delineations  of  Irish  life,  and  his  be- 
ing employed  in  1808  to  finish  the  romance  of 
Queen  IIoo  Hall,  left  imperfect  by  Mr.  Strut t. 
"  Accident,"  he  continues,  "  at  length  threw  the 
lost  sheets  in  my  way.  I  happened  to  want  some 
fishing  tackle  for  the  use  of  a  guest,  when  it  oc- 
curred to  me  to  search  the  old  writing-desk  al- 
ready mentioned,  in  which  I  used  to  keep  articles 
of  that  nature.  I  got  access  to  it  with  some  diffi- 
culty, and  in  looking  for  lines  and  fiies,  the  long- 
lost  manuscript  presented  itself.  I  immediately 
set  to  work  to  complete  it  according  to  my  origi- 
nal purpose."  It  was,  in  1814,  published  anony- 
mously, under  the  title  of  *Waverley,  or  'Tis 
Sixty  Years  Since.' 

The  appearance  of  this  memorable  romance 
makes  an  epoch  in  the  history  of  modern  litera- 
ture. Its  progress  at  the  outset  was  slow,  but 
after  two  or  three  months  it  made  its  way  to  a 
high  place  in  public  estimation,  and  in  a  short 
time  the  sale  amounted  to  about  twelve  thousand 
copies.  Some  time  previously  he  had  removed 
*rith  his  family  to  a  small  estate  which  he  had 
purchased  near  the  ruins  of  ^lelrose  Abbey,  and 
to  which  he  gave  the  name  of  Abbotsford,  instead 
of  Cartlcy-IIole,  which  it  fonnerly  possessed. 
Here  he  erected  a  mansion-house,  and  employed 
his  leisure  in  the  improvement  of  his  property  by 
planting  and  farming.  Viewing  the  character  of 
a  proprietor  of  land  as  more  worthy  of  attainment 
than  that  of  a  mere  author,  however  successful, 
it  was  the  great  object  of  his  ambition  to  be  able 
to  leave  an  estate  to  his  descendants ;  and  for  this 
purpose  he  laboured  incessantly  on  those  delight- 
ful fictions  which  now  followed  c<ich  other  In  rapid 
succession  from  his  pen.  To  Waverley  succeed- 
ed, in  1815,  *Guy  Mannering;'  in  1816,  'The 
Antiquary,*  and  the  first  series  of  *  The  Tales  of 
my  Landlord,'  containing  'The  Black  Dwarf*  and 
'Old  Mortality;*  in  1818,  'Roy  Ro}',*  and  the 
second  series  of '  The  Tales  of  my  Landlord,*  con- 
taining '  The  Ileait  of  Mid-Lothian ;  *  and  in  1819, 
the  third  series  of  '  The  Tales  of  my  Landlord,* 
comprising  '  The  Bride  of  Lammermoor,*  and  '  A 
Legend  of  Montrose.*  In  1820  he  published  his 
chivaliic  romance  of '  Ivanhoe,*  and  in  the  course 
of  the  same  year  appeared  '  The  Monastery*  and 


'The  Abbot,*  the  latter  being  a  seqael  to  the  for- 
mer, and  both  relating  to  the  period  of  Scottish 
histor}'  comprising  the  reign  of  the  unfortunate 
Mary,  and  the  regency  of  her  brother,  the  earl  of 
Moray.  In  only  one  instance  had  the  author 
permitted  his  own  prejudices  to  jar  upon  the  feel- 
ings of  his  countrymen,  by  giving,  in  the  tale  of 
'  Old  Mortality,*  a  somewhat  harshly  drawn,  and 
highly  coloured,  delineation  of  the  Covenanters. 
This  led  to  an  admirable  series  of  papers  by  Dr. 
M'Cric  in  the  Edinburgh  Christian  Instructor, 
which  were  afterwards  collected  and  published  in 
the  form  of  a  pamphlet.  Sir  Walter,  though  the 
child  of  Presbyterian  parents,  was  himself  an 
Episcopalian. 

On  the  accession  of  George  lY.,  Mr.  Scott  was, 
March  1820,  created  a  baronet.  In  the  beginning 
of  1821  appeared  his  romance  of  English  history 
entitled  *  Keuilworth,*  which  completed  the  num- 
ber of  twelve  volumes,  all  published,  if  not  en- 
tirely written,  within  a  year.  In  1822  he  pro- 
duced '  The  Pirate,'  and  '  The  Fortunes  of  Nigel ;' 
in  1823  'Peveril  of  the  Peak,*  and  '  Quentin  Dur- 
ward;*  in  1824  'St.  Ronan*s  Well,'  and  'Red- 
gauntlet;*  in  1826  '  Tales  of  the  Crusaders;'  in 
182C  '  Woodstock  ;*  in  1827  '  Chronicles  of  the 
Canongate,*  first  series ;  the  second  series  of  which 
appeared  in  the  following  year ;  in  1829  'Ann  of 
Gierstein;*  and  in  1831  a  fourth  series  of '  Tales 
of  my  Landlord,*  containing  '  Count  Robert  of 
Paris,*  and  '  Castle  Dangerous.'  The  whole  num- 
ber of  his  novels  extended  to  seventy-four  vol- 
umes; and,  besides  contributing  to  the  Edinburgh 
Review,  during  the  first  years  of  its  existence, 
and  afterwards  to  the  Quarterly  Review,  he  wrote 
for  the  Supplement  of  the  sixth  edition  of  the  En- 
cyclopsdia  Britannica  the  aitlcles  Cliivalry,  Ro- 
mance, and  the  Drama.  In  1814  he  edited  the 
works  of  Swift,  in  19  vols.,  with  a  Life  of  the 
Author,  and  furnished  an  elaborate  introductoiy 
essay  to  the  '  Border  Antiquities,*  a  work  in  tiro 
vols,  quarto.  In  1815  he  made  a  tour  of  Fnmoe 
and  Belgium,  and,  on  his  return,  published  'Panrs 
Letters  to  his  Kinsfolk,*  and  a  poem  styled  'The 
Field  of  Waterloo,'  which  he  had  visited  in  his 
route.  In  the  same  year  he  joined  Mr.  Robert 
Jameson  and  Mr.  Ilenr^'  Weber  in  composing  a 
quarto  volume  on  Icelandic  antiquities.    In  1818 


•I 


J 


SCOTT, 


420 


SIR  WALTER. 


der  the  title  of  *  Tales  of  a  Grandfather,'  being 
addressed  to  his  grandson,  John  Ilngh  Lockhart, 
under  the  name  of  Ilngh  Littlcjohn,  Esq.  In  the 
following  year  appeared  the  second,  and  in  1880 
the  third  and  concluding  scries  of  that  work.  In 
the  latter  year  he  also  contributed  a  *  History  of 
Scotland,*  in  2  vols.,  to  '  Lardner's  Cabinet  Cy- 
clopaedia;' and  *  Letters  on  Demonology  and 
Witchcraft,'  to  the  Family  Library.  In  1881  he 
added  to  his  *  Tales  of  a  Grandfather'  a  uniform 
series  on  French  History.  In  the  same  year  two 
sermons,  which  he  had  written  for  a  young  cleri- 
cal friend,  were  published  in  London,  and  met 
with  an  extensive  sale.  The  profits  of  these  vari- 
ous publications  enabled  him  to  pay  a  farther 
dividend  of  8s.  in  the  pound,  which,  but  for  the 
vast  accumulation  of  interest,  would  have  reduced 
his  debts  to  nearly  one-half.  Of  £54,000  which 
had  now  been  paid,  all  except  about  £7,000  had 
been  produced  by  his  own  literary  exertions.  He 
had,  besides,  paid  up  the  premium  of  the  policy 
upon  his  life ;  and  to  mark  their  high  sense  of  his 
honourable  conduct,  his  creditors  presented  him 
with  the  library,  manuscripts,  curiosities,  and 
plate,  at  Abbotsford,  which  had  once  been  his  own. 
In  November  1830  he  retired  from  his  office  of 
principal  clerk  of  session,  with  the  superannuation 
allowance  usually  given  after  twenty- three  years' 
service.  Earl  Grey,  the  then  prime  minister,  of- 
fered to  gi\int  him  the  full  salary ;  but  he  declined 
to  accept  of  such  a  favour  from  one  to  whom  he 
was  opposed  in  politics.  During  the  succeeding 
winter  he  was  attacked  by  the  sj-mptoms  of  gra- 
dual paralysis,  a  disease  hereditary  in  his  family. 
His  contracted  limb  became  weaker  and  more 
painful,  and  his  utterance  began  to  be  aifected. 
During  the  summer  of  1831  he  gi'cw  gradually 
worse.  It  was  now  obvious  that  he  had  over- 
tasked his  strength,  and  his  physicians  forbade  all 
mental  exertion,  but  he  could  not  be  restrained 
altogether  from  his  literary  labours.  In  the  au- 
tumn a  visit  to  Italy  was  recommended;  and 
through  the  kind  offices  of  Captain  Basil  Hall,  a 
passage  to  Malta  was  readily  obtained  for  him  in 
his  majesty's  ship  the  Barham,  then  fitting  ont  for 
that  port.  He  was  with  difficulty  prevailed  on  to 
leave  Scotland,  but  yielded  at  length  to  the  en- 
treaties of  his  friends,  and,  accompanied  by  his 


eldest  son  and  his  daughter  Anne,  he  embariced 
at  Portsmouth  on  the  27th  October.    His  health 
seemed  to  be  improved  by  the  Toyage^  and  on  the 
27th  December  he  landed  at  Naples,  where  he  was 
received  by  the  king  and  his  court  with  the  most 
flattering  honours.     In  April  he  proceeded  to 
Rome,  and  afterwards  visited  Hvoli,  Alban!,  and 
Frescati.    His  fast  decaying  strength,  however, 
warned  him  to  return  to  his  native  land,  and  he 
hurried  rapidly  homewards.    During  the  jonmey 
ho  sustained  another  serious  attack  of  apoplexy, 
and  arrived  in  London  in  ncariy  the  last  stage  of 
physical  and  mental  prostration.    After  remaining 
thei*e  three  weeks,  in  accordance  with  his  own 
eaiTiest  desire,  he  was  conveyed  by  the  steam 
packet  to  Newhaven,  near  Edinburgh,   and  on 
July  11,  1882,  he  reached  once  more  his  favourite 
residence  of  Abbotsford.    Mr.  Lockhart  relates, 
that  as  the  carriage  descended  the  vale  of  the  Ga- 
la, he  roused  himself  to  a  momentary  conscious- 
ness, and  by  degrees  recognised  the  features  of 
that  familiar  landscape.   After  lingering  in  a  state 
of  insensibility  till  mortification  had  commenced 
in  different  parts  of  his  mortal  frame,  he  expired 
without  a  stniggle,  September  21,  1882,  and  was 
interred  amidst  the  niins  of  Diyburgh  Abbey,  his 
burial-place  there  being  in  right  of  his  grandmo- 
ther, Mrs.  Barbara  Scott  of  Sandyknowe,  daugh- 
ter of  Mr.  Thomas  Haliburton  of  Newmains.    A 
magnificent  monument  to  his  memory,  from  a  de- 
sign of  Mr.  George  Kemp,  was,  some  years  after 
his  death,  erected  in  Prince's  Street,  Edinburgh, 
for  which  collections  were  made  in  all  parts  of  the 
country.    A  very  handsome  pillar,   surmonnted 
with  a  statue,  was  also  erected  in  George's  Square, 
Glasgow.    In  the  market-place  of  Selkirk  there  is 
also  a  statue  of  him  in  freestone.    The  Memoira 
of  Sir  Walter  Scott,  in  7  vols.  8vo,  by  his  son-in- 
law,  Mr.  I-.ockhart,  were  published  in  1837-8. 

He  left  two  sons  and  two  daughters,  none  of 
whom  survived  him  many  years.  His  elder  soni 
Sir  Walter  Scott,  second  baronet  of  Abbotsford, 
was  bom  in  July  1801,  and  very  early  gave  mdi- 
cations  of  a  bold  and  manly  spirit.  In  1818  he 
was  made  a  comet  in  the  corps  of  the  Selkirkshire 
yeomanry  cavahy,  and  all  his  studies  took  the 
direction  of  a  military  life.  The  following  year 
he  obtained  a  commission  as  comet  in  the  18th 


L 


J 


SELKIRK, 


480 


EARL  OF. 


•*  It  connected  tlie  full  of  the  lionse  of  Seaforth  not  only  with 
tlie  appeamnce  of  a  deaf  Caberfae ,  but  with  tlie  contempora- 
neous appearance  of  various  different  pliysical  niiMfortanes  in 
■creral  of  the  other  preat  IIip;hlHnd  c]iief« ;  all  of  wljich  are 
■aid — and  were  certainly  believed  both  by  Scott  and  Davy — 
to  have  actnally  occnrred."  ^Ir.  Morritt  "  heard  the  pro- 
phecy quoted  in  the  Highlands  at  a  time  wlien  T^rd  Seaforth 
had  two  »ins  both  alive  and  in  good  health— so  that  it  cer- 
tainly was  not  made  apris  coup."  In  Scott's  Poetical  Work*^ 
(p.  647,  Ed.  1841.)  are  some  vprses  on  I-ord  Seafurth's  death. 
His  eldest  dnnghter,  the  Hon.  Mrs.  Stewart  Mackenzie,  suc- 
ceeded to  tlie  family  CAtutes. 


Selkirk,  earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred in  1G4G,  on  I^rd  William  Douglas,  eldest  son  of  the 
first  marquis  of  Dunglas.  by  his  2d  wife,  (f^ce  vol.  ii.  p  48). 
Bom  Dec.  21.  lb*S4,  lie  was  created  earl  of  Selkirk,  I^rd  Daer 
and  Shortcleugh,  by  patent  dated  Ang.  4,  1646,  to  him  and 
his  heirs  male  whatsoever.  He  married  Anne,  duchess  of 
Hamilton,  in  her  own  right,  and,  on  n  petition  from  her 
grace,  was  created  duke  of  Hamilton  for  life,  12th  October 
1660.  He  had  seven  sons  and  four  daughters,  who  all  took 
the  n.nme  of  Hamilton.  Having  resigned  the  earldom  of 
Selkirk,  he  obtained  from  .TameaVII.  a  new  patent,  dated 
6th  Oct<iber  1688,  conferring  it,  with  the  original  precedence, 
upon  his  third  son,  Ix)rd  Charles  Hamilton.  This  nobleman 
was  baptized  at  Hamilton,  5th  February  1664,  and  was  ap- 
pointed colonel  of  the  first  regiment  of  lion«e,  20th  Xoveml)er 
1688,  in  room  of  his  eldest  brother,  the  enrl  of  Arran,  after- 
wards fourth  duke  of  Hamilton  and  first  duke  of  Brandon, 
(see  vol.  ii.  of  this  work,  page  421).  The  earl  of  Selkirk 
entered  early  into  the  Revnlution,  and  by  King  William, 
whom  lie  attended  in  mnut  of  his  campaigns,  was  appointed 
one  of  the  lords  of  the  bedchamber.  He  held  the  same  office 
tinder  Queen  Anne  and  Kings  George  I.  and  II.  In  1696  he 
was  appointed  lord-clerk-register  of  Scotland,  and  held  that 
office  till  the  death  of  King  William,  but  in  1733  was  restored 
to  it  by  George  II.  He  Ktrcnuoui*ly  opposed  the  Urjion.  At 
the  general  election  of  1713,  chosen  one  of  the  sixteen  repre- 
sentatives of  the  ScottiKh  peerage,  he  was  afterwards  three 
times  rechosen.  He  was  »herifi*  principal  of  Lanark^hi^e, 
and,  dying,  unmarried,  at  I^ndon,  13th  March  1739,  was 
succeeded  by  his  brother.  Lord  John  Hamilton,  earl  of  Rng- 
len,  who  was  thenceforth  styled  earl  of  Selkirk  and  Rnglcn. 
(See  Ilroi.KX,  earl  of,  page  388  of  this  volume.)  The  latter 
dii'd  withfint  male  isnue,  3d  December,  1744,  when  the  titles 
of  earl  of  S»'lkirk,  Lord  Dacr  and  Shortcleugh,  with  the 
estates  of  Crawfonl- Douglas  and  Crawford-john,  devolved 
upon  his  nearest  male  heir,  his  grand-nephew,  Dunbar  Ilnm- 
ilton,  grandson  of  his  br(>ther,  I-ord  Basil,  sixth  son  of  Wil- 
liam and  Anne,  duke  and  duchess  of  Hamilton. 

Of  I^rd  Basil  Hamilton  an  account  is  given  in  Douglas' 
Pcemgo,  (Wood's  edition,  vol.  ii.  p.  488.)  where  he  is  de- 
scribed as  a  young  man  of  distinguished  abilities,  great  spirit, 
and  an  amiable  dispositicm.  Several  of  his  letters  to  his  fa- 
ther are  printed  in  Dalrymple's  Memoirs  of  Scotland.  In 
consequence  of  King  William  having  withheld  his  protec- 
tion from  the  Scotch  settlers  at  the  isthmus  of  Darien,  the 
ruin  of  the  colony  followed,  and  many  of  the  colonists  were 
thniwn  into  prison  by  the  Spaniards.  In  behalf  <»f  these  un- 
fortun.'ite  {»erKons,  Lord  Basil  Hamilton  was,  in  November 
16u9,  deputed  by  the  Darien  company  to  present  an  address 
at  Ixndon  to  the  king.  His  majesty  desired  the  Scottish 
secretaries  to  intimate  to  the  Company  that  he  would  attend 
to  their  request,  and  would  endeavnur  to  promote  the  trade 
of  Scotland,  but  refused  to  see  Lord  Babil  Uaxnilton,  because 


he  had  not  appeared  at  court  when  Inst  in  London. 
upon  the  directors  of  the  Company  requested  the  lord-dm- 
eellor  of  Scotland,  then  in  London,  to  urge  his  majesty  to 
receive  his  lordsliip.  An  audience  was  socordinglj  fixed  to 
be  in  the  eonncil  chamber,  after  a  council  meetiDg.  The  king 
forgot  the  appointment,  and  was  passing  into  another  iwnn, 
when  I<ord  B:isil  placed  himself  in  the  passage,  and  said  that 
he  was  commissioned  by  a  great  body  of  his  sobjects  to  liy 
their  misfortunes  at  his  feet— that  he  had  a  right  to  be  faeaid, 
and  would  be  heard.  The  king  returned  to  the  cRmcO 
room,  listened  with  patience,  gave  instant  order  to  apply  to 
Spain  for  redress,  then  turning  to  those  near  him,  and, 
**  This  yoimg  man  is  too  bold,  if  any  man  can  be  too  bold  in 
his  country's  cause.**  In  the  autumn  of  1701,  his  kfdahip, 
then  in  his  80th  year,  was  drowned  in  tlie  Minnock,  a  snail 
river  in  Dumfries- shire,  then  swelled  bj  a  sodden  run,  h 
sight  of  his  brother,  the  earl  of  Selkirk,  and  sereral  gentle- 
men, who  could  render  him  no  assistance.  His  serrant  had 
ridden  forward,  in  order  to  try  tire  ford,  and  was  dismoonted 
in  it.  I^>rd  Basil  rushed  in,  and  caught  the  man,  but  his 
horse  falling  at  that  moment,  they  were  both  carried  down 
by  the  torrent.  His  untimely  death  w.ns  deplored  as  a  na- 
tional loss.  He  married  Mary,  grand-danghter  and  heimi 
of  Sir  David  Dunbar  of  Baldoon,  Wigtonshire,  baronet,  and 
had  two  s<ms,  who  both  inherited  Baldoon,  and  two  daugh- 
ters, Mrs.  ^lurray  of  Philiphaugh,  and  the  countess  of  Don- 
donald.  B.isil  Hamilton,  the  second  son,  succeeded  his  bro- 
ther in  Baldt>on  in  1703.  He  engaged  in  the  reltellioa  of 
1715 ;  had  the  command  of  a  troop  of  horse  under  Visooimt 
Kenmure,  and  was  among  the  number  of  those  who  surren- 
dered at  Preston,  where  he  had  displayed  pvat  connge; 
When  the  prisoners  were  marched  into  I/)ndon,  his  youth, 
interesting  figure,  and  unconcerned  demeanour,  attracted  the 
attention  and  commiseration  of  the  spectators.  He  was  tried 
the  3lst  M.ay  1716,  found  guilty,  and  sentenced  to  be  exe- 
cuted, 13th  July,  but  reprieved  and  pardoned.  In  1732,  an 
act  of  pnrli.-iment  w.is  passed  for  restoring  Basil  Hamiltnn  in 
blood.  At  the  general  election  1741  he  was  elected  M.P.  fcr 
the  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright,  and  died  in  Xovember  1742. 
An  epitaph  was  written  upon  him  by  Hamilton  of  Bangnor. 
By  his  wife,  I.tjibella,  daughter  of  the  Hon.  Colonel  Alexan- 
der Mackenzie,  M.P.,  secimd  son  of  the  fourth  earl  of  Sea- 
forth, he  had  Dunb.nr,  fourth  e.trl  of  Selkirk,  another  son, 
and  two  d.anghtei-s. 

Dunbar  Hamilton  of  Baldoon,  succeeded  the  eari  of  Sd- 
kirk  and  Ruglen,  in  1744,  as  fourth  earl  of  Selkirk,  on  wbid 
occasion  he  resumed  the  paternal  name  of  Douglas.  He  stu- 
died at  the  university  of  Ghifgow,  and  on  the  breaking  out  of 
the  rebellion  of  1745,  exerted  himself  strennously  and  snc- 
cessfully  in  snpport  of  the  government.  In  1787,  and  again 
in  1793,  he  was  chosen  one  of  the  sixteen  Scottish  repmeo- 
t^itive  peers.  He  died  at  Edinburgh,  24th  May  1799,  in  bit 
77th  year.  By  his  countess,  Helen,  fifth  dangliter  of  tfae 
Hon.  John  Hamilton,  second  son  of  Thomas,  sixth  exH  of 
Haddington,  he  liad,  with  six  danghters,  seven  sons,  who  all 
predeceased  him  except  t\)e  youngest,  Thomas,  who  became 
fifth  eari  of  Selkirk. 

The  second  son,  Basil  William,  I.ord  Daer,  bom  16lh 
March  1763,  e.arly  displayed  great  abilities  and  uncommon 
activity  of  mind.  On  the  completion  of  his  educ:ition  he  tra- 
velled on  the  continent  for  a  short  time  in  1783.  Three 
vears  afterwards  his  father  transferred  to  him  the  mansi^e- 
ment  of  all  his  landed  property  in  the  stewartry  of  Ku-kcnd- 
bright  and  county  of  Wigton.  During  the  meeting  <^  the 
constituent  assembly  in  1789,  he  went  to  Paris.  B^ng  • 
warm  admirer  of  the  Revolution,  he  lived  much  in  the  eodetr 


SELKIRK. 


432 


SEMPLE. 


He  seems  to  have  early  engaged  in  the  bucca- 
neer expeditions  to  the  South  Seas ;  and  in  1708 
he  joined  the  Cinque  Ports  galley,  in  the  capacity 
of  sailing  master.  While  lying  off  the  coast  of 
Brazil,  Selkirk  had  a  remarkable  dream,  ia  which 
he  was  forewarned  of  the  total  failure  of  the  ex- 
pedition, and  the  wreck  of  his  ship ;  and  having 
soon  after  had  a  quarrel  with  his  commander, 
Captain  Stradling,  he  was,  in  October  1704,  with 
his  owa  consent,  put  ashore  on  the  uninhabited 
island  of  Juan  Fernandez,  with  his  sea  chest,  a 
few  books,  including  his  Bible,  his  nautical  instru- 
ments, some  tobacco,  a  gun,  with  a  pound  of  gun- 
powder, and  some  balls,  a  knife,  a  kettle,  an  axe, 
a  flip-can,  &c.  Before  the  boat  quitted  the  beach  he 
changed  his  mind,  but  the  captain  would  not  allow 
him  to  return  on  board,  and  after  four  years  and 
four  months*  solitary  residence,  ho  was  discovered 
and  taken  off  the  island  by  Captain  Woodcs  Rogci-s, 
in  January  1709.  Rogers  made  him  his  mate, 
and  a  few  weeks  thereafter  appointed  him  to  the 
command  of  a  prize,  which  was  fitted  out  as  a 
privateer,  in  which  situation  he  conducted  himself 
with  great  vigour,  steadiness,  and  prudence.  Af- 
ter going  on  a  privateering  expedition  across  the 
Pacific,  in  October  1711,  they  returned  to  Eng- 
land, from  which  Selkhk  had  been  absent  upwards 
of  eight  years.  Of  the  sum  of  £107,000  which 
Rogers  had  realized  by  plundering  the  enemy, 
Selkirk  seems  to  have  shared  to  the  amount  of 
about  £800. 

In  the  spring  of  1712  he  once  more  set  foot  in 
Largo,  bringing  home  with  him  his  gun,  sea  chest, 
and  drinking  cup,  which  he  had  with  him  on  the 
island.  They  were  long  preserved,  in  the  house  in 
which  he  was  born,  by  the  descendant  of  one  of  his 
brothers,  but  in  1862  they  were  sold.  Having 
formed  an  attachment  to  a  country  girl,  named  So- 
phia Bruce,  whom  he  met  in  his  solitary  walks,  he 
eloped  with  her,  and  never  returned.  He  went  to 
sea  again  in  1717,  and  died  in  the  situation  of 
lieutenant  on  board  his  majesty's  ship  Weymouth, 
in  1723.  His  widow,  a  second  wife,  named  Fran- 
ces Candis,  claimed  and  received  his  property  in 
his  native  village.  His  history  is  supposed  to 
have  suggested  to  Defoe  the  groundwork  of  his 
matchless  naiTative  of  Robinson  Crusoe.  Sel- 
kirk's Life  and  Adventures,  writt<;n  by  John  How- 


ell, author  of  an  '  Essay  on  the  War  GoUeys  of 
the  Ancients,*  was  published  by  Oliver  and  Boyd, 
Edinburgh,  in  1829. 

Sempijc,  a  Burnaine  of  great  antiquity  in  the  wett  of  SeoU 
land.  Mr.  Lower,  in  his  list  of  En^isk  sumamet  formed 
from  baptismal  names,  gires  Semple  as  deriTed  from  Sam- 
pol,  a  corruption  of  St  Paul,  (English  Svmame$,  voL  L  p. 
155) ;  but  this  does  not  seem  to  have  been  the  origin  of  the 
Scottish  name.  Hamilton  of  Wishavr,  in  his  Descriptkm  of 
the  Sheriffdom  of  Renfrew,  (printed  for  the  Mutland  Club, 
1831,  p.  141,)  referring  to  the  old  tradition,  which  docs  not 
appear  to  have  had  anj  foundation,  of  King  Robert  IL,  csllad 
Blear-Eje,  being  cut  from  his  mother's  womb,  at  a  place 
near  Renfrew,  by  Sir  John  Forrester  of  Elliestowi,  sayi, 
**  before  that  ho  was  reputed  a  simple  man — from  whence  the 
house  of  Sempill  and  lords  thereof  have  their  name  ai^  part 
of  their  estate.**  The  family  of  Sempic,  howerer,  wen 
known  in  Scotland  at  an  earlier  period.  The  first  on  record 
was*  Robert  de  Semple  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  II.  (1214 —  ! 
1249).  He  was  vasKal  in  Elziotstoun,  on  the  south  side  of  I 
I/>ch  Winnoch,  Renfrewshire,  under  the  hi;;h  steward  of  | 
Scotland,  about  1220.  Tlie  family  were  heritable  bailies  of  « 
the  regality  of  Paisley  and  sheriffs  of  Renfrewshire,  under  '. 
the  lord  Iiigh  steward  of  Scotland,  and  had  large  possessioDS    | 

i 


in  that  and  the  two  adjoining  counties  of  Ayr  and  Lanaxk. 


SE^rpLE,  or  OS  it  is  now  spelled,  Semfxll,  Baron,  a  ti& 
in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  conferred  in  1489  on  Sir  John 
Semple  of  the  fiimily  above  mentioned.  Robert  de  Sem^ 
is  witness  to  a  donation  of  Walter,  lord  high  steward  of 
Scotland,  of  the  church  of  Largs  to  the  monastery  of  Paidcy 
about  1246.  His  son,  Robert  de  Semple,  seneschal  or  cham- 
berlain of  Renfrew,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III.,  witneaied 
a  charter  of  Malcolm  earl  of  Lennox  about  1280,  also,  a 
grant  of  Jnmes,  high  steward  of  Scotland.  He  had  two  sons, 
Robert  and  Thomas,  both  great  patriots  and  staunch  friends 
of  Robert  the  Bruce,  from  whom  the  latter  obtained  half  of 
the  lands  of  liOngniddnr. 

Robert,  the  elder  son,  seneschal  of  Renfrew,  for  his  faith- 
ful services  received  from  King  Robert,  by  a  grant  imder  the 
gront  seal,  all  the  lands  in  the  parish  of  I^Jirgs,  Aynhire, 
which  previously  belonged  to  John  Baliol,  to  him  and  his 
heirs  for  ever.  He  is  witness  in  an  agreement  between  tin 
monasterv  of  Paislev  and  the  town  of  Renfrew,  1318,  and  in 
the  collation  of  the  church  of  Largs,  1318.  He  died  befbn 
1330.  His  son,  William  de  Semple,  steward  of  Renfrew,  ii 
witness  in  the  ratification  of  Kilpatrick,  granted  by  Malcolm, 
earl  of  Lennox,  in  that  year.  Under  the  designation  of  Wil- 
liam de  Semple  of  Elliotstoun  or  Ellieston,  he  witnessed  a 
charter  of  Adam  de  Fullerton  in  1344. 

His  great-grandson,  John  Sempill,  the  fourth  designated 
of  Elliotstoun,  was  employed  in  several  negotiations  of  state, 
and  in  1421  was  one  of  the  Scots  commissioners  appointed  to 
treat  with  the  English  for  the  liberation  of  James  I.  He 
waited  upon  his  majesty  at  Durham,  1 3th  December  1425. 
on  his  return  to  his  own  dominions.  He  was  knighted  by 
that  king  about  1430,  and  died  ten  years  afterwards. 

His  son,  Sir  Robert  Sempill  of  Elliotstoun,  had  a  chartff 
from  James  1 1.,  of  the  lands  of  Southennan  (a  conruptioo  of 
South  Annan),  in  the  pari.sh  of  West  Kilbride,  Lanarkshire, 
31st  October  1401.  Sir  Robert's  son.  Sir  William  Sempll  of 
Elliotstoun,  was  made  sheriff  of  Renfrewshire,  and  in  1474 
he  obtained  from  James  III.  a  charter  of  the  baronies  of  El- 
liotstoun and  Castleton.    His  son,  Thomas  Sempill  of  Elliofc- 


SEMPILL, 


434 


OF  BELTREES. 


upon  the  triul  of  Patrick,  earl  of  Orkney,  in  1614.  He  never 
went  to  court,  or  interfered  in  pahlic  aflfaini,  but  lived  al- 
ways at  ht)me  in  great  splendour  and  magnlficeuce.  He  died 
19th  September  1639.  Like  his  father,  he  was  twice  mar- 
ried, first,  to  r<ady  Anne  Hamilton,  eldest  daughter  of  the 
first  earl  of  Abercom,  and  had  by  her  a  daughter,  Marian, 
Lady  Preston  of  Valleyfield ;  and,  secondly,  to  Lady  Elixa- 
bcth  Hay,  third  daughter  of  the  ninth  carl  of  Errol,  and, 
with  two  daughters,  had  four  sons,  namely,  1.  Francis,  sixth 
Lord  Sempill,  who  died,  without  issue,  3d  November,  1644. 
2.  Robert,  who  succeeded  his  brother  as  seventh  I/)rd  Sem- 
pill. 3.  Archibald  Sempill  of  Dykehead ;  and  4.  James,  who 
entered  a  religious  order  on  the  continent. 

Robert,  seventh  Lord  Sempill,  was  never  concerned  in  any 
state  affairs,  but  from  his  well-known  attachment  to  the 
royal  cause,  he  was  fined  £1,000  by  Cromwell's  act  of  grace 
and  pardon,  1654.  He  died  8th  September  1675.  By  his 
wife,  Anne  Douglas,  daughter  of  the  first  Lord  Mordington, 
he  had  two  sons,  Robert,  master  of  Sempill,  who  died  in  his 
18th  year,  unmarried,  and  Francis,  eighth  Lord  Sempill,  and 
two  daughters,  Anne,  of  whom  afterwards,  and  Jean,  wife  of 
Alexander  Sinclair  of  Roslin. 

Francis,  eighth  lord,  became  a  Protestant,  and  was  the 
first  of  the  Lords  Sempill  who  had  appeared  in  parliament 
since  the  reign  of  Queen  Mary,  being  excluded  on  account  of 
their  adherence  to  popery.  Ho  married  the  sister  of  the 
first  earl  of  Roscbery,  but  died  without  issue  in  1684. 

His  elder  sister,  Anne,  succeeded  as  baroness  of  Sempill. 
She  married  Francis  Abercromby  of  Fettemeir,  who  was  cre- 
ated, for  his  life  only.  Lord  Glassford,  his  title  being  taken 
from  an  estate  of  the  Sempill  family  of  that  name,  5th  July 
1685.  (See  voL  ii.  of  this  work,  p.  809.)  Lady  Sempill 
obtained  a  new  charter  of  the  title  and  estates,  May  16, 
1688,  Ecttling  them  on  her  female  issue  in  default  of  male, 
with  remainder  to  her  heirs  and  assignees  whatsoever.  She 
died  in  1C95.  She  had,  with  one  daughter,  five  sons.  1. 
Francis,  ninth  Lord  Sempill.  2.  Hon.  Captain  Robert  Sem- 
pill, killed  in  the  wars  abroad,  without  issue.  3.  John,  tenth 
Lord  Sempill.  4.  Hon.  Alexander  Sempill,  who  died  young ; 
and  5.  Hew,  eleventh  Lord  Sempill,  bom  after  the  entail. 

Francis,  ninth  Lord  Sempill,  was  educated  in  the  popish 
religion,  but  after  succeeding  to  the  title,  ho  became  a  Pro- 
testant, and  took  his  seat  in  parliament,  14th  May,  1703. 
He  gave  the  treaty  of  union  all  the  oppo»itIon  in  his  power, 
voting  against  every  article.  He  died,  unmarried,  not  long 
aftenvards.  His  brother,  John,  tenth  Lord  Sempill,  was 
very  active  during  the  rebellion  of  1715,  on  the  side  of  gov- 
ernment, in  promoting  the  training  and  disciplining  of  the 
Ayrshire  fencible  men.  He  died,  unmarried,  in  Augu.st  1716. 
His  only  8ur\'iving  brother.  Hew,  eleventh  Lord  Sempill, 
early  entered  the  army.  His  first  commission  was  dated  in 
July  1709.  He  served  with  reputation  in  Flanders  and 
Spain,  and  in  1718  was  major  of  the  2Gth  regiment  of  foot, 
or  Cameronians.  in  1731  ho  was  lieutenant-colonel  of  the 
19th  foot,  and  14th  January,  1741,  ho  succeeded  the  earl  of 
Craufurd  as  colonel  of  the  42d  foot.  During  his  command 
that  regiment  was  designated  Lord  Sempiirs  Highlanders. 
In  1743  he  accompanied  it  to  Flanders.  In  that  and  the 
following  year  the  regiment  was  quartered  in  diflerent  parts 
of  that  country  ;  and  by  their  quiet,  orderly,  and  kind  de- 
portment, acquired  the  entire  confidence  of  the  people  among 
whom  they  mixed.  The  elector-palatine  wrote  to  his  envoy 
in  I^mdun,  desiring  him  to  thank  the  king  of  Great  Britain 
for  the  excellent  behaviour  of  the  regiment  while  in  his  terri- 
tories in  1743  and  1744,  and  for  their  sake,  he  adds,  *'  I  will 
always  pay  a  respect  and  regard  to  a  Scotchman  in  future." 


I/>rd  Sempill  commanded  in  the  town  of  Aeth,  when  it  was 
besieged  by  the  French,  and  made  a  gallant  defence.  He 
was  appointed  colonel  of  the  25th  foot,  25th  April  1745. 
At  the  battle  of  Culloden,  16th  April  174G,  he  acted  as  a 
brigadier-general.  His  regiment  was  placed  in  the  second 
line  in  the  left  wing  of  the  royal  army.  In  the  middle  of 
August  following,  he  arrived  at  Aberdeen,  and  aasnnied  the 
command  of  the  troops  stationed  in  that  quarter.  He  died 
in  that  city,  25th  November  the  same  year.  His  death  was 
occasioned  by  the  puncture  of  the  tendon  of  his  arm  <hi  being 
let  blood.  In  1727  he  had  sold  the  estates  of  EUiotsUmn 
and  Castle-Semple,  after  they  had  been  for  abont  fire  hun- 
dred years  the  property  of  the  Sempill  fisimily,  to  Colond 
M'Dowall,  a  younger  son  of  M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  and  in 
1813,  William  M'Dowall  of  Garthland  and  Castle-Sempla 
sold  the  latter  estate  to  John  Harvey,  Esq.  of  Jamaica  In 
1741,  Hew,  I/>rd  Sempill,  bought  the  estate  of  North  Barr, 
in  the  same  county.  The  Sempill  family  at  one  period  pos- 
sessed property  which  at  the  present  day  would  bring  a  ren- 
tal of  upwards  of  £20,000,  but  most  of  it  has  passed  into 
other  hands.  He  was  the  author  of  *  A  short  Address  to  the 
Public,  on  the  practice  of  cashiering  Military  Officers  withont 
a  Trial;  and  a  Vindication  of  the  Conduct  and  Political 
Opinions  of  the  Author/  Loud.  1793,  8vo.  By  his  first  wife, 
Sarah,  daughter  and  coheiress  of  Nathanael  Gaskil),  Esq. 
(called  Gascoigne  in  Doughs'  Peerage)  of  Manchester,  his 
lordship  had  five  sons  and  nx  daughters.  Two  of  his  sons 
were  officers  in  the  army. 

John,  twelfth  Lord  Sempill,  the  eldest  son,  sncoeeded  his 
father  in  1746,  and  died  at  Sempill  house,  15th  Jannaiy 
1782.  He  married  Janet,  only  daughter  and  heiress  of  Hugh 
Dunlop  of  Bishoptoun,  Renfrewshire,  and  had  Hugh,  thir- 
teenth Lord  Sempill,  two  other  sons,  and  three  daughters. 

Hugh,  thirteenth  I^rd  Sempill,  an  officer  in  the  3d  rrp- 
ment  of  foot-guards,  (ensign,  24th  December  1777,  lieuten- 
ant, 26th  February  1781,)  retired  from  the  army  in  1791 
He  died  25th  January  1830.  By  his  wife,  Maria,  daughter 
of  Charles  Mellish,  Esq.  of  Rngnal,  Nuttingluimshire,  be  lad 
two  sons,  Selkirk,  who  succeeded  him,  and  Francis,  died  3d 
January  1843,  and  two  daughters,  the  Hon.  Maria  Janet, 
and  the  Hon.  Surah  Sempill. 

The  elder  son,  Selkirk,  fourteenth  I^rd  Seir.pill,  bom  12th 
February  1788,  died  unmarried  in  1835.  The  title  then  de- 
volved on  his  sister,  ^laria  Janet,  second  Baroness  SempU 
in  her  own  right.  She  married  in  1826,  Edward  Candjer, 
Esq.  of  liJorton  Pinkney,  a  deputy  lieutenant  of  Northamp- 
tonshire, who  assumed  the  name  of  Sempill  only,  by  royal 
license,  dated  26th  August  1853. 


The  Sempills  of  Beltrces,  Renfrewshire,  were  descended 
from  John,  third  son  of  the  third  I^rd  Sempill.  This  gen- 
tleman, called  "John  the  dancer"  by  Knox,  married,  as  al- 
ready stated,  Mary  Livingstone,  one  of  the  ni:uds  of  honoor 
to  Queen  Mary,  with  whom  they  were  both  great  favourite*. 
Their  son,  Sir  James  Sempill  of  Beltrees,  was  ambassador  to 
Queen  Elizabeth  in  the  reign  of  James  VI.  He  w.ns  an  inti- 
mate and  faithful  friend  of  Mr.  Andrew  Melville.  In  Dr. 
M'Crie's  Life  of  Jlelville,  he  is  frequently  mentioned.  Being 
a  great  favourite  of  King  James  VI.,  Sir  James  was  employ- 
ed to  transcribe  the  famous  Basilicon  Duron,  written  by  that 
monarch,  and  having  sent  it  to  Melville  to  peruse,  the  Utter 
took  objection  to  some  pa.ssages  in  it,  and  the  suhject  ▼&> 
brought  belbre  the  synod  of  Fife,  by  Mr.  John  Dykes,  minis- 
ter at  Anstruther,  in  September  1599.  llie  king  sent  Mr. 
Francis  Bothwell  to  apprehend  Dykes,  but  he  escaped.  Thil 
obliged  the  king,  in  self-defence,  to  publish  the  work  entire 


J 


J 


SETON 


436 


OF  SETON. 


imd  acted  nt  Lee  mnd  Harper's  Booth  in  Bartholomevr  Fair, 
in  1728.  (Johnson's  Scots  Musical  Museum^  vol.  vi.  p.  477.) 
The  Poems  attributed  to  the  Semples  of  Beltrees  were  pub- 
lished at  Edinburgh  in  1849,  in  one  volume  8vo. 

Francis  Sempill  was  the  last  of  the  three  rhyming  lairds  of 
Beltrees.  He  sold  Beltrees,  which  is  in  the  parish  of  Loch- 
winnoch,  retaining  the  superioritj,  and  in  1677,  towards  the 
end  of  his  life,  the  family  removed  to  a  property  in  the  par- 
iah of  Kilbarchan,  called  Tliirdpart,  which  he  had  purchased. 

He  had  a  son,  Robert,  who  married  ^lary,  sister  of  Sir 
Robert  Polluk  of  PoUok.  Their  son,  also  named  Robert, 
bom  8th  January  1687,  died  in  July  1789,  in  his  103d  year. 
In  1697,  when  only  ten  years  old,  he  was  present  at  the 
burning  of  the  witdics  at  Paisley.  To  prevent  his  going  his 
parents  hid  his  shoes,  and  he  went  without  them.  He  was 
appointed  a  justice  of  the  peace  in  1708,  and  at  his  death 
was  probably  the  oldest  judicial  functionary  of  that  or  any 
other  rank  in  the  British  empire.  Sir  John  Sinclair,  in  his 
•  Code  of  Health  and  Longevity/  makes  Robert  SempilPs  ago 
105,  and  in  the  Old  Statistical  Account  of  Kilbarchan,  it  is 
made  108.  William  Semple,  however,  in  his  '  Continuation 
of  Crawfur^'s  History  of  Renfrewshire,*  (Part  II.  p.  163,) 
expressly  states  that  the  old  gentleman  was  *'  bom  January 
1687,"  adding  that,  "on  March  21st,  1782, 1  was  in  company 
with  him,  his  daughter,  his  grand-daughter,  and  his  great- 
grandson,  all  in  good  health.**  William  Semple  was  himself 
a  native  of  Kilbarchan  parish,  having  been  the  son  of  a  farm- 
er, and  bom  10th  May  1747,  as  he  has  taken  care  to  leave 
on  record  (Continuation  of  Craw/urd's  Ilistory^  p.  128,  note). 
In  the  New  Statistical  Account  of  Paihley  (p.  165)  he  is  er- 
roneously called  a  native  of  that  town.  We  learn  from  the 
latter  useful  work  that  the  old  man*s  son,  Robert  Sempill, 
acquired  some  money  and  retrieved  the  circumstances  of  the 
family,  but  left  it  all  to  Mr.  Hamilton  Collins,  who  had 
married  his  youngest  sister, — Mrs.  Campbell,  the  eldest  sister, 
being  entirely  overlooked.  The  daughter  of  the  latter  married 
Mr.  Stewart,  a  merchant  in  Greenock,  and  their  son  took  the 
title  of  James  Stewart  of  Beltrees. 


Setox,  a  surname  derived  from  Say-tun,  the  dwelling  of 
Say.  Anciently  there  were  in  England  two  families  named 
Snjj  of  Norman  descent.  The  first  of  the  race  who  came  into 
Scotland  was  Secher  or  Saiker  de  Say,  who  obtained  from 
David  I.  lands  in  Haddingtonshire,  and  was  the  ancestor  of 
the  noble  familv  of  Scton,  earls  of  Winton.  He  was  the 
son  of  Dugal  de  Say,  by  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  De  Quincy, 
earl  of  W^inchester,  constable  of  Scotland.  Alexander  de  So- 
ton,  son  of  Secher,  witnessed  a  charter  of  David  I.,  to  Wil- 
liam de  Riddell  of  the  lands  of  Riddell  in  Roxburghshire. 
He  was  proprietor  of  Seton  and  Winton  in  East  I^thian, 
and  Winchburgh  in  Linlithgowshire,  and  his  son,  Philip  de 
Scton,  got  a  charter  of  these  lands  from  William  the  Lion,  to 
be  held  in  c^nte  of  the  crown.  Philip*s  eldest  son.  Sir  Al- 
exander de  Seton,  witnessed  many  charters  of  Alexander  IL, 
and  also  a  donation  of  Sayer  de  Quincy,  earl  of  Winchester, 
to  the  abbacy  of  Dunfennline,  before  1233.  His  son,  Serlo 
or  Secher  de  Seton,  had  two  sons  and  a  daughter,  Sir  Alex- 
ander, Sur  John,  and  Barbara,  the  wife  of  Sir  William  Keith, 
great  marischal  of  Scotland.  Among  those  who  swore  fealty 
to  Edward  I.  in  1296  was  Alisaundre  de  Seton,  vallct,  Rich- 
ard de  Seton,  del  counte  de  Dunfres,  and  John  de  Seton  of 
the  same  county.  Sir  Alcx.inder,  the  elder  son,  was  father 
of  Sir  Christopher  Seton,  who  married  Lady  Chriintian  Bmcc, 
third  daughter  of  Robert  eari  of  Carrick,  sister  of  King  Ro- 
bert 1.,  widow  of  Grotney,  earl  of  Mar.  Ho  was  one  of  the 
principal  supporters  of  his  brother-in-law,  and  was  present  at 


his  coronation  at  Soone  27th  March  130^    At  the 
troua  battle  of  Methven,  13th  Jane  following,  he 
Brace  when  he  was  unhoned  by  Philip  de  Mowbray.    He 
aflerwarda  shut  himself  up  in  Lochdoon  castle  in  Ayrduri, 
and  on  its  surrender  to  the  English,  Sir  Christopher  Setoa 
was,  by  order  of  Edward  I.,  executed  at  Dumfriet.    He  ap- 
pears to  have  been  succeeded  by  his  brother  Sir  Alexander 
Seton,  who  signed,  with  other  patriotic  nobles,  the  famoos 
letter  to  the  Pope  in  1820,  asserting  the  independenoe  of 
Scotland.    He  had  grants  from  King  Robert  I.  of  Taxions 
lands,  as  well  as  of  the  manor  of  Tranent  and  other  eztensivo 
possessions  previously  belonging  to  the  noble  family  of  De 
Quincy,  attainted  for  thdr  espoosal  of  the  canse  of  Edward. 
He  also  got  the  lands  of  Falside  or  Fawside,  forfeited  by  Al- 
exander de  Such,  who  married  one  of  the  dangfaten  and 
heiresses  of  Roger  de  Quincy,  earl  of  Winchester.    Falside 
castle,  situated  near  the  boundary  with  Inveresk,  was  one  of 
the  ancient  strong  fortalioes  of  the  Setons.     A  yonngv 
branch  of  the  family  styled  themselves  the  Setons  of  Falsids. 
Their  principal  castle  was  Niddry  in  Linlithgowshire,  the 
rains  of  which  still  remain.    Sir  Alexander  de  Seton  had  a 
safe-conduct  into  England  7th  January  1320,  and  Robert  L 
applied  for  another,  21st  March  1327,  for  hun  to  treat  with 
the  English.    He  was  governor  of  the  town  of  Berwick  when 
it  was  besieged  by  the  English  in  1338.    His  son  Thomas 
was  given  as  a  hostage  to  King  Edward  III.,  that  that  place 
would  bo  surrendered  on  a  certain  day  if  not  relieved  before 
then.    Sir  William  Keith  having  arrived  with  sucoonrs,  as- 
sumed the  governorship,  and  refused  to  deliver  np  the  town. 
Edward  ordered  Thomas  Seton,  and,  some  acconnts  say,  two 
sons  of  Keith,  who  had  fallen  into  his  hands,  to  be  executed 
in  sight  of  the  besieged.    The  day  after  the  defeat  of  the 
Scots  army  at  Halidon-hill,  19th  July  1333,  Berwick  sor- 
rendered  to  the  English.    Sir  Alexander  Seton  was  present 
in  Edward   Baliors  parliament,   10th  February  following, 
when  he  witnessed  the  concession  of  Berwick  to  the  English. 
He  had  a  safe-conduct  to  go  to  England,  15th  October  1337, 
and  in  August  1340,  he  was  one  of  the  hostages  for  John, 
earl  of  Moray,  when  he  was  liberated  for  a  time.     He  ap- 
pears to  have  entered  into  a  religious  order  in  his  old  age,  as 
**  Frater  Alexander  de  Seton  miles,  hospitalis  sancti  Johan- 
nis  Jerasalem  in  Scotia**  had  a  safe-conduct  into  England  oa 
the  affairs  of  David  IL,  12th  August  1348.     By  his  wifc^ 
Christian,  daughter  of  Cheyne  of  Straloch,  he  had  three  soof 
and  a  daughter,  namely,  Alexander,  killed  in  oppo«ng  the 
landing  of  Edward  Baliol  near  Kinghom,  6th  August  18SS; 
Thomas,  already  mentioned;  and  William,  drowned  in  aa 
attack  on  the  English  fleet  at  Berwick,  in  sight  of  his  father, 
in  July  1333.    Tlte  daughter,  Margaret,  became  heiress  of 
Seton.    She  married  Alan  de  Wyntoun,  supposed  tohsTt 
been  a  cadet  of  the  Scton  family.    This  marriage,  we  an 
told,  produced  a  feud  in  East  Lothian,  and  oceanoned  mora 
than  a  hundred  ploughs  to  be  laid  aside  from  labour.    Hii 
children  took  the  name  of  Seton.   He  died  in  the  Holy  Land, 
leaving  a  son.  Sir  William  Seton,  and  a  daughter,  ChristiiB 
or  Margaret,  countess  of  Dunbar  and  March. 

The  only  son.  Sir  William  Seton  of  Seton,  viated  Jeran- 
lem.  He  lived  previously  to  1366,  and  it  is  recorded  of  him 
that  he  "  was  the  first  creatit  and  maid  lord  in  the  parlia- 
ment, and  he  and  his  posteritie  to  have  ane  voit  yairin  aad 
be  callit  Lords."  Accordingly,  in  the  Records  of  the  Scottish 
parliament,  held  at  Scone  26th  ^farch  1371,  at  the  corona- 
tion of  Robert  IL,  William  de  Seton  is  named  among  the 
"  Nobiles  Barones,**  as  "  Dominus  de  Seton.**  He  married 
Catherine,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Sinclair  of  Hermandstoi, 
and  had,  with  four  daughters,  two  sons.  Sir  John  and  Sir 


SETON,  i: 

Lord  Saton  itm  one  of  btr  chief  mppaiteri  it  CubexTj  Hill, 
and  whmi  aha  mida  lier  escape  from  Loehleven  outla  in  Iha 
beginning  dT  Uijr  1568,  ha  ou  lyini;  Kcntij  among  the  hilla 
on  the  other  ude,  and  immediately  joining  her,  condacted 
her  flnt  to  hia  caitie  of  Niddrj,  in  Linlithgowehire,  uti  then 
to  Uamilton.  He  iroa  preeent  at  tha  bnttia  of  Lungiide,  and 
oo  the  defeat  of  the  qoeen't  foreea  then,  nlired  to  Flandeie. 
He  reouuaed  tiro  yean  in  exile,  and  for  liie  liring  «ai  com- 
pelled to  become  a  iraggoner.  A  piinCing  of  liim  driring  ■ 
wags™  *'^^  f"'"'  ^"tf  *">  '1  the  north  end  of  the  long 
lialleiy  of  Seton.  He  wu  in  Scatlind  in  the  apring  of  ISiO 
•ctirtlj  employed  on  behalf  of  Qnten  Slaij.  He  w«»  one  of 
the  noblea  of  her  faction  who  ligned  the  letter  to  Qneen  Eli- 
wbeth,  dated  in  Maich  of  that  year.  On  the  report  that  tha 
lords  of  the  king's  party  wer«  to  coma  to  Kdinborgh  on  the 
Snt  of  tlay,  (ome  of  tha  qoeeu'e  lords  left  tha  town,  bnt 
'  Lord  Seton  aawmhied  )iii  fonea  at  the  palace  of  Ha)Trood- 
houe,  and  br«t[ged  that  be  would  enter  in  the  town,  and 
eansa  beat  a  dram,  in  deepita  of  all  the  carles.  He  bad  in 
company  with  him  the  Lady  NorthDmberland."  Thii  lady 
was  in  Scotland  on  the  captiTs  qoRn's  behalf,  and  the  eune 
year  she  waa  lent  with  Lord  Seton  to  the  Low  Coantriea  to 
•olidt  the  usietanea  of  the  duiie  of  Alva  for  the  friends  of 
Mary's  canae  in  Scotland.  On  the  downrall  of  the  Regent 
Morton  in  IfiSl,  he  waa  committed  to  the  chargo  of  Lord 
Seton  and  enadiy  other  noblemen,  to  be  convtyed  to  Dam- 
barton  caatle.  In  January  of  the  ume  year  he  waa  one  of 
the  lorda  of  Iha  king's  hooaehold,  who  snbscribed  Che  S«wnd 
Confeaion  of  Faith,  commonly  called  the  King's  Confeseion. 
H(  waj  one  of  tlie  jnry  on  Horton'a  trial,  and  with  the  laird 
of  WauchtoD  wai  objected  Co  by  him,  aa  known  Co  be  bit  en- 


8  FIFTH  LOBD. 

emies.    At  hia  execution,  ■■  Lord  Seton  lod  hin  ttn  m 
stood  in  a  atair,  aouth-eait  from  tb*  oroa."     Ha  wu  aaa 
the  noblanwD  who  conreyed  the  dnke  of  Lenixa  do  U*  w^ 
to  England  in  Deeembei  1S82,  wbsi  ordend  oat  of  Scotl) 
The  following  year  ha  was  oomplainad  npmi  by  tlM  ^nodal 
aaaemhly  of  I^thian  for  entertuning  of  "  Seminuy  prieMi  ~ 
In  Jannary  1U4,  be  wai  tent  by  King  James  VL  anitiaw 
dor  to  Franoa.     He  died  aoon  aftu  hie  retnn,  on  SUi  Jam 
aiy  1ESS,  aged  elwat  G5,  and  waa  boriad  ia  tbe  faiDily  m 
at  Seton,  where  there  ia  a  monament  to  bU  menury.     Bj 
his  wife,  laabel,  danghtar  of  Sir  Willjun  Hamilton  of  Sa- 
qnhar,  bigb-treamrer  of  Sootlaod,  ha  bad  fln  boo*  end 
danghter,  Marguet,  married  to  Ldrd  Claod  HanQtoa.    Tke 
Boni  were,  1.  George,  mastv  ul  Seton,  wbo  predeoeaMd  Ui 
father  in  Uaroh  1583.     S.  Bobert,  utb  Lord  BebUL     •.  Sir 
John  SeCon,  Lord  Barai,  of  whom  afterwarda.     4.  AkxaB- 
der  SeCon  of  Ploacardine.  fint  earl  of  Dnnfarmline,  (na  vaL 
ti.p.101).   S.  SirWilliamSetonof  Eyllimiare,  alieriffof  Ud 
l^thtan  and  postmaatar  of  Scotland.      It  ia   related  tbat 
George,  fifth  Ijird  Seton,  dcolined  the  digni^of  earidain, 
being  anwilling  to  forego  what  he  conaidered  a  gnat  diatioo- 


f*ct  in  the  following  linea : 


An  engraring  of  tha  Seton  family  from  a  punting  by  Sir 
Anlonlo  Mare,  csnaisting  of  Lord  Seton  and  fiTsyoiuigeat 
children,  is  givtn  in  Tinkerton's  Scottish  GaUef^.  The  ftl- 
lowing  ia  a  woodcut  of  it: 


SETON, 


440 


OF  MOUNIE. 


one  dated  19th  November  1622,  another,  20th  Jnlj  162G, 
and  the  third,  10th  July  1630. 

His  son,  John  Seton  of  Pitmcdden,  accompanied  the  earl 
of  Errol,  lord-high-constable  of  Scotland,  at  the  coronation 
of  Charles  1.  in  1633.  He  was  a  steadj  loyalist,  and  in  May 
1638,  the  marquis  of  Huntly  having  been  appointed  the  king*8 
lieutenant  in  the  north,  is  ssud  to  have  sent  the  following 
letter  to  him :  "  Right  special  cousin.  Being  resolved,  upon  a 
special  commission  from  the  king,  to  be  present  at  Dalkeith, 
6th  June,  for  attending  his  majesty^s  service  there,  and  being 
desirous  of  both  the  company  and  advice  of  my  best  friends, 
as  occasion  may  offer,  I  heartily  entreat  yon,  as  one  in  whom 
I  confide,  to  meet  me  at  Fettercairn  upon  Friday  1  June  at 
night,  for  accompanying  me  in  that  journey ;  and  it  shall 
oblige  me  at  other  times  to  acquit  myself  in  your  occasions, 
as  one  who  is  your  assured  cousin,  Huntly.'*  Tliis  letter, 
quoted  from  Douglas*  Baronage^  is  dated  "Aberdeen,  21  st 
May  1638,*'  but  Huntly  was  at  that  date  a  prisoner  in  Edin- 
burgh castle.  The  date  probably  should  be  March.  On  the 
roarquis*8  second  son,  the  Viscount  Aboyne,  arriving  at  Aber- 
deen in  June,  as  commander  of  the  king's  forces  in  the  north, 
Seton  joined  his  standard.  He  commanded  a  detachment 
of  loyalist  troops  at  the  battle  of  the  Bridge  of  Dee,  and 
while  riding  along  the  river  side  with  Lord  Aboyne,  he  was  shot 
through  the  heart  by  a  cannon-ball,  being  then  only  in  his 
29th  year.  In  consequence,  his  descendants  have  a  heart, 
with  drops  of  blood  issning  from  it,  in  the  centre  of  their 
coat  of  arms.  He  hod  two  sons,  James  and  Alexander,  both 
infants  at  their  father's  death.  With  their  mother  they  were 
driven  from  their  house,  which  wns  plundered,  and  the  whole 
rents  of  their  estates  seized  by  the  Covenanters.  In  1640, 
they  were  placed  by  the  king  under  the  guardianship  of  their 
kinsman,  George,  earl  of  Winton.  Their  mother  married  the 
earl  of  Hartfell,  and  on  her  death,  Winton  took  them  into 
his  own  family.  In  1649,  he  sent  them  to  the  university  of 
Aberdeen.  After  completing  their  education,  J.imes,  the 
elder  son,  proprietor  of  Pitmedden,  went  upon  the  continent, 
and  visited  moat  of  the  courts  of  Europe.  He  returned  home 
at  the  Restoration,  and  became  an  officer  in  the  English  fleet 
under  the  duke  of  York.  He  was  present  in  the  desperate 
engagement  near  Hant'ich,  where  the  English  obtained  a  sig- 
nal victory  over  the  Dutch,  8d  June  1665.  In  the  attack  of 
the  Dutch  on  the  English  fleet  at  Chatham,  in  1667,  he  was 
severely  wounded,  and  died  of  his  wounds  at  London  soun 
after,  without  issue. 

His  brother,  Sir  Alexander,  succeeded  him.  He  passed 
advocate  at  the  Scottish  bar  10th  December  1661,  and  was 
knighted  by  Charles  II.,  in  1664.  He  was  appointed  on  or- 
dinary lord  of  session  31st  October  1677,  when  he  assumed 
the  title  of  Lord  Pitmedden,  and  a  lord  of  justiciary  5th  July 
1682.  He  was  created  a  baronet  of  Nova  Scotia  by  royal 
patent,  15th  January  1684.  He  represented  the  county  of 
Aberdeen  in  the  Scots  parliament,  and  for  his  boldness  and 
independence  in  opposing  the  measures  of  James  VI  I.,  he 
was  deprived  by  that  monarch  of  his  seat  on  the  bench.  At 
the  Revolution  he  was  offered  to  bo  restored  as  a  lord  of  ses- 
sion and  justiciary,  but  he  declined,  as  inconsistent  with  the 
oaths  he  had  previously  taken.  He  died,  at  an  advanced 
age,  in  1719.  According  to  Wodrow,  he  possessed  a  vast 
and  curious  library.  He  published  an  edition  of  Sir  George 
Afackenzie's  '  Law  of  Scotland  in  matters  Criminal,*  with  a. 
treatise  on  Mutilation  and  Demembration,  annexed.  He 
bad,  with  five  daughters,  five  sons.  Of  these  may  be  men- 
tioned Sir  William,  second  baronet ;  George,  ancestor  of  the 
Setons  of  Mounie ;  and  Alexander,  a  physician,  who  served 
under  the  duke  of  Marlborough. 


Sir  William,  second  baronet,  waa,  in  hu  father's  lifetime, 
M.P.  for  the  county  of  Aberdeen,  from  1702  to  1706.  He 
was  one  of  the  commissioners  to  treat  of  the  Union,  and  af- 
terwards one  of  the  commissioners  of  eqnivaleDt.  With  four 
daughters,  he  had  five  sons,  and  died  in  1744. 

His  eldest  son,  Sir  Alexander,  third  baronet,  was  an  oflSeer 
in  the  guards.  Dying  without  issue,  his  next  brother,  Sr 
William,  became  fourth  baronet  He  also  died  without  isne, 
and  was  succeeded  by  his  next  brother,  Sur  Archibald  Seton, 
R.N.  On  his  decease,  without  issue,  the  title  devolved  on 
his  nephew,  Su:  William,  sixth  baronet,  the  son  of  a  younger 
brother,  Charles.  Sir  William  died  in  1819.  He  bad  8 
sons  and  2  daughters.  Charles,  the  eldest  son,  died  young. 
James,  the  2d  son,  major  99th  Highlanders,  was  killed  in  the 
Peninsular  war  in  1814. 

His  only  son,  Sir  William  Coote  Seton,  sncoeeded  hu  gnnd- 
father  as  7th  baronet  Bom  Dec  19,  1808,  he  passed  advo- 
cate in  1831.  He  married  Eliza- Henrietta,  2d  daughter  of 
Henry  Lumsden,  Esq.  of  Cnshnie,  Aberdeenshire,  and  widow 
of  Captain  Wilson,  East  India  Company's  service ;  issue,  5 
sons  and  3  daughters.  The  eldest  son,  James  LamsdeOf 
lieutenant,  1st  Madras  fusiliers,  was  born  in  1835. 

The  Setons  of  Abercom,  Linlithgowshire,  are  descended 
from  Sir  Alexander  Seton,  eldest  son  of  Alexander  Seton, 
earl  of  Huntly,  by  his  second  wife.  He  inherited  the  lands 
of  Touch  and  Tullibody,  and  was  appointed  heritable  armonr- 
bearer  and  squire  of  the  body  to  James  III.  From  his  son, 
Sir  Alexander  Seton  of  Touch,  came  in  a  direct  line,  Sir 
William  Seton  of  Abercom,  created  a  baronet  of  Nova  Sootia 
in  1663,  with  remainder  to  his  heirs  male  whatsoever.  His 
eldest  son,  Sir  "Walter,  advocate  and  commissary-derk  of 
Edinburgh,  2d  baronet,  was  succeeded  by  his  son.  Sir  Henry, 
Sd  baronet  On  the  death,  without  issue,  of  the  last  James 
Seton  of  Touch,  he  became  undoubted  male  heir  of  Sir  Alex- 
ander Seton,  eldest  son  of  1st  e.arl  of  Huntly.  Sir  Henry  died 
in  1751.  His  son.  Sir  Henry  Seton  of  Culbeg,  baronet, 
was  father  of  Sir  Alexander,  6th  hart.,  who  died  in  India  in 
1810.  He  TO.  in  1795,  Lydia,  5th  daughter  of  Sir  Charl'S 
William  Blunt,  baronet,  and  had  5  sons  and  1  daughter. 

The  eldest  son.  Sir  Henry  John  Seton,  bom  April  4, 1796, 
5tii  baronet  of  Abcrcorn,  and  one  of  the  grooms  in  waiting  to 
her  majesty,  Queen  Victoria,  served  in  the  Peninsolar  wsr. 
He  claims  to  be  direct  male  heir  of  Sir  Alexander  Seton,  Ist 
Lord  Gordon.  His  next  brother,  Charles  Hay,  bom  in  1797, 
married  in  1829,  Caroline,  daughter  of  W.  P.Hodges,  Esq.; 
issue,  a  son. 

Of  the  family  of  Touch  was  Sir  Alexander  Seton,  (knighted 
by  diaries  I.  in  1633,)  2d  son  of  James  Seton  of  Touch,  7th 
generation  from  Alexander  Seton,  Ix>rd  Gordon,  in  a  direct 
male  line.  Appointed  an  ordinary  lord  of  session,  as  Loni 
Kilcreuch,  Feb.  14,  1626,  he  resigned  his  seat  June  6,  1637. 
His  grandson.  Sir  Walter  Seton  of  Culbeg,  was  created  a 
baronet  of  Nova  Scotia  in  1633,  to  him  and  his  heirs  null 
whatsoever.  The  Setons  of  Touch  are  represented  by  tin 
family  of  Scton-Steuart,  baronet.     (See  Steuart.) 

The  Setons  of  Mounie,  Aberdeenshire,  are  a  branch  of  the 
Setons  of  Pitmedden.  George  Seton  of  Mounie,  the  first  rf 
the  family,  was  second  son  of  Sir  Alexander  Seton,  Ifid 
Pitmedden.  His  son,  William  Seton  of  Mounie,  died  un- 
married, when  the  estate  devolved  on  his  eldest  sister,  Mar- 
garet, married  to  James  Anderson  of  Cobenshaw,  (of  the 
Andersons  of  Broughton,  Northumberland,  from  whom  the 
earls  of  Yarborough  in  England  are  descended,)  who  assomed 
the  name  of  Seton.   They  had,  with  other  issue,  a  son,  Alex- 


I,   . 


J! 


J 


SHARP, 


442 


ARCHBISHOP  JAMES. 


dial  college,  Aberdeen,  on  quitting  which  he  pro- 
ceeded iuto  England,  and  visited  the  universities 
of  Oxford  and  Cambridge.  On  the  recommenda- 
tion of  the  celebrated  Alexander  Henderson,  he 
subsequently  obtained  the  professorship  of  philo  • 
sopliy  in  the  university  of  St.  Andrews.  In 
1648,  at  the  request  of  Mr.  James  Bruce,  min- 
ister of  Kingsbarns,  he  was  presented  by  the  earl 
of  Crawford  to  the  church  and  parish  of  Crail,  on 
which  he  resigned  hA  chair.  Remarkable  in  his 
eai'ly  career  for  his  attachment  to  Presbyterianism, 
he  enjoyed  the  full  confidence,  and  took  part  in 
all  the  councils,  of  the  leaders  of  the  church  of 
Scotland,  and  in  1650  was  elected  one  of  the  min- 
isters of  Edinburgh,  but  the  troubles  of  the  time 
consequent  on  CromwelFs  invasion  of  Scotland 
prevented  his  acceptance  of  the  call. 

In  August  1651  he  and  a  number  of  other  minis- 
ters, with  some  of  the  nobility,  were  sui-prised  by 
a  party  of  the  English  at  Alyth,  in  Angus,  at 
the  time  General  Monk  was  besieging  Dundee, 
and  being  put  on  board  a  ship  at  Broughty  Ferry, 
were  carried  prisoners  to  London.  He  seems  to 
have  obtained  the  favour  of  Cromwell,  who  set 
him  at  liberty,  while  the  rest  were  retained  for 
some  time  in  confinement. 

When  the  division  took  place  among  the  Pres- 
byterians of  Resolutioners  and  Protesters,  Shai*p 
joined  the  foi-mer,  and  in  1657  was  sent  by  his 
party  to  London  to  plead  their  cause  with  Crom- 
well, in  opposition  to  Messrs.  James  Guthrie, 
Patrick  Gillespie,  and  the  other  commissioners 
from  the  Protesters.  On  this  occasion  he  so  much 
distinguished  himself  by  his  address  that  Cromwell 
remarked  to  the  bystanders,  "That  gentleman, 
after  the  Scotch  way,  should  be  called  Shai-p  of 
that  ilk."  Ill  January  1660,  on  the  prospect  of 
the  Restoration,  he  was  again,  with  five  ministers 
of  Edinburgh,  despatched  to  London  by  the  lead- 
ing ministers  on  the  side  of  the  Resolutioners,  to 
communicate  the  views  of  their  party  to  Monk. 
He  remained  in  London  till  May  4,  when  he  was 
sent  by  Monk  to  Breda,  to  procure  the  sanction  of 
Charles  II.  to  the  proposed  settlement  of  the  ec- 
clesiastical affairs  of  Scotland.  He  returned  to 
I^ndon,  May  26,  and  appears  to  have  continued 
there  till  about  the  middle  of  August,  being  all 
the  time  in  close  communication  with  the  princi- 


pal leading  persons  and  paities  of  the  day,  main- 
taining, at  the  same  time,  an  active  correspondenee 
with  the  Presbyterian  clergy  of  Scotland,  irbo 
placed  their  entire  confidence  in  him.  A  fall  ab- 
stract of  his  letters  on  the  occasion,  which  are 
preserved  in  the  library  of  the  aniversity  of  Ghu- 
gow,  will  be  found  in  Wodrow*s  Histoiy. 

When  he  returned  to  Scotland,  he  delivered  to 
Mr.  Robert  Douglas  a  letter  from  the  king,  to  be 
communicated  to  the  presbytery  of  Edinboigfa,  in 
which  his  majesty  declared  his  resolution  to  pro- 
tect and  preserve  the  government  of  the  Chnith 
of  Scotland,  as  "  settled  by  law;*'  a  phrase  which 
completely  blinded  the  clergy  to  the  designs  of 
Charles,  and  their  representative,  Sharp,  who  ap- 
pears by  this  time  to  have  been  gained  over,  for 
the  introduction  of  pi'elacy.  On  the  subversion 
by  parliament  of  the  Pi-esbyterian  Church  m 
August  1661,  the  royal  pledge  was  thus  at  once 
transferred  to  the  support  of  that  episcopacy  which 
had  been  overthrown  in  1638,  and  which  the  peo- 
ple of  Scotland  could  never  be  prevailed  upon  to 
recognise  as  the  national  religion. 

During  his  absence  in  England,  Sharp  had  been 
elected  professor  of  divinity  in  St.  Mary's  college, 
St.  Andrews.  lie  was  also  appoint^jd  his  majesty's 
chaplain  for  Scotland,  with  a  salary  of  £200  per 
annum. 

Having,  on  the  rising  of  parliament,  again  gone 
up  to  London,  he  was  nominated  aix^hbishop  of 
St.  Andrews,  and  he  and  three  others  were  con- 
secrated with  great  pomp  at  Westminster,  Decem- 
ber 15,  1671.  On  his  return  from  London  m 
April,  he  and  his  coadjutors,  Fairfoul,  bishop  of 
Glasgow,  and  Hamilton,  bishop  of  Galloway,  en- 
tered Edinburgh  in  great  state,  and  soon  after 
Sharp  went  over  to  Fife,  and  having  dined  at 
Abbotshall  with  Sir  Andrew  Ramsay,  on  the  15th 
of  that  month,  he  proceeded  to  Lesley  House. 
The  earl  of  Rothes  had  prepared  a  sort  of  triumphsl 
progress  for  him,  by  writing  to  several  persons 
and  corporations  to  meet  liim  at  different  points 
of  the  route,  so  that  the  cavalcade  swelled  to  seven 
or  eight  hundred  horsemen.  Among  the  company 
were  the  earls  of  Rothes,  Leven,  and  Kellie;  Lord 
Newark;  Sir  AVilliam  Scott  of  Ardross,  John 
Lundie  of  Lundie,  Dr.  Alexander  Martin  of 
Strathcndrie,   Arthur  Forbes  of  Hires,  Thomas 


SHARP, 


444 


ARCHBISHOP  JAMES. 


bishop :  Soon  after  passing  the  farm-hoose  of 
Magns,  between  eleven  and  twelve  o'clock,  the 
coachman,  looking  ronnd,  saw  the  conspirators 
riding  at  full  speed,  pistols  in  hand,  witii  swords 
drawn,  and  hanging  from  their  wrists;  and  he 
immediately  called  to  the  postillion  to  drive  on, 
for  he  suspected  their  pursners  had  evil  intentions. 
Finding  his  coach  driven  at  such  an  increased 
speed,  his  grace  looked  out  to  see  what  was  the 
cause.  Russell  was  by  this  time  so  near  as  to  see 
and  recognise  the  archbishop.  He  immediately 
fired  and  called  to  the  rest  to  come  up.  The  pri- 
mate urged  the  coachman  to  drive  on,  and  he  kept 
on  for  half-a-mile  at  the  same  rapid  rate.  One 
Henderson,  who  was  best  mounted,  got  ahead  of 
the  postillion,  and,  after  wounding  him  in  the 
face,  cut  his  horse^s  hams.  The  coach  being  thus 
stopped,  was  immediately  surrounded  by  the  pur- 
suing party.  On  this,  Shai-p,  turning  to  his 
daughter,  exclaimed,  "  Lord  have  mercy  on  me ! 
My  poor  child,  I  am  gone  !"  They  then  fired  into 
the  coach,  and  wounded  him  two  inches  below  the 
collar-bone,  the  ball  entering  between  the  second 
and  third  ribs.  This  pistol  was  fired  so  close  to 
his  body  that  the  wadding  burnt  his  gown,  and 
was  rubbed  off  by  Miss  Sharp.  One  of  them, 
named  George  Fleman,  then  rode  forward,  and 
seized  the  horses'  reins  on  the  near  side,  and  held 
them  till  George  Balfour  had  fired  into  the  coach. 
James  Russell  alighted,  and,  taking  Fleman's 
sword,  opened  the  coach  door,  and  desired  "Ju- 
das" to  come  forth,  saying  that  the  blood  he  had 
shed  was  crying  to  Heaven  for  vengeance  on  him, 
at  the  same  time  thrusting  his  sword  at  him,  he 
wounded  him  in  the  region  of  the  kidneys.  John 
Balfour,  who  was  still  on  horseback,  also  com- 
manded him  to  come  forth,  and  fired  his  pistol 
at  him.  James  Russell  desired  him  again  to 
come  forth,  "  and  make  ready  for  death,  judg- 
ment, and  eteniity."  The  archbishop  addressing 
them,  said,  *'  Gentlemen,  if  you  will  spare  my  life, 
whatever  else  yon  will  please  to  do,  you  shall 
never  be  questioned  for  it."  His  daughter  now 
sprung  out,  and  falling  on  her  knees,  with  tears 
and  prayers  begged  her  father's  life,  but  she  ap- 
pealed to  them  in  vain.  Sharp  then  came  out  of 
the  coach,  and  said  that  "  he  did  not  know  that 
he  had  ever  injured  any  of  them,  but  if  he  had,  he 


was  ready  to  make  reparation,  beseeching  them 
to  spare  his  life,  and  lie  would  never' trouble  tbem 
for  that  violence ;  bnt  prayed  tbem  to  consider, 
before  they  brought  the  guilt  of  innocent  blood 
upon  themselves.'*  After  receiving  various  wounds 
from  their  swords,  Balfour  gave  him  a  tremendous 
cut  above  the  left  eye,  on  which  he  exclaimed, 
"Kow  yon  have  done  the  turn,**  and  then  fell 
forward,  with  his  head  resting  on  his  arms.  Miss 
Sharp  was  all  this  time  held  by  Andrew  Gnillan, 
with  the  view  of  securing  her  from  danger,  when 
interposing  herself  between  her  father  and  the 
conspirators.  The  spot  where  the  assassination 
took  place  is  still  marked  by  a  stone  erected  to 
the  memory  of  Gnillan,  a  weaver  lad,  one  of  the 
only  two  of  the  party  who  were  executed  for  the 
deed,  the  other  being  Hackstou  of  Rathillct,  nei- 
ther of  whom,  it  is  remarkable,  had  any  actual 
pui-ticipation  in  the  murder.  Rathillct,  according 
to  the  historians  of  the  time,  remained  aloof,  on 
horseback,  his  face  muffled  in  his  cloak,  but  near 
enough  to  be  recognised  by  Sharp,  who  appealed 
to  him,  as  a  gentleman,  to  protect  him,  to  which, 
according  to  Guillan's  account,  Rathillct  replied, 
"  I  shall  never  lay  hand  on  you." 

According  to   "the  evidence  of  two  persons 
who  were  present,"  as  presei*ved  by  Kirkton,  (Se- 
cret and  True  History  of  the  Kirk  of  Scotland^  p. 
421,)  the  conspiratoi*s  first  "poured  in  on  the 
bishop's  body  a  shower  of  ball ;"  but  one  of  them 
having  heard  his  daughter  say  to  the  coachman, 
"  There  is  life  in  my  father  yet,'*  they  "  forced 
him  out  of  the  coach,"  and  "  discharged  a  new 
shower  of  shot  on  him,  on  which  he  fell  back,  and 
lay  as  dead.     Some  gave  him  a  prick  with  a 
sword,  on  which  he  raised  himself.     Then  thej 
saw  shooting  would    not  doe,   and  drew   their 
swords.    On  the  sight  of  cold  iron  his  courage 
failed,  and  he  made  hideouse  schriecks  as  ever 
wer  heard ;  one  of  them  gave  him  a  blow  on  tbc 
f\ice,  and  his  chafts  fell  down ;   then  he  spoke 
somewhat,  but  it  could  not  be  nndci*stood ;  they 
redoubled  their  stroaks  and  killed  him  outright." 
The  assassination  of  Archbishop  Sharp  forms  the 
subject  of  an  admirable  painting  by  Sir  William 
Allan,  which  has  been  engraved.      The  event 
brought  much  opprobrium  on  the  Presbyterians, 
"  though  unjustly,"  says  Sir  Walter  Scott,  "  for 


.! 


I 


1/ 


I     / 


SriARPE. 


446 


SHAW. 


Kirkton,  with  an  account  of  the  murder  of  Arch- 
bishop Shai-pe,  by  James  Russell,  an  actor  there- 
in,' Edinburgli,  4 to.    To  this  work  he  appended 
a  series  of  Notes  remarkable  for  their  piquancy. 
In  1820  he  published  an  edition  of  the  Rev.  Ro- 
bert Law's  *  Mcmorialls,  or  the  considerable  things 
that  fell  out  within  this  island  of  Great  Britain 
from  1638  to  1684,*  Edinburgh,  4to.     This  work, 
it  is  said  in  Watf  s  *  Bibliotheca  Britannica/  foi-ms 
a  collection  of  ])erhaps  the  best  selected  tales  of 
witchcraft  and  wizardy  which  has  been  yet  pub- 
lished.   In  1823  he  produced  his  'BaUad  Book,'  a 
small  collection  of  Scottish  ballads,  inscribed  to 
the  editor  of  the  Border  Minstrelsy.    In  1827  he 
edited   *The  Life  of  Lady  Margaret  Cunning- 
hame,'  and  a  naiTative  of  the  *  Conversion  of  Lady 
Wanistoun.'    In  1828  he  edited  for  the  Banna- 
tyne  Club  the  *  Letters  of  Lady  Margaret  Ken- 
nedy,' or  Burnet,  to  John,  duke  of  Lauderdale, 
and  in  1829,  for  the  same  Club,  the  '  Lettei-s  of 
Archibald,  Earl  of  Argyle,'  to  the  same  noble- 
mau.    lie  also  furnished  the  curious  engravings 
illustrative  of  Sir  Richard  i^Iaitland's  '  History  of 
the  House  of  Seton  to  the  year  1659,  with  the 
continuation  by  Alexander  Viscount  Kingston  to 
1G87,'  printed  for  the  Maitland  Club  in  1829.    A 
small  collection  of  his  characteristic  etchings  ap- 
pealed in  1833,  under  the  title  of  *  Portraits  by 
an  Amateur.'    In  1837  he  edited  *  Minuets  and 
Songs  by  Thomas  sixth  Earl  of  Kelly,'  and  *  Sar- 
gundo,  or  the  Valiant   Christian,' — a  Romanist 
song  of  triumph  for  the   victory  of  the  Popish 
earls  of  Glenlivat  iu  1594.     Of  these  works  the 
impressions  were  limited,  and  they  arc  not  much 
known,  except  to  antiquaries  and  bibliographers. 
AVhen  Sir  Walter  Scott  began  to  keep  a  diary  in 
November  1825,  about  the  first  portrait  ho  in- 
scribed in  it,  was  that  of  the  subject  of  this  no- 
tice.    **Chai*les  Kirkpatrick  Sharpe,"  it  begins, 
"  is  another  very  remarkable  man.     He  was  bred 
a  clergyman,   but  never  took  orders.     He  has 
infinite  wit,  and  a  great  turn  for  antiquarian  lore, 
as  the  publications  of  Kirkton,  &c.,  bear  witness. 
His  drawings  arc  the  most    fanciful  and  droll 
imaginable — a   mixture    between    Hogarth    and 
some  of  those  foreign  masters  who  painted  temp- 
tations of  St.  Anthony,  and  such  grotesque  sub- 
jects.   As  a  poi)t  he  has  not  a  very  strong  touch. 


Strange  that  his  finger-ends  can  describe  so  well 
what  be  cannot  bring  ont  clearly  and  firmly  in 
words  I  If  he  were  to  make  drawing  a  resomice 
it  might  raise  him  a  large  income.  Bat  tbongh  a 
lover  of  antiquities,  and,  therefore,  of  expensive 
trifles,  Charles  Kirkpatrick  Sharpe  is  too  aristo- 
cratic to  nse  his  art  to  assist  his  parse.  He  is  a 
very  complete  genealogist,  and  has  made  many 
detections  in  Douglas  and  other  books  on  pedi- 
gree, which  oar  nobles  would  do  well  to  suppress 
if  they  had  an  opportunity.  Strange  that  a  man 
should  be  so  curious  after  scandal  of  centnries  old! 
Not  but  that  Charles  loves  it  fresh  and  fresh  also; 
for  being  very  much  a  fashionable  man,  he  is  al- 
ways master  of  the  reigning  report,  and  he  tells 
the  anecdote  with  such  gusto  that  there  is  no  help- 
ing sjrmpathising  with  him — a  peculiarity  of  voice 
adding  not  a  little  to  the  general  effect.  My  idea  is 
that  Charles  Kirkpatrick  Sharpe,  with  his  oddities, 
tastes,  satire,  and  high  aristocratic  feelings,  re- 
sembles Horace  Walpole — ^perhaps  in  his  person 
also  in  a  general  way,"  One  of  the  great  pub- 
lishing houses  of  London  offered  him  a  large  sum 
for  his  autobiography,  but  he  refused  the  offer. 
Mr.  Sharpe  died  18th  March  1851,  aged  npwanls 
of  70.    His  collection  of  antiquities  was  among 

the  richest  which  any  private  gentleman  had  ever 

I 
accumulated  in  Scotland. 

Shaw,  a  surname,  the  origin  of  which  in  Scotland,  mts  , 
Nisbet,  is  commonlj  attributed  to  one  Shaw«  second  eon  of  • 
Duncan  carl  of  Fife,  who  was  cupbearer  to  Alexander  III.,  | 
and  whose  descendants  assumed  their  surname  from  his  pn^  J 
])er  name,  and  their  armorial  bearings  from  the  badge  of  lit  |' 
office.  In  England  the  word  Shaw  means  a  small  wood  or  | 
copse.  In  the  county  of  Dublin,  Ireland,  there  is  a  familj  "f  ]; 
the  name  of  Shaw,  possessing  a  baronetcy,  which  were  orijri-  i 
nally  Scotch,  and  formed  part  of  the  clan  Chattan.  I 

In  the  Ragman  Roll  is  the  name  of  William  de  Shaw,  one 
of  the  barons  who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  I.  in  1296.  He 
was  the  progenitor  of  the  Shaws  of  Hailiy  and  Somb^.  '.n  ' 
old  family  in  Ayrsliire.  The  principal  family  of  the  nanjc 
was  that  of  Shaw  of  Sauchie,  Stirlingshire.  John  Shaw  of  ' 
Sauchie  was  comptroller  to  James  III.  The  lands  of  Grern- 
ock  were  acquired  in  marriage  by  one  of  his  progenitors  with 
one  of  the  coheirs  of  Galbraith  of  Greenock  in  the  reign  of 
Robert  III.  In  the  reign  of  James  V.,  Alexander  Shaw  of 
Sauchie  gave  the  lands  of  Greenock  in  patrimony  to  John 
Shaw,  his  eldest  son  by  his  second  wife,  Elizabeth,  daughter 
of  William  Cunningham  of  Glengamock.  The  family  of 
Sauchie  failed  in  succession  about  the  end  of  the  seventeenth 
century,  and  have  since  been  represented  by  that  of  Shsw 
Stewart  of  Greenock  and  Blackball.  (^Nisbcfs  fferaJdj-y,  \d. 
i.  p.  43.) 

Tlie  family  of  Shaw  of  Bargarran,  Renfrewshire,  derived 
their  descent  from  a  younger  brother  of  the  family  of  San- 


SHORT. 


448 


SHORTT. 


married  again,  Jatnea  WaUon,  Esq.,  47th  regiment,  son  of 
James  Watson,  Esq.  of  Bridge  Castle,  Ldnlithgowsbire,  wri- 
ter to  the  signet ;  witiiout  issue.  Mrs.  Shedden  Watson  died 
in  Jan.  1861.  She  was  a  great  traveller,  and  had  fomteen 
times  crossed  the  Bay  of  Biscay.  Three  times  she  had  yis- 
ited  Egypt,  and  had  gone  over  the  whole  of  Syria  and  the 
Holy  Land.  She  spoke  several  languages  with  fluency.  For 
A  memoir  of  her  uncle.  Sir  David  J.  Hamilton  Dickson,  see  2d 
vol.  of  this  work,  page  38.  Her  elder  sister,  Jane  Marguerite, 
married  John  Robertson,  Esq.  of  Ednam  House,  Kelso,  with- 
out issue.    This  lady  has  been  a  great  benefactor  to  that  town. 

Robert  Shedden,  the  only  son  of  Mrs.  Shedden  Watson,  by 
her  first  husband,  a  young  and  enterprising  navigator,  was 
cut  off  in  the  spring-time  of  his  days,  while  prosecuting  the 
search  for  the  missing  expedition  to  the  Arctic  regions  under 
Sir  John  Franklin.  Early  in  life  he  entered  the  navy,  and 
served  throughout  the  Chinese  war,  in  which  he  was  severely 
wounded.  In  possession  of  an  ample  fortune,  in  1847  he 
built  the  Kancy  Dawson  yacht  schooner,  in  which  he  sailed 
from  England  in  November  of  that  year,  on  a  voyage  round 
the  world.  At  the  end  of  his  second  year's  absence,  he  touch- 
ed at  Petropaulski,  Kamschatka.  He  fell  in  with  ice  on  the 
passage  through  Behring*s  Straits,  and  found  her  majesty's 
ships,  Herald  and  Plover,  which  had  been  despatched  by 
government  for  Sir  John's  relief,  just  as  they  were  sailing 
from  Kotzebue  Sound.  His  yacht  kept  company  with  them 
fbr  some  days,  and  went  with  the  boats  despatched  from  the 
Plover  round  Point  Barrow,  rendering  great  assistance  to 
the  boat  expedition  to  the  Mackenzie  river.  The  Kancy 
Dawson  sailed  south  in  company  with  the  Herald,  and 
arrived  at  Mazatlan  on  November  11,  1849.  On  the  pas- 
sage Mr.  Shedden  was  extremely  ill,  and  five  days  after  his 
arrival  at  Mazatlan,  he  died  on  the  16th  of  tliat  month,  in 
his  29th  year.  A  park  near  Kelso,  given  by  his  aunt,  Mrs. 
Robertson,  to  the  inhabitants,  is  called  Shedden  Park,  after 
his  name.  She  expended  not  less  than  £3,000  in  its  pur- 
chase and  laying  out.  In  June  18G1  she  presented  to  the 
town  a  valuable  range  of  houses  situated  at  the  west  end  of 
Shedden  Park ;  the  rents  of  which,  amounting  to  about  £50 
a-year,  are  to  be  applied  to  its  embellishment  or  enlargement. 

Mr.  William  Shedden's  brother,  George  Shedden,  Esq.  of 
Panlersbury  Park,  Northamptonshire,  Knockmarloch,  Ayr- 
shire, and  Hadmead,  Buckinghamshire,  married  his  cousin, 
Mary,  elder  daughter  and  coheiress  of  William  Goodrich,  Esq. 
of  Spring  Hill,  Isle  of  Wight;  issue,  8  sons  and  4  daughters. 
He  succeeded  his  father  in  1826. 

In  1861  a  case  relating  to  the  succession  to  the  Rougli- 
wood  property,  which  had  been  before  the  Court  of  Session, 
was  argued  in  the  Probate  Court,  London,  under  the  I^egili- 
macy  Declaration  Act.  A  petition  was  presented  to  the  lat- 
ter court  by  a  gentleman  of  the  name  of  Shedden  and  his 
daughter,  praying  to  be  declared  a  natural  bom  subject  of 
her  majesty  and  the  legitimate  son  of  Mr.  William  Ralston 
Shedden,  deceased,  of  Roughwood,  Ayrshire.  The  latter  had 
gone  to  America  in  1770,  and  afterwards  engaged  in  business. 
In  1790,  being  then  a  widower,  he  is  said  to  have  married  a 
Miss  Wilson,  then  16  years  of  age,  and  by  her  had  2  children, 
of  whom  the  petitioner  was  one.  Miss  Shedden  conducted  her 
father's  case  throughout  with  great  skill,  fluency,  and  eloquence, 
but  the  decision  of  the  court  was  adverse  to  his  claims. 

The  Sheddens  of  Morris  Hill,  also  in  Ayrshire,  descend 
from  John  Shedden,  younger  brother  of  Robert  Shedden,  the 
first  of  Roughwood. 

SHORT,  James,  an  eminent  optician,  the  son 
of  William  Short,  a  joiner  in  Edinburgh,  y^ 


bom  in  that  city,  Jnne  10,  1710.  At  the  sge 
of  ten  he  was  admitted  into  Ilerlot^s  Hospital, 
and  in  1726  was  entered  a  student  of  the  univer- 
sity of  Edinburgh,  where  he  took  his  degree  of 
M.A.  At  the  earnest  solicitation  of  his  grand- 
mother, he  attended  the  divinity  hall,  and  passed 
his  trials,  with  the  view  of  becoming  a  minister, 
but  finding  the  clerical  profession  little  suited  to 
his  genins  for  mechanics,  he  relinquished  it,  with* 
ont  being  licensed.  His  taste  for  mathematics 
having  attracted  the  notice  of  the  celebrated  Mac- 
laurin,  whose  class  he  attended,  he  kindly  per- 
mitted him  the  use  of  his  rooms  in  the  college  for 
his  apparatus,  where  he  commenced  the  practice 
of  his  art,  and,  under  the  superintendence  of  that 
eminent  professor,  ho  made  great  proficiency, 
especially  in  the  casting  and  polishing  of  the  me- 
tallic specula  of  reflecting  telescopes.  In  1736  be 
was  appointed,  by  Queen  Caroline,  mathematical 
tutor  to  William  duke  of  Cumberland.  On  his 
removal  to  London,  he  was  elected  a  fellow  of  the 
Royal  Society,  and  became  a  contributor  of  many 
excellent  papei-s  to  the  Philosophical  Transactions. 
In  1739  he  accompanied  the  earl  of  Morton,  by 
whom  and  the  earl  of  Macclesfield  he  was  much 
patronized,  to  make  a  sui-vcy  of  the  Orkney  Isl- 
ands. On  his  return  to  London,  he  established 
himself  there  as  an  optician,  and  obtained  a  high 
reputation  for  his  skill  in  the  constniction  of  tele- 
scopes, and  other  mathematical  instniments.  He 
died  at  Ncwington  Butts,  near  London,  June  15, 
1768,  leaving  a  fortune  of  about  £20,000,  acquired 
by  his  own  exertions. 

Shortt,  {Schorte^  Schort^  or  Short,}  the  snnuune  of  a 
Dumfries-shire  family,  supposed  to  hare  come  origuislly 
from  Holland.  According  to  tradition,  Archibald  Schort 
was  in  1491  proprietor  of  Cambus  Barron,  StiiiingshiiSi. 
For  their  adherence  to  the  Covenant,  Alexander  and  Robot 
Shortt,  of  this  family,  brothers,  suffered  great  persecutioo. 
The  former  was  obliged  to  fly  to  Holland,  with  tiie  forfcitnn 
of  his  property,  while  the  latter  was  hunted  for  years  by  tbs 
dragoons  of  "the  bloody  Claver'se."  Robert  married  in 
1G64,  Janet,  daughter  of  Matthew  Kurkpatrick,  brother  of 
the  laird  of  Closebun),  and  by  her  had  Dr.  Thomas  Sbortt, 
physician  to  George  IL,  a  notice  of  whom  is  given  on  tba 
following  page.  Robertas  grandson,  Thomas  Shortt,  married 
Margaret,  second  daughter  of  Francis  Carruthers  of  Hart- 
wood,  Dumfries-shire,  and  had  by  her  an  only  son,  Frasdl 
Shortt  of  Courance  and  Whiteland,  in  the  same  county. 
The  latter  had  three  sons,  the  youngest  of  whom,  Miyor 
John  lilacourtie  Shortt,  Bombay  army,  bom  5th  Fefanaiy 
1803,  succeeded  to  the  estate;  married,  with  issue. 


SIBBALD, 


450 


SIR  ROBERT. 


have  all  disappeared,  and  the  Rev.  Patrick  Sibbald,  paraon 
of  St.  Nicholas*  clmrch,  Aberdeen,  and  rector  of  Murischal 
college  there. 

SIBBALD,  Sir  Robert,  an  eminent  physician, 
naturalist,  and  antiquary,  was  a  younger  son  of 
David  Sibbald,  third  brother  of  Sir  James  Sibbald 
of  Rankeillour,  a  descendant  of  the  Sibbalds  of 
Balgonie,  Fifeshire.  He  was  bom  in  1641.  Bow- 
er, in  his  *  History  of  the  University  of  Edinburgh,' 
says  that  he  was  a  native  of  that  city.  He  began 
to  learn  Latin  in  the  burgh  school  of  Cupar  in 
1650.  The  following  year  his  parents  removed 
with  him  to  Dundee.  They  were  in  that  town 
when  it  was  taken  by  General  Monk  by  assaidt, 
after  a  stubborn  and  prolonged  resistance  by  the 
inhabitants.  During  this  memorable  siege  the 
subject  of  til  is  notice  had  a  very  narrow  escape 
for  his  life,  and  his  father  was  severely  wounded. 
In  the  pillage  which  followed,  the  family  were 
robbed  of  eveiything  they  possessed  by  the  Eng- 
lish soldiery,  and  had  to  walk  to  Cupar  from  ina- 
bility to  pay  for  any  mode  of  conveyance.  After- 
wards young  Sibbald  became  a  student  in  the 
university  of  Edinburgh,  where  he  remained  for 
five  years.  He  applied  himself  to  the  pi*ofesslon 
of  physic,  in  which  his  uncle.  Dr.  George  Sibbald 
of  Gibliston,  had  attained  considerable  eminence. 
In  March  1660,  he  went  to  Holland,  and  for  a 
year  and  a  half  studied  anatomy  and  surgciy  at 
Leyden,  then  the  most  celebrated  medical  school 
In  Europe.  He  took  his  doctor's  degree  there  in 
1661,  his  inaugural  dissertation  on  the  occasion 
being  published  under  the  title  of '  De  Variis  Ta- 
bia  Speciebus.' 

On  leaving  Leyden  he  went  to  Paris,  and  after- 
wards to  Angiers,  where  he  remained  a  year, 
pursuing  his  studies  with  gi-cat  assiduity.  He 
next  repaired  to  London,  and  in  October  1662 
returned  to  Edinburgh,  where  he  commenced  the 
practice  of  medicine.  About  1667  he  and  Dr. 
aftei*wards  Sir  Andrew  Balfour,  who  had  been 
long  in  France,  formed  the  design  of  instituting 
a  botanical  garden  in  Edinburgh,  and  for  this  pur- 
pose they  procured  an  enclosure  "  of  some  forty 
feet  every  way,"  as  he  takes  care  to  tell  us,  in  the 
north  yards  of  the  abbey,  which  they  stocked  with 
a  collection  of  800  or  900  plants.  Other  physicians 
in  Edinburgh  now  joined  them,  and  subscriptions 


were  raised  for  the  snpport  of  the  garden.  Fnm 
the  town  council  they  afterwards  obtained  a  leue 
of  the  garden  belonging  to  Trinity  Hospital  and 
adjacent  ground,  for  the  same  purpose.  It  wag 
principally  through  the  instrumentality  of  Dr. 
Sibbald  that  the  royal  college  of  physicians  of 
Edinburgh,  of  which  he  was  one  of  the  origtBal 
members,  obtained  their  charter  of  incoiporation. 
The  great  seal  was  appended  to  it,  29th  Novem- 
ber 1681,  being  St.  Andrew's  day.  In  1682  be 
was  knighted  by  the  duke  of  York,  then  high- 
commissioner  in  Scotland. 

By  the  encouragement  of  the  earl  of  Perth,  Sir 
Robert  had,  with  his  other  pursuits,  began  to 
make  collections  for  an  accurate  geographical  and 
statistical  account  of  Scotland,  with  a  description 
of  the  natural  histoiy  of  the  kingdom.  Throngfa 
that  nobleman,  he  was  appointed  by  Charles  II., 
by  patent  dated  30th  September  1682,  geographer 
royal  for  Scotland,  and  he  got  another  patent  to  be 
his  physician  there.  At  the  same  time  he  receiv- 
ed his  majesty's  commands  to  publish  the  natml 
history  of  the  country,  with  its  geographical  de- 
scription. *^This,"  says  Sir  Robert,  in  his  auto- 
biography, ^^was  the  cause  of  great  pains  and 
very  much  expense  to  me,  in  buying  all  the  books 
and  manuscripts  I  could  get  for  that  use,  and  pro- 
curing informations  from  all  parts  of  the  country, 
even  the  most  remote  isles.  I  employed  John 
Adair  for  surveying,  and  did  bestow  much  upon 
him,  and  paid  a  guinea  for  each  double  of  the 
maps  he  made.  He  got  much  money  from  the 
gentry,  and  an  allowance  from  the  public  for  it; 
but  notwithstanding  the  matter  was  recommended 
by  a  committee  of  the  council,  and  my  pains  and 
progress  in  the  work  represented,  yet  I  obtained 
nothing  except  a  patent  for  one  hundred  poonds 
sterling  of  salary  from  King  James  the  Seventh 
as  his  physician.  I  got  only  one  year's  payment" 
In  1682  he  had  published  an  advertisement  rela- 
tive to  his  geographical  work,  with  queries,  which 
was  distributed  over  the  kingdom.  The  follow- 
ing yeai*,  he  issued,  in  Latin  and  in  English,  an 
account  of  the  projected  work,  stating  what  btd 
been  effected  and  what  required  to  be  done,  with 
proposals  for  printing  it.  In  1684  he  published 
his  principal  work,  entitled  *  Scotia  Illnstrata,  sive 
Frodromns  Historic  Naturalis  Scotiie^*  folio,  scv- 


I   , 


'I    : 


I.   I 


SIBBALD, 


451 


SIR  ROBERT. 


enty  copies  of  whicli,  he  says,  lie  gave  away  in 
presents.  Of  this  work  Dr.  Fitcairn  published  an 
anonymous  review  in  1696.  ^^Sibbald,**  says 
Bower,  (History  of  the  University  of  Edinburgh^ 
vol.  i.  p.  371,)  "had  condemned  the  medical  sys- 
tem of  Bellini,  Fitcaim^s  great  master,  and  this 
was  the  cause  of  no  mercy  being  shown  to  his 
Prodromus.  He  laughs  at  him  for  giving  credit 
to  the  report  that  there  were  in  Scotland  *  wild 
oxen  with  manes,*  and  'badgers  like  swine,*  'bea- 
vers,*  &c.  Quotations  are  given,  from  which  his 
ignorance  of  natural  history,  botany,  zoology,  and 
geography,  is  proved,  as  well  as  his  plagiarism 
from  Ray,  Sutherland,  and  others.  It  must  be 
confessed  that  the  criticism  is  most  unreasonably 
severe.*'  To  this  charge  of  ignorance  and  plagi- 
arism, Sibbald  replied,  in  a  pamphlet,  entitled 
*VindicijB  Prodromi  Naturalis  Historiae  Scotiac,* 
&c.,  in  which  he  gives  some  account  of  his  eai'Iy 
years  and  studies. 

In  December  1684,  Sir  Robeit  was  elected  pre- 
sident of  the  Royal  College  of  Fhysicians,  and 
while  he  filled  that  ofiice  the  Dispensatory  or 
Pharmacopoeia  for  Edinburgh  was  completed.  In 
the  following  March  he  was  appointed  by  the 
town  conncil  the  first  professor  of  medicine  in  the 
nniversity  of  Edinburgh.  He  had  been  educated 
in  episcopalian  principles,  and  associated  con- 
stantly with  those  who  T^ere  opposed  to  the  Cov- 
enant. In  this  year  (1685),  by  the  persuasion  of 
the  earl  of  Perth,  then  chancellor  of  Scotland,  he 
became  a  convert  to  the  Roman  Catholic  religion, 
and  was  in  consequence  very  ncai'ly  assassinated 
by  a  mob  who  surrounded  the  house  in  which  he 
resided,  in  Carrubber's  Close,  Edinburgh.  They 
broke  into  it,  while  he  with  difficulty  escaped  by 
the  yard  behind.  Forcing  their  way  into  his 
room,  they  searched  his  bed,  and  not  finding  him, 
went  away,  after  having  sworn  that  they  would 
'*  Rathillet**  him.  He  went  for  a  time  to  London, 
where  the  conduct  of  the  Jesuits  with  whom  he 
came  in  contact,  and  the  evil  influence  they  exer- 
cised over  the  mind  of  the  king,  so  struck  him 
that,  as  he  says,  "I  repented  of  my  rashness, 
and  resolved  to  come  home,  and  return  to  the 
chnrch  I  was  bom  in.'*  He  is  also  said  to  have 
been  disgusted  with  the  rigid  discipline  and  ex- 
treme fastings  of  popciy. 


Having  compiled  a  catalogue  of  his  museum,  he 
dedicated  it  to  the  magistrates  and  citizens  of 
Edinburgh,  as  a  testimony  of  his  gratitude  for  the 
honours  conferred  upon  him.  In  1697  he  pre- 
sented it  to  the  univei'sity  of  Edinburgh,  under  the 
modest  title  of  '  Auctarium  Musssi  Balfouriani  e 
Mns^o  Sibbaldiano,*  as  if  it  had  only  been  an  ap- 
pendix to  Dr.  Balfour's.  The  catalogue  was 
printed  at  the  expense  of  the  university,  and  con- 
tains 216  pages  in  12mo.  It  is  divided  into  four 
classes.  1.  Fossils — ^minerals,  stones,  and  metals, 
also  marine  substances.  2.  The  more  rare  vege- 
table substances  taken  from  plants,  their  roots, 
bark,  timber,  and  fruit ;  also  marine  plants.  3. 
Tlie  more  rare  productions  from  the  animal  king- 
dom ;  and  4.  Works  of  art  connected  with  the 
various  arts  and  sciences;  to  which  are  added 
manuscripts  and  some  scarce  books.  The  follow- 
ing portraits  of  eminent  men  were  also  bequeathed 
by  him  to  the  university,  viz.,  Chai'les  I.  and  II., 
James  VIl.,  the  earl  of  Perth  in  his  robes  as 
chancellor,  and  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  Lord  Ad- 
vocate, founder  of  the  Advocates*  library.  The 
only  original  portrait  of  Drummond  of  Hawthorn- 
den  is  in  the  same  collection.  In  1706,  Sir  Ro- 
bert proposed  to  teach  natural  history  and  medi- 
cine during  spring  in  private  colleges,  a  phrase 
which  implies  that  his  lectures  would  be  delivered 
in  his  own  house.  An  advertisement  of  his  in 
Latin  appears  in  the  Edinburgh  Courant,  14th 
February  of  that  year.  In  it  he  modestly  desig- 
nates himself  Philiatris^  that  is,  *  studious  of  med- 
icine,* and  we  are  informed  that  he  had  success- 
fully practised  medicine  for  forty-three  years. 
Those  who  attended  his  class  were  to  be  *^  well 
acquainted  with  the  Latin  and  Greek  languages, 
all  philosophy,  and  the  principles  of  mathematics ; 
and  certificates  from  the  different  professors  under 
whom  they  had  studied  were  to  be  produced.** 
The  lectures,  according  to  the  univei*sal  practice, 
were  delivered  in  Latin. 

Two  editions  of  his  *  Histoiy  of  Fife*  were  pub- 
lished in  his  lifetime,  the  most  correct  of  which 
appeared  in  1710.  An  edition  of  it,  with  notes 
and  illustrations  and  an  accurate  list  of  his  writ- 
ings, was  published  at  Cupar  in  1803.  To  a  rare 
species  of  plant  discovered  by  him  among  the  in- 
digenous plants  of  Scotland  Linnseus  gave  the 


SIBBALD, 


452 


SIR  ROBERT. 


name  of  Sibbaldia.  The  period  of  Sir  Robert 
Sibbald^s  death  ia  not  known,  bnt  from  the  last  of 
his  published  works  being  dated  in  1711,  it  is 
supposed  to  have  been  in  1712.  In  1722  a  cata- 
logue was  printed  at  Edinburgh  of  **  the  library 
of  the  late  learned  and  ingenious  Sir  Robert  Sib- 
bald  of  Eipps,  doctor  of  medicine,'*  to  be  sold  by 
auction.  Many  of  his  manuscripts  and  printed 
books  were  purchased  for  the  Advocates*  library. 
The  following  is  a  list  of  his  works,  most  of  which 
exhibit  deep  antiquarian  research,  extensive  ob- 
servation, and  judicious  inquiry  into  the  actual 
state  of  his  native  country  in  his  own  time : 

De  Variifl  Tabis  Spedebos.    Lejd.  1661,  4to. 

Nnndos  Sooto-Britannns,  de  Deacriptione  Scotiie  AntiqoaB 
et  Moderns.    Edin.  1683,  folio. 

An  Acoonnt  of  the  Soottiah  Atlas.    Edin.  1683,  folio. 

Scotia  iUoatrata ;  sive  Prodromns  Historia  Naturalia ;  in 
qno  regionia  natnra,  inoolaram  ingenia  et  mores,  morbi  iis- 
qne  medendi  methodns,  et  medicina  indigena,  accurate  ex- 
plicantur,  &c    Edin.  1684,  fbl.    The  work  of  tventj  jears. 

Phalainolog^a  Nora ;  aire  Obsenrationes  de  rarioribos  qni- 
bosdam  Balsnis  in  SootisB  littos,  nuper  ejectis,  &e.  Lond. 
1773,  8to.    a  reprint  of  a  Work  publiahed  at  Edinborgh 

1692,  4to. 

An  Adyertiaement  anent  the  XipUias  or  Swordfish  exposed 
at  Edinburgh. 
An  Essay  concerning  the  Tbnie  of  the  Ancients.    Edin. 

1693,  12mo. 

Bogata  Joannis  Sletzeri  rei  tormentarite  in  Scotiie  Prae- 
fecti  Tbeatram  celebrionim  urbiam,  arcium,  templonim,  et 
monasteriorum  Scotiae,  lingua  Latina  scrips!,  quod  in  lingu- 
am  nostram  yersum  edidit,  cum  Iconibus.    Lond.  1693,  fol. 

Additions  to  the  Edition  of  Camden*s  Britannia.    1695. 

Introdnctio  ad  Historiam  Berum  a  Bomanis  gestarum,  in 
ea  Borealis  BritannisB  parte,  quas  ultra  Murum  Picticum  est. 
Edin.  1696,  fol.    Edited  bj  Thomas  Buddim.in.    1711. 

Auctarium  Musei  Balfouriani,  e  museo  Sibbaldiano;  sive 
enumeratio  et  descriptio  rerum  rariorum,  tarn  naturalium 
quitm  artifidalium,  quas  B.  Sibbaldus,  Academiie  Edin- 
burgensB,  donavit    Edin.  1697,  8vo. 

Provision  for  the  Poor  in  time  of  dearth  and  scarcity. 
Edin.  1699,  Svo. 

Memoria  Balfouriana.    Edin.  1699,  8?o. 

CoBlii  Sedulii  Scot!  poemata  sacra  ex  MSS.  optima:  notse 
transcripsi,  contuli  cum  variis  ejus  editionibus  et  notis,  Ne- 
brissensis  et  meis  illustravi :  boo  opus  recognitum  cum  selec- 
tis  notis  ediderunt  Joannes  GUlane  et  Joannes  Forrest,  meo 
rogatn.    Edm.  1701,  8vo. 

Georgii  Sibbaldi,  M.D.  Domini  de  Giblistone,  Begulss  bene 
et  salubriter  vivendi,  partim  prosa  partim  metro  expressse 
nunc  primum  ex  MSS.  autographis  autboris  in  lucem  edits, 
et  notis  illustrata;,  per  B.  S.  M.D.  ex  fratre  Davidc,  Nepo- 
tern.  Edin.  1701,  8vo.  Qnibus  acoessere  Boberti  Bodii  de 
Trocboregia,  de  filii  sui  promogeniti  institutions  monita,  ali- 
aque  ex  autboris  autograpbis  MSS.  edita. 

An  AdverUsement  anent  a  rare  sort  of  Wbale  came  in 
near  Cramond.    1701. 

Tbe  Liberty  and  Independence  of  the  Kingdom  and  Church 
of  Scotland,  asserted  from  andcnt  records.  Edin.  1702,  4to. 
Now  very  rare. 


Commentarius  in  'Vitam  Georgii  Bnchanani,  &e.  £& 
1702,  Svo. 

An  Answer  to  the  second  Letter  to  the  Lord  Biibop  of 
Carlisle,  wherein  the  Soots  indent  possession  in  Britam  ii 
asserted,  and  answers  are  given  to  the  olgectiona  against  it  is 
the  2d  letter,  and  in  Mr.  Atwood's  Ute  book.  Edin.  1704,  8tq. 

De  Gestis  Gulielmi  Valbe  Herois  Scoti,  CoQectanea  vans. 
Edm.  1705,  Svo. 

In  Hippocratis  Legem,  et  in  ejus  Epistolam  ad  Tbeanlnm 
Filium,  Commentarii.    Edin.  1706,  8vo. 

Historical  Inquiries  concerning  the  Roman  SIommwBts 
and  Antiquities  in  tbe  north  part  of  Britain  called  Seotland; 
in  which  there  is  an  account  of  tbe  Roman  walla,  poets,  colo- 
nies and  forts,  temples,  altars,  sepulchres,  and  military  waji 
in  this  country,  and  of  the  Boman  fwoes  lodged  there,  from 
the  vestiges  and  inscriptions  yet  remaining,  and  fimotbt 
urns,  medals,  measures,  and  buckles  and  arms,  and  soch  liks 
antiquities  found  there,  with  copper  cuts.     Edin.  1707,  foL 

A  Letter  to  Dr.  Archibald  Pitcaim.    Edin.  1709,  8va 

VindidsB  Scotias  illustrate,  sive  Prodromi  Natoralis  Uiito- 
risB  Scotis,  contra  Prodromomastiges,  sub  larva  libelli  de 
legibus  historic  naturalis,  latentes.     Edin.  1710,  foL 

MiscellanesB  qusedam  eruditsB  Antiquitatis  qus  ad  berea- 
lem  Britannite  majoris  partem  pertinent ;  in  quibns  lod  qid- 
dam  historicorum  Romanorum,  variaque  monumenta  antiqiu 
illustrantur.     Edin.  1710,  fol. 

Tbe  History,  Ancient  and  Modem,  of  the  Sheriffdoms  of 
Linlithgow  and  Stirling ;  with  an  account  of  the  natonl  pro- 
ducts of  the  land  and  water,  in  two  Books.    Edin.  1710,  foL 

Account  of  the  Writers,  Andent  and  Modem,  printed,  and 
manuscripts  not  printed,  which  treat  of  the  DescrifrfMO  of 
North  Britain,  called  Scotland,  as  it  was  of  old,  and  is  now 
at  present ;  with  a  catalogue  of  the  maps  and  prospects,  snd 
figures  of  tbe  andent  monuments.    2  parts.     Edin.  1710,  fd. 

Tbe  History,  Andent  and  Modem,  of  the  Sberifidoms  of 
Fife  and  Kinross,  with  a  Description  of  both,  and  of  the  Friths 
of  Forth  and  Tay,  and  tlie  Islands  in  them ;  in  which  then 
is  an  account  of  tbe  royal  seats  and  castles,  and  of  the  royal 
burghs  and  ports,  and  of  the  religious  houses  and  sdiools, 
and  of  the  most  remarkable  houses  of  tbe  nobility  and  gra- 
try ;  with  an  account  of  the  natural  products  of  the  land  and 
waters.    Edin.  1710.  ful.    Reprinted,  Cupar-Fife.   1803,  Sro. 

Description  of  the  Islands  of  Orkney  and  Zetland,  witli 
tbe  Maps  of  them.    Edin.  1711,  fol. 

Portus,  Colonic,  et  Castella  Romana,  ad  Bodotiiam  et  sd 
Taum ;  or.  Conjectures  concerning  the  Roman  Ports,  Colo- 
nies and  Forts  in  the  Friths  of  Forth  and  Tay.  Edin.  1711,  foL 

Commentarius  in  Julii  Agricolas  Expeditiones  8,  4,  5,  6, 7, 
in  vita  ejus,  per  Comelium  Tadtum  generum  ejus,  descrip- 
tas ;  et  in  boreali  Britannia)  parte,  qute  Scotia  didtnr  geitsi. 
In  quo,  ex  vestigiis  castrorum,  &c.  textus  Tadti  illustrantor. 
Edin.  1711,  folio. 

Specimen  Glossi.irii  de  populis  et  lods  Britanniss  boradts, 
in  explicadone  locomm  quorundam  diffidlium  apnd  acripto- 
res  veteres.    Edin.  1711,  folio. 

Series  remm  a  Bomanis,  post  avocatum  agrioolam  in  Bri- 
tannia  boreali,  gestamm.     Edin.  1711,  folio. 

A  Catalogue  of  the  Library  of  Sir  Robert  Sibbald,  M.D. 
Edin.  1722,  4to. 

Account  of  several  Shells  observed  in  Scotland.  FhiL 
Trans.  Abr.  i v.  p.  111. 

Concerning  several  Stones  voided  by  a  Boy.     lb.  p.  295. 

Account  of  some  Stones  and  Plants  lately  found  in  Scot- 
land,    lb.  p.  526. 

Account  of  the  Pediculus  Ceti,  Lepas  Diadema  Linn.  IK 
1700,  Abr.  V.  p.  317. 


I 

!i 


I  ! 


—ill 


SIMPSON, 


454 


SIR  GEORGE. 


chased  and  greatly  enlarged  by  Mr.  Alexander 
^lackay,  then  a  bookseller  in  tlie  High  Street, 
Edinburgh.  Having  acquired  money  and  pur- 
chased the  estate  of  Blackcastle,  Mid  Lothian, 
Mr.  Mackay  retired  from  business  about  1832, 
when  not  finding  a  purchaser  for  his  library  en- 
tire, he  sold  it  off  by  public  auction. 

Mr.  Sibbald's  works  are : 

The  Edinburgh  Magazine,  commenced  in  1783.  Snbse- 
qiientlv  conducted  by  Dr.  Bobert  Anderson,  author  of  *The 
Lives  of  the  Poets.* 

The  Vocal  Mngazlne,  a  Selection  of  tlie  most  esteemed 
English,  Scots,  nnd  Iribh  Aint,  Ancient  and  Modem,  adapted 
for  the  Harpsichord  or  Violin.     Kdin.  1797. 

Hecord  of  the  Public  Ministry  of  Je^ius  Christ;  compre- 
hending all  that  is  related  by  the  Four  Evangelists,  in  one 
regular  narrative,  without  repetition  or  omission,  arranged 
trith  strict  attention  to  the  Chronology,  and  to  their  own 
words,  according  to  the  most  esteemed  translation;  with 
Preliminanr  Ob8er>'iition8.     Edin.  1798. 

Chronicle  of  Scottish  Poeti  v,  with  a  Gloss.nrT  of  the  Scots 
language.  Edin.  1802,  4  vols.  12mo.  A  valuable  acquisi- 
tion to  Scots  literature. 

SIMPSON,  Sm  George,  governor  of  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company's  tcmtories,  only  sou  of  Mr. 
George  Simpson,  Lochbroom,  Ross-shire,  was  bom 
there  in  1792.  In  early  youth  he  was  received  into 
the  counting-house  of  a  London  firm,  extensively 
engaged  in  the  AVest  India  trade.  His  active  and 
energetic  habits  soon  attracted  the  notice  of  the 
earl  of  Selkirk,  then  at  the  head  of  the  Hudson's 
Bay  Company,  and  Mr.  Andrew  Colville,  a  large 
stockholder,  and  through  their  influence  he  was 
selected  to  superintend  the  affaii*sof  the  Company 
at  their  settlements  in  British  North  America. 
He  accordingly  proceeded  thither  in  Februaiy 
1820.  A  troublous  warfare  was  then  carried  on 
between  the  Hudson's  Bay  Compan}-,  which  was 
chartered,  and  the  North  West  Fur  Company, 
unchartered,  but  owing  to  Mr.  Simpson's  tact  and 
daring,  ability,  energ}',  and  uprif^htness,  in  1821  a 
coalition  of  the  rival  Companies  took  place,  where- 
by the  North-West  Company  retained  over  one- 
half  of  the  capital  stock  of  the  united  association, 
and  secured  more  than  half  of  the  ofiices  in  the 
territory  for  their  resident  associates.  The  charter 
of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  had  originally  been 
granted  by  Charles  U.  in  1670,  to  Prince  Rupert 
and  others,  empowering  them  to  trade  exclusively 
with  the  aborigines  on  and  about  Hudson's  Bay. 
The  North-West  Fui'  Company  was  formed  at 
Montreal  in  the  winter  of  1783-4.    It  disputed  the 


right  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company,  and  activdy 
opposed  it.    When  the  companies  united,  the  new 

I 

association  became  known  as  tlie  Hudson's  Bay 
Fur  Company.  Mr.  Simpson  was  immediately 
appointed  resident  governor  at  Rupert  Land,  one 
of  the  divisions  of  the  country  held  by  the  united 
Companies.  In  this  situation  he  exhibited  so 
much  address  and  dexterity  that,  a  few  yean 
afterwards,  he  was  appointed  governor  of  the 
whole  of  what  is  called  the  Hudson!s  Bay  Com- 
pany's territories. 

In  1836,  when  the  renewal  of  the  charter  of  the 
Company  became  necessaiy,  Mr.  Simpson  was  m- 
structed  by  the  directors  to  fit  out  an  expedition 
to  connect  the  discoveries  of  Captains  Ross  and 
Back  in  the  Arctic  Regions,  with  the  view  of  in- 
quiring into  the  nature  of  the  country  itself  and 
the  resources  of  the  surrounding  territory,  and 
reporting  to  the  British  government.     Under  the 
conduct  of  his  nephew,  Mr.  Thomas  Simpson, 
noted  in  Arctic  discover}',  the  expedition  was  en- 
tii-ely  successful.    During  a  period  of  three  years, 
it  traced  the  Arctic  coast  of  America,  from  tlie 
mouth  of  the  Mackenzie  river  to  Point  Barrow, 
and  from  the  mouth  of  the  Coppermine  river  to 
the  gulf  of  Boothia.  ^^  His  experience  in  the  Indian 
countjy,"  said  Sir  Roderick  Impey  Murchison,  vice- 
president  of  the  London  Geographical  Socictj, 
speaking  of  Sir  George,  in  his  address  delivered  at 
the  anniversaiy  meeting  of  the  Society,  May  27, 
1861,  ^^  his  intimate  knowledge  of  its  i*esources,  aud 
his  influence  both  with  the  white  and  Indian  pop- 
ulation, tended  greatly  to  facilitate  the  progress 
through  it  of  the  land  Arctic  expeditions,  and  to 
lessen  the  hardships  and  privations  they  had  to 
encounter.    The  Arctic  expeditions  undertaken  by 
the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  wei*e  planned  and  fitted 
out  under  his  immediate  direction,  and  the  instruc- 
tions which  he  gave  to  their  respective  commanders, 
independently  of  their  admirable  adaptation  to  the 
ends  in  view,  were  eminently  calculated  to  promote 
the  objects  for  which  they  were  issued."    In  con- 
sideration of  the  services  of  these  Arctic  expe- 
ditions, he  had  the  honour  of  knighthood  con- 
ferred on  him  in  1841 .    On  Maich  3  of  that  year 
he  set  out  from  London  on  an  overland  joomey 
round  the  world,  which  he  accomplished  in  19 
months  and  26  days.    Of  this  journey  he  pub- 


h 


I  . 


SIMSON, 


i56 


WILLIAM,  R.S.IL 


I! 


sequence  bat  a  limited  education.  About  1814 
the  family  removed  to  Edinburgh,  where  his  elder 
sunriying  brother  had  settled  some  years  previ- 
ously. William  was  first  intended  to  be  a  sailor, 
but  the  skipper  under  whose  charge  he  was  placed 
thought  him  too  delicate  for  the  sea,  and  he  soon 
relinquished  that  occupation.  His  friends  then 
wished  him  to  be  an  optician  or  a  grocer,  but  he 
liked  neither  employment.  Having  amused  him- 
self with  cutting  out  little  figures  in  paper  and 
produced  a  regiment  of  soldiers,  the  taste  and 
truth  with  which  they  were  executed,  attracted 
the  attention  of  a  gentleman,  who  purchased 
them,  and  a  friend,  who  saw  this  specimen  of  his 
talents,  succeeded  in  getting  him  placed  as  an  ap- 
prentice with  a  Mr.  Stephen  Lawrence,  a  drawer 
in  water  colours  on  satin.  As  a  branch  of  fash- 
ionable education  in  Edinburgh  at  that  time,  young 
ladies  employed  themselves  in  covering  over  the 
subjects  on  the  satin,  principally  scenes  from  *•  The 
Lady  of  the  Lake,*  &c.,  with  needlework  in  silk 
and  worsted.  He  commenced  his  engagement 
with  Mr.  Lawrence,  31st  August,  1815,  boarding 
with  him  through  the  day,  and  returning  home  at 
night.  His  evenings  were  at  first  occupied  occa- 
sionally in  assisting  a  Mr.  Kay,  a  water  colour 
artist  then  in  Edinburgh,  and  afterwards  in  at- 
tendance at  the  antique  academy  of  the  board  of 
Trustees,  a  school  of  design  in  which  Sir  David 
Wilkie,  Sir  AVilliam  Allan,  and  John  Burnet  the 
engraver,  were  educated.  It  was  then  under  the 
superintendence  of  Mr.  S.  Graham,  and  after  his 
death  of  Mr.  Andrew  Wilson,  an  eminent  land- 
scape painter.  After  Simson  had  been  about  four 
years  engaged  on  satin  samplers  for  young  ladies, 
Mr.  Wilson  proposed  to  take  him  as  an  assistant 
teacher  in  his  private  classes.  Tliis  he  gladly 
agreed  to,  and  in  1824,  when  that  gentleman  re- 
signed his  private  teaching,  he  was  succeeded  by 
Mr.  Simson  and  his  elder  brother,  w^ho  had  at- 
tained considerable  proficiency  as  an  artist.  In 
1826,  the  brothers  were  elected  masters  of  the 
Hill  Street  Institution,  Edinburgh,  where  they 
continued  for  four  years. 

Disliking  the  drudgeiy  of  teaching,  William 
Simson  commenced  to  practise  art  independently. 
His  first  works  were  coast  pieces,  somewhat  in 
the  style  of  Collins,  sketched  chiefly  on  the  sands 


of  Leith  and  the  shores  of  Fife.  At  these  be 
worked  for  nearly  ten  years,  acquiring  dmiiig 
that  time  both  patrons  and  popolarity.  AmoBf 
the  earliest  purchasers  of  hie  coast  scenes  were 
Baron  Hume,  Lord  Abercrombie,  the  earl  of  J^e- 
ven,  Lady  Jane  Stuart,  Mr.  W.  Tytler,  Mr.  Do- 
nald Smith,  and  Mr.  J.  G.  Kinnear.  His  prices 
at  first  were  small,  and  for  the  first  six  years  the 
highest  price  which  he  obtained  for  a  single  pic- 
ture was  £50. 

In  1829  he  became  a  member  of  the  Boyal 
Scottish  Academy,  on  the  Junction  of  that  body 
with  the  associates  of  the  Royal  Institation.  In 
this  year  he  produced  his  picture  of  *  The  Twelfth 
of  August,*  for  which  he  received  one  hundred 
guineas  from  Mr.  Donald  Smith.  He  also,  the 
same  year,  painted  the  portrait  of  his  steady 
friend,  Mr.  William  Scrope,  the  author  of  seyersl 
books  on  deer-stalking.  Mr.  Simson  was  of  great 
assistance  to  Mr.  Scrope  in  his  sporting  works, 
aiding  him,  it  is  said,  on  more  than  one  occasion 
with  the  palette  and  the  pencil.  In  1830,  he  re- 
ceived one  hundred  and  thirty  guineas  firom  Mr. 
J.  M.  Melville,  for  his  painting  *of  *  Sportsmen 
Regaling,*  and  the  same  year  the  same  snm  from 
Mr.  J.  G.  Kinnear  for  'The  Highland  Deer 
Stalkers.'  The  next  three  or  four  years  were  de- 
voted to  portrait  painting,  and  he  soon  realized  a 
sufficient  snm  to  enable  him  to  visit  Italy,  whkh 
he  did  in  1835,  and  where  he  remained  for  three 
years.  On  his  return  in  1838,  he  settled  in  Lon- 
don. His  paintings  subsequently  exhibited  in  the 
Royal  Academy,  Ti*afalgar  Square,  or  the  British 
Institution,  Fall  Mall,  were  the  following : 

A  Camaldolese  monk  shoving  the  relics  of  liis  oonreoi 
1838.  This  painting  formed  the  subject  of  the  first  engnr- 
ing  issued  bj  the  Art  Union  of  London. 

Giotto  discovered  herding  sheep  bj  Cimabae.  1838.  Boo^ 
by  Sir  Robert  Peel,  the  eminent  statesman,  for  160  gnineis. 

A  Dntch  faroilj.  1839.  Bonght  bj  the  marquis  of  LiOf- 
downe  for  150  guineas. 

Columbus  asking  bread/ind  water  for  his  child  at  the  door 
of  the  convent  of  Santa  Maria  da  Rabida.  1839.  Boa|^ 
by  Sir  Willonghby  Gordon  for  200  guineas. 

Goatherds  of  the  Campagna  di  Roma.  1839.  Bonght  Ijr 
Mr.  Wells  of  Redleaf,  for  80  guineas.  For  the  same  gentle- 
man he  also  painted  a  duplicate  of  his  Columbus. 

Gil  Bias  introducing  himself  to  I.aura.  1840.  Pnzthsied 
by  Mr.  Sheepshanks  for  100  guineas. 

The  Temptation  of  St.  Anthony.  1841.  An  old  snbjoci, 
but  in  this  instance  cleverly  and  delicately  treated. 

The  Chateau  of  Rubens.    1841. 


SINCLAIR, 


458 


BARON. 


1 


Clair  promptly  offered  to  pledge  his  head  that  two  favourite 
dogs  of  hiH,  culled  "  Help  uud  Huld,'*  vrould  kill  the  deer  be> 
fore  she  crossed  the  March-burn.  The  king  instantly  accept- 
ed  the  ofier,  and  pledged  himself  to  give  the  forest  of  Pent- 
land  moor, — which  included  the  northern  division  of  the 
great  Mid  I^tliian  hill-range, — in  guerdon  of  success.  A 
few  slow-hounds  having  been  let  loose  to  beat  up  the  deer, 
the  king  stationed  himself  on  the  l>e8t  vantage-ground  for 
commanding  a  view  of  the  chase.  Sir  William,  on  his  part, 
after  slipping  his  dogs,  prayed  earnestly  to  St.  Katherine,  to 
give  the  deer  up  to  them,  and,  on  a  fleet-footed  steed,  went 
in  full  chase  after  tho  deer.  Arriving  at  the  March-bum,  he 
threw  liimself  from  his  horse  in  despair.  *Hold,*  just 
in  the  crisis  of  fate,  stopped  the  deer  in  the  brook,  and  the 
next  instant  *  Help  *  came  up,  drove  her  back,  and  killed 
her  on  tho  winning  side  of  the  stream.  The  king,  who  had 
witnessed  the  result,  came  speedily  down  from  his  vantage- 
ground,  embraced  Sir  William,  and  granted  him  in  free  for- 
estry the  lands  of  Logan-house,  once  a  favourite  hunting 
seat  of  the  Scottish  kings,  Kirton,  and  Kamcraig.  In  grati- 
tude for  the  fancied  interference  of  St.  Katherine  in  his 
favour,  the  knight,  in  the  superstition  of  the  times,  built  the 
chapel  of  St  Katherine  in  tho  Hopes,  parish  of  Penicnick. 
Sir  William  accompanied  Sir  James  Douglas  on  his  expedi- 
tion to  the  Holy  Land  with  the  heart  of  Bruce,  and  was 
killed  with  him  fighting  against  the  Moors  in  Spain,  25th 
August  1330.  His  tomb  is  s:ud  to  be  still  seen  in  Koslin 
chapel,  and  it  appropriately  represents  the  person  of  a  knight 
in  armour,  attended  by  a  greyhound.  Sir  Walter  Scott,  in 
*  llie  I^y  of  the  I«ast  Minstrel,'  says, 

**  There  are  twenty  of  Roslin's  barons  bold 
Lie  buried  within  that  proud  chapellc  ;** 


'*  And  each  St.  Clair  w;is  buried  there. 

With  candle,  with  book,  and  with  knell.'* 

He  left  an  infant  son,  who  was  also  Sir  William  St.  Clair. 
By  the  marriage  of  this  knight  of  Iloslin,  with  Isabel,  one  of 
the  daughters  and  coheiresses  of  Malise,  earl  of  Strathem, 
Caithness,  and  Orkney,  his  elder  son,  Henry  St.  Clair,  be- 
came earl  of  Orkney,  and  in  1379  obtained  a  recognition  of 
his  title  from  Haco  IV.,  king  of  Norway,  (see  page  2G4  of 
this  volume,  article  Orkney,  earl  of). 

Besides  another  son,  named  David,  Sir  William  had  a 
daughter,  Margaret,  who  married,  first,  Thomas,  second  earl 
of  Anprus ;  and,  secondly,  Sir  William  Sinclair  of  Hcrdmans- 
toun,  Haddingtonshire,  and  hud  issue  by  both. 

The  baronial  magnificence  and  rude  hospitality  for  which 
the  early  knights  of  Ronlin  were  renowned  are  said  to  have 
been  exceeded  by  Sir  William  St.  Clair,  tliird  earl  of  Orkney, 
in  the  reigns  of  James  I.  and  II.  Father  Hay,  a  member  of  his 
household,  speaks  of  him  as  *  a  prince,*  who  maintained  his 
state  '*  at  his  palace  of  the  castle  of  Roslin,"  where  "  he  kept 
a  great  court,  and  was  royally  served  at  his  own  table,  in 
vessels  of  gold  and  silver ;  Lord  Dirleton  being  Ins  master  of 
the  household.  Lord  Borthwick  his  cupbearer,  and  Ix>rd 
Fleming  his  car^'cr ;  in  whose  absence  they  had  deputies  to 
attend, — viz.  Stewart,  laird  of  Drumlanrig;  Tweedie,  laird 
of  Duraferline ;  and  Sandilands,  laird  of  Calder.  He  had  his 
halls  and  other  apartments  richly  adorned  with  embroidered 
hangings.  His  princess,  P^lizubeth  Douglas,  was  served  by 
75  gentlewomen,  whereof  53  were  daughters  of  noblemen,  all 
clothed  in  velvet  and  silks,  with  their  chains  of  gold  and 
other  ornaments,  and  was  attended  by  200  riding  gentlemen 
in  all  joumies ;  and  if  it  happened  to  be  dark  when  slie  went 


to  Edinburgh,  where  her  lodgings  were  at  the  foot  of  Black 
Fryars  wynd,  80  lighted  torches  were  carried  before  her." 

The  St.  Clairs  of  Roslin  were  hereditaxj  grand-maitaii  of 
masonry  in  Scotland,  tliat  office  having  been  conferred  oo  them 
by  James  II.  William  St  Clair,  earl  of  Orkney  and  Gaithncts, 
the  first  grand-master,  and  his  snccessors,  held  thnr  ooorti, 
or  assembled  their  grand  lodges,  in  Kilwinning,  Ayrshire,  at 
the  seat  of  the  earliest  fraternity.  In  1736,  William  St 
Clair  of  Roslin,  obliged  to  sell  his  estates,  and  destitute  of  an 
heir,  resigned  to  an  assembly  of  the  lodges  of  Edinbor^  and 
its  vicinity,  all  claim  to  the  grand-mastersliip,  and  empow- 
ered them,  in  common  with  the  other  lodges  of  the  coontiy, 
to  declare  the  office  elective.  On  St.  Andrew's  day  of  that 
year,  the  representatives  of  about  32  lodges  recnved  the  re- 
signation, elected  William  St  Clair  himself  their  grud- 
master,  and  constituted  themselves  into  the  grand  lodge  of 
Scotland.  This  William  St  Clair,  the  last  of  the  direct 
male  line  of  Roslin,  died  In  1778,  aged  78. 


SzxcLAiR,  Baron,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred 26th  Jmiuary  1489,  by  act  of  parliament,  on  Henry, 
son  of  William  Sinclair,  son  of  William,  third  earl  of  Orkney 
of  his  family,  lord-chancellor  of  Scotland,  by  his  first  wife, 
Lady  Margaret  Douglas,  eldest  daughter  of  the  fourth  eari  of 
Douglas,  duke  of  Touralne.  This  W'illiam  Sinclair  had  from 
his  father  the  barony  of  Newburgh,  Aberdeenshire,  in  which 
he  was  infeft,  16th  March,  1450.  In  1470  his  father  re- 
signed the  earldom  of  Orkney  to  James  III.,  and  was  sobse- 
quently  styled  earl  of  Caithness.  The  latter  title  devolved  to 
the  earl's  second  son,  William  Sinclair,  by  his  second  marriage 
with  Marjory,  daughter  of  Alexander  Sutherland  d  Dun- 
heath.  A  younger  son,  Sir  Oliver  Sinclair  of  Roslin,  received 
from  his  father  large  estates.  The  settlement  was  disputed 
by  William  Sinclair  of  Newburgh,  the  eldest  son,  when  a 
compromise  was  entered  into.  Sir  Oliver  relinquished  to 
him  the  lands  of  Couslund,  Mid  Lothian,  with  the  barony  of 
Dysart  and  the  c:u>tle  of  Ravenscraig  in  Fife,  and  the  lands 
of  Dubbo,  Carberry,  and  Wilston,  adjacent  thereta  These 
had  been  bestowed  on  the  earl  their  father  on  his  re»gning  | 
the  earldom  of  Orkney.  On  the  other  hand,  William  Sin- 
clair of  Kewburgh  and  his  eldest  son,  Henry,  renounced  all 
title  to  the  barony  of  Roslin,  by  indenture  dated  9th  Febni- 
ary  1482. 

This  son,  llenr}',  had  charters  of  various  lands,  and  parti- 
cularly of  Dysart  and  Ravenscraig.  He  was  created  Lord 
Sinclair  in  1489,  and  fell  at  the  buttle  of  Flodden,  9th  Sep- 
tember 1513.  His  son,  William,  second  Lord  Sinclair,  bad 
two  sons,  Henry,  third  Lord  Sinclair,  and  the  Hon.  Magnus 
Sinclair  of  Kininmont,  Fifeshire.  The  third  Lord  Sindsir 
supported  the  Reformation  in  Scotland.  In  May  1568,  oo 
Queen  Mary*s  escape  from  I.ochleven,  he  joined  the  associa- 
tion in  her  behalf  at  Hamilton.  He  died  21st  October  1601. 
By  his  wife,  Elizabeth,  second  daughter  of  the  seventh  Lord 
Forbes,  he  had,  with  four  daughters  who  were  all  married, 
two  sons,  James,  master  of  Sinclair,  who  predeceased  him, 
and  Captain  the  Hon.  Lawrence  Sinclair.  The  master  of 
Sinclair  left  three  sons.  Henry,  the  eldest,  succeeded  hii 
grandfather  as  fourth  Lord  Sinclair,  but  died  soon  after  com-  | 
ing  of  age  in  1602,  without  issue.  His  next  brother,  James, 
succeeded  as  fifth  Ijortl  Sinclair,  but  held  the  title  only  for  a 
short  time.  He  died  unmarried,  when  Patrick,  the  yoongert 
son,  became  sixth  Lord  Sinclair.  The  latter  died  in  1615, 
leaving  two  sons,  John,  seventh  Lord,  and  Colonel  tlie  Hod. 
Henry,  died  at  Dysart  5lh  September  1670,  and  out 
daughter,  Elizabeth,  l^y  Campbell  of  Glenurdiy. 

John,  beveuth  Lord  Sinclair,  bom  29th  Octoberi  1610^ 


I 


SINCLAIR, 


4C0 


OF  LONGFORMACUa 


Tolved  on  Sir  James  Erskine,  baronet,  aecond  earl  of  Ross- 
Ijn,  grandson  of  the  Hon.  Catherine  St  Clair,  the  general's 
second  eldest  sister,  who  married  Sir  John  Erskine  of  Alra, 
baronet,  (see  Rossltn,  earl  of,  p.  874  of  this  volume ).  The 
general's  third  sister,  the  Hon.  Maiy  St.  Clair,  married  Sir 
William  Baird  of  Newbyth.  His  fourth  sister,  Elisabeth, 
conntess  of  Wemjss,  had  two  daughters,  Elisabeth,  countess 
of  Sutherland,  and  Margaret,  countess  of  Moray. 

llie  title  of  Lord  Sinclair  devolved  on  the  general's  cousin, 
Charles  St  Clair  of  Herdmanstonn,  advocate,  who,  however, 
did  not  assume  it  He  died  at  Edinburgh,  4th  November 
1775.  With  one  daughter,  Elizabeth,  the  wife  of  Colonel 
Dalrymple,  he  had  two  sons,  Matthew,  who  died  young,  and 
Andrew,  eleventh  Lord  Sinclair  de/cirs,  but  neither  did  he 
assume  the  title.  He  died  in  December  1776,  little  more 
than  a  year  after  his  father.  He  married  a  daughter  of  John 
Rutherford,  Esq.  of  Edgerston,  and  with  one  daughter,  Eleo- 
nora,  who  died  unmarried,  he  had  two  sons,  Charles,  twelfth 
Lord  Sinclair,  and  the  Hon.  Matthew  St  Clair,  master  and 
commander  in  the  royal  navy,  1797.  He  was  appointed  to 
the  command  of  the  Msrtin  sloop  of  war  of  16  guns,  which, 
in  1800,  sailed  from  Yarmouth  to  Heligoland,  and  was  lost 
at  sea. 

Charles  St.  Clair  of  Herdmanstonn,  the  elder  son,  bom  in 
1768,  claimed  the  title  of  Lord  Sinclair,  and  had  it  confirmed 
to  him  by  a  decision  of  the  House  of  I^ords,  25th  April  1782. 
His  lordship  was  in  the  army,  which  he  qmlted,  with  the 
rank  of  lieut-col.,  in  1802.  In  1803  he  became  lieut-col.  of 
the  Berwickshire  militia,  but  resigned  in  1805.  In  1807  he 
was  chosen  a  Scots  representative  peer,  and  the  following  year 
appointed  to  the  coinniaiid  of  the  Haddingtonshire  militia, 
lie  married,  Ist,  in  1802,  Mary  Agnes,  daughter  of  Cliisholm 
of  Cliisholm,  and  bad  by  her  8  sons  and  1  dr, '  I^dy  SincL-iir 
died  in  1814,  and  in  1816  he  married,  2dly,  Isabella,  daugh- 
ter of  Alexander  Chatto,  E^q.  of  Main  House,  Rozburglisliire; 
issue,  2  drt.  Heir,  his  eldest  son,  James,  master  of  Sinclair, 
J. P.  and  D.r«.,  formerly  Capt.  Gren.-gds,  born  July  3, 1803, 
m.  in  1830,  Jane,  eldest  dr.  of  ArchibHld  Little,  Esq.  of  Shab- 
den  Park,  Surrey ;  issue,  4  sons  and  2  daughters. 


The  above-named  Sir  Oliver  St  Clair  of  Roslin,  second  son 
of  the  second  marriage  of  William,  third  earl  of  Orkney  of 
his  family,  by  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Sir  W^illinm  Borthwick 
of  Borthwick,  had  five  sons.  George,  the  eldest,  succeeded 
him  in  Roslin.  Henry,  the  second  son,  was  educated  for  the 
church  at  the  univerttity  of  St.  Andrews.  He  was  highly 
esteemed  by  James  V.,  and  was  for  years  in  his  family.  He 
Acquired  the  lands  of  Stevenston,  Haddingtonshire,  in  1536, 
but  in  the  following  year  realigned  them  to  his  younger 
brother.  James.  On  13th  November  1537,  he  was  admitted 
an  ordinary  lord  of  session,  and  on  16th  December  1538,  he 
was  appointed  rector  of  Glasgow.  In  1541  he  became  per- 
petual commendator  of  the  abbey  of  Kilwinning,  which  last 
benefice  he  exchanged  with  Gavin  Hamilton  for  the  deanery 
of  Glasgow  in  1550.  In  1544  he  was  president  of  the  court 
of  session.  He  was  ambassador  from  Scotland  to  England, 
and  Flanders,  and  in  1560  was  appointed  bishop  of  Ross. 
He  died  in  France,  where  he  went  to  get  cut  for  the  stone, 
January  2,  1565.  The  character  of  this  pi-elate  has  been 
elegantly  drawn  by  Mr.  Tytler.  He  has,  however,  decided 
ngainst  him  the  doubt  which  Lord  Hailes  had  expressed  as  to 
>>  liether  the  Reports  of  decisions,  known  as  Sinclair's  Prac- 
ticks,  and  which  commence  1st  June  1540  and  are  continued 
till  28th  May  1549,  were  compiled  by  him  or  his  brother, 
John.  Sir  Oliver  Sinclair,  the  third  son,  was  the  celebrated 
favourite  of  James  V.,  who  had  the  command  of  the  Scots 


army  at  the  rout  of  Solway  Mois  in  1542.  He  got  m  dwrtac 
under  the  great  seal  of  the  lands  and  buooj  of  Pitcain, 
dated  12th  January,  1587,  and  afterwards  one  finom  Queen 
Mary,  of  the  lands  of  Boreland,  near  Djaart,  Fifeahire,  dated 
29th  July,  1546.  He  lefl  iaane.  John,  the  foorth  son,  rec- 
tor of  Snaw,  was  admitted  an  ordinary  lord  of  sesskm,  27th 
April  1540.  He  was  afterwards  dean  of  Bestalrig.  He  at- 
tended his  brother,  the  bishop  of  Roes,  to  Franes  in  1564^ 
and  brought  home  with  him  the  materials  whidi  he  had 
commenced  for  a  continuation  of  Boece*s  History  of  Scot- 
land. He  succeeded  his  brother  as  president  of  the  esort  of 
session.  Sinclair,  dean  of  Bestalrig,  married  Qneen  Maiy 
and  Lord  Damley,  in  the  abbey  diurdi  of  Holjrood,  S9U 
July,  1565.  Shortly  afterwards  be  was  pcomoted  to  be 
bishop  of  Brechin,  but  died  in  April  3566.  The  fifth 
was  James  Sinclair  of  Stevenston,  ahneady  mentioned. 


The  Sinclurs  of  Dunbeath,  Invemess-ehire,  baronets,  de- 
scend firom  the  Hon.  George  Sinchur  of  Mey,  third  son  of  the 
fourth  earl  of  Caithness  of  the  name  of  Sinclair.  Bj  his 
wife,  Margaret,  daughter  of  the  seventh  Lord  Forbes,  Mr. 
Sinclair  of  Mey  had,  with  several  daughters,  three  sons.  L 
William,  who  succeeded  to  the  estate  of  Mey.  2.  Sir  John 
Sinclau*,  who  got  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Dunbeath,  80th 
July  1624.  3.  Alexander  Sinclair  of  I^hrone.  The  second 
son.  Sir  John  Sinclair,  was,  as  Sinclair  of  Canisby,  created  a 
baronet  of  Nova  Scotia,  by  patent,  dated  2d  January  1631, 
to  himself  and  the  heirs  male  of  his  body.  Having  ofdy  a 
daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  Hugh  Roee  of  Kilravock,  he 
was  succeeded,  in  default  of  issue  nude,  by  his  nephew,  Wil- 
liam, eldest  son  of  his  younger  brother,  Alexander.  The  lat- 
ter had,  with  3  daughters,  4  sons.  1.  William,  his  bdr.  2. 
Alexander  Sinclair  of  Stempster.  3.  John  Sinclair  of  Brab- 
ster.    4.  George  Sinclair,  first  of  the  Sinclairs  of  Barrock. 

The  eldest  son,  Sir  William,  was  the  2d  b:uronet  During 
the  civil  wars,  he  adhered  to  the  cause  of  Charles  I.,  and  in 
1650  his  house  was  plundered  by  the  Covenanters. 

His  cousin,  Sir  James  Sinclair  of  Dunbeath  and  Stempster, 
was  the  3d  baronet  He  m.  Is.il>el,  daughter  of  Sir  Archibald 
Muir,  lord  provost  of  Edinburgh,  and  died  in  1742.  His 
eldest  son.  Sir  William  Sinclair  of  Dunbeath,  4th  baronet, 
had  a  son,  Sir  Benjamin,  5th  baronet,  who  died  in  1796. 

His  son.  Sir  John,  6th  baronet,  a  major-general  in  the 
East  India  Company's  service,  died  Oct  1,  1842,  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  cousin,  Sir  John  Sinclair,  7th  baronet,  born 
Sept  16,  1794,  manied  in  July  1821,  the  daughter  of  John 
Lcarmontli,  Ei^q.  of  the  Dean,  Edinburgh;  issue,  with  one 
daughter  (who  died  in  1849),  three  sons.  1.  John,  captain 
39th  Madras  N.  I.,  bom  in  1822,  killed  at  the  capture  of 
Ihansie,  April  5,  1858.  2.  Alexander  Young,  bom  in  1824, 
capt  H.  M.  Bomb.iy  army,  married.  3.  George,  bom  in  1826, 
formerly  capt  H.  M.  Bengal  anny,  married,  in  1859,  Agnes, 
only  dr.  of  John  I^armonth  of  the  Dean. 

The  Sinclairs  of  Longfonnacus,  Berwickshire,  who  also 
possess  a  baronetcy  of  Nova  Scotia,  are  descended  from  Sir 
George  St  Clair,  third  son  of  Sir  William  St  Clair  of  Roslto, 
the  sixth  generation  of  that  "  lordly  line.**  The  first  baronet 
of  this  branch  was  Sir  Robert  Sinclair,  the  twelfth  proprietor 
of  lx)ngformacus,  advocate,  who  was  retoured  heir  to  bis 
father,  James  Sinclair,  in  those  lands,  4th  November,  1647. 
He  was  an  active  supporter  of  the  ruyal  cause  during  the 
civil  wars,  and  by  Charles  II.  was  created  a  baronet  of  Nova 
Scotia,  by  patent,  dated  10th  December  1664,  to  him  and  his 
heirs  male  whatsoever.  He  died  in  1678.  His  eldest  son, 
Sir  John,  second  baronet,  had  one  son.  Sir  Robert,  third 


SINCLAIR, 


462 


GEORGE. 


and  Div'iHiun/  *  The  Bore/  wnd  other  pablicntioiiM.  He  miur- 
ried,  May  1,  1816,  I^dr  Catherine  Camilia  Tolleinnclie,  sister 
of  the  6lh  earl  of  Dysart;  issue,  8  sons  and  8  dnu^hters. 
Suns:  1.  Dndler,  died  unmarried.  2.  John  George  Tolle- 
mnche,  bom  Nov.  8,  1825;  married,  in  1853,  Emma,  daugh- 
ter of  Uie  deceased  William  S.  Standish,  Esq.  of  Duxbury, 
county  Lancaster;  iifsue,  Clarence  Granville,  born  April  3, 
1858:  Amy-Camilla,  and  two  other  daughters.  3.  Granville, 
died  in  1833.  Daughters:  1.  Kmilia  Magdalen  Ix>ui8a,  mar- 
ried, Ist,  in  1837,  Henry  Tollemache,  Esq.,  and  2dly,  her 
former  miimage  being  dissolved  by  divorce,  in  1841,  Mnjor 
John  Power;  iwme  by  1st  marriage,  a  son,  and  by  2d,  one  son 
and  2  daughters.  2.  Adelaide  Mary,  manied  in  1845,  George, 
2d  son  of  John  James  Hope  Johnstone,  Esq.  of  Annandale, 
M.P. ;  issue,  one  son  and  2  daughters.     8.  Olive  Sophia. 

In  Caithness- shire  are  also  the  SIncIairs  of  Forss,  an  estate 
acquired  from  the  earl  of  Sutherland  in  1560,  the  representa- 
tive of  which  family,  James  Sinclair,  Esq.  of  Forss,  advocate, 
succeeded  his  father  in  1822;  the  Sindairs  of  Lybster;  the 
Sinclairs  of  Freswick ;  and  other  families  of  the  name. 


The  Sinclairs  are  understood  to  be  a  dan,  tlieir  b:idge  being 
«  branch  of  whins  or  gorss,  and  their  tartan  red.  For  the 
feuds  and  achievements  of  the  clan,  see  vol.  i.  of  this  work 
(article  Caitiixess,  earl  of,  pp.  521 — 525).  President  Forbes 
says  that  in  1745  the  earl  of  Caithness  could  raise  1,000  men. 
According  to  an  old  superstition  no  Sinclair  will  willingly 
dress  in  green,  or  venture  to  cross  the  mountain  called  the  Ord 
of  Caithness  on  a  jilunday,  for  in  such  an  array  and  on  that 
duy,  forty  Sinclairs,  led  by  the  earl  of  Caithness,  by  that  road 
marched  to  the  fatal  field  of  Hodden,  and  were  all  slain,  ex- 
cept the  drummer,  who  was  dismissed  before  the  battle  began. 

Of  the  great  house  of  Sindair,  the  earl  of  Caithness  is  the 
collateral  heir  male,  the  direct  heir  of  line  being  Mr.  An- 
struther  Thomson  of  Charleton,  Fifeshire.  The  latter  is  thus 
descended :  Margaret  Paterson,  sister  of  Colonel  James  Pa- 
terson  St.  Clair,  above  mentioned,  (see  page  45G,)  whose 
mother  was  the  Hon.  Grizei  St.  Clair,  daughter  of  the  7th 
I^rd  Sinclair,  marrieii  John  Thomson,  Esq.  of  Charleton, 
Her  daughter,  Grizei  Maria  Thomson,  heiress  of  Charleton, 
became  the  wife  of  Colonel  John  Anstruther,  2d  son  of  Sir 
Philip  Anstruther  of  Balcaskie,  baronet,  and  her  son,  John 
Anstruther  Thomson,  by  his  wife,  Clementina,  only  dr.  of  the 
Right  Hon.  William  Adam  of  Blair-Adam,  had  a  son,  John 
Anstruther  Thomson,  representative  of  the  e^irls  of  Orkney. 

SINCLAIR,  George,  a  distinguished  mathe- 
matical writer  of  the  scventeeiitli  century,  of 
whose  early  history  Httle  is  known,  was  admitted 
professor  of  philosophy  in  the  university  of  Glas- 
gow, April  18,  1654.  In  1661  he  published  his 
first  work,  '  Tyrocinia  Mathematica ;  in  iv.  Trac- 
tatus,'  &c.  In  1662  he  was  ejected  from  his 
chair,  for  declining  to  comply  with  the  episcopal 
form  of  church  government  then  forced  upon  Scot- 
land. He  afterwards  pursued,  with  some  suc- 
cess, the  business  of  a  mineral  surveyor  and  prac- 
tical engineer.  About  1670  he  was  employed  by 
the  magistrates  of  Edinburgh  to  superintend  the 
introduction  of  water  into  that  city.  In  1672  he 
published  a  quarto,  entitled  *  Hydrostaticks ;  or, 


the  Force,  Weight,  and  Pressure  of  Fluid  Bodies.* 
And,  in  1680,  a  similar  work  in  Svo,  under  the 
title  of  *  Hydrostatical  Experiments,  with  XtLsoel- 
lany  Observations,  and  a  Relation  of  an  Evil 
Spirit ;  also  a  Discourse  concerning  Coal.'    This 
strange  compound  of  science  and  superstition  con- 
tained an  account  of  the  Witches  of  Glenlnce ;  the 
ingenious  author  being,  like  many  other  learned 
men  of  his  time,  a  firm  believer  in  the  black  art 
His  Hydrostatics  were  attacked  in  a  cnrions  pam- 
phlet, entitled  *  The  Art  of  Weighing  Vanity,'  by 
Professor  James  Gregory,   under   the    assnmed 
name  of  Patrick  Mather,  Archbeadle  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  St.  Andrews.    An  unpublished  answer 
by  Sinclair,  quaintly  styled  *  Cacns  pulled  out  of 
his  Den  by  the  Ilecis,*  remains  in  manuscript  in 
the  libraiy  of  the  univci'sity  of  Glasgow,  to  which 
it  was  presented  by  the  author  in  1692.    Sinclair 
is  said  to  have  been  among  the  first  in  Great  Bri- 
tain who  attempted  to  measure  the  heights  of 
mountains  by  the  barometer.    His  best-known 
work  is  his  '  Satan's  Invisible  World  Discovered,* 
published  about  1685,  and  fi*equently  reprinted. 
At  the  Revolution  he  was  recalled  to  his  chair  of 
philosophy  in  the  university  of  Glasgow,  and  on 
March  3,  1691,  he  was  transferred  to  the  profes- 
sorship of  mathematics,  on  its  revival  by  the  fac- 
ulty of  the  college.    He  died  in  1696.    His  works 
are: 

Tyrocinia  Mathematica;  in  iv.  Tractatus,  viz.  arithmetlcnm, 
sphericam,  geographicnm,  et  echometricum  divisa.  Gla^ 
1661,  12mo. 

Ars  Nova,  et  magna  Graritatis  ac  Levitatis,  sea  Dialog- 
omm  Philosophicomm,  Libri  vi.  de  Aeris  vera  et  reali  gravi- 
tate.    Rott.  1669,  4to. 

Hydrostaticks ;  or,  the  Force,  Weight,  and  Pressure  of 
Fluid  Bodies,  made  evident  by  Physical  and  sensible  Experi- 
ments; together  with  some  Miscellaneous  Observations;  the 
last  whereof  is  a  short  History  of  Coal.     Edin.  1672,  4to. 

Natural  Philosophy  improved  by  new  Experiments.  The 
same  Work  with  a  new  title,  and  Miscellaneous  Observations, 
which  contmns  a  Relation  of  an  evil  Spirit ;  with  a  Disooursi 
on  Coal.     Edin.  1683,  4to. 

Satnn*s  Invisible  World  discovered;  or,  a  Choice  Collection 
of  Relations  anent  Devils,  Spirits,  Witches,  and  Apparitions. 
Edin.  1685,  12mo.  Glasg.  1769,  12mo.  This  important 
discovery  of  the  old  gentleman's  cellarages  and  coUeagnes 
was  long  a  favourite  with  the  lower  classes,  but  it  u  nov 
less  popular,  as  its  man'elloos  descriptions  are  now  less 
credited. 

Principles  of  Astronomy  and  Navigation;  or,  the  Doctrine 
of  the  Sphere:  on  Mercurial  Weather  Glasses:  Method  <rt 
buoying  up  a  ship  of  any  burden  from  the  ground  of  the  Se» 
Edin.  1688,  12mo. 

Translation  of  Dickson*s  Truth's  VictOTy  over  Error. 


Ib_ 


SINCLAIR, 


464 


SIR  JOHN. 


In  the  following  year,  he  made  an  extensive 
tour  through  the  nortliem  countries  of  Europe, 
with  the  view  of  inquiring  into  their  political  and 
commercial  condition.  In  the  course  of  this  jour- 
ney, he  travelled  above  7,500  miles,  and  was  in- 
troduced  to  nearly  all  the  courts  of  the  various 
countries  through  which  he  passed.  He  also  be- 
came acquainted  with  many  of  the  most  eminent 
and  remarkable  men  on  the  continent.  It  was 
not,  however,  till  1830,  when  he  published  two 
large  volumes  of  his  correspondence,  that  a  digest 
of  the  valuable  observations  made  on  the  occasion 
on  the  political,  commercial,  agricultural,  moral, 
and  religious  state  of  the  countries  he  had  visited, 
was  submitted  to  the  public.  On  his  retmn  to 
Scotland  in  1787,  he  proceeded  with  those  im- 
provements on  his  own  estate  which  speedily  tend- 
ed, in  a  great  degree,  to  give  a  new  aspect  to  the 
county  of  Caithness,  and  to  which  the  large  in- 
crease of  the  population  of  that  count}',  which 
subsequently  took  place,  is  mainly  to  be  attributed. 

On  the  6th  of  March  1788,  Sir  John  Sinclair 
married  a  second  time,  at  London,  the  Hon.  Di- 
ana Macdonald,  only  daughter  of  Alexander  first 
Lord  Macdouald.  The  same  year  the  degree  of 
doctor  of  laws  was  conferred  on  him  by  the  uni- 
versity of  Glasgow.  Having,  about  this  time, 
directed  his  attention  to  the  improvement  of  Brit- 
ish wool,  he  published  several  papers  on  the  sub- 
ject, and  in  1791  procured  the  establishment  of  a 
society  at  Edinburgh  for  the  encouragement  of 
valuable  breeds  of  sheep,  of  which  he  was  chosen 
the  president.  By  the  cxeitions  of  this  useful 
Society,  gi*eat  improvements  were  effected  in  the 
pastoral  districts ;  and  many  lands  were  doubled 
in  value  by  the  new  mode  of  sheep-farming  intro- 
duced. 

The  previous  year  he  had  begun  to  entei'tain 
the  idea  of  that  great  national  undertaking  which 
is  associated  with  his  name,  the  Statistical  account 
of  Scotland.  So  little  had  the  subject  been  at 
that  time  attended  to  that  the  very  term  *  statis- 
tics' is  of  his  invention.  Being  a  lay  member  of 
the  General  Assembly,  it  occurred  to  him  that  he 
might  be  able  to  prevail  on  a  great  proportion  of 
the  clergy  of  the  Church  of  Scotland  to  furnish 
the  requisite  information  regarding  every  parish, 
80  that  a  complete  statistical  account  of  the  king- 


dom might  be  obtidned.  Hia  original  plan  was  to 
draw  up  a  general  atatiatical  vieir  of  ScoUaod, 
without  reference  to  parochial  diatricts ;  but  lach 
a  mass  of  useful  facts  and  observations  was  eon- 
tained  in  the  communications  sent  to  him,  that  he 
resolved  upon  preparing  the  woriL  for  preaa  In  the 
extended  form  in  which  it  was  pabliahed.  After 
unwearied  exertions  he  succeeded  in  bringing  oat 
the  first  volume  of  this  great  work  in  1791.  But, 
although  backed  by  a  recommendation  from  the 
Greneral  Assembly,  and  supported  by  the  active 
exertions  of  some  of  the  leading  members  of  the 
church,  he  had  to  contend  with  many  difficnltiee 
before  he  could  complete  the  nndertaking.  De- 
termined to  bring  it  to  a  satisfactory  condnsion, 
he  engaged  five  statistical  missionaries,  to  whom 
he  allotted  different  divisions  of  the  country ;  and 
by  their  means  the  accounts  of  no  less  than 
twenty-five  parishes,  which  must  otherwise  have 
been  wanting,  were  accurately  obtained.  The 
work  was  at  length  completed  on  the  1st  of  Janu- 
ary 1798,  seven  years  and  a  half  after  its  com- 
mencement. It  was  comprised  in  twenty  thick 
8vo  volumes,  to  which  another  was  subsequently 
added.  The  profits  of  the  publication  were  given 
to  the  Society  instituted  for  the  benefit  of  the  Sous 
of  the  Clergy ;  and  for  the  same  benevolent  pur- 
pose Sir  John  obtained  a  grant  of  £2,000  from 
government.  A  New  Statistical  Account  of  Scot- 
land, in  15  volumes,  8vo.,  was  published  by  Black- 
wood of  Edinburgh  in  1845,  Sir  John  Sinclair's 
work  having  been  taken  as  its  model. 

In  May  1793  Sir  John  printed  and  circulated  i 
plan  for  establishing  a  Board  of  Agriculture  and 
Internal  Improvement ;  and,  on  the  15th  of  the 
same  month,  ho  moved,  in  his  place  in  parlia- 
ment, an  address  to  the  crown  in  favour  of  the 
proposed  establishment.  After  an  animated  and 
interesting  debate,  which  was  adjourned  till  the 
17th,  his  motion  was  carried,  on  a  division,  by  i 
majority  of  75.  Soon  after  the  Board  was  ap- 
pointed, and  received  a  charter  from  the  crown, 
in  which  Sir  John  Sinclair  was  nominated  its  first 
president.  To  the  exei*tions  of  this  board  the 
country  is  indebted,  in  a  great  degree,  for  its  rapid 
progress  in  the  ait  of  husbandry.  A  spirit  of  en- 
terprise was  excited  among  the  farming  classes, 
agricultural  associations  were  formed  all  over  the 


.  I 


_j. 


SINCLAIR, 


465 


SIR  JOHN. 


kiiigilom,  reports  were  publisbed,  in  50  octavo 
volumes,  describing  accurately  every  county  in 
Great  Britain,  and  tlie  substance  of  the  informa- 
tion thus  accumulated  was  digested,  by  Sir  John 
himself,  into  his  *  Code  of  Agriculture,*  published 
iu  1819.  He  continued  president  of  the  board  for 
tbhrteen  years.  In  1803  Sir  Humphrey  Davy 
gave  his  first  course  of  lectures  on  agricultural 
chemistry  before  the  board  of  agriculture.  Ap- 
pointed their  professor  with  a  salary  of  £100  per 
annum,  Davy  continued  for  ten  years  to  detail 
befoire  them  the  enlarged  views  which  his  scienti- 
fic acquirements  enabled  him  to  take  of  the  sub- 
ject, and  in  1813  the  lectures  were  published  at 
the  request  of  the  board.  When  Sir  John  Sin- 
clahr  ceased  to  superintend  its  operations,  the 
board  of  agriculture  gradually  declined,  and  was 
finally  abolished. 

Soon  after  the  commencement  of  hostilities  with 
France  in  1793,  so  great  was  the  stagnation  that 
prevailed  in  the  commerce  of  Great  Britain,  that 
a  deficiency  in  the  circulating  medium  was  the 
consequence,  and  the  national  bankruptcy  seemed 
almost  inevitable.  In  this  emergency.  Sir  John 
came  forward  with  a  plan  for  the  issue  of  Exche- 
quer bills  to  the  amount  of  five  millions,  to  be 
issued  by  way  of  loans  in  small  sums  to  merchants 
and  manufacturers.  This  plan  received  the  ready 
approval  of  Pitt  and  Dundas,  and  having  speedily 
passed,  proved  the  means  of  preventing  general 
min. 

In  1794,  when  the  call  to  arms  was  made  by 
government.  Sir  John  Sinclair  received  letters  of 
service  to  raise  a  fencible  regiment  in  the  counties 
of  Ross  and  Caithness,  the  services  of  which 
should  extend  to  England.  Tlie  regiment  on  be- 
faig  formed  amounted  to  one  thousand  men.  It 
was  at  first  called  the  *^  Caithness  fenciblcs,**  but 
In  compliment  to  the  chief  title  In  Scotland  of 
the  Prince  of  Wales,  the  name  was  subsequently 
changed  to  that  of  the  **  Rothesay  and  Caithness 
fendbles.**  The  uniform  of  the  regiment  was  a 
bonnet  and  feathers,  with  a  plaid  and  tartan 
trews.  The  latter  was  adopted  by  Sir  John  Sin- 
clair in  the  belief  that  it  was  more  ancient  than 
the  kilt,  and,  as  was  usual  with  him  on  every 
natter  that  engrossed  his  attention,  he  wrote  a 
pamphlet  on  the  subject.    A  second  battalion,  at 

IIL 


first  of  600  and  afterwards  of  1,000  men,  was  iu 
1795  raised  by  him,  which  served  in  Ireland  in 
suppressing  the  rebellion  of  1798  During  the 
volunteer  period,  Sir  John  commanded  the  camp 
at  Aberdeen,  and  published  several  pamphlets  on 
military  matters.  In  one  of  these,  entitled  *•  Cur- 
sory Observations  on  the  Military  Sj'stcm  of  Great 
Britain,*  the  tactics  of  Nnpolcon  were  investi- 
gated, and  improvements  in  the  system  of  Gi*eat 
Britain  suggested.  When  the  expedition  to 
Egypt  was  undertaken  two  hundred  and  twenty 
of  the  Caithness  fencibles  volunteered  into  the 
regiments  of  the  line,  pflrticnlarly  the  79th  and 
92d  Highlanders.  One  of  them.  Sergeant  Sinclair, 
of  the  79th  regiment,  took  an  eagle  from  the 
French  Invincibles  at  the  battle  of  Alexandria,  for 
which  Sir  John  procured  him  promotion. 

Having,  as  early  as  1783,  acquired  a  considera- 
ble reputation  as  a  writer  on  finance,  he  was  in- 
duced to  follow  out  the  subject  in  his  *  Review  of 
the  Financial  Administration  of  the  Right  Hon. 
William  Pitt,*  to  which  an  appendix  was  added 
in  1789,  and  a  third  part  in  1790.  In  1797,  when 
Pitt,  then  combining  in  himself  the  offices  of 
prime  minister  and  chancellor  of  the  exchequer, 
found  that  the  ti*easury  was  exhausted,  whilst  the 
demands  upon  it  were  increasing,  he  consulted  Sir 
John  Sinclair,  at  that  time,  through  the  interest 
of  the  prince  of  Wales,  member  for  Petersfield,  as 
to  what  was  to  be  done  in  the  emergency.  The 
result  was  the  scheme  known  by  the  name  of  the 
"Loyalty  Loan,"  the  germ  of  several  subsequent 
financial  projects.  He  supported  the  minister  in 
his  war  measures  against  the  French  republic,  but 
when  he  saw  a  pi'ospect  of  peace  he  was  willing 
to  take  advantage  of  it.  He  joined  the  party 
known  by  the  name  of  the  **  Armed  Neutrality," 
of  which  the  earl  of  Moira  was  considered  the  head, 
and  which  supported  economy  and  retrenchment, 
and  parliamentary  reform.  During  the  greater 
part  of  the  sessions  1797,  98,  and  99,  he  took  a 
leading  part  in  the  business  of  the  house  of  com- 
mons, especially  in  opposing  the  financial  measures 
of  the  government.  When  the  bill  for  a  union 
with  Ireland  was  under  discussion  in  parliament, 
he  made  an  effort  to  have  the  number  of  the  Scot- 
tish representatives  increased,  but  was  unsuccess- 


ful. 


2o 


1 


SINCLAIR, 


4G6 


SIR  JOFIN. 


1 1 


Being  led,  about  1802,  to  the  considcratiou  of 
the  subject  of  health,  he  published  in  1803  a  quarto 
pamphlet,  entitled  '■  Hints  on  Longevity.'  In 
the  same  year  he  collected  his  Essays  on  Miscel- 
laneous Subjects,  and  published  them  together  in 
one  volume  octavo.  He  afterwards  compiled  an 
extensive  work  on  the  general  subject  of  health, 
in  which  he  condensed  into  a  manageable  form  all 
tlie  widely  scattered  matenals  found  in  ancient 
and  modem  authors.  This  was  published  in 
1807,  as  a  *Code  of  Health  and  Ix)ngevity,'  in 
4  vo!8.  8vo,  subsequently  abridged  into  one  vol. 

In  May  1805,  Sir  John  was  appointed  by  Mr. 
Pitt  a  commissioner  for  superintending  tlie  con- 
struction of  new  roads  and  bridges  in  the  noitli  of 
Scotland.  In  1810,  he  was  swoni  a  privy  councillor. 
His  speecii  on  the  bullion  question  was  among  the 
last  delivered  by  him  in  parliament,  from  which 
he  retired  in  July  1811,  when  he  was  succeeded 
by  his  eldest  son.  The  same  year,  under  the 
administration  of  Mr.  Pcrcival,  he  was  appointed 
cashier  of  excise  in  Scotland,  with  a  salary  of 
£2,000  a-year.  This  situation  he  was  induced  to 
accept  in  consequence  of  his  private  affaire  hav- 
ing become  much  embarrassed  by  the  vast  ex- 
penses incurred  in  his  public  life,  and  by  tlie  un- 
successful prosecution  of  certain  claims  which  he 
had  on  the  East  India  Company. 

Early  in  1815,  Sir  Jolin  visited  tlie  Netlierlands, 
principally  with  the  object  of  examining  into  the 
agiicultural  state  of  that  countiy,  and  of  ascer- 
taining the  relative  prices  of  grain  in  Great  Britain 
and  the  continental  com  countries,  more  especially 
Flandere  and  France.  The  escape  of  Napoleon 
from  Elba  caused  him  to  retuni  sooner  than  he 
wished.  The  following  year,  he  published  his 
*  Hints  on  the  Agricultural  State  of  the  Nether- 
lands compared  with  that  of  Great  Britain.'  After 
the  victory  of  Waterloo,  he  again  visited  the  con- 
tinent, and  went  over  the  field  of  battle.  At 
Calais,  on  his  return  homeward,  he  met  with  Ser- 
geant Ewart.  of  the  Scots  Greys,  who  had  dis- 
tinguished himself  by  capturing  one  of  the  French 
eagles,  and  it  was  through  Sir  John  Sinclair's 
interest  that  that  intrepid  soldier  was  promoted  to 
an  ensigncy  in  a  veteran  corps. 

Besides  the  works  specified.  Sir  John  published 
a  great  variety  of  smaller  pamphlets  and  tracts,  on 


subjects  connected  with  agricaltiire  or  poUtial 
economy.  Among  the  firat  of  liia  writings  was 
a  work  on  the  Sabbath,  which  by  the  advice  of 
Dr.  Adam  Smith,  to  whom  he  had  submitted  it  is 
manuscript,  was  never  published.  He  had  earij 
obtained  the  friendship  of  that  emineDt  phikMO- 
pher,  a  circumstance  which  greatly  strengthened  his 
taste  for  political  economy.  His  agricultural  wiit- 
ings,  having  been  translated  hito  the  French,  Ger- 
man, and  other  languages,  he  was  elected  a  member 
of  most  of  the  agricultural  societies  of  the  continent, 
and  held  no  less  than  twenty-five  diplomas  fron 
institutions  in  France,  Flanders,  Prussia,  Av- 
tria.  Saxony,  Wirtemberg,  Germany,  Sweden, 
Denmark,  Russia,  Italy,  the  United  States,  ukI 
the  West  Indies.  He  was  likewise  a  fellow  of 
the  royal  societies  of  Ijondon  and  Edinburgh,  aod 
of  the  antiquarian  society  of  London.  He  wis 
president  of  the  Highland  Society  of  London,  as 
well  as  an  original  member  of  the  Highhuid 
Society  of  Scotland.  Whatever  tended  to  tlie  pre- 
servation of  the  national  language,  dress,  or  dim- 
net's  of  his  native  countr}-,  he  was  always  anxious 
to  promote.  He  frequently  presided  at  the  annul 
competition  of  pipei's  in  Edinburgh,  and  was  en- 
thusiastic in  the  admiration  of  the  music  of  Scot- 
land. 

His  intimacy  with  the  most  eminent  men  of  his 
time,  both  at  home  and  abroad,  led  him  into  u 
extensive  con-espondence,  and  two  veiy  interest- 
ing volumes  of  it  were  published  at  London  in 
1831.  His  name  and  works  were  well  knoira  in 
America.  With  Presidents  Washington,  Jeffer- 
son, and  Adams,  he  had  frequent  communications; 
whilst  few  foreigners  of  any  distinction  visited 
Scotland  without  lettera  of  introduction  to  him. 

Sir  John  Sinclair  died  at  Edinburgh,  where  be 
had  resided  for  the  last  twenty  years  of  his  active 
and  useful  life,«December  21, 1835,  and  was  buried 
in  the  Royal  chapel  of  Holyrood.  By  his  first 
wife  he  had  two  daughters,  and  by  his  second, 
seven  sons  and  five  daughters.  The  names  of  bis 
children  are  given  in  the  genealogical  account  of 
the  family  prefixed  to  this  memoir.  "In  early 
life,"  says  his  son,  "  ho  was  tall,  well-proportioned, 
and  athletic.  He  was  six  feet  two  inches  in 
height.  His  features  were  formed  nearly  after  the 
Grecian    model.      He    was    always  of  a  spju« 


I 


■  I 


SINCLAIR, 


467 


SIR  JOHN. 


habit,  and  as  he  advanced  in  life,  stooped  con- 
siderably.*' It  was  said  of  him  by  the  Abbe 
Gregoire  that  ^*the  Chevalier  Sinclaur  was  not 
only  the  most  indefatigable  man  in  Europe,  bat 
the  man  of  the  most  extensive  acqnaintance.*' 
A  remarkable  instance  of  that  energy  of  character, 
for  which  he  was  distiugnished  daring  his  whole 
life,  was  evuiced  by  him  'at  the  early  age  of 
eighteen,  in  the  formation  of  a  road  over  the  hill 
of  Ben  Cheilt,  in  the  centre  of  the  connty  of 
Caithness.  It  was  believed  that  the  whole  ^*  sta- 
tute laboar'*  of  the  coimtry  conld  not  make  a  road 
over  it,  but  having  resolved  upon  completing  one 
in  the  shortest  possible  time,  he  surveyed  the 
ground  in  person,  and  mai'ked  out  the  intended 
line,  then  appointed  all  the  neighbouring  faimers  to 
meet  him  on  a  certain  day  with  their  sei-vants. 
They  accordingly  assembled  to  the  number  of 
1,260,  and  being  divided  into  parties  and  plenti- 
fully supplied  with  tools  and  provisions,  they 
worked  from  day -dawn,  ^^  until  a  road,"  as  we 
are  told  by  his  son,  *^  which  had  been  hardly  pas- 
sable for  horses  in  the  morning,  became  practicable 
for  carriages  before  night."  To  this  feat  he  was 
indebted  for  his  first  wife's  choice  of  him,  out  of 
many  suitors.  One  of  his  rivals,  on  an  excursion 
to  the  Highlands,  had  been  unexpectedly  recalled 
from  Inverness  to  London.  Calling  upon  Miss 
Maitland  he  expressed  to  her  and  her  mother  his 
great  disappointment  at  not  being  able  to  extend 
his  tour.  He  had  heai'd,  he  said,  of  a  young  gen- 
tleman in  Caithness,  of  the  name  of  Sinclair,  who 
was  carrying  on  improvements  in  that  county  with 
an  energy  never  before  heard  of.  He  then  gave 
an  account  of  his  making  '*a  road  over  a  hill 
which  had  been  looked  upon  as  impassable,"  and 
of  ^*  his  plans  for  introducing  commerce  and  manu- 
factures, and  for  advancing  agriculture."  This 
encomium  decided  the  young  lady's  preference  in 
fiYOvar  of  Sir  John,  then  Mr.  Sinclair.  His  pro- 
posals for  her  hand  were  accepted,  and  the  mar- 
riage contract  drawn  up.  Nothing  more  was  re- 
quired than  the  naming  of  the  marriage  day,  when 
an  onexpected  obstacle  presented  itself  in  the  re- 
pugnance of  Mrs.  Maitland  to  the  removal  of  her 
daughter  from  her  own  neighbourhood.  She  in- 
sisted on  a  promise  from  her  future  son-in-law 
that  he  would  reside  permanently  in  England. 


To  this  he  would  not  consent,  and,  under  tiie 
impression  that  Miss  Maitland  agi-eed  with  her 
mother,  he  set  off  on  his  fii'st  excursion  to  the 
continent.  On  his  return,  he  learnt  that  the 
young  lady  did  not  approve  of  the  maternal 
stipulation,  and  the  marriage  accordingly  took 
place. 

Asa  practical  benefactor  of  his  country  and  true 
patriot,  his  name  will  be  long  remembered.  Soon 
after  he  first  entered  parliament,  he  was  the 
means  of  procuring  a  goverament  grant  for  the 
relief  of  his  suffering  countrymen,  which  earned 
for  him  their  lasting  gratitude.  The  summer  of 
1782  had  been  cold  and  stormy,  and  a  general 
failure  of  the  crops  took  place  throughout  the 
northern  counties.  By  the  exertions  of  Sir  John, 
then  Mr.  Sinclair,  the  sum  of  £15,000  was  obtained 
fi-om  Government,  by  which  the  inhabitants  of 
fifteen  counties,  amounting  to  111,521  souls,  were 
preserved  from  starvation. 

Of  Su*  John  Sinclair  there  are  many  portraits. 
Tiie  best  are  two  full  lengths,  one  by  West,  and 
the  other  by  Sir  Henry  Raeburn.  Both  represent 
him  in  the  uniform  of  his  fencible  regiment;  a 
dress  which  he  delighted  to  wear,  long  after  the 
corps  had  ceased  to  exist. 

A  catalogue  of  the  vai-ious  books,  tracts,  and 
papers  printed  by  Sir  John  Sinclair,  is  given  at 
the  end  of  the  Memoirs  of  his  Life  and  Works,  by 
his  son,  the  Rev.  John  Sinclair.  They  amount 
to  367.  A  complete  list  of  them  would  occupy 
more  than  five  pages  of  tliis  work  in  small  type. 

The  following  are  the  more  important : 

Lucubrations  durinf^  a  sliort  Receiss;  contiiining  «  plan  for 
a  more  equal  Representation  of  the  People,  l^ondon,  1782, 
8vo. 

Observations  on  the  Scottish  Dialect.    London,  1782,  8to. 

History  of  the  Public  Revenue  of  the  British  Empire. 
London,  1784.  2  vols.  4to.  Appendis,  4to,  Part  iii.  1790, 4to. 
The  same,  with  a  Review  of  Pitt's  Financial  Administration, 
1803-4,  3  vols.  8vo. 

State  of  Alterations  which  may  be  proposed  in  the  I«aws 
for  regulating  the  Election  of  Members  of  Parliament  for 
Shh^s  in  Scotland.     1787,  8vo. 

Address  to  the  Landed  Interest  on  the  Com  Bill  now  be- 
fore parliament.    London,  1791,  8vo. 

Dissertation  on  the  Authenticity  of  the  Poems  of  Ossiam. 
1795,  4to.    With  an  Appendix.     1807. 

Account  of  tlie  Origin  of  the  Board  of  Agriculture  and  its 
progress  for  three  years.     I«ondun,  1796,  4 to. 

Communications  to  the  Board  of  Agriculture  on  subjects 
relative  to  Husbandry  and  Internal  Improvement.  London, 
1797,  4to. 


SINCLAIR, 


468 


SIR  JOHN. 


The  Statistical  Account  of  Scotland,  drawn  np  from  the 
Comnmnicutions  of  the  Ministers  of  the  difTereiit  Parislies. 
21  vols.  8to.    Ediu.  1791-1799. 

Thoughts  respecting  the  ensuing  Campaign  on  the  Bor- 
ders of  Italy,  and  its  probable  Issue.     1797. 

Inquiry  into  the  State  of  Scotland.     1800. 

£ss:ij8  on  Miscellaneous  Subjects.     Ix>ndon,  1802,  8to. 

On  the  Political  State  of  £un»pe.     1803. 

Obflerratiuns  on  the  Propriety  of  Presen'ing  the  Dress,  the 
I^ngUHge,  the  Poetry,  the  Music,  and  the  Customs  of  the 
Ancient  Inhabitants  of  Scotland.     1804. 

The  Code  of  Health  and  Longevity.  Edin.  1807, 4  vols.  8vn. 
Four  8ubi>equent  editions  in  one  vol.  8vo ;  the  tirst  published 
in  1819. 

General  View  of  the  Agriculture  of  the  Northern  Counties 
and  Islands  of  Scotland.  Kdin.  1812,  8vo.  3d  edition,  with 
numerous  plates.     Edin.  1820,  2  vols.  8vo. 

Account  of  the  Highland  Society  of  Scotland.  I^ndon, 
1813.  8va 

Thoughts  on  the  Agricultural  and  Fmnncial  Stite  of  the 
Country.     1815. 

History  of  the  Campaign  of  the  Armies  under  the  Duke  of 
Wellington,  and  of  tlie  Prussians  under  Prince  Blucber.  By 
Baron  Muffling.  Edited,  with  additional  particulars,  and  an 
Appendix.    1815. 

The  Code  of  Agriculture.  1817.  5  editions,  8vo.  Trans- 
hited  into  the  French,  (Jennan,  and  Dutch  languages. 

Analysis  of  the  Statistical  Account  of  Scotland.  2  Parts, 
1825,  2  vols. 

Fingnl,  a  Tragedy  in  Five  Acto.     1830. 

The  Correspondence  of  Right  Hon.  Sir  John  Sinclair, 
Bart;  with  Reminiscences  of  distinguished  Characters.  2 
vols.,  I^ondon,  1881,  8vo. 

Tlio  minor  works,  pamphlets,  and  fugitive  pie- 
ces, may  be  classified  as  follows : 

LiTKRAUT.— Impulse  of  the  Moment.  1782. — Song  fur 
the  Rothesay  and  Caithness  Fencibles.  1792.  —  iSketch  of 
an  Intended  System  of  Education  for  George  Sinclair.  1801. 
Sketch  of  a  System  of  Education  fur  a  Yuung  Gentleman. 
1802.  — Genefiogy  of  tiie  Sinclairs  of  Ulbster.  1810.— 
Miscellaneous  Papers.  1811. — On  the  State  of  Society 
in  Edinburgh.  1811. — letter  from  Sir  John  Sinclair  to 
George  Sinclair,  Esq.,  regarding  the  literary  undertakings 
he  has  in  contemplation.  1813. — Ode  on  the  Ifestorn- 
tion  of  the  House  of  Orange.  1815.  —  A  Messieurs  lea 
Rcdactenrs  de  rObservateur.  1815. — K  Genenil  View  of 
the  Principles  of  the  Christian  Faith,  as  explained  in  M'rs 
Hannah  Sinclair's  Treatise  on  that  Subject  1818. — Evi- 
dence to  prove  that  the  celebrated  air  called  '  Gramschree 
Molly'  was  composed  in  Scotland.  1819. — Prospettu-s  ex- 
plaining the  nature  and  superior  advantages  of  the  *Codean 
System  of  Knowledge.*  1819. — Account  of  some  singular 
Incidents  in  the  Life  of  the  Right  Hon.  Sir  John  Sinclair, 
Bart.,  1820. — Address  to  the  Citizens  of  Edinburgh  on  His 
Majesty's  expected  visit  to  Scotland.  1820.  —  I/'tter  on 
Codification.  1 820.— Reparation  of  St.  Giles'  Church,  Edin- 
burgh. Circular  letter  to  the  Faculty  of  Advocates.  1821. 
— letter  on  Mount-iin  Dew.  1822. — On  the  Impfirtance  of 
Scotland  aa  a  separate  Divihion  of  the  British  Empire.  1822. 
— On  the  Impropriety  of  Indulging  Grief  for  the  low  of  near 
relations  or  particular  friends.  1823. — Gretna  Green  Mar- 
riages. 1823. — Address  to  t!ie  Public  on  Infant  Schools.  1829. 
— Letter  to  the  Commij^Hionera  for  the  Improvements  in  the 
City  of  Edinburgh.     1829.— To  the  Members  of  the  Board  of 


Trustees  fur  promoting  the  Fisheries,  Manuiitcturas,  and  c4lMr 
Improvements  in  Scotland.  1829. — Address  to  the  I nhabitRnti 
of  Edinburgh  on  the  City  Improrements.  1830.— >Tboiigbli 
regarding  proposed  future  literary  Lalionrs.  18SI.— Oo  tfti 
Monument  to  Biums.  183 1 . — Preliminary  OfaserratioMoa  tin 
Plan  of  a  Code,  or  Digeat  of  Religion.  1 834. — Hints  on  the  Pte- 
posed  Monument  to  the  memory  of  Sir  Walter  SaAt  18S8u 
—letter  to  Dr.  D.  B.  Reid,  on  the  Pliiloaophical  Sodely  tf 
Edinburgh.  1835. — Plan  of  a  Meeting  for  Constituting  t 
Society  to  supply  the  City  of  Tendon  with  Blilk.  1885i.— 
Infonnation  re»<pecting  the  Castle  of  Dunsinane.— On  dM 
tenden^  of  Ignorance  and  Want  of  Education  to  prodoot  m 
excessive  population,  as  exemplified  in  tlie  state  of  Irehwd.— 
PI:m  for  procuring  the  sum  necessary  to  complete  the  TlianM 
Tunnel. — On  tlie  great  advantages  which  I  jteratars  dcrind 
from  the  erection  of  the  Monastery  and  Collie  of  Ions.— 
Hints  respecting  *The  Course  of  Time,*  a  Poem,  bj  Robrtt 
Pollok,  M.A.,  with  a  short  account  of  the  Author. — Hints  m 
to  Autographs. — Hints  on  the  Character  of  Genond  Wsab- 
ington. — On  the  Means  of  Improving  the  Systems  of  Educa- 
tion in  Scotland. — Observations  on  the  Training  of  Pugiliits, 
Wrestlers,  Jockeys,  and  others;  and  the  Tnuning  of  Rnnniig 
Horses,  &c,  Kicholson's  Journal,  xiii.,  309,  1806. — Extncts 
from  a  Collection  of  Papers  on  the  subject  of  Athletic  Exo^ 
cixes.  li).  XV.  67. — On  the  Breeding  and  Feeding  of  Gsne 
Cocks.     lb.  xvL,  207.     1807. 

STATisricAL. — Address  to  the  Clergy  of  the  CliurcU  of 
England,  on  the  Nature  and  Principles  of  Statistical  Philo- 
sophy. 1792. — Specimens  of  Statisticiil  Reports.  1791— 
History  of  the  Origin  and  Progress  of  the  Statistical  Acooast 
of  Scotland.  1798,  8vo. — Statistical  Account  of  the  Parish 
of  Thurso  1798. — Sketch  of  an  Intrmluction  to  the  propmed 
Analysis  of  the  Statistical  Account  of  Scotland,  1-  Ot,—Oa 
the  Advantsges  to  be  derix'ed  by  Political  Economy  frotn 
Statistical  Researches.  1833. — .Statistical  display  of  the 
Population  of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland.  1835. — Statistical 
Displ.'iy  of  the  Occupation  of  the  .Male  Population  in  each 
section  of  the  United  Kingdom,  deduced  from  the  return 
made  to  Parliament  in  1831. 

Political — On  the  Propriety  of  Dissolving  Parliament 
1782. — Reflections  on  tlie  Expediency  of  Increasing  the  niun- 
her  of  the  Representatives  of  the  People.  1782.— The  Criw 
of  Europe.  1 783,  8vo. — Tlie  Propriety  of  Retaining  Gibral- 
tar. 1783. — letters  to  the  Chamber  of  Commerce  at  Edin- 
imrgh  on  the  suigect  of  the  Corn  luiws.  1787. — General 
View  of  the  Enquiries  essential  for  the  Internal  Improveineot 
of  the  Kingdom.  1795. — Speech  dn  the  Bill  for  Imp<wngim 
Income  Tax,  1798,  8vo. — Thoughts  on  the  dismissal  (^  the 
Minister  and  tlie  R-storation  of  Peace,  addrese^  to  the 
Livery  of  the  City  of  I-ondon.  1798. — Hints  on  the  present 
jilartning  Crisis.  1798. — Letters  on  the  state  of  the  Nstivn, 
.addressed  to  Ijord  Thurlow.  1798. — Impartial  Thoughts  oo 
Pe.ice  and  War.  1803  — Address  to  the  Chairman,  Depotj 
Chainnan,  and  Directors  of  the  En.st  India  Company,  1809.— 
letter  to  the  Cliancellor  of  the  Exchequer  in  IrvUnd,  itiatift 
to  the  Dissolution  of  the  Union.  1810. — ^Three  other  Pam* 
phlets  against  the  Repeal  of  the  Union. — Hints  regarding  the 
renewal  of  the  charter  of  the  East  India  Company.  181l> 
— On  the  State  of  the  Country  in  December  1816.— Fuor 
Letters  on  the  Distresses  of  the  Times.  1816. — On  the 
means  of  arre.Nting  the  pntgress  of  National  Calamity.  1817, 
2  editions.— On  the  State  of  the  Nation.  1819. — Address  ta 
the  Rttti>nnersof  Great  Britain.  1819.— On  the  Cawis  of 
our  National  Dintres^es.  1820. — Nine  other  Pamphlets  on 
tlie  Distresses  of  the  Country. — On  the  means  of  promoting 
tlie  Prosperity  of  a  gi"e«t  Political  Community.     1826.-  Oh- 


h 


i_.~" 


SINCLAIR, 


470 


SIR  JOHN. 


I 

I 


of  our  Finances.  Ix>ndon,  1783.  8vo.  3  editions. — Memoir, 
containing  a  Plan  for  Re-establisliing  Public  Credit  1783. 
— I^etters  to  the  Directors  and  Governors  of  the  Bank  of 
Kngiand,  on  the  Pecuniary  Distrewes  of  tlie  Country.  1797, 
8vo. — Propos;ilH  fur  a  Tontine  on  a  new  principle,  by  the 
establishment  of  Age  Annuities,  increasing  by  Survivorship. 
1803. — Cursory  Hints  regarding  Paper  Cnrrency.  1810. — 
Obnervations  on  the  Report  of  the  Bullion  Committee.  Lon. 
1810,  8vo. — Remarks  on  a  Pamphlet  concerning  the  Depre- 
ciation of  Currency,  hy  William  HuMkisson,  Esq.  1810,  8vo. 
— Speech  on  tlie  Report  of  the  Bullion  Committee  on  May 
15,  1811. — letter  to  the  Proprietors  of  the  Public  Funds  in 
general,  and  of  Bank  Stock  in  pHrticuUr.  1814. — On  Cir- 
culation and  Coin.  1816. — Plan  to  promote  the  establish- 
ment of  Country  Banks.  1817. — On  the  approaching  Critus, 
or  the  Impracticability  and  Injustice  of  resuming  Cash  Pay- 
ments  at  the  Bank.  1818. — Two  other  pamphlets  on  the 
subject  of  the  Resumption  of  Cash  Payments  were  published 
by  him.  1818,  1819. — Thoughts  on  Paper  Circulation. 
1819.— Tlie  Creed  of  Improved  Circulation.  1820.— Hints 
on  reducing  the  National  Debt  1820. — Political  Maxims  on 
tlie  subject  of  Circulation  or  the  Currency.  1820. — On  the 
subject  of  Circulation  or  the  Currency  he  subsequently  pub- 
lished, at  various  times,  no  fewer  than  25  pamphlets,  besides 
those  mentioned. — Correspondence  respecting  the  Financial 
state  of  the  Country.  1820. — Hints  as  to  a  Metallic  Cur- 
rency and  a  Free  Trade.  1823. — Proofs  of  the  numerous 
Advantages  derived  from  the  Bank  Restriction.  1823.  An- 
other pamphlet  on  the  same  subject  1827. — Plan  for  estab- 
lishing '*A  fixed  and  pennanent  Fund**  for  promoting  the 
Improvement  of  Scotland.  1823. — On  the  Means  of  reliev- 
ing the  pecuniary  embarrassments  of  the  Country.  1826. — 
On  the  Paper  Circulation  of  Scotland.  1826. — On  the  Bank 
Monopoly.  1826. — I«etter  to  Sir  Henry  Parnell,  Bart.,  M.P., 
Chairman  of  the  Financial  Committee.  1828. — On  the  Nai- 
ture  of  Exchange.  1829. — Proofs  of  the  Assertion  that  when 
the  Price  of  the  Precions  Metals  is  Ifigher  in  England  than 
in  Foreign  Conntries,  it  operates  through  the  medium  of  the 
Exchange:  1st,  As  a  Bounty  on  the  Exportation  of  British 
Commodities;  and,  2d,  As  a  Tax  on  the  Import^ition  of  For- 
ei>;ii  Commodities.  1829. — Plan  for  enabling  Government  to 
re<luce  Four  Millions  of  Taxes.  1830. — A  Brief  Statement 
of  the  Advantages  derivable  by  converting  the  Dead  Weight 
to  the  amount  of  from  Four  to  Five  Millions  sterling,  from 
Temporary  into  Perpetual  Annuities.  1834. — On  the  Pro- 
priety of  making  Silver,  jointly  with  Gold,  a  I^gal  Tender. — 
Hints  on  the  Importance  of  W^ealth. — On  the  Means  of  Tax- 
ing the  Funded  as  well  as  lianded  Interest — On  the  Nature 
of  CsKh  Accounts,  as  granted  by  the  Banks  of  Scotland. — 
Account  of  the  Scotch  Banks  issuing  Notes  which  have  sus- 
pended their  payments  in  the  course  of  the  last  fifty  vears. — 
Plan  of  an  Institution  for  the  purchase  and  sale  of  Temporary 
Reversionarv  Interests  in  the  Public  Funds. 

Works  on  Hkaltii  ajcd  I^nokvity. — Hints  on  longe- 
vity. 1803,  4to. — Result  of  Inquiries  regarding  Athletic 
Exercises.  1807. — Plan  of  a  Society  for  ascertaining  the 
Means  of  preserving  Health.  1808.  Ditto,  1816.— Hints  to 
the  Officers  of  Regiments  ordered  on  service  in  the  West  In- 
dies, on  the  Means  of  preserving  their  Health.  1823. — 
Hints  to  Persons  afflicted  with  Paralytic  or  Apoplectic  Dis- 
orders. 1823. — On  the  Cure  and  Prevention  of  Cholera, 
Fever,  &c.,  by  means  of  Cold  Bathing.  1826. — Hints  on  the 
Preservation  of  Health  in  Hot  Climates.  1826. — Proofa  of 
the  advantages  derived  from  the  publication  of  the  C«>de  of 
Health.  1827.— Address  to  the  Hygeian  Society.  1827.— 
Account  of  a  singular  Mode  of  Preventing  Coughs  and  Sore 


Throats,  by  diminishing  the  length  of  the  Umla.  1828  — 
Hints  on  the  Preservation  of  Health.  1828.- Rational  Meik 
of  Employing  lime  for  Invalids,  or  Persons  adfaseed  is 
years.  1829.— On  Ruptures.  1829.— Medical  Hints.  18tL 
— Ditto,  On  Fever,  Sore  Throat,  Lombago^  and  Weakncaitf 
the  Joints.  1832. — On  Preventing  the  Extension  of  the  dis- 
lera.  1832.— On  the  Means  of  Preserving  Health,  and  aU 
Uining  I/>ngevity.  1838.— On  the  Means  of  Preventing  thi 
Miachievons  Effects  of  the  Roman  Malaria.  1838.— Ob  a 
valuable  Means  of  applying  Friction  and  Heat  in  Chronic  Is- 
fl:immation  and  Swelling  of  the  Eyelids.  18S3. — On  Venti- 
lation, with  a  diagram. 

Naval  and  Military. — ^Tliongbtson  the  Naval  Strcni^ 
of  the  British  Empire.  Part  I.  I^ndon,  1782,  8vo.  Put 
II.  1783.  8vo. — Considerations  on  Militias  and  Stan^agA^ 
mies.  1782. — Hints  respecting  the  Stato  of  the  Camp  it 
Aberdeen,  and  on  Encampments  in  geneml.  1795. — Addna 
to  Farmers,  with  a  Plan  for  a  more  speedy  conveyance  of  Ui 
Majesty's  forces.  1797. — Observations  regarding  the  Rami- 
neration  applied  for  by  the  Fencible  Regiments.  1798^— 
Cursory  Observations  on  the  Military  System  of  Great  Bri^ 
tain.  1798. — Account  of  the  Rothesay  and  Caithness  Fea- 
ciltles.  1800. — Hints  regarding  the  absolute  neeessitj  of 
greater  energy  in  conducting  our  Military  operations.  1809. 
— On  Percussion.  1830. — Hints  regarding  the  Cbtbiogof 
the  British  Army. 

Miscrllanrous. — Thoughts  on   Peace.    1795.— PIm  of 
an  agreement  among  the  Powers  of  Europe  and  the  United 
States  of  America  for  rewarding  Discoveries  for  the  Benefit 
of  Society.    1796. — letter  to  tho  Planters,  Merchants,  vA 
others  interested  in  our  West  India  Islands.   1814.— Hlnta 
regarding  the  uae  of  Coffee.    1814. — I«etter  to  the  Comnut- 
tee  of  Merchants  interested  in  the  Warehousing  or  Bondinj; 
Svstem.    1814. — Address  to  the  Mercantile  interest   1814. 
— On  the  Peace  Establishment    1814. — Four  letters  on  th« 
Distresses  of  the  Times.    1816. — Exhortation  to  the  Opers* 
tive  Weavers  in  Glasgow,  Paisley,  &c.    1819. — On  the  Uses 
of  Chamomile  Tea.    1821. — Speech  on  receiving  a  Silver  Cnp 
from  J.  W.  Coke,  Esq.  of  Norfolk.    1821.— Hints  u  to  a 
motion  Sir  John  Sinclair  proposes  to  make  in  the  Gfoenl 
A.s8embly.    1822. — Sketch  of  a   Report   from  the  Genenl 
Committee  appointed  by  the  associated  Counties  in  Scotlini 
1823. — On  the  means  of  giving  public  Relief  to  the  DistraK^ 
Manufacturers.    1826. — Address  to  Manufacturers  on  thor 
Depressed  State.    1827. — On  the  Proposed  Alterations  in  the 
Entail  I^ws  of  Scotland.     letter  to  the  Conveners  of  Cooa- 
ties.    1828. — Hints  on  the  Characteristical  Qualities  of  the 
Irish  Nation.    1828.  —  Brief  Statement  on   Improving  oor 
Settlements  at  the  Cape  of  Good  Hope  and  at  the  Manritiitf. 
1829. — letter  to  the  East  India  Company,  on  the  Introdoc- 
tion  of  the  Bitter  Cassana.    1829. — Plan  for  Promoting  tiic 
Improvement  and  Prosperity  of  our  West  India  Colooiea. 
1829. — Plan  for  publishing  Digests  or  Codes  of  four  of  tb« 
most  Interesting  Branches  of  human  Knowledge.    1.  Agri- 
culture.    2.  Health.    3.  Political  Economy.    And  4.  BeB- 
gion.    1830.— Letter  to  the  Chairman  of  the  West  IndiJi 
Committee,  on  the  Dangers  of  Immediate  Emancipation. 
1830.— Final  Appeal  on  the  West  India  Question.    1831- 
Hiiits  on  the  Advantages  of  Flax  Husbandry  and  the  linen 
Manufacture,  as  practised  in  Flanders.  1832. — Hints  for  tlie 
Consideration  of  the  Committee  on  the  Silk  Trade.    1833.— 
letter  to  I/)rd  Viscount  St  Vincent,  on  the  West  Indium 
Question.    1833. — Hints  on   the  means  of  Improving  the 
I^aws  regarding  Church  Patronage  in  Scotland.    1834.— On 
a  Plan  by  which  the  British  Settlements  in  the  East  ind 
West  Indies  might  be  essentially  benefited. — Hints  retarding 


SKENE, 


472 


OF  CURRIEHILL. 


I , 


I 


1.  Georji^,  his  heir.  2.  Alexander,  a  merchant  in  JauiHica. 
8.  David,  surgeon  of  an  Kast  India  ship.  4.  John,  nn  officer, 
under  General  Cope,  killed  at  the  battle  of  Preston  in  1743. 

George  Skene  of  Skene,  the  eldest  son,  mnrried,  drbt,  his 
counin,  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  M:«jor  George  Skene,  who  en- 
tailed his  estate  of  Carriston  upon  her  and  the  heirs  male  of 
her  body.  He  had  2  sons.  1.  George,  his  successor.  2.  James, 
a  captain  in  the  army.  He  married,  2dly,  his  first  cousin, 
Sarah,  daughter  of  Baillie  William  Simpson,  without  issue. 

The  family  of  Skene  of  Skene  becjune  extinct  in  1827, 
when  the  estates,  including  CarrlKton,  devolved  on  James, 
fourth  earl  of  Fife,  nephew  of  the  last  Skene  of  Skene ;  his 
father,  Alexander,  third  earl  of  Fife,  having  married,  April 
17,  1811^  Mary,  daughter  uf  George  Skene  of  Skene. 

Agnes  Skene,  daughter  of  Alexander  Skene,  younger  of 
Skene,  married  Captain  Watts  of  the  royal  anny,  who  was 
at  CuUiaien  in  1746,  and  had  a  son,  Vice-admiral  E.  G. 
Watts,  C.B.,  a  notice  of  whom  is  given  under  Watts. 


The  Curriehill  branch  is  descended  from  James,  2d  son  of 
Alexander  Skene  of  Skene,  who  lived  in  the  16th  century. 
He  purchitsed  the  eatate  of  Wester  Corse,  Aberdeenshire,  and 
had  7  sons,  of  whom  James,  the  eldest,  was  ancestor  of  the 
Skenes  of  Wester  Corse  and  Kamore,  a  family  lung  extinct ; 
John,  the  6th  son,  a  celebrated  lawyer,  afterwards  Sir  John 
Skene,  was  progenitor  of  the  Curriehill  family,  and  Gilbert, 
the  youngest,  was  ancestor  of  the  Skenes  of  Rubislaw. 

Sir  Ji>hn  Skene  of  Curriehill  is  said,  in  a  mamuirript  me- 
moir of  him  in  possession  of  his  representative,  Mr.  Skene  of 
Rubislaw,  (quoted  in  Brtmton  and  Jlaitfi  Smaiort  of  the 
College  of  Jtutict^  p.  230,)  to  have  been  the  second  son  of 
James  Skene  of  Wester  Corse  and  Ramore,  by  Janet,  second 
daughter  of  Alexander  Rurnct  of  I^ys.  He  appears  to  liave 
been  born  in  1549,  and  received  his  early  education  in  Aber- 
deen and  at  King's  college,  Old  Aberdeen.  In  1556  ho  went 
t<)  the  university  of  St.  Andrews,  where  he  took  the  degree  of 
M.A.  In  1564  and  1565,  he  was  a  regent  or  professor  in  the 
latter  university.  He  spent  several  years  in  Denmark,  Nor- 
way, and  Sweden,  which  was  afterwards  of  much  use  to  him. 
On  his  return  to  Scotland,  he  selected  the  profession  of  the 
law,  and  was  admitted  advocate  19th  March,  1676.  The 
regent  Morton  commissioned  him  and  Sir  James  Balfour  to 
make  a  general  digest  of  the  Scottish  laws,  but  they  were 
prevented  from  completing  it  by  the  fall  of  that  nobleman. 
Skene,  however,  for  his  labours,  got  fnun  him  an  annual  pen- 
.sion  of  ten  chalders  of  meal,  granted  to  him  for  life  out  of 
the  revenues  of  the  abbey  of  Aberbrothock,  10th  June  1577. 
At  the  meeting  of  the  General  Assembly  at  Gla.sgow,  24tli 
April  1581,  it  was  agreed  to  submit  to  the  king  and  c<mncil 
a  proposal  that  a  judge  should  be  appointed  to  sit  at  Edin- 
burgh, to  decide  upon  the  injuries  and  wrongs  done  to  mini- 
sters in  execution  of  their  offices,  and  that  Mr.  John  Skene 
should  be  nominated  procurator  for  the  ministers  so  injured. 
In  1587,  he  was  named  member  of  a  commiHsion  appointed 
to  consider  the  statutes  passed  in  the  two  previous  parlia- 
menu,  and  to  determine  how  many  of  them  should  be  print- 
ed. In  January  1589,  the  year  after  the  destruction  of  the 
Spanish  Annada,  when  the  intrigues  of  the  Jesuits  and  the 
popish  priests,  as  well  as  the  treas^ms  of  the  three  popish 
earls,  Huntly,  Enol,  and  Crawford,  threatened  nmch  danger 
to  the  protestant  religion  in  this  realm,  Mr.  John  Skene  was 
one  of  thirteen  commissioners  appointed  at  a  public  meeting 
held  at  Edinburgh  "to  meet  every  week  to  consult  upon  af- 
fairs pertaining  to  the  weid  of  the  kirk  in  so  dangerous  a 
time."  When  Sir  James  Melville,  the  same  year,  was  chosen 
by  the  king  to  proceed  as  ambjuts.'^dor  to  Denmark,  for  the 


purpose  of  concluding  a  marriage  with  tbe  prineeHS  Anne,  be 
selected  Skene  as  hia  legal  adviser.  **Hia  intijestv,"  says 
Melville,  {ilfemoirs,  p.  866,)  "thoebt  then  that  ther  were 
many  better  lawers.  I  said  '  that  be  was  bed.  aoqoanted 
witli  tlie  conditions  of  the  Germans,  and  culd  mak  thrai  lang 
harangues  in  Ijitin ;  and  was  a  gude,  trew,  stout  man,  lyk  a 
Dutch  man.'  Tlten  his  majesty  waa  content  that  be  sokl  gi 
with  me.**  Melville  was  prevented  by  court  intrigues  fironi 
undertaking  the  intended  embassy,  but  Skene  aocompaoied 
the  earl  Marischal  to  Denmark  in  tbe  summer  of  1589.  On 
the  22d  October  of  the  same  year,  when  King  James  bimidf 
embarked  at  Leith  for  Norway,  he  was  one  of  tlie  penons  se- 
lected to  accompany  him. 

In  1589  he  was  appointed  joint  lord-advocate  with  Sir 
David  M'Gill.    In  the  following  year  he  accompanied  Cokmd 
Stewart  on  an  embassv  to  German  v.     In  1591  he  was  him- 
self  ambaasador  to  the  States  General.     In  1592  he  was  sp- 
pointed  one  of  tlie  commissioners  to  examine  **  the  lawes  and 
actis  maid  in  this  present  parliament,  and  all  otheris  monici- 
pall  lawes  and  actis  of  parliament  bygane;**  and  *^tocoiuidrr 
quhat  lawes  or  actis  necessiirlie  wald  be  knawin  to  the  tub- 
jecti.H,**  and  to  catise  the  same  to  be  printed.     The  execution 
of  tliis  undertiJdng  was  intrusted  to  Sir  John  Skene,  who 
had  been  kniglited  by  James  VI.    The  first  part  was  pub- 
lished in  1598,  being  the  acts  of  parliament  from  James  L 
downwards.    To  this  was  appended  Sir  John's  well-known 
work,  *  De  Verborum  Significatione.*     In  September  1594  be 
had  been  appointed  clerk-register,  and  on  the  30th  of  tbe 
following  month  admitted  an  ordinary  lord  of  session,  when 
he  took  the  title  of  Ix>rd  Curriehill.     He  is  said  to  bare 
owed  his  preferment  to  the  influence  of  Walter  Stewart,  prior 
of  Blantyre,  who  was  married  to  a  sister  of  his  wife,  Helen,  s 
daughter  of  James  Somer\'ille  of  Camnethan.     In  1596  be 
was  appointed  one  of  the  eight  commissioners  of  tbe  exche- 
quer, known  as  the  Octavians,  but,  with  his  fellow -commis- 
sioners, ho  resigned  this  obnoxious  office  in  the  following 
year.    In  July  1604,  after  King  James*  accession  to  the  Eng- 
lish throne,  he  was,  at  a  parliament  held  at  Perth,  named  one 
of  the  commissioners  for  treating  of  the  intended  unk>n  be- 
tween Scotland  and  England,  which  did  not  then  take  effect 
In  1607,  having  completed  his  treatis<>s  of  t he  ^^^rurm  Jl/e- 
jtstatem  and  Quoniam  AUackiamenta,  he  present^  them  to 
the  privy  council,  who  recommended  the  work  to  the  king  in 
a  letter,  dated  15th  March  that  year.     The  volume  was  sf- 
terwards  prcsentetl  to  parliament,  and  ordered  to  be  printed, 
commis.sioners  being  appointed  to  fix  a  sum  of  money  to  be 
paid  to  Sir  John,  to  defray  the  expenses  and  for  remunera- 
tion to  himself.     In  the  end  of  1611,  being  then  aged  and 
infirm,  he  executed  a  resignation  of  his  office  of  derk-rrgis- 
ter,  in  favour  of  his  eldest  son,  Sir  James  Skene,  af^erwardt 
Ittrd-prcsidcnt  of  the  court  of  sesstitm.  and  sent  him  to  court 
with  it,  instmcting  him  not  to  make  use  of  it,  unless  h« 
found  the  king  willing  to  admit  him.     Instead  of  tbe  office 
of  clerk-register,  liowever,  the  son  was  induced  to  accept  tb« 
less  lucrative  situation  of  an  oniiuary  lord  of  session.    On 
being  infonned  of  this,  his  father  died,  a  few  days  after,  of 
vexation.     Tlie  works  of  Sir  John  Skene  are :  *  Lawes  sad 
Actes  of  Parliament,   maid  by  King  ,Iames  1st  of  Scotland, 
and  his  Successors  Kinges  of  Scotland,*  Edin.  1597,  folio; 
*The  Aulde  I^nwes  and  Constitutions  of  Scotland,  C(»Ilfcted 
furth  of  the  Register,  and  otiier  auld  authentick  Bukes,  fni 
the  days  of  K.  Maleolme  the  Second,  untill  the  time  c^Kiog 
.lames  the  First,*  Edin.   1609,  folio;  '  Regia  Majestas,  mb 
Vet<>res,  Leges  et  Constitntiones  Scoticse,  cum  Annott.'  Lon- 
don, 1613,  foiio.     In  Scotch,  1774,  4to ;  *  De  Verborum  Sif^ 
uificatione ;  an  Explanat'on  of  Tennes,  difficile  Wonks,  Ste. 


I 


SKINNKR, 


474 


REV.  JOHN. 


Jolm  Gordon  Cumming,  Ksq.  of  Pitlurg  and  Bimeas, 
Aberdeenshire,  deriving  bin  descent  from  Adam  de  Gordon, 
the  fir»t  of  the  name  who  settled  in  Scotland  in  1057,  inher- 
ited in  1815  the  estates  of  his  reUtive,  Skene  of  Dyce,  the 
eldest  collateral  branch  of  Skene  of  Skene,  and  assumed  the 
name  of  Skene,  in  addition  to  his  own,  in  conformity  with  a 
deed  of  enttiiL  The  name  of  Camming  was  also  an  assumed 
one,  on  his  father,  John  Gordon,  Enq.  of  Pitlurg,  inheriting 
the  estate  of  Birness,  parish  of  Logie  Buciian,  in  right  of  liis 
mother,  (who  died  in  1755,)  Barbara,  daughter  of  lloLert 
Camming,  Esq.  of  Birness.  Mr.  Gordon  Cumming  Skene 
also  possesses  a  small  property  in  the  parish  of  Fmtray. 


Of  this  name,  and  belonging  to  one  of  the  Aberdeenshire 
families  of  Skene,  was  Andrew  Skene,  an  eminent  advocate, 
the  fourth  son  of  Dr.  Geo/rgs  Skene,  a  distinguished  physi- 
cian in  Aberdeen,  and  professor  of  natural  history  in  Maris- 
chal  college  of  that  city.  Mr.  Skene  was  bom  there,  Febm- 
ary  26,  1784;  and,  after  receiving  the  rudiments  of  his 
education  at  the  grammar-school,  completed  his  academical 
studies  at  Marischal  college.  He  was  originally  destined  by 
his  friends  for  the  practice  of  the  law  in  his  native  place, 
but,  preferring  a  higher  field  of  exertion,  be  was  removed  to 
the  metropolia,  and  entered  as  a  student  of  law  in  the  uni- 
versity of  Edinburgh,  in  the  winter  session  of  1803,  when  tlie 
civil  and  Scottish  law  classes  were  taught  by  the  hite  I^rd 
Newton  and  Baron  Hume.  He  was  a  diligent  student,  and 
prosecuted  his  legal  researches  with  perseverance  and  indus- 
try. In  Jane  1806  he  was  admitted  advocate;  and,  for 
some  time  afler  being  called  to  the  bar,  he  experienced  much 
disooaraging  neglecL  In  the  coarse  of  a  few  years,  however, 
his  great  talents  began  to  be  appreciated,  and,  about  the 
year  1815,  he  was  fully  established  in  respectable  practice. 
In  1834  he  succeeded  Ix>rd  Cockbum  as  solicitor- general 
for  Scotland.  He  had  not,  however,  held  his  appointment 
many  days  when  a  change  of  ministry  occurred,  on  which 
he  tendered  his  resignation.  At  the  end  of  the  winter 
session  of  1835  he  seemed  in  his  usual  health,  when  he 
was  suddenly  seized  with  an  alarming  illness,  which  indi- 
cated an  inflammatory  affection  of  the  brain.  After  a  few 
days'  illness  he  expired,  April  2,  1835,  at  the  age  of  51.  An 
elegant  monument  to  his  memory,  by  Mr.  Patric  Park, 
sculptor,  was  erected  by  his  sister  in  the  New  Calton  bury- 
ing-ground,  Edinburgh,  where  he  lies  interred. 

SKINNKR,  Rev.  John,  a  popular  song- writer 
and  ecclesiastical  historian,  was  born  at  Balfour, 
in  the  parish  of  Birse,  Aberdeenshire,  October  8, 
1721.  He  was  the  son  of  the  schoolmaster  of 
that  parish,  his  mother  being  the  widow  of  Don- 
ald Farquharson,  Esq.  of  Balfour.  At  thiiteen 
years  of  age  he  was  sent  to  the  Marischal  college, 
Aberdeen,  where  he  obtained  a  bursary.  On 
leaving  the  university  he  became  assistant  to  the 
parish  schoolmaster  of  Kemnay,  and  in  1739  re- 
moved to  Monymusk,  where  he  held  the  same 
situation.  Through  the  kindness  of  I>ady  Grant 
he  was  allowed  the  use  of  the  extensive  library  at 
Monymusk  House.  About  this  time  he  quitted 
the  Presbyterian  church,  in  which  he  had  been 


educated,  for  the  Scottish  Kpiscopal  oommunioii, 
and  thereafter  directed  his  studies  for  the  miois- 
try.    In  1740,  he  went  to  Shetland,  as  tutor  to 
the  only  son  of  Mr.  Sinclair  of  Scalloway,  and 
while  there  he  married  the  daugtitcr  of  Mr.  llnn- 
ter,  the  only  Episcopalian  clergyman  in  that  re- 
mote part  of  the  country.    Having  returned  to 
Aberdeenshire,  he  was  ordained  by  Bishop  Dou- 
bar  at  Peterhead,  and  in  Kov.   1742,  was  ap- 
pointed to  the  charge  of  the  Episcopal  congrega- 
tion at   I^ngside,  near   that  town.      Here  be 
officiated  for  the  long  period  of  65  years,  residiDg 
all  the  time  in  a  small  thatched  cottage  at  Liiishart 
With  his  brethren,  who  were  in  general  Jacobites, 
he  suffered  in  the  troublous  period  of  1745-6.  More 
than  once  imprisoned,  he  had  often  to  leave  his 
house,  and  resort  to  stratagems  to  avoid  falling 
into  the  hands  of  the  soldiery.    On  one  occasion 
he  disguised  liimself  as  a  miller,  and  on  another, 
on  his  return  home,  he  found  his  house  in  posses- 
sion of  a  militaiy  party,  and  was  robbed  of  every 
thing,  even  the  linen  intended  for  Mrs.  Skinner, 
then  confined  with   her  5th   child.     Soon  after- 
wards his  little  chapel,  with  all  its  furniture,  was 
burned.    He  continued  quietly  and  faithfully  to 
discharge  the  duties  of  his  office,  often  addref^sing 
his  people  from  the  door  or  window  of  his  lowly 
cottage,  until  he  was  apprehended  in  May  1753, 
on  a  warrant  from  the  sheriff,  and  committed  to 
prison  for  six  months,  for  preaching  to  more  th.<in 
four  persons, contrary  to  the  then  rigorous  law. 

He  took  a  leading  part  in  the  polemical  discas- 
sions  of  his  time,  and  several  pamphlets  of  a  con- 
troversial nature  issued  from  his  pen.  In  all  these 
he  evinced  considerable  acuteness,  with  a  remark- 
able power  of  ridicule.  In  1746  he  published  t 
small  pamphlet,  entitled  '  A  Preservative  against 
Presbyteiy;*  and,  in  1757,  he  brought  out  at 
London  a  *  Dissertation  on  Job's  Prophecy,'  whirl: 
obtained  the  approbation  of  Bishop  Sherlock.  In 
1767  he  issued  another  pamphlet  in  vindication 
of  the  Scottish  Episcopal  church.  He  assisted 
Dr.  Gleig  of  Stirling,  in  preparing  some  of  the 
articles  for  an  edition  of  the  ^  Encyclopedia  Bri- 
tannica.'  He  tried  fanning,  too,  liaving  aboat 
1758  entered  upon  Mains  of  Lndquham  in  the 
vicinity  of  Longside,  but  this  speculation  proved 
a  failure.    He  is  popularly  known  to  his  conn- 


SMELLIE, 


476 


WILLIAM. 


doctrines  of  Liuuflcus,  gained  the  gold  medal  given 
by  Dr.  Hope,  the  botanical  professor,  and  was  in- 
serted in  the  first  edition  of  tlie  Encycloptedia 
Britannica.  While  attending  this  class,  the  pro- 
fessor, during  an  illness  which  confined  him  to  the 
house,  selected  Smellio  to  continue  the  course  of 
lectures  in  his  absence. 

In  March  1765  he  commenced  bnsiness  as  a 
printer  in  partnership  with  Robert  and  William 
Auld,  the  former  of  whom  was  a  solicitor,  and  to 
enable  him  to  enter  upon  tliis  connection,  two  of 
his  friends,  Drs.  Robertson  and  Hope,  advanced 
him  the  sum  of  seventy  pounds.  Two  years  there- 
after, on  the  retirement  of  Robert  Anid,  John  Bal- 
four, a  bookseller,  was  admitted  into  the  copart- 
nery. They  published  the  Weekly  Journal,  a 
newspni)er  conducted  by  Smellie,  which  being  an 
unprofitable  concern,  led  to  disputes  which  termi- 
nated in  a  dissolution  of  the  company  in  Novem- 
ber 1771.  He  now  carried  on  the  business  in 
connection  with  Balfour,  and  easily  obtained  from 
I>ord  Kaines  the  favour  of  his  becoming  security 
to  the  Royal  Bank  for  a  cash  account  to  the  extent 
of  about  £300.  Their  acquaintance  had  originated 
in  the  following  circumstance:  When  his  lord- 
ship's 'Elements  of  Criticism'  were  in  course  of 
being  printed  by  MuiTuy  and  Cochrane,  Mr.  Smel- 
lie communicated  to  his  lordship,  anonymously,  a 
series  of  criticisms  on  the  work.  I^rd  Kames  re- 
quested the  name  of  his  unknown  correspondent ; 
and,  on  being  informed,  ever  afterwards  honoured 
him  with  various  marks  of  his  friendship.  BaUbnr 
and  Smellie  were  appointed  printers  to  the  univer- 
sity; and  the  latter*s  correct  taste  and  complete 
knowledge  of  the  J^tin  and  English  languages 
often  proved  very  serviceable  to  authors  in  the 
passage  of  their  works  through  the  press.  In  par- 
ticular, he  aflforded  to  Dr.  Bnchan  the  most  effi- 
cient aid  in  his  '  Domestic  Medicine,'  fii*st  pub- 
lished in  1770,  to  such  an  extent,  indeed,  that  the 
authorship  of  the  entire  work  was  confidently 
ascribed  to  him.  The  principal  articles  for  the 
first  edition  of  the  Encyclopaedia  Britannica,  S 
vols.  4to,  which  began  to  be  printed  in  1771,  were 
written,  designed,  or  compiled  by  Smellie,  who 
prepared  and  superintended  the  entire  publication, 
for  which  he  was  paid  by  Mr.  Andrew  Bell,  en- 
graver, the  principal  proprietor,  the  sum  of  £200. 


Of  the  second  edition  of  this  work  he  was  offered  ' 
a  share  conjointly  with  the  editorship^  bat  he  ne- 
fortunately  declined  it,  and  tlins  lost  all  chance  of 
obtaining  any  adequate  reward  for  his  immense 
labonr. 

In  October  1778,  in  conjunction  with  Dr.  Gil- 
bert Stuart,  Mr.  Smellie  commenced  *•  The  Edin- 
burgli  Magazine  and  Review,*  edited  by  the  latter, 
which  only  extended  to  five  volumes  8vo,  closing 
with  the  number  for  Angost  1776.      Althongii 
conducted  with  great  spirit  and  ability,  the  strong 
personalities  indulged  in  by  Dr.  Stuart  led  to  its 
downfall.    In  1775  Mr.  Smellie's  friends  nrged 
him  to  become  a  candidate  for  the  vacant  chair  of 
natural  history  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  but 
the  patronage  lM>ing  in  the  gift  of  the  crown,  the 
superior  interest  of  Dr.  John  Walker  caused  him 
to  be  chosen  in  preference.    In  1781  Mr.  Smellie 
was  elected  superintendent  of  the  Museum  of  Na- 
tural Ilistor}'  belonging  to  the  Society  of  Scottish 
Antiquaries,  of  which  he  was  an  original  member. 
In  1782  he  published  an  *•  Account  of  the  Institn- 
tion  and  Pi*ogress  of  the  Society  of  Antiquaries  in 
Scotland,'  to  which  he  added  a  second  part  in 
1784 ;  and  in  1793  he  was  elected  the  secretary  of 
that  society.    At  their  desii-e  he  had,  in  1781, 
drawn  up  the  fii*st  regular  plan  for  procuring  a 
statistical  account  of  the  parishes  of  Scotland, 
which  was  printed  and  circulated,  and  although  it 
attracted  little  attention  at  the  time,  it  had  the 
merit  of  being  the  precursor  of  the  scheme  which 
Sir  John  Sinclair  afterwards  brought  to  maturity. 
His  excellent  translation  of  Buffon^s  ^  Natural  His- 
tory,' in  nine  vols.  8vo,  with  numerous  plates  and 
occasional  notes,  appeared  in  1781,  and  soon  passed 
through  five  editions. 

On  the  dissolution  of  the  firm  of  Balfour  and 
Smellie,  in  1782,  Mr.  Smellie  assumed  as  his  part- 
ner, Creech  the  bookseller,  who  continued  in  con- 
nection with  him  till  the  close  of  1798,  after  which 
Smellie  carried  on  the  business  on  his  own  account. 
In  1784  he  published  a  tract  ^On  the  Nature, 
Powers,  and  Privileges  of  Juries,'  which,  contain- 
ing a  clear  and  judicious  exposition  of  legal  prin- 
ciples, was  quoted  with  much  approbation  by  Lord 
Erskine,  in  his  famous  speech  in  defence  of  Dr. 
Shipley,  Dean  of  St.  Asaph.  He  was  the  author 
of  several  other  pamphlets,  chiefly  relating  to  local 


I 


SMELLIE. 


477 


SMETON. 


politics,  lu  1790  appeared  the  firet  volame  of  liis 
principal  work,  *  The  Philosophy  of  Natural  His- 
tory/ for  the  copyright  of  which  he  received  one 
thousand  guineas  from  Mr.  C.  Elliott,  bookseller, 
Edinburgh,  and  fifty  guineas  for  every  subsequent 
edition,  besides  being  employed  to  print  it.  The 
bargain  was  concluded  before  a  single  page  of  the 
work  was  written.  The  second  volume,  which 
concluded  the  work,  was  published  by  his  son  in 
1799,  four  years  after  the  author's  death.  It  was 
reprinted  in  Ireland  and  America,  and  translated 
into  the  German  language.  After  a  long  illness, 
Mr.  Smeliie  died  June  24,  1795,  aged  65. 

He  is  described  as  being  about  the  middle  size, 
and  in  bis  youth  good-looking  and  active,  but 
when  past  middle  life,  he  acquired  a  sort  of  loung- 
ing gait,  and  became  careless  and  somewhat  slov- 
enly in  his  dress  and  appearance.  Bums,  the  first 
Edinburgh  edition  of  whose  poems  he  printed,  in 
a  letter  to  Mr.  Peter  Hill,  bookseller,  mentions 
him  as  *^  a  man  positively  of  the  firat  abilities  and 
greatest  strength  of  mind,  as  well  as  one  of  the 
best  hearts  and  keenest  wits  that  he  had  ever  met 
with.*'  In  January  1787  he  introduced  Bums  to 
the  Crochallan  club,  which  consisted  of  the  liter- 
ary men  and  wits  of  Edinburgh,  and  in  a  good- 
homoured  extemporaneous  satirical  fragment  writ- 
ten by  Bums  on  his  intit>duction,  he  thus  refei-s  to 
Mr.  Smeliie : 


**  To  Crochallan  came 


The  old  cocked  hat,  tlie  brown  sartoat  the  same ; 
His  britftling  beard  just  rising  in  its  might, 
(Twas  four  long  night«  and  dajs  to  shaving  night); 
His  iinoomb*d  grisly  locks,  wild-staring,  thatched 
A  head  for  tlioaght  profound  and  clear  unmatched : 
And,  though  his  caustic  wit  was  biting  rude, 
His  heart  was  warm,  benevolent  and  good.** 

Mr.  Smeliie  left  a  widow  with  four  sons  and 
four  danghtcrs.  His  eldest  daughter  married  Mr. 
George  Watson,  an  eminent  portrait  painter,  of 
Edhiburgh.  He  had  projected  a  series  of  the  lives 
of  nen  of  literary  eminence  with  whom  he  was 
personally  acquainted ;  but  he  only  lived  to  com- 
plete four  of  them,— namely,  those  of  Lord  Kames, 
Dr.  John  Gregory,  David  Hume,  and  I>r.  Adam 
Smith,  which  were  published  in  1800  by  his  son, 
Mr.  Alexander  Smeliie,  who  succeeded  him  in  the 
printing  business. 


His  works  ai*e : 

Tbesaoms  Medicus.  sive  Dinpntationum  in  Aeademia  Edin- 
end  ad  Rem  Modicam  pertinentiuin,  a  Collvgio  institnto  ad 
hoc  usque  tempus,  Delectus.  Vol.  i.  Edin.  1778,  8vo.  Vol. 
il  1778.    iii.  and  iv.  1785. 

Natural  Histoiy,  general  and  particular;  from  the  French 
of  Count  de  Buffon.  Illustrated  with  300  Copperplates;  and 
occasional  Notes  and  Observations  by  the  Translator.  Edin. 
1780,  9  vols.  8vo.    2d  edit.  1785-6,  9  vols.  8vo. 

Account  of  the  Institution  and  Progress  of  the  Society  of 
Antiquaries  of  Scotland.    Edin.  1783,  4to. 

An  Address  to  the  People  of  Scotland,  on  the  Nature, 
Powers,  and  Privileges  of  Juries:  by  a  Jur}'man.  Edin. 
1784.    2d  edit    Edin.  1820. 

The  PhiloBophy  of  Natural  History.  Edin.  1790-1799,  2 
vols.  4to. 

Dissertation  on  Public  Spirit,  and  three  Essays.  Edin. 
1800,  8vo. 


Smeton,  SmeatoH,  or  Smytkan,  a  surname,  having  the 
same  derivative  as  Smith,  which  see. 

SMETON,  Thomas,  a  learned  divine  of  the 
church  of  Scotland,  was  bom  at  the  village  of 
Gask,  near  Perth,  about  1536.  He  received  the 
first  part  of  his  education  at  the  school  of  Perth, 
and  in  1553  was  entered  at  St.  Salvator^s  College, 
St.  Andrews,  where  he  prosecuted  his  studies  with 
so  much  success,  that  he  was  chosen  one  of  the 
I'egcnts.  When  the  reformed  doctrines  gained 
ground  in  the  university,  lie  went  to  France,  and 
with  the  view  of  enquiring  into  the  tnith,  he 
studied  for  some  time  in  the  Jesuits*  college  at 
Paris,  as  the  oi'der  of  the  Jesuits  was  the  most 
learned  and  cunning  in  popish  doctrines.  By  the 
advice  of  £dmond  Hay,  the  Jesuit,  who  was  anx- 
ious to  secure  him  to  his  order,  he  next  proceeded 
to  Rome.  On  the  way  he  visited  Geneva,  and 
had  an  opportunity  of  conversing  with  Mr.  Andrew 
Melville,  Mr.  Gilbert  Moncricff,  and  the  other  re- 
formers there. 

On  arriving  at  Rome  he  entered  a  Jesuits* college, 
and,  during  his  residence  there,  obtained  permission 
to  accompany  in  his  visits  the  father  appointed  to 
wait  upon  snch  persons  as  were  in  prison  for 
heresy.  As  they  returned  to  the  college,  he  would 
adopt  the  opinions  of  the  prisoners,  and  maintain 
them  against  the  Jesuit,  as  if  for  the  sake  of  argu- 
ment, but  In  reality  to  have  his  doubts  resolved. 
Tlie  more  he  enquired,  the  stronger  became  his 
convictions  of  the  truth  of  the  protestant  doctrines, 
and  after  residing  there  a  year  and  a  half,  he  be- 
came suspected,  and  was  remitted  back  to  Paris, 
through  all  the  colleges  of  the  Jesuits  by  the  way. 


SMIBERT, 


478 


JOHN. 


On  his  return  to  the  French  capital,  Edmond 
Hay  perceived  tlie  chan^^e  that  had  taken  place 
in  his  sentiments,  and  advised  him  to  go  to 
the  college  of  Clermont,  where,  according  to 
Dempster,  he  taught  humanity  with  great  ap- 
plause. It  appears,  however,  that  on  the  way  lie 
was  seized  with  a  dangerous  fever,  on  his  recovery 
from  which  he  resolved  upon  embracing  protes- 
tantism ;  and,  returning  to  Paris,  he  began  to  mix 
openly  with  the  reformers.  This  was  in  1572, 
and  at  the  time  of  tlie  massacre  of  St.  Bartliolo- 
mew,  which  happened  sliortly  after,  his  lodgings 
were  narrowly  searched.  He  took  refuge  in  the 
house  of  Sir  Francis  Walsingham,  the  English 
srabassador,  which,  as  Calderwood  says,  **  was  a 
girth  to  many"  in  that  terrible  time.  He  accom- 
panied Walsingham  to  England,  and  at  first  set- 
tled as  a  schoolmaster  in  Colchester  in  Essex. 

In  1578,  Smeton  returned  to  Scotland,  and  was 
appointed  minister  at  Paisley.  In  October  that 
year,  he  was  named  one  of  the  assessors  to  the 
moderator  of  the  General  Assembly,  and  on  7th 
July  following  he  was  himself  chosen  moderator. 
At  the  desire  of  Mr.  Andrew  Melville,  he  wrote  an 
answer  to  the  book  of  Mr.  Archibald  Hamilton  the 
apostate,  *  De  Confusione  Calvinianae  Sect«e  apnd 
Scotos."  This  answer,  entitled  *  Responsio  ad 
Ilamiltonii  Dialogum,*  was  published  at  Edin- 
burgh in  1579.  When,  in  that  year,  the  attention 
of  the  Oeueral  Assembly  was  directed  to  the  re- 
formation and  improvement  of  the  universities, 
Smeton  and  Andrew  Melville  were  the  first  to  pro- 
pose that  the  college  of  St.  Mary^s,  St.  Andrews, 
which  had  been  founded  by  Archbishop  Bethune 
in  1537,  shonld  be  exclusively  appropriated  to  the 
study  of  theology.  In  October  1580,  when  An- 
drew Melville  was  removed  to  the  divinity  college 
there,  or  New  college,  as  it  came  to  be  called,  as 
its  fii-st  piincipal,  Smeton  was  appointed  his  suc- 
cessor as  principal  of  the  university  of  Glasgow. 
He  took  a  very  active  part  in  church  mattei*s,  and 
was  at  every  Assembly  named  one  of  the  assessors 
to  the  moderator.  At  the  General  Assembly  held 
24th  April  1583,  he  was  again  elected  moderator, 
but  died  at  Glasgow,  December  13th,  the  same 
year,  of  a  fever. 

SMIBERT,  John,  an  eminent  artist,  whose 
works  are  described  as  having  had  a  powerful  and 


lasting  influence  on  the  arts  of  design  in  America, 
was  bom  in  the  Grassmarket,  Edinbnrgfa,  abost 
1684.  His  father  was  a  dyer.  He  aenred  liis  ap- 
prenticeship to  a  honse-painter  in  his  native  city ; 
bot,  anxious  to  raise  himself  above  that  bumble 
occupation,  he  repaired  to  London,  where,  for  sob- 
sistence,  he  was  at  first  obliged  to  work  for  coach- 
painters.  He  was  snbseqnently  employed  in  copy- 
ing pictures  for  dealers,  and  obtained  admittance 
into  the  academy.  After  pursuing  his  studies 
there  for  some  time,  he  funnd  means  to  visit  Italy, 
where  he  spent  three  years  in  copying  Baphad, 
Titian,  Vandyck,  and  Reubens,  and  became  the 
fellow-traveller  of  the  celebrated  Dean  Berkeley, 
afterwards  bishop  of  Cloyne,  in  Ireland.  While 
at  Florence  he  was  engaged  by  the  grand  dake  of 
Tuscany  to  paint  two  or  three  Siberian  Tartars 
presented  to  his  highness  by  the  Czar  of  Russia. 
On  his  return  to  England  his  improvement  was  ao 
great  that  he  soon  obtained  a  large  share  of  busi- 
ness. 

In  1728,  when  his  friend  Dr.  Berkeley  went  to 
America  to  found  a  university  in  the  Island  of 
Bermuda,  for  the  conversion  of  the  American 
savages  to  Christianity,  he  took  Smibert  with  him 
as  professor  of  drawing,  painting,  and  architecture. 
In  his  intended  institution  ;  and  with  this  learned 
and  philanthropic  individual  he  resided  for  two 
years  at  Newport,  Rhode  Island.  A  large  paint- 
ing by  Smibert,  representing  Berkeley  and  some 
of  his  family,  with  the  artist  himself,  on  their  first 
landing  in  America,  is  shown  at  Yale  College, 
being,  it  is  believed,  the  first  picture  of  more 
than  a  single  figure  ever  painted  in  the  United 
States. 

Being  disappointed  in  obtaining  assistance  from 
England,  Berkeley  abandoned  his  project  of  a 
university,  and  after  his  return  to  Britain  Smibert 
settled  at  Boston  in  New  England,  where  he  mar- 
ried a  daughter  of  Dr.  Williams,  the  Latin  school- 
master of  that  town,  by  whom  he  had  two  children 
lie  acquired  considerable  foi*tune  and  a  high  r^n- 
tation  by  his  art,  and  died  there  in  1751.  His 
son,  Nathaniel,  who  died  young,  was  also  an  artist 
of  much  promise.  Some  account  of  Smibert,  who 
was  an  acquaintance  and  correspondent  of  Allan 
Ramsay,  will  be  found  in  Walpole*s  *  Anecdotes 
of  Fainting,*  and  in  Dunlap's  valuable  '  History 


SMITII, 


480 


ADAM,  LL.D. 


and  kiiidr«d  suWjecU  1m  has  from  time  to  time  furnished 
VMluitble  communicntiofM  to  tlie  Geulo^iad  and  other  scientiiio 
Societies,  and  he  has  also  funuHlied  important  memoirs  on 
simiUr  fonnations  which  fell  under  hiii  notice  in  Spain,  Por- 
tuf^alf  France,  and  Madeira.  Jn  addition  to  the  works  above 
mentioned,  Mr.  Smith  is  the  author  of  the  following;: — 1.  *  A 
Voyage  round  the  World  from  1806  to  1812,  in  which  Japan, 
Kamschatka,  the  Aleutian  Jslanda,  and  the  Sandwich  Islands 
were  visited,  including  a  narrative  of  the  Narrator's  Ship- 
wreck on  the  Island  of  Sannack,  and  his  8ub:^uent  wreck 
in  the  ship's  longboat ;  with  an  Account  of  the  present  state 
of  the  Sandwich  Islands,  and  a  Vocabulary  of  their  I«an- 
fl^unge;  by  Archit>ald  Campbell — Drawn  up  by  Mr.  Smith 
from  the  verbal  account  of  the  author,*  Edinburgh,  1816, 
8vo. — 2.  *  Journal  of  a  Voyage  to  Spitzl>ergen  and  the  east 
c<>;ist  of  Greenland  in  his  Majesty's  Ship  Griper,  by  Douglai 
Charles  Clavering,  Emj.,  F.K.S.,  Commander — Communicat- 
ed by  James  Smith,  Esq.  of  Jurdanhill,  F.IiS.,  with  a  Chart 
of  the  Dii^oveiies  of  Captains  Clavering  and  Scoreshy — from 
the  Edinburgh  New  rhiloBopliical  Journal  for  July  1830. — 
With  a  Biographical  Notice  of  Captain  Clavering  drawn  up 
from  his  papers.' — 8.  '  I^etters  to  an  English  Peer  on  the 
present  state  of  the  Church  of  Scotland,'  8vo,  Ix>ndon,  1841 
.ind  1843.  4.  *  Uesearches  in  Newer  Pliocene  and  Post  Ter- 
tiary Geology,'  8vo,  I^ndon,  1862. 

Mr.  Smith  married  Mary,  daugliter  of  Alexander  Wilson, 
Em].,  iasue,  one  mm  and  five  daughtem.  The  son,  Archibald 
Smith,  Esq.,  F.R.S.,  married  Susan  Emma.  d.HUghter  of 
Vice-Chanctrllor  Sir  James  Parker  of  Temple  Rotheby,  I^- 
owtcrsbire.  D.-mghtetM — 1.  ChriAtiiia  I^iura,  married  Waiter 
Buchanan,  Esq.,  M.P.  for  the  city  of  Glaagow.  2.  Isabella, 
married  Henry  G«>re  Booth,  Esq.,  son  of  Sir  Robert  G«»re 
Booth,  bart.;  3.  Ix)uifui,  married  William  Hamilton,  Enq., 
of  Minard  Castle,  Argyleshire.  4.  Sabina  Douglas  Claver- 
ing.    5.  Jane  Charlotte. 

S.MITH,  Adam,  LL.I).,  a  distinguishecl  writer 
on  morals  and  political  economy,  was  the  only 
child  of  Adam  Smith,  comptroller  of  the  cnstoms 
at  Kirkcaldy,  and  of  Margaret,  daughter  of  Mr. 
Douglas  of  Stratheury.  He  was  bora  at  Khk- 
caldy,  June  6,  1723,  a  few  months  after  the  death 
of  his  father.  When  about  three  years  old,  he 
was  stolen  by  gipsies,  but  was  soon  recovered  by 
his  uncle,  who  followed  and  overtook  the  vagrants 
in  Leslie  Wood.  He  received  his  early  education 
at  the  grammar  school  of  his  native  place,  and 
soon  attracted  notice  by  his  fondness  for  books, 
and  by  his  extraordinary  powers  of  memoi-}-. 
His  constitution,  during  his  infancy  and  boyhood, 
was  weak  and  sickly,  which  prevented  him  from 
joining  in  the  sports  and  pastimes  of  his  school 
companions.  Even  at  this  early  penod  he  was 
remarkable  for  those  habits  which  remained  with 
him  through  life,  of  speaking  to  himself  when 
alone,  and  of  absence  in  company.  In  1737  he 
was  sent  to  the  university  of  Glasgow,  where  his 
favounte  studies  were  mathematics  and  philoso- 


phy. Jn  1740  lie  removed  to  BaHol  college,  Ox- 
ford, as  an  exhibitioner  on  Sneirs  Fonndatioii, 
(see  Snell,)  with  the  view  of  entering  the  Chnitli 
of  England ;  and,  while  there,  he  cnUivated,  witli 
great  success,  tlie  study  of  languages.  After  t 
residence  at  Oxford  for  seven  years,  not  finding 
the  ecclesiastical  profession  suitable  to  bis  taste, 
he  returned  to  Kirkcaldy,  and  for  nearly  two 
years  remained  at  home  with  his  mother.  In 
1748  he  fixed  his  residence  at  Edinburgh,  where, 
during  that  and  tlie  following  years,  be  read  lec- 
tures on  rhetoric  and  belles  lettres,  under  the 
patronage  of  Ix)rd  Kames.  At  what  particular 
period  his  acquaintance  with  Hume  the  historian 
commenced  docs  not  appear,  bnt  it  seems  to  have 
speedily  ripened  to  a  lasting  friendship.  In  1751 
he  was  elected  professor  of  logic  in  the  university 
of  Glasgow;  and  the  year  following,  on  the  death 
of  Mr.  Thomas  Craigie,  the  immediate  successor 
of  ])r.  Hutcheson,  he  was  removed  to  the  chair  of 
moral  philosophy  in  the  same  university.  In  this 
situation  he  remained  for  thirteen  years.'  In  1759 
he  published  his  ^Theory  of  Moral  Sentiments,* 
to  the  second  edition  of  which  he  appended  a  trea- 
tise *•  On  the  Origin  of  languages.'  He  had  pre- 
viously contributed  to  the  first  Edinburgh  Review, 
which  was  begun  in  1755,  a  Review  of  Dr.  John- 
son's Dictionary  of  the  English  I^auguage.  and 
some  gem  nil  obseiTations  on  the  state  of  litera- 
ture in  the  difllerent  countries  of  Europe.  In 
1762  the  senatus  academicus  of  the  university  of 
Glasgow  unanimously  conferred  upon  him  the 
degree  of  doctor  of  laws. 

Towards  the  close  of  1763  he  received  an  invi- 
tation from  Mr.  Charles  Townsend,  who  had  mar- 
ried the  widowed  duchess  of  Buccleuch,  to  accom- 
pany her  grace's  son,  the  young  duke,  on  his 
travel.s ;  wlien  the  liberal  terms  offered,  with  his 
strong  desire  to  visit  the  continent,  induced  him 
at  once  to  resign  his  professorship.  He  joined 
the  duke  at  London  early  in  1764,  and  in  the 
month  of  March  they  set  out  for  Paris.  After  a 
stay  of  ton  or  twelve  days  in  that  city,  they  pro- 
ceeded to  Toulouse,  where  they  remained  eighteen 
months ;  after  which  they  journeyed  through  the 
southern  provinces  to  Geneva.  About  Christmas 
1765  they  retunicd  to  Paris,  where  they  remaincil 
for  nearly  a  year.     Among  his  acquaintances  in 


'i  I 


ii 


SillTH, 


482 


JAMES,  OF  DEANSTON. 


of  propriety  which  his  recluse  habits  tended  at 
once  to  perfect  in  his  conception,  and  to  diminish 
his  power  of  realizing.  He  never  sat  for  his  pic- 
ture; but  tlio  medallion  of  Tassie  conveys  an 
exact  idea  of  his  profile,  and  of  the  general  ex- 
pression of  his  countenance."  lie  was  equally 
remarkable  for  absence  of  mind  and  simplicity  of 
character,  and  for  muttering  to  himself  while 
walking  the  streets.  As  an  instance  of  the  very 
high  regard  in  which  ho  was  held  by  the  leading 
statesmen  of  the  day,  it  is  related  that  the  last 
time  he  was  in  Loudon,  he  had  engaged  to  dine 
with  Lord  Melville,  then  Mr.  Dundas,  at  Wim- 
bledon; Mr.  Pitt,  Mr.  Greuville,  Mr.  Addington, 
afterwards  Viscount  Sidmoutli,  and  some  others 
of  his  lordship*s  friends,  were  there.  Dr.  Smitii 
arrived  late,  after  the  compan\'  had  sat  down  to 
dinner.  Tho  moment  he  entered  the  room  all  the 
company  rose.  He  apologised  for  being  late,  and 
entreated  them  to  keep  their  seats.  *^  No,"  said 
they,  **  we  will  stand  till  you  are  seated,  for  we 
are  all  your  scholars."    His  works  are: 

The  Theorj  of  Moral  Sentiments;  to  which  is  added,  a 
Dissertation  on  the  Origin  of  Languages.  Lend.  1759,  8vo. 
Ix>nd.  1761,  8vo.  6th  edition,  with  considerable  additions 
and  corrections.     I«ond.  1790,  2  vols.  8vo. 

An  Knqnlrv  into  the  Nature  and  Causes  of  the  Wealth  of 
Nations.  Lond.  1776,  2  vols.  4to.  Supplement.  1784,  4to. 
The  work  has  passed  through  numerous  editions.  The  11th 
edition  appeared  with  Notes,  Supplementary  Chapters  and  a 
Life  of  the  Author ;  by  William  Phtyfair.  Ix>nd.  1805, 3  vols. 
8vo.  Again,  with  Notes  and  Additions,  by  Mr.  Buchanan. 
Edin.  1814,  4  vols.  8vo.  In  French,  avec  dea  Notej*  et  Ob- 
servations par  Germain  Garnier  de  Tlnstitut  National.  Pa- 
ris, 1802,  5  vols.  8vo.     1809,  3  vols.  8vo. 

ratter  to  .Mr.  Strahan  on  the  last  Illness  of  David  Hume. 
I^)nel.  1777,  8vo. 

Essnys  on  Philosophical  Subjects ;  to  which  is  prefixed  an 
Account  of  the  Life  and  Writings  of  the  Author,  by  Dugald 
Stewart.     I^ond.  1795,  4to. 

Complete  Works,  with  his  Life,  by  Dugald  Stewart.  1812, 
5  vols.  8vo. 

SMTm,  James,  of  Deanston,  an  eminent  sci- 
entific agriculturist,  was  born  in  Glasgow,  3d 
January  1789.  His  father  had  settled  in  that 
city  in  business,  and  became  a  wealthy  man.  His 
mother  was  a  daughter  of  Mi*.  Buchanan  of  Car- 
ston,  Stirlingshire.  His  father  died  in  his  infancy, 
and  his  mother  went  to  reside  with  her  youngest 
brother,  who  at  that  time  was  the  managing  part- 
ner of  very  extensive  cotton  works  at  Deanston, 
now  a  beautiful  village,  on  the  romantic  river 
Teith,  about  eight  miles  north-west  of  Stirling. 


Mr.  Smith's  edncation  was  completed  at  the 
university  of  Glasgow.  After  leaTing  it  he  went 
to  reside  with  his  unde  at  Catrine  works,  Ayr* 
shii-e,  belonging  to  the  some  firm  as  thorn  at 
Deanston.  At  Catrine,  young  Smith  devoted  his 
energies  to  the  attainment  of  a  practical  aud  thor- 
ough knowledge  of  the  uomerons  intricacies  of 
both  mechanics  and  cotton -spinning.  He  entered 
the  factory  in  the  lowest  station,  working,  at  the 
same  time,  twelve  hoars  a-day;  and  at  the  age 
of  eighteen,  his  nnde  unhesitating! j  appointed 
him  to  the  entire  management  of  the  Deanston 
works. 

In  1812  the  Dalkeith  Farmers'  Club  offered  a 
premium  of  £500  for  an  effective  reaping  machine. 
This  led  Mr.  Smith  to  turn  his  mind  to  the  con- 
struction of  one ;  but,  from  some  cause  or  other, 
the  machine  he  produced  did  not  succeed.    The 
committee,  however,  were  so  much  pleased  with 
the  ingenuity  of  his  invention  that  they  enoonr- 
iigcd  him  to  bring  forward,  daring  the  next  ses- 
sion, a  machine,  for  the  same  object,  on  the  same 
principle.    He  complied  with  their  wishes,  bnt,  m 
the  course  of  trial,  an  acddent  happened  to  the 
implement,  which  again  prevented  the  committee 
from  awai'ding  to  him  the  premium.    For  this 
ingenious  invention  he  received  from  the  same 
club  a  superb  piece  of  plate,  valued  at  fiAy  gm'- 
neas;   from  the  Highland  Society  of  Scotland, 
another  piece  of  plate ;    from    the  Gargnnnock 
Farmers^  Club,  in  his  omu  neighbourhood,  a  pair 
of  silver  cups,  and  from  the  Imperial  Agricultoial 
Society  of  St.  Petersburg,  a  massive  gold  medal, 
transmitted  through  the  Russian  ambassador  at 
the  British  court.    At  the  time  these  numerous 
presentations  were  made  to  him  Mr.  Smith  was 
only  twenty-four  ycai*s  of  age. 

Previous  to  1828,  he  had  been  successful  in 
many  of  his  experiments  upon  his  uncle's  farm; 
but  he  never  could  get  Mr.  Buchanan  to  adopt 
his  theory  on  the  proper  cultivation  of  the  soil, 
to  its  full  extent.  In  the  year  mentioned,  how- 
ever, ho  got  into  his  own  possession  the  Dean- 
ston farm,  comprising  upwards  of  200  acres, 
then  in  a  miserable  state  of  culture,  and  he  then 
commenced  his  celebrated  thorough  drainngeand 
deep-working  opcrntions,  which  ended  in  its  com- 
plete reclamation. 


SMOLLETT, 


484 


DR.  TOBIAS  GEORGE. 


ifest  themselves  ;  and,  besides  writing  several 
keen  and  skilful  satires,  he  composed  *  The  Regi- 
cide,* a  tragedy,  founded  on  the  assassination  of 
King  James  L  In  1740  his  grandfather  died, 
without  leaving  any  provision  either  for  the  mo- 
ther of  Smollett  or  the  familjs  and  thns  thrown 
upon  his  own  resources,  Smollett  resolved  to  visit 
London  after  the  expiry  of  his  apprenticeship,  and 
endeavour  to  obtain  employment  in  the  aimy  or 
navy.  On  his  amval  there  he  presented  his  tra- 
gedy to  the  managers  of  the  theatres,  bnt  meet- 
ing with  no  success  in  his  endeavours  to  bring  it 
on  the  stage,  he  published  it,  in  1749,  with  an 
angry  preface.  In  1741  he  obtained  the  appoint- 
ment of  surgeon*s-mate  on  board  a  man-of-war, 
and  sailed  in  the  nnfortnnate  expedition  to  Car- 
thagena.  While  the  ship  was  in  the  West  Indies 
he  quitted  the  service,  and,  during  his  residence 
in  Jamaica,  he  became  attached  to  a  Miss  Anne 
Lascelles,  whom  he  afterwards  maiiied. 

On  his  return  to  London  in  1746,  his  feelings 
of  patriotism  led  him  to  write  the  beautiful  and 
spirited  poem  of  *The  Tears  of  Scotland.'  The 
same  year  he  published  *  Advice,  a  Satire ;'  and 
about  the  same  time  composed  the  opera  of '  Al- 
ceste,'  which,  however,  was  never  acted,  in  con- 
sequence of  some  ill-timed  satires  on  Rich  the 
manager.  He  had  expected  £3,000  with  his 
wife,  but  of  this  sum  he  obtained  only  a  small 
part,  and  that  after  a  very  expensive  lawsuit  re- 
garding It.  He  was  therefore  obliged  to  have 
recoui-se  to  his  pen  for  support,  and  In  1748  he 
published  '  The  Adventures  of  Roderick  Random,* 
in  two  volumes,  which  soon  became  the  most  po- 
pular novel  of  the  age. 

In  1750  Smollett  visited  Paris,  and  on  his  re- 
turn in  1751  he  produced  'The  Adventures  of 
Peregrine  Pickle,'  in  four  volumes  12mo,  which 
had  a  rapid  sale,  and  was  soon  translated  into 
French.  Having  obtained  the  degree  of  M.D.,  he 
settled  at  Bath,  with  the  view  of  entering  upon 
medical  practice ;  but,  being  disappointed  in  his 
design,  he  returned  to  London,  and  fixing  his 
residence  at  Chelsea,  became  an  author  by  pro- 
fession. In  1753  he  published  the  'Adventures 
of  Count  Fathom,'  and  in  1755  his  translntion  of 
*  Don  Quixote.'  About  this  time  ho  visited  liis 
relations  in  Scotland,  and  on  his  return  to  London 


he  undertook  the  editorship  of '  The  Critical  Re- 
view.'   In  1757  his  farce  of  '  The  Reprisal,  or  the 
Tars  of  Old  England,'  was  performed  at  Dnuy 
Lane  theatre.    Being  convicted  of  a  libel  on  Ad- 
miral Kuowles,  inaerted  in  *•  The  Critical  Review,' 
he  was  sentenced  to  pay  a  fine  of  £100,  and  to  be 
imprisoned  in  the  King's  Bench  for  three  months. 
During  his  confinement,  he  composed  the  'Adven- 
tures of  Sir  Lancelot  Greaves,'  a  sort  of  EngM 
Quixote,  in  which  the  character  of  Theodore,  kug 
of  Corsica,  his  fellow-prisoner,  is  beantifolly  deli- 
neated.     His   'Complete    History  of  England, 
from  the  earliest  times  to  the  Treaty  of  Aix-la- 
Chapelle,'  in  four  quarto  volumes,  appeared  in 
1758,  and  is  said  to  have  been  w^rltten  in  the  short 
space  of  fourteen  months.    The  success  of  this 
work  encouraged  him  to  write  a  continuation  of  it 
to  1764.    By  this  work,  the  most  Important  of 
his  productions,  he  is  said  to  have  realized  the 
sum  of  £2,000. 

In  June  1763  he  had  visited  the  Continent,  in 
the  hope  of  dissipating  the  melancholy  which 
preyed  upon  his  mind  in  consequence  of  the  death 
of  his  only  daughter  this  yeai*.  On  his  return  he 
published  his  '  Travels  through  France  and  Italy,' 
In  two  vols.  Soon  after,  on  account  of  declin- 
ing health,  he  again  went  to  Scotland,  and  on 
his  retum  to  London  he  made  an  unsuccessful 
attempt  to  obtain  from  government  an  appomt- 
ment  as  consul  at  some  port  In  the  Mediterranean. 
His  novel  entitled  *  Adventures  of  an  Atom'  was 
published  in  1769.  His  health  becoming  again  im- 
paired, he  set  out  early  in  1770  for  Italy,  whence  he 
never  returned.  During  the  journey  he  wrote  his 
'  Expedition  of  Humphrey  Clinker,'  which,  in  the 
opinion  of  many,  is  his  best  novel. 

Dr.  Smollett  died  October  21,  1774,  at  a  village 
called  Monte  Nuovo,  near  I^ghora,  where  he  had 
taken  up  his  abode.  His  widow,  the  Narclssa  of 
^  Roderick  Random,'  was  left  nearly  destitute  m 
a  foreign  land ;  and  March  3,  1784,  a  benefit  was 
procured  for  her  in  the  Theatre-Royal,  Edinburgh, 
the  proceeds,  amounting,  with  private  donations, 
to  £366,  being  remitted  to  her  in  Italy. 

Tiie  only  work  he  published  connected  with  his 
profession  was  a  treatise  *  On  the  External  Use  of 
Cold  Water,'  a  subject  which  many  years  after- 
wards began  to  occupy  considerable  attention  u 


I 


I 


SMYTH. 


486 


SMrrHE. 


lysi/  and  introduced  into  it  a  short  history  of 
Medical  Electricity  in  its  application  to  tlio  core  of 
this  disease.  lie  subsequently,  for  professional 
improvement,  visited  France,  Italy,  and  Holland, 
and  in  1768  settled  in  London.  His  first  pnblic 
appointment  was  physician  to  the  Middlesex  hos- 
pital ;  he  had  also  considerable  private  practice. 
His  attention  having  been  particularly  directed  to 
the  prevention  of  contagion  in  cases  of  fever,  he 
had  recourse  to  the  effect  of  nitric  acid  gas,  the 
preventive  power  of  which  he  fully  established. 
His  experiments  made  by  order  of  government  on 
board  of  the  Spanish  prison  ship  at  Winchester, 
where  a  pestilential  fever  prevailed,  were  deemed 
satisfactory,  and  in  1802,  parliament,  in  requital 
of  his  services,  voted  him  a  reward  of  £6,000. 
I]  is  claim  to  the  original  merit  of  this  valuable 
discovery  was  disputed  by  Dr.  James  Johnstone 
of  Kidderminster,  for  his  father,  and  by  M.  Chap- 
tal  of  France,  on  behalf  of  Guyton-Moi-veau,  and 
he  was  involved  in  a  severe  polemical  dispute  in 
consequence  with  several  of  the  profession.  Soon 
after,  for  his  health  he  went  to  the  south  of  France, 
and  subsequentl}',  retiring  from  professional  pur- 
suits, went  to  live  at  Sunbuiy.  He  was  a  fellow 
of  the  Royal  College  of  Physicians,  London,  also 
a  fellow  of  the  Royal  Society,  London,  and  physi- 
cian extraordinary  to  the  king,  George  III.  lie 
died  18th  June  1821.  He  had  married  in  1775, 
Mary,  only  child  and  heii*C8s  of  Thomas  Holy- 
land,  Esq.  of  Bromley,  Kent,  and  had  by  her  eight 
sons  and  two  daughters.  His  eldest  son.  General 
Sir  James  Carmichael  Smyth,  was  created  a  bar- 
onet of  the  United  Kingdom  in  1821.  His  eldest 
daughter  mamed  Dr.  Alexander  Monro,  professor 
of  anatomy  in  the  univei*sity  of  Edinburgh.  (See 
vol.  i.  p.  691,  col.  2,  art.  Carmichael  of  Bul- 
madie.) 

Dr.  Carmichael  Smyth  was  the  author  of  the 
following  medical  publications : 

Tentamcn  Med.  IntiVLff.  de  Par.olvsi.     Edin.  1764,  8vo. 

An  Account  of  the  Effects  of  Swinj^ng,  emplojed  as  a 
Remedy  in  Pulinonarv  Consumption  and  Hectic  Fever. 
I^nd.  1787,  8vo. 

The  Works  of  the  late  Dr.  William  Stork.  Lond.  1788, 4to. 

A  Description  of  the  Jnil  Distemper,  aa  it  appe.ired  amonj; 
tlio  Spanish  Prisoners  at  Winchester  in  the  year  1780;  with 
an  Account  of  the  means  employed  for  curing  that  Fever, 
and  for  destroying  the  Contagion  which  gave  rise  to  it. 
Lund.  2795,  8vo. 

An  Account  of  tlic  Experiments  made  on  bo:ird  the  Union 


Hospital  Ship,  to  detennine  the  Effect  of  the  Kitroos  Add  in 
destroying  Contagion,  and  the  safety  with  which  it  nu^  be 
employed.    Lond.  1796,  8vo. 

The  Effect  of  the  Nitrous  Vapour  in  pre\'enting  md  de- 
stroying Contagion;  ascertained  from  a  variety  of  trials, 
made  chiefly  by  Surgeons  of  his  Majesty**  Nary  in  PriaoiB, 
HoepitulSf  and  on  board  of  ships :  with  an  IntroductioD,  re- 
specting the  Nature  of  Contagion,  which  giv«s  rise  to  the 
JaU  and  Hospital  Fever,  and  the  various  methods  fomcriy 
employed  to  prevent  or  destroy  this.     Lond.  1799,  8vo. 

Letter  to  William  'Wilberforee,  Esq.,  containing  Bemarls 
on  a  Pamphlet,  entitled  *  An  Account  of  tlie  Disoomy  oftbe 
Power  of  the  Mineral  Acid  Vapours  to  destroy  CootagHa, 
by  .Tohn  .Johnstone,  M.D.*    Lond.  1805,  8vo. 

Remarks  on  a  Report  of  31.  Chaptal ;  with  an  Kianrins- 
tion  of  the  Claim  of  M.  Guyton  de  Morvean  to  the  dtseowy 
of  tlie  power  of  Mineral  Add  Gases  on  Contagion.  Loodflo, 
1805,  8vo. 

A  Treatise  on  the  Hydrencephalns,  or  Dropsy  of  the  Brain. 
Lond.  1814,  8vo. 

Ixitter  from  Mr.  Young  relating  his  own  case,  in  which  an 
enlarged  Spleen  was  cured  by  the  application  of  the  actoal 
Cautery.    Annals  of  Med.  vi.  437,  1801. 


Smytiii-::,  one  of  the  modes  of  spelling  the  surname  of 
Smith.    The  family  of  Smythe  of  Meth^'en,  Perthahire,  de- 
scend from  Thomas  Smith,  who  was  apothecary  to  King 
James  III.,  as  appeara  by  a  charter,  of  data  29th  Jan- 
uary 1477.     His  son,  Patrick  Smith  of  Braco,  Perthshire, 
temp.  James  IV.,  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Wiliiam  Smith 
of  lirnco.    The  latter,  by  his  wife,  Agnes  Scott,  of  the  fami- 
ly of  Halwearle,  Fifeshiro,  relict  of  Christopher  Snel  of  Bal- 
garvie,  in  tlie  same  county,  had  a  son,  Patrick  Smith  of 
Braco,  who  was  served  Iieir  to  his  father  in  15CI.    Alexan- 
der, Patrick's  son,  predeceased  him  in  1G03,  leaving  two  sons, 
Patrick,  who  succeeded  his  grandfather  in  1G04,  and  An- 
dn>w.     On  the  consecration  of  their  gnarduui,  George  Gn- 
liam,  minister  of  Scone,  as  bishop  of  Orkney,  they  were 
removed  thither,  where  they  settled.    Andrew  acquired  the 
estate  of  Rapness,  and  marrying  in  Orkney,  left  issue.    Pa- 
trick, the  elder  son,  hiird  of  Brnco,  was  thrice  married,  bis 
first  wife  being  CHtherine  Graham,  daughter  of  h»  gnardian, 
and  had  i^uiuc  by  all  his  wives.     Henr}*,  his  eldest  son,  joioed 
the  anny  of  Charles  I.,  and  fell  at  Marston  Moor  in  1644. 
George,  the  second  son,   predeceased  his  fatlier,  who  was 
succeeded  by  Patrick,  the  third  son.     'llie  latter  made  gmt 
additions  to  jiis  paternal  estate  in  Perthshu^,  and  ao^nined 
also  the  lands  of  Maill  in  Orkney.     He  was  cast  away  about 
IGol,  in  crossing  the  Pentland  frith,  when  himself  and  the 
whole  boat's  crew  were  drowned.     His  eldest  surviving  sod, 
Patrick  Smith  of  Braco,  sold  his  estates  in  the  Orkneys,  and 
in   1 GG4  purchased  from  the  duke  of  I.ennox,  the  lands  fd 
Met  liven,  Perthshii-e,  part  of  the  dowi-y  lands  formerly  appro- 
priated for  the  maintenance  of  the  queen-dowager  of  Scot- 
land.    Patrick  Smith  of  Methven  was  twice  married.    Pa- 
trick, his  only  son  by  his  first  wife,  was  acddentally  shot  bv 
his  tutor,  on  a  shooting  party,  on  the  loch  of  Methven.    Da- 
vid, his  eldest  son,  by  his  second  wife,  succeeded  him.    His 
first  wife,  Anne,  daughter  of  James  Keith  of  Benholm.  bro- 
ther of  the  bixth  earl  Marischal,  was  a  lady  of  a  bold  military 
spirit,  who  distinguished  herself  by  her  opposition  to  the 
Covenanters.     On  Sunday,  13th  October  1678,  during  her 
husband's  absence  in  Ix>ndon,  some  of  that  persecuted  budy, 
chiefly  from  l*erth,  met  f«)r  worship  in  the  neighbourhood  of 
iMethveri  castle,  when  Mrs.  Smythe,  at  the  head  of  her  hns- 
band's  tenantry,  drove  them  off  the  estate.     In  a  letter  to 


SOMERVILLE, 


4B8 


BARON. 


WilliAin  Somerville,  the  poet,  author  of  *The  Chase/ &o., 
descended  from  the  third  son. 

William  de  Somerville,  the  second  son,  came  to  Scotland 
with  David  I.,  from  whom  he  had  a  grant  of  the  lands  of 
Camwath  in  Clydesdale.  He  witnessed  the  foundation  char^ 
ter  of  Melrose  abbey  by  that  monarch  in  1136,  also  donations 
by  him  to  the  monasteries  of  Dunfermline  and  Kelso.  He 
died  in  1142,  and  was  buried  at  Melrose.  He  had  two  sons, 
William,  who  witnessed  a  charter  of  David  I.  to  the  abbacy 
of  Kelso  in  1144,  as  well  as  several  of  Malcolm  IV.,  and 
died  in  1161 ;  and  Walter,  witness  to  a  charter  of  the  latter 
monarch  betwixt  1154  and  1160.  The  former  left  a  son, 
also  named  William  de  Somerville,  witness  to  several  char- 
ters of  Malcolm  IV.  and  William  the  Lion.  In  the  reign  of 
the  latter  he  slew  a  monstrous  animal  which  greatly  devas- 
tat«d  the  district  of  Linton,  Roxburghshire.  According  to 
tradition,  it  was  a  serpent,  supposed  to  have  been  the  last 
that  infested  that  part  of  the  country,  and  in  1174  he  ob- 
tained the  lands  of  Linton  from  the  king  as  a  reward.  A 
place  is  pointed  out  as  the  animal's  den,  bearing  the  name  of 
'*  the  worm*s  hole,**  and  the  ground  in  ita  vicinity  is  called 
Wormington.  On  an  ancient  stone  on  the  south  wall  of  the 
parish  church  is  the  figure  of  a  horseman  spearing  the  mouth 
of  an  animal  resembling  a  dragon,  and  underneath  it  were 
inscribed  the  words : 

"  The  wode  laird  of  I^riestone 
Slew  the  wode  worm  of  WMrmieston, 
And  won  all  Linton  parochine.** 

The  crest  of  the  Ix>rds  Somerville  has  the  inscription  "  The 
wode  laird,"  and  contains  other  allusions  to  William  de  Som- 
er\'ille*s  exploit.  After  obtaining  the  lands  of  Linton,  the 
latter  became  chief  falconer  to  the  king  and  sheriff  of  Rox- 
burghshire.    He  was  buried  in  the  choir  of  Linton  church. 

William  de  Somerville  of  Linton  and  Camwath,  the  son  of 
this  adventurous  baron,  is  said  to  have  distinguished  himself 
at  a  tournament  at  Roxburgh,  before  Alexander  11.  His 
son.  Sir  William  de  Somenille,  fought  at  the  battle  of 
Largs,  2d  October  1263,  and  died  in  1282.  The  son  of  this 
baron,  Sir  Thomas  de  Somerville  of  Linton  and  Camwath, 
was  present  in  the  convention  at  Brigham,  12th  March  1290, 
when  a  marriage  between  the  Princess  Margaret  and  Prince 
Edward  of  England  was  proposed.  He  swore  fealty  to  King 
Edward  L,  15th  May  1296,  but  the  following  year  he  joined 
Sir  William  W^allace.  He  made  several  donations  to  the 
monks  of  Melrose  out  of  his  barony  of  Linton,  and  died  about 
1300,  leaving  two  sons,  Sir  Walter,  and  Sir  John  de  Somer- 
ville. The  former  was  one  of  the  few  barons  who  supported 
Wallace,  under  whom  he  commanded  the  third  brigade  of 
cavalry  at  the  battle  of  Biggnr.  He  was  also  a  steady  ad- 
herent of  Robert  the  Brace.  The  latter  was  taken  by  the 
English  in  1306.  During  the  wars  of  this  period,  Linton 
tower,  built  by  William  de  Somerville,  the  serpent-slayer,  was 
often  put  in  peril,  from  its  position  on  the  borders,  by  its 
owners'  sturdy  opposition  to  the  aggressions  of  the  English. 

Sir  Walter  de  Somei-ville  of  Linton  and  Camwath,  one  of 
Brace's  principal  associates,  died  about  1330.  By  his  wife, 
Giles,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Sir  John  Herring,  he  got  the 
lands  of  Gilmerton,  Dram,  and  Goodtrees,  Mid  Lothian,  and 
had  three  sons.  1.  Sir  James,  killed  at  the  battle  of  Dur- 
ham in  1846.  2.  Sir  Tliomas,  who  fought  in  the  same  bat- 
tle, and  succeeded  his  brother.  8.  Richard,  witness  to  a 
charter  of  the  earl  of  I^nnox  in  1340. 

Sir  Thomas  de  Somerville  of  Linton  and  Camwath,  between 
1362  and  1866,  had  three  safe-conducts  into  England  to 


visit  the  shrine  of  SL  Thomas  k  Bedcet  at  CantorlNuy,  and 
one  to  go  through  England  to  visit  St.  John  of  Amboiie  hi 
France.  He  died  before  1870.  His  eldeat  aoo.  Sir  WSStm 
de  Somerville,  one  of  the  hostages  for  the  rdeaae  of  David 
II.,  8d  October  1357,  died  io  1408,  leaTug  two  sqm,  Sir 
Thomas,  first  Lord  Somerville,  and  William,  aneestor  of  ths 
Somervilles  of  Cambo. 


SoMERYiixv,  Baron,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scodaad, 
conferred  before  1430,  on  Sir  Thomas  Soroenrille,  above  man- 
tioned.  He  had  a  safe-oondaot  to  England  to  meet  James 
I.,  18th  December  1423,  and  he  was  one  of  the  goarantees  of 
the  treaty  for  his  release,  28th  December  1424 ;  also,  one  of 
the  jury  on  the  trial  of  Hurdach,  dnke  of  Albany,  in  Ifsj 
1425.  He  held  the  office  of  justiciary  of  SeoCland  sooth  of 
the  Forth,  and  appears  to  have  been  created  a  peer,  by  the 
title  of  Lord  Somerville,  before  1480.  He  died  in  1445.  He 
married  Janet,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Stewart  of  Derae- 
ley,  and  got  with  her  the  barony  of  Cambnsnethan,  Lanark- 
shire. His  son,  William,  second  Lord  Somerville,  was  fire- 
quently  a  commissioner  to  treat  with  Uie  English  as  to  peaca^ 
and  was  a  conservator  of  several  truces  with  the  English. 
He  died  in  June  1455.  With  two  daughters,  he  had  two  sons; 
John,  third  Lord  Somerville,  and  Thomas  Somerville,  of  Plsac^ 
Stirlingshire. 

John,  third  Lord  Somerville,  was  wounded  at  the  betUe 
of  Sark  against  the  English  in  1448.  He  was  present  with 
James  II.  at  the  «ege  of  Roxburgh,  when  his  majesty  was 
killed  by  the  bursting  of  a  cannon  in  1460.  He  was  con- 
cerned with  the  Boyds  in  carrying  off  James  III.  from  lia- 
lithgow  to  Edinburgh,  9th  July  1466,  for  which  a  pardon 
under  the  great  seal  was  granted  to  him  by  parliament,  13th 
October  that  year.  He  died  in  November  1491.  He  was 
twice  married;  first,  to  Helen  Hepburn,  sister  of  Patrkk, 
first  earl  of  Bothwell,  and  had  by  her  a  son,  ^^HHiam,  master 
of  Somcr\*ille,  who  died  in  1488,  and  two  daughters ;  2(ily, 
to  Mariot,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  and, 
with  a  daughter,  Mary,  had  a  son.  Sir  John  Somerville  of 
Canibusnethan,  tutor  to  his  nephew,  John,  fourth  f>ord 
Somen'ille,  who  was  of  weak  intellect.  Sir  John  was  killed 
at  Flodden  9th  September  1513.  He  married  Elizabeth,  a 
daughter  of  Carmichael  of  Balmedie,  Fifeshire,  and  was  an- 
cestor uf  the  Somervilles  of  Cambusnethan.  His  son,  Sir 
John  Somerville  of  Cambusnethan,  was  called  Red  Bag,  from 
carrying  a  red  leathern  bag  for  holding  his  hawk's  meat  He 
married  a  sister  of  the  earl  of  Montrose.  Their  son  took 
to  wife,  Catherine,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Carmichael  of 
Meadowflat,  captain  of  Crawford,  one  of  the  mistresses 
of  James  V.  In  that  curious  book,  *  The  Memorie  of  tlie 
Somervilles,*  published  in  1815,  2  vols.,  from  the  original 
manuscripts,  many  intei'«sting  notices  are  gi\*en  of  the 
royal  visits  to  Cowthally,  Lord  Somerville*s  seat  in 
the  parish  of  Camwath;  and  especi.illy  of  the  flirtations 
of  James  V.  with  "  Mistress  Katherine  Carmichael,  the  cap- 
tain of  Crawfiiird's  daughter,  a  young  lady  much  about  sex- 
teinth  years  of  age,  admired  for  her  beautie,  handsomeness  of 
persone,  and  vivacity  of  spirit."  The  work  was  written  by 
James  Somerville  of  Drum,  who  died  in  1690,  styled 
in  the  title-page,  James  eleventh  I^rd  Somerville.  Al- 
luding to  ''  Mistress  Katherine*s**  connexion  with  the  king, 
the  author  thus  concludes  an  admirable  defence  of  her: — 
*'  Thus  far  I  have  digressed  in  vindication  of  this  excdlent 
lady  that  it  may  appear  it  was  nether  her  choyse  nor  any 
vitious  habite  that  prevailed  over  her  chastitie,  but  ane  ine- 
\ntable  fate  that  the  strongest  resistance  could  hardly  witlt- 
st'md.*'    She  died  in  1552.    She  was  descended  from  the 


SOMEllVILLE, 


490 


THOMAS,  D.D. 


coart  on  that  tiial,  bat  it  wns  passed  over.  Jumes  Somer- 
ville  of  Drum  died  in  16U0.  His  son^  James  Somerville, 
}^ounger  of  Diiim,  predeceased  his  father.  In  a  drunken 
quarrel,  he  was  mortally  wounded  by  Thomas,  son  of  Tho- 
mas Learmontli,  advocate,  with  the  sword  of  Hugh  Pater- 
son,  yonngor  of  Bannockbum,  8th  July  1682.  He  lived  a 
day  or  two  afterwards,  forgave  Learmonth,  and  counselled 
him  to  leave  the  country.  It  was  alleged  that  the  wound 
was  rendered  mortal  by  bad  management.  His  son,  James 
Somerville,  born  in  1674,  succeeded  his  grandfather,  and  was 
properly  twelfth  Lord  Somemlle.  He  died  4th  December 
1709,  leaving,  with  two  daughters,  four  sons.  1.  James. 
2.  George  Somerville  of  Dinder,  Somersetshire.  8  and  4. 
John  and  William,  who  both  died  without  issue. 

John,  the  eldest  son,  thirteenth  I^rd  Somerville,  claimed, 
at  the  keenly  contested  election  of  a  representative  peer  of 
Scotland  in  1721,  to  be  admitted  to  vote,  but  his  claim  was 
not  allowed.  He  thereupon  entered  a  protest.  At  the  gen- 
end  election  21st  April  1722,  the  same  took  place.  At  the 
election,  however,  of  15th  August  following,  his  vote  was  ad- 
mitted, and  on  a  petition  to  the  king,  his  right  to  the  peerage 
was  acknowledged  by  the  House  of  I^rds,  27th  May  1723. 
At  the  general  election  of  1741,  he  was  chosen  one  of  the 
8i:cteen  Scots  representative  peers.  He  added  considerably 
to  his  fortune  by  an  aiTangcment  with  his  kmsman,  the  cele- 
brated author  of  *  Tlie  Clnise,*  William  Somerville,  Ksq.  of 
Eadstone,  Warwickshire,  and  Somerville  Aston,  Gloucester- 
shire, representative  of  the  English  branch  of  the  Somer- 
villes,  by  which,  in  consideration  of  certain  sums  applied  to 
the  relief  of  burdens,  the  latter,  who  was  unmarried,  settled 
the  reversion  of  his  estates  upon  him.  He  succeeded  to 
them,  on  the  death  of  the  poet  in  1742.  He  built  the  ele- 
gant house  of  Drum,  and  laid  out  the  plantations  there  in 
great  taste.  Ho  died  at  Drum,  14th  December  1765.  He 
was  twice  married,  to  English  ladies,  and  had  two  sons  and 
two  daughters. 

The  elder  son,  James,  foui-tcenth  I*ord  Somerville,  an  offi- 
cer in  the  2d  regiment  of  dragoon  guards,  sen'ed  several 
campaigns  with  great  credit.  He  quitted  the  army  in  1764, 
with  the  rank  of  lieutenant-colonel.  He  was  chosen  a  repre- 
sentative peer  7th  August  1793,  and  died  16th  April  1796, 
unmarried. 

His  brother,  the  Hon.  Hugh  Somerville,  was  also  an  officer 
of  the  2d  dragoon  guards,  and  afterwards  major  of  the  IGth 
light  drag(M)ns.  In  1762  he  accompanied  the  latter  regiment 
to  Portugal,  and  w.-ts  in  the  force  under  Brigadier-general 
Burg«>vne,  which  surprised  u  Spanish  advanced  party  in 
the  town  of  Valencia  d'Alcantara,  Aug.  27,  1762,  when  they 
entirely  destroyed  one  of  the  best  regiments  in  the  Spanish 
service.  In  1763  he  became  iieut.-col.  of  his  regiment.  He 
quitted  the  army  soon  after,  and  died  at  York  house,  Clifton, 
May  7,  1795.  He  was  twice  married,  like  liis  father,  and 
to  English  ladies.  By  his  first  wife  he  had  a  son,  John, 
15th  I^rd  Somerville,  and  by  his  second,  six  sons  and  one 
daughter. 

John,  15th  I^rd  Somerville,  distinguished  himself  hy  the 
attention  which  he  paid  to  agriculture,  and  has  transmitted 
his  name  to  posterity  by  the  introduction  of  the  breed  of  Me- 
rino sheep  from  Lisbon  into  Great  Britain.  In  1805  and 
subsequent  years,  while  residing  at  his  seat  of  The  Pavilion 
on  the  Tweed,  he  was  the  companion  of  Sir  Walter  Scott  in 
salmon-spearing  and  other  s{>orts.  To  Scott  his  skill  in 
every  dep.irtment  of  the  science  of  rural  economy  was  <if 
great  use,  and  he  always  tidked  of  him  in  particuhir  as  his 
master  in  the  art  of  planting.  In  Scott's  work,  •  Paul's  Let- 
ters to  his  Kinsfolk,'  he  figures  as  Paul's  laird.     He  succeed- 


ed Sir  John  Sinclair  in  1813,  as  president  of  tbe  B<iani  of 
Agriculture,  and  died,  unmarried,  in  1819. 

His  half-brother,  Mark,  succeeded  as  ISth  lord.  Bora 
Oct  26,  1784,  he  died,  unmarried,  June  8,  1842. 

His  brother,  Kenelm,  became  17th  lord.  Hs  was  bom 
Nor.  14, 1787;  educated  at  Itugby ;  entered  the  royal  navj 
in  1801 ;  placed  on  the  retired  list  of  reftr-sdmirals  in  184€. 
He  commanded  the  Thames  on  the  coast  of  AmerieB,  sad 
was  officially  recommended  for  his  aenriees  during  the  expe- 
dition up  the  Patnxent  river.  He  married,  Sept.  8, 1838, 
Frances  Louisa,  only  daugliter  of  John  Hayman,  Esq.;  iasDe, 
two  sons,  viz.  1.  Hugh,  bom  Oct  11,  1^89;  2.  Frederick- 
Koel,  bom  Oct.  8,  1840,  and  five  daughters. 

SOMERVILLE,  Thomas,  D.D.,  an  eminent 
divine  and  historian,  i^'as  born  in  tlie  spring  of  1741, 
at  Hawick,  of  wliich  parish  his  father  was  minister. 
He  studied  at  the  university  of  Edinburgh ;  nnd,  in 
the  autumn  of  1762,  regularly  licensed  as  a  preacher 
of  the  gospeL  Shortly  after,  he  was  appointed  by 
Sir  Gilbert  Elliot  of  Minto,  tutor  to  his  son,  the 
tirst  I^rd  Minto,  afterwards  governor-general  of 
India.  In  1767,  the  church  of  Minto  becoming 
vacant,  he  was  presented  by  Sir  Gilbeit  to  that 
charge.  In  1772,  on  the  translation  of  Dr.  James 
Macknight  to  Edinburgh,  Sir  Gilbert's  interest  pro- 
cured for  him  the  more  lucrative  living  of  Jedburgh. 
At  the  commencement  of  the  American  Revolution- 
ary war,  he  published  a  pamphlet,  entitled  *  Candid 
Thoughts  ou  American  Independence,*  written  iu 
a  spirit  of  determined  hostility  to  the  claims  of 
the  colonists,  which  drew  forth  a  reply  from  Mr. 
Tod  of  Kirtlands,  called  '  Consolatoiy  Thoughls 
on  American  Independence,  by  a  Merchant.'    Iu 

1792  lie  produced  his  'History  of  the  Political 
Transactions,  and  of  Parties,  from  the  Restoration 
of  Charles  II.  to  the  Death  of  King  AVilliam,*  a 
work  which  displays  considerable  research.    In 

1793  he  was  nominated  one  of  the  chaplains  iu  or- 
dinary to  his  majesty  for  Scotland,  and  also  elected 
a  member  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Edinburgh. 

In  1798  he  published  a  *  History  of  the  Reign 
of  Queen  Anne,*  dedicated  by  permission  to 
George  III. ;  and  being,  at  the  time  of  its 
publication,  iu  London,  he  was  introduced  at 
St.  James*,  and  personally  presented  a  cx>py  of 
the  work  to  the  king.  Ho  funiished  the  statisti- 
cal survey  of  the  parish  of  Jedbnrgh  to  Sir  John 
Sinclair's  work,  and  on  the  attempt  to  introduce 
the  culture  of  the  tobacco  plant  into  Roxburgh- 
shire, ho  was  among  the  first  to  afTord  it  a  fair 
trial.     He  died  at  Jedburgh,  ^lay  16,  1«30,  m 


SPEXS, 


494 


OF  LATHALLAN. 


sioii  in  the  3d  draj;oon  f;aani0,  Hiid  fi-om  1810  to  1818,  was 
M.P.  for  Renrrewshire.  He  died  in  1832,  and  was  niceeeded 
bj  his  eldest  son,  Alexander  Speirs,  Em}.  of  Elderslie,  at  one 
period  lord-lieutenant  of  the  county,  and  M.P.  for  Richmond. 
He  died  in  1844. 

His  only  son,  Archibald  Alexander,  bom  io  1840,  was  edn- 
cated  at  Eton ;  a  lieutenant  Scots  fuulier  guards,  and  a  msr 
gistrate  for  Renfrewshire. 


Spens.  or  Spbncb,  a  surname,  origin.illy  a  Fifesliiro  one, 
derived  from  a  word,  meaning  in  Scotland,  a  spare  room  be- 
side the  kitchen,  and  in  Engbnd,  a  yard,  an  enclosure,  a 
buttery.  The  family  of  Spens  of  Lathallan,  of  great  anti- 
quity in  that  county,  from  their  carrying  the  lion  rampant  of 
lilacduff  in  their  arms,  are  said  to  have  been  descended  from 
the  ohi  earls  of  Fife.  Of  the  Spences  of  Wolmerston,  or  Wor- 
mieston,  in  the  parish  of  Cnul,  we  have  the  following  notices : 

The  Spences  of  Wormieston  adhered  to  the  cause  of  Queen 
Mary,  and  at  the  parliament  held  by  the  regent  Lennox  at 
Stirling,  28th  August  1571,  David  Spenoe  of  Wormieston 
was  amongst  the  **  rebels  **  forfeited.  He  is  described  as  one  of 
the  most  able  and  upright  characters  of  the  period.  In  the 
daring  attempt  to  surprise  the  parliament  at  Stirling,  on  the 
4th  September,  planned  by  Kirkaldy  of  Grange,  he  had  re- 
ceived from  the  latter  the  charge  of  securing  the  regent  and 
saving  his  life  at  every  risk,  and  aft«r  the  regent  had  surren- 
dered, he  executed  his  charge  so  faithfully  that  when  at- 
tacked by  his  murderers,  he  received  through  his  own  body 
tlie  bullet  by  which  Lennox  was  mortally  wounded.  Wor- 
mieston was  afterwards  barbarously  hacked  to  pieces  by  the 
king*s  psrty  who  came  to  the  rescue,  although  the  wounded 
T^nnox  repeatedly  called  to  spare  his  life.  Atter  James  VI. 
had  succeeded  to  the  throne  of  England,  Sir  James  Spence  of 
Wormieston  was  sent  ambassador  to  the  king  of  Sweden, 
with  the  view  of  effecting  a  peace  between  that  monarch  and 
the  king  of  Denmark.  The  barony  of  Wormieston  after- 
wards came  into  possession  of  the  Lindsays. 

Count  de  Spens,  who  was  ranked  amongst  the  first  of  the 
nobility  in  Sweden,  and  was  generalissimo  of  the  Swedish 
forces,  was  a  descendant  of  the  house  of  Wormieston. 

It  is  not  improbable  that  Sir  Patrick  Spens,  of  the  ancient 
ballad  which  bears  that  name,  was  a  baron  of  Wormieston.  The 
occasion  of  the  ballad  was  the  expedition  which  conveyed  the 
princess  Margaret,  daughter  of  King  Alexander  III.,  to  Nor- 
way in  1281,  when  she  was  espoused  to  Eric,  king  of  that 
country.  *'  In  returning  home,**  says  Fordoun  in  his  History 
of  Scotland,  **  after  the  celebration  of  her  nuptials,  the  abbot 
of  Balmerinoch,  Bernard  of  Monte-alto,  and  many  other  per- 
sons were  drowned."  The  command  of  the  ship  that  bore 
the  princess  to  Norway,  was  given  to  Sir  Patrick  Spens,  as 


"  the  best  sailor 


That  ever  sailed  the  sea  ;** 

and  the  gallant  commander  and  all  his  company  are  repre- 
sented as  having  been  lost  on  their  homeward  voyage : 

**  Sir  Patrick  he  is  on  the  sea. 
And  far  out  ower  the  faem, 
Wi'  five  and  fifty  Scots  lords*  sons 
That  longed  to  bo  at  hame.*' 

Midway  between  Norway  and  the  coast  of  Fife,  they  were 
all  cast  awav 

"  Half  ower,  hnlf  ower,  to  Abeidour.'* 


Sir  Walter  Scott  preferred  to  read  it, 

"  0  forty  miles  off  Aberdeen,** 

remarking  that  in  a  voyage  from  Nonraj,  a  sbipwrsek 
on  the  north  coast  appean  as  probaUe  at  aither  in  the 
frith  of  Forth  or  Tay.  But  as  Aberdoor  waa  the  ntaniK 
port  to  Dunfermline,  where  the  Scottish  monardia  duefly 
resided  from  the  time  of  Maloohn  Caamors  to  that  of  Aki- 
ander  III.,  and  as  the  royal  conlmiaBona^^  Wemjv  of  W«- 
mjm  and  Soott  of  Balwearie,  sent  to  eeoort  the  yoong  prin- 
cess to  her  husband,  bekmged  to  Fife,  it  ■eema  more  fikdy 
that  the  common  reading  ia  the  correct  ona : 

^  Half  ower,  half  ower,  to  Aberdoor, 
Fnll  fifty  fathoms  deep. 
And  there  lies  gode  Sir  Patrick  Spcna, 
Wi*  the  Scotch  lords  at  his  feet.** 

The  immediate  ancestor  of  the  Lathallan  family  was  Hen- 
ry de  Spens,  who  flourislied  in  the  end  of  the  thirteenth  cen- 
tury. Like  most  of  the  other  Soots  barons  he  was  compelled 
to  swear  fealty  to  Edward  I.  in  1296.  Contemporary  with 
him  was  Niool  de  Spens,  who  was  also  fmroed  to  swear  alle- 
giance to  that  imperious  monarch.  Henry  died  noon  after 
1300.  His  son,  Thomas  de  Spens,  ia  mentioned  in  two 
charters,  in  the  reign  of  Robert  Bruce,  to  the  monastery  of 
Soltray.  His  son  and  successor,  William  de  Spens,  had 
two  sons,  William  his  hour,  and  Walter  de  Spens,  witness  in 
a  writ  of  the  bishop  of  Aberdeen  in  1882.  William,  the  elder 
son,  was  proprietor  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  I^thaUan, 
and  several  others  in  the  same  county,  of  whidi  the  earls  of 
Fife  were  superiors  UU  the  forfeiture  of  Murdach  dnkeot 
Albany  and  eari  of  Fife  in  1425,  after  which  the  fiunily  hdd 
the  lands  of  the  crown.  He  died  about  1432,  at  an  advanced 
age.  He  married  Isabel,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Dancan 
Campbell  of  Glen  Douglas,  Tarbet,  Dumbartonshire.  In 
consequence  of  this  marriage  the  Spens*  of  lathallan,  with 
several  cadets  of  the  family,  added  to  their  arms  gyromnf  o^ 
eight,  the  paternal  coat  of  Argyle.  With  one  daughter,  be 
had  two  sons,  John,  his  heir,  and  William,  first  of  the  Spens* 
of  Kilspindy,  Perthshire,  who  flourished  principally  in  the 
reigns  of  James  I.  and  II.,  but  have  long  been  extinct 

John  de  Spens,  the  elder  son,  in  his  father's  lifetime  was 
designed  of  Glen  Douglas,  and  he  retained  that  designatkm 
with  that  of  lathallan,  as  long  as  he  lived.  He  is  described 
as  having  been  a  person  of  great  parts  and  spirit,  and  ex- 
tremely active  in  business.  In  1434,  he  was  chosen  one  of 
the  lords  of  the  articles  in  a  full  parliament  held  at  Perth  \ij 
King  James  I.  He  died  in  the  banning  of  the  reign  of 
James  II.  By  his  wife,  Isabel,  daughter  of  Sir  John  We- 
myss  of  Rires,  progenitor  of  the  earls  of  Wemvss,  he  hsd  fbor 
sons.  1.  Alexander,  his  heir.  2.  Robert,  of  Httedie,  Fife- 
shire.  3.  Thomas,  bishop  of  Galloway,  a  lexu-ned  prdate, 
appointed  in  1458  lord-privy-seal  for  Scotland.  The  follov- 
ing  year,  on  being  translated  to  the  see  of  Aberdeen,  be  re- 
igned the  privy  seal,  but  in  1468  received  it  again,  and  held 
it  till  1471.  Being  very  prudent  and  expert  in  business, 
Bishop  Spens  was  employed  in  several  embassies,  particoburly 
in  the  treaty  of  marriage  between  the  duke  of  Savoy  and 
Lewis,  Count  de  Maurienne,  his  son,  with  Anabella,  sister  of 
King  James  II.,  in  1449,  and  on  27th  July  1451,  he  was  ap- 
pointed ambassador  from  Scotland  to  negotiate  a  truce  with 
England.  There  is  an  efiigy  of  Bishop  Spens  in  the  collegi- 
ate church  of  Roslin.  He  erected  an  hospital  at  Edinboigfa, 
where  he  died,  and  was  buried  in  the  Trinity  college  cburdi- 


I   ■ 


SPOTTISWOOD, 


496 


JOHN. 


estate  bj  James  IV.  This  baron^s  son,  William  Spottia- 
wood  of  Spottiswoodf  fell  at  Flodden,  in  September  1613. 
By  his  wife,  Elixabeth,  daughter  of  Henry  Hop-Pringle  of 
TorsoDoe,  he  had,  with  two  younger  children,  two  sons,  Da- 
vid, his  successor,  who  died  toward  the  end  of  the  reign  of 
James  V. ;  and  John,  superintendent  of  Lothian,  a  memoir 
of  whom  is  given  below  in  larger  type.  The  latter  mar- 
ried Beatrix,  daughtor  of  Patrick  Crighton  of  Lugton  and 
Gilmerton,  and  had,  with  one  daughter,  two  sons,  John, 
archbishop  of  St.  Andrews,  who  carried  on  the  line  of  the 
family,  and  Jam^,  appointed  biahop  of  Clogher  in  Ireland 
in  1621,  who  dying  m  London  in  16-14,  was  buried  in  West- 
minster Abbey.  The  descendants  of  his  son,  Sir  Heoiy 
Spottiswood,  still  continue  in  Ireland. 

David  Spottiswood  of  Spottiswood  left  an  only  ion,  Nin- 
ian  Spottiswood  of  Spottiswood,  who  was  served  heir  to  his 
father  in  1550 ;  and  left  two  sons.  William,  his  successor, 
died  unmarried  in  1594.  John  succeeded  his  brother,  and 
died  soon  after,  without  issue. 

The  representation  of  the  family  devolved  on  his  cousin, 
John  Spottiswood,  archbishop  of  St.  Andrews,  a  memoir  of 
whom  is  given  on  page  466  in  larger  type.  This  eminent 
prelate  sold,  in  1620,  the  estate  of  Spottiswood  to  a  family 
of  the  name  of  Bell.  He  married  Rachel,  a  daughter  of  Da- 
vid Lindsay,  D.D.,  bishop  of  Boss,  and  with  a  daughter, 
Anne,  wife  of  William  Sinclair  of  Roslin,  had  two  sons.  Sir 
John,  and  Sir  Robert.  The  elder  son  succeeded  to  the  estate 
of  Dairsie,  Fifeshire,  which  had  been  purchased  by  his  father, 
and  was  one  of  the  gentlemen  of  the  bedchamber  to  James 
YI.  His  only  son,  Mr.  Jolm  Spottiswood,  was  a  faithful 
adherent  of  Charles  I.,  and  having  joined  the  marquis  of 
Montrose,  was  taken  prisoner  with  him,  tried,  condemned, 
and  executed  for  high  treason  in  1650.  Of  Sir  Robert,  the 
svcoud  son,  president  of  the  court  of  session  and  secretary  of 
btute  for  Scotland,  beheaded  16th  January  1646,  a  memoir  is 
inserted  at  pMge  468,  in  larger  type,  by  his  wife,  Bethia, 
eldest  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Morrison  of  Prestongrange, 
n  lord  of  session.  Sir  Robert  had,  with  three  daughters,  three 
sons.  1.  John,  who  died,  unmarried,  before  the  Restoration. 
2.  Alexander.  3.  Robert,  physician  to  the  governor  and  gar- 
rison of  Tangier,  and  author  of  a  *  Catalogue  of  Plants  grow- 
ing within  the  fortifications  of  Tangier  in  1673,'  inserted  in 
the  Philosophical  Transactions  for  1696  (Abr.  iv.  p.  85). 
He  died  in  1688,  leaving  an  only  son,  Alexander,  bom  in 
16*76.  a  general  in  the  army,  appointed  governor  of  Virginia 
in  1710.    The  latter  married  and  left  issue. 

Sir  Robert's  becond  son,  Alexander  Spottiswood,  advocate, 
succeeded  to  the  representation  of  the  family,  and  died  in  1675. 
His  only  sur>'iving  son,  John  Spottiswood,  an  eminent  advo- 
cate, was  professor  of  law  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh. 
He  purchased  back,  in  1700,  the  lands  and  barony  of  Spot- 
tiswood from  the  heirs  of  the  Bells,  after  they  had  been 
eighty  years  out  of  the  family.  He  was  the  author  of  the 
following  works  on  jurisprudence :  *  Introduction  to  the 
Knowledge  of  the  Style  of  Writs,  simple  and  compound, 
made  use  of  in  Scotland,*  Edin.  1707,  4 to;  *  The  Form  of 
Process  before  the  Lords  of  Council  and  Session :  to  which  u 
prefixed,  the  Present  State  of  the  College  of  Justice,*  Edin. 
1711,  8vo;  *The  Law  concerning  Election  of  Membera  in 
Scotland  to  sit  and  vote  in  the  Parliament  of  Great  Britun  ; 
second  edit,  corrected  and  augmented,  with  several  Acts  and 
Statutes  relative  to  Elections,*  Edin.  1722,  12mo ;  *  Notes  on 
Hope's  Minor  Pructicks,  and  an  Account  of  all  the  Religious 
Houses  in  Scotland  at  the  Reformation/  Edin.  1784,  12mo. 
His  only  son,  John  Spottiswoode  of  Spottiswoode,  had  three 
sons  and  three  daughters.    The  eldest  son,  John  Spottis- 


woode of  Spottiswoode,  married,  Jane  10, 1779,  If  af^puvt  Pl»- 
nelope,  dauglitor  of  William  Strahao,  Esq.,  IIm  eminent  priit- 
erof  liondtm,  and  had  6  ions  and  8  danglitert.  He  died  Ftk 
3, 1805.  The  sons  were,  1.  John,  his  heir.  2.  William,  M 
nnmarried.  8.  George,  of  Gladswood,  BerwidEahirt,  lini-caL 
in  the  army,  who  died  in  Sept  1857.  4.  Andrew,  of  Bimb 
Hall,  Surrey,  married  Mary,  daugliter  of  T.  N.  Loogno, 
Esq.,  of  the  publishing  house  of  Longman*  and  Co.,  with  is- 
lae,  2  sons,  William,  of  the  hoose  of  Eyn  and  Spottisweodi^ 
printers  to  the  Queen,  London,  and  George,  and  8  dangjItfinL 
5.  Robert,  and  6.  Henry,  both  d:ed  unmarried. 

The  eldest  ion,  John  Spottiswoode  of  Spottiswoode,  ban 
June  17, 1780,  married.  Sept  13,  1809,  Helen,  2d  devgbtar 
of  Andrew  Wauchope  of  Kiddrie  M ariscbal,  iarac,  2  sons, 
John  and  Andrew,  officers  in  the  airny,  and  2  dan^tcn, 
Alicia  Anne,  married  in  1836,  Lord  John  Dooglae  MoatagM 
Scott,  only  brother  of  the  duke  of  Bncdencb,  and  Margant 
Penelope,  who,  in  1834,  became  the  wife  of  Sir  Hogfa  Hone 
Campbell  of  Marchmont,  bart,  and  died  Oct  13,  1839.  Tae 
name  is  now  spelled  with  a  final  e.  Heir,  Andrew,  bora  in 
1812,  a  colonel  in  the  army,  and  commanding  the  1st  dragoon 
guards,  married,  in  1844,  Jane  Emilj,  dr.  of  Lient-ooL  Wm. 
Campbell,  9th  lancen. 

The  Spottiswoodes  of  Muiresk,  Aberdeenshire,  are  a  bnndi 
of  the  family  of  Spottiswoode  of  that  ilk. 

SPOTTISWOOD,  or  Spotswood,  Jonx,  snper- 
intendeot  of  Lothian,  descended  from  an  ancient 
family  of  that  name  in  the  Merse,  as  above  shown, 
was  born  iu  1510.  He  was  scarcely  four  years  of 
age  when  his  father  was  slain  at  Flodden.  In  June 
1584  he  was  entered  a  student  at  the  nniversity 
of  Glasgow,  where  he  applied  himself  chiefly  to 
the  study  of  divinity,  and  took  the  degree  of  M.A. 
Having  imbibed  the  doctrines  of  the  Reformation, 
and  perceiving  the  danger  of  professing  them  open- 
ly, lie  went  to  England  in  1538,  and  at  London  was 
introduced  to  Archbishop  Cranmer,  by  whom  be 
was  admitted  into  holy  orders.  In  January  1543, 
on  tlio  return  of  the  Scots  nobles  who  had  been 
taken  prisoners  at  Solway  Moss,  he  came  back  to 
Scotland,  iu  company  of  the  earl  of  Glencaun, 
with  whom  he  resided  for  several  years.  In  1544 
he  was  employed  by  the  young  earl  of  Lennox  in 
a  private  mission  to  the  English  court,  relative  to 
his  marriage  with  the  Lady  Margaret  Douglas, 
niece  of  Henry  VUI.,  in  which  he  was  snccesafol. 
In  1547  he  was  presented  to  the  parsonage  of 
Caldcr,  by  Sir  James  Sandilands,  afterwards  the 
first  Lord  Toipliichen,  a  zealous  promoter  of  the 
Reformation.  In  1558  he  accompanied  Lord 
James  Stewart,  afterwards  the  Regent  Murray, 
and  the  other  parliamentary  commissioners,  to 
Paris,  to  witness  the  marriage  of  the  young  Queen 
Mary  to  the  dauphin  of  France.  On  the  estab- 
lishment of  the  Presbyterian  religion  In  Scotland, 


i 


SPOTTISWOOD, 


500 


SIR  ROBERT. 


Lord  New- Abbey,  from  the  baronj  of  that  name 
in  Galloway,  which  had  been  conferred  on  liim  by 
the  archbishop  his  father.  On  the  accession  of 
Charles  I.  he  was  nominated  an  ordinary  lord  of 
session,  Febmary  14,  1626,  and  on  tlic  death  of 
Sir  James  Skene,  in  November  1633,  he  was  cho- 
sen president  of  the  court.  Having  disposed  o^ 
the  estate  of  New-Abbey  to  King  Charles,  whc 
bestowed  it  on  the  newly  erected  bishopric  of  Ed- 
inburgh, he  assumed  the  name  of  Liord  Duni- 
pace,  from  an  estate  he  had  purchased  in  Stirling* 
shire. 

In  1637,  when  the  Scots  nation  commenced  that 
resolute  opposition  to  the  oppressive  measures  of 
the  king,  which  ended  in  the  overthrow  of  episco- 
pacy. Sir  Robert  Spottiswood,  who,  from  his  big- 
oted pai-tizanship,  had  I'endered  himself  obnoxious 
to  his  countrymen,  was  obliged  to  quit  the  king- 
dom, when  he  attached  himself  closely  to  the 
king^s  person.     On  Charles  visiting  Scotland  in 
1641,  the  Estates  petitioned  his  majesty  to  remove 
Sir  Robert  Spottiswood  from  his  person  and  coun- 
cils, a  request  with  which  he  was  obliged  to  com- 
ply.   In  1645,  however,  he  was  recalled  by  the 
king,  and  appointed  secretary  of  state  for  Scot- 
land, in  which  capacity  he  signed  the  commission 
of  the  marquis  of  Montrose,  as  lieutenant-governor 
and  captain-general  of  all  his  majesty^s  forces  in 
Scotland,  with  power  to  summon  a  parliament,  to 
meet  at  Glasgow,  and  to  confer  the  honour  of 
knighthood.  Being  himself  the  bearer  of  this  com- 
mission, as  he  could  not  travel  by  any  of  the  ordi- 
nary roads  without  risk  of  apprehension,  he  took 
a  circuitous  route  from  Oxford.    Passing  through 
Wales,  and  embarking  at  the  island  of  Anglesey, 
he  crossed  over  to  the  Isle  of  Man.    Thence  he 
sailed  for  the  AVcst  Highlands,  and  landed  in 
Lochaber.    Proceeding  into  Athol,  he  was  con- 
ducted by  a  party  of  Athol-men  to  the  marquis  of 
Montrose,  then  at  Bothwell  Moor.  lie  accompanied 
the  royalist  army  till  its  defeat  at  Philiphaugh, 
where  he  was  taken  prisoner,  September  13, 1645, 
with  only  his  walking-cane  in  his  hand.    He  was 
arraigned  before  the  parliament  which  met,  accord- 
ing to  adjournment,  at  St.  Andrews.  With  Colonel 
Nathaniel  Gordon,  the  Hon.  William  Murray,  and 
Captain  Guthrie,  also  prisoners.  Sir  Robert  Spottis- 
wood pleaded  exemption  from  trial,  on  the  ground 


of  "  quarter,**  but  after  three  hoars'  debate,  on  the 
10th  January  1646,  tlie  parliament  overrnled  this 
defence,  and  the  committee  of  estates  fonnd  them 
all  "  guilty  of  high  treason  against  the  states  of 
the  kingdouL**    His  three  fellow-prisoners  weie 
condemned  to  death  nnder  an  act  passed  the  pre- 
ceding year,  declaring  that  all  persons  who  after 
having  subscribed  the  Covenant,  should  withdraw 
from  it,  should  be  held  as  guilty  of  high  treason. 
But  as  Sir  Robert  Spottiswood  had  not  snbscribed 
the  Covenant,  the  committee  stated  in  a  special 
report  the  grounds  on  which  they  fonnd  him 
guilty  of  high  treason,  namely,  Ist,  that  he  had 
advised,  docqueted,  signed,  canied,  and  delivered 
to  the  marquis  of  Montrose  the  oommission  ap- 
pointing him  *Mieutenant-govemor  and  captain- 
general  **  of  all  his  maJesty^s  forces  in  Scotland ; 
and,  2dly,  that  he  had  been  taken  in  arms  against 
the  country  at  Philiphaugh.    After  a  lengthened 
debate,  the  parliament  decided  that  both  these 
cliarges  wei-e  capital  offences,  and  accordingly  Sir 
Robert  was  condemned  by  a  large  majority  to 
lose  his  head,  with  forfanlture  of  lands  and  goods, 
heritable  and  moveable. 

Whan  the  vote  was  taken  whether  Sir  Robert 
Spottiswood  should  suffer,  the  earls  of  Eglinton, 
Cassillis,  Dunfermline,  and  Camwath  voted  that 
his  life  should  be  spared ;  and  the  lord-chancellor 
and  the  earl  of  I^nark,  by  leave  of  the  house,  de- 
clined voting.    The  following  passage  is  extracted 
from  the  Life  of  Sir  Robert,  prefixed  to  his  work, 
entitled  '  The  Practicks  of  the  Law  of  Scotland,* 
printed  in  1706.     "  Though  many  liked  not  bis 
party,  they  liked  his  person,  which  made  him 
many  friends  even  among  the  Covenanters,  inso- 
much that  after  his  sentence  was  read,  some  of 
the  nobility  spoke  in  his  behalf,  and  entreated  tbe 
house  to  consider  the  quality  and  parts  of  that 
excellent  gentleman  and  most  just  judge,  whom 
they  had  condemned,  and  begged  earnestly  his 
life  might  be  spared.    But  an  eminent  knowledge 
and  esteem  which,  in  other  cases,  might  be  a  mo- 
tive to  save  a  criminal,  was  here  only  the  cause  of 
taking  an  innocent  man*s  life — ^so  dangerous  is  it, 
in  a  corrupt  age,  to  be  eminently  constant  and 
virtuous.    Tho  gentlemen  who  spoke  were  told 
that  the  authority  of  the  established  government 
was  not  secure  while  Sir  Robert*s  life  was  spared. 


I 


i    ' 


==1 


STAIR, 


504 


SECOND  EARL  OF. 


rooted  oat  to  purpose."  A  daplicate  of  these  instnictions 
was  at  the  same  time  sent  bjr  him  to  Colonel  Hili,  the  gov- 
ernor of  Fort  William,  with  a  similar  letter.  The  odium 
against  the  government  that  arose  in  the  nation  when  the 
accounts  of  the  massacre  were  known,  alarmed  the  king,  and 
to  padfj  the  people  he  dismissed  Su:  John  Dalrymple  from 
office  and  from  his  councils.  A  commission  of  inquiry  into 
the  massacre  was  granted  29th  April  1695,  and  in  tlieir  re- 
port, which  was  aflerwards  adopted  bj  parliament,  the  com- 
missioners threw  the  whole  blame  upon  Secretary  Daliymple, 
stating  that  his  letters  had  exceeded  the  king*8  instructions. 
In  their  address  to  the  king,  founded  upon  the  same,  the 
estates  stated  that,  in  the  first  place,  thej  had  found  that  the 
letters  of  tlie  Master  of  Stair  (Secretary  Dalrymple)  had  ex- 
ceeded his  Majesty's  instructions  as  to  the  killing  and  destruc- 
tion of  the  Glenco-men,  and  they  conclude  as  follows: — **  that 
considering  that  the  Master  of  Stair's  excess  in  his  letters 
against  the  Glenoo-men  has  been  the  original  cause  of 
this  unhappy  business,  and  hath  given  occauon,  in  a  great 
measure,  to  so  extraordinary  an  execution,  by  the  warm  direc- 
tions he  gives  about  doing  it  by  way  of  surprise ;  and  con- 
sidering the  station  and  trust  he  is  in,  and  that  he  is  abitent, 
we  do,  therefore,  beg  that  your  Majesty  will  give  such  orders 
about  Iiim  for  vindication  of  your  government,  as  you  in  your 
royal  wisdom  shall  think  fit.  And,  likewise,  considering  that 
the  actorshave  barbarously  killed  men  under  trust,  we  humbly 
desire  your  Majesty  would  be  pleased  to  send  the  actors  home, 
and  to  give  orders  to  your  advocate  to  prosecute  them  accord- 
ing to  law.'*  The  est:ttes  also  solicited  his  Majesty  to  order 
reparation  to  be  made  to  the  surviving  inhabitants  of  the 
glen  for  the  losses  they  had  sustained  in  their  properties. 
Whether  this  was  ever  done,  does  not  appear,  but  it  is  highly 
probable  that  this  part  of  the  address  was  as  little  heeded  as 
the  rest  Tlie  murderers,  instead  of  being  brought  to  trial, 
were  allowed  by  William  to  remain  in  his  service,  and  some 
of  them  were  even  promoted.  The  report  of  the  Scottish 
parliament,  though  drawn  up  as  favourably  as  possible 
fur  the  king,  was  carefully  suppressed  during  his  life- 
time, a  proof  that  the  govern meut  of  tlie  day  were  anxious 
to  have  the  whole  matter  buried  in  oblivion  at  once  and  fur 
ever. 

The  same  year,  Sir  John  succeeded  his  father  as  2d  Viscount 
Stair,  but  did  not  take  his  seat  in  parliament  for  some  years. 
In  1698,  he  made  a  strong  attempt  to  do  so,  but  was  dis- 
suaded from  it  by  the  duke  of  Queensberry,  the  earls  of  Ar- 
gyle,  Leven,  and  Seafield,  and  by  his  brother,  the  Hon.  Sir 
Hugh  Dalrymple  of  North  Berwick,  baronet,  lord-president 
of  the  court  of  session.  The  lord-justice-clerk  was  deter- 
mined, if  he  offered  to  take  his  seat,  to  call  for  the  vute  and 
address  to  the  king,  passed  respecting  the  affair  of  Glenco,  by 
which  it  was  declared  to  be  a  barbarous  murder.  He  took 
tlic  oaths  and  his  seat  in  parliament  2Ut  J'ebruary  1700, 
and  on  the  accession  of  Queen  Anne  was  sworn  a  privy  coun- 
cillor. He  was  created  earl  of  Stair,  Viscount  Dalrymple, 
and  Lord  Newliston,  Glenluce  and  Stranraer,  April  8,  1703, 
by  patent,  to  tlie  heirs  male  of  his  body,  with  remainder  to 
the  heirs  male  of  his  father.  In  1705,  he  was  named  one  of 
the  commissioners  for  the  treaty  of  Union,  and  was  so  instru- 
mental in  carrying  that  measure  through  parliament  as  to 
give  rise  to  the  opinion  that  without  his  assistance  it  could 
not  have  passed.  He  died  suddenly,  January  8,  1707.  On 
that  day,  after  speaking  warmly  in  favour  of  the  22d  article 
of  the  treaty  of  Union,  he  walked  home,  and  dined  very 
cheerfully  with  company,  but  died  the  same  evening.  Ac- 
cording to  a  contemporary  {Macky's  Memoirs)  he  was  an 
able  lawyer,  and  possessed  of  good  natural  parts.     His  con- 


Tenation  was  lively  and  faoetiom ;  and  be  mada  alwm  a 
better  companion  than  a  ttatonnan,  being  natnrally  Twy  !•- 
dolent.  In  his  person  he  was  handsome,  tall  and  fair.  He 
married  ElizabeUi,  danghto*  and  hebresa  of  Sir  John  Dondas 
of  Newliston,  Linlithgowshire,  and  by  her  bad  five  soni  nd 
two  danghtera. 

His  second  son,  John,  second  earl  of  Stair,  a  diatingoisbsd 
military  commander  and  accomplished  statesman,  was  bon 
at  Edinburgh,  July  20, 1679.  When  a  mere  boy,  be  had  the 
misfortune  to  kill  his  elder  brother,  James,  by  tlie  aoddeotsl 
discharge  of  a  pistol.  About  1681  he  was  aent  to  Lejdeo, 
where  he  made  great  profidency  in  the  langnages,  and  other 
branches  of  education.  On  his  return  to  Scotland,  he  wss 
sent  to  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  under  a  guardian,  to 
finish  his  studies.  He  was  designed  by  his  fiither  fw  the 
law,  but  he  himself  was  anxious  for  a  military  life.  In  1687 
he  went  over  to  Holland,  where  he  passed  through  the  fiiit 
military  gradations,  under  the  eye  of  the  prince  (^  Orsi^ 
At  this  time  he  could  speak  the  French,  Spanish,  Germsn, 
Italian  and  Dutdi  languages  with  great  purity.  At  the  Re- 
volution he  returned  to  Scotland.  He  was  amongst  the  first 
to  declare  for  William  and  Mary,  and  went  up  with  his  father 
to  London  to  pay  his  homage  to  King  William,  by  whom  he 
was  most  graciously  received.  He  attended  the  king  to  Ire- 
land, and  in  1692  accompanied  his  father  and  King  William 
to  Flanders.  His  msjesty  conferred  a  coloners  commisnoo 
on  him,  and  he  served  as  a  volunteer  under  the  eari  of  An- 
gus, colonel  of  the  Gameronian  regiment,  at  the  battle  of 
Steinkirk,  August  2d  of  that  year,  where  Angus  was  killed. 
Although  so  young,  no  British  officer  signalized  himsdf  more 
in  this  engagement  than  Colonel  Dalrymple.  He  several 
times  rallied  his  regiment  when  the  ranks  were  broken  by  the 
cannon,  and  brought  them  back  to  the  charge.  In  the  sue* 
ceeding  winter  he  was  sent  to  study  the  law  at  the  univer- 
sity of  Leyden,  where  he  had  previously  received  the  greater 
part  of  his  education.  In  1700  he  accompanied  Lord  Lex- 
ington in  his  embassy  to  Vienna,  and  after  making  the  toor 
of  Germany  and  Italy,  he  returned  home  in  1701.  Soon  af- 
ter he  was  appointed  lieutenant-colonel  of  the  Scots  regiment 
of  foot  guards.  In  1702  he  served  as  aide-de-camp  to  the 
duke  of  Marlborough  at  the  taking  of  V^enloo  and  Liege,  sod 
the  attack  on  Peer.  At  the  assault  on  the  dtadel  of  Venko, 
when  the  fort  of  Chartreuse  was  taken  by  the  allies,  Colonrl 
Dalrymple  had  the  good  fortune  to  save  the  life  of  the  prince 
of  Hesse-Cassel,  aflerwards  king  of  Sweden,  who,  in  wresting 
the  colours  from  a  French  officer,  was  upon  the  point  of  be- 
ing cut  down  by  a  grenadier,  when  Dalrymple  shot  the  sr- 
sailant  dead  upon  the  spot,  with  his  pistol.  In  April  1703, 
he  had  a  coloners  commission  in  the  Dutch  service.  In  Jsn- 
uary  1706  he  obtained  the  command  of  the  Gameronian  regi- 
ment, and  in  the  succeeding  August  that  of  the  Royal  Scots 
Greys.  He  was  a  brigadier-general  at  the  battle  of  Ramilic^ 
12th  May  that  year;  and,  succeeding  his  father  in  January 
1707  as  second  earl  of  Stair,  was  soon  af^er  chosen  one  of  the 
representative  peers  of  Scotland  in  the  imperial  pariiament. 
He  held  an  important  command  at  the  victories  of  Oudenarde 
and  Malplaquet ;  and  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  lieutenant- 
general,  January  1,  1710.  In  the  winter  of  1709  he  bad 
been  sent  ambassador  extraordinary  to  the  king  of  Poland, 
but  in  May  1710  he  went  to  the  siege  of  Douay,  which  sur- 
rendered to  the  allies  on  the  26th  of  June.  In  the  same 
vejir  he  was  invested  with  the  order  of  the  Thistle.    On  the. 

m 

dismissal  of  the  Godolpliin  mini^try  in  1711,  when  the  duke 
of  Marlborough  was  superseded  by  the  duke  of  Ormond  in 
the  command  of  the  army,  I.ord  Stair  sold  his  commission, 
and  retired  from  the  military  service  for  the  time. 


STAIR, 


506 


EIGHTH  EARL  OF. 


Scotland.  The  succeMion  to  the  titles  was  contested  by 
James  Dalrymple,  second  sunriving  son  of  Colonel  tlie  Hon. 
William  Dalrymple,  above  inentionedf  on  the  ground  Uiat  it 
was  not  in  the  power  of  the  sovereign  to  transfer  the  right  to 
create  or  nominate  a  peer  to  any  individaaL  Both  cousins 
▼oted  as  earl  of  Stiur  at  the  general  election  of  Scots  repre- 
sentative peers,  18th  August  1747,  and  petitions  to  the  king 
were  presented  from  boUi,  claiming  the  titles,  as  also  one  from 
the  earl  of  Dumfries,  eldest  son  of  Colonel  William  Dalrrm- 
ple  and  the  countess,  if  it  was  not  adjudged  to  his  brother, 
James.  The  House  of  Lords  having,  on  4th  May  1748,  de- 
dded  in  favour  of  James  Dalrymple,  he  accordingly  became 
third  earl  of  Stair.  His  father.  Colonel  the  Hon.  William 
Dalrymple  of  Glenmure  was  the  fourth  but  second  surviving 
son  of  the  first  earl  of  Stair,  and  M.P.  for  Ayrsliire  in  the 
last  parliament  of  Scotland.  He  was  a  finn  supporter  of  the 
treaty  of  Union,  and  afterwards  sat  first  for  Clackroannan- 
siilre,  then  for  the  Stranraer  burghs,  and  Utterly  for  Wigton- 
sliire,  in  the  imperial  parliament.  He  died  Sd  December 
1744.  By  his  wife,  tlie  countess  of  Dumfries,  he  hud  six 
sons,  the  three  youngest  of  whom  died  unmarried,  and  two 
daughters.  His  eldest  son,  William,  succeeded  as  earl  of 
Dumfries.  His  second  sou,  Captain  the  Hon.  John  Dnlrrm- 
ple,  the  favourite  nephew  of  the  great  eari  of  Stair,  died,  un- 
married, 2Sd  February  1742.  The  third  son,  James,  passed 
advocate  in  1728,  and  by  the  resolnUon  of  the  House  of 
Lords  became  third  earl  of  Stair,  4th  lilay  1748.  He 
died,  without  issue,  13th  March  1760,  and  in  punnance  of 
the  remainders  in  the  patent,  the  earldom  of  Stur  reverted 
to  his  eldest  brother,  William,  fourth  earl  of  Dumfries,  who 
thus  became  fourth  earl  of  Stair  also.  (See  Dumfries, 
earl  of,  vol.  ii.  p.  78.)  Dying,  without  surviving  issue,  27th 
July  1768,  he  was  succeeded  as  fifth  earl  of  Stair  by  his  cou- 
sin. Captain  John  Dalrymple,  to  whom  the  title  had  at  first 
been  assigned  under  the  new  patent,  eldest  son  of  the  Hon. 
George  Dalrymple,  fiflh  son  of  the  first  earl  of  Stair.  His 
f:itlier  passed  advocate  in  1704,  and  was  appointed  one  of  the 
barons  of  the  court  of  exchequer  in  Scotland  in  1707.  He 
purchased  at  a  judicial  sale,  the  estate  of  Daimahoy,  Mid 
I»thian,  and  died  at  Mofiut,  29th  July  1745.  With  two 
daughters,  he  had  a  younger  son.  General  William  Dalrym- 
ple, lieutenant-governor  of  Chelsea  hospital,  who  died  at 
I^ndon,  23d  February  1707,  leaving  an  only  son,  John  Wil- 
liam Henry  Dalrymple,  who  became  seventh  earl  of  Stair. 

The  fifth  earl  passed  ad\'Ocate  in  1741,  but  afterwards 
went  into  the  unny,  and  had  the  rank  of  ciptain.  He  sold 
the  estate  of  Kcwiiston  to  Roger  Hog,  Esq.  Chosen  one  of 
the  sixteen  representative  Scots  peers  on  a  vacancy  in  1771, 
he  opposed  the  measures  of  the  administration  which  led  to 
the  revolt  of  the  American  colonies.  Having  presented  the 
petition  of  the  ngcnt  for  Massachusetts  against  these  mea- 
sures, he  received  the  thanks  of  that  province  in  1774.  He 
was  the  author  of  liievcral  pamphlets  on  political  subjects, 
which  have  entitled  him  to  a  place  in  Walpole's  Catalogue  of 
Royal  and  Koble  Authors,  vol.  v.  Park's  edition  (1805). 
Their  titles  are :  *  Considerations  preliminary  to  the  fixing 
the  Supplies,  the  Ways  and  Means,  and  the  Taxes  for  the 
year  1781,'  Ix>nd.  1781,  8vo ;  *  Facts  and  their  Consequences 
submitted  to  the  consideration  of  the  Public  at  laT^'  Lond. 
1782,  8vo ;  An  Argument  to  prove  that  it  is  the  indispensa- 
ble duty  of  the  Creditors  of  the  Public  to  insist  that  Govern- 
ment do  forthwith  bring  forward  the  consideration  of  the 
State  of  the  Nation,*  I^nd.  1783,  8vo;  *St.Hte  of  the  Public 
Debts,*  I^nd.  1783,  8vo;  *  Address  to  and  Expostnlation 
with  the  Public,*  Lond.  1784,  8vo;  *  Comparative  State  of 
the  Public  Revenues  fur  the  years  1783-4,*  Lond.  1785,  8vo; 


*  Tlie  I'roper  IJmits  of  tlie  Govemment's  iatcffctcoee  witk 
the  afiairs  of  the  East  India  Company,*  1784.  In  this  tnet 
be  severely  attacked  the  coalition  ministry,  and  promised  Lis 
rapport  to  the  Pitt  administratimi  so  long  as  they  abould 
continue  to  deserve  it.  He  died  Oct.  18,  1789.  He 'married 
a  daughter  of  George  Middleton,  Esq.,  banker  in  LooJoa, 
and  had  one  ion,  John,  who  raoceeded. 

John,  sixth  earl  of  Stair,  bom  Sept.  24, 1749,  became  a 
captain  in  the  87th  foot  in  1779,  and  serred  in  the  fint  Amer- 
ican war.  He  was  at  the  successful  attack  on  New  I/mdoa 
and  Fort  Griswold,  in  Sept.  1781,  under  Sir  Henry  Clinton, 
who  sent  him  home  with  the  despatches.  He  was  appointed 
minister  plenipotentiary  to  the  king  and  republic  of  Poland, 
Jan.  5,  1782,  and  envoy  extraordinary  and  minister  plenipo- 
tentiary to  the  court  of  Berlin,  Aug.  5, 1785.  Saeoeeding 
his  father  in  1789,  he  was  chosen  one  of  the  sixteen  Seots 
representative  peers  at  the  general  election  of  1790,  and  sev- 
eral tiroes  rcchosen.    He  died,  without  issae,  June  1,  18SL 

His  cousin,  John  William  Henry  Dalrymple,  son  of  Gen- 
eral William  Dalrymple,  above  mentioned,  became  seventh 
earL  Bom  November  16,  1784,  he  married  in  1808,  Laora, 
youngest  daughter  of  John  Manners,  Esq.  of  Grantham 
Grange,  and  Ixtuisa,  countess  of  Dysart.  This  marriage  was 
dissolved  the  following  year,  in  consequence  of  his  having  en- 
tered  into  a  marriage  contract  in  1804  with  Johanna,  d.tn|>h- 
ter  of  diaries  Gordon,  Esq.  of  CInny.  The  latter  marrisf^e 
was,  however,  dissolved  in  June  1820.  The  eail  died  at  Pa- 
ris, without  issue,  March  22,  1840. 

His  kinsman.  Sir  John  Hamilton  Dalrymple,  baron^  soc- 
ceeded  him  as  eighth  earl.  (See  vol.  ii.  p.  5.)  He  was  the 
4th  but  eldest  surviving  son  of  Sir  John  Dalrymple  of  Gran* 
ston,  fourth  baronet  of  that  family,  one  of  the  barons  of  tfa« 
court  of  Exchequer  in  Scotland,  and  author  of  those 'Me* 
moirs  of  Gre:it  Britain  and  Ireland,*  which  first  revealed 
the  painful  fact  that  Sidney  and  some  others  of  the  gmt 
whig  patriots,  in  the  reign  of  Charles  II.,  were  pensioners  of 
the  French  king,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  12).  The  eighth  earl,  loni 
15th  June  1771,  succeeded,  on  the  death  of  his  father,  SCtk 
February  1810,  to  the  baronetcy  of  Nova  Scoti.i,  which  had 
been  conferred  on  his  great-great-grandfather,  Sir  Jama 
Dalrymple  of  Borthwick,  28th  April  1G98.  lliroogh  liis 
mother,  Elixabcth,  only  child  of  Thomas  Hamilton  MscGill 
of  Fala,  and  heiress  of  the  Viscounts  Oxenfurd,  he  inherited 
the  estates  of  Oxenford  and  Fala.  He  entered  the  army  u 
ensign  in  the  40th  foot,  28th  February  1790,  and  attained 
the  rank  of  general  28th  June  1838.  In  1&43  he  was  ap- 
pointed colonel  of  the  4Gth  foot  I.ong  known  .ns  Sir  John 
I)alrymple,  he  early  embraced  the  whig  cause,  and  more  than 
once  before  the  passing  of  the  Reform  Bill  in  1832,  contested 
the  representation  of  Mid  Ix)thian,  without  success.  In  De- 
cember of  that  year,  he  carried  his  election  for  the  county  br 
a  majority  of  Go  votes.  He  succeeded  his  cousin,  the  seventh 
earl  of  Stair,  in  that  title  and  the  ample  estates  connected 
with  it,  in  March  1840,  snd  in  the  following  month  was  ap- 
pointed keeper  of  the  great  seal  of  Scotland,  an  office  which 
he  held  till  September  1841.  On  the  11th  August  tliat 
year  he  was  created  liaron  Oxenford  of  Cousland  in  the  peer- 
age of  the  United  Kingdom,  with  remainder  to  his  brother, 
North  Hamilton  Dalr}*mp1e  of  Cleland  and  Fordelh  In  .Au- 
gust 1846,  he  was  reappointed  keeper  of  tlie  great  seal  of 
Scotland.  In  1847  he  was  made  a  kniglit  of  the  Thistle. 
In  his  latter  years  his  attention  was  engrossed  by  the  man- 
agement of  his  extensive  estates  in  Mid  1.4>thian  and  Gallo- 
wav.     Of  the  former  countv  he  was  for  some  vears  convener. 

•  •  • 

He  died  at  liis  se.it  of  Oxenford  castle,  Mid  I^>thian,  10th 
January  1853,  at  the  age  of  82.    Although  twice  married, 


i 


STEDMAN. 


508 


STEUAET. 


I     I 


leased.  In  1780  he  was  again  taken  prisoner,  while  com- 
manding a  foraging  part/  in  the  vicinitj  of  Springfield,  Bur- 
lington, New  Jersey,  but  made  his  escape.  He  was  appointed 
aide-de-oainp  to  Baron  Linsingen,  then  in  command  of  the 
auxiliary  Hessian  troops,  retiiining  his  commissary  powers. 
Owing  to  the  scarcity  of  provisions,  a  rifle  corps  of  German 
emigrants  was  raised,  to  the  number  of  400,  and,  being  placed 
under  his  command,  proved  an  efficient  foraging  force.  At 
the  battle  of  Guildford  Court-house,  March  15,  1781,  he  was 
wounded  in  his  sword  hand,  in  single  combat  with  an  Ameri- 
can dragoon,  and  was  only  saved  from  being  cut  down,  by 
tlie  appearance  of  a  British  light  horseman,  who  slew  his 
adversary.  At  the  peace  of  1783,  l:e  came  to  England,  and 
retired  on  the  half-pay  of  a  colonel.     He  was  the  author  of  a 

•  History  of  the  American  War,*  published  in  1794,  In  1797, 
through  the  influence  of  the  Marquis  Gomwallis,  he  was  ap- 
pointed deputy-comptroller  and  accountant-general  of  the 
revenue  of  stamps,  an  office  created  on  the  occasion.  He  died 
ill  1812,  and  was  succeeded  in  his  office  by  his  only  son  John, 
bom  in  1786.  In  1813  the  latter  was  appointed  civil  secretary 
at  Gibraltar  and  registrar  of  the  Supreme  Court  of  Appeal,  and 
in  1816  one  of  the  judges  of  the  Court  of  Admiralty  there. 

4.  John  Stedman  of  Wester  Baldridge,  Fifeshire.  Bum  in 
1678,  he  was  ordained,  in  1699,  minister  of  Dal ineny,  Lin- 
lithgowshire, and,  in  1710,  translated  to  the  Tron  church, 
Edinburgh.  He  died  in  1713.  By  his  wife,  Jean,  2d 
daughter  of  Rev.  John  Kinnaird,  minister  of  East  Calder, 
he  had  three  sons ;  Robert,  Alexander,  and  John,  and  six 
daughters.  Robert  Stedman,  the  eldest  son,  bom  in  1701, 
entered  in  17S0,  as  ensign  in  the  Scots  brigade  in  the  Dutch 
service,  and  rose  to  the  rank  of  lieutenant-colonel.  He  was 
at  the  battles  of  Fontenoy  and  Rocroix,  and  the  sieges  of 
Dendermond  and  Bergen -op  Zoom,  and  died  at  Breda  in 
1770.  He  left  two  sons,  John  Gabriel,  bom  1741,  and  Wil- 
liam George,  bom  1748,  both  lieut.-colonels  in  the  Scots  bri- 
gade, Dutch  service.  John  Gabriel,  the  elder  son,  was  infeft  in 
Kmieside,  Kinross-sliire,  in  1791.     In  1796  he  published  a 

•  Narrative  of  a  Five  Years*  Expedition  against  the  revolted  Ne- 
groes of  Surinam  from  1772  to  1777.*  The  same  year  he  was 
appointed  to  the  command  of  a  British  regiment  of  the  line, 
then  in  garrison  at  Gibraltar,  but  was  prevented  by  an  acci- 
dent from  joining  it,  and  died  in  1797. — Alexander,  the  2d  son, 
died  at  Jamaica,  unmarried.  John,  the  3d  son,  born  in  1710, 
w:is,  in  1740,  appointed  surgeon  to  the  North  British  dra- 
goons, or  Scots  Greys.  He  afterwards  practised  as  a  physi- 
cian in  Dunfermline,  and  subsequently  settled  in  Edinburgh. 
Besides  several  medical  treatises,  he  was  the  author  of '  Lse- 
lius  and  Hortensia,  or  Thoughts  on  the  Nature  and  Objects 
of  Taste  and  Genius.'  He  succeeded  to  Little  Sepgie  in  1705, 
and  married  Peggy,  daughter  of  Robert  Wellwood  of  Pitliver, 
Perthshire.     He  died  in  1791. 

Lieutenant-colonel  John  Gabriel  Stedman  of  Emieside  had 
3  sons.  1.  William  George,  bom  1784,  who  succeeded  him 
in  that  property.  He  was  a  lieutenant  in  the  royal  navy, 
and  was  killed  while  boarding  a  French  privateer  off  the 
inland  of  Cuba.  2.  Robert  Adrian,  born  in  1790,  lieutenant- 
colonel  1st  light  cavalry,  in  the  East  India  Company's  ser- 
vice, and  C.B.  He  succeeded  his  brother  in  Emieside  in 
1812.  He  was  at  the  battle  of  Aliwal  in  the  Punjaub,  Jan. 
28,  1846,  and  was  mentioned  with  high  praise  in  the  de- 
spatch of  Sir  Harry  Smith,  the  commander-in-chief.  He 
died  at  sea,  April  12,  1849,  on  his  voyage  home,  after  hav- 
ing served  41  years  in  India.  A  monument  to  his  memory 
is  erected  at  Cawnpore  by  his  brother  officers.  3.  John 
Cambridge,  born  in  1796,  a  cnptain  34th  light  infantry.  East 
India  Company'ssemce,  was  killed  in  1834  in  battlein  Bunnah. 


Lieutenant-colonel  William  George  Stedman  had  an  ooly 
son,  Lieut-general  John  Andrew  Stedman,  bom  in  1788, 
who  entered  the  Dutch  service  as  a  cadet,  and  roia  to  tba 
rank  of  lieutenant-general  On  17th  and  18th  June,  1815, 
he  covered  with  the  Dutch  troopa  the  right  wing  of  the  allied 
army,  and  the  road  from  Mens  to  Bmssels,  under  the  eam- 
mand  of  the  Duke  of  Wellington.  He  received  aeveral  orden 
of  knighthood,  and  was  made  by  Louis  XVIIL,  an  c^Bcer  ef 
the  Legion  of  Honour.  He  died  in  1824.  His  only  too, 
Cliarles  John  William,  became  a  naturalized  sahject  of  Plme- 
sia,  and  Baron  de  Stedman  in  that  kingdom. 


Steuart,  of  Allanton,  an  andent  family  in  Lanarkslme,  a 
branch  of  the  great  house  of  Stewart,  lineally  deeoended  from 
Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Daldowie,  sisth  son  6f  Sir  John  Stew- 
art of  Bonkill,  son  of  Alexander,  fourth  lord-higfa-eteward  of 
Scotland.  Sir  John  was  killed  at  the  battle  of  FaUdzk  in 
1298.  He  had  bestowed  in  1290,  the  estate  of  Daldowie,  in 
Clydesdale,  part  of  his  extensive  possessions  in  the  conntiet 
of  Lanark  and  Renfrew,  in  patrimony  on  his  son.  Sir  Robert 
The  latter  fought  at  Bannockbura,  and  with  three  of  his  bro- 
thers. Sir  Allan,  Sir  Walter,  and  Sir  Hugh,  accompanied 
Edward  Brace  to  Ireland  in  1315.  He  was  in  the  battle  of 
Dundalk  in  1318,  in  which  Edward  Bruce  was  killed. 

The  lands  of  Allanton,  in  the  parish  of  Cainbnslang,  whidi 
afterwards  came  mto  the  possession  of  thb  family,  previouly 
belonged  to  the  abbey  of  Aberbrothwick. 

From  Allan  Stewart  of  Daldowie,  a  steunch  adherent  of 
the  house  of  Douglas,  killed  in  1385  in  action  against  the 
English,  descended  James  Stewart  of  Allanton,  who  had 
two  sons.  Sir  Walter,  bom  in  1606,  and  Sir  James,  of  Colt- 
ness,  twice  lord-provost  of  Edinburgh.  Sir  Walter  Stewart 
of  Allanton  married  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  Sir  Jama 
Hamilton  of  Broomhill,  and  sister  of  the  first  Lord  Belhavo. 
"  It  is  recorded  that  Oliver  Cromwell,  in  1050,  after  the  bat- 
tle of  Dunbar,  in  his  progress  through  Lanarkshire,  halted 
with  a  few  attendants  at  Allanton  house,  where  he  was  bos- 
pitably  entertained  by  Lady  Stewart,  and  where  he  passed 
the  night.  Sir  Walter,  being  a  royalist,  tof»k  care  to  be  out 
of  the  way.  On  the  Protector's  arrival,  it  is  said,  torn 
choice  canary  and  other  refreshments  were  presented,  but  he 
would  suffer  nothing  to  be  touched  until  he  himself  had  firet 
said  grace,  which  he  fervently  did  for  more  than  half-an-bonr, 
to  the  great  edification  of  the  lady.  He  then  courteously  in- 
quired after  Sir  Walter,  and  on  drinking  the  health  of  the 
family,  observed  that  his  mother*s  name  was  Stewart,  and 
that  he  always  felt  a  kindness  for  the  name.**  Sir  Walter's 
eldest  son  and  heir  apparent,  Gavin,  predeceased  his  father  in 
March  1652,  leaving  an  only  daughter,  Margaret,  who  only 
survived  him  a  year.  William,  another  son  of  Sir  Walter, 
succeeded  him  as  proprietor  of  Allanton.  The  offer  of  a  bar- 
onetcy of  Nova  Scotia  was,  in  1 687,  made  to  him  by  Kmg 
James  VIL,  but  declined,  from  the  chivalrous  feeling  preva- 
lent at  that  period,  that  the  title  of  a  knight  banneret  con- 
ferred by  the  hands  of  royalty  on  the  field  of  battle,  whidi 
so  many  of  his  ancestors  had  so  gloriously  acquired,  was  a 
more  honourable  distinction.  On  his  refusal  it  was  given  to 
his  cousin,  Robert  Stewart  of  AlLinbank,  15th  August  1687. 

James  Steuart,  bom  in  1715,  tenth  baron  of  Allanton.  and 
thirteenth  in  descent  from  the  lord-high-steward  of  Scotland, 
died  in  1772.  He  married  in  1754,  his  cousin,  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Henry  Steuart  Barclay,  Esq.  of  Collaimie,  Fife- 
shire, younger  brother  of  Sir  James  Steuait  of  Goodtrees, 
baronet,  solicitor-general  for  Scotland,  in  the  reign  of  George 
I.  His  son.  Sir  Henry  Steuart,  an  elegant  scliolar  and  ac- 
complished gentleman,  bom  20th  October  1759,  was,  ia 


!     I 


il   I 


STEUART, 


510 


OF  DALGUISE. 


sabject  published  in  Great  Britain.  It  appeared  in  1767,  in 
two  volumes  quarto,  and  for  tie  oopyriglit  of  the  work  he  got 
£500  from  Messrs.  Miller  and  Cadell.  As  this  work  was 
published  nine  jears  before  that  of  Dr.  Adam  Smith,  Sir  James 
Steuart  is  well  entitled  to  be  considered  the  father  of  politi- 
cal economy  in  Great  Britain.  In  1771  he  obtained  a  full 
pardon,  and  in  1772  he  published,  at  tlie  request  of  the  East 
India  Companj,  a  treatise  on  '  The  Principles  of  Monej  as 
applied  to  tlie  Coin  of  Bengal.* 

In  1712,  Sir  James  Steuart  of  Goodtrees  purchased 
from  his  nephew,  Sir  David,  the  son  of  his  eldest  bro- 
ther, Sir  Thomas  Steuart,  the  estate  of  Coltness,  and 
in  1778,  Sir  James  Denham  Steuart,  the  political  econo- 
mist, on  the  death  of  Sir  Archibald  Steuart  Denham,  suc- 
ceeded to  the  baronetcv  of  Coltness,  which  beaime  united 
in  his  person  with  that  of  Goodtrees.  Sir  James  died  of 
an  inflammation  in  his  toe,  November  26,  1780.  He  was 
buried  in  the  familj  vault  at  Cambusnethan  church,  Lan- 
arkshii-e,  and  a  monument  was  erected  to  his  memory  in 
Westminster  Abbey. 

His  works  are:  *Dirletou*s  Doubts  and  Questions  in 
the  I^w  of  Scotland  resolved  and  answered,*  Edinburgh, 
1715,  folio ;  » Apologie  du  Sentiment  de  Newton  sur  I'Au- 
cienne  Chronologie  des  Grecs,  oontenant  des  responses  ii 
toutes  les  objections  qni  y  ont  6t6  faites  jusqu'ii  present,* 
Franc-sur-le-Mein,  1757,  4to;  *A  Treatise  on  German 
Coins;'  in  German,  Tubingen,  1757;  *  A  Dissertation  upon 
the  Doctrine  and  Principles  of  Money  applied  to  the  German 
Coin,*  Tubingen,  1758 ;  '  An  Inquiry  into  the  Principles  of 
Political  Economy ;  being  an  essay  on  the  science  of  domes- 
tic policy  in  free  nations ;  in  which  are  particularly  consider- 
ed, population,  agriculture,  trade,  industry,  money,  coin, 
interest,  circulation,  banks,  exchange,  public  credit,  and 
taxes,*  I-.ond.  1767,  2  vols.  4to:  Dublin,  1770,  3  vols.  8vo; 
*  The  Principles  of  Money  applied  to  the  present  state  of 
Bengal,*  1772,  4to ;  •  A  Plan  for  introducing  Uniformity  in 
Weights  and  Measures  within  the  limits  of  the  British  Em- 
pire,' Lond.  1790,  8vo;  'Considerations  on  the  Interest  of 
the  County  of  Lanark  in  Scotland ;  which  may  be  applied  to 
that  of  Great  Britain  in  general,  in  relation  to  agriculture, 
maintenance  of  the  poor,  wages  of  labourers,  and  connection 
and  interest  of  the  land  and  trade,  &c.*  His  works,  com- 
]>lete  in  six  volumes  8vo,  with  a  Memoir,  were  published  in 
1805,  by  his  son,  who  also  published  in  1818,  at  Greenock, 
the  Correspondence  between  his  father  and  the  celebrated 
Lady  Mary  Wortley  Montague,  whose  acquaintance  he  had 
made  at  V'enice  in  1758. 

The  son.  Sir  James  Steuart,  fourth  baronet,  bom  in  1744, 
a  general  in  the  army,  colonel  of  the  2d  dragoons,  and  M.P. 
for  Ijanarkshire,  died,  without  issue,  in  1839,  when  his 
cousin.  Sir  Henry  Barclay  Steuart,  eldest  son  of  Heniy 
Steuart  Barclay,  Esq.  of  CoUaimie,  Fifeshire,  succeeded  as 
fifth  baronet. 


The  family  of  Steuart  of  Auchlunkart,  Banffshire,  are  de- 
scended from  Alexander  Stewart  of  Stradown,  advocate, 
fourth  son  of  the  earl  of  Athol,  (see  vol.  i.  page  163).  His 
son,  Andrew  Stuart  of  Tannadice,  was  father  of  another 
Andrew,  who  was  the  first  to  spell  his  name  Steuart.  The 
great-grandson  of  this  Andrew  Steuart  of  Tannadice,  Patrick 
Steuart,  married  his  cousin,  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Alexan- 
der Stewart  of  Auchlunkart,  an  estate  which  came  into  the 
family  by  marriage  with  the  heiress  of  Innes  of  Auchlunkart 
Patrick  was  succeeded  by  his  brother,  Andrew,  who  married 
Harriet,  daughter  of  James  Gordon  of  Cocklarachie,  Aber- 
deenshire, and  had  three  sons  and  two  daughters,  the  younger 


of  whom,  Mary,  married  David  Monypenny,  Esq.  of  PitniiOy, 
a  lord  of  session  under  the  title  of  Lord  PitmiUy.  Patnek 
Steuart  of  Auchlunkart  House,  Andrew's  eldest  eon,  married 
9th  November  1820,  Radiel,  only  daughter  of  Laehlan  Ger- 
don  of  Park ;  with  issue,  an  only  ion,  Andrew,  born  25di 
May  1822,  of  the  Inner  Temple,  London. 


The  family  of  Steuart  of  Dalgnise,  Perthshire,  tre 
ed  from  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Amtollie  and  Cardaeya»  alee 
designed  of  Dowallie,  the  youngest  natural  son  of  King  Ro- 
bert 11.  of  Scotland,  by  Marion  or  Mariota  de  Cardnsy, 
daughter  of  John  de  Cardney  of  that  ilk,  aster  of  BolMrt 
Cardney,  bishop  of  Dunkeld  from  1896  to  1436.    Sir  John 
Stewart,  knighted  at  the  coronation  of  King  James  L  at 
Soone  in  1424,  married  Jean  Dmmmond,  sster  of  AnnabcUa 
Drummond,  queen  of  Robert  III.,  and  daughter  of  Sff  John 
Drunimond  of  Drummond.    His  grandson,  the  third  kdrd  of 
Amtullie,  died  about  1320,  leaving  three  sons.    The  ddsrt 
continued  the  family  of  Amtullie,  the  lineal  and  male  repie* 
sentative  of  which,  Ronald  Steuart  Mensies,  Esq.,  was  the 
grandson  of  John  Steuart  of  Cardneya,  who  asKumed  the 
name  of  Menzies,  on  succeeding  as  heir  of  entail  to  Cnldsres 
and  the  other  estates  of  his  maternal  uncle.  Colonel  Mensiei 
At  the  Reformation  in  Scotland,  the  lairds  of  Amtollie  aod 
Kinnaird  received  an  order  signed  by  the  lord  James  Stew- 
art, afterwards  the  regent  Moray,  the  earl  of  Axgyle  and 
Lord  Ruthven,  to  t:ike  down  and  bum  the  images  at  tht 
cathedral  church  of  Dunkeld.    The  laird  of  Amtullie,  mi  that 
occasion  unroofed  the  cathedral.     At  that  time  he  hdd  the 
oflice  of  bailie  of  the  regality  of  Dunkeld,  which  continncd 
for  some  time  in  his  family.    John,  the  second  son,  was  no- 
ccstor  of  the  family  of  Steuart  of  Dalguise.    The  third  soe, 
Sir  lliomas,  was  \ncar  of  Dowallie. 

John  Steuart  of  Dalguise  died  in  1576.  Tlie  Isnds  d 
Dalguise  had  been  granted  to  him  in  1543,  by  George, 
bishop  of  Dunkeld.  By  his  wife,  Elizabeth,  dsughter  of 
Alexander  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  he  had  a  son,  Alexander 
Steuart,  whose  son,  John  Steuart,  nsnnlly  styled  in  Gadic, 
Ian  Mohr  MacaUistair^  or  great  John,  the  son  of  Alexander, 
was  leader  of  tlic  Atliole  Stewarts  under  the  banner  of  the 
marquis  of  Montrose,  during  the  civil  wars,  and  having  beea 
chamberlain  to  the  bishops  of  Dunkeld,  he  possessed  consid- 
erable influence  in  the  neighbouring  districts.  He  married 
Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Mr.  Stewart  of  Kinnaird,  of  the  fsm- 
ily  of  Rosyth,  and  died  in  1653.  With  several  daughters, 
ho  had  three  sons.  Alexander,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded. 
William,  the  second  son,  got  from  his  father  the  lands  of 
Middle  Dalguise,  and  married  a  daughter  of  Menzies  of  Bol' 
fracks.  From  the  third  son  are  descended  several  Stewarts 
in  Strathbran. 

John  Steuart,  the  sixth  laird  of  Dalguise,  was  a  commis- 
sioner of  supply  for  the  county  of  Perth,  and  took  a  part  hi 
many  of  the  military  and  political  transactions  of  his  time. 
He  married  his  second  cousin,  Isobel,  only  daughter  of  Wil- 
liam Steuart  of  Middle  Dalguise  above  mentioned,  and  died 
in  1706.  His  eldest  son,  John  Steuart  of  Dalguise,  bora  in 
1689,  possessed  the  estate  for  the  long  period  of  70  yean 
He  was  engaged  in  the  rebellion  of  1715.  He  was  present, 
as  an  officer  of  cavalry,  at  the  battle  of  Sheriffmuir,  and  suf- 
fered both  fine  and  imprisonment.  He  built  the  honse  of 
Dalguise,  and  was  a  magistrate  and  commissioner  of  supply 
for  the  county  of  Perth,  as  were  also  the  subsequent  propri- 
etors of  Dalguise.  He  died  25th  September  1776,  aged  S7, 
and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son,  John  Steuart,  eighth 
laird  of  Dalguise.  His  fifth  son,  David,  at  one  period  a 
banker  in  Edinburgh,  in  partnership  with  Robert  Allan,  Esq. 


I    I 


STEWART. 


512 


STEWART. 


"  Peace  has  its  victories  as  well  as  war,** 

Mr.  Stevenson  was  generally  consnlted  as  an  an- 
tlioritj  in  all  matters  relating  to  the  constmction 
of  harboai*s,  roads,  docks,  breakwaters,  and  rail- 
ways. He  it  was  who  first  brought  into  notice 
the  snperiority  of  malleable  iron  rods  for  railways 
over  the  old  cast  iron.  His  labours  were  princi- 
pally exhibited  on  the  coasts  of  Scotland  ;  scarce- 
ly a  harbonr,  rock,  or  island,  but  bears  evidence 
of  his  indefatigable  indnstr}',  and  the  amonnt  of 
life  and  property  which,  by  his  exertions,  have 
been  saved,  is  beyond  calculation.  The  beautiful 
eastern  approach  to  Edinburgh  by  the  Calton  liill 
was  planned  by  him,  and  executed  nnder  his  di- 
rection. His  suggestion  of  a  new  form  of  sus- 
pension bridge,  applicable  to  small  spans,  was 
partially  adopted  in  the  bridge  over  the  Thames 
at  Hammersmith,  London.  In  1815  he  was  elect- 
ed a  fellow  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Edinburgh. 
He  afterwards  became  a  member  of  the  Geological 
Society  of  London,  and  the  Wemerian  and  Anti- 
quarian Societies  of  Scotland. 

Mr.  Stevenson  died  at  his  residence  in  Edin- 
burgh, 12th  July  1850.  Besides  his  account  of 
the  Bell  rock  lighthouse,  he  was  the  author  of 
several  articles  in  the  Encyclopedia  Britannica, 
also  in  Brewstcr^s  Edinburgh  Encyclopedia,  and 
other  scientific  journals.  In  1817,  he  published  a 
scries  of  letters  in  the  Scots  Magazine,  containing 
an  account  of  a  tour  which  he  made  through  the 
Netherlands  and  a  description  of  the  engineering 
works  connected  with  the  drainage  and  embank- 
ment of  Holland.  His  printed  professional  reports 
and  contributions  are  also  sufficient  to  fill  four 
quarto  volumes.  A  marble  bust  of  him,  executed 
by  Mr.  Samuel  Josephs,  sculptor,  at  the  command 
of  the  commissioners  of  the  board  of  northeni 
lighthouses,  stands  in  the  library  of  the  Bell  rock 
lighthouse,  the  noblest  monument  of  his  genius. 
A  memoir  of  him  by  his  son,  Mr.  Allan  Steven- 
son, who  succeeded  him  in  office,  was  contributed, 
shortly  aft«r  his  death,  to  the  New  Philosophical 
Journal. 

Stewart,  a  surname  derived  from  the  high  office  of  stew- 
ard of  the  royal  hoasehold,  and  distinguished  as  being  that 
of  a  race  of  Scottisli  kings  which  occupied  the  throne  of  Scot- 
land for  upwards  of  three  hundred,  and  that  of  England  for 
more  than  one  liundred  years.  The  name  is  sometimes  writ- 
ten Steuart,  and  by  the  later  royal  family  of  Scotland, 


Stuart.  As  Tarioos  families  throngboiit  Scotland,  at  wdl  as 
in  England  and  Irdand,  bear  this  mmanBe,  mhim  of  the  prin* 
dpal  branches  having  diverged  from  the  main  line  at  a  pe- 
riod antecedent  to  its  beeoroing  rojal,  it  may  be 
that  those  who  retain  the  original  spelling  bdong  to 
one  or  other  of  these  branches,  that  tiie  ftinilies  who  adopi 
the  spelling  of  Steuart  are  offiihoots,  generally  illegitiinate.  if 
the  royal  house  previously  to  Queen  Mary,  and  that  tiie  ibni 
of  Stuart,  which  was  only  assumed,  for  the  fint  tint,  whca 
that  ill-fated  princess  went  to  France,  ii  ezdnsvely  thst  of 
the  royal  blood.  In  the  death-warrant  of  Chaiki  L  the 
name  is  spelled  Steuart. 

The  first  of  the  family  of  Stewart  is  s«d  by  PSnkcrtan  to 
have  been  a  Norman  baron  named  Alan,  who  obtained  fima 
William  the  Conqueror  the  barony  of  Oswestxy  in  Shn^tshirB. 
He  was  the  son  of  Flaald,  and  the  father  of  three  sons,  Wil- 
liam, Walter  and  Simon.  It  is  frmn  the  leoond  thatthi 
royal  family  of  Scotland  descend. 

The  eldest  son,  William,  was  the  progenitor  of  a  race  of 
earls  of  Arundel,  whose  title,  being  territorial,  and  hmda,  ul- 
timately went  by  an  heiress  into  the  family  of  the  duke  ci 
Norfulk.  The  two  younger  sons,  Walter  and  Simon,  came 
to  Scotland.  Walter  was  by  David  I.  appointed  dapifor, 
that  is,  meat-bearer  or  steward  of  the  royal  bonsebold; 
sometimes  called  teneichalltu.  Simon  was  tlie  ancestor  <^  the 
Boyds,  his  son,  Robert,  having  been  called  Boidk,  from  Ui 
yellow  hfur. 

The  dnties  of  high-steward  comprised  the  management  of 
the  royal  household,  as  well  as  the  collecticm  of  the  natioiMl 
revenue  and  the  command  of  the  king^s  armies,  and  firom  the 
office  Walter's  descendants  took  the  name  of  Stewart. 

From  David  I.  (1124—1153)  Walter  obtained  the  lands  <f 
Renfrew,  Paisley,  Pollock,  Gathcart,  and  others  in  that  dis- 
trict, and  in  1157,  King  Malcolm  IV.  granted  a  charter  of 
confirmation  of  the  same.  In  1160,  he  founded  the  abbey  of 
Paisley,  the  monks  of  which,  of  the  Cluniac  order  of  Refonn- 
ed  Benedictines,  were  brought  from  the  priory  of  Wenlock  in 
Shropshire.  Walter  died  in  1177,  and  was  interred  in  the 
monastery  at  Paisley,  the  bnrying-place  of  the  Stewarts  be- 
fore their  accession  to  the  throne,  Renfrew  being  their  ososl 
residence. 

Walter's  son  and  successor,  Alan,  died  in  1204,  leaving  a 
son,  Walter,  who  was  appointed  by  Alexander  II.  justicianrof 
Scotland,  in  addition  to  his  hereditary  office  of  high-stewari 
He  died  in  ]2-l(i,  leaving  four  sons  and  three  daughten 
Walter,  the  third  son,  was  earl  of  Menteith.  The  eldest 
son,  Alexander,  was,  in  1255,  one  of  the  councillors  of 
Alexander  III.,  then  under  age,  and  one  of  the  regents  of 
Scotland.  He  married  Jean,  daughter  and  heims  of  James, 
lord  of  Bute,  grandson  of  Somerled,  and,  in  her  right, 
he  seized  both  the  Isle  of  Bute  and  that  of  Arran.  The 
complaints  made  to  the  Norwegian  court  by  Roan  or 
Roderick  of  Bute,  and  the  other  islanders,  of  the  aggressioni 
of  the  Scots,  led  to  Hnco's  celebrated  expedition,  and  the 
battle  of  I^rgs,  2d  October  1263,  in  which  the  high-steward 
commanded  the  right  wing  of  the  Scots  army,  and  the  Nor- 
wegians were  signally  defeated.  In  1265  the  whole  of  the 
western  isles  were  ceded  by  treaty  to  Scotland. 

Alexander  had  two  sons,  James,  his  successor,  and  John, 
known  as  that  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  who  fell  at  the 
battle  of  Falkirk  in  1298,  (see  p.  510  of  this  voIume>  Ud- 
der  Sir  John  Stewart,  in  this  battle,  were  the  men  of  Bote, 
known  at  that  time  by  the  name  of  the  Lord-high-stewsrd*s 
Brandanes,  and  they  were  almost  whoUj  slain  with  their 
valiant  leader.    Wyntoun  says : 


ii 


=j 


STEWART. 


514 


OF  ATHOLE. 


VI.,  whose  descent  on  his  father's  side  was  through  the  earl 
of  I^ennox,  the  head  of  the  second  branch,  there  did  not  exist 
a  male  offset  of  the  family  which  had  sprung  from  an  indi- 
vidual later  than  Robert  II.    Widely  as  some  branches  of 
the  Stewarts  have  spread,  and  nameroas  as  are  the  families  of 
this  name,  there  is  not  a  lineal  male  representative  of  anj  of 
the  crowned  heads  of  the  race,  Henry,  Cardinal  York,  who 
died  in  1804,  being  the  last    The  crown  which  came  into 
the  Stewart  family  through  a  female  seems  destined  ever  to 
be  transmitted  through  a  female.     From  the  princess  Elisa- 
beth, daughter  of  James  VI.,  descended,  through  her  daugh- 
ter, Sophia,  electress  of  Hanover,  the  present  line  of  British 
monarchs.    The  nearest  heir  of  the  royal  house  of  Stuart  by 
direct  descent  is  Francis  V.,  grand-duke  of  I^Iodena,  bom 
June  1,  1819,  (accession,  1846,  ceased  to  govern,  1859,)  his 
mother  having  been  Mary  Beatrice,  of  the  royal  houss  of 
Sardinia.      The  princess    Henrietta,  younger  daughter  of 
Charles  I.  of  Great  Britain,  married  the  duke  of  Orleans,  and 
had  2  daughters,  one  of  whom  married  the  king  of  Sardinia, 
whose  elder  twin  daughter  married  the  duke  of  Modena. 

The  male  representation  or  chiefship  of  the  family  is  claim- 
ed by  the  earl  of  Galloway  (see  vol  ii.  p.  278) ;  also,  by  the 
Stewarts  of  Castlemilk  as  descended  from  a  junior  branch  of 
Damley  and  Lennox. 


Stkwart,  the  name  of  one  of  the  Scottish  clans  not  ori- 
ginally of  Celtic  origin.  The  first  and  principal  seat  of  the 
Stewarts  was  in  Benfrewshire,  but  branches  of  them  pene- 
trated into  the  western  Highlands  and  Perthshire,  and  ac- 
quiring territories  there,  became  founders  of  distinct  families 
of  the  same  name.  Of  these  the  principal  were  the  Stewarts 
of  Lorn,  the  Stewarts  of  Athole,  and  the  Stewarts  of  Bal- 
quhidder,  from  one  or  other  of  which  all  the  rest  have  been 
derived.  The  Stewarts  of  I^m  were  descended  from  a  natu- 
ral son  of  John  Stewart,  the  last  lord  of  Lorn,  who,  with  the 
assistance  of  the  M'Larens,  retained  forcible  possession  of 
part  of  his  futlier*s  estates.  From  this  family  sprang  the 
Stewarts  of  Appin,  who,  with  the  Athole  branches,  were 
considered  in  the  Highlands  as  funning  the  clan  Stewart. 
The  badge  of  the  original  Stewarts  was  the  onk,  and  of  the 
roval  Stuarts,  the  thibtle. 

The  district  of  Appin  forms  the  north-west  comer  of  Ar- 
pyleshire.  In  the  Ettrick  Sliepherd'a  well-known  ballud  of 
'  The  Stewarts  of  Appin,'  he  thus  alludes  to  it : 

*'  I  sing  of  a  land  that  was  famous  of  yore, 

The  land  of  green  Appin,  the  ward  of  the  flood. 
Where  every  grey  cairn  that  broods  over  the  shore. 
Murks  graves  of  the  royal,  the  valiant,  or  good ; 
The  land  where  the  strains  of  grey  Ossian  were  framed, — 

The  land  of  fair  Sehna,  and  reign  of  Fingal, — 
And  late  of  a  race,  that  with  tears  must  be  named 

The  noble  Clan  Stewart,  the  bravest  of  all, 
Oh-hon  a  Rei !  and  the  Stewarts  of  Appin  ! 
The  gallant,  devoted  old  Stewarts  of  Appin  I 
Their  glory  is  o*er. 
For  the  clan  is  no  more, 
And  the  Sassenach  sings  on  the  hills  of  Green  Appin !  ** 

In  the  end  of  the  fifteenth  century,  the  Stewarts  of  Appin 
were  vassals  of  the  earl  of  Argyle  in  his  lordship  of  Lorn.  In 
1493  the  name  of  the  chief  was  Dongal  Stewart.  He  was 
the  natural  son  of  John  Stewart,  the  last  lord  of  I^m,  and 
Isabella,  eldest  daughter  of  the  first  earl  of  Argyle,  (see  vol. 
i.  p.  646).  The  assassination  of  Campbell  of  Calder,  guar- 
dian of  the  young  earl  of  Argyle,  in  February  1592,  (see  vol. 


i.  p.  874,)  caused  a  fend  between  the  Stewarts  of  Appin  and 
the  Campbells,  the  eflEects  of  which  were  loog  fett.  Dnring 
the  civil  wars,  the  Stewarts  of  Ap[Hn  ranged  themselves  mi- 
der  the  banners  of  Montrose,  and  at  tbe  battle  of  Inreriocby, 
2d  February  1645,  rendered  that  dilvalroiis  nobleman  good 
service.  They  and  the  canse  wbioh  tbej  npbeld  wen  op- 
posed by  the  Campbells,  who  possessed  the  north  side  of  tiw 
same  parish,  a  small  rivnlet,  called  C<m  Rmagky  or  red  b^ 
from  the  rongh  swamp  through  whieb  it  nn,  being  tbe  divid- 
mg  line  ci  their  lands. 

The  Stewarts  of  Appin  under  their  chief,  Robert  Stewart, 
engaged  in  the  rebellion  of  1715,  when  they  brought  400 
men  into  the  field.  They  were  also  "oat**  in  1745, 
Stewart  of  Ardshiel,  800  strong.  Some  lands  in  Ap^ 
forfeited  on  the  latter  occasion,  but  were  afterwards  restand. 
The  principal  family  is  extinct,  and  their  estate  has  pswii 
toothers,  chiefly  to  a  family  of  tbe  name  of  Downie.  Tbert 
are  still,  howerer,  many  branches  of  this  tribe  rsmainnig  n 
Appin.  The  chief  cadets  are  the  families  of  Ardshid,  Invcr- 
nahyle,  Auchnacrone,  Fasnacloich,  and  Bslacfanlish. 

Between  the  Stewarts  of  Inremahyle  and  the  Campbdb 
of  Dunstafihage,  there  existed  a  bitter  feud,  and  about  the 
beginning  of  the  sixteenth  century,  the  former  family  wot 
all  cut  ofi*  but  one  child,  the  infant  son  of  Stewsrt  of  Inver- 
naliyle,  by  the  chief  of  Dunstafihage,  called  CaUem  Uame^  or 
Green  Colin.  The  boy*s  nurse  fled  with  him  to  Ardnamur- 
chan,  where  her  husband,  the  blacksmith  of  the  district,  if> 
sided.  The  latter  brought  him  up  to  his  own  trade,  and  at 
sixteen  years  of  age  he  could  wield  two  forehammers  at  ooee, 
one  in  each  hand,  on  the  anvil,  which  acquired  for  bun  tbt 
name  of  Damhnutt  fum  arJ^  or  Donald  of  the  bammen. 
Having  made  a  two-edged  sword  for  him,  his  foster-father, 
on  presenting  it,  told  him  of  his  birth  and  lineage,  and  of  tbe 
event  which  was  the  cause  of  his  being  brought  to  Aidsa- 
murchan.  Burning  with  a  desire  for  vengeance,  Donald  set 
ofi*  with  twelve  of  his  companions,  and  at  a  smithy  at  Cor- 
p.tch  in  Lochaber,  he  forged  a  two-edged  sword  for  each  of 
them.  He  then  proceeded  direct  to  Dunstaflnage,  where  be 
slew  Green  Colin  and  fifteen  of  his  retainers.  Having  re- 
covered his  inheritance,  he  ever  after  proved  himself  "  the  ns- 
conqnered  foe  of  the  Campbell.**  The  chief  of  the  Stewarts 
of  Appin  being,  at  the  time,  a  minor,  Donald  of  the  ham- 
mers was  appointed  tutor  of  the  clan.  He  commanded  the 
Stewarts  of  Appin  at  the  battle  of  Pinkie  in  1547,  and  oo 
their  return  homewards  from  that  disastrous  field,  in  a  fam- 
ishing condition,  they  found  in  a  house  at  the  church  of  Port 
of  Menteith,  some  fowls  roasting  for  a  marriage  party.  Theie 
they  took  from  the  spit,  and  greedily  devoured.  They  then 
proceeded  on  their  way.  The  earl  of  Menteith,  one  of  tbt 
marriage  guests,  on  being  apprised  of  the  cii-cumstance,  pur- 
sued them,  and  came  up  with  them  at  a  place  called  Tobcr- 
nareal.  To  a  taunt  from  one  of  his  attendants,  one  of  the 
Stewarts  replied  by  an  arrow  through  the  heart  In  tht  ooo- 
flict  that  ensued,  the  earl  fell  by  the  ponderous  arm  of  Don- 
:ild  of  the  hammers,  and  nearly  all  his  fullowers  were  killed, 
riie  History  of  Donald  of  the  Hammers,  written  by  Sir  Waltff 
.Scott,  will  be  found  in  the  fifth  edition  of  Captain  Bnrt*s 
letters. 


The  Stewarts  of  Athole  consist  almost  entirely  of  the  de- 
scendants, by  his  five  illegitimate  sons,  of  Sir  Alexander 
Stewart,  earl  of  Buchan,  called,  from  his  ferocity,  *The  wolf 
of  Badenoch,*  (see  voL  i.  p.  454,)  the  fourth  son  of  Robert 
II.,  by  his  first  wife,  Elizabeth  More.  One  of  his  natorsl 
sons,  Duncan  Stewart,  whose  disposition  was  ss  ferodoos  as 
his  father's,  at  the  head  of  a  vast  number  of  wild  Catliemn. 


I 


i; 


STEWART 


516 


OF  AIIDV01RI.ICH. 


The  Stewarta  of  Drnmin,  Ban&liire,  now  of  Belladram, 
Inverness-shire,  trace  their  descent  fmni  Sir  Walter  Stewart 
of  Strathaven,  knighted  for  his  services  at  the  b.ittle  of  Har- 
iaw  in  1411,  one  of  the  illegitimate  sons  of  the  Wolf  of  Bad- 
enoch,  and  consequently  of  roral  blood.  The  representatiTe 
of  the  familj,  John  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Belladrum,  bom  29th 
May  1784,  was  M.P.  fur  Beverley  in  the  last  parliament  of 
George  IV.  He  died  in  1860.  He  had  2  sons  and  2  dangh- 
ters.  Sons:  1.  Charles,  born  in  1817,  appointed  in  1839  to 
the  East  India  Gompany^s  civil  sdrvice.  2.  John  Henry 
Eraser,  bom  in  1821,  fonnerly  an  officer  in  the  army. 


The  Stewarts  of  Binnie,  Linlithgowshire,  descend  from  Sir 
Robert  Stewart  of  Tarbolton  and  Graickston,  2d  son  of  Wal- 
ter, 3d  high-steward  and  justiciary  of  Scotland,  in  the  reign 
of  Alexander  II.  (See  pMgj  512  of  this  volume.)  The  lands 
of  Binnie  were  purchased  by  Robert  Stewart,  advocate,  the 
12th  of  the  family.  Previously  to  his  time  the  family  desig- 
nations were,  of  Torbane  and  Raiss,  Halrig,  and  Shawood. 
The  representative  of  the  family,  John  Stewart  of  Binnie, 
bora  March  4,  1776,  at  one  period  a  captain  in  the  East  In- 
dia Company's  maritime  service,  succeeded  his  elder  brother, 
Robert  Stewart,  in  1802. 


The  Stewarts  of  St.  Fort,  Fifeshire,  representatives  of  the 
old  family  of  Stewart  of  Urrard,  Perthshire,  are  descended 
from  John,  another  natural  son  of  the  Wolf  of  Badenoch. 
John  Stewart  of  Urrard,  the  fifth  of  the  family,  had,  besides 
.Tames  his  heir,  another  son,  who  died  in  childhood,  of  fright 
during  the  battle  of  Killiecrankie,  which  was  fought  be»ide 
the  mansion-house  of  Urrard  in  1689.  The  elder  son,  James 
Stewart  of  Urrard,  had,  with  other  children,  a  daughter, 
Jean,  called  Minay  iCm  Uan^  the  wife  of  Niel  M'Glashan  of 
Clune.  She  is  said  to  have  acted  a  distinguished  part  in 
Stirling  castle,  after  the  battle  of  Slieriffmuir  in  1715.  Ro- 
bert Stewart  of  this  family,  born  in  1746,  was  a  capt^iin  in 
the  East  India  Company's  service,  on  the  staflf  of  Genend 
Glavering.  On  his  return  to  Scotland  he  purchased  the  es- 
tates of  Gastle  Stewart  in  Wigtownshire,  and  St.  Fort  in  Fife- 
Khire,  the  fomier  of  which  was  afterwards  sold.  By  his  wife, 
Ann  Stewart,  daughter  of  Henry  Balfuur  of  Dinbory,  he  had, 
with  two  daughters,  three  sons.  1.  Archibald  Gampbeli, 
who  succeeded  him,  and  died  unmarried.  2.  Henry,  who 
succeeded  his  brother.  3.  William,  an  officer  in  the  Gold- 
stream  guards,  who  assumed  the  surname  of  Balfour,  in  addi- 
tion to  Stewart,  in  conformity  to  the  will  of  his  maternal 
uncle.  Lieutenant-general  Nisbet  Balfour. 

Henry  Stewart  of  St  Fort,  born  in  1796,  married,  in  1837, 
Jane,  daughter  of  James  Eraser,  Esq.  of  GHlderskeil,  issue,  2 
sons.     Robert  Balfour,  the  elder,  wiis  born  in  1838. 


The  Stewarts  of  Physgill  and  Glenturk,  Wigtownshire, 
descend  from  John  Stewart,  parson  of  Kirkmahoe,  2d  son  of 
S«r  Alexander  Stewart  of  Gariies,  who  died  in  lo90. 

j^gnes,  only  child  of  Lieutenant  Robert  Stewart,  R.N.,  and 
grand- daughter  of  John  Stewart  of  Physgill,  succeeded  to 
both  the  estates  of  Physgill  and  Glenturk,  the  latter  in  right 
of  her  mother,  Agnes  Stewart,  heire««  of  Robert  Stewart  of 
Glenturk.  In  1740  she  married  John  Ilathorn  of  Over 
Airies,  in  the  same  county,  and  had  a  son,  Robert  Hathorn 
Stewart,  who  succeeded  his  mother.  This  gentletnan  mar- 
ried, in  1794^  Ittabella,  only  daughter  of  Sir  Stair  Agnew,  of 
lA>chnaw,  bart. ;  issue  2  sons  and  2  daughters.  He  died 
Nov.  7,  1818. 

His  elder  son.  Stair  Hathora  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Physgill, 
bom  in  1796,  was  educated  at  Oxford ;  «  magistrate  and  a 


deputy-lieutenant  and  convener  of  the  ooantr  of  Wigtowa. 
He  married,  1st,  in  1820,  Maigaret,  only  daag;hter  of  Jums 
Johnston  of  Straiton,  issue,  a  son  and  a  dauj;fater;  Sdly,  in 
1826,  Helen,  youngest  daughter  of  the  Bight  lion.  Sir  Jobi 
Sinclair  of  Ulbster,  bMt.,  iMue,  2  sons  and  2  daugliter*; 
Bdly,  in  ^846,  Jane  Rothes,  daughter  of  John  Mattland,  Esq. 
of  Freugh,  Wigtownshire.  His  eldest  aon.  Robert  Hatboni 
Johnston,  bora  in  1824,  an  officer  98d  Highlanders,  sue- 
ceeded,  in  1841,  on  the  death  of  his  nnele,  James  Johnston, 
Esq.  of  Straiton,  to  his  entailed  estates  in  Mid  Lothian  and 
West  Ix>thian,  and  in  consequence  assumed  tlie  addilioiMl 
name  of  Johnston.  He  married,  1st,  in  1851,  Ellen,  dan^- 
ter  of  Archibald  Douglas,  Esq.  of  Glenfinnart,  Aigykdiirs; 
2dly,  in  1856,  Anne,  daughter  of  Sir  William  UaxweU,  of 
Monreith,  baronet. 


The  Stewarts  of  Coll  and  Knodcrioch,  Argyleshire,  were 
formerly  designed  of  Benmore,  Perthshire.  The  present  re- 
presentative, John  Lome  Stewart,  Esq.,  bom  in  1800,  is  the 
eldest  son  of  Duncan  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Glenbnckie,  by  Mar- 
garet, daughter  of  Duncan  Stewart,  Esq.  of  ArdsheaL  He 
married,  in  1831,  Mary,  daughter  of  Archibald  Campbell, 
Esq.,  with  issue.  Is  a  magistrate  for  Perthshire,  and  a  de- 
puty* lieutenant  of  Argyleshire.  His  son  and  heir,  Duncan, 
bora  in  1834,  married,  in  1858,  Ferooza  Maipuret,  daughter 
ofSirJohnM'Neill,  G.C.B. 


In  the  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright  are   the  families  of 
Stewart  of  Shambellv,  and  Stewart  of  Cairasmore. 

William  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Shambelly,  bom  in  1815,  eldest 
son  of  William  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Shambelly.  by  Berths, 
daughter  of  Charles  Donaldson,  Esq.  of  Brougliton,  suc- 
ceeded in  1844.  In  1841  he  was  appointed  a  deputr- 
iieutenant  of  the  stew.irtry,  and,  in  1846.  mnjnr  in  the  Gal- 
lowny  militia,  but  resigned  in  1854.  In  1845  he  married 
Katlierinc,  daughter  of  John  Hardie,  Et^q.  Heir,  his  son, 
William,  born  in  1848. 

Lieut.-Colonel  James  Stewart,  42d  Highlanders,  yoonger 
of  the  two  sons  of  Chnrles  Stewart  of  Shamlielly,  hid  an 
only  child,  Williamina  Helen  Stewart,  who  married  Colonel 
James  John  Furbes  I^itli  of  Whitehaugh,  Aberdeenshire,  the 
representative  of  the  Tolqnhoun  Forbeses. 


Tlie  Stewarts  of  Ardvoirlich,  Perthshire,  are  descended 
from  Jumes  Stewart,  oilled  .James  the  Gross,  4th  and  onW 
surviving  son  of  Murdoch,  duke  of  Albany,  regent  of  Soot- 
land,  beheaded  in  1425.  On  the  rain  of  his  family  he  fled  to 
Ireland,  where,  by  a  lady  of  the  name  of  Macdnnald,  he  had 
seven  sons  and  one  daughter.  James  II.  created  Andrev, 
the  eldest  son,  Lord  Avnnd.ile.     (See  vol.  i.,  p.  169.) 

James,  the  third  son,  ance.stor  of  the  Stewarts  of  Ardvoir- 
lich, married  Annabel,  daughter  of  Buchanan  of  that  ilk. 

His  son,  William  Stewart,  who  succeeded  him.  married 
Mariota,  daughter  of  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Gleaorchy,  Ances- 
tor of  the  mnrquis  of  Breadalbane,  and  had  several  children. 
From  one  of  his  younger  sons,  John,  the  family  of  Stewart  of 
Glenbuckie,  and  from  another,  that  of  Stewart  of  Gartna- 
feraran,  both  in  Perthshire,  were  descended. 

His  eldest  son,  Walter  Stewart,  succeetled  his  father,  and 
married  Euphcmin,  daughter  of  Jan)es  Re«id<»ch  of  Colto* 
brairuan,  comptroller  of  the  household  of  .Tamos  IV\ 

His  son,  Alexander  Stewart  of  Ardvoirlich,  married  Msr- 
garet,  daughter  of  Drammond  of  Drummoiid  Krinoch,  and 
had  two  sons,  James,  his  successor,  and  .lohn,  ancestor  of  the 
Perthshire  families  of  Stewart  of  Annat,  Stewart  of  Hal- 
lachallan,  and  Stewart  of  Craigtoun. 


STEWART, 


518 


DUGALD. 


maindcr  of  his  life,  pursuing  his  mathematical 
researches  as  an  amoscmeut ;  his  duties  in  the 
nuiversity  being  performed  by  his  son,  the  after- 
wards celebrated  Dugald  Stewart,  who,  in  1775, 
was  associated  with  him  in  the  professorship.  Dr. 
Stewai*t  died  January  23,  1785,  at  the  age  of  68. 
His  works  arc : 

General  Tlieorems,  of  considerable  use  in  the  higher  parts 
of  Mathematics.     Edin.  1746,  8vo. 

A  Solution  of  Kepler's  Problem.     Edin.  1756,  8vo. 

Tracta,  Physical  and  Mathematical ;  containing  un  expla- 
nation of  several  important  Points  in  Phjsical  Astronomy, 
and  a  new  Method  of  ascertahiing  the  San  s  distance  from 
the  Earth  bj  the  Theory  of  Gravitation.    Lond.  1761-8,  8vo. 

Distance  of  the  Snn  from  the  Earth  determined  bj  the  The- 
orj  of  Gravitation,  together  with  several  other  tbmgs  relative 
to  the  same  sahject ;  being  a  Supplement  to  bis  Physical  and 
Mathematical  Tracts.  Edin.  1763,  8vo.   The  same,  1764,  8vo. 

Propositiones  Geometries  more  vetemm  demonstratte,  ad 
Georaetriam  antiquam  illostrandam  et  promavendam  idonese. 
Edin.  1763,  8vo. 

Pappi  Alexitndriiii  CoUectiunam  Mathematicamm  libri 
qnarti,  Propositio  quarta  generalior  facta :  cui  Propositiones 
aliquot  eodein  spectantes  adjiciuntur.  Ess.  Phys.  and  Lit.  L 
p.  141.   1754. — Solution  of  Kepler's  Problem.    lb.  ii.  p.  116. 

STEWART,  Dugald,  a  distinguished  writer 
on  ethics  and  metaphysics,  was  born  in  the  college 
of  Edinburgh,  Nov.  22,  1753.  He  was  the  only 
son,  who  survived  the  age  of  infancy,  of  Dr. 
Matthew  Stewart,  professor  of  mathematics  in 
that  university,  and  Marjory,  daughter  of  Archi- 
bald Stewart,  Esq.  of  Catrine,  Ayrshire,  writer  to 
the  signet.  At  the  age  of  seven  he  was  sent  to 
the  High  School,  and,  in  October  1766,  was  en- 
tered a  student  at  the  college  of  his  native  city, 
where  his  studies  were  chiefly  directed  to  histoiy, 
logic,  metaphysics,  and  monils.  In  1771  he  re- 
moved to  the  university  of  Glasgow,  to  attend  the 
lectures  of  the  celebrated  Dr.  Reid;  and  during 
the  session  he  composed  his  admirable  Essay  on 
Dreams,  first  published  iu  the  first  volume  of  the 
*  Philosophy  of  the  Human  Mind,'  in  1792. 

The  declining  state  of  his  father's  health  com- 
pelled him,  in  the  autumn  of  1772,  to  return  to 
Edinburgh,  and  oflBciate  iu  his  stead  to  the  mathe- 
matical cla^>s  in  the  university,  a  task  for  which, 
at  the  early  age  of  nineteen,  he  was  fully  qualified. 
When  he  had  completed  his  twenty-first  year  he 
was  appointed  assistant  and  successor  to  his  Hi- 
ther, on  whose  death,  in  1785,  he  was  nominated 
to  the  vacant  chair.  In  1778,  during  Dr.  Adam 
Ferguson*s  absence  in  America,  he  supplied  his 


place  in  the  moral  philosophy  class.    In  1780  be 
received  a  number  of  young  noblemen  and  gen- 
tlemen, as  pupils  into  his  house,  axkd^  in  1783,  he 
visited  Paris  in  company  with  the  marqiiis  of  Lo- 
thian.   On  his  return,  he  married,  the  same  year, 
Helen,  daughter  of  Neil  Banmitjme,  Esq.,  mer- 
chant in  Glasgow,  by  whom  he  had  one  son.    In 
1785  he  exchanged  his  chair  for  that  of  moral 
philosophy,  to  allow  Dr.  Fergnson  to  retire  on  the 
salary  of  mathematical  professor,  and  thenceforth 
devoted  himself  almost  exclusively  to  the  proseca- 
tion  and  culture  of  intellectual  science.    In  1787 
his  wife  died,  and  the  following  summer  he  again 
visited  the  continent,  with  Mr.  Ramsay  of  Barn- 
ton.   In  1 790  he  married  Helen  D'Arcy  Cranstonn, 
a  daughter  of  the  Hon.  George  Cranstonn,  and 
authoress  of  the  song,  *The  tears  I  shed  most 
ever  fall. 

In  1793  he  read  before  the  Royal  Society  of 
Edinburgh  his  Account  of  the  Life  and  Writings 
of  Dr.  Adam  Smith,  and  the  same  year  he  pub- 
lished the  *'  Outlines  of  Moral  Philosophy,*  for  the 
use  of  his  students.  In  March,  1796,  he  comma- 
nicated  to  the  Royal  Society  his  account  of  the 
Life  and  Writings  of  Dr.  Robertson,  and,  in  1802, 
that  of  the  Life  and  Writings  of  Dr.  Reid.  The 
Memoirs  of  Smith,  Reid,  and  Robertson,  were  af- 
terwai*ds  collected  into  one  volume,  and  published 
with  additional  notes.  In  1796  he  again  took  a 
number  of  pupils  into  his  house,  and,  in  1800,  he 
added  a  course  of  lectures  on  political  economy  to 
the  usual  course  of  his  chair.  So  extenjjive  were 
his  acquirements,  and  so  ready  his  talent  for  com- 
municating knowledge,  that  his  colleagues  fre- 
quently availed  themselves  of  his  assistance  in 
lecturing  to  their  classes,  in  cases  of  illness  or  ab- 
sence. In  addition  to  his  own  academical  duties 
ho  repeatedly  supplied  the  place  of  Dr.  John 
Robison,  professor  of  natural  philosophy.  He 
tanght  for  several  months  during  one  winter  tlie 
Greek  classes  of  Professor  Dalzel;  he  more  than 
one  season  taught  the  mathematical  classes  for 
Mr.  Playfjiir;  he  delivered  some  lectures  on  logic 
during  an  illness  of  Dr.  Finlayson,  and  he,  one 
winter,  lectured  for  some  time  on  Belles  Lettres 
for  the  successor  of  Dr.  Blair 

Iu  1806  he  accompanied  the  earl  of  Lauderdale, 
when  he  went  on  a  political  mission  to  Paiis.    On 


gTEWARrr, 


500 


GENERAL  DATm. 


i  ! 


CanoDgate  cliorchyftni.  A  mooaiiieDt  to  hi* 
mory  stands  on  the  Calton  Hill.  Ediabarfk.  He 
left  a  widow  and  two  chQdrea,  a  soo  aadadaagh- 
ter,  the  former  of  whom,  Lieatenani-coloiiel  Mat- 
thew Stewart,  has  published  mn  able  panphlet  oo 
Indian  affairs.  His  widow,  who  holds  a  hish 
place  among  the  writers  of  Scottish  soog,  sar- 
vived  her  hnsband  ten  rears,  driog  JoljSS,  1838. 
She  was  the  sister  of  the  Coantcas  PnrgstalL  the 
subject  of  Captain  BasU  HaU*s '  Schloss  Hainfeld,' 
and  of  Mr.  George  Cranstoon,  advocate,  after- 
ten\'ards  Lord  Corehoose.  Dngald  Stewart's 
works  are : 

Klementt  of  the  PhikMophj  of  the  Hnmaii  Hind.  Lond. 
1792.  4to.  likewiM  ia  8ro.'  Edin.  li(14,  toL  Ut,  Sro. 
vol  2d.  4to. 

Ontlines  of  Moral  VhtUmofHij;  for  the  oee  of  StodcnU  m 
the  Univenitj  of  Edmbon^     Edin.  1793,  8vo. 

Dr.  Adam  Smith**  Esmt*  oo  Pbiloeofpbieal  SobjeeU;  with 
an  Accoant  of  the  Life  and  WritiBgn  of  the  Antbor.    I^ood. 

1795,  4to. 
Acconnt  of  the  Life  and  Writingn  of  William  Bobertaon. 

D.D.    Lond.  1801,  Sro. 

Accoant  of  the  Life  and  Writing  of  Thomas  Beid,  D.D. 

Edin.  1803,  8vo. 

Sutement  of  Facts  relatire  to  the  Election  of  a  Mathemat- 
ical Professor  in  the  University  of  Edinborgfa ;  acoom|>anied 
with  original  papers  and  critical  remarks.    Edin.  1805.  3d 

edit  8vo. 

Postscript  to  a  Statement  of  Facts  relative  to  the  election 
of  Professor  Leslie :  with  an  Appendix,  consisting  cliieflj  of 
Extracts  from  the  Records  of  the  Universitj  and  from  those 
of  the  Citj  of  Edinburgh.     Edin.  ]80<i.  8to. 

Pliilosophical  Essajs.     Edin.  1810.  4to. 

Biographical  Memoirs  of  Adam  Smith,  LL.D..  William 
Robertiton,  D.D.,  and  Ihomas  |{eid,  D.D. ;  now  collected  in- 
to one  volume,  with  additional  Kotes.    Edin.  1811,  4to. 

Some  Account  of  a  Boj  bom  Blind  and  Deaf.     1812,  4to. 

Supplement  to  the  fourth  and  fifth  editions  of  the  Encj- 
clopsedia  Britantiica,  with  a  Preliminary  Dissertation,  exhib- 
iting a  General  View  of  the  Progress  of  Metaphysical,  Ethi- 
cal, and  Politicnl  Philosophy,  since  the  revival  of  Letters  in 
Europe.     Edin.  1816,  4to. 

The  continuation  of  the  second  port  of  the  Philosophy  of 
the  Human  Mind.     1827. 

The  Philosophy  of  the  Active  and  Moral  Powers  of  Man. 
Third  volume  of  the  Philosophy  of  the  Human  Mind.    1828. 

Works  in  ten  volumes,  edited  by  Sir  William  Hamilton, 
Baronet,  with  anoriginal  Memoir  of  the  Author.  Edin.  1855-7. 

STKWAKT,  David,  of  Garth,  a  major-general 
in  the  army,  and  popular  writer  on  the  Highland- 
ers, wns  the  second  son  of  Robert  Stewart,  Esq. 
of  Gartli,  in  Perthshire,  where  he  was  bom  in 
1772.  In  1789  he  entered  the  42d  regiment  as  an 
ensign,  and  in  1792  was  appointed  lieutenant. 
He  served  in  the  campaigns  of  the  duke  of  York  in 
Flanders,  and  was  present  at  the  siege  of  Nieu- 


port  aod  the  dcicMe  «r  KiBCCMB.    Ia 
1795,  hk  iccnMst  londB^  pnt  «r  Ae 
nder  Sir  Ralpli  AberoiMidiy, 
West  Lidies,  where  be 
rarietj  ci  opfntaoea 
OMOta,  pMtirulariy  in  Ae  c^rtsreofSL 
and  was  afterwaids  cmplojed  for 
BOTfmitting  serriee  ia  the  woods  •p""*^  t^  Ca- 
ribbs  m  St.  YineeBt.    Ia  1796  he  was  praMled 
to  the  nuik  of  ca^itaia-Iieatewuit,  aad  ia  1797  be 
served  in  the  expediiioo  ai^uast  Porto  Eaeo;  af- 
ter wbicb  be  retonied  to  Eoglaad ;  bat  was  sfaMMt 
innaediatelj  ordered  to  join  tbe  bead-qnarten  «f 
bis  regiment  at  Gibraltar.    In  1799  be  aeeoiapa- 
nied  tbe  expedition  against  Minorca;  bat  was 
Uken  prisoner  at  sea,  and  after  being  drained  for 
five  montbs  in  Spain  was  excbanged.    In  Decem- 
ber 1800  be  was  promoted  to  tbe  rank  of  captain, 
a  step  wliicb,  like  all  his  sabseqnent  ones,  was 
given  bim  for  bis  services  alone.     In  1801  he  re- 
ceived orders  to  join  Sir  Ralph  Abercrombv  against 
Egypt.    At  tbe  landing  in  tbe  Bay  of  Abonkir, 
on  tbe  morning  of  Marcb  8,  1801,  he  was  one  of 
the  first  who  leaped  on  shore  from  the  boats ;  aad 
by  his  gallant  bearing  he  contributed  greatly  to 
the  dislodging  of  the  enemy  from  their  position  on 
the  Sandhills.    He  also  distinguished  himself  in 
the  celebrated  action  of  the  21st  March,  where  he 
received  a  severe  wound,  which  prevented  hun 
from  taking  part  in  the  subsequent  operations  of 
the  campaign. 

Some  time  after  his  return  from  Egj-pt,  he  re- 
cruited, as  was  then  the  custom,  for  his  majority, 
and  such  was  his  popularity  among  his  connfay- 
men,  that,  in  less  than  three  weeks,  he  raised  his 
contingent  of  125  men.  He  now,  in  1804,  enter- 
ed the  second  battalion  of  the  78tli  or  Ross-shire 
Highlanders,  with  the  rank  of  major,  and  in  Sep- 
tember 1805  accompanied  the  regiment  to  Gibral- 
tar, where  it  continued  to  peifonn  garrison  duty 
till  the  ensuing  May,  when  it  embarked  for  Sicily, 
to  join  in  the  descent  which  General  Sir  John 
Stuart  was  then  meditating  on  Calabria.  At  the 
battle  of  Maida,  July  4,  1806,  where  he  gi-eatly 
distinguished  himself,  he  was  again  severely 
wounded,  which  forced  him  to  retire  from  the 
field,  and  ultimately  to  return  to  Britain.  In 
April  1808  he  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of  lien- 


ii  , 


I  ' 


STIRLING 


622 


OF  GLORAT. 


I  ■ 


I 


1 1 

I 

h 


H 


James  Edwiird  Alexander  of  Weaterton,  descended  from  the 
faiiiilj  of  Alexander  of  ^lenstrie,  ancestor  of  the  noble  familj 
of  Stirlingf  may  also  be  able  to  establish  a  claim  to  this  title. 
Alexander  llamphrys,  calling  himself  Alexander,  (men- 
tioned at  pnge  105  of  vuL  L,)  claimed  the  title,  as  descended 
in  the  female  line  from  a  apn  of  John  Alexander  of  Gartmore, 
the  4th  son  of  the  1st  earl,  but  it  was  proved  bj  the  officers 
of  the  crown  that  John  Alexander  of  Gartmure  had  no  son, 
and  that  Gartmore  descended  to  his  daughter,  because  there 
WHS  no  mule  heir,  and  at  the  trial  of  Alexander  HamphiTS  in 
the  high  court  of  justiciary  at  Edinburgh,  for  forgerj,  in 
1839,  it  was  proved  that  the  pretended  charter  of  Kova 
Damns,  gmiiting  the  honours  to  the  heirs  female  of  the  last 
larl,  was  a  manifest  forgery. 


The  principal  family  of  the  name  of  Stirling  is  considered 
to  be  that  of  Stirling  of  Keir,  Perthshire.  It  b  of  great 
antiquity,  and  supposed  to  be  deacended  from  Walter  de 
Strivilin,  witness  in  a  charter  of  Prince  Henry,  son  of  David 
I.,  of  the  grant  of  the  church  of  Sprouston,  by  John,  bishop 
of  Glasgow.  Robert  de  Strivilin  is  frequently  a  witness  in 
charters  of  King  William  the  Lion,  and  in  those  of  Alexander 
IL  Robert  and  Walter  Strivilin  are  witnesses.  In  the  reign 
of  the  latter  monarch,  Thomus  de  Stiivelin  was  chancellor  of 
Scotland.  In  the  transumpt  of  a  charter  of  Alexander  III., 
the  thirteenth  year  of  his  reign,  to  Richard  de  Moravia,  bro- 
ther of  Gilbert,  bishop  of  Caithness,  of  the  lands  of  Cowbin, 
one  of  the  witnrases  is  Thomas  de  Strivilin,  canceliarius, 
(See  Nitfbet's  Heraldry,  vol.  i.  p.  410.)  In  the  Ragman  Roll 
are  several  barons  of  the  name  of  StriviUn,  who  swore  fealty 
to  Edward  I.  in  1292,  1296,  and  1297,  viz.,  1.  Johannes  de 
Strivilin,  miles,  of  Glenesk.  Sir  John  Stirling  of  Glenesk 
had  a  daughter,  his  sole  heiress,  who,  in  the  reign  of  David 
II.,  married  Sir  Alexander  Lindsay,  second  son  of  David 
domnius  de  Cruuford,  and  earned  the  ebtate  of  Glenesk  into 
that  family.  2.  Alisandre  de  Strivelyne  del  cunte  de  Lanerk, 
the  head  of  the  family  of  Stirling  of  Calder,  near  Glasgow, 
which  in  the  reign  of  James  V.  terminated  in  an  heiress, 
who,  in  1535,  miiriied  James  Stirling  of  Keir.  3.  Johannes 
de  Slriviling  ue  Moruvia,also  designed  Johannes  de  Strivelyn 
de  Murrilf.  4.  Johannes  de  Slriviling  de  Cai-se,  Stirling- 
shire. Sir  John  Stirling  cf  Carse  favoured  the  cause  of 
Edward  Bnliol,  and,  according  to  Dugdule,  was  summoned 
to  attetid  the  English  pailiament  as  a  peer  of  England.  His 
daughter  and  sole  heiress,  Mrtijory,  married  John  Mentelth, 
son  of  Sir  Walter  Menteith  of  Rusky,  and  brought  him  the 
estate  of  Can>e.  5.  William  de  Strivelyn.  Under  this  name 
it  is  stated  that  the  Stirlings  of  Calder  '^seem  to  be  the  root 
of  all  the  other  Stirlings,  and  from  whom  all  the  rest  of  the 
Stirlings  in  the  western  parts  of  Scotland  are  descended." 

On  the  extinction  of  the  male  line  of  Glenesk,  the  Stirlings 
branched  off  into  two  principal  families,  the  Stirlings  of  Keir 
and  the  Stirlings  of  Calder.  The  direct  hue  of  the  latter  be- 
came extinct  in  the  IGth  century,  though  many  of  its  brandies 
still  exist,  and  the  estate  of  Calder  became  by  marriage  the 
property  of  the  house  of  Keir.  Andrew  Stirliiig,  the  last 
laird  of  Culder,  had  an  only  child,  Janet,  who^e  ward  and 
marriage  James  V.  bestowed  upon  Sir  James  Stirling  of 
Kt'ir,  hy  gift  under  the  great  seal,  dated  July  22,  1529.  In 
a  contirmation  of  the  marriage  contract  to  the  archbishop  of 
Glasgow  in  1532,  the  young  lady  is  called  *' spouse  Jacobi 
Stirling."  She,  however,  eloped  from  him,  but  he  retained 
posses&ion  of  the  estate,  and  transmitted  it  to  his  descendants. 

In  the  reign  of  James  VI.,  the  proprietor  of  Keir  was  Sir 
Archibald  Stirling,  who  had  cliarge  of  the  young  Prince 
Henry  at  Stirling  castle.     On  the  7th  May  1603,  after  Jiuncs* 


departure  for  London,  the  queen  went  to  SUrling  to  obtwo  pos- 
aession  of  the  prince,  but  tlie  coantesa  of  Mar  and  her  son  and 
the  laird  of  Keir  would  not  allow  tlie  prince  to  go  with  bcr. 

In  the  reigns  of  Charies  I.  and  II.  Sir  Georgo  Stirlny  of 
Keir  was  a  staunch  royalist,  and  funght  under  Uootrose.  On 
June  11,  1641,  he  was  apprehended  with  Montnwe  himself 
and  Lord  Kapier,  and  committed  to  the  castle  of  Edinburgh. 
They  were  released  in  Nov.  of  the  some  year.  In  1644  be 
was  Mgain  arrested,  (see  page  238  of  this  toL,  art  Fixst 
Lord  Kapikb.)  Sir  George  married  Lady  Elizabeth  Kspier. 
daughter  of  the  first  Lord  Kapier,  and  niece  of  the  grmc 
Montrose. 

William  Stirling,  Esq.  of  Keir,  the  repreftentatiTe  of  that  an- 
cient family,  the  only  son  of  Archibald  Stirling,  Esq.  ot  Keir, 
by  Elizabeth,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Maxwell,  bail  <-f 
PoUok,  was  bom  at  Kenmnre,  near  Glasgow,  Mardi  8, 1818, 
and  graduated  at  Trinity  college,  Cambridge.  Having  visited 
Palestine,  on  his  return  in  1846,  he  printed  for  private  circu- 
lation, a  small  volume  entitled  *  Songs  of  the  Holy  Lanii.* 
They  were  afterwards  published  with  considerable  additioij 
in  an  8vo  volume,  in  1848.  He  afterwards  turned  his  attett- 
tion  particularly  to  the  language  and  his^tory  of  the  SpaniiJi 
peninsula,  and  in  1848,  he  produced  a  work  of  much  researtli 
and  learning,  in  8  vols.  8vo,  called  '  The  Annals  of  the  Artists 
of  Spain.'  In  1852  he  published  *The  Cloister  Life  i>f 
Charles  V.^  While  preparing  for  the  latter  wuik,  he  visited 
the  convent  of  Yuste,  the  place  to  which  "the  contentious 
monarch"  retired.  At  the  general  election  of  1852  ^!r.  Stir- 
ling was  elected  M.P.  for  the  county  of  Perth,  and  in  1855 
published  the  Life  of  Velasquez,  the  famous  Spanish  painter. 
In  October  1857,  he  was  ai>pointed  one  of  a  commission  to 
inquire  into  the  expediency  of  uniting  the  two  universities  of 
Aberdeen.  In  April  1861,  the  degree  of  doctor  of  laws  was 
conferred  upon  him  by  the  university  of  Edinburgh. 


The  Stirlings  of  Kippendavie,  Perthshire,  and  Carden,  Stir- 
lingshire, are  cadets  of  the  Keir  family.  The  ancestor  of  the 
Kippendavie  branch  was  Archibald  Stirling,  son  of  Archibald 
Stirling  of  Keir,  to  whom  his  father  gave  the  lands  of  Kip- 
pendavie by  charter,  dated  Aug.  5,  1594. 

John  Stirling  of  Kippendavie  married  Mary,  2d  daughter 
of  William  Graham,  Esq.  of  Airth  Castle,  and  had  a  s»o. 
Patrick,  who  married  in  1810,  Catherine  Georgina,  2d  daugh- 
ter of  John  Wedderbum,  Esq.  of  Spring  Garden,  Jamaica. 
He  died  March  SO,  I860,  leaving  2  sons  and  1  daughter. 

The  elder  son,  John  Stirling,  Esq.  of  Kippendarie,  J.P., 
bom  Aug.  19,  1811,  married  Aug  8,  1839,  Catherine  Msrr. 
only  child  of  Rev.  John  Wellings  by  Mary  Wedderbum,  Lis 
wife  ;  issue,  3  sons  and  1  daughter.  i 


The  Stirlings  of  Ardoch  in  Strathallan,  also  a  branch  of 
the  house  of  Keir,  possessed  a  baronetcy  of  Xova  Scotia,  con- 
ferred 2d  May  1666,  but  this  family  merged,  by  marrisgr,  in 
that  of  Moray  of  Aberaiimie,  the  heiress  being  the  eldest 
daughter  of  Sir  Wiiham  Stirling,  baiouet  of  Ardocb.  &* 
p.  205  of  this  voL 


The  family  of  Stirling  of  Gl«)rat,  Stirlingshire,  are  said  to 
be  descended  from  the  Stirlings  of  Calder.  The  first  of  tie 
family  was  Sir  John  Stirling,  armour-bearer  to  King  JanifS 
I.  of  Scotland,  comptroller  (►f  the  royal  household,  govemi-r 
of  Dumbarton  castle,  and  sheriff  of  Duntbarton.  He  wai 
kniglited  in  1430,  on  the  baptism  of  the  twin  princes.  He 
obtained  the  lands  of  Glorat  in  dowry  with  his  wife,  the 
daughter  of  the  laird  of  Galbraith. 

His  son,  WiUiam  Stirling  of  Glorut,  was  also  goveni(x 


STONE. 


524 


STORMOKT. 


1 1 


I  ! 


Mr.  Stodart  of  Loanhead  is  represented  bj  George  Tweedie 
Stodart,  Esq.  of  Oliver,  Peebles-sliire,  who,  on  the  death  of 
his  maternal  uncle,  succeeded  to  the  estates  of  the  chiefs  of 
the  ancient  border  clan  of  Tweedie. 

In  the  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright  is  the  familj  of  Stot- 
hert  of  Cargen,  which  seems  but  another  form  of  the  name 
of  Stodart. 

STONE,  Edmund,  an  ingenious  self- taught 
mathematician,  was  bom  in  Scotland,  but  neither 
the  place  nor  the  time  of  his  birth  is  known.  Ho 
was  the  son  of  a  gardener  in  the  employment  of 
the  duke  of  Argyle,  at  Inverary,  and  had  reached 
his  eighth  year  before  he  learned  to  read.  He  was 
taught  the  letters  of  the  alphabet  by  a  servant, 
and,  with  the  assistance  only  of  books,  and  no 
guide  but  lils  own  genius,  he  learned  Latin  and 
French,  and  the  elements  of  mathematics.  Be- 
fore he  was  eighteen  he  had  acquired  a  knowledge 
of  geometry  and  analysis,  and  his  proficiency  be- 
coming accidentally  known  to  the  duke,  in  whose 
garden  he  wiis  employe^  under  his  father,  an  oc- 
cupation was  procured  for  him  which  left  him  lei- 
sure for  his  favourite  studies.  Whether  he  went 
to  London  or  remained  in  Argylcshire  is  uncer- 
tain ;  but  in  1725  he  was  chosen  a  fellow  of  the 
Royal  Society.  Besides  several  communications 
to  the  Philosophical  Transactions,  among  which  is 
an  *  Account  of  two  Species  of  Lines  of  the  Third 
Order  not  mentioned  by  Sir  Isaac  Newton  or  Mr. 
Stirling,*  he  published  several  useful  mathemati- 
cal works,  partly  original  and  partly  translated,  a 
list  of  which  is  subjoined.  In  1742  or  1743,  his 
name  was  withdrawn  from  the  list  of  the  Rovnl 
Society,  and  in  his  old  age  he  appears  to  have 
been  left  to  poverty  and  neglect.  He  died  in 
March  or  April  1768.     His  works  are : 

A  new  Mathematical  Dictionniy.     1726,  8vo. 

Conic  Sections.    Lond.  1723,  4to. 

i^Iethod  of  Fluxionn.     Ix)nd.  1730,  8vo. 

The  Elements  of  Euclid.  1731,  2  vols.  8vo.  A  neat  and 
useful  edition. 

Euclid's  Elements  of  Geometry,  the  first  six,  the  eleventh 
and  twelfth  Books ;  translated  into  English  from  Dr.  Grego- 
ry's edition ;  with  notes  and  additions.     Lond.  1752,  8vo. 

The  Construction  and  Piincipal  Uses  of  Mathematical  In- 
Ktrument.s,  from  the  French  of  M.  Bion ;  to  which  are  added. 
The  Construction  and  Uses  of  such  Instruments  as  are  omit- 
ted by  Bion,  particularly  of  those  invented  or  improved  bv 
the  English;  42  plates.  Ix)nd.  1758,  fol.  Second  edition, 
Lond.  1759,  fol. 

The  whole  Doctrine  of  Parallaxes  explained  and  illustrat- 
ed, by  an  arithmetical  and  geometrical  construction  of  the 
Transit  of  Venus  over  the  Sun,  June  6,  1761 ;  enriched  with 
a  new  and  general  method  of  determining  the  places  where 


any  transit  of  this  planet,  and  especially  that  wbi«li  will  be 
June  8,  1769,  may  be  best  obterred,  for  the  ioTeatigatioii  of 
its  parallax.    Lond.  1763,  8vo. 

Some  Reflections  on  the  Uncertain^  of  many  Afltraneaa- 
cal  and  Geographical  Positiona  with  regard  to  th«  Figore  and 
Magnitude  of  Uie  Earth,  the  finding  the  Longitude  at  sea  by 
watches,  and  other  operations  of  the  moat  eminent  astrano- 
mers,  with  some  hints  towards  their  reformatioa.  liondeo, 
1768,  8vo. 

Concerning  two  species  of  Lines  of  the  third  ofdcr,  not 
mentioned  by  Sir  Isaac  Newton  nor  by  Mr.  Stiriing.  PUL 
Trans.  1740,  Abr.  TiiL  892. 

STONE,  Jerome,  a  self-tanght  scholar  and 
poet,  the  son  of  a  mariner,  was  bom,  in  1727,  in 
the  parisli  of  Scoonie,  in  flfeshire.     His  father 
died  abroad  when  he  was  bat  three  years  of  age, 
leaving  his  mother  in  very  straitened  circumstan- 
ces, and  he  received  his  edncation  at  the  parish 
school.    He  was  at  fii*st  nothing  more  than  a  tra- 
velling cliapman  or  pedlar,  but  afterwards  his  love 
of  books  induced  him  to  become  an  itinerant  book- 
seller, that  he  might  have  an  opportunity  of  read- 
ing.   He  studied  IIebi*ew,  Greek,  and  Latin,  and, 
with  scarcely  any  assistance,  made  himself  profi- 
cient in  them  all.    The  professors  at  St.  Andrews 
having  heard  of  his  remarkable    acquirements, 
liberally  allowed  him  free  access  to  their  lectures. 
He  attended  the  sessions  regularly,  and  soon  came 
to  be  distinguished  among  the  students  for  his 
proficiency  in  almost  every  branch  of  learning. 
He  subsequently  obtained  the  situation  of  assist- 
ant to  the  rector  of  the  grammar-school  of  Duii- 
keld,  and,  in  three  ycai*s  after,  the  rcctorsliip  it- 
self.   Having  acquired  a  knowledge  of  the  Gaelic 
language,   he  was  so  much  charmed  with  the 
Gaelic  poetry,  that  he  translated  several  pieces 
into  English,  and  sent  his  versions  to  the  Scots 
Magazine,  in  which  they  appeared  chiefly  during 
the  years  1752,  1755,  and  1756.     He  now  com- 
menced a  work  of  great  labour  and  ingenuity,  en- 
titled *  An  Enquiiy  into  the  Origin  of  the  NaUon 
and  Language  of  the  Ancient  Scots,  with  Conjec- 
tures respecting  the  primitive  State  of  the  Celtic 
aud  other  European  nations,*  which  he  did  not 
live  to  complete.    He  died  of  a  fever  in  1757,  in 
the  thirtieth  year  of  his  age,  leaving  in  manuscript 
an  allegory,  entitled  *TheImmortality  of  Authors,* 
which  was  published  after  his  death,  and  hasoftea 
been  reprinted. 

Stormont,  Viscount  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland, 
conferred  in  1621,  on  Sir  David  Murray  of  Gospertie,  Lord 


'I    ' 


STORMONT. 


526 


STRACHAN. 


ft  celebrated  Uwjer  and  statesman,  first  earl  of  Mansfield, 
(nee  page  227  of  this  vol.)  5.  Hon.  Charles;  and  6.  Hon. 
K'lliert  Murray,  who  both  died  without  issue. 

The  eldest  son,  David,  sixth  riacount,  bom  about  1689, 
died  2dd  Jul?  1748,  was  succeeded  bj  bis  elder  son,  David, 
seventh  viscount  The  hitter,  bom  9th  October  1727,  was 
educated  at  Westminster  school,  and  in  1744  went  to  Christ 
Church  college,  Oxford.  He  acquired  a  distinguished  repu- 
tation as  a  scholar,  and  was  the  author  of  many  eloquent 
Latin  compositions.  After  succeeding  to  the  title  he  spent 
some  years  on  the  continent,  and  in  1754  was  chosen  one  of 
the  sixteen  Scoto  representative  peers.  The  following  year 
he  was  appointed  ambassador  to  the  elector  of  Saxony,  and 
king  and  republic  of  Poland.  In  1762  he  returned  to  Bri- 
t:iin,  and  was  swom  a  privy  councillor,  26th  July  1763.  ¥nm 
the  hitter  ye.ir  he  was  ambassador  extraordinary  and  pleni- 
potentiary to  Vienna  till  1772,  when  he  was  appointed  in  the 
same  capacity  to  the  court  of  France.  In  1768  he  had  been 
made  a  knight  of  the  Thistle.  He  remained  in  Paris  till  the 
commencement  of  hostilities  in  1778,  when  he  was  appointed 
lord-justice-general  of  Scotland.  On  27th  October,  1779,  he 
was  constituted  principal  secretary  of  state  for  North  Britain, 
an  office  which  he  held  till  the  dissolution  of  Lord  North*s 
administration  in  1782.  On  the  formation  of  the  coalition 
minintry,  in  the  spring  of  1783,  he  was  appointed  president 
of  the  council,  but  on  the  rejection  of  Fox*8  India  bill  in  De- 
cember following,  he  resigned  that  office.  He  had  married 
in  17o9,  at  Warsaw,  Henrietta  Frederica,  daughter  of  Henry, 
Count  Bunau,  councillor  to  the  elector  of  Saxony,  and  by  her 
had  two  daughters.  That  lady  dying  in  1766,  he  married,  a 
second  time,  the  Hon.  Louisa  Cathcart,  third  daughter  of  the 
ninth  Lord  Cathcart.  On  the  death  of  the  first,  called  the 
great  earl  of  Mansfield,  20th  March  1793,  she  succeeded  as 
countess  of  Mansfield  in  the  county  of  Nottingham,  in  her 
own  right,  the  remainder  having  been  to  her,  as  the  wife  of 
his  nephew.  Viscount  Stormont,  under  the  impression  preva- 
lent at  the  period  of  the  creation  of  the  earldom,  Slst  Octo- 
ber, 1776,  that  no  British  peerage  could  be  limited  to  a  peer 
of  Scotland,  even  in  remainder.  When,  however,  the  con- 
verse was  established  by  law,  the  first  earl  of  Mansfield  ob 
tained  another  patent,  dated  26th  July,  1792,  creating  him 
earl  of  Mansfield  of  Caen  W(X)d,  county  Middlesex,  with  re- 
mainder to  his  nephew,  her  husband,  \l8Connt  Stormont. 
Accordingly,  on  the  death  of  his  uncle  in  1793,  he  succeeded 
as  second  enrl  of  Mansfield.  On  the  division  in  the  opposi- 
tion 1794,  he  joined  the  adniinihtration,  and  on  27th  Decem- 
ber that  year  was  a  second  time  appointed  president  of  the 
council.  He  rrsigned  the  oflSce  of  lord-justice-general  in 
1795.  Besides  the  oflUces  mentioned,  he  also  held  those  of 
joint  clerk  of  the  court  of  king's  bench,  and  chancellor  of 
Marischal  college,  Aberdeen.  He  died  at  Brighton,  1st  Sep- 
tember, 1796,  in  his  69th  year,  and  was  buried  in  Westmin- 
ster Abbey  in  the  same  vault  with  the  first  earl  of  Mansfield. 
By  his  first  wife  he  had  two  daughters,  the  elder  of  whom, 
Elirabeth  Mary,  married  in  1786  George  Fmch-Hatton  of 
Eastwell,  M.P.,  and  had,  with  other  issue,  George  WHlIiam 
Finch -Hatton,  earl  of  Winchelsea.  By  his  second  wife,  who 
took  for  her  second  husband  the  Hon.  Robert  Fulke  Greville, 
he  had,  with  one  daughter,  four  sons,  namely,  1.  William, 
third  earl  of  Mansfield.  2.  Hon.  George  Mumiy,  principal 
auditor  of  exchequer  in  Scotland,  and  a  lieutenant-general  in 
the  army,  died  in  1848  8.  Hon.  Charles  Murray,  major  in 
the  army.  4.  Hon.  Henry  Murray,  C.B.,  lieutenant-general 
in  the  arm  v. 

William,  eighth  viscount  of  Stormont.  and  third  earl  of 
Mansfield,  bom  at  Paris  7th  March  1777,  manned  Frederica, 


daugliter  of  Willuim  Markham,  D.D.,  arehbisboporTdik, 
and  with  three  dftogfaten,  had  four  sons.  He  ^ed  18th  Feb- 
ruary 1840. 

Hw  eldest  son,  William  DaWd,  born  Fab.  91, 1806,  new 
oeeded  as  9th  viscount  of  Stormont  and  4tb  eari  of  Manaiisid. 
He  inbarited  both  earldoms,  that  in  the  eountj  of  Uiddleaex 
on  the  death  of  his  father,  and  that  in  the  county  of  Notting- 
ham on  the  decease  of  his  grandmother,  July  II,  1843;  ho^- 
ditary  keeper  of  the  palace  of  Seone;  appointed  in  1846  a 
depaty-lientenant  of  Perthshire;  and  was  lieotenant-^oloBcl 
of  the  Stirlingshire  militia.  In  1830  he  was  eleeted  M.P.  ftr 
Aldborougli,  in  1831  for  Woodstock,  in  183S  for  Norwidi, 
and  in  1837  for  Perthshire;  and  was  a  lord  of  tiie  treaiuf) 
from  Dec.  1884  UU  April  1835;  Knight  of  the  Thistle,  18a; 
lord-lirntenant  of  oonnty  of  Clackmannan,  1852.  In  18SS; 
1858, 1859,  he  waa  lurd-high-commbsioner  to  the  GeMral 
Assembly  of  the  Church  of  Scotland.  He  manied,  April  8; 
1829, 1/>msa,  8d  daughter  of  Cnthbert  Ellinon,  Esq.  of  Hepbm 
Hall,  county  of  Durham,  issue,  a  son,  William  David,  Yiseetrat 
Stormont,  an  officer  in  the  grenadier  guards,  bom  July  27, 
1835,  and  a  daughter.  Lady  l/ouisa  Nina  Blarray,  wife  (rf'the 
Hon.  George  Edwin  Lasoelles,  a  son  of  the  3d  earl  of  Harewood. 


Stdacitax,  a  surname  derived  from  the  lands  of  Strath- 
aen  or  Strathachan,  in  Kincardineshire.  The  family  of  Stn- 
chan  of  Strachan  is  of  great  antiquity.  In  1100.  we  find 
Waldems  de  Strachane  or  Strathethyne,  **  cum  eofuentm  Rm- 
dolphi  de  Strachane  hceredis  wi,**  conveying  lands  to  the 
canons  of  St.  Andrews,  and  John,  the  son  of  Rudcdphm, 
makes  over  to  the  abbot  and  convent  of  Dnnfermfine  the 
lands  of  Belheldie,  pro  salute  sua,  the  deed  being  oonfirmed 
by  Alexander  IIL  in  1278.  About  1316,  the  barony  of 
Strachan,  Fetteresso,  and  Dalpersey,  Ac.,  mei>ged  by  msr- 
riage  into  the  family  of  Keith,  but  in  the  reign  of  David  IL 
Sir  James  Strachan  of  Monboddo,  in  the  same  county,  d>- 
tained  the  lands  of  Thornton  by  marriage  with  Agneta  de 
Thornton.  He  had  two  sons.  Duncan,  the  elder,  had  the 
lands  of  Monboddo.  The  younger  son.  Sir  John  Strachar, 
pot  the  lands  of  Thornton.  He  was  knighted  by  R«>bert  IL 
in  1375,  and  to  him  the  previous  charters  were,  in  the  fol- 
lowing year,  confirmed  by  the  same  monarch. 

Sir  Alexander  Strachan  of  Thornton,  a  commismoner  of  the 
exchequer,  and  siibsequently  a  commissioner  for  auditing  the 
treasury  accounts,  was  created  a  b.ironet  of  Nova  Scotia  by 
King  Charies  L,  28th  May  1625.  On  the  death  of  his  son, 
the  second  baronet,  without  issue,  the  title,  being  to  heirs 
male  generally,  was  inherited  by  his  kinsman  Sir  James 
Strachan  of  Monboddo,  whose  lineiU  descent  from  the  family 
of  Thomton  was  thereafter  further  proved  and  confirmed  by 
deed  under  the  great  seal  in  1663.  On  the  death  of  the 
fourth  baronet,  issueless,  the  baronetcy  again  went  to  a  dis- 
tant kinsman.  The  fiflh  baronet.  Sir  John  Strachan,  a  post- 
c.iptain  R.N  ,  died  December  28,  1777. 

The  sixth  baronet  was  Admind  Sir  Richard  Strachan, 
G.C.B.,  distinguished  for  his  naval  serx-ices.  Bom  in  Devon- 
shire, Octol>er  7,  1760,  he  was  the  eldest  son  of  Patrick 
Strachan,  Esq.,  lieutenant  R.N.  When  in  command  of  the 
Concorde,  42  guns,  in  the  squadron  under  Sir  J.  B.  Warren, 
in  an  engagement  with  the  French  on  St,  George's  day,  1794, 
to  the  westward  of  Guernsey,  he  captured  a  French  ship  of 
38  gims  called  I'Engageante.  Afterwards  in  the  Mehonpns, 
42  gims,  and  then  in  the  Donegal,  80  guns,  he  was  constant- 
ly employed  in  active  sen-ice,  in  the  course  of  which  he  made 
several  prizes,  amongst  the  rest,  a  Spanish  ship,  with  a  cargo 
worth  about  £200,000.  In  the  spring  of  1804,  he  was  no- 
minated a  colonel  of  marines.    About  July  I80d,  he 


ii 


K      1 
I 


STRANG. 


528 


STRANGE. 


authors.  In  1797,  he  was  elected  M.P.  for  New- 
port, Hants,  and  sat  in  parliament  till  1818.  He 
was  a  whig,  and  always  voted  with  that  party. 
He  died  Aug.  25,  1831,  aged  83. 

Strang,  or  Strong,  a  surname  orijiinnllj  of  Fifeshire. 
An  ancient  fumily  of  this  name  possessed,  at  one  time,  the 
estate  of  Hnlcjiskief  parish  of  CHml>ee,  in  that  county.  John 
Strang  of  Ralcnskie,  married,  before  1362,  Cecilia,  si.tter  of 
Kicliard  Aiistruther  of  that  ilk,  and  received  from  the  latter 
certain  tenements  in  Anstmther. 

In  1466  William  Strang  of  Ualcuskie  was  one  of  an  assize 
of  perambuhition  for  clearing  of  inarches.  In  1482  John 
Strang  of  Balcaskie  and  Ewingston  had  a  charter  to  tliese 
lands,  which  were,  in  the  same  year,  acquired  bj  George 
Strang,  probably  his  fatlier,  from  George  Porteous,  portioner 
tiiereof,  in  exchange  for  the  lands  of  Whiteside  and  Glenkirk. 

John  Strung  of  lialcaskie  is  mentioned  in  1514  and  1521. 
He  had  a  son,  George,  who,  in  1517,  formed  one  of  a  jury 
who  made  a  valuation  of  Fifeshire.  George  predece.'ised  his 
father,  leaving  a  son.  John  Strang  of  Balcaskie  was  slain  at 
Pinkie  in  1547,  and  was  succeeded  bv  his  grandson. 

In  1605  a  son  of  the  family  joined  the  expedition  to  the 
I.ewii(.  for  the  colonization  of  that  island  and  improvement  of 
the  fishi'ries.  (See  p.  49  of  this  vol.)  On  the  destruction  of 
the  expedition  this  gentleman  settled  in  the  Orkneys. 

John  Strang  of  nalcaskie,  bom  before  1578,  had  •  son, 
Thomas,  who,  in  1641,  was  served  heir  to  his  great-grand- 
fatiier,  shiin  at  Pinkie.  After  the  sale  of  Balcaskie,  in  1615, 
lie  became  colonel  of  Cochrane*8  Scots  regiment. 

Sir  Robert  Strange,  the  eminent  engraver,  a  memoir  of 
whom  is  given  below  in  lai'ger  type,  was  the  fourth  in  lineal 
descent  from  Sir  David  Map^us  Strang  or  Strange,  sub- 
chanter  of  Orkner  from  1544  to  1565.  Sir  David  is  assumed 
to  have  been  a  younger  son  of  the  Strangs  of  Balciiskie,  of 
which,  however,  there  is  no  proof. 

Tlie  family  of  Strang  of  Pitcorthie,  in  the  same  county, 
descended  from  John  Strang,  who,  about  1306,  married 
Christian  Duddingston,  and  with  her  .acquired  W'ester  Pit- 
corthie. In  1447  Sir  William  Olipliant  of  Kellie  granted  the 
half  of  Easter  Pitcorthie  to  his  grand.son,  Walter  Strang. 
Another  Walter  Strang  of  Pitcorthie  is  supposed  to  have 
fallen  at  Flodden.  He  left  three  heiresses,  Isabel,  Giios,  and 
Agnes,  who  divided  Pitcorthie  among  them. 


Dr.  John  Strang,  a  learned  divine  of  the  17th  century, 
was  the  son  of  Mr.  W^illiam  Strang,  minister  of  Irvine,  in 
AyrHhire,  where  he  was  bom  in  1584.  He  lost  his  father 
while  still  very  young,  but  his  mother  soon  after  married  Mr. 
Robert  Wiikie,  minister  of  Kilmarnock,  under  whose  care  he 
was  educated  at  the  public  school  of  that  town.  At  the  age 
of  twelve  he  was  sent  to  study  Greek  and  philosophy  at  St. 
Leonard's  college,  St.  Andrews.  In  his  sixteenth  year,  he  ob- 
tained the  degree  of  M.A.,  and  shortly  after  he  was  appointed 
one  of  the  regents  of  the  college.  In  1613  he  became  minister 
of  Errol,  in  the  presbytery  of  Perth.  In  1616,  at  the  recom- 
mendation of  James  VI.,  he  and  several  other  persons  were 
invested  with  the  degree  of  D.D.  at  St.  Andrews.  In  1618 
he  voted  against  the  five  articles  of  Perth,  notwithstanding 
which  he  was  appointed  a  member  of  the  court  of  high  com- 
mission, but  never  attended  its  meetings.  In  1620  he  was 
chosen  one  of  the  ministers  of  Edinburgh,  but  preferred  re> 
maining  at  Errol.  In  1626  he  was  appointed  principal  of 
the  university  of  Ghisgow,  in  place  of  Mr.  John  Cameron, 
resigned.     He  rendered  himself  exceedingly  unpopular  with 


the  more  rigid  Pmbyterians  by  hia  temporiMng  mMm;  and 
among  the  papers  of  Charles  I.,  foirad  after  tlie  battle  of  NMrly, 
was  discovered  a  letter  of  his  addressed  to  Dr.  Baleanqnlial, 
with  A  treatise,  entitled  '  Bessoos  why  all  bis  Majesty's  er- 
thodox  Subjects,  and,  namely,  those  who  sofaaeribed  tlis  late 
Covenant,  should  thankfully  acquiesce  to  his  lfa]«ty*s  latt 
Declaration  and  Proclamations,  with  an  Answer  to  the  Rea- 
sons objected  in  the  hite  ProtesUtion  to  the  oontrary.'    la 
1650  he  demitted  his  office  of  prindpal.  and  retired  en  aa 
annuity  allowed  him  by  the  visitorB  of  the  unirernty.    He 
died  at  Edinboi^gfa,  June  20,  1654.    He  was  the  anther  of  a 
treatise,  l)e  Volnntate  et  Aetionibos  Dei  circa  peeeatom. 
printed  by  the  Elzevirs  at  Amsterdam  in  1657;  also,  of  sne. 
De  Interpretatione  et  Perfectiooe  ScriptnrB.  Rotterdam,  1661 

STRANGE,  Sir  Bobert,  an  emiueut  cngniTer, 
was  born  In  the  island  of  Pomona  in  Orknej,  July 
14,  1721.    He  was  lineally  descended  from  Sir 
David  Strange,  or  Strang,  a  younger  son  of  the 
family  of  Balcaskie  in  Fifeshire,  who  settled  in 
Orkney  at  the  time  of  the  Refoimation.    After 
receiving  a  classical  education  at  Kirkwall,  he 
was  intended  for  the  law,  but,  disliking  that  pro- 
fession, he  went  on  board  a  man-of-war  bound 
for  the  Mediterranean.    On  his  return,  some  of 
his  sketches  were  shown  to  Mr.  Richard  Cooper, 
an  engraver  in  Edinburgh,  who  took  him  as  an 
appi*enticc,  and  he  soon  made  rnpid  progress  m 
the  arts.    When  the  rebel  army  entered  Edin- 
burgh in  September  1745,  he  was  induced  to  join 
the  service  of  the  Pretender ;  and  lie  continued  to 
act  as  one  of  the  prince's  life-guards  till  his  defeat 
at  Cnlloden  ;  after  which  he  wns  obliged  to  con- 
ceal himself  for  several  mouths  in  the  Highlands. 
When  the  vigilance  of  the  government  was  some- 
wliat  abated  ho  rctumed  to  Edinburgh,  where  he 
contrived  to  maintain  himself  by  the  sale  of  the 
portraits  of  the  rebel  leaders,  of  which  great  num- 
bers were  sold  at  a  guinea  each.     In   1747  he 
man'ied  Isabella,  only  daughter  of  William  Lum- 
isden,  son  of  Bishop  Lumisden ;  and  soon  after  be 
went  to  Paris,  where  he  prosecuted  his  studies, 
under  the  direction  of  the  celebrated  I^  Bas,  from 
whom  he  had  the  first  hint  of  tho  use  of  the  in- 
strument called  the  dry  needlcy  which  he  after- 
wards greatly  improved  by  his  own  genius.    In 
1761  he  removed  to  London,  where  he  settled, 
and  engraved  several  fine  historical  prints,  which 
deservedly  raised  his  reputation.     As  historical 
engraving  had  at  that  period  made  little  progress 
in  Britain,  he  may  justly  be  considered  the  father 
of  that  difficult  department  of  the  art.    lu  1760 


I  I 


I   I 


•   I 


J 


STRATHALLAN, 


630 


FOURTH  VISCOUNT  OF. 


Reformation,  a  hoitse  of  canons  regular  founded  in  1200,  bj 
Gilbert,  earl  of  Strathern,  and  his  countess  Matilda.  He 
was  raised  to  the  peerage,  31st  January  1G09,  by  the  title  of 
Lord  Madderty,  the  parish  in  which  Inchaffray  is  situated, 
and  which,  in  ancient  times,  was  the  seat  of  a  Celtic  monas- 
tery. It  was  secularized  before  the  foundation  of  Inchaffiray, 
with  which  a  remnant  of.jts  domuns  was  incorporated.  Pre- 
vious to  being  created  a  peer,  he  was  styled  lord  of  Incbaf- 
fray,  a  name  signifying  **  the  iidand  of  masses."  He  died  in 
September  1623.  By  his  wife,  Jean,  dauj^hter  of  Sir  James 
Chisholme  of  Cromlix,  he  got  the  lands  of  Innerpeffray,  she 
being  heiress,  through  her  mother,  of  Sir  John  Drummond, 
the  owner  of  that  property.  He  had  two  sons  and  four 
daughters.  The  second  son,  the  Hon.  Sir  James  Drummond 
of  Machany,  carried  on  the  line  of  the  family. 

The  elder  son,  John,  second  Lord  Madderty,  was  among 
the  first  of  the  nobility  who  joined  the  marquis  of  Montrose, 
at  Bothwell,  after  the  battle  of  Kilsyth  in  1645,  for  which  he 
was  imprisoned.  In  1619,  he  bound  himself  not  to  oppose 
the  parliament,  and  also  becahie  cautioner  for  Graham  of 
Inchbraco,  the  cousin  of  Montrose,  under  a  penalty  of 
£50,000.  By  his  wife,  Helen,  eldest  daughter  of  Patrick 
Lesly,  commendator  of  Lindores,  he  had,  with  three  daugh- 
ters, fire  sons.  1.  Da\'id,  third  Lord  Madderty.  2.  Hon. 
James  Drummond,  and  3.  Hon.  John  Drummond,  both  offi- 
cers in  foreign  service.  4.  Hon.  Ludovick  Drummond,  who 
fought  at  Worcester,  and  escaping  thence,  went  into  the 
Swedish  army,  &nd  was  killed  at  the  storming  of  Copenha- 
gen. 5.  Hon.  William  Drummond,  a  general  in  the  army, 
lirst  viscount  of  Strathallan. 

The  eldest  son,  David,  third  Lord  Madderty,  was  in  1644, 
in  his  father's  lifetime,  imprisoned,  by  an  order  of  the  com- 
mittee of  estate,  with  other  friends  of  ^lontrose.  On  his 
deathbed  he  is  said,  {Founiainhall,  vol.  i.  p.  295,)  to  have  re- 
signed his  title,  11th  April  1684,  in  fHVour  of  his  youngest 
brother.  General  William  Drummond,  who,  however,  was,  at 
any  rate,  entitled  to  succeed  to  it,  as  his  intennediate  bro- 
thers had  all  predeceased  him.  The  third  I^rd  Madderty  was 
twice  married.  By  his  first  wife,  a  daughter  of  Creigliton  of 
Haltoun  and  Luncardie,  he  had  a  daughter,  who  died  young. 
By  his  second  wife.  Lady  Beatrix  Graham,  a  sister  of  the 
great  marquis  of  Montrose,  he  had  two  suns,  who  also  both 
died  young,  and  three  daughters.  1.  Hon.  Margaret,  wife  of 
her  cousin,  John  Graham,  postmaster-general  of  Scotland, 
son  of  Patrick  Graham  of  Inchbraco.  2.  Hon.  Beatrix,  Coun- 
tess of  Hyndford.  3.  Hon.  Mary,  wife  of  John  Haldane  of 
Gleneagles. 

His  young«'st  brother,  the  Hon.  William  Drummond,  fifth 
son  of  the  2d  Lord  Madderty,  had  a  command  in  the  anny 
of  the  "  Engagement,"  raised  for  the  rescue  of  Charles  I.  in 
1648.  On  the  defeat  of  that  enterprise  he  joined  the  mar- 
quis of  Onnond,  then  in  arms  for  the  king  in  Ireland.  He 
had  the  command  of  a  regiment  at  the  battle  of  Worcester  in 
1 651,  and  was  taken  prisoner,  but  made  his  escape.  He  then 
joined  the  royalists  under  the  earl  of  Glencaim,  in  the  High- 
lands, where  his  kinsman,  Andrew  Drummond,  brother  of 
Sir  James  Drummond  of  Machany,  commanded  a  regiment 
of  Athol-men ;  and  he  continued  with  them  till  they  were 
dispersed  by  the  parliamentary  general,  Morgan,  in  1654. 
Subsequently  he  entered  the  Muscovite  service,  where  he  at- 
tiuned  the  rank  of  Ueutenant-general.  As  he  himself  says, 
he  "  served  long  in  the  wars  at  home  and  abroad,  against  the 
Polonians  and  Tartars."  After  the  Restoration,  he  was  re- 
called to  England  by  Charles  II.,  who  in  1666  appointed  him 
major-general  of  the  forces  in  Scotland.  Notwithstanding 
his  known  loyalty,  he  was  in  1675,  on  a  mere  surmise  of  hav- 


ing oorresponded  with  some  of  the  exiled  Covenntm  b 
Holland,  imprisoned  in  Dnmbarton  castle  for  a  jeer.  Oa 
his  release,  he  was  restored  to  his  command,  and  in  IMi 
appointed  general  of  the  ordnanee.  On  the  aoc— imi  ef 
King  James  VII.,  the  folbwing  year,  he  was  nominated  gM- 
eral  of  the  forces  in  Scotland,  and  appointed  a  laid  of  tht 
treasury.  In  1684,  on  the  rengnation  of  his  hrothcr,  be  bt- 
came  4th  Lord  Madderty,  and  was  created  visoonnt  of  SUnA- 
alhui  and  Ijord  Drummond  of  Cromlix,  by  patent  dated 
Sept  6, 1686,  to  him  and  the  heirt  male  of  his  body,  with 
remainder  to  bis  nearest  hein  male  whatsoever.  He  died  in 
January  1688.  In  a  fnneral  sermon  preached  at  his  dncMS, 
by  Principal  Monro  of  Edinburgh,  it  is  said  of  him,  **  Now, 
we  have  this  generous  sonl  in  MotooTia,  a  stranger,  and  yei 
may  be  sure  the  cavalier's  coffers  were  not  then  of  gmt 
weight ;  but  he  carried  with  him  that  which  never  fbfseok 
him  till  his  last  breath,  reeolntion  above  the  disasten  of  Ar- 
tune,  composure  of  spirit  in  the  midst  of  adversity,  and  so- 
complishments  proper  for  any  station  in  conrt  or  camp  that 
became  a  gentleman.**  He  wrote  an  account  of  the  Dmra- 
mond  family,  in  which  he  traces  its  origin  to  the  Hongarian 
noble,  Maurice,  who  is  said  to  have  accompanied  Edgar  Atb- 
eling  and  his  two  sisters  to  Scotland  in  1068,  (see  voL  iL  p. 
60).  By  his  wife,  Elisabeth,  daughter  of  Sir  Ardiibald 
Johnston,  Lord  Warriston,  executed  in  1663,  and  widow  ci 
Thomas  Hepburn  of  Hnmbie,  he  had,  with  one  daughter, 
Elizabeth,  countess  of  Kinnoul,  a  son,  William,  second  vis- 
count of  Strathallan.    The  latter  died  7th  Jnlj  1702. 

On  the  death  of  his  son,  William,  third  viscount,  without 
issue,  26th  May  1711,  in  his  rixteenth  year,  the  estates  of 
Cromlix,  &c.  devolved  on  the  Kinnoul  famil j  aa  hein  of  lioe, 
while  the  titles  reverted  to  the  heir  male,  his  oonnn,  WilliaRi 
Drummond,  descended  from  the  Hon.  Sir  James  Drmnmood 
of  Machany,  second  son  of  the  first  Lord  Maderty.  Sir  James 
was  colonel  of  the  Perthshire  foot  in  the  "  Engagement "  for 
the  rescue  of  Charles  I.  in  1648,  and  died  before  the  Resto- 
ration. By  his  wife,  Catherine  Hamilton,  sister  of  the  first 
I^rd  Bargeny,  he  had,  with  a  daughter,  married  to  Alexan- 
der Robertson  of  Strowan,  eight  sons,  who  all  died  without 
issue  except  the  eldest,  Sir  James  Drummond  of  Machany, 
who  was  fined  £500  by  Cromirell  in  1654,  and  died  in  Jalr 
1G75.  His  son,  Sir  John  Drummond  of  Machany,  was  oat- 
lawed  in  1690,  for  his  attachment  to  the  exiled  royal  family, 
but  returned  to  Scotland  and  died  at  Edinburgh  in  1707. 
He  had  six  sons  and  four  daughters.  The  three  eldest  sods 
predeceased  him.  William,  the  fourth  son,  succeeded  as 
fourth  viscount  of  Strathallan.  Andrew,  the  fifth  son,  was 
tlie  founder  of  the  well-known  great  banking-house  of  Dnun- 
mond  at  Charing  Cross,  London.  He  purchased  the  estate 
of  Stnnmore  in  Middlesex  in  1729,  and  died  2d  Fehnarj 
1769.  Thomas,  the  sixth  son,  engaged  in  the  rebellion  of 
1715,  and  was  taken  prisoner  at  Sheriffniuir. 

The  ftmrth  viscount  was  amongst  the  first  to  enter  into 
the  rebellion  of  1715,  there  being  no  clan  in  SooUand  more 
zealous  in  the  Stuart  cause  than  the  Drummonds.  He  was 
taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Sheriffmnir,  but  was  not  sub- 
jected to  prosecution  or  forfeiture  at  that  time.  In  1745, 
within  a  fortnight  after  Prince  Charles  Edward  dispUyed  his 
standard  at  Glenfinnan,  he  was  joined  by  Lord  StrathaUsn, 
who  was  left  in  command  of  the  rebel  forces  in  Scotland 
when  the  Chevalier  marched  into  England.  At  the  battle  of 
Culloden,  Lord  Strathallan  had  a  command  on  the  right 
wing  of  the  rebel  army,  and  when  the  latter  gave  way,  be 
was  cut  down  and  killed  by  the  duke  of  Coraberiand*s  dra- 
goons. He  had  married  in  1712,  Margaret  Murray,  daughter 
of  the  baroness  Naime,  whose  devotion  to  the  canse  of  the 


STRATIIERN, 


532 


EARL  OF. 


I  ; 


i: 


her  ladyship  bjr  J^rd  CumpbelL    She  died  March  25,  I860. 
Stratheden  is  in  Fifeshire,  her  husband's  uative  countiy. 


STBATnKRX,  a  surname  derived  from  the  district  of  that 
name  in  Pertlishire,  which  forms  the  basin  of  the  river  Earn 
and  its  tributaiies. 


STRATUKRSf  earl  of,  a  title  of  great  antiquity  in  Scotland, 
the  first  possessor  of  which  on  record  was  Malise,  one  of  the 
witnesses  of  the  foundation  of  the  priory  of  Scone,  bj  Alex- 
ander  I.,  in  I  Hi.  He  is  sappoeed  to  have  been  a  Celt, 
though  bearing  the  Sason  title  of  earl,  in  ancient  times  the 
highest  rank  in  the  kingdom,  next  to  that  of  the  sovereign. 
At  the  battle  of  the  SUndard,  22d  August  1138,  Malise,  earl 
of  Strathem,  distinguished  himself  greatly.  When  the  Scots 
had  prepared  for  battle,  their  king,  David  I.,  by  the  advice  of 
his  chief  leaders,  resolved  to  commence  the  attack  with  the 
men-at-arms  and  the  nrchers,  but  the  men  of  Galloway 
claimed  that  pre-eminence,  alleging  that  it  was  their  right 
by  ancient  custom.  It  is  stated  that  most  of  the  men-at- 
arms  in  the  Scottish  ranks  were  subjects  of  England,  who 
had  joined  the  forces  of  David.  This  caused  several  alterca- 
tions and  jealousies.  "  Whence  arises  this  mighty  confidence 
in  these  Normans?"  exclaimed  Malise,  earl  of  Strathem,  in- 
dignantly, to  the  king.  **  I  wear  no  armour,  yet  they  who  do 
will  not  advance  beyond  me  this  day.**  **  Enrl,"  retorted 
Alan  de  Percy,  an  illegitimate  son  of  the  great  baron  of  that 
name,  **  you  boast  of  what  you  dare  not  perform."  David 
repressed  this  dispute,  and  unwillingly  yielded  to  the  claims 
of  the  men  of  Galloway.  This  Alan  de  Percy  had  attached 
himself  to  David  I.  before  his  accession  to  the  throne,  and 
ever  afterwards  adhered  to  him.  In  return  for  his  valuable 
services  he  received  the  manors  of  Oxenham  and  Heton,  in 
Teviotdale.  He  and  his  family  were  munificent  endowers  of 
Melrose  abbey ;  but  after  suittaining  an  honourable  name  for 
three  generations,  his  line  became  extinct  for  lack  of  heirs. 

Malise's  son,  Ferquhard,  or  Ferteth,  second  earl  of  Strath- 
em, was  one  of  the  six  earls  that  leagued  against  Malcolm 
IV.  (See  pnge  94  of  this  volume.)  He  witnessed  a  charter 
of  that  monarch  to  the  monastery  of  Scone  in  1160,  and  in 
the  following  year  obtained  a  settlement  in  the  province  of 
Moray,  when  its  turbulent  inhabitants  were  removed  to  other 
parts  of  the  kingdom.  In  the  foundation  charter  of  Inch- 
affray  he  is  called  Ferchard,  Dei  indidgentia^  comes  de  Strath- 
eryn.  He  died  in  1171.  His  elder  son,  Gilbert,  third  earl 
of  Strathem,  was  the  founder  of  the  monastery  of  Inchaf- 
fray,  and  he  richly  endowed  it  for  canons  regular.  The 
foundation  charter,  dated  in  1198,  was  confirmed  by  King 
William  the  Lion  in  1200.  The  witnesses  were,  Malise,  bro- 
ther of  Enrl  Gilbert,  William,  Ferchard,  and  Robert,  hi.s 
sons.  Earl  Gilbert  had  five  sons  and  four  daughters.  His 
three  eldest  sons  predeceased  him.  Robert,  the  fourth  son, 
became  fourth  earl  of  Strathem.  Malise,  the  younger  son, 
got  from  King  William  the  lands  of  Kincardine,  to  be  held  of 
his  brother,  Earl  Robert,  and  through  the  marriage  of  his 
niece,  Annabella,  elder  daughter  of  Earl  Robert,  to  Sir  David 
Graham,  ancestor  of  the  duke  of  Montrose,  they  afterwards 
came  into  that  family.  Tlie  fourth  earl  witnessed  a  charter 
of  Alexander  II.  of  the  earldom  of  Fife  in  the  eleventh  year 
of  his  reign,  1225,  and  he  was  one  of  the  witnesses  to  the 
treaty  concluded  betwixt  that  monarch  and  Henry  11.  of 
England,  when  their  differences  were  adjusted  by  the  cardi- 
nal legate  of  York  in  1237.  He  died  before  1244,  leaving, 
with  two  daughters,  a  son,  ^lalise,  fiftli  carl  of  Strathem. 

This  powerrul  noble  was  one  of  the  principal  maffnatet  Sco- 
^  of  his  time,  and  took  a  leading  part  in  all  the  public 


tranaactions  of  that  day.  In  the  minority  of  Alwiaiider  IlL, 
he  joined  the  English  party,  and  was  reonrod  into  the  pro- 
tection of  Henry  III.  of  Engknd,  lOth  Angnat  1255.  He 
was  one  of  the  guardians  of  the  yonng  king  and  Qneea  Mar- 
garet, daughter  of  Henry,  whom  he  had  nutnied  in  1251, 
appointed  in  virtne  of  the  treaty  of  Roxbnrgb,  the  20tZi  8^ 
tember  that  year.    He  died  in  1270. 

His  800,  Malise,  6th  earl,  a  goarantoe  of  the  msniage  ttmtj 
of  Margaret  of  Scotland  with  Eric,  king  of  Norway,  in  1281, 
sat  in  the  parliament  at  Scone,  Feb.  5, 1284,  when  the  Seots 
nobles  became  bound  to  acknowledge  Margaret  the  maidca  of 
Norway,  as  their  sovereign,  in  the  event  of  the  death  of  Aks- 
ander  III.  He  agreed  to  the  marriage  of  Qoeen  Matpcai 
with  the  prince  of  Wales,  afterwards  Edward  XL  of  Engisad, 
a  marriage  never  destined  to  take  place.  In  the  oontest  lor 
the  crown,  he  was  one  of  the  nominees  on  the  part  of  Ma 
Baliol,  in  1292.  He  swore  fealty  to  Edward  L  at  Sciifiag. 
12th  July  of  that  year,  and  was  present  at  Berwick  on  the 
17th  of  tlie  following  November,  when  the  claim  to  the  erowa 
was  decided  in  Bailors  favour.  He  was  one  of  the  nobles 
summoned  to  attend  Edward  I.  into  Gasconj,  1st  September 
1294,  and  was  in  the  Scots  array  that  invaded  Englai^  m 
Marcli  129G,  for  which  his  estates  were  sequestrated.  He 
agjun,  however,  swore  fealty  to  Edward  on  the  13th  of  the 
following  July,  and  was  dead  before  the  8d  September  of  the 
same  year.  Amongst  other  names  in  the  Ragman  BoO,  as 
having  sworn  fealty  to  Edward  in  1296,  are  those  of  Robert 
de  Strathem  and  Maucolum  de  Strathem,  cleric,  del  comte  de 
Peebles,  ahso,  John  de  Strathem,  del  comte  de  Fmfar,  whic^ 
shows  that  at  that  period  there  were  several  barons  of  the 
name  of  Strathem  in  different  parts  of  Scotland.  The  sixth 
earl  of  Stratliem  had  a  son,  Malise,  seventh  earl,  and  a  daagb- 
ter,  Mary,  wife  of  Sir  John  Moray  of  Drumsargard,  and 
mother  of  three  sons,  1.  Maurice,  who  was  created  eari  tl 
Strathem.  2.  Sir  Alexander  Moray  of  Dmmsargard,  Ogflvy, 
and  Abercairaev.  3.  Walter,  ancestor  of  the  3]urravs  of 
Ogilface. 

Malise,  seventh  earl,  was  one  of  the  adherents  of  Robert 
the  Brace,  and  was  imprisoned  in  England  from  1306  to  ISth 
November  1308,  and  then  only  released  on  his  ginng  secnii^ 
for  his  loyal  behaviour  to  Edward  II.,  and  not  to  leave  Eng' 
land  without  the  king*s  permission.  He  was  one  of  the  pi* 
triotlc  Scots  nobles  who,  in  1320,  signed  the  famous  letter  to 
the  Pope,  asserting  the  independence  of  Scotland.  At  the 
battle  of  Halidonhill,  19th  July  1333,  he  and  the  earls  of 
Ross  and  Sutherland  had  the  command  of  the  third  divisin 
of  the  Scots  army.  Knighton,  the  English  historian,  wbo 
lived  in  the  following  century,  erroneously  states  that  he  was 
amongst  the  slain  in  that  battle,  a  mistake  which  has  been 
repeated  by  Dalrymple  in  his  Annals.  The  following  year  be 
resigned  his  earldom  of  Strathem  in  favour  of  a  potent  Eng- 
lish noble,  John  de  Warren,  earl  of  Warren  and  Surrey,  whe 
had  married  his  daughter,  Johanna,  and  a  letter  is  extant 
from  Edward  Baliol  to  Henry  de  Bellemonte,  earl  of  Bogfaan 
or  Buchan,  dated  2(1  March  1334,  indicating  that  Eari  3Ialise 
was  then  alive.  In  1345,  he  was  forfeited  and  attainted  fct 
giving  his  earldom  of  Strathem  to  the  earl  of  Warren,  m 
enemy  of  David  II.  Sir  James  Dalrymple  {Hi^oneal  Col- 
lections^  p.  376),  states  that  his  daughter  Johanna,  countess 
of  Warren,  Surrey,  and  Strathem,  was  also  forfeited  for  mar- 
rying the  s:(me  nobleman. 

It  is  supposed  that  Karl  Malise  was  three  times  married. 
Douglas  {Peerage,,  vol.  ii.  p.  559)  says  that  Marjory  Mas- 
champ,  countess  of  Strathem,  was  probably  his  first  wife, 
perhaps  his  stepmother,  which  is  most  consistent  with  diro- 
nology.    Johanna,  daughter  of  Shr  John  Menteth,  appears  to 


STRATHMORE. 


534 


STRUTHERS. 


gained  tbe  Fife  coast,  and  returned  to  the  camp  at  Perth, 
about  the  2l8t  of  October.  He  was  killed  at  the  battle  of 
Slieriffmuir,  13th  November  following,  unmarried.  His  next 
brother,  Charles,  fourth  earl  of  Strathmore  and  sixth  earl 
of  Kinghom,  died  11th  May  1728,  of  an  accidental  wound 
received  two  days  before,  in  a  scuffle  betwixt  James  Carnegie 
of  Fiuhaven  and  John  Lyon  of  Brighton.  On  the  9th  he  had 
gone  to  Forfar,  to  attend  the  funeral  of  a  young  lady,  and 
afterwards  went  to  a  tavern,  with  the  two  gentlemen  named 
and  others.  In  the  evening  his  lordship  and  Mr.  Cam^'e 
paid  a  visit  to  Lady  Auchterhouse,  a  sister  of  the  latter. 
Mr.  Lyon  followed  them  and  behaved  rudely  both  to  the  lady 
and  her  brother.  Lord  Strathmore  thereupon  lefl  the  house, 
and,  in  the  street,  some  words  passed  between  Mr.  Lyon  and 
Mr.  Carnegie,  who  was  pushed  into  a  kennel,  two  feet  deep, 
from  which  a  servant  of  the  earl  helped  to  extiicate  him. 
Mr.  Caniegie  immediately  drew  his  sword.  Mr.  Lyon  ran 
towards  Lord  Strathmore,  whose  back  was  to  him,  and  en« 
deavoured  to  draw  his  lordship*s  sword.  Mr.  Carnegie  pur- 
sued him  in  a  staggering  state,  and,  on  coming  up,  made  a 
pass  at  him,  and  the  earl  turning  hastily  round  and  pushing 
Lyon  off,  received  the  weapon  through  his  body.  Mr.  Car- 
negie was  brought  to  trial  for  the  murder  of  the  earl,  before 
the  high  court  of  justiciary  at  Kdmburgh,  2d  August  1728, 
but  acquitted,  through  the  superior  ability  and  tirmuess  of 
his  counsel,  Robert  Dundas  of  Aniiston.  (See  vol.  ii.  p.  95.) 
His  lordship  married  in  1725,  Lady  Susan  Cochrane,  the 
second  of  the  three  beautiful  daughters  of  the  fourth  earl  of 
Dundonald,  but  had  no  issue  by  her.  She  married,  secondly, 
2d  April  1745,  Mr.  George  Forbes,  her  factor,  and  master  of 
the  horse  to  the  Chevalier  de  St.  George,  and  bad  to  him  a 
daughter.  Lady  Strathmore  became  a  Roman  Catholic,  and 
died  at  Paris  24th  June  1754.  James,  iitlh  earl  of  Strath- 
more and  seventh  earl  of  Kinghom,  a  captain  in  the  army, 
married  the  Hun.  Jane  Oliphunt,  and  died,  without  issue, 
14th  January  1735.  The  youngest  of  the  brotliers,  Thomas, 
previous  to  succeeding  to  the  family  titles,  was  chosen  M.P. 
for  Forfarshire,  at  the  general  election  of  1734.  On  the  abo- 
lition of  tbe  heritable  jurisdictions  in  1747,  he  obttined  for 
the  constabulary  of  Forfar  £G00.  He  died  18th  January 
1753.  By  his  countess,  Jane,  daughter  and  heiress  of  James 
Nicholson,  Esq.  of  West  Rainton,  county  Durham,  he  had, 
with  four  daugiiters,  three  sons.  1.  John,  seventh  earl  of 
Stnithmore  and  tenth  earl  of  Kinghom.  2.  Hon.  James 
Philip  Lyon,  in  the  service  of  the  East  India  Company,  one 
of  the  unfortunate  snffi'rers  who  fell  victims  to  the  rage  of 
Cassim  Ally  Cuwn  in  Bengal,  in  Febmary  1763,  in  his  25th 
year.  8.  Hon.  Thomas  Lyon  of  Hetton,  county  of  Durham, 
M.P.  for  the  Aberdeen  burghs  from  1768  to  1780,  died  in 
1796,  aged  55. 

The  eldest  son,  John,  seventh  earl  of  Strathmore,  bom  in 
1737,  completed  his  education  by  foreign  travel,  in  the  course 
of  which  he  visited  Spain  and  Portugal.  He  manned,  Febm- 
ary 25,  1766,  Mary  Eleanor,  only  child  and  heiress  of  George 
Bowes  of  Streatham  Castle  and  Gibside,  county  of  Dur- 
ham, the  then  richest  heiress  in  Europe,  her  fortune  being 
£1,040,000,  with  vast  additions  on  her  mother's  death,  and 
immense  estates  on  the  demise  of  her  uncle.  The  same  year, 
his  lordship  obtained  an  act  of  parliament  to  enable  him  and 
his  countess  to  take  and  use  the  name  of  Bowes  only.  He 
was  elected  one  of  the  sixteen  Scots  representative  peers  Ist 
October  1767,  again  in  1768  and  in  1774,  and  died  at  sea, 
on  his  passage  to  I^isbon  for  the  recovery  of  his  health,  7th 
March  1776,  in  his  d9th  year.  The  countess,  on  17th  Janu- 
ary 1777,  took  for  her  second  husband  Andrew  Robinson 
Stoney  of  Coldpighill,  county  Durham,  afterwards  M.P.  for 


Newcastle-upon-Tyne.  Refusing  to  comply  with  bit  wi»ha 
in  regard  to  her  estates,  she  was  forcibly  carried  eff  bj  hia 
and  other  armed  men,  November  lOtb,  1786L  Sbt  *■ 
brought  up  to  the  king*s  bench  by  writ  ofkabeas  eorpm^  and 
released,  and  her  husband  was  oommitted  to  prison.  Tbe 
lady  recovered  her  estates,  which  she  had  ungned  to  her 
husband  under  the  influence  of  terror,  in  May  1788L  She 
died  28th  April  1800,  in  her  52d  year,  and  was  buried  ia 
Westminster  Abbey,  attuned  in  a  superb  bridal  di««.  A  mn- 
nnment,  with  a  suitable  inscriptioD,  is  there  erected  to  her 
memory.    The  earl  had  4  sons  and  2  dangbters. 

John,  the  eldest  son,  eighth  earl  of  Strathmore,  bora  April 
14,  1769,  captain  65th  foot  in  1789,  and  a  representative 
Soots  peer,  was  created  a  peer  of  the  United  Kingdom,  Jolj 
18, 1815,  as  Baron  Bowes  of  Streatham  Castle.  He  mar- 
ried, July  2,  1820,  Mary,  daughter  of  J.  Milner,  Esq.  ff 
Staindrop,  county  Durham,  but  died  the  following  day,  Julr 
3,  when  his  English  barony  expired.  His  oonntess  married, 
in  1831,  William  Hutt,  Esq.,  M.P.,  and  died  May  5,  1860. 

The  earl  was  succeeded  by  his  brother,  Thoiu.'is.  9th  eari  <'f 
Strathmore.     Born  May  3,  1773,  he  died  Aug.  27, 1846u 

His  grandson,  Thomas  George,  son  of  George,  J-ord  Glsn- 
mis.  who  died  in  1834,  leaving  2  sons  and  2  daughteis,  sue- 
ceeded  as  10th  esu-l  of  Strathmore,  and  12th  eari  of  Ein^om. 
Bom  in  1822,  he  was  Appoiut«d  a  lieutenant  Iht  life-guards  in 
1844;  but  retired  in  1846.  A  n^presentative  Scuts  per-: 
married  in  1850,  Hon.  Charlotte  l^faria,  elde^iit  daughter  \A 
Viscount  Barrington.  She  died  at  the  age  of  28,  Nov.  3, 185^, 
without  issue.  The  earKs  brother,  Hon.  Claude  Lyon  Buwr>. 
lieut  2d  life-guards,  born  in  1824,  married  in  1853,  Franii-!) 
Dora,  daughter  of  Oswald  Smith,  Esq.  of  Blendon,  with  iasiie. 

Strutiiers,  a  sumame  derived  from  the  word  Strother.  it 
Strather,  frequently  applied  in  the  south  and  east  of  Sootlaml 
to  places  remarkable  for  swamps  and  morahes. 

STRUTIIERS,  John-,  author  of  '  Tlie  Pot^r 
Man's  Sabbatli,'  was  born  at  tlie  cottage  of  Fore- 
faulds,  on  the  estate  of  Long  Calderwood,  parUli 
of  East  Kilbride,  Lanarkshire,  18th  Jnly  1776. 
lie  was  the  second  sou  and  fourth  child  of  AVil- 
liara  Struthers,  for  more  than  forty  3*ears  a  shoe- 
maker in  that  parish.  His  education  was  of  the 
scantiest  kind.  He  was  taught  to  read  by  his 
mother,  from  the  Shorter  Catechism  and  the  Pro- 
verbs of  Solomon,  and,  at  a  very  early  age,  could 
read  any  chapter  in  the  Bible.  He  acquired  the 
art  of  writing  by  copying  the  letters  of  the  alpha- 
bet, scrawled  in  a  very  rude  manner,  on  the  side 
of  an  old  slate,  by  his  mother,  who  herself  had 
never  been  taught  to  write.  Her  simple  mode  of 
tuition,  however,  was  greatly  assisted  by  the  kind 
notice  taken  of  the  boy  by  Mrs.  Baillie,  widoir  of 
Dr.  James  Baillie,  formerly  professor  of  theolog}' 
in  the  university  of  Glasgow,  who,  us  he  tells  us 
in  his  autobiography,  "with  her  two  daughters. 
Miss  Baillie  and  Miss  Joanna  Baillie,  afterwards 
so  highly  distinguished  for  her  poetical  powers. 


STRUTHERS, 


536 


JOHN. 


In  1811,  Mr.  Stmthers  published  hU  poem  of 
'  The  Winter  Da}',*  which  was  moderate!}'  suc- 
cessfal.  Parts  of  it  were  included  in  a  collected 
edition  of  his  poetical  writings,  under  the  title  of 
*  Poems,  Moral  and  Religious,'  published  in  1814. 
Two  years  after,  when  there  was  a  high  degree 
of  excitement  in  the  country,  and  a  very  great 
amount  of  suffenng,  he  published,  anonymously,  a 
short  ^  Essay  on  the  State  of  the  Labouring  Poor, 
with  some  hints  for  its  improvement,'  his  plan 
being  the  allotment  of  farms  of  ten  acres.  Tliis 
pamphlet  created  a  good  deal  of  sensation,  and 
before  it  was  known  who  was  the  author,  was  at- 
tributed to  some  of  the  most  eminent  authors  of 
the  day. 

The  following  year  Mr.  Stmthers  was  employed 
by  Mr.  Fullarton,  of  the  firm  of  Messrs.  Khull, 
Blackie,  and  Co.,  publishers,  Glasgow,  to  edit  a 
collection  of  songs,  which,  under  the  title  of  *  The 
Harp  of  Caledonia,'  came  out  in  3  vols.  18mo, 
and  had  a  very  extensive  sale.  In  1818,  appeared 
his  poem  of  *•  The  Plough,'  written  in  the  Spen- 
serian stanza,  and  about  the  same  time  he  edited 
a  small  volume  of  poems,  by  Mr.  William  Muir  of 
Campsie,  to  which  he  added  a  biographical  pre- 
face. About  the  bcgtnniiig  of  1819  he  entered  the 
printing-ofSce  of  Khull,  Blackie,  and  Co.,  as  a 
cx)rrcctor  of  the  press.  Here  he  assisted  in  editing 
AVodrow's  History  of  the  Sufferings  of  the  Church 
of  Scotland,  which  was  printed  from  a  copy  that 
belonged  to  himself,  and  also  wrote  the  History  of 
Scotland  from  the  Union  to  1827,  which  was  pub- 
lished in  the  latter  year.  His  latest  literary  em- 
ployment was  tlie  continuation  of  this  history  down 
to  the  period  of  the  disruption  of  the  church  of 
Scotland  in  1843,  which  was  finished  jnst  before 
his  death.  With  Mr.  Alexander  Wliitelaw,  and 
others,  he  was,  for  about  eighteen  months,  en- 
gaged writing  the  lives  of  distinguished  natives  of 
Scotland,  most  of  which  were  transferred  to  the 
collection  published  in  1835,  in  four  volumes,  un- 
der the  name  of  'A  Biographical  Dictionary  of 
Eminent  Scotsmen,'  by  Robeit  Chambers.  Being 
in  1831  temporarily  thrown  out  of  employment, 
Mr.  Struthers  published,  in  that  year,  a  pamphlet 
against  the  voluntary  principle,  entitled  *  Tckel,' 
extending  to  96  pages,  8vo.  He  afterwards  ob- 
tained his  former  literary  situation,  in  the  firm  of 


Archibald  FoUarton  and  Co^  pobllshen.  !■ 
1833,  he  was  i^ppointed  librarian  of  StirGng'i 
library,  Glasgow,  with  a  yeariy  salary  of  fifty 
pounds.  He  held  that  sitaation  for  fifteen  yean, 
when,  in  consequence  of  the  duties  being  greatly 
increased,  he  resigned  the  oflice,  and  at  tbe  ad- 
▼anced  age  of  74,  returned  to  his  first  trade,  that 
of  shoemaking.  In  1836  be  published  his  poem  of 
^Dychmont,*  which  he  reprinted  the  followiag 
year  in  an  8vo  edition  of  his  poems.  He  also 
wrote  for  the  Christian  Instmctor,  biogrqihlcal 
notices  of  James  Hogg,  minister  of  Dalserf,  after- 
wards of  Camock,  and  Principal  Bobertson,  and 
published  some  short  tracts  on  the  religions  con- 
troversies of  the  day.  At  the  disruption  he  had 
joined  the  Free  church  of  Scotland,  and  in  his 
latter  3'ears,  was  twice  representative  elder  to  its 
General  Assembly.  At  one  period  he  issued  pro- 
posals for  publishing  a  volume  of  Essays,  some  of 
which  had  been  already  printed,  but  this  rolnme 
circumstances  prevented  him  from  completing. 
In  1850,  an  edition  of  his  poetical  works,  in  two 
volumes,  handsomely  got  up,  with  his  autobiogra- 
phy prefixed,  and  a  portrait,  was  published  bj 
Messrs.  A.  Fullarton  and  Co. 

Mr.  Struthers  died  at  Glasgow,  somewhat  sud- 
denly, on  the  evening  of  the  30th  July  1853,  m 
his  78th  year,  having  been  three  times  married. 
"  Though  early  of  a  very  feeble  constitution,"  says 
one  who  knew  him  well,  *'  he  had  acquired  great 
bodily  vigour.  His  step  was  firm  and  elastic ;  bis 
figure  rather  tall  and  muscular,  though  slight.  A 
walk  of  fifty  miles  a-day,  up  to  within  three  or 
four  years  of  his  death,  was  nothing  to  him.  He 
delighted  in  the  country,  and  in  visiting  oar 
shores  and  mountains.  He  was  a  man  of  few 
wants  and  little  ambition.  He  was  allowed  to 
toil  on  to  the  end.  Though  decidedly  a  man  of 
genius,  whose  life  had  been  spent  in  honest  labour, 
and  who  had  large  acquaintance  of  men  and 
things  both  in  the  literary  and  religious  world,  and 
though  his  writings  were  all  in  the  defence  of 
tiiith,  religion,  good  order,  and  humanity,  no  other 
attempt  than  that  of  a  few  private  friends  was 
ever  made,  towards  the  close  of  his  da3's,  to  ease 
him  of  the  cares  of  old  age ;  and  that  attempt  had 
resulted  in  very  little.  But  he  coveted  little  eitlier 
the  praises  or  the  rewards  of  men.    He  was  a  man 


li 


I 
1 1 


STUART, 


540 


SIR  CHARLES. 


tion.*  This  was  the  frait  of  his  early  and  vigorous 
application  to  the  study  of  history  and  the  general 
principles  of  legislation,  and  the  merit  of  which 
procured  him  the  degree  of  doctor  of  laws  from  tlie 
university  of  Edinburgh.  In  1772  he  edited  Sul- 
livan^s  Lectures  on  tlie  English  Constitution,  to 
wliich  he  prefixed  a  '  Discourse  on  the  Govern- 
ment and  Laws  of  England.*  Being  disappointed, 
principally  through  the  influence  of  Dr.  Robertson 
exerted  against  him,  in  an  attempt  to  obtain  one 
of  the  law  professorships  in  the  university  of 
Edinburgh,  he  removed  to  London,  and  from  1768 
to  1773  be  was  a  regular  contributor  to  the 
Monthly  Review. 

In  the  latter  year  Dr.  Stuart  returned  to  bis 
native  city,  and,  in  conjunction  with  Mi*.  Smcllie 
and  othei-s,  commenced  the  Edinbtirgli  Magazine 
and  Review;  but  his  illiberal  and  virulent  criti- 
cisms and  coarse  personalities  ruined  the  character 
of  the  work,  which  was  discontinued  in  1776. 
Two  of  his  most  prominent  characteiistics  were 
arrogance  of  manners,  and  a  lofty  idea  of  his  own 
genins  and  learning.  On  the  failure  of  the  Maga- 
zine, he  thus  wrote:  *^  It  is  my  constant  fate  to  be 
disappointed  in  everything  I  attempt;  I  do  not 
think  I  ever  had  a  wish  that  was  gratified,  and 
never  dreaded  an  event  that  did  not  come.  With 
this  felicity  of  fate,  I  wonder  how  the  devil  I  could 
turn  projector.  I  am  now  sorry  that  I  left  Lon- 
don ;  and  the  moment  I  have  money  enough  to 
carry  me  back  to  it  I  shall  set  off.  I  mortally  ab- 
hor and  detest  this  place,  and  everybody  in  it. 
Never  was  there  a  city  where  there  was  so  much 
pretension  to  knowledge  and  that  had  so  little  of  it. 
The  solemn  foppery,  and  the  gross  stupidity  of 
the  Scottish  literati  are  perfectly  insupportable. 
Nothing  will  do  in  this  country  that  has  common 
sense  in  it;  only  cant,  hypocrisy,  and  supei'stition 
will  flourish  here.  A  curse  on  the  country,  and 
on  all  the  men,  women,  and  children  of  it." 

In  1778  he  published  his  'View  of  Society 
in  Europe,  in  its  Progress  from  Rudeness  to  Re- 
finement,' which  became  tlic  most  popular  of  his 
works.  The  year  following  appeared  his  *0b- 
sei-vations  conceraing  the  Public  Law  and  Consti- 
tutional Ilistoiy  of  Scotland;'  in  1780  *The  His- 
tory of  the  Reformation  in  Scotland;'  and,  in 
1782,  *The  History  of  Scotland,  from  the  estab-  j 


lishment  of  the  Reformation  to  the  Death  of  Qneea 
Mary,'  in  2  vols.  His  object  in  this  pablicatioB 
was  to  vindicate  the  character  of  the  qneen,  and 
to  expose  the  weakness  of  the  proofii  of  her  gnilt 
brought  forward  by  Dr.  Robertson,  whoee  writings 
he  assailed  thronghoat  life  with  unrelenting  ani- 
mosity. In  1782  he  again  repaired  to  London, 
and  engaged  in  writing  for  the  Political  Herald 
and  English  Review;  but  habits  of  intemperance 
had  undermined  his  constitution,  and  being  at- 
tacked with  dropsy,  he  returned  to  his  father*s 
house  at  Musselburgh,  where  he  died,  Angost  IS, 
1786. 

STUART,  Sir  Charles,  a  distingnished  gene- 
ral, fourth  son  of  the  third  earl  of  Bute,  was  bom 
in  January  1753.  He  was  educated  under  the 
superintendence  of  his  father,  and  after  having 
lyade  the  tour  of  Europe,  and  been  presented  at 
the  principal  courts,  he  entered  the  aimy  in  1768, 
as  ensign  in  the  37th  foot.  He  was  rapidly  pro- 
moted through  the  intermediate  steps,  and  in  1777 
was  made  lieutenant-colonel  of  the  26th  foot  or 
Cameronians.  He  continued  in  that  regiment  for 
several  years,  and  eminently  distinguished  himself 
in  the  American  revolutionary  war.  In  1782,  he 
had  the  rank  of  colonel,  and  in  1793  of  major- 
general.  In  October  1794  he  was  appointed 
colonel  of  the  68th  foot,  and  in  the  follo^-ing 
March  of  his  old  regiment,  the  26th.  In  1794  and 
following  year  he  was  employed  in  the  Mediterra- 
nean, and  made  himself  master  of  Corsica.  In 
December  1796,  he  was  appointed  to  the  command 
of  the  auxiliary  British  force  in  Portugal,  and  the 
measures  he  adopted,  on  his  arrival  with  the 
troops,  effectually  secured  that  country  against 
the  then  threatened  invasion  of  tiie  French. 

On  his  return  to  Britain,  he  was,  in  January 
1798,  promoted  to  the  rank  of  lieutenant-general. 
In  September  of  that  year  he  again  sailed  for  Por- 
tugal, took  the  British  troops  there  under  his  com- 
mand, and  proceeded  with  them  to  Minoix^.  He 
landed  November  7,  and  by  the  18tli  of  the  same 
month,  he  had  made  a  conquest  of  the  whole 
island,  without  the  loss  of  a  man,  the  Spanish 
forces,  to  the  number  of  3,700,  hating  capitulated. 
For  this  important  service,  he  was  invested  with 
the  order  of  the  Bath,  January  8,  1799,  and  the 
same  year  was  appointed  governor  of  Minorca. 


I 


I     I 


1      I 


I        I 


I      J 


tj 


SUTHERLAND, 


542 


COUNTESS  OP. 


I 


oetli,  was  the  first  earl  of  Sutlierland,  having  been  raised  to 
that  dignity  by  Malcohn  Canmore  in  1061,  on  the  introdnc- 
tion  of  the  Saxon  title  of  earl  into  Scotland. 

Karl  William  died  at  Dnnrobin  in  1248.  His  son,  Wil- 
li.-im,  second  earl,  succeeded  to  the  title  in  his  infancy.  He 
was  one  of  the  Scots  nobles  who  attended  the  parliament  of 
Alexander  III.  at  Soone,  5th  February  1284,  when  the  suc- 
cession to  the  crown  of  Scotland  was  settled,  and  he  sat  in 
the  great  convention  at  Brigham,  12th  March  1290.  He 
swore  fealty  to  Edward  I.  in  1296,  but  joined  the  cause  of 
Bruce,  and  made  several  incursions  on  the  English  borders, 
in  one  of  which  he  took  the  castle  of  Roxburgh,  burnt  Dur- 
ham, and  wasted  the  country.  He  was  one  of  the  eighteen 
Highland  chiefs  who  fonght  at  the  battle  of  Bannockbum,  in 
1314,  on  the  side  of  Bruce,  and  he  subscribed  the  famous  let- 
ter of  the  Scots  nobles  to  the  Pope,  6th  April  1320.  He  died 
in  1325,  having  enjoyed  the  title  for  the  long  period  of  77 
years. 

His  son,  Kenneth,  the  third  earl,  fell  at  the  battle  of  Hali- 
don-bill  in  1333,  valiantly  supporting  the  cause  of  David  H. 
With  a  daughter,  Eustach,  he  had  two  sons,  William,  fourth 
earl,  and  Nicholas,  ancestor  of  the  Lords  Dufius. 

William,  fourth  earl,  married  the  Princess  Margaret,  eldest 
daughter  of  Robert  I-,  by  his  second  wife,  Elizabeth  de  Bur- 
gn,  and  he  made  grants  of  land  in  the  counties  of  Inverness 
and  Aberdeen  to  powerful  and  influential  persons,  to  win 
their  support  of  his  eldest  son,  John*s  claim  to  the  succession 
to  the  crown.  John  was  selected  by  his  uncle,  David  II.,  as 
heir  to  the  throne,  in  preference  to  the  high-steward,  who 
had  married  the  Princess  Marjory,  but  he  died  at  Lincoln  in 
England  in  1361,  while  a  hostage  there  for  the  payment  of 
the  king's  ransom.  His  father,  Earl  William,  was  one  of  the 
commissioners  to  treat  for  the  release  of  King  David  in  Idol, 
also  on  13th  June  1354,  and  again  in  1357.  He  was  for 
some  years  detained  in  England  as  an  hostage  for  David*s 
observance  of  the  treaty  on  his  release  from  his  long  captivi- 
tv.    The  eari  did  not  obtain  his  full  libertv  till  20th  March 

m  9 

1367.  He  died  at  Dunrobin  in  Sutherland  in  1370.  His 
son,  William,  fifth  earl,  is  called  William  de  MurrifT,  son  of 
William,  earl  of  Sutherland,  in  a  document  dated  28th  Jan- 
uary 1367,  in  which  Edward  III.  takes  him  into  his  protec- 
tion while  in  England.  He  was  present  at  the  surprise  of 
Berwick  by  the  Scots  in  November  1884,  and  in  that  divi- 
sion of  the  Scots  army  which  marched  towards  Carlisle  in 
1388,  under  the  command  of  the  two  sons  of  Robert  II.,  the 
earls  of  Fife  and  Strathem,  while  a  smaller  dimion  passed 
into  Nortliuniherland,  under  the  earl  of  Douglas,  and  fought 
the  battle  of  Otterbum.  With  their  neighbours,  the  Mac- 
kays,  the  clan  Sutherland  were  often  at  feud,  and  in  all  their 
contests  with  them  they  generally  came  off  victorious.  On 
one  occasion  in  1595,  in  a  discuxsion  concerning  their  differ- 
ences, the  earl,  erroneously  called  Nicholas,  instead  of  Wil- 
liam, in  Sir  Robert  Gordon's  history,  stabbed  the  chief  of  the 
Mackays  and  his  son  with  his  own  hand  (see  page  5  of  this 
volume).  He  died  about  the  end  of  the  14th  century,  leaving 
two  sons,  Robert,  sixth  earl,  and  Kenneth,  ancestor  of  George 
Sutherland  of  Fors,  who,  as  heir  male  of  the  ancient  earls, 
claimed  the  earldom  in  1766. 

Robert,  sixth  earl,  was  engaged  in  the  battle  of  Homildon 
in  1402.  He  was  sent  to  England  as  an  hostage  for  James 
I.,  9th  November  1427.  In  his  time  the  clan  Mackay  be- 
came troublesome,  and  the  earl  was  obliged  to  take  up  arms 
against  John  Aberigh,  natural  son  of  Angus  Dubh  Mackay, 
whom  he  forced  to  retire  for  a  time  for  safety  to  the  Isles. 
But  be  returned  to  Sutherland,  and  having  entered  Strath- 
nlly,  unawares,  the  night  after  Christmas,  be  slew  three  of 


the  Siitherlands  at  Dinoboll.  H«  again  fled,  Imt 
closely  pursued  by  the  eari  that  he  was  fbraed  to  tobmit,  af- 
ter previously  obtaining  pardon.  The  eari  died  in  1442. 
He  had  tliiye  soni.  1.  John,  seventh  eari.  f.  Robot,  i. 
Alexander,  ancestor  of  the  Sleacht  Keooeth  wick  AUiatcr. 

John,  seventh  earl,  resigned  the  earidom  in  faroor  of  John 
his  son  and  heir,  22d  February  1456,  reaerring  to  Minaelf 
the  liferent  of  it,  and  died  in  1460.  He  had  married  Mar- 
garet, daughter  of  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  Laoaric- 
Hhire,  and  by  her  had  four  sons  and  two  danf^ters.  The 
sons  were:  1.  Alexander,  who  pfvdeeeaaed  his  father,  t. 
John,  eighth  earl  of  Sntherhind.  8.  Nicholas.  4.  Thorns 
Beg.  The  elder  daughter,  Lady  Jane,  manried  Sir  James 
Dunbar  of  Cumnock,  and  was  the  mother  of  Gawin  Danhar, 
bishop  of  Aberdeen.  The  younger  danghttf  was  the  wife  of 
Seton  of  Meldrum.  The  widowed  oonntess  and  her  son.  Earl 
John,  disagreeing,  he  demolished  her  house  and  tower  of 
Helmsdale,  which  had  been  Uiilt  by  her.  She  reUred  to 
Easter  Garty,  and  as  a  protection  married  Alexander  Ihm- 
bar,  the  brother  of  her  daughter*s  husband.  Alexander 
Dunbar  was  killed  by  Alexander  Sutherland  of  Dilred,  who 
was  executed  and  forfeited  for  the  crime,  (see  page  6  of  this 
volume). 

John,  eighth  earl,  died  in  1508.  He  had  married  lAdy 
Margaret  Maodonald,  eldest  daughter  of  Alexander  eari  of 
Ross,  lord  of  the  Isles,  and  by  her,  who  was  drowned  cross- 
ing the  ferry  of  Uness,  he  had  two  sons :  John,  ninth  earl, 
and  Alexander,  who  died  young,  and  a  daughter,  Elizabeth, 
countess  of  Sutherland.  A  John,  eari  of  Sutheriand,  either 
the  ninth  earl  or  his  father,  slew  two  of  his  nephews,  sons  of 
a  natural  brother,  called  Tliomas  Mour.  The  young  men, 
Robert  Sutherland  and  the  Keith,  so  called  on  account  of 
being  brought  up  by  a  person  of  that  name,  had  d^en  an- 
noyed the  earl,  and  on  one  occasion  they  entered  his  castle  of 
Dnnrobin  to  brave  him  to  his  face,  which  so  provoked  him 
that  he  instantly  killed  Robert  in  the  house.  Tlie  Keith, 
after  receiving  several  wounds,  escaped  from  the  house,  bat 
was  overtiiken  and  slain  at  the  ClavMde  near  Dnnrobin, 
which  from  that  circumstance  was  afterwards  called  Ailem- 
Cheith,  or  the  bush  of  the  Keith.  The  ninth  earl  died,  with- 
out issue,  in  1514,  when  the  succession  devolved  upon  hia 
sihter,  Elizabeth,  countess  of  Sutherland  in  her  own  right. 

This  lady  had  married  Adam  Gordon  of  Aboyne,  secc«d 
son  of  George,  second  earl  of  Huntly,  high-chancellor  of  Scot- 
land, and  in  his  wife's  right,  according  to  the  custom  of  the 
age,  he  was  styled  earl  of  Sutherland.  In  1516,  Earl  Adam 
made  a  grant  of  some  lands  in  Strathully  to  the  earl  of  Caith- 
ness, in  order  to  secure  his  assistxmce  against  the  Mackays. 
Having,  contrary  to  good  faith,  both  kept  the  lands  and 
joined  the  enemies  of  the  earl  of  Sutherland,  an  action  at  law 
was  commenced  by  the  latter,  but  the  matters  in  dispute  be- 
tween them  were  subsequently  settled  by  arbitration,  (nee 
vol.  i.  p.  521).  Tiiking  advantage  of  the  earl  of  Sutheriand  s 
absence  in  Edinburgh,  on  this  business,  the  Mackays  in  1517 
invaded  Sutherland,  and  burnt  and  spoiled  everything  which 
came  in  their  way.  The  countess,  who  had  remained  at 
home,  placed  her  clan  under  the  command  of  her  natural 
brother,  Alexander  Sutherland,  who  defeated  the  Mackays, 
with  great  slaughter,  at  a  place  called  Torran-Dubh,  near 
Rogart,  (see  page  6  of  this  volume).  This  Alexander  Suth- 
erland afterwards  married  the  sister  of  the  Mackay  chief,  and 
was  induced  bv  him  to  raise  disturbances  in  Sutheriand.  On 
the  death  of  the  ninth  earl,  he  had  laid  claim  to  the  earldom, 
on  the  pretence  that  his  father  and  mother  had  entered  into 
a  contract  of  marriage,  and  that  he  was  li^timately  bom, 
but  had  judicially  renounced  his  claim  in  presence  of  the sher. 


SUTHERLAND, 


544 


FOURTEENTH  EARL  OF. 


liis  confidence  to  murder  the  young  earl  in  his  absence. 
Some  of  the  friends  of  the  latter  having  received  private  in- 
telligence of  this  atrocious  design,  Qame  quietly  at  night,  to 
the  bum  of  Golspie,  in  the  vicinity  of  Dunrobin.  Concealing 
themselves  to  prevent  discovery,  they  sent  Alexander  Gordon 
of  Sidderay  to  the  castle,  disguised  as  a  pedlar,  for  the  pur- 
pose of  warning  the  earl  of  his  danger.  Early  the  following 
morning,  the  earl  proposed  to  the  residents  in  the  castle,  un- 
der whose  charge  he  was,  to  accompany  him  on  a  small  ex- 
cursion in  the  neighbourhood.  This  proposal  seemed  so  rea- 
sonable in  itself,  that,  although  he  was  perpetually  watched 
by  the  earl  of  Caithness*  servants,  they  at  once  agreed. 
When  they  got  out,  the  earl  led  his  keepers  directly  into  the 
ambush  laid  by  his  friends,  who  rushed  from  their  hiding- 
plnce,  and  seizing  him,  conveyed  him  safely  to  Strathbogie. 
For  the  subsequent  proceedings  between  the  rival  houses  of 
Sutherland  and  Caithness,  see  vol.  i.  p.  522,  et  seq.  In  1581 
the  earl  of  Sutherland  was  one  of  the  assize  on  the  trial  of 
the  regent  Morton.  In  1583  he  obtained  from  the  euri  of 
Huntly,  the  king's  lieutenant  in  the  north,  a  grant  of  the  su- 
periority of  Strathnaver,  and  of  the  heritable  sheriffiihip  of 
Sutherland  and  Strathnaver,  which  last  was  granted  in  lieu 
of  the  lordship  of  Aboyne.  This  grant  was  confirmed  by  his 
mnjesty  in  a  charter  under  the  great  seal,  by  which  Suther- 
land and  Strathnaver  were  disjoined  and  dismembered  from 
the  sheriffdom  of  Inverness.  The  earl  died  at  Dunrobin,  6th 
Detember  1594,  in  his  48d  year.  Having  divorced  Lady 
Rnrbara  SinclMr  in  1573,  he  married,  secondly.  Lady  Jean 
Gordon,  third  daughter  of  the  fourth  earl  of  Huntly,  high- 
chancellor  of  Scotland,  who  had  been  previously  married  to 
the  earl  of  Bothwell,  but  repudiated  to  enable  that  ambitious 
and  profligate  nol)leman  to  marry  Queen  Mary.  She  subse- 
quently married  Alexander  Ogilvy  of  Boyne,  whom  she  also 
survived.  To  the  earl  of  Sutherland  she  had,  with  two 
dnugliters,  four  sons.  1.  John,  13th  ear).  2.  Hon.  Sir 
Alexander  Gordon.  8.  Hon.  Adam  Gordon.  4.  Hon.  Sir 
Robert  Gordon  of  Gordonstoun,  the  historian  of  the  family  of 
.Sutherland,  created  a  baronet  of  Kova  Scotia,  being  the  first 
of  that  order,  28th  May  1625.  (Sec  vol.  ii.  p.  330,  for  a 
memoir  of  him.) 

John,  13th  eari  of  Sutheriand,  bom  20th  July  1576, 
carried  the  sword  at  the  opening  of  parliament  13th  Decem- 
ber 1597.  In  July  of  the  following  year  he  set  out  to  tnivel 
on  the  continent,  and  returned  home  in  1600.  In  1606  he 
was  accused  of  being  a  secret  Catholic,  and  he  and  his  wife 
and  mother  were  ordered  to  be  confined  in  Inverness,  while 
the  earl  of  Caithness  and  his  lady,  also  suspected  of  papistry, 
were  ordered  to  Elgin.  The  matters  in  dispute  between  the 
two  earls  having  been  submitted  to  the  privy  council,  who 
showed  no  disposition  to  decide  them  quickly,  George,  earl  of 
Caithness,  in  the  beginning  of  1614,  sought  to  gratify  his 
vengeance  against  the  earl  of  Sutherland,  by  accusing  him  of 
privately  fiivouring  popery.  He  was  accordingly  apprehended 
upon  a  warrant  issued  by  the  king,  and  imprisoned  at  St. 
Andrews.  He  applied  to  the  bishops  for  a  month's  delay, 
promising  that  before  that  time  he  would  either  give  the 
church  satisfaction,  or  surrender  himself,  but  his  application 
was  refused  by  the  court  of  high  commission.  Sir  Alexander 
Gordon,  the  earl's  brother,  being  then  in  Edinburgh,  imme- 
diately sent  notice  of  these  proceedings  to  his  youngest  bro- 
ther, Sir  Robert  Gordon,  who  was  at  that  time  in  London. 
Sir  Robert  applied  to  the  king  for  the  earl's  release  for  a 
time,  that  he  might  look  after  his  affairs  in  the  north,  when 
his  majesty  granted  a  warrant  for  his  liberation  till  the 
month  of  August  following  On  the  expiration  of  the  time, 
he  retnrned  to  his  confinement  at  St.  Andrews,  whence  be 


was  removed,  on  hit  own  application,  to  the  abbej  of  Holy- 
rood-house.  There  he  remained  till  March  1616,  when  ht 
obtained  leave  to  go  home,  **  having,**  nya  Sir  Robot  G«r* 
don,  '*  in  some  measure  satisfied  the  dliurcli  ooooemii^  hk 
religion.**  He  died  at  Dornoch,  11th  September  tbe  aune 
year,  aged  40.  By  his  countess.  Lady  Anna  ElpbtaaloD,  be 
had,  with  two  daughters,  four  sons,  namelj,  1.  Patrick,  mat- 
ter of  Sutherland,  who  died  young.  2.  John,  fonxteeoth  eaiL 
8.  Hon.  Adam  Gordon,  who  entered  the  Swedbh  aerriee,  and 
was  killed  at  the  battle  of  Nordlingen,  27th  Angost  1684^ 
aged  22.  4.  Hon.  George  Posthamus  Gordon,  born  alter 
his  father's  death,  9th  Febraary  1616,  a  lieoteoant-ooloncl 
in  the  army.  The  younger  daughter,  Lady^  Anne,  wife  of  Sir 
Gilbert  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels,  Aberdeenshire,  was  drowned 
at  sea  on  the  coast  of  Holland  in  July  1648,  on  her 
to  France,  to  enjoy  the  free  exerdse  of  her  rdigioo, 
been  bred  in  the  Romish  futh,  under  her  grandmother,  Jeea, 
countess  of  Bothwell  and  Sutherland.  Besides  aereral  other 
passengers,  three  daughters  of  the  eari  of  Angus,  nieces  of 
the  duke  of  Lennox,  and  two  sons  of  the  earl  of  Wintoon, 
were  lost  in  the  same  ship. 

John,  fourteenth  earl  of  Sutherland,  bom  4th  March  1609, 
was  only  six  years  old  when  he  succeeded  his  fathor,  and  dur- 
ing his  minority  his  uncle.  Sir  Robert  Gordon,  was  tutor  of 
Sutherland.    In  this  capacity  the  latter  was  mndi  engaged 
in  securing  the  peace  of  the  country,  so  often  broken  by  the 
lawless  proceedings  of  the  earl  of  Caithness,  against  whoa, 
armed  with  the  king's  authority,  he  led  an  expedition,  and 
forced  him,  in  September  1623,  to  surrender  his  prindpsl 
castles  and  to  fiy  to  Orkney,  (see  voL  i.  p.  524).    By  Sir  Ro- 
bert's judicious  management  of  the  affairs  of  the  home  of 
Sutherland,  his  nephew,  the  cnrl,  on  attaining  his  majori^, 
found  the  hostility  of  the  enemy  of  his  bouse,  the  eari  of 
Caithness,  either  neutralized,  or  rendered  no  longer  danger- 
on!«.     In  1633,  however,  he  found  himself  involved  in  a  quar- 
rel with  Lord  Lorn,  then  justiciary  of  the  Isles,  eldest  son  of 
the  earl  of  Argyle,  in  consequence  of  having  hanged  some 
islesmen  and  others,   dependents  of  Lord  Lorn,  for  horse- 
stealing.    Lord  Lorn  complained  to  the  lords  of  tbe  council 
against  the  earl,  for  having,  as  he  maintained,  apprehended 
the  king's  free  subjects  without  a  commission,  and  for  caus- 
ing them  to  be  executed,  and  obtained  letters  to  charge  him 
to  answer  the  complaint.     Sir  Robert  Gordon,  being  then 
at  Edinburgh,  stated  the  true  facts  of  the  case  to  the  oousdl, 
who  approved  of  the  earl's  conduct,  and  decided  that  in  re- 
spect the  earl  of  Sutherland  had  the  rights  of  regality  and 
sheriffship  within  himself,  and  was  appointed  to  administer 
justice  within  his  own  bounds,  he  was  not  obliged  to  send 
criminals,  though  islanders,  to  Lord  Ijom  or  his  deputies. 
Tliis  decision  had  the  effect  of  relieving  Sutherland  and  Ross 
from  farther  incursions  on  the  part  of  Lord  Lom's  followen* 
In  1G37,  the  earl  joined  the  supplicants  against  the  serrioe 
book,  and  on  the  breaking  out  of  the  civil  war  in  the  follow- 
ing year,  accompanied  by  Lord  Reay  and  the  master  of  Ber- 
ridale  and  others,  he  went  to  Inverness  <nd  Elgin,  and  was 
very  active  in  persuading  the  inhabitants  to  subscribe  the 
Covenant.    The  marquis  of  Huntly,  who  had  raised  the  loysl 
standard  in  the  north,  wrote  him  confidentially,  blaming  him 
for  his  past  conduct,  .and  advising  him  to  declare  for  tbe 
king,  but  the  earl  informed  him,  in  reply,  that  it  was  agauist 
the  bishops  and  their  innovations,  and  not  against  the  king, 
that  he  was  acting.     He  then,  in  his  turn,  advised  the  mar- 
quis to  join  the  Covenanters,  by  doing  which  he  «ud  be 
would  not  only  confer  honour  on  himself,  but  much  good  on 
his  native  country.    Thereupon  he  joined  the  eari  of  Sesforth 
and  the  other  Covenanteni  on  the  north  of  tbe  river  Spey. 


i   I 


; 


SUTHERLAND. 


546 


SUTTIE. 


'  I 
'  I 

f 


and  was  the  mother  of  the  celebrated  Sir  John  Sinclair,  bar- 
onet. 

^VilIiam,  sixteenth  earl  of  Sutherland,  was,  when  I>ord 
Strathnaver,  chosen  M.P.  for  Sutherlandshire  at  the  general 
election  of  1727.  He  was  admitted  a  fellow  of  the  Royal  So- 
ciety in  1732,  and  sacceeded  his  grandfather  in  1783.  Chosen 
one  of  the  sixteen  Scots  representative  peers  in  1734,  he  was 
re-elect-ed  in  1741.  On  the  commencement  of  the  rebellion  of 
1745,  he  was  one  of  the  loyal  Highland  chiefs  wlio  received 
letters  from  Lord-president  Forbes,  to  raise  independent  com- 
panies from  their  clans  for  the  service  of  government.  Ac- 
cordingly, two  companies  of  Sutherland  men,  amounting  to 
100  each,  were  enrolled,  and  joined  the  government  forces 
against  the  Pretender.  He  contributed  greatly  to  the  sup- 
pression of  the  rebellion  in  the  north.  Under  the  heritable 
jurisdictions  abolition  act  of  1747,  he  had  X1,000  allowed 
him  for  the  redeemable  slierifisliip  of  Sutherland.  He  died 
in  France,  Dec  7,  1750,  nged  50.  By  his  countess,  Lady^ 
Klizabeth  Wemyss,  eldest  daughter  of  the  Sd  earl  of  Wemyss 
he  had,  with  a  daughter,  I^ady  Elizabeth,  wife  of  her  cousin, 
Hon.  James  Wemyss  of  WemyHS,  a  son,  William. 

The  son,  William,  eighteenth  earl  of  Sutherland,  bom 
May  29,  1735,  was  an  o£Bcer  in  the  army,  and  in  1759, 
when  an  invasion  was  expected,  he  raised  a  battalion  of 
infantry,  of  which  'he  was  constituted  lieutenant-colonel. 
He  was  appointed  aide-de-camp  to  the  king,  with  the  rank 
of  colonel  in  the  army,  20th  April,  1763.  He  was  one  of  the 
sixteen  representative  Scots  peers,  and  died  at  Bath  16th 
June  1766,  nged  31.  He  had  married  at  Edinburgh,  14th 
April  1761,  Mary,  eldest  daughter  and  coheiress  of  William 
Maxwell,  PIsq.  of  I'reston,  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright,  and 
had  tw(^  daughters,  I^dy  Catherine  and  I^dy  Elizabeth. 
The  former,  bom  24tli  May  1764,  died  at  Dunrubin  castle  3d 
January  1766.  The  loss  of  their  daugliter  so  deeply  affected 
the  earl  and  countess  that  they  went  to  Bath,  in  the  hope 
tliat  the  amusements  of  that  place  would  dispel  their  grief. 
There,  however,  the  earl  was  seized  with  a  lever,  and  the 
countess  devoted  herself  so  entirely  to  the  care  of  her  hus- 
band, sitting  up  with  him  for  twenty-one  days  night  and 
day,  without  retiring  to  bed,  that  her  health  was  affected, 
and  she  died  1st  June  the  same  year,  sixteen  days  before  his 
lordship.  Their  corpses  were  brought  to  Scotland,  and  in- 
terred in  Holvrood-house. 

Their  only  surviving  daughter,  Klizabeth,  bom  at  Leven 
Lodge,  near  Edinburgh,  2-1  th  May  1765,  succeeded  as  coun- 
tess of  Sutherland,  when  little  more  than  a  year  old.  She 
was  placed  under  the  guai-dianship  of  John,  duke  of  Athol, 
Charles,  earl  of  Elgin  and  Kincardine,  Sir  Adam  Fergusson 
of  Kilkerran,  and  Sir  David  Dnlrymple  of  Hailes,  baronets, 
and  John  Mackenzie,  Esq.  of  Delvin.  A  sharp  contest  arose 
for  the  title,  her  right  to  the  earldom  being  disputed  on  the 
ground  that  it  could  not  legally  descend  to  a  female  heir. 
Her  opponents  were  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Gordonstoun  and 
Letteifourie,  baronet,  and  George  Sutlierland,  Esq.  of  Fors. 
Lord  Hailes  drew  up  a  paper  for  her  ladyahip,  entitled  'Ad- 
ditional Case  for  Elizabeth,  claiming  the  title  and  dignity  of 
Countess  of  Sutherland,*  which  evinced  great  ability,  accu- 
racy, and  depth  of  reseiirch.  The  House  of  I^rds  decided  in 
her  favour  21st  March  1771.  The  countess,  the  eighteenth 
in  succession  to  the  earldom,  married  4th  September  1785, 
George  Granville  Leveson  Gower,  viscount  of  Trentham,  eldest 
Kon  of  Earl  Gower,  afterwards  marquis  of  Stafford,  by  his 
second  wife,  Lady  I^uisa  Egerton,  daughter  of  the  first  duke  of 
Ilridgewater.  His  lordship  Mucceeded  to  his  father's  titles, 
and  became  the  second  marquis  of  Stafford.  On  Hth  January 
1833  he  was  created  duke  of  Sutherhuid,  and  died  19lh  July, 


the  same  year.  The  duchess  of  Sutherland,  oonnteas  in  her 
own  right,  thenceforth  styled  dncfaess-eoanteM  of  SntiieriaDd, 
held  the  earldom  during,  the  long  period  of  7i  rears  and  sev- 
en months,  and  died  in  Januarv  1839. 

Her  eldest  son,  George  Granville,  bom  in  1786,  soeceeded 
his  father  as  second  duke  of  Sutherland,  in  1833,  and  his 
mother  in  the  Scottish  titles,  in  1839.  He  married  in  1823, 
Lady  Harriet  Elizabeth  Georjpana,  8d  daughter  of  6tli  eari  of 
Carlisle,  issue,  4  sons  and  7  daoghtera.  The  dnoheas  was  for 
a  long  time  mistress  of  the  robes  to  Queeo  Victoaa.  Hu 
grace  died  Feb.  28,  1861,  and  was  succeeded  bj  his  ddest 
son,  George  Granville  William.  The  2d  duke's  eldest  daogii- 
ter  married  in  1844,  the  duke  of  Argyle ;  the  second  dangfate^ 
married  in  1843,  Lord  Blantyre;  the  third  daagiiter  married 
in  1847,  the  marquis  of  Kildare,  eldest  son  of  the  doktof 

Leinster. 
George  Granville  WilUam,  3d  duke  of  Sntherland,  pre- 

viottsly  styled  marquis  of  Stafford  and  Lend  StratknaTer,  bora 
Dec.  19,  1828,  married  in  1819,  Anne,  only  child  of  John 
Hay  Mackenzie,  Esq.  of  Cromortie  and  Newhall,  and  niece 
of  Sir  William   Gibson  Craig,  hart.;   issue,   3  aons  and  1 
daughter.     Sons,  1.  George  Granville,  Earl  Gower,  bom  July 
25,  1850,  died  July  5,  1858.     2.  Cromartie,  marquis  of  Staf- 
ford.   3.  I^rd  Francis,  Viscount  Tarbet,  bom  Aug.  3,  1852. 
Daughter,  Lady  Florence.     On  Oct  21,  18G1,  the  duchess  of 
Sutherland  was  created  countess  of  Cromartie  in  her  own 
right,  with  succession  to  her  surviving  2d  son,  and  the  heirs 
male  of  his  body.     The  title  of  earl  of  Cromartie,  forfeited  in 
the  person  of  George,  3d  earl,  in  1746,  has  thus  been  re- 
stored to  a  descendant  of  the  same  family  by  a  new  oea- 
tion  in  her  favour.     The  expenses  attending  the  creation  of 
her  new  honours,  in  the  way  of  fees  and  stamps,  are  stated 
to  have  been  as  follows,  viz.:— As  fees.  Countess  Cromartie 
X2,3S7  14s.  8d. ;  Viscountess  Tarbet,  X416  5s.;  Baroness 
C.-istlehaven,  £348  8s.  8J. ;  Baroness  Macleod,  £404  8s.  21 
Stamps,  X  1,870.     Total,  £5,462  16s. 


I/)rd  Francis  Leveson  Gower,  afterwards  J.ord  Franci< 
Egerton,  the  first  duke's  second  son,  inherited  the  estates  of 
liis  uncle,  the  hist  uuke  of  Brid;;ewater,  and  obtained  a  re- 
vival in  his  own  favour  of  the  titles  of  earl  of  Kllesmere  and 
Viscount  Brackley,  in  the  peerage  of  England,  in  1846.  He 
acquired  considerable  literary  distinction  :is  the  tninslutor  ot 
*  Fuust,'  and  as  a  poet,  and  w:is  fur  many  years  a  member  of 
the  liuubc  of  Commons.  He  died  in  October  1857,  aged  57, 
and  was  succeeded  by  his  son  George,  second  earl  of  Elies- 
mere  of  this  family,  born  June  15,  1823,  and  dii.-d  Sept.  19, 
1862.  lie  had  married  Lidy  ^laiy  l^uisa  Campbell,  young- 
est daughter  uf  the  earl  of  Cawdor;  issue,  2  sons,  Francis 
Charles  Granville,  Viscount  Brackley,  who  succeetled  as  8d 
earl  of  Ellesmere,  born  .April  5,  1847,  and  Hon.  Alfired  John 
Francis,  boru  Feb.  6,  1854. 


SuTTiK,  the  name  of  a  Haddingtonahire  family,  possessing 
a  baronetcy  of  Nova  Scotia,  conferred  15th  May  1702,  on 
George  Suttic  of  Addiston.  By  hia  marriage  with  Miss  Sem- 
ple,  heiress  of  Balgonie,  East  Lothian,  the  family  acquired 
that  Chtate.  His  son,  Sir  George  Suttie  of  Balgonie,  tli« 
voungest  but  only  sur\'iving  of  Hve  sons,  becime  the  second 
baronet,  Thi.s  gentleman's  eldest  son.  Sir  Getirge,  thj^  bar- 
onet, a  lieutenant- colonel  in  the  army,  and  M.P.  for  Had- 
dingtonshire, married  Agnes,  second  daughter  of  Wiliiam 
Grant,  Esq.  of  Pi^estongrange,  a  lonl  of  session,  under  the 
title  of  I^rd  Prestongrange,  and  with  five  daughters,  bad 
three  sons.  Sir  James,  the  eldest  son,  Ixtni  lOtli  May  179o, 
succeeded  hu)  father  as  fourth  baronet,  26th  November,  1783. 


SYDSERF.  548  SYMINGTON. 


divine,  the  son  of  a  merchant  in  Paisley,  was  born  Elements  of  Divine  Truth.     A  series  of  I^ectnres  on  Chris- 

in  tliat  town,  26th  June,  1785.     At  the  university  ti.m  Theolopy  to  Sabbath  School  Teachers.     8vo.     Euio- 

of  Glasgow,  he  carried  off  the  fii-st  Iionours  in  scv-  '^"'"S^*    ^^'^-    J'^«^^^""^"^«- 

oral  classes,  in  the  higher  mathematics,  in  natural  Dr.  Symington  married,  in   1811,  Miss  Jane 

I)hilosoi)hy,  and  in  divinity,  and  in  1803  he  took  Stevenson  of  Crookedholm,  and  had  a  large  family, 

the  degree  of  A.M.    Being  intended  for  the  min-  Three  sons  and  three  daughters  8nr\ived  him. 

istry  in  the  Reformed  Presbyterian   Church,  of  Ilis  brother,  the  Rev.  William  Symington,  D.D., 

I      >vhich  his  father  was  a  member,  he  studied  theo-  minister  of  the  first  congregation  of  the  Reformed 

logy  under  the  Rev.  John  Mac^lillan  of  Stirling,  Presbyterian  Church,  Glasgow,  succeeded  him  as 

and  soon  after  being  licensed  to  preach,  he  re-  professor,  and  died  in  Jan.  1862.     He  was  the 

ceived  no  less  than  four  calls,  one  of  which  was  author  of  several  standard  works  in  theology, 

from  Paisley.     He  accepted  the  last,  and  was  Another  brother,  Robert  Brown    Symington, 

ordained  in  1809.  was  father  of  Andrew  James  Symington,  mer- 

In  the  year  1820,  he  was  chosen  to  succeed  his  chant  in  Glasgow,  born  at  Paisley,  27th  July, 
old  instructor,  Professor  MacMillan,  in  the  chair  1825,  author  of  'Harebell  Chimes,'  a  volume  of 
of  theology  in  the  Reformed  Presbyterian  Church,  poetry,  I>ondon,  1848 ;  Genevieve,  and  other  po- 
Ilis  lectures  in  that  capacity  were  described  as  ems,  printed  for  private  circulation;  'The  Bean- 
being  always  solid  and  useful,  rising  occasionally  tiful  in  Nature,  Art,  and  Life,'  2  vols*  crown  8vo. 
into  a  strain  of  devout  eloquence.  London,  1857;  and  *Pen  and  Pencil  Sketches  of 

In  1831,  he  received  the  degree  of  doctor  of  Faroe  and  Iceland.'    I-K)ndon,  1862. 


ton  Bunk,  Peebles- sliire,  born  in  1881,  was  in  1849  «p-  divinity  from  the  western  nnlversitj  of  PcDiisyl- 

pointed  to  the  E.  I.  Co.'s  miUtanr  service.    His  next  brother,     „^^s^    ^«j  •     ioja  us-  ^ t  _.*!.• 

l;?^«    u        r    *  ow  u      •   loo^      •  10SO  cr  vauia,  End  in  1840  his  own  a/ma  mafer,  the  am- 

Robert  Hepbame,  lient.  R.N.,  bom  in  1834,  m.  m  1859,  £li»i,  ^                                                                     ' 

cidestdanghlcrof  James  Hnnter,  Esq.  of  Hafton,Arg}le»liire.  versity  of  Glasgow,  COnfeiTCd  thc  samc  hODOnr 

upon  him.    A  few  public  sermons  wliich  he  had 

Stdserf,  b  snmame  derived  from  St  Serf.    The  only  »    j  .    v  i.  i/^   *•          ^     .    i      ...           <■ 

.urviring  bUhop  in  the  Scottish  Epi.cop.1  Church  .t  th.  P««whed  in  behalf  of  important  cbanties  and  SOCI- 

Kestoruti(»n  was  named  Thomas  Sjdserf.    He  was  at  one  eties  were  published  by  request ;   and,  besides 

time  bii^hop  of  Brechin,  and  afterwards  of  GallowHT,  from  preparing  a  Guide  fof  Social  Worship,  a  Book  of 

which  see  he  was  removed  bj  the  authority  uf  the  Genentl  ... 

Assembly  of  1638,  and  excommunicated.  Disciphne,  and  Similar  documents,  at  thc  request 

of  his  Synod,  he  composed  a  new  Doctrinal  Testi-    ' 

Stmk,  a  contraction  of  Simon.    In  Scotland  the  name  is  -„«-,„  •-  «^««i.«4:^«  4.^  au^  *•:-♦:«-.  <-*  a^     r  am, 

r        .y       11  J  o-       J  c-        A            *  qiony  m  adaptaticvi  to  the  existing  state  of  the 

more  frequently  spelled  Sim  and  Sime.    An  emment  surgeon  '^                                        ^ 

of  this  name,  James  Syme,  bom  in  Fifeshir*  in  1799,  was  in  church  tO  which  he  belonged.     He  died  Sept.  22, 

1833  appointed  professor  of  clinical  surgery  in  the  university  1353^  jn  t))e  69th  year  of  his  age.     His  WOrks  are:      t 
uf  Edinburgh,  where  he  had  been  educated.     He  is  the  author                                                                                                        t 

of  a  'Treatise  on  the  Excision  of  Diseased  Joints,'  1831;  ^h®  ^^  of  Paul's  Fathers.    A  sermon.     1818. 

'  Contributions  to  Pathology,'  •  The  Practice  of  Surgerr,'  and  1^«  Dismission.  Rest,  and  Future  Glory  of  the  Good  and 

other  medical  works,  and  was  chosen  chairman  of  the'  Com-  ^^'^^^^  ^enrant    A  sermon  preached  on  Uie  death  of  the 

mittee  for  the  Examination  of  Surgical  Instruments  of  the  ^•^-  Archibald  Mason,  D.D.    1832. 

International  Exhibition  at  London  in  1862.  The  Blood  of  Faithful  Martyrs  precious  in  the  sight  of  the 

______  Lord.    A  sermon.    1834. 

STMixtfrow.  a  surname  derived  from  two  parislies  of  the  ^he  Child  Jesus.    A  sermon.    1889. 

same  name,  the  one  in  Kyle,  Ayrshire,  and  the  other  in  Lanark-  ^"^*^*  S^**  ^y**"*    ^  «snnon.     1840. 

shu^.     Both  parishes  acquired  their  name,  originally  written  ^^^^^  Swallowed  up  »n  V.ctory;  a  sermon  prwcl.ed  on 

Symonstoun,  from  Symon  Loccartl  or  Lockhart,  who  held  the  *^«  ^'^'^  ""^  '^''  K*'^'  ^^  "^»*'"  Goold. junior  minister  of  the 

lands  of  both  under  Walter,  the  1st  steward,  and  was  the  ^^^'^^  Presbyterian  Congregation,  Edinburgh.    PuUidied 

progenitor  of  the  I^kharts  of  Lee  and  other  families  of  the  ^7  ^°*«*-    ^hird  edition.     Edinbuijh   1844. 

same  name.    ITie  tradition  among  the  Symingtons  is  that  they  ^he  Martyr's  Monument,    A  Brief  View  of  the  Prinapks 

were  originally  Douglases,  and  fron»  Unarkshire,  near  Tinto.  «"^  character  of  the  Scottish  Martyrs.     Paidey,  1847. 

WiiUam  Symington,  the  supposed  inventor  of  the  steam  ^"  Intemperance.    A  sermon, 

engine,   bom   at   I^dhills,   Lanarkshire,   died  at   Ix)ndon,  ^uide  to  Private  Social  Prayer. 

March  22,  1831.     For  his  connection  with  steam  navigation  ^'^y  ^"  *^*  ^^'^^  °^ ^*'*  Heavenly  State, 

see  the  memoirs  of  Taylor,  James,  pott,  and  Miller,  '^'"^^^^  ®"  ^''*  Sabb:itli. 

Patrick  Sum  emkxt  Lecture  on  the  Claims  of  the  Church  and  Society  on  \  oung 

Men.     Glasgow,  I80O. 

SYMINGTON,  Andrew,  D.  D.,   an  eminent  '^*«"^°»''  ^^  ^*'«  ^''-  '^^"^'"•'''  "**"'^''y'  '^''''^"'-    ^"^^'^ 

CO  his  Discourses. 


!£. 


TANNAHILL. 


550 


TASSIE. 


■  t 

■  I 


1 1 


; 
I! 


memoii*s  of  the  author  and  of  his  friend,  R.  A. 
Smith,  by  Mi*.  Philip  A.  Ramsay,  was  published 
at  Glasgow. 

Tannahill^s  friend,  Robert  Archibald  Smith, 
to  whom  Scottish  melody  is  so  much  indebted, 
was  a  native  of  England,  but  spent  the  greater 
part  of  his  life  in  Scotland.  He  was  born  at 
Reading,  in  Berkshire,  November  16,  1780,  being 
the  son  of  Robert  Smith,  a  native  of  East  Kil- 
bride, near  Glasgow,  who  had  been  a  silk-weaver 
in  Paisley,  but  had  removed  to  England.  At  an 
early  age  he  gave  indications  of  his  genius  for 
music ;  and  he  was  in  a  great  measure  self-taught, 
having  never  had  the  benefit  of  a  regular  musical 
education.  As  he  grew  up  he  became  a  member 
of  a  church  choir  in  Reading,  and  likewise  joined 
the  band  of  a  regiment  of  volunteers.  When  veiy 
young  he  wafl  placed  at  the  loom,  and  on  the  re- 
turn of  his  father  with  the  family  to  Paisley,  in 
1800,  he  for  some  time  followed  the  trade  of  a 
weaver,  but  never  liked  the  occupation.  In  1802 
he  married,  and  soon  after  he  commenced  the 
teaching  of  music.  A  congeniality  of  sentiment 
brought  him  acquainted  with  Tannahill,  and  dur- 
ing the  life  of  the  unfortunate  bard,  he  composed 
original  music  for  many  of  his  songs,  while  vari- 
ous others  he  adapted  and  fitted  witli  piano-forte 
accompaniments.  Through  one  of  these,  *  Jessie, 
the  Flower  o'  Dumblane,'  the  name  of  R.  A.  Smith 
first  became  known  as  a  musical  composer.  In 
1807,  chiefly  on  the  recommendation  of  the  Rev. 
Dr.  Boog,  senior  minister  of  the  Abbey  parish  of 
Paisley,  he  was  appointed  precentor  of  that 
church,  a  situation  which  he  filled  with  great  cre- 
dit for  sixteen  years.  In  August  1823  he  re- 
moved to  Edinburgh,  having  been  appointed  to  con- 
duct the  music  in  St.  George's  church  of  that  city, 
under  the  auspices  of  Dr.  Andrew  Thomson,  the 
minister  thereof,  wliose  own  musical  attainments 
were  of  a  high  order.  Smith's  publichtions  arc  of 
great  value.  Among  these  are  *  Devotional  Mu- 
sic, original  and  select,'  published  in  1807,  amount- 
ing to  no  less  than  twenty-one  original  pieces; 
*  Anthems,  in  four  vocal  parts,  with  an  Accompa- 
niment for  the  Organ  or  Piano-forte,' 1819  ;  and 
'Select  Melodies,'  1827.  His  great  work,  *The 
Scottish  Minstrel,'  comprising  every  Scottish  mel- 
ody worth  preserving,  with  a  great  number  of 


original  pieces  by  the  editor,  appeared  in  six  vol- 
umes, at  intervals,  fiiom  1821  to  1824.  He  after 
wards  published  a  similar  wiork,  comprisiog  the 
melodies  of  the  sister  island,  entitled  'The  Idsh 
Minstrel.'  Besides  these,  he  prepared  and  ar- 
ranged the  following :—'  Sacred  Music,  for  the  use 
of  St.  George's  Church,  Edinburgh  ;*  '  The  Sacred 
Harmony  of  the  Church  of  Scotland  ;*  '  Sacred 
Music,  consisting  of  Tunes,  Sanctnses,  Doxolo- 
gies,  Thanksgivings,  &c.*  sung  in  St.  Geoi^^s 
Church ;'  and  composed  a  number  of  anthems  for 
the  anniversary  of  George  Heriot's  day.  His  de- 
tached pieces  are  very  numerous.  Smith  died  at 
Edinburgh,  January  3,  1829,  universally  lament- 
ed, leaving  a  widow  and  five  children. 

Taruas,  Earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peemge  of  Scotland,  eoc- 
ferred  by  patent,  dated  4th  September  1660,  for  life  onlr,  on 
Walter  Scott  of  Highchester,  eldest  son  of  Sir  Gideon  Scott 
of  Highchester,  second  son  of  Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden, 
(see  p.  408  of  this  volnme).  The  earl  died  in  1693,  aged 
abont  48,  when,  though  he  left  issue,  his  title  being  a  life- 
peerage,  became  extinct. 

TASSIE,  James,  a  celebrated  modeller,  was 
born  of  obscure  parents  in  the  neighbourhood  of 
Glasgow,  at  what  particular  period  is  not  known, 
and  began  life  in  the  humble  condition  of  a  conn- 
try  stone-mason.  On  a  visit  to  Glasgow  during 
the  fair,  he  obtained  a  view  of  the  collection  of 
paintings  formed  by  the  brothers  Foulis,  the  emi- 
nent printers.  With  the  design  of  acquiring  a 
knowledge  of  drawing,  he  soon  after  removed  to 
Glasgow,  where  he  constantly  attended  the  infant 
academy,  as  often  as  he  could  spare  time  from  his 
occupation  of  stone-cutting,  by  which  he  main- 
tained himself.  Repairing  aftei-wards  to  Dnblin 
in  search  of  employment,  he  became  kno^n  to 
Dr.  Quin,  a  physician,  who  amused  his  leisure  by 
attempting  to  imitate  precious  stones  with  col- 
oured pastes,  and  to  take  off  impressions  of  the 
antique  sculptured  gems,  an  art  pi*actised  in 
France  and  Italy  with  gi-eat  secrecy.  The  Doc- 
tor, finding  that  Tassie  possessed  all  the  neces- 
sary qualifications,  took  him  as  his  assistant,  and 
when  they  had  succeeded  in  their  experiments,  he 
generously  enabled  him  to  proceed  to  London, 
and  tiy  the  art,  as  a  profession,  for  his  own  ben- 
efit. Tassie,  accordingly,  went  to  London  in 
1766,  where,  from  his  excessive  modesty,  he  long 
struggled  with  diflSculties,  which  would  have  dis- 


;    I 


I   I 


TAYLOR. 


552 


TELFORD. 


a  steam -vessel  ou  the  liudsoii,  and  Mr.  Bell  one 
on  the  Clyde  in  1812.  In  1824  Mr.  Taylor  ad- 
dressed a  printed  statement  of  his  concern  in  the 
invention  of  steam  navigation  to  Sir  Henry  Par- 
uell,  chairman  of  a  select  committee  on  steam- 
boats, in  the  hope  that  government  would  grant 
liim  some  reward  for  his  services ;  but  in  this  he 
was  disappointed.  lie  had  previously  engaged 
in  an  extensive  pottery  at  Cumnock,  Ayi-shire, 
which  had  not  succeeded.  He  died  September 
18,  1825,  in  his  68th  year. 

Soon  aft^r  his  decease,  a  renewed  application 
was  made  to  government,  by  oneX)f  his  relatives, 
on  behalf  of  his  widow  and  family,  in  which  the 
claims  brought  forward  at  the  time  by  Mr.  Sy- 
mington were  explained  away.  A  pension  of 
£50  a-ycar  was  bestowed  by  government  on  his 
widow. 

The  mei'it  of  the  invention  of  the  steamboat  has 
been  ascribed  to  Taylor,  although  he  himself  never 
attempted  to  claim  for  himself  exclusively  tlie  ori- 
gination of  steam  navigation.  To  Mr.  Miller  he 
undoubtedly  afforded  very  valuable  assistance  in 
his  experiments,  by  his  suggestions,  skill  in  plan- 
drawing,  powers  of  calculation,  and  indefatigable 
zeal  in  the  superintendence  of  such  parts  of  the 
undertaking  as  were  more  especially  intrusted  to 
liis  charge,  but  this  is  all,  after  a  careful  examina- 
tion of  the  rival  claims  of  Miller,  Taylor,  and  Sy- 
mington, that  can,  in  common  fairness,  be  allowed 
to  him.  A  memoir  of  Mi*.  Miller,  who  was  at  the 
sole  expense  of  the  experiments,  and  under  whose 
direction  they  were  undertaken,  will  be  found  in 
the  Supplement.  It  was  not  until  35  yeai*s  after 
the  latest  of  that  gentleman^s  experiments  with 
steam,  and  nine  after  his  death,  that  Taylor  ever 
claimed  even  a  joint  share  in  the  invention  of 
steam  navigation.  The  following  are  the  titles  of 
the  works  ou  which  his  claims  have  been  founded : 

Memorial  by  the  late  Air.  James  Taylor,  of  Cumnock, 
Ayrshire ;  presented  to  the  Select  Committee  of  the  House 
of  Commons  on  Steamboats,  &c.,  through  the  Right  lion. 
Sir  llfinry  Parnell,  Bart.,  on  the  subject  of  propelling  vessels 
by  steam  power.  Dated  April,  1824.  Second  edition,  with 
original  coixespondence  sustaining  Mr.  Taylor's  claims. 

A  Concise  History  of  the  origin  of  Steam  Navigation:  Com- 
prising its  invention  by  Mr.  James  Taylor,  and  experiment:*  by 
him  iu  Conjunction  with  the  late  Patrick  Miller  of  Dalswin- 
ton,  Esq.    Compiled  from  authentic  documents.  Edia,  1842. 

A  Brief  Account  of  the  Kise  and  Early  Progress  of  Steam 


NaTigation,  intended  to  demoostmte  that  it  orig^iated  is  ibt 
BUggestboB  and  experiniAnta  of  the  Ute  ftlr.  James  Taylor 
of  Cumnock,  in  connection  with  the  late  Mr.  U iikr  of  Dal- 
Bwiuton,  Ayr,  1844. 


Tblfer,  or  Tklford,  a  somame  from  TmO^kr^  Iron 
cntter,  borne  by  a  Norman  knigbt,  who  landed  with  the  Con- 
qoeror,  and  we  are  told,  went  before  the  army  te  the  attack 
of  the  Saxons,  singing  cliiTahrons  songs,  throwing  his  aword 
m  the  air  and  catching  it  agun  as  it  felL 

T£LiFOBD,  Thomas,  a  dlstingiiisbed  civil  en- 
gineer, was  bom  of  parents  in  bomble  life  in  the 
pastoral  valley  of  Eskdale,  in  Domfries-shire,  m 
1757.    He  received  a  limited  edacatlon  at  the 
parish  school  of  Westerkirk,  bat  afterwards  taught 
himself  Latin,  French,  Italian,  and  German.    At 
the  age  of  fourteen  he  was  bonnd  apprentice  to  a 
baildcr  in  his  native  parish,  where  be  for  some 
yeara  worked  as  a  stone-mason.   After  the  expiry 
of  his  time  he  went  to  Edinborgh,  where  he  stu- 
died the  principles  of  architectnre.     In  1782  he 
proceeded  to  London,  and  obtained  employment 
under  Sir  AA'illiam  Chambers,  in  the  building  of 
Somerset  House.    Here  his  gi*eat  merit  became 
conspicuous,  and  he  was  subsequently  engaged  iu 
superintending  some  works  belonging  to  govern- 
ment in  Portsmouth  dock-yard.     In  1787  he  was 
appointed  suneyor  of  public  works  in  the  county 
of  Salop,  a  situation  which  he  held  till  his  death. 
In  1790  he  was  employed  by  the  British  Fishery 
Society  to  inspect  the  harboui-s  at  their  i-cspective 
stations,  and  he  devised  the  plan  for  the  exten- 
sive establishment  at  Wick,   in  the  county  of 
Caithness,  which  is  now  known  by  the  name  of 
Pultcneytown.    In  the  years  1803  and  1804  the 
parliamentary  commissioners  for  making   roads 
and  building  bridges  in  the  Highlands  of  Scot- 
land, appointed  him  their  engineer ;  and,  under 
his  directions,  eleven  hundred  bridges  were  built, 
and  860  miles  of  new  road  constructed.     Tlie 
Caledonian  canal  was  also  completed  according  to 
his  plans.   In  these  and  various  other  works  which 
he  executed  in  different    districts   in  England, 
Scotland,  and  Wales,  his  extraordinaiy  skill  ena- 
bled him  to  sui*mount  difficulties  of  the  greatest 
magnitude.    The  most  stupendous  undertaking  in 
which  he  was  engaged,  and  the  most  imperishable 
monument  of  his  fame,  is  the  Mcnai  Suspension 
Bridge  over  the  Bangour  Feny,  one  of  the  most 
magnificent  structures  of  its  kind  in  the  world. 


TENNANT, 


554 


WILLIAM. 


ii 


tlio  son  of  a  merchant  in  a  small  way  In  Anstra- 
ther,  a  royal  burgh  near  the  east  neuk  of  Fife, 
which  was  also  the  bii*thplace  of  Dr.  Chalmei's. 
He  was  born  in  1784,  and  received  the  elemen- 
tary part  of  his  education  at  the  burgh  school. 
Although  born  without  any  pei*sonal  malformation, 
he  lost  the  nse  of  his  feet  in  his  early  childhood, 
so  that  through  life  he  was  compelled  to  nse 
crutches.  As  he  was  utterly  incapable  of  any  physi- 
cal exertions  for  his  own  livelihood,  he  had  but  the 
prospect  before  him  of  becoming  a  countiy  school- 
master or  dominie.  He  was  accordingly,  in  1799, 
entered  as  a  student  in  the  united  college  of  St. 
Andrews,  where  he  bad  his  townsman.  Dr.  Chal- 
mei's, as  a  fellow-student,  and  where  he  remained 
two  sessions.  The  circumstances  of  his  father 
prevented  him  from  continuing  longer  at  college, 
but  on  his  return  home  he  devoted  himself  assi- 
duously to  his  studies.  Having  a  great  aptitude 
for  learning,  he  soon  made  himself  master  of  the 
ancient  and  modern  languages,  and  then  applied 
himself  to  the  acquirement  of  the  eastern  tongues. 
In  May  1801,  he  became  clerk  to  his  brother, 
a  cora-merchant  first  in  Glasgow,  and  afterwards 
in  Anstruther.  Tliat  gentleman*s  affairs  having 
become  embarrassed,  the  creditors,  in  the  absence 
of  the  principal,  seized  upon  his  humble  clerk,  and 
immured  him  in  prison.  Not  depressed,  however, 
by  this  unfortunate  circumstance,  he  set  about 
composing  his  principal  poem,  *  Anster  Fair,*  the 
introductoiy  stanzas  of  which  were  committed  to 
writing  while  he  was  in  durance.  It  was  finished 
in  his  fathcr^s  house  in  1811,  and  published  anon- 
ymously the  following  year  by  Mr.  Cockbum, 
bookseller,  Anstruther.  He  had  previously,  about 
1805,  published  some  small  ballads,  chiefly  on  lo- 
cal subjects,  the  circulation  of  which  was  entirely 
confined  to  his  native  town.  The  subject  of  his 
*  Anster  Fair'  was  the  courtship  and  mairiagc  of 
"  Maggie  Lauder,"  the  famous  heroine  of  Scottish 
song,  and  the  humours  of  the  fair  of  Anstruther 
are  depicted  in  a  gay  and  lively  strain,  with  a  wit 
and  fancy,  and  an  ease  of  poetic  expression  pecu- 
liarly the  author's  own.  Mr.  Tennant  indeed  pos- 
sessed a  rich  native  humour,  with  considerable 
powers  of  good-natured  satire,  an  animated  and 
lively  facility  of  painting  local  character,  scenes, 
and  customs,  and  a  poetical  genius  of  a  high  or- 


der, rarely  anited  in  one  person.  The  poem,  with 
all  its  merits,  from  f^pearing  In  an  obscure  eoan- 
try  town,  did  not  at  first  attract  mnch  attention 
beyond  the  limits  of  Anstruther,  bat  a  copy  of  i( 
having  reached  Edinburgh,  in  the  month  of  Av- 
gost  following  its  publication,  Lord  Woodhonse- 
lee,  celebrated  as  a  scholar  and  critic,  addressed  a 
letter  to  the  publisher,  expressing  his  opinion  that 
it  contained  *^  unequivocal  marks  of  strong  origi- 
nal genius,  a  vein  of  humour  of  an  nncommon 
cast,  united  with  a  talent  for  natural  description 
of  the  most  vivid  and  characteristic  species,  and 
above  all,  a  true  feeling  of  the  sublime,  forming 
altogether  one  of  the  most  pleasing  and  singular 
combinations  of  the  different  powers  of  poetry 
that  he  hnd  ever  met  with."  In  November  1814, 
on  the  publication  of  a  new  and  revised  edition  of 
the  poem,  Mr.  Jeffrey  made  it  the  subject  of  an 
article  in  the  *  Edinburgh  Review,'  in  which  he 
gave  it  high  praise.  It  is  written  in  the  oitava 
rima^  which  Lord  Byron  rendered  popular  in  his 
Beppo  and  Don  Juan,  and  has  been  frequently 
reprinted. 

In  the  autumn  of  1813,  Mr.  Tennant  was  ap- 
pointed parish  teacher  at  Denino,  abont  four  miles 
from  St.  Andrews,  at  a  salary  of  forty  pounds  a- 
year.  He  added  to  his  income  by  taking  board- 
ers. While  he  resided  at  this  place  he  had  the 
advantage  of  access  to  the  librar}'  of  the  universi- 
ty of  St.  Andrews.  Ho  was  thus  enabled  to  per- 
fect himself  in  the  knowledge  of  Hebrew,  and  to 
become  versed  in  the  Arabic,  Syriac,  and  Persian 
languages.  A  society  which  he  had  originated  in 
Anstruther,  called  the  "  Musomanik,"  and  which 
was  composed  of  all  the  "  dabblers  in  rhyme," 
and  "admirers  of  fun  and  good-fellowship,"  in 
the  eastern  comer  of  the  county,  published  a  small 
volume  in  1814,  entitled  *  Boute-Rim^s ;  or  Poet- 
ical Pastimes  of  a  few  Hobblei*s  round  the  base  of 
Parnassus,'  which  contains  a  number  of  short  pie- 
ces by  its  recorder,  Mr.  Tennant.  This  society 
continued  to  hold  its  meetings  till  1817,  when,  by 
the  dispersion  of  its  leading  members,  its  celebra- 
tions were  suspended. 

In  1816,  Mr.  Tennant,  chiefly  throngh  the  re- 
commendation of  Mr.  George  Thomson,  the  friend 
and  correspondent  of  Bums,  was  transferred  to 
the  more  lucrative  situation  of  parish  schoolmas- 


TftOMSON,  61 

III  the  earlj  part  of  the  fear  1800,  the  stnU  o( 
the  pnblic  records  thronghont  the  kingdom  wu 
brought  nnder  the  coosiderntion  of  the  House  o( 
Commons,  and  nn  addre»s  being  presented  to  the 
king  on  tlie  subject,  two  royiil  commissions  in  ref- 
erence to  them  were  Usned,  dated  19tb  Jnlf  1600, 
and  23d  Maj  1806,  and  it  was  resolved  that  a 
depnty- clerk- register  for  Scotland  should  be  ap- 
poiuted.  Lord  Frederick  Campbell,  then  lord- 
clerk-register,  and  one  of  the  record  commission- 
en',  addressed  a  mcniorinl  to  his  mnjestjr,  and  ob- 
tained a  royal  warraut  for  the  creation  of  gnch  an 
office,  dated  igth  June  1806.  On  the  30th  of  the 
aame  month,  he  appoiuled  Mr,  Thomson  depntj- 
clcrk- register.  To  the  duties  of  this  imponant 
situation  he  devoted  his  whole  attention,  and  bj 
biajndicions  management  and  unwearied  superin- 
tendence the  entire  33-3lem  of  the  public  registries 
was  I'evised  and  improved,  and  a  series  of  publi- 
cations commenced  which  are  honourable  alike  to 
liiinsclf,  to  the  record  commissioners,  and  to  Scot- 
latiil.    His  portrait  is  subjoined. 


In  February  18S8,  Mr.  Thomson  was  n 
one  of  the  principal  cleiks  of  (be  court  of 
The  dntlea  of  this  office  did  not  materinlly  Inter-    jnj".nd'"part!>. 
fere  with  his  labonrs  In  the  record  publicationa    d«ics,  from  tb<  latof  Junuu? 


■.a  THOMAa 

and  other  congenial  pnnaita.  On  the  InatitatkB 
of  the  Bannatyne  Club  In  182S,  for  the  publica- 
tion of  works  illnstratire  of  the  hlstor;  and  anti- 
quities of  Scotland,  Mr.  Thomson  was  dUMn 
vico-president,  and  on  the  death,  In  September 
18SS,  of  Sir  Walter  Scott,  tfae  fonnder  and  fint 
|»«sident  of  the  clnb,  he  was  nnanimonslj  dected 
preudent.  He  took  an  active  Interest  In  ita  pro- 
ceedings till  his  death.  He  died  at  his  residence 
at  Shmbhill,  Lelth  Walk,  near  Edinbnr^,  Octo- 
ber 3, 1862.  He  bad  married  Anne,  dangbter  of 
Thomas  Keed,  Esq.,  at  one  time  an  annj  agnt 
in  Dublin.  Her  mother  was  the  daughter  of  Sir 
Francis  James  Buchanan,  and  she  was  b^  mar- 
riage niece  to  General  Drummond  of  Dmma- 
whnnce,  Perthshire. 

The  following  list  of  the  pnblications  brongtt 
ont  under  bis  superintendence  shows  how  much 
ho  accomplished  for  the  elucidation  of  the  andrat 
histoi'ical  and  legal  muniments  of  Scotland,  be- 
sides the  aid  which  he  so  Uberallj  gave  to  other 
associates  In  the  same  work : 

Works  published  under  the  authority  of  the 
Record  Commissioners: 


Inqnititinnnm  ri  CipelTnm  Domini  Regii 
qii»  in  Publicii  Archi™  Sratis  ndhuc  BerT»ntnr,  AUneri- 
nlio.     1811,  ISIE,  3  volt.  folJD. 

R»giilrum  Mip"  Siplli  Rcpim  Scotntnm  in  Airbiria 
Publioi  Mstmitum,  MCCCVI.— MCCCCXXIV.    1814,  (bl 

Tb«  Actl  oflheP*r1i.im»ntsorScoll.nd.  VaLiLMnl 
li.  IICCCCXXIV.— MDCCVII.  1814  to  1821,  10  nk 
fiilio.  Tha  lint  Tohimc  of  tb«  unoi,  [o  codtnin  tli«  '  flfp- 
aiii  Majeatattm.'  with  tlio  inoit  sncitrt  rtcordfd  pna«!iii|!i 
mid  «cts  oF  parlinment,  was  deliij«l  till  lh«  conclasioD  of  iLt 
nitirtwork.  Pnciniu  la  April  1841,  when  his  offidtloB- 
ni'clinii  nith  th*  Gtnernt  R^'stfr  Hmst  ind  the  Bttnd 
■  ''inmiuion  temtinatcd,  Mr.  Thoniaon  hid  oimpleled,  orpiT- 
prfd  for  press,  Itilh  llic  eicfplion  of  tlie  prefn«,  all  thutU 
i-.iii»idered  as  properly  appertaining  to  the  series  of  tb*  poiiBt 
stiitntts  of  Scotliind.  Tlis  rohune  was  pobliiJied  b  ISM, 
under  tha  mpeiintendence  of  Mr.  Innn,  wlio  coiitriboted  the 
prfiiminarj  nmller,  ind  made  large  »dditions  to  Ihe  Tolumt 

llie  Acts  of  tbe  Lords  Audilora  of  CaDa 
.MCCCCLXVI— MCCCCXCIV.     1839, 

Hia  Acta  of  the  Ijinla  u(  Coanul  in  Ckil  Caaia, 
JICCCCLXXVIII.— JTCCCCXCV.     1839,  folio. 

Abbreviations  of  varioas  Registers,  printed  a-    ' 
cliisively  for  the  nse  of  the  office,  according  to  the 
ptnns  digested  by  Mr.  Tliomson ; 

A  ContinmiliDn  of  the  Betoura  of  Service  to  tbe  Chmia;  j 
Office,  from  the  Union,  A.  D.  1707. 

Digest  of  Ihe  Registera  of  SasiiHi,  G«-     j 
countin,  with  reluin  b-    :, 


mi  Complaint^ 


THOMSON, 


564 


KEV.  JOHN. 


ii 


1 1 


I! 


his  impressions  of  it  on  the  walls  of  the  house,  on 
pasteboard,  or  on  any  stray  piece  of  paper,  using 
for  the  purpose,  in  the  absence  of  more  suitable 
implements,  chan-ed  wood  or  candle-snuffings,  or 
anything  else  be  could  procure  that  would  do.  At 
this  period  he  would  rise  at  two  o^clock  of  a  sum- 
mer morning,  and  travel  several  miles  to  witness 
a  peculiar  effect  at  sunrise,  from  its  rays  pene- 
trating a  neighbouring  wood.  At  the  same  time 
that  he  thus  studied  natui-e  he  did  not  neglect  the 
acquisition  of  a  knowledge  of  physical  science,  and 
made  himself  thoroughly  acquainted  with  astro- 
nomy, geology,  optics,  and  chemistry.  Whatever 
was  striking,  picturesque,  or  effective  in  nature 
had  early  attracted  his  attention,  but,  as  he  grew 
in  years,  he  penetrated  deeper  than  the  mere  ex- 
ternal world.  *'  He  was  familiar,''  says  a  personal 
friend  of  his,  who  had  many  opportunities  of  know- 
ing his  mind,  ^^  with  the  laws  of  nature  before  he 
attempted  to  represent  them ;  and  to  the  study  of 
the  natural  world,  during  his  early  years,  he  at- 
tributed all  his  knowledge,  and  his  intense  love  of 
art." 

He  was  sent  to  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  to 
prepare  for  the  ministiy,  and  during  the  years  he 
remained  at  college  he  had  little  time  for  painting, 
except  in  the  university  vacations  in  summer, 
when  he  quietly  pursued  his  favourite  study.  In 
the  course  of  his  last  session,  in  Edinburgh,  he 
took  a  month's  lessons  from  Alexander  Nay- 
smith,  the  father  of  the  Scottish  school  of  land- 
scape painting,  and  this  was  all  the  instruction  in 
art  tliat  he  ever  received.  On  attaining  his  twen- 
ty-fii*3t  year,  he  was  licensed  for  the  ministry,  and 
his  father  dying  shortly  after,  he  was  appointed 
his  successor  in  Dailly,  being  ordained  minister  of 
that  parish  in  1800. 

During  the  time  that  he  remained  at  Dailly,  he 
painted  a  number  of  landscapes,  which  he  made 
presents  of  to  his  friends.  In  1805  he  was  trans- 
lated to  the  pastoral  charge  of  the  parish  of  Dud- 
dingston,  within  a  mile  of  Edinburgh.  His  pre- 
dilection for  ai't  had  grown,  stronger  with  his 
years,  and  the  scenery  around  his  new  neighbour- 
hood, which  included  within  it  the  fine  old  ruin  of 
Queen  Mary's  ancient  castle  of  Craigmillar,  af- 
forded fitting  subjects  for  his  pencil.  He  soon 
became  celebrated  as  a  landscape  painter,  and  be- 


ing early  admitted  an  honorary  member  of  the 
Royal  Scottish  academy,  his  works  eontmned  to 
grace  the  walls  of  their  exhibitions  as  long  tm  life 
was  spared  to  him.    His  subjects  were  found  m 
the  grandeur  and  sublimity  of  natare,  and  his 
style  is  marked  chiefly  by  great  power  and  Inresdth 
of  general  effect,  and  the  embodiment  of  a  senti- 
ment suitable  to  the  scene.    Orders  for  pictores 
poured  in  upon  him  from  all  quarters,  and  at  one 
period  his  annual  receipts  from  this  sooroe  skne 
actually  amounted  to  £1,800.    For  the  first  pie- 
tui*e  he  sold  he  got  fifteen  guineas.    He  himself 
thought  this  too  much,  but  on  consulting  Mr. 
Williams,  tlie  well-known  delineator  of  Gredsn 
scenery,  on  the  subject,  his  friend  told  him  that 
his  picture  was  worth  three  times  the  money,  and 
he  was  satisfied.    In  the  heyday  of  hia  prosperity, 
he  has  counted  nine  carriages  in  a  forenoon  at  his 
door  at  Duddingston  with  orders  for  pictures. 
Ancient  castles  and  decayed  fortresses  were  fa- 
vourite subjects  with  him,  and  he  searched  far  and 
near  for  them,  executing  sketches  of  those  best 
known.     Dunstaffnage  near  Oban,  Dnnluce  m 
Galloway,  Wolfs  Crag,  and  every  other  place  of 
note,   were  painted  by  him,  besides  numerons 
views  of  Craigmillar  in  every  variety  of  aspect. 
He  studied  much  the  works  of  the  old  mastere, 
Salvator  Rosa,  Poussin,  Claud,  &c.,  but  he  did 
not  imitate  them.    His  own  genins  was  too  origi- 
nal for  that,  and  besides,  he  devoted  it  to  the  de- 
lineation of  Scottish,  not  Italian  scenery.    His 
representations  of  the  internal  Scenery  of  his  na- 
tive land  are  marked  by  great  truthfulness,  bean- 
ty,  and  poetical  sentiment.    The  Trosachs,,  Ben- 
blaffen,    Glenfishie,  Lochlomond,   Loch  Achray, 
Achray  water.  Loch  Etive,  and  the  other  princi- 
pal lakes  of  the  north  and  west  of  Scotland,  were 
repeatedly  portrayed  by  him,  and  always  with 
success.    A  small  picture  of  Achray  water  done 
by  him  was  by  the  best  judges  pronounced  one  of 
the  happiest  efforts  of  pictorial  genius.    While 
engaged  painting,  it  was  his  habit  to  repeat  pas- 
sages from  the  Greek,  Latin,  and  English  poets 
that  approximately  bore  on  the  subject  in  hand, 
or  the  particular  aspect  under  which  he  proposed 
to  represent  it.    Among  his  frequent  visitors  at 
Duddfngston  manse  were  Sir  Walter  Scott,  John 
Clerk  of  EKlin,  advocate,  afterwards  Lord  Eidin, 


ii 

i ' 


i'      I 


THOMSON, 


568 


THOMAS,  M.D.  &  F.KS. 


He  married  in  1816,  Miss  Agnes  Oolquhonn, 
daughter  of  a  distiller  near  Stirling,  and  left  Issue. 
His  son,  Dr.  Thomas  Thomson  of  the  Bengal  ar- 
my, author  of  *  Travels  in  Thibet,*  was  appointed 
superintendent  of  the  Botanic  gardens  at  Calcutta. 
His  daughter's  husband.  Dr.  R.  D.  Thomson,  be- 
came professor  of  chemistry  at  St.  Thomas'  Hos- 
pital, London,  whither  his  valuable  mineral  col- 
lection was  removed  after  his  death.  A  memoir 
in  the  Annual  Register  of  1852  has  supplied  the 
materials  for  this  notice. 
Subjoined  is  a  list  of  Dr.  Thomson's  works : 

A  Sjstem  of  Chemistry.  Edin.  1802,  4  vols.  8vo.  Sec- 
ond edition  much  enlarged,  1804,  4  vols.  8vo.  Third  edit 
Edin.  1807,  5  vols.  8vo.    Lond.  1817,  4  yls.  8vo. 

Elements  of  Chemistrj.    Edin.  1810,  Ivo. 

History  of  the  Royil  Society  of  London,  from  its  institu- 
tion to  the  end  of  the  eighteenth  century.  London,  1812, 4to. 

IVavels  in  Sweden,  during  the  summer  of  1812.  Illus- 
trated with  Maps  and  other  Plates.    Lond.  1813,  4to. 

Annals  of  Pliilosophy ;  or  Magaxine  of  Chemistry,  Miner- 
alogy, Mechanics,  Natural  History,  Agriculture,  and  the  Arts. 
Lend.  1813,  &c    Published  monthly. 

On  Oxalic  Acid.  PbiL  Trans.  1808,  63.  lb.  Nicb.  Jour. 
zzl  14, 1808. 

Analysis  of  a  new  Spedes  of  Copper  Ore.    lb.  1814,  45. 

Chemical  Analysis  of  a  Black  Sand  from  the  river  Dee,  in 
Aberdeenshire,  and  of  a  Copper  Ore  from  Arthrey,  in  Stir- 
lingshire. Trans.  Soc.  Edin.  1812,  vol.  vi.  253.  lb.  Nicb. 
Jour,  xxviii.  19. 

Experiments  on  AUanite^  a  new  Mineral  from  Greenland, 
lb.  371.     lb.  Nicb.  Jour.  zxix.  47. 

Chemical  Analysis  of  Sodalite,  a  new  Mineral  from  Green- 
land,    lb.  387.     lb.  Nich.  Jour.  xxix.  285. 

Experiments  to  determine  whether  or  not  Fluids  be  Con- 
ductors of  Caloric     Nich.  Jour.  iv.  529,  1801. 

On  the  supposed  Currents  in  Hot  Liquids.  lb.  i.  81.  1802. 

Remarks  on  Combustion,     lb.  ii.  10. 

On  the  Compounds  of  Sulphur  and  Oxygen. 

On  the  Oxides  of  Lead.     lb.  viii.  280,  1804. 

On  Pepper.     lb.  ix.  68. 

On  Silver  Coins.    lb.  xiv.  396,  1806. 

On  the  Inflammable  Gas  formed  during  the  Distillation  of 
Peat     lb.  xvi.  241, 1807. 

On  the  Oxides  of  Iron.    lb.  xxvii.  375, 1810. 

An  Analysis  of  Fluor  Spar.    lb.  157. 

On  the  Gaseous  Combinations  of  Hydrogen  and  Carbon, 
lb.  321. 

A  Biographical  Account  of  the  Honourable  Henry  Caven- 
dish.   Tbom.  Ann.  Phil.  i.  1,  1813. 

On  Ulmin.     lb.  23. 

Biographical  Account  of  the  Life  of  Joseph  Priestley, 
LL.D.,  &c     lb.  81. 

On  the  Uquid  Gum  from  Botany  Bay.    lb.  163. 

On  the  Specific  Gravity  of  the  Gases.    lb.  177. 

Some  Observations  in  answer  to  Mr.  Chenevix^s  Attack 
upon  Wemer*s  Mineralogical  Method.     lb.  243. 

Biographical  Account  of  M.  de  Fourcroy.     lb.  321. 

On  Veins.    lb.  350. 

Description  of  a  Resinous  Substance  lately  dug  out  of  the 
earth  at  Highgate.    lb.  ii.  9. 


On  A  new  variety  of  Ulmin.    lb.  IL 

On  the  Heat  evolved  during  the  InflnmmntSim  of  the  no- 
man  Body.    Ih.  26. 

On  the  Daltonian  Theory  of  Definite  VnpOKtioDM  m  Ckem* 
ieal  Combinationa.    lb.  82. 

Biographical  Aooonnt  of  M.  Lavoiner.    lb.  81. 

Analyns  of  the  Chmeae  Gong.    Ill  208. 

Some  Mineralogical  Obeervataons  in  Cornwafl.    lb.  247. 

On  the  Composition  of  Osde  of  SSnc.    lb.  410. 

Sketch  of  tile  improvement  of  Sdenoe  made  dnif^  tiN 
year  1818.    lb.  iil  1, 1814. 

A  Discovery  of  the  Atomic  Theory.    lb.  829. 

Outline  of  D.  Benelius*8  Chemical  Nomenelatiire^  lb.  430. 

On  the  Composition  of  Blende.    lb.  ir.  89. 

On  the  Composition  of  Snlpbnrat  of  AntimoDy.    lb.  95. 

On  the  Aretia  Phoeorrhoea.    lb.  129. 

Biographical  Acoonnt  of  Mr.  Scheele.    lb.  161. 

On  the  Oxides  of  Arsenic    lb.  171. 

Analyns  of  the  Asbestona  Actmolite.     lb.  209. 

A  Geognostical  Sketch  of  the  Counties  of  Northnmberiand, 
Durham,  and  part  of  Cumberland.     lb.  337. 

On  the  Aurora  Borodis.    lb.  427. 

Sketch  of  the  latest  Improvements  in  the  Physical  Sdsa- 
ces.    lb.  V.  1,  1815. 

A  Biographical  Account  of  David  Bittenhonae,  LLD., 
F.RS.,  &c,  late  Prendent  of  the  American  Philoeophiesl 
Society.    lb.  161. 

Observations  on  some  Points  connected  with  the  Atomie 
Theory.    lb.  184. 

A  Biographical  Acoonnt  of  Sir  Benjamin  Thompeon,  Kht 
Count  Rumford.    lb.  241. 

Biographical  Account  of  Joseph  Black,  M.D.,  F.B.S.F^ 
&c,  Professor  of  Chemistry  in  the  Univeraty  of  Edinborfb. 
lb.  821. 

Account  of  the  Improvements  in  Physical  Science  during 
the  year  1816.     lb.  vu.  1,  1816. 

Account  of  an  Accident  which  happened  in  a  Coal-Mine  at 
Uege  in  1812.    lb.  260. 

On  the  re-union  of  Parts  accidentally  separated  from  the 
Living  Body.    lb.  263. 

Some  Observations  on  the  relations  between  the  Specific 
Gravity  of  Gaseous  Bodies,  and  the  Weights  of  their  Atoms, 
lb.  843. 

On  the  Introduction  of  the  Mode  of  Bleaching  into  Great 
Britain.    lb.  viii.  1,  1816. 

Experiments  on  Phosphorated  Hydrogen  Gaa.     lb.  87. 

Geological  Sketch  of  the  Country  round  Birmingbam. 
lb.  161. 

Account  of  the  Improvements  in  Physical  Science  during 
the  year  1816.    lb.  ix.  1, 1817. 

Biographical  Account  of  the  Right  Reverend  Richard  Wat- 
son, D.D.,  F.R.S.,  Lord  Bishop  of  Uandaff.    lb.  257. 

Account  of  a  Remarkable  Fossil,     lb.  342. 

Biographical  Account  of  Jean  de  Carro,  M.D.  lb.  x.  1, 
1817. 

On  the  Salts  composed  of  Sulphuric  Acid  and  Peroxide  of 
Iron.    lb.  98. 

Chemical  Analysis  of  Tin,  from  the  different  Smelting- 
Houses  in  Cornwall.     lb.  166,  &c. 

Attempt  to  Establish  the  First  Principles  of  Chemistry  by 
Experiment.     1825,  2  vols. 

Outlines  of  Mineralogy  and  Geology.    1836,  2  vols. 

History  of  Chemistry.     1830-1. 

He  alho  contributed  to  the  *  Records  of  General  Science,*  a 
journal  started  and  edited  by  his  nephew,  Dr.  R.  D.  Tbom- 
son. 


.l!»Wd 


THOMSON. 


570 


THRIEPLAND. 


of  the  freedom  and  iDdependence  of  the  chnrch, 
and  of  the  rights  and  privileges  of  the  Christian 
people.  With  his  characteristic  energy  and  zeal, 
he  engaged  in  the  discussions  connected  with  the 
memorable  *^  Apocryphal  qncstion,"  and  in  the 
latter  years  of  his  life  spent  much  of  his  time 
in  exposing  the  misrepresentations  of  those  of 
the  adherents  of  the  British  and  Foreign  Bible 
Society  who  approved  of  the  conduct  of  that  body, 
in  printing  and  circulating  the  Bible  containing 
the  Apocrypha,  in  opposition  to  its  own  leading 
principle.  It  is  supposed  that  the  personal  tone 
which  the  controversy  assumed  in  the  hands  of 
his  opponents,  combined  with  the  labours  and 
anxieties  which  the  part  he  had  undertaken  im- 
posed on  him,  had  the  effect  of  seriously  impairing 
his  constitution.  The  last  great  public  question 
in  which  he  made  a  prominent  appearance,  was 
that  of  the  abolition  of  slavery  in  our  West  India 
colonies,  when  he  came  forward  as  the  advocate 
of  immediate  emancipation. 

Dr.  Thomson  died  suddenly,  February  9,  1881. 
About  five  in  the  afternoon  of  that  day  he  was 
returaing  home  fi*om  a  meeting  of  presbytery,  and 
having  met  a  friend  by  the  way,  he  conversed, 
with  animation  and  cheerfulness,  till  he  reached 
his  own  door,  on  the  threshold  of  which,  stopping 
for  a  moment,  he  muttered  some  words  indistinct- 
ly, and  Instantly,  without  a  struggle  or  a  groan, 
fell  down  on  the  pavement.  He  was  carried  into 
his  own  house  in  a  state  of  insensibility,  and  a 
vein  being  opened,  only  a  few  ounces  of  blood 
flowed,  and  he  immediately  expired.  He  was  in- 
terred in  a  piece  of  ground  connected  with  St. 
Cuthbcrt^s  churchyard.  Soon  after  his  death  a 
volume  of  his  *  Seimons  and  Sacramental  Exhor- 
tations^ was  published  at  Edinburgh,  with  an  in- 
teresting memoir  prefixed,  which  has  furnished 
us  with  the  details  of  this  notice.  On  his  settle- 
ment at  Sprouston,  he  married  a  lady  of  the  name 
of  Cannichael,  by  whom  he  had  ten  children, 
seven  of  whom  survived  him.  Through  the  re- 
commendation of  Lord  Brougham,  William  IV. 
granted  a  pension  of  £150  to  his  widow.  His 
eldest  son,  Mr.  John  Thomson,  who  was  the  fii*st 
professor  of  music  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh, 
appointed  under  the  liberal  endowment  of  the  late 
General  Reid,  died  at  Edinburgh  in  May  1841. 


THOBBumi,  a  niniaine,  a  oorraption  of  Tborbmid,  Baa- 
ing the  tbundeii>olt  of  Tbor,  the  Jupiter  of  the  TeotooiD 
nations.  Thursday,  the  day  of  Tbor,  has  its  name  from  bin. 
The  Norse  somame  of  Thorhiam  or  narham  ngnifies  ^ 
diild  or  Aotrn  ofThor.    Btomis  also  the  Noras  name  ftr  a  bear. 

Thiubplaxd,  the  name  of  a  Perthaihire  famflj  poHtsBag 
a  haronetcjr  of  Nova  Scotia,  oonfeiTed,  10th  November  1687, 
on  Sir  Patrick  Tbriepland,  of  Fingask  caatle,  in  the  paridi  of 
Kilspindie.  He  had  prenonsly  been  knighted  by  Charias  U. 
in  1674.  Hia  baronetcy  was  given  with  remainder  to  bk 
heirs  male.  He  was  a  staunch  sapporter  of  the  rojal  eaasi^ 
when  the  troubles  broke  oat  in  SooUand  in  the  nign  of 
Charles  I.,  and  died  m  1689. 

Hia  only  son,  Sir  David,  second  baronet,  adhered  te  tbs 
cause  of  tlie  abdicated  kuig,  James  YII.,  and  after  the  destk 
of  that  monarch,  held  a  secret  oorrespondeaoe  with  his  son, 
the  Cberalier  de  St  Geoige,  and  tboee  who  favound  his  p(»- 
tensions.    In  1715  be  was  amonf^  the  first,  with  hia  eons  and 
a  party  of  followem,  to  join  the  standard  of  the  earl  of  JJar, 
'  and  when  the  Chevalier  de  St.  George  arrired  in  Scotland  he 
spent  a  night  at  Fingask  castle,  the  seat  of  Sir  David.   Aftar 
the  dispersion  of  the  insuigents,  about  160  officers  and  gen- 
tlemen who  had  followed  the  rebel  army  into  the  H^landa, 
among  whom  was  Sir  David  Tbriepland,  hearing  that  two 
French  frigates  had  arrived  off  the  Orkney  ooest,  aallied  fnaa 
the  hills  on  horseback,  and  crossing  the  low  country  of  Mo- 
ray, embarked  in  boats  at  Bnrgh-head,  and  landed  in  Caith- 
ness.   Thence  they  proceeded  to  the  Orkney  Islands,  wbert 
they  had  the  good  fortune  to  reach  the  French  ahips,  whifik 
carried  them  to  Guttenburg  in  Sweden.     In  consequence  of 
the  active  part  he  took  in  the  rebellion,  he  was  attainted  by 
act  of  parliament  in  1716.    He  died  in  1746.    He  msxried, 
first,  in  1688,  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Bamssf  of 
Bamff,  by  whom  he  had  seven  sons  and  three  daughters;  sod, 
secondly,  in  1707,  Dtmfie  Catherine  Smith  of  Bambill,b/ 
whom  he  had  two  sons  and  four  daughters. 

His  youngest  and  only  surviving  son.  Sir  Stuart  Tbriep- 
land, became  third  baronet.  This  gentleman  was  also  stroog- 
Iv  attached  to  the  house  of  Stuart,  after  whom  be  was  named. 
He  took  part  in  the  insurrection  of  1745,  and  continued  with 
Prince  Charles  Edward  till  the  battle  of  Culloden.  His  mo- 
ther's property  which  he  had  inherited  was  furfdted.  ss  bis 
paternal  estate  had  been  in  1716,  and  a  reward  offered  fur 
his  apprehension.  He  escaped  to  France,  where  he  re- 
mained at  the  court  of  the  Stuarts  until  the  act  of  in- 
demnity permitted  his  return  to  Scotland.  For  some  time 
he  practised  in  Edinburgh  as  a  surgeon.  At  a  sale  ni 
forfeited  lands  in  1782,  he  repurchased  the  family  estatei 
He  died  2d  February  1805.  He  had  married  in  1753,  Janet, 
eldest  daughter  of  David  Sinclair,  Esq.  of  Southdun,  bf 
whom  he  had  a  son  and  daughter,  who  both  died  withoat 
issue;  and,  secondly,  in  1761,  Miss.Tanet  Budge  Murray  of 
Pennyland,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons  and  a  daughter. 

His  eldest  s^.  Sir  Patrick  Murray  Tbriepland,  fourth  bar- 
onet, bom  in  November  1762,  petitioned  George  IV.,  when  in 
Scotland  in  1822,  for  the  restoration  of  the  forfeited  title  of 
the  family,  and,  on  25th  April  1826,  his  majesty  was  pleawd 
to  signify  his  assent  to  the  introduction  of  a  bill  into  parlia- 
ment, whereby  the  attainder  was  reversed.  He  died  lltb 
January  1837.  By  his  wife,  Jessie  Murray,  daughter  of 
William  Scott  Ker,  Esq.  of  Chatto,  Roxburghshure,  be  had  s 
son  and  three  daughters. 

The  son,  Sir  Patrick  Murray  Tbriepland,  fifth  baronet, 
was  born  2Gth  May  1800.  He  was  major  of  the  Perthshire 
militia,  but  resigned  in  1843. 


■I 


I 


TRAIN. 


578 


TRAQUAIR. 


I  i 


from  Kirkintilloch.  In  Jane  1822,  he  was  ap- 
pointed to  Qucensferry,  whence  he  also  transmit- 
ted several  remains  of  antiquity  to  Sir  Walter, 
with  an  amusing  account  of  the  annual  "  riding  of 
the  marches  *'  by  the  freemen  of  Lh)Utbgow.  At 
Sir  Walter's  request,  ho  collected  information  re- 
specting the  manners,  customs,  traditions,  and 
superstitions  of  the  fishermen  of  Buckhaven,  and 
first  gave  him  a  description  of  the  "  ITailly  Hoo," 
a  superstition  alluded  to  in  Quentin  Durward. 

After  being  about  six  months  at  Queensferry, 
Mr.  Train  was,  in  consequence  of  the  cessation  of 
the  duty  on  salt,  oi-dered  in  January  1823,  to  Fal- 
kirk. While  in  Edinburgh  in  the  spring  of  1826, 
he  related  to  Sir  Walter  Scott  the  story  of  a  Fife- 
shire  'Surgeon's  daughter,'  which  suggested  to 
him  the  tale  bearing  that  name  in  the  '  Chronicles 
of  the  Canongate.' 

The  last  district  to  which  Mr.  Train  was  ap- 
pointed was  that  of  Castle  Douglas,  in  the  stew- 
artiy  of  Kirkcudbright,  where  for  nine  years  he 
discharged  his  laborious  duties  as  supervisor  of 
excise.  For  the  edition  of  the  Waverley  novels, 
published  in  1829,  he  furnished  much  of  the  infor- 
mation contained  in  the  notes,  and  the  assistance 
thus  rendered  by  him  was  acknowledged  by  Sir 
Walter  in  the  different  volumes.  In  November 
of  the  same  year,  on  the  recommendation  of  Mr. 
Skene  of  Rubisluw,  Mr.  Train  was  admitted  an 
lionorary  member  of  the  Society  of  Scottish  Anti- 
quaries. 

Having  formed  the  design  of  writing  a  histoiy 
of  the  Isle  of  Man,  in  the  course  of  his  researches 
for  materials,  he  obtained  possession  of  several 
curious  records,  relative  to  the  annals  of  the  isl- 
nnd,  and  was  enabled  to  transmit  to  Sir  AValter 
Scott  some  Interesting  and  little-known  particu- 
lars, which  were  duly  made  use  of  in  Pevcril  of 
the  Peak. 

After  being  twenty-eight  years  in  the  service  of 
the  excise,  Mr.  Train  was  placed  on  the  retired 
list  in  183G,  and  afterwards  resided  in  a  cottage 
in  the  neighbourhood  of  Castle  Douglas,  pursuing 
his  literary  studies  to  the  last,  and  occasionally 
contributing  tales  and  poetry  to  '  Chambers'  Jour- 
nal,' the  *  Dumfries  Magazine,'  and  other  periodi- 
cals. The  last  of  his  publications  was  *  The  Buch- 
anites  from  first  to  last.'    He  died  14th  December 


1852,  aged  74.  He  left  several  works,  indodiis 
a  '  History  of  the  Isle  of  Man/  He  had  mtiried 
in  1803,  Mary,  eldest  daughter  of  Mr.  Robert 
Wilson,  gardener  in  Ajt^  bj  whom  be  htdftn 
children.  His  eldest  son,  William,  became  easUer 
in  the  Southern  Bank,  Dnmfries,  and  was  after- 
wards appointed  one  of  the  inspectors  of  tbeKi- 
tional  Provincial  Bank  of  England.  In  the  Col- 
lected edition  of  the  Waverlej  Novels  and  it 
Lockhart's  life  of  Scott,  there  are  several  noCien 
of  Mr.  Train,  to  which  and  to  Lis  Life  in  tlie 
*  Contemporaries  of  Bums,*  we  have  been  indeU- 
ed  for  the  materials  for  this  memoir. 
His  works  are : 

Poetical  Rererics.     Glasgow,  1806,  8to. 

Strains  of  the  Moantaiii  Muse.     Edinbnrgfa,  1814,  Sroi 

Historical  and  Statbtical  Account  of  the  Isle  of  Mao. 
From  the  earliest  times  to  the  present  date ;  witli  a  riew  ot 
its  ancient  Laws,  peculiar  Cnstoms  and  popular  SupentitioDS. 
Douglas,  1845.  2  vols.  8ro. 

The  Buchanites  from  First  to  Last.     Edin.  1846, 12nM. 


ill 

I   I 

i ; 
I 


'I'raquaik,  Earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peeraf^e  of  Scotiand, 
conferred  in  1633,  on  Sir  John  Stuart,  lord-bigh-treamrer  « 
Scotland,  the  fifth  in  descent  from  James  Stewart,  a  natnnl 
son  of  the  earl  of  Buchan,  brother  uterine  of  James  IL  and 
the  second  son  of  Sir  James  Stewart,  called  the  Bhick  Knight 
of  I^m,  bj  Jane  Beaufort,  queen  dowager  of  King  James  L 
James  Stewart  obtained  from  his  father  an  act  of  legitimation, 
under  the  grent  seal,  20th  February  1489,  and  a  charter  of 
the  lands  of  Traquair,  Peebles-shire,  to  him  and  the  beirs  male 
of  his  body  legitimately  begotten.     He  fell  at  Flodden,  9th 
September  1513.     Having  married  the  heiress  of  Rntberford, 
and  got  with  her  the  lands  ol  I'utherford  and  Wells,  Box- 
burghshii-e,  he  quartered  the  amis  of  Kutberford  with  Lis 
own.     His  son,  )Villiam  Stewart  of  Traquair,  bad  fours(BU. 
1.  Robert,  who  succeeded  to  the  family  estates  but  died  with- 
out issue,  9th  September  1548.     2.  Sir  John  Stuart  of  Tn- 
quair,  who  was  knighted,  20th  July   1565,   when  Queen 
Mary  created  Dam  ley  duke  of  Albany,  and  the  following 
year  ^ns  appointed  captain  of  her  guards.     He  remained  a 
steady  friend  to  that  ill-fated  queen,  and  was  one  of  those 
who  entered  into  a  bond  of  association  to  support  and  defend 
her  rights,  after  her  escape  from  L.ochIevcn,  in  1568.    He 
was  afterwards  continued  as  captain  of  the  king's  guard.    3. 
Sir  William  Stunrt  of  Traquair,  one  of  the  gentlemen  of  the 
bedchamber  to  James  VI.  and  governor  of  Dumbarton  castie 
ill  1582.    This  laird  of  Traquair  was  a  courtier  of  King 
James.     At  the  meeting  of  the  estates  of  parli.nment,  17eh 
January  1593,  he  was  one  of  the  commissioners  appointed 
''  to  convene  in  the  Checker  house,"  to  consider  as  to  the 
payment  of  the  king's  debts,  "  as  also  touching  his  majeity's 
visitation  of  the  Isles**  the  following  summer,  "and  needful 
provisions  to  be  made  therefor.**    (jCaldeneood,  vol.  r.  p. 
221.)    At  the  baptism  of  Prince  Henry  in  the  chapel  roral 
of  Stirling  in  August  1594,  the  laird  of  Traquair  officiated  as 
a  ''paile**  bearer.     In  a  convention  held  at  Holrrood-boose, 
10th  December  1598,  he  was  present  ns  one  of  the  king's 
privy  council.    He  died,  unmarried,  20th  May,   1C05.    4. 
James,  who  also  possessed  the  Traquair  estates,  and  died  ia 


TROTfER. 


582 


TULLIBARDINE. 


The  Trotters  of  Dryden  and  Bush,  Mid  Lothian,  are 
descended  from  Archibald  Trotter,  2d  son  of  Alexander 
Trotter  of  Ca»tle8hiels,  wlio  succeeded  his  father  in  1693. 
Archibnld  m.,  in  1748,  Jean,  daaghter  and  heiress  of  Robert 
Moabray,  EUq.  of  Bosh  and  CsMtlelaw,  grandson  of  Robert 
Moabray,  Esq.  of  Cockaimy,  and  had,  with  1  daaghter,  4  sons. 
1.  Robert.  2.  Alexander,  of  Dreghom.  3.  John,  of  Dyrham 
Park,  Herts.  4.  Sir  Coutts,  of  Westville,  Linoolnsliire,  created 
a  baronet  in  1821,  grandfather  of  Sir  Coutts  Lindsay,  Bart. 

The  eldest  son,  Robert,  of  Bush  and  Castlela  w,  was  postmas- 
ter-genenU  for  Scotland,  and  died  in  1807.  He  bad,  with  2 
daughters,  2  sons,  John,  and  Archibald,  of  Dryden. 

The  elder  son,  John  Trotter  of  Bush  and  Castlelaw,  bom 
in  1788,  died,  without  issue,  Nov.  13,  1852. 

His  brother,  Arcliibald  Trutter  of  Dryden,  bom  in  1789, 
sacoeeded  him.  Appointed  to  the  Bengal  civil  service  in  1806, 
he  retired  in  1840 ;  twice  married,  with  issue  by  both  wives. 


Alexander  Trotter  of  Dreghom,  above  mentioned,  bom  in 
1755,  died  in  1842.  He  bad  5  sons  and  1  daughter.  Archi- 
bald Trotter  of  Dreghom,  his  eldest  son,  bom  in  1799,  died 
Oct.  26,  1844.  He  m.  I^uisa  Jane,  youngest  daughter  of 
James  Strange,  Madras  civil  service,  and  Ann,  daaghter  of 
1st  Viscount  Melville;  issue,  5  sons  and  3  daughters.  Coutts 
Trotter  of  Dreghom,  the  eldest  son,  was  bom  April  9, 1831, 
and  in  1854  was  appointed  to  the  Bengal  civil  service.  His 
next  brother,  James  Stuart,  R.N.,  was  bom  in  1839. 


The  Trotters  of  Ballindean,  Perthshire,  belong  to  an  Edin- 
burgh family,  three  of  whom  were  merchants  and  bui^gesses 
of  that  dty. 

William  Trotter,  bora  in  1772,  was,  in  1826  and  1827, 
lord-provost  of  Edinburgh.  He  m.,  in  1801,  iiis  cousin,  St. 
Chur  Stuart,  dr.  of  Robert  Knox,  Esq.,  physician,  London; 
issue,  4  sons  and  3  drs. 

Robert  Knox  Trotter  of  Ballindean,  the  eldest  son,  entered 
when  young  into  the  17th  regiment  of  Lancers,  in  which  he 
rose  to  the  rank  of  captain.  He  m.,  in  1833,  Hon.  Mary 
Rollo,  eldest  dr.  of  8th  Lord  Rollo,  with  issue. 


Thomas  Trottrii,  M.D.,  at  one  time  physician  to  the 
Channel  Fleet,  a  native  of  Roxburghshire,  was  educiited  at 
the  university  of  Edinburgh.  In  1782,  while  still  very  young, 
he  was  appointed  surgeon  in  the  royal  navy,  and  was  the  first 
member  of  bis  corps  who  was  obliged  to  seek  employment  in 
the  African  trade.  In  1785,  he  settled  at  a  small  town  in 
Northumberland :  and  in  1788  he  obtained  his  doctor*s  de- 
gree at  Edinburgh.  In  1789,  by  the  friendship  of  Admiral 
Roddum,  he  was  appointed  surgeon  of  hi:*  flag-ship.  In  1790 
he  published  a  *  Review  of  the  Medical  Department  of  the 
British  Navy ;  *  in  1793  he  was  appointed  physician  of  the  Royal 
Hospital  at  Portsmoutli,  and  in  1794  physician  to  the  Fleet. 

The  improvement  of  the  medical  discipline  of  the  navy, 
both  as  regards  the  care  of  the  men*s  health  and  the  advance- 
ment of  the  medical  officers,  was  early  attended  to  by  Dr. 
Trotter,  and  the  many  marks  of  respect  which  he  received, 
from  both  officers  and  seamen,  afford  satisfactory  evidence  of 
the  advantngeous  nature  of  the  changes  whicli  he  effected. 

Aflter  a  long  and  laborious  attendance  on  his  duties  in  the 
fleet,  he  retired  with  a  pension  of  £200  a- year,  and,  settling 
at  Newcastle,  practised  there  for  many  years  with  great  re- 
putation, occiisionally  amusing  himself  with  poetry,  and  otlier 
elegant  literary  pursuits.  His  professional  works  deservedly 
rank  high.    He  died  Sept.  5th,  1832.     His  works  are; 

Observations  on  the  Scurvy.  Edin.  1785,  8vo.  2d  edit 
enlarged.     1792,  8vo. 


De  Ebrietate  ejuaque  Eifeefcibiu  in  Corpus  Hnmanwi. 
1788,  4to. 

A  Review  of  the  Medical  DepaitmeDt  in  tiM  British  Ksiy; 
with  a  Method  of  Reform  propostd.    Loud.  1790,  8to. 

Medical  and  Cbemteal  Essays;  cootnining  additional  Ob" 
servations  on  Scorvy,  with  Cases  and  Misotnaneons  Facti,  ia 
Reply  to  Dr.  Beddoes  and  others ;  Cass  and  DisssetioD  of  a 
Blue  Boy;  Communications  from  New  SonUi  Wales  on  Seor- 
vy ;  on  preserving  Water  purs  and  sweat  in  Long  Voyagei, 
&c    Lond.  1795,  8vo.    2d  edit  1796,  Sto. 

Medics  Nautiea;  an  Essay  on  the  Dissases  of  Sesmci, 
oomprehending  the  Histocy  of  Health  in  his  Migssty's  Fleet, 
under  tlie  command  of  Richard,  Earl  Hove,  AdaunL  Lin> 
don,  1797,  8vo;  vol.  ii.  1799,  8vo;  voL  iii.  compffifccnding 
the  Health  of  the  Channel  Fleet  for  the  j^an  1799, 1800, 
and  1801.    Lond.  1808,  8vo. 

Sospiria  Ooeani ;  a  Monody  on  the  late  Earl  Howe.  Lond. 
1800,  4to. 

An  Essay,  Mediea],  Philosophical  and  Chemical,  on  Drank* 
enness,  and  its  Effects  on  the  Human  Body.  I.«nd.  1804, 
8vo.    4th  edit.  1812 ;  translated  from  De  Ebrietate,  && 

A  Proposal  for  destroying  the  Fire  and  Cboak  Damps  oi 
Coal  Mines ;  and  their  Production  explained  on  the  Priaci- 
ples  of  Modem  Chemistiy;  addressed  to  the  Ownen  and 
Agents  of  Coal- works.     Lond.  1805,  8 vo. 

A  second  Address  to  the  Owners  and  Agents  of  Coal- 
Mines,  on  destroying  the  Fure  and  Cboak  Damp,  in  ooofuta- 
tion  of  two  Pamphlets  lately  circulated  in  the  neighbonrliood 
of  Newcastle.     Loud.  1806,  8vo. 

A  View  of  the  Nervous  Temperament ;  bdng  a  Praetieal 
Inquiiy  into  the  increasing  Prevalence,  Preventions  and 
Treatment  of  those  Diseases  oommonlj  called  Kerroos,  ^- 
ions.  Stomach  and  Liver  Complunts,  Indigestion,  Low  Spir- 
its, Gout,  &c  Lond.  1807,  8ro.  2d  edit.  1808,  8ro.  3d 
edit.    1812,  8vo. 

The  Noble  Foundling ;  or,  the  Hermit  of  the  Tweed ;  a 
Tragedy.     Lond.  1812,  Svo. 

Also  many  contributions  to  the  Medical  Journal,  the  Eu- 
ropean Magazine,  and  other  periodical  worics. 


TuLLiBARi>i:(E,  Earl  of,  a  title,  now  merged  in  the  dukedom 
of  Athol,  conferred,  10th  July  1606,  on  Sir  John  Murray,  Lord 
Murray  of  TuHibardine.  His  son,  William,  second  earl  of  Tolli- 
bardine,  resigned  his  earldom  into  the  hands  of  King  CharksL, 
Ist  April  1626,  that  it  might  be  transferred  to  his  brother.  Sir 
Patrick  Murray,  as  his  son  enjoyed  the  earldom  of  AtboL 
(See  vol.  i.  p.  16o.)  This  Sir  Patrick  Murray  was  the  third 
son  of  the  iirst  earl  of  TuHibardine,  and  on  his  brother's  re- 
signation, he  was  created  earl  of  TuHibardine  and  Lord  Mar- 
ray  of  Cask,  13th  January  1629,  to  him  and  his  heirs  male 
whatsoever.  By  his  wife,  an  English  lady,  the  widow  of 
Sir  Francis  Vere,  he  had  two  sons,  James,  fourth  earl  of 
TuHibardine,  and  the  Hon.  William  Murray  of  Redcastle,  <^ 
whom  afterwards. 

The  fourth  earl  succeeded  his  father  iu  1643.  He  took  an 
active  part  with  the  parliament  against  the  king,  and  did  not 
scruple,  it  is  said,  to  sacrifice  his  brother,  who  had  taken 
arms  for  the  royal  cause.  In  January  1647  he  opposed  the 
delivering  up  of  Charles  I.  to  the  English  by  the  Soots  army. 
In  1654  he  was  fined  £1,500  by  Cromweirs  act  of  grace  and 
pardon.  He  died  in  January  1670,  without  issue.  His  tities 
devolved  on  John  earl  of  Athol,  whose  son,  John  Lord  Mur- 
ray, was  created  eail  of  TuHibardine  for  life,  27th  July  1696. 

The  earl's  brother,  the  Hon.  William  Murray  of  Redcastle, 
a  young  man  of  firm  loyalty,  joined  the  marquif  of  Mmi- 
truse,  and  was,  with  several  other  noblemen  and  gentlemen. 


.    t 


!. 
I'    I 


I 


TWEEDDALE, 


584 


FIEST  EARL  OF. 


TwEEDDALB,  ^larquis  of,  a  title  in  the  peera^  of  Scot- 
land, confeiTed  in  1G94  on  Join  Hay,  earl  of  Tweeddale, 
descended  fn>m  Robert,  second  and  younger  son  of  William 
de  Haya,  who  held  the  office  of  pincema  domini  regit^  or 
king*8  butler,  in  the  reigns  of  Malcolm  IV.  and  William  the 
Lion.  (For  the  origin  of  the  surname  of  Hny,  see  vol.  ii.  p. 
141.)  Robertas  son,  Sir  William  do  Haya,  witneHsed  a  char- 
ter of  King  Alexander  II.  to  the  abbot  and  monks  of  Kelso 
in  1240.  He  was  father  of  Sir  John  de  Haya,  who  acquired 
the  lauds  of  I^ierworth,  Mid  IjOthian,  by  marriage.  His 
son.  Sir  William  de  Haya  of  I<ocherworth,  appeared  in  the 
parliament  at  Brigham,  12th  March  1290,  when  the  marriage 
of  the  Princess  Margaret  of  Scotland  and  Prince  Edward  of 
England  was  proposed.  In  the  contest  for  the  crown,  he 
was  one  of  the  nominees  on  the  part  of  Bruce  the  competitor 
in  1292.  In  July  of  the  latter  year  he  swore  fealty  to  King 
Edward  I.,  and  also  submitted  to  that  monarch  in  1297. 
Sir  William's  son.  Sir  Gilbert,  swore  fealty  to  the  English 
king  in  1296.  By  his  marriage  with  Mary,  one  of  the  dangh- 
ters  and  coheiresses  of  that  distinguished  patriot,  Sir  Simon 
Eraser  of  Oliver  castle,  executed  by  Edward  I.  in  1306,  he  ac- 
quired considerable  lands  in  tlie  county  of  Peebles,  and  quar- 
tered the  Eraser  arms  with  his  own.  His  grandson,  Sir 
William  de  Haya  of  I^ocherworth,  was  made  prisoner  at  the 
battle  of  Durham,  17th  October  1346.  In  Dairy mple*8  An- 
nuls, (vol.  ii.  p.  108.)  he  is  said  to  have  been  among  the 
killed  in  that  battle ;  but  this  is  incorrect,  as  he  was  one  of 
the  commissioners  to  treat  concerning  the  ransom  of  King 
David  II.  in  1354.  His  son,  Sir  Thomas  Hay,  was  one  of 
the  hostages  for  the  liberation  of  that  monarch,  dd  October, 
1357,  and  was  placed  in  the  custody  of  the  shcrifT  of  North- 
umberland. He  got  leave  from  Edward  to  go  to  Rome,  IGtli 
May  1369.  He  afterwards  returned  home,  and  in  1385  had 
400  of  the  40,000  francs  sent  by  the  king  of  France  with 
John  de  Vienne  to  be  distributed  among  the  principal  per- 
sons of  Scotland.  His  son.  Sir  William  Hay,  sheriff  of  ]\-e- 
bles,  was  twice  a  conmiissioner  to  treat  witli  the  English. 
He  married,  first,  Johanna,  eldest  daughter  of  Hugh  GiSurd 
of  Yester,  Haddingtunshire,  with  whom  he  got  the  manor  of 
Tester,  with  the  patrunagc  of  the  church.  Originally  calle<i 
St.  Bathan's,  and  afterwards  Y'ester,  the  church  was  in  1421 
restored  to  its  own  name,  and  converted  by  Sir  William  into 
a  collegiate  establishment  for  a  pmvost,  six  prebendaries,  and 
two  singing  boys,  which  it  continued  to  be  until  the  4{efor- 
mution.  In  consequence  of  this  marriage.  Sir  William  add- 
ed the  arms  of  Gififord  to  his  own.  He  manned,  secondly, 
Alicia,  danghtcr  of  Sir  Thomas  Hay  of  Errol,  and  had  \asuq 
by  both  wives ;  by  the  first,  three  sons  and  three  daughters ; 
and  by  the  second,  a  son  and  a  daughter.  The  eldest  son, 
Sir  William  Hay,  predeceased  his  father.  The  second  son. 
Sir  Thomas  Hay  of  Vester,  was  one  of  the  hostages  for  King 
James  I.,  4th  December  1423,  when  his  annual  revenue  was 
estimated  at  600  merks,  and  again  16tli  July  1425.  He 
died  without  issue,  in  1432.  The  third  son  succeeded  his 
brother.  The  youngest  son,  Edmund  de  Hay,  was  ancestor 
of  the  Hays  of  Barra,  Rannes,  Mountblairy,  Cocklaw,  Faich- 
field,  li^mfield,  Linpluni,  Alderston,  ^lordirigton,  and  other 
farniii^  of  the  name. 

Sir  David  Hay  of  Yester,  the  third  but  eldest  surviving 
son,  married  Lady  Miiry  Douglas,  relict  of  the  first  I-,ord 
Forbes,  only  daughter  of  George,  first  earl  of  Angus,  of  that 
house,  by  Mary,  daughter  of  King  Robert  III.,  and  had  two 
sons  and  a  dangliter.  John  Hay  of  Tester,  the  elder  son, 
w;is  created  a  peer,  by  solemn  investiture  in  parliament,  by 
the  title  of  Ix)rd  Ilav  of  Tester,  29th  January,  1487-8.  He 
was  twice  married ;  first,  to  Alary,  daughter  of  John,  Ix»rd 


IJndsay  of  Byres,  by  whom  he  had  a  ton,  John,  aeeond  Ijord 
Yester;  and,  secondly,  to  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Georgt 
Cunningham,  son  of  Sir  William  CnnniDgbam  of  Beltan,  bj 
whom  lie  had  two  sons  and  two  daughters.  Jolm,  seoonl 
I^ord  Yester,  fell  at  the  battle  of  Flodden,  9tli  September 
1513,  leaving  three  sons  and  three  daIlgfate^^  Tlie  sons 
were,  John,  third  Lord  Yester ;  George  Haj  of  Oliver  castle ; 
and  William,  ancestor  of  the  Hays  of  ASonktun.  John,  third 
Lord  Yester,  signed  the  letter  to  Henry  VI I L  refosing  to  it- 
move  the  duke  of  All>any  from  the  guardianship  of  Kin? 
James  V.,  4th  July  1516.  He  set  his  seal  to  a  treaty  with 
England,  7th  October  1517,  and  died  in  1543.  He  was 
twice  married ;  first,  to  Elizabeth  Douglas,  sister  ci  Archi- 
bald, sixth  earl  of  Angus,  by  whom  he  had  a  sod,  John, 
fourth  Ijord  Yester,  and  a  daughter,  Elizabeth,  Lady  Setoo ; 
and,  secondly,  to  the  daughter  and  sole  heiress  of  Dickson  of 
Smithfield,  Peebles-shire,  and  had  by  her  a  sad.  John,  ances- 
tor of  the  family  of  Hav  of  Smithfield  and  Havstonn,  baron- 
et,  and  a  daughter,  Jane,  wife  of  Broun  of  Coalstoun.  Jolm. 
fourth  Lord  Yester,  was  taken  prisoner  by  the  EnglUh  at 
the  battle  of  Pinkie,  10th  Scpteml)er  1547,  and  sent  to  the 
Tower  of  I/>ndon,  where  he  remained  till  peace  was  con- 
cluded, when  he  was  released.  He  died  in  1557.  Br  his 
wife,  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  the  fourth  earl  of  Living- 
stone, he  had  two  sons:  William,  fifth  Lord  Yester,  »ni 
Thomas,  provost  of  St.  Bathan*s,  and  a  daughter,  Man-, 
Mrs.  Congalton  of  Congalton. 

William,  fifth  Lord  Yester,  joined  the  Refurmation.  tad 
was  one  of  the  noblemen  who  subscribed  the  Bo(»k  of  D'}>ci- 
pline,  in  the  Tolbooth  of  Edinburgh,  27th  .Tanuary  1561. 
He  adhered  to  Queen  Mary,  and  was  present  with  her  forcw 
at  CarboiTy  Hill  in  1567.  He  was  also  on  the  queen's  axk 
at  the  battle  of  I^ngsidc  in  the  following  year.  In  1570  he 
was  one  of  the  noblemen  who  signed  a  letter  to  Queen  Eli- 
zabeth in  behalf  of  Queen  Maiy,  then  a  captive  in  England. 
He  died  in  August  1576.  By  his  wife,  Marg.iret,  daughter 
of  Sir  John  Kerr  of  Fernihirst.  he  had,  with  four  danghters 
two  sons:  William,  sixth  Lord  Tester,  and  James,  seven: L 
Lord  Tester. 

William,  sixth  I/>rd  Tester,  was  one  of  the  nobles  enpped 
in  the  Rai«l  of  Ruthven  in  1582.  The  following  year  be  re- 
tired to  the  continent,  but  returned  in  1585,  and  died  in 
1591.  Leaving  daughters  only,  his  brother  James,  seventh 
Ix)rd  Tester,  had  a  charter  from  James  VL,  to  him  and  Us 
heii-s  male,  of  the  lordship  and  barony  of  Tester,  cor.taiiilnj: 
a  new  creation.  He  died  in  February  1609.  Bv  his  »if»'. 
Lndy  Margaret  Kerr,  third  daughter  of  the  fin^t  earl  of  Ia>- 
thian,  he  had,  with  a  daughter,  two  sons:  ,Tuhn,  eighth 
Lord  Tester,  and  lion.  Sir  William  Hay  of  Linplum. 

John,  eighth  Lord  T^ester,  and  first  earl  of  Tweeddale,  was 
distinguished  for  lii»  sagacity  and  attention  to  business.  lie 
wjis  opjHised  to  the  obnoxious  five  articles  of  Perth,  and  vot?iI 
against  them  in  the  parliament  of  1621.  In  1633  hetp- 
])osed  the  act  for  regulating  the  apparel  of  churchmen,  ar:d 
in  1637  was  one  of  the  supplicants  against  the  introduction 
of  the  liturgy  into  Scotland.  In  1639  he  had  the  cominni.d 
of  a  regiment  in  the  Scots  anny.  Ho  was  created  e.nrl  of 
Tweeddale  by  patent  dated  at  Newcastle,  1st  Decemlw 
1646,  to  him  and  his  heii-s  male  for  ever.  He  died  in  Ifvi. 
He  was  twice  married ;  first,  to  L,ndy  Jane  Seton,  daniihler 
of  his  brotlier-in-law,  Alexander,  first  earl  of  I)nnfem^lin^ 
high-chancellor  of  Scotland,  .nnd  by  her  had  one  son,  Juhn, 
second  earl  of  Tweeddale ;  and,  secondly,  to  I jidv  Mar;:iirft 
Montgomery,  eldest  daughter  of  the  sixth  earl  of  Eglinlf^.m, 
by  whom  he  had  another  son,  Hon.  William  Hay.  on  wL<»i:i 
he  settled  the  barony  of  Drumelzier. 


TWEEDDALB.  m 

bn'KiidieT-ireiKrnl,  snil  distingiilahad  hjntwlf  it  [lis  butllH  nf 
Schellcnben;  in  1T04,  and  Rxmilllaa  in  1T06.  Ha  dind  ZSlli 
AnKnM  1706.    S.  Urd  WiUiiun  Hut  uF  Meohill. 

Cliarln,  tliird  iiinrqnii  or  TwMddDic,  wns,  on  the  iic- 
c«aion  of  GwrgB  1.,  in  1714,  appointed  pivudent  of  tlj* 
coart  of  police  and  lord^lienlenant  of  th*  count)  of  Hadding- 
ton. AC  tbc  g«neni]  el«lion,  Sd  Unrcb  1715,  lio  waa  oliOMn 
ong  of  tli«  uilnn  rcpreHntH^vs  p«n,  and  died  17th  De- 
csmber  following.  Uy  lji>  miiitliion«a,  I.adjr  Snaan  Hamil- 
ton, coDntcu  of  Dnndonild,  Koind  daoghtcT  of  William  and 
Anne,  duke  and  duclieu  of  IIiimiltDn,  lie  had,  Trith  fuur 
dnughten,  four  aona:  ■  1.  Jobti,  fourtli  mnrquia.  Z.  James, 
died  yonng.  8.  Ijjrd  Chnrlf»  H«j  of  IJnpIum.  4,  George, 
aiath  marqnia.  Hie  third  eon,  Lord  CliarlM  Hai,  aetred  M 
the  Bicge  of  Gibraltar,  and  aflerwards  in  GBrmany,  wi  a  tdI- 
unleer  under  Prince  Kngene  of  Saioj.  Ho  bad  the  commi*- 
iion  of  eniign  18th  May  1722,  and  in  1T39  obtained  a  tioop 
in  Che  9th  regiment  of  dngooni.  At  Ibe  general  election  of 
1741  ha  waa  dioMn  M.P.  for  the  conntf  of  Haddington.  In 
April  1T4S  he  wa*  promoted  lo  the  command  of  a  company 
in  the  3d  regiment  of  foot-guardt.  He  beliaied  gallantly  at 
the  battle  of  Fontenor,  SOtU  April  1745,  and  was  wounded. 
Hii  loidaliip  was  appointed  aide-de-camp  to  the  king.  4th 
Mnnh  1749,  ooloDel  of  ^a  S3d  foot  20th  Morember  \'i2, 
and  Riajor-genenl  S3d  Febnury  1757.  In  May  of  the  latter 
year  lit  tailed  for  America  oi  Mcond  in  command  under 
Gonenil  Uopeon,  and  joined  thaaart  of  I^jodonn,  commander- 
in-chief,  who  hod  under  him  11.000  land  forcea.  anppoiitd 
by  S3  oliips  of  war  and  lO.SOO  seamen.  A>  Ihia  formidable 
uroament,  inatead  of  being  engaged  in  active  opentiona,  vai 
for  a  time  idly  employed  in  ehum  tlgltU  at  Holifui,  l.ord 
Chorle*  Hay  Ihreir  out  aome  reflectiona  on  hia  anperior  offi- 
ctra  for  not  at  onca  attacking  tlie  enemy,  a  council  of  war 
waa  called,  31>C  Jnty  1757,  when  he  waa  ordered  under  ar- 
rest, and  Bent  a  prifioner  to  England.  Hia  trial  commenced 
13tb  Fobruary  17C0,  befoiv  a  getieral  court  martuil  at  the 
horM-guarda,  Ij)ndon,  and  hus  linitlied  4(h  tfnrcli.  The 
reanlt  win  not  made  public  The  cau  was  laid  before  the 
king,  but  no  decision  appears  to  have  been  given,  oa  l^rd 
Charlea  died  at  London  two  montha  afternorda,  laC  liny 
1700,  onmiuTifd. 

John,  fourth  mirquis  of  Tweeddale,  having  atudied  tlie 
law,  was  appinnled  uu  eitraordinary  lord  of  session  7(li 
March  1731.  He  waa  chosen  one  of  Cha  niteen  repreaento- 
tire  peers  in  17!!,  nnd  afterwarda  aeieril  liinea  n-elected. 
He  dlslingnitlied  biniself  much  in  parliament,  and  on  the 
resipiation  of  Sir  Bobert  Walpole  in  February  1742, : 


Tho( 


secretary  of  stato  for  Scotland  was  revived  and  conferred 
lilm,  and  he  wa*  also  appointed  principal  keeper  of  the  lig- 
net;  bat  resigned  bath  offices  in  Jannary  174S.  when  the 
former  was  aholiabed.  lu  Jnne  1761  he  was  appointed  jus- 
lice-general  of  Scotland.  He  was  also  a  privy  cnuneillor  and 
governor  of  the  Bank  of  Scotland.  He  died  at  London  in 
176!.  He  was  not  only  the  lost  socreUry  of  state  for  Scot- 
hind,  hut  the  last  who  held  the  oSics  of  extraordinary  lord  of 
Hssion.  He  married  Ijdy  Frances  Carteret,  daughter  of 
.lohn,  earl  of  Granville,  and,  with  four  daughter,  had  two 
wins,  George,  enil  of  Gifford,  who  died  in  infancy,  and  George, 
■iftb  maiquia,  who  died  4th  October  1770,  in  his  13tli  year. 
The  title  devolved  on  liis  uncle,  George,  eiilti  marquis  of 
Tweoddale.  'J'liia  nobleman  was  appointed  one  of  the  board 
of  police,  June  1755,  but  resigned  that  office  in  1771.     By  a 


TYTLER, 


died  lOth  Kovember  17S7,  ami 
Oeorge  Hay,  an  offleer  in  the  naval  senica  of  the  East  India 
Company,  grandson  of  Lord  William  Haj  of  Kewhall,  tlmd 
son  of  John,  second  msniDia  of  Tweeddale. 

The  seventh  manjuia  was  one  oTtfae  vitem  reprewntativa 
pens  and  lord-lieutenant  of  the  eounty  of  HadiUngtOD.  He 
married  at  Edinbnrgli,  ISth  April  17S5,  Lady  Hannah  Cfaai^ 
btte  Uaitland,  fourth  danghCer  of  the  taienth  eail  of  Lau- 
derdale. They  went  to  the  oontinrat  in  180!.  oo  acconnt  if 
tin  ststs  of  tbe  marquia'a  health,  and  nnfortiuiately  happeo- 
sd  to  be  in  France  at  the  commmeemeiit  af  huetililies  ia 
1808,  whan  all  British  aabjeeta  in  tliat  oonutry  vera  detained 
by  Bonaparte.  Tbe  nurdiionea*  died  at  VnduD,  Uay  8, 
and  the  ttunjuit  9th  Aug.  1804.  Tliey  bad  sii  aona  and  six 
daughters.  The  eldest  aon,  George,  aucceeded  aa  8cli  marquiiL 
Tbe  !d  son,  Lord  James  Hay,  became  a  lieutenaat-geiient  in 
the  army  in  1864,  and  diwi  in  186!:.  The  3d  son,  Lord  John 
Hay,  C.B.,  bom  in  1798,  entered  the  royal  nary,  and  when  a 
lieutenant  in  tbe  Seahorse  frigate,  lost  his  left  arm  in  tbe 
Dardanelles  in  August  1S07,  by  a  shot  linm  a  battery,  wliila 

taken  shelter  nnder  the  hind.  In  1818  he  became  captain 
R.S.,  and  rose  to  the  rank  of  rtar-odminJ.  He  served  as 
commodiire  in  command  of  a  tmall  squadron  on  the  north 
cooit  or  Spain  during  tbe  civil  war  in  that  country.  For  hia 
serrieea  lie  itcnved  [be  Grand  Cross  of  the  Spanish  order  of 
Ch;iriea  III.  In  1846  he  was  appointed  one  of  the  lords  of 
Che  admiralty,  and  in  the  following  year  was  eliosen  11. P.  fur 
Wiadsor.  Lord  William.  tliB  4th  son,  died  young  Isrd 
Edward  George,  tbe  5tb  son,  bom  in  1800,  became  lieuL-col- 
oiiel  in  the  army  in  1881.  Lord  Tliomas.  the  6t1i  son,  in  holy 
orders,  waa  appointed  reotor  of  Rendleahim,  SuSiilk.  in  18S0. 
George,  8th  marquis  of  Tweeddale,  bom  Feb.  1,  I7S7,  aac^ 
cecded  hia  father  in  1804,  and  entered  the  aimy  the  same 
year.  He  was  iiide-de-csmp  to  the  duke  of  Wellington  during 
the  Peninsular  war,  and  was  wounded  at  the  battle  of  Buaaco. 
Sept.  7, 1810.  He  recdred  ti  medal  for  his  serrieea  at  ossial- 
anC- quarter- master-general,  sC  Vittoria.  He  became  mijnr 
41sl  rii"M81!i  C.B.,  1815, and  K.T..  1820.  In1S54heat- 
tainnl  the  full  rank  of  general  in  llie  army.  In  184!  Ix  was 
appointed  governor  of  MadroB,  where  he  continued  tiil  1S46: 
oneof  the  sixteen  representative  peem,  lord-Iiedtenant  of  Had- 
dingtonshire, and  hercditorr  bailie  or  chamberlain  of  Dun- 
fennline.  He  married  in  ISIG.  Lady  Susan  Montague,  third 
dsugbler  of  the  5th  duke  of  Manchester :  issue,  6  aona  and  7 
dauEblers.  Sons:'  1.  George,  earl  of  GiBbrd,  bom  18!!.  !. 
I.ard  Arthur  Hay,  bom  1 824,  a  colonel  in  the  army.  3.  Lord 
Williiim  Montngiie,  bom  1826.  4.  Lord  John,  boni  IS!7,  and 
5.  Lord  Charles  Edward,  bom  in  IBM,  officers  in  the  army. 
C.Urd  Frederick,  bom  in  1835.  Daughlers:  l.I^dySosan 
fleorgJJina,  «.,  in  1830,  James,  Lord  Ratnuy,  anerwatdt 
marquis  of  Dalhoniie.  and  died  in  1853.  2.  Lady  Bannsb 
Charlotte,  bom  in  1818,  fii,  in  1843,  Simon  Watson  Taylor, 
Esq.  of  Earlstoke  Purk.  Wilt).  3.  Lady  Lonian  Jane,  bom 
in  1819.  m.  in  1841,  Dobert  B.  Wordlaw  Rams.iy.  Eh],  of 
Wfaiteliill,  with  iasne.  4.  Ijidy  Eliaibeth,  bom  in  1820,  ss.  ' 
in  1830.  Arthur,  marquis  of  Douro,  !d  dulie  of  Wellington. 
S.  IjidyJane.  6.  Ijidy  Julia.  7.  Ijidy  Emily,  m.  in  1856, 
Sir  Robert  Peel,  3d  hart,  of  Drayton  Manor,  SlnSbrdshire. 


lich  ha  beqnei 


Tttlkr,  the  surname  of  a  family  distingniahed  i 
eratnre  of  Scotland,  one  branch  of  which  possesses  ' 
of  Ealnain,  Invemcsa-eliire,  and  another  that  of  Wi 
ilated  a  largo  for<une,  lee.  Mid  Ij>thian,— the  "haunted  Woodbouseleo"  ol 
be  laid  out  in  the  pur-  ler  Scolfs  ballad  of 'The  Gray  Brolher.'  Tl.o  fan 
ille  of  Tweeddale.    He     oripnally  waa  Seton,  that  of  Tytler  baring  been  as 


TTTLER,  688  ALEXANDER  ERASER. 

lionie,  and,  in  17C5,  cutcicd  tlie  uiiivcrsit}'  of  Ed-  ond  edition  of  wliich  was  priuted  &t  Londoo  in 
itiburgli,  where  lie  prosecuted  liis  studies  with  180C.— Txii'd  AVoodliou^elce's  portrait  is  subjoined. 
great  success.  In  ITTO  he  was  admitted  advo- 
cate, and  in  the  spring  of  1771  lie  accompanied 
liU  I'elatiou,  Mr.  Kurr  of  Blacksliiel^,  on  a  tour  to 
Paris,  rctuniiug  by  Flanders  aud  Holland.  Iti 
1771  Ua  published,  at  Edinburgh,  'Piscatory  Ec- 
lo^CB,  with  other  Poetical  MisceJIanies,  by  Plii- 
uehas  Fletcher ;  illostrnted  »ith  Notes,  Criticnl 
and  Explaiintory.'  To  tlie  Works  of  Dr.  John 
Gregory,  publislied  in  1778,  he  contributed  tlie 
Preliniinury  accouut  of  the  Author's  Life  and 
Writings.  During  the  same  year  he  published  n 
folio  volume.  Supplementary  to  Lord  Kames's 
Dictionary  of  Decisions.  In  1780  be  was  ap- 
pointed, coiijnnctly  with  Jlr.  Pringle,  professor  of 
civil  hi:itory  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  and 
in  1786  he  became  sole  professor.  For  the  use  of 
Ills  Btudenla  Le  piinlcd,  in  1782,  'A  Flan  aud 
Outlines  of  a  Course  of  Lectures  on  Universal 
History,  Ancient  and  Klodern,'  wliicti  lie  after- 
wni'ds  enlarged  and  published,  in  1801,  in  2  vol^. 
8vo,  under  tlie  title  of '  Elements  of  General  His- 
tory, Ancient  and  Modem.'    In  1791  appealed, 

anonymously,  bis  best  ivork,  being  an 'Essay  on  Having  been  appointed  a  senator  of  tbe  college 
the  Principles  of 'rranslniion,' the  third  edition  of  of  justice,  he  took  his  seat  on  tlie  bench  of  ilie 
wliicli,  considerably  enlarged,  was  published  in  court  of  session,  February  2,  1802,  willi  tlie  title 
1813.  of  Lord  Woodbousclec,  and  in  1811  lie  became  a 

In  1790,  through  the  influence  of  Lord  Mel-  judgeofthc  jusliciaryeourt.  In  1807  be  published 
viile,  Mr.  Tyiler  was  np]>oiiited  judge- advocate  of  at  Edinburgh,  in  two  vnls.  4to,  '  Alemoirs  of  tlie 
Scotlnnd ;  aud  on  the  death  of  Iiis  father,  in  1792,  Life  and  Writings  of  the  lion.  Ilcnrj  Home, 
lie  succeeded  to  llie  estate  of  Woodhooselee,  near  Lord  Karnes ;'  and  in  1810  lie  produced  '  An  His- 
Edinburgh.  He  bnd  previously,  on  the  death  of  toricai  and  Critical  Essay  on  the  life  and  Cliar- 
hls  fallier-in-law,  become  possessed,  in  right  of  aetcr  of  Petrarch;  with  a  Translation  of  a  few  or 
bis  wife,  of  the  estate  of  Bnliinin,  in  the  county  of  his  Sonnets.'  Among  other  literary  project!, 
Inverness.  In  1799  he  published  an  edition  of  which  his  death  prevented  Ills  completing,  was 
Dr.  Derhain's  Physico-Tlicology,  with  an  Account  the  Life  of  George  Bnchannn.  He  died  at  Edin- 
of  the  Life  and  l\'rilings  of  tlie  Antlior,  aud  a  burgh,  January  5,  1813.  iu  the  68th  year  of  his 
short  * Dissertulion  on  Fiual  Causes,'  accompanied  age.  He  was  a  contributor  to  tlic  Mirror  and  the 
by  notes.  During  the  same  year  lie  wrote  a  pain-  Lounger,  and  also  commnnicaied  some  papers  to 
phlet,  which  was  published  iit  Dublin,  under  the  tlie  Transactions  of  the  Uojal  Society  of  Edin- 
title  of  '  Ireland  Profiting  by  Example ;  or  the  burgh,  of  wliich  he  was  an  original  member.  By 
Question  Considered,  whether  Scolland  has  Gain-  his  wife,  Ann,  eldest  daughter  of  William  Fra«T. 
cd  or  Lost  by  the  Union?'  which  came  out  at  Esq.  of  Balnain,  wliom  he  married  in  1776,  he 
such  a  seasonable  time  that,  on  the  day  of  publi-  left  four  sons  and  two  daughters.  Tbe  eldest  sou 
cation,  the  sale  amounted  to  three  thousand.  In  succeeded  to  the  estate  of  lialnaiii,  aud  the  second 
1800  appeared  from  his  pen  nn'I':ssay  on  Military  to  that  of  Woodbouselee.  .  Another  son,  Aleian- 
I^w,  and  tbe  Practice  of  Courts-Martial ;'  a  sec-    der,  published,  in  1815,  a  work  in  two  volume*. 


TYTLER, 


690 


PATRICK  FRASER. 


L 


cal  investigation,  tho  happy  bonrs  devoted  to  the 
pursuit  of  tnith,  are  at  an  end,  and  that  he  mnst 
at  last  bid  farewell  to  an  old  and  dear  companion/' 
The  work  commences  with  the  accession  of  Alex- 
ander III.  in  1249 ;  the  period  when  onr  national 
annals  become  particularly  interesting  to  the  gen- 
eral reader, — and  continues  to  the  accession  of 
James  YL  to  the  throne  of  England   in  1603. 
Mr.  Tytler's  style  is  plain  and  perspicuous,  always 
animated,  and  often  elegant  and  vigorons.    His 
laborious  researclies  begin  especially  to  be  most 
effective  when  he  reaches  the  troublous  times  of 
the  fifth  James.    He  is  then  most  successful  in 
bringing  new  sources  of  information  to  light,  in 
correcting  old  mistakes,  and  combating  and  over- 
turning cherished  prejudices.  The  first  and  second 
volumes  were  reviewed  by  Sir  Walter  Scott  in 
the  Quarterly,  and  he  intended,  had  he  lived,  to 
have  criticised  the  work  throughout,  for  he  con- 
sidered it,  says  Mr.  Lockhart,  as  a  very  impor- 
tant one  in  itself,  and  had,  moreover,  a  waim  re- 
gard for  the  author,  the  son  of  his  early  friend. 
Lord  Woodhouselee.    Mr.  Tytler's  high  chuiT.h 
episcopalian  principles  pervade  the  tone  of  his 
admirable  1iistor}%  and  a  charge  which,    in  the 
seventh  volume,  he  bronglit  against  John  Knox, 
of  being  " pre-cognizant  of  and  implicated  in" 
tlie  murder  of  David  Rizzio,  was  ably  answered 
by  the  Rev.  Tliomas  M*Crie,  D.D.,  son  of  the 
distinguished  biographer  of  Knox,  in  the  Appen- 
dix to  his  '  Sketclies  of  Scottish  Church  History,' 
ns  well  as  by  other  writers,  jealous  for  the  cliarac- 
ter  and  honour  of  tlie  great  reformer.    Tlie  evi- 
dence adduced  by  Mr.  Tytler  certainly  appears 
altogether  insufficient  to  sustain  such  a  charge,  in 
the  face  of  all  historical  testimony  to  the  contrary. 
Mr.  Tytler's   'Histoiy  of  Scotland'  introduced 
him  to  the  notice  of  Sir  Robert  Peel,  when  pre- 
mier, and  a  pension  of  £200  a-year  was  bestowed 
upon  him  by  government. 

During  the  period  when  he  was  chiefly  occupied 
in  tlie  composition  of  his  great  national  work,  Mr. 
Tytler  wrote  several  other  works  of  interest  and 
value,  a  list  of  which  is  given  below.  One  of 
these,  contributed  to  the  *  Family  Library,'  pub- 
lished by  Mr.  Murray,  entitled  'Lives  of  Scottish 
Worthies,'  in  3  vols.  12mo,  contained  biographies 
of  Alexander  TIL,  Michael  Scott,  Sir  William 


Wallace,  Robert  the  Bruce,  John  Barbour,  An- 
drew Winton,  John  do  Fordonn,  James  L,  Robert 
Henryson,  William  Dunbar,  and  Sir  David  Lind- 
say, and  was  one  of  the  most  attractive  of  his 
publications.  His  life  of  Sir  Walter  Raleigh, 
1832,  is  remarkable  for  the  view  which  he  starts 
and  supports  on  the  subject  of  Sir  Robert  Cecirs 
plots,  connected  with  RaleigVs  ruin.  It  contains 
some  new  materials  of  interest,  and  is  valuable  for 
its  able  defence  of  that  adventurous  and  interest- 
ing personage,  and  for  its  careful  digest  of  state 
papers,  and  graphic  descriptions  of  contemporane- 
ous events.  The  same  indeed  may  be  said  of  all 
Mr.  Tytler's  works. 

With  his  other  attainments,  he  was  a  good  lyr- 
ical poet,  and  about  1829  he  wrote  a  few  verses 
for  one  of  the  ^  Bannatjrne  Garlands.'  Having  in 
his  youth  served  in  the  Mid  Lothian  yeomanry 
cavalry,  the  lively  songs  which  he  then  composed, 
having  reference  to  the  military  duties  of  himself 
and  comrades,  were  frequently  sung  with  great 
applause  at  the  mess  table.  In  1833,  in  conjunc- 
tion with  Ml*.  Hog  of  Newliston,  and  Mr.  Adam 
Ui*quhart,  advocate,  ho  presented  to  the  Banna- 
tyne  and  Maitland  Clubs,  a  volume  illustrative  of 
the  Revolution,  entitled  *  Memoirs  of  the  War 
cniTied  on  in  Scotland  and  Ireland  in  1^9-91,* 
by  Major-general  Hugh  Mackay. 

Mr.  Tytler's  constitution,  never  robust,  gradu- 
ally gave  way  under  the  exhausting  laboui-s  of  a 
literary  life.     He  was  a  severe  and  in  general  an 
accurate  historical  student;  and  his  pension,  it 
was  thought,  would  have  enabled  him  to  continue 
his   researches  in  British   history,   and   perhaps 
have  induced  him  to  have  written  a  work  con- 
nected with  the  annals  of  England,  which  he  is 
known  to  have  contemplated,  and  for  wliich  he 
collected  materials.     For  the  last  six  or  seven 
years  of  his  life,  however,  the  state  of  his  health 
prevented  him  from  pursuing  his  favourite  studies. 
He  died  at  Great  Malvern,  Worcestershire,  on 
Christmas  eve,  1849,  in  his  59th  year.     He  was 
twice  married.    His  first  wife,  Rachel  Elizabeth, 
daughter  of  Thomas  Hog,  Esq.  of  Newliston,  died 
in  1835.    By  her  he  had  two  sons,  Alexander  and 
Thomas  Patrick,  both  in  the  East  India  Company's 
military  service,  and  one  daughter.     His  second 
wife,  Anastasia,  daughter  ofThomsonBonar,  Esq. 


;     I 


TYTLER, 


592 


JAMES. 


miscellaneous  literary  work  of  almost  every  de- 
scription, for  which  he  was  remarkably  well 
adapted,  having  a  general  knowledge  of  nearly 
every  subject,  and  of  most  of  the  sciences. 

He  was  employed  by  a  surgeon  to  compile  for 
him  a  '  System  of  Surgery,*  which  made  its  np- 
-pearauce  in  8  vols.  8vo,  in  1793*  This  work  he 
had  not  completed  when  he  was  compelled  to 
quit  Scotland,  but  he  finished  it  at  Belfast  before 
crossing  the  Atlantic.  He  was  also  an  occasional 
contributor  to  the  *  Medical  Commentaries,'  and 
other  periodical  publications  of  the  time.  It  is 
stated  by  Dr.  Watt,  in  his  ^  Bibliotheca  Britanni- 
ca,*  that  he  conducted  a  weekly  paper  called  '  The 
Observer,'  comprehending  a  series  of  Essays,  pub- 
lished at  Glasgow  in  1786,  and  extending  to  26 
numbers,  folio.  Of  these,  the  first  number  was 
the  only  one  literally  penned  by  this  singular  in- 
dividutil,  the  rest  being  printed  by  him  without 
the  aid  of  a  manuscript,  according  to  his  usual 
practice. 

The  principal  work  on  which  Tytler  was  en- 
gaged was  the  second  edition  of  the  *•  Encyclopae- 
dia Britannica,'  of  which  he  was  the  principal 
editor,  and  furnished  to  its  pages  a  large  propor- 
tion of  the  more  considerable  scientific  treatises 
and  histories,  and  almost  all  the  minor  ai*ticlcs. 
On  his  leaving  the  sanctuary  at  Holyrood-housc, 
he  took  lodgings,  first  at  Restalrig,  or  Dudding- 
stone,  and  afterwards  within  the  town;  but  on 
becoming  connected  with  the  *  Encyclopaedia  Bri- 
tannica,'  an  apartment  was  assigned  to  him  in  the 
printing-ofUcc,  where  this  extraordinary  genius 
performed  the  functions  of  compiler  and  corrector 
of  the  press,  at  the  superb  salary  of  sixteen  shil- 
lings per  week  I  When  the  third  edition  was  un- 
dertaken, ho  was  engaged  as  a  stated  contributor, 
upon  more  liberal  terms,  and  wrote  a  larger  share 
of  the  early  volumes  than  is  ascribed  to  him  in 
the  general  preface. 

At  one  period  of  his  career  ho  conducted  a 
manufactory  of  magnesia  for  a  Mr.  Robert  Wright 
of  Colinton ;  but  after  he  had  fairly  established  it, 
he  was  dismissed,  without  obtaining  either  a  share 
in  the  business,  or  a  suitable  compensation  for  his 
services.  One  of  his  most  eccentric  actions  was 
Ills  attempt  to  ascend  in  a  balloon,  constructed  on 
the  plan  of  Montgolfier,  which,  however,  from 


some  unforeseen  defect  in  the  macliiueryf  proved 
a  failure.  He  was  ever  aflerwards  known  in  Ed- 
inburgh as  ''  Balloon  Tytler.**  NotwithsUndlDg 
hlfl  acknowledged  talents  and  industry^  his  intem- 
perate habits,  and  want  of  prudence  and  perM- 
verance,  kept  him  always  poor  and  dependent 
Bums,  in  his  Notes  on  Scottish  Song,  describes 
him  as  '*  an  obscure,  tippling,  but  extraordinary 
body,  who  drudges  about  Edinburgh  as  a  com- 
mon printer,  witli  leaky  shoes,  a  sky-llgfated  hat, 
and  knee  buckles.**  As  a  proof  of  the  extraordinary 
stock  of  general  knowledge  which  he  possessed, 
and  the  ease  with  which  he  conld  write  on  any 
subject,  almost  extempore,  the  following  anecdote 
is  related  of  him.  A  gentleman  of  Edinburgh, 
who  had  once  occasion  to  apply  to  Tytler  for  as 
much  matter  as  would  form  a  junction  between  a 
certain  history  and  its  continuation  to  a  later  pe- 
riod, found  him  lodged  in  one  of  those  elevated 
apartments  c.illed  garrets,  and  was  informed  by 
the  old  woman  with  whom  he  lived  that  he  conld 
not  be  seen,  as  he  had  gone  to  bed  rather  the 
worse  of  liquor.  Determined,  however,  not  to 
depart  without  his  errand,  the  gentleman  was 
shown  into  Mr.  Tyt1er*s  apartment  by  the  light  of 
a  lamp,  where  he  found  him  in  the  situation  de- 
scribed by  his  landlady.  The  gentleman  having 
acquainted  him  with  the  nature  of  his  business, 
Mr.  Tytler  called  for  pen,  ink,  and  paper,  and  in 
a  short  time  produced  about  a  page  and  a  half  of 
Ietter-pi*css,  which  answered  the  end  proposed  as 
completely  as  if  it  had  been  the  result  of  the  most 
mature  deliberation. 

Having  joined  the  Society  of  "  Friends  of  the 
People,"  Tytler  published  *A  Pamphlet  on  the 
Excise,*  containing  an  exposition  of  the  abuses  of 
Government.  In  1792  he  conducted  a  periodical 
publication  entitled  'The  Historical  Register,  or 
Edinburgh  Montlily  Intelligencer,*  in  whicli  be 
systematically  advocated  parliamentaty  reform. 
About  the  close  of  that  year  he  published  *A 
Handbill,  addressed  to  the  People,*  written  in 
such  an  inflammatory  style  as  to  render  him  ob- 
noxious to  the  authorities.  learning  that  a  war- 
rant was  issued  for  his  apprehension,  he  suddenly 
disappeared  from  Edinburgh,  leaving  his  family 
behind  him,  and  finding  his  way  to  Ii*eland,  em- 
barked from  that  country  for  America.    He  was 


I, 


c 


I 


I 


1  I 


TYTLER. 


598 


URE. 


cited  before  tlie  high  coiut  of  justiciary,  but  failing 
to  appear,  was  outlawed,  January  7, 1793.  On  his 
arrival  in  the  United  States,  he  fixed  his  residence 
at  Salem,  Massaclinsetts,  where  he  established  a 
newspaper,  which  he  conducted  till  his  death  in 
the  end  of  1803,  in  the  58th  year  of  his  age. 
Ills  known  works  are : 

Tlie  Pleasures  of  the  Abbey. 

KsMys  on  the  most  important  Subjects  of  Natural  and 
Revealed  Religion.     Edin.  1772,  8vo. 

I.etter  to  Mr.  John  Barclay  on  the  Doctrine  of  Assurance. 

The  Weekly  Mirror;  a  Periodical  Publication,  begun  in 
1780. 

The  Observer ;  a  Weekly  Paper,  comprehending  a  series  of 
Essays,  published  in  Glasgow  in  1786,  and  extending  to  26 
numbers,  folio. 

A  System  of  Geography.    1788,  8vo. 

A  History  of  Edinburgh.    12mo. 

The  Edinburgh  Geographical,  Historical,  and  Commercial 
Grammar.     2  vols.  8vo. 

A  Review  of  Dritchken*8  Theory  of  Inflammation ;  with  a 
practical  dedication.     12mo. 

Remarks  on  Mr.  Pinkerton*s  Introduction  to  the  Historv 
of  Scotland.     8vo. 

A  Poetical  Translation  of  Virgirs  Eclogues,    4to. 

A  Pamphlet  on  the  Excise. 

The  Historical  Register;  a  Periodical  Publication. 

Tht  Gentleman  and  Lady*s  Magazine;  publiMhed  monthly. 

The  Weekly  Review;  a  Literary  l^liscellany.     1780. 

TYTLER,  Henry  AVilliam,  ^I.D.,  physician 


and  translator,  younger  brother  of  the  preceding, 
was  born  at  Fern,  near  Brechin,  in  1752 ;  being 
the  son  of  the  minister  of  that  place.  Addicting 
himself  to  the  translation  of  classic  poetry,  the 
first  work  by  which  he  made  himself  known  was  , 
*  P«dotrophia,  or  the  Art  of  Nursing  and  Rearing 
Children,  a  Poem  in  three  Books,  from  the  I^tin 
of  St.  Marthe,  with  Medical  and  Historical  Notes, 
and  the  Life  of  the  Author,'  8vo,  published  in 
1797.  He  died  at  Edinburgh,  Angust  24,  1808. 
At  his  death  he  left  in  mannscript,  *  The  Works 
of  Callimachns,  translated  into  English  Verse; 
the  Hymns  and  Epigrams  from  the  Greek,  with 
the  Coma  Berenices  from  the  Latin  of  Catullns ; 
with  the  original  Texts  and  Notes,*  said  to  be  the 
first  English  translation  of  a  Greek  poet  by  a  na- 
tive of  Scotland.  Its  publication  was  kindly  ed- 
ited by  the  earl  of  Buchan.  Dr.  Tytler  was  also 
the  author  of  a  *  Voyage  from  the  Cape  of  Good 
Hope,'  nnd  other  poems,  pnblished  in  1804,  and 
of  some  pieces  in  the  Gentleman's  Magazine  and 
other  periodicals.  He  completed  a  translation  of 
the  Seventeen  Books  of  the  Poem  on  the  Punic 
War,  by  Silius  Italicus,  with  a  Preface  and  Com- 
mentaiT. 


U 


URE,  Andrew,  ^I.D.,  a  distinguished  chemi- 
cal philosopher,  was  born  in  Glasgow,  18th  May 
1778.  He  studied  at  the  univei'sity  of  his  native 
city,  and  subsequently  at  that  of  Edinburgh.  Af- 
terwards he  engaged  in  the  establishment  of  the 
Glasgow  ObsciTatory,  where  he  resided  for  some 
time,  and  where  he  was  honoured  with  a  visit 
from  the  celebrated  Sir  AVilliam  Herschell.  In 
the  year  1806,  on  the  resignation  of  Dr.  Birkbeck, 
he  was  appointed  professor  of  chemistry  and  nat- 
ural philosophy  ill  the  Audersonian  univei'sity  of 
Glasgow.  Eloquent  as  a  lecturer,  he  was  most 
successful  in  his  class  experiments.  In  1818  he 
brought  forward  his  *New  Experimental  Re- 
searches on  some  of  the  leading  doctrines  of  Ca- 
in. 


loric,  particularly  on  the  relation  between  the 
elasticity,  temperature,  and  latent  heat  of  differ- 
ent vapours,  and  on  thermometric  admeasure- 
ment and  capacity,'  which  was  read  before  tlie 
iloyal  Society,  and  published  in  their  *  Transac- 
tions '  for  that  year.  Sir  James  Ivory,  ^fr.  Dan- 
iel, and  other  philosophers,  adopted  the  conclu- 
sions offered  in  this  paper,  as  the  bases  of  their 
meteorological  theories. 

In  1821,  Dr.  Ure  published  the  first  edition  of 
his  well-known  *  Dictionary  of  Chemistry,'  which 
procured  him  the  friendship  of  Sir  Humphrey 
Davy,  Dr.  AVollaston,  and  Dr.  E.  D.  Clarke.  In 
1822,  in  which  year  he  became  a'fellow  of  the 

Royal  Society,  his  paper  on  the  *  Ultimate  Analy- 

2p 


\ 


\ 


/ 


1 1 


■  I 


IJRQUHART, 


594 


SIR  THOMAS. 


sis  of  Vegetable  Substances*  appeared  in  the  Phi- 
losophical Transactions.  lu  1829  ho  published 
his  System  of  Geology ;  in  1835,  his  Philosophy 
of  Manufactures ;  and  in  1836,  his  work  on  the 
Cotton  Manufactures  of  Great  Britain, — the  latter 
in  two  Tolumes.  His  next  great  work,  one  of 
immense  labour  and  research,  was  the  *  Dictionary 
of  Arts,  Manufactures,  and  Mines,'  the  last  edi- 
tion of  which  in  his  lifetime,  appeared  in  1852. 
This  work  has  been  translated  into  several  of  the 
continental  languages. 

Dr.  Ure  was  remarkable  for  accuracy  in  chemi- 
cal analysis,  and  it  has  been  stated  by  competent 
authority,  that  none  of  his  results  have  ever  been 
overturned.  He  was  one  of  the  original  fellows 
of  the  Geological  Society.  He  also  belonged  to 
the  Astronomical  Society,  and  was  a  member  of 
several  continental  societies.  In  1880  he  went  to 
reside  In  Loudon,  where  he  died  2d  January  1857. 

UuQUiiART,  or  Ukchard,  the  name  of  n  minor  clan, 
(^Urachduih)  originally  settled  in  Cromarty,  (badge,  the 
wallflower,)  a  branch  of  the  clan  Forbes.  Nisbet  savs,  **  A 
brother  of  Oclionchar,  who  slew  the  bear,  and  was  predeces- 
srir  of  the  Lords  Forbes,  having  in  keeping  the  casUe  of  Ur- 
quliart,  took  his  surname  from  the  place.**  This  castle  stood 
on  the  south  side  of  Loch  Ness,  and  was  in  ancient  times  a 
place  of  great  strength  and  importance,  as  is  apparent 
from  its  extensive  and  magnificent  mins.  In  that  fabulous 
work,  *  The  true  pedigree  and  lineal  descent  of  the  most  an- 
cient and  honourable  family  of  Urquhart,  since  the  creation 
of  the  world,  by  Sir  Thomas  Urquhart,  Knight  of  Cromartie,* 
the  origin  of  the  family  and  name  is  ascribed  to  Ourohartos^ 
that  is,  *  fortunate  and  well-beloved,*  the  familiar  name  of 
Ksormon,  of  whom  the  eccentric  author  describes  himself  as 
the  128th  descendant  He  traces  his  pedigree,  in  a  direct 
line,  even  up  to  Adam  and  Eve,  and  according  to  him,  the 
meaning  of  the  word  Urquhart  is  the  same  as  that  of  Adam, 
namely,  •  red  earth.^ 

The  family  of  Urquhart  is  one  of  great  antiquity.  In 
HailcH*  Annals,  it  is  mentioned  that  Edward  I.  of  England, 
daring  the  time  of  the  competition  for  the  Scottish  crown, 
ordered  a  list  of  the  sheriff:*  in  Scotland  to  be  made  out 
Among  them  appears  the  name  of  William  Urquhart  of  Cro- 
martie, heritable  sheriff  of  the  county.  He  married  a  daugh- 
ter of  Hugh,  earl  of  Ross,  and  his  son  Adam  obtained  charters 
of  various  lands.  A  descendant  of  his,  Thomas  Urquhart  of 
Cromartie,  who  lived  in  the  16th  century,  was  father  of  11 
daughters  and  25  sons,  ^xtn  of  the  latter  fell  at  the  bat- 
tle of  Pinkie  in  1547,  and  from  another  derived  the  Urquharts 
of  Newhall,  Montea^le,  Kinbeachie,  and  Braelangwell. 

The  eldest  son,  Alexander  Urquhart  of  Cromartie,  had  a 
cliarter  from  Jame»  V.  of  the  lands  of  Inch  Rory  and  others, 
in  the  shires  of  Ross  and  Inverness,  dated  March  7,  1532. 
He  had  two  sons.  The  younger  son,  Jehn  Urquhart,  bom  in 
1547,  became  tutor  to  his  grand-nephew.  Sir  Thomas  Ur- 
quhart, and  was  well  known  afterwards  by  the  designation  of 
the  "  tutor  of  Cromartie."    He  died  Nov.  8,  1 681,  aged  84. 

Of  Sir  Thomas,  the  family  genealogist,  a  memoir  follows 


in  larger  type.  He  was  succeeded  by  a  brothsr,  whose 
ceoor,  a  cousin  of  his  own,  sold  what  remained  of  the  family 
property  to  the  Mackenziea,  afterwards  caris  of  Cromartie. 
The  mide  line  ended  in  Cobnel  James  Urq[iihart,  sn  efieer  ef 
much  distinction,  who  died  in  1741.  The  representatasn  of 
the  family  devolved  on  the  Urquharts  of  firacUngwcll,  vfaidi 
was  sold  (with  the  exception  of  a  small  portion,  which  is 
strictly  entailed)  by  Charles  Gordon  Urqahazt,  Esq.,  sn  eii- 
cerhi  the  ScoU  Greys.  The  Utter*a  brother,  David  Urqahait, 
Esq.,  at  one  period  secretary  to  the  British  legation  at  Con- 
stantinople, and  author  of  a  work  on  the  Resonroes  of  Turkey, 
and  other  publications,  became  representative  of  the  fiunily. 


The  Urqnharta  of  If  eldmm,  Aberdeenshire,  obtained  that 
estate  through  the  marriage,  in  1610,  of  their  aooestor,  Jeka 
Urquhart  of  Craigfintry,  tutor  of  Cromarty,  with  EUsabcCk 
Seton,  heiress  of  Meldrum.  The  Urquharts  of  Craigrtoii, 
and  a  few  more  families  of  the  nsme,  still  possess  estates  m 
the  north  of  Scotland.  And  persons  of  this  surname  are  atiO 
numerous  in  the  counties  of  Ross  and  Cromarty.  In  Rosi- 
shire,  Invemcss-shire,  and  Morayshire,  there  are  parishes  of 
the  name  of  Urquhart 

URQUHART,  Sib  Thomas,  of  Cromartie,  a 
quaint  old  writer  of  the  seventeenth  centmy,  is 
chiefly  known  as  the  translator  of  Rabelais,  lie 
appears  to  have  at  one  period  travelled  mnch  on 
the  continent.  Ue  afterwards  became  a  cavalier 
officer,  and  was  knighted  by  Charles  I.  at  White- 
hall. After  that  monarches  decapitation,  he  ac- 
companied Charles  n.  in  his  march  into  England, 
and  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Worcester 
in  1651,  when  his  estates  were  forfeited  by  Crom- 
well. The  year  following  he  published  at  Lon- 
don, where  he  was  detained  for  some  time  on  his 
parole,  a  singular  piece,  entitled  '  The  Discovery 
of  a  most  exquisite  Jewel,  found  in  the  kennel  of 
Worcester  Streets  the  day  after  the  Fight,  and  six 
before  the  Autumnal  Equinox,  anno  1651,  serving 
in  this  Place  to  frontal  a  Vindication  of  the  Hon- 
our  of  Scotland  from  that  Infamy  wherennto  the 
rigid  Presbyterian  Party  of  that  Nation,  oat  of 
their  Covetousness  and  Ambition,  most  dissem- 
bledly  hath  involved  it.^  He  also  wiote  the  adven- 
tures of  the  Admirable  Crichton,  and  among  vari- 
ous other  curious  matters,  his  inventive  genins 
fabricated  the  strange  and  original  genealogy  of  the 
Urquhart  fumily  above  mentioned.  His 'Jewel* 
was  written  for  the  avowed  purpose  of  helping 
him  to  the  recovery  of  his  estates,  as  he  conceived 
that  the  Protector  would  have  been  so  dazzled  by 
the  extraordinary  talent  displayed  in  it,  as  to 
have  readily  restored  them,  and  he  boasts  that 
it  was  the  prodaction  of  fourteen  days  1 


■  I 


VERE, 


596 


WALLACE. 


Scheuk,  lithographer  of  Edinburgh.  His  last  work 
was  *•  Reynard  the  Fox,*  a  spirited  adaptation  from 
the  famous  German  fable  of  that  name,  embellished 
with  illustrations,  lie  furnished  additions  to 
George  Thomson^s  *  Musical  ^liscellany,*  poetry 
to  the  *•  Christian  Herald,*  edited  by  the  Rev.  Dr. 
Gardner,  songs  to  the  *•  Book  of  Scottish  Song,* 
and  to  *  Whistle  Binkie,*  the  two  latter  Glasgow 
publications.  lie  likewise  wrote  the  greater  part 
of  the  letterpress  for  Geikie*s  popular  volume  of 
*  Etchings.' 

Mr.  Vedder  retired  from  active  duty  in  1852, 
and  died  at  Edinburgh,  Feb.  11,  1854,  aged  63. 


Vkrb,  m  garnaoM,  luidenUy  Ttriouly  writtca  da  Vcn,  Ttyr, 
Were,  and  Wur.  Radalphna  or  Balph  da  Vara,  held  hi^ 
eBt«teaiiiLaniirki]iire,fai^.  AlejumdarlL  Tbaermtaalhar- 
enofthcMeatatct,  Catherine,  only  efaUd  of  Sir  WiUiaaWeic, 
2d  Bart  of  BIad[irood,  ai.,  in  1738,  Hoo.  Cbmiaa  Hope,  af 
Cniigiehall,  2d  ion  of  8d  Earl  of  Hopetonn.  Tha  dfaewidMt 
and  repreeentatiTa  of  the  hnuij,  WiOinni  Edward  Hope  Yere, 
Esq.,  of  CnigiebaU  and  Blackwood,  bora  in  18X4,  aDceeeded 
Uu  father  in  1848,  and  m.,  in  1857,  Lady  Maiy  EmUj  Bojk^ 
sister  of  9tb  earl  of  Cork,  with  ii 


Vipojrr,  a  surname  originalljr  Vetera-poota.  A  fiudj  if 
this  name,  in  ancient  times,  posaeaaed  the  lands  of  Abeidov, 
Fireahire.  It  ended  in  an  heir  female,  who  nanild,  in  I12C, 
Ahinns  de  Mortno-Maria  or  Moitinicr.  In  tho  soeoad  eea> 
turj  tbereaAer  these  Unds  became  the  property  of  the  Dea- 
glasea,  anceston  of  the  ecrls  of  ^lorton. 


teX.^  ^-^--v^^ 


w 


Waij)IR,  originalljr  M'aitho  or  Watho^  and  afterwards 
WaltAo  or  PTo/c/te,  tlie  samame  of  h  Koxbarghshire  famiir, 
tile  first  of  which  that  can  be  traced  in  anjr  record,  Thomas 
Waitlio,  was  public  and  pnpal  notary  to  tlie  abbacy  of  Kelso. 
•John  Wnltho,  proprietor,  by  succession,  of  a  considenilile  por- 
tion of  the  Marklunds  of  Kelso,  had  a  son,  George,  living  in 
1 652,  who  was  the  fintt  to  spell  liis  name  Waldie.  He  got  a 
charter  of  his  lands  from  tlie  Karl  of  Roxburgh  in  1664. 

1 1  is  descendant,  another  George  Waldie,  died  in  1745. 
This  gentleman  had  a  son,  John  Waldie,  K.«iq.,  of  Berryhill 
and  Hayhope,  who  married  Jean,  eldest  daughter  and  heiress 
of  Charles  Ormston,  Esq.,  of  llenderxyde,  an  old  Kelso  family, 
'i'hat  estate  had  been  purchased  in  1715  from  Edmonstone  of 
Kdnam,  and  by  this  marriage  it  came  to  the  family  of  Waldie. 
lie  had  2  sons,  George  and  Robert. 

George  Wuldie  of  Hendersyde  Park,  the  elder  son,  m.,  in 
1 779,  Ann,  eldest  daughter  of  Jonathan  Ormhton,  Esq.,  of  New- 
castle-on-Tyne,  and  died  in  1826.  He  had  one  son,  John 
Waldie,  D.L.,  bom  in  1781,  who  succeeded  him,  and  3  daugh- 
ters. 1.  Maria  Jane,  m.,  Richard  GrlHith,  Eaiq.,  Dublin,  with 
iiMue.  2.  Charlotte,  m.,  in  1822,  Stephen  Euton,  Esq.,  of 
.Stamford,  issue,  2  sons  and  2  dn.  3.  Jane,  to.,  in  1820, 
(leorge  Edward  Watts,  afterwards  Adnnral  Watts;  issue, 
a  son,  William  Charics,  who  died  in  1861. 

Robert,  the  second  son  of  John  WaUiie,  Esq.,  was  a  school- 
fellow at  Kelso,  of  Sir  Walter  Scott,  in  the  first  volume  of 
whose  Life  by  Lockhart,  mention  is  made  of  him  and  of  his 
mother,  a  Quaker  lady.  The  kind  attentions  he  received  from 
tiie  Waldie  family,  s;iys  his  biographer,  "nave  left  strong 
traces  on  every  page  of  his  works  in  which  he  has  occsision  to 
introduce  the  Society  of  Friends."  Mr.  I.ockliart  adds,  "1 
riMnember  the  pleasure  with  which  he  read,  late  in  life,  'Rome 
in  the  Nineteenth  Century,'  an  ingenious  work,  produce(f  by 
one  of  Mr.  Waldie's  graftid-dangliters,  and  how  comically  he 
depicted  the  alann  with  which  his  ancient  friend  would  have 
peru.ved  some  of  its  delineations  of  the  high  places  of  Popery." 

The  grand-daughter,  Ijere  referred  to,  wjis  Mrs.  Eaton,  2d 
.laughlei-  of  George  Waldie,  Esq.,  of  Hendersyde  Park.  Be- 
HJ'ics  -Uonie  in  the  Nineteenth  Cenlury,'  published  in 
1J20:  she  was  authoi-ess  of  »At  Home  and  Abroad;'  *  Three 


days  in  Relginm  ;*  *  Days  of  Battle,*  &c.  Bom  in  1788,  sbe 
died  in  1859.  Her  youngest  sister,  Mrs.  Watts,  (bora  to 
1790,  died  in  July  1826,)  was  early  distingatabed  for  ber 
taste  in  literature  and  art.  Sbe  ezecoted  between  40  and  50 
pictures  in  oil  colours,  besides  nnmeroos  pieces  in  water  colour 
and  pencil.  Many  of  her  paintings  were  exhibited  at  the 
Royal  Acidemy  and  British  Gallery,  and  were  justly  ad- 
mired. She  was  at  Brussels  during  the  battle  of  Waterloo, 
and  visited  the  field  while  as  yet  the  bodies  of  the  dead  were 
sc'iroely  interred.  Her  sister,  Mrs.  Eaton,  was  with  ber,  both 
sisters  being  then  unm:urried.  Mrs.  Watts  took  a  panoramic 
sketch  of  tlie  field,  a  copy  of  wliich  she  carried  with  ber  to 
London,  and  published  it,  with  a  description  by  herself.  This 
little  work,  entitled,  '  Waterloo,  by  a  near  Obserrer,*  went 
through  ten  editions  in  the  course  of  a  few  moutlis.  In  1820 
'  appeared  her  *  Sketches  in  Italy,*  and  met  with  great 


Wallace,  a  surname,  the  most  illn:>trioiis  in  the  annabof 
Scotland,  originally  rariously  written  Walence  or  WalejiL 
The  progenitor  of  all  the  families  of  the  name  of  Wallace  io 
this  country  is  said  to  have  been  Eimeros  Galeias  so  called 
on  account  of  his  liaving  been,  according  to  Sir  James  Dal- 
rymple,  a  native  of  Wales.     Tliose  of  this  name  are,  bow- 
ever,  of  Anglo-Nonnan  extraction.     Eimero?,  a  witness  of 
the  foundation  charter  of  the  abbacy  of  Kelan  by  Darid  I. 
about  1128,  is  supposed  to  hare  been  the  father  of  Rtchani 
Waiense,  who  obtained  from  the  high-steward  of  SooUaad  s 
considenible  portion  of  the  district  of  Kyle  in  Ayrshirs,  and 
was  one  of  the  witnesses  to  the  charter  of  the  Abbey  of  Pais- 
ley, founded  in  1160  by  Walter  the  high-steward.    His  lands 
ill  Ayrsliire  he  named  Richardton  after  himself,  now  ^car- 
ton, the  name  of  a  village  and  parish  in  that  county.    He 
was  the  most  powerful  vassal  of  the  Stewarta  in  Kyle.    Hii 
elder  son,  also  named  Rich:trd,  was  contemporary  with  Alan, 
the  high-steward,  who  died  abtmt  1204.     Tliis  second  Bidi- 
ard  was  the  first  who  spelled  his  name  Walays,  and  on  bis 
death,  his  younger  brother,  Henry  Walays,  succeeded  to  the 
family  estiites.     Early  in  the  13th  centniy  Henry  acquired 
some  Ui.ao  under  the  Stewarts  in  Benfrewshire.    These  buds 
were  inherited  by  Adam  Walays,  said  to  bare  been  liring  io 


jj 


WALLACE, 


598 


SIR  WILLIAM. 


when  hU  political  and  personal  friends  came  forward  to  his 
assistance.  A  pablic  testimonial  realized  between  three  and 
four  thousand  pounds,  which  sum  was  inrested  in  the  pur- 
chase of  an  annuity  of  about  £500  a-year.  Mr.  Wallace 
died  Slst  March  1855,  aged  82.  He  used  to  boast  of  his  de- 
scent from  Sir  William  Wallace,  a  name  which,  he  said,  he 
was  proud  of,  and  which  he  hoped  he  had  uerer  done  any- 
thing to  sully.  His  brother,  Sir  James  Maxwell  Wallace, 
K.H.,  a  Waterloo  officer,  attained  the  rank  of  lieutenant- 
general  in  the  army  in  1855. 

Sir  William  Wallace  had  no  legitimate  issue,  but  is  sud  to 
have  left  a  natural  daughter,  who,  according  to  tradition, 
married  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Stoprig,  **  a  squire  of  the  BaUol 
blood/*  as  he  is  called  by  Blair,  progenitor  of  the  Baillies  of 
Lamington,  an  estate  which  previously  belonged  to  a  family 
of  the  name^  Braidfoot. 

The  Wallaces  of  Caimhill,  an  Ayrshupe  family,  possessed 
that  estate  for  more  than  two  centuries.  About  the  beginning 
of  the  18th  century,  Thomas  Wallace,  father  of  John  Wal- 
lace of  Cessnock,  above  mentioned,  acquired  the  lands  of 
Caimhill,  and  died  in  April  1748.  His  elder  son,  William 
Wallace,  advocate,  who  died  at  Glasgow  16th  November  1763, 
was  the  author  of  a  song  called  *  Strephon  and  Lydia.*  He 
was  cousin  of  Wallace  of  Kelly. 

Another  William  Wallace,  advocate,  the  son  of  Robert 
Wallace  of  Holmston,  Ayrshire,  writer  to  the  Mgnet,  was  in 
December  1752  appointed  professor  of  universal  history  in 
the  univerfkity  of  Edinburgh.  He  was  afterwards  professor 
of  Scots  law,  one  of  the  assessors  of  the  city,  and  sheriff- 
depute  of  Ayrshire,  and  died  28th  November  1786. 

WALLACE,  Sir  William,  the  heroic  defender 
of  the  liberties  and  independence  of  Scotland,  was 
the  second  son  of  Sir  Malcolm  Wallace,  knight  of 
Eldcrslie  and  Auchiiibotliie,  Renfrewshire,  and  his 
wife,  the  danghtcr  of  Sir  Raynauld  Crawford,  sheriff 
of  Ayr.  His  lineage  is  given  above.  He  was  born, 
it  is  conjectured,  about  the  middle  of  the  reign  of 
Alexander  III.,  or  abont  1276.  His  early  years 
are  snid  to  have  been  passed  under  the  superin- 
tendence of  his  nncle,  a  wealthy  ecclesiastic,  at 
Dunipacc,  in  Stirlingshirc,  from  whom  he  received 
the  first  rudiments  of  his  education,  and  who  was 
careful  to  instil  into  his  youthful  breast  the  strong- 
est sentiments  of  patriotism  and  independence. 
.After  the  subversion  of  the  liberties  of  bis  country 
by  Edward  I.  of  England,  he  was  sent  to  the  se- 
minary attached  to  the  cathedral  of  Dundee, 
where  he  contracted  a  friendship  with  John  Blair, 
a  Benedictine  monk,  who  afterwards  became  his 
chaplain.  Being  an  eye-witness  of  most  of  the 
actions  of  Wallace,  Blair,  with  the  assistance  of 
Thomas  Gi'ny,  pai*son  of  Libberton,  composed  a 
history  of  them  in  Latin,  and  from  that  work, 
only  a  few  frngments  of  which  have  been  pre- 
served, was  derived  much  of  the  information  con- 


tained in  the  celebrated  poem  of  Blind  Hany  tin 
Minstrel,  where  most  of  Wallace's  achieTements 
have  been  commemorated. 

The  snbjogation  of  his  native  conntrj  bj  tin 
English,  and  the  wanton  ontragea  committed  by 
the  soldiery  who  were  left  to  garrison  the  Tarioiit 
castles  -and  principal  towns,  roused  Wallace's  m- 
dignation,  and  he  formed  an  associaUon  among 
hui  fellow-students,  for  the  purpose  of  defending 
themselves  and  punishing  the  aggressions  of  the 
intruders,  whenever  opportunities  offered.  Having 
been  publicly  insulted  by  a  youth  named  Selby, 
the  son  of  the  governor  of  Dundee,  he  drew  his 
dagger  and  struck  him  dead  on  the  q[>ot,  and 
though  immediately  surrounded  by  the  friends  of 
the  deceased,  he  luckily  effected  his  escape,  alter 
killing  two  or  three  other  Englishmen  who  at- 
tempted to  intercept  hb  flight.  For  this  deed  be 
was  proclaimed  a  traitor,  outlawed,  and  forced  for 
some  time  to  lurk  among  the  woods  and  moun- 
tain fastnesses  of  the  country.  His  extraordinary 
personal  strength,  undaunted  courage,  enterpris- 
ing spirit,  and  dexterity,  as  well  as  his  ardent  at- 
tachment to  his  native  country,  with  his  inextin- 
guishable hatred  of  its  oppressors,  rendered  hun 
peculiarly  fitted  to  be  the  leader  of  a  band  of  pa- 
triots burning  to  avenge  the  wrongs  of  their  suf- 
fering father-land ;  and  he  soon  attracted  to  his 
side  a  number  of  broken  and  desperate  men,  who, 
weary  of  the  English  yoke,  resolved  to  join  their 
fortunes  with  one  who  had  so  opportunely  stood 
forth  as  the  assertor  of  the  national  independence. 
For  a  long  time  they  seem  to  have  lived  chiefly 
by  plunder  and  the  chase,  attacking,  whenever 
occasion  offered,  the  convoys  and  foraging  parties 
of  the  English,  and  retreating,  when  pursued,  to 
the  woods  and  secret  recesses  of  the  country. 

At  this  period,  Wallace,  under  various  disguis- 
es, was  in  the  habit  of  visiting  the  garrisoned 
towns,  venturing  boldly  into  the  market-places,  to 
ascertain  the  strength  and  condition  of  the  enemy, 
on  which  occasions  he  had  various  personal  en- 
counters with  English  soldiei*s,  frcqucntl}-  escaping 
with  difficulty  from  their  superiority  of  numbers, 
llis  exploits  gradually  brought  a  great  accession 
to  his  partisans ;  and  after  the  battle  of  Dunbar 
in  1296,  in  which  the  Scots  were  defeated  with 
great  slaughter,  Wallace  became  conspicuously 


WALLACE, 


600 


SIR  WILLIAM. 


Bingham  tbe  treasurer.  Relinquishing  the  siege 
of  the  castle  of  Dundee,  to  be  continued  by  the 
townsmen  themselves,  by  a  forced  march  he  has- 
tened to  oppose  the  progress  of  the  enemy,  and 
when  the  Englisli  army  came  on  to  cross  the  Forth 
by  Stii'ling  bridge,  they  beheld  the  intrepid  de- 
fenders of  Scottish  freedom  posted  on  a  rising 
ground,  near  the  Abbey  of  Cambuskenncth,  pre- 
pared and  eager  to  dispute  their  passage.  The 
Scottish  army  consisted  of  40,000  foot  and  180 
cavalry,  while  that  of  the  English  amounted  to 
60,000  foot  and  1,000  heavy-armed  horse.  Wa- 
renne  at  first  had  recourse  to  the  arts  of  negotia- 
tion, but  AVallace  tauntingly  sent  him  back  a 
message  that  they  came  not  there  to  negotiate  but 
to  fight,  and  to  show  them  that  Scotland  was  free. 
The  English,  under  Crdssingham,  advanced  to 
cross  the  liver,  and  when  nearly  one-half  had 
passed  the  bridge,  they  were  attacked  by  the 
Scots  with  an  impetuosity  wliich  they  could  not 
withstand,  and  after  a  terrific  slaughter,  Wallace 
gained  a  complete  victory.  Those  on  the  other 
side  of  the  river,  seeing  the  day  irretrievably  lost, 
burnt  their  tents,  abandoned  their  baggage  and 
standards,  and  hastened  back  in  disorderly  flight 
to  Berwick,  whither  their  commander,  Warenne, 
had  found  his  way,  but  Cressiugham  was  left 
among  the  slain.  This  memorable  battle,  fought 
September  11,  1297,  was  followed  by  the  surren- 
der of  the  castles  of  Dumbarton  and  Dundee,  and 
the  expulsion  of  the  English  from  the  kingdom. 

Soon  after,  at  a  meeting  of  the  Scottish  nobles, 
held  in  the  Forest-Kirk,  Selkirkshire,  Wallace 
was  elected  regent  of  Scotland  in  name  of  John 
Baliol,  then  a  captive  in  England.  The  late  wars 
and  the  neglect  of  agriculture,  caused  by  the  dis- 
organised state  of  the  country,  having  spread  fa- 
mine and  pestilence  over  tlie  kingdom,  Wallace 
resolved  on  an  expedition  into  England.  With  a 
large  force  he  proceeded  as  far  as  Newcastle,  and 
after  ravaging  the  northern  counties  with  fire  and 
sword,  sparing  neither  age  nor  sex,  he  rctunied 
with  a  large  and  valuable  booty  to  Scotland.  Ed- 
ward in  the  meantime  hastened  from  Flandcra, 
and  as  soon  as  he  had  completed  his  preparations 
for  a  new  invasion  of  the  countiy,  ho  entered 
Scotland  at  the  head  of  a  formidable  army  of 
neaily  100,000  foot  and  8,000  horsemen.     ^Va^ 


lace,  unable  to  cope  with  such  a  force,  retired  be- 
fore him  as  he  advanced,  wasting  the  country  in 
his  route,  and  removing  the  people  with  their  cattle 
and  pi-ovisions  along  with  him.  The  EngUsh 
troops,  in  consequence,  soon  began  to  feel  all  tbe 
eficcts  of  want,  and  Edward  was  under  tbe  neces- 
sity of  ordei'iug  an  inglorious  retreat.  At  this 
critical  juncture,  when  the  military  skill  of  Wal- 
lace seemed  about  to  be  crowned  with  complete 
success,  his  plans  were  rendered  abortive  by  tbe 
treachery  of  two  Scottish  nobles,  Patrick,  earl  of 
Dunbar,  and  Umfraville,  earl  of  Angus,  whofonnd 
means  to  communicate  to  the  bishop  of  Durham 
the  position  of  the  Scottish  army,  with  Wallace^s 
intention  to  sm*prise  the  English  by  a  night  at- 
tack, and  afterwards  to  hang  upon  their  n'ar,  and 
harass  them  in  their  retreat.    Edward  instautlv 

• 

ordered  his  army  to  advance,  and   by  a  rjpid 
march  came  in  sight  of  the  Scottish  forces  as  they 
were  taking  up  their  positions  for  battle  at  Fal- 
kirk.   The  Scots  army,  commanded  by  Wallace, 
Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  and  Coniyu,  lord  of 
Badenoch,  did  not  exceed  30,000  men,  and  being 
compelled  to  fight  at  a  disadvantage,  no  soontr 
wei*c  they  attacked  by  the  English  than  Coniyn, 
with  the  dlvis>ion  under  his  command,  treacher- 
ously turned  their  bannei's  and  maiched  off  tbe 
field.      The  English,  in  consequence,   gniued  a 
complete  victory,  July  22,   1298.     Among  the 
Scots  were  slain  Stewart,  brother  to  the  steward 
of  the  kingdom,  Macduff,  uncle  to  the  earl  of  Fife, 
and  the  faithful  Sir  John  the  Graham,  who  was 
sorely  lamented  by  Wallace.    That  great  muu 
himself,  when  he  saw  every  hope  lost,  nillied  llie 
broken  remains  of  his  army,  and,  by  a  masterly 
retreat,   conducted  them  in    safety    beyond  tbe 
Forth,  by  the  way  of  Stirling,  which  they  burnt, 
at  the  same  time  laying  waste  all  the  surroundiug 
districts.    Soon  after,  the  impoverished  state  of 
the  country  compelled  Edward,  with  his  arun%  to 
return  to  England. 

Finding  that  the  nobles  were  combined  against 
him,  and  seeing  it  impossible,  in  the  then  cii*cum- 
stanccs  of  the  country,  to  contend  singly  with  the 
power  of  Edward,  Wallace  resigned  the  regency, 
and  it  is  supposed,  for  this  period  of  his  history  is 
involved  in  much  obscurity,  proceeded  to  France, 
in  the  hope  of  obtaining  assbtanco  from  Fiiilip, 


1.   I 


WALLACE, 


602 


WILLIAM. 


1 1 


1722,  licensed  to  preach  by  the  presbytery  of 
Dunblane,  and,  in  Angnst  1723,  was  presented  by 
the  marquis  of  Annandale  to  the  church  and  par- 
ish of  Moffat. 

In  1729  Dr.  Wallace  was  elected  moderator  of 
the  synod  of  Dumfries.  A  sermon  which  he 
preached  before  that  body  in  the  following  October 
having  been  published,  was  shown  to  Queen  Caro- 
line, who  recommended  him  to  the  carl  of  Islay, 
then  chief  manager  of  the  affairs  of  Scotland. 
Wallace  was,  in  consequence,  in  1733,  appointed 
one  of  the  ministers  of  the  Greyfriars*  church, 
Edinburgh.  Three  years  afterwards,  however, 
he  forfeited  the  favour  of  Government,  by  refusing 
to  read  from  his  pulpit  the  act  relative  to  the 
Porteous  riot,  but  on  the  overthrow  of  the  Wal- 
pole  adihinistration  in  1742,  he  was  intrusted  by 
their  successors  in  the  ministry  with  the  conduct 
of  ecclesiastical  affairs,  so  far  as  related  to  the 
crown  presentations  in  Scotland,  and  for  four 
years  seems  to  have  managed  this  delicate  duty 
in  such  a  way  as  to  give  satisfaction  to  all  parties 
concerned.  He  took  a  principal  share  in  the  esta- 
blishment of  the  Scottish  Ministers'  AVidows' 
Fund,  the  idea  of  which  was  originally  suggested 
by  Mr.  Mathieson,  a  minister  of  the  High  Church 
of  Edinburgh.  The  plan,  however,  was  chiefly 
matured  by  the  exertions  of  Dr.  Wallace  and  Dr. 
Webster.  Dr.  Wallace  was  moderator  of  the 
General  Assembly  in  1743,  which  sanctioned  the 
scheme ;  and,  in  the  ensuing  November,  he  was 
commissioned,  along  with  Mr.  George  Wishart, 
minister  of  the  Tron  church,  to  proceed  to  Lon- 
don to  watch  the  proceedings  in  parliament  re- 
garding it.  To  his  exertions,  indeed,  it  was 
mainly  owing  that  the  sanction  of  the  legislature 
was  procured  for  this  important  and  beneficial 
measnre.  Among  the  documents  preserved  in  the 
office  of  the  Trustees  of  the  MinisteiV  Widows' 
Fund  are,  •*  Proposals  in  Dr.  Wallace's  handwrit- 
ing, for  establishing  a  General  AVidows'  Scheme, 
supposed  to  bo  written  before  the  Ministers'  Wi- 
dows' Fund  was  projected,' and 'Parcel  of  Origi- 
nal Calculations,  previous  to  the  first  act  of  Par- 
liament on  the  Ministers'  Widows'  Fund,  holo- 
graph of  Dr.  Wallace.'  His  portrait,  presented 
by  one  of  liis  relatives,  graces  the  liall  of  the  trus- 
tees, being  placed  opposite  to  that  of  Dr.  AVcbstor. 


In  1744  Dr.  Wallace  was  appointed  one  of  the 
royal  chaplains  for  Scotland.  In  1753  he  pub- 
lished his  celebrated  '  Dissertation  on  the  Nom- 
bers  of  Mankind,  in  Ancient  and  Modem  Times,* 
the  original  sketch  of  whidi  he  had  previooslj 
read  to  the  Philosophical  Society  of  Edinburgh. 
To  the  work  were  appended  some  remarks  on 
Mr.  Hume's  Political  Discourse  of  the  Popolons- 
ness  of  Ancient  Nations.  The  work  is  remarica- 
ble,  not  only  for  the  mass  of  cnrions  statistical 
information  which  it  contains,  but  fbr  the  many 
ingenious  speculations  of  the  author  on  the  sub- 
ject of  population,  to  one  of  which  the  peculiar 
theories  of  Mr.  Malthus  owed  their  origin.  It 
was  translated  into  French,  under  the  inspection 
of  Montesquieu ;  and  a  new  edition  appeared  in 
1809,  with  a  Life  of  the  author.  He  died  July 
29, 1771.— His  works  are : 

A  Sermon  preached  in  the  High  Church  of  Edtnlmi]gli, 
Mondar,  January  6,  1746,  upon  occa«on  of  the  Annirersaiy 
Meeting  of  the  Societr  in  Scotland  for  Propagating  Christian 
Knowledge. 

A  Dissertation  on  the  Numbers  of  Mankind  in  Andeot 
and  Modem  Times ;  with  an  Appendix,  containing  additional 
Ohservations  on  the  same  Subject,  and  some  Remarks  en 
Mr.  Hume's  Political  Discourse  of  the  Popolonsness  of  An- 
cient Nations.  Edin.  1753,  8ro.  (Anon.)  2d  edit  £din. 
1809,  8vo. 

Characteristics  of  tlie  Present  State  of  Great  Britain.  Lon- 
don, 1758,  8vo. 

Various  Prospects  of  Mankind,  Nature,  and  Providence. 
1761. 

He  left  behind  him  some  manuscript  spedmens  of  his  ma- 
thematical labours;  and  an  Essay  on  Taste,  wliich  was  pre- 
pared for  the  press  by  his  son,  Mr.  George  Wallace,  advo- 
cate, but  never  published. 

The  latter  wns  the  author  of  a  work  on  the  *  Nature  snd 
Descent  of  Ancient  Peerages,  connected  with  the  State  of 
Scotland,*  1783;  and  of  *A  System  of  the  Principles  of  the 
I^w  of  Scotland,*  17G0.  He  wrote  also  a  poem  entitled 
*  Prospects  from  Hills  in  Fife,*  published  at  Edinburgh  in  1800. 

AVALLACE,  AVilliam,  an  eminent  mathcma- 
tieian,  the  son  of  a  Icnther-mannfacturer  and  shoe- 
maker in  Dysart,  Fifeshire,  and  tlic  eldest  of  a 
numerous  family,  was  bora  in  that  burgh,  23d 
September  1768.  His  progenitors  Iiad  been  set- 
tled, for  some  generations,  at  the  village  of  Kil- 
conqnhar,  in  the  same  county.  His  grandfather 
inherited  a  small  property,  the  greater  part  of 
which  he  lost  through  mismanagement.  He  re- 
ceived the  fii*st  rudiments  of  his  education  from  an 
aged  widow  in  Iiis  native  town,  who,  besides 
keeping  a  school  for  childi*en,  had  a  shop  for  the 
retail  of  small  wares.    About  the  age  of  seven  he 


!       I 


;i     : 


AV  ALL  ACE, 


604 


WILLIAM. 


to  Leybourne's  Repositoiy,  the  Geutlcmoii^s 
Mathematical  Companion,  and  other  scientific 
publications  in  England,  and  so  widely  extended 
was  his  reputation  as  a  mathematician  of  the  high- 
est order,  that,  in  1803,  he  received  a  letter,  un- 
der a  feigned  name,  intimating  to  him  that  an 
instinictor  in  mathematics  was  wanted  for  the 
Royal  Military  College,  then  established  at  Great 
Marlow,  Buckinghamshire,  and  recommending 
him  to  become  a  candidate  for  the  office.  By  the 
advice  of  his  friend.  Professor  Play  fair,  he  pro- 
ceeded to  Great  Marlow,  and  after  an  examina- 
tion, was  declaimed  the  successful  candidate  over 
several  competitors.  This  appointment  he  held 
for  upwanls  of  sixteen  years,  firat  at  Great  Mar- 
low,  and  afterwards  at  Sandhurst,  Berkshire,  to 
which  place  the  military  college  was  removed.  In 
1818  the  directoi-s  of  the  college  resolved  that  a 
half-yearly  course  of  lectures  on  practical  astro- 
nomy should  be  given  to  the  students,  and  Mr. 
Wallace  was  appointed  lecturer.  For  the  purpose 
of  instructing  them  in  the  manner  of  making 
celestial  observations,  a  small  observatory  was, 
under  his  superintendence,  erected,  and  furnished 
with  the  necessary  instruments. 

In  1819,  on  the  death  of  Professor  Playfair, 
then  professor  of  natural  philosopiiy  in  the  uni- 
versity of  Edinburgh,  Mr.,  afterwards  Sir  John 
Leslie  succeeded  him  in  that  chair,  and  Mr.  Wal- 
lace became  a  candidate  for  the  chair  of  mathe- 
matics, vacated  by  the  latter.  After  a  very  keen 
competition,  he  was  elected  by  a  large  majority, 
and  thereby  obtained  the  great  object  of  his  am- 
bition, a  professorship  in  a  Scottish  univei'sit}-. 

In  1838,  on  account  of  ill  health,  he  was  com- 
pelled to  resign  his  chair,  having  been  unable  to 
perform  his  duties  in  pei*son  during  the  three  pre- 
vious sessions.  On  his  resignation  the  degree  of 
doctor  of  laws  was  conferred  upon  him  by  the 
senatus  academicuSy  and  at  the  same  time  he  re- 
ceived a  pension  from  the  government,  in  consid- 
eration, as  the  warrant  stated,  of  his  attainments 
in  science  and  litcraturc,  and  his  valuable  services 
at  the  Royal  Military  College  and  the  univei-sity. 
AVIien  the  fourth  edition  of  the  Encyclopedia 
Britannica  was  commonccd.  Dr.  AVallace  under- 
took the  revision  of  all  the  mathematical  papers 
he  had  contributed  to  the  previous  edilion,   as 


well  as  some  of  tboee  which  had  been  written  by 
Dr.  Robi8on ;  and  several  of  the  more  important 
treatises,  particularly  on  algebra,  conic  sections, 
and  fluxions,  were  remodelled  and  almost  entirely 
rewritten. 

After  five  years  of  private  life,  Professor  Wal- 
lace died  at  Edinburgh,  28tli  April,  1843,  in  his 
75th  year.    He  was  mainly  instmmental  in  the 
erection  of  the  Observatory  on  the  Calton  Hill  of 
that  city,  and  ho  was  the  means  of  procoring  a 
monument  to  be  erected  in  Edinburgh  to  Napier, 
the  celebrated  inventor  oY  the  logarithms.    He 
was  one  of  the  original  nonresident  membera  of 
the  Royal  Astronomical  Society  of  London,  and 
from  a  memoir  of  him  wliich  appeared  in  the 
quarterly  fasciculus  of  that  body,  published  Feb- 
ruary 9,  1844,  the  materials  for  this  notice  have 
chiefly  been  derived.    He  was  also  a  fellow  of  the 
Royal  Society  of  Edinburgh,    a   corresponding 
member  of  the  Institution  of  Civil  Engineers,  and 
an  honorary  member  of  the  Cambridge  Philoso- 
phical Society.    A  few  weeks  before  his  death  he 
was  elected  an  honorary  member  of  the  'Royal 
Irish  Academy.    Having  a  turn  for  mechanics,  he 
invented    an  instrument  called    the   Eidograph, 
from  two  Greek  words,  signifying  *  a  form,*  and 
'  to  drawy  a  description  of  which  he  presented  to 
the  Royal  Society  of   Edinburgh.      In   copying 
plans  or  other  drawings  it  answers  the  same  pur- 
pose as  the  common  Pantograph,  but  is  greatly 
superior  to  it,  both  in  the  extent  of  its  applicatiou 
and  the  accuracy  of  its  perfoi*mance.     He  was 
also  the  inventor  of  the  Chorograph,  an  instru- 
ment for  describing  on  paper  any  triangle  having 
one  side  and  all  its  angles  given,  and  also  for  con- 
structing two  similar  triangles,    on    two    given 
straight  lines,  having  the  angles  given. 

He  does  not  seem  to  have  published  any  sepa- 
rate work  but  the  one  first  mentioned  below.  The 
subsequent  seven  papers  are  among  those  which 
he  wrote  for  the  Royal  Society  of  Edinburgh,  and 

published  in  their  '  Transactions :' 

« 

A  New  Book  of  IntereAt,  contiiining  Aliquot  THbles,  tnilj 
proportioned  to  any  jjiven  rate,     l^ndon,  1794,  8vo. 

Geometrical  PoririinH,  with  Kxainpleii  of  their  Applicitluiis 
to  the  Solution  of  I'robleinit.     179G. 

Development  of  a  certain  Alji^braic  Formula.     1805. 

A  new  method  of  expressing  the  Go-efficients  in  the  De- 
velopment of  tlie  Formulti  that  represents  tho  mutual  per- 


I 


I  • 


I 


I    I 
I 


WARDLWV, 


608 


RALPH,  D.D. 


iujS  .^ati.-ft  •']  btmsfilf  on  tliu  point,  he  summoned 
nil  the  n-ionrcea  of  his  l<'^c  to  defend  the  judg- 
ment he  had  formed  from  cavil  or  objection.  Be- 
3'ond  this  he  did  not  ;ro  much  into  the  region  of 
systematic  or  hUtorical  theology;  while  of  the 
flficculationft  of  mere  philosophical  theologians  he 
to^^k  little  note,  a.4  either  lying  beyond  the  sphere 
which  he  had  pn:i>icribcd  for  him.«c!f,  or  not  likely 
to  Ih!  directly  useful  to  those  whom  it  was  his 
ambition  to  train  to  be  ^ible  ministers  of  the  new 
te:4tameiit/  To  those  who  were  privileged  to  at- 
tend his  prelections,  they  were  valuable  not  only 
fur  the  amount  of-  sound  theological  knowledge 
which  they  imparted,  but  also  as  models  of  thco- 
lof^ical  disquisition,  and  as  affording  an  excellent 
discipline  for  the  faculties  of  those  who  were  des- 
tined to  teach  others/*  For  the  greater  part  of 
the  time  that  he  filled  the  theological  chair  he  re- 
ceived no  remuneration,  and  when  at  length  he 
did  receive  a  salary,  it  was  so  small  that  it  did 
little  more  than  suffice  to  defray  the  necessarj- 
cxpon*<es  to  which  he  was  subjected  in  fulfilling 
its  duties.  But  to  account  for  this  it  may  be 
stated,  that  at  that  time  the  means  of  the  Con- 
gregationalists  in  Scotland  were  very  limited, 
while  the  demands  upon  them  for  the  upholding 
of  their  institutions  were  proportionnbly  heavy. 
Notwithstanding  the  gratuitous  nature  of  his  ser- 
vices, J)r.  Wardlaw  took  great  delight  in  his  pro- 
fessional <lntics,  and  fi*om  first  to  last  discharged 
tlicm  with  the  utmost  fidelity  and  success. 

As  a  preacher  Mr.  Wardlaw  became  very  pop- 
ular, and  his  con<7regation  increased  so  much  that 
tlie  clmi)ol  in  Albion  Street  was  in  course  of  time 
found  to  be  too  small  for  it.  A  larger  building 
was  iu  consequence  eiTctcd  in  West  George's 
•Street,  and  ojiened  for  divine  worship  25th  De- 
reniber  1810.  T1k»  year  before,  the  honorar}-  de- 
j;ree  of  D.I),  had  been  conferred  upon  him  by  the 
ihoologieul  faculty  of  Yale  college,  Connecticut, 
one  of  the  most  distinguished  of  the  universities  of 
the  Tnited  States. 

The  character  of  his  pulpit  ministrations  is  thus 
described  by  Dr.  Lindsay  Alexander:  "lie  made 

u^e  of  very  little  action  in  the  pulpit— of  none  in- 

* 
tleed,  lM»yond  a  very  slight  and  somewhat  i*egulat- 

e«l  motion  of  the  hands,  with  an  occasional  step 

baekwards  when  something  moi*o   than    usually 


emphatic  was  to  be  nttered.    His  Bennons  too 
were  more  didactic  than  oratorical  iu  their  cob- 
strnction ;  being  characterised  nuber  by  the  grar- 
iiy  of  their  matter,  the  perspicnitr  and  force  of 
the  reasoning,  the  grace  of  tbe  diction,  and  the 
pcrsnasiveness  of  his  intonation,  tban  bj  anythmg 
like  rhetorical  brilliancy  or  vehement  declama- 
tion.   His  main  strength  lay  in  his  extensive  and 
exact  acquaintance  with  Scriptnre,  in  his  arga* 
mentative  distinctness  and  dexterity,  in  his  re- 
fined taste  and  felicitons  expression,  in  his  vnim- 
peachable  good  sense,  in  tbe  practical  sagadty 
with  which  he  detected  the  relation  of  his  subject 
to  the  personal  interests  and  responsibilities  of  his 
audience,  and  in  the  wise  and  aflectionatc  ear- 
nestness with  which  he  pressed  that  upon  their 
attention.     lie  seldom  indulged  in  any  oniament 
or  any  play  of  fancy.     lie  never  sought  such  for 
its  own  sake,  and  bevond  the  occasional  intro- 
duction  of  some  select  figure  or  comparison,  he 
never  resorted  to  it  even  for  the  sukc  of  illostra- 
tion.     lie  was  never  dull  or  commonplace;  bnt 
his  vivacity  was  that  of  the  understanding  rather 
than  that  of  the  imagination.     Sometimes,  when 
handling  suitable  themes,  a  bni*st  of  feeling  would 
escape  him,  which  was  felt  to  be  perfectly  genu- 
ine, and  which  seldom  failed  to  communicate  its 
contagion  to  the  hearers ;  bnt  he  spent  no  time 
on  sentimentalities,  and  showed  no  ambition  to 
provoke  a  tear  except  as  that  might  be  the  sijrn 
of  his  an*ow  having  reached  the  heart.     His  chief 
aim  seemed  always  to  be  to  convc}'  fully,  clearly 
and  forcibly  to  the  mind  of  his  audience  the  troth 
presented  by  the  part  of  Scripture  from  which  he 
was  discoursing.     Hence  he  was  eminently  tex- 
tual as  a  prencher,  and  scrupulously  faithful  as  an 
expositor.     Hence,  also,  the  practical  nature  of  his 
discoui-ses."     In  the  beginning  of  bis  ministry,  it 
was  his  custom  to  prcjich  without  notes.    His  m.an- 
ner  is  said  to  have  been  then  constrained,  and  his 
enunciation  monotonous.     Thci-e  is  even  a  tradi- 
tion that  on  one  occasion  he  fairly  broke  down, 
and  being  unable  to  recover  himself,  be  had  to  re- 
tire, while  another  minister  finished  the  service. 
At  a  later  period  he  read  his  discourses,  but  with 
such  an  exquisite  modulati(m  of  voice   that  an 
effect  not  less  than  that  of  onitory  was  produced. 
Ac  first  he  did  not  confine  his  preaching  to  tbe 


I 


I,  , 


WARDLAW, 


609 


RALPH,  D.D. 


II 


chapel  in  Albion  Street,  bat  often  officiated  also 
in  the  villnges  snrronnding  Glasgow,  his  sermons 
being  delivered  at  cross  roads,  in  fields,  bams, 
schoolrooms,  and'  kitchens.  A  regidar  station  of 
his  for  many  snmmcrs  was  at  the  top  of  Balmanno 
Street,  the  highest  street  in  Glasgow,  where,  on 
Sabbath  evenings,  monnted  on  a  chair,  lie  pro- 
claimed the  gospel.  Of  his  regular  congregation, 
it  may  be  stated  that  a  considerable  poi*tion  were 
weavers  from  Bridgetown.  On  Sunday  mornings 
these  people  were  accustomed  to  meet  nnd  pro- 
ceed in  a  body  to  Albion  Street,  and  in  the  same 
way  to  return.  Their  departure  caused  quite  a 
sensation  in  the  then  quiet  village,  and  as  they 
passed,  the  remark  might  be  heard,  "  There  goes 
Wardlaw's  brigade." 

As  an  author.  Dr.  Wardlaw  was  distinguished 
no  less  than  as  a  preacher  or  divinity  professor. 
He  published  a  great  variety  of  works,  which  Dr. 
Alexander  divides  into  three  classes :  theological, 
homiletical,  and  biographical.  Of  these  were 
sermons,  pamphlets,  and  more  lasting  works. 
The  Socinian  and  Sabbath  questions  occupied  a 
large  share  of  his  attention.  In  the  anti-slaveiy 
agitation  he  was  scarcely  less  conspicuous,  and  in 
many  a  debate  proved  himself  a  ready  logician. 
In  every  controversy  his  aim  was  truth,  not  victoiy. 

In  1883  he  was  chosen  to  deliver  the  first  of  the 
Series  of  Congregational  Lectures  in  London ;  and 
the  courae  delivered  was  afterwards  published  un- 
der the  title  of  *  Christian  Ethics,  or  Moral  Philo- 
sophy on  the  Principles  of  Divine  Revelation.' 
He  also  found  time  to  contribute  to  several  of  the 
evangelical  Magazines,  and  even  to  cultivate  his 
poetical  powers.  His  verses,  though  devoid  of 
much  originality,  exhibit  a  refined  taste,  and  great 
facility  of  expression.  If  not  a  poet,  the  spirit  of 
poetry  was  in  him,  blending  with  lofty  devotional 
feeling.  Among  his  fellow-students  at  college 
was  Thomas  Campbell,  and  it  is  recorded  to  Dr. 
Wardlaw's  credit  that  he  stoo<l  in  the  list  of  po- 
etical prizemen  the  same  year  that  the  young  poet 
won  his  laurels,  for  those  celebrated  ^*  translations 
from  the  Greek "  which  are  still  thought  worthy 
of  publication  with  his  maturer  poems. 

Many  attempts  were  made  to  induce  him  to 
leave  Glasgow  for  another  sphere  of  labour,  but 
these  he  successively  resisted.    Tlie  Independent 

IIL 


colleges  in  England  sent  him  repeated  invitations, 
and  offered  to  him,  either  as  principal  or  profes- 
sor, positions  not  only  more  lucrative  but  more 
influential.  To  Hoxton  he  was  invited  in  1817 ; 
to  Rotherham  in  1828,  and  again  in  1833 ;  to 
Springhill  in  1837,  and  to  Lancashire  In  1842.  In 
1828  he  had  been  pointed  out  as  one  eminently 
qualified  to  fill  the  chair  of  mental  and  moral 
philosophy  in  the  Ix)ndon  university.  But  in 
all  these  cases  he  decided  on  remaining  where 
he  was. 

On  16th  Februar}'  1853,  he  completed  the  fifti- 
eth year  of  his  pastorate.  Seimons  were  preached 
and  a  festival  assembly  was  held  to  commemorate 
the  event.  It  was  also  resolved  to  raise  a  monu- 
ment to  perpetuate  his  name  and  worth  in  the 
city  where  he  had  so  long  and  usefully  laboured. 
Accordingly  a  large  sura  of  money  was  collected, 
and  a  building  afterwards  erected  in  a  destitute 
neighbourhood,  to  be  used  as  an  educational  esta- 
blishment, under  the  name  of  "Tlie  Wardlaw 
Jubilee  School  and  Mission  House."  In  the 
month  of  August  following,  his  health  began  to 
fail,  and  after  several  months  of  acute  agony,  en- 
dured with  the  utmost  patience  and  resignation, 
ho  died  17th  December  1863,  within  a  few  da vs 
of  completing  his  74th  year.  He  was  buried  in 
the  Necropolis  of  Glasgow,  his  funeral  being  at- 
tended by  the  lord  -  provost,  magistrates,  and 
council  of  the  city,  the  professors  of  the  univei-si- 
ty,  the  clergy  of  all  denominations,  and  hundreds 
of  the  citizens. 

At  the  commencement  of  his  ministiy  he  had 
married  his  cousin,  Jane  Smith,  who  survived 
him,  and  by  whom  he  had  a  large  famil}'. 
One  of  his  sons  was  n  missionary  at  Bellary, 
in  the  East  Indies,  and  another  a  merchant  in 
Glasgow.  Two  of  his  daughters  were  married  to 
missionaries,  one  of  whom,  ^Irs.  Rcid,  returned 
to  Glasgow,  a  widow,  with  her  famil}*.  It  may 
be  stated  here  that  Dr.  Wardlaw^s  grandfather,  a 
merchant  in  his  native  town,  Dalkeith,  was  con- 
nected with  the  Wai'dlaws  of  Pitreavie  in  Fife, 
and  that  he  could  trace  his  descent  on  his  mother^s 
side  frem  James  V.  Memo! re  of  the  Life  and 
Writings  of  Dr.  Wai-dlaw,  by  William  Lindsay 
Alexander,  D.D.,  were  published  at  Edinburgh 

in  1855. — Among  Dr.  Wardlaw's  works  are: 

2g 


WARDLAW, 


610 


RALPH,  D.D. 


•  I 


'  I 


I'. 


Sbumons.— Christian  Mercv.  A  Sermon  preached  at  the 
request  of  tlie  Ghwgow  Female  Society.  1810.— Qualifica- 
tioiis  for  Teiiching,  easential  to  the  Character  of  a  Christian 
Bishop.  A  Sermon  preached  18th  March,  1811,  at  the  in- 
Btitution  of  the  Gh«si;ow  Theological  Academy. — The  Doc- 
trine of  a  Particular  Providence;  a  Sermon  preached  August 
23,  1812,  on  tlic  death  of  the  author's  brother,  Captain  John 
Wa.dlaw,  who  fell  in  the  battle  of  Salamanca.  Glasgow, 
1812.  Three  editions. — Discourses  on  the  Principal  Points 
of  the  Socinian  Controversy.  Glasgow,  1814,  8vo.  2d  edi- 
tion, 1828,  with  additions. — The  Scriptural  Unity  of  the 
Churclips  of  Christ  illustrated  and  recommended.  A  Sermon 
preached  on  occa>ion  of  the  fifth  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Con- 
gregational Union  fitr  Scotland,  1817. — The  Contemplation  of 
Heathen  Idolatry  an  Incitement  to  Missionary  zeaL  A  Ser- 
mon preached  before  the  I^ndon  Missionary  Sodety  May  13, 
1818,  and  publialied  at  their  request. — Sermon  preached  on 
occa.sioii  of  the  Death  of  the  Ilev.  Dr.  Balfour  of  Glasgow, 
Oct  13,  1818.— The  Truth,  Nature,  and  Universality  of  the 
Gospel;  a  Sermon  preached  at  Stirling  Juno  29,  1819,  at  the 
Anniversary  Meeting  of  the  Society  for  Stu-lingshire  and  its 
>'iciuity  in  aid  of  Missions  and  other  religious  objects. — 
Cliarge  delivered  by  Dr.  Wardlaw  at  the  Ordination  of  the 
Rev.  Archibald  Jack,  Whitehaven.  Published  with  the  other 
discourses  delivered  on  the  occasion.  Kdin.  1820. — Tlie  pur- 
poses of  Divine  Mercy  to  the  Seed  of  Abraham.  A  Sermon 
preached  April  25, 1820,  on  behalf  of  tlie  Society  for  promot- 
ing Christianity  among  the  Jews. — ^The  Christian  Duty  of 
Submission  to  Civil  Government.  Glasg.  1820,  8ro. — ^The 
Vanity  of  t  lie  Earthly  Hopes  of  Man.  A  Sermon  preached 
Dec.  9,  1821,  on  occasion  of  the  death  of  Mr.  William 
Friend  Durant,  of  Poole,  Dorsetshire,  Student  in  the  Uni- 
versity.— ^The  Early  SuccchS  of  the  Gospel  an  Evidence  of  its 
Truth.  A  Sermon  preaclied  May  20th,  1823,  before  the 
IIoMie  Missionary  Society,  and  published  at  tiie  request  of 
i:s  Dij-cctors.  Lond.  1823.  8vo.— Love  to  Christ.  1823.— The 
Divine  Dissuasive  to  tli*»  Yonn;^  ai^aiiist  the  Enticements  of 
Sinner."*.  Ghisg.  1^24. — Two  Disrourscs  on  Milan's  Responsi- 
bility for  his  Ik'lii'f.  In  reference  to  a  iitatenient  in  the  In- 
au'.;ural  Discourse  of  Mr.,  afterwards  Lord  Brougham,  as 
lx)rd  Rector  of  tlie  University  of  Gla.sgow,  delivered  April  C, 
1825.  2d  edition,  witli  addition  of  Two  Sermons  on  the  Re- 
.spon.Mbility  of  tlie  Heathen.  Glasg.  1820. — Christ  the  First 
Fruits.  A  Sermon  preached  September  21,  1828,  on  occa- 
sion of  the  lamented  death  of  Mrs.  Greville  Ewing. — Collected 
Sennons.  Giasj;.  182 J. — Love  to  Christ  the  Constraining 
Principle  of  the  Ciiristiaii  Ministr}'.  A  Ciiarge  delivered  in 
the  Scots  Church,  Crown  Court,  London,  at  the  Ordination 
of  John  lieid,  M.A.,  as  a  Missionary  to  Belhuy  in  the  East 
Indies,  Augn.st  18,  1829.  Publislied  by  request. — Christ's 
Care  of  his  Servants:  a  Sermon  preached  May  23,  1830,  on 
occasion  of  the  death  of  the  Rev.  John  Hercus.  With  an 
Appendix,  containing  a  brief  Memoir.  Glasg.  1830,  8vo. — 
Discourses  on  the  Sabbath.  Giasg.  1832,  pp.  295,  12mo. — 
The  Voice  of  the  Spirit  to  the  Churches.  A  Sermon  preached 
at  the  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Scottish  Congregational  Union 
at  Edinburgh,  in  May,  1832. — Civil  Establishments  of  Chris- 
tianity tried  by  their  only  authoritative  test,  the  Word  of 
God.  Glasg.  1833,  8vo. — The  Jubilee:  A  Sermon  preached 
in  West  George  Street  Chapel,  Glasgow,  August  1.  1834,  the 
day  of  Negro  Emancipation  in  the  British  Colonies.  Glasg. 
1834,  8vo. — The  Ministrj'  of  the  Gospel  the  Service  of  Christ. 
An  Ordination  Charge.  1840. — The  Revival  of  Religion  :  A 
Discourse.  Ghisg.  1841,  12mo. — The  End  of  Laving  and  the 
Gain  of  Dying  to  the  Faithful  Sen'ant  of  Christ.  A  Sermon 
prcudied  August  8,  1841,  cq  occasion  of  the  death  of  the 


Rev.  Greville  Ewing. — On  Chxistian  Gommimioii.  A  Ser- 
mon. Glasg.  1842. — Disconrtes  on  the  Naitnra  and  Extent 
of  the  Atonement  of  Christ.  Glasg.  1844,  post  8vo,  ppi  285w 
—The  Final  Triamph  of  God*s  Fsithiiil  Serrants.  A  ScraioB 
preached  Jane  18,  1843,  on  occasion  of  tha  death  of  the  Ser. 
Dr.  P'letcher. — ^The  End,  the  Time  of  Divina  interpntakMa; 
and  the  Duty  and  Peace  of  Waiting  for  it.  A  Sermoa 
preached  on  occasion  of  the  death  of  the  Rev.  John  Moiell 
Mackenxie,  by  tlie  mclanclioly  loss  of  the  steamer  Pegasos* 
which  stmck  upon  the  Goldstone  Rock,  off  the  eoaat  of 
Korthamberland,  between  night  and  morning  of  July  20, 
1843.  Nearly  one-half  of  the  Sermon  is  devoted  to  a  sketch 
of  the  Life  and  Character  of  Mr.  Mackenzie,  who  was  Dr. 
Wardlaw*8  Colleague  in  the  'Iheological  Academy. — SennoD 
preadied  on  occasion  of  the  death  of  the  Rev.  Alezaadcr 
Campbell,  Pastor  of  the  Congregational  Church,  GreeoodL 
Appended  to  his  *  Select  Remains.*  Glasg.  1845. — Senaoa 
preached  on  the  death  of  the  Rev.  Dr.  Hengfa,  pnblished, 
along  with  two  others,  Ghtsgow,  1845. — Sermon  and  Speech 
on  the  Purity  of  Church  Fellowship,  contribnted  to  'Tbe 
Jubilee  Memorial  of  the  Scottish  Congregational  Churches,* 
held  at  Edinburgh  in  Oct.  1848.— The  CaU  to  Repentance. 
A  Sermon.  1851. — What  U  Death?  A  Sermon  dehvered  in 
Poultry  Chapel,  London,  on  the  Evening  of  Nov.  27, 1851, 
on  occasion  of  the  death  of  the  Rev.  John  Philip,  D.D.,  for 
thirty  years  Superintendent  of  the  Missions  of  the  London 
Missionary  Society  in  South  Africa.  Witii  an  AppeoJiz. 
Edin.  1852,  8vo. — ^The  Christianas  final  Home.  A  Sermon 
preached  February  29,  1852,  on  occasion  of  the  death  of  the 
Rev.  Christopher  Anderson,  Pastor  of  the  Baptist  Chnrdt, 
Chariotte  Street  Chapel.  Edin.  1852,  8vo. — In  the  Scottisli 
Pulpit  for  Saturday,  March  81,  1832,  appeared  a  Sermon 
on  '  The  Agency  of  God  in  Human  Calamities,*  preached  by 
Dr.  W^ardlaw  on  the  day  of  the  National  Fast  appointed  co 
account  of  the  visitation  of  the  Cholera. 

Lectures. — Three  Lectures  on  Rom.  iv.  9 — 23.  With 
an  Appendix  on  the  Mode  of  Baptism.  Glasg  1807. — Lec- 
tures on  the  Book  of  Ecclesiastes,  1821,  2  vols.  8vo.  2 J. 
edit.  2  vols.  12mo.  Glasg.  1838.— Christian  Ethics,  or  Moral 
Philosophy  on  the  Principles  of  Divine  Revelation.  Being 
lectures  delivered  in  Ix)ndon  as  the  first  course  in  a  series 
instituted  by  the  Committee  of  the  Congregational  Union 
and  Library  in  the  Metropolis.  1833.  Third  edition,  1836. 
Subsequent  editions.  For  these  lectures  he  received  from  the 
Committee  £130. — The  Importance  of  the  Church  Coutio- 
versy  and  the  Manner  in  which  it  ought  to  be  conducted. 
1838. — Lectures  on  Church  Establiahments  delivered  in  Free- 
masons Hall,  London.  London,  1839,  8vo,  pp.  391. — Lec- 
tures on  Female  Prostitution:  its  Nature,  Extent,  Effects, 
Guilt,  Causes,  and  Remedy,  &c.  Glii.sg.  1842,  pobt  8vo.— 
Lecture  on  the  Headship  of  Chri>t  as  affected  by  Natiraal 
Church  Establishments.  Glasg.  1847.  —  Lectures  on  Sys- 
tematic Theology.  A  Complete  System  of  Polemic  Dirir.iM. 
By  Ralph  Wardlaw,  D.D.  Edited  by  the  Rev.  James  B. 
Campbell,  M.A.    3  voLi.  8vo.     Posthumous 

HISCELI.AN'£0  L'S. 

Essay  on  Mr.  Joseph  Lancaster's  Improvements  in  Educa- 
tion; the  substance  of  which  was  read  before  the  Literarr 
and  Commercial  Society  of  Glasgow.     1810. 

Unitarianism  incapable  of  Vindication.  Glasgow,  1816, 8vo. 

A  Collection  of  Hymns  for  Public  W'orship.  5th  edit, 
Glasg.  1817,  12mo.     12th  edit.,  Edin.  1847, 18mo. 

Essay  on  Benevolent  Institutions  for  the  Relief  of  the 
Poor:  the  substance  read  to  the  Literary  and  Commercial 
Society  of  Glasgow,  April  1817.    Glasg.  1817,  8vo. 


WARDLAW. 


611 


WATSON. 


1 1 


An  Appeal  ngdost  MisrepresenUtion  and  Calumny, 
written  in  defence  of  the  Rev.  Blr.  Campbell,  Independent 
minister  at  Oban,  who  liad  been  assailed  by  a  party  belong- 
ing; to  the  Established  Charch,  in  an  '  Address  to  the  Reli- 
gions Public.*    1820. 

A  Second  Appeal  to  the  Public,  in  answer  to  the  Reply 
of  A  Committee  of  the  Inhabitants  of  Oban.     1820. 

A  DiriMitation  on  the  Scriptural  Authority,  Nnture,  and 
Uses  of  Infant  Baptbin.    Glasg.  1825,  8vo.    Kew  edition, 

1847. 

A  Reply  to  tlie  Letter  of  the  Rev.  John  Birt,  of  Manches- 
ter, to  Dr.  Wardlaw,  *  On  some  Paitsages  in  his  Dissertation 
on  Infant  Baptism.'    Glasg.  1825,  8vo. 

Two  Essays.  I.  On  the  Assnmnce  of  Faith.  II.  On  tlie 
Extent  of  the  Atonement,  and  Universal  Pardon.  1830. 
Third  edition.    Glasg.  1836,  12mo. 

Exposure  Exposed:  A  Statement  of  Facts  relative  to  West 
George  Street  Chapel,  Glasgow.  Glasg.  1834,  8vo.  This 
pamphlet  was  one  of  the  innumerable  publications  which 
were  called  forth  by  the  Voluntary  Controversy. 

Speech  of  the  Rev.  Dr.  Wardlaw,  at  the  Public  Meeting  in 
Glasgow,  for  the  Separation  of  Church  and  State,  March  6tli, 
1834,  with  the  Memorial  to  Earl  Grey,  and  the  Petition  to 
Parliament,  adopted  at  the  Meeting.  2d  edition.  Glasg. 
1834, 12roo. 

Friendly  Letters  to  the  Society  of  Friends.  Glosg.  1836, 
12mo. 

Sketch  of  the  Life  and  Character  of  the  Rev.  Robert  S. 
M*AU  of  ManohcKter,  LLD.,  prefixed  to  his  Collected  Dis- 
courses.   2  vols.  8vo,  1840. 

Letters  to  the  Rev.  Hugh  M'Neile,  M.A.,  on  some  portions 
of  his  I..ectures  on  the  Church  of  England,  1841. 

Memoir  of  the  Rev.  John  Reid,  late  Missionary  at  Bellary. 
Glasg.  1844,  8vo. 

The  Life  of  Joseph  and  the  Last  Days  of  Jacob.  A  Hook 
for  Youth  and  for  Age.    Glasg.  1844,  small  8vo,  pp.  426. 

A  Catholic  Spirit,  its  Consistency  with  Conscientiousness. 
Being  one  of  the  *  Essays  on  Christian  Union'  by  eight  min- 
inters  of  different  denominations,  published  in  one  volume  at 
GLisgow  in  1845. 

Congregational  Independency,  in  contradistinction  to  Epis- 
copacy and  Presbyterianism,  the  Church  Polity  of  the  New 
Testament.     Glasg.  1848,  post  8vo,  pp.  379. 

Treatise  on  Miracles.    Edin.  1852,  post  8vo. 

He  contributed  an  Introductory  Essay  to  Doddridge*s 
Practical  Discourses  on  Regeneration,  one  of  the  series  of  Se- 
lect Christian  Authors  published  by  Mr.  Collins,  Glasgow, 
1829;  also  an  Introductory  Essay  to  Clark's  Collection  of 
Scripture  Promises,  another  of  Collins's  Select  Christian 
Authors.  1830.  He  also  supplied  an  Introductory  Essay  to 
an  edition  of  Bishop  Hall's  Contemplations  on  the  Historical 
Passages  of  the  Old  and  New  Testaments,  in  2  vols.  8vo. 
Glasgow.     1830. 

He  also  edited  an  edition  of  *The  Hebrew  Wife;  or  the 
Iaw  of  Marriage  Examined,*  by  Mr.  Dwight,  an  American 
lawyer.    Glasgow,  1837. 

To  the  Missionary  Magazine,  and  the  Scottish  Congrega- 
tional Magazine  he  was  an  occasional  contributor. 

Posthumous  Works.    Published  by  FuUarton  &  Co.  1862. 


Warbexder,  a  surname  evidently  originally  derived  from 
the  chase,  borne  by  a  family  possesung  a  baronetcy,  the  first 
of  whom,  George  Warrender,  Esq.  of  Lochend,  East  Lothian, 
M.P.,  an  eminent  merchant  in  Edinburgh,  and  lord-provost 
of  that  city  in  the  reigns  of  King  William,  Queen  Anne,  and 
George  L,  was  created  a  baronet  of  Great  Britain  Juno  2, 


1715.  His  son,  Sir  John,  2d  baronet,  dyinc:  in  1773,  was 
succeeded  by  his  only  surviving  son.  Sir  Putrick,  3d  baronet. 
This  gentleman,  bom  March  7,  1731,  served  as  a  cavalry 
ofiicer  at  the  battle  of  Minden.  He  was  afterwards  M.P.  for 
the  Haddington  burghs,  and  king's  remembrancer  in  the 
court  of  Exchequer  in  Scotland.  On  his  death,  in  1799,  his 
elder  son,  Sir  George,  bom  Dec.  5, 1782,  became  4th  baronet. 
He  graduated  at  Christ  cimrch,  Oxford,  and  in  1822  was 
sworn  a  privy  councillor.  Dying  in  1849,  he  was  succeeded 
by  his  brother.  Sir  John,  fifth  baronet,  born  in  1786,  married 
first  in  1823,  a  daughter  of  James,  earl  of  L:iuderdalc,  by 
whom  he  had  a  son  and  a  daughter;  and  2dly,  in  1831,  a 
fti.<tter  of  Lord  Alvaoley.  His  daughter,  Helen  Catherine, 
m.,  in  1854,  George  Baillie,  Esq.,  younger  of  Mellerstain  and 
Jerviswoode,  Berwickshire,  who,  on  his  father  succeeding  to 
the  earldom  of  Haddington  in  1858,  became  Lord  Binning. 
The  son,  George,  at  one  period  a  captain  in  the  Coldstream 
Guards,  m.,  in  1854,  Helen,  only  child  of  Sir  Hugh  Hume 
Campbell  of  Marchmont,  baronet. 

WATSON,  David,  chiefly  known  as  the  trans- 
lator of  Horace,  born  at  Brechin  in  1710,  was 
educated  at  St.  Leonard's  college,  St.  Andrews, 
and  was  afterwards  appointed  professor  of  philo- 
sophy there.  In  1747,  when  the  colleges  of  St. 
Leonard  and  St.  Salvador  were  united,  he  was 
deprived  of  his  chair,  on  which  he  went  to  London. 
His  well-known  translation  of  Horace  was  pub- 
lished in  two  volumes  8vo,  with  notes.  He  died 
in  destitute  circumstances  near  London,  in  1756, 
and  was  buried  at  the  expense  of  the  parish.  Be- 
sides his  translation  of  Horace,  he  wrote  '  A  Clear 
and  Compendious  History  of  the  Heathen  Gods 
and  Goddesses,  and  their  Contemporaries,'  for  the 
use  of  Schools.    London,  1752,  8vo. 

WATSON,  Robert,  LL.D.,  an  elegant  histo- 
rian, was  bom  at  St.  Andi-cws  about  1780.  He 
was  the  son  of  an  apothecary  of  that  town,  who 
was  also  a  brewer.  He  received  his  education  at 
the  school  and  university  of  his  native  place,  and 
to  improve  liimself  he  removed  first  to  the  university 
of  Glasgow,  and  afterwards  to  that  of  Edinburgh. 

Having  acquired  a  knowledge  of  the  principles 
of  universal  grammar,  he  prepared  a  course  of  lec- 
tures on  style  and  language,  and  also  one  on  rhe- 
toric, both  of  which  he  delivered  at  Edinburgh,  by 
which  he  secured  the  friendship  of  Lord  Karnes, 
Mr.  Hume,  and  other  eminent  men  of  that  day. 
About  this  time  he  was  licensed  to  preach ;  and  a 
vacancy  having  occurred  in  one  of  the  churches  of 
St.  Andrews,  he  offered  himself  a  candidate  for  it, 
but  was  disappointed.  Soon  after,  however,  on 
the  retirement  of  Mr.  Rymer,  he  obtained  the  pro- 
fessoi-ship  of  logic  in  St.  Salvador's  college,  to 


AVATT, 


613 


JAMES. 


South  Carolina,  Mr.  Watson  was  elected  au  hon- 
orary member  thereof.  It  was  afterwards  exhi- 
bited through  the  whole  of  the  United  States  of 
America,  witli  gi*eat  eclat. 

Sir  John  Watson  Gordon,  the  distinguished 
porti'ait  painter,  who  was  elected  president  of  the 
Royal  Scottish  Academy,  on  the  death  of  Sir  Wil- 
liam Allan,  in  1850,  is  the  nephew  of  the  subject 
of  this  memoir,  who  was  a  third  cousin  of  Sir 
Walter  Scott. 

Among  the  paintings  of  Mr.  Watson  while  pre- 
sident of  the  Scotti:*h  Academy,  were: — Portrait  of 
Sir  Charles  Kerr ;  Tlie  Hermit ;  James  Hogarth ; 
Colonel  McDonald,  91st  regiment,  and  his  Lady; 
Fori*est  Alexander,  painted  for  the  Commercial 
Bank  of  Scotland ;  Jewish  Doctor;  Rev.  Bishop 
Patterson;  Old  Soldier;  Female  Ornithologist;  Sir 
Peter  Murray,  TIn-eipland ;  Narrative  intciTupted, 

with  Portraits  of  Gentlemen. 

WATT,  Jameb,  a  celebrated  natural  philoso- 
pher and  civil  engineer,  the  great  improver  of  the 
steam-engine,  was  born  at  Greenock,  January  19, 
1736.  His  great-grandfather,  a  farmer  of  Aber- 
deenshire, was  killed  in  one  of  Montrose*s  battles, 
when  his  property,  being  foifeited,  was  lost  to  the 
family.  The  son  of  this  man,  Thomas  Watt,  es- 
tablished himself  in  Gi*eenock  as  a  teacher  of 
mathematics  and  the  elements  of  navigation,  and 
was  baron  bailie  of  the  bnrgli  of  barony  of  Craw- 
ford*s  Dyke.  Ho  had  two  sons,  the  elder,  John, 
a  teacher  of  mathematics  and  surveyor  in  Glas- 
gow, died  in  1737,  at  the  age  of  fifty,  leaving  a 
'  Survey  of  the  River  Clyde,  from  Glasgow  to  the 
Point  of  Toward,*  which  was  published  b}'  his 
brother  several  years  afterwanls.  The  younger 
son,  James,  the  father  of  the  celebrated  engineer, 
was  a  builder  and  merchant  in  Greenock,  of  which 
town  he  was  for  a  quarter  of  a  century  councillor, 
treasurer,  and  one  of  the  magistrates.  He  died 
at  the  age  of  84,  in  1782. 

James  Watt,  the  subject  of  this  notice,  was  the 
elder  and  onl}*  surviving  child  of  the  latter,  his 
brother,  John  Watt,  a  youth  of  promising  abili- 
ties, being  lost  at  sea  soon  after  he  came  of  age. 
He  received  his  first  instructions  in  rending  from 
bia  mother,  whose  name  was  Agnes  Muirhead, 
whilst  his  father  taught  him  writing  and  arith- 
metic.   Ho  was  afterwards  placed  at  the  elemen- 


tary public  school  of  Greenock,  but  the  delicacy 
of  his  health  interfered  with  his  regular  attendance 
on  the  classes,  and  for  the  greater  part  of  his  time 
he  was  confined  to  his  chamber,  where  he  devoted 
himself  to  unassisted  study.  He  early  displayed 
a  partiality  for  mechanics,  and  when  only  six 
years  of  age  he  was  observed  at  work  with  a  ])iece 
of  chalk  upon  the  fioor  of  a  room  drawing  a  geo- 
metrical problem.  While  still  a  mere  boy,  his 
attention  began  to  be  attracted  to  the  great  power 
of  steam,  as  the  following  interesting  anecdote 
will  siiow: — His  aunt,  Mrs.  Muirhead,  sitting 
with  him  one  evening  at  the  tea-table,  said, 
**  James,  I  never  saw  such  an  idle  boy  I  Take  a 
book,  and  employ  youi*self  usefully ;  for  the  last 
half  hour  yon  have  not  spoken  a  word,  but  taken 
off  the  lid  of  that  kettle  and  put  it  on  again,  hold- 
ing now  a  cup  and  now  a  silver  spoon  over  the 
steam,  watching  how  it  rises  from  the  spout,  and 
catching  and  counting  the  drops  of  water.**  It 
appears  that  when  thus  reproved,  his  active  mind 
was  engaged  in  investigating  the  condensation  by 
steam.  We  are  told  that  he  prosecuted  almost 
every  branch  of  science  with  equal  success,  and 
especially  took  so  much  Interest  in  reading  books 
on  medicine  and  surgery,  that  he  was  one  day  de- 
tected conveying  into  his  room  the  head  of  a  child 
which  had  died  of  some  obscure  disease,  that  he 
might  take  occasion  to  dissect  it. 

After  passing  a  year  with  some  Glasgow  rela- 
tives, in  1755,  while  only  eighteen  years  old,  a 
desire  for  improvement  in  mechanical  art  induced 
him  to  go  to  London,  where  he  placed  himself  un- 
der the  tuition  of  Mr.  John  Morgan,  mathematical 
and  nautical  instrument  maker,  in  Finch  Lane, 
Comhill.  To  that  gentleman  an  apprenticeship 
fee  of  twenty  gnineas  was  paid  with  him.  Ten 
hours  a-day  was  given  up  to  a  trying  sedentar}- 
employment,  which  involved  much  exertion  of 
thought  as  well  as  much  weariness  to  the  frame. 
He  also  worked  over  lionrs  to  win  a  little  money 
for  himself,  and  made  the  sum  of  eight  shillings 
a-week  suffice  for  his  nourishment.  At  the  end 
of  a  3'ear  ill  health  compelled  him  to  return  to 
Greenock.  He  now  pursued  his  studies  and  oc- 
cupations without  more  instruction,  and  in  1757 
settled  in  Glasgow  as  a  maker  of  mathematical 
instruments.    Meeting  with  opposition  from  some 


WATT, 


614 


JAM£S. 


of  the  corporations,  on  account  of  liis  supposed  in- 
fringement of  their  privileges,  the  professors  of 
the  university  interferecl,  and  attaclied  him  to 
their  establishment.  He  had  been  employed  to 
repair  some  astronomical  Instruments  which  had 
been  bequeathed  to  the  university  by  a  Jamaica 
proprietor,  and  had  suffered  some  injury  by  the 
voyage.  This  commission  earned  for  him  more 
than  the  £5  wliich,  as  the  records  bear  witness, 
he  received  for  his  work.  Before  he  had  reached 
his  twenty-first  year  he  was  allowed  to  occupy  a 
small  workshop  for  carrying  on  his  business  with- 
in the  college  precincts,  with  the  title  of  "  mathe- 
matical instrument  maker  to  the  university.**  He 
had  also  an  apartment  within  the  college,  where 
he  lived.  His  principal  protectors  on  the  occasion 
were  Adam  Smith,  author  of  *The  Wealth  of 
Nations  ;*  Dr.  Black,  the  celebrated  discoverer  of 
latent  heat ;  Robert  Simson,  the  eminent  mathe- 
matician ;  and  Dr.  Dick,  professor  of  natural  phi- 
losophy.  Tliese  great  men  thought  then  that 
they  were  only  delivering  a  zealous  and  able 
workman  from  the  overbearing  of  the  corpora- 
tions, but  soon  after  recognising  in  him  a  first- 
rate  man,  they  bestowed  on  him  their  warmest 
friendship.  Before  the  close  of  his  residence  in 
the  university,  which  lasted  six  years,  his  work- 
shop became  a  sort  of  academy,  whither  students, 
professors,  and  eminent  men  of  Glasgow  resorted, 
to  discuss  difiicult  questions  of  art,  science,  and 
literature.  "  When  any  difficulty  arrested  us  in  the 
university,"  saysRobison,  one  of  the  most  illustrious 
editors  of  the  British  Cyclopedia,  in  an  unpub- 
lished paper  quoted  by  Arago,  "  we  used  to  run 
to  our  workman.  When  once  excited,  any  sub- 
ject became  for  him  a  text  for  serious  study  and 
discoveries.  He  never  let  go  his  hold,  until  he 
had  entirely  cleared  up  the  proposed  question. 
One  day  the  desired  solution  seemed  to  require 
that  LeopoUrs  work  on  machines  should  be  read ; 
Watt  immediately  learned  German.  On  another 
occasion,  and  for  a  similar  reason,  he  rendered 
himself  master  of  the  Italian  language."  Although 
totally  insensible  to  the  charms  of  music,  and  not 
able  to  distinguish  one  note  from  another,  he  con- 
structed an  organ,  which  exhibited  essential  im- 
improvcmcnts  in  the  mechanical  details,  in  the  re- 
gulatoi*s,  and  in  the  method  of  measuring  the  force 


of  the  wind,  and  which  showed,  too,  no  defidencj 
in  its  powers  of  harmony. 

Having  directed  much  of  his  attention  to  the 
subject  of  the  elasticity  of  steam,  and  its  conse- 
quent availability  as  a  motive  power,  about  1761 
or  1762  Watt  tried  some  experiments  on  Papin's 
digester, — ^the  contrivance  of  an  ingenious  French 
emigri  of  that  name,  made  in  London  to  realize 
in  practice  his  discovery  of  its  property  of  pro- 
ducing a  yacnnm  in  space  by  means  of  refrigera- 
tion, as  a  counterpoise  and  auxiliary  to  its  elasti- 
city, in  obtaining  an  alternate  or  oscillatory  mo- 
tion,— and  he  had  worked  with  strong  steam  a  small 
model  of  his  own  construction,  but  the  imperfec- 
tions inherent  to  its  application  in  the  crude  mo- 
del of  the  Huguenot  doctor  prevented  him  at  the 
time  from  proceeding  with  it  farther.  In  the  win- 
ter of  1763-4  he  was  employed  by  Professor  An- 
derson, who  had  succeeded  Dr.  Dick  in  the  chair 
of  natural  philosophy,  to  put  in* order  a  working 
model  of  a  steam-engine  upon  Newcomen*s  con- 
struction, which  had  never  worked  well.  In  this 
machine,  then  firat  made  known  to  Watt,  the  con- 
structor,— a  hardware  dealer  at  Dartmouth,  whose 
name  it  bore, — following  Papin  in  the  use  of  the 
vacuum -producing,  in  conjunction  with  the  expan- 
sive, qualities  of  steam,  had, — hy  separating  the  di- 
gester of  the  latter,  wliich  was  boiler,  cylinder, 
and  condenser  in  one,  into  two  vessels ;  a  boiler 
or  caldron,  and  a  cylinder ;  the  former  for  gener- 
ating the  stC2im,  and  the  latter,  receiving  it  from 
the  caldron,  for  exciting  alternate  motion,  although 
of  a  slow  kind,  first  by  its  expansion,  and  next 
by  its  condensation, — produced  a  real  and  useful 
motive  power,  and  opened  the  way  to  further  and 
far  more  important  improvements  on  the  part  of 
the  subject  of  our  memoir.  In  Newcomen's  en- 
gine, the  vacuum  was  at  first  produced  by  exter- 
nal refrigeration.  A  second  and  larger  cylinder 
enveloped  the  working  one,  and  into  the  circular 
space  between  them  an  ample  quantity  of  cold 
water  was  poured,  the  chill  of  which  gradually 
penetrated  through  all  the  thickness  of  the  metal, 
and  at  least  reached  the  steam  itself.  The  t;irdi- 
ness  with  which  steam  would  cool  and  lose  its 
elasticity  by  means  of  such  a  process  was  a  seri- 
ous impediment  to  its  general  usefulness.  But 
accident  fortunately  soon  indicated  a  very  simple 


WAIT, 


617 


JAMES. 


pomps  aloue,  of  the  sum  of  two  Uioussiud  four 
Iiundi^cd  ponnds. 

Passing  over  meantime  tlie  ordinary  incidents  of 
his  life,  let  as  continue  our  account  of  the  Improve- 
ments made  by  Watt  on  that  wondeiful  adapta- 
tion of  the  properties  of  water  called  the  steam- 
engine,  which  constitutes  his  gi'eatest  merit,  and 
strongest  claim  on  the  gratitude  of  the  whole  fam- 
ily of  man.  He  conceived  the  idea  of  transform- 
ing his  machiucs  from  being  merely  pumps  into 
universal  motive  powers,  and  of  indefinite  force. 

Accoi-dingly,  after  parliament,  notwithstanding 
8ome  opposition  on  the  pai*t,  among  others,  of  the 
celebmted  Edmund  Burke,  had  in  1774  granted, 
on  his  petition  and  that  of  his  now  fiicnd  and 
partner,  Mr.  Boulton  of  Soho,  near  Birmingham, 
a  prolongation  of  twenty-five  years  to  his  patent 
of  1769,  and  their  gi-eat  establishment  at  Soho  had 
begun  to  become  the  most  useful  school  in  practi- 
cal mechanics  for  all  England,  Watt  applied  him- 
self to  the  great  task  of  its  realization.  His  first 
step  in  this  direction  was  the  invention  of  the 
double  stroke,  or,  as  it  is  sometimes  called,  a 
daubie  acting  engine. 

To  conceive  the  principle  of  it,  let  the  account 
already  given  of  the  modified  or  Newcomen*s 
engine  be  referred  to.  The  cylinder  is  closed; 
the  external  air  has  no  access  to  it ;  it  is  steam 
pressure,  not  atmospheric,  that  makes  the  piston 
to  descend ;  the  ascending  movement  is  due  to  a 
simple  counterpoibc,  because  at  the  moment  when 
this  takes  place,  the  steam  being  enabled  to  cir- 
cnlate  freely  from  the  higher  to  the  lower  portions 
of  the  cylinder,  presses  equally  on  the  piston  in 
both  directions.  It  is  easy  to  see,  that  the  modi- 
fied engine,  or  Newcomen*s,  has  power  only  dur- 
ing the  descending  oscillation.  This  serious  defect 
was  remedied  by  a  veiy  simple  change,  which 
produced  the  double  acting  machine. 

In  the  engine  known  under  this  name,  as  well 
as  in  the  one  which  we  denominated  the  modified 
one,  at  the  pleasure  of  the  engineer  or  attendant 
the  steam  from  the  boiler  goes  freely  above  the 
piston,  and  presses  it  down  without  meeting  with 
any  obstacle ;  because  at  that  moment  the  lower 
area  of  the  cylinder  is  in  communication  with  the 
condenser.  Watt  opened  a  communication  be- 
tween the  caldron  and  the  lower  area  of  the  pis- 


ton ;  the  foregoing  movement  once  achieved,  the 
communication  between  the  caldron  and  the  up- 
per area  of  the  cylinder  is  closed,  and  by  the  tm*n- 
ing  of  a  tap  the  steam  can  only  now  pass  from 
the  caldron  below  the  piston,  which  it  elevates ; 
at  the  same  moment  the  steam  in  the  upper  area 
which  had  produced  the  descending  movement,  is 
by  a  commnnication  with  the  condenser  also  in- 
troduced, and — a  certain  cock  having  been  opened 
— ^transferred  to  the  condenser  to  regain  there  its 
former  fluid  state.  A  contrary  arrangement  of 
the  cocks  again  rovei*ses  this  motion  as  soon  as 
the  piston  has  attained  its  maximum  height.  And 
thus  similar  effects  are  indefinitely  reproduced. 
The  motive  power  in  both  ascent  and  descent  is 
now  exclusively  steam,  which,  except  to  the  ex- 
tent of  the  inequality  arising  from  the  weight  of 
the  piston,  has  the  same  power  in  both  move- 
ments. Hence  its  name  of  the  double  acting  en- 
gine. 

To  render  this  new  motive  power  of  eas}'  and 
convenient  application,  Watt  had  other  difficulties 
to  overcome.  It  was  necessary  to  convert  the 
motion  of  the  piston  oscillating  in  a  straight  line, 
and  therefore  inflexible^  into  one  of  a  beam  or 
shaft  that  moved  in  a  circular  direction,  or,  in 
other  words,  revolved  upon  its  axis.  Perhaps  the 
solution  which  he  gave  to  this  important  problem 
is  his  most  ingenious  invention.  The  beautiful 
arrangement  by  which  he  accomplished  this,  call- 
ed parallel  motion^  is  au  articulated  parallelogram, 
which  with  each  double  oscillation  developes  and 
contracts  itself  with  the  smoothness  of  motion, — 
"  almost,"  says  Arago,  from  whom  we  quote  this 
description,  "  with  the  grace, — that  chaims  us  in 
the  gestures  of  a  consummate  actor."  In  its  va- 
rious transformations  it  exhibits  the  most  curious 
geometrical  conditions,  throe  of  it^  angles  describ- 
ing arcs  of  circles  in  space,  while  the  fourth  moves 
ver}'  nearly  in  a  stmght  line.  "  When  I  saw  it 
for  the  firet  time,"  says  Watt,  "  I  was  myself  sur- 
prised at  the  rcgularity  of  its  motion,  and  felt 
tiTily  all  the  pleasure  of  novelty,  as  if  I  was  ex- 
amining the  invention  of  anot/ier  man.^^  The  in- 
genuity and  utility  of  this  invention  is  shown  In 
this,  that  Smeaton,  the  celebrated  engineer,  a 
groat  admirer  of  Watt,  did  not  believe  that  in 
practice  it  could  become  a  general  means  of  im- 


WEBSTER, 


626 


ALEXANDER,  D.D. 


mally  inducted  to  that  charge.  In  the  spring  of 
the  following  year  he  received  a  call  from  the 
congregation  in  Wells  Street,  London,  which  he 
declined ;  and,  in  May  1781,  the  call  was  carried 
before  the  synod  at  Edinburgh,  when  it  was  de- 
cided that  he  should  remain  at  Newton.  Two 
other  calls  from  the  same  congregation  were  sub- 
sequently brought  under  the  consideration  of  the 
synod,  the  last  of  which  was  sustained,  March  19, 
1782 ;  and  he  was  admitted  to  his  new  chai'ge  by 
the  Secession  presbytery  of  Edinburgh  on  the  SOth 
of  the  following  May.  In  June  he  commenced 
his  ministry  in  I^ndon,  where  he  became  exceed- 
ingly popular,  both  as  a  preacher,  and  on  account 
of  the  active  part  which  he  took  in  promoting  the 
interests  of  the  London  Missionary  and  Bible  So- 
cieties, and  of  many  of  the  religious  and  charita- 
ble institutions  of  the  metropolis.  In  1815  he 
received  the  degi*ee  of  D.D^from  Marischal  Col- 
lege, Aberdeen.  He  died  December  14,  1827,  in 
the  74th  year  of  his  age,  and  the  45th  of  his  min- 
istry in  London.  His  congregation,  besides  de- 
fraying his  funeral  expenses,  and  securing  an  an- 
nuity to  his  widow,  erected  to  his  memory  an 
elegant  tablet  of  marble,  with  a  suitable  inscrip- 
tion, in  their  chapel  in  Wells  Street.  An  inter- 
esting memoir  of  his  life,  with  selections  from  his 
epistolary  coiTCspondence,  pulpit  recollections,  &c. 
by  the  Rev.  James  Hay,  Kinross,  and  the  Rev. 
Dr.  Belfrage,  Fall^irk,  was  published  at  London 
in  1830. 

Webster,  a  surname  derived  from  the  craft  of  a  weaver 
or  Webber,  being  its  feminine  form,  the  several  sarnames  ter- 
minating in  ster  being  the  regular  Anglo-Saxon  form  of  femi- 
nine nouns  of  action,  as  Spinster  for  Spinner,  Tapster  for 
Tapper,  Baxter  for  Baker,  Brewster  for  Brewer,  &c,  (see 
Lower  on  English  Surnames^  vol.  i.  p.  113). 

AVEBSTER,  Alexander,  D.D.,  an  eminent 
divine,  was  born  in  Edinburgh  in  1707,  being  the 
son  of  the  Rev.  James  Webster,  who  had  suffered 
in  the  persecuting  times  of  the  Stuarts,  and  was 
afterwards  minister  of  the  Tolbooth  church,  Edin- 
burgh, and  author  of  a  small  volume  of  comran- 
nion  sermons  published  in  1705.  He  studied  at 
the  university  of  his  native  city,  and  discovered 
an  early  predilection  for  mathematical  learning. 
After  attending  the  divinity  hall,  he  was  licensed 
to  preach,  and,  in  1733,  was  ordained  minister  of 
the  parish  of  Culross,  in  Pertlisliire,  where  he  dis- 1 


tinguished  himself  by  his  eloquence  and  piety,  and 
by  the  faithfal  and  laborious  discharge  of  his  pas- 
toral daties.  In  Jnne  1737  he  was  translated  to 
the  Tolbooth  chnrch,  Edinburgh,  and  soon  be- 
came one  of  the  most  popular  men  of  his  time  in 
the  metropolis.  Eleven  days  after  his  settlement 
there,  he  married  Mary  Erskine,  a  young  lady  of 
fortune,  daughter  of  Colonel  John  Erskine,  and 
nearly  related  to  the  noble  family  of  Dnndonald. 

With  the  assistance  of  Dr.  Wallace,  he  prepared 
the  scheme  of  a  perpetual  fund  for  the  relief  of  the 
widows  and  children  of  the  clergy  of  the  Chnrch 
of  Scotland,  which  his  singular  powers  of  arith- 
metical calculation  enabled  him,  by  apportioning 
the  rates,  &c.,  to  bring  to  a  sure  and  practical 
bearing.  The  Calculations  were  published  at 
Edinburgh  in  1748,  folio.  After  being  submitted 
to  the  General  Assembly,  the  scheme  was  finally 
established  by  act  qf  parliament. 

In  1745,  when  Edinburgh  was  taken  possession 
of  by  the  rebels.  Dr.  Webster  remained  in  the 
city,  and  employed  his  great  influence  in  retaining 
the  minds  of  the  people  in  their  allegiance  to  the 
house  of  Hanover.  In  1753  he  pnbL'shed  a  Ser- 
mon preached  at  the  opening  of  the  General  As- 
sembly in  that  year,  entitled  '  Zeal  for  the  Civil 
and  Religious  Interests  of  Mankind  recommended.* 
In  1755  he  drew  up,  for  the  information  of  govern- 
ment, an  account  of  the  number  of  people  m 
Scotland.  He  died  January  25,  1784,  in  his 
76th  year. 

Dr.  Webster  was  celebrated  in  his  day  for  his 
wit  and  social  qualities,  and  many  amusing  stories 
are  told  of  his  fondness  for  claret.  He  had  some 
pretensions  to  the  character  of  a  poet ;  and  Fink- 
erton,  in  the  second  volume  of  his  Select  Scot- 
tish Ballads,  has  printed  an  amatory  piece  of 
his,  without  his  name,  which,  in  elegance  and 
warmth,  has  been  said  to  rival  even  the  effusions 
of  Catullus.  With  a  daughter  he  had  six  sons, 
one  of  whom.  Colonel  Webster,  fell  in  the  Amer- 
ican war. 

VVeddell,  a  surname  derived  from  the  old  parish  of  Wt- 
dale,  "tlie  vale  of  woe,"  now  the  parish  of  Stow,  which  is 
partly  in  Selkirksliire,  but  chiefly  in  Mid  T^thUn,  It  an- 
ciently belonged  to  the  bishops  of  St.  Andrews,  and  a  res- 
dence  of  theirs  on  the  site  of  what  is  now  the  village  of  Stow 
originated  the  hitter  name,  which  in  the  Anglo-Saxon  meant 
"a  choice  place,*'  '*a  select  station,"  and  is  the  wdl-known 


WELSH, 


032 


DAVID,  D.D. 


3186  of  this  privilege,  they  **  sometimes  silenced, 
by  their  tumnltnous  acclamations,  the  voice  of 
reason  and  tlie  laws  of  discipline/^  On  hearing 
this  quotation  the  friends  of  patronage  in  the  As- 
sembly, seizing  on  it  as  a  testimony  against  the 
fitness  of  the  Christian  people  to  choose  their  pas- 
tors, i*eceived  it  with  cheei-s  of  triumph,  but  they 
were  instantly  put  to  silence  by  the  retort  of  Dr. 
Welsh  :  "  You  are  welcome  to  the  sneer  of  this 
arch -infidel  and  ti-uckling  politician ;  I  take  the 
benefit  of  his  f act y 

In  the  great  ecclesiastical  controversy  which 
arose  as  to  the  independence  of  the  church,  he 
took  a  decided  part.  In  the  private  consultations 
of  the  evangelical  party  his  views  were  fully  ex- 
pressed, and  the  utmost  confidence  was  placed  in 
his  integrity  and  judgment.  So  highly  was  his 
character  estimated  that  at  the  meeting  of  the 
General  Assembly  of  1842,  he  was  chosen  mode- 
rator of  the  Assembly  which  adopted  the  Claim  of 
Right.  lie  was  thus  made  to  occupy  the  most 
conspicuous  position  in  the  Church  of  Scotland  on 
the  day  of  the  disruption,  and  his  sanction  to  the 
proceedings  which  led  to  that  event,  in  the  eyes 
of  many  went  farther  to  redeem  the  act  from  the 
charge  of  precipitate  rashness  than  that  perhaps 
of  any  other  individual  in  the  church. 

On  the  morning  of  the  memorable  18th  of  May 
1843,  Edinburgh  was  all  excitement  in  expecta- 
tion of  the  gi'cat  ecclesiastical  event  which  was  to 
take  place  that  day,  and  which  was  to  prove  the 
zeal  and  the  sincerity  of  those  who  had  adopted 
for  their  fundamental  principle  the  sacred  truth, 
that  *'  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ  is  the  on\y  head  and 
King  of  the  church."  All  business  was  suspended 
in  the  city,  and  the  streets  were  filled  with  seri- 
ous and  anxious  crowds  collected  from  every  part 
of  Scotland  ;  many  came  from  England,  and  even 
some  from  foreign  lands.  The  customary  levee  of 
the  lord-high-commissioner  at  Holyrood  was  more 
numerously  attended  that  day  than  on  previous 
occasions.  The  friends  of  the  goveniment  throng- 
ed there  in  large  numbers  to  give  an  imposing  as- 
pect to  their  cause,  while  the  ministei*s  and 
elders  of  the  chnrcli  about  to  separate  from  it 
flocked  to  the  levee  to  testify  their  abiding  loyalty. 
When  the  commissioner  had  proceeded  in  state  to 
St.  Giles'  church,  Dr.  AVelsh,  in  presence  of  a 


densely  crowded  and  excited  audience,  preadied 
bis  sermon  on  the  text,  *'  Let  every  man  be  folly 
persuaded  in  his  own  mind/'  On  the  condiision 
of  the  service,  the  commissioner,  the  most  noUe 
the  marquis  of  Bate,  and  his  train,  attended  by  a 
brilliant  military  escort,  proceeded  to  St.  Andrew*8 
church,  in  George  Street,  and  assumed  the  throne, 
whidi  was  surrounded  by  the  chief  officers  of  state 
in  Scotland,  and  a  distinguished  circle  of  landed 
proprietors. 

Tlie  crowning  act  Is  thus  narrated :  Dr.  Welsh 
took  the  moderator's  chair.  Nothing  but  the 
highest  mental  energy,  aided  by  strength  from 
above,  could  have  sustained  him — feeble  in  body 
through  previous  illness  and  anxiety,  and  ex- 
hausted by  the  labour  he  had  already  that  day 
gone  through.  But  he  was  firm  and  collected; 
veiy  pale,  but  full  of  dignity,  as  one  about  to  do  a 
great  deed,  and  of  elevation,  from  the  consdoos- 
ness  that  he  was  doing  it  for  Christ.  His  opening 
prayer  being  ended,  the  Assembly  became  still  as 
death.  In  a  voice  not  strong,  but  clear  and  dis- 
tinct, and  heard  in  every  comer  of  the  building, 
he  said,  **  According  to  the  usual  form  of  proce- 
dure, this  is  the  time  for  making  up  the  roll ;  but, 
in  consequence  of  certain  proceedings  respecting 
our  rights  and  privileges, — proceedings  which 
have  been  sanctioned  by  her  majesty's  govern- 
ment, and  by  the  legislature  of  the  country,  and 
more  especially  that  there  has  been  an  infringe- 
ment on  the  liberties  of  our  constitution,  so  that 
we  could  not  now  constitute  this  court  without  a 
violation  of  the  terms  of  the  union  between  church 
and  state  in  this  land,  as  now  authoritatively  de- 
clared— I  must  protest  against  our  proceeding 
farther.  The  reasons  that  have  led  to  this  con- 
clusion are  fully  set  forth  in  the  document  which 
I  hold  in  my  hand,  and  which,  with  the  permis- 
sion of  the  house,  I  shall  now  proceed  to  read." 
Having  read  the  protest,  which  was  signed  by  120 
ministers  and  73  lay  elders,  Dr.  Welsh  laid  it  on 
the  table,  and  bowing  to  the  commissioner,  left 
the  chair.  Followed  by  Dr.  Chalmere,  Dr.  Gor- 
don, and  a  host  of  others,  he  proceeded  out  of 
the  church,  and  in  long  procession,  headed  by 
him,  marched,  through  the  crowds  assembled, 
to  Tanfield  Hall,  Canonmills.  On  an-iving  there, 
he  again  assumed  the  chair,  and  in  a  most  spirit- 


ji 


WELWOOD. 


634 


WEMYSS. 


died  April  13,  1767.  He  lind  one  son^  Robert,  nnd  four 
diiupliters.  1.  Catiierine,  born  May  23,  1722,  married  Rev. 
Sir  Willirim  MoncriefTe,  miniiiter  of  Blackford,  wbo  became, 
in  1744,  7th  baroni  t  of  Tippermalnch,  (see  Mokcrikffr,  p. 
176  of  this  volume.)  2.  Isobel,  married  James  Robertson 
Barclay  of  Kcavil,  Sept  24,  1744.  3.  Margaret,  man-led  in 
1754,  Dr.  John  Ste<hTian,  bom  in  1710,  died  1791,  one  of 
the  professors  in  the  university  of  Edinburgh.    4.  Susan. 

The  son,  Robert  Wellwood  of  Garvock  and  Pitliver,  advo- 
cate, born  Dec.  22,  1720,  married,  in  1744,  Mary,  eldest 
daughter  of  Sir  George  Preston,  4th  baronet  of  ValleTfield, 
Robert  Wellwood  executed  an  entail  of  his  property,  dated 
May  29.  1790,  and  died  January  12,  1791.  He  had  two 
sons,  Robert  and  Andrew,  and  4  daujiliters.  1.  Anne,  bom 
in  1745,  married  Robeit  Scott  MoncriefTe  of  Coates  and  Kew- 
hall ;  issue  one  son,  Robert  Scott  Wellwood,  who  died  in  1854 
without  issue.  2.  Susan,  born  in  1751,  died  unmarried.  3. 
Elizabeth,  bom  Nov.  21,  1752,  married  Allan  Maconochie, 
Loni  Meadowbank,  (t<ee  Maconociiik,  p.  60  of  this  volume). 
4.  Catherine,  bum  May  12,  1754,  died  unmarried. 

The  elder  son,  Robert  Wellwood  of  Garvock,  bom  Feb.  7, 
1747,  married,  1st,  Lilias,  2d  daughter  of  James  Robertson 
Barclay  of  Keavil,  and  2dly,  Eliza  M'Neil.  He  died  July  7| 
1820,  leaving  2  daughters  by  first  marriage.  1.  IwtbellA 
married  Robert  Clarke  of  Comrie  Castle,  Perthshire.  She 
died  in  1826,  leaving,  with  other  issue,  a  son,  Rev.  William 
Colin  Clarke,  bom  in  1810,  married  in  1856,  Anne,  eldest 
daughter  of  William  D.  Pigut,  late  of  Dysart,  Queen*8  coun- 
ty, Ireland,  with  issue.  He  is  heir  of  entail  to  Valleyfield. 
2.  Mary,  married  Lawrence  Johnston  of  Sands,  with  issue. 

Robert  Wellwood  was  succeeded  bv  his  brother,  Andrew 
IkTofTat  Wellwood  of  Gan'ock,  bom  in  1764,  died  Feb.  25, 
1847.  He  had  one  daughter,  Anna  Mary,  who  married,  Ist* 
John  Jatnes  Boswell,  advocate,  with  issue ;  and,  2dly,  Ralph 
Clarke,  Edinburgh.  On  the  death  of  Robert  Scott  Wellwooil, 
nephew  of  Andrew  Moffat  Wellwood,  in  1854,  Alexander 
Maconochie,  2d  Lord  Meadowbank,  son  of  the  first  judge  of 
thut  name,  succeeded  to  Garvock,  (see  page  60  of  this  vol) 

Wkmyss,  a  surname  derived  from  the  Gaelic  word  Uamh^ 
a  cave,  and  the  name  of  a  pariah  in  Fifeshire,  on  the  shore  of 
the  Forth,  from  the  number  of  caves  in  the  rocks  there. 


Wemyss,   Earl  of,  a  title  in  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  con- 
ferred in  1633,  on  Sir  John  Wemyss,  I.ord  Wemyss  of  Elcho, 
descended  from  a  family  of  the  origin  of  which  there  are 
more  accounts  than  one.     All  agree,  however,  ns  to  their  be- 
ing derived  fnnn  the  family  of  Macduff,  maomior  of  Fife,  in 
the  reign  of  Malcolm  Canmore.     The  family   of  Wemyss, 
therefore,  is,  it  is  believed,  the  only  ancient  family  in  the  low- 
lands* having  a  really  Celtic  origin,  and  one  of  the  few  great 
families  in  Scotland  which,  thn>ugli  the  male  line,  can  claim 
kindred  with  Celtic  hlood.     The  lands  now  fonning  the  par- 
ish of  Wemyss  arc  said  to  have  Wen  part  of  the  estate  of 
Macduff.  Shakspere's  well-known  thane  of  Fife.     Acc<»rdinc 
to  Sibbalii,  Gilliinichael,  the  third  in  descent  from  Macduff, 
had  H  second  son  named  Hugo,  who  obtained  the  lands  from 
his  father,  with   lands  in   Loch oresli ire,  and  in  tlie  parish  of 
Kennoway,  and  the  patronage  of  the  church  of  Markinch. 
He  is  mentioned  in  the  chartulary  of  Dunfermline,  as  Hugo, 
the  son   of  Gillimichael,   during  the  reign  of  Malcolm  IV. 
According  to  a  manuscript  account  of  the  family  in  the  poji- 
8e8:»ion  of  the  earl  of  Wemyss,  the  first  of  his  house  is  said  to 
have  Inren  Michael  Wemyss,  second  son  of  Duncan,  fifth  earl 
of  Fife,  who  died  in  1165,  but  Sibbald's  account  seems  sanc- 
tioned by  ancient  charters. 


Hugo,  the  son  of  Hugo,  the  soo  of  Gillimicbael,  eoofimied 
to  the  canons  of  St.  Andrews,  the  chareh  of  Markinch,  with 
•  toft  and  the  tetnds.  John,  his  son,  designed  in  charten 
John  of  Metbldl,  miles,  assumed  the  name  of,  or  was  s^led, 
Ian  mhor  nan  UamJk^  or  great  John  of  the  cave,  in  the  rdgn 
of  Alexander  IL  His  son,  lifichael  de  Wemyss,  was  the  fa- 
ther of  Sir  John  de  Wonyss,  mentioned  bj  Fordnn  as  having 
had  a  dream  of  the  victory  obtained  by  the  Scots  over  the 
Norwegians  at  Largs  in  1263.  In  1290,  Sir  Michad  de 
Wemyss,  the  son  of  Sir  John,  with  his  brother  Sir  Davkl, 
according  to  Wynton  and  Fordnn,  were  sent  with  the  great 
Sir  Michael  Scott  of  Balwearie,  to  Norway,  to  bring  to  Scot- 
land the  young  Queen  Margaret,  the  grand-danghter  nS  Alex- 
ander IIL  Among  other  reliqnes  of  the  olden  time  pir»- 
serx-ed  in  the  castle  of  Wemyss,  the  reudeoce  of  the  family, 
is  a  silver  bowl,  said  to  have  been  presented  to  Sa 
Michael  Wemyss  by  Eric, iking  of  Norway,  on  this  occa- 
sion. Sir  Micliael  de  Wemyss  was  present  when  Bafiot 
did  homage  to  Edward  L  in  1292,  and  in  1296  he  swore 
fealty  to  Edward  I.  In  1315  he  witnessed  the  act  of  settle- 
ment of  the  Scottish  crown  bv  Robert  the  Bruce  at  Avr. 
His  son.  Sir  David  de  Wemyss,  was  one  of  the  patriotic  no- 
bles who  subscribed  the  famous  letter  to  the  Pope  in  1320, 
:isserting  the  independence  of  Scotland;  and  his  son.  Sir 
Michael,  confirmed  all  the  grants  of  his  predecessors  to  the 
churches  of  St.  Andrews  and  Soltniy.  The  latter  had  three 
sons.  Sir  David,  his  heir;  Sir  John,  who  obtained  from 
his  father  the  lands  of  Rires,  snd  part  of  Ix>choreshure,  and 
from  Sir  Alexander  Abemethy  a  grant  of  the  barony  of  Kin- 
caldmm ;  and  Sir  Michael.  Sir  John,  the  second  son,  died  in 
1358,  leaving  a  son.  Sir  David  Wemyss,  of  Rires  and  Kincal- 
dmm,  who  died  before  1373.  The  son  of  the  latter,  Sir  John 
Wemyss  of  Rires  and  Kincaldmm,  in  virtue  of  a  settlement 
by  his  uncle.  Sir  David  de  Wemyss,  sheriff  of  Fife,  succeeded 
to  the  familv  estate  in  1375. 

This  Sir  David  Wemyss,  the  elder  son  of  Sir  Michael 
had  a  son,  Sir  David  Wemyss,  who  was  one  of  the  guaran- 
tees for  the  release  of  David  IL,  and  this  baron's  son, 
also  named  Sir  David,  was  one  of  the  hostages  for  that 
monarch's  ransom.  The  latter  left  a  daughter,  Marpiret, 
married  to  Sir  Patrick  de  Inchmartine,  and  by  him  had  a 
daughter,  Isabel  de  Inclimartiiie.  heiress  of  that  barony. 
This  last  married  Sir  Alan  Erskine,  and  had  two  daugh- 
ters, his  CO -heiresses,  Margjiret,  wife  of  Sir  John  Glen, 
nnd  Isabel,  married  to  Sir  John  Wemvss  of  Rires  and  Kin- 
Cjildmm,  the  heir  male  of  the  family.  Resides  the  lands  he 
held  from  his  father,  and  those  disponed  to  him  hy  his  father- 
in-law,  he  had  extensive  grants  of  lands  in  Fife  and  ehsewhere, 
from  Robert  11.  and  Robert  IIL  He  had  three  sons,  the 
second  of  whom,  Duncan,  was  one  of  the  ho&tages  on  the 
liberation  of  .lames  L,  and  the  third,  Alexander,  was  an- 
cestor of  the  familv  of  Wemvss  of  Lnthocar. 

The  eldest  son.  Sir  David  Wemyss,  designed  Davy  of  the 
Wemyss,  dieil  in  1461,  leaving  a  son.  Sir  John  de  Wemyw, 
who  was  one  of  the  consen'ators  of  the  treaty  with  the  Eeg- 
lisli  in  1484.  He  died  in  1502,  leaving  a  son,  Sir  John 
Wemyss  of  Wemyss,  whose  fourth  son,  Thomas  Wemyss,  was 
ancestor  of  the  family  of  Wemyss  of  Winthank  or  Wemyss 
ilall.  Sir  David  Wemyss.  the  eldest  son  of  Sir  John,  was 
killed  at  Flodden  in  l.nl3.  and  Sir  David's  eldest  son,  also  Sir 
David  Wemvss,  di«Mi  in  1544.  Sir  John  Wemv.ss,  the  eldest  i^nr- 
viving  son,  repulsed  the  Knglish  who  landed  in  Fife  in  1547, 
and  in  1550,  when  the  queen  i-egent  pm]»osed  that  the  landed 
propt'rty  of  the  ctmntry  should  be  taxed  fur  the  pay  of  a  stand- 
ing force,  about  oOO  of  the  hanms  assembled  in  Kdinburgh, 
and  sent  the  lairds  of  Wemyssund  Cuider  to remoustn^te against 


WEMTSa 


WmrEFOOBD. 


Jo  1800  he  ruMd  the  93d  foot,  and  of  that  rrpment  1m  «m 
m^de  eokMid  in  1800.  In  Maj  1803  be  wus  appointed  major- 
pMwnl  on  the  Korth  British  ataflT.  and  in  Kor.  1805,  Im  waa 
promoted  to  the  rank  of  lientenant-i^neral.  He  married  the 
dnoghter  of  Sir  William  Ef>kine  of  Torrie,  and  was  saeeeed- 
M  br  bis  eld«t  son.  Jani«t  Erskine  WemTss  cf  WcmrH, 
b<irn  in  1789,  the  25th  proprietor  of  the  estate  of  Wemja,  in 
direct  descent  from  Ho^  the  son  of  Gillimieliael,  4tb  carl  of 
Fift.  He  entered  the  nar^r,  and  rose  to  the  rank  of  rear- 
admiral,  and  %ras  M.P.  for  Fife»hii«  from  1820  to  1880,  and 
from  1832  to  1847.  He  married  in  1829,  Ijidj  Emma  Hay, 
daughter  of  the  ICtli  earl  of  Errol.  On  his  death,  in  1854. 
he  was  snooeeded  by  his  arm,  James  Har  Wemjas,  Esq.,  bom 
in  1829,  married  in  1855,  Millioent,2d  daughter  of  Hon.  John 
Kennedy  Erdcine  and  Lady  Angosta  Fitzdarenre.  He  en- 
tered tiie  nary  in  1841,  and  retired  in  1848.  Elected  M.P. 
for  Fiftfsliire  in  1859. 

Francis.  5th  esirl  of  Wemyss,  bom  Oct.  21,  1728,  after 
hmn%  educated  at  Eton  college,  trarelled  on  the  eonUnent. 
and  retomed  to  Scotland  in  1744.  He  pnrchaaed  sereral 
catntes  in  East  Lothian,  where  he  bult  Amisfield  House,  and 
tlie  magnificent  seat  of  Goafvrd.  He  died  at  Gosftn^,  Aug. 
24,  1808,  in  his  85th  year.  By  liis  conntesa,  luuly  Cathe- 
rine Gordon,  Cth  daughter  of  the  2d  duke  of  Gordon,  he  had 
one  son  and  five  daugbterk  Frands,  Loid  Elcho,  the  son, 
liom  at  Edinburgh  Jan.  81, 1749,  was  chosen  M.P.  for  the 
Haddington  burglis  at  the  general  election  in  1780,  and  r»- 
duNien  in  1784.  In  hia  lat^r  years  be  deroted  hia  attention 
pruidpnlly  to  agricultural  punuita.  He  predeoenaed  hia  fa- 
ther, at  Amiafield  Houne,  Jan.  20,  1808,  in  his  59th  year. 
He  married,  July  18,  1771,  Mias  Susan  Tracy  Keck,  then 
one  of  the  maida  of  honour  to  Queen  Charlotte,  and  second 
daughter  of  Anthony  Tracy  Keck,  of  Great  Tew,  in  tlie  county 
of  Oxford,  and  by  her  lie  had  one  aon  and  fonr  daughters. 

Franda,  sixth  earl  of  Wemrns,  I^rd  Elcho*^  only  son,  bom 
April  15,  1772,  was  an  officer  in  the  army  and  aide-de-caiiip 
to  luH  grand-uncle.  Lord  Adam  Gordon,  commander-in-chief 
of  the  forces  in  Scotland,  from  1793  to  1797.  In  1808  lie 
succeeded  hia  gmndfnther  as  earl  of  Wemyaa,  and  on  tlie 
death  of  the  fourth  duke  of  Qu<«n(iberry  in  December  1810, 
lie  a1f«o  bec.'tme  enrl  of  ^larcli,  vi«connt  of  Peebles,  and  lx)rd 
Donglafl  of  Miedpnth,  Lyne,  and  Mnnard,  inheriting  the 
hnrony  of  Kiedpnth,  and  the  extensive  property  belon^iog  to 
liirt  grnce  in  the  conr.ty  of  Peebles.  He  wua  lord-lieutenant 
of  Peeblea-nhire  and  a  deputy-lieutenant  of  Haddingtonsliire, 
and  in  1821  he  was  created  Baron  Wemyss  of  Wemyna  in  the 
peerfl|!e  of  the  United  Kingdom.  He  died  28th  June,  1853.  He 
married  8lNt  May  1794.  Margaret,  fourth  daughter  of  Walter 
Campbell,  Esq.  of  Sliawfield,  and  had  2  sons  nnd  8  daughters. 

The  elder  son,  Francia  Wemyss  Charteria  Douglas,  7th 
enrl  of  Wemyss  and  2d  earl  of  Wemyss  and  March,  bom  in 
170n,  was  in  Angust  1858  appointed  lord-lientenant  of  Pee- 
blea-shire.  He  married  in  1817  Lady  I^niaa  Bingham,  4th 
daughter  of  Richard,  2d  earl  of  Lucan,  by  whom  he  has  had 
5  sons  and  2  dangliters.  The  eldest  son.  the  Hon.  Fnmcis 
Wemyss  Charteria,  M.P.,  I<ord  KIcho,  was  bom  Aug.  4, 1818, 
and  married,  Aug.  29,  1843,  I^dy  Anne  Frederica  Anson,  2d 
daughter  of  the  Ist  earl  of  Lichfield,  by  whom  he  has  issue. 


A  b.'tronetry  of  Kuva  Scotia  was,  in  1703,  conferred  by 
Queen  Anne  on  Sir  James  Wemyss  of  Bogie,  Fifeshure,  de- 
scended from  the  2d  son  of  Sir  David  de  Wemyss,  progenitor 
of  (lie  earls  of  Wemyss,  by  patent,  to  him  and  his  heirs  male 
whomsoever.  On  the  death  of  Sir  James,  3d  baronet,  with- 
out iitsue.  the  representation  in  the  male  line  devolved  on  the 
descendant  of  the  Ist  baronet*a  next  brother,  Henry,  Sir  Jamea 


Wcnym  writer  to  tba 

JaoMS  WsBiyM,  winMtnr  of 

Ob  tba  death  of  this  crrtlrmssi   4th 

fht,  81, 1S49,  tba  title  dmhcd  •■  hia 

WemyaiB,  hoen  Avg.  1,  1880, 

Bengal,  eldtst  nna  of  John  W( 

caldy,  eooaiB-fmiiaa  of  Sir  JaoMa  W< 

Sir  John,  8th  bwMMt,  was  aerrad  heir  i*  the 

ooBTt  of  the  sheriff  of  ehaneciy  al  Edhabogh, 

WIIITEFOORD,  Caleb,  ra  nuBcnt  «il  aid 
satirietl  poet,  was  born  at  Ediabugli  ia  17S4 
He  was  the  onlj  son  of  Colonel  Charles  WUte- 
foord,   5th  regiment   of  foot,  third  son  of  Sk 
Adam  Whitefoord,  an  Aynhire  baroneC.    lie  ena- 
pleted  his  edncation  at  the  nnirerritj  of  Lis  aative 
city.    His  father  intended  him  for  the  ehnrth, 
but  to  the  clerical  profession  lie  entertained  sack 
strong  objections,  that  the  colonel  was  obliged  to 
relinquish  his  design.    lie  was   in  conseqaeace 
sent  to  London,  and  placed  in  the  connting-houe 
of  Mr.  Archibald  Stewart,  a  wine  merchant  io 
York  Bnlldings,  where  he  remained  abont  fonr 
years.    AVhile  in  this  sitnntion  his  father  died  in 
Galwaj  in  Irclnnd,  leaving  tbe  principal  part  of 
his  fortnae  to  him  and  his  sister,  Airs.  SmitL 
Shortly  after,  Mr.  Wliitefoord  went  to  France, 
where  lie  resided  abont  two  years,  nntil  he  came 
of  age.    On  his  retnm  to  England  lie  commenced 
bnsiiicss  in   the  wine  tmde,  in   Craven  Street, 
Stnind,  in  partnership  with  a  gentleman  of  the 
name  of  Brown.    Possessing  strong  natural  tal- 
ents, with  wit,  learning,  antl  taste,  lie  was  well 
fitted  to  shine  ns  an  author,  bnt  he  had  no  ambi- 
tion for  literary  distinction.     All  he  seemed  aoxi- 
ons  abont  was  to  be  admitted  to  the  iiiterconrse  of 
such  men  as  Johnson,  Reynolds,  Goldsmith,  Gar- 
rick,  Foote,  and  other  choice  spirits  of  that  day. 
Having  accidentally  fonncd  an  acquaintance  irith 
^Ir.  Woodfall  the  printer,  at  the  solicitation  of  that 
gentleman  he  became  a  frequent  contributor  of 
short  satirical  pieces,  both  in  prose  and  verse,  to 
the  *  Public  Advertiser,'  which  attracted  consider- 
able notice  for  their  humour  and  singularity.    So 
careless,  however,  was  lie  abont  the  reputation 
which  they  brought  him,  that,  as  soon  as  dismissed 
fi-om  his  pen,  he  took  no  farther  concern  abont 
them,  but  left  tlicm  exposed  and  deserted,  till  Al- 
mond and  Debrett  sought  after,  and  gave  them  a 
place  in  that  appropriate  asylum,  •  The  Foundling    • 
Asylum  for  Wit.'    He  was  the  originator  of  that 


WILKIE, 


640 


SIR  DAVID. 


produced  and  sold  at  increasing  prices,  year  bv 
year,  liis  well-known  and  most  celebrated  works, 
most  of  which  have  been  engraved.  The  follow- 
ing is  a  brief  enumeration  of  them: — In  1811,  *  A 
Gamekeeper'  and  *  A  Humorous  Scene;'  in  1812, 
*  Blind  Man's  Buff,'  a  Sketch,  and  *The  Village 
Festival,'  now  in  the  National  Gallery ;  in  1813, 
the  finished  picture  of  ^ Blind  Man's  Buff;'  In 
1814,  *The  Letter  of  Introduction,'  and  'Duncan 
Gray;'  in  1815,  'Distraining  for  Rent;'  in  1816, 
•The  Rabbit  on  the  AVall;'  in  1817,  'The  Break- 
fnst;'  in  1818,  *The  EiTand  Boy'  and  'The  Ab- 
botsford  Family;'  in  1819,  'The  Penny  Wedding;' 
in  1820,  'The  Reading  of  the  WUl;'  in  1821, 
'  Guess  my  Name'  and  'Newsmongers;'  in  1822, 
'  Chelsea  Pensioners  Reading  the  Gazette  of  the 
Battle  of  Waterioo ; '  in  1823, '  Tlie  Parish  Beadle ; ' 
in  1824,  *  Smugglers  offering  Run  Goods  for  Sale 
or  Concealment,'  and  'Tlie  Cottage  Toilet;'  and, 
in  1825,  'The  Highland  Family.' 

In  the  latter  year  Wilkie  lost  a  considerable 
sum  in  a  speculation  in  which  he  had  engaged,  a 
circumstance  tliat  had  a  visible  effect  upon  his 
constitution,  and  for  the  recovery  of  his  health  his 
medical  attendants  advised  a  tour  on  the  Conti- 
nent. On  this  occasion  he  visited  Rome  and 
Madrid,  and  was  absent  for  about  three  vcars. 
During  this  period  he  was  not  idle;  besides  mak- 
ing a  great  number  of  studies,  he  nearly  completed 
some  pictures  both  in  Italy  and  Spain.  Soon  after 
his  return  in  1828,  he  began  to  display  a  total  change 
in  the  style  of  his  execution,  the  choice  of  his  sub- 
ject, and  the  principle  of  his  light  and  shades.  In 
his  earlier  paintings  he  adopted  the  principle  of  the 
yiomisli  and  Dutch  schools.  The  mingled  beau- 
ties of  Teniei*s,  Wouvremans,  and  Ostade,  were 
])resent,  without  the  grossness  of  their  subjects,  or 
the  coarseness  of  their  incidents.  He  was  no 
imitator,  however,  of  any  of  them.  He  saw  na- 
ture through  the  same  medium  through  which  those 
great  artists  had  contemplated  her,  and,  his  judg- 
ment assuring  him  that  the  course  they  pursued 
was  correct,  he  adopted  it  as  his  own.  In  the 
same  manner,  on  arriving  amidst  the  accumulated 
treasures  of  the  Spanish  school  at  Madrid,  he  was 
Htruck  with  admiration  at  the  powerful  effects  its 
artists  had  produced;  and  he  resolved  on  the 
hnxardous  experimeut  of  resting  his  future  fame 


on  a  style  utterly  opposed  to  tliat  in  which  be  thai 
stood  unrivalled  amidst  Enropean  artists.  Instead 
of  a  general  breadth  of  light,  he  adopted  powerfol 
contrasts,  in  place  of  rendering  his  darks  Tsloable 
by  the  great  prevalence  of  light,  he  made  his  bril- 
liancy of  light  to  depend  upon  the  predominanoe 
of  the  dark.  The  following  are  the  principal  pic- 
tures painted  by  him  in  his  second  style: — ^'Tbe 
Spanish  Posada;'  'The  Maid  of  Sanigossa;'  'The 
Guerilla's  Departure;'  'Tlie  Gnerilla*s  Retom;' 
^  John  Knox  Preaching  before  Mary  Queen  of 
Scots,'  exhibited  m  1832 ;  '  Spanish  Monks,*  ex- 
hibited in  1833 ;  *  Not  at  Home,'  and  '  Spanish 
Mother  and  Child,'  In  1834 ;  '  Columbns,'  in  1885; 

*  Peep -o'- day  Boys'  Cabin,'  in  1836;  *MajT 
Queen  of  Scots  escaping  fix>m  Lochleven  Castle,' 
*The  Cottar's  Saturday  Night,'  *The  Empress 
Josephine,'  and  *The  Fortune-teller,'   In  1887; 

*  Queen  Victoria's  First  Council,'  in  1838;  'The 
Discovery  of  the  Body  of  Tippoo  Saib,'   and 

*  Grace  before  Meat,'  in  1839;  and  'Bcnvenuto 
Cellini  and  the  Pope,'  and  'The  Irish  Whisky 
Still,'  in  1840.  Besides  these,  he  left  an  unfioisbed 
picture  of  *•  John  Knox  Administering  the  Sacra- 
ment,' one  of  his  principal  pictures.  *  The  Preacli- 
ing  of  John  Knox,'  which  is  a  most  magnificent 
and  truly  national  picture,  was  purchased  by  Sir 
Robert  Peel  at  a  considerable  sum. 

Mr.  R.  B.  Haydon,  himself  a  painter  of  great 
eminence,  thus  speaks  of  Wilkie's  change  of  style: 
'^  He  first  startled  the  British  artists  from  their 
absurd  excess  in  imitating  Reynolds,  by  the  power 
and  beauty  of  his  *  Village  Politicians,'  and  found- 
ed our  unrivalled  domestic  school.     Had  he  per- 
severed in  the  path  which  Nature  had  carved  ont 
for  him,  had  he  wisely  gone  on  adding  perfection 
to  peifection,  there  is  no  calculating  on  the  extent 
of  excellence  to  which  he  must  have  carried  his 
works,  for  his  invention  was  flowing  and  contin- 
ual,   his  eye  for  the  quantities  of   composition 
exquisite,  his  taste  simple,  his  eagei*nes3  for  im- 
provement great,  and,  at  that  time,  his  industry 
incessant ;  but,  alas !  he  soon  observed  that  power 
and  competence  were  seldom  obtained  in  England 
by  inventive  art,  and  having  a  great  relish  for  so- 
ciety, where  a  man  can  hardly  keep  to  t  great 
and  solitary  principle,  he  listened  to  the  flatteries 
of  those  who  wished  to  have  their  heads  Immor- 


ii 


i,       


I.J 


WILLIAM  I. 


C48 


WILLIAM  I. 


1 1 


WILLIAM  I.,  Kino  op  Scots,  stjled  William 
the  Lion,  from  being  tlie  fii'st  Scottish  monnrcli 
who  assnmed  the  iignre  of  a  lion  rampant  on  his 
shield,  grandson  of  David  I.,  and  brother  of  Mal- 
colm IV.,  was  born  in  1143.  He  succeeded  to 
the  throne  in  1165,  and  soon  after  he  repaired  to 
the  English  coart,  to  endeavour  to  obtain  from 
Henrj  II.  of  England  the  restoration  of  the  terri- 
tory of  Northumberland,  which  had  been  relin- 
quished by  Malcolm.  Ileniy  put  him  off  with 
fair  promises,  and,  at  length,  finding  all  his  soli- 
citations fruitless,  William  sent  ambassadors  to 
France,  in  1168,  and  concluded  a  treaty  with  the 
French  king  against  England.  In  1172  he  joined 
with  Richard,  Coeur  de  Lion,  in  a  confederacy 
against  the  English  monarch,  fiUher  of  that  prince, 
who  promised  to  restore  to  him  the  earldom  of 
Northumberland,  and  to  give  to  his  brother,  Da- 
vid, the  earldom  of  Cambridge.  In  accordance 
with  this  agreement,  William  invaded  England. 
He  divided  his  army  into  three  columns ;  the  first 
of  which  laid  siege  to  Carlisle,  the  second  he  him- 
self led  into  Northnmberland,  and  his  brother, 
David,  advanced  with  the  third  into  Leicester- 
shire. After  reducing  the  castles  of  Burgh,  Ap- 
pleby, and  Warkworth,  William  joined  that  divi- 
sion of  his  army  which  was  besieging  Carlisle. 
The  place  was  already  so  much  weakened,  that 
the  governor  had  agreed  to  sunendcr  it  by  a  cer- 
tain day,  provided  it  was  not  previously  relieved ; 
on  which  the  king,  leaving  some  troops  to  continue 
the  siege,  invested  the  castle  with  part  of  the 
forces  under  his  command,  at  the  same  time  send- 
ing a  strong  reinforcement  to  his  brother  David. 
At  this  juncture,  when  his  army  was  so  much  re- 
duced, he  received  intelligence  that  a  strong  body 
of  English  were  on  their  march  to  surprise  him. 
Ketiring  to  Alnwick,  he  laid  siege  to  that  place ; 
but  was  unexpectedly  attacked  by  400  Yorkshire 
horsemen,  who,  disguising  themselves  in  Scottish 
habits,  had  approached  his  camp  unobserved. 
William  mistook  them  for  a  party  of  his  own 
stragglers  returning  loaded  with  spoil ;  but  the 
display  of  the  English  banners  soon  undeceived 
him.  On  perceiving  his  error,  he  gallantly  charged 
the  enemy  at  the  head  of  sixty  horse ;  but  being 
overpowered  by  numbers,  he  was  taken  prisoner 
and  conveyed  to  Kichmond  castle.    He  was  then 


carried  in  chains  before  Henry,  at  Northampton, 
and  ordered  to  be  sent  to  the  castle  of  Falaise  in 
Normandy,  where  he  was  confined  with  other 
state  prisoners.  Towards  the  close  of  the  year  he 
regained  his  liberty,  but  only  by  consenting  to  do 
homage  to  Henry  for  Scotland  and  all  his  other 
possessions ;  and,  as  a  security,  he  was  obliged  to 
deliver  into  the  hands  of  the  English  monarch  the 
castles  of  Roxburgh,  Berwick,  Jedburgh,  Edin- 
burgh, and  Stirling.  David,  the  king's  brother, 
with  twenty  barons,  who  were  present  at  the  sign- 
ing of  this  convention,  were  given  to  Ileniy  as 
hostages  on  the  occasion.  This  took  place  in 
1174,  and  in  the  succeeding  year,  William,  with 
the  clergy  and  barons,  did  homage  to  Henry  at 
York. 

In  1188  the  bishop  of  Durham  was  sent  by 
Henry  into  Scotland  to  levy  a  contribution  for  the 
Holy  War ;  and  the  restitution  of  the  castles  of 
Roxburgh  and  Berwick  were  offered  to  William, 
to  induce  him  to  give  the  tenths  of  his  kingdom 
for  the  pui*pose ;  but  the  Scottish  clergy  and  barons 
assembled  in  parliament,  indignantly  refused  their 
consent,  declaring  that  **  they  would  not  pay,  al- 
though both  kings  should  have  sworn  to  levy 
them."  On  the  death  of  Henry  in  1189,  Richard, 
his  successor,  having  resolved  on  an  expedition 
into  the  Holy  Land,  that  he  might  secure  the 
quiet  of  his  dominions  in  his  absence,  determined 
upon  making  the  Scots  his  friends,  and  restored  to 
William  all  the  rights  and  territories  which  had 
been  wrested  from  him  during  the  reign  of  his 
father.  For  this  William  agi*eed  to  pay  ten  thou- 
sand merks  sterling.  Tlie  treaty  entered  into  be- 
tween the  two  monarchs  on  this  occasion  is  still 
extant.  In  it  Richard  acknowledges  that  **all 
the  conventions  and  acts  of  submission  from  Wil- 
liam to  the  crown  of  England  had  been  extorted 
from  him  by  unprecedented  writings  and  duresse;" 
and  thus  was  Scotland  restored  to  her  indepen- 
dence, of  which  she  had  been  temporarily  deprived, 
by  measures,  on  the  part  of  Henry,  which  even  the 
English  themselves  considered  as  forced  and  un- 
just. William  continued  a  faithful  ally  of  Richard, 
and  when  the  latter  was  imprisoned  by  the  em- 
peror of  Germany,  on  his  return  from  Palestine, 
the  king  of  Scotland  sent  an  army  to  assist  bla 
regency  against  his  brother  John,  who  had  UBurped 


WILLOCK, 


645 


JOHN. 


and,  ^vhilc  he  resided  in  Edinburgh,  they  met 
with  liim  in  private,  and  Ustened  to  his  religions 
exiiortations/'  So  high  did  he  stand  in  tlie  esti- 
mation of  Knox,  that,  in  his  History,  the  latter 
never  mentions  him  without  expressions  of  a£fec- 
tion  and  esteem.  In  the  end  of  the  year  he  re- 
turned to  Embden,  bat  in  the  snmmer  of  1558  he 
received  a  new  commission  from  the  dnchess,  and 
again  came  to  Scotland,  where  his  presence  was 
much  required  by  the  Protestant  party.  Soon  af- 
ter his  arrival  ho  was  seized  with  a  severe  illness, 
but  this  did  not  prevent  him  from  preaching,  from 
his  bed,  the  Reformed  doctrines,  to  great  numbcra 
of  the  nobility,  gentr}-,  and  others  who  came  to 
hear  him. 

After  his  recovery,  wishing  to  remain  in  Scot- 
land, he  resigned  his  commission  from  the  duchess, 
and  resolved  to  devote  himself  entii*cly  to  the  ad- 
vancement of  the  Protestant  cause  in  his  native 
country.  With  Mr.  William  Harlowe,  he  began 
to  preach  openly  in  Edinburgh  and  Leith,  while 
Mr.  Paul  Methven,  Mr.  John  Douglas,  Erskine  of 
Dun,  and  others,  proclaimed  the  doctrines  of  the 
Reformation  in  various  pai*ts  of  Scotland.  Till 
the  arrival  of  Knox  fi*om  Geneva  in  May  1559, 
the  great  burden  of  affairs  lay  chiefly  on  the  shoul- 
ders of  Willock,  who,  having  retired  to  the  town 
of  Ayr,  preached  regularly  in  St.  John's  church  of 
that  town,  being  protected  by  the  earl  of  Glen- 
cairn  and  a  numerous  band  of  the  nobility  and 
gentry  of  Ayrshire.  While  occupied  in  this  duty, 
he  had  a  long  controversial  correspondence  with 
Quentin  Kennedy,  the  famous  abbot  of  Crossra- 
guel.  He  also  seems  to  have  had  a  controversy 
with  Black,  a  Dominican  friar,  and  Robert  Max- 
well, a  schoolmaster  in  Glasgow. 

With  the  view  of  intimidating  the  Protestant 
party,  the  queen  regent  summoned  their  preach- 
ers, mentioning  particularly  Knox,  Willock,  Dou- 
glas, and  Methven,  to  appear  before  her  and  her 
council  at  Stirling,  May  10,  1559,  to  answer  for 
their  reputed  heresy  and  schism atical  conduct. 
Finding,  however,  that,  previous  to  the  day  ap- 
pointed, the  Reformers  had  assembled  in  vast 
numbers  at  Perth,  she  persuaded  Erskine  of  Dun 
to  prevail  on  his  brethren  to  disperse,  promising 
that  their  preachers  should  be  unmolested,  and  all 
their  grievances  redressed.     On  this  assurance. 


the  greater  part  of  the  Protestants  returned  to 
their  homes.  But  when  the  day  of  trial  came,  the 
summons  was  called  by  orders  of  the  queen,  and 
the  preachers  outlawed  for  not  answering  the 
citation.  The  perfidy  of  the  regent  on  this  occa- 
sion led  to  the  destruction  of  the  monasteries, 
iii*8t  at  Perth,  and  then  in  various  other  towns  in 
the  kingdom,  to  the  interdiction  of  the  popish 
worship  in  Scotland,  and  finally  to  the  overthrow 
of  her  own  authority. 

In  the  end  of  June  the  lords  of  the  congregation 
arrived  in  the  capital,  with  Knox  and  Willock  in 
their  company.  The  former  was  straightway 
elected  minister  of  Edinburgh,  and  Protestant 
ministers  preached  freely  in  all  the  churches.  In 
virtue  of  a  truce  agreed  to  between  the  queen  re- 
gent, then  with  her  party  at  Dunbar,  and  the 
Protestant  lords,  dated  July  24,  the  latter  with 
their  adherents  left  Edinburgh,  taking  Knox  with 
them.  Willock,  who  was  less  obnoxious  to  the 
Papists,  was  appointed  to  officiate  in  his  stead, 
and  preached  regularly  in  St.  Giles\  In  this  dif- 
ficult situation  he  displayed  a  firmness  and  pru- 
dence which  eminently  qualified  him  for  tlic  high 
office  to  which  he  had  been  called  in  the  absence 
of  Knox.  Tlie  regent  made  several  pressing  at- 
tempts to  have  the  Roman  Catholic  service  re- 
established in  the  church  of  St.  Giles,  but  Mr. 
Willock  and  the  citizens  declared  that  tliey  could 
not  relinquish  the  right  which  was  secured  to 
them  by  the  late  treaty,  nor  allow  idolatiy  to  be 
again  set  up  in  the  High  Church  of  the  city.  Al- 
though the  French  mercenaries  in  the  sei'vice  of 
the  regent  paraded  the  city  in  an  insolent  and 
supercilious  manner,  and  often  disturbed,  by  their 
loud  talking  and  noise,  the  Protestant  worship, 
Willock  maintained  his  place,  and  in  the  month 
of  August  administered  the  sacrament  of  the 
Lord's  Supper,  after  the  reformed  manner,  for  the 
fii-st  time  in  Edinburgh,  in  St.  Giles*  church. 

The  queen  regent  having  broken  the  treaty,  and 
retii'ed  to  Leith,  which  she  fortified  and  defended 
with  French  troops,  a  convention  of  the  nobility, 
barons,  and  burgesses,  was  held  at  Edinburgh, 
October  21,  to  deliberate  as  to  her  deposition  from 
the  government,  to  which  the  two  principal  minis- 
ters, Willock  and  Knox,  were  called  for  their 
opinion  and  advice.    By  this  assembly,  she  was 


WILSON, 


649 


ALEXANDER. 


Of  this  law,  however,  the  enlightened  bailies  and 
skippers  of  Greenocic  were,  of  conrse,  ignorant, 
when  they  issued  tlieir  sapient  interdict  against  the 
cultivation  of  poetry. 

WILSON,  James,  an  eminent  American  law- 
yer, and  one  of  the  subscribers  of  the  Declaration 
of  Independence,  the  son  of  a  respectable  farmer, 
was  bom  in  Scotland  about  1742.  After  studying 
successively  at  Glasgow,  St.  Andrews,  and  Edin- 
burgh, he  emigrated,  in  1776,  to  Philadelphia, 
and  was,  for  a  few  months,  employed  as  a  tutor  iu 
the  college  and  academy  of  that  place,  in  which 
capacity  he  acquired  a  high  reputation  for  his 
classical  leaniing.  On  relinquishing  that  situa- 
tion, he  commenced  the  study  of  the  law,  and  at 
tlie  end  of  two  years  was  admitted  to  tlic  bar. 
He  began  to  practise,  first  at  Reading,  and  then 
at  Carlisle,  and  from  the  latter  place  he  removed 
to  Annapolis.  In  1778  he  returned  to  Philadel- 
phia, where  he  continued  to  reside  during  the  re- 
mainder of  his  life.  In  1775  he  was  elected  a 
member  of  Congress,  and  uniformly  spoke  and 
acted  in  favour  of  independence.  In  1777  he  was 
superseded  in  Congress  through  the  influence  of 
party  spurit,  but  resumed  his  scat  in  1782.  In 
1779  he  received  the  arduous  and  delicate  ap- 
pointment of  advocate-general  for  the  French 
government  in  the  United  States,  an  office  which 
he  resigned  in  1781,  in  consequence  of  difficulties 
respecting  the  mode  of  remuneration.  He  con- 
tinued, however,  to  give  his  advice  in  such  cases 
as  were  laid  before  him  by  the  ministers  and  con- 
suls of  France  until  1783,  when  the  French  trans- 
mitted to  him  a  present  of  ten  thousand  llvres. 

In  1787  he  was  a  member  of  the  Convention 
which  framed  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States,  and  was  one  of  tlic  committee  who  report- 
ed the  draught  of  the  same.  In  the  State  Con- 
vention of  Pennsylvania  his  exertions  were  of 
essential  service  in  securing  the  adoption  of  the 
Constitution.  He  was  snbsequently  a  member  of 
the  Convention  wliich  changed  the  constitution  of 
Pennsylvania,  to  render  it  conformable  to  that  of 
the  United  States ;  and,  being  one  of  the  commit- 
tee appointed  to  prepare  the  drauglit,  was  intrust- 
ed with  the  duty  of  drawing  it  out  in  the  proper 
form.  In  1789  he  was  appointed,  by  General 
Washington,  a  judge  of  the  supreme  court  of  the 


United  States,  and,  whilst  on  a  circuit  in  North 
Carolina,  in  the  discharge  of  his  functions,  he  died 
at  Edenton,  August  28, 1798.  His  political  and 
legal  disquisitions,  which  are.  highly  esteemed  iu 
America,  have  been  published  in  three  volumes. 

WILSON,  Alexander,  the  celebrated  Ameri- 
can oniithologlst,  also  distinguislied  as  a  writer  of 
Scottish  poetry,  was  bom  at  Paislej',  July  6, 1766. 
His  father  was  a  distiller  in  a  small  wa}',  and,  be- 
ing in  poor  circumstances,  was  not  able  to  give 
him  more  than  an  ordinary  education.  In  his 
thirteenth  year  he  was  bound  apprentice  for  three 
years  to  his  brother-in-law,  William  Duncan,  a 
weaver,  and,  after  completing  his  indenture,  he 
worked  for  four  years  as  a  jom*neyman,  at  first  in 
Paisley,  afterwards  in  Lochwinnoch,  where  his 
father  was  then  i*esiding,  and  latterly  at  Queens- 
ferry  with  his  old  master  and  relative  Duncan, 
who  had  removed  to  that  place.  An  American 
biographer  tells  us,  tliat  he  acquired  the  nickname 
of  "  the  lazy  weaver,"  from  Iiis  love  of  reading, 
and  attachment  to  the  quiet  and  sequestered  beau- 
ties of  nature.  He  derived  from  his  mother,  who 
died  when  he  was  ten  years  of  age,  a  taste  for 
music,  and  he  gave  early  indications  of  possessing 
poetical  talent  of  a  high  order.  Disgusted  witli 
the  confined  and  monotonous  nature  of  his  em- 
ployment, he  resolved  to  abandon  the  shuttle,  and 
betake  himself  to  the  wandering  trade  of  a  pedlar; 
and  accordingly  he  canned  a  pack  for  a  period  of 
about  three  years.  In  1789^  he  prmted,  at  Paisley, 
a  volume,  entitled  *  Poems,  Humorous,  Satirical, 
and  Serious,'  and  offered  for  sale  his  chapman's 
wares  and  his  book  at  tlie  same  time ;  but  finding 
few  customers  for  either,  he  returned  to  Lochwin- 
noch, and  resumed  his  former  occupation  at  the 
loom.  In  1791  he  hastily  composed  a  poem  on 
the  question — *•  Whether  the  exertions  of  Allan 
Ramsay  or  Robert  Ferguson  had  done  most  honour 
to  Scottish  poetry?'  which  he  i*ecited  before  the 
members  of  the  debating  society,  called  *^The 
Forum,"  at  Edinburgh,  giving  tlie  preference  to 
Ferguson,  and  soon  after  published  it  under  the 
title  of  '  The  Laurel  Disputed.'  At  this  time  he 
wrote  and  recited  in  public  two  other  poetical 
essays,  and  also  contributed  some  pieces  to  Dr. 
Anderson's  *  Bee.'  In  1792  appeared  his  admir- 
able narrative  poem,  *  Watty  and  Meg,'  which,  in 


WILSON, 


651 


WILLIAM  RAE. 


to  the  Falls  of  the  Niac^ara,  and,  on  his  return,  he 
wrote  his  poem  of  *  The  Foi-esters,'  published  in 
the  Portfolio.  From  this  time  till  1806  he  was 
busily  employed  on  his  gi*eat  ornithological  work, 
and  his  friend  Lawson  having  declined  to  join 
with  him  in  the  undertaking,  he  proceeded  with 
it  alone,  drawing,  etching,  and  colouring  all  the 
plates  himself.  In  the  latter  year  he  had  the  good 
fortune  to  be  engaged,  at  a  liberal  salary,  by  Mr. 
Samuel  F.  Bradford,  bookseller  in  Philadelphia,  as 
assistant  editor  of  the  American  edition  of  Bees* 
Cyclopaedia.  He  now  relinquished  the  office  of  a 
schoolmaster,  and  Mr.  Bradford  having  agreed  to 
take  all  the  risk  of  publishing  the  Ornithology,  he 
applied  himself  to  preparing  it  for  the  press.  In 
September  1808  the  first  volume  of  this  great  na- 
tional work  made  its  appearance,  and  its  splendour 
and  ability  equally  surprised  and  delighted  the 
American  public.  Immediately  on  its  publication, 
Wilson  set  out  on  a  journey  through  the  Eastern 
slates,  for  the  purpose  of  showing  his  book  and 
soliciting  subscriptions.  lie  went  as  far  as  Maine, 
and  i-etumed  through  Ycnnont  to  Albany  and 
Philadelphia.  He  afterwards  undertook  an  expe- 
dition on  the  same  errand  to  the  South,  passing 
through  Virginia,  the  Carolinns,  and  Georgia. 
When  at  Charleston  he  had  procured  only  a  hun- 
dred and  twenty -five  subscribers;  at  Savannah 
they  had  amounted  to  two  hnndred  and  fifty, 
**  obtained,**  he  says,  *^  at  a  price  worth  five  times 
their  amount." 

The  second  volume  of  the  Ornithology  was 
published  in  January  1810,  and  in  the  following 
month  the  author  proceeded  to  Pittsburg.  From 
thence,  in  a  small  boat  or  skifi^,  he  descended  the 
Ohio  for  about  six  hundred  miles.  He  visited  the 
numerous  towns  that  had  even  then  sprung  up  in 
the  wilderness,  and  explored  various  parts  of  the 
country  for  the  purpose  of  extending  his  observa- 
tions, collecting  specimens,  and  watching  the 
habits  of  birds  in  their  native  haunts.  *' Since 
Febniary  1810,"  he  says,  in  a  letter  to  his  brother, 
David,  a  year  or  two  afterwards,  "  I  have  slept 
for  several  weeks  in  the  wilderness  alone,  in  an 
Indian  country,  with  my  gun  and  my  pistols  in 
my  bosom ;  and  have  found  myself  so  much  re- 
duced by  sickness  as  to  be  scarcely  able  to  stand, 
when  not  uitliin  three  hundred  miles  of  a  white 


settlement."  Near  Louisville  he  sold  his  skiff, 
and  perfonned  the  journey  to  Natchez  partly  on 
foot  and  partly  on  horseback.  In  his  diaiy  he 
says :  **  This  journey,  four  hundred  and  seventy- 
five  miles  from  Nashville,  I  have  performed  alone, 
through  difficulties  which  those  who  never  passed 
the  road  could  not  have  a  conception  of."  He 
proceeded  to  New  Orleans,  and  thence  to  New 
York,  and  home  to  Philadelphia. 

Six  volumes  of  the  Oiiiithology  wei'e  published 
previous  to  1813,  and  the  seventh  appeared  in 
that  year.  In  1812  AVilson  was  chosen  a  member 
of  the  Society  of  Artists  of  the  United  States,  also 
of  the  American  Philosophical  Society,  and  of 
other  learned  bodies.  In  1813  he  had  completed 
the  letterpress  of  the  eighth  volume  of  the  Orni- 
thology; but  from  want  of  proper  assistants  to 
ttolour  the  plates,  he  was  obliged  to  undertake  the 
whole  of  this  department  himself,  in  addition  to 
his  other  duties.  After  a  few  days'  illness,  he  died, 
of  dysenter}',  August  23,  1813,  in  his  48th  year. 
The  letterpress  of  the  ninth  volume  of  the  Orni- 
thology was  supplied  "by  his  friend  and  com- 
panion in  several  excursions,  Mr.  George  Ord, 
who  prefixed  an  intei*e8ting  memoir  of  the  deceased 
naturalist.  Three  supplementary  volumes,  con- 
taining American  birds  not  described  by  Wilson, 
have  been  published  in  folio  by  Charles  Lucien 
Bonaparte.  In  1832  an  addition  of  the  American 
Ornithology,  with  illustrative  Notes  and  a  Life  of 
Wilson,  by  Sir  William  Jardine,  baronet,  was 
published  at  London  in  three  volumes. 

WIIJSON,  William  Rak,  of  Kelvinbank, 
LL.D.,  an  eminent  traveller,  was  born  in  Paisley, 
7th  June,  1772.  lie  was  the  eldest  sou  of  a  gen- 
tleman of  the  name  of  Rae  at  Haddington,  of 
which  town  his  grandfather  was  provost,  and  the 
nephew  and  heir  of  John  AVilson,  one  of  the 
town  clerks  of  Glasgow.  He  was  bred  to  the  law, 
and  practised  for  some  years  as  a  solicitor  before 
the  supreme  courts  in  Scotland.  On  Mr.  Wilson's 
death,  in  1806,  without  issue,  Mr.  Xlae  succeeded 
to  his  fortune,  and,  by  letters  patent,  assumed  the 
additional  surname  of  WiUon.  In  1811,  he  mar- 
ried Frances,  4th  daughter  of  John  Phillips,  Esq. 
of  Stobcross,  merchant  in  Glasgow,  but  she  died, 
without  issue,  about  18  months  after  the  marriage. 

After  his  wife's  death,  he  was  induced  to  visit 


I  I 


1 1 


AVILSON, 


652 


JOHN. 


foreign  parts,  and  lie  spent  a  large  portion  of  the 
remainder  of  his  life  in  travelling  in  the  east,  and 
throughout  the  continent  of  Europe.  The  anti- 
quities of  the  Holy  Land  were  the  chief  objects  of 
his  study  and  research,  and  ho  gave  to  the  world 
the  fruits  of  his  travels  in  sundry  works  of  con- 
siderable interest,  such  as  *  Travels  in  Norway, 
Sweden,  and  Denmark ; '  *  Travels  in  Russia ;  * 
and  '  Travels  in  Eg3'pt  and  the  Holy  Land,'  pub- 
lished in  1828.  The  latter,  in  particular,  went 
through  several  editions,  and  was  for  a  long  time 
very  popular.  From  the  univereity  of  Glasgow 
he  received  the  honorary  degree  of  doctor  of  laws. 
He  entered  into  a  second  marriage  with  Miss 
Gates,  an  English  lady  of  good  family,  who  was 
his  devoted  companion  through  all  the  latter  period 
of  his  life,  and  in  all  his  sojoumings  in  many  lands. 
Dr.  Wilson  died  at  Tendon  in  June  1849,  age^ 
76,  without  issue,  leaving  an  ample  foi-tune,  the 
bulk  of  which  was  divided  among  several  nephews 
and  nieces.  Among  his  other  charitable  bequests 
was  a  sum  to  afford  an  annual  prize,  to  be  awarded 
by  the  university  of  Glasgow,  to  a  student  of  divi- 
nity, for  the  best  essay  on  *  The  life  of  our  ador- 
able Redeemer,  Jesus  Christ ;  His  righteousness, 
atoning  death,  and  that  everlasting  benefit  arising 
from  these  blessings  to  a  lost  and  miserable  world.' 
His  body  was,  by  his  own  desire,  brought  to  Glas- 
gow, where  it  was  tempoi*arily  inteired  in  one  of 
the  Egyptian  vaults  in  the  Necropolis,  but  shortly 
afterwards  removed  and  peiinancntly  deposited  in 
a  tomb  erected  under  the  superintendence  of  his 
trustees.  This  is  a  beautiful  and  stately  struc- 
ture, and  forms  a  leading  object  of  interest  in  the 
Necropolis  of  Glasgow.  The  architect  was  Mr.  J. 
A.  Bell  of  Edinburgh,  and  the  sculptor,  Mr. 
M-Lean.  The  design  is,  very  appropriately,  of 
an  Eastern  character,  the  tyipQ  being  to  be  found 
in  the  numerous  sepulchral  monuments  still  ex- 
isting in  and  around  the  city  of  Jerusalem.  A 
central  tablet  beare  the  following  inscription  :  "  In 
memory  of  William.  Rae  Wilson,  LL.D.,  late  of 
Kelvinbank,  wiio  died  2d  Juno,  1849,  aged  7G, 
author  of  'Travels  in  the  Holy  Land,'  and  editor 
of  works  written  on  that  and  other  countries  dur- 
ing many  years.  *Tiiy  servants  take  pleasure  in 
her  stones,  and  favour  the  dust  thereof.'  Tiiis 
tablet  is  inscribed  by  his  affectionate  wife.*'    A 


friend  who  knew  him  well  thus  writes  of  him 
**  In  private  life  Dr.  Rae  Wilson  was  eminently 
social.  Gifted  with  a  most  active  mind,  and  har- 
ing  had  his  talent  for  conversation  sharpened  by 
much  exercise  in  the  coarse  of  his  travels,  he  was 
a  most  interesting  and  instructive  companion.  It 
was  no  ordinary  treat  to  listen  to  his  animated 
descriptions  of  the  remarkable  places  and  persons 
he  had  visited ;  and  to  the  very  close  of  his  long 
life,  he  continned  to  take  the  greatest  pleasure  in 
retracing  his  steps,  particularly  over  the  Holy 
Land ;  happy  in  the  idea  of  communicatiog  some 
portion  of  his  own  knowledge  and  zeal  to  his 
friends.  He  was  ever  ready  to  do  good,  in  the 
best  sense,  as  he  had  opportunity.  He  was  not 
only  a  distributor  of  religious  tracts,  but  a  writer 
of  some  that  are  highly  esteemed.** 

WILSON,  John,  a  distinguished  poet  and 
critic,  the  son  of  a  prosperous  manufacturer  in 
Paisley,  was  bom  19th  May  1785.  His  mother, 
whose  maiden  name  was  Sym,  was  of  a  wealthy 
Glasgow  family.  After  receiving  the  early  part  of 
his  education  at  the  manse  of  the  Meams,  Ren- 
frewshire, under  the  tuition  of  the  Rev.  Dr. 
George  M^Latchie,  at  the  age  of  13  he  commenced 
his  studies  at  the  univereity  of  Glasgow,  where  he 
remained  four  years.  In  18(H  he  entered  Magda- 
len college,  Oxford,  as  a  gentleman  commoner, 
and  continued  thei*e  also  four  years.  While  at 
Oxford,  he  won  the  Newdegate  prize  of  fifty 
guineas  for  an  English  poem  of  fifty  lines. 

Remarkable  in  his  youth  for  that  fine  physical 
development  on  which,  even  till  a  short  time  be- 
fore his.  death,  years  produced  but  little  effect, 
among  his  college  friends  he  at  once  acquired  a 
pre-eminence  in  all  the  athletic  exercises  and  out- 
of-door  amusements  engaged  in  by  the  young  Ox- 
onians, and  manifold  were  the  reports  which  in 
after  years  were  rife  of  the  eccentricities  and  ro- 
mantic incidents  which  marked  this  period  of  his 
life.  To  use  the  language  of  the  author  of  *  A 
Memorial  and  Estimate  *  of  him,  by  one  of  his 
students,  published  in  Edinburgh  in  1854 :  "  The 
number  of  his  friends  and  associates  ^  was  im- 
mense,' ranging,  curiously  enough,  through  everj- 
degree  of  the  social  scale,  from  *  gi-oom,  cobbler, 
stable-boy,  barber's  apprentice,  with  every  kind 
of  blackguardism  and  i-uffianism,'  up  to  the  ordi- 


!l 


!■     ! 


I      I 


I      I 

I 

I. 


jl 


!i 


WILSON, 


653 


JOHN. 


naiy  nnder-graduate,  the  fasliionable  gentleman- 
commoner,  the  vciy  dean,  proctor,  and  fellow,  nor 
even  stopping  short  of  *  nnllmited  favour  with  the 
learned  president  of  Magdalen  College,  editor  of 
parts  of  Plato  and  of  some  theology.'  He  could 
have  been  no  common  young  man,  so  far  as  per- 
sonal interest  and  the  power  of  ingratiating  go, 
who  thus  stood.  Still  his  favourite  companions 
were  *  people  who  had  talents  for  thumping  and 
being  thumped.*  In  some  one  of  the  recesses,  be- 
tween university  term-times,  must  have  taken 
place,  if  at  all,  the  reported  extravagance  of  his 
joining  himself  to  a  party  of  strolling  players,  en- 
joying the  disguise  with  its  accompaniments  of 
hardship  or  joviality,  and  taking  the  leading  parts, 
both  in  tragedy  and  comedy,  at  country  fairs 
throughout  England,  no  doubt  under  grotesque 
vicissitudes  of  popular  acceptation ;  now  called 
before  the  threepenny  curtain  to  address  an  audi- 
ence of  half-drunken  rustics ;  now  hissed  off  the 
stage  in  the  full  height  of  the  *  Carobyscs  vein.* 
He  was  said  to  have  become  temporary  waiter  at 
an  inn  for  the  sake  of  some  fair  stranger  there 
resident,  and  to  have  been  so  great  a  favourite 
with  all  and  sundry,  as  the  hrumorons  and  eccen- 
tric young  *  John,*  that  the  establishment  would 
scarce  part  with-  him.  These  histories  are  really 
traceable  to  very  slight  occasion  in  fact.  A  still 
odder  tale  used  to  be  circulated  of  him,  appai-ently 
dependent  on  impulses  of  a  more  serious  kind; 
how  having  been  smitten  with  the  outlandish 
charms  of  a  beautiful  young  jet-eyed  gipsy  daugh- 
ter of  the  king  of  that  mysterions  tribe,  he  fol- 
lowed the  gang  in  secret,  and  preferring  his  suit, 
succeeded  in  it, — was  allowed  to  assume  the  gipsy 
garb, — to  marry  the  dai'k  maiden,  or  at  least  set- 
tle for  some  time  in  their  encampment,  a  sort  of 
adopted  heir  to  the  Egyptian  princedom,  till  dis- 
covered and  reclaimed  to  civilized  life  by  his 
friends.  Frequent  is  his  own  allusion,  at  all 
events,  to  some  decisive  encounter  with  one  of 
their  champions  in  the  ring,  where  victory  de- 
clared itself  for  him.** 

On  the  death  of  his  father  he  succeeded  to  a 
fortune  estimated  as  high  as  £30,000,  and  having 
purchased  the  estate  of  EUeray,  beautifully  situ- 
ated on  the  lake  of  Windermere,  Westmoreland, 
on  quitting  Oxford  he  went  to  reside  there.    This 


was  in  1808,  and  for  some  years  he  remained  in  a 
district,  the  picturesque  beauty  of  which  furnished 
materials  for  ministering  to  his  naturally  high 
poetic  temperament,  and  enjoying  the  society  of 
Wordsworth,  Sonthey,  De  Quincey  (a  fellow-stu- 
dent at  Oxford),  and  the  other  distinguished  men 
of  letters  who  then  resided  near  the  lakes.    Here 
he  showed  himself  particularly  partial  to  all  sorts 
of  athletic  exercises  and  wild  field-sports,  and  out- 
of-door  activity  of  unusual  kinds,  and  is  described 
by  an  American  writer,  who  was  inti*oduced  to  him 
at  Wordsworth's  house,  as  a  young  man  *  in  a 
sailor's  dress,  about  twenty-one,  tall  and  lightly 
built,  of  florid  complexion,  and  hair  of  a  hue  un- 
suited  to  that  colour,"  and  as  one  who  seemed  '*  to 
have  an  intense  enjoyment  of  life,  to  feel  happy 
and  pleased  with  himself  as  with  others,  being 
young,  rich,  healthy,  and  full  of  intellectual  acti- 
vity."   The  following  is  a  description  of  one  of 
the  extraordinary  recreations  in  which   he  was 
fond  of  indulging.    "  About  this  time,"  continues 
the  same  American  writer,  *^  a  young  man,  name 
not  given,  had  taken  up  his  abode  in  the  vale  of 
Grasmere,  anxious  for  an  introduction  to  Mr. 
Wilson,  and  strolled  out  early  one  fine  summer 
moraing — three  o'clock — to  that  rocky  and  moor- 
ish common  (called  the  White  Moss),  which  over- 
hangs the  vale  of  Rydal,  dividing  it  from  Gras- 
mere.    Looking  southward  in  the  direction  of 
Rydal,  he  suddenly  became  aware  of  a  huge  beast 
advancing  at  a  long  trot,  with  the  heavy  and 
thundering  ti*ead  of  a  hippopotamus,  along  the 
public  road.     The  creature  soon  arrived  within 
half-a-mile  of  him,  in  the  grey  light  of  morning, — 
a  bull,  apparently  flying  from  unseen  danger  in 
the  rear.    As  yet,  all  was  mysteiy ;  till  suddenly 
three  horsemen  emerged  round  a  turn  in  the  road, 
hunting  after  it  in  full  speed,  in  evident  pursuit. 
Tlie  bull  made  heavily  for  the  moor,  which  he 
reached,  then  paused,  panting,  blowing  out  smoke, 
and  looking  back.     The  animal  was  not  safe, 
however;  the  horsemen,  scarcel}'  relaxing  their 
speed,  charged  up  hill,  gained  the  rear  of  the  bull, 
and  drove  him  at  full  gallop,  over  the  worst  part 
of  this  impracticable  gi*ound,  to  that  below ;  while 
the  stranger  perceived,  by  the  increasing  light, 
that  the  three  were  armed  with  immense  spears, 
fourteen  feet  long.    By  these,  the  fugitive  beast 


;  I 


M 


!  I 


il 


I  1 


AVILSON, 


656 


JOHN. 


Edinbnrgh  was  offered  to  him,  but  he  declined  it. 
For  the  last  few  months  of  his  life  he  suffered 
gi'eatly  from  pulmonary  disease,  followed  hy  rheu- 
matic gout,  and  died  18th  May  1856. 

AVILSON,  John,  an  eminent  vocalist,  was  bom 
ill  Edinburgh  in  1800,  and  at  ten  years  of  age 
was  apprenticed  to  a  printer.  After  working  as  a 
compositor,  he  was  engaged  as  a  reader,  or  correc- 
tor of  tlic  press,  in  the  establishment  of  James 
Ballantyue,  the  printer  of  the  Waverley  novels, 
and  it  is  said  was  one  of  the  few  who  were  in  the 
secret  of  Sir  AVsilter  Scott  being  the  author.  At 
this  time  he  devoted  his  evenings  to  the  acquire- 
ment of  the  French  and  Latin  languages,  and  after 
becoming  versed  in  these,  with  other  two  friends 
he  turned  his  attention  to  the  study  of  Italian. 
Ho  was  always  fond  of  singing,  and  having  im- 
proved Iiis  voice  by  attending  the  classes  of  a 
musical  association  called  the  Edinburgh  Institu- 
tion, which  met  in  the  High  church  aisle,  he  ob- 
tained the  office  of  precentor  in  one  of  the  dissent- 
ing chapels  of  Edinburgh.  He  now  scrionsl}'  set 
about  cultivating  the  musical  powers  with  which 
he  was  so  richly  endowed.  With  a  voice  of  the 
finest  quality,  he  possessed  the  most  exquisite  na- 
tural taste,  and  he  improved  both  by  tlie  most 
assiduous  and  earnest  studv. 

In  1827  he  left  the  printing  business,  and  be- 
came a  teacher  of  singing,  appeai'ing  occasionally 
at  private  concerts  in  Edinburgh.  In  June  of 
that  year  he  went  to  London,  and  for  three 
months  took  lessons  from  Signor  Lanza,  an  Italian 
master  of  the  vocal  art.  He  also  acquired  a 
knowledge  of  elocution,  as  it  was  his  intention  to 
go  upon  the  stage.  When  he  began  to  prepare 
himself  for  this  step,  several  of  his  friends  endea- 
voured to  dissuade  him  from  it.  His  mother,  a 
pious  old  lady,  and  Mr.  Grey,  his  pastor,  who 
was  much  attached  to  him,  remonstrated  in  vain. 
He  resigned  his  precentorship,  and  in  March  1830 
he  made  his  firat  appearance  on  the  stage  of  the 
Theatre  lloyal,  Edinburgh,  as  Henry  Bertram  in 
the  opera  of  *Guy  Mannering.*  The  following 
night  he  sung  in  the  opera  of  Rosina,  and  during 
the  same  week  he  appeared  as  Massaniello.  His 
success  was  complete,  and  after  singing  for  three 
weeks  at  the  Edinburgh  theati-e,  he  went  to  Perth, 
where  he  performed  during  the  summer.    Ho  was 


soon  called  tO/  London,  and  on  the  SOth  October 
appeared  at  Covent  Garden  theatre  for  the  fint 
time,  as  Don  Carlos  in  the  Daenna.     Having 
thas  laid  the  foundation  of  that  high  fame  which 
he  afterwards  so  fully  acquired,  he  continued  to 
sing  as  principal  tenor,    alternately  at  Covent 
Garden  and  Drnry  Lane,  until  the  summer  of 
1837.    In  the  following  winter  he  waa  eogsged 
at   the   English    Opera   House,   where,   among 
other  snccessfhl  performances,  he  played  Donald, 
the  leading  character  in  the  Mountain  Sylph,  an 
opera  which  was  performed  upwards  of  one  hnn- 
dred  nights  in  succession.    For  this  theatre  he 
translated  from  the  Italian,  and  adapted  for  the 
English  stage,  the  opera  of  *La  Somuambnla.* 
Soon  after  this  he  commenced  a  new  species  of 
musical  entertainments,  for  which  he  became  cel- 
ebrated.   They  consisted  entirely  of  Scotch  songs, 
varied  with  descriptive  remarks  and  appropriate 
anecdotes  illustrative  of  the  various  pieces  intro- 
duced.   He  was  the  first  who  originated  this  class 
of  monplogical  musical  entertainments,  which  be- 
came very  popular.    The  names  he  gave  them, 
such  as  *  A  Nicht  wi'  Burns,'  and  '  Adventures  of 
Prince  Charlie,'  were  eminently  attractive.    Mr. 
Wilson  was  the  most  accomplished  singer  of  Scot- 
tish ballads  of  modem  times.    For  pathos  and 
expression  in  singing  the  beautiful  melodies  of  his 
native  land  he  was  never  surpassed.     He  particu- 
larly excelled  in  the  plaintive  and  unadorned  lays 
of  Scotland,  and  in  aii-s  of  a  humorous  cast  he 
equally  maintained  the  national  character. 

The  idea  of  these  original  and  novel  entertain- 
ments appears  to  have  been  accidental.  In  the 
spring  of  1838,  he  was  solicited  by  the  Mechanics' 
Institute  of  London,  of  which  Dr.  Birkbeck  was 
president,  to  give  three  lectures  on  Scottish  music. 
This  task  he  accomplished  successfullj-.  He 
attracted  crowded  audiences,  and  was  asked  by 
six  or  seven  similar  institutions  to  repeat  his 
lectures.  This,  however,  he  declined  to  do  at 
the  time,  as  he  had  resolved  to  visit  the  United 
States. 

In  September  1838  he  sailed  from  Bristol  on  a 
professional  tour  to  America.  He  remained  in  the 
United  States  for  nearly  two  years,  and  gave  sev- 
eral of  his  Scottish  entertainments  at  New  York. 
Durin;r  his  stav  in  America  he  translated  and 


■I 


!• 


I  I 


!•■ 


! 

■ 


WINRAM. 


6(>8 


JOHN. 


1534,  third  prior,  and  in  1536  sub-prior,  of  their 
abbey  or  monastery  at  St.  Andrews.  The  prior. 
Lord  James  Stewart,  afterwards  the  regent  Mo- 
ray, was  then  in  liis  minority,  and,  conseqaently, 
much  of  the  common  business  of  the  abbey  de- 
volved on  the  sub-prior.  Although  he  held  such 
a  prominent  situation  in  the  popish  church,  Win- 
ram  secretly  favoured  the  doctrines  of  the  Refor- 
mation ;  and  while  he  carefully  avoided  uttering 
in  public  anything  that  might  subject  him  to  per- 
secution, he  did  not  fail  to  enlighten  the  minds  of 
many,  particularly  among  the  monks  and  noviti- 
ates of  the  abbey,  in  the  knowledge  of  the  truth. 

At  the  trial  of  George  Wishart,  the  martyr,  at 
St.  Andrews,  February  28,  1546,  Winram  was 
desired  by  Cardinal  Bethune  to  open  the  proceed- 
ings with  a  suitable  sermon.  This  was  evidently 
done  to  test  his  principles;  but  the  wary  sub- 
prior  was  on  his  guard,  and,  although  in  preaching 
on  the  parable  of  tlie  wheat  and  tares,  he  entered 
upon  a  definition  of  heresy,  he  took  care  not  to 
commit  himself,  and  concluded  by  declaring  that 
heretics  ought  to  be  put  down,  **  even  hn  this  pres- 
ent world."  After  the  condemnation  of  Wishart, 
the  sub-prior  ventured  to  speak  to  the  bishops  on 
his  behalf,  whereupon  the  cardinal  upbraided  him, 
saying,  "  Well,  Sir,  and  you,  we  know  what  a 
man  you  are,  seven  years  ago." 

A  short  time  after  the  death  of  the  cardinal, 
Winram,  who,  during  the  vacancy,  was  vicar- 
gcncral  of  the  diocese,  was  called  to  account  by 
Hamilton,  the  archbishop-elect,  for  allowing  Knox 
to  preach  his  ^Mieretical  and  schismatical  doc- 
trines," unreproved.  He,  therefore,  held  a  con- 
vention of  the  friars  of  the  abbey  and  learned  men 
of  the  ttnivei'sity,  before  which  he  summoned 
Knox  and  Rough,  another  Protestant  preacher. 
At  this  meeting,  Knox,  aware  of  the  report  con- 
cerning the  private  sentiments  of  Winram,  de- 
manded from  him  a  public  acknowledgment  of  his 
opinion,  whether  the  doctrines  taught  by  him  and 
his  colleague  were  scriptural  or  unscriptural ;  for, 
if  he  believed  them  to  be  true,  it  was  his  duty  to 
give  them  the  sanction  of  his  authority.  Winram 
cautiously  replied  that  he  did  not  come  there  as  a 
judge,  and  would  neither  aflSnn  nor  condemn  the 
points  in  question  ;  but,  if  Knox  pleased,  he  would 
reason  with  him  a  little.     After  maintaining  the 


argument  for  a  short  time,  the  sab-prior  deToIved 
it  on  an  old  Greyfriar,  named  Arbnckle,  wlio 
seemed  to  be  in  his  dotage.  The  latter  was  aooa 
forced  to  yield  in  disgrace,  Winram  himself  bdng 
the  first  to  condemn  his  extravagant  aMertioiis. 
Although  he  disapproved  of  many  of  the  proceed- 
ings of  the  Popish  clergy,  Winram,  whose  condact 
was  sometimes  extremely  ambigoons,  contuiaed 
till  a  late  period  to  act  with  them,  and,  in  .^ril 
1558,  he  was  present  at  the  trial  and  condenmi- 
tion  of  Walter  Mill,  the  martyr,  at  St.  Andrews. 
Being  a  member  of  the  provincial  council  of  tke 
Popish  clergy  which  met  in  1549,  he  was  em- 
ployed by  his  brethren  to  draw  up  the  canon  m- 
tended  to  settle  the  ridiculous  dispute,  then  warm- 
ly agitated  amongst  the  clergy,  whether  the  Patar 
Noster  should  be  said  to  the  saints,  or  to  God 
alone.  In  the  council  which  sat  in  1559,  he  was 
nominated  one  of  the  six  persons  to  whose  exam- 
ination and  admonition  the  archbishops  of  Glas- 
gow and  St.  Andrews  submitted  their  private  con- 
duct. 

He  appears  soon  after  to  have  openly  joined  the 
Reformera,  and,  in  April  1560,  was  one  of  the 
ministers  to  whom  was  committed  the  important 
trust  of  compiling  the  Old  Confession  of  Faith, 
and  the  First  Book  of  Discipline,  one  of  his  co- 
adjutors being  John  Knox,  with  whom  he  bad 
formerly  disputed  at  St.  Andrews.  In  April  1561 
he  was  elected  one  of  the  five  ecclesiastical  super- 
intendents of  provinces,  his  district  being  Fife, 
Forthrick,  and  Strathem.  After  this  he  was  a 
constant  attendant  on  the  meetings  of  the  General 
Assembly,  and  was  employed  in  their  committees 
on  the  most  important  affaii*s ;  but,  like  the  other 
superintendents,  he  was  frequently  accused  of  neg- 
ligence in  visiting  the  district  committed  to  his 
charge.  In  1571  he  was  one  of  the  commission- 
ers appointed  by  the  General  Assembly,  convened 
at  Leith,  to  proceed  to  the  castle,  then  held  bj 
Kirkcaldy  of  Grange,  for  the  queen,  to  endeavour 
to  bring  about  an  agreement  between  the  two 
contending  parties,  when  he  began  the  confer- 
ence, which  was  principally  conducted,  on  Kirk- 
caldy's part,  by  the  laird  of  Lethington.  In  Jan- 
uary 1572  ho  attended  the  convention  at  Leith 
called  by  the  regent  Morton,  at  which  the  Tul- 
chnn  bishops  were  authorised,  and  the  former  ec- 


|l 


-A 


WISH  ART, 


664 


GEORGE. 


according  to  the  old  Scottish  version,  beginning 
"  Have  mercy  on  me  now,  good  Lord.  After  thy 
gi'cat  mercy;"  and  retired  saying,  "God  grant 
quiet  rest."  After  the  family  had  gone  to  sleep,  at 
midnight  they  were  aroused  with  a  violent  knock- 
ing, and  on  looking  out  they  found  that  the  house 
was  surrounded  with  a  powerful  force,  command- 
ed by  the  earl  of  Bothwell.  Cockburn  and  his 
friends  refused  at  first  to  deliver  Wishart  up,  but 
Bothwell  solemnly  assured  them  that  no  harm 
was  intended,  and  that,  should  any  violence  be 
offered  to  Wishart,  he  would  himself  interpose  for 
his  safety.  Anxious  to  avoid  bloodshed,  Wishart 
commanded  the  gates  to  be  opened,  adding,  "  the 
will  of  God  be  done ! "  He  was  borne  away  a 
prisoner,  and  conveyed  to  Elphinston  Hall,  the 
niins  of  which  may  still  be  seen  about  a  mile  and 
a  half  fi*om  Ormiston.  Here  the  carduial  was  in 
waiting,  and  Bothwell  treacherously  forfeited  his 
plighted  troth,  by  surrendering  him  into  his  hands. 
"From  that  time  forth,"  says  Pitscottie,  with 
honest  indignation,  "  the  Earl  Bothwell  prospered 
never,  neither  any  of  his  affaire." 

After  having  been  confined  for  more  than  a 
month  in  irons  in  the  sea-tower  of  St.  Andrews, 
Wishart  was  brought  to  trial  before  a  coiivocjition 
of  the  prelates  and -clergy,  assembled  for  tlie  pur- 
pose in  the  Cathedral,  On  tliis  occasion  every 
form  of  law,  justice,  and  decency,  was  disregard- 
ed. Tlie  prisoner  was  not  allowed  a  patient  hear- 
ing, but  was  treated  with  every  species  of  con- 
tumely and  reproach.  He  was  condemned  to 
death  as  an  obstinate  heretic,  and  next  day, 
March  1,  1546,  he  was  burnt  at  the  stake  on  the 
Castle  Green.  His  hands  were  tied  behind  him 
— there  was  a  chain  round  his  middle,  and  a  rope 
about  his  neck,  and  he  was  surrounded  by  milita- 
ry guard;?.  On  approaching  the  fire  he  knelt 
down,  and,  after  rising,  he  repeated  the  following 
words  three  times : — "  O  thou  Saviour  of  the 
world,  have  mercy  upon  me.  Father  of  heaven, 
I  commend  my  spirit  into  thy  holy  hands."  And 
turning  to  the  people  he  said — "Brethren  and 
sisters,  I  beseech  you  that  ye  take  not  offence 
at  the  Word  on  account  of  the  tonnents  which 
ye  see  prepared  for  me.  Love  the  Word  of 
God.  Suffer  patiently  for  the  Word's  sake,  and 
it  will  prove  your  everlasting  comfort.    Exhort 


also  brethren  and  sisters  who  have  often  beard  ne 
elsewhere,  that  they  fall  not  away  because  of  po*- 
sccntion.    Show  them  that  mj  doctrine  was  not 
of  men.    Had  it  been  of  men,  I  should  bare  had 
their  thanks.    It  is  because  it  was  the  trne  gos- 
pel given  me  by  the  grace  of  God,  that  I  this  day 
suffer,  not  sorrowfnlly,  but  with  a  glad  heart.   It 
was  for  this  cause  I  was  sent  among  yon.    It  wai 
to  suffer  this  fire  for  Christ's  sake.     Look  at  me, 
and  ye  shall  not  find  my  countenance  to  change. 
This  grim  fire  I  fear  not.    And  so  I  pray  yon  also 
not  to  fear  them  that  can  slay  the  body,  but  have 
no  power  to  slay  the  soul.    Some  have  alleged 
that  I  tanght  concerning  the  soul  that  it  shall 
sleep  till  the  last  day.    On  the  contrary,  I  knoif 
most  surely  that  my  soul  shall  sap  with  my  Savi- 
our this  night,  even  with  him  for  whom  I  am  now 
to  suffer."    He  then  prayed  for  his  accusers  thus : 
"  I  beseech  thee.  Father  of  heaven,  to  forgive  such 
as  have  ignorantly,  or  even  of  evil  mind,  forged 
lies  against  me.   I  forgive  them  with  all  my  heart. 
I  beseech  Christ  also  to  forgive  such  as  have  this 
day  ignorantly  condemned  me  to  death."    And 
turning  again  to  the  people,  he  added — "Ibe- 
seedi  you,  brethren  and  sisters,  to  exhort  yoor 
prelates  to  learn  God's  word,  that  they  may  at 
least  be  ashamed  to  do  evil,  and  leani  to  do  well. 
And  if  they  turn  not,  the  wrath  of  God  will  come 
upon  them  suddenly.    They  shall  not   escape." 
The    executioner   now    craved    his    forgiveness. 
"  Come  hither,  my  heart,"  said  he,  and  kissing 
his  cheek,  added,  "take  this  as  a  tokcnth.itl 
forgive  thee.    Do  thine  office."     He   was  tlien 
suspended  from  the  gibbet  over  the  fire,  by  the 
chain  round  his  middle;  and  after  he  had  been 
also  strangled  by  the  rope  round  his  neck,  his  body 
was  burned  to  ashes,  amidst  the  sighs  and  groans 
of  the  spectators.     Apprehensive   lest  a  rescue 
should  be  attempted,  Bethune  had  commanded 
all    the   artillery    of   the   castle    to   be    pointed 
towards  the   place  of  execution,  and   the  gun- 
ners also  were  stationed  by  their  guns  with  their 
matches    ready,    so    that    immediate    execution 
might  be  done  against  any  who  should  attempt 
a  rescue,   while    himself,   with    the    other    pre- 
lates,   reclining    in    luxurious    pomp,    witnessed 
the  melancholy  spectacle  with   exultation.      In 
most  accounts  of  Wisliart's  martyrdom,  it  Is  men- 


WOOD, 


670 


SIR  ANDREW. 


had  fled  to  the  Low  Countries.  Upon  this  the 
malcontents  "  seized  on  his  luggage  and  furniture 
in  their  passage  to  the  Forth,  surprised  his  castle 
of  Dunbar,  furnished  themselves  with  arms  and 
ammunitions  out  of  the  royal  stores,  and  overran 
the  three  I^thians  and  the  Merse,  rifling  and 
plundering  all  honest  men."  (Abercromhie's  Mar- 
tial Adiievements.)  James  speedily  found  himself 
at  the  head  of  a  well-appointed  force  of  30,000 
men,  and  recrossing  the  Forth,  in  April  1488,  he 
marched  past  Stirling,  and  pitched  his  standard 
near  the  ancient  castle  of  Blackness.  He  soon, 
however,  disbanded  his  army,  but  the  rebel  peers 
again  mustering  their  vassals,  he  was  defeated  at 
Sauchicbum  on  the  1 1th  of  the  following  June, 
and  the  unfortunate  monarch,  in  riding  from  the 
field,  fell  from  his  horse,  and  was  stabbed  to  death 
by  a  pretended  priest,  in  the  miller^s  cottage  at 
Beaton^s  mill,  a  hamlet  on  the  Bannock,  into 
which  he  had  been  carried.  At  the  time,  he  was 
endeavouring  to  make  his  way  across  the  country 
to  Sir  Andrew  Wood  at  Alloa,  where  the  latter 
was  cruizing  with  his  two  ships,  the  Flower  and 
the  Yellow  Carvel.  On  the  right  bank  of  the 
Forth  he  kept  several  of  his  boats  close  by  the 
shore,  to  receive  the  king  if  the  tide  of  battle 
turned  against  him ;  and  he  often  landed  with  his 
brothers,  John  and  Robert,  and  ^*a  competent 
number  of  men,  hoping  to  share  in  the  dangers  of 
the  day  ;  but  no  such  opportunity  occurred." 

The  insurgent  nobles  had  advanced  with  their 
victorious  army  to  Linlithgow,  and  a  report  reach- 
ed their  camp  that,  while  sailing  up  and  down  the 
Forth,  Sir  Andrew  Wood's  ships  had  been  seen 
taking  on  board  men  wounded  in  the  battle, 
and  there  was  good  reason  for  believing  that 
the  king,  whose  fate  was  unknown,  having  ef- 
fected his  escape,  was  on  board  one  of  them. 
This  occasioned  the  insurgents  to  remove  their 
camp  to  Leith.  Thence  mcssengera  were  sent  to 
Sir  Andrew  in  the  name  of  James,  duke  of  Rothe- 
say, prince  of  Scotland,  the  king's  son,  whom  the 
insurgents  had  kept  with  them  and  forced  to  act 
against  his  father,  to  inquire  if  this  was  the  case. 
Sir  Andrew  solemnly  declared  that  the  king  was 
not  with  him,  and  gave  the  messengers  leave  to 
search  the  ships.  A  second  message  was  sent, 
requesting  an  inten-iew.    To  this  he  agi-eed,  on 


condition  that  the  J^ords  Seton  siid  lilcnig 
should  remain  on  board  his  sliipe,  as  bostaget  for 
Ilia  safe  return. 

On  his  appearance  before  the  council,  arrayed  ia 
magnificent  armour,  the  yoong  fnrince,  then  In  kii 
sixteenth  year,  is  said  to  have  wept  as  he  entered 
the  eonncll-room,  and  asked  timidlj,  "Sir,  are 
you  my  father?  "  Sir  Andrew  replied,  "  I  am  noc 
your  father,  but  his  faithful  senrant ;  and  the  en- 
emy of  those  who  have  occasioned  his  downfidL* 
**  Know  yon  where  the  king  is?  "  asked  aereral  of 
the  lords,  ^*  or  who  those  were  yon  took  on  board 
after  the  battle  ?  "    *'  As  for  the  king,**  replied  Sir 
Andrew,  "  I  know  nothing  of  him.     Mj  brotherB 
and  I  were  ready  to  have  risked  onr  lives  In  his 
defence.    We  landed  in  our  boats  opposite  Alloa ; 
but  finding  our  efforts  to  fight  or  to  save  him  vaio, 
we  returned  to  the  fleet."    "He  added,"  says 
Buchanan,  "  that  if  the  king  were  alive,  he  was 
resolved  to  obey  none  but  him,  and  if  he  were 
slain,  he  was  ready  to  revenge  him."    Again  he 
was  asked  "  if  the  king  were  not  really  on  board 
either  of  his  ships."    *'  He  is  not,"  he  sternly  re- 
plied ;  **  I  would  to  God  he  was,  for  then  he  would 
be  in  safety.    Then  I  could  defend  him  from  those 
vile  traitors  who,  I  fear,  have  slain  him,  and  whom 
I  hope  to  see,  one  day,  rewarded  as  they  deserve.** 
lie  then  withdrew,  and  returned  on  board,  where 
his  brothers  had  begun  to  be  seriously  alarmed  at 
his  long  absence. 

Of  Sir  Andrew  Wood's  interview  with  the  rebel 
lords,  Lindsay  of  Pitscottie  has  given  a  graphic 
and  circumstantial  account,  and  although  the  af- 
fecting statement  that  the  young  king,  James  IV., 
mistook  him  for  his  father,  has  been  generally 
received,  it  is  not  likely  to  have  been  the  case,  as 
there  is  no  hint  in  history  of  his  ever  having  been 
excluded  from  the  presence  of  his  father,  and  at  the 
time  he  was  sixteen  years  of  age,  and  must  have 
known  his  person  well.  It  is  not  probable  that 
lie  could  have  been  misled  by  the  noble  and  dig- 
nified aspect  of  the  admiral,  or  by  any  fancied  re» 
semblance  which  he  bore  to  James  III.,  as  some 
writers  assume.  This  would  make  a  mere  child 
of  him,  and  we  therefore  entirely  discredit  the 
storv. 

Irritated  at  the  plainness  with  which  Wood  had 
spoken  his  mind  to  them,  the  Insnrgent  nobles, 


ii 


iJ 


WOOD, 


672 


SIR  ANDREW. 


I  ■■ 


I 


I 


was  appointed  pilot  to  the  king  to  the  Isle  of  May, 
that  "being  skilful  in  pyloting,  he  should  be 
ready,  upon  the  king's  call,  to  pylot  and  convey 
him  and  the  queen,  in  visit  to  St.  Adrian's  chap- 
pel,"  on  that  isle,  where  there  was  a  holy  shrine 
and  well,  and  titere  is  a  charter  of  some  lands 
granted  to  him  for  that  service. 

Meantime  the  English  king,  indignant  at  the 
disgrace  which  his  flag  had  sustained,  and  that 
from  A  foe  so  little  known  on  tlie  sea,  determined 
to  assert  the  naval  pre-eminence  of  England.  lie 
offered  an  annual  pension  of  £1,000  to  any  of  his 
commanders  who  should  capture  the  ships  of  Wood, 
and  take  him  prisoner.  One  Stephen  Bull,  when 
other  English  commanders  of  ships  had  declined 
to  attempt  such  a  hazardous  enterprise,  engaged 
to  take  Wood,  and  bring  him  to  London,  dead  or 
alive.  Appointed  to  three  stout  ships  fully  equip- 
I)ed  for  war.  Bull  sailed  for  the  Forth,  in  July 
1490,  and  entering  the  frith,  cast  anchor  at  the 
back  of  the  Isle  of  May.  In  the  belief  that  peace 
had  been  established  with  England,  Sir  Andrew 
AVood  had  gone  to  Flanders  as  convoy  to  some 
merchant  vessels.  To  prevent  the  Scots  fisher- 
men from  giving  him  notice,  on  his  return,  of  his 
appearance  there,  Bull  took  the  precaution  to 
seize  all  the  fishing -boats  on  the  coast,  and 
he  retained  a  few  of  the  fishermen  on  board 
liis  own  ship,  that  they  might  point  out  to  him 
the  ships  of  the  Scots  admiral,  on  their  ar- 
rival in  the  frith.  The  English  continued  to 
keep  a  good  look  out  at  sea,  and  one  summer 
morning  they  discovered  two  vessels  passing  St. 
Abb's  Head  at  the  mouth  of  the  Forth.  The 
fishermen  who  had  been  taken  captives  were  or- 
dered to  the  masthead,  to  give  their  opinion  of  the 
ships  in  sPght.  At  first  they  hesitated  to  say  whe- 
ther the  approaching  vessels  were  Wood's  or  not, 
but  on  their  liberty  being  promised  them,  they 
immediately  declared  them  to  be  his.  The  Eng- 
lish commander  now  ordered  his  men  to  pre- 
pare for  battle,  distributing  wine  among  them. 
Meanwhile,  on  the  morning  of  the  10th  of  Au- 
gust, Sir  Andrew  Wood  was  steering  up  the 
frith,  unconscious  of  an  enemy  being  so  near  at 
hand,  but  no  sooner  had  he  perceived  the  three 
ships  of  England  coming  from  the  shelter  of  the 
Isle  of  May,  than  he  gave  orders  to  clear  away 


everything  for  battle ;  and  calling  his  men  toge- 
ther, he  thus  addressed  them :  '^  ThesCv  my  lada, 
are  the  foes  who  expect  to  convey  ns  in  bonds  to 
the  English  king,  bat,  by  your  conrage  and  the 
help  of  Grod,  they  shall  fail.  Set  yourselves  in 
order  every  man  to  his  station.  Charge  gunners; 
let  the  cross-bows  be  ready ;  have  the  lime  pots 
and  fire  balls  to  the  tops ;  and  the  two-handed 
swords  to  the  fore  rooms.  Be  stent,  be  diligent, 
for  your  own  sakes,  and  for  the  honour  of  this 
realm."  Wine  was  handed  round,  and  the  Scot- 
tish ships  resounded  with  cheers. 

The  sun  having  now  arisen,  folly  displayed  the 
strength  of  the  English  force  ;  but  the  Scots  were 
prepared  for  them.   By  skilful  management,  Wood 
got  to  windward  of  the  foe ;  and  immediately  a 
close  and  furious  combat  began,  which  lasted  till 
night.    During  the  whole  day  the  shores  of  Fife 
were  crowded  with  spectators,  who  by  their  shouts 
and  gesticulations  did  all  in  their  power  to  en- 
courage their  countrymen  in  the  arduous  fight. 
At  the  close  of  the  day,  the  ships  mutually  drew 
off,  and  the  battle  remained  undecided.    The  night 
was  spent  in  refitting,  and  in  preparation  for  the 
ensuing  day.    On  the  dawn  of  morn  the  trumpets 
sounded,  the  battle  was  renewed,  and  the  ships, 
closely  locked  together,  fioated  unheeded  by  the 
combatants,  and  before  an  ebb  tide  and  a  south 
wind  drifted  round  the  east  coast  of  Fife  till  they 
were  opposite  the  mouth  of  the  Tay.     The  sea- 
manship of  Wood  and  the  valour  of  the  Scottish 
sailors  at  length  prevailed.    The  three  English 
ships   grounded  on  the    sand -banks   and  were 
captured.      Bull    sniTcndered,    and,     with    his 
ships,    was    carried    into    Dundee,    where    the 
wounded  of  both  parties    had    every   attention 
paid  to  them.      The  unfortunate  English   com- 
mander was  conducted  to  Edinburgh  by  Wood, 
and  presented  to  the  king.     On  this  occasion 
James  gave  a  noble  proof  of  the  generosity  of 
mind  which  so  remarkably  distinguished  him.   lie 
bestowed  gifts  upon  Bull  and  on  his  followers, 
and,  without   exacting  any  ransom,  sent  them 
home  with  their  ships  as  a  present  to  the  English 
king.    At  the  same  time  he  desired  them  to  in- 
form their  master,  that  Scotland,  like  England, 
could  boast  of  brave  and  warlike  sons  both  by  sea 
and  land ;  and  he  requested  that  England  shonid 


'   I 


•   I 


I 


WYNZET. 


676 


YOUNG. 


a  postscript  remindiDg  Jolm  Knox  of  hut  promise 
to  answer  liim  as  to  his  vocation  to  the  ministry. 
Its  publication  was  speedily  followed  by  bis  trans- 
lation of  the  well-known  work  of  Vincentius  Liri- 
nensis  ^  On  the  Antiquity  and  Tinith  of  the  Cath- 
olic Faith/  which  he  dedicated  to  Mary,  Queen 
of  Scots.  Both  works  were  published  at  Ant- 
werp in  1563.  They  wera  written  in  the  Scots 
vernacular  of  the  time,  Wynzet  professing  not  to 
know  English.  For  the  benefit  of  his  country- 
men, he  translated  some  other  tractates  of  the 
ancient  fathei-s,  also,  a  discourse  by  ^Kenatus 
Benedictus,  concerning  Composing  Discords  in 
Religion,'  printed  at  Paris  in  1565,  8vo.  The  au- 
thor, Ren<S  Benoist,  accompanied  Queen  Mary 
from  France  in  August  1561,  and  remained  in 
Scotland  for  two  years  in  the  capacity  of  preacher 
and  father  confessor  to  her  majesty. 

In  1565  Wynzet  went  to  France,  and  took  the 
degree  of  master  of  arts  in  the  university  of  Fai'is ; 
and  he  taught  philosophy  there  with  great  applause 
in  1569.    It  is  also  stated  that  he  was  three  times 


chosen  procurator  in  that  oniversity.  He  also  ap- 
pears to  have  been  in  Italy.  Having  approved  him- 
self a  zealous  and  faithful  cliampion  of  the  charcb, 
he  was  in  1576  appointed  by  the  pope  abbot  of  the 
Scots  monastery  of  St.  James*,  Katisbon.  He 
proved  himself  a  benefactor  to  the  establisbmeut 
over  which  he  presided,  for^  besides  introdudng  a 
stricter  observance  of  monastic  discipline,  he  ren- 
ovated the  buildings  of  the  monastery  and  seemed 
for  it  various  privileges.  About  this  time  he  ac- 
quired the  degree  of  doctor  in  divinity.  In  1582, 
he  published,  at  lugoldstadt,  the  ^  Scourge  of  Sec- 
tarians,* on  the  subject  of  obedience  to  the  civil  ma- 
gistrate, and  another  work  of  the  same  kind,  in 
answer  to  Buchanan's  discourse  *  De  Jure  Regni 
apud  Scotos.*  lie  died  21st  September  1592,  at  the 
age  of  74,  and  a  monument  was  erected  to  his  me- 
mory'. His '  Tractatis '  were  printed  by  J.  B.  Gracie, 
Esq.,  for  the  Maitland  Club  in  1835.  4to.  The 
introduction  contains  all  the  particulars  about  him 
that  can  now  be  ascertained,  and  all  of  his  writings 
that  are  extant  arc  printed  in  this  quarto  volume. 


! 


I    I 


Y 


Young,  the  surname  of  a  Forfarehire  family,  who  at  one 
period  possessed  the  ebtate  of  Aoldbar,  on  the  right  bank  of 
the  Southesk. 

John  Young,  merchant  burgess  of  Edinburgh,  in  1541,  mar- 
ried Margaret  Scrymgeour,  daughter  of  Scrvnigeour  of  Glas- 
well,  and  sister  of  Henry  Scrymgeonr,  professor  of  philosophy, 
and  afterwards  of  civil  hiw,  at  Genera ;  another  sister  married 
the  fiither  of  Master  James  Melvil.  John  Young  was  a]»o  a 
burgess  of  Dundee,  and  died  there  on  31st  August  1583,  in 
the  86th  year  of  liis  age.  His  surviving  children  were :  1. 
John,  provost  of  the  collegiate  church  at  Dysart.  2.  Peter, 
afterwards  Sir  Peter.  3.  Alexander,  usher  of  the  privy 
chamber  to  King  James  VI.,  died  29tli  September  1603, 
without  issue :  Isabella  and  Joanna.  His  other  children  died 
in  childliood,  except  Henry,  killed  in  Schouen  in  the  service 
of  the  king  of  Sweden. 

Peter  was  bom  at  Dundee,  15th  August  1541.  He  and  his 
brother  AJexandcr  were  educated  under  the  care  and  apparently 
at  the  charge  of  their  maternal  uncle,  Henry  Scrymgeour,  but 
their  more  immediate  teacher  was  Theodore  Beza.  On  4th 
January  1569,  Peter  was  appointed,  on  the  recommendation 
of  the  regent  Moray,  assistant  preceptor  to  James  VI.,  and 
shortly  after  became,  along  with  George  Buchanan,  a  pen- 
sioner of  Queen  Elizabeth,  the  one  receiving  £100  and  the 
ilher  X30  sterling  per  uiinuui.    Af^er  the  king  became  of 


flge  Young  was  made  almoner,  and  reUiined  that  office  till 
Iiis  death.     He  was  employed  in  various'embassie:!!,  was  one 
of  tho  Octavinns,  a  member  of  the  queen*8  (Anne  of  Den- 
mark) council,  and  was  engMged  in  variou.i  matters  relatir^; 
to  religion  and  to  the  universities.     He  received  his  sh^re  of 
church  lands,  and  also  bought  largely.     His  residence  and 
estate,  whence  he  took  his  designation  was  Kaster  Seatoo. 
part  of  the  abl)ey  lands  of  Arbroath.     He  was  kniglited  l>y 
the  king  at  Whitehall  19th  February  1605,  and  had  at  tl>e 
same  time  a  grant  of  a  pension  of  X300  sterling  per  annum. 
He  married,  Hrst,  4th   February  1577,  Elizabeth  Gib,  a 
daughter  or  granddaughter  of  Robert   Gib,   the  celebrated 
jester  or  fool  to  King  James  V.,  a  good  example  of  the  pro- 
verb that  *'  it  titkes  a  wise  man  to  be  a  fool."     Rob  became 
laird  of  CiuTuber,  and  his  descendants  remained  long  about 
the  court,  several  having  been  knighted.     Sir  Peter  Yonn; 
had  by  his  first  wife;  1.  Marie,  bom  Ist  June  1579;  married 
John  Douglas  of  Tiiliquhillie.    2.  and  3.  James  and  Henry, 
twins,  born  10th  June  1580.   The  former  was  knighted  bv  the 
king  at  his  baptism  and  made  gentleman  of  the  be<ichambrr. 
4.  Margaret,  born  14th  November  1581 ;  married  David  IJnd- 
say  of  Kinnettles.   5.  and  6.  Peter  and  Robert,  twins,  boni  1:4 
July  1583.  Peter,  the  tifth  son,  a  gentleman  of  the  bedcbanibfr 
to  King  ChaHes  I.,  was  in  the  suite  of  tho  earl  of  Spenoer,  sent 
on  a  special  mission  to  Gubtavus  Adolphiis  with  the  ord^  uf 


] 


YOUNG, 


677 


PATRICK. 


1 1 
1 1 


:i 


il 


1 1 


!i 


L 


the  Garter,  and  was  kni^Iited  by  that  monArch  in  1628.  He 
died  6th  Febmarj  1631.  His  twin-brother,  Robert,  travel- 
led as  tutor  to  some  nobleman,  and  died  at  Westin  17th 
Blarch  1 620,  on  Iiis  retnm  from  the  Holy  I^nd,  and  while 
writing  his  travels.  7.  Patrick,  a  celebrated  Greek  adiolar 
and  divine,  of  whom  a  memoir  follows  in  larger  type.  8. 
John,  bom  2dth  Jane  1585.  dean  of  Winchester,  and  chap- 
htin  to  King  James  I.  of  England.  He  had  travelled  with 
the  T/>rd  Wharton's  son,  and  acquired  considerable  property 
in  Fife.  He  founded  a  sdiool  at  St.  Andrews.  He  lefl  his 
estates  to  his  nephew.  Peter  Young  of  Seaton;  died  in  1654 
or  1655.  9.  and  10.  Frederic  and  Joanna,  twins,  bom  81st 
January  1587.  11.  Michael,  bom  6th  November  1589;  was 
educated  at  the  charge  of  the  king,  and  sent  to  Sidney, 
Sussex  college,  Cambridge.  12.  Anne,  born  16th  February 
1590, 

Sir  Peter*s  first  wife,  Klizabeth  Gib.  died  at  Ix>ith  10th 
May  1595,  and  on  6th  May  1596,  he  married  a  second  time, 
Dame  Janet  Murray,  I^dy  Torphichen,  widow  of  the  first 
temporal  lord  of  that  title,  and  daughter  of  Murray  of  Pol - 
mnise.  She  died  in  November  of  that  year.  By  Marjory 
Mavine,  daughter  of  Mavine  of  Sandfurde,  his  third  wife,  he 
had,  1.  Kuphemia,  bom  20th  April  1601,  married  Sir  David 
Ogilvy  of  Clova.  2.  Elizabeth,  bom  11th  Febraary  1603. 
3.  Nicola,  bom  5th  July  1604,  married  David  Boswell  of 
Halmuto.  4.  Arbella.  bom  18th  December  1608,  married 
John  IJvingston,  younger  of  Dunipace. 

Sir  Peter  Young  outlived  his  pupil,  James  VI.,  and  dying 
at  his  house  of  Easter  Seaton  on  the  7th  January  1628, 
was  buried  at  the  parish  church  of  St.  Vigeans,  where  liis 
monument  is  still  extant.  Sir  Peter  was  succeeded  bv  his 
eldest  son,  Sir  James  Young,  knight,  who  liad  a  grant  of 
land  in  Ireland.  He  married,  first,  Isobel  Arbuthnot,  a 
daughter  of  David  Arbuthnot  of  Findonrie,  by  whom  he  had 
two  sons:  1.  Charles,  who  died  young;  2.  Peter,  who  sno- 
C(*eded  him  in  bis  estates  in  Scotland ;  and  a  daughter,  &Iar- 
garet,  married  to  Francis  Duguid  of  Auohinhuif.  Sir  James 
married,  secondly,  Je.in  Stewart,  by  whom  he  had  a  daugh- 
ter, Ann,  married  to  George  Seton,  eldest  son  of  Wil- 
liam Set^n  of  Mynnoris,  Aberdeenshire.  Dame  Jean  Stewart 
married  for  her  second  husband  Frederic  Lyon  of  Brigton. 

Several  families  of  the  name  of  Young  in  the  north  of  Ire- 
land claim  descent  from  Sir  James  Young,  and  this  may  be ; 
i^ut  it  is  certain  that  they  are  not  descended  from  the  Youngs 
of  Auldbar,  as  they  also  claim  to  be.  They  can  only  be  a 
collateral  branch.  Peter  Young  of  Seaton  manned  Isobel 
Ochterlony,  a  daughter  of  Ochterlony  of  Wester  Seaton, 
and  had,  1.  Kobert,  who  succeeded  him;  2.  Margaret,  mar- 
ried in  1659  to  Sir  John  Forbes  of  Craigievar,  baronet  Her 
tocher  was  8,000  pounds  Scots.  8.  A  daughter,  married  to 
Guthrie  of  Westhall,  from  whom  were  descended  Major  John 
Guthrie  and  his  brothers,  and  the  Guthries  of  Craigie.  Peter 
Young  sold  Ea.^ter  Seaton  and  other  lands,  and  purchased 
part  of  Auldbar  in  1670.  Rol>ert  Young  married  Anna  Gra- 
ham, daughter  of  Sir  William  Graham  of  Claverhouse,  by 
whom  he  had,  1.  David,  his  heir.  2.  Anna,  married  to 
James  Barclay,  younger  of  Balmakewan.  3.  Cecilia,  married 
to  George  I^ith  of  Overhall.  4.  Elizabeth,  (married  to  John 
Tumbnll,  yonnger  of  Strickathrow ;)  and  perhaps  others. 
David  Young  had  fur  his  tutor  the  celebrated  Thomas  Rud- 
diman,  and  married  Marjory,  eldest  daughter  of  Fothring- 
ham  of  Powrie,  by  whom  he  had,  1.  Robert,  his  heir,  and  at 
least  one  other  son.  2.  Anna,  (married  to  Robert  Ochter- 
lony;) and  apparently  other  daughters.  Roliert  succeeded 
his  father  in  1743,  and  sold  A uM bar  to  a  relative.  William 
Chalmers  of  Hazlehead.    Robert  Young  and  his  brothers  and 


sisters,  except  Anna,  died  without  issue.  She  was  served 
heir  to  her  grandfather,  Robert  Young,  13th  December  1768. 
Her  son,  John  Ochterlony,  sold  Kintrockat.  He  married 
Mary  Roberta  Skinner,  and  by  her  had,  1.  Robert;  2.  Alex- 
ander, who  died  unmarried ;  and  daughters. 

In  the  Annual  Register  for  1759  is  related,  at  page  122, 
an  interesting  anecdote  of  a  Captain  Ochteriony  who  was 
killed  at  the  siege  of  Quebec  in  that  year.  The  Ochterlonies 
were  descended  from  Prince  Rupert,  thus :  Charles  I.  had  a 
sister  married  to  the  Elector  Palatine  of  Bohemia.  Prince 
Rupert,  their  son,  had  Mary  Ruperta  by  Mrs.  Hughes ;  Ru- 
perta  married  Brigadier-general  I^rd  Hare ;  their  daughter, 
Henrietta  Hare,  (who  was  maid-of-honour  to  the  princess  of 
Orange,  and  cousin  to  the  duchess  of  Norfolk,)  married 
David  Skinner,  Esq. ;  Mary  Ruperta,  their  eldest  daughter, 
bom  24th  July  1737,  married  John  Ochterlony,  who  was 
bom  January  1786.  Their  children  were  Henrietta,  Anne, 
Elizabeth,  Margaret.  (For  Oghterlont,  see  vol.  ii.  p.  259. 
— Also  see  Auchtbrlont,  vol.  i.  p.  169.) 

William  Chalmers  of  Auldbar  was  succeeded  bv  his  son 
Patrick,  who  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Patrick,  who  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  Patrick,  who  died  in  1855,  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  brother,  John  Inglis  Chalmers,  Esq.  of 
Auldbar,  one  of  the  deputy-lieutenants  of  Forfarshire. 

YOUNG,  Patrick,  an  eminent  scholar,  de- 
scended from  an  ancient  family,  was  born  Angnst 
29,  1584,  at  Easter  Seaton,  in  Forfarsliire,  the 
residence  of  liis  father,  Sir  Peter  Tonng,  Joint 
tntor  with  Buchanan  to  James  YI.  At  the  age 
of  fifteen  lie  was  sent  to  the  university  of  St.  An- 
drews, where,  on  completing  the  nsnal  conrse  of 
academical  study,  he  received  the  degree  of  M.A. 
in  1608.  Soon  after  he  accompanied  liis  fatlier  to 
England,  and  Iiaving  been  introduced  to  the  no- 
tice of  Dr.  Lloyd,  bishop  of  Chester,  lie  was  re- 
ceived into  his  house  as  his  librarian,  or  secretary. 
In  1605  he  was  incorporated  M.A.  at  Oxford, 
and,  entering  into  deacon^s  orders,  he  was  made 
one  of  the  chaplains  of  All  Souls'  college.  This 
office  he  held  for  three  years,  and  during  that 
time  he  employed  himself  chiefly  in  the  study  of 
ecclesiastical  history,  and  in  cultivating  the  Greek 
language.  Having  gone  to  I^ndon  with  the  view 
of  making  his  way  at  court,  he  obtained,  through 
the  interest  of  Dr.  Montague,  bishop  of  Bath  and 
Wells,  a  pension  from  the  king  of  £50  per  annum, 
and  was  occasionally  employed  by  his  majesty, 
and  some  of  the  persons  in  power,  in  writing  I^- 
tin  letters.  He  was  also  tutor  to  the  young  prin- 
ces, Henry  and  Charles.  By  the  influence  of 
Bishop  Montague  he  was  appointed  to  the  super- 
intendence of  the  Royal  Library,  then  newly 
founded  by  the  kinq:.  In  1617  Young  went  to 
Paris,  with  recommendatory  letters  from  Camden 


ARNOT. 


680 


ARNOT. 


hU  descent  from  tlie  Aniota  of  Scotland,  «nd  cirried,  first 
and  fourth,  a  clievron  Wtween  three  stiirs,  being  the  arms  of 
A  mot,  quartered  with  tlie  coat  of  some  other  family.  The 
grandson  of  John  Arnot  «f  BrocoUie  acquired  the  lands  of 
Cockbumspath.  His  son,  William,  married  Margaret  Wal- 
lace, and  their  son.  Sir  J«ibn  Arnot  of  IJerewick,  a  burgest 
in  E«liiiburgh,  was  in  1587  chonen  lord  provost  of  that  city 
fur  four  years.  He  was  knighted  by  King  James  VI.,  and, 
about  1604.  was  appointed  treasurer-depute  of  Scotland. 
lie  was  again  chosen  lord  provost  of  Edinburgh  from  1608 
to  1G15  inclusive.  In  160.)  he  acquired  four  oxgates  of  land 
in  Restalrig.  In  that  and  subsequent  years  he  bought  from 
the  earl  of  Orkney,  (who  was  beheaded,)  the  lands  of  Bers- 
wick,  Sandwick,  and  Hoy,  Kirkluscar,  and  Westraw  in  Ork- 
ney. He  also  possessed  the  barony  of  Granton  near  Edin- 
burgh, the  lands  of  Fonlden,  Renlismains,  and  Crumstanes 
in  Berwickshire,  and  those  of  Woodmill  in  Fife.  Fast  Castle 
and  the  adjacent  lands  of  Luinsdean,  aHer  remaining  a  few 
years  vested  in  the  crown,  becmie  the  property  of  James 
Arnot,  merchant  in  Edinl)nrgh.  who  resigned  them  to  the 
Ilomex,  May  24,  1617.  {Hist  of  Coldmgham  Prwry,  p. 
92.)  Sir  John  Arnot  married,  first,  a  daughter  of  John- 
ston of  Kellobank,  utsne,  three  sons  and  two  daugliters;  2dly, 
a  daughter  of  Craig  of  Riccart«>n,  by  whom  he  had  two 
daughters.  All  hit  children  were  married,  and  to  them  all 
ho  gave  portions  of  his  estates ;  and  now,  sayi  Hago,  (who 
died  in  1786,)  **it  is  not  known  that  he  has  a  descendant 
on  earth,  or  if  that  descendant  retains  any  part  of  his  pro- 
perty, except  Home  of  M.tnderston,  whose  predecessor.  Sir 
George,  married  Sir  John's  second  daughter,  Helen,  and  got 
the  lands  of  Crumstane,  and  Wilkie  of  Foulden,  who  mar- 
ried the  only  daughter  of  his  third  son,  James  Arnot  of 
Granton." 

Sir  John  Arnot,  (!'''*  eldest  son  predt-ceasing  him.)  gave 
the  lands  of  Woodmill  to  his  grandson.  Woodmill  had  be- 
longed to  an  old  branch  of  the  family  of  Arnot,  but  John 
Arnot,  heir  apparent  of  Woodmill,  having  unfortunately 
killed  John  Murrav,  son  of  Charles  Mnrrav  of  Aikit,  the 
sum  paid  as  an  assvthment  to  the  friends  of  the  deceased, 
the  expense  of  obtaining  a  royal  pardon,  nnd  other  circum- 
stances, obliged  them  to  part  with  the  estate  in  the  beginning 
of  the  17tii  century.  It  was  purchased  by  Sir  John  Arnot, 
and  continued  in  his  family  alnmt  100  years,  "when,"  says 
Hugo,  "James  Arnot,  younger  of  Woodmill,  sitting  in  sober 
manner  in  a  tavern  in  Edinburgh,  in  company  with  three 
other  young  gentlemen,  on  January  13,  1700,  w:is  barba- 
rously murdered,  {Edinbttrffh  Gazette,  Ko.  93).  Archibald 
Montgomery,  brother  of  Sir  James  Montgomery  of  Skelmor- 
lie,  a  man  who  had  alre.'idy  committed  the  most  flagitious 
actions,  pmsued,  with  a  drawn  sword,  his  own  servant,  who 
fled  for  shelter  into  the  room  where  young  Arnot  and  his 
companions  were  sitting.  Montgomery  bui-st  open  the  door, 
and  thrust  his  sword  up  Amot's  left  eve  into  the  brain,  of 
which  he  died  in  eight  hours.  Montgomery  was  unncconnt- 
ahly  suffered  to  escape,  and  notwithstanding  the  rewards  of- 
fered by  the  lair.l  of  Woodmill,  never  was  apprehended.  The 
estate  was  soon  aftenvards  sold,  and  went  entirely  out  of  the 
name  and  family  of  .Arnot." 

To  his  second  son,  William,  Sir  John  gave  the  lands  of 
Cockbumspath  {General  Regiiter,  Oct.  15,  1012).  His  hos- 
pitality was  so  great  that  an  EiigliNhman  {Taylor's  Works, 
p:ige  137)  who  vi^ited  Scotland  al»out  1  G.SO,  represents  his 
house  ns  an  inn,  where  every  stranger  was  sure  of  go«Kl  en- 
tertainment and  a  hearty  welcome.  William  Arnot  of  Cock- 
hnrnspath,  with  his  two  sons,  and  his  brother,  the  laird  of 
Gr:mton,   unfortunately   bec:iine  security,   to  m  very  l:irge  ] 


mmount,  for  James  Dalziell,  merdiant  in  Edinbnri^,  wbo 
married  one  of  Sir  John's  daughten,  and,  in  eonsequenoe  of 
bis  bankrupt<7,  thej  were  obliged  to  sell  their  CMtates  of 
Cockbumspath  and  Granton.  Bat  John  Arnot,  king's  equer- 
ry, William's  eldest  son,  kept  the  lands  of  Hoprig,  Tbs 
family  are  now  extinct 

To  retora  to  the  family  of  Arnot  of  Arnot.  William,  tbe 
son  of  Sir  Henry  Amot,  entailed  his  lands  in  1410.  He  had 
two  sons,  Richard,  and  John.  Richard  rengned  the  lands  in 
favour  of  hu  brother,  {General  Register,  Not.  26,  1429,) 
and  died  without  issue. 

[A  **  Jscobos  de  Arnot**  was  shield-bemrer  to  Robert  dnke 
of  Albany,  in  the  eighth  year  of  his  goremonhip,  shoot 
1418  or  thereby]. 

John  Amot  married  Margery,  dangliter  of  John  BoswcO 
of  Balmuto,  and  had  2  sons,  John,  his  snocessor.  And  Walter 
Amot  of  Balliarton,  and  8  danghters.  1.  Florence,  married 
Sir  John  Rattray  of  Rattray,  whose  daughter  and  heiress, 
Grisel,  married  John,  8d  earl  of  Atliole.  3.  Elisjtbcth,  mar- 
ried William,  2d  Lord  Semple.  8.  Helen,  married  Sir  Tho- 
mas Douglas  of  Amacrotgfa.  This  Isird  of  Amot  was  killed 
at  Bogiebnshes  by  I Jvingston,  laird  of  East  Wemyss,  who, 
with  a  numerous  party  of  his  followers,  attempted  to  watt 
his  cattle,  which  had  been  poinded  by  Amot*s  brother-in- 
law,  the  laird  of  Balmuto,  but  was  taken  prisoner,  and  his 
followers  routed.  Amot's  widow  afterwards  married  Sir 
Thomas  Sibbald  of  Balgonie.  Walter  Araot  of  Balhartoa, 
the  younger  son,  had  a  son,  William,  who  saocceded  hnn, 
and  liad  two  daughters,  on«heiresses.  1.  Elisabeth,  mairied, 
Ist,  to  Brown  of  Fordell,  who  got  with  her  tlie  mansioo- 
honse  and  half  the  lands  of  Balb:irton ;  2dlr,  ColvUle  of 
Hiltnnn,  from  which  msrriage  descended  tlie  l.afds  Colritle, 
both  of  Culross  and  Ochiltree.  2.  Helen,  wife  of  Ardtibald 
Dundas  of  Fingask,  who  got  with  her  the  other  half  of  the 
lands  of  Balbarton,  but  Fingask  conveyed  his  share  of  these 
lands  to  Brown  of  Fordell. 

John,  the  son  and  successor  of  the  laird  of  Amot  killed 
at  Bogiebnshes,  married  Catherine,  daughter  of  Melville  of 
Cambie,  and  had  18  sons,  and  a  daughter,  married  to  John 
Wemyss,  brother  of  the  laird  of  Wemyss.  The  8  eldest  sons 
were,  1.  John.  2.  David,  bishop  of 'Galloway,  dean  of  the 
Chapel  Boyal,  and  councillor  to  King  Jttmea  IV.;  and  3. 
Robert,  who  got  the  lands  of  Woodmill  from  the  king,  hn 
master.  He  was  comptroller  of  Scotland,  and  captain  of 
Stirling  castle.  With  his  two  uncles-in-law.  Sir  Robert  Col- 
ville  of  Ililtoun  and  the  laird  of  Fingask,  he  was  killed  in 
the  battle  of  Flodden.  From  this  gentleman  the  Amots  of 
Balcormo  were  descended.  Of  the  remaining  brothers,  some 
pnrchased  lands  in  Fife,  Gallowny,  Kirkcndbrif;litshire,  Aa, 
and  several  devoted  themselves  to  the  church,  and  becanie 
prebend.'iries  of  the  Chapel  Royal  and  Stirling. 

John,  the  eldest  son,  married  in  1489,  Eup!;ame,  dangbtcr 
of  Scot  of  Balwearie,  and  had  5  sons  and  3  daughters. 

Walter,  the  eldest  son,  1520,  married  Elizabeth  Doduing- 
ston.  daughter  of  the  laird  of  Saintford,  and  had  3  sons  and 
5  daughters. 

David,  the  next  laird  of  Amot,  m.irried,  in  1549.  Jane, 
daughter  of  Brace  of  Karlshall,  and  had  4  sons  and  3  dangh- 
ters. He  was  remarkable  for  his  vigour  and  dexterity  in 
martial  sports  and  exercises.  King  Henry  VIII.  hariiig  sent 
William,  Ix)nl  Howard  and  the  bishop  of  St  Darid's,  am- 
bassadors to  Scotland,  six  of  their  retinue  challenge^]  any  six 
Scottish  gentlemen  and  yeomen  to  a  trial  of  hkill  in  archery 
on  the  links  of  I^eith,  for  a  hundred  crowns  and  a  tun  of 
wine.  David  Arnot,  then  younger  of  that  ilk,  wa«  one  of  the 
six  who  accepted  the  challenge,  and  the  Scots  gained  the  match. 


ARXOT. 


682 


BEATSOX. 


h 


■  I 


oured  with  tlie  notice  of  tbe  kin;;  liiinself,  and  who  ittjied  liiin 
*  liacktooth  Amot.**  He  wu  to  have  khared  in  the  kwg* 
Inmntr,  but  at  the  time  of  hia  niujea*y*ii  distribation  of  cer- 
tain confiscated  property,  na  the  tradition  run5,  he  waa  uiifur- 
tun.ntely  ahMent,  and  aiiotlier  mana^  to  j^et  what  waa  intended 
for  Iiim.  It  waa  ever  after  n  aaying  among  llie  Iriali  Aniota  that 
the  family  *•  had  had  ill  luck.'*  Tliere  does  not  appear  to  be 
any  document  in  the  office  of  Ulster  King  of  Ann«  at  Dub- 
lin whicli  gives  a  list  of  tbe  officem  of  the  regiinenta  in  the 
army  of  William  III.,  when  bis  majesty  was  in  Ireland. 
What  rank  "  Bncktooth  Amot**  held  in  the  army  which 
fought  against  King  James  is  therefore  not  known.  Whether 
he  commanded  a  regiment  or  not  is  not  ascertained,  as  even 
the  War-office,  Ix>ndon.  has  no  means  of  funiishing  a  list  of 
officem  of  the  name  of  Amot  c<»mmandtng  regiments  in  Ireland 
during  King  WiHiam*s  reign.  Jn  the  Records  of  Ulster  King 
of  Arms  there  is  the  registration  of  anns  to  James  Amot  of 
Amot  Grove,  May  27,  1747.  This  ,Tame8  Amot  died  in  1780. 
With  a  daughter,  he  had  4  sons,  Hugh.  Henry,  William,  and 
Robert.  The  eldest  and  third  sons,  Hugh  and  William,  en- 
tered the  army  about  1794,  the  fonner  as  surgeon,  and  the 
latter  as  assistant  surgeon,  14th  Light  Dragoons.  Uoth  died, 
with  a  Hervant,  on  the  same  day,  in  June  179G,  of  an  epi- 
demic disease,  in  St.  Domingo.  Henry,  the  2d  son,  a  sur- 
geon at  Demerara,  is  said  to  have  gone  to  St.  Domingo,  and 
nothing  was  afterwards  known  of  him.  Amot  Grove,  and 
another  estate  in  King*s  county,  fell  to  the  youngest  son, 
Robert.  By  nibmanagement  all  the  Amot  property  in  Ire- 
land was  subsequently  lost  to  the  family,  and  was  ultimately 
sold  by  auction  liy  order  of  the  Encumbered  Estates  court. 
Tims  lapsed  the  estate  and  property  of  the  family  of  Amot 
of  Fennanagh,  and  it  is  not  known  if  there  is  any  person  of 
the  name  descended  from  this  family  in  Ireland.  The  last  was 
,Iaines  Arnot  of  Ilicli-hill,  Annagh,  who  had  no  male  issue, 
grandson  of  John  .Arnot,  brother  of  James  Amot  of  Arnot 
Grove,  father  of  James  of  1747.  The  family  of  Amot  Grove 
are  represented,  in  the  female  line,  by  the  issue  of  the  only 
diuighter  of  the  latter.  This  gentleman  had  no  brothers  or 
sisters,  but  he  had  three  uncles,  brothers  of  his  father.  The 
eldest,  Hugh  Arnot,  principal  of  an  educational  institute  nt 
Edendcrry,  King's  county,  dying  unmarried,  left  his  pn»perty 
to  his  neplKMv,  James  Amot  of  Arnot  Grove.  Michael  Arnot, 
the  second  uncle,  had  two  daughters,  one  of  whom  married  a 
gentleman  of  the  name  of  Buchanan,  and  was  mother  of 
Mrs.  Gabriel  Montgomery  of  I/isnuskea.  John  Arnot,  the 
third  uncle,  had  a  son,  Hugh,  who  married  Sarah,  daughter 
of  John  Davies  of  Marketliill,  Annagh.  Hujih's  son,  James 
Amot,  married  Agnes,  daughter  of  .lohn  Thomson  of  Sto- 
neygate,  Ayi-shirc,  heiress  of  the  lands  of  Stoneygate,  and 
had  two  sons,  John  Thomson  Arnot,  and  Hugh  Amot 


B 


Beatson, — under  this  surname  (vol.  i.  p.  2C3),  mention  is 
made  of  Major-general  Beatson,  who  distinguished  himself  in 
India.  The  second  son  of  Robert  Beatson.  Esq.  of  Kilrie, 
Fifeshiro,  he  was  horn  at  Dundee.  Oct.  24. 17/)9.  As  a  cadet 
in  the  East  India  Company's  service,  he  arrived  at  Madras 
in  June  1776,  jmd  served  for  more  than  two  years  with  the 
corps  of  engineers  there.  He  was  then  appointed  quarter- 
master of  brigade  to  a  detachment  in  the  field,  but  pre- 
vious to  joining  it,  was  permitted  to  do  duty  with  n  Eun>- 
pean  regiment  at  the  siege  of  Pondieherry  in  1778.     Hit* 


nest  appointment  was  soperinUnding  MigiiMcr  at  Ifaaali- 
patain,  witk  the  rank  of  acting  lisntenant  of  cngioccn^    At 
the  end  of  1782  he  was  mpefBcdcd*  when,  quitting  tkat 
corps,  he  proceeded  to  Madras,  to  join  tlie  mrmj  in  tbe  6eU, 
and   became  aide-de-camp  to  Major  Gcnenl  Stout,  tbe 
commnnder-in-cbief.    After  the  siege  of  CndakMre,  be  wm 
appointed  quarter-master  of  brigada  to  a  pottioa  iif  tbe 
army  that  remained  in  tbe  field  in  tbe  Tidnity  of  Sladras, 
until  the   peace  of   1784,  witb   Tippoo    Snltann.     Soon 
after  be  was  nominated  to  tbe  command  of  a  BcTcnne  bat- 
talion at  Tanjore,  and  in  1785  waa  attached  to  a  grenadier 
battalion.     In  1787  be  became  aeniur  captain  in  a  coqw 
of  Gnides  formed  that  year,  and  waa  employed  in  sur- 
veying  and    exploring   Uie   whole  face  of   tbo  Caraatib 
The  campaigns  of  tbe  war  witb  Tippoo  Snltann,  wbicb 
commenced  in  1790,  enabled  bim  to  extend  hia  trigonome- 
trical survey  over  a  great  portion  of  the  Mjaore.     In  con- 
sequence of  these  surveys,  and  tbe  eztra-<^kial  assistance 
rendered  by  him  in  the  attack  of  Bangalore,  Sereradroog, 
and  other  forts,  he  was,  by  order  of  tbe  Court  of  Directors, 
placed  upon  tbe  same  footing,  in  respect  to  aJlowanoea.  .is  a 
major  of  the  Guides.     HU  intimate  knowledge  o^  tbe  Faaa  of 
Muglee  enabled  him  to  lead  Ix)rd  Comwallia  through  it  in 
Feb.  1791,  and  during  the  si"ge  of  Bangalore,  as  command- 
ant of  the  Guides,  be  was  employed  in  oondncting  all  recoo- 
nmtering  parties.     His  recommendation  that  the  tower  of  tbe 
gateway  slionld  be  breached,  instead  of  tbe  curtain  on  its 
lefV,  was  adopted  by  Ix)rd  Corawallis,  who  ordered  an  imme- 
diate change  in  the  point  of  attack,  and  the  fortress  was  taken 
by  storm  in  24  hours,  in  presence  of  tbe  whole  of  the  Snltann^s 
army. 

Captain  Beatson  next  asusted  at  tbe  siege  of  Nandedurguro. 
which  was  also  taken  by  storm.  He  also  planned  the  attack 
on  Sevemdroog,  and  superintended  and  directed  the  sie;j;e  of 
that  place,  and  in  14  days  this  formidable  hill-fort  was  also 
taken.  On  the  night  of  Feb.  1792,  when  Tippoo  Sultaun*s 
entrenched  camp  was  attacked  in  three  columns  by  Ixml 
Comwallis,  Capt.  Bentson  led  the  right  column,  commandrd 
by  Sir  W.  Medows,  but  an  unfortunate  mistake  occurred,  in 
spite  of  his  remonstnmces,  in  the  column  turning  to  tbe  rii;ht 
instead  of  the  left,  and  att;icking  a  redoubt,  which  prevented 
the  British  from  experiencing  all  the  success  anticipated. 

After  the  pejice  with  Tippoo  Sult^tun  in  1792,  Capt  Beataon 
W.1.S  appointed  Town  Major  of  Fort-George,  and  aide-de-camp 
to  the  g<»vemor.    In  1793,  by  command  of  the  Marquis  Com- 
wallis, he  prepared  a  plan  for  the  attack  of  Pondieherry.    la 
1794,  he  w:is  appointed  chief  engineer  to  the  expedition,  under 
Col.  James  Stuart,  against  the  Isle  of  France,  and  afVer  tbe 
operations  of  the  war  he  retumed  to  Engl.-md  in  1795.     In 
1797  he  was  again  in  India,  having  been  appointed  by  the 
Court  of  Directors  to  complete  an  investigation  and  survey 
relating  to  a  scheme  for  watering  the  Circars  from  the  two 
great  rivers,   Kistnah  and  Godavery.      He  commenced  his 
survey  on  14th  March,  1798,  but  in  July  following  he  wjis 
ordered  to  Calcutta,  where  he  was  n.imed  aide-de-camp  to 
the  earl  of  Momington,  afterwards  Marquis  Wellcsley,  gov- 
ernor-General of  India.     On  the  voyage  ho  had  prepared  '  A 
Sketch  of  a  Plan  of  Operation  against  Tippoo  Sultaun,*  in 
which  he  recommended  the  reduction  of  Seringapatom,  as  the 
first  and  immediate  object  of  the  campaign.     It  obtained  the 
approval  of  the  Govemor-General,  and  in  Jcmnary  1799  Major 
Beatson  accompanied  his  lonlship  to  Madras.      When  the 
:irmy  waa  about  to  invade  the  territories  of  Tippoo  Sultaun, 
.Miijor  Bcittson  was  appointed  Surveyor-General  to  the  army 
in  the  field.    In  the  siege  of  Svringapatam,  his  plan  of  attack 
was  preferred  to  that  by  the  engineer  officers.    After  its  cap- 


I    I 


:i 


1 1 


! 


i| 


=  1 


<  I 


I       I 


BONAR. 


686 


BONAR. 


_^     I ' 


Hepbarn  Moitaj  of  Balmanno  CiiKtle,  PertliBhire,  Uarunet, 
•nd  aatomed  the  names  of  Hepburn  Mnrnij  in  addition  to 
Belflcbes.  He  left  two  sons,  Alexander  Hepburn  ilum«y 
Belackes  of  InTcrmaj  and  Balinanna  Castle,  appmnted,  in 
1819,  a  depatj-lieatenant  of  Pertkskire ;  and  John  Mnrn^ 
BeUchea,  a  major-general  in  the  army  (1855).  He  senred  in 
the  peninsnla,  and  has  the  war  medal  with  4  clasps. 

In  Inrermay  House  there  are,  among  other  paintings,  a 
series  of  large  family  pictures  and  ezqnisite  miniatures,  like- 
nesses of  the  Murrays  and  Hepbums,  ancestors  of  the  Bel- 
sches  of  Inrennay.  The  family  also  preserve,  with  great 
care,  a  splendid  jag,  encased  in  gold  and  silrer  tiligree  work, 
presented  by  Queen  Mary  to  Adam  Hepburn,  panton  of  Old- 
hinnstocks,  who  married  her  to  the  earl  of  Bothwell. 

Alexander  Hepburn,  of  the  family  to  which  that  of  Hep- 
burn-Murray-Belsches  belongs,  was,  on  October  10,  1C34, 
elected  one  of  the  regents  or  professors  in  the  university  of 
Edinburgh,  as  we  learn  from  the  list  of  the  principals  and 
professors,  from  its  foundation  to  the  year  1700,  in  the 
roister  of  the  town  council  of  that  city. 

The  surname  of  Belcher  in  England,  from  a  similarity  in 
the  arms,  is  supposed  to  be  the  same  as  that  of  Belsches. 
According  to  Mr.  Mark  Antony  Lower,  the  former  is  derived 
from  the  old  French  words  Bel  cAere,  *  good  company.*  Thus 
Chaucer  says. 


it 


For  oosynage  and  eek  for  bele  cheer  J* 


The  same  authority  states  that  Bellasis,  the  original  of 
Belsches,  is  only  Bstte  atsez  in  French,  meaning  '  handsome 
enough.* 

BoxAK,  a  surname  belon^ng  to  a  family  of  French  origin, 
which  settled  in  Soothind  in  the  reign  of  King  William  the 
Lion.  According  to  an  ancient  family  tradition,  the  name 
was  originally  Bonares,  and  was  first  assumed  by  a  valvassor 
of  Aquitaine,  named  Guilhcm  le  Danois,  claiming  descent 
from  the  Danish  Vikingrs,  who,  in  842,  sailed  up  the  Loire, 
and  founded  a  colony  at  Angers.  A  band  of  Pagan  North- 
men which  hu  had  defeated,  during  one  of  the  many  invasions 
to  which  France  in  those  times  was  subjected,  hod  intrenched 
themselves  with  their  booty  in  the  Abbey  of  St.  Blaise  sur 
Loire,  to  which  he  set  fire,  and  for  this  act  he  was  blamed  by 
many  at  court  as  having  been  guilty  uf  sacrilege,  but  the 
then  king  of  France  .approved  of  what  he  liad  done,  and  turn- 
ing to  bis  accusers,  exclaimed,  in  the  rude  Latin  of  the  period, 
**  Bona  res !  Bona  res  I  Conspectu  Dei  et  Regis  I"  *'  A  good 
thing,  u  good  thing,  in  the  eyes  of  God  and  the  King!  **  in  con- 
sequence of  which  he  was  thenceforth  called  Guiihem  de  Bon- 
ares, an  appellation  which  descended  as  a  patronymic  to  his 
race.  In  the  fourteenth  and  iiflccnth  centuries,  the  name  iu 
Scotland  was  written  Bonare  and  frequently  Bonari's;  and 
afterwards,  with  a  circumflex,  Bonar ;  but  the  accent  is  now 
placed  on  the  first  instead  of  the  last  syllable. 

Sir  Guiihem  (or  William)  de  Bonare,  the  first  of  the  family 
who  came  to  Scotland,  before  1200  received  from  William 
the  Lion,  a  grant  of  land.s  in  Perthshire,  to  be  held  of  the 
crown  in  fief,  to  which  he  gave  his  own  name,  yet  borne  by 
the  village  of  Bonar,  situated  at  the  foot  of  a  hill,  on  the 
summit  of  which  are  the  ruins  of  Castle  Bonar,  the  donjon  or 
keep  being  the  only  portion  now  remaining.  Although  the 
barony  has  long  since  passed  into  other  hands,  it  still  contin- 
ues to  Im?  a  sajing  amongst  the  peasantry  that  "the  auld 
tower  will  stand  till  tlic  Ronares  come  back." 

Sir  Guilhcm  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  William,  who  was 
living  about  1230.  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  the  Second. 
The  son  of  the  latter,  William-Kog«?r  de  Bonar,  took  the 


CTOM.  in  124S-9,  and  joined  the  utk  cnieade  vitli  the  elkr 
SeoCtiah  knighta,  whom  Alexander  tbe  Tliiid  aent  to  Fake- 
tane,  to  %ht  under  tbe  benner  of  SC  homa.  He  was  a 
kni^t  of  the  Sacred  and  UiUtaiy  Hoepitafier  Older  of  tfai 
HolySepnkhre.  He  retomed  fiom  the  Holjr  Land  in  1254-^ 
He  b  known  to  bare  had  two  aona,  tis.  Wiffiaan,  hi 
aor,  and  Jdm  of  Laindea,  who  went  to  Flandcfv,  and 
progenitor  of  several  Unas  which  flooriahed  both  in  that 
try  and  in  Sweden,  Poland,  Moraria,  Silcaia,  and  Bredao. 
Mordry,  in  his  *  Gnmd  Dictionaire  EQstoriqoe,*  tbns  mentioBs 
them,  **  Bonar,  fiunille  noUe  en  Ecoese,  dont  phwem 
branches  se  sout  dtablies  en  FUndres,  en  SwMe,  en  Fohgont, 
et  en  antres  pays  de  rEnrope.** 

In  the  Snpplementaxy  Volume  of  BnilBe*s  '  faindad  Gcntfr 
of  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,*  a  Jtrj  full  aoooont  is  gnan  el 
the  fiunily  of  Bonar,  in  rdation  to  the  Bonares  of  Bonaie, 
Kdtj,  Kilgraston  and  Kimmeigfaanie,  and  from  it  jvc  extnet 
the  following  passage:  **  Of  all  the  continental  bnndiea,  the 
most  iUnstrious  were  the  Polish  lines,  which  rose  to  great 
importance,  and  filled  the  highest  offices  in  that  kingdom, 
holding  the  dignities  of  Lord  High  Chancellor,  of  Eari-senes- 
chal,  or  Burgrave-pabUn  of  Cracow,  of  Prime  Minister  of 
the  Crown,  of  Premier  lay  senator  of  Pohmd,  of  Lrad-diief- 
govemor,  or  Magnus  Gubemator,  of  Lord  high  ti«asarer,  ol 
Lord  president  of  the  States,  or  TaTemioorom  B^alinm 
Magister,  of  Grand  Master  of  the  Mint  and  Mines.    They 
were  also  invested  with  the  rank  and  title  oi  Starosts,  or  earis 
of  the  kingdom  of  Poland,  and  of  Barons  of  the  Holy  Roman 
Empire,  (whidi  last  dignity  was  possessed  by  all  tbe  other 
Continental  branches  of  this  family,)  and  produced  sevenl 
prelates  eminent  both  by  their  learning  and  piety,  of  whom 
the  two  most  conspicuous  were  Theobald,  of  the  SOesian 
branch,  (issued  from  a  younger  son  of  John,  lord  high  txva- 
surer  of  Poland,  ietnp.  King  Sigismund  I..)  who  was  General 
of  the  Franciscans ;  and  still  greater  lustre  has  been  shed  on 
the  name  by  the  virtues  and  piety  of  St.  John-Isajah  de  Bo- 
nare^ patron-saint  of  Casimirowna,  who,  dying  in  odour  of 
sanctity,  in  1473,  was  canonized,  and  is  recorded  in  tbe  cal- 
endar on  the  8th  of  February,  as  appears  in  the  Acts  of  the 
Ballandists.     This  eminent  personage  was  brother  of  John  dr 
Bonare,  lord  high  chancellor  of  Poland,  temp.  King  Casimir 
IV.    The  four  most  illustrious  descendants  of  this  family 
on  the  Continent,  and  all  descended  from  John  of  Laindes, 
were,  1st.  Jehan  de  Bonare  (of  the   Flemish   line)   Roth 
magister  of  the  armies  of  France,  who  signalized  himself  by 
the  victor)'  g:uued  over  the  English  in  1337 ;  2d.  St  John- 
Isajah  de  Bonare,  patron  saint  of  Casimirowna ;  3d.  John  d<^ 
Bonare,  Starost  of  Zator,  Rabzstym,  and  Oczwyucin,  Baron  of 
Biecin,  and  of  the  Holy  Roman  Empire,  Premier  lay  senator 
of  Poland,  Burgrave  Palatin  of  Cracow,  and  Magnus  Guber- 
nator,  in  1550,  who  married  his  daughter  to  John  de  Firley, 
Heritable  Grand -marshal  and  Palatin  of  Poland,  elected 
king  in  1572,  but  resigned  in  favour  of  King  Henry  de  Valois; 
this  lady  is  said  by  Mismiez  to  have  carried  a  considerable 
portion  of  the  possessions  of  the  family  of  Bonar  into  the 
house  of  Firley,  by  her  marriage ;  4.  John  de  Baner  (of  th^ 
Swedish  line),  Field-marshal  and  Generalissimo  of  the  Nor- 
thern Lejigue,  in  1640."    It  is  thought  by  Swedish  writer* 
that  the  knightly  hou.se  of  Baner  in  Sweden,  on  whos^  name 
the  celebrated  lield-marshal  has  thrown  such  lustre,  derive 
their  origin,  name  and  amis  from  the  Bonar  family  above 
alluded  to,  and  that  their  name  of  B:mer,  as  it  were  Banner,  is 
deduced  from  the  two  banners  added  to  their  anns  bv  the 
king  of  Fnince,  in  couimemoration  of  the  signal  victory  gained 
by  Mes&ire  Jehan  de  Bonaro  over  the  English. 

William  Bonare,  the  elder  son  of  WiUiam- Roger,  tlic  Cru- 


i: 


:   I 


M 


BOXAU. 


6S8 


BONAR. 


Scotland,  5th  March,  1525,  according  to  which  "  bis  heritable 
baronj  of  Keltj  wm  to  be  holden  by  him  and  liis  heirs  mule 
immediately  of  the  king  and  his  successors  in  free  barony/* 
Having  a  feud  with  Andrew  Hullo  of  Duncrub,  ancestor  of 
I^rd  Uollo,  mnd  Godfrey  Wilson,  he  attacked  them  in  the 
parish  church  of  Dunning,  and  wounded  the  latter,  for  which 
act  of  violence  he  succeeded  in  obtaining  a  reniisuon  under  the 
great  seal  of  Scotland,  28th  January  152G-7.  He  married 
Hesitrice,  of  the  Hays  of  Errol,  by  whom  he  had  m  danghter, 
Isabel,  married  to  Charles,  of  the  Kutherfords  of  Faimilee,  and 
two  sons,  William,  his  successor,  and  John  of  Trevor,  who  mar- 
ried Margaret  Colville  of  the  Culross  family,  and  had,  with 
other  issue,  a  son  and  heir,  James  of  Trevor,  from  whom 
derived  also  the  Bonars  of  Boghall,  of  Nether  Cultuquhaire, 
and  of  Eyemouth ;  with  the  legitimated  line  of  Kindady, 
founded  by  his  natural  son,  John,  of  Kinclady,  legitimated 
under  the  great  seal  of  Scotland,  18th  January,  158G. 

Sir  Walter  resigned  his  barony  into  the  queen's  hands,  by 
deed  dated  at  Kelty,  23d  February  1535,  in  favour  of  his  son, 
William  Bonar,  who  fought  at  the  brittle  of  Pinkie  in  1547. 
William*8  son,  Ninian,  received  from  King  James  the  Sixth  a 
grant  of  the  island  of  North  Ronaldshay,  and  investiture,  per 
charter  under  the  great  seal,  28th  July,  1591.  Having  no 
male  issue,  be  resigned  the  barony  by  act  dated  at  Kelty,  28th 
November,  1610,  in  favour  of  his  brother,  Robert  Bonar. 
The  last  baron  of  Kelty,  William  Bonar,  great-grandson  of 
this  Robert,  died  in  December,  1691,  without  issue,  when  his 
kinsman,  John  Bonar,  the  sixth  proprietor  of  Kilgra»ton,  be- 
came the  chief  of  the  family.  He  was  the  eldest  son  of  John, 
fifth  laird  of  Kilgraston,  and  Agnes,  daughter  and  heu:  of 
I^urence  Graham  of  Callander,  a  scion  of  Montrose,  and  in 
right  of  his  mother  representative  and  heir  of  line  of  Graham 
of  Callander.  He  died  in  1694,  and  was  succeeded  by  his 
son,  John  Bonar,  bom  16th  January  1670,  married  16th 
December  1693,  Grizzel,  daughter  of  Gilbert  Bennett  of 
Beath,  by  whom  he  had  seven  children,  all  of  whom  except 
two,  John  the  eldest,  and  Andrew,  died  young.  During  the 
troubles  of  those  days  he  was  subjected  to  perbccution  for  his 
attachment  to  Prebbyterianism.  He  was  settled  in  the  parish 
of  Torphichen  in  1693,  and  continued  in  that  charge  till  his 
death,  7th  AugUht  1747,  a  period  of  fifty  years.  He  was 
known  as  one  of  the  twelve  Marrow  men,  and  was  the  inti- 
mate friend  of  Kbenezer  and  Ralph  Er&kine.  His  third  son 
Andrew,  was  founder  of  the  Bonars  of  Camden  and  Elmstead, 
in  the  county  of  Kent,  England.  By  a  disposition  dated  at 
Kilgrahton,  23d  October  1696,  he  conveyed  his  tenandry  of 
Kilgraston,  with  the  castle,  manor,  and  lands  thereof,  to  his 
cousins,  Oliphant  of  Curssow,  Oliphant  of  Cultuquhaire, 
Muiray  of  Auchtcrtyre,  and  Craigie  of  Dumbamy,  in  mort- 
g.'ige,  under  reversion  and  reservation  of  free  regiess  and  in- 
gress to  said  tenandry  of  Kilgraston,  to  his  heir-male. 

His  eldest  son,  John,  bore  the  dengnation  of  titular  of 
Kilgraston.  He  was  born  at  Torphichen  25th  July  1696, 
and  became  a  minister.  He  was  settled  in  the  parishes  of 
Ketlar  and  Noith  Zell  in  Shetland  in  the  year  1729,  and  died 
there  in  1752.  He  was  distinguibhed  as  a  chibsical  scholar 
and  well  acquainted  with  the  Oriental  languages.  One  of 
his  descendants,  Thomson  Bonar,  beciime  connected  with  an 
extensive  mercantile  house  in  Russia,  which  still  bears  the 
name, — and,  along  with  his  wife,  Wiis  murdered  by  their 
valet  in  London,  in  June  1813.  Another  of  the  sons  of 
John  Bonar,  named  Andrew,  was  born  in  March  1734,  mar- 
ried Patience  ReJmoi*e,  by  whom  he  left  two  sons,  James 
and  William,  and  a  daughter,  Anne,  uho  married  the  Rev. 
Archibald  Bonar,  niini>ter  of  Cramond.  The  elde?!  sun  of 
John  Bonar  of  Fethur  was  John,  the  last  titular  of  Kilgras- 


ton. He  wu  bom  4th  Kovember  1721, — becmmo  a  nunistcr, 
— WH  ordained  at  Cockpeo  22d  Aognst  1746, — tmielated  te 
Perth  in  Jaiinaiy  1756,  and  died  there  21«t  l>eceDibcr  17CL 
He  was  the  author  of  aereral  religions  imblicatioas,  oae  of 
which,  entitled  *  Obserrations  on  the  Gondoct  and  Character 
of  Judas  lacariot,*  has  been  frrqaentljr  reprinted.  His  eld- 
est son,  siso  John  Bonar,  bom  in  1747,  on  tha  shnlilioii  of 
the  feudal  system  of  Scotland  relinqniahed  th9  qnalificstioB 
of  titnlar  of  Kilgraston,  which  his  father  bad  bomb  He 
was  eminent  in  his  day  for  his  profbnnd  koowledfs  of  the 
Revenne  laws,  nnitcd  with  sn  acnta  diseemmant  in  the  sp- 
plication  of  them.  In  1764,  while  at  the  nniTienitj  af  Edin- 
burgh, he  and  five  other  students,  namely,  Mr.  WHfiaa 
Creech,  the  bookseller;  Mr.  John  Bruce,  aftcrwarda  proAa- 
sor  of  logic  there ;  Henry  Mackensie,  author  of  the  *  Man  of 
Feeling;*  and  Mr.  Belches,  allerwarda  of  InTcmi^;  witik 
the  view  of  mutoal  improvement  in  pnUie  BptMng,  orip- 
nated  the  debating  dub,  called  the  Speculativa  Society, 
which  still  flourishes.  He  was  secretary  of  the  society  fnxn 
its  institution  till  November  1771.  On  8th  Febraary  of  that 
year  he  received  an  unanimous  vote  of  tbanka  for  bis  seal 
and  attention  to  the  interests  of  the  society.  He  read  in  aU 
fourteen  essays  to  the  society,  his  last  in  1775,  indicatbg  an 
attendance  of  more  than  eleven  yesrs.  He  aftervaids  be- 
came solicitor  of  excise.  The  minister,  Lord  If  eWiUe,  and 
the  board  of  Treasury  placed  great  confidence  in  his  judg- 
ment in  questions  of  revenne.  He  waa  author  of  a  pamphlet 
entitled  *  Consideration  on  the  proposed  application  to  Hit 
Majesty  and  Parliament  for  the  establisliment  of  a  Licensed 
Tlieatre  in  Edinburgh  ;*  printed  in  1767.  He  died  in  1807, 
unmarried. 

The  second  son  of  John  Bonar  of  Perth,  Andrew  Bonar, 
with  his  immediate  younger  brotlier,  Alexander,  was  pertncr 
of  the  banking  house  of  Ramsays,  Bonars,  &  Co.  In  1792  he 
acquired  the  property  of  Warriston  in  the  neighbourhood  of 
Edinburgh,  and,  in  1818,  purchased  the  estMte  of  Kimmer- 
ghame  in  Berwickshire.  He  died  5th  August  1825.  He 
was  succeeded  in  the  estate  of  Kimmerghnme  by  his  eldest 
son,  John,  bom  in  1798,  and  died,  unmarried,  in  July  1831. 
His  brother  James,  one  of  the  partners  of  the  firm  of  Small, 
Colquhoun  &  Co.,  merchants,  London,  succeeded  him.  The 
latter  married  Mary,  daughter  of  Sir  Patrick  Murray  of  Ocb- 
tertyre.  In  1846  he  sold  the  estate  of  Kimmerghanie  tu 
Miss  Campbell  of  BIythswood.  One  of  his  brothers,  William, 
born  in  1797,  married  Lilias,  daughter  of  Alexander  Cun- 
ningham, Esq.  of  Craigends;  issue,  one  danghter;  another, 
Andrew,  born  in  1802,  married  in  1833,  BlaiTelline,  daugh- 
ter of  M'Donell  of  Glengarry;  h»8ue,  two  sons  and  two 
daughters. 

The  third  son  of  John  Bonar  of  Perth  was  Alexander  Bo- 
nar, who  was  bom  22d  Febraary  1750,  married  Sarah 
M'Call,  daughter  of  John  M'Call,  merchant  in  Glasgow, 
died  in  April  1820.  He  was  a  partner  in  the  house  of  Ram- 
uiys,  Bonars,  &  Co.,  and  was  proprietor  first  of  Bosebank,  on 
which  a  part  of  Edinburgh  is  now  built — then  of  Craighall,  in 
the  neighbourhood  of  Edinbnrgh,  and  subsequently  purchased 
in  1818  the  CAtute  of  liitllio,  bitu.ited  about  eight  miles  wnt 
of  Edinburgh.  He  left  five  daughters  snd  one  son,  named 
John,  who  succeeded  him  in  the  ^tatt  of  Rntho,  and  died 
unmairied  in  1838.  The  estate  of  Bat  ho  afterwards  passeu 
(in  1844)  into  the  hands  of  the  late  Hobert  Cadell,  Esq., 
the  publiiiber  of  Sir  Walter  Scott's  works,  and  subse- 
quently into  the  possession  of  Ord  Ewing,  Esq.,  a  Glasgow 
niercliaiit. 

Archibald,  third  son  of  John  Bonar  of  Perth,  was  minister 
of  Cran)(>nd,  and  died  in  1816,  leaving  two  sons  and  sevrrel 


I 


I 


ll 


BUCHAN, 


692 


PETER. 


*^  who  Lad  at  one  time  large  pusscssious,  and 
kept  a  good  castle,  modisUly  called  a  howe^  at 
Rathay,  parish  of  Crlmond.  lie  was  a  sciou  of 
the  Ctunjns,  earls  of  Buchan."  lu  his  youth  he 
obtalued  a  midshipmau's  commissioD,  but  hud  to 
relluquish  his  desire  for  a  seafaring  life,  his  parcuts 
haviug  refused  to  furuish  him  with  au  outfit. 

lu  1814,  he  published  a  small  volume  of  poems 
and  songs.  Uo  now  conceived  the  design  of  set- 
ting up  a  printing  establishment  at  Peterhead,  at 
that  time  without  one.  He  had  mamcd  against 
his  father's  consent,  and  from  him  never  received 
any  assistance  iu  any  of  his  plans  l  but  haviug 
made  a  copperplate-press  from  an  engraving  which 
he  had  seen  iu  a  book,  ho  showed  it  to  au  influen- 
tial friend,  who  strongly  advised  him  to  prosecute 
his  design.  Accordiogly,  iu  1816,  he  went  to 
Edinburgh,  **  with  a  pocket  full  of  flattering  intro- 
ductory lette]:s,  and  an  almost  empty  pui-se."  lie 
got  introduced  to  the  earl  of  Buchan,  who  rocom- 
mended  him  to  various  friends,  and  amongst 
othoi's,  to  a  Dr.  Charles  Wiugate,  a  medical  geu- 
tlemau  in  Stirling.  To  that  tpwn  he  proceeded 
with  the  view  of  learning  **  the  mysteries  of  print- 
ing," and  after  no  more  than  ten  days*  attendance 
iu  a  printing  office  there,  he  composed  and  printed 
a  song  as  a  specimen  of  his  proficiency,  with  which 
he  returned  to  Edinburgh.  From  one  of  the  coil's 
friends  he  now  received  about  £50  sterling,  with 
which  he  purchased  types,  &c.,  and  commenced 
business  iu  Peterlicad,  on  the  24th  of  March  the 
same  year. 

In  1819,  he  constructed  a  new  piinting-press, 
**  wood,  uon,  and  brass,'*  with  which  he  printed 
one  of  his  most  popular  works,  *The  annals  of 
Peterhead,'  a  thin  12mo  volume,  iilustrutcd  with 
half-a-dozen  copperplates  of  his  own  engraving. 
The  press  was  wrought  with  the  feet  instead  of 
the  hands,  and  took  impressions  from  stone,  cop- 
per, and  wood,  as  well  as  from  types,  and  would 
have  answered  equally  well  for  printing  on  cloth. 
He  also  invented  an  index  for  keeping  an  accomit 
of  the  number  of  sheets  printed  in  any  given  time. 
A  ])atent  press-maker  iu  Edinburgh,  he  tells  us, 
once  wrote  to  him  to  send  him  one,  and  held  out 
a  great  reward.  He  acknowledged  its  receipt  and 
utility ;  then  went  to  America,  and  with  him  his 
machine  and  golden  hopes. 


Mr.  Buchan'a  next  literary  prodnctiou  was  ^  Au 
Hutorical  Acconut  of  the  ancient  and  noble  fami- 
ly of  Keith,  Earls  Marischal  of  Scotland,  with  the 
attainted  noblemen,  &c.*  This  work  brought  him 
considerable  reputation  as  well  as  remnnentioo. 

After  this,  Mr.  Buchan  filled  for  a  time  a  sitaa- 
tion  iu  London,  on  a  salary  of  £150  a-year,  but 
was  obliged  to  leave  it  on  account  of  bad  healths 
After  his  return  to  Peterhead,  he  published  iu 
1824,  a  treatise,  dedicated  to  his  son,  in  wliich  be 
endeavoured  to  prove  that  brutes  are  possessed  of 
souls  and  are  immortal ! 

In  1828,  he  published  in  two  volumes  8vo,  a 
work  entitled  *  Ancient  Ballads  and  Songs  of  the 
North  of  Scotland,  hitherto  unpublished,  w  ith  Ex- 
planatory Notes.'  This  work,  unlike  his  former 
productions,  was  printed  and  published  at  Edm- 
bm-gh,  and  at  once  made  his  name  known.  Sh 
Walter  Scott,  in  his  introduction  to  the  ^Miustrekj 
of  the  Scottish  Border,'  has  borne  ample  testimony 
to  the  value  of  Mr  Buchan's  collection.  The  work 
was  most  favourably  received ;  the  whole  edition 
havuig  been  sold  iu  the  course  of  a  few  months. 
By  it  he  added  upwards  of  forty  to  our  stock  of 
recovered  songs,  while  more  perfect  ven>ions  wtrc 
given  of  nearly  an  equal  number  which  had  been 
previously  printed.  Amongst  these  mny  be  men- 
tioned the  beautiful  ballad  of  *  Burd  Helen.' 

He  was  now  brought  into  con'espondence  with 
Sir  Walter  Scott,  and  others  of  high  literary  stand- 
ing, and  was  frequently  a  guest  at  Abbot:jrord. 
The  Scottish  Society  of  Antiquaries  elected  huu  a 
conesponding  member,  as  did  also  the  Northern 
Institution  for  the  promotion  of  science  and  litera- 
ture. He  was  also  hononred  with  diplomas  of 
membei-ship  from  some  of  the  leading  literary 
societies  of  England. 

In  1834,  he  published  '  The  Peterhead  Smug- 
glers,' a  melodrama  of  uo  great  merit.  The  best 
and  most  original  part  of  this  publicatiou  was 
the  introductory  dedication,  which  contained  n 
bitter  philippic  against  lawyers,  by  whom  hesccws 
to  have  been  constantly  persecuted.  With  it,  he 
advertised,  **  as  preparing  for  publication,"  a  new 
collection  of  ballads,  to  be  entitled  '  North  Coun- 
trie  Minstrelsy,  Ancient  and  Modem,  with  Notes.* 
The  work  was  never  published,  but  the  manuscript 
volumes  found  theii*  way  into  the  archives  of  the 


!'    ! 


BUG  HAN. 


693 


CAMriJELL. 


Percy  Society,  I^ondon,  through  Mr.  Jerdnn  of 
the  I-aterary  Gazette,  and  in  1845,  nnknown  to 
the  author,  selections  from  them  formed  one  of  the 
miscellaneous  issues  of  the  Society,  entitled  *  Scot- 

4 

tish  Traditional  Versions  of  Ancient  Ballads, 
edited  by  James  Henry  Dixon.*  These,  however, 
are  only  different  versions  of  previously  known 
ballads. 

Mr.  Buchan  afterwards  purchased  a  small  pro- 
perty near  Dennyloanhead,  Stirlingshire,  which 
he  called  Bnchanstone,  intending  there  to  spend 
the  remainder  of  his  days  in  retirement  and  ease ; 
but  in  this  he  was  disappointed.  Tlie  superior  of 
the  land  claimed  the  minerajs  on  his  estate,  and 
a  long  and  harassing  lawsuit  was  the  consequence. 
In  1852,  he  sold  the  property,  and  proceeded  to 
a  son  in  Ireland,  and  resided  for  some  time  at 
Strandhill  House,  county  of  Leitrim.  In  the  early 
part  of  1854,  he  repaired  to  I^ndon,  with  the 
view  of  efTecting  an*angcments  for  the  publication 
of  another  volume  of  *  Ancient  Scottish  Ballads,* 
but  was  there  seized  with  Illness,  and  after  a  few 
hours  suffering,  died,  1 9th  September  the  same  year. 
His  remains  were  interred  in  the  beautiful  ceme- 
tery of  Noni'ood,  near  I^ndon.  In  private  life, 
he  was  remarkably  modest,  and  of  singularly  un- 
assuming manners.  His  eldest  son,  Charles  For- 
bes Buchan,  D.D.,  wns,  in  1840,  inducted  minister 
of  Fordoun,  Kincardineshire. 

Mr.  Buclian*8  works  are : 

Tlie  Recreation  of  I^eisnre  ITonre,  being  Songs  and  Verses 
in  the  Scottifth  dialect.     Peterhead,  1814. 

Annals  of  Peterhead,  now  extremely  scarce.  Peterhead, 
1819,  12mo. 

An  Historical  Account  of  the  ancient  and  nol>le  family  of 
Keith,  Karls  Marischal  of  Scotland,  with  the  attainted  noble- 
men, &C.     Peterhead. 

Treatise  proving  tliat  Rnites  have  Souls  and  are  Immortal. 
Peterhead,  1824. 

Ancient  Ballads  and  Soni:^  of  the  North  of  Scotland, 
liitherto  unpublished,  with  Kxplnnatorr  Notes.  Kdinbnrgh, 
1828,  2  vols.  8ro. 

The  Peterhead  Smugglers  of  the  last  century ;  or  William 
and  Annie,  an  original  melodrama,  in  three  acta. — Aim, 
]*oems  and  Songs,  with  Biographical  Notices.  Edinburgh, 
1834,  8vo. 

The  Eglinton  Tonmament,  and  Gentlemen  Unmaske<l. 
(ilasgow,  1839.  This  work  was  aAerwarda  republished 
nnder  the  title  of  Rritain*s  Boast,  her  Glory  and  her  shame ; 
or  a  Mirmr  for  all  Ranks,  in  which  are  distinctly  seen  the 
origin  and  history  of  kings,  noblemen,  gentlemen,  clergymen, 
men  of  learning  and  genius,  lawyers,  physicians,  merchants, 
manufacturers,  mechanic!*,  soldiers,  sailors,  &c.,  with  the  true 
characteristics  of  each.    Tlie  necessity  and  advantages  of 


^ucation,  commerce,  and  trade. — Also  an  account  of  the 
Chivalry  of  the  Andents,  the  Eglinton  Tournament,  and 
Gentlemen  Unmasked.  In  a  conversation  between  the  shades 
of  a  king  and  his  preceptor,  a  knight,  in  the  Elysian  fields. 
Glasgow,  1840,  royal  18mo. 

The  Pamllel ;  or  Principles  of  the  British  Constitution 
Exemplified.  For  the  benefit  of  every  legislator  and  British 
subject,  whether  tory,  whig,  or  radical. — Also  a  defence  of 
Church  Establishments,  Magna  Charta,  the  Bill  of  Rights, 
Habeas  Corpus  Act,  Articles  of  the  Scottish  Union,  and  Act 
for  securing  the  Protestant  and  Presbyterian  Religion,  &c. 
London,  1835. 

Man, — Body  and  Soul, — as  he  was,  as  he  is,  and  as  he 
sliall  be.     1849. 

Mr.  Buchan  also  published  rarions  other  works  of  n  minor 
cliaraeter,  illustrative  of  the  literary  antiquities  of  Scotland, 
as  *  Gleanings  of  Scarce  Old  Ballads;!  *  The  Wanderings  of 
Prince  Charles  Stuart  and  Miss  Flora  Macdonald,*  from  a 
manuscript  of  the  period,  with  several  Jacobite  Poems,  Ser- 
mons, Songs,  and  Sketches.  He  also  supplied  George  Chal- 
mers, Esq.,  with  much  useful  information  for  his  Caledonia. 

Two  unpublished  volumes  of  bis  Ballad  Collections  were 
left  in  the  possession  of  Dr.  Charles  Mackay  of  London. 


Caxpbki.l,  (additional  to  article  in  vol.  i.  pages  548 — 
569),  Of  this  surname  was  the  family  of  Dnneaves  in  Perth- 
shire, the  first  of  which,  Duncan  Campbell  of  Duneavea,  was 
the  second  son  of  Robert  Campbell  of  Glenlyon,  in  the  same 
county,  lineally  descended,  in  the  direct  male  line,  from 
Archibald  Campbell  of  Glenlyon,  second  son,  (by  I^dy  Mar- 
garet Douglas,)  of  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenurehy,  an- 
cestor of  the  noble  family  of  Breadalbane,  (see  vol.  i.  page 
373).  Duncan  Campbell  of  Duneaves  had  a  son,  Duncan 
Campbell  of  Milntown,  in  Glenlyon,  who  took  to  wife  Janet, 
daughter  of  the  Rev.  Alexander  Robertson,  minister  of  Fort- 
ingal,  and  was  father  of  Archibald  Campbell,  a  lieutenant  in 
the  army.  This  gentleman  married  Margaret,  daughter  of 
James  Small,  a  captain  in  the  army,  and  their  third  son  was 
lieutenant-general,  Sir  Archibald  Campbell,  baronet,  com- 
mander of  the  British  forces  in  the  Burmese  war. 

Sir  Archibald  entered  the  service  in  the  year  1787,  by 
raising  a  quota  of  twenty  men  for  an  ensigncy  in  the  77th 
regiment,  and,  in  the  spring  of  the  following  year,  he  em- 
barked with  that  corps  for  the  East  Indies.  He  was  present 
at  the  operations  agiunst  the  army  of  Tippoo  Saib,  sultan  of 
Mysore,  which  led  to  tlie  reduction  oil^  Cananore  and  other 
places  on  the  coast  of  Malabar  in  1790.  In  1791  he  was 
promoted  to  a  lieutenancy  in  his  regiment,  and  was  appointed 
adjutant  of  it.  During  that  and  the  following  yeibr  he  served 
in  the  campaigns  in  the  Mysore  country,  and  was  present  at 
the  first  siege  of  Seringapatam,  its  capital,  in  February  1792. 
In  1795  be  served  at  tlie  reduction  of  the  Dutch  garrison  of 
Cochin  and  its  dependencies  on  the  coast  of  Malabar,  and  in 
1796  at  that  of  the  island  of  Ceylon.  In  1799,  as  major  in 
the  European  brigade  of  the  Bombay  army,  be  was  present 
at  the  battle  of  Saduceer  and  the  siege  and  taking  of  Serin- 
gapatam by  assault.  In  the  same  year  he  became,  by  pur- 
chase, captain  in  the  67th  regiment,  and  with  the  view  of 
remaining  on  foreign  service,  he  immediately  exchanged  into 
the  88th  regiment,  that  corps  having  just  arrived  in  India. 

In  1801,  Capt.  Campbell  was  compelled  by  ill  health  to 


CAMPBELL. 


694 


SIR  ARCHIBALD. 


retnm  to  England,  and  until  1803,  lie  was  employed  npoo 
the  recruiting  service.  lie  was  then  appointed  to  the  staff 
of  the  southern  district,  as  major  of  brigade.  In  1804  he 
became  major  of  the  6th  battalion  of  reserve,  stationed  in 
Guernsey,  and  lie  remained  there  until  its  reduction  in  the 
beginning  of  1805.  A  few  weeks  thereafter  he  was  placed 
on  full  pay  of  the  71  st  regiment,  and,  in  general,  commanded 
the  2d  battalion  of  that  corps  in  Scotland  and  Ireland  until 
1808,  when  he  joined  the  1st  battalion  on  its  embarkation 
for  Portugal.  He  served  with  it  at  the  battles  of  Ruleia  and 
Vimiera,  as  also  during  the  campugn  in  Spun,  under  the 
command  of  Sir  John  Moore,  and  the  retreat  to  Coninna,  at 
the  battle  of  which  he  was  present,  in  January  1809. 

In  the  following  month  he  was  promoted  to  the  rank  of 
lieutenant -colonel,  and  appointed  to  accompany  Marshal 
Beresford  to  assist  in  the  oi^anization  of  the  Portuguese 
army.  In  this  service  he  was  raised  to  the  rank  of  colonel, 
and  had  the  command  of  a  regiment  of  infantry.  In  1811 
he  was  appointed  brigadier-general,  and  commanded  a  brigade 
during  the  whole  of  the  war  in  the  Peninsula  and  the  south 
of  France,  being  present  at  the  battles  of  Busaco,  Albuera, 
the  surprise  of  the  French  corps  commanded  by  General  Gi- 
mrd,  at  Arrago  Sifolinos,  28th  October  1811,  tlie  siege  of 
Radajoz,  6th  April  1812;  the  battles  of  Vittoria,  the  Pyre- 
nees, the  Nivelle,  and  the  Nive. 

In  the  end  of  1818,  the  Prince  Regent  of  Portugal  promot- 
ed him  to  the  rank  of  major-general  in  the  Portuguese  service, 
and  conferred  upon  liim  the  insignia  of  the  order  of  the  Tower 
and  Sword.  He  was  knighted  April  28,  1814,  by  the  Prince 
Regent  of  Great  Britain,  afterwards  George  IV.,  and  appoint- 
ed one  of  liis  royal  highness*  aides-de-camp,  with  the  rank 
of  colonel  in  the  army ;  and  in  1815,  he  was  nominated  a 
knight-commander  of  the  Bath.  In  1816  he  was  appointed 
to  the  command  of  the  IJsbon  division  of  the  Portuguese 
armv. 

In  1820,  at  the  first  breaking  out  of  the  Revolution  in 
Portugal,  he  offered,  in  the  absence  of  Field-marshal  Lord 
Beresford,  to  march,  with  his  division,  to  suppress  the  rising 
at  Oporto.  His  advices,  however,  were  declined  by  the 
regency,  and  he  at  once  gave  in  his  resignation,  and  soon 
after  returned  to  England. 

In  1821  he  was  appointed  to  the  command  of  the  38th 
regiment,  and  the  following  year  he  joined  that  corps  at  the 
Ca{)e,  and  proceeded  with  it  to  India.  He  was  stationed  at 
Berlmnipore  when  he  was  selected  to  take  the  command  of 
the  expedition  agunst  the  Burmese  in  1824.  Elated  by  some 
recent  conquests  which  they  had  made  over  the  northern 
mountainous  province  of  Assam,  and  being  brought  into  more 
immediate  contact  with  the  British  frontiers,  the  Burmese 
had  begun,  towards  the  end  of  1823,  to  make  sundry  en- 
croachments upon  the  possessions  of  tiie  East  India  Compnny. 
In  a  sudden  night  attack,  they  drove  away  a  small  guard  of 
British  troops  stationed  on  the  small  muddy  island  of  Shapu- 
ree,  in  the  province  of  Bengal,  but  close  to  the  coast  of  Arra- 
caii,  and  took  forcible  possession  of  it.  On  being  remon- 
strated with,  the  court  of  Ava  intimated,  that  unless  its  right 
to  the  island  was  admitted,  the  victorious  lord  of  the  white 
elephant  and  the  golden  foot,  as  the  sovereign  of  Burmah  is 
styled,  would  invade  the  Company's  dominions.  In  the 
meantime,  a  detachment  of  British  troops  landed  on  tlie  dis- 
puted island  and  expelled  the  intruders  from  it.  The  Bur- 
mese ruler  now  demanded  from  the  government  at  Calcutta 
the  cession  of  Northern  Bengal,  .is  being  a  part  of  Ava,  and 
in  January  1824,  the  Burmese  forces  marched  into  Kadschar, 
which  had  deposed  its  rulers,  and  put  itself  under  British 
protection.     I^rd  Amherst,  then  governor-general  of  India, 


immediately  declared  war  against  Bonnab,  and  genenl  Sir 
Archibald  Campbell,  at  the  head  of  the  Britiah  forot,  aseead- 
ed  the  Irrawaddy,  took  Rangoon,  and  made  himadf  maitcr 
of  Prome.  Tlie  Burmese  roonardi  now  aaw  himaelf  obliged 
to  conclude  a  very  unequal  peace  at  Palanagb,  Deeember  SI, 
1825.  As,  however,  the  txeaty  was  not  ratified,  on  the  port 
of  the  Burmese,  by  the  time  specified,  January  18, 1826,  Sir 
Archibald  continued  his  advance,  on  the  19tli,  and  stonaid 
the  fortress  of  Melloone.  This  led  to  the  ratificatkNi  of  the 
treaty,  on  February  24,  and  the  oonclnsion  of  the  war.  The 
king  of  the  white  elephant  ceded  to  the  Company  the  pro- 
vinces of  Arracan,  Merguy,  Tavoy,  and  Yea,  and  paid  than  a 
sum  of  money  amounting  to  £1,250,000.  The  impartant 
city  of  Rangoon  was  declared  a  free  port.  Thus  all  the 
western  ooast  of  the  Burman  empire  was  ceded  to  the  East 
India  Company,  and  the  most  powerful  of  the  East  India 
states  was  divided  and  weakened. 

For  his  conduct  in  this  arduous  war.  Sir  Archibald  Camp- 
bell received  a  vote  of  thanks  from  both  houses  of  paiiiament, 
from  the  governor-general  in  council,  and  from  the  court  of 
directors  of  the  Honourable  the  East  India  Company.  The 
latter  farther  testified  their  approval  of  hia  skill,  gallantly, 
and  perseverance  throughout  the  war,  by  granting  him  a 
pension  of  Xl,000  per  annum  for  life,  and  presenting  him 
with  a  handsome  gold  medaL 

At  the  termination  of  the  war,  he  was  appointed  com- 
mander of  the  forces  in  the  ceded  provinces  on  the  coast  of 
Tenasserim,  and  at  the  same  time  had  the  honour  of  being 
civil  commissioner  in  relation  to  the  affurs  of  the  kingdoms 
of  Burmah  and  Siam.  While  holding  these  oflloes,  hix  health 
began  seriously  to  suffer,  and  he  applied  for  leave  to  rrton 
to  England.  In  accordance,  however,  with  the  earnest  de- 
sire of  the  Supreme  government  at  Calcutta,  he  continued  in 
his  command  for  another  year,  when  increased  illness  obliged 
him  to  leave  India,  which  he  did  in  1829.  On  September 
21st  of  that  year,  he  was  appointed  colonel  of  the  95th  regi- 
ment, subsequently  of  the  77tli,  and  on  Febniary  17, 1840, 
of  the  62d. 

In  the  spring  of  1831,  Sir  Archibald  was  appointed  liea- 
tenant-govemor  of  the  province  of  New  Bninswick,  where 
he  remained  for  nearly  six  years.  He  was  created  a  baroaet 
of  the  United  Kingdom,  30lh  September  of  the  same  year. 
In  August  1839  lie  was  offered  the  appointment  of  com- 
mander-in-chief in  Bombay,  which  be  accepted,  but  owin«; 
to  severe  indisposition  he  was  not  able  to  enter  upon  it.  At 
various  times  he  was  presented  with  the  freedom  of  the 
towns  of  Strabane  and  Cork  in  Ireland,  and  Perth  in  Scot- 
land. He  was  also  G.C.B.  He  died  in  1843.  Bv  his  wife. 
Helen,  daughter  of  Mr.cdonald  of  Garth,  Perthsliire,  he  had 
two  sons  and  three  danghters.  llie  Uev.  Archibald  Cairp- 
l>el],  the  elder  son,  a  chaplain  in  India,  died,  unmarried,  in  1831. 

Major-general  Sir  John  Campbell,  the  second  son,  sac- 
ceeded  as  second  baronet.  Bom  14th  April  1807,  he  mar- 
ried, 21st  July  1841,  Helen  Margaret,  only  child  of  Coliwri 
John  Crow,  East  India  Company's  service.  He  was  killed 
in  the  assault  on  the  Redan.  Sebastopol,  18th  June  1835. 
when  in  command  of  a  division.  In  this  attack  he  seems 
to  have  displayed  a  courage  amounting  Ui  raahness.  He  seiit 
away  his  two  aides-de-camp  just  before  he  rushed  out  of  the 
trench,  and  fell  in  the  act  of  cheering  his  men.  He  wss 
hnried  on  Cathcart*A  Hill,  among  m.nny  bnivc  officers  killed 
at  the  same  time.  He  had,  with  other  issue.  Sir  Archibald 
Ava  Campbell,  third  baronet,  bom  at  Edinltun;h  in  1^4. 
Heir  presumptive  to  the  title,  his  brother,  John  James  Ava 
Campbell,  born  in  1845. 


I   I 


,    I 
■i    I 


CAMPBELL. 


696 


COCKBUBN. 


he  held  the  rank  of  general  of  brigade;  and  as  commander  <^ 
the  advanced  force,  he  defeated  the  Sikhs  in  the  action  near 
Ramnngger,  22d  November  1848.  He  also  took  a  leading 
part  at  the  passage  of  the  Chenah,  8d  December  the  same 
year.  At  the  battle  of  Chillianwallah,  where  he  was  wound- 
ed, he  commanded  the  third  infantry  division,  which  formed 
the  lefl  of  the  armv.  Lord  Gongh,  in  his  despatch  to  the 
commander-in-chief,  after  the  victory,  said,  **  Brigadier- 
general  Campbell,  with  that  steady  coolness  and  military 
precision  for  which  he  is  so  remarkable,  carried  every  thing 
before  him.**  He  also  took  part  in  the  great  battle  of  Goo- 
jerat  in  1849.  For  liis  services  in  this  campaign  he  was 
created  K.  C.  B.,  and  received  the  thanks  of  parliament  and 
of  the  East  India  Company.  In  1851  and  1852,  he  com- 
manded the  Peshawnr  district,  then  in  a  very  unsettled  state. 
Under  Sir  Charles  Napier  he  was  employed  at  the  forcing  of 
the  Kohat  pass.  In  the  latter  year  lie  was  constantly  en- 
gaged in  encounters  with  the  hill  tribes.  At  the  close  of 
the  Punjanb  campaign  he  received  the  Grand  Cross  of 
the  order  of  the  Bath.  In  1854  he  was  appointed  to  the 
command  of  the  Highland  brigade  in  the  Crimea.  At  Alma, 
September  20th,  the  Guards  and  Highlanders,  forming  the 
first  or  duke  of  Cambridge*8  division,  were  ordered  to  ad- 
vance, at  the  very  crisis  of  the  battle,  to  support  the  Light 
division.  "  Highlanders,**  exclaimed  Sir  Colin,  as  they  came 
to  the  charge,  "  grant  me  a  favour.  Let  me  have  to  ask  the 
queen*s  permission  for  yon  to  wear  a  bonnet  I  Don*t  pull  a 
trigger  until  yon  get  within  a  yard  of  the  Ru.^sians.*'  They 
did  not  fire  a  shot  until  close  upon  the  Russian  column,  when 
they  delivered  a  volley  and  charged.  The  enemy  fell  back, 
but  at  a  short  distance  rallied,  and  advanced  a  few  steps  with 
lowered  bayonets.  The  Scots  accepted  the  challenge  with  a 
cheer,  and  charged  at  them,  on  which  the  Russians,  throwing 
off  their  packs,  fled.  When  the  siege  of  Sebastopol  was  com- 
menced. Sir  Colin  was  placed  by  Ix>rd  Raglan  at  Balaklava, 
in  command  of  a  miscellaneous  force,  composed  principally  of 
the  93d  Highlanders,  the  marines  from  the  fleet,  and  a  few 
Turkish  troops.  On  the  25th  October,  the  Russians,  in  great 
force,  advanced  upon  Katichoi.  Against  Sir  Colin's  regiment 
of  Highlanders,  the  Russian  commander  sent  five  hundred 
cavalry.  They  were  received  in  line,  instead  of  in  a  square, 
and  two  discharges,  the  second  reserved  until  the  Russian 
horse  were  within  shot  range,  soon  scattered  them,  and  Bala- 
klava, with  all  its  stores  and  shipping,  was  preserved,  as  the 
position  of  the  Highlanders  closed  the  access  to  the  harbour. 
In  June  1854,  Sir  Colin  Campbell  was  promoted  to  the  rank 
of  rnxjor-general,  and  in  October  of  the  same  year  he  wai 
nominated  colonel  of  the  G7tli  foot.  In  1855  he  received  the 
local  rank  of  general  in  Turkey,  and  in  1856,  that  of  lieu- 
tenant-general in  the  army.  He  was  also  created  Grand-cross 
of  the  Sardinian  order  of  St.  Maurice  and  St.  Lazarus,  pre- 
sented with  the  freedom  of  the  city  of  Ix>ndon,  and  made  an 
honorary  doctor  of  civil  laws  of  Oxford.  In  1857,  on  the 
mutiny  of  the  Sepoy  regiments  in  India,  Sir  Colin  was  ap- 
pointed commander-in-chief  there,  with  the  local  rank  of 
general.  His  skill,  judgment-,  and  bravery,  enabled  him,  in 
one  short  campaign,  to  tranquillize  the  Doab,  crush  the 
Gwalior  Contingent,  take  Lucknow,  overmn  Oude  with 
moveable  columns,  wrest  Rohilcund  from  the  rule  of  the 
rel>els,  secure  our  possession  of  that  rich  province,  and  re- 
establish the  civil  rule  of  the  Company  in  its  old  sites  of 
power.  As  a  reward  for  his  services,  he  was,  in  Angust  of 
tlie  same  year,  raised  to  the  peerage  of  the  United  Kingdom, 
by  the  title  of  Bnron  Clyde  of  Clydesdale.  In  1858  he  was 
raised  to  the  rank  of  general,  and  on  the  coming  of  age  of  the 
Prince  of  Wales,  Nov.  9, 1862,  he  was  created  a  field-rnarshaL 


COCKBURN,  Henbt,  an  eminent  Judge  and 
eloquent  pleader,  was  born  26th  October  1779, 
either  at  Edinburgh,  or  at  Cockpcn,  a  small  estate 
about  eight  miles  south  of  that  city,  then  beloog- 
ing  to  his  father,  but  afterwards  sold  to  the  earl 
of  Dalhousie.     Ilis  father,  Archibald  Cockbum, 
at  one  time  sheriff  of  Mid-Lothian,  and  subse- 
quently also  judge-admiral,  was,  from  1790  till  his 
death  in  1809,  a  baron  of  the  exchequer  in  Scot- 
land.   His  mother,  Janet  Rannie,  was  one  of  the 
two  daughters  of  Captain  Rannie  of  MelTille,  her 
sister  being  the  wife  of  Ilenrj  Dundas,  the  first 
Viscount  Melville.    In  1787  he  was  sent  to  the 
High  school  of  Edinburgh,  and  in  1793  he  entered 
the  university.    He  studied  Greek  under  Dalzel, 
logic  under  Finlayson,  moral  philosophy  under 
Dngald  Stewart,  and  in  1800  passed  advocate. 
Tliat  was  a  period  remarkable  in  the  history  of 
Edinburgh  for  the  dawn  of  a  new  epoch  of  literaiy, 
political,  and  legal  talent.    He  was  called  to  the 
bar  at  a  time  when  he  had  to  compete  with  such 
men  as  MoncrieiT,  Fullerton,  Jeffrey,  Cranstoun, 
and  John  Clerk ;   and  highly  gifted  as  they  all 
were,  and  each    remarkable   for  some  peculiar 
faculty  of  his  own,  in  the  power  of  persuasion  he 
soon  distanced  them  all.    **  Of  all  the  great  plead- 
ers of  the  Scottish  bar,"  wrote  Mr.  Ix>ckhart,  in 
1818,  "  Mr.  Cockburn  is  the  only  one  who  is  cap- 
able of  touching,  with  a  bold  and  assured  hand, 
the  chords  of  feeling;  who  can,  by  one  plain  word, 
and  one  plain  look,  convey  the  whole  soul  of 
tenderness,  or  appeal,  with  the  authority  of  a  true 
prophet,  to  yet  higher  emotions  which  slnmber  in 
many  bosoms,  but  are  dead,  I  think,  in  none.    As 
every  truly  pathetic  speaker  must  be,  Mr.  Cock- 
bum  is  a  homely  speaker.    .    .    .     Instead  of 
labouring,  as  most  orators  do,  to  impress  on  the 
minds  of  his  audience  a  high  notion  of  his  powers 
and  attainments,  this  man  seems  to  be  anxious 
about  nothing  except  to  make  them  forget  that  he 
wears  a  gown,  and  to  be  satisfied  that  they  are 
listening  to  a  person  who  thinks,  feels,  and  judges 
exactly  like  themselves.    It  is  not  his  ambition  to 
be  admired ;  he  wishes  only  to  be  trusted.     He 
does  not,  by  one  word  or  gesture,  show  that  he 
aspii*es  to  be  reckoned  a  great  man ;  but  it  is  plain 
that  lie  would  give  the  world  that  they  should  be- 
lieve him  to  be  an  honest  one.    And  after  he  has 


COCKBURN. 


697 


COMBE. 


been  allowed  to  tell  bis  story  in  his  own  way  for 
ten  minutes,  I  wonid  defy  Diogenes  Iiiroself  to 
donbt  it.  His  nse  of  tlie  langnage,  and  Iiis  still 
more  exquisite  nse  of  the  images  and  allasions  of 
common  Scottish  life,  mnst  contribute  in  the  most 
powerful  manner  to  his  success  in  this  first  great 
object  of  all  his  rhetoric.  There  is  an  air  of  broad 
and  undisguised  sincerity  in  the  simple  tones  and 
energetic  phrases  he  employs,  which  finds  its  way 
like  a  charm  to  the  very  bottom  of  the  hearts 
around  him.  He  sees  it  painted  in  their  beaming 
and  expanding  faces,  and  sees,  and  knows,  and 
feels  at  once  that  his  eloquence  is  persuasive. 
Once  so  far  victorious,  he  is  thenceforth  iiTesisti- 
ble.  He  has  established  an  understanding  be- 
tween himself  and  his  audience — a  feeling  of  fel- 
lowship And  confidence  of  communion — which 
nothing  can  disturb.  The  electricity  of  thought 
and  of  sentiment  passes  from  his  face  to  theirs, 
and  thrills  back  again  from  theirs  to  his.  He  has 
fairly  come  into  contact ;  he  sees  their  breasts  lie 
bare  to  his  weapon,  and  he  will  make  no  thrust 
in  vain." 

In  1806  Mr.  Cockbum  was  appointed  advo- 
cate-depute, but  in  July  1810  he  was  dismissed 
by  the  lord-advocate  of  the  day,  for  not  being  of 
nis  party,  and  voting  against  him  at  a  faculty 
meeting.  In  Maix^h  1811,  he  married,  and  went 
to  reside  at  Bonaly,  in  the  parish  of  Colinton, 
about  three  miles  from  Edinburgh,  which  conti- 
nued to  be  his  place  of  residence  till  his  death. 

In  1830,  on  the  accession  of  the  whig  party  to 
power,  Mr.  Jeffrey  became  lord-advocate  and 
Mr.  Cockbum  solicitor-general  of  Scotland.  These 
two  names  of  Jeffrey  and  Cockbum  had  long  been 
linked  together  as  rival  leaders  at  the  bar,  and 
they  were  now  to  be  associated  as  colleagues.  In 
1834,  they  were  both  elevated  to  the  bench  as 
lords  of  session,  when  they  respectively  assumed 
the  judicial  titles  of  Lord  Jeffrey  and  Lord  Cock- 
bum. As  a  judge  I^rd  Cockbum  was  careful, 
patient,  and  subtle,  while  as  a  man  he  was  singu- 
larly large-hearted  and  genial.  He  possessed  hu- 
mour, wit,  and  eloquence  in  a  high  degree,  with 
ripe  observation  and  inimitable  expression,  a  sound 
judgment  and  a  kind  heart.  He  died  at  his  house 
at  Bonaly  on  the  morning  of  April  26,  1854,  aged 
76. 


A  patriotic  and  benevolent  spirit  induced  him  to 
exert  his  influence  for  the  welfare  of  Edinburgh  and 
its  institutions.  Among  these  the  Koyal  Scottish 
Academy  claimed  a  large  portion  of  his  attention. 
His  love  of  art,  and  devotion  to  the  Scottish  capi- 
tal, led  him  to  publish,  in  1850,  a  characteristic 
pamphlet,  entitled  'The  Best  AVay  of  Spoiling  the 
Beauty  of  Edinburgh.*  He  also  wrote  some  let- 
ters in  the  newspapers  on  the  same  subject,  and 
two  ai*ticles  in  the  Edinburgh  Review  on  the  office 
of  I>ord  Advocate.  In  1852  appeared  at  Edin- 
burgh his  *  Life  of  Lord  Jefl'rey,'  in  2  vols.  8vo, 
and  in  1856  'Memorials  of  His  own  Time,' By 
Lord  Cockbum.    Edinburgh,  1  vol.  8vo. 

COMBE,  George,  a  distinguished  phrenolo- 
gist, was  bom  in  Edinburgh  in  1788.  His  father, 
of  the  same  name,  was  a  brewer  at  Livingston's 
Yards  in  that  city,  a  locality  at  one  period  at  the 
back  of  the  Castle,  but  now  removed.  His  mo- 
ther, Marion  Newton,  belonged  to  the  family  of 
Newton  of  Curriehill.  They  had  seventeen  chil- 
dren, of  whom  George,  and  Andi*ew,  (a  memoir 
of  whom  is  given  at  page  675  of  vol.  i.,)  were  the 
most  conspicuous.  Tlieir  father  is  described  as  a 
tall,  robust  man,  a  staunch  Presbyterian  of  the  old 
school,  and  his  phrenological  sons  report  that  he 
could  never  find  a  hat  that  would  fit  his  head, 
and  was  obliged  to  have  a  block  for  himself. 
Their  mother  was  energetic  and  conscientious. 
Neither  parent  had  much  education,  and  both 
seem  to  have  been  very  strict  in  the  religious  dis- 
cipline of  their  family. 

George  was  bred  to  the  law,  and  in  1812  passed 
as  a  writer  to  the  signet.  In  1816,  when  Spurz- 
heim,  the  celebrated  physiologist,  visited  Edin- 
burgh, he  attended  his  lectures  on  the  science  of 
phrenology,  and  reached  a  conviction  which  de- 
termined the  character  of  his  mind  and  life.  He 
himself  tells  us  that  he  was  not  ''  led  away  by 
enthusiasm,**  but  won  by  the  evidence  that  the 
doctrine  was  '*  eminently  practical.**  He  straight- 
way set  himself  to  study  the  opinions  of  Gall  and 
Spurzheim,  being  convinced  that  they  had  a  basis 
in  nature,  but  as  his  mind  had  no  scientific  quali- 
ty which  could  give  him  insight  into  the  bearings 
of  theory  and  practice,  hypothesis,  discovery  and 
explanation,  he  stopped  when  he  should  have 
gone  on.     He  admitted  Gall*s  anatomy  of  the 


COMBE. 


699 


COULTHART. 


i; 


1841-2  made  such  exertions  to  master  the  Ger- 
mnii  language  as  seriously  affected  his  health,  and 
brought  on  an  illness  that  induced  the  abandon- 
ment of  the  attempt.  He  did,  however,  deliver 
one  coui'se  of  lectures  in  German  at  Heidelberg; 
and  though,  from  the  cause  referred  to,  his  jour- 
neys and  residence  on  the  continent  were  not,  gen- 
erally speaking,  immediately  devoted  to  the  spread 
of  his  philosophy,  the  knowledge  he  acquired  of 
the  leaders  and  of  the  course  of  public  opinion 
throughout  Europe  was  of  much  value,  and  was 
always  turned  to  good  account. 

The  latter  period  of  his  life  was  one  of  very  in- 
firm health,  the  result,  as  he  believed,  of  the  early 
adverse  influences  which  turned  his  own  and  his 
brother*s  attention  so  strongly  to  sanitary  sub- 
jects. He  died  14th  August,  1858,  at  his  friend 
Dr.  Lane^s  hydropathic  establishment  at  Moor 
Park,  Surrey,  and  was  interred  in  the  Dean  ceme- 
tery, Edinburgh. — His  principal  works  are : 

EflMjs  on  PhrenoIogT,  or  tat  Enquiry  into  the  Principles 
And  Utilitj  of  the  System  of  Dr.  Gall  snd  Sporsheim  into 
the  Objections  made  against  it.    Edin.  1819,  Svo. 

Elements  of  Phrenology.  Edin.  1824,  12mo.  The  same. 
7ch  edition.    Edin.  1885,  12mo. 

A  System  of  Phrenology.  Edin.  1825,  2  vols.  8vo.  Na- 
meroas  editions. 

'  Letter  to  Francis  Jeffrey  in  Answer  to  his  Criticism  on 
Phrenology,  contained  in  No.  88  of  Edinburgh  Review.  Ed- 
inburgh, 1826. 

Essay  on  the  Constitution  of  Man  and  its  Relation  to  Ex- 
ternal Objects.    Edin.  1827. 

Notes  in  Answer  to  Mr.  Soott*s  Remarks  on  Mr.  Combe*s 
Essay  on  the  Natund  Constitution  of  Man.    1827. 

The  Constitution  of  Man  in  Relation  to  External  Objects. 
Edin.  1827,  12mo.    Numerous  editions. 

What  should  Secular  Education  Embrace.    1828. 

Answer  to  *  ObserT.<itions  on  the  Phrenological  Develop- 
ment of  Burke,  Hare,  and  the  other  atrocious  murderers,  by 
Thomas  Stone.*    Edin.  1829. 

Letter  on  the  Prejudices  of  the  great  in  Science  and  Phi- 
losophy against  Phrenology,  addressed  to  the  Editor  of  the 
Edinburgh  Weekly  Journal.    Edin.  1829. 

Lectures  on  Phrenology,  with  Notes,  an  Introductory  Es- 
say, and  an  Historical  Sketch,  by  Andrew  Boardman.  Lon- 
don, 1839,  12mo. 

Lectures  on  Moral  Philosophy.    Boston,  1840, 12mo. 

Moral  Philosophy.    Edin.  1840,  12mo. 

Address  delivered  at  the  Anniversary  celebration  of  the 
birth  of  Spurzheim  and  the  Organization  of  the  Boston 
rhrenological  Society,  December  81,  1839.    Boston,  1840. 

Notes  on  the  United  States  of  North  America  during  a 
l*hrenological  Visit  in  1838-39-40.  Edinburgh,  1841,  3  vols. 
12mo. 

Notes  on  tlie  New  Reformation  in  Germany,  and  on  Na- 
tional Education  and  the  Common  Sclioob  of  Massocho- 
Mtts.     Edin.  1845. 

Thoughts  on  Capital  Punishment.     Kdin.  1847. 


Outlines  of  Phrenology.    Numerous  editions. 

The  Currency  Question  considered  in  relation  to  the  Bank 
Restriction  Act.    Pamphlet. 

Phrenological  Observations  on  tlie  Cerebral  development  of 
David  Haggart,  lately  executed  at  Edinbnigh  for  murder. 
Edin.  1821, 12mo. 

The  Suppressed  Documents,  or  an  Appeal  to  the  Publio 
against  the  Ccmductors  of  the  Scottish  Guardian*  Glasgow, 
1836,  8vo. 

Our  Rule  in  India.    Edin.  1838,  8vo. 

Remarks  on  National  Education.    Edin.  1847. 

Relation  between  Religion  and  Science.  2d  edition.  Ed- 
inburgh, 1847.  4th  edition,  called  PeopIe*s  Edition.  Edin. 
1856. 

Answer  to  the  Attack  on  the  Constitution  of  Man  con- 
tained in  *  Nature  and  Revelation  Harmonious,  by  the  Rev. 
C.  J.  Kennedy,  Paisley.'    Edin.  1848. 

Lectures  on  Popular  Education,  delivered  to  the  Edinburgh 
Philosophical  Association  in  April  and  Nov.  1833.  8d.  edit. 
Edin.  1848,  8vo. 

The  Life  and  Correspondence  of  Andrew  Combe,  M.D. 
Edin.  1850,  8vo. 

Secular  Education  Lecture  delivered  Nov.  25,  1851,  in 
Queen  Street  Hall,  Edinburgh.    Edin.  1851,  8vo. 

Secular  Instruction,  or  Extension  of  Church  Endowments. 
Letter  to  the  Duke  of  Argyle.    Edin.  1852,  8vo. 

Remarks  on  the  Principles  of  Criminal  Legislation,  and  the 
Practice  of  Prison  Discipline.    London,  1854,  8vo. 

Notes  on  a  Visit  to  Germany  in  1854.    Edin.  1854,  8vo. 

Phrenology  applied  to  Painting  and  Sculpture.  London, 
1855,  8vo. 

Refutations  Refuted.  A  Reply  to  pamphlets  put  forth  in 
answer  to  the  Currency  Question  considered.  Ix)ndon,  1856, 
8vo. 

On  Teaching  Physiology  and  its  Applications  in  Common 
Schools.    Edin.  1857,  8vo  pamphlet. 


CouLTHABT,  of  Coulthart  and  Collyn,  the  surname  and  de- 
signation of  an  ancient  family  in  Wigtownshire,  which  derive 
their  name  and  descent  from  Coulthartus,  a  Roman  lieuten- 
ant, who  fought  under  Julius  Agricola,  at  the  foot  of  the 
Gra/hpian  mountains,  when  that  victorious  genernl  was  op- 
posed by  the  confederated  forces  of  the  Scots,  Picts,  and 
Danes,  under  Corbredus  Galdus.  Peace  having  been  restored 
soon  after  that  decisive  engagement,  Coulthartus,  instead  of 
returning  to  Rome,  married  Marsa,  daughter  of  Kadalayne, 
chief  of  the  Novantes,  by  whom  he  acquired  large  territorial 
possessions  near  the  present  Whithorn,  in  the  county  of  Wig- 
town. Coulthartus,  who  was  versed  in  all  the  wisdom  and 
learning  of  the  Romans,  afterwards  lived  as  a  Caledonian 
chieftain,  and  died  tliere. 

Godofredus,  a  descendant  of  Coulthartus,  appears  to  have 
opposed  the  usurpations  of  Donald  Bane  and  Duncan,  and  to 
have  energetically  supported  the  restoration  of  the  legitimate 
ofbpring  of  Malcolm  to  the  throne.  Godofredus  was  present 
at  Scoon  when  Edgar  was  crowned  and  anointed,  but  dying 
at  Coulthart  in  the  succeeding  reign  of  Alexander,  was  buried 
with  great  pomp  and  solemnity  in  the  fmnily  mausoleum  at 
Candida  Casa.  By  his  wife,  Maud,  daughter  of  Stephen  de 
MauUa,  he  had,  with  2  daughters,  2  sons.  Sir  Radulphus,  his 
heir,  and  Amelick,  who  fought  at  Northallerton,  under  the 
eari  of  March,  against  Stephen,  king  of  England. 

The  elder  son.  Sir  Radulphus  de  Coulthart,  was  the  first  of 
the  family  on  record  that  used  the  territorial  designation  na 
A  surname,  and  the  first  lord  that  joined  the  Crusaders  in  an 
expedition  to  Palestine.    After  hiii  return  from  the   Holy 


DICK, 


705 


THOMAS,  LL.D. 


thcrc^s  lightning.''  Overcome  bj  tlie  remarkable 
phenomenon,  they  both  fell  to  the  ground,  and  it 
was  some  time  before  thcjr  could  recover  them- 
selves. From  that  day,  anxious  to  penetrate  the 
mysteries  of  astronomy  and  meteorology,  he  ea- 
gerly inquired  for  all  books  that  treated  of  such 
difficult  and  abstruse  subjects,  preferring  them  to 
every  other. 

His  father  intended  him  for  his  own  business, 
and  accordingly  set  him  to  the  loom.  In  conse- 
quence, he  received  but  a  limited  education.  A 
severe  aftnck  of  small-pox,  followed  by  measles, 
greatly  weakened  his  constitution,  and,  with  his 
desire  to  pursue  mental  investigations,  gave  him  a 
decided  distaste  to  any  mere  mechanical  employ- 
ment«  In  his  13th  yenr  he  was  enabled,  by  sav- 
ing his  pocket  money,  to  purchase  a  small  work 
on  astronomy,  entitled  *■  Martin's  Gentlemen's  and 
Ladies'  Philosophy,'  and  it  became  his  constant 
study,  even  while  plying  the  shuttle. 

To  enable  him  to  have  an  accurate  knowledge 
of  the  planets  described  in  the  book,  he  contrived 
a  machine  for  grinding  a  series  of  lenses  of  differ- 
ent foci,  for  simple  and  compound  microscopes ; 
and,  purchasing  from  the  old  women  in  the  neigh- 
bourhood of  his  father's  house,  all  their  spectacle 
glasses  for  which  they  had  no  nse,  by  the  help  of 
pasteboard  tubes,  he  constructed  for  himself  tele- 
scopes, and  began  to  make  observations  on  the 
heavenly  bodies.  His  parents  thought  his  pur- 
suits very  foolish,  and  frequently  expressed  tlieu* 
belief  that  he  would  never  make  his  bread  by  gaz- 
ing at  the  stars.  His  mother,  in  particular,  com- 
pared him  to  ^Uhe  folk  o'  whilk  the  prophet 
speaks,  wlia  weary  themselves  in  the  fire  for  very 
vanity."  They  had  the  wisdom,  however,  to  al- 
low the  youth  to  follow  his  own  inclination,  and 
at  the  age  of  sixteen  he  became  assistant  teacher 
in  one  of  the  schools  at  Dundee.  AVith  the  view 
of  going  to  college,  he  now  began  the  stndy  of 
Latin. 

In  1794,  being  then  twenty,  he  became  a  stu- 
dent in  the  university  of  Edinburgh,  supporting 
iiimsclf  by  private  teaching.  In  the  spring  of 
1795  he  was  appointed  teacher  to  the  Orphan's 
Hospital,  Edinburgh,  and  in  that  situation  he  con- 
tinned  for  two  years,  devoting  himself,  in  his 

l*>i8ure  hours,  to  the  study  of  the  scriptures,  and 
III. 


to  the  perusal  of  books  upon  theological  ci'iticism. 
In  November  1797,  he  was  appointed  teacher 
of  the  school  at  Dubbieside,  near  Leven  in  Fife. 
Thence  he  removed  to  a  school  at  the  Path  of 
Condie,  Perthshire.  Wliile  in  the  latter  place,  he 
began  to  contribute  to  various  publications,  essays 
on  the  subjects  most  congenial  to  his  mind  and 
studies.  In  November  1800,  he  was  invited  to 
resume  his  situation  as  teacher  in  the  Edinburgh 
Orphan's  Hospital,  and  in  the  following  year  he 
was  licensed  to  preach  in  the  Secession  church. 
He  officiated  for  se^ral  years  as  a  probationer  of 
that  church  in  different  parts  of  Scotland,  but  at 
last,  at  the  earnest  invitation  of  the  Rev.  J.  Ja- 
mieson  and  his  session,  he  became  teacher  of  a 
school  in  connexion  with  the  Secession  church  at 
Methven.  In  that  place  he  instituted  classes  for 
teaching  the  sciences,  established  a  people's  libra- 
ry, and  founded  what  may  be  termed  the  first 
Mechanic's  Institute  in  Great  Britain,  having  in 
the  London  Monthly  Magazine  proposed  the  esta- 
blishment of  these  institutions  six  years  before 
the  foundation  of  any  one  of  them  in  the  kingdom. 

After  being  ten  years  settled  in  Methven,  he 
removed  to  an  educational  establishment  at  Perth, 
where  he  remained  for  ten  years  more.  It  was 
while  residing  in  the  "  Fair  City,"  that  hq  wrote 
his  'Christian  Philosopher,'  published  in  1827, 
which  speedily  ran  through  several  editions,  each 
of  large  impression,  and  at  the  time  of  his  death 
was  in  its  eleventh.  The  success  of  this  work  in- 
duced him,  in  the  5Sd  year  of  his  age,  to  resign 
his  position  as  a  teacher,  and  to  retire  to  Broughty 
FeiTy,  near  Dundee,  where,  on  the  high  grounds 
overlooking  the  Tay,  he  had  bnilt  a  cottage,  in 
which  he  spent  the  remainder  of  his  days.  The 
little  plot  of  ground  around  his  dwelling  was  a 
barren,  irregular  spot,  where  nothing  would  grow, 
until  eight  thousand  wheelbarrow  loads  of  soil  had 
been  laid  upon  its  surface  by  the  learned  philoso- 
pher himself.  A  room  on  the  top  of  his  house, 
with  openings  to  the  four  cardinal  points,  was  fit- 
ted up  as  an  observatory,  and  in  this  was  placed 
his  philosophical  instraments,  which  were  both 
valuable  and  numerous. 

Ilis  taking  up  his  abode  in  such  an  elevated 

position  excited,  at  the  time,  the  wonderment  of 

the  country  people  around,  who  looked  with  awe 

2  Y 


FORBES, 


709 


OF  WIIITEIIAUGH. 


Walter,  the  2d  son,  in,  in  Wbitsundaj  of  that  year,  designated 
uf  Tulqoboun. 

Walter  Forbes  of  Tolquhon,  married,  before  16*26,  Jean 
Forbes,  sister  of  Alexander,  first  Lord  Pitsligo,  and  had  fbor 
sons  and  a  daughter.  In  a  letter,  dated  June  14,  1651,  said 
to  be  in  the  handwriting  of  Charles  II.,  the  king  forbids 
Huntlj  to  make  anj  levy  on  Tolquhon,  or  to  make  the  laird 
torn  out,  because  lie  is  paHt  sixty,  and  his  son,  Alexander,  is 
already  out,  and  commanding  a  regiment  of  foot  as  colonel, 
lie  died  in  1661. 

His  eldest  son,  Sir  Alexander  Forbes  of  Tolquhon,  married 
in  1649  Dame  Bathia  Murray,  daughter  of  the  laird  of  Black< 
barony,  and  relict  of  Sir  William  Forbes  of  Craigievar.  They 
had  no  children.  He  is  mentioned  at  vol.  ii.  p.  230,  as  one 
of  the  three  colonels  for  Aberdeenshire  in  the  Scottisli  army 
of  Charles  II.  'llie  hitter  part  of  his  Ufe  he  passed  at  Tol- 
quhon, and,  notwithstanding  the  fatigues  of  his  youth,  reached 
a  great  age.     He  died  in  1701-2.  * 

As  Sir  Alexander  bad  no  lawful  issue,  the  estate  passed  t» 
his  nephew,  William  Forbes,  son  of  Thomas  Forbes  of  Achry, 
advocate  in  Edinburgh,  by  his  wife,  I^dy  Henrietta  Entkine, 
daughter  of  James,  Lord  Anchterhouse,  2d  earl  of  Buchan,  of 
the  Erakine  family.    Thomas  died  in  1701. 

His  son,  William  Forbes  of  Tolquhon,  wa9  served  heir  in 
1704.  IMie  same  year,  his  mother.  Lady  Henrietta,  married 
Alexander  Abercromby,  and  they  applied  to  the  court  of  ses- 
sion for  an  aliment  for  her  from  the  estate  of  Tulquhon.  In 
1706,  he  married  Anne,  daughter  and  heuress  of  John  Leith 
of  Whitehnugh,  and  his  wife,  Elisabeth,  daughter  of  William. 
11th  I^rd  Forbes,  issue,  2  sons,  1.  William  Forbes,  vicar  of 
Thombury,  2.  John  Forbes  I^th  of  Whitehaugh,  and  a  daugh- 
ter, Henrietta.  He  did  not  enjoy  Tolquhon  estate  long.  In 
the  last  years  of  Sir  Alexander's  life,  it  had  been  overbur- 
dened, it  is  said,  by  designing  persons,  the  laird  being  in  his 
dotage.  The  same  individuals  now  procured  its  sale,  by 
order  of  the  court  of  session.  In  Nov.  1716,  it  was  purchased 
by  Lieutenant-colonel  Francis  Farqnhar,  from  whom  it  passed 
to  William,  earl  of  Aberdeen.  Tolquhon,  thinking  himself 
aggrieved  by  the  mimner  in  which  the  decision  was  obtained, 
refused  to  quit  the  house,  and  on  Sept.  5,  1718,  it  was  at- 
tacked by  a  body  of  military,  and  himself  wounded  and  taken 
prisoner.  He  afterwards  left  the  country,  but  returned  in 
January  1728,  and  lived  with  his  family  in  London.  He  died 
April  5,  the  same  year,  and  was  buried  in  Wetttminster  abbey. 

William  Forbes,  his  elder  son,  studied  at  Oxford,  for  the 
Church  of  England.  In  June  1736.  he  was  presented  by  his 
college  to  tlie  curacy  of  Binsay,  in  the  suburbs  of  Oxford.  In 
1748,  he  was  tnmslated  to  the  vicarage  of  Thombury,  Glou- 
cestershire, where  he  died  in  Sept  1761,  without  issue. 

Juhn  Forbes  Leith  of  Whitehaugh  became,  by  his  brother's 
de.ntli,  the  representative  of  the  family  of  Tolquhon. 

By  the  marriage  contract  betwixt  William  Forbes  of  Tul- 
quhon and  Anne  I^ith,  it  was  provided  that  the  2d  son  of 
that  marriage,  or,  failing  him,  the  next  younger,  and  so  on, 
should  be  heir  (to  his  mother)  of  the  estate  of  Whitehaugh, 
in  the  parish  of  Tullynessle,  on  condition  that  he  should 
assume  the  surname  of  Ijtith,  and  the  arms  of  Whitehaugh. 
In  1719,  John  l^ith  of  Whitehaugh  made  a  disposition  in 
favour  of  his  only  daughter,  Anne  Leith,  Mrs.  Forbes  of  Tol- 
quhon, who  was  afterwanis  desi>;nated  Lady  Tolquhon  and 
Whitehaugh.  He  died  before  June  1722,  when  John  Furbes 
I^ith  appears  to  have  been  a  minor.  Anne  I<eith,  his  mo- 
ther, died  Nov.  11,  1738,  and  was  buried  in  WestiiiiuMter 
abbey.  In  1739,  John  Forbes  I.eith  received  a  charter  of  his 
lands  under  the  great  seal.  **  He  had  received,**  says  the 
New  Statuiieal  Account  of  Scotland  (vol.  xiL  p.  417),  **  a  uni- 


versity education  at  Oxford,  and  resided,  chiefly  in  England, 
until  about  the  year  1735,  when  he  came  to  reside  upon  his 
property.  A  mansion  house  nearly  in  ruins,  and  a  tenantry, 
not  only  ignorant  of  the  improved  modes  of  agriculture,  but 
wedded  to  old  practices,  must  have  been  considerable  discour- 
agements to  an  Oxonian,  and  a  gentleman  accustomed  to  the 
comforts  of  a  more  advanced  state  of  civilization ;  but  in  place 
of  flying  from,  he  determined  to  remove  them,  and  lived  to 
enjoy  the  fruits  of  his  resolution  in  a  comfortable  mansion, 
with  suitable  garden,  a  well-improved  personal  farm,  several 
hundred  acres  of  thriving  wood,  and  an  increased  and  increas- 
ing rent-roll.  His  son  and  successor  more  than  followed  up 
the  example  which  had  been  set  him.  He  took  under  his 
own  management  a  large  portion  of  the  estate,  which  had 
been  before  a  number  of  unproductive  possessions,  and  con- 
verted it  into  one  beautiful  fann  of  regular  fields,  tastefully 
laid  out,  and  fenced  with  hedgerows,  and  the  whole  sur- 
rounded with  thriving  wood.  His  attention  was  particulariy 
directed  to  the  improvement  of  the  breeds  of  cattle,  which,  in 
bis  time,  were  in  that  quarter  of  a  very  inferior  description ; 
and  at  a  very  considerable  expense  he  brought  from  a  dis- 
tance, and  was  the  means  of  introducing  amongst  his  ten- 
antry, and  throughout  the  district,  animals  of  a  much  better 
kind.  It  may  be  mentioned  that  a  considenible  portion  of 
the  estate  of  Whitehaugh  at  one  time  belonged  to  the  Knights 
Temphirs.  One  field  of  the  farm  is  called  Temple  Cloae,  and 
another  St.  John's  Close.  Although  the  Templars,  we  be- 
lieve, had  but  one  settlement  in  Scotland,  viz.,  the  hospital 
of  St.  Gennains  in  Ixithian,  they  enjoyed  the  funds  of  several 
churches  and  houses  in  various  parts  of  the  country."  He 
died  at  Edinburgh,  SepL  26,  1781.  He  had  married  Jean, 
eldest  daughter  of  Theodore  Morrison  of  Bogny,  and  had  3 
sons,  1.  William  Forbes  Leith  of  Whitehaugh.  borti  in  1749. 
2.  Theodore  Forbes  I^ith  of  Whitehaugh,  born  in  1751.  3. 
John  Leith,  who  died,  of  fever,  at  an  early  age. 

William  Forbes  l.eith  of  Whitehaugh,  the  eldest  son,  was 
educated  at  King's  college,  Aberdeen,  and  allerwards  studied 
civil  law.     He  died  in  the  spring  of  1806,  unmarried. 

He  was  succeeded  by  his  brother.  Dr.  Theodore  Forbes 
I^ith  of  Whitehaugh.  After  receiving  a  university  educa- 
tion, with  his  brother,  he  was  put  under  the  care  of  Dr.  Gre- 
gory of  Aberdeen,  to  study  medicine,  and  in  1765  he  became 
the  pupil  of  Dr.  CuUen  of  Edinburgh.  He  studied  at  the 
university  there,  and  obtained  the  degree  of  ]M.D.  in  1768. 
After  having  visited  France,  he  settled  in  Greenwich  as  a 
medical  practitioner.  He  was  a  man  of  great  personal  strength 
and  courage,  and  several  stories  are  told,  highly  honourable 
of  him,  of  his  exploits  when  attacked  by  highwaymen,  in  his 
journeys  between  Greenwich  and  I^ndon.  After  succeeding 
to  the  estate,  he  settled  at  Whitehaugh,  and  died,  in  August 
1819,  of  lockjaw,  following  upon  a  fracture  of  the  collar- 
bone, occasioned  by  an  accidental  upsetting  of  his  carriage. 
He  had  married  Marie  d'Arboine,  a  French  lady  of  ancient 
family,  and  by  her  had  3  sons  and  3  daughters. 

The  eldest  son,  Theodore  Forbes  Leilh,  born  in  1777,  died 
young. 

The  2d  son,  James  John  Forbes  Leith,  succeeded  lib  fa- 
ther in  Whitehaugh.  In  1798  he  went  out  to  India,  and 
joined  the  Company's  service  in  the  rank  of  lieutenant.  With 
the  exception  of  a  short  visit  to  Britain  in  1814-15,  he  con- 
tinued in  active  service  till  1826,  when  he  retired,  with  the 
rank  of  lieut.-col.,  having  been  present  at  the  talking  of  Digh, 
and  all  the  other  actions  in  which  his  regiment  was  engaged. 
On  Nov.  28,  1827,  he  married  Williamina  Helen,  only  child 
Lieut. -colonel  James  Stewart,  42d  Highlanders,  and  Wil- 
liamina Kerr,  his  wife.    Col.  Stewart  was  the  younger  son  of 


FORREST. 


710 


GARDNER. 


Charles  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Sbambelly,  in  the  stewartrj  of  Kirk- 
codbrigbt,  and  a  descendant  of  one  of  the  branches  of  the 
rojal  hoose  of  Stewart.  The  genealogical  tree  of  the  faimilj, 
in  possession  of  William  Stewart,  Esq.  of  Shambellj,  exhibits 
its  connexion  with  Robert  the  Bmoe,  in  a  direct  line.  In 
addition  to  family  liononrs  of  snch  a  rank.  Colonel  Stewart 
acquired  others  of  no  common  extent,  personal  to  himself. 
Daring  abont  thirtj  jears  of  active  military  sennce  in  Ame- 
rica, Holland,  Spain,  and  Egypt,  nnder  Sir  Ralph  Aberorom- 
bie.  Lord  Moira,  and  General  Sir  John  Moore,  he  was  present 
at  the  battles  of  Brandywine  and  Monmonth,  the  taking  of 
Philadelphia,  the  siege  of  Charlestown,  the  redaction  of  St. 
Lucia,  the  storming  of  SL  Vincent's,  the  attempt  on  Cadiz, 
the  redaction  of  ^linorca,  the  action  at  Aboakir,  Blarch  8, 
1800,  the  surrender  of  Cairo,  the  siege  of  Alexandria,  and 
numerous  smaller  actions;  and  was  repeatedly  seTerely 
wounded.  Colonel  and  Mrs.  Forbes  I^ith  had  5  sons  and  3 
daughters,  vis.,  1.  James,  bom  at  Edinburgh,  Dec  10,  1828, 
married,  without  issue.  2.  Williamina  Stewart,  bom  at 
Whitehangh,  Oct.  11,  1830.  3.  Helen  Maris,  bom  at  White- 
haugh,  Deo.  1,  1831,  married  in  Not.  1851,  R.  Hepburn, 
Esq.  of  Riccarton,  issue,  a  daughter.  4.  Rev.  William,  M.A., 
bora  April  9,  1833,  educated  at  Worcester  college,  Oxford,  a 
dergjrman  of  the  Church  of  England.  5.  Thomas  Augustus, 
bora  Aug.  25, 1834.  6.  Henry  Stewart,  bora  March  2, 1836. 
7.  Adelaide  Isabella,  bom  Nov.  7,  1837.  8.  Charles  Ed- 
ward, bom  Oct  18,  1839,  ensign  45th  regiment. 

FORREST,  Robert,  au  ingenious  self- taught 
sculptor,  bom  at  Carluke,  Lanarkshire,  in  1790, 
was  bred  a  stone-mason  in  the  quarries  of  Clydes- 
dale. His  first  public  work  was  the  statue  of  Sir 
William  Wallace,  which,  in  1817,  was  placed  in 
the  steeple  of  the  parish  church  at  Lanark.  His 
next  work  was  the  colossal  figm*c,  fourteen  feet 
high,  of  the  first  Viscount  Melville,  which,  in  1821, 
was  placed  on  the  elegant  pillar,  a  copy  of  Tra- 
jan*8  column  at  Rome,  in  the  centre  of  St.  Andrew 
Square,  Edinburgh.  The  height  of  the  column  is 
136  feet,  the  diameter  at  the  base,  12  feet.  Mr. 
Forrest  was  also  the  sculptor  of  the  well-known 
statue  of  John  Knox  in  the  Necropolis  of  Glasgow. 

In  1832,  Mr.  Forrest  opened  a  public  exhibition 
of  statuary  on  the  Calton  Hill,  Edinburgh,  with 
four  equestrian  statues,  under  the  patronage  of  the 
Royal  Association  of  Contributoi*s  to  the  National 
Monument  of  Scotland.  In  progress  of  time  the 
gallery  was  extended  to  about  thirty  groups,  all 
executed  by  the  indefatigable  sculptor  himself, 
and  the  statuaiy  soon  took  its  place  as  one  of  the 
most  popular  exhibitions  in  the  Scottish  metropo- 
lis. His  figures  all  display  i-cmarkable  boldness 
of  attitude,  great  accuracy  of  proportion,  and  mi- 
nute attention  to  detail.  Several  of  the  finest  of 
them  are  strikingly  original  in  design,  as  well  as 
show  great  skill  in  execution.    In  1843,  a  statue 


by  him,  of  the  Uien  recently  deceased  Mr.  Fer- 
guson of  Raitb,  was  erected  at  HaddlDgton,  ood- 
sldered  one  of  the  best  of  bis  works.  Mr.  Forrest 
died  at  Edinborgh,  Dec.  29, 1852,  in  his  6dd  year. 


6 


GARDNER,  Georob,  an  eminent  botanist, 
was  bom,  in  May  1810,  at  Ardentinny,  Ai^gjle- 
shire,  oa  the  west  side  of  Loch  Long,  where  his 
father,  a  native  of  Aberdeen,  was  gardener  to  the 
earl  of  Dunmore.  In  1816,  his  father  removed  to 
Ardrossan,  Ayrshire,  having  been  appointed  gar- 
dener there  to  the  earl  of  EgUnton.  He  received 
the  rudiments  of  his  education  at  the  parish  school 
of  that  place,  and  he  was  afterwards  placed  at  the 
grammar  school  of  Glasgow,  his  parents,  having 
gone  to  reside  in  that  city  in  1822.  After  study- 
ing for  the  medical  profession  in  the  Andersonian 
university  and  the  university  of  Glasgow,  he  ob- 
tained his  diploma  as  surgeon  from  the  faculty  of 
physicians  and  surgeons  of  that  city.  He  had 
early  shown  a  decided  taste  for  the  science  of  bo- 
tany, and  having  discovered,  in  one  of  his  botan- 
izing rambles  in  Stirlingshire,  the  rare  Ntiphar 
minima  or  pulima^  growing  in  the  lake  at  Mug- 
dock  castle,  he  was  introduced  to  Sir  William 
Jackson  Hooker,  then  the  distinguished  professor 
of  botany  in  the  university  of  Glasgow,  whose 
botanical  classes  he  subsequently  attended. 

In  1836  Mr.  Gardner  published  a  work  enti- 
tled *  Musci  Britannici,  or  Pocket  Herbarium  of 
British  Mosses,*  arranged  and  named  according  to 
Hooker's  'British  Flora.*  Tliis  work  was  ven' 
favourably  received,  and  a  copy  of  it  having 
reached  the  duke  of  Bedford,  he  became  a  liberal 
patron,  and  subscribed  fifty  pounds,  to  defray  the 
expense  of  Mr.  Gardner's  proceeding  to  North 
Brazil,  to  explore  the  botanical  riches  of  that  lux- 
uriant portion  of  South  America.  In  the  summer 
of  1836,  he  sailed  from  Liverpool,  and  arrived  at 
Rio  de  Janeiro  in  July.  He  immediately  began 
Ills  explorations,  and  in  the  course  of  his  investi- 
gations he  reached  as  far  north  as  the  province  of 
Goyaz,  making  frequent  excursions  to  the  Oi^u 


I 


J 


JOHNSTONE, 


713 


Mrs.  christian  ISOBEL. 


i.  p>i}!e  555,)  by  liis  2d  wife,  Anne,  dauf^liter  of  Sir  Williwm 
Coniwaliis.  When  very  joung  he  was  created  a  peer  of  Scot- 
land by  the  title  of  Baron  Kintyre,  to  himself  and  his  heirs 
male  and  assigns,  by  roynl  charter,  dated  Kebroary  IS,  1626. 
He  entered  the  militiuy  aerrice  of  Iavm  XUL  of  France, 
and  in  the  wars  of  that  monarch  with  Spain,  he  bad  the 
command  of  a  regiment.  On  his  return  to  Scotland,  he  was 
creiited  by  Charles  I.  earl  of  Ir^'ine  and  Baron  Londie,  by 
patent,  dated  at  York,  March  28,  1642,  to  him  and  the  lieirs 
male  of  his  body.  He  died  in  France  before  tlie  Restoration, 
without  issue,  whereby  his  titles  of  earl  of  Irvine  and  Baron 
Lundie  became  extinct 


k>^^»fc%«»»*^« 


JOHNSTONE,  Mrs.  Christian  Isobkl,  one 
of  the  most  esteemed  of  modern  female  novelets, 
was  born  in  Fifesliire  in  1781.  Very  early  in  Hfe 
she  married  a  Mr.  M^Leisb,  wliom  she  was  com- 
pelled to  divorce.  About  1812  she  married,  a 
ttecond  time,  Mr.  John  Johnstone,  then  school- 
master at  Dunfermline.  Tiiey  afterwards  re- 
moved to  Inverness,  where  Mr.  Johnstone  pur- 
chased the  Inverness  Courier,  of  which  lie  be- 
came editor.  Tlie  assistance  of  his  wife  aided 
materially  in  giving  to  that  paper  a  character 
and  a  tone  not  often  attained  by  a  provincial 
journal,  although  afterwards  ably  maintained  by 
a  succeeding  editor,  Mr.  Robert  Carruthers. 
While  at  Inverness,  Mrs.  Johnstone  wrote  *  Clan 
Albyn,  a  National  Tale,*  published  at  Edinburgh 
anonymously  in  1815. 

The  Inverness  Courier  being  sold,  Mr.  John- 
stone and  his  wife  removed  to  Edinburgh,  where 
Mr.  Blackwood,  publisher,  engaged  Mrs.  John- 
stone to  write  another  novel.  The  novel  referred 
to,  *  Elizabeth  De  Bruce,*  was  published  in  1827  in 
3  vols,  post  8vo.  It  was  decidedly  successful,  al- 
though not  to  the  extent  Mr.  Blackwood  expected, 
lie  had  printed  2,000  copies,  the  usual  impression 
of  a  three-volumed  novel  being  500.  Some  1,200 
or  1,400  were  sold  readily,  at  the  regular  price. 

The  copyright  of  the  Edinburgh  Weekly  Chro- 
nicle was  bought  by  Mr.  Blackwood  and  Mr. 
Johnstone,  the  latter  of  whom  had  opened  a 
printing-office  in  James*  Square.  Of  that  uews- 
piiper  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Johnstone  were  the  editors. 


Under  them  the  principles  of  the  pnpcr  were 
much  too  liberal  for  their  co  -  proprietor,  who 
belonged  to  the  old  Tory  parly,  and  the  con- 
nexion did  not  long  continue.  The  Chronicle 
was  subsequently  sold  by  the  Johnstones,  on  their 
undertaking  other  projects.  Amongst  these  was 
the  publication  of  ^Tlie  Schoolmaster,*  a  three- 
halfpenny  weekly  journal,  conducted  and  almost 
wholly  written  by  Mrs.  Johnstone.  This  was  one 
of  the  first  of  the  cheap  periodical  papers  publish- 
ed in  Edinburgh,  and  at  the  outset  was  tolerably 
successful ;  but  being  really  too  good,  grave,  and 
instractive  for  the  price,  readers  of  cheap  publica- 
tions not  being  then  so  numerous  as  they  after- 
wards became,  it  began  to  decline,  when  it  as- 
sumed a  monthly  form  as  *  Johnstone*s  Magazine,* 
published  at  eightpence.  That  periodical,  de- 
voted almost  entirely  to  literary  and  social  sub- 
jects, to  the  exclusion  of  purely  political  matters, 
was,  soon  after,  incorporated  with  ^  Tait*s  Maga- 
zine,* which  had  previously  become  a  shilling,  in- 
stead of  a  half-crown,  monthly.  Tliis  was  in  1834. 

Mrs.  Johnstone  had  been  a  writer  for  that 
mngazine  from  its  commencement,  and  a  consulting 
friend  of  Mr.  Tait.  She  now  formed  a  permanent 
connexion  with  it,  and  although  not,  strictly 
speaking,  the  editor,  she  had  entire  charge  of  the 
literary  department,  and  was  a  large  and  regular 
contributor.  She  was  to  Tait  what  Professor 
Wilson  was  to  Lhckwoad;  the  ostensible  always, 
and,  indeed,  the  real  editors  being  the  respective 
publishers. 

The  politics  of  ^  Tait*s  Magazine*  were  of  the  ex- 
treme liberal  school,  and  as  it  was  conducted 
with  much  ability  and  fearlessness,  it  rose  at 
once  into  a  large  curculation.  For  its  success  in 
the  shilling  form,  it  was  mainly  indebted  to  its 
elaborate  and  often  eloquent  reviews  of  books, 
for  a  long  period  almost  exclusively  written  by 
Mrs.  Johnstone. 

'The  Edinburgh  Tales,*  conducted  by  Mrs. 
Johnstone,  consisted  principally  of  her  admir- 
aible  tales  in  the  'Schoolmaster,*  'Johnstone's 
Magazine,*  and  'Tait's  Magazine,*  with  new  tales 
by  the  best  writers,  chiefly  female  authors.  Tlie 
proprietors  were  Mr.  Tait  and  Messrs.  Chapman 
and  Hall,  London.  The  work  was  issued  in  week- 
ly numbers  at  three  halfpence,  and  in  monthly 


JOHNSTONE, 


714 


mb8.  christian  isobel. 


I 


parts,  and  afterwards  in  volnmes.  By  the  end  of 
the  third  volume  all  Mrs.  Johnstone^s  tales  had 
appeared  in  it,  and  the  work  came  to  its  natural 
conclusion.  The  sale  of  the  early  numbers,  which 
more  particularly  contained  Mrs.  Johnstone's  sto- 
ries, was  very  large ;  above  30,000  copies.  In  the 
collected  form  the  work  had  also  a  considerable  sale. 

In  1846,  when  Mr.  Tait  retired  from  business, 
Tait*s  Magazine  was  sold,  after  which  period 
Mrs.  Johnstone  ceased  to  write.  She  was 
the  authoress  of  another  work  of  fiction,  be- 
sides those  mentioned,  which  was  very  popular, 
namely,  ^  Nights  of  the  Round  Table,'  a  sort  of 
punning  title,  Edinburgh,  1832,  8vo.  This  was 
considered  by  herself  the  most  attractive  of 
her  works  of  fiction.  The  most  popular  of  her 
works  was  one  on  a  very  practical  subject :  *  Tlie 
Ck>ok  and  Housewife's  Manual :  a  Practical  Sys- 
tem of  Modem  Domestic  Ck>okery  and  Family 
Management.  By  Mrs.  Margaret  Dodds,  of  the 
Cleikum  Inn,  St.  Ronans.*  Meg  Dodds'  direc- 
tions in  cookery  had  acquired  great  influence  in 
well-regulated  kitchens  before  it  became  known 
that  Mrs.  Johnstone  was  the  authoress.  This 
work  was  originally  written  at  Inverness,  chiefly, 
like  her  Clan  Albyn,  to  keep  the  Inverness  Cou- 
rier press  going.  Its  success  was  very  great.  It 
always  yielded  her  a  considerable  and  steady  in- 
come, and  is  still  in  high  favour.  In  1858  the  work, 
published  by  Oliver  and  Boyd,  Edinburgh,  had 
reached  its  tenth  edition. 

The  fame  of  Mrs.  Johnstone  will  chiefly  rest  on 
her  Talcs  and  her  Meg  Dodds'  Cookery.  As 
works  of  Action  her  stories  were  not  excelled  by 
those  of  any  of  her  contemporaries,  and  many  and 
gifted  were  the  tale  writers  of  her  day.  Eveiy 
one  of  her  tales  carries  a  grand  morni,  gently,  but 
irresistibly  enforced ;  a  power  possessed  only  by  a 
female  writer  of  genius  like  hers. 

In  private  life  Mrs.  Johnstone  bore  about  her 
as  little  as  possible  of  the  air  of  authorship,  and  is 
described  ns  having  been  truly  amiable  and  wor- 
thy in  all  relations.  Dc  Qnincey  speaks  of  her  as 
**  our  own  Mrs.  Johnstone,  the  Mrs.  Jameson  of 
Scotland,"  and  cites  her  along  with  '*  Joanna 
Bnillie,  Miss  Mitford,  and  other  women  of  admi- 
rable genius,"  ns  an  example  of  a  woman  "culti- 
vating the  profession  of  authorship,  with  abso- 


lutely no  sacrifice  or  lorn  of  fe 
**MrB.  Johnstone,**  he  oontinnes,  ^^bas  parsoed 
the  profession  of  literature,  the  noblest  of  profes- 
sions, and  the  only  one  open  to  both  sexes  afike, 
with  even  more  assiduity  (than  these  others)  aid 
as  a  daily  occupation ;  and,  I  haTe  erery  ressoa 
to  believe,  with  as  much  benefit  to  her  own  hap- 
piness as  to  the  instruction  and  amnsement  of  her 
readers;  for  the  petty  cares  of  aothorship  are 
agreeable,  and  its  serions  cares  are  ennobUDg.** 

Mrs.  Johnstone  died  at  Edlnbni^  2€th  August 
1857.  Her  husband  survived  her  hat  a  few 
months.  They  were  buried  in  the  Grange  ceme- 
tery, where  an  elegant  obelisk  was  erected  to 
their  memory,  bearing  the  following  inscription : 
"  Mrs.  Christian  Isobel  Johnstone,  Died  26  Au- 
gust 1857,  aged  76.  John  Johnstone,  Died  3  No- 
vember following,  aged  78.  A  memorial  of  literaiy 
excellence  and  private  wonh.    Erected  1858." 

As  a  writer,  Mrs.  Johnstone^s  style  was  re- 
markably clear  and  lucid,  and  she  possessed  a 
rich  imagination,  great  powers  of  description,  and 
diligent  observation.  Of  an  nnassnming  disposi- 
tion, she  shrank  from  anything  like  publicity  or 
conspicuousness.  It  was  always  with  diffi- 
culty that  her  mingled  modesty  and  pride,  both 
conspicuous  elements  of  her  character,  would 
allow  her  name  to  appear  on  her  wi-itings.  In 
this,  being  a  professional  writer,  she  was  undoubt- 
edly wrong,  as  her  literary  reputation,  to  some 
extent,  suflered  by  her  over-sensitive  feelings  in 
this  respect.  More  knowing  authors  who  live  by 
their  pen  generally  court  ever}'  opportunity  of 
having  their  names  before  the  public  and  bringing 
the  accumulated  fame  of  all  their  previous  works 
to  bear  upon  their  latest.  A  writer  in  Tail's 
Magazine,*  in  an  obituary  notice  of  her,  says : 
"  Her  manner  of  life  was  that  of  a  perfect  gentle- 
woman. Even  the  good  she  did  was  often  con- 
cealed from  those  for  whom  it  was  done.  Manv 
persons  came  to  occnpy  respectable  positions  in 
the  world  who  were  indebted  exclusively  to  her 
plans,  devised  without  solicitation,  and  untold 
when  they  were  successful.  Robert  Nicoll,  who 
has  been  called  the  second  Bums  of  Scotland,  was 
indebted  to  her  kindness  for  the  means  that  ren- 
dered his  genius  known,  and  placed  him  forn-ard 
on  the  road  through  life ;  a  road  to  be  so  short  for 


-I 


LANDSBOROUGH. 


715 


LOCKHART. 


him,  aud,  on  his  return  to  Scotland  in  broken 
health,  he  became  again,  with  bis  young  wife, 
the  gnest  of  the  same  lady.  While  dying  in  her 
house  be  revised,  we  believe,  his  last  sad  verses, 
*  Deatb  answers  many  prayers.*  ** 
Her  works  are : 

Clan  Albyn,  a  National  Tale.  Edinburgh,  1816.  Pub- 
lished anonjmooely. 

Elisabeth  de  Brace.    Edin.  1827,  8  vols. 

The  Schoolmaster.    Edited  bj  Mrs.  Johnstone. 

The  Edinbnry^h  Tales.    8  vols.    8d  edition.    Edin.  1846. 

lires  and  Voyages  of  Drake,  CaTondish,  and  Dampier, 
including  a  History  of  the  Buccaneers.  Edinburgh  Cabinet 
Library,  No.  6.     1881. 

NighU  of  the  Round  Table.    Edin.  1832,  8ro. 

The  Cook  and  Housewife's  Manual  A  Practical  System 
of  modern  Domestic  Cookery  and  Family  Management.  By 
Mrs.  Margaret  Dodds  of  the  Cleiknm  Inn,  St.  Ronans.  10th 
edition.    Edin.  1858. 

Diversions  of  Hollvcot    A  Book  for  children. 


<^^^^^MN^^^^^^^^^^^WWW^^VMVMMWMW^^»^^^^*^^***^^»*»^^^^^»^^^^i^^^^^»^**^»^^^^^ 


LANDSBOROUGH,  David,  D.D.,  a  poet  and 
naturalist,  was  bom  in  1782,  in  the  parish  of 
Daily,  in  the  north-east  verge  of  Kirkcudbright- 
shire, celebrated,  with  the  contiguous  mountain 
districts,  as  the  scene  of  not  a  few  eventful  occur- 
rences in  the  history  of  the  persecuted  Covenant- 
ers. Tliis,  too,  WAS  the  district  of  the  Grordons, 
knights  of  Loch  invar,  afterwards  viscounts  of 
Kenmure.  He  was  educated,  first,  at  the  parish 
school,  and  subsequently  at  Dumfries  academy, 
and  studied  at  the  university  of  Edinburgh  for  the 
ministrv  of  the  Established  Church  of  Scotland. 
While  a  student,  he  was  for  some  time  a  tutor  in 
the  family  of  Sir  WilHam  Miller,  a  lord  of  session, 
under  the  title  of  Lord  Glenlee.  Tliis  gentleman, 
whose  seat  of  Barskimming  is  in  Ayrshire,  while 
his  estate  of  Glenlee,  from  which  he  took  his  title, 
is  in  Galloway,  exerted  his  influence  on  his  be- 
half, and,  on  being  licensed  to  preach  the  gospel, 
Mr.  Lnndsborongh  became  assistant  in  the  Old 
Church  of  Ayr.  He  was  soon,  however,  present- 
ed to  the  parish  of  Stevenston,  in  the  same  coun- 
ty, and  was  ord.iined  in  1811. 

Being  one  of  what  was  called  *  the  evangelical* 
party  in  the  chnrcli,  at  the  disruption  in  1843,  he 
relinquished  his  charge,  and  became  minister  of  a 


congregation  at  Saltcoats  in  connection  with  the 
Free  church. 

Much  of  his  time,  when  not  occupied  in  tlie  du- 
ties of  the  ministry,  was  devoted  to  the  study  of 
natural  history,  in  the  different  departments  of 
botany  and  conchology.  In  the  latter  years  of 
his  life  the  algie,  or  seaweeds,  of  the  coasts  of 
Ayrshire  and  Arran  especially  engaged  his  atten- 
tion. He  published  several  works  which,  at  the 
time  of  their  appearance,  attracted  some  attention. 
His  first  work  was  entitled  ^  Arran,  a  Poem  in  6 
Cantos,'  Edinburgh,  1847,  16mo.  In  1852  ap- 
peared from  his  pen,  ^  Excursions  to  Arran,  Ailsa 
Craig,  and  the  two  Cumbraes,  with  I'eference  to 
the  natural  history  of  these  islands,'  Edinburgh, 
8vo.  He  also,  the  same  year,  published  a  ^  Pop- 
ular History  of  British  Zoophytes  and  Coralline,* 
London,  8vo.  He  was,  likewise,  the  author  of  a 
*  Popular  Histor}'  of  British  Seaweeds  ;*  also,  of  a 
little  volume  of  religious  biography,  entitled  ^  Ayr- 
shire Sketches.*  To  Dr.  Harvey's  ^Phycologica 
Britannica*  he  contributed  various  papers,  and 
that  gentleman  marked  his  sense  of  their  merits 
by  naming  an  alg»  after  him.  Dr.  Johnston,  au- 
thor of  'The  History  of  British  Zoophytes,*  in 
like  manner  gave  his  name  to  a  zoophyte,  and  a 
sheH  also  bears  the  name  of  LandtburgU. 

He  had  the  degree  of  doctor  in  divinity  from 
an  American  nnivei*sity.  He  died,  suddenly,  of 
cholera,  in  September  1854. 

LocKRABT  of  Clkohorn,  an  ancient  family  in  the  parish 
of  Lanark.  Allan  Lockliart  of  Clegborn  is  a  witness  in  the 
cliarters  of  James  II.  A  cliarter  was  granted  by  James  IV., 
to  Sir  Stephen  Lockhart  of  Cleghom,  of  the  lands  of  that 
name,  qum  prku  pertifuienmt  ad  predeees§oret.  His  son, 
Allan.  WHS  father  of  Alexander  Lockhart,  who  was  infeft  in 
the  bHrony  of  Cleghom  and  the  lands  of  Crugfoot  in  1583. 
Alexander's  son,  Allan  Lockhart,  was  seised  in  these  lands  in 
1582.  From  him  descended  Allan  Lockhhrt,  Esq.  ot  Cleghom, 
whose  onlj  diild,  Marianne,  married,  in  1792,  William  Eiliott, 
Esq.,  M.P.  for  Selkirkshire  from  1806  to  1830,  descended  frwni 
a  branch  of  the  family  of  Elliott  of  Stobbs  in  Roxburghshire. 
In  consequence  of  this  marriage  he  assumed  the  sumame  of 
Elliott,  and  died  in  1832.  With  2  daughters  he  had  5  sons, 
1.  John,  12th  light  dragoons,  killed  at  Waterloo.  2.  Allnn, 
who  succeeded.  8.  Walter,  Enst  India  Company*s  service, 
wlio  died,  without  issue,  in  1850.  4.  William,  mnjor,  ]Madras 
native  infantry,  married  Dora,  daughter  of  George  Clerk 
Craigie,  Esq.  of  Dumbnmie,  and  died  in  India  in  1855,  leav- 
ing  3  sons  and  2  daughters.    5.  Gilbert,  li.N.,  died  in  1825. 

Allan  Elliott  Lockhart,  Esq.  of  Cleghom  and  Borthwick- 
brae,  the  2d  son,  born  in  1803,  was  educated  in  the  univer- 
sity of  Edinbnrgli,  and  passed  advocate  in  1824.  In  1846  he 
WHi  elected  M.P.  for  Selkirkshire;  a  magistrate  and  deputy- 


LOW, 


717 


DAVID. 


fterveu,  ultbuugli  aonie  were  likewise  tnken  down  by  Mr. 
Chambers,  and  published  bj  him  in  a  collection  of  Scottish 
anecdotes  several  rears  ago.  Bnt  the  above  form  the  least 
of  the  late  bishop*a  claims  to  regret  and  remembrance.  A 
most  kind  and  noble  heart  gave  a  charm  to  his  daily  inter- 
course inexpressible  bj  words,  while  the  devotion  of  his 
ever}'  thought  to  the  cause  of  religion  and  the  special  interests 
of  tlie  Episcopal  church  of  Scotland,  gave  a  consistent  dig- 
nity, amounting  to  grandeur,  to  his  whole  life  and  convers.i- 
tion." 

He  died  Jaiinar}*  26,  1855,  in  liis  88tli  year. 
Among  his  other  public  benefactions  he  left  £1,200 
to  St.  Jolin^s  chapel,  Pittenweem,  which  was  laid 
oat  in  the  parchase  of  lands,  now  yielding  abont 
£60  of  free  yearly  rent.  A  memoir  of  Bishop 
I^w,  by  the  Rev.  W.  Blatch,  was  published  at 
Tendon,  in  1  vol.  12mo,  in  1855.  A  smaller  Bio- 
graphical Sketch  by  Matthew  Foster  ConoUy, 
town-clerk  of  Anstrnther,  formerly  agent  and 
churchwarden  of  the  bishop,  appeared  at  Edin- 
burgh in  1859. 

LOW,  David,  an  eminent  professor  of  agii- 
culture,  was  the  eldest  son  of  Alexander  Low  of 
Laws,  Berwickshire,  a  gentleman  extensively  em- 
ployed in  the  management  of  landed  property, 
both  as  a  general  adviser  and  a  land  agent.  The 
subject  of  this  notice,  bom  in  1786,  was  educated 
at  Perth  academy,  and  stndied  at  the  university 
of  Edinburgh.  Close  application  to  his  studies 
affected  his  health,  which  led  to  his  spending  one 
winter  in  Portugal,  as  he  afterwards  did  a  second 
season  in  Italy.  On  his  retnm  to  Scotland  he  as- 
sisted his  father,  who  occupied  extensive  farms  in 
Berwickshire,  in  the  duties  of  his  profession  and 
the  general  management  of  his  land.  He  showed 
great  facilities  for  business,  and  a  special  aptitude 
for  the  profession  of  a  land  agent  and  valuator. 

In  1817  Mr.  I^w  first  appeared  as  an  author. 
The  termination  of  the  war  with  France,  two 
years  before,  had  produced  a  sudden  and  great 
lowering  of  prices  of  farm  produce  throughout  the 
country,  and  created  a  serious  embaiTassment 
among  the  farmers  generally.  In  these  circum- 
stances Mr.  Low  published  a  work  entitled  *  Ob- 
servations on  the  present  state  of  Landed  Pro- 
perty, and  on  the  Prospects  of  the  Landholder 
and  the  Fanner,'  which  was  written  with  the  view 
of  **  impressing  upon  the  attention  of  the  landed 
gentlemen  the  good  policy  of  endeavouring  to 
preserve,  as  far  as  a  lenient  exaction  of  rents  could 


effect  the  object,  those  funds  of  the  tenants  which 
were  destined  to  cultivation  and  the  business  of 
the  farm.'' 

Abont  1825  Mr.  Low  removed  to  Edinburgh, 
where  he  afterwards  permanently  resided.  In 
1826  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  Agriculture  was 
commenced,  mainly  at  his  snggestion.  The  first 
nunAber  contains  two  articles  from  his  pen,  and 
the  first  volume  no  fewer  than  sixteen.  In  1828 
he  became  editor  of  the  Journal.  Much  of  the 
high  character  to  which  that  periodical  attained 
was  due  to  the  value  of  his  own  communications, 
and  the  general  ability  with  which  it  was  con- 
ducted. In  1831  he  was  appointed  successor  to 
Mr.  Coventry  as  professor  of  agriculture  in  the 
university  of  Edinburgh.  In  1882  he  was  suc- 
ceeded in  the  editorship  of  the  Quarterly  Journal 
of  Agriculture  by  Mr.  MacGillvray. 

Soon  after  his  appointment  to  the  chair  of  agri- 
culture, Mr.  Low  directed  his  attention  to  the 
formation  of  a  museum  to  illustrate  his  lectures. 
He  presented  a  memorial  to  the  Board  of  Trustees 
for  the  Encouragement  of  Manufactures  in  Scot- 
land, pointing  out  the  advantages  which  would  re- 
sult from  the  establishment  of  an  agricultural 
museum,  accessible  to  farmers  and  others  inter- 
ested in  rural  economy,  and  expressing  the  hope 
that  the  Board  would  **8ee  fit  to  assign  a  sum 
sufficient  for  the  purpose  of  forming  an  agricultural 
museum  in  Edinburgh."  The  Board,  however, 
did  not  consider  the  object  to  fall  within  their 
sphere,  and  Mr.  Ix>w,  in  consequence,  applied  to 
the  government,  during  the  time  that  Ix)rd  Vis- 
count Althorp  was  the  chancellor  of  the  exchequer. 
The  answer  returned  was  favourable.  The  com- 
munication, dated  December  17,  1883,  was  signed 
by  Mr.  Spring  Bice,  afterwards  Lord  Monteagle. 
It  stated  that  the  Ix>rds  Commissioners  of  the 
Treasury,  **  being  prepared  to  acknowledge  the 
utility  of  such  an  establishment,  by  which  the 
science  of  agriculture  may  be  advanced  by  pro- 
moting the  study  of  it,  with  all  the  aid  of  illustra- 
tion and  experiment,  and  especially  in  connexion 
with  the  science  of  chemistry,  they  have  resolved 
to  recommend  to  his  majesty  that  an  annual  issue 
of  £300  should  be  made  for  the  purpose,  for  five 
successive  years,  out  of  the  funds  of  the  trustees 
for  improving  fisheries  and  manufactures  in  Scot- 


M^DIARMID, 


720 


JOHN. 


I 


whom  Coll  WM8  a  favonrite  ChriitUn  name.  Tlie  IriHh  hit- 
t<nians  infann  ns  that,  on  St  Patrick's  dajr,  1501,  there  was 
fought  a  battle  between  the  O'Keilb  and  certain  Scots,  in 
which  the  latter  hwt  a  son  of  the  laird  of  Aig,  of  the  familj 
of  tlie  Macdonnelln,  the  three  sons  of  CoU  Mac  Alexander, 
and  about  sixty  common  soldiers.  The  most  famoos  person- 
»f^  so  named  was  Sir  Allaster  MacColI  Macdonald,  com- 
monly called  C«»ll  Coitncli,  or  the  left-handed,  or  Kolkittoch, 
lieutenant-general  to  the  great  marqnis  of  Montrose  (see  toI. 
ii.  p.  720).  He  was  of  the  Blacdonalds  of  Colonsaj,  whence 
his  father  had  been  expelled  by  the  Campbells,  and  settled  in 
the  connty  of  Antrim,  in  the  province  of  Ulster. 

Tlie  Mu^>>lhi  bare  the  same  badge  as  the  Macdonnlds,  the 
French  gorm  or  common  heather.  The  latter  great  clan  are 
of  the  race  of  Conn,  a  celebrated  Irish  king,  called  Conn  of 
the  hundred  battles,  hence  they  are  called  MacConneK  or 
Macdonell,  and  tlie  name  MacCoU  may  be  but  a  corruption 
of  the  former  word. 

like  many  of  the  smaller  septs  who  had  settled  in  or  near 
the  territories  of  the  Campbells,  the  MacColls  were  merged 
in  that  great  race,  and  had  scarcely  an  independent  hvatorj 
of  their  own.  They  were  among  the  clans  who  were  arrayed 
against  the  cUn  Gregor,  who  called  to  thdr  aid  their  distant 
friends,  the  Macphersons.  Fifty  of  the  latter  at  once  has- 
tened to  their  asBiatance,  but  on  reaching  BInir  Athol,  were 
informed  of  the  battle  of  Glenfruln,  in  which  the  Macgregors 
were  victorious.  They  accordingly  retraced  their  steps  to 
their  own  country,  and  in  passing  the  dreary  ridge  of  Drum 
Uaclid.-ir,  they  encountered  a  large  body  of  the  MacColla  re- 
turning with  a  cretu^  or  spoil,  of  cattle  from  Roes  or  Suth- 
eriand.  A  sanguinary  battle  took  place  on  the  side  of  Loch 
Garry,  in  which  the  Macpliersons  were  the  conquerors,  with 
trifling  loss,  and  the  MacCoIls  suffered  severely,  their  leader 
and  most  of  their  men  being  killed.  One  of  them,  named 
Angus  MncCi>li,  di.«played  great  strength  and  dexterity,  and 
on  the  defeat  of  his  clan,  is  said,  while  engaged  in  a  hand  to 
hand  coinb:it  with  a  Macpherson,  to  have  saved  himself  by 
leaping  backward  across  a  chnsm  so  wide  that  even  to  at- 
tempt it  by  a  forward  leap  wafl  a  hazardous  venture. 

This  clan  has  produced  a  poet,  whose  Gaelic  piecea  rank 
very  high  in  the  Highlands;  Kvan  M*Coll,  bom  at  Kenmore 
on  I^fh  Fyne  side  in  1812.  At  a  very  early  nge  he  di»- 
pl.-iyed  nn  irresistible  thirst  for  legendary  lore  and  Gaelic 
poetry,  and  when  he  had  reached  his  teens,  his  father,  Dugald 
M'Coll.  engagt>d  a  tutor  fur  him,  who  not  only  taught  him 
properly  to  read  and  understand  English,  but  also  awakened 
in  him  a  taste  for  English  literature.  In  the  year  1837  he 
appeared  an  a  contributor  to  the  Gaelic  Magazine,  then  pub- 
litfhed  in  Glasgow.  His  contributions  were  afterwards  col- 
lecteil  and  publislied  in  a  separate  volume,  entitled  CUirgach 
nam  Ikann,  or  the  *  Mountain  ILirp.*  Through  the  influence 
of  Mr.  Fletcher  of  Dunnns  and  Mr.  Campbell  of  Islay,  M'Coll 
was  Ruh.spqnently  appointed  to  a  situation  in  the  customs  at 
IJverpooi. 

M'DIARMID,  John,  an  accomplished  journal- 
ist and  popular  writer,  the  son  of  the  Rev.  Ilitgli 
M*Diarmid,  minister  of  the  Gaelic  churcli,  Glas- 
j;ow,  was  born,  it  is  said,  in  Edinbnrgb  in  1790. 
He  received  a  fair  education  at  Edinburgh,  and 
became  a  clerk  in  a  counting-house  in  tbat  city, 
connected  with  a  bleaclifield  at  Roslin.  He  next 
procured  a  situation  in  the  bead  office  of  the  Com- 


mercial bftok,  wbere  he  rose  to  s  responsible  pooi- 
tion,  which  be  retained  for  several  years.  Doring 
this  time  he  attended  snch  classes  in  the  nnlversit  j 
as  were  accessible  to  his  leisure  hours,  and  pDrsned 
a  coarse  of  instructive  reading  with  great  diligence. 
In  the  evenings  he  acted  as  amanuensis  for  two 
years  to  Professor  Playfahr,  with  so  mneli  satis- 
faction to  the  latter  tbat  the  advantages  of  his 
classes  and  his  Hbraiy  were  offered  to  him  and 
eagerly  accepted. 

Mr.  M*DiannId  became  a  member  of  one  of  the 
college  debating  societies,  and  the  **  Edinburgh  Fo- 
rum,** a  society  which  held  its  meetings  in  public, 
and  of  which  be  became  one  of  the  leading  speakers. 
Previous  to  1817,  be  had  contribnted  to  the  lead- 
ing magazines  of  tbat  day,  many  fugitive  pieces 
both  in  prose  and  verse.    In  1815,  when  Edin- 
burgh was  illnminated  in  bononr  of  the  victory  of 
Waterloo,  a  triplet,  written  by  liim,  was  exhibit- 
ed, in  letters  of  fire,  over  the  door  of  a  publishing 
house  in  tbat  city,  and  acquired  for  the  author  no 
small  degree  of  local  fame.    The  same  year,  at 
the  request  of  a  fellow-clerk,  some  spirited  lines, 
on  the  Battle  of  Waterloo,  were  written  for  the 
occasion  of  laying  the  foundation-stone  of  the 
Waterloo  monument  at  Newabbey,  near  Dum- 
fries, tlie  first  memorial  of  the  great  battle  erected 
in  the  kingdom.    The  Waterloo  lines  having  at- 
tracted  attention,   his  services  were  sought  by 
several  of  the  leading  publishers  in  E<linburgh, 
though  he  still  retained  bis  post  in  the  bank. 

*'Mr.  M'Diarmid*s  literary  pursuits,"  says  the 
memoir  of  him  written  by  bis  son,  "  were  now 
becoming  of  some  value  to  bini,  in  a  monetary 
point  of  view.  In  1816,  be  one  day  received  for 
publications  compiled  for  Messi-s.  Oliver  &  Boyd, 
the  sum  of  fifty  pounds,  and  an  anecdote  we  can 
give  as  to  its  disposal  will  show  that,  along  with 
independence  of  mind,  generosity  of  nature  enter- 
ed largely  into  the  composition  of  his  character. 
He  bad  just  left  his  publishers^  office,  highly  elat- 
ed with  the  possession  of  so  much  money,  when 
he  encountered  a  brother  poet,  whose  muse, 
though  better  known  to  fame  than  his  own,  failed, 
as  is  frequently  the  habit  of  the  muse,  to  supply 
its  possessor  with  the  comforts  of  life.  A  tale  of 
distress  was  told,  and  ere  Mr.  M*Diarmid's  first 
prize  in  the  walk  of  literature  had  continued  for 


■;l 


I , 


■~J 


M'DIARMID, 


721 


JOHN. 


liftlf-aii-hour  in  liis  pocket,  it  was  transferred  en- 
tire to  that  of  his  more  needy  friend,  a  destination 
whence  it  never  retumcd." 

In  the  end  of  that  year  (1816)  he  formed  one 
of  a  trio  who  liad  resolved  to  set  on  foot  a  new 
weekly  journal  in  Edinburgh,  the  other  two  being 
Mr.  Charles  Maclaren  and  Mr.  William  Ritchie. 
Tlie  project  resulted  in  the  establishment  of  the 
Scotsman,  the  first  number  of  which  appeared  on 
the  25th  January  1817.  He  retained  for  many 
years  his  share  in  the  copyright,  but  the  manage-  * 
ment  devolved  entirely  on  his  two  friends.  In 
January  1817,  Mr.  M^Diarmid  left  Edinburgh  to 
assume  the  editorship  of  the  Dumfries  and  GaUo- 
way  Courier^  which  had  been  establishedin  1809,  by 
the  Rev.  Dr.  Henry  Duncan,  minister  of  Ruthwell, 
and  had  been  edited  by  him  up  to  the  period  when 
Mr.  M*Diarmid  joined  it.  That  paper  professed 
no  party  politics,  though  leaning  to  liberal  views ; 
and  was  used  mainly  for  promoting  the  benevo- 
lent schemes  of  its  editor;  amongst  which  his 
project  for  establishing  Savings  Banks,  first  made 
to  the  world  through  its  columns  in  1810,  will  for 
ever  reflect  lustre  on  the  author  and  his  newspaper. 

The  talent,  intelligence,  taste,  and  industry 
which  Mr.  M*Diarmid  brought  to  his  editorial  la- 
bours, soon  showed  that  he  was  admirably  quali- 
fied for  the  position  which  he  had  now  assumed. 
Interesting  himself  in  agricultural  matters  and 
agricultural  improvement,  his  weekly  article  on 
rural  aff'airs  became  remarkable  for  variety  of  de- 
tail, and  for  the  attractive  foims  in  which  that 
detail  was  presented  to  his  readers.  In  this  de- 
partment he  opened  up  a  new  branch  of  journal- 
ism, one  at  that  time  quite  unheeded,  but  which 
now  forms  a  most  important  feature  in  both  the 
provincial  and  metropolitan  press. 

In  1820,  Mr.  M'Diai-mid  was  offiered  the  edi- 
toi*ship  of  the  Caledonian  Mercury^  the  oldest 
established  newspaper  in  Scotland.  The  liberal 
party  in  Dumfries,  however,  were  unwilling  to 
lose  his  services,  and  by  the  intervention  of  Mr. 
William  Gordon,  writer  in  that  town,  a  new  ar- 
rangement was  made,  by  which  he  and  Mr. 
M'Diarmid  became  jointly  interested  with  Dr. 
Duncan  in  the  property  of  the  Courier.  This 
partnership  continned  till  1837,  when  Mr.  M^Diar- 

niid  became  solo  proprietor  of  the  copyright.    In 
III. 


1843,  he  admitted  his  eldest  son,  Mr.  William 
Ritchie  M'Diarmid,  to  a  partnership  and  share  m 
the  editorial  duties  of  the  newspaper,  and  ap- 
pointed him  also  to  be  his  successor. 

In  1832,  Mr.  M*Diarmid  acted  as  secretary  to 
the  Dumfries  relief  fund,  when  that  town  was  first 
visited  by  the  Asiatic  cholera,  and  he  ever  took 
an  active  part  in  all  the  local  charities  of  Dum- 
fries, lie  was  a  firm  and  strenuous  supporter  of 
all  the  liberal  measures  brought  forward  during 
his  editorial  career,  such  as  the  repeal  of  the  Test 
and  Corporation  Acts,  carried  in  1820;  Roman 
Catholic  Emancipation,  in  1829;  the  Reform  Bill, 
in  1832 ;  and  Free  Trade,  in  1848. 

In  1817,  he  published  an  edition  of  Cowper's 
Poems,  prefaced  by  a  life  of  the  poet.  This  book 
became  very  popular,  and  reached  several  edi- 
tions. In  1820  the  first  volume  of  the  *  Scrap 
Book^  appeared — a  book  of  selections  and  original 
contributions  in  prose  and  verse — which  met  with 
a  still  more  extended  circulation  and  fame.  A 
second  volume  was  soon  required,  and  many  suc- 
cessive editions  of  both  were  afterwards  publishe<l. 
In  1825,  Mr.  M^Diarmid  started  the  Dumfries 
Magazine,  chiefly  with  a  view  to  afibrd  scope 
for  local  literary  talent.  Tliis  periodical  lasted 
for  three  years.  In  1823,  an  edition  of  Gold- 
smith's Vicar  of  AVakefield,  with  a  memoir  of 
the  author  by  Mr.  M^Diarmid,  was  published  at 
Edinburgh,  and  in  1830  he  printed  and  published 
in  Dumfries  his  *  Sketches  from  Nature,'  chiefly  a 
selection  from  the  pages  of  the  Courier,  and 
abounding  in  interesting  de<9criptions  of  scenery 
and  character  pertaining  to  the  district.  He  also 
contributed  to  the  *  Picture  of  Dumfries,'  an  illus- 
trated work  published  in  1832,  a  graphic  account 
of  the  ancient  burgh  and  its  locality ;  and  some 
minor  works,  such  as  a  description  of  Mofiat,  and 
a  life  of  William  Nicholson,  the  Galloway  poet, 
were  thrown  off  in  the  intervals  of  his  leisure. 

It  was  as  a  journalist,  however,  that  Mr.  M*- 
Diarmid  particularly  excelled.  His  extensive  and 
minute  acquaintance  with  agriculture,  his  bound- 
less store  of  curious  and  amusing  gossip  relating 
to  rural  affairs,  and  even  that  honest  love  of  the 
marvellous  with  which  he  was  frequently  charged, 
all  contributed  to  render  his  name  and  his  news- 
paper popular.    A  good  story,  a  romantic  Inci- 

2z 


MACKEXZIK. 


725 


M^KIRDY. 


there,  it  was  determined  to  abandou  the  fort  in 
the  course  of  the  following  spring,  and  return  across 
the  Rocky  mountains.  In  the  meantime  Macken- 
zie went  back  to  Shahaptan,  to  remove  his  goods 
from  thence,  and  bnj  horses  and  provisions  with 
them  for  the  caravan,  across  the  mountains.  He 
was  accompanied  by  two  of  the  clerks,  Mr.  John 
Reed,  an  Irishman,  and  Mr.  Alfred  Seton  of  New 
York.  On  their  arrival  they  found  that  the  post 
had  been  rifled  by  the  Indians,  and  the  goods 
carried  off.  Mackenzie  was  fortunate  enough  to 
recover  part  of  the  stolen  property.  He  then  re- 
turned to  Astoria,  where  he  arrived,  with  the 
other  partnei-s,  on  the  12tli  of  June. 

After  another  consultation,  it  was  resolved,  as 
two  of  the  most  influential  of  the  partners  disap- 
proved of  the  design  to  break  up  and  depart  from 
Astoria,  that  Mi*.  M'Dougal  should  continue  to 
hold  it,  with  forty  men,  and  that  Mr.  Mackenzie, 
with  four  hunters  and  eight  common  men,  should 
winter  in  the  abundant  country  of  Wollamut, 
whence  he  might  be  enabled  to  furnish  a  constant 
supply  of  provisions  to  Astoria. 

On  the  expected  an-ival  of  the  frigate  Phoebe 
and  Isaac  Tod,  British  iships,  Mr.  M'Dougal,  on 
the  16th  October,  entered  into  an  agi-eement  with 
Mr.  M'Tavish,  of  the  North-west  Company,  to 
sell  him,  on  their  account,  the  whole  stock  of  furs 
and  merchandise  of  all  kinds,  in  the  country,  be- 
longing to  the  Company  of  which  Mr.  Astor  was 
the  head.  On  the  morning  of  the  30th  Novem- 
ber, the  British  sloop  of  war  Racoon,  of  twenty- 
six  guns  and  120  men,  anchored  in  Baker's  Bay, 
near  the  fort,  and  its  commander,  Captain  Black, 
took  possession  of  the  place,  on  the  part  of  Gi-eat 
Britain,  and  changed  the  name  to  Fort  George. 
At  the  close  of  the  war  in  1814,  in  co;ifoi'mity  to 
the  treaty  of  Ghent,  the  settlement  was  restored 
to  the  United  States,  but  the  property,  business 
and  ports,  remained  in  the  hands  of  the  North- 
west company,  under  the  above-mentioned  act  of 
sale  by  Mr.  M^Dougal.  On  the  4th  April  follow- 
ing, Mr.  Mackenzie,  with  two  of  the  partnera  and 
such  of  the  persons  employed  at  Astoria  as  had 
not  entered  Into  the  service  of  the  North-west 
Company,  set  out  for  New  York,  across  the  Rocky 
roonntains.  He  had  converted  everything  he 
oonld  into  available  funds,  which  he  conveyed. 


tlirongh  an  extensive  wilderness,  to  Mr.  Astor, 
and  his  friends  asserted  that  to  Mr.  Mackenzie 
alone  was  tliat  gentleman  indebted  for  all  that 
w^as  saved  from  the  ruin  caused  by  the  agreement 
entered  into  by  Mr.  M^Dongal  with  Mr.  M'Tavish. 
The  trade  in  peltries  was  forthwith  engrossed  by 
the  North-west  Company. 

Mr.  Mackenzie  subsequentl}'  exerted  himself  to 
secure  for  the  United  States  the  exclusive  trade 
of  Oregon,  but  after  a  long  negotiation  with  Mr. 
Astor,  and,  through  him,  with  Messrs.  Madison, 
Gallatin,  and  other  leading  individuals  in  and  out 
of  office,  the  matter  was  abandoned,  and  on  the 
merging  of  the  North-west  Company  in  the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company  in  March  1821,  Mr.  Mac- 
kenzie joined  the  latter.  He  was  Immediately 
appointed  one  of  the  conncil  and  chief  factor. 
^^From  that  time,''  says  Mr.  Irving,  "the  Hud- 
son's Bay  Company  enjoyed  a  monopoly  of  the 
Indian  trade  from  the  coast  of  the  Pacific  to  the 
Rocky  mountains,  and  for  a  considerable  extent 
north  and  south.  They  removed  their  emporium 
from  Astoria  to  Fort  Vancouver,  a  strong  post  on 
the  left  bank  of  the  Columbia  river,  about  sixty 
miles  from  its  mouth ;  whence  they  furnished  their 
interior  posts,  and  sent  forth  their  brigades  of 
trappers." 

In  August  1825«  Mr.  Mackenzie  married  a  lady 
of  the  name  of  Adelegonde  Humbert,  and  shortly 
after  he  was  appointed  governor  of  the  Company. 
At  this  time  he  resided  at  Fort  Garry,  Red  River 
settlement,  where  he  remained  till  1832,  in  active 
and  prosperous  business.  At  length,  having 
amassed  a  large  fortune,  in  August  1833  he  went 
to  reside  in  Mayville,  Chautauque  county,  where 
he  spent  the  remainder  of  his  days.  He  died 
January  20,  1851,  leaving  a  widow  and  fourteen 
children.    One  of  the  latter  was  by  a  former  wife. 

M'KiKDT,  formcrlj  Mackukkrdt,  or  Makwrkrdy,  an 
ancient  aurname  in  Bute,  Arran,  and  othem  of  tlie  Wtatern 
Ittlunds,  and  derired  from  tbeir  original  inhabiunts. 

At  a  rery  earlj  period  the  larger  portion  of  the  isUnd  of 
Bute  belonged  to  tbe  Mnckurerdys,  wbidi  waa  leased  to  tkeui 
by  James  IV.  in  1489,  and  in  1506  feued  as  crown  hmda,  in 
one  general  charter  of  the  SOth  parliament.  The  charter 
showa  that  there  were  a  total  of  78  feuarti,  and  of  these 
12  were  Mackurerdvs,  U  Bunnachtynes,  and  10  Stewarts. 
This  charter  is  curious,  as  showing  many  remarkable  Scot- 
tish surnames.' 

The  properties  in  Bute  fened  to  tlie  Blackurerdys,  with 
I  others,  priucipallr  descended  to  Kobert  &Iackurerdy,  baron  of 


MERCER, 


727 


OF  POTTEEHILL. 


and  Sootland,  in  tin  AttHck  on  Scarboroogb.  It  appears  that, 
when  returning  to  Scotland  that  rear,  hia  father,  John  Mercer, 
was  driren  br  streiw  of  weMther  upon  the  coast  of  £ngland,  and 
seised  and  confined  in  the  castle  of  Scarborough,  till  an  order 
from  the  English  court  effected  his  discharge.  The  earl  of 
Douglas,  from  whom  he  held  landM,  calls  him  his  yassal,  or 
**  man,**  (homma^)  in  a  letter  sent  to  King  Richard,  remonstrat- 
ing upon  tlie  injustice  uf  bis  seizure  His  son,  to  revenge  the 
injurr,  cruized  before  Scarborough  with  a  fleet  composed  of 
French,  Scots,  and  Spanhirds,  and  captured  several  vessels. 
John  Philpot,  an  opulent  citizen  of  I^ndon,  thereupon,  we  are 
told,  took  upon  himself  the  protection  of  the  trade  of  tlte  king- 
dom, neglected  hj  the  Duke  of  Lancaster,  who  governed  the 
kingdom  in  theminoritv  of  his  nephew,  and  having  hired  1,000 
armed  men,  sent  them  to  sea  in  search  of  Mercer,  whom  thev 
took,  with  his  prizes  and  15  Spanisli  vessels,  his  consorts  nil 
richlv  laden.  On  January  1,  1378,  Andrew  Mercer  got  a  safe 
conduct  as  **  Armiger**  of  the  King  of  Scotland.  This  might 
have  been  an  office, — but  if  it  was  a  title,  it  is  probably  tlie  first 
recorded  instance  of  nn  "  esquire,^  a  title  onlv  first  known  in 
England  in  the  reign  of  Richard  II. 

In  1384,  Andrew  appears  in  the  chart ulary  of  I.ennox  as 
Sir  Andrew.  On  April  28,  the  same  year,  he  got  forty  merks 
furth  of  the  customs  of  the  burgh  of  Pvrtli.  Sir  Andrew  died 
in  1390-1. 

His  son,  Sir  Michael,  was  the  ward  of  Walter  Stewart,  lord 
of  Brecliin,  the  king's  brother,  from  1391  to  1402.  He 
mnrried  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Sir  David  Stewart  of  Durris- 
deer,  before  1396.  in  his  minority.  He  died  ab<»ut  1440.  He 
had  two  sons.  Sir  Andrew,  and  Robert,  of  Balief,  ancestor  of 
the  Balief  branch,  which  consisted  of  four  Roberts  in  suc- 
cession, the  second  of  whom  was  ambassador  to  the  king  of 
the  Romans,  October  13,  1471,  and  the  race  became  extinct 
in  Robert,  who  died  in  1583,  without  issue. 

Sir  Andrew,  the  elder  son,  besides  other  charters,  got  one 
for  the  barony  of  Meikleonr,  Perthsliire,  March  21,  1440-44, 
one  for  Kilgraston,  Pitkeatlily,  and  one-fourth  of  Lednoch,  in 
the  same  county,  Oct  26,  1451,  and  one  for  Dumb:umey, 
Nov.  19, 1455.  He  died  iu  1473.  He  had  a  son.  Sir  Laurence, 
and  a  daughter,  Christian,  who  married  Gilbert  Skene  of  Skene. 

Sir  Laurence,  the  son,  had  a  safe  conduct  to  England  from 
Edward  IV.,  June  12,  1*1 7!.  He  married  in  1475,  Isobel, 
a  daughter  of  Henry  WuMiawof  Torry,  and  died  in  1501. 
His  widow  married  2dly  in  1504,  Patrick  Mercer  uf  Incli- 
bre:ikie.  Sir  I«aurence  had  2  sons  and  a  daughter,  Isobel, 
mnrried  to  Robert  Maule  of  Panniure. 

Sir  Henry,  the  elder  son,  married  Margaret  Duughis  of 
Lochleven,  and  was  killed  at  Flodden.  His  son,  l^ureuce, 
carried  on  the  main  line,  from  which  branched  off  the  ^lei^cera 
of  Melgins  and  Saline,  in  1588.  Sir  James,  last  of  the  Aldie 
line,  died  in  1671.  He  was  one  of  his  mHJesty's  ordinary 
gentlemen  ushers. 

Sur  Laurence  Mercer  of  Melgins,  mtuiied,  1st,  Margaret, 
heiress  of  Aldie,  from  whom  is  descended  Countess  de  Fla- 
hault,  baronMS  Keith  and  Naime,  (see  p.  236  of  this  vol)  female 
representative  of  Aldie;  2dly,  Christian  Kinloch.  The  Mel- 
gins line  became  extinct  on  the  death  of  his  son,  Robert,  in 
1792.  Robert  Mercer,  of  the  Saline  branch,  is  now  mide  re- 
presentative of  Aldie. 

Robert,  the  2d  son  of  Sir  I«aurenoe  Mercer  and  Isobel 
Wardlaw,  was  styled  of  Newton  of  Forgandenny.  He  married 
Helen.  sty]e<l  of  Newton  and  Dalgetty  in  the  *'  Book  of  Drum- 
inond,**  widow  of  James  Oliphant,  and  youngest  daughter  of 
Edmund  Chisholm  of  Cromlix,  by  his  2d  wife,  Isobel  Drum- 
niond  of  Coldoch.  liobert  had  three  sons  and  a  daughter, 
Elizabeth,  married  to  WiUiam  Ha?  of  Gourdie. 


The  eldest  son,  James,  of  Newton  of  Forgandenny,  and 
Newton  and  Dalgetty,  married  Elizabeth  Wemyss,  and  w.os  an- 
cestor of  the  Clevage  line,  which  became  extinct  in  Robert, 
who  died  at  Perth  in  1810. 

llie  second  son  was  named  William. 

Andrew,  the  third  son,  mnrried  in  February  1562,  Mariot. 
daughter  of  Adam  Blackwood,  merchant  burgess  of  Perili. 
He  had  a  charter  from  his  uncle,  William  Clibholm,  bishop  cf 
Dunblane,  for  lands  near  Perth,  December  20, 1563 ;  pen^ng 
reference  to  the  Pope,  charter  not  confirmed  till  Jannary  22, 
1566.  He  was  admitted  a  merchant  burgess  of  Perth,  Jan. 
18, 1567,  and  appointed  by  John,  earl  of  Montrose,  sheriff- 
depute  of  PerthflJiure,  together  with  John  Graliame  of  Bal- 
gowan,  October  5, 1585.  He  had  3  sons,  William,  James, 
and  I^urence. 

William,  the  eldest  son,  married  Helen  Drtunmond,  and 
was  ancestor  of  the  Potterhill  line,  extinct  in  William,  who 
died  about  1740,  leaving  four  daughters. 

Laurence,  the  third  son,  bom  in  1578,  mstriculated  at  St. 
Andrews  in  1596,  and  graduated  in  1601.  He  was  admitted 
to  the  ministry  in  1607,  and  became  parson  of  Fosssway,  in 
which  parish  Aldie  is,  in  1609.  He  died  about  1653.  He 
married  February  8, 1619,  Margaret,  daughter  of  Mr.  Edmond 
M  vlis,  parson  of  Cleish,  and  hsd  2  sons  and  2  daughters,  the 
latter  twins. 

L'lurence,  the  elder  son,  bom  in  1622,  was  admitted  min- 
ister of  Foesaway  in  1654,  and  died  about  1658. 

Edninnd,  the  second  s<m,  bom  in  1625,  sat  on  an  asaze  at 
Crodc  of  Devon  in  1662,  na  Edmond  Mercer,  at  Balridrie,  in 
the  parish  of  Muckart. 

Laurence  had  a  son,  also  named  Laurence,  bom  about 
1657.  He  was  admitted  minister  of  Gask,  December  10, 
1680,  but  was  removed,  by  order  of  the  privy  council,  in  1690, 
when  he  became  factor  of  Aldie.  He  died  January  30, 1720. 
He  married  in  1706,  Jean,  only  daughter  of  William  lindsay, 
bishop  of  Dunkeld,  and  relict  of  James  Lindsay  of  Dow  Hill 
her  feousin.  She  was  styled  Lady  Pitteuchar,  from  an  estate 
which  Iter  second  husband  possessed.  I«aurence  hsd  three 
Kuns. 

James  Francis  of  Pitteuchar,  the  eldest  son,  a  lieutenant- 
colonel  in  the  army,  was  killed  by  a  cannon-ball,  August  13, 
1 756,  when  defending  Fort  Oswego,  of  whicli  he  was  in  com- 
mand, against  a  French  force  umier  Montcalm.  (See  Smol- 
letVs  History  ofEngkmd.  p.  577.)    He  left  no  issue. 

I^urence,  the  second  son,  predeceased  his  elder  brother,  at 
Kingston,  Jamaica,  in  August  1742,  without  issue. 

Willitmi,  tlie  third  son,  bom  October  1,  1717,  succeeded  to 
Pitteuchar,  on  the  death  of  Colonel  James,  in  1756.  He  liad 
a  charter  of  Potterhill  from  the  earl  of  Kinnoul,  April  16, 
1768.  He  died  at  Potterhill,  January  16, 1785.  He  married 
Elizabeth,  daugbter  of  George  Swan,  a  son  of  Charles  II. 
When  asked  why  he  had  not  ennobled  him,  as  he  had  his  other 
children,  the  king  replied,  **  I  did  not  dare  to  make  a  dtudi 
(Scotch  for  duck),  of  him,  but  I  made  a  nobler  bird,*^  namely, 
a  Swan.  William  had  ten  sons  and  three  daughters. 
,  Laurence  James,  tlie  eldest  son,  and  8d  child,  bom  Jan- 
uary 10,  1752,  succeeded  to  Potterhill  on  the  death  of  his 
father  in  1785.  He  entered  the  Bengal  civil  service,  and  whs 
chief  judge  at  Burd wan.  He  died  there,  August  20,1791, 
and  was  described  as  "  the  upright  judge.^ 

James,  the  2d  son  and  4th  child,  died  young. 

William,  the  Sd  son  and  5th  child,  bom  January  8, 
1755,  joined  the  19tli  regiment  at  Gibraltar  in  1769,  and 
sold  out  at  Dublin.  Havuig  got  a  cadetship  to  India,  he 
sailed  under  a  letter  of  exchequer,  on  board  of  "^  llie  Mount 
Stewart**    Captured  on  the  voyage,  he  was  carried  to  Spain, 


WILLEIt,  7 

About  lesa  ha  wu  angijieJ  id  I]»  miliui?  Hrria  in  In- 

Lind.    Dnring  tht  ciril  win  b«  took  tht  putt  of  ibi  pvlU- 

niMt,  mil  Dbliiin«d  fram  Rnlmt.  xri  oF  EnMi.  jtmsnl  of  tlia 

.5  eiptaiii  of  bona.     In 

?f,  Anglw  Sp«uli>in.>  in 

onincil  7'^lix'u  reduMd 

loicrMtiiiUnw,!!]'^  ■'-^hiui.mmnititiae 

tu£300;ai»-]»lfDrBtbirdput  WliuU 

«                    iieecMdis.    7>''  ha  hi.d 


^  Ireland,  (od  nuMd 
W  th«  apriog  of  1650. 


M  l-ord  Robert*.  Buun  of 

ScpMnlMT  18,  1669,  CoLml 

Walooin  in  n  poitn  to  hii  Eiceltincj," 

Anottiv  in 


ir        fitruriJIPruEauutliti 


nnndvf 
court  of 


Libraij.    Ou  Uicainber  U,  1675,  tba  judgn  dacidtd  Unit, 
I      lu  Iben  H,u  no  m«nwE«  ointniit  ur  wrilMu  igrwiiiBiil.  ■ 

en  ;^W^!t1  pmpo««d  illiuio,  he  w«  eu- 


Sretand  lut  w 


a  being  vidura 


fuui  tiioea  mairied,  liia 


Tba  aluRMi  or  war  aj,  and  nuir  Ibe  motto,  of  the  ilcrixn 

of  Aldia,  ia,  that  is,  tlie  great  pool,  or  iJie 

afl         "^  urigin  in  Ibe  attack  at  Scarburou);h, 

Id".     Ibcir  cieat  ia  a  cnue  cnub- 

iiig  a  anakt  or  atalit  aer[>eut. 

MILLEK,  Patrick,  of  DuUnioton,  Damfrius- 
sliire,  whose  name  is  ussugiuted  with  tlie  Juvcntiou 
of  tlie  iteauboat,  was  bum  at  Gla^igun-  in  1731. 
lie  ir*3  the  }'ouug<?ii[  son  of  W  Esq. 

ofGlenlee,  iu  the  slcwartr)'  of  amj 

brother  of  Sir  TboDias  Miller,  nLo  hks  created  a 
baronet,  and  lord  preaiJaiit  of  tiie  court  of  session, 
iu  1788.    Poascssiog  nuiuuiU  genius  aud  abiiitj, 


«  PA'rmCK. 

he  wus  tbe  fortnites,  hav- 

ing started  in  life  without  a  sixjieiico — as  be  nsed 
to  boost — nnd  with  nothiug  bat  a  good  edacatiou 
wberenitli  10  make  bis  \n\y  iu  the  ivorld.  Jii  his 
youth,  as  a  sailor,  he  visited  maiij'  parts  of  tliu 
globe,  including  tlie  conntiies  of  the  Medltcni- 
nean,  the  West  Indies,  aod  America.  He  after- 
wards became  a  banker  in  Ediabnrgii,  niid  having 
realized  fortune,  lie  purcliiscd  the 

estate  of  Dalswiuion,  building  011  It  hii  elegant 
mansion,  subsequently  Ilie  seat  of  •fames  Mac- 
Alpine  Leny ,  Esq. 

For  nearlj  thirty  years  he  was  deputy- governor 
of  the  Bank  of  Scotland,  which  he  placed  on  the 
eminent  position  it  now  occupies  by  entirely  alter- 
ing its  system  of  exchanges  with  Ixindon. 

He  dcTOtcd  his  leisure  to  the  sciences  of  navi- 
gation, artillery,  and  agriculture,  and  In  all  three 
he  made  discoveries  from  which  the  most  impor* 
tant  advautngee  have  been  derived  by  the  world 
at  large.  First  amongst  these  stands  tlie  steam- 
boat, of  which  he  was  the  origiuator,  though  the 
honour  of  this  S^^  Taylor  (see 

page  &1  of  this  volume)  aud  AVilliam  Symington 
have  each  claimed,  'i'hcse  were  both  employed 
by  him,  Symington  having  been  introduced  to  Mr. 
Miller  by  Taylor.  In  Februarj-,  1787,  Mr.  Miller 
published  a  pamphlet,  in  which  bo  distinctly  au> 
iiuuuced  his  belief  in  the  practicability  of  u^ing 
steam  as  a  motive  power  fur  the  propulsion  of 
v&isels, — at  the  same  timu  intimating  liis  iuicniion 
of  trying  the  experiment  of  so  propelling  boats; 
nnd  in  October,  1788,  he  did  try  the  experiment 
on  a  small  scale  at  Dalswmton,  Kith  the  iiiort 
perfect  success, — repeating  it  on  a  larger  one  in 
December,  1789,  on  the  Forth  and  Clyde  caual. 
The  engine  used  by  him  iu  the  first  uf  these  ex- 
periments is  now  preserved  in  the  Keusinglon 
Patent  Unseam,  for  which  it  was  obtained  by 
iteunet  Woodcroft,  Esq.,  F.ILS.,  anihor  of  'Tlie 
Origin  and  Progress  of  Steuni  NavignlJon,' who 
spent  a  large  sum  of  money  in  the  searcli  for  it, 
and  subsequent  restoration  of  such  of  its  pnrls  as 
were  missing  when  he  discovered  It. 

The  ancient  the  Trinity  House, 

Lcith,  unanlroously  voted  Air.  Miller  the  freedom 
of  that  body,  on  the  occasion  of  Ids  ]>resentiDg 
them  with  a  copy  0    his  puuiphlct,  in  which  Ibe 


DULLER. 


780 


MORVILLE. 


:  I 


t . 


prncticability  of  using  steam  for  purposes  of  Duvi- 
gation  was  first  suggested  by  him. 

Double  and  triple  boats  were  amongst  Mr.  Mil- 
ler^s  numerous  inventions,  and  he  likewise  invcnt- 
c<l  paddle  wheels,  which  are  not  very  dissimilar 
from  those  in  use  on  the  steamers  of  the  present 
day.  He  took  a  patent  for  paddle-wheel  boats  of 
the  description  just  mentioned  in  May,  1796,  but 
it  docs  not  appear  that  he  ever  derived  any  bene- 
fit from  it.  A  plurality  of  masts  was  a  favourite 
idea  of  his,  and  we  find  that,  in  1786,  he  built  a 
double  vessel,  with  paddle-wheels  moved  by  man- 
ual labour,  which  had  five  masts.  This  vessel, 
armed  with  carronades — another  of  his  inventions 
— he  offered  to  the  government  of  the  day ;  and 
on  their  declining  the  offer,  presented  it  to  Gusta- 
vus  III.,  king  of  Sweden,  who  acknowledged  it  by 
an  autograph  letter  of  thanks,  enclosed  in  a  mag- 
nificent gold  box,  whicli  also  contained,  as  a  gift 
from  his  majesty,  a  small  packet  of  turnip  seed, 
whence  sprung  the  first  Swedish  turnips  ever 
grown  in  Great  Britain. 

Although  Mr. 'Miller, — from  having  been  the 
first  man  in  modern  days  who  constructed  gims 
with  chambei-3,  to  which  he  gave  the  name  of  cnr- 
ronndcs,  in  consequence  of  his  having  had  them 
cast  at  tlio  Carron  foundry, — is  generally  consi- 
dered the  inventor  of  that  species  of  ordnance,  he 
himself  always  gave  the  credit  of  the  idea  to  Gus- 
tavus  Adolplius  the  Great;  and  indeed  most  of 
the  first  pieces  cast  for  him  hnd  Latin  inscriptions 
on  them  to  that  effect.  He  went  to  verj'  great 
expense  with  his  experiments  on  these  guns,  wliich 
he  tried  of  all  calibres,  from  2-poundere  up  to  132- 
pounders.  With  one  of  the  latter  he  obtained  a 
range  of  above  5,000  3-anls.  Ho  was  not  content 
with  testing  his  invention  (if  so  it  may  be  called) 
in  the  usual  way,  but  actually  proved  it  practi- 
cally by  fitting  out  a  privateer  (the  'Spitfire'), 
:irmed  with  sixteen  of  his  18-pounder  carronades, 
and  sending  her  on  a  cruise  in  the  Channel,  at  the 
inouth  of  which  slie  was  captured  by  a  French 
frijj:ate  (the  *  Surveillante,'  36),  after  a  hard-fought 
action,  in  which  tlie  frigate  had  sixty  or  seventy 
men  killed  and  wounded,  and  had  to  run  for  port 
with  between  four  and  five  feet  water  in  her  hold. 

Mr.  Miller's  inventions  and  experiments  in  na- 
vigation and  gunnery  alone  cost  him  above  £30,000, 


but  what  he  gpcnt  on  his  agricultural  improve- 
ments and  experiments  has  never  been  ascertaiued, 
though  it  is  believed  to  have  been  very  large. 
He  contrived  the  first  drill  plough  ever  vanA  in 

• 

the  United  Kingdom,  also  a  thrashing-machiae 
worked  by  horses,  and  an  iron  plough.  He  like- 
wise introduced  the  feeding  of  cattle  on  steamed 
potatoes,  and  the  dressing  of  land  with  kilu-bnrut 
clay  as  a  substitute  for  lime.  But  the  improve- 
ment in  agriculture  which  he  considered  the  most 
important  was  the  cultivation  of  fiorin  grass,  the 
great  value  of  which  was  first  bronght  to  notice 
by  the  Rev.  Dr.  Richardson  of  Clonfeckle,  in  Ire- 
land. Off  land  which  had  not  previously  let  for 
more  than  a  shilling  an  acre,  Mr.  Miller  got  crops 
of  fiorin  grass  hay,  which  brought  at  auction 
nearly  as  much  as  the  best  wheat  land  on  the 
Dalswinton  estate. 

Mr.  Miller  was  so  highly  thought  of  as  a  pntc- 
tical  agriculturist,  that  one  of  the  agricultural 
societies  of  Scotland  presenti*d  him  with  two 
splendid  silver  vases,  bearing  suitable  inscriptions. 

He  died  at  Dalswinton,  December  9,  1815,  nnd 
was  inten'ed  in  the  Greyfriars'  churchyard,  Edin- 
burgh. He  had  man'ied  early  in  life,  and  had 
several  children,  of  whom  three  sons  and  two 
daughters  survived  him,  viz.:  Patrick,  member  of 
parliament  in  1789-90  for  Dumfries-shire;  Wil- 
liam, an  officer  of  the  lloyal  horse  guards  (blue) ; 
Janet,  married  to  John  Francis,  15th  earl  of  Mar; 
Jean,  married  to  T^slie  Grove  Jones,  an  officer  of 
the  Grenadier  guards ;  Thomas  Hamilton,  an  ad- 
vocate at  the  Scottish  bar.  In  1862  was  printed 
at  Tendon,  '  A  Letter  to  Bennet  Woodcroft,  Esq., 
F.R.S.,  vindicating  the  right  of  Patrick  Miller. 
Esq.  of  Dalswinton,  to  be  regarded  as  the  first 
inventor  of  Practical  Steam  Navigation.  By  Ma- 
jor-general Miller,  C.B.,  late  of  the  Madnis  anil- 
Iciy.* 

MouviLLK.  the  snrnnine  of  h  hij^h  feuii:il  family,  of  Ai)p<>- 
Nonnan  ori;;in,  wiiich,  in  tli«  twelftli  century,  was  one  ot  the 
most  eminent  in  Scotland.  The  surname  is  supposed  to  iiave 
been  assumed  from  tiie  village  of  Morville,  on  the  water  of 
Aire,  in  the  province  of  Picardy,  France.  The  first  of  the 
name  on  record  in  Scothiiid,  Hugh  de  Morviile,  came  from 
Burgh  on  the  Sands,  in  Cumberland,  about  the  year  1100,  and 
acquired  extensive  pos-nes^ions  in  Tweediiale,  I^iuderdale, 
the  Ix)thians,  Clydesdale,  nnd  more  especially  in  Cunning- 
ham, Ayrshire.  He  also  held  the  hereditaiy  office  of  lord- 
high-coristable  of  the  kingdom.  He  was  a  witness  to  tlte 
fnqnisUis  Davidii^  lllG. 


MORVILLE. 


731 


MURCHISON. 


In  1138,  he  was  one  of  the  witnesses  to  a  diarter  of  protec- 
tion then  gninted  by  David  I.  to  the  monks  of  TTnemoutli.  In 
1140«  he  foanded  the  celebrated  abbev  of  Kilwinning,  in  Cnn- 
ningUam,  nearly  the  whole  of  which  district  belonged  to  him, 
and  endowed  it  with  revenues  so  ample  that  few  temporal 
lordships  at  the  time  were  so  vuloable.  About  1150,  lie 
founded  Drybnrgh  abbey,  fonr  miles  from  Melrose,  on  the 
nortli  bank  of  the  Tweed.  He -died  in  1162.  By  his  wife, 
Beatrice  de  Beauchamp,  he  is  said  to  h:ive  acquired  still  great- 
er posMessions  than  his  own.  Probably  the  Tweeddale  property 
came  by  her,  as,  according  to  the  Chronicle  of  Melros,  she  ob- 
tained a  charter  of  confirmation  for  the  new  foundation  of 
Dry  burgh  Abbey  from  David  I.  He  hud  a  son,  Itichard  de 
Alurville,  and  a  daughter,  Johanna,  the  wife  of  Richard  de 
Germin. 

Many  of  de  Morville*s  prindpal  vassaU  csime  from  Eng- 
land, and  from  the  chief  of  them  sprung  some  of  our  noble 
and  baronial  families,  such  as  the  Cunninghams,  the  Rosses, 
the  Loudouns,  the  St.  Claira,  the  Msiitlands,  and  others. 
Tlie  great  barony  of  Kilmnurs  he  conferred  on  Wamebald, 
the  first  of  the  family  of  Cunningham.  aAerwards  earUi  of 
Glencaim.  This  was  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  I.,  betwixt 
1107  and  1124. 

Hugh  de  ^IorvilIe*s  only  son,  Richsrd  de  Morville,  lord  of 
Cunningham  and  high-constable  of  Scotland,  was  principal 
minister  of  William  the  Lion.  In  tlie  year  of  his  fatlier*s 
death,  he  confirmed  a  donation  by  Robert,  son  of  Wamebald, 
to  the  churcli  of  Sancta  Maria  of  Kelso.  He  also  granted  a 
charter  to  Jame^de  Loudoun,  of  the  barony  of  Ix>udoun  and 
others.  He  died  in  1189.  By  his  wife,  Avicia  de  I^ncaster, 
(or  de  Corbet,  according  to  Nisbet,  who  Miys  she  died  in 
1191,)  he  had  a  son,  William,  and  two  daughters,  Eva  and 
Maud,  the  latter  married  to  Stephen,  an  ancestor  of  the 
Glencaim  family. 

Willijim  de  Morville,  the  son,  lord-high-constable  of  Scot- 
land, granted  a  new  charter  to  James  de  Loudoun  of  the 
lands  of  Loudoun.  He  died,  without  issue,  in  1196,  and  was 
succeeded  in  his  large  domains  by  his  elder  sister,  Eva,  Kla, 
or  Elena  de  Morville.  Tliis  lady  married  Roland,  lord  of 
Galloway,  who,  in  her  right,  bec;inie  possessed  of  all  the 
lands  and  honours  of  her  family,  also  constable  of  Scotland 
and  lord  of  Cunningham,  (the  latter  afterwards  one  of  the 
titles  of  the  Prince  of  Scotland,)  for  which  he  paid,  as  a  duty 
of  homage,  700  merks  to  King  William  the  Lion. 

Tlieir  son,  Allan,  lord  of  Galloway  and  Cunningham,  and 
constable  of  Scotland,  died  in  1234,  without  male  issue.  By 
his  first  wife,  daughter  of  Hugh  de  Lacy,  he  had  a  daughter, 
Elena,  married  to  Roger  de  Quincy,  earl  of  Winchester,  in 
Iter  ri;;ljt  constable  of  Scotland  and  proprietor  of  a  consider- 
able share  of  tlie  de  Morville  estates,  particularly  in  Cun- 
ningham. By  his  second  wife,  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of 
David,  earl  of  HunUngton,  next  brother  to  King  William 
the  Lion,  he  had  two  daughters,  Dervigalda  or  Devorgille, 
and  Christian.  l*he  former  married  in  1233,  John  Baliol, 
lord  of  Bernard's  castle,  county  Durham,  who  in  consequence 
became  lord  of  Galloway  and  proprietor  of  the  greater  part 
of  the  de  Morville  lands  in  Cunningham.  John  Baliol,  some 
time  king  of  Scotland,  was  thus  a  great-grandson  of  the 
family. 

The  name  of  de  Morville  lias  been  lost  in  Scotland  since 
the  18th  century.  Even  the  pince  of  residence  of  Hugh  de 
Morville,  the  progenitor  of  this  once  princely  race,  in  spite  of 
all  his  possessions,  is  now  unknown.  The  English  baron, 
Hugh  de  Morville,  who  was  concerned  in  the  murder  of  Tho- 
mas k  Becket,  at  Canterbury,  December  29,  1170,  was 
of  the  same  family  as  the  de  Morville  who  settled  in  Scotland. 


Mu^tCHisox,  soAened  from  Murdockton,  the  name  of  a 
minor  clan  in  Loclialsh,  Ross-shire,  in  Gaelic  cdled  Eilatt 
Calmaon,  h  is  supposed  from  their  being  long  the  goverimrs 
of  Eilean  Donnnn  Castle,  the  place  where  Donald  Gorme  of 
Sleat  met  his  death  in  1589,  (see  vol.  ii.  p.  548.)  Calm 
signifying  a  pillar,  fort,  or  strength,  and  atm  a  person.  Some 
of  them  have  changed  their  name  to  Dove,  from  the  erroneous 
impression  that  the  word  is  Calaman,  which  is  the  Gaelic  for 
a  pigeon.  The  castle  of  Eilan  Donnan  is  also  called  Seafort, 
from  its  being  built  on  an  island,  surrounded  by  water  at  full 
tide,  and  from  it  the  earls  of  Seaibrth  derive  tlieir  title. 

The  Murchisons  fought  under  the  Mackenzies  and  carried 
their  banners.  Thev  are  descended  from  Murdoch  or  Murcha, 
who  received  a  diarter  of  the  lands  of  Kintail  from  David  II^, 
in  1362. 

Colond  Donald  Mnrdiison  of  Auchtertyre,  lA)chaIsli,  com- 
missioner to  William,  5th  eari  of  Seaforth,  was.  during  the 
period  in  which  he  lived,  the  military  leader  of  the  jilackenzies, 
Maclennans,  and  M'Raes,  in  their  opposition  to  the  gov- 
emment  forces  from  1719  to  1726.  He  is  mentioned  at  page 
69  of  this  volume,  (article  Maguae.)  as  having  successfully 
defended  the  lands  of  Seafortli,  during  the  time  their  forfeit- 
ure lasted,  and  collecting  tlie  Scafurth  rents,  conveyed  them 
to  France,  and  delivered  them  to  the  earl,  then  in  exile.  All 
his  movements  were  narrowly  watched  by  govemment,  and  a 
reward  offered  for  his  apprehension,  with  a  description  of  his 
person,  which  was  posted  up  at  all  the  ports,  so  that  he 
might  be  captured  at  sea.  General  Wade  wrote  often,  with 
very  particular  information,  to  government  about  him,  and  in 
one  of  bis  communications  he  gives  an  account  of  Colonel 
Murdiison's  entry  into  Edinburgh,  with  a  numerous  band  of 
Highlanders.  He  encountered  much  annoyance  from  the 
Monroes,  Bosses,  and  Macknys,  and  other  loyal  clans.  Hav- 
ing lost  his  right-hand  man  Tuach  of  Conon^  he  w:is  alwars 
in  a  state  of  warfare,  but  his  wariness  and  tact  invariably 
brought  him  out  of  danger. 

The  anecdotes  of  his  feats  are  numerous,  and  a  written  re- 
cord of  his  exploits  bin  the  hands  of  Sir  Roderick  Murchison, 
a  distant  relative  of  the  colonel,  collected  by  Dr.  Murchison 
of  Tarradale,  near  Beauly,  as  related  by  his  father,  the  grand- 
father of  S\x  Roderick.  He  lived  at  Auchtertyre,  Lodialsh, 
and  died  at  a  great  age.  The  colonel  was  at  length  captured 
at  sea,  on  his  return  from  France,  and  imprisoned  in  the 
Tower  of  London.  King  George  I.  visited  liim  personally, 
and  upon  promise  that  in  future  he  would  be  as  fsithful  to 
him  as  to  his  own  diief,  gave  him  his  liberty,  and  bestowed 
upon  him  a  great  part  of  the  lands  possessed  by  Seaforth  in 
KintaiL  About  tlie  same  time  peace  and  pardon  for  Scafurth 
and  his  clan  were  obtained  by  the  aid  of  Marshal  Wade.  In 
an  interview  with  tlie  earl,  after  hu  return,  his  lordship  up- 
br.iided  him  with  taking  possession  of  his  land,  and  is  even 
said  to  have  broken  open  his  charter-chest  in  the  coloners 
absence,  and  carried  off  his  title  deeds.  **  Donald,*'  said  the 
earl,  '*  would  not  less  land  by  far  have  satisfied  you."  "  I 
thought,**  replied  the  colonel,  **that  Seaforth  could  ne%*er 
grudge  me  what  his  mnjesty  has  granted,  after  all  the  toils, 
hardships,  and  narrow  escapes  with  my  life.  I  have  had  in 
your  cause."  The  colonePs  indignation  and  agiUition  were 
so  extreme  that  he  burst  a  blood- vessd,  went  over  to  Conon, 
to  the  house  of  the  widow  of  his  old  friend  Tuach^  where  he 
died.  Seaforth  visited  him  before  his  death,  and  asked  him 
if  he  should  like  to  be  buried  in  the  Seaforth  tomb.  Ho  re- 
plied thst  she  who  gave  him  a  bed  to  die  in  would  give  him 
a  grave  to  lie  in.  He  left  a  brother,  Murdoch  Mnrchit»on,  who 
I  was  wounded  at  Culloden,  and  married  Mary,  daughter  of  the 


RATTRAY. 


733 


RATTRAY. 


He  wni  called  to  the  bar  in  1791,  and  for  manj  jears  was 
sheriff  of  Mid  Lothian.  On  the  promotion  of  Lord  Meadow- 
bank  to  tlie  bench  in  1819,  he  was  appointed  lord-adrocate 
for  Scotland,  an  office  which  he  held  during  all  tlie  snbee- 
qnent  torj  ministries.  On  the  accession  of  Karl  Grey*s  min- 
iKtry  in  1880,  be  retired  with  his  colleagues,  but  again  be- 
came lord-adrocnte  during  the  brief  administration  of  Sir 
Robert  Peel  in  1884  and  1885,  and  in  1841  was  reappointed. 
He  was  M.P.  for  the  Crail  bnrghs  in  Fife,  from  1820  to  1826; 
for  Harwich,  from  1827  to  1830;  for  PorUrlington,  in  1831; 
for  Buteshire,  in  1831,  and  he  again  represented  that  conntj 
from  1833  till  his  death.  He  was  also  a  member  of  the  privy 
council.  He  died  at  his  seat  of  St.  Catherines,  about  3  miles 
from  Edinburgh,  19tli  October  1842.  Notwithstanding  the 
long  period  during  which  be  held  the  office  of  lord-adTocate, 
he  always  declined  a  seat  on  the  bench,  to  which  lie  had  the 
first  claim,  as  he  did  not  consider  himself  suffidently  qualified, 
.  as  a  practicing  lawyer,  for  the  judicial  office.  He  married 
5rnry,  daughter  of  Colonel  Charles  Stuart,  but  by  her  had  no 
issue,  and  on  his  death  the  baronetcy  became  extinct. 


Rattrat,  a  surname  derived  from  the  barony  of  that 
name  in  Perthithire.  So  far  back  as  the  reign  of  Malcolm 
Canmore,  (1057-1093)  the  family  of  Rattray  of  Rattray  and 
Craighall  are  said  to  have  existed  in  that  county  (iVtiftet,  vol. 
i.  p.  130).  In  the  reigns  of  William  the  Lion  and  Alexander 
II.,  lived  Alanus  de  Rattrieff,  as  the  name  was  then  spelled, 
whose  son,  Sir  Tliomas  de  Rattrieff,  was  knighted  by  Alex- 
ander 111.  By  Christian,  liis  wife,  the  latter  acquired  part 
of  the  lands  of  Glencaveryn  and  Kingoldrum,  in  Forfarshire. 
In  the  Register  of  the  Abbacy  of  Arbroath,  there  is  a  per- 
ambulation, of  date  1250,  between  that  convent  and  Thomas 
de  Rattrieff,  about  the  latter  lands.  He  lefl  two  sons,  £ns- 
tatius  and  John.  The  former  was  father  of  Adam  de  Rat- 
trieff, who,  in  1292,  with  other  Scots  barons,  was  compelled 
to  submit  to  Edward  L  He  is  mentioned  both  in  Prynne's 
Collections  and  Rymer*s  Foedera.  In  1296,  he  was  again 
forced  to  swear  allegiance  to  the  English  king.  He  died  be- 
fore 1315.  His  son,  Alexander  de  Rattrie,  was  one  of  the 
barons  of  the  parliament  held  at  Ayr  that  year  to  settle  the 
succession  to  the  crown.  Dying  issueless,  he  was  succeeded 
by  his  brother,  another  Eustatius  de  Rattrie,  who,  in  the 
parliament  of  Perth,  August  1320,  was  falsely  accused  of 
being  concerned  in  the  conspuracy  of  Sir  William  Soulis  and 
Sir  David  Brechin  against  Robert  the  Bruce,  but  fairly 
acquitted. 

His  son,  John  de  Rattrny,  lix-ing  in  the  reign  of  David  IT., 
was  father  of  the  next  proprietor  after  him, — John  de  Rat- 
tray, who  died  at  the  close  of  the  reign  of  James  L  The 
son  of  the  latter,  Patrick  de  Rattray,  living  in  1456,  was 
father  of  Sir  Sylvester  Rattray  of  that  ilk,  who  was  appoint- 
ed one  of  the  ambassadors  extraordinarv  to  treat  with  the 
king  of  England,  for  which  he  obtained  a  safe-conduct,  dated 
12th  June  1463.  He  sat  in  the  pariiament  of  1481,  and  is 
represented  as  having  had  great  influence  at  court  His 
wife*s  name  was  Alison  Hepburn.  His  son,  Sir  John  Rat- 
tray of  Rattray,  was  knighted  by  James  IV.  By  his  wife, 
Elizabeth,  daughter  of  James,  second  Lord  Kennedy,  he  had 
three  sons  and  one  daughter.  His  eldest  son,  John,  an  officer 
in  the  Dutch  service,  married  Margaret  Abercrombie,  but 
died  in  Holland  before  his  father,  without  issue.  Patrick, 
the  second  son,  succeeded  to  the  estate,  as  did  also,  after 
him,  the  youngest  son,  Sylvester.  The  daughter,  Grizel, 
married  John  Stewart,  third  earl  of  Athol,  of  that  name. 
On  Sir  John*8  death,  the  earl  laid  claim  to  a  portion  of  the 
Rattray  estate,  as  husband  of  his  only  daughter,  and,  at  the 


head  of  a  large  body  of  his  retainers,  forcibly  took  possession 
of  tlie  castle  of  Rattray,  and  carried  off  the  family  writs. 
Patrick,  the  then  proprietor,  retired  to  the  castle  of  Craighall, 
which  he  gallantly  and  successfully  defended.  The  old 
castle  of  Rattray,  near  Blairgowrie,  the  ancient  stronghold  of 
the  family,  is  now  in  ruins.  At  Craighall,  the  more  modem 
seat  of  tlie  family,  there  is  some  beautiful  cliff  scenery. 
"  The  house,**  {New  StaiUtical  A  cetmnt—PeHhitkire,  Arti- 
de  Batiray^)  "is  situated  on  the  top  of  a  rock,  about  214 
feet,  almost  perpendicular  above  the  Ericht.  Craighall  is 
accessible  only  in  front,  which  is  from  the  south,  and  on  each 
wde  of  the  entrance  a  little  in  advance  of  the  house  are  two 
round  buildings,  evidently  intended  for  protection,  with  some 
openings  for  missile  weapons,  as  if  for  the  nw  of  ardiers — a 
mode  of  defence  very  common  in  former  agea.** 

In  the  summer  of  1793  Craighall  was  visited  by  Sir  Wal- 
ter Scott,  accompanied  by  his  friend  William  Clerk,  the  bro- 
ther of  John  Clerk,  Lord  Eldin,  a  relative  of  the  Rattray 
family.  Ix)dchart  says :  "  From  the  position  of  this  striking 
place,  as  Mr.  Clerk  at  once  perceived,  and  as  the  author  af- 
terwards confessed  to  him,  that  of  the  Tully-Veolan  ^n  Wa- 
verley)  was  very  faithfully  copied,  though  in  the  description 
of  the  house  itself,  and  its  gardens,  many  features  were 
adopted  from  Bnintsfield  and  Ravelstone.  Mr.  Clerk  has 
told  me  that  he  went  through  the  first  chapters  of  Waverley 
without  more  than  a  vague  suspicion  of  the  new  novelist, 
but  that  when  he  read  the  arrival  at  Tully-Veolan,  his  sus- 
picion was  at  once  converted  into  certainty,  and  he  handed 
the  book  to  a  common  friend  of  his  and  the  author^s,  saying, 
*  This  is  Scott*8 — and  1*11  lay  a  bet  you*ll  find  such  and  such 
things  in  the  next  chapter.*  In  the  course  of  a  ride  from 
Craighall,  they  had  both  become  considerably  fagged  and 
heated,  and  Clerk,  seeing  the  smoke  of  a  dachan  a  little  way 
before  them,  ejaculated — *  How  agreeable  if  we  should  here 
fall  in  with  one  of  those  signposts  where  a  red  lion  predomi- 
nates over  a  punch-bowl !  *  The  phrase  happened  to  tickle 
Scott*s  fancy — he  often  introduced  it  on  similar  occasions  af- 
terwards— and  at  the  distance  of  twenty  years  (when  the 
authorship  of  the  Waverley  novels  was  still  a  mystery)  Mr. 
Clerk  was  at  no  loss  to  recognise  an  old  acquaintance  in  the 
Miuge  bear*  which  *  predominates  *  over  the  stone  basin  in 
the  courtyard  of  Baron  Bradwardine.**  The  Athol  family  con- 
tinued to  possess  the  greater  part  of  the  lands  of  Rattray 
nntil  about  the  beginning  of  the  17th  century,  when  they  were 
evicted  from  them  by  an  appraising  at  the  instance  of  Sir 
Robert  Cricliton  of  Clunie. 

Sylvester  Rattray,  on  succeeding  his  brother,  Patrick,  en- 
deavoured to  get  himself  served  heir  to  his  father  and  bro- 
thers at  Perth,  the  county  town  of  the  shire  in  which  his 
lands  were  situated,  but  found  it  impossible,  because,  as  the 
writ  bears,  the  earl  of  Athol  and  his  friends  are  **  magnss  po- 
testatis  et  fortitudinis**  in  that  town.  He  applied,  in  conse- 
quence, to  King  James  V.,  and  obtained  from  his  majesty  a 
commisnon  under  the  great  seal  to  have  service  done  at  Dun- 
dee, dated  at  Edinburgh,  17th  October  1533.  He  was  ac- 
cordingly aeraid  heir  to  his  father  and  two  brothers  in  the 
barony  of  Cnughall  and  Kyneballoch,  and  infefl  therein  in 
Dundee  in  1534. 

His  son  and  successor,  David  Rattray  of  Craighall  and 
Kyneballoch,  served  heir  to  his  father  in  1554,  had  two  sons, 
George  and  Sylvester,  the  latter  minister  at  Auchtergaven 
and  ancestor  of  Rattray  of  Dalnoon.  The  elder  son, 
George  Rattray  of  Craighall,  succeeded  his  father,  in  the 
commencement  of  the  rdgn  of  James  VI.  He  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  son,  Sylvester,  who  was  infeil  in  all  his  fathers 
lands  by  a  charter  under  the  great  seal,  dated  26th  October 


REID, 


786 


SIR  ^VILUAM,  K.C.B. 


i' 


I , 


but  participated  iu  liis  fricnddliip,  nud  received 
excitement  from  his  converae.  Iu  Scottish  song, 
and  in  pieces  of  characteristic  humour,  Mr.  Reid, 
in  several  instances,  approved  himself  not  unwor- 
thy  of  either  such  intimacy  or  inspiration.  These 
are  chiefly  preserved  in  a  collection,  entitled, 
'  Poetr}',  Original  aud  Selected,^  ^vhich  appeared 
under  the  tasteful  auspices  of  himself  and  partner. 
It  Is  now  scarce,  but  highly  valued.  Even,  how- 
ever, when  it  shall  have  altogether  ceased  to  be 
known  but  to  coUectoi's,  many  of  the  simple  and 
beautiful  lines  of  Mr.  Rcid*s  earlier  compositions, 
and  racy,  quaint,  and  original  thoughts  and  ex- 
pressions of  his  riper  years,  will  cling  to  the  gen- 
eral memory.  Perhaps,  of  these,  the  humorous 
will  be  the  longest  lived." 

In  Stenhouse*s  edition  of  Johnson's  Musical 
Museum  (6  vols.  8vo,  Edinburgh,  1839)  arc 
some  additional  stanzas,  by  Mr.  Reid,  of  *My 
ain  kind  Deary,  O, '  grounded  on  the  old 
verses  of  *  The  Lea-rig ;'  aud  of  ^  Cauld  Kail  in 
Aberdeen,'  in  continuation.  He  also  wrote  some 
additional  stanzas  to  ^John  Anderson  my  Jo,' 
and  the  fine  songs  of  ^  Fair  modest  Flower,'  ^  Kate 
o'  Gowrie,'  *  Upon  the  Banks  of  flowing  Clyde,' 
and  a  portion  of  *•  Of  a'  the  Airts  the  wind  can 
blaw.'  In  the  edition  of  Bums'  Poems  published 
by  Fullarton  &  Co.,  and  edited  by  the  Ettrick 
Shepherd  and  Motherwell  the  poet,  the  latter  has 
inserted  (vol.  v.  p.  282)  a  *  Monody  on  the  Death 
of  Robert  Bums,'  by  Mr.  Reid,  of  whom  it  is 
stated,  in  a  note,  that  he  *^  was  a  most  enthusias- 
tic admirer  of  Bums,  possessed  a  rich  fund  of 
native  humour,  and  was  the  author  of  several  po- 
ems in  our  vernacular  dialect  that  merit  preser- 
vation." 

Mr.  Reid  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  James 
Henderson,  linen  printer,  Newhall,  who,  witli  two 
sons  and  five  daughters,  survived  him. 

REID,  Sir  William,  K.C.B.,  a  distinguished 
public  oflScer,  eldest  son  of  tlie  Rev.  James  Reid, 
minister  of  Kinglassie,  Fifeshirc,  was  bom  there 
in  1791.  He  was  educated  at  Musselburgh,  and 
was  afterwards  sent  to  Woolwich  Royal  military 
academy,  to  be  trained  for  the  corps  of  Royal  En- 
gineers, lie  obtained  his  first  commission  10th 
February,  1809,  and  was  engaged  during  the  last 
four  years  of  the  war  in  the  Peninsula,  under  the 


duke  of  Wellington.  He  was  at  tiie  three  sieges 
of  Badajoz,  ^herc  he  was  wounded,  the  siege  of 
Ciudad  Rodrigo,  where  he  was  again  wounded, 
the  siege  of  the  Forts  and  the  battle  of  Salaman- 
ca, the  sieges  of  Burgos  and  San  Sebastian,  at  the 
latter  of  which  he  was  a  third  time  wounded,  and 
at  the  battles  of  Yittoria,  Nivellc,  Nive,  and  Tou- 
louse. At  the  peace  he  served  on  the  coasts  of 
America  under  Greneral  Lambert,  until  the  termi- 
nation of  the  war  there,  and  rejoined  the  British 
army  in  Belgium  in  1815.  The  following  year  he 
served  in  the  expedition  under  Lord  Exmouth, 
against  Algiers.  For  some  years  he  was  adjutant 
of  the  corps  of  sappers. 

In  1838,  being  then  lieutenant-colonel,  he  was 
appointed  to  the  governorship  of  the  Bermudas, 
where  he  introduced  many  important  and  benefi- 
cial improvements.  On  his  arrival  there  he  found 
agriculture  far  behind;  com  and  hay  were  im- 
ported. There  was  little  fruit.  Bitter  citron - 
trees  grew  every  whei'e,  and  in  sight  of  the  gov- 
ernment-house' was  a  wide  swamp.  Colonel  Reid 
immediately  set  about  amending  all  this.  He 
grafted  a  sweet  orange  on  a  bitter  cltrou-trec  in 
front  of  the  govemment-honse.  It  bore  good 
fruit,  and  in  due  time  all  the  bitter  trees  were 
grafted.  He  drained  the  swamp,  imported  ploiiglis, 
had  ploughing  taught,  gave  prizes  for  the  best 
productions,  and,  in  1846,  held  a  grand  agricultu- 
ral fete  in  a  fine  dry  meadow-field — the  old  swamp. 
It  was  emphatically  said  of  him,  that  *^  he  guvo 
new  spirit  to  the  people,  showed  them  how  to 
work  out  theur  own  prosperity,  changed  the  face 
of  the  island,  took  great  interest  in  popular  edu- 
cation ;  and  won  the  title  of  *•  the  Good  Grovemor,' 
by  which  he  became  affectionately  remembered  in 
Bermuda."  His  government  of  Bermuda  was  the 
subject  of  an  aiticle,  entitled  *  A  Model  Gover- 
nor,' in  Dickens' '  Household  Words.' 

In  1846,  Colonel  Reid  was  appointed  governor 
of  the  Windward  West  India  Islands,  where, 
also,  by  his  firm  and  conciliatory  conduct,  he 
gained  the  confidence  and  good  will  of  the  entire 
population.  In  1848,  he  returned  to  England, 
and  in  the  following  year  was  appointed  com- 
manding engineer  at  Woolwich,  and  directed  the 
engineer  oflScers  and  sappers  and  miners  at  the 
great  Exhibition  at  Loudon  iu  1851.    On  the  re* 


.- 


REID.  T 

sfgnation  of  Mr.  Robert  Steplienson,  Colonel  H«id 
wu  reqacsted  by  tlie  Bojal  ComiDusioDera  to  be- 
come, in  his  room,  cliairoinn  of  tlie  executive 
committee,  flnd  the  Bnccess  of  the  ExLibitlon,  in 
lis  enrly  stages  particnlarlj,  and  nbove  all,  in  Its 
pDiictual  opening,  nt  the  nppoinrcd  time,  was,  in 
a  great  degree,  oving  to  his  tranqnil  eaerfff  and 
deteiminntion.  He  declined  all  remoneration  for 
Ills  aerviccs,  and  in  September  of  tliat  year  li«  re- 
ceived tbe  nnsollcited  appointment  of  gOTemor  of 
Malta.  On  tliat  occasion  tie  was  created  a  knigbt 
rommaiidcr  of  Hie  Batli.  On  30th  May  1856,  he 
became  major-general.    In  1857  he  returned  to 

Ilia  name  will  be  endnringly  known  for  his 
valnablo  labonrs  ia  aiding  the  inveatigation  of  Die 
law  of  storms,  by  a  carefnl  analysis  of  the  rarions 
hurricanes  of  llie  Atlantic  and  Indian  ocesns. 
When  employed  ns  mnjor  of  engineers  in  Bar- 
badoea,  restorln;;  the  buildings  mined  in  the  linr- 
riciine  of  1831,  he  was  led  to  inquire  into  the  his- 
tory of  former  storms;  bnt  the  West  Indian  records 
contained  little  beyond  detnlls  of  losses  in  lives 
and  property,  anil  fumislied  no  dnta  whereby  the 
tme  character  or  the  nctnal   courses    of  these 
storms  might  be  investigated.    In  the  '  Americnn 
Journal  of  Science,'  a  paper  by  Mr.  Redtleld  had 
appeared,  on  the  'Gales  and  Ilnrrlcanes  of  the 
North  Atlantic,'  a  copy  of  which  camo  nnder  the 
notice  of  Colonel  Reid.     Impressed  with  the  im- 
j     poi'tancc  of  the  snbject,  he  became  satisfied  of  the 
I     rotative  character  and  determinate  progress  of 
I     lliesc  storms  as  niaiiitnined  by  Mr.  Itcdfield,  and 
'     linviniT  been  able  Co  devote  more  attention  to  these 
I    inquiries,  he  publislied,  in  1838,  his  first  paper 


6  SCfi 

'On  Harricanes,'  in  t 
fessional  Papers  uf  t 
valuable  work,  entitle 
the  I.AW  of  Storms  t 
according  to  Place  ani 
year,  and  three  large 
from  the  press.  A  mi 
'The  Progress  of  the  ] 
Stonnsand  of  the  vnri 
cal  Application  of  tht 
published  in  1849.  ' 
theoretical  invest igati 
cal  value  to  all  who  h 
both  of  the  Ivast  and 
Sir  William  Iteid  wtis 
or  fail  to  be  impressed 
of  the  natural  or  mom 
bronglit  into  contact, 
and  calm  temper  of  a 
with  a  rare  talent  fc 
died  in  I^ndon,  in  tin 
had  married  a  danght 
ham,  and  left  five  dan 


ScnixarocK.  In  th« 
■MWd  lliit  tha  tittr  rtC  «i 
on  Jolin  Scrimgeonr.  Sd  Vii 
dn,  ii  extinct.  Itiihnt  i 
I«il  of  the  enrldom  not  Wit 
known.  TbclitlMorViitcon 
confrrrwl  on  Sir  John  Scrii 
were  lo  him  ind  th«  li»ira 


I 


r.,-„ 


¥